DOCSLIB.ORG

Reproduction: the Origins of Sex

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reproduction: the Origins of Sex Biology Reproduction: The origins of sex Organisms reproduce in all sorts of weird and wonderful ways and scientists have just discovered that a type of fish that existed over 360 million years ago was the first to to have sexual intercourse, like many animals, including humans, still do. In this lesson you will investigate the following: • What is reproduction? • What are the different types of reproduction? • What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of these types of reproduction? So, let’s produce some answers! This is a print version of an interactive online lesson. To sign up for the real thing or for curriculum details about the lesson go to www.cosmosforschools.com Introduction: Reproduction (P1) Scientists have discovered the origins of sexual intercourse through studying fossils of armour-plated fish called antiarch placoderms that became extinct some 360 million years ago. The fish, which gave rise to all current vertebrates with jaws, including humans, were the first animals to develop specific male and female genitalia. Before the placoderms all reproduction was through external fertilisation, in which sperm and eggs are expelled into the water to unite – the way many modern fish do. But the scientists found evidence the placoderms changed all this. They discovered structures in the fossils that they interpret as bony "claspers" — male organs that penetrate the female and deliver sperm. They say the placoderms would have had sex side by side. But the discovery that the animals had penetrative sex is perhaps less surprising than the fact that the bony fishes that follow placoderms in the evolutionary tree show no evidence for internal fertilisation. That means that some of the placoderms' descendants had to "re-invent" sex organs such as claspers in sharks and rays and penises in mammals and birds. Read the original Cosmos blog post here. Loading... Poll 1 Hypothesise: While the antiarch placoderms are the first known organisms to have had sexual intercourse, organisms have been reproducing sexually for approximately 2 billion years. Other organisms reproduce asexually – that is, without a partner. Without doing any research, suggest which of the following organisms you think reproduce sexually. Note: Some organisms can reproduce both sexually and asexually! Koalas Bacteria Yeast Sea anemone Cacti Gather: Reproduction (P1) Sexual reproduction Loading... Sexual reproduction requires two parent cells. These cells are known as gametes and each holds half of the genetic information of their parent. Male gametes are known as sperm and female gametes are known as eggs (or ova). When the two gametes fuse a zygote is formed – a process known as fertilisation. The offspring hold a full complement of genetic information, half from the male and half from the female. Question 1 Define: In your own words, define the term sexual reproduction. Question 2 Question 3 Remember: The male gametes are known as eggs. Recall: Female gametes contain 50% of the female's genes. True True False False Question 4 List: In the table below, describe internal and external fertilisation and provide an example of a species that uses this type of fertilisation. Type of fertilisation Brief description Example Internal fertilisation External fertilisation Asexual reproduction Loading... Question 5 Define: In your own words, define the term asexual reproduction. Question 6 Identify: The video clip describes three types of asexual reproduction: cell division, budding and splitting. Use the line drawing tool to link the species in the sketchpad below with their method of asexual reproduction. Process: Reproduction (P1) Whether sexually or asexually, organisms reproduce in all sorts of weird and wonderful ways. In the case of the redback and dark fishing spiders the males are eaten alive by the female during sex! The following fun facts about the dark fishing spider will help you answer questions 1–4 below: During mating season the males outnumber the females 3:1. The weight of the female spider is 14 times that of the male. Each female can produce 1000 spiderlings, which she carries around and guards in a webbed nest. Question 1 Question 2 Calculate: A population of dark fishing spiders has 20 Calculate: At the beginning of mating season a population of females. How many males spiders would you expect there to be dark fishing spiders has 30 males. How many female spiders at the beginning of mating season? would you expect there to be? Question 3 Question 4 Calculate: A female dark fishing spider was found to weigh 7 Calculate: There are 15 male dark fishing spiders in a grams. What would you expect a male to weigh? population. How many offspring could be produced? Question 5 Investigate: Complete the table below. For the "Parental care rating" use the following system: "0" – parents take no care of offspring. "1" – parents care for seeds or fertilised eggs. "2" – parents care for offspring after they are born or hatched. For the other columns use the answers below: Sexual (internal) | Sexual (external) and asexual (splitting) | Asexual (cell division) | Sexual (internal) Thousands | Millions | 40,000 to 200,000 Female lays 4–10 spherical silk sacs, each with around 250 eggs | Divides in two every 20 minutes in ideal conditions | Usually only 1 offspring per year. Zygotes develop into seeds in fruit before dispersal by being eaten | Offspring spends 1 month developing in uterus then 7 months in pouch living on mother's milk and pap. Then stays another 5 months carried on mother's back | Parents not present at fertilisation – no care of offspring. Split individuals are fully developed, just need to grow new arms. Organism Image Method of Offspring Number Number of offspring: Parent Parental care: reproductio genetical of Notes al care Notes n ly offsprin rating identical g per to year parents? Escherichia coli Can’t identify parents – A common gut Yes 1 individual becomes 2 bacteria "daughter" individuals, fully developed. Phascolarctos cinereus Sexual 1 Koala (internal) Ophiactis Thousands of eggs and savignyi sperm released into the 0 Brittle star ocean seasonally where they are fertilised. Many offspring eaten. Often individuals split to produce two new individuals. Carnegiea Only starts flowering at 30 gigantea years old. 2,000 seeds per Saguaro fruit, 20–100 fruit per cactus plant. Very few seeds grow to maturity. Latrodectus Female keeps egg sac in hasselti 1,000 to her web for 3–6 weeks Redback 2,500 until young emerge. spider They stay on the web a few days, sometimes eating siblings, before leaving. Question 6 Think: What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of sexual and asexual reproduction? Propose why each may have led to evolutionary success. Hint: You may share ideas about this task in the discussion board at the bottom of this page. If it is closed ