March 2017
To: His Worship the Mayor and Councillors
From: Planning Officer
For: Development Assessment Panel
Development Application: 894/D012/16 Applicant: Cameron Lock Surveying Proposal: Conventional Land Division (two existing allotments to create three allotments) Subject Land: No. 43 Rivoli Drive, Beachport and Lot 14 Admella Drive, Beachport Nature of Proposal: Non-Complying Development Plan: Wattle Range Council (Consolidated – 07/02/2013) Zoning: Rural Living Zone, Precinct 18 (Beachport) Referrals DAC, SA Water SA Water Corporation Public Notification: Category 3 Key issues Allotments less than 1 hectare Recommendations Determined by Panel
Purpose of Report
The purpose of this report is to provide information to the Development Assessment Panel in order for a determination to be made on an Application for the proposed land division.
Staff do not have delegated authority to determine the Application, as it comprises of a land division that is classed as non-complying. The land in question is zoned as Rural Living which requires a minimum land size of 10,000m2 and the proposed allotments are approximately 7000m2. As such, the Application is referred to the Development Assessment Panel for determination.
In making its determination, the Panel is required to consider whether, on balance, the proposal is firstly seriously at variance with the Development Plan as a whole. If so, the Application must be refused consent pursuant to Section 35(2) of the Development Act 1993. If not, the Development Assessment Panel must go on to consider whether the proposal sufficiently accords with the Development Plan to merit consent.
1
Background 19/04/2015 – Land Division application lodged 01/06/2016 – Council resolved to proceed with the assessment of the application 25/05/2016 – SA Water referral response received 08/06/2016 – Development Assessment Commission referral response received 23/06/2016 – Category 3 Public Consultation commenced 12/07/2016 – Category 3 Public Consultation ended with one representations received 22/08/2016 – Decision made to refer application to Development Assessment Panel 28/9/2016 – Development Assessment Panel refuse approval due to concerns regarding potential site contamination 09/02/2017 – A new Statement of Effect submitted including a site contamination report Site specifics and details
See attachment A for maps
The allotment located at No. 43 Rivoli Drive features a three-storey detached dwelling, a detached ‘commercial’ sized shed, a detached domestic shed, and a small outbuilding sighted to the rear boundary of the property.
The existing allotment has vehicle access from Rivoli Drive and secondary access from Admella Drive. The existing allotment is primarily open with natural vegetation bordering the allotment along the respective road frontages. Land levels rise gently toward the middle of the allotment when viewed from Admella Drive.
The adjoining allotment located at Lot 14 Admella Drive is currently vacant undeveloped land and is characterised by a gentle formation of undulant terrain. The allotment features a blend of natural vegetation along the southern and western boundaries. The allotment has existing vehicle access from Admella Drive.
Site zoning and land use
The subject allotments are located within the Rural Living Zone and within Precinct 18 (Beachport).
Currently there are numerous allotments of land for sale in the ‘Muggleton’ area of Beachport with many land parcels complying with the minimum 1 Ha size requirement.
The surrounding area presents a low density semi-rural residential character which consists of a gentle pattern of detached dwellings and domestic structures located on spacious plots.
Proposal in Detail
This development application is seeking development plan consent for a land division over two existing allotments located at Lot No. 13, No. 43 Rivoli Drive, Beachport (C/T Ref 5864/196), and Lot 14 Admella Drive, Beachport (C/T Ref 5864/197).
The division proposes the creation of three allotments from two existing allotments, to form one additional allotment. The subject land is located within a Rural Living Zone and within Precinct 18 (Beachport).
The two existing allotments are characterised by gently undulating terrain, covering an area of 1.026 ha (10,260 m²), and 1.096 ha (10,960 m²). In combination, the existing allotments form an aggregate area of 2.122 ha (21.220 m²). The three proposed allotments would have site areas forming 7,039 m², 7,063 m², and 7,119 m².
2
The subject land is located in the Rural Living Zone and Precinct 18 (Beachport), and a land division comprising allotments of an area less than 1 hectare (10,000 m²) is a ‘non-complying’ form of development.
There is no reticulated water supply or community wastewater management scheme (CWMS) servicing the allotments in the Beachport Rural Living Zone. The surrounding dwellings in this zone are serviced by bore and rainwater supplies or aerobic wastewater facilities. Access to the proposed allotments is to be gained from Rivoli Drive and Admella Drive.
TABLE 1: DEVELOPMENT DATA:
Consideration Proposed land division Development Plan Merit Assessment Quantitative Guideline
Site Area Each allotment approx. 7000m2 1 Ha/10,000m2 (Rural Living Zone)
Each allotment approx. 60m (variations from front width to back Allotment Width width due to allotment shape) N/A
Allotment Depth Each allotment approx. 100m N/A
External Wall Height* N/A N/A
Maximum Overall Height N/A N/A (to roof apex)*
Floor Area (including N/A N/A garage, and alfresco)
Site Coverage N/A N/A
Private Open Space N/A N/A
Street Set-back N/A N/A
Flank Set-backs N/A N/A N/A
Rear Set-back N/A N/A
Car Parking Provision N/A N/A
Relevant Planning History
29/2/2012 – Domestic Shed development approval
10/11/2005 – Shed development approval
24/10/2005 – 2 storey dwelling approval
19/04/2015 – Land Division application lodged
28/9/2016 - Development Assessment Panel refuse approval due to concerns regarding potential site contamination
3
Public Notification
See attachments C for details
Category 3 Public Consultation was conducted from the 15/02/2017 to the 09/03/2017 and no representations were received.
State Agency Consultation
Pursuant to Schedule 8 of the Development Regulations 2008, referrals were made to the Development Assessment Commission (DAC), and SA Water.
Internally, Council’s Engineering Department provided advice in relation to driveway access, and stormwater disposal.
Development Plan Assessment
Pursuant to Section 35 (3) of the Development Act 1993, the development is considered a Non- Complying form of development and therefore if granted Development Plan Consent, the concurrence of the Development Assessment Commission is required.
The most relevant provisions applicable to this application encompass the following:
Zoning
The subject allotments are located within the Rural Living Zone and within Precinct 18 (Beachport) as per ‘Zone Map WatR/21’.
The subject land is located within a Rural Living Zone and Precinct 18 as per Zone Map WatR/21.
Land Division in the Rural Living Zone and Precinct 18 (Beachport) requires that allotments shall be of an area that is not less than one hectare.
The three proposed allotments would have site areas forming 7,039 m², 7,063 m², and 7,119 m², each allotment of which would be under one hectare. The average width of each proposed allotment would not be less than 60 percent of the average depth, and would therefore be in accordance with PDC 12 (b) of the Rural Living Zone and Precinct 18.
The proposed allotments being around 7000m2 in size each therefore is considered to be at variance.
Site Contamination
During the previous application for a land division, council had concerns regarding potential site contamination arising from the burial of materials (namely building materials) on the property.
The subject land has a history of being used as a landfill site being backfilled with building material. The contents of the backfill cannot be 100% verified but it is known to include concrete, steel, plastic, timber, whitegoods and building materials.
The owner has signed a Statutory Declaration stating the nature of the waste and that he has removed the waste.
4
During the previous DAP meeting to consider the land division (28/9/17), DAP also agreed this was a concern and without a formal site contamination assessment, it could not be confident there no risk to the land or future residents.
As there was no certain way to determine the nature, level and current risk of any contamination present on the site, a preliminary site assessment was recommended to the applicant as a means of determining the level of contamination, if any.
A preliminary site investigation was conducted by Tonkin Consulting in December 2016 which concluded that there was no asbestos material present on the site and it did not identify any other potential sources of contamination that would preclude the future use of the site for rural living.
Therefore the issue of site contamination has been resolved and cannot be raised as an objection to this current development proposal by DAP.
Summary
The proposed land division does not comply with the Council Development Plan in regards to minimum land size requirements for the zoning in this area. The proposed allotments are short of the requirement of 10,000m2 by approximately 3000m2 per proposed allotment.
There is also numerous complying options for vacant land in the area along Ringwood Drive, Burkes Island Road and other areas within Muggleton. Many of these allotments have been on the market for several years and are selling very slowly with little demand.
There is also a risk of setting a precedent where an approval of this application may encourage other land owners to submit land division applications that are non-compliant in regards to required minimum land size.
However it can be argued that there is a shortage of land sizes between 1000m2 and 10,000m2 within the Beachport area and the proposed allotments may cater for this demand and provide more variety of land stock.
There is also evidence of allotments in the Muggeleton area already under the 10,000m2 size as per Frank Brennan’s Statement of Effect (see Attachment C)
If the application for 3 allotments is not supported, the applicant will amend the application to a 2 allotment land division to ensure complying land sizes.
Consistent with this conclusion, the following recommendations are provided: RECOMMENDATION That the Development Assessment Panel Receive and note the report. Advise the applicant that having regard to the Development Plan (Wattle Range) and all the supporting documentation, that the proposed development is considered not to be at significant variance to the development plan. Advise the applicant that pursuant to Regulation 17 (3)(b) of the Development Regulations 2008, the Wattle Range Development Assessment Panel supports the lodgement for the 3 allotments of approximately 7000m2 each and will proceed with an assessment of the application. Development Plan Consent be granted subject to the following conditions:
1. That the development is undertaken in accordance with DA 894/D007/16 – the approved plans, details and conditions. 2. The subject land shall be maintained in a state of good repair and tidy condition to the reasonable satisfaction of Council at all times.
5
3. Payment of $2849 into the Planning and development Fund (1 allotment/s @ 2849/allotment). Payment may be made by credit card via the internet at www.edala.sa.gov.au or by phone (7109 7018), be cheque payable to the Development Assessment Commission marked “Not negotiable” and sent to GPO Box 1815, Adelaide 50001 or in person, at Ground Floor, 101 Grenfell Street, Adelaide. 4. A final plan complying with the requirements for plans as set out in the Manual of Survey Practice Volume 1 (Plan presentation and guidelines) issued by the Registrar General to be lodged with the Development Assessment Commission for Land Division Certificate purposes.
Pete Whiting PLANNING OFFICER
6
po box 335 . millicent . south australia . 5280 m . 0418 838 152 e . [email protected] ABN 30 684 514 085
7 February 2017
STATEMENT OF EFFECT
Development Application for LIPSON REEF PTY LTD for a NON-COMPLYING LAND DIVISION 894/D012/16 of ALLOTMENTS 13 & 14 in DP 58206, ADMELLA DRIVE, BEACHPORT, 5280 HUNDRED OF RIVOLI BAY in the area of the WATTLE RANGE COUNCIL
P a g e | 1
CONTENTS Page No.
1. Introduction ...... 2 2. Background ...... 2 3. The Subject Land ...... 2 4. Existing Character of the Locality ...... 3 5. Nature of the Proposed Development ...... 4 6. Assessment of Planning Merits ...... 5 6.1 Assessment of Development Plan Provisions – Zoning Context ...... 5 6.2 Assessment of Development Plan Provisions – General (Council-wide) Provisions ...... 5 6.3 Assessment of Development Plan Provisions – Rural Living Zone...... 11 7. Social, Economic and Environmental Effects ...... 12 8. Other Information ...... 13 9. Conclusions ...... 13 10. Appendices ...... 15
10.1 Land Division Plan & Aerial Locality Plan ..…………... 16 10.2 Zone & Precinct Maps – WatR/21 and Bushfire Map – WatR/17 ……………………………………………….. 19 10.3 Certificates of Title – 5864/196 & 5864/197 .………. 23 10.4 Tonkin Consulting’s “Preliminary Site Inspection” Report ……………………………………… 30
P a g e | 2
1. Introduction
This Statement of Effect has been prepared in relation to Development Application No. 894/D012/16 by Lipson Reef Pty Ltd for their proposed land division of allotments 13 & 14 in DP 58206, hundred of Rivoli Bay, Admella Drive, Beachport (the ‘subject land’). This Statement of Effect assesses the proposal with respect to the relevant provisions contained in the Development Plan for the Wattle Range Council area (Consolidated – 7th February 2013).
2. Background
The Development Application is seeking approval for a land division of the subject land from the existing 2 allotments into 3 rural living allotments having areas of 7,039 m2; 7,063 m2 and 7,119 m2 respectively. Refer to land Division Plan and Aerial Location Plan in Appendix 1. The subject land is located in the Rural Living Zone and Beachport, Penola, Millicent Rural Living Precinct Zone and a land division into allotments of less than 1 hectare (or 10,000 m2) in area is a non-complying form of development in that Zone.
3. The Subject Land
The subject land is allotments 13 & 14 in DP 58206, Admella Drive, Beachport, being that land comprised in Certificates of Title Volume 5864 Folio 196 and Volume 5864 Folio 197. (Refer to Appendix 3). The subject land is contained in 2 large allotments having a gently undulating terrain and an area of 1.026 ha (or 10,260 m2) and 1.096 ha (or 10,960 m2) respectively and a combined area of 2.122 ha (or 21,220 m2). A photo across the subject land (refer to Photo 1 below) shows the existing dwelling and domestic garage in the foreground and the gentle undulating terrain, while the aerial view (refer to Photo 2 below) of the subject land shows allotment 14 being vacant clear land and allotment 13 containing the existing dwelling, domestic garage and large ‘commercial’ sized shed.
Photo 1 – looking north-westerly across the subject land – noting the existing dwelling and domestic garage in the foreground and the gentle undulating terrain.
P a g e | 3
Photo 2 – aerial view of the subject land – noting allotment 14 being vacant clear land and allotment 13 containing the existing dwelling, domestic garage and large ‘commercial’ sized shed.
4. Existing Character of the Locality
The subject land is located in the Rural Living Beachport, Penola, Millicent Rural Living Precinct Zone of the Development Plan (Wattle Range – as consolidated on 7th February 2013) and contained on Zone Map WatR/21 and Precinct Map WatR/21 as attached in Appendix 2. The character and nature of the locality around the subject land is predominantly rural living allotments of varying sizes, many of which contain detached dwellings as shown in the aerial photo below (refer to Photo 3). Within the Beachport Rural Living precinct there are 128 rural living allotments of which 67 allotments (or 52%) have an area less than 1.0 hectare. Refer to Map 1 below. There is no reticulated water supply or community wastewater management scheme (CWMS) servicing the allotments in the Beachport Rural Living Zone. The dwellings in this Zone are serviced by bore and rainwater supplies and septic or aerobic wastewater facilities.
Photo 3 – showing the Beachport Rural Living Zone and the subject land – noting the 128 rural living allotments of varying sizes and the number of existing dwellings. P a g e | 4
Map 1 – showing the subject land and the 67 allotments having an area less than 1.0 hectare.
5. Nature of the Proposed Development
The proposed land division seeks to undertake a land division of the existing 2 allotments having an area of 1.026 hectares and 1.096 hectares respectively, into 3 new allotments having areas of 7,039 m2; 7,063 m2 and 7,119 m2 respectively. The land division plan showing the proposed allotments detailed above is shown on Figure 1 below.
Figure 1 – Land Division Plan P a g e | 5
6. Assessment of Planning Merits
The following is an assessment of the proposed development against the relevant key provisions of the Development Plan for the Wattle Range Council area (Consolidated – 7th February 2013). The policies for the Wattle Range Council area are expressed generally in relation to all development throughout the Council area, then in more detail for the various zones. All sections and all relevant provisions within each section of the Development Plan must be considered in relation to a Development Application. In the event of any inconsistency between the Council-wide provisions and the zone provisions, then the more detailed zone provisions would generally prevail. This Statement of Effect has been prepared to accompany and support the Development Application for the proposed land division of the subject land.
6.1 Assessment of Development Plan Provisions – Zoning Context
The subject land is located in the Rural Living Zone and Beachport, Penola, Millicent Precinct Area #18 in the Development Plan (Wattle Range – as consolidated on 7th February 2013). The proposed land division to create the 3 allotments is not considered to be seriously at variance with the objectives and principles of development control in the Rural Living Zone and is classified as a non-complying form of development as allotments are less than 1.0 hectare in area contrary to principle of development control #12(a).
6.2 Assessment of Development Plan Provisions – General (Council-wide) Provisions
The most directly applicable provisions of the Development Plan in the General (Council-wide) section are discussed below. Coastal Areas The subject land is not considered to be coastal land however is within 550 metres (at its closest point) to Rivoli Bay and will not adversely affect the management of the land, adjoining land or the coast. Further the subject land does not abut or have direct or indirect access to the coast or a reserve and is not considered at risk of sea-flood. The subject land is protected from coastal hazards by the foredune formations adjacent to the coast and is not subject to inundation by storm tides or combined storm tides and stormwater, coastal erosion or sand drift, and probable sea level rise. Objectives 5 Development only undertaken on land which is not subject to or that can be protected from coastal hazards including inundation by storm tides or combined storm tides and stormwater, coastal erosion or sand drift, and probable sea level rise.
P a g e | 6
Principles of Development Control Environmental Protection 3 Development should not be located in delicate or environmentally-sensitive coastal features such as sand dunes, cliff-tops, wetlands or substantially intact strata of native vegetation. Land Division 25 Land in coastal areas should only be divided if: (a) it or the subsequent development and use of the land will not adversely affect the management of the land, adjoining land or the coast (b) sand dunes, wetlands and substantially intact strata of native vegetation are maintained or consolidated within single allotments. 26 Land division in coastal areas outside of designated urban or settlement zones should not increase either of the following: (a) the number of allotments abutting the coast or a reserve (b) the number of allotments, including community title allotments and those that incorporate rights of way, with direct access to the coast or a reserve. 27 Land should not be divided for commercial, industrial or residential purposes unless a layout can be achieved whereby roads, parking areas and development sites on each allotment are at least 0.3 metres above the standard sea-flood risk level, unless the land is, or can be provided with appropriate coastal protection measures.
Hazards The subject land is not subject to inundation by tidal, drainage or flood waters and there are no earthworks associated with the land division. The subject land and land division is not located in a high bushfire risk area. The subject land is located in a medium bushfire risk area as delineated on BPA Map WatR/17 (Bushfire Risk). The subject land is located on the corner of Rivoli Drive and Admella Drive and these roads provide good access to allotments in the land division for fire-fighting purposes and egress for residents in times of bushfire risk. Given the historical excavation undertaken on allotment 13 and the excavation having been filled predominantly with construction and demolition rubble, soils from other sites, white goods, steel, concrete, plastics, treated timber and plastic bags marked “Caution Asbestos”, Council requested the applicant undertake a preliminary site investigation (PSI) report to demonstrate that the site is suitable for a land division and subsequent development in accordance with the current rural living zoning. Consultants, Tonkin Consulting, were engaged to prepare the PSI Report and undertook a desktop study, site inspection covering preliminary site investigations and intrusive investigation of the historically excavated and backfilled area. A copy of Tonkin’s PSI Report is attached in Appendix 4 on page 30. The Tonkin PSI Report concluded as follows – “Based on the Conceptual Site Model (CSM) and the Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI) findings, it is concluded that potentially contaminating activities have occurred on the subject site, in the form of uncontrolled filling of the excavation in the centre of the site. Following the intrusive investigation which targeted the former excavation, no contaminants were found at levels exceeding the nominated NEPM 2013 Health Investigation Level A (Residential), nor was any asbestos detected.” “The land is zoned as rural living and currently has a dwelling located on the eastern side of the central fence which is utilised as a domestic premise. The intent to divide and develop the western portion of the title for future rural living does not change the land use however it increases the potential sensitivity. This report does not identify any potential contamination that would preclude the future use of the site for rural living.”
P a g e | 7
It is further advised that the site was inspected by EPA officers in April 2015 and it was confirmed by the EPA that the plastic bags marked “Caution Asbestos” contained broken concrete material and not asbestos material. The steel; plastic; timber and white goods have been recovered by the applicant from the excavated area and recycled at the Beachport Resource Recovery facility in accordance with the recommendations provided by the EPA. Objectives 1 Maintenance of the natural environment and systems by limiting development in areas susceptible to natural hazard risk. 2 Development located away from areas that are vulnerable to, and cannot be adequately and effectively protected from the risk of natural hazards. Principles of Development Control Hazards – Flooding 4 Development should not be undertaken in areas liable to inundation by tidal, drainage or flood waters unless the development can achieve all of the following: (a) it is developed with a public stormwater system capable of catering for a 1 in 100 year average return interval flood event (b) buildings are designed and constructed to prevent the entry of floodwaters in a 1 in 100 year average return interval flood event. 5 Development, including earthworks associated with development, should not do any of the following: (a) impede the flow of floodwaters through the land or other surrounding land (b) occur on land where the risk of flooding is unacceptable having regard to personal and public safety and to property damage (c) increase the potential hazard risk to public safety of persons during a flood event (d) aggravate the potential for erosion or siltation or lead to the destruction of vegetation during a flood (e) cause any adverse effect on the floodway function (f) increase the risk of flooding of other land (g) obstruct a watercourse. Hazards – Bushfire 11 Land division for residential or tourist accommodation purposes within areas of high bushfire risk should be limited to those areas specifically set aside for these uses. 12 Where land division does occur it should be designed to: (a) minimise the danger to residents, other occupants of buildings and fire fighting personnel (b) minimise the extent of damage to buildings and other property during a bushfire (c) ensure each allotment contains a suitable building site that is located away from vegetation that would pose an unacceptable risk in the event of bushfire (d) ensure provision of a fire hazard separation zone isolating residential allotments from areas that pose an unacceptable bushfire risk by containing the allotments within a perimeter road or through other means that achieve an adequate separation. Site Contamination 21 Development, including land division, should not occur on contaminated land or on potentially contaminated land unless either of the following applies: (a) remediation of the site is undertaken to a standard that makes it suitable and safe for the proposed use (b) the site will be maintained in a condition, or the development will be undertaken in a manner, that will not pose a threat to the health and safety of the environment or to occupiers of the site or land in the locality.
P a g e | 8
Infrastructure The proposed land division will utilise the existing infrastructure provided to the land, including electricity supply and roads. The road network in the Beachport Rural Living Zone is well developed with Rivoli Drive being a sealed road and Admella Drive being an open surface road. Electricity supply is available to all 3 proposed allotments in the land division. There is no reticulated water or community wastewater management scheme servicing the subject land and the allotments in the Beachport Rural Living Zone. Future dwellings developed on the proposed 3 allotments will be serviced by bore and rainwater supplies and septic or aerobic wastewater facilities. Objectives 1 Infrastructure provided in an economical and environmentally sensitive manner. 4 The visual impact of infrastructure facilities minimised. 5 The efficient and cost-effective use of existing infrastructure. Principles of Development Control 1 Development should not occur without the provision of adequate utilities and services, including: (a) electricity supply (b) water supply (e) effluent disposal systems (f) formed all-weather public roads (g) telecommunications services 2 Development should only occur where it provides, or has access to, relevant easements for the supply of infrastructure. 6 In areas where no reticulated water supply is available, buildings whose usage is reliant on a water supply should be equipped with an adequate and reliable on-site water storage system. 8 Electricity infrastructure should be designed and located to minimise its visual and environmental impacts. 10 Utilities and services, including access roads and tracks, should be sited on areas already cleared of native vegetation. If this is not possible, their siting should cause minimal interference or disturbance to existing native vegetation and biodiversity.
Interface between Land Uses The proposed land division for rural purposes is being undertaken within an appropriate Zone under the Development Plan where the issues of the interface between landuses have been appropriately considered in the zoning of the subject land. Objectives 1. Development located and designed to prevent adverse impact and conflict between land uses. Principles of Development Control 1. Development should not detrimentally affect the amenity of the locality or cause unreasonable interference through any of the following: (b) noise (h) traffic impacts. 2. Development should be designed and sited to minimise negative impact on existing and potential future land uses considered appropriate in the locality. 5. Sensitive uses likely to conflict with the continuation of lawfully existing developments and land uses considered appropriate for the zone should not be developed or should be designed to minimise negative impacts. P a g e | 9
Land Division The proposed land division is considered to be appropriate forms of development within the Zone and takes advantage of the existing infrastructure to service the new allotments. Stormwater from the allotments created in the land division is capable of being disposed of in an appropriate and environmentally sensitive manner on the subject land. The allotments in the proposed land division will not be connected to a reticulated water supply as a reticulated water supply is not available to the subject land or other allotments in the Beachport Rural Living Zone. A combination of groundwater and rainwater supplies will provided adequate water supply to residents. Wastewater from the allotments in the rural living will be disposed of on-site via a septic tank or aerobic wastewater treatment system. The subject land is considered suitable for the purposes for which they are being subdivided and its subdivision will not give rise to any adverse impacts or outcomes detailed in principle of development control 2. The proposed land division will not require or necessitate the clearance of native vegetation or impact on wetlands. The proposed land division is located on the corner of Rivoli Drive and Admella Drive and these roads provide good all-weather access to all new allotments in the land division. The subject land and land division is not located in a high bushfire risk area. The subject land is located in a medium bushfire risk area as delineated on BPA Map WatR/17 (Bushfire Risk). The subject land has frontage to Rivoli Drive and Admella Drive and these roads provide good access to allotments in the land division for fire-fighting purposes and egress for residents in times of bushfire risk. The proposed 3 allotments have a regular configuration and size that make them suitable for rural living use and the development of dwellings and associated outbuildings. Objectives 1 Land division that occurs in an orderly sequence allowing efficient provision of new infrastructure and facilities and making optimum use of existing under utilised infrastructure and facilities. 2 Land division that creates allotments appropriate for the intended use. 3 Land division that is integrated with site features, including landscape and environmental features, adjacent land uses, the existing transport network and the availability of infrastructure. 4 Land division restricted in rural areas to ensure the efficient use of rural land for primary production and avoidance of uneconomic infrastructure provision. Principles of Development Control 1 When land is divided: (a) stormwater should be capable of being drained safely and efficiently from each proposed allotment and disposed of from the land in an environmentally sensitive manner (b) a sufficient water supply should be made available for each allotment 2 Land should not be divided if any of the following apply: (a) the size, shape, location, slope or nature of the land makes any of the allotments unsuitable for the intended use
P a g e | 10
(b) any allotment will not have a frontage to an existing or proposed public road (f) the intended use of the land would be contrary to the zone objectives (g) any single allotments are created that sit within more than one zone. Design and Layout 3 Land divisions should be designed to ensure that areas of native vegetation and wetlands do not need to be cleared as a consequence of subsequent development or fragmented or reduced in size. 4 The design of a land division should incorporate: (a) roads, thoroughfares and open space that result in safe and convenient linkages with the surrounding environment, including public and community transport facilities, and which, where necessary, facilitate the satisfactory future division of land and the inter-communication with neighbouring localities (b) safe and convenient access from each allotment to an existing or proposed public road or thoroughfare (c) areas to provide appropriate separation distances between potentially conflicting land uses and/or zones (f) the preservation of significant natural, cultural or landscape features including State and local heritage places (g) protection for existing vegetation and drainage lines 5 Land division within an area identified as being an ‘Excluded Area from Bushfire Protection Planning Provisions’ as shown on Bushfire Protection Area BPA - Bushfire Risk, should be designed to make provisions for: (a) emergency vehicle access through to the Bushfire Protection Area and other areas of open space connected to it (b) a mainly continuous street pattern serving new allotments that eliminates the use of cul-de-sacs or dead end roads (c) a fire hazard separation zone isolating residential allotments from areas that pose an unacceptable bushfire risk by containing the allotments within a perimeter road or through other means that achieve an adequate separation.
Orderly and Sustainable Development The proposed land division of the subject land is an orderly and economic development in this locality, and will not have an adverse impact on the amenity of the locality. Services and infrastructure servicing the subject land can be efficiently and economically provided to the development without impacting on the amenity of the area. The proposed land division of the subject land is considered to be an appropriate and sustainable use of the subject land in accordance with the respective principles of development control in the Rural Living Zone. Objectives 1. Orderly and economical development that creates a safe, convenient and pleasant environment in which to live. 2. Development occurring in an orderly sequence and in a compact form to enable the efficient provision of public services and facilities. 3. Development that does not jeopardise the continuance of adjoining authorised land uses. 4. Development that does not prejudice the achievement of the provisions of the Development Plan. Principles of Development Control 1. Development should not prejudice the development of a zone for its intended purpose. 2. Land outside of townships and settlements should primarily be used for primary production and conservation purposes. P a g e | 11
3. The economic base of the region should be expanded in a sustainable manner. 6. Development should be located and staged to achieve the economical provision of public services and infrastructure, and to maximise the use of existing services and infrastructure. 8. Vacant or underutilised land should be developed in an efficient and co- ordinated manner to not prejudice the orderly development of adjacent land.
Transportation and Access The proposed land division of the subject land will allow for the safe, convenient and efficient movement of traffic, provides good access to all allotments from the Rivoli Drive and Admella Drive. The development of this land into 3 rural living allotments will not adversely impact on the capacity of the road network servicing the subject land and the other allotments in the Beachport Rural Living Zone. Vehicles entering and exiting the new allotment will be able to do so in a forward direction. Objectives 2. Development that: (a) provides safe and efficient movement for all motorised and non- motorised transport modes (b) ensures access for vehicles including emergency services, public infrastructure maintenance and commercial vehicles Principles of Development Control Transportation and Access – Land Use 1. Land uses arranged to support the efficient provision of sustainable transport networks and encourage their use. Transportation and Access – Movement Systems 3. Transport corridors should be sited and designed so as to not unreasonably interfere with the health and amenity of adjacent sensitive land uses. 4. Roads should be sited and designed to blend with the landscape and be in sympathy with the terrain. Transportation and Access – Access 22. Development should have direct access from an all weather public road. 23. Development should be provided with safe and convenient access which: (a) avoids unreasonable interference with the flow of traffic on adjoining roads (b) accommodates the type and volume of traffic likely to be generated by the development or land use and minimises induced traffic through over-provision (c) is sit ed and designed to minimise any adverse impacts on the occupants of and visitors to neighbouring properties.
6.3 Assessment of Development Plan Provisions – Rural Living Zone
The most directly applicable provisions of the Development Plan in the Rural Living Zone section are discussed below.
P a g e | 12
Rural Living Zone The proposed land division within the Rural Living Zone will support future development of the forms of development envisaged by principle of development control 1. The proposed land division is considered to be non-complying development as the 3 proposed allotments are less than 1.0 hectare in area. The 3 proposed allotments comply with the provision in principle of development control 12(b) in that their average width is equal to or greater than 60 percent of their average depth. The subject land is located in the Rural Living Zone and within the Beachport Penola Millicent Rural Living Precinct Area #18 and principles of development control 8-10 and 16-22 are not applicable to this land division proposal. The subject land is not contained within the concepts shown on Concept Plan Map WatR/5 – Rural Living and Concept Plan Map WatR/7 - Rural Living as referred to in principle of development control 11. The future development of dwellings on the new allotments is consistent with the objectives for the Rural Living Zone. Objectives 1 A zone consisting of large allotments, detached dwellings and rural activities that do not adversely impact the amenity of the locality. Principles of Development Control Land Use 1 The following forms of development are envisaged in the zone: ▪ detached dwelling ▪ domestic outbuilding in association with a detached dwelling ▪ domestic structure ▪ dwelling addition ▪ farming ▪ farm building ▪ stable. 2 Development listed as non-complying is generally inappropriate and not acceptable unless it can be demonstrated that it does not undermine the objectives and principles of the Development Plan. Precinct Specific Provisions Precinct 18 Beachport Penola Millicent 11 Development should be carried out, where applicable, in accordance with the concepts shown on Concept Plan Map WatR/5 – Rural Living and Concept Plan Map WatR/7 - Rural Living. 12 The division of land should not result in the creation of additional allotments having an: (a) area less than one hectare (b) average width less than 60 percent of its average depth. 13 Development in this Area should comprise detached dwellings and associated outbuildings of single storey construction on large allotments.
7. Social, Economic and Environmental Effects
Social and Economic Impacts The proposed land division is considered to be orderly and economic development and from a social and economic perspective the proposed land division and future dwellings on the subject land will enhance the rural living style of development in this locality. The proposed land division is expected to have no adverse social effects on the locality, as the proposed land division is consistent with the established pattern of land division and rural living development in the locality. P a g e | 13
The proposed land division will not adversely impinge on the open nature of the subject land and the locality and will be complementary to the landuses and desired character of the Rural Living Zone. In economic terms, the proposal may have a positive effect on the wider locality by creating a demand for goods and services during the construction stage of future dwellings. This positive effect assumes that the demand is drawn from local suppliers, outlets and businesses. Environmental Impacts The proposed land division and future dwellings on the new allotments is unlikely to have any impact on the environmental conditions of the locality or give rise to any environmental impact on the locality. Summary – Social, Economic & Environmental Effects In summary, it is considered that there will be no adverse social, economic and environmental effects of the proposed development on the locality or other existing developments in the general locality. The overall development when completed will complement and enhance the character and amenity of the area.
8. Other Information
This Statement of Effect accompanies and forms party of the Development Application for the proposed development. The Applicant is prepared to provide the Wattle Range Council with any other additional information which may be required in order to assist Council assess and determine the Development Application. The Applicant is also prepared to attend any meeting to discuss the proposed development, should it be considered necessary.
9. Conclusions
The proposed development of the subject land by land division is being undertaken within the Rural Living Zone and displays considerable planning merit and warrants the granting of Development Plan Consent for the following reasons – . Within the Beachport Rural Living precinct and in the vicinity of the subject land there are 128 rural living allotments of which 67 allotments (or 52%) have an area less than 1.0 hectare. Refer to Map 1 on page 4. . The proposed 3 allotments have a regular configuration and size that make them suitable for rural living use and the development of dwellings and associated outbuildings. The proposed allotments have areas of 7,039 m2; 7,063 m2 and 7,119 m2 respectively. . The 3 proposed allotments comply with the provision in principle of development control 12(b) in that their average width is equal to or greater than 60 percent of their average depth.
P a g e | 14
. The development of the subject land into 3 rural living allotments will not adversely impact on the capacity of the road network servicing the subject land and the other allotments in the Beachport Rural Living Zone. . The subject land is considered suitable for the purposes for which they are being subdivided and its subdivision will not give rise to any adverse impacts or outcomes detailed in principle of development control 2. . Allotment 13 is not subject to any site contamination as detailed in Tonkin Consulting’s PSI Report. . The proposed land division of the subject land is an orderly and economic development in this locality, and will not have an adverse impact on the amenity of the locality.
Conclusion It is submitted that the proposed land division while a non-complying form of development it is not inconsistent with the various relevant Objectives and Principles of Development Control contained in the Development Plan for the Wattle Range Council. The proposed land division when completed will not adversely impact on the amenity or character of the Beachport Rural Living Zone. The development will complement the locality and further enhance lifestyle in and around Beachport. The proposed development is not considered to be seriously at variance with the Development Plan for the Wattle Range Council, and therefore warrants the granting of Development Plan Consent.
F.N. (Frank) Brennan JP Principal Consultant FRANK BRENNAN CONSULTING SERVICES
Dip in Planning Dip in Local Government Administration Member Planning Institute of Australia
P a g e | 15 Appendices 10
# Appendix Page
10.1 Land Division Plan & Aerial Locality Plan ..……………………… 16 10.2 Zone & Precinct Maps – WatR/21 and Bushfire Map – WatR/17 …………………....……….……………………… 19 10.3 Certificates of Title – 5864/196 & 5864/197 ……………………. 23 10.4 Tonkin Consulting’s “Preliminary Site Inspection” Report …….. 30 Page | 16
APPENDIX 1
Land Division Plan & Aerial Locality Plan Page | 17 Date created: Land Services Group May 28, 2016 The Property Location Browser is available on the Land Services Group Website: www.sa.gov.au/landservices
–SUBJECT LAND Page | 18
Disclaimer: The information provided above, is not represented to be accurate, current or complete at the time of printing this report. The Government of South Australia accepts no liability for the use of this data, or any reliance placed on it. Page | 19
APPENDIX 2
Zone & Precinct Maps - WatR/21 & Bushfire Map BPA WatR/17 Page | 20
MAP WatR/4 Adjoins
Q23 Q3 S44 S2 S1 S3
SAMUEL W AY DR
MCLACHLAN DR
A4 A5 A6 R S255 D
D D
O
A7 A1 O A11 W A3 A2 A21 A3 G A1 PrPro S252 N S254 I
R S71 A22 S478 GELTWOOD DR A12 A23 A16 S237 A24 S249 S250 S242 A17 A15 S241 S248 S129 S425 R S66 A26 D I I
A12 L
A52 A53 O S236
V
A51 I A1 R S63 S246 A13 S244 A14 S216 S221 S430 S67
D
A R DM E D
LL S72 WatR AD N MAP R A S471 L
S S231 S230 S457 S54 I S225 S
S50 S53 K
R
U B RuL A1 S217 S51 A2 S O U T H S52 A3 /4 S218 E R N S55 A6 A4 Adjoi
A7 A5 P O A200 A2 R ns T S A4 A8
MAP WatR/4 Adjoins WatR/4 MAP S78 S75
A3 A2 H W A1 S57 Y SUBJECT In LAND S58
A11 CstCon S70
Land Not Within a Council Area (Coastal Waters) S257 Council Boundary is sea coast (low water mark)
MAP WatR/4 Adjoins
Lamberts Conformal Conic Projection, GDA94
0500m
BEACHPORT ENVIRONS Zones CstCon Coastal Conservation In Industry PrPro Zone Map WatR/21 Primary Production RuL Rural Living Zone Boundary Development Plan Boundary WATTLE RANGE COUNCIL Consolidated - 7 February 2013 Page | 21
MAP WatR/4 Adjoins
Q23 Q3 S44 S2 S1 S3
SAMUEL WAY DR
MCLACHLAN DR
A4 A5 A6 R S255 D
D D
O
A7 A1 O A11 W A3 A2 A21 A3 G A1 S252 N S254 I
R S71 A22 GELTWOOD DR A12 A23 A16 S237 A24 S249 S250 S242 A17 A15 S241 S248 S129 S478 S425 R S66 A26 D I I
A12 L A52 A53 O S236 18
V
A51 I A1 R S63 S246 A13 S244 A14 S216 S221 S430 S67
D
A R DM E D
LL S72 WatR AD N MAP R A S471 L
S S231 S230 S457 I S225 S
S50 S53 K
S54 R
U B A1 S217 S51 A2 S O U T H S52 A3 /4 S218 E R N S55 A6 A4 Adjoi
A7 A5 P O A200 A2 R ns T S A4 A8
MAP WatR/4 Adjoins WatR/4 MAP S78
S56 A3 H W A2 A1 S57 Y
S58 S75 SUBJECT
LAND A11 S70
Land Not Within a Council Area (Coastal Waters) S257
Council Boundary is sea coast (low water mark)
MAP WatR/4 Adjoins
Lamberts Conformal Conic Projection, GDA94
Precinct 18 Beachport, Penola, Millicent 0500m
BEACHPORT ENVIRONS Precinct Map WatR/21
Precinct Boundary Development Plan Boundary WATTLE RANGE COUNCIL Consolidated - 7 February 2013 Page | 22
BPA Map WatR/2 Adjoins
Q3 Q23 S2 S3 S1 S44
SAMUEL WAY DR
A11 A12 A15 MCLACHLAN DR A117 A4 A5 S71 A10 A6 A82 A71 A72 R
A81 S255 D
D D Lake George A9 O A3 A2 A7 A1 O A11
W
A21 S252 S254 G BEACHPORT A1 A8 N S478 A18 I
R A22 GELTWOOD DR A12 A23 A16 S237 A24 S250 A17 S242 A25 S249 S241 S248 A3 S129
R S66
A26 D
I I L S236 A53 O
A52 V
I
A51 R S246 S63 A13 S245 S243 S244 A103 A14
A102 S216 S221 S430 D S425 A101 R D D
A32 N
A
L
A31 BPAAdjoins WatR/2 Map S67 S AD I ME LLA S S72 BEA D K CHP R R ORT- S457 M U ILLIC ENT S231 B RD S214 S230 S471 S213 S220 S225 S50 S53 S54
S217 S51 S218 S52 S55 A6 A4 A201 A2 A7 A5 A200 A8
BPA Map WatR/2AdjoinsBPA S56 SO A3 UT HE A1 RN P S57 OR TS S75 HW Y S58 SUBJECT LAND S70
Land Not Within A11
a Council Area S257 (Coastal Waters)
BPA Map WatR/2 Adjoins See enlargement map for accurate representation.
0 500 m Bushfire Protection Area BPA Map WatR/17 Medium Bushfire Risk BUSHFIRE RISK General Bushfire Risk Development Plan Boundary WATTLE RANGE COUNCIL Consolidated - 7 February 2013 Page | 23
APPENDIX 3 Certificates of Title 5864/196 and 5864/197 Product Register Search Page | 24 Date/Time 28/05/2016 01:40PM Customer Reference Hoffmann Order ID 20160528000355 Cost $27.25
The Registrar-General certifies that this Title Register Search displays the records maintained in the Register Book and other notations at the time of searching.
Registrar-General Certificate of Title - Volume 5864 Folio 196 Parent Title(s) CT 5501/270, CT 5501/275 Dealing(s) RTU 9188675 Creating Title Title Issued 09/01/2002 Edition 7 Edition Issued 19/02/2013 Estate Type FEE SIMPLE Registered Proprietor LIPSON REEF PTY. LTD. (ACN: 146 872 479) OF PO BOX 2171 HUMPTY DOO NT 0836 Description of Land ALLOTMENT 13 DEPOSITED PLAN 58206 IN THE AREA NAMED BEACHPORT HUNDRED OF RIVOLI BAY Easements NIL Schedule of Dealings Dealing Number Description 11886627 MORTGAGE TO NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD. Notations Dealings Affecting Title NIL Priority Notices NIL
Land Services Group Page 1 of 3 Copyright Privacy Disclaimer: www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showCopyright www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showPrivacyStatement www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showDisclaimer Product Register Search Page | 25 Date/Time 28/05/2016 01:40PM Customer Reference Hoffmann Order ID 20160528000355 Cost $27.25
Notations on Plan NIL Registrar-General's Notes NIL Administrative Interests NIL * Denotes the dealing has been re-lodged.
Land Services Group Page 2 of 3 Copyright Privacy Disclaimer: www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showCopyright www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showPrivacyStatement www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showDisclaimer Product Register Search Page | 26 Date/Time 28/05/2016 01:40PM Customer Reference Hoffmann Order ID 20160528000355 Cost $27.25
Land Services Group Page 3 of 3 Copyright Privacy Disclaimer: www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showCopyright www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showPrivacyStatement www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showDisclaimer Product Register Search Page | 27 Date/Time 28/05/2016 01:39PM Customer Reference Hoffmann Order ID 20160528000354 Cost $27.25
The Registrar-General certifies that this Title Register Search displays the records maintained in the Register Book and other notations at the time of searching.
Registrar-General Certificate of Title - Volume 5864 Folio 197 Parent Title(s) CT 5501/270 Dealing(s) RTU 9188675 Creating Title Title Issued 09/01/2002 Edition 3 Edition Issued 19/06/2009 Estate Type FEE SIMPLE Registered Proprietor ALLAN DEAN OSCHAR KERRY LORRAINE OSCHAR OF RMB 1015 PENOLA SA 5277 AS JOINT TENANTS Description of Land ALLOTMENT 14 DEPOSITED PLAN 58206 IN THE AREA NAMED BEACHPORT HUNDRED OF RIVOLI BAY Easements NIL Schedule of Dealings NIL Notations Dealings Affecting Title NIL Priority Notices NIL
Land Services Group Page 1 of 3 Copyright Privacy Disclaimer: www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showCopyright www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showPrivacyStatement www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showDisclaimer Product Register Search Page | 28 Date/Time 28/05/2016 01:39PM Customer Reference Hoffmann Order ID 20160528000354 Cost $27.25
Notations on Plan NIL Registrar-General's Notes UNAPPROVED D59112 Administrative Interests NIL * Denotes the dealing has been re-lodged.
Land Services Group Page 2 of 3 Copyright Privacy Disclaimer: www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showCopyright www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showPrivacyStatement www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showDisclaimer Product Register Search Page | 29 Date/Time 28/05/2016 01:39PM Customer Reference Hoffmann Order ID 20160528000354 Cost $27.25
Land Services Group Page 3 of 3 Copyright Privacy Disclaimer: www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showCopyright www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showPrivacyStatement www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showDisclaimer Page | 30
APPENDIX 4
Tonkin Consulting's "Preliminary Site Investigation" Report Page | 31
Lot 13 Admella Drive
Preliminary Site Investigation
Frank Brennan Consulting Services
December 2016
Ref No. 20161432R001
Page | 32
Document History and Status
Rev Description Author Reviewed Approved Date
A Final MTB JCH TT 23 December 2016
© Tonkin Consulting 2015 This document is, and shall remain, the property of Tonkin Consulting. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation Page | 33
Contents
1 Executive Summary 1
2 Introduction 2 2.1 Background 2 2.2 Objectives 2 2.3 Scope of Work 2
3 Site History Investigations 4 3.1 Site Identification 4 3.2 Site Features 4 3.3 Site Operations and Facilities 7 3.4 Historical CT Search 7 3.5 Aerial Photography Review 7 3.6 Services & Service Providers (DBYD) 8 3.7 Regional Geology 9 3.8 Regional Hydrogeology 9 3.9 EPA Section 7 Search 10 3.10 Potential PCA and Sources 10 3.10.1 Contaminants of Potential Concern 10
4 Preliminary Conceptual Site Model (CSM) 11 4.1 Potential Sources 11 4.2 Potential Exposure Routes 11 4.3 Potential Receptors 12 4.4 Plausible Exposure Pathways 12
5 Soil Analytical Results 14 5.1 Sampling Methodology 14 5.2 Soil Lithology Encountered/Extent of Fill 14 5.3 Quality Control and Quality Assurance 14 5.4 Soil Analytical Results 15
6 Updated Conceptual Site Model 16 6.1 Potential Sources 16 6.2 Potential Exposure Routes 16 6.3 Potential Receptors 16 6.4 Plausible Exposure Pathways 16
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation Page | 34
7 Discussion 19 7.1 Possible Exposure Scenarios 19 7.1.1 Possible Exposure Pathway #1 19 7.1.2 Possible Exposure Pathway #2 19 7.1.3 Possible Exposure Pathway #3 19 7.1.4 Possible Exposure Pathway #4 20 7.1.5 Possible Exposure Pathway #5 20 7.2 Inherent Uncertainties 20
8 Conclusions 21 8.1 Conclusions 21
9 Statement of Limitations 22
Tables Table 3.1 Site Details 4 Table 3.2 Summary of Aerial Photography 7 Table 4.1 Preliminary Conceptual Site Model – Current Site 13 Table 5.1 Site Specific Soil Lithology 14 Table 6.1 Updated Conceptual Site Model 17
Figures Figure 3.1 Site Locality Plan 5 Figure 3.2 Site Features Plan 6
Appendices Appendix A Searches Appendix B Aerial Photos Appendix C Field Forms Appendix C Soil Analytical Results Appendix D Site Photos
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation Page | 35
1 Executive Summary A site inspection and desktop review of historical information has identified or inferred a number of potentially contaminating activities to have occurred at the site or within the surrounding vicinity of the site. These activities include: Imported materials which were put in the excavation; Historic site development, including the building of a shed and hardstand areas and associated importation of fill; Historic agricultural activities, including use of pesticides and herbicides for land maintenance. Offsite septic systems Based on the Conceptual Site Model (CSM) and the Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI) findings, it is concluded that potentially contaminating activities have occurred on the subject site, in the form of uncontrolled filling of the excavation in the centre of the site. Following the intrusive investigation which targeted the former excavation, no contaminants were found at levels exceeding the nominated NEPM 2013 Health Investigation Level A (Residential), nor was any asbestos detected. The development of a CSM and assessment of the potential historical contamination has been undertaken to help address issues that may affect the viability of the development for the proposed rural living land use. The PSI has addressed the major concern identified by council (historical excavation filling) however the following inherent uncertainties remain: A targeted assessment of the most likely source of gross contamination and most likely chemicals of concern was undertaken based on historical searches. Additional grid based assessment across the entire site will increase the coverage and reduce potential omissions however this inherent uncertainty will always exist regardless of the intensity of investigation. Groundwater conditions were not assessed as part of this investigation and hence remain unknown; The land is zoned as rural living and currently has a dwelling located on the eastern side of the central fence which is utilised as a domestic premise. The intent to divide and develop the western portion of the title for future rural living does not change the land use however it increases the potential sensitivity. This report does not identify any potential contamination that would preclude the future use of the site for rural living. A statement of suitability can only be provided by an EPA accredited auditor via a site contamination audit report. In the event that the client or council requests this statement additional investigations may be required.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 1 Page | 36
2 Introduction
2.1 Background As part of the assessment of the proposed land division at 42 Rivoli Drive, Beachport, South Australia, 5280 (site), Wattle Range Council requested that the applicant provide a preliminary site investigation (PSI) report (this report) to demonstrate that the site is suitable for a land division and subsequent development in accordance with the current rural living zoning. Historically the allotment has been excavated and filled with uncontrolled fill. In April 2015 a complaint was made to council regarding excavations occurring at the site. Council’s subsequent investigation showed that excavation of sand had been carried out and that the excavation had been filled predominantly with construction and demolition rubble, soils from other sites, white goods, steel concrete, plastics, treated timber and plastic bags marked “Caution Asbestos”. The site was inspected by EPA officers after council’s inspection of the property in April 2015. It was confirmed by EPA that the plastic bags marked “Caution Asbestos” contained broken concrete material and not asbestos material. The steel; plastic; timber and white goods have been recovered from the excavated area and recycled at the Beachport Resource Recovery facility in accordance with the recommendation provided by the EPA.
2.2 Objectives The objective of this PSI is to conduct the desktop searches required as part of a PSI, prepare a preliminary conceptual site model (CSM) to identify potential risks and conduct intrusive investigation to determine the potential risk to human health and the environment. These assessments are intended to: Identify relevant contamination issues; Identify contaminants of concern; Identify areas of potential concern and the potentially affected elements; Compare site data with National Environmental Protection Measure (NEPM)1 Assessment of Site Contamination (ASC); Identify trends in the historical data; and Identify data gaps to enable assessment of potential risk. Work is conducted in accordance with the and SA EPA Guidelines 2
2.3 Scope of Work This report comprises a desktop study, site inspection covering preliminary site investigations and intrusive investigation of the historically excavated and backfilled area The scope of work included: Site inspection; Review of the historical and current site activities and information; Identify potentially contaminating activities; Develop preliminary conceptual site model (CSM); Investigate shallow soils at the excavation site; and
1 NEPC (2013) National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure 1999 Amended 2013. 2 SA EPA (20109) Guidelines for the assessment and remediation of groundwater contamination
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 2 Page | 37
Prepare a PSI report including update of the CSM, data gaps which may exist and the potential risk to human health and the environment.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 3 Page | 38
3 Site History Investigations
3.1 Site Identification The site is described as 42 Rivoli Drive, Beachport, South Australia, 5280. Site details are outlined in Table 3.1 below. The site area and location plans are presented in Figure 3.1 and Figure 3.2. A copy of the current Certificate of Title (CT) is provided in Appendix A. Historical information relating to site ownership is summarised in Section 3.4 of this report. Council information pertaining to the site and zoning of the area is provided in Appendix A. Table 3.1 Site Details
Site Address 43 Rivoli Drive, Beachport, South Australia, 5280 (Also referred to as Lot 13 Admella Drive) Current Owner(s) Lipson Reef Pty Ltd
Current Certificate of Title(s) Volume 5864 Folio 196
Parcel / Plan Deposited plan 58206 Allotment 13
Local Government Authority Wattle Range Council
Council Zoning Rural Living (RuL)
Current Land Use Rural Living
Proposed Land Use Rural Living
Land Area (approximate) 10,392 m2
3.2 Site Features A site inspection was undertaken by Tonkin Consulting personnel on 5 December 2016 and the following observations made: The site is split into two sections, demarcated by a fence. On the eastern portion of the allotment there is a residential dwelling. The eastern portion of the site also has a shed and driveway adjacent the dwelling. The house has a septic system with a soakage trench directed towards the north west. There is lawn around the dwelling which is irrigated. On the western portion of the allotment there is a shed with a gravel hardstand area and driveway in front of it. There is a storage area adjacent the shed with an assortment of items including wood, steel and two boats. There is an area approximately in the centre of the western portion which shows evidence of land disturbance. The disturbance in the centre of the site is a former excavation which was backfilled. Refer to Figure 3.1 and Figure 3.2 for site locality and features plans.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 4 Page | 39
Legend Site
Frank Brennan Consulting Services 0 250 500 7501000 m Lot 13 Admella Drive
Job Number: 20161432 Data Acknowledgement: Site Locality Plan Filename: Admella_drive.qgs Aerial from Google, 2016 Revision: REV A Date: 19/12/2016 Figure 3.1 Drawn: MTB Page | 40
Legend
Extent of Site Test Pit Locations Approximate Extent of Excavation
4 0 4 8 12 m Frank Brennan Consulting Services
Job Number: 20161432 Data Acknowledgement: Lot 13 Admella Drive Filename: Admella_drive.qgs Aerial from Google, 2016 Site Plan Revision: REV A Date: 19/12/2016 Drawn: MTB Figure 3.2 Page | 41
3.3 Site Operations and Facilities Currently the eastern portion of the site is used as a residential dwelling with a shed. The western portion of the site is used as a residential storage area. Historically sand was excavated from the centre of the site and backfilled with uncontrolled fill. Some of the materials which were disposed of include: Demolition rubble; Soils from other sites; White goods; Steel; Concrete; Plastic bags with labelling “caution asbestos”; Plastics; and Treated timber. The steel, plastic, timber and white goods were removed from the excavation area and recycled.
3.4 Historical CT Search A review of the historic certificate of titles (CT) found that the original CT was owned by 5 different people before the title was transferred to Verdun Charles in 1948 who was a labourer by trade. The title was then transferred to Dean Muggleton in 1978, who was a grazier by trade. Dean Muggleton owned the property until 2001, when the property was transferred to individuals. In 2013 the property was transferred to Lipson Reef Pty Ltd. Lipson Reef Pty Ltd are listed online as owning a restaurant in Beachport. A summary of the historic certificate of titles is presented in Appendix A.
3.5 Aerial Photography Review Aerial photographs were obtained from 1950 and 1982 and Google Earth images from 2003, 2010, 2012 and 2014. They were inspected in order to assess land use changes over time in both the subject site and adjacent land. Copies of the historical aerial photographs from 1950 and 1982 are included in Appendix B. Details of the aerial photographs inspected during this investigation are summarised below in Table 3.2 Table 3.2 Summary of Aerial Photography
Date Scale Survey Comments
13/12/1950 1:32000 53 The site is undeveloped and appears to be covered in sand dunes and vegetation. There is no infrastructure or development in the vicinity of the site, with only an unsealed road to the west and south. Approximately 700m to the south of the site, is Rivoli Bay. Approximately 750m to the west of the site, beyond the unsealed road is Lake George. The township of Beachport has been established to the south west of the site. 03/03/1982 1:40000 2824 The site and surrounding areas have been developed into large rural residences with houses and large portions which are either vacant or have been developed into pasture. Gravel roads have been constructed to service the few residences in the vicinity of the site. Bitumen roads have been constructed to Beachport
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 7 Page | 42
Date Scale Survey Comments
2003 Google Map Image The site is a vacant pasture area. Additional rural residences have been constructed around the site, with large portions of land which are either vacant or pasture. Some of the roads servicing the rural residences have been bituminised. A business has been constructed to the near west of the property. It appears as though the property is some sort of industrial business evident by the driveways which allow for trucks to enter and turn and the silos/tanks adjacent a large shed. Anecdotally it is thought that the business is Beachport Liquid Minerals which manufacture and distribute liquid livestock supplements for cattle, sheep and horses. Development has continued at Beachport. 2010 Google Map Image The site has been split into its current configuration, with two allotments, separated by a fence. On the eastern allotment a house and shed with a driveway has been constructed. There are signs of irrigation of lawn on the site, as there are areas of green lawn. The western portion of the site is undeveloped, but with signs of some activity at the site, evident by the light sand/gravel surface. Development of rural residences has continued in the vicinity of the site, although the properties directly adjacent to the site remain vacant/undeveloped. Most rural properties have a portion of vacant land or pasture around the dwelling. The industrial site to the west has continued to develop with the installation of additional silos/tanks. 2012 Google Map Image The eastern portion of the site has remained the same as the 2010 image. A shed is under construction/has been constructed on the western portion of the site. It also appears that the areas around the shed are being utilised as a laydown/storage area. Development of rural residences has continued in the vicinity of the site, although the properties directly adjacent to the site remain vacant/undeveloped. Most rural properties have a portion of vacant land or pasture around the dwelling. The industrial site to the west is the same as the 2010 image. 2014 Google Map Image The eastern portion of the site has remained the same as the 2010 image. The site has a shed on the western portion of the site with laydown/storage adjacent. It appears as though excavation has commenced on the western portion of the site. This is evident by the sand at the surface and the uneven nature of the surface. Development of rural residences has continued in the vicinity of the site, although the properties directly adjacent to the site remain vacant/undeveloped. Most rural properties have a portion of vacant land or pasture around the dwelling. The industrial site to the west is the same as the 2010 image
3.6 Services & Service Providers (DBYD) A search of the Dial Before You Dig (DBYD) information has confirmed the absence of SA Water infrastructure on-site and in the vicinity of the site. Wastewater in Beachport is managed through a Community Wastewater Management System (CWMS) which is run by council. Anecdotal evidence provided by Frank Brennan indicates that the dwelling on the eastern portion of the site is not connected to this system and has a septic tank and associated soakage trench located to the north west of the building. It is anticipated that future developments would be connected to this CWMS service. This search confirmed site inspection observations that there is overhead power bordering the site on both Rivoli Drive and Admella Drive. Low voltage power enters the site from the Admella drive overhead power poles to both the eastern and western portion of the site. The western
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 8 Page | 43
portion of the site appears to have two low voltage lines running into the property from two power poles. The DBYD searches confirmed that there is Telstra infrastructure in the vicinity of the site and on the site. The Telstra infrastructure runs along both Rivoli Drive and Admella Drive. A Telstra line runs from a junction located at the intersection of Rivoli Drive and Admella Drive onto the site. The Telstra line runs from the south-eastern corner of the site towards the north-western corner of the site. The DBYD search indicated that SA Water have no assets in the vicinity of the site, indicating that potable water would need to be sourced from rainwater tanks, groundwater or purchased from a supplier. DBYD plans are presented in Appendix A.
3.7 Regional Geology The site is in close proximity to the coast with the geology in the area being comprised of deep flat lying sands and sand sheets and meadow podsols and Osborne high sea level marine deposits. The surface soils in the area around Rivoli Bay are part of the Rivoli land system which consists of a series of parallel, narrow, low unconsolidated coastal sand ridges and depressions or swales. The soils in the vicinity of the site consists of low dunes, which are mostly vegetated and stable. Less than 10% of this area are swales with wet deep sands or occasionally peat. The soils are typified by highly calcareous loamy sands which range from brown to yellow in colour. They are young, mildly leached soils which have originated from shelly sea-floor sediments. Regional geology maps are presented in Appendix A.
3.8 Regional Hydrogeology The site is located on the Limestone Coast in the prescribed well area of lower south east, Rivoli Bay. Lake George is located approximately 700m to the west of the site and has permanent water supplied but outflows to the sea are limited. The Limestone Coast is the major groundwater province in South Australia, with large supplies of relatively good quality groundwater. In the Limestone Coast region, groundwater is the primary source of water for irrigation, industry, stock and domestic use. Groundwater resources in the region are contained within two regionally extensive aquifer systems, an upper unconfined aquifer and a deeper confined aquifer. The unconfined aquifer is the principal source of groundwater for the Limestone Coast and is used for municipal supplies for towns, stock and domestic water, industrial use, and widespread irrigation. The quality of the unconfined groundwater resources varies across the region but is generally of good quality and bores accessing this aquifer generally have high yields.3 Groundwater flow directions are generally towards the coast and in the vicinity of the site is expected to flow in a west to south-westerly direction. A search of the groundwater bores on the water connect web site4 reveals that there are 55 groundwater wells within 1.0 km of the site. The majority of the wells have a listed purpose as domestic. The recorded standing water level in the wells ranges from 0.76 m to 5.3 m, showing that the water within the unconfined aquifer in the vicinity of the site is shallow. Salinity within the shallow aquifer ranges from 446 mg/L to 3,333 mg/L, although the salinity in most wells is below 1000 mg/L. The low salinity in the groundwater means that it is generally suitable for potable, irrigation and stock uses. There are three groundwater wells assumed to be down hydraulic gradient. These three wells do not have details on the purpose of them however it is possible that they are for domestic purposes. Water connect searches are presented in Appendix A.
3 Pirsa (2013), Water Resources of the Limestone Coast 4 Water Connect, https://www.waterconnect.sa.gov.au/Systems/GD/Pages/Default.aspx, accessed 16 December 2016
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 9 Page | 44
3.9 EPA Section 7 Search A search of the South Australia Environmental Protection Authority (SA EPA) records under Section 7 of the Land and Business (Sale and Conveyancing) Act 1994 indicated that no known potentially contaminating activities have been reported on the title area. The SA EPA search results are included in Appendix A.
3.10 Potential PCA and Sources Based on review of the environmental site history information gathered to date, potentially contaminating activities that may have, or are occurring at the site and/or in the site vicinity include:
On-site Activities (Past and Current) Agricultural activities; Imported materials (uncontrolled filling of the historical excavation); Use of herbicides/pesticides for land maintenance; Use of fertilisers and other chemicals for agricultural use; and Onsite septic system.
Off-site Activities (Past and Current) Farming practices; Property maintenance; Runoff and dust from adjacent industrial property; and Offsite septic systems.
3.10.1 Contaminants of Potential Concern Contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) associated with the site historical and current uses and offsite historical and current uses may include, but are not limited to the following: Heavy Metals; Polycyclic aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs); Organochlorine pesticides, organophosphorus pesticides (OCPs/OPPs); Hydrocarbons; Asbestos; Nutrients; and Pathogens.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 10 Page | 45
4 Preliminary Conceptual Site Model (CSM) A preliminary Conceptual Site Model (CSM) has been formulated utilising available information gathered as part of this investigation. This is an iterative CSM and was prepared to determine the presence of plausible exposure pathways to the proposed development and hence the presence of significant risk to susceptible receptors such as humans, ecosystems and the built environment. For a significant or identifiable risk to exist an exposure pathway must be present which requires each of the following to be identified: Known and potential sources of contamination and contaminants of concern including the mechanism(s) of contamination (e.g. ‘top down’ spill or sub-surface release from corroded tank or pipe); Potentially affected media (soil, sediment, groundwater, surface water, indoor and ambient air); Human and ecological receptors; and Potential and complete exposure pathways. In the absence of a plausible exposure pathway there is no risk. Therefore, the presence of measurable concentrations of contaminants does not automatically imply that the site will cause harm. The nature and importance of both receptors and exposure routes, which are relevant to any particular site, will vary according to its characteristics, intended end-use and its environmental setting.
4.1 Potential Sources
The site history review has identified potential site contamination issues associated with known or possible historical activities on the site and the surrounding areas. Potential site specific sources of contamination to the allotments are that of: Imported materials (uncontrolled filling of the historical excavation); Onsite septic system; Historic site development, including the building of a shed and hardstand areas and associated importation of fill; and Agricultural activities, including pesticides and herbicides for land maintenance and use of fertilisers. Potential off site sources of contamination to the site are that of: Farming practices (including animal burial); Property maintenance; Runoff and dust from adjacent industrial property; and Offsite septic systems.
4.2 Potential Exposure Routes The main exposure routes relevant for the site that could be feasible in terms of the end use of the site are as follows: Through direct skin contact and/or ingestion of potentially contaminated soil/asbestos; Through direct skin contact with impacted groundwater;
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 11 Page | 46
Surface water infiltration leading to downward leaching of contaminants within shallow soils and potentially into the underlying groundwater system; and Groundwater extraction for domestic use leading to direct contact and ingestion.
4.3 Potential Receptors
Based on the potential sources of contamination identified at the site to date, the following key site-specific potential receptors may be considered for this site: Future site users and workers, including (but not limited to), construction, excavation and maintenance workers via ingestion and direct contact with impacted soil, and inhalation of generated dust; Users of groundwater in the site vicinity; and Surface water ecosystems.
4.4 Plausible Exposure Pathways
On the basis of the available information gathered as part of the environmental site history investigation to date, the CSM and key plausible exposure pathways in terms of conditions known prior to any intrusive assessment, is provided in Table 4.1.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 12 Page | 47
Table 4.1 Preliminary Conceptual Site Model – Current Site
Possible Potential Transport Hazard / Source of Contaminants of Exposure Key Areas Affected Mechanisms and Exposure Potential Receptors Contamination Potential Concern Pathway # Routes
Western portion of the Direct contact, ingestion, inhalation (via Users of the site, ground workers, Heavy metals, PAHs, site where historic volatilisation, dust) migration of water maintenance/excavation workers, 1 Imported fill materials/filling hydrocarbons, herbicides/ excavation and filling through soil to groundwater and surface water ecosystems and pesticides, asbestos occurred migration of gas through soil groundwater
Soil beneath the soakage Faecal Coliforms, E,coli, Total pit, located in the north Coliforms, Ammonia, BOD, Groundwater, soil in Septic tank and soakage west of the eastern Infiltration and migration of water 2 TOC, Nitrogen (Nitrate + vicinity/beneath soakage trench trench portion of the site and through soil to groundwater Nitrite), Oxidised Nitrogen, and users of groundwater. the groundwater beneath Urea, Heavy metals the site
Direct contact, ingestion, particulate Users of the site, ground workers, Distribution across Herbicides/pesticides & inhalation, plant root uptake, surface maintenance/excavation workers, 3 Historic farming practices shallow and sub surface animal burial water migration of water through soil to surface water ecosystems and soils groundwater groundwater
Southern portion of site, Users of the site, ground workers, Direct contact, ingestion, particulate associated with the shed, maintenance/excavation workers, 4 Historic Site Development Heavy metals inhalation, surface water migration of storage bays and surface water ecosystems and water through soil to groundwater hardstand areas groundwater
Direct contact, ingestion, particulate Users of the site, ground workers, Heavy metals, herbicides/ Distribution across site Off-site Activities surrounding inhalation, plant root uptake, surface maintenance/excavation workers, 5 pesticides, nutrients, from dust in the air or the site water migration of water through soil to surface water ecosystems and Microbes surface water runoff groundwater groundwater
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 13 Page | 48
5 Soil Analytical Results
5.1 Sampling Methodology An intrusive investigation at the site was undertaken on 5 December 2016. The intrusive investigation targeted the former excavation and filling which occurred on the western portion of the site. A total of 8 test pits were excavated using a backhoe in a grid based formation across the historic excavation area. The different lithologies encountered were logged and one sample taken from each layer. The test pits were excavated to a depth where natural soil was encountered to delineate any fill materials encountered. 7 test pits were dug within the former excavation and one outside the excavation area to confirm natural conditions (TP8). Figure 3.2 shows the location of the test pits. All samples were sent to MGT Eurofins (MGT) under Tonkin Consulting’s chain of custody procedures. 8 primary samples and one intra-laboratory duplicate sample were analysed for TRH/ BTEXN/ PAH/ OCP/ OPP/ As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn and Hg. MGT Eurofins is NATA accredited for the analysis requested. Testing for the presence/absence of asbestos was undertaken on 3 samples. Field forms are presented in Appendix C and laboratory reports are presented in Appendix D.
5.2 Soil Lithology Encountered/Extent of Fill A general overview of the soil lithology encountered across the site is presented in Table 5.1. More detailed bore logs and photos are provided in Appendix C and Appendix E. Table 5.1 Site Specific Soil Lithology
Depth Range of Soils Encountered General Site Wide Description (mbgs)
0.0-1.0* FILL – SAND, brown with inclusions of pipe, timber, wire, metal, plastic, tiles, brick and concrete 1.0-2.0* NATURAL – SAND, yellow *Depths of lithology vary across the site and this table highlights the average depths of recorded lithology encountered – refer to bore logs for actual depths
Test pit locations were selected to allow for vertical and horizontal delineation of the fill materials within the excavation. Test pit locations are provided on Figure 3.2. The fill was delineated horizontally to the east by shallow test pit, TP9, to the south by TP8, TP6 to the west and to the north by TP3 which had shallow fill and the exposed excavation face to north. The fill materials were vertically delineated at all locations with the depth of the fill ranged from 0.6 mbgs in TP3 to 1.7 mbgs in TP7. Bore logs and site photographs provided in Appendix C and Appendix E.
5.3 Quality Control and Quality Assurance Quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) measures were undertaken by Tonkin Consulting field personnel during soil sampling. All samples were tracked under Tonkin Consulting chain of custody (COC) procedures. A total of 8 primary soil samples and one intra-laboratory duplicate samples were analysed by MGT. Calculated soil investigation RPDs are presented in the analytical results table presented in Appendix D. RPDs are not able to be calculated where one or both of the samples recorded
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 14 Page | 49
results below the laboratory limit of reporting (LOR). Soil RPDs are generally considered acceptable when they are less than 30% (when concentrations are <10 x LOR) or less than 50% (when concentrations are >10 x LOR). All RPDs were below 20% with the exception of moisture, arsenic and zinc. All of the RPDs are considered acceptable as the concentrations reported were marginally above the laboratory LOR and therefore small changes in actual concentration result in large relative differences. All samples were analysed within laboratory holding times. Review of the available laboratory quality assurance and quality control data accompanying the laboratory reports indicates: No method blank result outliers occurred; No matrix spike outliers occurred; No duplicate outliers occurred; No laboratory control outliers occurred; and The frequency of all laboratory control samples met frequency compliance guidelines. The laboratory results are considered acceptable for the purposes of this report as discussed above.
5.4 Soil Analytical Results The soil analytical results are presented in Appendix D. As the proposed end use of the property is as a residential allotment the NEPM 2013 Health Investigation Level A (Residential) has been adopted. The concentration of all analytes was reported below the laboratory LOR with the exception of metals. Metal concentrations were reported above the laboratory LOR but were below the NEPM 2013 HIL A criteria. Asbestos analysis was also undertaken on the soil. The soil was tested for the presence or absence of asbestos. No asbestos was detected in any of the three samples tested (TP02-1, TP05-1, TP07-1). The soil results do not exceed the NEPM HIL A criteria and would not preclude the development of the site for the intended rural living zoning.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 15 Page | 50
6 Updated Conceptual Site Model Following the investigations completed to date the preliminary Conceptual Site Model (CSM) has been updated utilising information gathered as part of the intrusive investigation.
6.1 Potential Sources The site history review has identified potential site contamination issues associated with known or possible historical activities on the site and the surrounding areas. Potential site specific sources of contamination to the allotments are that of: Imported materials (uncontrolled filling of the historical excavation); Historic site development, including the building of a shed and hardstand areas and associated importation of fill; and Historic agricultural activities, including use of pesticides and herbicides for land maintenance. Potential off site sources of contamination to the site are that of: Farming practices; Property maintenance; and Offsite septic systems.
6.2 Potential Exposure Routes The main exposure routes relevant for the site that could be feasible in terms of the end use of the site are as follows: Through direct skin contact and/or ingestion of potentially contaminated soil/asbestos; Through direct skin contact with impacted groundwater; and Groundwater extraction for domestic use leading to direct contact and ingestion.
6.3 Potential Receptors Based on the potential sources of contamination identified at the site to date, the following key site-specific potential receptors may be considered for this site: Future residents in Rural Living setting; Site workers, including (but not limited to) construction, excavation and maintenance workers via accidental ingestion and direct contact with contaminated groundwater, impacted surface water; Current or future users of groundwater in the site vicinity including for potable use; and Ecological receptors such as groundwater dependent ecosystems.
6.4 Plausible Exposure Pathways On the basis of the available information and risk evaluation undertaken to date, the key possible exposure pathways with the CSM are provided in Table 6.1.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 16 Page | 51
Table 6.1 Updated Conceptual Site Model
Possible Potential Hazard / Contaminants of Exposure Transport Potential Receptors Plausible Exposure Pathway Source of Potential Key Areas Affected Pathway Mechanisms and (Rural Living) (Rural Living) Contamination Concern # Exposure Routes Limited to historic excavation and Not likely given delineation of filling filling. Concentrations identified and chemical concentrations below the Heavy metals, PAHs, within excavation area were below NEPM HIL A guideline and no asbestos Imported fill hydrocarbons, NIL – of the area 1 the nominated NEPM HIL NIL detected in soils analysed. materials/filling herbicides/ investigated Residential criteria and not pesticides, asbestos asbestos was detected in soils sampled
No evidence was gathered to Historical application of herbicides and suggest animal burial occurred at pesticides would likely be due to Direct contact, Users of the site, ground the site. Herbicide and pesticide recent land maintenance activities ingestion, particulate workers, distribution across shallow and sub given previous grazing activities not Historic farming Herbicides/pesticides, inhalation surface maintenance/excavation 2 surface soils is likely to be limited to uncommon for residential land practices animal burial water migration of workers, surface water recent domestic levels given applications. Animal burial is more water through soil to ecosystems and historical grazing use and was not likely to occur at locations in proximity groundwater groundwater investigated as part of this to animal shelters/feeding location and investigation not likely near two joining roads.
Southern portion of site, associated Importation of virgin material in the with the shed, storage bays and southern portion of the site is likely to Direct contact, Users of the site, ground hardstand areas is expected to be be surficial in nature and not a major ingestion, particulate workers, virgin material sourced from local source of contamination. Historic Site inhalation, surface maintenance/excavation 3 Heavy metals quarry for the purpose of creating a Development water migration of workers, surface water trafficable entrance to the site, water through soil to ecosystems and therefore was not investigated as a groundwater groundwater major source of potential contamination
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 17 Page | 52
Possible Potential Hazard / Contaminants of Exposure Transport Potential Receptors Plausible Exposure Pathway Source of Potential Key Areas Affected Pathway Mechanisms and (Rural Living) (Rural Living) Contamination Concern # Exposure Routes Faecal Coliforms, No current extraction of groundwater. E,coli, Total Located on the eastern portion, not Future users of groundwater are Coliforms, Ammonia, considered to impact on soil on the NIL – groundwater not reminded that SA Health advise that Septic tank and Future users of 4 BOD, TOC, Nitrogen western portion not investigated as currently extracted at bore water should not be used for any soakage trench groundwater. (Nitrate + Nitrite), it is outside historical excavation the site. purpose, unless it has been tested and Oxidised Nitrogen, and filling area) shown to be suitable for that use Urea, Heavy metals
No current extraction of groundwater. Heavy metals, Future users of groundwater are Off-site Activities NIL – groundwater not herbicides/ Groundwater migration beneath Future users of reminded that SA Health advise that 5 surrounding the currently extracted at pesticides, nutrients, site groundwater. bore water should not be used for any site the site. microbes purpose, unless it has been tested and shown to be suitable for that use
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 18 Page | 53
7 Discussion The PSI has been undertaken at the request of the client focusing on the historic excavation and uncontrolled filling which occurred at the site. The historic excavation activities at the site involved the excavation of sand and backfilling with a range of materials including: Demolition rubble; Soils from other sites; White goods; Steel; Concrete; Plastic bags with labelling “caution asbestos”; Plastics; and Treated timber. The site was inspected by EPA officers after council’s inspection of the property in April 2015 and it was confirmed that the plastic bags marked “Caution Asbestos” contained broken concrete material and not asbestos material. The steel; plastic; timber and white goods were recovered from the excavated area and recycled to the Beachport Resource Recovery facility in accordance with the recommendation from the EPA. Upon investigation of the site additional possible exposure scenarios not related to the historic excavation activities have been discovered, however these are not expected to preclude the site from use for rural living as described below in greater detail.
7.1 Possible Exposure Scenarios
7.1.1 Possible Exposure Pathway #1 Historically excavation and filling with a range of different materials has occurred on the site. The extent of the excavation is limited to a section in the middle of the western portion of the site as shown on Figure 3.2. Intrusive investigations targeted the historic activities. Analytical results from the intrusive investigations were below the nominated NEPM HIL Residential criteria and no asbestos was detected. As the analytical results were below the adopted criteria it is considered that chemical contamination does not exist and therefore no pathway to future receptors.
7.1.2 Possible Exposure Pathway #2 A potential exposure pathway which was identified through the investigation was historic farming practices at the site. The contaminants of concern from the historic farming practices were pesticides and herbicides used for land maintenance. Any pesticides or herbicides used on the land would have been applied broadly and be limited to the near surface. The analytical results collected did not detect any pesticides or herbicides in any samples. Although a grid based assessment across the entire site was not undertaken as part of this assessment it is considered unlikely that any potential pesticides or herbicides from historic farming practices would preclude the property from use under the current rural living zoning.
7.1.3 Possible Exposure Pathway #3 Some historic site development has occurred which has included the construction of a shed, a laydown area and hardstand area. These areas to the south of the western portion of the site. The source of the potential contamination is the importation of fill. The hardstand areas have been covered in gravel, which is likely to be an imported virgin material which has been sourced locally. The surrounding rural living allotments appear to have similar materials to create access
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 19 Page | 54
to their sites and it is considered unlikely that contamination from the imported fill would preclude the property from the proposed rural living use.
7.1.4 Possible Exposure Pathway #4 A septic system was anecdotally reported to exist to the north west of the dwelling on the eastern allotment which would service the associated infrastructure on that property. Septic systems and associated soakage trenches are designed to drain away septic waters and in this case potentially to groundwater. The risk that may exist in the future is if groundwater is extracted for potable use, however there is no current groundwater well on site therefore no pathway from the source to the receptor. The findings of this investigation do not include assessment of groundwater beneath the site, however installation of groundwater bores and access to groundwater may be permitted on the proposed residential allotment following the appropriate application process. If groundwater extraction is proposed future users are reminded that SA Health advise that bore water should not be used for any purpose, unless it has been tested and shown to be suitable for that use.
7.1.5 Possible Exposure Pathway #5 Groundwater could be affected by current or historic land use on surrounding properties and the risk that may exist in the future is if groundwater is extracted for potable use. There is no current groundwater well on site therefore no pathway from the source to the receptor. The findings of this investigation do not include assessment of groundwater beneath the site, however installation of groundwater bores and access to groundwater may be permitted on the proposed residential allotment following the appropriate application process. If groundwater extraction is proposed future users are reminded that SA Health advise that bore water should not be used for any purpose, unless it has been tested and shown to be suitable for that use.
7.2 Inherent Uncertainties The development of a CSM and assessment of the potential historical contamination has been undertaken to help address issues that may affect the viability of the development for the proposed rural living land use. The PSI has addressed the major concern identified by council (historical excavation filling) however the following inherent uncertainties remain: A targeted assessment of the most likely source of gross contamination and most likely chemicals of concern was undertaken based on historical searches. Additional grid based assessment across the entire site will increase the coverage and reduce potential omissions however this inherent uncertainty will always exist regardless of the intensity of investigation; and Groundwater conditions were not assessed as part of this investigation and hence remain unknown.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 20 Page | 55
8 Conclusions
8.1 Conclusions Tonkin Consulting has performed an Environmental Site History (ESH) as part of a Preliminary Site Investigation for a portion of Deposited plan 58206 Allotment 13 within the Certificate of Title (CT) Volume 5864 Folio 196 located at 42 Rivoli Drive, Beachport, South Australia, 5280. A site inspection and desktop review of historical information has identified or inferred a number of potentially contaminating activities to have occurred at the site or within the surrounding vicinity of the site. These activities include: Imported materials which were put in the excavation; Historic site development, including the building of a shed and hardstand areas and associated importation of fill; Historic agricultural activities, including use of pesticides and herbicides for land maintenance; and Offsite septic systems. Based on the CSM and the PSI findings, it is concluded that potentially contaminating activities have occurred on the subject site, in the form of uncontrolled filling of the excavation in the centre of the site. Following the intrusive investigation which targeted the former excavation, no contaminants were found at levels exceeding the nominated NEPM HIL Residential criteria, nor was any asbestos detected. Other onsite sources of potential contamination include imported fill from development of hardstand areas and the shed on the site, pesticides and herbicides from historic farming activities. Although a grid based assessment across the entire site was not undertaken as part of this assessment it is considered unlikely that any potential pesticides or herbicides from historic farming practices would preclude the property from use under the current rural living zoning. The surrounding rural living allotments appear to have similar materials to create access to their sites and it is considered unlikely that contamination from the imported fill would preclude the property from the proposed rural living use. Offsite sources of contamination may be present beneath the site through the movement of groundwater beneath the site. No groundwater bore is currently located on the site; however, this may change in the future. The findings of this investigation do not include assessment of groundwater beneath the site, however installation of groundwater bores and access to groundwater may be permitted on the proposed residential allotment following the appropriate application process. If groundwater extraction is proposed future users are reminded that SA Health advise that bore water should not be used for any purpose, unless it has been tested and shown to be suitable for that use. The land is zoned as rural living and currently has a dwelling located to the eastern side of the central fence being utilised as a domestic premise. The intent to divide and develop the western portion of the title for future rural living does not change the land use however does increase the potential sensitivity. This report does not identify any potential contamination that would preclude the future use of the site for rural living. A statement of suitability can only be provided by an EPA accredited auditor via a site contamination audit report. In the event that the client or council requests this statement additional investigations may be required.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 21 Page | 56
9 Statement of Limitations Tonkin Consulting has prepared this Preliminary Site Investigation – Environmental Site History Investigation to provide a preliminary potential site contamination assessment for the subject site. The report is based on our interpretation of targeted information gathered during our investigations and has been undertaken in accordance with good professional practice and current requirements. The results of this process are set out in this report and any conclusions we have made must be considered in this light. The scope of the investigations is in general accordance with current standards applied by the relevant authority at the date of the report. It must be recognised that standards for environmental performance are regularly reviewed and the results indicated in the report should therefore be reviewed in the light of changing standards. A qualified person should always be contacted to advise on any matters involving the interpretation of the report. This report was prepared for the client, on the basis of agreed parameters. Tonkin Consulting takes no responsibility for any reliance a third party places on this report or any of its conclusions. If a third party wants to determine the environmental conditions of the site, the services of an appropriately qualified expert should be retained.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 22 Page | 57
Appendix A
Searches
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation Page | 58 Title History Lot 13 Admella Road, Beachport
Title Reference Date Owner Comments CT 481/131 6/7/1881 Friedrich Ernst Rudolph 10/6/1883 Peter Sinclair 1/03/1905 William Edward Osbourne 26/03/1917 John Humphries 12/07/1922 Arthur William Henry Chant 23/02/1948 Verdun Charles Evans Labourer CT 2167/185 27/09/1951 Verdun Charles Evans Labourer CT 4118/325 1/06/1978 Dean Graham Muggleton Grazier CT4124/986 30/08/1978 Dean Graham Muggleton Grazier CT 4128/779 25/10/1978 Dean Graham Muggleton Grazier CT 5501/275 10/02/1998 Dean Graham Muggleton Grazier 13/06/2001 Norman kym Sutherland, Jocelyn Christine Sutherland, Jabanksia Pty Ltd CT 4128/778 25/10/1978 Dean Graham Muggleton Grazier CT 5501/270 10/02/1998 Dean Graham Muggleton Grazier 13/06/2001 Norman kym Sutherland, Jocelyn Christine Sutherland, Jabanksia Pty Ltd CT 5864/196 9/01/2002 Norman kym Sutherland, Jocelyn Christine Sutherland, Jabanksia Pty Ltd 27/05/2005 Christopher Bryan Hoffmann, Pamela Dawn Hoffmann 19/02/2013 Lipson Reef Pty Ltd
2016.1432 Page | 59 Page | 60 Page | 61 Page | 62 Page | 63 Page | 64 Page | 65 Page | 66 Page | 67 Page | 68 Page | 69 Product Child Parent Title Search Date/Time 01/12/2016 03:42PM
Certificate of Title Title Reference: CT 5501/270 Status: CANCELLED Parent Title(s): CT 4128/778 Dealing(s) Creating Title: CONVERTED TITLE Title Issued: 10/02/1998 Title Cancelled: 09/01/2002 Edition: 2 Child Titles
Title Reference Status Estate Type Plan / Parcel Proprietors/Lessees/ Custodians at time of issue CT 5864/194 CANCELLED Fee Simple D58206 Allotment 11 JOCELYN CHRISTINE SUTHERLAND JABANKSIA PTY. LTD. NORMAN KYM SUTHERLAND CT 5864/195 CANCELLED Fee Simple D58206 Allotment 12 JABANKSIA PTY. LTD. NORMAN KYM SUTHERLAND JOCELYN CHRISTINE SUTHERLAND CT 5864/196 CURRENT Fee Simple D58206 Allotment 13 JABANKSIA PTY. LTD. NORMAN KYM SUTHERLAND JOCELYN CHRISTINE SUTHERLAND CT 5864/197 CURRENT Fee Simple D58206 Allotment 14 NORMAN KYM SUTHERLAND JABANKSIA PTY. LTD. JOCELYN CHRISTINE SUTHERLAND
Land Services Page 1 of 1 Copyright Privacy Disclaimer: www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showCopyright www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showPrivacyStatement www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showDisclaimer Page | 70 Page | 71 Page | 72 Product Historical Search (Cancelled Title) Date/Time 01/12/2016 03:50PM
Certificate of Title Title Reference: CT 5501/275 Status: CANCELLED Parent Title(s): CT 4128/779 Dealing(s) Creating CONVERTED TITLE Title: Title Issued: 10/02/1998 Title Cancelled: 09/01/2002 Child Title(s): CT 5864/195, CT 5864/196 Edition: 2 Dealings
Lodgement Completion Dealing Dealing Type Dealing Details Date Date Number Status 02/10/2001 10/01/2002 9188675 UNCERTIFIED Registered NORMAN KYM SUTHERLAND, APPLICATION JOCELYN CHRISTINE FOR DEPOSIT SUTHERLAND, OF A PLAN OF JABANKSIA PTY. LTD. (ACN: DIVISION 096 368 320) 23/04/2001 13/06/2001 9085142 MORTGAGE Registered COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 23/04/2001 13/06/2001 9085141 MORTGAGE Registered COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 23/04/2001 13/06/2001 9085140 TRANSFER Registered NORMAN KYM SUTHERLAND, JOCELYN CHRISTINE SUTHERLAND, JABANKSIA PTY. LTD. (ACN: 096 368 320) 23/04/2001 13/06/2001 9085139 APPOINTMENT Registered KAY MICHELLE MUGGLETON OF NEW (TRST), TRUSTEES HELEN MARY MUGGLETON (TRST), ROBERT MICHAEL KENNEDY (TRST)
Land Services Page 1 of 1 Copyright Privacy Disclaimer: www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showCopyright www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showPrivacyStatement www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showDisclaimer Page | 73 Product Historical Search Date/Time 01/12/2016 03:32PM
Certificate of Title Title Reference: CT 5864/196
Status: CURRENT
Parent Title(s): CT 5501/270, CT 5501/275
Dealing(s) Creating RTU 9188675 Title:
Title Issued: 09/01/2002
Edition: 7 Dealings
Lodgement Completion Dealing Dealing Type Dealing Details Date Date Number Status
31/01/2013 19/02/2013 11886627 MORTGAGE Registered NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD.
31/01/2013 19/02/2013 11886626 TRANSFER Registered LIPSON REEF PTY. LTD. (ACN: 146 872 479)
31/01/2013 19/02/2013 11886625 DISCHARGE Registered 10219430 OF MORTGAGE 10719854 10885769
22/01/2008 14/02/2008 10885769 MORTGAGE Registered AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD.
07/06/2007 03/07/2007 10719854 MORTGAGE Registered AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD.
06/05/2005 27/05/2005 10219430 MORTGAGE Registered AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD.
06/05/2005 27/05/2005 10219429 TRANSFER Registered CHRISTOPHER BRYAN HOFFMANN, PAMELA DAWN HOFFMANN
30/07/2004 10/08/2004 10038253 DISCHARGE Registered 9502362 OF MORTGAGE
08/01/2003 10/02/2003 9502362 MORTGAGE Registered ADELAIDE BANK LTD. (ACN: 061 461 550)
08/01/2003 10/02/2003 9502359 DISCHARGE Registered 9085141 OF MORTGAGE 9085142
23/04/2001 13/06/2001 9085142 MORTGAGE Registered COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
23/04/2001 13/06/2001 9085141 MORTGAGE Registered COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
Land Services Page 1 of 1 Copyright Privacy Disclaimer: www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showCopyright www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showPrivacyStatement www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showDisclaimer Page | 74 Page | 75 Page | 76 Page | 77 Page | 78 Page | 79 Page | 80 Page | 81 Page | 82 Page | 83 Page | 84 Page | 85 Page | 86 Page | 87 Page | 88 Page | 89 Page | 90 Page | 91 Page | 92 Page | 93 Page | 94 Page | 95 Page | 96 Page | 97 Page | 98 Page | 99
MAP WatR/4 Adjoins
4 4 6 6 6 6
6$08(/: $<'5
0&/$&+/$1'5
$ $ $ 5 6 '
'
2
$ $ 2 $ : $ $ PrPro $ $ * $ 6 1 6 ,
5 6 $ 6 *(/7:22''5 $ $ $ 6 $ 6 6 6 $ $ 6 6 6 6 5 6 $ ' ,
$ /
$ $ 2 6
9
$ , $ 5 6 6 $ 6 $ 6 6 6 6
'
$ 5 '0 ( ' // 6 $' 1 MAP 5 $ 6 /
6 6 6 6 6 , 6 6
6 6 .
5 8 WatR
RuL % $ 6 6 $ 6 2 8 7 + 6 $ Adjoi /4 6 ( 5 1 6 $ $
$ $ 3 2 $ $ 5 ns 7 6 $ $
MAP WatR/4Adjoins 6 6
$ $ + : $ 6 < In 6
$ CstCon 6
Land Not Within a Council Area (Coastal Waters) 6 &RXQFLO%RXQGDU\LVVHDFRDVW ORZZDWHUPDUN
MAP WatR/4 Adjoins
/DPEHUWV&RQIRUPDO&RQLF3URMHFWLRQ*'$
P
BEACHPORT ENVIRONS Zones &VW&RQ &RDVWDO&RQVHUYDWLRQ ,Q ,QGXVWU\ Zone Map WatR/21 3U3UR 3ULPDU\3URGXFWLRQ 5X/ 5XUDO/LYLQJ =RQH%RXQGDU\ WATTLE RANGE COUNCIL 'HYHORSPHQW3ODQ%RXQGDU\ &RQVROLGDWHG)HEUXDU\ Page | 100 Wattle Range Council Zone Section Rural Living Zone
Rural Living Zone
5HIHUWRWKH0DS5HIHUHQFH7DEOHVIRUDOLVWRIWKHPDSVWKDWUHODWHWRWKLV]RQH OBJECTIVES
$]RQHFRQVLVWLQJRIODUJHDOORWPHQWVGHWDFKHGGZHOOLQJVDQGUXUDODFWLYLWLHVWKDWGRQRWDGYHUVHO\ LPSDFWWKHDPHQLW\RIWKHORFDOLW\
PRINCIPLES OF DEVELOPMENT CONTROL
Land Use 7KHIROORZLQJIRUPVRIGHYHORSPHQWDUHHQYLVDJHGLQWKH]RQH
ƒ GHWDFKHGGZHOOLQJ ƒ GRPHVWLFRXWEXLOGLQJLQDVVRFLDWLRQZLWKDGHWDFKHGGZHOOLQJ ƒ GRPHVWLFVWUXFWXUH ƒ GZHOOLQJDGGLWLRQ ƒ IDUPLQJ ƒ IDUPEXLOGLQJ ƒ VWDEOH 'HYHORSPHQWOLVWHGDVQRQFRPSO\LQJLVJHQHUDOO\LQDSSURSULDWHDQGQRWDFFHSWDEOHXQOHVVLWFDQEH GHPRQVWUDWHGWKDWLWGRHVQRWXQGHUPLQHWKHREMHFWLYHVDQGSULQFLSOHVRIWKH'HYHORSPHQW3ODQ
7KHUHVKRXOGEHQRPRUHWKDQRQHGZHOOLQJSHUDOORWPHQW
7KHNHHSLQJRIDQLPDOVVKRXOGEHDQFLOODU\WRDQGLQDVVRFLDWLRQZLWKWKHUHVLGHQWLDOXVHRIWKHODQG
7KHNHHSLQJRIKRUVHVVKRXOGRQO\EHXQGHUWDNHQLIWKHKRUVHVDUHDFFRPPRGDWHGZLWKLQDVWDEOHRU VKHOWHUZLWKVXSSOHPHQWDU\IHHGLQJWRPDLQWDLQSDVWXUHFRYHU
Form and Character 2WKHUWKDQIRUGZHOOLQJVGHYHORSPHQWVKRXOGEHVHWEDFNDWOHDVW PHWUHVIURPDQ\URDGIURQWDJH H[FHSWZKHUHIURQWLQJDURDGLGHQWLILHGLQ7DEOH:DW5%XLOGLQJ6HWEDFNVIURP5RDG%RXQGDULHV ZKHUHDQLQFUHDVHGVHWEDFNPD\EHUHTXLUHGWRPLQLPLVHWKHYLVXDOLPSDFWRIGHYHORSPHQW
'ZHOOLQJVVKRXOGEHGHVLJQHGZLWKLQWKHIROORZLQJSDUDPHWHUV
Parameter Value
0LQLPXPVHWEDFNIURPSULPDU\URDGIURQWDJH PHWUHV
0LQLPXPVHWEDFNIURPVHFRQGDU\URDGIURQWDJH PHWUHV
0LQLPXPVHWEDFNIURPVLGHERXQGDULHV PHWUHV
0LQLPXPVHWEDFNIURPUHDU ERXQGDU\ PHWUHV
0D[LPXPVLWHFRYHUDJH SHUFHQW
0D[LPXPEXLOGLQJKHLJKW IURPQDWXUDOJURXQGOHYHO PHWUHV
&RQVROLGDWHG)HEUXDU\ Page | 101 Wattle Range Council Zone Section Rural Living Zone
PRECINCT SPECIFIC PROVISIONS
5HIHUWRWKH0DS5HIHUHQFH7DEOHVIRUDOLVWRIWKHPDSVWKDWUHODWHWRWKHIROORZLQJSUHFLQFWV
Precinct 17 Southend, Hatherleigh, Rocky Camp, Glencoe 7KHGLYLVLRQRIODQGVKRXOGQRWUHVXOWLQWKHFUHDWLRQRIDGGLWLRQDODOORWPHQWV
6HFWLRQVWR +XQGUHGRI5LYROL%D\DW6RXWKHQGVKRXOGEHVXEVWDQWLDOO\GHYHORSHGIRUWKH SULPDU\SXUSRVHVRIWKH]RQHEHIRUHDQ\RWKHUSDUWRIWKHDUHDLVGHYHORSHG
'HYHORSPHQWIRUUXUDOOLYLQJXVHVDW5RFN\&DPSVKRXOGEHFRQILQHGWR6HFWLRQV DQG+XQGUHGRI0RXQW0XLUKHDGZLWKDQ\GHYHORSPHQWRIODQGRXWVLGHWKHVH 6HFWLRQVEHLQJGHIHUUHGXQWLODOOH[LVWLQJXQFRQVWUXFWHGURDGVKDYHEHHQFRPSOHWHGWRDUHDVRQDEOHDOO ZHDWKHUVWDQGDUGDVSDUWRIWKHSURSRVHGGHYHORSPHQW
Precinct 18 Beachport, Penola, Millicent 'HYHORSPHQWVKRXOGEHFDUULHGRXWZKHUHDSSOLFDEOHLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKHFRQFHSWVVKRZQRQ Concept Plan Map WatR/5 – Rural Living DQGConcept Plan Map WatR/7 - Rural Living.
7KHGLYLVLRQRIODQGVKRXOGQRWUHVXOWLQWKHFUHDWLRQRIDGGLWLRQDODOORWPHQWVKDYLQJDQ
D DUHDOHVVWKDQRQHKHFWDUH
E DYHUDJHZLGWKOHVVWKDQSHUFHQWRILWVDYHUDJHGHSWK
'HYHORSPHQWLQWKLV$UHDVKRXOGFRPSULVHGHWDFKHGGZHOOLQJVDQGDVVRFLDWHGRXWEXLOGLQJVRIVLQJOH VWRUH\FRQVWUXFWLRQRQODUJHDOORWPHQWV
)XUWKHUUXUDOOLYLQJGHYHORSPHQWRQ6HFWLRQVWR +XQGUHGRI5LYROL%D\DW%HDFKSRUWVKRXOGQRWEH XQGHUWDNHQXQWLOWKHH[LVWLQJDOORWPHQWVKDYHEHHQVXEVWDQWLDOO\GHYHORSHGDQGWKHQVKRXOGRQO\ SURFHHGVHTXHQWLDOO\LQFRRUGLQDWHGVWDJHVLQDQRUWKHUO\GLUHFWLRQFRPPHQFLQJIURP6HFWLRQ
5XUDOUHVLGHQWLDOGHYHORSPHQWDW3HQRODDGMDFHQWWRWKH3HQRODE\SDVVVKRXOGEHLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKDOO RIWKHIROORZLQJ
D SURYLGHWKHPLQLPXPVLWHDUHDVSUHVFULEHGH[FOXGLQJDQ\ODQGUHTXLUHGIRUWKHE\SDVV
E HQVXUHQRGLUHFWDFFHVVWRWKHE\SDVV
F EHGHVLJQHGWRPLWLJDWHDQ\DGYHUVHQRLVHLPSDFWV
G EHVHWEDFNDPLQLPXPRIPHWUHVIURPWKHE\SDVV
Precinct 19 Tantanoola, Glencoe 'HYHORSPHQWVKRXOGEHFDUULHGRXWZKHUHDSSOLFDEOHLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKHFRQFHSWVVKRZQRQ Concept Plan Map WatR/6 - Rural Living.
7KHGLYLVLRQRIODQGVKRXOGQRWUHVXOWLQWKHFUHDWLRQRIDGGLWLRQDODOORWPHQWVKDYLQJHLWKHURIWKH IROORZLQJ
D DQDUHDOHVVWKDQKHFWDUHVDQGDIURQWDJHWRDSXEOLFURDGOHVVWKDQSHUFHQWRILWVDYHUDJH GHSWK
E DQDUHDQRWOHVVWKDQWZRKHFWDUHVRUPRUHWKDQIRXUKHFWDUHVDQGDIURQWDJHWRDSXEOLFURDGOHVV WKDQSHUFHQWRILWVDYHUDJHGHSWK
&RQVROLGDWHG)HEUXDU\ Page | 102 Wattle Range Council Zone Section Rural Living Zone
%XVLQHVVDQGFRPPHUFLDOGHYHORSPHQWDW*OHQFRHVKRXOGEHIRFXVHGSULPDULO\DWWKHZHVWHUQHQGRI .LULS5RDG
$OOGZHOOLQJVLQWKLVDUHDVKRXOGEHFRQQHFWHGWRDQDHURELFZDVWHZDWHUWUHDWPHQWV\VWHP
'HYHORSPHQWRI6HFWLRQV DQGSDUW6HFWLRQ+XQGUHGRI+LQGPDUVKVKRXOGWDNHSODFHLQD PDQQHUWKDWDOORZVIRUIXWXUHXUEDQH[SDQVLRQRIWKH7DQWDQRROD7RZQVKLS
Precinct 20 Rendelsham 7KHGLYLVLRQRIODQGVKRXOGQRWWDNHSODFHXQOHVV
D QRDGGLWLRQDODOORWPHQWVDUHFUHDWHG
E WKHODQGGLYLVLRQLQYROYHVERXQGDU\UDWLRQDOL]DWLRQZKHUHWKHQXPEHURIUHVXOWLQJDOORWPHQWVLVQRW JUHDWHUWKDQWKHQXPEHUWKDWH[LVWHGSULRUWRUDWLRQDOL]DWLRQDQGSURYLGHGQRDOORWPHQWKDVDQDUHD OHVVWKDQILYHKHFWDUHV
'HYHORSPHQWVKRXOGWDNHSODFHZLWKDSSURSULDWHUHJDUGEHLQJKDGIRUWKHH[LVWHQFHRIFRQWDPLQDWLRQ GXHWRWKHIRUPHUGHSRVLWLRQRIKRXVHKROGZDVWHVRQODQGGHVFULEHGDV6HFWLRQ+XQGUHGRI5LYROL %D\
PROCEDURAL MATTERS
Complying Development &RPSO\LQJGHYHORSPHQWVDUHSUHVFULEHGLQ6FKHGXOHRIWKHDevelopment Regulations 2008 Non-complying Development 'HYHORSPHQW LQFOXGLQJEXLOGLQJZRUNDFKDQJHLQWKHXVHRIODQGRUGLYLVLRQRIDQDOORWPHQW IRUWKH IROORZLQJLVQRQFRPSO\LQJ Form of Development Exceptions
$GYHUWLVHPHQWDQGRUDGYHUWLVLQJ $GYHUWLVHPHQWDQGRUDGYHUWLVLQJKRDUGLQJZKHUHWKH KRDUGLQJ GHYHORSPHQWDFKLHYHVDWOHDVWRQHRI D RU E D LVDGMDFHQWWRDURDGZLWKDVSHHGOLPLWRIOHVVWKDQ NPK E KDVDQDGYHUWLVHPHQWDUHDRIVTXDUHPHWUHVRUOHVV DQGDFKLHYHVDOORIWKHIROORZLQJ L WKHPHVVDJHFRQWDLQHGWKHUHRQUHODWHVHQWLUHO\WR DODZIXOXVHRIODQG LL WKHDGYHUWLVHPHQWLVHUHFWHGRQWKHVDPH DOORWPHQWDVWKHXVHLWVHHNVWRDGYHUWLVH LLL WKHDGYHUWLVHPHQWZLOOQRWUHVXOWLQPRUHWKDQWZR DGYHUWLVHPHQWVRQWKHDOORWPHQW
$PXVHPHQWPDFKLQHFHQWUH
&RPPHUFLDOIRUHVWU\
&UHPDWRULXP
'DLU\
'ZHOOLQJ ([FHSWGHWDFKHGGZHOOLQJ
)XHOGHSRW
*HQHUDOLQGXVWU\
Page | 103 Wattle Range Council Zone Section Rural Living Zone
Form of Development Exceptions
+RUWLFXOWXUHLQYROYLQJWKHJURZLQJRI ([FHSWZKHUHWKHORFDWLRQIRUWKHJURZLQJRIROLYHVDFKLHYHV D ROLYHV DQG E D DWOHDVWPHWUHVIURPDOORIWKHIROORZLQJ L D1DWLRQDO3DUN LL D&RQVHUYDWLRQ3DUN LLL D:LOGHUQHVV3URWHFWLRQ$UHD LY WKHHGJHRIDVXEVWDQWLDOO\LQWDFWVWUDWXPRIQDWLYH YHJHWDWLRQJUHDWHUWKDQKHFWDUHVLQDUHD E DWOHDVWPHWUHVIURPWKHHGJHRIDVXEVWDQWLDOO\ LQWDFWVWUDWXPRIQDWLYHYHJHWDWLRQKHFWDUHVRUOHVVLQ DUHD
+RWHO
,QGXVWU\
,QWHQVLYHDQLPDONHHSLQJ
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
0DMRUSXEOLFVHUYLFHGHSRW
0RWRUUHSDLUVWDWLRQ
3HWUROILOOLQJVWDWLRQ
5HVWDXUDQW
5RDGWUDQVSRUWWHUPLQDO
6HUYLFHWUDGHSUHPLVHV
6KRSRUJURXSRIVKRSV ([FHSWZKHUHWKHJURVVOHDVDEOHDUHDLVOHVVWKDQVTXDUH PHWUHV
6SHFLDOLQGXVWU\
6WRFNVDOHV\DUG
&RQVROLGDWHG)HEUXDU\ Page | 104 Wattle Range Council Zone Section Rural Living Zone
Form of Development Exceptions
6WRFNVODXJKWHUZRUNV
6WRUH
:DUHKRXVH
:DVWHUHFHSWLRQVWRUDJHWUHDWPHQW RUGLVSRVDO
:UHFNLQJ\DUG Public Notification &DWHJRULHVRISXEOLFQRWLILFDWLRQDUHSUHVFULEHGLQ6FKHGXOH RIWKHDevelopment Regulations 2008 )XUWKHUWKHIROORZLQJIRUPVRIGHYHORSPHQW H[FHSWZKHUHWKHGHYHORSPHQWLVQRQFRPSO\LQJ DUH GHVLJQDWHG Category 1 Category 2
'RPHVWLFRXWEXLOGLQJ
&RQVROLGDWHG)HEUXDU\ Sequence Number:57721741 Page | 105 Date Requested: 14/12/16
Your Request Area is highlighted in pink
Mr Mitchell Browne Tonkin 66 Rundle Street Kent Town SA 5067
Underground cable locations
ASSETS FOUND
Area as Requested: Admella Drive Beachport SA 5280
The process:
1. You made an enquiry with Dial Before You Dig (1100).
2. Dial Before You Dig referred your enquiry to SA Power Networks (South Australia's Distribution Network).
3. SA Power Networks has checked their records and have found underground assets in your request area.
4. Please review the attached Asset Map(s) in regard to your excavation, as there may be some restrictions that apply if your excavation is greater than 300mm below ground level and less than 3.0m from an SA Power Networks Asset. Further explanation of restricted and exclusion zones can be found at http://www.sapowernetworks.com.au/public/download.jsp?id=1775 OR search sapowernetworks.com.au for NICC 404 and by referring to the figure on page 10, 11 or 12.
5. An on-site assessment and/or technical drawings may also be necessary to ascertain the exact cable/asset location. This service can be provided by SA Power Networks and may incur a cost.
6. Please contact your local SA Power Networks Location Officer to schedule work or make further enquiries regarding this request either by return email or the contact number supplied. Other general enquiries can be made on (08) 8292 0218.
7. If you have damaged SA Power Networks Assets immediately notify Faults & Emergencies on 131 366.
Please note: Underground services in the vicinity of any proposed earthworks must be located by hand digging (pot-holing) prior to the commencement of works. Persons conducting works will be held responsible for any resulting loss or damage to the services associated with infrastructure Important information and conditions of use for users of Page | 106 underground services information supplied by SA Power Networks
Indicative information only The accompanying information is intended only to indicate the presence of SA Power Networks' underground services and/or to convey general indicative information in respect of the location marked on the plans. The information does not necessarily provide current, comprehensive or accurate description or location of the underground services or associated infrastructure.
The information may also describe or indicate the presence of underground services or infrastructure not owned by SA Power Networks, for example, electrical services connected to an SA Power Networks' service point. SA Power Networks takes no responsibility for services or infrastructure that is not owned or operated by SA Power Networks or the accuracy or completeness of their description or location in the accompanying information.
Obtaining more technical information from Network for planning or engineering design (non-digging) projects can be arranged through the SA Power Networks Builders and Contractors Electrical Service Line on 1300 650 014.
Identifying the location of underground services Working near or around live electrical cables can be hazardous. An on-site assessment is strongly recommended prior to undertaking ANY works and is necessary to determine the location of the underground services. This can be undertaken by SA Power Networks or an alternative professional locating service provider. Enquiries can be made about SA Power Networks' cable location service by telephoning (08) 8292 0218.
Restrictions may apply in regard to your excavation particularly if your excavation is greater than 300mm below ground level and less than 3.0m from an SA Power Networks asset. Further explanation regarding restricted exclusion zones can be found at http://www.sapowernetworks.com.au/public/download.jsp?id=1775 OR search sapowernetworks.com.au for NICC 404 and by referring to the figures on pages 10, 11 or 12.
Underground services in the vicinity of any proposed earthworks must be located by hand digging (pot-holing) prior to the commencement of the works. Persons conducting works will be held responsible for any resulting loss or damage to the services or associated infrastructure.
Working near high voltage 66kV underground cables Persons intending to conduct earthworks in the vicinity of an SA Power Networks high voltage 66kV underground cable MUST first obtain a site-specific clearance by contacting the SA Power Networks Cable Management Technical Officer on 0403 582 130 or 0403 582 174.
Basis of information supply The accompanying information is supplied at the request of, and is only provided for use by, the requestor. The information is valid for 30 days from the date of issue.
SA Power Networks, its employees, agents and contractors shall accept no responsibility for any inaccuracy or incompleteness in the information provided or liability in respect of any personal injury, death, loss or damage to any real or personal property or otherwise that arises out of or in connection with, directly or indirectly, the provision of or reliance upon the information.
It is the requestor's responsibility to ensure that the information provided accords with the area depicted on the requestor's Dial Before You Dig request. The information provided should not be used in respect of any area outside of the area depicted on the Dial Before You Dig request. SA Power Networks does not warrant that the information is suitable for the requestor’s intended purposes.
Any use of the accompanying information is subject to the requestor's agreement to the conditions contained in this document. Upon acceptance of these conditions, SA Power Networks grants the requestor permission to use the information. The information must be returned to SA Power Networks if the conditions are not accepted.
Important note: It is an offence under the Electricity Act 1996 (SA) to cause damage to or interfere with electrical infrastructure
Page | 107 ASSET LOCATION MAP - HIGH VOLTAGE
The Plan/Sketch is supplied at your request and is subject to your agreement that SA Power Networks shall not be liable or responsible for the information supplied pursuant to this request. Upon acceptance of this condition SA Power Networks grants you permission to use the Plan/Sketch as a guide to the location of SA Power Networks underground installation. The Plan/Sketch must be returned to SA Power Networks if you fail to accept the conditions of use. Page | 108 ASSET LOCATION MAP - LOW VOLTAGE
Note: The presence of public lighting columns may indicate additional unidentified cables within the search area
The Plan/Sketch is supplied at your request and is subject to your agreement that SA Power Networks shall not be liable or responsible for the information supplied pursuant to this request. Upon acceptance of this condition SA Power Networks grants you permission to use the Plan/Sketch as a guide to the location of SA Power Networks underground installation. The Plan/Sketch must be returned to SA Power Networks if you fail to accept the conditions of use. Page | 109
Cable Plan P50 16.0N
P50 17.5 1.5 10 MBHJW E 53 10 MBHJ 2/0.40 PE S
2/0.40 PE 122.3 P1:O68 P1:O68 9DEAD 9DEAD
2 83.2
L13 D58206
48
20 MBHJ
P1:O51-70 L14 P50 1.0 D58206 4.0 30 MBHJ 1 P35 22.0 20 MBHJ SS WIREGUARD 10 MBHJ
4.1 56.8 5.9 50 CPFUT PE 50 CPFUT PE 2 P1:O51-100 P1:O51-100 EJ 211.5 26.3 5 5 60.0 17.0 P1:O81 50 MBHJ 30 MBHJ 9DEAD EJ 97.3 114.7 10 MBHJ P50 23.0 EJ 2 30 MBHJ
10.0 50 CPFUT MBHJ 50.6 50LEFT IN SITU
20
17.0 4 P35 2/0.40 1.0 EJ 6.5 20 PR
2/0.40 P1:O11-23
EJ 7DEAD 29 1.0 0m 10m 20m 30m 40m 50m 60m
P1:O21 For all Telstra DBYD plan enquiries - 1DEAD Sequence Number: 57721743 email - [email protected] For urgent onsite contact only - ph 1800 653 935 (bus hrs) Please read Duty of Care prior to any excavating TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED A.C.N. 051 775 556 Generated On 14/12/2016 08:44:56
WARNING - Due to the nature of Telstra underground plant and the age of some cables and records, it is impossible to ascertain the precise location of all Telstra plant from Telstra's plans. The accuracy and/or completeness of the information supplied can not be guaranteed as property boundaries, depths and other natural landscape features may change over time, and accordingly the plans are indicative only. Telstra does not warrant or hold out that its plans are accurate and accepts no responsibility for any inaccuracy shown on the plans.
It is your responsibility to locate Telstra's underground plant by careful hand pot-holing prior to any excavation in the vicinity and to exercise due care during that excavation.
Please read and understand the information supplied in the duty of care statement attached with the Telstra plans. TELSTRA WILL SEEK COMPENSATION FOR LOSS CAUSED BY DAMAGE TO ITS PLANT.
Telstra plans and information supplied are valid for 60 days from the date of issue. If this timeframe has elapsed, please reapply for plans.
Page 1 of 1 Page | 110
SOUTH AUSTRALIAN WATER CORPORATION
Notification number: 11644405 Sequence number: 57721744 Enquiry date: 14/12/2016 8:38:00 AM Enquiry location: Admella Drive, Beachport SA 5280
Mr Mitchell Browne Tonkin 66 Rundle Street
Kent Town SA 5067
Dial Before You Dig Response – No SA Water Assets Identified
Dear Mr Mitchell Browne
Thank you for contacting Dial Before You Dig (DBYD) prior to engaging in work or activities which may affect the water and sewerage infrastructure of SA Water Corporation.
We have received your request through the Dial Before You Dig service. The site location you have requested indicates there is no SA Water infrastructure recorded.
Disclaimer The information has been generated by an automated system based on the area highlighted. It is your responsibility to ensure that the dig site is properly defined when submitting your Dial Before You Dig enquiry. If the information does not match the dig site or you have received this message in error please resubmit your enquiry.
This advice and/or information is given for your private use only. The accuracy of the advice and information is not guaranteed and no responsibility is accepted by the crown, the South Australian Water Corporation or their officers, agents or servants for any loss or damage caused by reliance upon this advice and/or information, as a result of any error, omission, incorrect description or statement therein whether caused by negligence or otherwise.
The information contained in this message may be confidential and may also be subject of legal, professional or public interest immunity. If you are not the intended recipient any use, disclosure or copying of this document is unauthorised. If you have received this message in error, please contact Dial Before You Dig.
For further enquiries or assistance with interpretation of plans and search content, or to report any obvious errors with the data provided, please contact our DBYD support team via email [email protected]
Thank you for contacting DBYD service.
Yours sincerely
Dial Before You Dig Support Team SA Water Corporation
Please note: Any damage to SA Water infrastructure must be reported immediately to Service Faults and Emergencies (24 hours, 7 days) on 1300 883 121
0 15 30 60 90 120
Metres
Page | 111 South Australian Water Corporation NO ASSETS FOUND DBYD Sequence No: 57721744 Map Tile: 1 LT 7 LT 16 SUTHERLAND DR 8 LT 6 LT 31 17 60 LT 1 LT 19
LT 5 MUGGLETON RD 24 34 14 33 50 LAKESIDE DR 67 LT 4 91 66
SOUTHERN PORTS HWY LT 3 SEC 129 87
RIVOLI DR LT 2 39 52 45
8639 LT 1 71 46 42 26 43 48 20 56 8639 BEACHPORT
94 118 106 16 LT 32 4 8655 ADMELLA DR
29
SEC 471 SEC 213 214 85 SEC 213 214 37 33 17 7 LT 2 SOUTHERN PORTS HWY SEC 457
39
31 Water Main Wastewater Gravity CP Facility SIS Main This advice and/or information is given for your private use only. The accuracy of Water Main (Decommissioned) Wastewater Pumping CP Anode/Cathode Cables Railway the advice and information is not guaranteed and no responsibility is accepted by the crown, the South Australian Water Corporation or their officers, agents or Recycled Water Main Wastewater Vacuum CP Electricity Supply Cables Land Parcels servants for any loss or damage caused by reliance upon this advice and/or Decommissioned Asbestos Mains Wastewater Low Pressure CP Anode Bed Outlines CP = Cathodic Protection information, as a result of any error, omission, incorrect description or statement therein whether caused by negligence or otherwise. Scale @ A4: 1:5000 Page | 112 Lot 13 Admella Drive Local Geology
Page | 113 Lot 13 Admella Drive Soil Systems
Page | 114
RVL Rivoli Land System
Area: 87 km2
Landscape: The Rivoli land system is named after Rivoli Bay, near Beachport. It consists of a series of parallel, narrow, low unconsolidated coastal sand ridges and depressions or swales. The land system occurs in three disjunct areas; ie. adjacent to Rivoli Bay, and to Guichen Bay near Robe.
Rainfall: annual average
Main soils: H1 (45%)Carbonate sand (Shelly-Supravescent Calcarosol-Rudosol) H2 (40%)Calcareous siliceous sand (sandy Calcarosol-Tenosol)
Minor soils: N3 (9%)Wet soil (non to moderately saline) (Sodosolic-Calcarosolic-Dermosolic Hydrosol) N1 (3%)Peaty soil (Organosol)
Summary: The main limitations for land use in this land system are due partly to it’s proximity to the coast and hence exposure to strong wind, usually salt laden. The coastal sands have high wind erosion risks where conventional broad acre land uses are practised. Fertility problems are inherent, particularly trace element deficiencies, such as cobalt and manganese. Drainage and waterlogging and flooding occurs in a significant number of soils, with associated land management difficulties. The land is currently used mostly for grazing.
SLU % Component Main soils Propn Notes VpG 0.9 Swampy flat N3A7 V VpG Swampy subcoastal plains with mostly wet, Low dune H1H2 L calcareous, dark clay over marl. 10-20% low dunes VpO 1.3 Swampy flat N3A7 D with deep shelly or calcareous siliceous sands. Low dune H1H2 M VpO Swampy subcoastal plains as above. <10% low dunes. WEd 4.7 Dune H1H2 D WEd Dunes ,bare and active, with deep shelly Rocky coast RRB1B3 M calcareous sand or calcareous siliceous sand. <10% Beach H1H2 M rocky coast with bare calcrete or shallow calcareous WED 1.7 Dune H1H2 D or siliceous sand. <10% beaches. Rocky coast RRB1B3 M WED Dunes, mostly vegetated and stable, as above. Beach H1H2 M <10% rocky coast and beaches as above. WEe 1.3 Dune H1H2 D WEe Active, bare, low coastal dunes and sand WEE 45.1 Dune H1H2 D spreads, as above. Swale N3 M WEE Low dunes, mostly vegetated and stable, as WEH 35.6 Low dune H1H2 V above. <10% swales with wet deep sands or occasionally, peat. Swampy swale N3 C WEH Stable vegetated low dunes as above on gentle WEj 0.5 Dune H1H2 V slopes. 20-30% swampy swales with wet deep sands Flat N2H2 C or occasionally, peat. WEK 3.3 Low dune H1H2 V WEj Bare and active coastal dunes as above, with 20- Flat N2H2 C 30% flats with moderately saline wet organic sands, WEW 2.0 Dune H1H2 V and deep calcareous siliceous sands. Beach H1H2 C WEK Low dunes, vegetation-fixed. 20-30% flats as for WEj above. WEW Complex of vegetation-fixed, beaches and dunes, with soils as above. WKQ 0.6 Sandy flat H1H2 D Sand flat with deep shelly calcareous sand or calcareous siliceous sand. WNT 0.2 Coastal Swamp N2N3 D Coastal swamps with wet, mostly moderately saline, Dune H1H2 M organic sands. <10% dunes as above. WRR 0.1 Melaleuca flat N2N3 V Subcoastal swampy flat as above. 10-20% dunes as Dune H1H2 L above. Xl- 0.7 Lake WW D Water-filled lake Xtd 2.0 Swamp N1 V Peat swamps; 20-30% sandy rises with deep, well to Rise I2 C moderately drained, bleached siliceous sand. Xud 0.1 Swamp N3H2 D Swamps with wet deep sand soils. 10-30% peat. Sandy rise H2 M <10% sandy rises with deep calcareous siliceous sand. Page | 115 13 Admella Drive 1 km Water Connect Bore Search
Page | 116 Water Connect Database Summary 1km Radius from Site DHNO Unit No Class Drilled Date Drill Depth Last Opened Permit No Purpose Status SWL TDS EC yield Easting Northing CT Detail 93097 6923-1786 WW 3/12/1982 7 3/12/1982 92367 DOM OPR 2 1.25 415723.65 5852382.59 CT 5945 430 93741 6923-2430 WW 4/07/1989 7.5 4/07/1989 81167 DOM OPR 4.1 967 1751 0.5 416036.62 5852058.65 CT 5151 50 93752 6923-2441 WW 3.05 30/09/1969 0.76 1385 2502 414841.68 5852297.6 CT 5954 963 93754 6923-2443 WW 7.62 30/09/1969 1.22 1200 2172 415441.66 5852536.62 CT 5930 844 93755 6923-2444 WW 6.1 30/09/1969 700 1271 415566.7 5852058.55 CT 5646 859 93756 6923-2445 WW 9.14 30/09/1969 STK OPR 4.57 745 1353 416228.63 5852117.62 CT 5936 223 93757 6923-2446 WW 6.1 30/09/1969 3.66 615 1118 416342.66 5852579.58 CT 5425 176 94162 6923-2851 WW 1/01/1978 4.3 1/01/1978 IRRSTK OPR 2.13 506 920 415853.66 5852678.61 CT 5224 398 94171 6923-2860 WW 25/10/1978 5.1 25/10/1978 3037 2.2 683 1240 416192.68 5852937.57 CT 5513 34 94178 6923-2867 WW 4/01/1979 11 4/01/1979 5028 3 694 1260 5 415839.63 5852369.56 CT 5172 369 94323 6923-3012 WW 1/11/1980 4.37 1/11/1980 7989 2.98 416002.67 5852582.59 CL 1570 9 94608 6923-3297 WW 11/01/1983 8 11/01/1983 92499 DOM OPR 2 1.25 415689.68 5852479.56 CT 5262 291 94623 6923-3312 WW 13/03/1983 6.4 13/03/1983 92749 3.05 2.53 416212.67 5852797.63 94630 6923-3319 WW 5/12/1982 6 5/12/1982 11347 DOM OPR 1.9 1 415711.62 5852679.61 CT 5501 149 94726 6923-3415 WW 23/03/1984 7 23/03/1984 14057 DOMSTK OPR 2 854 1550 2.5 415935.7 5852926.54 CT 5923 414 94775 6923-3464 WW 12/09/1984 5 12/09/1984 14249 STK OPR 1 741 1344 3.78 415772.68 5852824.59 CT 5363 835 94776 6923-3465 WW 14/12/1984 6 14/12/1984 14058 STK OPR 1.5 744 1350 1.89 416440.65 5852235.59 CT 5363 836 94783 6923-3472 WW 16/02/1985 7 16/02/1985 16006 DOM OPR 3 476 865 0.12 415931.66 5852433.63 CT 5211 91 94784 6923-3473 WW 7/02/1985 9 7/02/1985 93982 DOM OPR 3 838 1520 2.87 415461.64 5851841.56 CR 5879 272 94785 6923-3474 WW 5/02/1985 5 5/02/1985 16015 DOM OPR 2 628 1140 1.87 416013.62 5852321.61 94787 6923-3476 WW 29/03/1985 8 29/03/1985 80079 DOM OPR 2 1160 2100 1.25 416218.67 5852809.6 CT 5512 646 94835 6923-3524 WW 1/03/1986 350 1/03/1986 17671 0 661 1200 1.25 414698.61 5852329.64 CR 5653 772 94836 6923-3525 WW 23/03/1986 9 23/03/1986 18167 2 728 1320 1.25 415454.66 5852127.65 CT 5335 470 94843 6923-3532 WW 21/06/1986 5 21/06/1986 17164 1.5 827 1500 1.5 415975.7 5852862.59 CT 5076 153 94844 6923-3533 WW 416050.69 5851926.64 CT 5151 50 94872 6923-3563 WW 20/07/1987 10 20/07/1987 80551 3.5 1088 1970 1.75 416100.68 5852826.57 CT 5495 254 94873 6923-3564 WW 1/08/1987 7.8 1/08/1987 19474 1.5 910 1650 1.76 416218.67 5852809.6 CT 5512 646 94902 6923-3593 WW 9/02/1988 8.5 9/02/1988 80691 4.3 644 1170 8 415507.69 5851886.63 CR 5879 272 94904 6923-3595 WW 8/02/1988 10.5 8/02/1988 80734 4.5 699 1270 8 415508.65 5851887.64 CR 5879 272 94941 6923-3632 WW 27/10/1988 8 27/10/1988 80911 IRR OPR 2 600 1090 1.25 416094.68 5851974.58 CT 5151 50 95029 6923-3720 WW 24/01/1991 9 24/01/1991 81710 STK OPR 3 877 1591 1 416225.65 5852685.58 CT 5958 305 139402 6923-3848 WW 4/04/1994 5.7 4/04/1994 31114 STK 446 810 1.5 416371.71 5852847.61 CT 5158 971 140013 6923-3853 WW 29/04/1994 8.5 29/04/1994 31569 DOM 2.1 661 1200 0.75 416296.6 5852427.77 140016 6923-3852 WW 29/04/1994 6.4 29/04/1994 31568 DOM 1.2 479 870 0.5 416296.78 5852577.56 153831 6923-3925 WW 8/12/1995 8 8/12/1995 82224 DOM 3333 5940 3.75 415031.57 5852727.73 CT 5952 637 162693 6923-3976 WW 31/01/1997 5.5 31/01/1997 40044 DOM 2.3 655 1190 0.75 415581.7 5852897.55 CT 5897 546 169205 6923-4024 WW 18/06/1998 13 18/06/1998 44903 DOM 7 666 1210 1.25 415741.67 5852157.64 CR 5649 249 174489 6923-4063 WW 31/03/1999 15 31/03/1999 48045 DOM 4 821 1490 1 416181.69 5852387.55 CT 5919 987 193337 6923-4227 WW 21/10/2002 5.4 21/10/2002 59665 DOM 1.5 1043 1890 2.25 415294 5852591 CT 5872 24 196210 6923-4241 WW 20/05/2003 12.5 20/05/2003 61028 DOM 2.2 1485 2680 2 415534 5852603 CT 5872 22 199810 6923-4285 WW 7 19/03/2004 64503 DOM 1.85 1027 1860 3 415560 5852979 CT 5897 545
1 of 2 Page | 117 Water Connect Database Summary 1km Radius from Site DHNO Unit No Class Drilled Date Drill Depth Last Opened Permit No Purpose Status SWL TDS EC yield Easting Northing CT Detail 201780 6923-4306 WW 2/12/2004 7 2/12/2004 103145 STK 2 935 1695 2 415385 5852373 CT 5497 261 211834 6923-4355 WW 8 2/03/2006 104547 DOM 3 772 1400 2 415289 5852519 CT 5930 836 211837 6923-4353 WW 8.5 19/04/2005 106478 STK 3.4 838 1520 2.5 415367 5852647 CT 5930 842 211839 6923-4354 WW 8.5 15/04/2005 106477 DOM 3.5 921 1670 3 415358 5852744 CT 5930 841 218476 6923-4387 WW 7.5 19/08/2006 117549 DOM 1.5 944 1710 415508 5852712 CT 5872 23 228908 6923-4438 WW 9 9/03/2007 127906 DOM 4 550 1000 0.9 416273 5852171 CT 5936 222 234306 6923-4478 WW 9 13/11/2007 138855 DOM 2.5 927 1680 1 416006 5852908 CT 5967 723 236074 6923-4490 WW 12/11/2007 6 12/11/2007 129693 DOM 617 1120 416212 5852741 CT 5958 305 272711 6923-4650 WW 30/11/2012 6.5 30/11/2012 218229 1.5 938 1700 1.25 415651.53 5852935.62 CT 5897 546 272888 6923-4654 WW 28/11/2012 11 28/11/2012 218188 5.3 894 1620 1.25 415287.84 5852139.43 CT 5513 386 275490 6923-4665 WW 25/03/2013 8 25/03/2013 219476 1021 1850 416427.93 5852245.22 CT 5363 836 275491 6923-4666 WW 25/03/2013 8 25/03/2013 219477 2.1 1027 1860 2 416430.33 5852325.01 CT 5363 836 275492 6923-4667 WW 25/03/2013 8 25/03/2013 219478 2.1 1030 1865 2 416430.15 5852463.59 CT 5363 836 275612 6923-4670 WW 27/09/2013 10.5 27/09/2013 226807 1 647 1175 2.5 416395.55 5851996.16 CT 5983 525
2 of 2 Page | 118
Tonkin Consulting Contact: Section 7 Level 2 Telephone: (08) 8204 2026 66 Rundle Street Email: [email protected] KENT TOWN SA 5067 Contact: Public Register Telephone: (08) 8204 9128 Email: [email protected]
06 December, 2016
EPA STATEMENT TO FORM 1 - CONTRACTS FOR SALE OF LAND OR BUSINESS
The EPA provides this statement to assist the vendor meet its obligations under section 7(1)(b) of the Land and Business (Sale and Conveyancing) Act 1994. A response to the questions prescribed in Schedule 1-Contracts for sale of land or business-forms (Divisions 1 and 2) of the Land and Business (Sale and Conveyancing) Act 1994 is provided in relation to the land.
I refer to your enquiry concerning the parcel of land comprised in
Title Reference CT Volume 5864 Folio 196 Address 43 Rivoli Drive, BEACHPORT SA 5280
Schedule – Division 1 – Land and Business (Sale and Conveyancing) Regulations 2010
PARTICULARS OF MORTGAGES, CHARGES AND PRESCRIBED ENCUMBRANCES AFFECTING THE LAND
7. Environment Protection Act 1993
Does the EPA hold any of the following details relating to the Environment Protection Act 1993:
7.1 Section 59 - Environment performance agreement that is registered in relation to the land. NO
7.2 Section 93 - Environment protection order that is registered in relation to the land. NO
7.3 Section 93A - Environment protection order relating to cessation of activity that is registered in NO relation to the land.
7.4 Section 99 - Clean-up order that is registered in relation to the land. NO
7.5 Section 100 - Clean-up authorisation that is registered in relation to the land. NO
7.6 Section 103H - Site contamination assessment order that is registered in relation to the land. NO
7.7 Section 103J - Site remediation order that is registered in relation to the land. NO
CT Volume 5864 Folio 196 page 1 of 4 Page | 119
7.8 Section 103N - Notice of declaration of special management area in relation to the land (due to NO possible existence of site contamination).
7.9 Section 103P - Notation of site contamination audit report in relation to the land. NO
7.10 Section 103S - Notice of prohibition or restriction on taking water affected by site NO contamination in relation to the land.
Schedule – Division 2 – Land and Business (Sale and Conveyancing) Regulations 2010
PARTICULARS RELATING TO ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION
3-Licences and exemptions recorded by EPA in public register
Does the EPA hold any of the following details in the public register: a) details of a current licence issued under Part 6 of the Environment Protection Act 1993 to conduct, at the land- i) a waste or recycling depot (as referred to in clause 3(3) of Schedule 1 Part A of that Act); or NO ii) activities producing listed wastes (as referred to in clause 3(4) of Schedule 1 Part A of that NO Act); or iii) any other prescribed activity of environmental significance under Schedule 1 of that Act? NO b) details of a licence no longer in force issued under Part 6 of the Environment Protection Act 1993 to conduct, at the land- i) a waste or recycling depot (as referred to in clause 3(3) of Schedule 1 Part A of that Act); or NO ii) activities producing listed wastes (as referred to in clause 3(4) of Schedule 1 Part A of that NO Act); or iii) any other prescribed activity of environmental significance under Schedule 1 of that Act? NO c) details of a current exemption issued under Part 6 of the Environment Protection Act 1993 NO from the application of a specified provision of that Act in relation to an activity carried on at the land? d) details of an exemption no longer in force issued under Part 6 of the Environment Protection NO Act 1993 from the application of a specified provision of that Act in relation to an activity carried on at the land? e) details of a licence issued under the repealed South Australian Waste Management NO Commission Act 1979 to operate a waste depot at the land? f) details of a licence issued under the repealed Waste Management Act 1987 to operate a NO waste depot at the land? g) details of a licence issued under the repealed South Australian Waste Management NO Commission Act 1979 to produce waste of a prescribed kind (within the meaning of that Act) at the land?
CT Volume 5864 Folio 196 page 2 of 4 Page | 120
h) details of a licence issued under the repealed Waste Management Act 1987 to produce NO prescribed waste (within the meaning of that Act) at the land?
4-Pollution and site contamination on the land - details recorded by the EPA in public register
Does the EPA hold any of the following details in the public register in relation to the land or part of the land: a) details of serious or material environmental harm caused or threatened in the course of an NO activity (whether or not notified under section 83 of the Environment Protection Act 1993)? b) details of site contamination notified to the EPA under section 83A of the Environment NO Protection Act 1993? c) a copy of a report of an environmental assessment (whether prepared by the EPA or some NO other person or body and whether or not required under legislation) that forms part of the information required to be recorded in the public register? d) a copy of a site contamination audit report? NO e) details of an agreement for the exclusion or limitation of liability for site contamination to which NO section 103E of the Environment Protection Act 1993 applies? f) details of an agreement entered into with the EPA relating to an approved voluntary site NO contamination assessment proposal under section 103I of the Environment Protection Act 1993? g) details of an agreement entered into with the EPA relating to an approved voluntary site NO remediation proposal under section 103K of the Environment Protection Act 1993? h) details of a notification under section 103Z(1) of the Environment Protection Act 1993 relating NO to the commencement of a site contamination audit? i) details of a notification under section 103Z(2) of the Environment Protection Act 1993 relating NO to the termination before completion of a site contamination audit? j) details of records, held by the former South Australian Waste Management Commission under NO the repealed Waste Management Act 1987, of waste (within the meaning of that Act) having been deposited on the land between 1 January 1983 and 30 April 1995?
5-Pollution and site contamination on the land - other details held by EPA
Does the EPA hold any of the following details in relation to the land or part of the land: a) a copy of a report known as a "Health Commission Report" prepared by or on behalf of the NO South Australian Health Commission (under the repealed South Australian Health Commission Act 1976)? b) details (which may include a report of an environmental assessment) relevant to an agreement NO entered into with the EPA relating to an approved voluntary site contamination assessment proposal under section 103I of the Environment Protection Act 1993? c) details (which may include a report of an environmental assessment) relevant to an agreement NO entered into with the EPA relating to an approved voluntary site remediation proposal under section 103K of the Environment Protection Act 1993?
CT Volume 5864 Folio 196 page 3 of 4 Page | 121
d) a copy of a pre-1 July 2009 site audit report? NO e) details relating to the termination before completion of a pre-1 July 2009 site audit? NO
All care and diligence has been taken to access the above information from available records. Historical records provided to the EPA concerning matters arising prior to 1 May 1995 are limited and may not be accurate or complete and therefore the EPA cannot confirm the accuracy of the historical information provided.
CT Volume 5864 Folio 196 page 4 of 4 Page | 122
Appendix B
Aerial Photos
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation Page | 123 Lot 13 Admella Drive 1950 Aerial Image
Page | 124 Lot 13 Admella Drive 1982 Aerial Image
Page | 125 Lot 13 Admella Drive 2003 Aerial Image
Image from Google Earth 2016
Page | 126 Lot 13 Admella Drive 2010 Aerial Image
Image from Google Earth 2016 Page | 127 Lot 13 Admella Drive 2012 Aerial Image
Image from Google Earth 2016 Page | 128 Lot 13 Admella Drive 2014 Aerial Image
Aerial Image from Google Earth 2016 Page | 129
Appendix C
Field Forms
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation Page | 130 Page | 131 Page | 132 Page | 133 Page | 134 Page | 135 Page | 136 Page | 137 Page | 138 Page | 139
Appendix D
Soil Analytical Results
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation Page | 140
Lot 13 Admella Drive Soil Analytical Results
Field ID TP02-1 DUP01 RPD% Difference TP02-2 TP03-1 TP04-1 TP05-1 TP06-2 TP07-1 TP08-2 Loc Code TP02-1 TP02-1 Between TP02-1 TP02-2 TP03-1 TP04-1 TP05-1 TP06-2 TP07-1 TP08-2 Sampled Date 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 & DUP01 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 Sample Code M16-De06117 M16-De06129 M16-De06118 M16-De06119 M16-De06120 M16-De06122 M16-De06125 M16-De06126 M16-De06128 NEPM 2013 Table 1A(1) HILs Res A Soil Chem Name Units EQL Tokuthion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 BTEX Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Xylene Total mg/kg 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 - <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 Halogenated Benzenes Hexachlorobenzene mg/kg 0.05 10 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Inorganics Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) % 1 11 6.1 57 6.8 6.2 4.3 6.1 4.8 6.9 5.9 Metals Arsenic mg/kg 2 100 10 6.9 37 13 3.2 9.3 2.7 2.8 5 3.6 Cadmium mg/kg 0.4 20 <0.4 <0.4 - <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 Chromium (III+VI) mg/kg 5 10 8.7 14 5.5 <5 14 5.4 <5 7.4 5.1 Copper mg/kg 5 6000 <5 <5 - <5 <5 11 <5 <5 <5 <5 Lead mg/kg 5 300 <5 <5 - <5 <5 10 <5 <5 7.9 <5 Mercury mg/kg 0.1 40 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Nickel mg/kg 5 400 <5 <5 - <5 <5 24 <5 <5 <5 <5 Zinc mg/kg 5 7400 30 23 26 <5 <5 38 <5 <5 26 <5 Organochlorine Pesticides 4,4-DDE mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 a-BHC mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Aldrin mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Aldrin + Dieldrin mg/kg 6 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 b-BHC mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 chlordane mg/kg 0.1 50 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 d-BHC mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 DDD mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 DDT mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 DDT+DDE+DDD mg/kg 240 <0.15 <0.15 - <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 Dieldrin mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Endosulfan I mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Endosulfan II mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Endrin mg/kg 0.05 10 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Endrin aldehyde mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Endrin ketone mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 g-BHC (Lindane) mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Heptachlor mg/kg 0.05 6 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.05 300 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Toxaphene mg/kg 1 20 <1 <1 - <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Organophosphorous Pesticides Azinophos methyl mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Bolstar (Sulprofos) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Chlorfenvinphos mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Chlorpyrifos mg/kg 0.2 160 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Chlorpyrifos-methyl mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Coumaphos mg/kg 2 <2 <2 - <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 Demeton-O mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Demeton-S mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Diazinon mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Dimethoate mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Disulfoton mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Ethion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Ethoprop mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Fensulfothion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Fenthion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Malathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Merphos mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Methyl parathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Mevinphos (Phosdrin) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Monocrotophos mg/kg 2 <2 <2 - <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 Naled (Dibrom) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Omethoate mg/kg 2 <2 <2 - <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 Phorate mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
1 of 2 Page | 141
Lot 13 Admella Drive Soil Analytical Results
Field ID TP02-1 DUP01 RPD% Difference TP02-2 TP03-1 TP04-1 TP05-1 TP06-2 TP07-1 TP08-2 Loc Code TP02-1 TP02-1 Between TP02-1 TP02-2 TP03-1 TP04-1 TP05-1 TP06-2 TP07-1 TP08-2 Sampled Date 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 & DUP01 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 Sample Code M16-De06117 M16-De06129 M16-De06118 M16-De06119 M16-De06120 M16-De06122 M16-De06125 M16-De06126 M16-De06128 NEPM 2013 Table 1A(1) HILs Res A Soil Chem Name Units EQL Pyrazophos mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Ronnel mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Terbufos mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Trichloronate mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Tetrachlorvinphos mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 PAH Benzo[b+j]fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * MG/KG 0.6 0.6 0.6 - 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * MG/KG 1.2 1.2 1.2 - 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 PAH/Phenols Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Anthracene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Chrysene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Fluorene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 PAHs (Sum of total) mg/kg 0.5 300 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Pyrene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Pesticides Parathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Pirimiphos-methyl mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 SVOCs EPN mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 TPH C10-C16 mg/kg 50 <50 <50 - <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 C16-C34 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 - <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 C34-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 - <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 F2-NAPHTHALENE mg/kg 50 <50 <50 - <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 C6 - C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 - <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 C10 - C14 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 - <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 C15 - C28 mg/kg 50 <50 <50 - <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 C29-C36 mg/kg 50 <50 <50 - <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 +C10 - C36 (Sum of total) mg/kg 50 <50 <50 - <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 C6-C10 less BTEX (F1) mg/kg 20 <20 <20 - <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 C6-C10 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 - <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
2 of 2 Page | 142 Page | 143 Page | 144
SF11: CHAIN OF CUSTODY REF: 2016.1432 Page 1 of 1
Job No: 2016.1432 Laboratory Name: MGT-Labmark Details: Frank Brennan Consulting Laboratory Address: 3-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh VIC 3166 Date Sampled: 5/12/2016 Sampled by: J. Neis-Beer Laboratory Contact: Sarah Gould phone: (03) 9564 7055 Consultant: Tonkin Consulting Address: 1 Krummel St, Mount Gambier SA 5290 Quotation No: email: [email protected] Contact: Jack Horan Fax: (08) 8723 5004 Delivery by: Toll Priority fax (03) 9564 7190 email: [email protected] Phone: (08) 8723 5002 Consignment Note:
Notes / Deviations from Standard Protocols B7 B14 Hold
Matrix Sample Asbestos Asbestos OCP/ OPP Container Container / Lab Sample Lab Preservation TRH/ BTEXN/ BTEXN/ TRH/ Identification Identification PAH, As, PAH, Cd, Cr, Cu, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn, Hg Identification in Identification Soil in TP02-1 Soil x x x **Please provide data in an Esdat format if possible** TP05-1 Soil x x x TP07-1 Soil x x x Please copy results to: DUP01 Soil x x [email protected] TP02-2 Soil x x TP03-1 Soil x x TP04-1 Soil x x TP06-2 Soil x x TP08-2 Soil x x TP04-2 Soil x TP05-2 Soil x TP06-1 Soil x TP08-1 Soil x DUP02 Soil x
Sample Preservation: Number of Samples: 9 9 3 5 Samples must be transported and stored Relinquished by: Relinquished by: Relinquished by: in a chilled or cold condition at all times Date and time: Date and time: Date and time: COC must remain with samples Company: Tonkin Consulting Company: Company: ANALYSING LABORATORY: Signature Signature Signature Please fax to the nominated Received in good condition by: Received in good condition by: Received in good condition by: Tonkin Consulting contact a signed COC Date and Time: Date and Time: Date and Time: showing assigned lab ID numbers Company: Company: Company: IMMEDIATELY on receipt of samples and Signature Signature Signature return original COC with final results Page | 145
Steven Borg
From: Sarah Gould Sent: Wednesday, 7 December 2016 10:24 AM To: Steven Borg Cc: AU02_USR_LAB00020 Subject: FW: Soils received without COC Attachments: 20161432_MGT Chain of Custody.pdf
Updated COC for report 526588 please.
Sarah Gould Phone : +61 3 8564 5053 Email : [email protected]
From: Jordan Neis-Beer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, 7 December 2016 10:02 AM To: Sarah Gould Cc: Jack Horan Subject: FW: Soils received without COC
Hello Sarah,
Please find attached the revised COC for 2016.1432.
Regards,
Jordan Neis-Beer Civil Engineer
A 1 Krummel Street, Mount Gambier SA 5290 T +61 8 8723 5002 F +61 8 8723 5004 E [email protected] W www.tonkin.com.au Development – Environment – Local Government – Mining & Resources – Spatial – Transport – Water Privacy & Confidentiality Notice: This email and any attachments to it, may contain confidential and privileged information solely for the use of the intended recipient (or person authorised). Any misuse of this email and/or file attachments is strictly prohibited. If this email has been received in error, please notify the sender by return email and delete all copies immediately. No guarantee is given that this email and/or any attachments are free from computer viruses or any other defect or error . P Please consider the environment before printing this email From: Sarah Gould [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2016 2:51 PM To: Jordan Neis-Beer
Thanks Jordan.
Sarah Gould Phone : +61 3 8564 5053 Email : [email protected]
From: Jordan Neis-Beer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2016 3:18 PM 1 Page | 146
To: Sarah Gould Subject: RE: Soils received without COC
Hi Sarah,
COC for soil samples is attached.
Regards,
Jordan Neis-Beer Civil Engineer
A 1 Krummel Street, Mount Gambier SA 5290 T +61 8 8723 5002 F +61 8 8723 5004 E [email protected] W www.tonkin.com.au Development – Environment – Local Government – Mining & Resources – Spatial – Transport – Water Privacy & Confidentiality Notice: This email and any attachments to it, may contain confidential and privileged information solely for the use of the intended recipient (or person authorised). Any misuse of this email and/or file attachments is strictly prohibited. If this email has been received in error, please notify the sender by return email and delete all copies immediately. No guarantee is given that this email and/or any attachments are free from computer viruses or any other defect or error . P Please consider the environment before printing this email From: Sarah Gould [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2016 1:42 PM To: Jordan Neis-Beer
Thanks Jordan.
Sarah Gould Phone : +61 3 8564 5053 Email : [email protected]
From: Jordan Neis-Beer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2016 1:34 PM To: Sarah Gould Subject: Re: Soils received without COC
Hi Sarah,
I'm sure I put it in there! I'm on the road for another hour but I'll send you a copy as soon as I get back to the office.
Jordan
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Sarah Gould
Hi Jordan,
2 Page | 147 We received an esky of soils today without a COC. Can you please send that through when available?
Thank you.
Regards, Sarah
Sarah Gould Analytical Services Manager
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close OAKLEIGH VIC 3166 AUSTRALIA Phone . : +61 3 8564 5053 Mobile : +61 409 801 765
Email : [email protected] Website. : www.eurofins.com.au/environmental-testing
Are you on TOP of PFASs? Find out more by reading Eurofins | mgt’s Environote by clicking here
Click here to report this email as spam.
ScannedByWebsenseForEurofins
Are you on TOP of PFASs? Find out more by reading Eurofins | mgt’s Environote by clicking here
Are you on TOP of PFASs? Find out more by reading Eurofins | mgt’s Environote by clicking here
3 Page | 148
Certificate of Analysis
NATA Accredited Accreditation Number 1261 Tonkin Consulting Site Number 1254 Level 2, 66 Rundle Street Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 – Testing The results of the tests, calibrations and/or Kent Town measurements included in this document are traceable to Australian/national standards. SA 5067
Attention: Jack Horan
Report 526588-S Project name FRANK BRENNAN CONSULTING Project ID 2016.1432 Received Date Dec 06, 2016
Client Sample ID TP02-1 TP02-2 TP03-1 TP04-1 Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06117 M16-De06118 M16-De06119 M16-De06120 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 TRH C10-36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 BTEX Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 97 106 87 109 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 1 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 149
Client Sample ID TP02-1 TP02-2 TP03-1 TP04-1 Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06117 M16-De06118 M16-De06119 M16-De06120 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % 94 89 90 90 p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % 64 62 63 63 Organochlorine Pesticides Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Methoxychlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 87 88 98 95 Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 59 57 65 58 Organophosphorus Pesticides Azinphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Bolstar 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Chlorfenvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Chlorpyrifos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Coumaphos 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2 < 2 < 2 Demeton-S 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Demeton-O 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Diazinon 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Dichlorvos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Dimethoate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Disulfoton 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 EPN 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Ethion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Ethoprop 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Ethyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Fenitrothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Fensulfothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 2 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 150
Client Sample ID TP02-1 TP02-2 TP03-1 TP04-1 Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06117 M16-De06118 M16-De06119 M16-De06120 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit Organophosphorus Pesticides Fenthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Malathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Merphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Methyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Mevinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Monocrotophos 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2 < 2 < 2 Naled 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Omethoate 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2 < 2 < 2 Phorate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Pirimiphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Pyrazophos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Ronnel 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Terbufos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Tetrachlorvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Tokuthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Trichloronate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Triphenylphosphate (surr.) 1 % 84 79 80 81 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100 TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100 Heavy Metals Arsenic 2 mg/kg 10 13 3.2 9.3 Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 Chromium 5 mg/kg 10 5.5 < 5 14 Copper 5 mg/kg < 5 < 5 < 5 11 Lead 5 mg/kg < 5 < 5 < 5 10 Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.1 Nickel 5 mg/kg < 5 < 5 < 5 24 Zinc 5 mg/kg 30 < 5 < 5 38
% Moisture 1 % 11 6.8 6.2 4.3
Client Sample ID TP05-1 TP06-2 TP07-1 TP08-2 Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06122 M16-De06125 M16-De06126 M16-De06128 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 TRH C10-36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 3 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 151
Client Sample ID TP05-1 TP06-2 TP07-1 TP08-2 Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06122 M16-De06125 M16-De06126 M16-De06128 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit BTEX Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 109 105 92 80 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % 94 91 93 79 p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % 66 62 65 55 Organochlorine Pesticides Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 4 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 152
Client Sample ID TP05-1 TP06-2 TP07-1 TP08-2 Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06122 M16-De06125 M16-De06126 M16-De06128 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit Organochlorine Pesticides Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Methoxychlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 76 81 103 89 Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 52 55 66 57 Organophosphorus Pesticides Azinphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Bolstar 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Chlorfenvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Chlorpyrifos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Coumaphos 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2 < 2 < 2 Demeton-S 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Demeton-O 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Diazinon 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Dichlorvos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Dimethoate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Disulfoton 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 EPN 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Ethion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Ethoprop 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Ethyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Fenitrothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Fensulfothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Fenthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Malathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Merphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Methyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Mevinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Monocrotophos 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2 < 2 < 2 Naled 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Omethoate 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2 < 2 < 2 Phorate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Pirimiphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Pyrazophos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Ronnel 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Terbufos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Tetrachlorvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Tokuthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Trichloronate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Triphenylphosphate (surr.) 1 % 86 82 84 71 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100 TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 5 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 153
Client Sample ID TP05-1 TP06-2 TP07-1 TP08-2 Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06122 M16-De06125 M16-De06126 M16-De06128 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit Heavy Metals Arsenic 2 mg/kg 2.7 2.8 5.0 3.6 Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 Chromium 5 mg/kg 5.4 < 5 7.4 5.1 Copper 5 mg/kg < 5 < 5 < 5 < 5 Lead 5 mg/kg < 5 < 5 7.9 < 5 Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Nickel 5 mg/kg < 5 < 5 < 5 < 5 Zinc 5 mg/kg < 5 < 5 26 < 5
% Moisture 1 % 6.1 4.8 6.9 5.9
Client Sample ID DUP01 Sample Matrix Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06129 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 TRH C10-36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 BTEX Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 92 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 0.6 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 1.2 Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 6 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 154
Client Sample ID DUP01 Sample Matrix Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06129 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % 88 p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % 61 Organochlorine Pesticides Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Methoxychlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 86 Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 59 Organophosphorus Pesticides Azinphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Bolstar 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Chlorfenvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Chlorpyrifos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Coumaphos 2 mg/kg < 2 Demeton-S 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Demeton-O 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Diazinon 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Dichlorvos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Dimethoate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Disulfoton 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 EPN 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Ethion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 7 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 155
Client Sample ID DUP01 Sample Matrix Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06129 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit Organophosphorus Pesticides Ethoprop 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Ethyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Fenitrothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Fensulfothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Fenthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Malathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Merphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Methyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Mevinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Monocrotophos 2 mg/kg < 2 Naled 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Omethoate 2 mg/kg < 2 Phorate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Pirimiphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Pyrazophos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Ronnel 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Terbufos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Tetrachlorvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Tokuthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Trichloronate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Triphenylphosphate (surr.) 1 % 80 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 Heavy Metals Arsenic 2 mg/kg 6.9 Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 Chromium 5 mg/kg 8.7 Copper 5 mg/kg < 5 Lead 5 mg/kg < 5 Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 Nickel 5 mg/kg < 5 Zinc 5 mg/kg 23
% Moisture 1 % 6.1
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 8 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 156
Sample History Where samples are submitted/analysed over several days, the last date of extraction and analysis is reported. A recent review of our LIMS has resulted in the correction or clarification of some method identifications. Due to this, some of the method reference information on reports has changed. However, no substantive change has been made to our laboratory methods, and as such there is no change in the validity of current or previous results (regarding both quality and NATA accreditation). If the date and time of sampling are not provided, the Laboratory will not be responsible for compromised results should testing be performed outside the recommended holding time.
Description Testing Site Extracted Holding Time Eurofins | mgt Suite B7 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Melbourne Dec 08, 2016 14 Day - Method: TRH C6-C36 - LTM-ORG-2010 BTEX Melbourne Dec 08, 2016 14 Day - Method: TRH C6-C40 - LTM-ORG-2010 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Melbourne Dec 08, 2016 14 Day - Method: TRH C6-C40 - LTM-ORG-2010 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Melbourne Dec 08, 2016 14 Day - Method: USEPA 8270 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Melbourne Dec 08, 2016 14 Day - Method: TRH C6-C40 - LTM-ORG-2010 Metals M8 Melbourne Dec 08, 2016 28 Days - Method: LTM-MET-3030 by ICP-OES (hydride ICP-OES for Mercury) Eurofins | mgt Suite B14 Organochlorine Pesticides Melbourne Dec 08, 2016 14 Day - Method: USEPA 8081 Organochlorine Pesticides Organophosphorus Pesticides Melbourne Dec 08, 2016 14 Day - Method: LTM-ORG-2200 Organophosphorus Pesticides by GC-MS % Moisture Melbourne Dec 07, 2016 14 Day - Method: LTM-GEN-7080 Moisture
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 9 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 157 MelbourneMelbourneMelbourneMelbourne SydneySydneySydneySydney BrisbaneBrisbaneBrisbaneBrisbane PerthPerthPerthPerth 2-5 Kingston Town Close Unit F3, Building F 1/21 Smallwood Place 2/91 Leach Highway Oakleigh VIC 3166 16 Mars Road Murarrie QLD 4172 Kewdale WA 6105 ABN– 50 005 085 521 Phone : +61 3 8564 5000 Lane Cove West NSW 2066 Phone : +61 7 3902 4600 Phone : +61 8 9251 9600 e.mail : [email protected] NATA # 1261 Phone : +61 2 9900 8400 NATA # 1261 Site # 20794 NATA # 1261 web : www.eurofins.com.au Site # 1254 & 14271 NATA # 1261 Site # 18217 Site # 18217 . Company Name: Tonkin Consulting Order No.: Received: Dec 6, 2016 3:21 PM Address: Level 2, 66 Rundle Street Report #: 526588 Due: Dec 13, 2016 Kent Town Phone: 08 8273 3100 Priority: 5 Day SA 5067 Fax: 08 8273 3110 Contact Name: Jack Horan Project Name: FRANK BRENNAN CONSULTING Project ID: 2016.1432 Eurofins | mgt Analytical Services Manager : Sarah Gould Asbestos Absence/Presence HOLD Eurofins |mgtSuiteB14 Moisture Set Eurofins |mgtSuiteB7
Sample Detail
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 XXXX Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794 Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X External Laboratory No Sample ID Sample Date Sampling Matrix LAB ID Time 1 TP02-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06117 X XXX 2 TP02-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06118 XXX 3 TP03-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06119 XXX 4 TP04-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06120 XXX 5 TP04-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06121 X 6 TP05-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06122 X XXX 7 TP05-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06123 X 8 TP06-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06124 X 9 TP06-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06125 XXX
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 10 of 23
Date Reported:Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 158 MelbourneMelbourneMelbourneMelbourne SydneySydneySydneySydney BrisbaneBrisbaneBrisbaneBrisbane PerthPerthPerthPerth 2-5 Kingston Town Close Unit F3, Building F 1/21 Smallwood Place 2/91 Leach Highway Oakleigh VIC 3166 16 Mars Road Murarrie QLD 4172 Kewdale WA 6105 ABN– 50 005 085 521 Phone : +61 3 8564 5000 Lane Cove West NSW 2066 Phone : +61 7 3902 4600 Phone : +61 8 9251 9600 e.mail : [email protected] NATA # 1261 Phone : +61 2 9900 8400 NATA # 1261 Site # 20794 NATA # 1261 web : www.eurofins.com.au Site # 1254 & 14271 NATA # 1261 Site # 18217 Site # 18217
Company Name: Tonkin Consulting Order No.: Received: Dec 6, 2016 3:21 PM Address: Level 2, 66 Rundle Street Report #: 526588 Due: Dec 13, 2016 Kent Town Phone: 08 8273 3100 Priority: 5 Day SA 5067 Fax: 08 8273 3110 Contact Name: Jack Horan Project Name: FRANK BRENNAN CONSULTING Project ID: 2016.1432 Eurofins | mgt Analytical Services Manager : Sarah Gould Asbestos Absence/Presence HOLD Eurofins |mgtSuiteB14 Moisture Set Eurofins |mgtSuiteB7
Sample Detail
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 XXXX Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794 Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X 10 TP07-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06126 X XXX 11 TP08-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06127 X 12 TP08-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06128 XXX 13 DUP01 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06129 XXX 14 DUP02 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06130 X Test Counts 3 5 9 9 9
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 11 of 23
Date Reported:Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 159
Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary
General 1. Laboratory QC results for Method Blanks, Duplicates, Matrix Spikes, and Laboratory Control Samples are included in this QC report where applicable. Additional QC data may be available on request. 2. All soil results are reported on a dry basis, unless otherwise stated. 3. Actual LORs are matrix dependant. Quoted LORs may be raised where sample extracts are diluted due to interferences. 4. Results are uncorrected for matrix spikes or surrogate recoveries. 5. SVOC analysis on waters are performed on homogenised, unfiltered samples, unless noted otherwise. 6. Samples were analysed on an 'as received' basis. 7. This report replaces any interim results previously issued.
Holding Times Please refer to 'Sample Preservation and Container Guide' for holding times (QS3001). For samples received on the last day of holding time, notification of testing requirements should have been received at least 6 hours prior to sample receipt deadlines as stated on the Sample Receipt Advice. If the Laboratory did not receive the information in the required timeframe, and regardless of any other integrity issues, suitably qualified results may still be reported. Holding times apply from the date of sampling, therefore compliance to these may be outside the laboratory's control. **NOTE: pH duplicates are reported as a range NOT as RPD
Units mg/kg: milligrams per Kilogram mg/l: milligrams per litre ug/l: micrograms per litre ppm: Parts per million ppb: Parts per billion %: Percentage org/100ml: Organisms per 100 millilitres NTU: Nephelometric Turbidity Units MPN/100mL: Most Probable Number of organisms per 100 millilitres
Terms Dry Where a moisture has been determined on a solid sample the result is expressed on a dry basis. LOR Limit of Reporting. SPIKE Addition of the analyte to the sample and reported as percentage recovery. RPD Relative Percent Difference between two Duplicate pieces of analysis. LCS Laboratory Control Sample - reported as percent recovery CRM Certified Reference Material - reported as percent recovery Method Blank In the case of solid samples these are performed on laboratory certified clean sands. In the case of water samples these are performed on de-ionised water. Surr - Surrogate The addition of a like compound to the analyte target and reported as percentage recovery. Duplicate A second piece of analysis from the same sample and reported in the same units as the result to show comparison. Batch Duplicate A second piece of analysis from a sample outside of the clients batch of samples but run within the laboratory batch of analysis. Batch SPIKE Spike recovery reported on a sample from outside of the clients batch of samples but run within the laboratory batch of analysis. USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency APHA American Public Health Association TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure COC Chain of Custody SRA Sample Receipt Advice CP Client Parent - QC was performed on samples pertaining to this report NCP Non-Client Parent - QC performed on samples not pertaining to this report, QC is representative of the sequence or batch that client samples were analysed within TEQ Toxic Equivalency Quotient
QC - Acceptance Criteria RPD Duplicates: Global RPD Duplicates Acceptance Criteria is 30% however the following acceptance guidelines are equally applicable: Results <10 times the LOR : No Limit Results between 10-20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-50% Results >20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-30% Surrogate Recoveries: Recoveries must lie between 50-150%-Phenols & PFASs 20-130%
QC Data General Comments 1. Where a result is reported as a less than (<), higher than the nominated LOR, this is due to either matrix interference, extract dilution required due to interferences or contaminant levels within the sample, high moisture content or insufficient sample provided. 2. Duplicate data shown within this report that states the word "BATCH" is a Batch Duplicate from outside of your sample batch, but within the laboratory sample batch at a 1:10 ratio. The Parent and Duplicate data shown is not data from your samples. 3. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting LCS data, Toxaphene & Chlordane are not added to the LCS. 4. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting Spike data, Toxaphene is not added to the Spike. 5. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - where reporting Spike & LCS data, a single spike of commercial Hydrocarbon products in the range of C12-C30 is added and it's Total Recovery is reported in the C10-C14 cell of the Report. 6. pH and Free Chlorine analysed in the laboratory - Analysis on this test must begin within 30 minutes of sampling.Therefore laboratory analysis is unlikely to be completed within holding time. Analysis will begin as soon as possible after sample receipt. 7. Recovery Data (Spikes & Surrogates) - where chromatographic interference does not allow the determination of Recovery the term "INT" appears against that analyte. 8. Polychlorinated Biphenyls are spiked only using Aroclor 1260 in Matrix Spikes and LCS. 9. For Matrix Spikes and LCS results a dash " -" in the report means that the specific analyte was not added to the QC sample. 10. Duplicate RPDs are calculated from raw analytical data thus it is possible to have two sets of data.
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 12 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 160
Quality Control Results
Acceptance Pass Qualifying Test Units Result 1 Limits Limits Code Method Blank Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions TRH C6-C9 mg/kg < 20 20 Pass TRH C10-C14 mg/kg < 20 20 Pass TRH C15-C28 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass TRH C29-C36 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass Method Blank BTEX Benzene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass Toluene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass Ethylbenzene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass m&p-Xylenes mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass o-Xylene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass Xylenes - Total mg/kg < 0.3 0.3 Pass Method Blank Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Naphthalene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass TRH C6-C10 mg/kg < 20 20 Pass Method Blank Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Acenaphthylene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Benzo(g.h.i)perylene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Chrysene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Dibenz(a.h)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Fluorene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Naphthalene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Phenanthrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Method Blank Organochlorine Pesticides Chlordanes - Total mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass 4.4'-DDD mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass 4.4'-DDE mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass 4.4'-DDT mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass a-BHC mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Aldrin mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass b-BHC mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass d-BHC mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Dieldrin mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Endosulfan I mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Endosulfan II mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Endrin mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Endrin aldehyde mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 13 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 161
Acceptance Pass Qualifying Test Units Result 1 Limits Limits Code Endrin ketone mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass g-BHC (Lindane) mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Heptachlor mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Hexachlorobenzene mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Methoxychlor mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Toxaphene mg/kg < 1 1 Pass Method Blank Organophosphorus Pesticides Azinphos-methyl mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Bolstar mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Chlorfenvinphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Chlorpyrifos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Chlorpyrifos-methyl mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Coumaphos mg/kg < 2 2 Pass Demeton-O mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Diazinon mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Dichlorvos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Dimethoate mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass EPN mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Ethion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Ethoprop mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Ethyl parathion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Fenitrothion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Fensulfothion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Fenthion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Malathion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Merphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Methyl parathion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Mevinphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Monocrotophos mg/kg < 2 2 Pass Naled mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Omethoate mg/kg < 2 2 Pass Phorate mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Pirimiphos-methyl mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Pyrazophos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Ronnel mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Terbufos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Tetrachlorvinphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Tokuthion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Trichloronate mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Method Blank Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions TRH >C10-C16 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass TRH >C16-C34 mg/kg < 100 100 Pass TRH >C34-C40 mg/kg < 100 100 Pass Method Blank Heavy Metals Arsenic mg/kg < 2 2 Pass Cadmium mg/kg < 0.4 0.4 Pass Chromium mg/kg < 5 5 Pass Copper mg/kg < 5 5 Pass Lead mg/kg < 5 5 Pass Mercury mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 14 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 162
Acceptance Pass Qualifying Test Units Result 1 Limits Limits Code Nickel mg/kg < 5 5 Pass Zinc mg/kg < 5 5 Pass LCS - % Recovery Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions TRH C6-C9 % 129 70-130 Pass TRH C10-C14 % 113 70-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery BTEX Benzene % 116 70-130 Pass Toluene % 120 70-130 Pass Ethylbenzene % 121 70-130 Pass m&p-Xylenes % 121 70-130 Pass Xylenes - Total % 120 70-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Naphthalene % 128 70-130 Pass TRH C6-C10 % 124 70-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthene % 87 70-130 Pass Acenaphthylene % 89 70-130 Pass Anthracene % 92 70-130 Pass Benz(a)anthracene % 79 70-130 Pass Benzo(a)pyrene % 89 70-130 Pass Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene % 95 70-130 Pass Benzo(g.h.i)perylene % 72 70-130 Pass Benzo(k)fluoranthene % 81 70-130 Pass Chrysene % 77 70-130 Pass Dibenz(a.h)anthracene % 78 70-130 Pass Fluoranthene % 72 70-130 Pass Fluorene % 87 70-130 Pass Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene % 74 70-130 Pass Naphthalene % 90 70-130 Pass Phenanthrene % 88 70-130 Pass Pyrene % 73 70-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery Organochlorine Pesticides 4.4'-DDD % 126 70-130 Pass 4.4'-DDE % 93 70-130 Pass 4.4'-DDT % 115 70-130 Pass a-BHC % 82 70-130 Pass Aldrin % 77 70-130 Pass b-BHC % 82 70-130 Pass d-BHC % 90 70-130 Pass Dieldrin % 91 70-130 Pass Endosulfan I % 89 70-130 Pass Endosulfan II % 92 70-130 Pass Endosulfan sulphate % 98 70-130 Pass Endrin % 85 70-130 Pass Endrin aldehyde % 97 70-130 Pass Endrin ketone % 123 70-130 Pass g-BHC (Lindane) % 83 70-130 Pass Heptachlor % 118 70-130 Pass Heptachlor epoxide % 83 70-130 Pass
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 15 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 163
Acceptance Pass Qualifying Test Units Result 1 Limits Limits Code Hexachlorobenzene % 80 70-130 Pass Methoxychlor % 117 70-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery Organophosphorus Pesticides Diazinon % 85 70-130 Pass Dimethoate % 74 70-130 Pass Ethion % 128 70-130 Pass Fenitrothion % 78 70-130 Pass Methyl parathion % 82 70-130 Pass Mevinphos % 75 70-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions TRH >C10-C16 % 118 70-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery Heavy Metals Arsenic % 109 80-120 Pass Cadmium % 110 80-120 Pass Chromium % 117 80-120 Pass Copper % 114 80-120 Pass Lead % 101 80-120 Pass Mercury % 119 75-125 Pass Nickel % 113 80-120 Pass Zinc % 111 80-120 Pass QA Acceptance Pass Qualifying Test Lab Sample ID Source Units Result 1 Limits Limits Code Spike - % Recovery Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1 TRH C6-C9 M16-De06117 CP % 129 70-130 Pass TRH C10-C14 M16-De06117 CP % 104 70-130 Pass Spike - % Recovery BTEX Result 1 Benzene M16-De06117 CP % 104 70-130 Pass Toluene M16-De06117 CP % 113 70-130 Pass Ethylbenzene M16-De06117 CP % 112 70-130 Pass m&p-Xylenes M16-De06117 CP % 111 70-130 Pass o-Xylene M16-De06117 CP % 111 70-130 Pass Xylenes - Total M16-De06117 CP % 111 70-130 Pass Spike - % Recovery Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Naphthalene M16-De06117 CP % 119 70-130 Pass TRH C6-C10 M16-De06117 CP % 120 70-130 Pass Spike - % Recovery Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1 4.4'-DDD M16-De06265 NCP % 126 70-130 Pass 4.4'-DDE M16-De06265 NCP % 105 70-130 Pass 4.4'-DDT M16-De06265 NCP % 88 70-130 Pass a-BHC M16-De06265 NCP % 96 70-130 Pass Aldrin M16-De06265 NCP % 89 70-130 Pass b-BHC M16-De06265 NCP % 99 70-130 Pass d-BHC M16-De06265 NCP % 109 70-130 Pass Dieldrin M16-De06265 NCP % 80 70-130 Pass Endosulfan I M16-De06265 NCP % 103 70-130 Pass Endosulfan II M16-De06265 NCP % 104 70-130 Pass Endosulfan sulphate M16-De06265 NCP % 115 70-130 Pass Endrin M16-De06265 NCP % 112 70-130 Pass
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 16 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 164
QA Acceptance Pass Qualifying Test Lab Sample ID Source Units Result 1 Limits Limits Code Endrin aldehyde M16-De06265 NCP % 108 70-130 Pass Endrin ketone M16-De06265 NCP % 128 70-130 Pass g-BHC (Lindane) M16-De06265 NCP % 97 70-130 Pass Heptachlor M16-De06265 NCP % 88 70-130 Pass Heptachlor epoxide M16-De06265 NCP % 97 70-130 Pass Hexachlorobenzene M16-De06265 NCP % 92 70-130 Pass Methoxychlor M16-De06265 NCP % 107 70-130 Pass Spike - % Recovery Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1 TRH >C10-C16 M16-De06117 CP % 109 70-130 Pass Spike - % Recovery Organophosphorus Pesticides Result 1 Diazinon M16-De06118 CP % 98 70-130 Pass Dimethoate M16-De06118 CP % 76 70-130 Pass Ethion M16-De06118 CP % 106 70-130 Pass Fenitrothion M16-De06118 CP % 79 70-130 Pass Methyl parathion M16-De06118 CP % 71 70-130 Pass Mevinphos M16-De06118 CP % 78 70-130 Pass Spike - % Recovery Heavy Metals Result 1 Arsenic M16-De06118 CP % 104 75-125 Pass Cadmium M16-De06118 CP % 103 75-125 Pass Chromium M16-De06118 CP % 104 75-125 Pass Copper M16-De06118 CP % 99 75-125 Pass Lead M16-De06118 CP % 100 75-125 Pass Mercury M16-De06118 CP % 99 70-130 Pass Nickel M16-De06118 CP % 102 75-125 Pass Zinc M16-De06118 CP % 97 75-125 Pass Spike - % Recovery Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1 Acenaphthene M16-De06129 CP % 99 70-130 Pass Acenaphthylene M16-De06129 CP % 102 70-130 Pass Anthracene M16-De06129 CP % 102 70-130 Pass Benz(a)anthracene M16-De06129 CP % 90 70-130 Pass Benzo(a)pyrene M16-De06129 CP % 104 70-130 Pass Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M16-De06129 CP % 121 70-130 Pass Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M16-De06129 CP % 85 70-130 Pass Benzo(k)fluoranthene M16-De06129 CP % 85 70-130 Pass Chrysene M16-De06129 CP % 90 70-130 Pass Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M16-De06129 CP % 89 70-130 Pass Fluoranthene M16-De06129 CP % 84 70-130 Pass Fluorene M16-De06129 CP % 99 70-130 Pass Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M16-De06129 CP % 86 70-130 Pass Naphthalene M16-De06129 CP % 103 70-130 Pass Phenanthrene M16-De06129 CP % 98 70-130 Pass Pyrene M16-De06129 CP % 86 70-130 Pass QA Acceptance Pass Qualifying Test Lab Sample ID Source Units Result 1 Limits Limits Code Duplicate Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD TRH C6-C9 M16-De06105 NCP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass TRH C10-C14 B16-De06591 NCP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass TRH C15-C28 B16-De06591 NCP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass TRH C29-C36 B16-De06591 NCP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 17 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 165
Duplicate BTEX Result 1 Result 2 RPD Benzene M16-De06105 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass Toluene M16-De06105 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass Ethylbenzene M16-De06105 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass m&p-Xylenes M16-De06105 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass o-Xylene M16-De06105 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass Xylenes - Total M16-De06105 NCP mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 <1 30% Pass Duplicate Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD Naphthalene M16-De06105 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass TRH C6-C10 M16-De06105 NCP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass Duplicate Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1 Result 2 RPD Acenaphthene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Acenaphthylene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Anthracene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benz(a)anthracene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benzo(a)pyrene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benzo(k)fluoranthene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Chrysene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Fluoranthene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Fluorene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Naphthalene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Phenanthrene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Pyrene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Duplicate Organophosphorus Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD Azinphos-methyl M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Bolstar M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Chlorfenvinphos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Chlorpyrifos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Chlorpyrifos-methyl M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Coumaphos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass Demeton-S M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Demeton-O M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Diazinon M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Dichlorvos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Dimethoate M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Disulfoton M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass EPN M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Ethion M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Ethoprop M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Ethyl parathion M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Fenitrothion M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Fensulfothion M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Fenthion M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Malathion M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Merphos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Methyl parathion M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Mevinphos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Monocrotophos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 18 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 166
Duplicate Organophosphorus Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD Naled M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Omethoate M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass Phorate M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Pirimiphos-methyl M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Pyrazophos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Ronnel M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Terbufos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Tetrachlorvinphos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Tokuthion M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Trichloronate M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Duplicate Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD TRH >C10-C16 B16-De06591 NCP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass TRH >C16-C34 B16-De06591 NCP mg/kg < 100 < 100 <1 30% Pass TRH >C34-C40 B16-De06591 NCP mg/kg < 100 < 100 <1 30% Pass Duplicate Heavy Metals Result 1 Result 2 RPD Arsenic M16-De06117 CP mg/kg 10 10.0 5.0 30% Pass Cadmium M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 <1 30% Pass Chromium M16-De06117 CP mg/kg 10 11 5.0 30% Pass Copper M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass Lead M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass Mercury M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass Nickel M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass Zinc M16-De06117 CP mg/kg 30 25 19 30% Pass Duplicate Heavy Metals Result 1 Result 2 RPD Arsenic M16-De06118 CP mg/kg 13 14 <1 30% Pass Cadmium M16-De06118 CP mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 <1 30% Pass Chromium M16-De06118 CP mg/kg 5.5 5.5 1.0 30% Pass Copper M16-De06118 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass Lead M16-De06118 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass Mercury M16-De06118 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass Nickel M16-De06118 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass Zinc M16-De06118 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass Duplicate Result 1 Result 2 RPD % Moisture M16-De06120 CP % 4.3 5.0 15 30% Pass Duplicate Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1 Result 2 RPD Acenaphthene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Acenaphthylene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Anthracene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benz(a)anthracene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benzo(a)pyrene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benzo(k)fluoranthene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Chrysene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Fluoranthene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Fluorene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Naphthalene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 19 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 167
Duplicate Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1 Result 2 RPD Phenanthrene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Pyrene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Duplicate Organophosphorus Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD Azinphos-methyl M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Bolstar M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Chlorfenvinphos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Chlorpyrifos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Chlorpyrifos-methyl M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Coumaphos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass Demeton-S M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Demeton-O M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Diazinon M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Dichlorvos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Dimethoate M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Disulfoton M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass EPN M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Ethion M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Ethoprop M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Ethyl parathion M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Fenitrothion M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Fensulfothion M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Fenthion M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Malathion M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Merphos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Methyl parathion M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Mevinphos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Monocrotophos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass Naled M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Omethoate M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass Phorate M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Pirimiphos-methyl M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Pyrazophos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Ronnel M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Terbufos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Tetrachlorvinphos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Tokuthion M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Trichloronate M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Duplicate Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD Chlordanes - Total M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass 4.4'-DDD M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass 4.4'-DDE M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass 4.4'-DDT M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass a-BHC M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Aldrin M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass b-BHC M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass d-BHC M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Dieldrin M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Endosulfan I M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Endosulfan II M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Endosulfan sulphate M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Endrin M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Endrin aldehyde M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 20 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 168
Duplicate Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD Endrin ketone M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass g-BHC (Lindane) M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Heptachlor M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Heptachlor epoxide M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Hexachlorobenzene M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Methoxychlor M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Toxaphene M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 21 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 169
Quality Control Analyte Summary Compliance
The table below is the actual occurrence of QC performed on the batch of samples within this report and as defined below
Laboratory Laboratory Laboratory Analysis Samples Duplicates Matrix Spikes Method Blanks Control Samples Analysed Reported Reported Reported Reported BTEX 9 1 1 1 1 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM 9 1 1 2 2 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM 9 1 1 2 2 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons 9 2 1 1 1 Organochlorine Pesticides 9 1 1 1 1 Organophosphorus Pesticides 9 2 1 1 1 Heavy Metals 9 2 1 1 1 % Moisture 9 1 NA NA NA
Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance follows guidelines delineated in the National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure April 2011, Schedule B3, Guideline on Laboratory Analysis of Potentially Contaminated Soils and US EPA SW-846 Chapter 1: 'Quality Control'. It comprises the following when a laboratory process batch is deemed to consist of up to 20 samples that are similar in terms of matrix and test procedure, and are processed as one unit for QC purposes. If more than 20 samples are being processed, they are considered as more than one batch.
Method blank One method blank per process batch.
Laboratory duplicate There should be at least one duplicate per process batch, or two duplicates if the process batch exceeds 10 samples.
Laboratory control sample (LCS) There should be at least one LCS per process batch.
Matrix spikes There should be one matrix spike per matrix type per process batch.
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 22 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 170
Comments
Sample Integrity Custody Seals Intact (if used) N/A Attempt to Chill was evident Yes Sample correctly preserved Yes Appropriate sample containers have been used Yes Sample containers for volatile analysis received with minimal headspace Yes Samples received within HoldingTime Yes Some samples have been subcontracted No
Qualifier Codes/Comments Code Description F2 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "naphthalene" value from the ">C10-C16" value. The naphthalene value used in this calculation is obtained from volatiles N01 (Purge & Trap analysis). Where we have reported both volatile (P&T GCMS) and semivolatile (GCMS) naphthalene data, results may not be identical. Provided correct sample handling protocols have been followed, any observed differences in results are likely to be due to procedural differences within each methodology. Results determined by both techniques have passed N02 all QAQC acceptance criteria, and are entirely technically valid. F1 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "Total BTEX" value from the "C6-C10" value. The "Total BTEX" value is obtained by summing the concentrations of BTEX N04 analytes. The "C6-C10" value is obtained by quantitating against a standard of mixed aromatic/aliphatic analytes. Please note:- These two PAH isomers closely co-elute using the most contemporary analytical methods and both the reported concentration (and the TEQ) apply specifically to N07 the total of the two co-eluting PAHs
Authorised By
Sarah Gould Analytical Services Manager Alex Petridis Senior Analyst-Metal (VIC) Alex Petridis Senior Analyst-Organic (VIC) Harry Bacalis Senior Analyst-Volatile (VIC) Huong Le Senior Analyst-Inorganic (VIC) Joseph Edouard Senior Analyst-Organic (VIC) Rhys Thomas Senior Analyst-Asbestos (WA)
Glenn Jackson National Operations Manager
- Indicates Not Requested * Indicates NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this service Measurement uncertainty of test data is available on request or please click here. Eurofins | mgt shall not be liable for loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred by the client, or any other person or company, resulting from the use of any information or interpretation given in this report. In no case shall Eurofins | mgt be liable for consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost profits, damages for failure to meet deadlines and lost production arising from this report. This document shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to the items tested. Unless indicated otherwise, the tests were performed on the samples as received.
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 23 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Page | 171
Certificate of Analysis
NATA Accredited Accreditation Number 1261 Site Number 18217 Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025–Testing The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included in this document are traceable to Australian/national standards.
Tonkin Consulting Level 2, 66 Rundle Street Kent Town SA 5067
Attention: Jack Horan Report 526588-AID Project Name FRANK BRENNAN CONSULTING Project ID 2016.1432 Received Date Dec 06, 2016 Date Reported Dec 15, 2016
Methodology: Asbestos ID Conducted in accordance with the Australian Standard AS 4964 – 2004: Method for the Qualitative Identification of Asbestos in Bulk Samples and in-house Method LTM-ASB-8020 by polarised light microscopy (PLM) and dispersion staining (DS) techniques. Bulk samples include building materials, soils and ores. Subsampling Soil The whole sample submitted is first dried and then sieved through a 10mm sieve followed by a Samples 2mm sieve. All fibrous matter viz greater than 10mm, greater than 2mm as well as the material passing through the 2mm sieve are retained and analysed for the presence of asbestos. If the sub 2mm fraction is greater than approximately 30 to 60g then a sub-sampling routine based on ISO 3082:2009(E) Iron ores - Sampling and Sample preparation procedures is employed. Depending on the nature and size of the soil sample, the sub-2 mm residue material may need to be sub-sampled for trace analysis in accordance with AS 4964-2004. Bonded The material is first examined and any fibres isolated and where required interfering organic asbestos- fibres or matter may be removed by treating the sample for several hours at a temperature not containing exceeding 400 ± 30°C. The resultant material is then ground and examined in accordance with material (ACM) AS 4964-2004. Limit of Reporting The nominal detection limit of the AS4964 method is around 0.01%. The examination of large sample sizes (at least 500 ml is recommended) may improve the likelihood of identifying asbestos material in the greater than 2 mm fraction. The NEPM screening level of 0.001% w/w asbestos in soil for FA and AF (i.e. non-bonded/friable asbestos) only applies where the FA and AF are able to be quantified by gravimetric procedures. This screening level is not applicable to free fibres. NOTE: NATA News, September 2011 – page 34, states, “Weighing of fibres is problematic and can lead to loss of fibres and potential exposure for laboratory analysts. To request laboratories to report information which is outside the scope of AS 4964-2004 and the scope of their accreditation is misleading and is most unwise” therefore such values reported are outside the scope of Eurofins | mgt NATA accreditation as designated by an asterisk.
Eurofins | mgt 2-5, Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, VIC, Australia, 3166 Page 1 of 7 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-AID NATA AccreditedPage | 172 Accreditation Number 1261 Site Number 18217 Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025–Testing The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included in this document are traceable to Australian/national standards.
Project Name FRANK BRENNAN CONSULTING Project ID 2016.1432 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Report 526588-AID
Eurofins | mgt Client Sample ID Sample No. Date Sampled Sample Description Result
No asbestos detected. TP02-1 16-De06117 Dec 05, 2016 Approximate Sample 75g Organic fibre detected. Sample consisted of: Brown coarse grain soil and rocks No respirable fibres detected. No asbestos detected. TP05-1 16-De06122 Dec 05, 2016 Approximate Sample 92g Organic fibre detected. Sample consisted of: Light brown coarse grain soil and rocks No respirable fibres detected. No asbestos detected. TP07-1 16-De06126 Dec 05, 2016 Approximate Sample 79g Organic fibre detected. Sample consisted of: Light brown coarse grain soil and rocks No respirable fibres detected.
Eurofins | mgt 2-5, Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, VIC, Australia, 3166 Page 2 of 7 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-AID Page | 173
Sample History Where samples are submitted/analysed over several days, the last date of extraction and analysis is reported. A recent review of our LIMS has resulted in the correction or clarification of some method identifications. Due to this, some of the method reference information on reports has changed. However, no substantive change has been made to our laboratory methods, and as such there is no change in the validity of current or previous results (regarding both quality and NATA accreditation). If the date and time of sampling are not provided, the Laboratory will not be responsible for compromised results should testing be performed outside the recommended holding time.
Description Testing Site Extracted Holding Time Asbestos - LTM-ASB-8020 Perth Dec 07, 2016 Indefinite
Eurofins | mgt 2-5, Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, VIC, Australia, 3166 Page 3 of 7 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-AID Page | 174 Melbourne Sydney Brisbane Perth 3-5 Kingston Town Close Unit F3, Building F 1/21 Smallwood Place 2/91 Leach Highway Oakleigh VIC 3166 16 Mars Road Murarrie QLD 4172 Kewdale WA 6105 Phone : +61 3 8564 5000 Lane Cove West NSW 2066 Phone : +61 7 3902 4600 Phone : +61 8 9251 9600 ABN – 50 005 085 521 e.mail : [email protected] NATA # 1261 Phone : +61 2 9900 8400 NATA # 1261 Site # 20794 NATA # 1261 web : www.eurofins.com.au Site # 1254 & 14271 NATA # 1261 Site # 18217 Site # 18217
V2
Company Name: Tonkin Consulting Order No.: Received: Dec 6, 2016 3:21 PM Address: Level 2, 66 Rundle Street Report #: 526588 Due: Dec 13, 2016 Kent Town Phone: 08 8273 3100 Priority: 5 Day SA 5067 Fax: 08 8273 3110 Contact Name: Jack Horan Project Name: FRANK BRENNAN CONSULTING Project ID: 2016.1432 Eurofins | mgt Analytical Services Manager : Sarah Gould Asbestos Absence/Presence HOLD Eurofins |mgtSuiteB14 Moisture Set Eurofins |mgtSuiteB7
Sample Detail
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 XXXX Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794 Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X External Laboratory No Sample ID Sample Date Sampling Matrix LAB ID Time 1 TP02-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06117 X XXX 2 TP02-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06118 XXX 3 TP03-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06119 XXX 4 TP04-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06120 XXX 5 TP04-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06121 X 6 TP05-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06122 X XXX 7 TP05-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06123 X 8 TP06-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06124 X 9 TP06-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06125 XXX
Eurofins | mgt 2-5, Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, VIC, Australia, 3166 Page 4 of 7 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-AID Page | 175 Melbourne Sydney Brisbane Perth 3-5 Kingston Town Close Unit F3, Building F 1/21 Smallwood Place 2/91 Leach Highway Oakleigh VIC 3166 16 Mars Road Murarrie QLD 4172 Kewdale WA 6105 Phone : +61 3 8564 5000 Lane Cove West NSW 2066 Phone : +61 7 3902 4600 Phone : +61 8 9251 9600 ABN – 50 005 085 521 e.mail : [email protected] NATA # 1261 Phone : +61 2 9900 8400 NATA # 1261 Site # 20794 NATA # 1261 web : www.eurofins.com.au Site # 1254 & 14271 NATA # 1261 Site # 18217 Site # 18217
V2
Company Name: Tonkin Consulting Order No.: Received: Dec 6, 2016 3:21 PM Address: Level 2, 66 Rundle Street Report #: 526588 Due: Dec 13, 2016 Kent Town Phone: 08 8273 3100 Priority: 5 Day SA 5067 Fax: 08 8273 3110 Contact Name: Jack Horan Project Name: FRANK BRENNAN CONSULTING Project ID: 2016.1432 Eurofins | mgt Analytical Services Manager : Sarah Gould Asbestos Absence/Presence HOLD Eurofins |mgtSuiteB14 Moisture Set Eurofins |mgtSuiteB7
Sample Detail
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 XXXX Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794 Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X 10 TP07-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06126 X XXX 11 TP08-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06127 X 12 TP08-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06128 XXX 13 DUP01 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06129 XXX 14 DUP02 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06130 X Test Counts 3 5 9 9 9
Eurofins | mgt 2-5, Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, VIC, Australia, 3166 Page 5 of 7 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-AID Page | 176
Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary General 1. QC data may be available on request. 2. All soil results are reported on a dry basis, unless otherwise stated. 3. Samples were analysed on an 'as received' basis. 4. This report replaces any interim results previously issued. Holding Times Please refer to 'Sample Preservation and Container Guide' for holding times (QS3001). For samples received on the last day of holding time, notification of testing requirements should have been received at least 6 hours prior to sample receipt deadlines as stated on the Sample Receipt Advice. If the Laboratory did not receive the information in the required timeframe, and regardless of any other integrity issues, suitably qualified results may still be reported. Holding times apply from the date of sampling, therefore compliance to these may be outside the laboratory's control. Units % w/w: weight for weight basis grams per kilogram Filter loading: fibres/100 graticule areas Reported Concentration: fibres/mL Flowrate: L/min Terms Dry Where a moisture has been determined on a solid sample the result is expressed on a dry basis. LOR Limit of Reporting. COC Chain of custody SRA Sample Receipt Advice ISO International Stardards Organisation AS Australian Standards WA DOH Western Australia Department of Health NOHSC National Occupational Health and Safety Commission ACM Bonded asbestos-containing material means any material containing more than 1% asbestos and comprises asbestos-containing-material which is in sound condition, although possibly broken or fragmented, and where the asbestos is bound in a matrix such as cement or resin. Common examples of ACM include but are not limited to: pipe and boiler insulation, sprayed-on fireproofing, troweled-on acoustical plaster, floor tile and mastic, floor linoleum, transite shingles, roofing materials, wall and ceiling plaster, ceiling tiles, and gasket materials. This term is restricted to material that cannot pass a 7 mm x 7 mm sieve. This sieve size is selected because it approximates the thickness of common asbestos cement sheeting and for fragments to be smaller than this would imply a high degree of damage and hence potential for fibre release. FA FA comprises friable asbestos material and includes severely weathered cement sheet, insulation products and woven asbestos material. This type of friable asbestos is defined here as asbestos material that is in a degraded condition such that it can be broken or crumbled by hand pressure. This material is typically unbonded or was previously bonded and is now significantly degraded (crumbling). PACM Presumed Asbestos-Containing Material means thermal system insulation and surfacing material found in buildings, vessels, and vessel sections constructed no later than 1980 that are assumed to contain greater than one percent asbestos but have not been sampled or analyzed to verify or negate the presence of asbestos. AF Asbestos fines (AF) are defined as free fibres, or fibre bundles, smaller than 7mm. It is the free fibres which present the greatest risk to human health, although very small fibres (< 5 microns in length) are not considered to be such a risk. AF also includes small fragments of bonded ACM that pass through a 7 mm x 7 mm sieve. (Note that for bonded ACM fragments to pass through a 7 mm x 7 mm sieve implies a substatntial degree of damage which increases the potential for fibre release.) AC Asbestos cement means a mixture of cement and asbestos fibres (typically 90:10 ratios).
Eurofins | mgt 2-5, Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, VIC, Australia, 3166 Page 6 of 7 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-AID Page | 177
Comments The samples received were not collected in approved asbestos bags and were therefore sub-sampled from the 250mL glass jars. Valid sub- sampling procedures were applied so as to ensure that the sub-samples to be analysed accurately represented the samples received.
Sample Integrity Custody Seals Intact (if used) N/A Attempt to Chill was evident Yes Sample correctly preserved Yes Appropriate sample containers have been used Yes Sample containers for volatile analysis received with minimal headspace Yes Samples received within HoldingTime Yes Some samples have been subcontracted No
Qualifier Codes/Comments Code Description N/A Not applicable
Authorised by:
Nibha Vaidya Senior Analyst-Asbestos (NSW)
Rhys Thomas Senior Analyst-Asbestos (WA)
Glenn Jackson National Operations Manager
Final Report – this report replaces any previously issued Report
- Indicates Not Requested * Indicates NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this service Uncertainty data is available on request Eurofins | mgt shall not be liable for loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred by the client, or any other person or company, resulting from the use of any information or interpretation given in this report. In no case shall Eurofins | mgt be liable for consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost profits, damages for failure to meet deadlines and lost production arising from this report. This document shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to the items tested. Unless indicated otherwise, the tests were performed on the samples as received.
Eurofins | mgt 2-5, Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, VIC, Australia, 3166 Page 7 of 7 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-AID Page | 178
Appendix E
Site Photos
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation Page | 179 13 Admella Drive Site Photographs
Photo looking north at the previously excavated area. The northern extent of the previous excavation is shown by the exposed natural soils in the background.
Photo looking north west at the previously excavated area. The northern extent of the previous excavation is shown by the exposed natural soils in the background. Page | 180 13 Admella Drive Site Photographs
Photo of TP5, which shows the sands and inclusions encountered during excavation of test pits.
Photo of the surface at TP7, which shows the types of materials within the former excavation area. Lot 13 Admella Drive
Preliminary Site Investigation
Frank Brennan Consulting Services
December 2016
Ref No. 20161432R001
Document History and Status
Rev Description Author Reviewed Approved Date
A Final MTB JCH TT 23 December 2016
© Tonkin Consulting 2015 This document is, and shall remain, the property of Tonkin Consulting. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation
Contents
1 Executive Summary 1
2 Introduction 2 2.1 Background 2 2.2 Objectives 2 2.3 Scope of Work 2
3 Site History Investigations 4 3.1 Site Identification 4 3.2 Site Features 4 3.3 Site Operations and Facilities 7 3.4 Historical CT Search 7 3.5 Aerial Photography Review 7 3.6 Services & Service Providers (DBYD) 8 3.7 Regional Geology 9 3.8 Regional Hydrogeology 9 3.9 EPA Section 7 Search 10 3.10 Potential PCA and Sources 10 3.10.1 Contaminants of Potential Concern 10
4 Preliminary Conceptual Site Model (CSM) 11 4.1 Potential Sources 11 4.2 Potential Exposure Routes 11 4.3 Potential Receptors 12 4.4 Plausible Exposure Pathways 12
5 Soil Analytical Results 14 5.1 Sampling Methodology 14 5.2 Soil Lithology Encountered/Extent of Fill 14 5.3 Quality Control and Quality Assurance 14 5.4 Soil Analytical Results 15
6 Updated Conceptual Site Model 16 6.1 Potential Sources 16 6.2 Potential Exposure Routes 16 6.3 Potential Receptors 16 6.4 Plausible Exposure Pathways 16
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation
7 Discussion 19 7.1 Possible Exposure Scenarios 19 7.1.1 Possible Exposure Pathway #1 19 7.1.2 Possible Exposure Pathway #2 19 7.1.3 Possible Exposure Pathway #3 19 7.1.4 Possible Exposure Pathway #4 20 7.1.5 Possible Exposure Pathway #5 20 7.2 Inherent Uncertainties 20
8 Conclusions 21 8.1 Conclusions 21
9 Statement of Limitations 22
Tables Table 3.1 Site Details 4 Table 3.2 Summary of Aerial Photography 7 Table 4.1 Preliminary Conceptual Site Model – Current Site 13 Table 5.1 Site Specific Soil Lithology 14 Table 6.1 Updated Conceptual Site Model 17
Figures Figure 3.1 Site Locality Plan 5 Figure 3.2 Site Features Plan 6
Appendices Appendix A Searches Appendix B Aerial Photos Appendix C Field Forms Appendix C Soil Analytical Results Appendix D Site Photos
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation
1 Executive Summary A site inspection and desktop review of historical information has identified or inferred a number of potentially contaminating activities to have occurred at the site or within the surrounding vicinity of the site. These activities include: Imported materials which were put in the excavation; Historic site development, including the building of a shed and hardstand areas and associated importation of fill; Historic agricultural activities, including use of pesticides and herbicides for land maintenance. Offsite septic systems Based on the Conceptual Site Model (CSM) and the Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI) findings, it is concluded that potentially contaminating activities have occurred on the subject site, in the form of uncontrolled filling of the excavation in the centre of the site. Following the intrusive investigation which targeted the former excavation, no contaminants were found at levels exceeding the nominated NEPM 2013 Health Investigation Level A (Residential), nor was any asbestos detected. The development of a CSM and assessment of the potential historical contamination has been undertaken to help address issues that may affect the viability of the development for the proposed rural living land use. The PSI has addressed the major concern identified by council (historical excavation filling) however the following inherent uncertainties remain: A targeted assessment of the most likely source of gross contamination and most likely chemicals of concern was undertaken based on historical searches. Additional grid based assessment across the entire site will increase the coverage and reduce potential omissions however this inherent uncertainty will always exist regardless of the intensity of investigation. Groundwater conditions were not assessed as part of this investigation and hence remain unknown; The land is zoned as rural living and currently has a dwelling located on the eastern side of the central fence which is utilised as a domestic premise. The intent to divide and develop the western portion of the title for future rural living does not change the land use however it increases the potential sensitivity. This report does not identify any potential contamination that would preclude the future use of the site for rural living. A statement of suitability can only be provided by an EPA accredited auditor via a site contamination audit report. In the event that the client or council requests this statement additional investigations may be required.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 1
2 Introduction
2.1 Background As part of the assessment of the proposed land division at 42 Rivoli Drive, Beachport, South Australia, 5280 (site), Wattle Range Council requested that the applicant provide a preliminary site investigation (PSI) report (this report) to demonstrate that the site is suitable for a land division and subsequent development in accordance with the current rural living zoning. Historically the allotment has been excavated and filled with uncontrolled fill. In April 2015 a complaint was made to council regarding excavations occurring at the site. Council’s subsequent investigation showed that excavation of sand had been carried out and that the excavation had been filled predominantly with construction and demolition rubble, soils from other sites, white goods, steel concrete, plastics, treated timber and plastic bags marked “Caution Asbestos”. The site was inspected by EPA officers after council’s inspection of the property in April 2015. It was confirmed by EPA that the plastic bags marked “Caution Asbestos” contained broken concrete material and not asbestos material. The steel; plastic; timber and white goods have been recovered from the excavated area and recycled at the Beachport Resource Recovery facility in accordance with the recommendation provided by the EPA.
2.2 Objectives The objective of this PSI is to conduct the desktop searches required as part of a PSI, prepare a preliminary conceptual site model (CSM) to identify potential risks and conduct intrusive investigation to determine the potential risk to human health and the environment. These assessments are intended to: Identify relevant contamination issues; Identify contaminants of concern; Identify areas of potential concern and the potentially affected elements; Compare site data with National Environmental Protection Measure (NEPM)1 Assessment of Site Contamination (ASC); Identify trends in the historical data; and Identify data gaps to enable assessment of potential risk. Work is conducted in accordance with the and SA EPA Guidelines 2
2.3 Scope of Work This report comprises a desktop study, site inspection covering preliminary site investigations and intrusive investigation of the historically excavated and backfilled area The scope of work included: Site inspection; Review of the historical and current site activities and information; Identify potentially contaminating activities; Develop preliminary conceptual site model (CSM); Investigate shallow soils at the excavation site; and
1 NEPC (2013) National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure 1999 Amended 2013. 2 SA EPA (20109) Guidelines for the assessment and remediation of groundwater contamination
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 2
Prepare a PSI report including update of the CSM, data gaps which may exist and the potential risk to human health and the environment.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 3
3 Site History Investigations
3.1 Site Identification The site is described as 42 Rivoli Drive, Beachport, South Australia, 5280. Site details are outlined in Table 3.1 below. The site area and location plans are presented in Figure 3.1 and Figure 3.2. A copy of the current Certificate of Title (CT) is provided in Appendix A. Historical information relating to site ownership is summarised in Section 3.4 of this report. Council information pertaining to the site and zoning of the area is provided in Appendix A. Table 3.1 Site Details
Site Address 43 Rivoli Drive, Beachport, South Australia, 5280 (Also referred to as Lot 13 Admella Drive) Current Owner(s) Lipson Reef Pty Ltd
Current Certificate of Title(s) Volume 5864 Folio 196
Parcel / Plan Deposited plan 58206 Allotment 13
Local Government Authority Wattle Range Council
Council Zoning Rural Living (RuL)
Current Land Use Rural Living
Proposed Land Use Rural Living
Land Area (approximate) 10,392 m2
3.2 Site Features A site inspection was undertaken by Tonkin Consulting personnel on 5 December 2016 and the following observations made: The site is split into two sections, demarcated by a fence. On the eastern portion of the allotment there is a residential dwelling. The eastern portion of the site also has a shed and driveway adjacent the dwelling. The house has a septic system with a soakage trench directed towards the north west. There is lawn around the dwelling which is irrigated. On the western portion of the allotment there is a shed with a gravel hardstand area and driveway in front of it. There is a storage area adjacent the shed with an assortment of items including wood, steel and two boats. There is an area approximately in the centre of the western portion which shows evidence of land disturbance. The disturbance in the centre of the site is a former excavation which was backfilled. Refer to Figure 3.1 and Figure 3.2 for site locality and features plans.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 4 Legend Site
Frank Brennan Consulting Services 0 250 500 7501000 m Lot 13 Admella Drive
Job Number: 20161432 Data Acknowledgement: Site Locality Plan Filename: Admella_drive.qgs Aerial from Google, 2016 Revision: REV A Date: 19/12/2016 Figure 3.1 Drawn: MTB Legend
Extent of Site Test Pit Locations Approximate Extent of Excavation
4 0 4 8 12 m Frank Brennan Consulting Services
Job Number: 20161432 Data Acknowledgement: Lot 13 Admella Drive Filename: Admella_drive.qgs Aerial from Google, 2016 Site Plan Revision: REV A Date: 19/12/2016 Drawn: MTB Figure 3.2
3.3 Site Operations and Facilities Currently the eastern portion of the site is used as a residential dwelling with a shed. The western portion of the site is used as a residential storage area. Historically sand was excavated from the centre of the site and backfilled with uncontrolled fill. Some of the materials which were disposed of include: Demolition rubble; Soils from other sites; White goods; Steel; Concrete; Plastic bags with labelling “caution asbestos”; Plastics; and Treated timber. The steel, plastic, timber and white goods were removed from the excavation area and recycled.
3.4 Historical CT Search A review of the historic certificate of titles (CT) found that the original CT was owned by 5 different people before the title was transferred to Verdun Charles in 1948 who was a labourer by trade. The title was then transferred to Dean Muggleton in 1978, who was a grazier by trade. Dean Muggleton owned the property until 2001, when the property was transferred to individuals. In 2013 the property was transferred to Lipson Reef Pty Ltd. Lipson Reef Pty Ltd are listed online as owning a restaurant in Beachport. A summary of the historic certificate of titles is presented in Appendix A.
3.5 Aerial Photography Review Aerial photographs were obtained from 1950 and 1982 and Google Earth images from 2003, 2010, 2012 and 2014. They were inspected in order to assess land use changes over time in both the subject site and adjacent land. Copies of the historical aerial photographs from 1950 and 1982 are included in Appendix B. Details of the aerial photographs inspected during this investigation are summarised below in Table 3.2 Table 3.2 Summary of Aerial Photography
Date Scale Survey Comments
13/12/1950 1:32000 53 The site is undeveloped and appears to be covered in sand dunes and vegetation. There is no infrastructure or development in the vicinity of the site, with only an unsealed road to the west and south. Approximately 700m to the south of the site, is Rivoli Bay. Approximately 750m to the west of the site, beyond the unsealed road is Lake George. The township of Beachport has been established to the south west of the site. 03/03/1982 1:40000 2824 The site and surrounding areas have been developed into large rural residences with houses and large portions which are either vacant or have been developed into pasture. Gravel roads have been constructed to service the few residences in the vicinity of the site. Bitumen roads have been constructed to Beachport
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 7
Date Scale Survey Comments
2003 Google Map Image The site is a vacant pasture area. Additional rural residences have been constructed around the site, with large portions of land which are either vacant or pasture. Some of the roads servicing the rural residences have been bituminised. A business has been constructed to the near west of the property. It appears as though the property is some sort of industrial business evident by the driveways which allow for trucks to enter and turn and the silos/tanks adjacent a large shed. Anecdotally it is thought that the business is Beachport Liquid Minerals which manufacture and distribute liquid livestock supplements for cattle, sheep and horses. Development has continued at Beachport. 2010 Google Map Image The site has been split into its current configuration, with two allotments, separated by a fence. On the eastern allotment a house and shed with a driveway has been constructed. There are signs of irrigation of lawn on the site, as there are areas of green lawn. The western portion of the site is undeveloped, but with signs of some activity at the site, evident by the light sand/gravel surface. Development of rural residences has continued in the vicinity of the site, although the properties directly adjacent to the site remain vacant/undeveloped. Most rural properties have a portion of vacant land or pasture around the dwelling. The industrial site to the west has continued to develop with the installation of additional silos/tanks. 2012 Google Map Image The eastern portion of the site has remained the same as the 2010 image. A shed is under construction/has been constructed on the western portion of the site. It also appears that the areas around the shed are being utilised as a laydown/storage area. Development of rural residences has continued in the vicinity of the site, although the properties directly adjacent to the site remain vacant/undeveloped. Most rural properties have a portion of vacant land or pasture around the dwelling. The industrial site to the west is the same as the 2010 image. 2014 Google Map Image The eastern portion of the site has remained the same as the 2010 image. The site has a shed on the western portion of the site with laydown/storage adjacent. It appears as though excavation has commenced on the western portion of the site. This is evident by the sand at the surface and the uneven nature of the surface. Development of rural residences has continued in the vicinity of the site, although the properties directly adjacent to the site remain vacant/undeveloped. Most rural properties have a portion of vacant land or pasture around the dwelling. The industrial site to the west is the same as the 2010 image
3.6 Services & Service Providers (DBYD) A search of the Dial Before You Dig (DBYD) information has confirmed the absence of SA Water infrastructure on-site and in the vicinity of the site. Wastewater in Beachport is managed through a Community Wastewater Management System (CWMS) which is run by council. Anecdotal evidence provided by Frank Brennan indicates that the dwelling on the eastern portion of the site is not connected to this system and has a septic tank and associated soakage trench located to the north west of the building. It is anticipated that future developments would be connected to this CWMS service. This search confirmed site inspection observations that there is overhead power bordering the site on both Rivoli Drive and Admella Drive. Low voltage power enters the site from the Admella drive overhead power poles to both the eastern and western portion of the site. The western
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 8
portion of the site appears to have two low voltage lines running into the property from two power poles. The DBYD searches confirmed that there is Telstra infrastructure in the vicinity of the site and on the site. The Telstra infrastructure runs along both Rivoli Drive and Admella Drive. A Telstra line runs from a junction located at the intersection of Rivoli Drive and Admella Drive onto the site. The Telstra line runs from the south-eastern corner of the site towards the north-western corner of the site. The DBYD search indicated that SA Water have no assets in the vicinity of the site, indicating that potable water would need to be sourced from rainwater tanks, groundwater or purchased from a supplier. DBYD plans are presented in Appendix A.
3.7 Regional Geology The site is in close proximity to the coast with the geology in the area being comprised of deep flat lying sands and sand sheets and meadow podsols and Osborne high sea level marine deposits. The surface soils in the area around Rivoli Bay are part of the Rivoli land system which consists of a series of parallel, narrow, low unconsolidated coastal sand ridges and depressions or swales. The soils in the vicinity of the site consists of low dunes, which are mostly vegetated and stable. Less than 10% of this area are swales with wet deep sands or occasionally peat. The soils are typified by highly calcareous loamy sands which range from brown to yellow in colour. They are young, mildly leached soils which have originated from shelly sea-floor sediments. Regional geology maps are presented in Appendix A.
3.8 Regional Hydrogeology The site is located on the Limestone Coast in the prescribed well area of lower south east, Rivoli Bay. Lake George is located approximately 700m to the west of the site and has permanent water supplied but outflows to the sea are limited. The Limestone Coast is the major groundwater province in South Australia, with large supplies of relatively good quality groundwater. In the Limestone Coast region, groundwater is the primary source of water for irrigation, industry, stock and domestic use. Groundwater resources in the region are contained within two regionally extensive aquifer systems, an upper unconfined aquifer and a deeper confined aquifer. The unconfined aquifer is the principal source of groundwater for the Limestone Coast and is used for municipal supplies for towns, stock and domestic water, industrial use, and widespread irrigation. The quality of the unconfined groundwater resources varies across the region but is generally of good quality and bores accessing this aquifer generally have high yields.3 Groundwater flow directions are generally towards the coast and in the vicinity of the site is expected to flow in a west to south-westerly direction. A search of the groundwater bores on the water connect web site4 reveals that there are 55 groundwater wells within 1.0 km of the site. The majority of the wells have a listed purpose as domestic. The recorded standing water level in the wells ranges from 0.76 m to 5.3 m, showing that the water within the unconfined aquifer in the vicinity of the site is shallow. Salinity within the shallow aquifer ranges from 446 mg/L to 3,333 mg/L, although the salinity in most wells is below 1000 mg/L. The low salinity in the groundwater means that it is generally suitable for potable, irrigation and stock uses. There are three groundwater wells assumed to be down hydraulic gradient. These three wells do not have details on the purpose of them however it is possible that they are for domestic purposes. Water connect searches are presented in Appendix A.
3 Pirsa (2013), Water Resources of the Limestone Coast 4 Water Connect, https://www.waterconnect.sa.gov.au/Systems/GD/Pages/Default.aspx, accessed 16 December 2016
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 9
3.9 EPA Section 7 Search A search of the South Australia Environmental Protection Authority (SA EPA) records under Section 7 of the Land and Business (Sale and Conveyancing) Act 1994 indicated that no known potentially contaminating activities have been reported on the title area. The SA EPA search results are included in Appendix A.
3.10 Potential PCA and Sources Based on review of the environmental site history information gathered to date, potentially contaminating activities that may have, or are occurring at the site and/or in the site vicinity include:
On-site Activities (Past and Current) Agricultural activities; Imported materials (uncontrolled filling of the historical excavation); Use of herbicides/pesticides for land maintenance; Use of fertilisers and other chemicals for agricultural use; and Onsite septic system.
Off-site Activities (Past and Current) Farming practices; Property maintenance; Runoff and dust from adjacent industrial property; and Offsite septic systems.
3.10.1 Contaminants of Potential Concern Contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) associated with the site historical and current uses and offsite historical and current uses may include, but are not limited to the following: Heavy Metals; Polycyclic aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs); Organochlorine pesticides, organophosphorus pesticides (OCPs/OPPs); Hydrocarbons; Asbestos; Nutrients; and Pathogens.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 10
4 Preliminary Conceptual Site Model (CSM) A preliminary Conceptual Site Model (CSM) has been formulated utilising available information gathered as part of this investigation. This is an iterative CSM and was prepared to determine the presence of plausible exposure pathways to the proposed development and hence the presence of significant risk to susceptible receptors such as humans, ecosystems and the built environment. For a significant or identifiable risk to exist an exposure pathway must be present which requires each of the following to be identified: Known and potential sources of contamination and contaminants of concern including the mechanism(s) of contamination (e.g. ‘top down’ spill or sub-surface release from corroded tank or pipe); Potentially affected media (soil, sediment, groundwater, surface water, indoor and ambient air); Human and ecological receptors; and Potential and complete exposure pathways. In the absence of a plausible exposure pathway there is no risk. Therefore, the presence of measurable concentrations of contaminants does not automatically imply that the site will cause harm. The nature and importance of both receptors and exposure routes, which are relevant to any particular site, will vary according to its characteristics, intended end-use and its environmental setting.
4.1 Potential Sources
The site history review has identified potential site contamination issues associated with known or possible historical activities on the site and the surrounding areas. Potential site specific sources of contamination to the allotments are that of: Imported materials (uncontrolled filling of the historical excavation); Onsite septic system; Historic site development, including the building of a shed and hardstand areas and associated importation of fill; and Agricultural activities, including pesticides and herbicides for land maintenance and use of fertilisers. Potential off site sources of contamination to the site are that of: Farming practices (including animal burial); Property maintenance; Runoff and dust from adjacent industrial property; and Offsite septic systems.
4.2 Potential Exposure Routes The main exposure routes relevant for the site that could be feasible in terms of the end use of the site are as follows: Through direct skin contact and/or ingestion of potentially contaminated soil/asbestos; Through direct skin contact with impacted groundwater;
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 11
Surface water infiltration leading to downward leaching of contaminants within shallow soils and potentially into the underlying groundwater system; and Groundwater extraction for domestic use leading to direct contact and ingestion.
4.3 Potential Receptors
Based on the potential sources of contamination identified at the site to date, the following key site-specific potential receptors may be considered for this site: Future site users and workers, including (but not limited to), construction, excavation and maintenance workers via ingestion and direct contact with impacted soil, and inhalation of generated dust; Users of groundwater in the site vicinity; and Surface water ecosystems.
4.4 Plausible Exposure Pathways
On the basis of the available information gathered as part of the environmental site history investigation to date, the CSM and key plausible exposure pathways in terms of conditions known prior to any intrusive assessment, is provided in Table 4.1.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 12
Table 4.1 Preliminary Conceptual Site Model – Current Site
Possible Potential Transport Hazard / Source of Contaminants of Exposure Key Areas Affected Mechanisms and Exposure Potential Receptors Contamination Potential Concern Pathway # Routes
Western portion of the Direct contact, ingestion, inhalation (via Users of the site, ground workers, Heavy metals, PAHs, site where historic volatilisation, dust) migration of water maintenance/excavation workers, 1 Imported fill materials/filling hydrocarbons, herbicides/ excavation and filling through soil to groundwater and surface water ecosystems and pesticides, asbestos occurred migration of gas through soil groundwater
Soil beneath the soakage Faecal Coliforms, E,coli, Total pit, located in the north Coliforms, Ammonia, BOD, Groundwater, soil in Septic tank and soakage west of the eastern Infiltration and migration of water 2 TOC, Nitrogen (Nitrate + vicinity/beneath soakage trench trench portion of the site and through soil to groundwater Nitrite), Oxidised Nitrogen, and users of groundwater. the groundwater beneath Urea, Heavy metals the site
Direct contact, ingestion, particulate Users of the site, ground workers, Distribution across Herbicides/pesticides & inhalation, plant root uptake, surface maintenance/excavation workers, 3 Historic farming practices shallow and sub surface animal burial water migration of water through soil to surface water ecosystems and soils groundwater groundwater
Southern portion of site, Users of the site, ground workers, Direct contact, ingestion, particulate associated with the shed, maintenance/excavation workers, 4 Historic Site Development Heavy metals inhalation, surface water migration of storage bays and surface water ecosystems and water through soil to groundwater hardstand areas groundwater
Direct contact, ingestion, particulate Users of the site, ground workers, Heavy metals, herbicides/ Distribution across site Off-site Activities surrounding inhalation, plant root uptake, surface maintenance/excavation workers, 5 pesticides, nutrients, from dust in the air or the site water migration of water through soil to surface water ecosystems and Microbes surface water runoff groundwater groundwater
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 13
5 Soil Analytical Results
5.1 Sampling Methodology An intrusive investigation at the site was undertaken on 5 December 2016. The intrusive investigation targeted the former excavation and filling which occurred on the western portion of the site. A total of 8 test pits were excavated using a backhoe in a grid based formation across the historic excavation area. The different lithologies encountered were logged and one sample taken from each layer. The test pits were excavated to a depth where natural soil was encountered to delineate any fill materials encountered. 7 test pits were dug within the former excavation and one outside the excavation area to confirm natural conditions (TP8). Figure 3.2 shows the location of the test pits. All samples were sent to MGT Eurofins (MGT) under Tonkin Consulting’s chain of custody procedures. 8 primary samples and one intra-laboratory duplicate sample were analysed for TRH/ BTEXN/ PAH/ OCP/ OPP/ As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn and Hg. MGT Eurofins is NATA accredited for the analysis requested. Testing for the presence/absence of asbestos was undertaken on 3 samples. Field forms are presented in Appendix C and laboratory reports are presented in Appendix D.
5.2 Soil Lithology Encountered/Extent of Fill A general overview of the soil lithology encountered across the site is presented in Table 5.1. More detailed bore logs and photos are provided in Appendix C and Appendix E. Table 5.1 Site Specific Soil Lithology
Depth Range of Soils Encountered General Site Wide Description (mbgs)
0.0-1.0* FILL – SAND, brown with inclusions of pipe, timber, wire, metal, plastic, tiles, brick and concrete 1.0-2.0* NATURAL – SAND, yellow *Depths of lithology vary across the site and this table highlights the average depths of recorded lithology encountered – refer to bore logs for actual depths
Test pit locations were selected to allow for vertical and horizontal delineation of the fill materials within the excavation. Test pit locations are provided on Figure 3.2. The fill was delineated horizontally to the east by shallow test pit, TP9, to the south by TP8, TP6 to the west and to the north by TP3 which had shallow fill and the exposed excavation face to north. The fill materials were vertically delineated at all locations with the depth of the fill ranged from 0.6 mbgs in TP3 to 1.7 mbgs in TP7. Bore logs and site photographs provided in Appendix C and Appendix E.
5.3 Quality Control and Quality Assurance Quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) measures were undertaken by Tonkin Consulting field personnel during soil sampling. All samples were tracked under Tonkin Consulting chain of custody (COC) procedures. A total of 8 primary soil samples and one intra-laboratory duplicate samples were analysed by MGT. Calculated soil investigation RPDs are presented in the analytical results table presented in Appendix D. RPDs are not able to be calculated where one or both of the samples recorded
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 14
results below the laboratory limit of reporting (LOR). Soil RPDs are generally considered acceptable when they are less than 30% (when concentrations are <10 x LOR) or less than 50% (when concentrations are >10 x LOR). All RPDs were below 20% with the exception of moisture, arsenic and zinc. All of the RPDs are considered acceptable as the concentrations reported were marginally above the laboratory LOR and therefore small changes in actual concentration result in large relative differences. All samples were analysed within laboratory holding times. Review of the available laboratory quality assurance and quality control data accompanying the laboratory reports indicates: No method blank result outliers occurred; No matrix spike outliers occurred; No duplicate outliers occurred; No laboratory control outliers occurred; and The frequency of all laboratory control samples met frequency compliance guidelines. The laboratory results are considered acceptable for the purposes of this report as discussed above.
5.4 Soil Analytical Results The soil analytical results are presented in Appendix D. As the proposed end use of the property is as a residential allotment the NEPM 2013 Health Investigation Level A (Residential) has been adopted. The concentration of all analytes was reported below the laboratory LOR with the exception of metals. Metal concentrations were reported above the laboratory LOR but were below the NEPM 2013 HIL A criteria. Asbestos analysis was also undertaken on the soil. The soil was tested for the presence or absence of asbestos. No asbestos was detected in any of the three samples tested (TP02-1, TP05-1, TP07-1). The soil results do not exceed the NEPM HIL A criteria and would not preclude the development of the site for the intended rural living zoning.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 15
6 Updated Conceptual Site Model Following the investigations completed to date the preliminary Conceptual Site Model (CSM) has been updated utilising information gathered as part of the intrusive investigation.
6.1 Potential Sources The site history review has identified potential site contamination issues associated with known or possible historical activities on the site and the surrounding areas. Potential site specific sources of contamination to the allotments are that of: Imported materials (uncontrolled filling of the historical excavation); Historic site development, including the building of a shed and hardstand areas and associated importation of fill; and Historic agricultural activities, including use of pesticides and herbicides for land maintenance. Potential off site sources of contamination to the site are that of: Farming practices; Property maintenance; and Offsite septic systems.
6.2 Potential Exposure Routes The main exposure routes relevant for the site that could be feasible in terms of the end use of the site are as follows: Through direct skin contact and/or ingestion of potentially contaminated soil/asbestos; Through direct skin contact with impacted groundwater; and Groundwater extraction for domestic use leading to direct contact and ingestion.
6.3 Potential Receptors Based on the potential sources of contamination identified at the site to date, the following key site-specific potential receptors may be considered for this site: Future residents in Rural Living setting; Site workers, including (but not limited to) construction, excavation and maintenance workers via accidental ingestion and direct contact with contaminated groundwater, impacted surface water; Current or future users of groundwater in the site vicinity including for potable use; and Ecological receptors such as groundwater dependent ecosystems.
6.4 Plausible Exposure Pathways On the basis of the available information and risk evaluation undertaken to date, the key possible exposure pathways with the CSM are provided in Table 6.1.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 16
Table 6.1 Updated Conceptual Site Model
Possible Potential Hazard / Contaminants of Exposure Transport Potential Receptors Plausible Exposure Pathway Source of Potential Key Areas Affected Pathway Mechanisms and (Rural Living) (Rural Living) Contamination Concern # Exposure Routes Limited to historic excavation and Not likely given delineation of filling filling. Concentrations identified and chemical concentrations below the Heavy metals, PAHs, within excavation area were below NEPM HIL A guideline and no asbestos Imported fill hydrocarbons, NIL – of the area 1 the nominated NEPM HIL NIL detected in soils analysed. materials/filling herbicides/ investigated Residential criteria and not pesticides, asbestos asbestos was detected in soils sampled
No evidence was gathered to Historical application of herbicides and suggest animal burial occurred at pesticides would likely be due to Direct contact, Users of the site, ground the site. Herbicide and pesticide recent land maintenance activities ingestion, particulate workers, distribution across shallow and sub given previous grazing activities not Historic farming Herbicides/pesticides, inhalation surface maintenance/excavation 2 surface soils is likely to be limited to uncommon for residential land practices animal burial water migration of workers, surface water recent domestic levels given applications. Animal burial is more water through soil to ecosystems and historical grazing use and was not likely to occur at locations in proximity groundwater groundwater investigated as part of this to animal shelters/feeding location and investigation not likely near two joining roads.
Southern portion of site, associated Importation of virgin material in the with the shed, storage bays and southern portion of the site is likely to Direct contact, Users of the site, ground hardstand areas is expected to be be surficial in nature and not a major ingestion, particulate workers, virgin material sourced from local source of contamination. Historic Site inhalation, surface maintenance/excavation 3 Heavy metals quarry for the purpose of creating a Development water migration of workers, surface water trafficable entrance to the site, water through soil to ecosystems and therefore was not investigated as a groundwater groundwater major source of potential contamination
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 17
Possible Potential Hazard / Contaminants of Exposure Transport Potential Receptors Plausible Exposure Pathway Source of Potential Key Areas Affected Pathway Mechanisms and (Rural Living) (Rural Living) Contamination Concern # Exposure Routes Faecal Coliforms, No current extraction of groundwater. E,coli, Total Located on the eastern portion, not Future users of groundwater are Coliforms, Ammonia, considered to impact on soil on the NIL – groundwater not reminded that SA Health advise that Septic tank and Future users of 4 BOD, TOC, Nitrogen western portion not investigated as currently extracted at bore water should not be used for any soakage trench groundwater. (Nitrate + Nitrite), it is outside historical excavation the site. purpose, unless it has been tested and Oxidised Nitrogen, and filling area) shown to be suitable for that use Urea, Heavy metals
No current extraction of groundwater. Heavy metals, Future users of groundwater are Off-site Activities NIL – groundwater not herbicides/ Groundwater migration beneath Future users of reminded that SA Health advise that 5 surrounding the currently extracted at pesticides, nutrients, site groundwater. bore water should not be used for any site the site. microbes purpose, unless it has been tested and shown to be suitable for that use
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 18
7 Discussion The PSI has been undertaken at the request of the client focusing on the historic excavation and uncontrolled filling which occurred at the site. The historic excavation activities at the site involved the excavation of sand and backfilling with a range of materials including: Demolition rubble; Soils from other sites; White goods; Steel; Concrete; Plastic bags with labelling “caution asbestos”; Plastics; and Treated timber. The site was inspected by EPA officers after council’s inspection of the property in April 2015 and it was confirmed that the plastic bags marked “Caution Asbestos” contained broken concrete material and not asbestos material. The steel; plastic; timber and white goods were recovered from the excavated area and recycled to the Beachport Resource Recovery facility in accordance with the recommendation from the EPA. Upon investigation of the site additional possible exposure scenarios not related to the historic excavation activities have been discovered, however these are not expected to preclude the site from use for rural living as described below in greater detail.
7.1 Possible Exposure Scenarios
7.1.1 Possible Exposure Pathway #1 Historically excavation and filling with a range of different materials has occurred on the site. The extent of the excavation is limited to a section in the middle of the western portion of the site as shown on Figure 3.2. Intrusive investigations targeted the historic activities. Analytical results from the intrusive investigations were below the nominated NEPM HIL Residential criteria and no asbestos was detected. As the analytical results were below the adopted criteria it is considered that chemical contamination does not exist and therefore no pathway to future receptors.
7.1.2 Possible Exposure Pathway #2 A potential exposure pathway which was identified through the investigation was historic farming practices at the site. The contaminants of concern from the historic farming practices were pesticides and herbicides used for land maintenance. Any pesticides or herbicides used on the land would have been applied broadly and be limited to the near surface. The analytical results collected did not detect any pesticides or herbicides in any samples. Although a grid based assessment across the entire site was not undertaken as part of this assessment it is considered unlikely that any potential pesticides or herbicides from historic farming practices would preclude the property from use under the current rural living zoning.
7.1.3 Possible Exposure Pathway #3 Some historic site development has occurred which has included the construction of a shed, a laydown area and hardstand area. These areas to the south of the western portion of the site. The source of the potential contamination is the importation of fill. The hardstand areas have been covered in gravel, which is likely to be an imported virgin material which has been sourced locally. The surrounding rural living allotments appear to have similar materials to create access
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 19
to their sites and it is considered unlikely that contamination from the imported fill would preclude the property from the proposed rural living use.
7.1.4 Possible Exposure Pathway #4 A septic system was anecdotally reported to exist to the north west of the dwelling on the eastern allotment which would service the associated infrastructure on that property. Septic systems and associated soakage trenches are designed to drain away septic waters and in this case potentially to groundwater. The risk that may exist in the future is if groundwater is extracted for potable use, however there is no current groundwater well on site therefore no pathway from the source to the receptor. The findings of this investigation do not include assessment of groundwater beneath the site, however installation of groundwater bores and access to groundwater may be permitted on the proposed residential allotment following the appropriate application process. If groundwater extraction is proposed future users are reminded that SA Health advise that bore water should not be used for any purpose, unless it has been tested and shown to be suitable for that use.
7.1.5 Possible Exposure Pathway #5 Groundwater could be affected by current or historic land use on surrounding properties and the risk that may exist in the future is if groundwater is extracted for potable use. There is no current groundwater well on site therefore no pathway from the source to the receptor. The findings of this investigation do not include assessment of groundwater beneath the site, however installation of groundwater bores and access to groundwater may be permitted on the proposed residential allotment following the appropriate application process. If groundwater extraction is proposed future users are reminded that SA Health advise that bore water should not be used for any purpose, unless it has been tested and shown to be suitable for that use.
7.2 Inherent Uncertainties The development of a CSM and assessment of the potential historical contamination has been undertaken to help address issues that may affect the viability of the development for the proposed rural living land use. The PSI has addressed the major concern identified by council (historical excavation filling) however the following inherent uncertainties remain: A targeted assessment of the most likely source of gross contamination and most likely chemicals of concern was undertaken based on historical searches. Additional grid based assessment across the entire site will increase the coverage and reduce potential omissions however this inherent uncertainty will always exist regardless of the intensity of investigation; and Groundwater conditions were not assessed as part of this investigation and hence remain unknown.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 20
8 Conclusions
8.1 Conclusions Tonkin Consulting has performed an Environmental Site History (ESH) as part of a Preliminary Site Investigation for a portion of Deposited plan 58206 Allotment 13 within the Certificate of Title (CT) Volume 5864 Folio 196 located at 42 Rivoli Drive, Beachport, South Australia, 5280. A site inspection and desktop review of historical information has identified or inferred a number of potentially contaminating activities to have occurred at the site or within the surrounding vicinity of the site. These activities include: Imported materials which were put in the excavation; Historic site development, including the building of a shed and hardstand areas and associated importation of fill; Historic agricultural activities, including use of pesticides and herbicides for land maintenance; and Offsite septic systems. Based on the CSM and the PSI findings, it is concluded that potentially contaminating activities have occurred on the subject site, in the form of uncontrolled filling of the excavation in the centre of the site. Following the intrusive investigation which targeted the former excavation, no contaminants were found at levels exceeding the nominated NEPM HIL Residential criteria, nor was any asbestos detected. Other onsite sources of potential contamination include imported fill from development of hardstand areas and the shed on the site, pesticides and herbicides from historic farming activities. Although a grid based assessment across the entire site was not undertaken as part of this assessment it is considered unlikely that any potential pesticides or herbicides from historic farming practices would preclude the property from use under the current rural living zoning. The surrounding rural living allotments appear to have similar materials to create access to their sites and it is considered unlikely that contamination from the imported fill would preclude the property from the proposed rural living use. Offsite sources of contamination may be present beneath the site through the movement of groundwater beneath the site. No groundwater bore is currently located on the site; however, this may change in the future. The findings of this investigation do not include assessment of groundwater beneath the site, however installation of groundwater bores and access to groundwater may be permitted on the proposed residential allotment following the appropriate application process. If groundwater extraction is proposed future users are reminded that SA Health advise that bore water should not be used for any purpose, unless it has been tested and shown to be suitable for that use. The land is zoned as rural living and currently has a dwelling located to the eastern side of the central fence being utilised as a domestic premise. The intent to divide and develop the western portion of the title for future rural living does not change the land use however does increase the potential sensitivity. This report does not identify any potential contamination that would preclude the future use of the site for rural living. A statement of suitability can only be provided by an EPA accredited auditor via a site contamination audit report. In the event that the client or council requests this statement additional investigations may be required.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 21
9 Statement of Limitations Tonkin Consulting has prepared this Preliminary Site Investigation – Environmental Site History Investigation to provide a preliminary potential site contamination assessment for the subject site. The report is based on our interpretation of targeted information gathered during our investigations and has been undertaken in accordance with good professional practice and current requirements. The results of this process are set out in this report and any conclusions we have made must be considered in this light. The scope of the investigations is in general accordance with current standards applied by the relevant authority at the date of the report. It must be recognised that standards for environmental performance are regularly reviewed and the results indicated in the report should therefore be reviewed in the light of changing standards. A qualified person should always be contacted to advise on any matters involving the interpretation of the report. This report was prepared for the client, on the basis of agreed parameters. Tonkin Consulting takes no responsibility for any reliance a third party places on this report or any of its conclusions. If a third party wants to determine the environmental conditions of the site, the services of an appropriately qualified expert should be retained.
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 22
Appendix A
Searches
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation Title History Lot 13 Admella Road, Beachport
Title Reference Date Owner Comments CT 481/131 6/7/1881 Friedrich Ernst Rudolph 10/6/1883 Peter Sinclair 1/03/1905 William Edward Osbourne 26/03/1917 John Humphries 12/07/1922 Arthur William Henry Chant 23/02/1948 Verdun Charles Evans Labourer CT 2167/185 27/09/1951 Verdun Charles Evans Labourer CT 4118/325 1/06/1978 Dean Graham Muggleton Grazier CT4124/986 30/08/1978 Dean Graham Muggleton Grazier CT 4128/779 25/10/1978 Dean Graham Muggleton Grazier CT 5501/275 10/02/1998 Dean Graham Muggleton Grazier 13/06/2001 Norman kym Sutherland, Jocelyn Christine Sutherland, Jabanksia Pty Ltd CT 4128/778 25/10/1978 Dean Graham Muggleton Grazier CT 5501/270 10/02/1998 Dean Graham Muggleton Grazier 13/06/2001 Norman kym Sutherland, Jocelyn Christine Sutherland, Jabanksia Pty Ltd CT 5864/196 9/01/2002 Norman kym Sutherland, Jocelyn Christine Sutherland, Jabanksia Pty Ltd 27/05/2005 Christopher Bryan Hoffmann, Pamela Dawn Hoffmann 19/02/2013 Lipson Reef Pty Ltd
2016.1432
Product Child Parent Title Search Date/Time 01/12/2016 03:42PM
Certificate of Title Title Reference: CT 5501/270 Status: CANCELLED Parent Title(s): CT 4128/778 Dealing(s) Creating Title: CONVERTED TITLE Title Issued: 10/02/1998 Title Cancelled: 09/01/2002 Edition: 2 Child Titles
Title Reference Status Estate Type Plan / Parcel Proprietors/Lessees/ Custodians at time of issue CT 5864/194 CANCELLED Fee Simple D58206 Allotment 11 JOCELYN CHRISTINE SUTHERLAND JABANKSIA PTY. LTD. NORMAN KYM SUTHERLAND CT 5864/195 CANCELLED Fee Simple D58206 Allotment 12 JABANKSIA PTY. LTD. NORMAN KYM SUTHERLAND JOCELYN CHRISTINE SUTHERLAND CT 5864/196 CURRENT Fee Simple D58206 Allotment 13 JABANKSIA PTY. LTD. NORMAN KYM SUTHERLAND JOCELYN CHRISTINE SUTHERLAND CT 5864/197 CURRENT Fee Simple D58206 Allotment 14 NORMAN KYM SUTHERLAND JABANKSIA PTY. LTD. JOCELYN CHRISTINE SUTHERLAND
Land Services Page 1 of 1 Copyright Privacy Disclaimer: www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showCopyright www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showPrivacyStatement www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showDisclaimer
Product Historical Search (Cancelled Title) Date/Time 01/12/2016 03:50PM
Certificate of Title Title Reference: CT 5501/275 Status: CANCELLED Parent Title(s): CT 4128/779 Dealing(s) Creating CONVERTED TITLE Title: Title Issued: 10/02/1998 Title Cancelled: 09/01/2002 Child Title(s): CT 5864/195, CT 5864/196 Edition: 2 Dealings
Lodgement Completion Dealing Dealing Type Dealing Details Date Date Number Status 02/10/2001 10/01/2002 9188675 UNCERTIFIED Registered NORMAN KYM SUTHERLAND, APPLICATION JOCELYN CHRISTINE FOR DEPOSIT SUTHERLAND, OF A PLAN OF JABANKSIA PTY. LTD. (ACN: DIVISION 096 368 320) 23/04/2001 13/06/2001 9085142 MORTGAGE Registered COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 23/04/2001 13/06/2001 9085141 MORTGAGE Registered COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 23/04/2001 13/06/2001 9085140 TRANSFER Registered NORMAN KYM SUTHERLAND, JOCELYN CHRISTINE SUTHERLAND, JABANKSIA PTY. LTD. (ACN: 096 368 320) 23/04/2001 13/06/2001 9085139 APPOINTMENT Registered KAY MICHELLE MUGGLETON OF NEW (TRST), TRUSTEES HELEN MARY MUGGLETON (TRST), ROBERT MICHAEL KENNEDY (TRST)
Land Services Page 1 of 1 Copyright Privacy Disclaimer: www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showCopyright www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showPrivacyStatement www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showDisclaimer Product Historical Search Date/Time 01/12/2016 03:32PM
Certificate of Title Title Reference: CT 5864/196
Status: CURRENT
Parent Title(s): CT 5501/270, CT 5501/275
Dealing(s) Creating RTU 9188675 Title:
Title Issued: 09/01/2002
Edition: 7 Dealings
Lodgement Completion Dealing Dealing Type Dealing Details Date Date Number Status
31/01/2013 19/02/2013 11886627 MORTGAGE Registered NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD.
31/01/2013 19/02/2013 11886626 TRANSFER Registered LIPSON REEF PTY. LTD. (ACN: 146 872 479)
31/01/2013 19/02/2013 11886625 DISCHARGE Registered 10219430 OF MORTGAGE 10719854 10885769
22/01/2008 14/02/2008 10885769 MORTGAGE Registered AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD.
07/06/2007 03/07/2007 10719854 MORTGAGE Registered AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD.
06/05/2005 27/05/2005 10219430 MORTGAGE Registered AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD.
06/05/2005 27/05/2005 10219429 TRANSFER Registered CHRISTOPHER BRYAN HOFFMANN, PAMELA DAWN HOFFMANN
30/07/2004 10/08/2004 10038253 DISCHARGE Registered 9502362 OF MORTGAGE
08/01/2003 10/02/2003 9502362 MORTGAGE Registered ADELAIDE BANK LTD. (ACN: 061 461 550)
08/01/2003 10/02/2003 9502359 DISCHARGE Registered 9085141 OF MORTGAGE 9085142
23/04/2001 13/06/2001 9085142 MORTGAGE Registered COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
23/04/2001 13/06/2001 9085141 MORTGAGE Registered COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
Land Services Page 1 of 1 Copyright Privacy Disclaimer: www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showCopyright www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showPrivacyStatement www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showDisclaimer
MAP WatR/4 Adjoins
4 4 6 6 6 6
6$08(/: $<'5
0&/$&+/$1'5
$ $ $ 5 6 '
'
2
$ $ 2 $ : $ $ PrPro $ $ * $ 6 1 6 ,
5 6 $ 6 *(/7:22''5 $ $ $ 6 $ 6 6 6 $ $ 6 6 6 6 5 6 $ ' ,
$ /
$ $ 2 6
9
$ , $ 5 6 6 $ 6 $ 6 6 6 6
'
$ 5 '0 ( ' // 6 $' 1 MAP 5 $ 6 /
6 6 6 6 6 , 6 6
6 6 .
5 8 WatR
RuL % $ 6 6 $ 6 2 8 7 + 6 $ Adjoi /4 6 ( 5 1 6 $ $
$ $ 3 2 $ $ 5 ns 7 6 $ $
MAP WatR/4Adjoins 6 6
$ $ + : $ 6 < In 6
$ CstCon 6
Land Not Within a Council Area (Coastal Waters) 6 &RXQFLO%RXQGDU\LVVHDFRDVW ORZZDWHUPDUN
MAP WatR/4 Adjoins
/DPEHUWV&RQIRUPDO&RQLF3URMHFWLRQ*'$
P
BEACHPORT ENVIRONS Zones &VW&RQ &RDVWDO&RQVHUYDWLRQ ,Q ,QGXVWU\ Zone Map WatR/21 3U3UR 3ULPDU\3URGXFWLRQ 5X/ 5XUDO/LYLQJ =RQH%RXQGDU\ WATTLE RANGE COUNCIL 'HYHORSPHQW3ODQ%RXQGDU\ &RQVROLGDWHG)HEUXDU\ Wattle Range Council Zone Section Rural Living Zone
Rural Living Zone
5HIHUWRWKH0DS5HIHUHQFH7DEOHVIRUDOLVWRIWKHPDSVWKDWUHODWHWRWKLV]RQH OBJECTIVES
$]RQHFRQVLVWLQJRIODUJHDOORWPHQWVGHWDFKHGGZHOOLQJVDQGUXUDODFWLYLWLHVWKDWGRQRWDGYHUVHO\ LPSDFWWKHDPHQLW\RIWKHORFDOLW\
PRINCIPLES OF DEVELOPMENT CONTROL
Land Use 7KHIROORZLQJIRUPVRIGHYHORSPHQWDUHHQYLVDJHGLQWKH]RQH
ƒ GHWDFKHGGZHOOLQJ ƒ GRPHVWLFRXWEXLOGLQJLQDVVRFLDWLRQZLWKDGHWDFKHGGZHOOLQJ ƒ GRPHVWLFVWUXFWXUH ƒ GZHOOLQJDGGLWLRQ ƒ IDUPLQJ ƒ IDUPEXLOGLQJ ƒ VWDEOH 'HYHORSPHQWOLVWHGDVQRQFRPSO\LQJLVJHQHUDOO\LQDSSURSULDWHDQGQRWDFFHSWDEOHXQOHVVLWFDQEH GHPRQVWUDWHGWKDWLWGRHVQRWXQGHUPLQHWKHREMHFWLYHVDQGSULQFLSOHVRIWKH'HYHORSPHQW3ODQ
7KHUHVKRXOGEHQRPRUHWKDQRQHGZHOOLQJSHUDOORWPHQW
7KHNHHSLQJRIDQLPDOVVKRXOGEHDQFLOODU\WRDQGLQDVVRFLDWLRQZLWKWKHUHVLGHQWLDOXVHRIWKHODQG
7KHNHHSLQJRIKRUVHVVKRXOGRQO\EHXQGHUWDNHQLIWKHKRUVHVDUHDFFRPPRGDWHGZLWKLQDVWDEOHRU VKHOWHUZLWKVXSSOHPHQWDU\IHHGLQJWRPDLQWDLQSDVWXUHFRYHU
Form and Character 2WKHUWKDQIRUGZHOOLQJVGHYHORSPHQWVKRXOGEHVHWEDFNDWOHDVW PHWUHVIURPDQ\URDGIURQWDJH H[FHSWZKHUHIURQWLQJDURDGLGHQWLILHGLQ7DEOH:DW5%XLOGLQJ6HWEDFNVIURP5RDG%RXQGDULHV ZKHUHDQLQFUHDVHGVHWEDFNPD\EHUHTXLUHGWRPLQLPLVHWKHYLVXDOLPSDFWRIGHYHORSPHQW
'ZHOOLQJVVKRXOGEHGHVLJQHGZLWKLQWKHIROORZLQJSDUDPHWHUV
Parameter Value
0LQLPXPVHWEDFNIURPSULPDU\URDGIURQWDJH PHWUHV
0LQLPXPVHWEDFNIURPVHFRQGDU\URDGIURQWDJH PHWUHV
0LQLPXPVHWEDFNIURPVLGHERXQGDULHV PHWUHV
0LQLPXPVHWEDFNIURPUHDU ERXQGDU\ PHWUHV
0D[LPXPVLWHFRYHUDJH SHUFHQW
0D[LPXPEXLOGLQJKHLJKW IURPQDWXUDOJURXQGOHYHO PHWUHV
&RQVROLGDWHG)HEUXDU\ Wattle Range Council Zone Section Rural Living Zone
PRECINCT SPECIFIC PROVISIONS
5HIHUWRWKH0DS5HIHUHQFH7DEOHVIRUDOLVWRIWKHPDSVWKDWUHODWHWRWKHIROORZLQJSUHFLQFWV
Precinct 17 Southend, Hatherleigh, Rocky Camp, Glencoe 7KHGLYLVLRQRIODQGVKRXOGQRWUHVXOWLQWKHFUHDWLRQRIDGGLWLRQDODOORWPHQWV
6HFWLRQVWR +XQGUHGRI5LYROL%D\DW6RXWKHQGVKRXOGEHVXEVWDQWLDOO\GHYHORSHGIRUWKH SULPDU\SXUSRVHVRIWKH]RQHEHIRUHDQ\RWKHUSDUWRIWKHDUHDLVGHYHORSHG
'HYHORSPHQWIRUUXUDOOLYLQJXVHVDW5RFN\&DPSVKRXOGEHFRQILQHGWR6HFWLRQV DQG+XQGUHGRI0RXQW0XLUKHDGZLWKDQ\GHYHORSPHQWRIODQGRXWVLGHWKHVH 6HFWLRQVEHLQJGHIHUUHGXQWLODOOH[LVWLQJXQFRQVWUXFWHGURDGVKDYHEHHQFRPSOHWHGWRDUHDVRQDEOHDOO ZHDWKHUVWDQGDUGDVSDUWRIWKHSURSRVHGGHYHORSPHQW
Precinct 18 Beachport, Penola, Millicent 'HYHORSPHQWVKRXOGEHFDUULHGRXWZKHUHDSSOLFDEOHLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKHFRQFHSWVVKRZQRQ Concept Plan Map WatR/5 – Rural Living DQGConcept Plan Map WatR/7 - Rural Living.
7KHGLYLVLRQRIODQGVKRXOGQRWUHVXOWLQWKHFUHDWLRQRIDGGLWLRQDODOORWPHQWVKDYLQJDQ
D DUHDOHVVWKDQRQHKHFWDUH
E DYHUDJHZLGWKOHVVWKDQSHUFHQWRILWVDYHUDJHGHSWK
'HYHORSPHQWLQWKLV$UHDVKRXOGFRPSULVHGHWDFKHGGZHOOLQJVDQGDVVRFLDWHGRXWEXLOGLQJVRIVLQJOH VWRUH\FRQVWUXFWLRQRQODUJHDOORWPHQWV
)XUWKHUUXUDOOLYLQJGHYHORSPHQWRQ6HFWLRQVWR +XQGUHGRI5LYROL%D\DW%HDFKSRUWVKRXOGQRWEH XQGHUWDNHQXQWLOWKHH[LVWLQJDOORWPHQWVKDYHEHHQVXEVWDQWLDOO\GHYHORSHGDQGWKHQVKRXOGRQO\ SURFHHGVHTXHQWLDOO\LQFRRUGLQDWHGVWDJHVLQDQRUWKHUO\GLUHFWLRQFRPPHQFLQJIURP6HFWLRQ
5XUDOUHVLGHQWLDOGHYHORSPHQWDW3HQRODDGMDFHQWWRWKH3HQRODE\SDVVVKRXOGEHLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKDOO RIWKHIROORZLQJ
D SURYLGHWKHPLQLPXPVLWHDUHDVSUHVFULEHGH[FOXGLQJDQ\ODQGUHTXLUHGIRUWKHE\SDVV
E HQVXUHQRGLUHFWDFFHVVWRWKHE\SDVV
F EHGHVLJQHGWRPLWLJDWHDQ\DGYHUVHQRLVHLPSDFWV
G EHVHWEDFNDPLQLPXPRIPHWUHVIURPWKHE\SDVV
Precinct 19 Tantanoola, Glencoe 'HYHORSPHQWVKRXOGEHFDUULHGRXWZKHUHDSSOLFDEOHLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKHFRQFHSWVVKRZQRQ Concept Plan Map WatR/6 - Rural Living.
7KHGLYLVLRQRIODQGVKRXOGQRWUHVXOWLQWKHFUHDWLRQRIDGGLWLRQDODOORWPHQWVKDYLQJHLWKHURIWKH IROORZLQJ
D DQDUHDOHVVWKDQKHFWDUHVDQGDIURQWDJHWRDSXEOLFURDGOHVVWKDQSHUFHQWRILWVDYHUDJH GHSWK
E DQDUHDQRWOHVVWKDQWZRKHFWDUHVRUPRUHWKDQIRXUKHFWDUHVDQGDIURQWDJHWRDSXEOLFURDGOHVV WKDQSHUFHQWRILWVDYHUDJHGHSWK
&RQVROLGDWHG)HEUXDU\ Wattle Range Council Zone Section Rural Living Zone
%XVLQHVVDQGFRPPHUFLDOGHYHORSPHQWDW*OHQFRHVKRXOGEHIRFXVHGSULPDULO\DWWKHZHVWHUQHQGRI .LULS5RDG
$OOGZHOOLQJVLQWKLVDUHDVKRXOGEHFRQQHFWHGWRDQDHURELFZDVWHZDWHUWUHDWPHQWV\VWHP
'HYHORSPHQWRI6HFWLRQV DQGSDUW6HFWLRQ+XQGUHGRI+LQGPDUVKVKRXOGWDNHSODFHLQD PDQQHUWKDWDOORZVIRUIXWXUHXUEDQH[SDQVLRQRIWKH7DQWDQRROD7RZQVKLS
Precinct 20 Rendelsham 7KHGLYLVLRQRIODQGVKRXOGQRWWDNHSODFHXQOHVV
D QRDGGLWLRQDODOORWPHQWVDUHFUHDWHG
E WKHODQGGLYLVLRQLQYROYHVERXQGDU\UDWLRQDOL]DWLRQZKHUHWKHQXPEHURIUHVXOWLQJDOORWPHQWVLVQRW JUHDWHUWKDQWKHQXPEHUWKDWH[LVWHGSULRUWRUDWLRQDOL]DWLRQDQGSURYLGHGQRDOORWPHQWKDVDQDUHD OHVVWKDQILYHKHFWDUHV
'HYHORSPHQWVKRXOGWDNHSODFHZLWKDSSURSULDWHUHJDUGEHLQJKDGIRUWKHH[LVWHQFHRIFRQWDPLQDWLRQ GXHWRWKHIRUPHUGHSRVLWLRQRIKRXVHKROGZDVWHVRQODQGGHVFULEHGDV6HFWLRQ+XQGUHGRI5LYROL %D\
PROCEDURAL MATTERS
Complying Development &RPSO\LQJGHYHORSPHQWVDUHSUHVFULEHGLQ6FKHGXOHRIWKHDevelopment Regulations 2008 Non-complying Development 'HYHORSPHQW LQFOXGLQJEXLOGLQJZRUNDFKDQJHLQWKHXVHRIODQGRUGLYLVLRQRIDQDOORWPHQW IRUWKH IROORZLQJLVQRQFRPSO\LQJ Form of Development Exceptions
$GYHUWLVHPHQWDQGRUDGYHUWLVLQJ $GYHUWLVHPHQWDQGRUDGYHUWLVLQJKRDUGLQJZKHUHWKH KRDUGLQJ GHYHORSPHQWDFKLHYHVDWOHDVWRQHRI D RU E D LVDGMDFHQWWRDURDGZLWKDVSHHGOLPLWRIOHVVWKDQ NPK E KDVDQDGYHUWLVHPHQWDUHDRIVTXDUHPHWUHVRUOHVV DQGDFKLHYHVDOORIWKHIROORZLQJ L WKHPHVVDJHFRQWDLQHGWKHUHRQUHODWHVHQWLUHO\WR DODZIXOXVHRIODQG LL WKHDGYHUWLVHPHQWLVHUHFWHGRQWKHVDPH DOORWPHQWDVWKHXVHLWVHHNVWRDGYHUWLVH LLL WKHDGYHUWLVHPHQWZLOOQRWUHVXOWLQPRUHWKDQWZR DGYHUWLVHPHQWVRQWKHDOORWPHQW
$PXVHPHQWPDFKLQHFHQWUH
&RPPHUFLDOIRUHVWU\
&UHPDWRULXP
'DLU\
'ZHOOLQJ ([FHSWGHWDFKHGGZHOOLQJ
)XHOGHSRW
*HQHUDOLQGXVWU\
Wattle Range Council Zone Section Rural Living Zone
Form of Development Exceptions
+RUWLFXOWXUHLQYROYLQJWKHJURZLQJRI ([FHSWZKHUHWKHORFDWLRQIRUWKHJURZLQJRIROLYHVDFKLHYHV D ROLYHV DQG E D DWOHDVWPHWUHVIURPDOORIWKHIROORZLQJ L D1DWLRQDO3DUN LL D&RQVHUYDWLRQ3DUN LLL D:LOGHUQHVV3URWHFWLRQ$UHD LY WKHHGJHRIDVXEVWDQWLDOO\LQWDFWVWUDWXPRIQDWLYH YHJHWDWLRQJUHDWHUWKDQKHFWDUHVLQDUHD E DWOHDVWPHWUHVIURPWKHHGJHRIDVXEVWDQWLDOO\ LQWDFWVWUDWXPRIQDWLYHYHJHWDWLRQKHFWDUHVRUOHVVLQ DUHD
+RWHO
,QGXVWU\
,QWHQVLYHDQLPDONHHSLQJ
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
0DMRUSXEOLFVHUYLFHGHSRW
0RWRUUHSDLUVWDWLRQ
3HWUROILOOLQJVWDWLRQ
5HVWDXUDQW
5RDGWUDQVSRUWWHUPLQDO
6HUYLFHWUDGHSUHPLVHV
6KRSRUJURXSRIVKRSV ([FHSWZKHUHWKHJURVVOHDVDEOHDUHDLVOHVVWKDQVTXDUH PHWUHV
6SHFLDOLQGXVWU\
6WRFNVDOHV\DUG
&RQVROLGDWHG)HEUXDU\ Wattle Range Council Zone Section Rural Living Zone
Form of Development Exceptions
6WRFNVODXJKWHUZRUNV
6WRUH
:DUHKRXVH
:DVWHUHFHSWLRQVWRUDJHWUHDWPHQW RUGLVSRVDO
:UHFNLQJ\DUG Public Notification &DWHJRULHVRISXEOLFQRWLILFDWLRQDUHSUHVFULEHGLQ6FKHGXOH RIWKHDevelopment Regulations 2008 )XUWKHUWKHIROORZLQJIRUPVRIGHYHORSPHQW H[FHSWZKHUHWKHGHYHORSPHQWLVQRQFRPSO\LQJ DUH GHVLJQDWHG Category 1 Category 2
'RPHVWLFRXWEXLOGLQJ
&RQVROLGDWHG)HEUXDU\ Sequence Number:57721741 Date Requested: 14/12/16
Your Request Area is highlighted in pink
Mr Mitchell Browne Tonkin 66 Rundle Street Kent Town SA 5067
Underground cable locations
ASSETS FOUND
Area as Requested: Admella Drive Beachport SA 5280
The process:
1. You made an enquiry with Dial Before You Dig (1100).
2. Dial Before You Dig referred your enquiry to SA Power Networks (South Australia's Distribution Network).
3. SA Power Networks has checked their records and have found underground assets in your request area.
4. Please review the attached Asset Map(s) in regard to your excavation, as there may be some restrictions that apply if your excavation is greater than 300mm below ground level and less than 3.0m from an SA Power Networks Asset. Further explanation of restricted and exclusion zones can be found at http://www.sapowernetworks.com.au/public/download.jsp?id=1775 OR search sapowernetworks.com.au for NICC 404 and by referring to the figure on page 10, 11 or 12.
5. An on-site assessment and/or technical drawings may also be necessary to ascertain the exact cable/asset location. This service can be provided by SA Power Networks and may incur a cost.
6. Please contact your local SA Power Networks Location Officer to schedule work or make further enquiries regarding this request either by return email or the contact number supplied. Other general enquiries can be made on (08) 8292 0218.
7. If you have damaged SA Power Networks Assets immediately notify Faults & Emergencies on 131 366.
Please note: Underground services in the vicinity of any proposed earthworks must be located by hand digging (pot-holing) prior to the commencement of works. Persons conducting works will be held responsible for any resulting loss or damage to the services associated with infrastructure Important information and conditions of use for users of underground services information supplied by SA Power Networks
Indicative information only The accompanying information is intended only to indicate the presence of SA Power Networks' underground services and/or to convey general indicative information in respect of the location marked on the plans. The information does not necessarily provide current, comprehensive or accurate description or location of the underground services or associated infrastructure.
The information may also describe or indicate the presence of underground services or infrastructure not owned by SA Power Networks, for example, electrical services connected to an SA Power Networks' service point. SA Power Networks takes no responsibility for services or infrastructure that is not owned or operated by SA Power Networks or the accuracy or completeness of their description or location in the accompanying information.
Obtaining more technical information from Network for planning or engineering design (non-digging) projects can be arranged through the SA Power Networks Builders and Contractors Electrical Service Line on 1300 650 014.
Identifying the location of underground services Working near or around live electrical cables can be hazardous. An on-site assessment is strongly recommended prior to undertaking ANY works and is necessary to determine the location of the underground services. This can be undertaken by SA Power Networks or an alternative professional locating service provider. Enquiries can be made about SA Power Networks' cable location service by telephoning (08) 8292 0218.
Restrictions may apply in regard to your excavation particularly if your excavation is greater than 300mm below ground level and less than 3.0m from an SA Power Networks asset. Further explanation regarding restricted exclusion zones can be found at http://www.sapowernetworks.com.au/public/download.jsp?id=1775 OR search sapowernetworks.com.au for NICC 404 and by referring to the figures on pages 10, 11 or 12.
Underground services in the vicinity of any proposed earthworks must be located by hand digging (pot-holing) prior to the commencement of the works. Persons conducting works will be held responsible for any resulting loss or damage to the services or associated infrastructure.
Working near high voltage 66kV underground cables Persons intending to conduct earthworks in the vicinity of an SA Power Networks high voltage 66kV underground cable MUST first obtain a site-specific clearance by contacting the SA Power Networks Cable Management Technical Officer on 0403 582 130 or 0403 582 174.
Basis of information supply The accompanying information is supplied at the request of, and is only provided for use by, the requestor. The information is valid for 30 days from the date of issue.
SA Power Networks, its employees, agents and contractors shall accept no responsibility for any inaccuracy or incompleteness in the information provided or liability in respect of any personal injury, death, loss or damage to any real or personal property or otherwise that arises out of or in connection with, directly or indirectly, the provision of or reliance upon the information.
It is the requestor's responsibility to ensure that the information provided accords with the area depicted on the requestor's Dial Before You Dig request. The information provided should not be used in respect of any area outside of the area depicted on the Dial Before You Dig request. SA Power Networks does not warrant that the information is suitable for the requestor’s intended purposes.
Any use of the accompanying information is subject to the requestor's agreement to the conditions contained in this document. Upon acceptance of these conditions, SA Power Networks grants the requestor permission to use the information. The information must be returned to SA Power Networks if the conditions are not accepted.
Important note: It is an offence under the Electricity Act 1996 (SA) to cause damage to or interfere with electrical infrastructure
ASSET LOCATION MAP - HIGH VOLTAGE
The Plan/Sketch is supplied at your request and is subject to your agreement that SA Power Networks shall not be liable or responsible for the information supplied pursuant to this request. Upon acceptance of this condition SA Power Networks grants you permission to use the Plan/Sketch as a guide to the location of SA Power Networks underground installation. The Plan/Sketch must be returned to SA Power Networks if you fail to accept the conditions of use. ASSET LOCATION MAP - LOW VOLTAGE
Note: The presence of public lighting columns may indicate additional unidentified cables within the search area
The Plan/Sketch is supplied at your request and is subject to your agreement that SA Power Networks shall not be liable or responsible for the information supplied pursuant to this request. Upon acceptance of this condition SA Power Networks grants you permission to use the Plan/Sketch as a guide to the location of SA Power Networks underground installation. The Plan/Sketch must be returned to SA Power Networks if you fail to accept the conditions of use. Cable Plan P50 16.0N
P50 17.5 1.5 10 MBHJW E 53 10 MBHJ 2/0.40 PE S
2/0.40 PE 122.3 P1:O68 P1:O68 9DEAD 9DEAD
2 83.2
L13 D58206
48
20 MBHJ
P1:O51-70 L14 P50 1.0 D58206 4.0 30 MBHJ 1 P35 22.0 20 MBHJ SS WIREGUARD 10 MBHJ
4.1 56.8 5.9 50 CPFUT PE 50 CPFUT PE 2 P1:O51-100 P1:O51-100 EJ 211.5 26.3 5 5 60.0 17.0 P1:O81 50 MBHJ 30 MBHJ 9DEAD EJ 97.3 114.7 10 MBHJ P50 23.0 EJ 2 30 MBHJ
10.0 50 CPFUT MBHJ 50.6 50LEFT IN SITU
20
17.0 4 P35 2/0.40 1.0 EJ 6.5 20 PR
2/0.40 P1:O11-23
EJ 7DEAD 29 1.0 0m 10m 20m 30m 40m 50m 60m
P1:O21 For all Telstra DBYD plan enquiries - 1DEAD Sequence Number: 57721743 email - [email protected] For urgent onsite contact only - ph 1800 653 935 (bus hrs) Please read Duty of Care prior to any excavating TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED A.C.N. 051 775 556 Generated On 14/12/2016 08:44:56
WARNING - Due to the nature of Telstra underground plant and the age of some cables and records, it is impossible to ascertain the precise location of all Telstra plant from Telstra's plans. The accuracy and/or completeness of the information supplied can not be guaranteed as property boundaries, depths and other natural landscape features may change over time, and accordingly the plans are indicative only. Telstra does not warrant or hold out that its plans are accurate and accepts no responsibility for any inaccuracy shown on the plans.
It is your responsibility to locate Telstra's underground plant by careful hand pot-holing prior to any excavation in the vicinity and to exercise due care during that excavation.
Please read and understand the information supplied in the duty of care statement attached with the Telstra plans. TELSTRA WILL SEEK COMPENSATION FOR LOSS CAUSED BY DAMAGE TO ITS PLANT.
Telstra plans and information supplied are valid for 60 days from the date of issue. If this timeframe has elapsed, please reapply for plans.
Page 1 of 1
SOUTH AUSTRALIAN WATER CORPORATION
Notification number: 11644405 Sequence number: 57721744 Enquiry date: 14/12/2016 8:38:00 AM Enquiry location: Admella Drive, Beachport SA 5280
Mr Mitchell Browne Tonkin 66 Rundle Street
Kent Town SA 5067
Dial Before You Dig Response – No SA Water Assets Identified
Dear Mr Mitchell Browne
Thank you for contacting Dial Before You Dig (DBYD) prior to engaging in work or activities which may affect the water and sewerage infrastructure of SA Water Corporation.
We have received your request through the Dial Before You Dig service. The site location you have requested indicates there is no SA Water infrastructure recorded.
Disclaimer The information has been generated by an automated system based on the area highlighted. It is your responsibility to ensure that the dig site is properly defined when submitting your Dial Before You Dig enquiry. If the information does not match the dig site or you have received this message in error please resubmit your enquiry.
This advice and/or information is given for your private use only. The accuracy of the advice and information is not guaranteed and no responsibility is accepted by the crown, the South Australian Water Corporation or their officers, agents or servants for any loss or damage caused by reliance upon this advice and/or information, as a result of any error, omission, incorrect description or statement therein whether caused by negligence or otherwise.
The information contained in this message may be confidential and may also be subject of legal, professional or public interest immunity. If you are not the intended recipient any use, disclosure or copying of this document is unauthorised. If you have received this message in error, please contact Dial Before You Dig.
For further enquiries or assistance with interpretation of plans and search content, or to report any obvious errors with the data provided, please contact our DBYD support team via email [email protected]
Thank you for contacting DBYD service.
Yours sincerely
Dial Before You Dig Support Team SA Water Corporation
Please note: Any damage to SA Water infrastructure must be reported immediately to Service Faults and Emergencies (24 hours, 7 days) on 1300 883 121
0 15 30 60 90 120
Metres
South Australian Water Corporation NO ASSETS FOUND DBYD Sequence No: 57721744 Map Tile: 1 LT 7 LT 16 SUTHERLAND DR 8 LT 6 LT 31 17 60 LT 1 LT 19
LT 5 MUGGLETON RD 24 34 14 33 50 LAKESIDE DR 67 LT 4 91 66
SOUTHERN PORTS HWY LT 3 SEC 129 87
RIVOLI DR LT 2 39 52 45
8639 LT 1 71 46 42 26 43 48 20 56 8639 BEACHPORT
94 118 106 16 LT 32 4 8655 ADMELLA DR
29
SEC 471 SEC 213 214 85 SEC 213 214 37 33 17 7 LT 2 SOUTHERN PORTS HWY SEC 457
39
31 Water Main Wastewater Gravity CP Facility SIS Main This advice and/or information is given for your private use only. The accuracy of Water Main (Decommissioned) Wastewater Pumping CP Anode/Cathode Cables Railway the advice and information is not guaranteed and no responsibility is accepted by the crown, the South Australian Water Corporation or their officers, agents or Recycled Water Main Wastewater Vacuum CP Electricity Supply Cables Land Parcels servants for any loss or damage caused by reliance upon this advice and/or Decommissioned Asbestos Mains Wastewater Low Pressure CP Anode Bed Outlines CP = Cathodic Protection information, as a result of any error, omission, incorrect description or statement therein whether caused by negligence or otherwise. Scale @ A4: 1:5000 Lot 13 Admella Drive Local Geology
Lot 13 Admella Drive Soil Systems
RVL Rivoli Land System
Area: 87 km2
Landscape: The Rivoli land system is named after Rivoli Bay, near Beachport. It consists of a series of parallel, narrow, low unconsolidated coastal sand ridges and depressions or swales. The land system occurs in three disjunct areas; ie. adjacent to Rivoli Bay, and to Guichen Bay near Robe.
Rainfall: annual average
Main soils: H1 (45%)Carbonate sand (Shelly-Supravescent Calcarosol-Rudosol) H2 (40%)Calcareous siliceous sand (sandy Calcarosol-Tenosol)
Minor soils: N3 (9%)Wet soil (non to moderately saline) (Sodosolic-Calcarosolic-Dermosolic Hydrosol) N1 (3%)Peaty soil (Organosol)
Summary: The main limitations for land use in this land system are due partly to it’s proximity to the coast and hence exposure to strong wind, usually salt laden. The coastal sands have high wind erosion risks where conventional broad acre land uses are practised. Fertility problems are inherent, particularly trace element deficiencies, such as cobalt and manganese. Drainage and waterlogging and flooding occurs in a significant number of soils, with associated land management difficulties. The land is currently used mostly for grazing.
SLU % Component Main soils Propn Notes VpG 0.9 Swampy flat N3A7 V VpG Swampy subcoastal plains with mostly wet, Low dune H1H2 L calcareous, dark clay over marl. 10-20% low dunes VpO 1.3 Swampy flat N3A7 D with deep shelly or calcareous siliceous sands. Low dune H1H2 M VpO Swampy subcoastal plains as above. <10% low dunes. WEd 4.7 Dune H1H2 D WEd Dunes ,bare and active, with deep shelly Rocky coast RRB1B3 M calcareous sand or calcareous siliceous sand. <10% Beach H1H2 M rocky coast with bare calcrete or shallow calcareous WED 1.7 Dune H1H2 D or siliceous sand. <10% beaches. Rocky coast RRB1B3 M WED Dunes, mostly vegetated and stable, as above. Beach H1H2 M <10% rocky coast and beaches as above. WEe 1.3 Dune H1H2 D WEe Active, bare, low coastal dunes and sand WEE 45.1 Dune H1H2 D spreads, as above. Swale N3 M WEE Low dunes, mostly vegetated and stable, as WEH 35.6 Low dune H1H2 V above. <10% swales with wet deep sands or occasionally, peat. Swampy swale N3 C WEH Stable vegetated low dunes as above on gentle WEj 0.5 Dune H1H2 V slopes. 20-30% swampy swales with wet deep sands Flat N2H2 C or occasionally, peat. WEK 3.3 Low dune H1H2 V WEj Bare and active coastal dunes as above, with 20- Flat N2H2 C 30% flats with moderately saline wet organic sands, WEW 2.0 Dune H1H2 V and deep calcareous siliceous sands. Beach H1H2 C WEK Low dunes, vegetation-fixed. 20-30% flats as for WEj above. WEW Complex of vegetation-fixed, beaches and dunes, with soils as above. WKQ 0.6 Sandy flat H1H2 D Sand flat with deep shelly calcareous sand or calcareous siliceous sand. WNT 0.2 Coastal Swamp N2N3 D Coastal swamps with wet, mostly moderately saline, Dune H1H2 M organic sands. <10% dunes as above. WRR 0.1 Melaleuca flat N2N3 V Subcoastal swampy flat as above. 10-20% dunes as Dune H1H2 L above. Xl- 0.7 Lake WW D Water-filled lake Xtd 2.0 Swamp N1 V Peat swamps; 20-30% sandy rises with deep, well to Rise I2 C moderately drained, bleached siliceous sand. Xud 0.1 Swamp N3H2 D Swamps with wet deep sand soils. 10-30% peat. Sandy rise H2 M <10% sandy rises with deep calcareous siliceous sand. 13 Admella Drive 1 km Water Connect Bore Search
Water Connect Database Summary 1km Radius from Site DHNO Unit No Class Drilled Date Drill Depth Last Opened Permit No Purpose Status SWL TDS EC yield Easting Northing CT Detail 93097 6923-1786 WW 3/12/1982 7 3/12/1982 92367 DOM OPR 2 1.25 415723.65 5852382.59 CT 5945 430 93741 6923-2430 WW 4/07/1989 7.5 4/07/1989 81167 DOM OPR 4.1 967 1751 0.5 416036.62 5852058.65 CT 5151 50 93752 6923-2441 WW 3.05 30/09/1969 0.76 1385 2502 414841.68 5852297.6 CT 5954 963 93754 6923-2443 WW 7.62 30/09/1969 1.22 1200 2172 415441.66 5852536.62 CT 5930 844 93755 6923-2444 WW 6.1 30/09/1969 700 1271 415566.7 5852058.55 CT 5646 859 93756 6923-2445 WW 9.14 30/09/1969 STK OPR 4.57 745 1353 416228.63 5852117.62 CT 5936 223 93757 6923-2446 WW 6.1 30/09/1969 3.66 615 1118 416342.66 5852579.58 CT 5425 176 94162 6923-2851 WW 1/01/1978 4.3 1/01/1978 IRRSTK OPR 2.13 506 920 415853.66 5852678.61 CT 5224 398 94171 6923-2860 WW 25/10/1978 5.1 25/10/1978 3037 2.2 683 1240 416192.68 5852937.57 CT 5513 34 94178 6923-2867 WW 4/01/1979 11 4/01/1979 5028 3 694 1260 5 415839.63 5852369.56 CT 5172 369 94323 6923-3012 WW 1/11/1980 4.37 1/11/1980 7989 2.98 416002.67 5852582.59 CL 1570 9 94608 6923-3297 WW 11/01/1983 8 11/01/1983 92499 DOM OPR 2 1.25 415689.68 5852479.56 CT 5262 291 94623 6923-3312 WW 13/03/1983 6.4 13/03/1983 92749 3.05 2.53 416212.67 5852797.63 94630 6923-3319 WW 5/12/1982 6 5/12/1982 11347 DOM OPR 1.9 1 415711.62 5852679.61 CT 5501 149 94726 6923-3415 WW 23/03/1984 7 23/03/1984 14057 DOMSTK OPR 2 854 1550 2.5 415935.7 5852926.54 CT 5923 414 94775 6923-3464 WW 12/09/1984 5 12/09/1984 14249 STK OPR 1 741 1344 3.78 415772.68 5852824.59 CT 5363 835 94776 6923-3465 WW 14/12/1984 6 14/12/1984 14058 STK OPR 1.5 744 1350 1.89 416440.65 5852235.59 CT 5363 836 94783 6923-3472 WW 16/02/1985 7 16/02/1985 16006 DOM OPR 3 476 865 0.12 415931.66 5852433.63 CT 5211 91 94784 6923-3473 WW 7/02/1985 9 7/02/1985 93982 DOM OPR 3 838 1520 2.87 415461.64 5851841.56 CR 5879 272 94785 6923-3474 WW 5/02/1985 5 5/02/1985 16015 DOM OPR 2 628 1140 1.87 416013.62 5852321.61 94787 6923-3476 WW 29/03/1985 8 29/03/1985 80079 DOM OPR 2 1160 2100 1.25 416218.67 5852809.6 CT 5512 646 94835 6923-3524 WW 1/03/1986 350 1/03/1986 17671 0 661 1200 1.25 414698.61 5852329.64 CR 5653 772 94836 6923-3525 WW 23/03/1986 9 23/03/1986 18167 2 728 1320 1.25 415454.66 5852127.65 CT 5335 470 94843 6923-3532 WW 21/06/1986 5 21/06/1986 17164 1.5 827 1500 1.5 415975.7 5852862.59 CT 5076 153 94844 6923-3533 WW 416050.69 5851926.64 CT 5151 50 94872 6923-3563 WW 20/07/1987 10 20/07/1987 80551 3.5 1088 1970 1.75 416100.68 5852826.57 CT 5495 254 94873 6923-3564 WW 1/08/1987 7.8 1/08/1987 19474 1.5 910 1650 1.76 416218.67 5852809.6 CT 5512 646 94902 6923-3593 WW 9/02/1988 8.5 9/02/1988 80691 4.3 644 1170 8 415507.69 5851886.63 CR 5879 272 94904 6923-3595 WW 8/02/1988 10.5 8/02/1988 80734 4.5 699 1270 8 415508.65 5851887.64 CR 5879 272 94941 6923-3632 WW 27/10/1988 8 27/10/1988 80911 IRR OPR 2 600 1090 1.25 416094.68 5851974.58 CT 5151 50 95029 6923-3720 WW 24/01/1991 9 24/01/1991 81710 STK OPR 3 877 1591 1 416225.65 5852685.58 CT 5958 305 139402 6923-3848 WW 4/04/1994 5.7 4/04/1994 31114 STK 446 810 1.5 416371.71 5852847.61 CT 5158 971 140013 6923-3853 WW 29/04/1994 8.5 29/04/1994 31569 DOM 2.1 661 1200 0.75 416296.6 5852427.77 140016 6923-3852 WW 29/04/1994 6.4 29/04/1994 31568 DOM 1.2 479 870 0.5 416296.78 5852577.56 153831 6923-3925 WW 8/12/1995 8 8/12/1995 82224 DOM 3333 5940 3.75 415031.57 5852727.73 CT 5952 637 162693 6923-3976 WW 31/01/1997 5.5 31/01/1997 40044 DOM 2.3 655 1190 0.75 415581.7 5852897.55 CT 5897 546 169205 6923-4024 WW 18/06/1998 13 18/06/1998 44903 DOM 7 666 1210 1.25 415741.67 5852157.64 CR 5649 249 174489 6923-4063 WW 31/03/1999 15 31/03/1999 48045 DOM 4 821 1490 1 416181.69 5852387.55 CT 5919 987 193337 6923-4227 WW 21/10/2002 5.4 21/10/2002 59665 DOM 1.5 1043 1890 2.25 415294 5852591 CT 5872 24 196210 6923-4241 WW 20/05/2003 12.5 20/05/2003 61028 DOM 2.2 1485 2680 2 415534 5852603 CT 5872 22 199810 6923-4285 WW 7 19/03/2004 64503 DOM 1.85 1027 1860 3 415560 5852979 CT 5897 545
1 of 2 Water Connect Database Summary 1km Radius from Site DHNO Unit No Class Drilled Date Drill Depth Last Opened Permit No Purpose Status SWL TDS EC yield Easting Northing CT Detail 201780 6923-4306 WW 2/12/2004 7 2/12/2004 103145 STK 2 935 1695 2 415385 5852373 CT 5497 261 211834 6923-4355 WW 8 2/03/2006 104547 DOM 3 772 1400 2 415289 5852519 CT 5930 836 211837 6923-4353 WW 8.5 19/04/2005 106478 STK 3.4 838 1520 2.5 415367 5852647 CT 5930 842 211839 6923-4354 WW 8.5 15/04/2005 106477 DOM 3.5 921 1670 3 415358 5852744 CT 5930 841 218476 6923-4387 WW 7.5 19/08/2006 117549 DOM 1.5 944 1710 415508 5852712 CT 5872 23 228908 6923-4438 WW 9 9/03/2007 127906 DOM 4 550 1000 0.9 416273 5852171 CT 5936 222 234306 6923-4478 WW 9 13/11/2007 138855 DOM 2.5 927 1680 1 416006 5852908 CT 5967 723 236074 6923-4490 WW 12/11/2007 6 12/11/2007 129693 DOM 617 1120 416212 5852741 CT 5958 305 272711 6923-4650 WW 30/11/2012 6.5 30/11/2012 218229 1.5 938 1700 1.25 415651.53 5852935.62 CT 5897 546 272888 6923-4654 WW 28/11/2012 11 28/11/2012 218188 5.3 894 1620 1.25 415287.84 5852139.43 CT 5513 386 275490 6923-4665 WW 25/03/2013 8 25/03/2013 219476 1021 1850 416427.93 5852245.22 CT 5363 836 275491 6923-4666 WW 25/03/2013 8 25/03/2013 219477 2.1 1027 1860 2 416430.33 5852325.01 CT 5363 836 275492 6923-4667 WW 25/03/2013 8 25/03/2013 219478 2.1 1030 1865 2 416430.15 5852463.59 CT 5363 836 275612 6923-4670 WW 27/09/2013 10.5 27/09/2013 226807 1 647 1175 2.5 416395.55 5851996.16 CT 5983 525
2 of 2 Tonkin Consulting Contact: Section 7 Level 2 Telephone: (08) 8204 2026 66 Rundle Street Email: [email protected] KENT TOWN SA 5067 Contact: Public Register Telephone: (08) 8204 9128 Email: [email protected]
06 December, 2016
EPA STATEMENT TO FORM 1 - CONTRACTS FOR SALE OF LAND OR BUSINESS
The EPA provides this statement to assist the vendor meet its obligations under section 7(1)(b) of the Land and Business (Sale and Conveyancing) Act 1994. A response to the questions prescribed in Schedule 1-Contracts for sale of land or business-forms (Divisions 1 and 2) of the Land and Business (Sale and Conveyancing) Act 1994 is provided in relation to the land.
I refer to your enquiry concerning the parcel of land comprised in
Title Reference CT Volume 5864 Folio 196 Address 43 Rivoli Drive, BEACHPORT SA 5280
Schedule – Division 1 – Land and Business (Sale and Conveyancing) Regulations 2010
PARTICULARS OF MORTGAGES, CHARGES AND PRESCRIBED ENCUMBRANCES AFFECTING THE LAND
7. Environment Protection Act 1993
Does the EPA hold any of the following details relating to the Environment Protection Act 1993:
7.1 Section 59 - Environment performance agreement that is registered in relation to the land. NO
7.2 Section 93 - Environment protection order that is registered in relation to the land. NO
7.3 Section 93A - Environment protection order relating to cessation of activity that is registered in NO relation to the land.
7.4 Section 99 - Clean-up order that is registered in relation to the land. NO
7.5 Section 100 - Clean-up authorisation that is registered in relation to the land. NO
7.6 Section 103H - Site contamination assessment order that is registered in relation to the land. NO
7.7 Section 103J - Site remediation order that is registered in relation to the land. NO
CT Volume 5864 Folio 196 page 1 of 4 7.8 Section 103N - Notice of declaration of special management area in relation to the land (due to NO possible existence of site contamination).
7.9 Section 103P - Notation of site contamination audit report in relation to the land. NO
7.10 Section 103S - Notice of prohibition or restriction on taking water affected by site NO contamination in relation to the land.
Schedule – Division 2 – Land and Business (Sale and Conveyancing) Regulations 2010
PARTICULARS RELATING TO ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION
3-Licences and exemptions recorded by EPA in public register
Does the EPA hold any of the following details in the public register: a) details of a current licence issued under Part 6 of the Environment Protection Act 1993 to conduct, at the land- i) a waste or recycling depot (as referred to in clause 3(3) of Schedule 1 Part A of that Act); or NO ii) activities producing listed wastes (as referred to in clause 3(4) of Schedule 1 Part A of that NO Act); or iii) any other prescribed activity of environmental significance under Schedule 1 of that Act? NO b) details of a licence no longer in force issued under Part 6 of the Environment Protection Act 1993 to conduct, at the land- i) a waste or recycling depot (as referred to in clause 3(3) of Schedule 1 Part A of that Act); or NO ii) activities producing listed wastes (as referred to in clause 3(4) of Schedule 1 Part A of that NO Act); or iii) any other prescribed activity of environmental significance under Schedule 1 of that Act? NO c) details of a current exemption issued under Part 6 of the Environment Protection Act 1993 NO from the application of a specified provision of that Act in relation to an activity carried on at the land? d) details of an exemption no longer in force issued under Part 6 of the Environment Protection NO Act 1993 from the application of a specified provision of that Act in relation to an activity carried on at the land? e) details of a licence issued under the repealed South Australian Waste Management NO Commission Act 1979 to operate a waste depot at the land? f) details of a licence issued under the repealed Waste Management Act 1987 to operate a NO waste depot at the land? g) details of a licence issued under the repealed South Australian Waste Management NO Commission Act 1979 to produce waste of a prescribed kind (within the meaning of that Act) at the land?
CT Volume 5864 Folio 196 page 2 of 4 h) details of a licence issued under the repealed Waste Management Act 1987 to produce NO prescribed waste (within the meaning of that Act) at the land?
4-Pollution and site contamination on the land - details recorded by the EPA in public register
Does the EPA hold any of the following details in the public register in relation to the land or part of the land: a) details of serious or material environmental harm caused or threatened in the course of an NO activity (whether or not notified under section 83 of the Environment Protection Act 1993)? b) details of site contamination notified to the EPA under section 83A of the Environment NO Protection Act 1993? c) a copy of a report of an environmental assessment (whether prepared by the EPA or some NO other person or body and whether or not required under legislation) that forms part of the information required to be recorded in the public register? d) a copy of a site contamination audit report? NO e) details of an agreement for the exclusion or limitation of liability for site contamination to which NO section 103E of the Environment Protection Act 1993 applies? f) details of an agreement entered into with the EPA relating to an approved voluntary site NO contamination assessment proposal under section 103I of the Environment Protection Act 1993? g) details of an agreement entered into with the EPA relating to an approved voluntary site NO remediation proposal under section 103K of the Environment Protection Act 1993? h) details of a notification under section 103Z(1) of the Environment Protection Act 1993 relating NO to the commencement of a site contamination audit? i) details of a notification under section 103Z(2) of the Environment Protection Act 1993 relating NO to the termination before completion of a site contamination audit? j) details of records, held by the former South Australian Waste Management Commission under NO the repealed Waste Management Act 1987, of waste (within the meaning of that Act) having been deposited on the land between 1 January 1983 and 30 April 1995?
5-Pollution and site contamination on the land - other details held by EPA
Does the EPA hold any of the following details in relation to the land or part of the land: a) a copy of a report known as a "Health Commission Report" prepared by or on behalf of the NO South Australian Health Commission (under the repealed South Australian Health Commission Act 1976)? b) details (which may include a report of an environmental assessment) relevant to an agreement NO entered into with the EPA relating to an approved voluntary site contamination assessment proposal under section 103I of the Environment Protection Act 1993? c) details (which may include a report of an environmental assessment) relevant to an agreement NO entered into with the EPA relating to an approved voluntary site remediation proposal under section 103K of the Environment Protection Act 1993?
CT Volume 5864 Folio 196 page 3 of 4 d) a copy of a pre-1 July 2009 site audit report? NO e) details relating to the termination before completion of a pre-1 July 2009 site audit? NO
All care and diligence has been taken to access the above information from available records. Historical records provided to the EPA concerning matters arising prior to 1 May 1995 are limited and may not be accurate or complete and therefore the EPA cannot confirm the accuracy of the historical information provided.
CT Volume 5864 Folio 196 page 4 of 4
Appendix B
Aerial Photos
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation Lot 13 Admella Drive 1950 Aerial Image
Lot 13 Admella Drive 1982 Aerial Image
Lot 13 Admella Drive 2003 Aerial Image
Image from Google Earth 2016
Lot 13 Admella Drive 2010 Aerial Image
Image from Google Earth 2016 Lot 13 Admella Drive 2012 Aerial Image
Image from Google Earth 2016 Lot 13 Admella Drive 2014 Aerial Image
Aerial Image from Google Earth 2016
Appendix C
Field Forms
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation
Appendix D
Soil Analytical Results
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation Lot 13 Admella Drive Soil Analytical Results
Field ID TP02-1 DUP01 RPD% Difference TP02-2 TP03-1 TP04-1 TP05-1 TP06-2 TP07-1 TP08-2 Loc Code TP02-1 TP02-1 Between TP02-1 TP02-2 TP03-1 TP04-1 TP05-1 TP06-2 TP07-1 TP08-2 Sampled Date 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 & DUP01 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 Sample Code M16-De06117 M16-De06129 M16-De06118 M16-De06119 M16-De06120 M16-De06122 M16-De06125 M16-De06126 M16-De06128 NEPM 2013 Table 1A(1) HILs Res A Soil Chem Name Units EQL Tokuthion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 BTEX Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Xylene Total mg/kg 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 - <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 Halogenated Benzenes Hexachlorobenzene mg/kg 0.05 10 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Inorganics Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) % 1 11 6.1 57 6.8 6.2 4.3 6.1 4.8 6.9 5.9 Metals Arsenic mg/kg 2 100 10 6.9 37 13 3.2 9.3 2.7 2.8 5 3.6 Cadmium mg/kg 0.4 20 <0.4 <0.4 - <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 Chromium (III+VI) mg/kg 5 10 8.7 14 5.5 <5 14 5.4 <5 7.4 5.1 Copper mg/kg 5 6000 <5 <5 - <5 <5 11 <5 <5 <5 <5 Lead mg/kg 5 300 <5 <5 - <5 <5 10 <5 <5 7.9 <5 Mercury mg/kg 0.1 40 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Nickel mg/kg 5 400 <5 <5 - <5 <5 24 <5 <5 <5 <5 Zinc mg/kg 5 7400 30 23 26 <5 <5 38 <5 <5 26 <5 Organochlorine Pesticides 4,4-DDE mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 a-BHC mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Aldrin mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Aldrin + Dieldrin mg/kg 6 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 b-BHC mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 chlordane mg/kg 0.1 50 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 d-BHC mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 DDD mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 DDT mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 DDT+DDE+DDD mg/kg 240 <0.15 <0.15 - <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 Dieldrin mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Endosulfan I mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Endosulfan II mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Endrin mg/kg 0.05 10 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Endrin aldehyde mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Endrin ketone mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 g-BHC (Lindane) mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Heptachlor mg/kg 0.05 6 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.05 300 <0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Toxaphene mg/kg 1 20 <1 <1 - <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Organophosphorous Pesticides Azinophos methyl mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Bolstar (Sulprofos) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Chlorfenvinphos mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Chlorpyrifos mg/kg 0.2 160 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Chlorpyrifos-methyl mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Coumaphos mg/kg 2 <2 <2 - <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 Demeton-O mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Demeton-S mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Diazinon mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Dimethoate mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Disulfoton mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Ethion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Ethoprop mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Fensulfothion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Fenthion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Malathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Merphos mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Methyl parathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Mevinphos (Phosdrin) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Monocrotophos mg/kg 2 <2 <2 - <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 Naled (Dibrom) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Omethoate mg/kg 2 <2 <2 - <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 Phorate mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
1 of 2 Lot 13 Admella Drive Soil Analytical Results
Field ID TP02-1 DUP01 RPD% Difference TP02-2 TP03-1 TP04-1 TP05-1 TP06-2 TP07-1 TP08-2 Loc Code TP02-1 TP02-1 Between TP02-1 TP02-2 TP03-1 TP04-1 TP05-1 TP06-2 TP07-1 TP08-2 Sampled Date 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 & DUP01 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 5/12/2016 Sample Code M16-De06117 M16-De06129 M16-De06118 M16-De06119 M16-De06120 M16-De06122 M16-De06125 M16-De06126 M16-De06128 NEPM 2013 Table 1A(1) HILs Res A Soil Chem Name Units EQL Pyrazophos mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Ronnel mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Terbufos mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Trichloronate mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Tetrachlorvinphos mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 PAH Benzo[b+j]fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * MG/KG 0.6 0.6 0.6 - 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * MG/KG 1.2 1.2 1.2 - 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 PAH/Phenols Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Anthracene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Chrysene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Fluorene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 PAHs (Sum of total) mg/kg 0.5 300 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Pyrene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Pesticides Parathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Pirimiphos-methyl mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 SVOCs EPN mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 TPH C10-C16 mg/kg 50 <50 <50 - <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 C16-C34 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 - <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 C34-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 - <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 F2-NAPHTHALENE mg/kg 50 <50 <50 - <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 C6 - C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 - <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 C10 - C14 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 - <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 C15 - C28 mg/kg 50 <50 <50 - <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 C29-C36 mg/kg 50 <50 <50 - <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 +C10 - C36 (Sum of total) mg/kg 50 <50 <50 - <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 C6-C10 less BTEX (F1) mg/kg 20 <20 <20 - <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 C6-C10 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 - <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
2 of 2
SF11: CHAIN OF CUSTODY REF: 2016.1432 Page 1 of 1
Job No: 2016.1432 Laboratory Name: MGT-Labmark Details: Frank Brennan Consulting Laboratory Address: 3-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh VIC 3166 Date Sampled: 5/12/2016 Sampled by: J. Neis-Beer Laboratory Contact: Sarah Gould phone: (03) 9564 7055 Consultant: Tonkin Consulting Address: 1 Krummel St, Mount Gambier SA 5290 Quotation No: email: [email protected] Contact: Jack Horan Fax: (08) 8723 5004 Delivery by: Toll Priority fax (03) 9564 7190 email: [email protected] Phone: (08) 8723 5002 Consignment Note:
Notes / Deviations from Standard Protocols B7 B14 Hold
Matrix Sample Asbestos Asbestos OCP/ OPP Container Container / Lab Sample Lab Preservation TRH/ BTEXN/ BTEXN/ TRH/ Identification Identification PAH, As, PAH, Cd, Cr, Cu, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn, Hg Identification in Identification Soil in TP02-1 Soil x x x **Please provide data in an Esdat format if possible** TP05-1 Soil x x x TP07-1 Soil x x x Please copy results to: DUP01 Soil x x [email protected] TP02-2 Soil x x TP03-1 Soil x x TP04-1 Soil x x TP06-2 Soil x x TP08-2 Soil x x TP04-2 Soil x TP05-2 Soil x TP06-1 Soil x TP08-1 Soil x DUP02 Soil x
Sample Preservation: Number of Samples: 9 9 3 5 Samples must be transported and stored Relinquished by: Relinquished by: Relinquished by: in a chilled or cold condition at all times Date and time: Date and time: Date and time: COC must remain with samples Company: Tonkin Consulting Company: Company: ANALYSING LABORATORY: Signature Signature Signature Please fax to the nominated Received in good condition by: Received in good condition by: Received in good condition by: Tonkin Consulting contact a signed COC Date and Time: Date and Time: Date and Time: showing assigned lab ID numbers Company: Company: Company: IMMEDIATELY on receipt of samples and Signature Signature Signature return original COC with final results Steven Borg
From: Sarah Gould Sent: Wednesday, 7 December 2016 10:24 AM To: Steven Borg Cc: AU02_USR_LAB00020 Subject: FW: Soils received without COC Attachments: 20161432_MGT Chain of Custody.pdf
Updated COC for report 526588 please.
Sarah Gould Phone : +61 3 8564 5053 Email : [email protected]
From: Jordan Neis-Beer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, 7 December 2016 10:02 AM To: Sarah Gould Cc: Jack Horan Subject: FW: Soils received without COC
Hello Sarah,
Please find attached the revised COC for 2016.1432.
Regards,
Jordan Neis-Beer Civil Engineer
A 1 Krummel Street, Mount Gambier SA 5290 T +61 8 8723 5002 F +61 8 8723 5004 E [email protected] W www.tonkin.com.au Development – Environment – Local Government – Mining & Resources – Spatial – Transport – Water Privacy & Confidentiality Notice: This email and any attachments to it, may contain confidential and privileged information solely for the use of the intended recipient (or person authorised). Any misuse of this email and/or file attachments is strictly prohibited. If this email has been received in error, please notify the sender by return email and delete all copies immediately. No guarantee is given that this email and/or any attachments are free from computer viruses or any other defect or error . P Please consider the environment before printing this email From: Sarah Gould [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2016 2:51 PM To: Jordan Neis-Beer
Thanks Jordan.
Sarah Gould Phone : +61 3 8564 5053 Email : [email protected]
From: Jordan Neis-Beer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2016 3:18 PM 1 To: Sarah Gould Subject: RE: Soils received without COC
Hi Sarah,
COC for soil samples is attached.
Regards,
Jordan Neis-Beer Civil Engineer
A 1 Krummel Street, Mount Gambier SA 5290 T +61 8 8723 5002 F +61 8 8723 5004 E [email protected] W www.tonkin.com.au Development – Environment – Local Government – Mining & Resources – Spatial – Transport – Water Privacy & Confidentiality Notice: This email and any attachments to it, may contain confidential and privileged information solely for the use of the intended recipient (or person authorised). Any misuse of this email and/or file attachments is strictly prohibited. If this email has been received in error, please notify the sender by return email and delete all copies immediately. No guarantee is given that this email and/or any attachments are free from computer viruses or any other defect or error . P Please consider the environment before printing this email From: Sarah Gould [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2016 1:42 PM To: Jordan Neis-Beer
Thanks Jordan.
Sarah Gould Phone : +61 3 8564 5053 Email : [email protected]
From: Jordan Neis-Beer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2016 1:34 PM To: Sarah Gould Subject: Re: Soils received without COC
Hi Sarah,
I'm sure I put it in there! I'm on the road for another hour but I'll send you a copy as soon as I get back to the office.
Jordan
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Sarah Gould
Hi Jordan,
2 We received an esky of soils today without a COC. Can you please send that through when available?
Thank you.
Regards, Sarah
Sarah Gould Analytical Services Manager
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close OAKLEIGH VIC 3166 AUSTRALIA Phone . : +61 3 8564 5053 Mobile : +61 409 801 765
Email : [email protected] Website. : www.eurofins.com.au/environmental-testing
Are you on TOP of PFASs? Find out more by reading Eurofins | mgt’s Environote by clicking here
Click here to report this email as spam.
ScannedByWebsenseForEurofins
Are you on TOP of PFASs? Find out more by reading Eurofins | mgt’s Environote by clicking here
Are you on TOP of PFASs? Find out more by reading Eurofins | mgt’s Environote by clicking here
3 Certificate of Analysis
NATA Accredited Accreditation Number 1261 Tonkin Consulting Site Number 1254 Level 2, 66 Rundle Street Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 – Testing The results of the tests, calibrations and/or Kent Town measurements included in this document are traceable to Australian/national standards. SA 5067
Attention: Jack Horan
Report 526588-S Project name FRANK BRENNAN CONSULTING Project ID 2016.1432 Received Date Dec 06, 2016
Client Sample ID TP02-1 TP02-2 TP03-1 TP04-1 Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06117 M16-De06118 M16-De06119 M16-De06120 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 TRH C10-36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 BTEX Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 97 106 87 109 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 1 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Client Sample ID TP02-1 TP02-2 TP03-1 TP04-1 Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06117 M16-De06118 M16-De06119 M16-De06120 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % 94 89 90 90 p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % 64 62 63 63 Organochlorine Pesticides Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Methoxychlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 87 88 98 95 Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 59 57 65 58 Organophosphorus Pesticides Azinphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Bolstar 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Chlorfenvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Chlorpyrifos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Coumaphos 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2 < 2 < 2 Demeton-S 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Demeton-O 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Diazinon 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Dichlorvos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Dimethoate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Disulfoton 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 EPN 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Ethion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Ethoprop 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Ethyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Fenitrothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Fensulfothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 2 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Client Sample ID TP02-1 TP02-2 TP03-1 TP04-1 Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06117 M16-De06118 M16-De06119 M16-De06120 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit Organophosphorus Pesticides Fenthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Malathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Merphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Methyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Mevinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Monocrotophos 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2 < 2 < 2 Naled 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Omethoate 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2 < 2 < 2 Phorate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Pirimiphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Pyrazophos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Ronnel 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Terbufos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Tetrachlorvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Tokuthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Trichloronate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Triphenylphosphate (surr.) 1 % 84 79 80 81 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100 TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100 Heavy Metals Arsenic 2 mg/kg 10 13 3.2 9.3 Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 Chromium 5 mg/kg 10 5.5 < 5 14 Copper 5 mg/kg < 5 < 5 < 5 11 Lead 5 mg/kg < 5 < 5 < 5 10 Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.1 Nickel 5 mg/kg < 5 < 5 < 5 24 Zinc 5 mg/kg 30 < 5 < 5 38
% Moisture 1 % 11 6.8 6.2 4.3
Client Sample ID TP05-1 TP06-2 TP07-1 TP08-2 Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06122 M16-De06125 M16-De06126 M16-De06128 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 TRH C10-36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 3 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Client Sample ID TP05-1 TP06-2 TP07-1 TP08-2 Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06122 M16-De06125 M16-De06126 M16-De06128 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit BTEX Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 109 105 92 80 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % 94 91 93 79 p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % 66 62 65 55 Organochlorine Pesticides Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 4 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Client Sample ID TP05-1 TP06-2 TP07-1 TP08-2 Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06122 M16-De06125 M16-De06126 M16-De06128 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit Organochlorine Pesticides Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Methoxychlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 76 81 103 89 Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 52 55 66 57 Organophosphorus Pesticides Azinphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Bolstar 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Chlorfenvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Chlorpyrifos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Coumaphos 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2 < 2 < 2 Demeton-S 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Demeton-O 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Diazinon 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Dichlorvos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Dimethoate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Disulfoton 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 EPN 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Ethion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Ethoprop 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Ethyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Fenitrothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Fensulfothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Fenthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Malathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Merphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Methyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Mevinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Monocrotophos 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2 < 2 < 2 Naled 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Omethoate 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2 < 2 < 2 Phorate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Pirimiphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Pyrazophos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Ronnel 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Terbufos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Tetrachlorvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Tokuthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Trichloronate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Triphenylphosphate (surr.) 1 % 86 82 84 71 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100 TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 5 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Client Sample ID TP05-1 TP06-2 TP07-1 TP08-2 Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06122 M16-De06125 M16-De06126 M16-De06128 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit Heavy Metals Arsenic 2 mg/kg 2.7 2.8 5.0 3.6 Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 Chromium 5 mg/kg 5.4 < 5 7.4 5.1 Copper 5 mg/kg < 5 < 5 < 5 < 5 Lead 5 mg/kg < 5 < 5 7.9 < 5 Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Nickel 5 mg/kg < 5 < 5 < 5 < 5 Zinc 5 mg/kg < 5 < 5 26 < 5
% Moisture 1 % 6.1 4.8 6.9 5.9
Client Sample ID DUP01 Sample Matrix Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06129 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 TRH C10-36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 BTEX Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 92 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 0.6 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 1.2 Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 6 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Client Sample ID DUP01 Sample Matrix Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06129 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % 88 p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % 61 Organochlorine Pesticides Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Methoxychlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 86 Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 59 Organophosphorus Pesticides Azinphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Bolstar 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Chlorfenvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Chlorpyrifos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Coumaphos 2 mg/kg < 2 Demeton-S 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Demeton-O 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Diazinon 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Dichlorvos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Dimethoate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Disulfoton 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 EPN 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Ethion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 7 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Client Sample ID DUP01 Sample Matrix Soil Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-De06129 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Test/Reference LOR Unit Organophosphorus Pesticides Ethoprop 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Ethyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Fenitrothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Fensulfothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Fenthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Malathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Merphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Methyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Mevinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Monocrotophos 2 mg/kg < 2 Naled 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Omethoate 2 mg/kg < 2 Phorate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Pirimiphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Pyrazophos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Ronnel 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Terbufos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Tetrachlorvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Tokuthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Trichloronate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 Triphenylphosphate (surr.) 1 % 80 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 Heavy Metals Arsenic 2 mg/kg 6.9 Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 Chromium 5 mg/kg 8.7 Copper 5 mg/kg < 5 Lead 5 mg/kg < 5 Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 Nickel 5 mg/kg < 5 Zinc 5 mg/kg 23
% Moisture 1 % 6.1
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 8 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Sample History Where samples are submitted/analysed over several days, the last date of extraction and analysis is reported. A recent review of our LIMS has resulted in the correction or clarification of some method identifications. Due to this, some of the method reference information on reports has changed. However, no substantive change has been made to our laboratory methods, and as such there is no change in the validity of current or previous results (regarding both quality and NATA accreditation). If the date and time of sampling are not provided, the Laboratory will not be responsible for compromised results should testing be performed outside the recommended holding time.
Description Testing Site Extracted Holding Time Eurofins | mgt Suite B7 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Melbourne Dec 08, 2016 14 Day - Method: TRH C6-C36 - LTM-ORG-2010 BTEX Melbourne Dec 08, 2016 14 Day - Method: TRH C6-C40 - LTM-ORG-2010 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Melbourne Dec 08, 2016 14 Day - Method: TRH C6-C40 - LTM-ORG-2010 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Melbourne Dec 08, 2016 14 Day - Method: USEPA 8270 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Melbourne Dec 08, 2016 14 Day - Method: TRH C6-C40 - LTM-ORG-2010 Metals M8 Melbourne Dec 08, 2016 28 Days - Method: LTM-MET-3030 by ICP-OES (hydride ICP-OES for Mercury) Eurofins | mgt Suite B14 Organochlorine Pesticides Melbourne Dec 08, 2016 14 Day - Method: USEPA 8081 Organochlorine Pesticides Organophosphorus Pesticides Melbourne Dec 08, 2016 14 Day - Method: LTM-ORG-2200 Organophosphorus Pesticides by GC-MS % Moisture Melbourne Dec 07, 2016 14 Day - Method: LTM-GEN-7080 Moisture
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 9 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S MelbourneMelbourneMelbourneMelbourne SydneySydneySydneySydney BrisbaneBrisbaneBrisbaneBrisbane PerthPerthPerthPerth 2-5 Kingston Town Close Unit F3, Building F 1/21 Smallwood Place 2/91 Leach Highway Oakleigh VIC 3166 16 Mars Road Murarrie QLD 4172 Kewdale WA 6105 ABN– 50 005 085 521 Phone : +61 3 8564 5000 Lane Cove West NSW 2066 Phone : +61 7 3902 4600 Phone : +61 8 9251 9600 e.mail : [email protected] NATA # 1261 Phone : +61 2 9900 8400 NATA # 1261 Site # 20794 NATA # 1261 web : www.eurofins.com.au Site # 1254 & 14271 NATA # 1261 Site # 18217 Site # 18217 . Company Name: Tonkin Consulting Order No.: Received: Dec 6, 2016 3:21 PM Address: Level 2, 66 Rundle Street Report #: 526588 Due: Dec 13, 2016 Kent Town Phone: 08 8273 3100 Priority: 5 Day SA 5067 Fax: 08 8273 3110 Contact Name: Jack Horan Project Name: FRANK BRENNAN CONSULTING Project ID: 2016.1432 Eurofins | mgt Analytical Services Manager : Sarah Gould Asbestos Absence/Presence HOLD Eurofins |mgtSuiteB14 Moisture Set Eurofins |mgtSuiteB7
Sample Detail
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 XXXX Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794 Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X External Laboratory No Sample ID Sample Date Sampling Matrix LAB ID Time 1 TP02-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06117 X XXX 2 TP02-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06118 XXX 3 TP03-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06119 XXX 4 TP04-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06120 XXX 5 TP04-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06121 X 6 TP05-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06122 X XXX 7 TP05-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06123 X 8 TP06-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06124 X 9 TP06-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06125 XXX
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 10 of 23
Date Reported:Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S MelbourneMelbourneMelbourneMelbourne SydneySydneySydneySydney BrisbaneBrisbaneBrisbaneBrisbane PerthPerthPerthPerth 2-5 Kingston Town Close Unit F3, Building F 1/21 Smallwood Place 2/91 Leach Highway Oakleigh VIC 3166 16 Mars Road Murarrie QLD 4172 Kewdale WA 6105 ABN– 50 005 085 521 Phone : +61 3 8564 5000 Lane Cove West NSW 2066 Phone : +61 7 3902 4600 Phone : +61 8 9251 9600 e.mail : [email protected] NATA # 1261 Phone : +61 2 9900 8400 NATA # 1261 Site # 20794 NATA # 1261 web : www.eurofins.com.au Site # 1254 & 14271 NATA # 1261 Site # 18217 Site # 18217
Company Name: Tonkin Consulting Order No.: Received: Dec 6, 2016 3:21 PM Address: Level 2, 66 Rundle Street Report #: 526588 Due: Dec 13, 2016 Kent Town Phone: 08 8273 3100 Priority: 5 Day SA 5067 Fax: 08 8273 3110 Contact Name: Jack Horan Project Name: FRANK BRENNAN CONSULTING Project ID: 2016.1432 Eurofins | mgt Analytical Services Manager : Sarah Gould Asbestos Absence/Presence HOLD Eurofins |mgtSuiteB14 Moisture Set Eurofins |mgtSuiteB7
Sample Detail
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 XXXX Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794 Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X 10 TP07-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06126 X XXX 11 TP08-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06127 X 12 TP08-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06128 XXX 13 DUP01 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06129 XXX 14 DUP02 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06130 X Test Counts 3 5 9 9 9
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 11 of 23
Date Reported:Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary
General 1. Laboratory QC results for Method Blanks, Duplicates, Matrix Spikes, and Laboratory Control Samples are included in this QC report where applicable. Additional QC data may be available on request. 2. All soil results are reported on a dry basis, unless otherwise stated. 3. Actual LORs are matrix dependant. Quoted LORs may be raised where sample extracts are diluted due to interferences. 4. Results are uncorrected for matrix spikes or surrogate recoveries. 5. SVOC analysis on waters are performed on homogenised, unfiltered samples, unless noted otherwise. 6. Samples were analysed on an 'as received' basis. 7. This report replaces any interim results previously issued.
Holding Times Please refer to 'Sample Preservation and Container Guide' for holding times (QS3001). For samples received on the last day of holding time, notification of testing requirements should have been received at least 6 hours prior to sample receipt deadlines as stated on the Sample Receipt Advice. If the Laboratory did not receive the information in the required timeframe, and regardless of any other integrity issues, suitably qualified results may still be reported. Holding times apply from the date of sampling, therefore compliance to these may be outside the laboratory's control. **NOTE: pH duplicates are reported as a range NOT as RPD
Units mg/kg: milligrams per Kilogram mg/l: milligrams per litre ug/l: micrograms per litre ppm: Parts per million ppb: Parts per billion %: Percentage org/100ml: Organisms per 100 millilitres NTU: Nephelometric Turbidity Units MPN/100mL: Most Probable Number of organisms per 100 millilitres
Terms Dry Where a moisture has been determined on a solid sample the result is expressed on a dry basis. LOR Limit of Reporting. SPIKE Addition of the analyte to the sample and reported as percentage recovery. RPD Relative Percent Difference between two Duplicate pieces of analysis. LCS Laboratory Control Sample - reported as percent recovery CRM Certified Reference Material - reported as percent recovery Method Blank In the case of solid samples these are performed on laboratory certified clean sands. In the case of water samples these are performed on de-ionised water. Surr - Surrogate The addition of a like compound to the analyte target and reported as percentage recovery. Duplicate A second piece of analysis from the same sample and reported in the same units as the result to show comparison. Batch Duplicate A second piece of analysis from a sample outside of the clients batch of samples but run within the laboratory batch of analysis. Batch SPIKE Spike recovery reported on a sample from outside of the clients batch of samples but run within the laboratory batch of analysis. USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency APHA American Public Health Association TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure COC Chain of Custody SRA Sample Receipt Advice CP Client Parent - QC was performed on samples pertaining to this report NCP Non-Client Parent - QC performed on samples not pertaining to this report, QC is representative of the sequence or batch that client samples were analysed within TEQ Toxic Equivalency Quotient
QC - Acceptance Criteria RPD Duplicates: Global RPD Duplicates Acceptance Criteria is 30% however the following acceptance guidelines are equally applicable: Results <10 times the LOR : No Limit Results between 10-20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-50% Results >20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-30% Surrogate Recoveries: Recoveries must lie between 50-150%-Phenols & PFASs 20-130%
QC Data General Comments 1. Where a result is reported as a less than (<), higher than the nominated LOR, this is due to either matrix interference, extract dilution required due to interferences or contaminant levels within the sample, high moisture content or insufficient sample provided. 2. Duplicate data shown within this report that states the word "BATCH" is a Batch Duplicate from outside of your sample batch, but within the laboratory sample batch at a 1:10 ratio. The Parent and Duplicate data shown is not data from your samples. 3. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting LCS data, Toxaphene & Chlordane are not added to the LCS. 4. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting Spike data, Toxaphene is not added to the Spike. 5. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - where reporting Spike & LCS data, a single spike of commercial Hydrocarbon products in the range of C12-C30 is added and it's Total Recovery is reported in the C10-C14 cell of the Report. 6. pH and Free Chlorine analysed in the laboratory - Analysis on this test must begin within 30 minutes of sampling.Therefore laboratory analysis is unlikely to be completed within holding time. Analysis will begin as soon as possible after sample receipt. 7. Recovery Data (Spikes & Surrogates) - where chromatographic interference does not allow the determination of Recovery the term "INT" appears against that analyte. 8. Polychlorinated Biphenyls are spiked only using Aroclor 1260 in Matrix Spikes and LCS. 9. For Matrix Spikes and LCS results a dash " -" in the report means that the specific analyte was not added to the QC sample. 10. Duplicate RPDs are calculated from raw analytical data thus it is possible to have two sets of data.
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 12 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Quality Control Results
Acceptance Pass Qualifying Test Units Result 1 Limits Limits Code Method Blank Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions TRH C6-C9 mg/kg < 20 20 Pass TRH C10-C14 mg/kg < 20 20 Pass TRH C15-C28 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass TRH C29-C36 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass Method Blank BTEX Benzene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass Toluene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass Ethylbenzene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass m&p-Xylenes mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass o-Xylene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass Xylenes - Total mg/kg < 0.3 0.3 Pass Method Blank Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Naphthalene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass TRH C6-C10 mg/kg < 20 20 Pass Method Blank Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Acenaphthylene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Benzo(g.h.i)perylene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Chrysene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Dibenz(a.h)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Fluorene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Naphthalene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Phenanthrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Method Blank Organochlorine Pesticides Chlordanes - Total mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass 4.4'-DDD mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass 4.4'-DDE mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass 4.4'-DDT mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass a-BHC mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Aldrin mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass b-BHC mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass d-BHC mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Dieldrin mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Endosulfan I mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Endosulfan II mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Endrin mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Endrin aldehyde mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 13 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Acceptance Pass Qualifying Test Units Result 1 Limits Limits Code Endrin ketone mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass g-BHC (Lindane) mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Heptachlor mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Hexachlorobenzene mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Methoxychlor mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass Toxaphene mg/kg < 1 1 Pass Method Blank Organophosphorus Pesticides Azinphos-methyl mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Bolstar mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Chlorfenvinphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Chlorpyrifos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Chlorpyrifos-methyl mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Coumaphos mg/kg < 2 2 Pass Demeton-O mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Diazinon mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Dichlorvos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Dimethoate mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass EPN mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Ethion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Ethoprop mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Ethyl parathion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Fenitrothion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Fensulfothion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Fenthion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Malathion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Merphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Methyl parathion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Mevinphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Monocrotophos mg/kg < 2 2 Pass Naled mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Omethoate mg/kg < 2 2 Pass Phorate mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Pirimiphos-methyl mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Pyrazophos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Ronnel mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Terbufos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Tetrachlorvinphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Tokuthion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Trichloronate mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass Method Blank Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions TRH >C10-C16 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass TRH >C16-C34 mg/kg < 100 100 Pass TRH >C34-C40 mg/kg < 100 100 Pass Method Blank Heavy Metals Arsenic mg/kg < 2 2 Pass Cadmium mg/kg < 0.4 0.4 Pass Chromium mg/kg < 5 5 Pass Copper mg/kg < 5 5 Pass Lead mg/kg < 5 5 Pass Mercury mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 14 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Acceptance Pass Qualifying Test Units Result 1 Limits Limits Code Nickel mg/kg < 5 5 Pass Zinc mg/kg < 5 5 Pass LCS - % Recovery Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions TRH C6-C9 % 129 70-130 Pass TRH C10-C14 % 113 70-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery BTEX Benzene % 116 70-130 Pass Toluene % 120 70-130 Pass Ethylbenzene % 121 70-130 Pass m&p-Xylenes % 121 70-130 Pass Xylenes - Total % 120 70-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Naphthalene % 128 70-130 Pass TRH C6-C10 % 124 70-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthene % 87 70-130 Pass Acenaphthylene % 89 70-130 Pass Anthracene % 92 70-130 Pass Benz(a)anthracene % 79 70-130 Pass Benzo(a)pyrene % 89 70-130 Pass Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene % 95 70-130 Pass Benzo(g.h.i)perylene % 72 70-130 Pass Benzo(k)fluoranthene % 81 70-130 Pass Chrysene % 77 70-130 Pass Dibenz(a.h)anthracene % 78 70-130 Pass Fluoranthene % 72 70-130 Pass Fluorene % 87 70-130 Pass Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene % 74 70-130 Pass Naphthalene % 90 70-130 Pass Phenanthrene % 88 70-130 Pass Pyrene % 73 70-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery Organochlorine Pesticides 4.4'-DDD % 126 70-130 Pass 4.4'-DDE % 93 70-130 Pass 4.4'-DDT % 115 70-130 Pass a-BHC % 82 70-130 Pass Aldrin % 77 70-130 Pass b-BHC % 82 70-130 Pass d-BHC % 90 70-130 Pass Dieldrin % 91 70-130 Pass Endosulfan I % 89 70-130 Pass Endosulfan II % 92 70-130 Pass Endosulfan sulphate % 98 70-130 Pass Endrin % 85 70-130 Pass Endrin aldehyde % 97 70-130 Pass Endrin ketone % 123 70-130 Pass g-BHC (Lindane) % 83 70-130 Pass Heptachlor % 118 70-130 Pass Heptachlor epoxide % 83 70-130 Pass
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 15 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Acceptance Pass Qualifying Test Units Result 1 Limits Limits Code Hexachlorobenzene % 80 70-130 Pass Methoxychlor % 117 70-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery Organophosphorus Pesticides Diazinon % 85 70-130 Pass Dimethoate % 74 70-130 Pass Ethion % 128 70-130 Pass Fenitrothion % 78 70-130 Pass Methyl parathion % 82 70-130 Pass Mevinphos % 75 70-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions TRH >C10-C16 % 118 70-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery Heavy Metals Arsenic % 109 80-120 Pass Cadmium % 110 80-120 Pass Chromium % 117 80-120 Pass Copper % 114 80-120 Pass Lead % 101 80-120 Pass Mercury % 119 75-125 Pass Nickel % 113 80-120 Pass Zinc % 111 80-120 Pass QA Acceptance Pass Qualifying Test Lab Sample ID Source Units Result 1 Limits Limits Code Spike - % Recovery Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1 TRH C6-C9 M16-De06117 CP % 129 70-130 Pass TRH C10-C14 M16-De06117 CP % 104 70-130 Pass Spike - % Recovery BTEX Result 1 Benzene M16-De06117 CP % 104 70-130 Pass Toluene M16-De06117 CP % 113 70-130 Pass Ethylbenzene M16-De06117 CP % 112 70-130 Pass m&p-Xylenes M16-De06117 CP % 111 70-130 Pass o-Xylene M16-De06117 CP % 111 70-130 Pass Xylenes - Total M16-De06117 CP % 111 70-130 Pass Spike - % Recovery Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Naphthalene M16-De06117 CP % 119 70-130 Pass TRH C6-C10 M16-De06117 CP % 120 70-130 Pass Spike - % Recovery Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1 4.4'-DDD M16-De06265 NCP % 126 70-130 Pass 4.4'-DDE M16-De06265 NCP % 105 70-130 Pass 4.4'-DDT M16-De06265 NCP % 88 70-130 Pass a-BHC M16-De06265 NCP % 96 70-130 Pass Aldrin M16-De06265 NCP % 89 70-130 Pass b-BHC M16-De06265 NCP % 99 70-130 Pass d-BHC M16-De06265 NCP % 109 70-130 Pass Dieldrin M16-De06265 NCP % 80 70-130 Pass Endosulfan I M16-De06265 NCP % 103 70-130 Pass Endosulfan II M16-De06265 NCP % 104 70-130 Pass Endosulfan sulphate M16-De06265 NCP % 115 70-130 Pass Endrin M16-De06265 NCP % 112 70-130 Pass
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 16 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S QA Acceptance Pass Qualifying Test Lab Sample ID Source Units Result 1 Limits Limits Code Endrin aldehyde M16-De06265 NCP % 108 70-130 Pass Endrin ketone M16-De06265 NCP % 128 70-130 Pass g-BHC (Lindane) M16-De06265 NCP % 97 70-130 Pass Heptachlor M16-De06265 NCP % 88 70-130 Pass Heptachlor epoxide M16-De06265 NCP % 97 70-130 Pass Hexachlorobenzene M16-De06265 NCP % 92 70-130 Pass Methoxychlor M16-De06265 NCP % 107 70-130 Pass Spike - % Recovery Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1 TRH >C10-C16 M16-De06117 CP % 109 70-130 Pass Spike - % Recovery Organophosphorus Pesticides Result 1 Diazinon M16-De06118 CP % 98 70-130 Pass Dimethoate M16-De06118 CP % 76 70-130 Pass Ethion M16-De06118 CP % 106 70-130 Pass Fenitrothion M16-De06118 CP % 79 70-130 Pass Methyl parathion M16-De06118 CP % 71 70-130 Pass Mevinphos M16-De06118 CP % 78 70-130 Pass Spike - % Recovery Heavy Metals Result 1 Arsenic M16-De06118 CP % 104 75-125 Pass Cadmium M16-De06118 CP % 103 75-125 Pass Chromium M16-De06118 CP % 104 75-125 Pass Copper M16-De06118 CP % 99 75-125 Pass Lead M16-De06118 CP % 100 75-125 Pass Mercury M16-De06118 CP % 99 70-130 Pass Nickel M16-De06118 CP % 102 75-125 Pass Zinc M16-De06118 CP % 97 75-125 Pass Spike - % Recovery Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1 Acenaphthene M16-De06129 CP % 99 70-130 Pass Acenaphthylene M16-De06129 CP % 102 70-130 Pass Anthracene M16-De06129 CP % 102 70-130 Pass Benz(a)anthracene M16-De06129 CP % 90 70-130 Pass Benzo(a)pyrene M16-De06129 CP % 104 70-130 Pass Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M16-De06129 CP % 121 70-130 Pass Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M16-De06129 CP % 85 70-130 Pass Benzo(k)fluoranthene M16-De06129 CP % 85 70-130 Pass Chrysene M16-De06129 CP % 90 70-130 Pass Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M16-De06129 CP % 89 70-130 Pass Fluoranthene M16-De06129 CP % 84 70-130 Pass Fluorene M16-De06129 CP % 99 70-130 Pass Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M16-De06129 CP % 86 70-130 Pass Naphthalene M16-De06129 CP % 103 70-130 Pass Phenanthrene M16-De06129 CP % 98 70-130 Pass Pyrene M16-De06129 CP % 86 70-130 Pass QA Acceptance Pass Qualifying Test Lab Sample ID Source Units Result 1 Limits Limits Code Duplicate Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD TRH C6-C9 M16-De06105 NCP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass TRH C10-C14 B16-De06591 NCP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass TRH C15-C28 B16-De06591 NCP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass TRH C29-C36 B16-De06591 NCP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 17 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Duplicate BTEX Result 1 Result 2 RPD Benzene M16-De06105 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass Toluene M16-De06105 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass Ethylbenzene M16-De06105 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass m&p-Xylenes M16-De06105 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass o-Xylene M16-De06105 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass Xylenes - Total M16-De06105 NCP mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 <1 30% Pass Duplicate Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD Naphthalene M16-De06105 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass TRH C6-C10 M16-De06105 NCP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass Duplicate Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1 Result 2 RPD Acenaphthene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Acenaphthylene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Anthracene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benz(a)anthracene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benzo(a)pyrene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benzo(k)fluoranthene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Chrysene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Fluoranthene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Fluorene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Naphthalene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Phenanthrene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Pyrene M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Duplicate Organophosphorus Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD Azinphos-methyl M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Bolstar M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Chlorfenvinphos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Chlorpyrifos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Chlorpyrifos-methyl M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Coumaphos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass Demeton-S M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Demeton-O M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Diazinon M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Dichlorvos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Dimethoate M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Disulfoton M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass EPN M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Ethion M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Ethoprop M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Ethyl parathion M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Fenitrothion M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Fensulfothion M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Fenthion M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Malathion M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Merphos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Methyl parathion M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Mevinphos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Monocrotophos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 18 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Duplicate Organophosphorus Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD Naled M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Omethoate M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass Phorate M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Pirimiphos-methyl M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Pyrazophos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Ronnel M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Terbufos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Tetrachlorvinphos M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Tokuthion M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Trichloronate M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Duplicate Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD TRH >C10-C16 B16-De06591 NCP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass TRH >C16-C34 B16-De06591 NCP mg/kg < 100 < 100 <1 30% Pass TRH >C34-C40 B16-De06591 NCP mg/kg < 100 < 100 <1 30% Pass Duplicate Heavy Metals Result 1 Result 2 RPD Arsenic M16-De06117 CP mg/kg 10 10.0 5.0 30% Pass Cadmium M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 <1 30% Pass Chromium M16-De06117 CP mg/kg 10 11 5.0 30% Pass Copper M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass Lead M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass Mercury M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass Nickel M16-De06117 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass Zinc M16-De06117 CP mg/kg 30 25 19 30% Pass Duplicate Heavy Metals Result 1 Result 2 RPD Arsenic M16-De06118 CP mg/kg 13 14 <1 30% Pass Cadmium M16-De06118 CP mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 <1 30% Pass Chromium M16-De06118 CP mg/kg 5.5 5.5 1.0 30% Pass Copper M16-De06118 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass Lead M16-De06118 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass Mercury M16-De06118 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass Nickel M16-De06118 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass Zinc M16-De06118 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass Duplicate Result 1 Result 2 RPD % Moisture M16-De06120 CP % 4.3 5.0 15 30% Pass Duplicate Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1 Result 2 RPD Acenaphthene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Acenaphthylene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Anthracene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benz(a)anthracene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benzo(a)pyrene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benzo(k)fluoranthene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Chrysene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Fluoranthene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Fluorene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Naphthalene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 19 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Duplicate Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1 Result 2 RPD Phenanthrene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Pyrene M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Duplicate Organophosphorus Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD Azinphos-methyl M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Bolstar M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Chlorfenvinphos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Chlorpyrifos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Chlorpyrifos-methyl M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Coumaphos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass Demeton-S M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Demeton-O M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Diazinon M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Dichlorvos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Dimethoate M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Disulfoton M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass EPN M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Ethion M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Ethoprop M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Ethyl parathion M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Fenitrothion M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Fensulfothion M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Fenthion M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Malathion M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Merphos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Methyl parathion M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Mevinphos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Monocrotophos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass Naled M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Omethoate M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass Phorate M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Pirimiphos-methyl M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Pyrazophos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Ronnel M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Terbufos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Tetrachlorvinphos M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Tokuthion M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Trichloronate M16-De06128 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass Duplicate Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD Chlordanes - Total M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass 4.4'-DDD M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass 4.4'-DDE M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass 4.4'-DDT M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass a-BHC M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Aldrin M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass b-BHC M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass d-BHC M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Dieldrin M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Endosulfan I M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Endosulfan II M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Endosulfan sulphate M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Endrin M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Endrin aldehyde M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 20 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Duplicate Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD Endrin ketone M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass g-BHC (Lindane) M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Heptachlor M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Heptachlor epoxide M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Hexachlorobenzene M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Methoxychlor M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass Toxaphene M16-De06129 CP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 21 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Quality Control Analyte Summary Compliance
The table below is the actual occurrence of QC performed on the batch of samples within this report and as defined below
Laboratory Laboratory Laboratory Analysis Samples Duplicates Matrix Spikes Method Blanks Control Samples Analysed Reported Reported Reported Reported BTEX 9 1 1 1 1 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM 9 1 1 2 2 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM 9 1 1 2 2 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons 9 2 1 1 1 Organochlorine Pesticides 9 1 1 1 1 Organophosphorus Pesticides 9 2 1 1 1 Heavy Metals 9 2 1 1 1 % Moisture 9 1 NA NA NA
Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance follows guidelines delineated in the National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure April 2011, Schedule B3, Guideline on Laboratory Analysis of Potentially Contaminated Soils and US EPA SW-846 Chapter 1: 'Quality Control'. It comprises the following when a laboratory process batch is deemed to consist of up to 20 samples that are similar in terms of matrix and test procedure, and are processed as one unit for QC purposes. If more than 20 samples are being processed, they are considered as more than one batch.
Method blank One method blank per process batch.
Laboratory duplicate There should be at least one duplicate per process batch, or two duplicates if the process batch exceeds 10 samples.
Laboratory control sample (LCS) There should be at least one LCS per process batch.
Matrix spikes There should be one matrix spike per matrix type per process batch.
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 22 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Comments
Sample Integrity Custody Seals Intact (if used) N/A Attempt to Chill was evident Yes Sample correctly preserved Yes Appropriate sample containers have been used Yes Sample containers for volatile analysis received with minimal headspace Yes Samples received within HoldingTime Yes Some samples have been subcontracted No
Qualifier Codes/Comments Code Description F2 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "naphthalene" value from the ">C10-C16" value. The naphthalene value used in this calculation is obtained from volatiles N01 (Purge & Trap analysis). Where we have reported both volatile (P&T GCMS) and semivolatile (GCMS) naphthalene data, results may not be identical. Provided correct sample handling protocols have been followed, any observed differences in results are likely to be due to procedural differences within each methodology. Results determined by both techniques have passed N02 all QAQC acceptance criteria, and are entirely technically valid. F1 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "Total BTEX" value from the "C6-C10" value. The "Total BTEX" value is obtained by summing the concentrations of BTEX N04 analytes. The "C6-C10" value is obtained by quantitating against a standard of mixed aromatic/aliphatic analytes. Please note:- These two PAH isomers closely co-elute using the most contemporary analytical methods and both the reported concentration (and the TEQ) apply specifically to N07 the total of the two co-eluting PAHs
Authorised By
Sarah Gould Analytical Services Manager Alex Petridis Senior Analyst-Metal (VIC) Alex Petridis Senior Analyst-Organic (VIC) Harry Bacalis Senior Analyst-Volatile (VIC) Huong Le Senior Analyst-Inorganic (VIC) Joseph Edouard Senior Analyst-Organic (VIC) Rhys Thomas Senior Analyst-Asbestos (WA)
Glenn Jackson National Operations Manager
- Indicates Not Requested * Indicates NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this service Measurement uncertainty of test data is available on request or please click here. Eurofins | mgt shall not be liable for loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred by the client, or any other person or company, resulting from the use of any information or interpretation given in this report. In no case shall Eurofins | mgt be liable for consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost profits, damages for failure to meet deadlines and lost production arising from this report. This document shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to the items tested. Unless indicated otherwise, the tests were performed on the samples as received.
Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166 Page 23 of 23 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-S Certificate of Analysis
NATA Accredited Accreditation Number 1261 Site Number 18217 Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025–Testing The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included in this document are traceable to Australian/national standards.
Tonkin Consulting Level 2, 66 Rundle Street Kent Town SA 5067
Attention: Jack Horan Report 526588-AID Project Name FRANK BRENNAN CONSULTING Project ID 2016.1432 Received Date Dec 06, 2016 Date Reported Dec 15, 2016
Methodology: Asbestos ID Conducted in accordance with the Australian Standard AS 4964 – 2004: Method for the Qualitative Identification of Asbestos in Bulk Samples and in-house Method LTM-ASB-8020 by polarised light microscopy (PLM) and dispersion staining (DS) techniques. Bulk samples include building materials, soils and ores. Subsampling Soil The whole sample submitted is first dried and then sieved through a 10mm sieve followed by a Samples 2mm sieve. All fibrous matter viz greater than 10mm, greater than 2mm as well as the material passing through the 2mm sieve are retained and analysed for the presence of asbestos. If the sub 2mm fraction is greater than approximately 30 to 60g then a sub-sampling routine based on ISO 3082:2009(E) Iron ores - Sampling and Sample preparation procedures is employed. Depending on the nature and size of the soil sample, the sub-2 mm residue material may need to be sub-sampled for trace analysis in accordance with AS 4964-2004. Bonded The material is first examined and any fibres isolated and where required interfering organic asbestos- fibres or matter may be removed by treating the sample for several hours at a temperature not containing exceeding 400 ± 30°C. The resultant material is then ground and examined in accordance with material (ACM) AS 4964-2004. Limit of Reporting The nominal detection limit of the AS4964 method is around 0.01%. The examination of large sample sizes (at least 500 ml is recommended) may improve the likelihood of identifying asbestos material in the greater than 2 mm fraction. The NEPM screening level of 0.001% w/w asbestos in soil for FA and AF (i.e. non-bonded/friable asbestos) only applies where the FA and AF are able to be quantified by gravimetric procedures. This screening level is not applicable to free fibres. NOTE: NATA News, September 2011 – page 34, states, “Weighing of fibres is problematic and can lead to loss of fibres and potential exposure for laboratory analysts. To request laboratories to report information which is outside the scope of AS 4964-2004 and the scope of their accreditation is misleading and is most unwise” therefore such values reported are outside the scope of Eurofins | mgt NATA accreditation as designated by an asterisk.
Eurofins | mgt 2-5, Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, VIC, Australia, 3166 Page 1 of 7 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-AID NATA Accredited Accreditation Number 1261 Site Number 18217 Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025–Testing The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included in this document are traceable to Australian/national standards.
Project Name FRANK BRENNAN CONSULTING Project ID 2016.1432 Date Sampled Dec 05, 2016 Report 526588-AID
Eurofins | mgt Client Sample ID Sample No. Date Sampled Sample Description Result
No asbestos detected. TP02-1 16-De06117 Dec 05, 2016 Approximate Sample 75g Organic fibre detected. Sample consisted of: Brown coarse grain soil and rocks No respirable fibres detected. No asbestos detected. TP05-1 16-De06122 Dec 05, 2016 Approximate Sample 92g Organic fibre detected. Sample consisted of: Light brown coarse grain soil and rocks No respirable fibres detected. No asbestos detected. TP07-1 16-De06126 Dec 05, 2016 Approximate Sample 79g Organic fibre detected. Sample consisted of: Light brown coarse grain soil and rocks No respirable fibres detected.
Eurofins | mgt 2-5, Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, VIC, Australia, 3166 Page 2 of 7 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-AID Sample History Where samples are submitted/analysed over several days, the last date of extraction and analysis is reported. A recent review of our LIMS has resulted in the correction or clarification of some method identifications. Due to this, some of the method reference information on reports has changed. However, no substantive change has been made to our laboratory methods, and as such there is no change in the validity of current or previous results (regarding both quality and NATA accreditation). If the date and time of sampling are not provided, the Laboratory will not be responsible for compromised results should testing be performed outside the recommended holding time.
Description Testing Site Extracted Holding Time Asbestos - LTM-ASB-8020 Perth Dec 07, 2016 Indefinite
Eurofins | mgt 2-5, Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, VIC, Australia, 3166 Page 3 of 7 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-AID Melbourne Sydney Brisbane Perth 3-5 Kingston Town Close Unit F3, Building F 1/21 Smallwood Place 2/91 Leach Highway Oakleigh VIC 3166 16 Mars Road Murarrie QLD 4172 Kewdale WA 6105 Phone : +61 3 8564 5000 Lane Cove West NSW 2066 Phone : +61 7 3902 4600 Phone : +61 8 9251 9600 ABN – 50 005 085 521 e.mail : [email protected] NATA # 1261 Phone : +61 2 9900 8400 NATA # 1261 Site # 20794 NATA # 1261 web : www.eurofins.com.au Site # 1254 & 14271 NATA # 1261 Site # 18217 Site # 18217
V2
Company Name: Tonkin Consulting Order No.: Received: Dec 6, 2016 3:21 PM Address: Level 2, 66 Rundle Street Report #: 526588 Due: Dec 13, 2016 Kent Town Phone: 08 8273 3100 Priority: 5 Day SA 5067 Fax: 08 8273 3110 Contact Name: Jack Horan Project Name: FRANK BRENNAN CONSULTING Project ID: 2016.1432 Eurofins | mgt Analytical Services Manager : Sarah Gould Asbestos Absence/Presence HOLD Eurofins |mgtSuiteB14 Moisture Set Eurofins |mgtSuiteB7
Sample Detail
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 XXXX Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794 Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X External Laboratory No Sample ID Sample Date Sampling Matrix LAB ID Time 1 TP02-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06117 X XXX 2 TP02-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06118 XXX 3 TP03-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06119 XXX 4 TP04-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06120 XXX 5 TP04-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06121 X 6 TP05-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06122 X XXX 7 TP05-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06123 X 8 TP06-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06124 X 9 TP06-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06125 XXX
Eurofins | mgt 2-5, Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, VIC, Australia, 3166 Page 4 of 7 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-AID Melbourne Sydney Brisbane Perth 3-5 Kingston Town Close Unit F3, Building F 1/21 Smallwood Place 2/91 Leach Highway Oakleigh VIC 3166 16 Mars Road Murarrie QLD 4172 Kewdale WA 6105 Phone : +61 3 8564 5000 Lane Cove West NSW 2066 Phone : +61 7 3902 4600 Phone : +61 8 9251 9600 ABN – 50 005 085 521 e.mail : [email protected] NATA # 1261 Phone : +61 2 9900 8400 NATA # 1261 Site # 20794 NATA # 1261 web : www.eurofins.com.au Site # 1254 & 14271 NATA # 1261 Site # 18217 Site # 18217
V2
Company Name: Tonkin Consulting Order No.: Received: Dec 6, 2016 3:21 PM Address: Level 2, 66 Rundle Street Report #: 526588 Due: Dec 13, 2016 Kent Town Phone: 08 8273 3100 Priority: 5 Day SA 5067 Fax: 08 8273 3110 Contact Name: Jack Horan Project Name: FRANK BRENNAN CONSULTING Project ID: 2016.1432 Eurofins | mgt Analytical Services Manager : Sarah Gould Asbestos Absence/Presence HOLD Eurofins |mgtSuiteB14 Moisture Set Eurofins |mgtSuiteB7
Sample Detail
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 XXXX Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794 Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X 10 TP07-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06126 X XXX 11 TP08-1 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06127 X 12 TP08-2 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06128 XXX 13 DUP01 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06129 XXX 14 DUP02 Dec 05, 2016 Soil M16-De06130 X Test Counts 3 5 9 9 9
Eurofins | mgt 2-5, Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, VIC, Australia, 3166 Page 5 of 7 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-AID Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary General 1. QC data may be available on request. 2. All soil results are reported on a dry basis, unless otherwise stated. 3. Samples were analysed on an 'as received' basis. 4. This report replaces any interim results previously issued. Holding Times Please refer to 'Sample Preservation and Container Guide' for holding times (QS3001). For samples received on the last day of holding time, notification of testing requirements should have been received at least 6 hours prior to sample receipt deadlines as stated on the Sample Receipt Advice. If the Laboratory did not receive the information in the required timeframe, and regardless of any other integrity issues, suitably qualified results may still be reported. Holding times apply from the date of sampling, therefore compliance to these may be outside the laboratory's control. Units % w/w: weight for weight basis grams per kilogram Filter loading: fibres/100 graticule areas Reported Concentration: fibres/mL Flowrate: L/min Terms Dry Where a moisture has been determined on a solid sample the result is expressed on a dry basis. LOR Limit of Reporting. COC Chain of custody SRA Sample Receipt Advice ISO International Stardards Organisation AS Australian Standards WA DOH Western Australia Department of Health NOHSC National Occupational Health and Safety Commission ACM Bonded asbestos-containing material means any material containing more than 1% asbestos and comprises asbestos-containing-material which is in sound condition, although possibly broken or fragmented, and where the asbestos is bound in a matrix such as cement or resin. Common examples of ACM include but are not limited to: pipe and boiler insulation, sprayed-on fireproofing, troweled-on acoustical plaster, floor tile and mastic, floor linoleum, transite shingles, roofing materials, wall and ceiling plaster, ceiling tiles, and gasket materials. This term is restricted to material that cannot pass a 7 mm x 7 mm sieve. This sieve size is selected because it approximates the thickness of common asbestos cement sheeting and for fragments to be smaller than this would imply a high degree of damage and hence potential for fibre release. FA FA comprises friable asbestos material and includes severely weathered cement sheet, insulation products and woven asbestos material. This type of friable asbestos is defined here as asbestos material that is in a degraded condition such that it can be broken or crumbled by hand pressure. This material is typically unbonded or was previously bonded and is now significantly degraded (crumbling). PACM Presumed Asbestos-Containing Material means thermal system insulation and surfacing material found in buildings, vessels, and vessel sections constructed no later than 1980 that are assumed to contain greater than one percent asbestos but have not been sampled or analyzed to verify or negate the presence of asbestos. AF Asbestos fines (AF) are defined as free fibres, or fibre bundles, smaller than 7mm. It is the free fibres which present the greatest risk to human health, although very small fibres (< 5 microns in length) are not considered to be such a risk. AF also includes small fragments of bonded ACM that pass through a 7 mm x 7 mm sieve. (Note that for bonded ACM fragments to pass through a 7 mm x 7 mm sieve implies a substatntial degree of damage which increases the potential for fibre release.) AC Asbestos cement means a mixture of cement and asbestos fibres (typically 90:10 ratios).
Eurofins | mgt 2-5, Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, VIC, Australia, 3166 Page 6 of 7 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-AID Comments The samples received were not collected in approved asbestos bags and were therefore sub-sampled from the 250mL glass jars. Valid sub- sampling procedures were applied so as to ensure that the sub-samples to be analysed accurately represented the samples received.
Sample Integrity Custody Seals Intact (if used) N/A Attempt to Chill was evident Yes Sample correctly preserved Yes Appropriate sample containers have been used Yes Sample containers for volatile analysis received with minimal headspace Yes Samples received within HoldingTime Yes Some samples have been subcontracted No
Qualifier Codes/Comments Code Description N/A Not applicable
Authorised by:
Nibha Vaidya Senior Analyst-Asbestos (NSW)
Rhys Thomas Senior Analyst-Asbestos (WA)
Glenn Jackson National Operations Manager
Final Report – this report replaces any previously issued Report
- Indicates Not Requested * Indicates NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this service Uncertainty data is available on request Eurofins | mgt shall not be liable for loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred by the client, or any other person or company, resulting from the use of any information or interpretation given in this report. In no case shall Eurofins | mgt be liable for consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost profits, damages for failure to meet deadlines and lost production arising from this report. This document shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to the items tested. Unless indicated otherwise, the tests were performed on the samples as received.
Eurofins | mgt 2-5, Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, VIC, Australia, 3166 Page 7 of 7 Date Reported: Dec 15, 2016 ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Report Number: 526588-AID
Appendix E
Site Photos
Ref No. 20161432R001 Lot 13 Admella Drive Preliminary Site Investigation 13 Admella Drive Site Photographs
Photo looking north at the previously excavated area. The northern extent of the previous excavation is shown by the exposed natural soils in the background.
Photo looking north west at the previously excavated area. The northern extent of the previous excavation is shown by the exposed natural soils in the background. 13 Admella Drive Site Photographs
Photo of TP5, which shows the sands and inclusions encountered during excavation of test pits.
Photo of the surface at TP7, which shows the types of materials within the former excavation area.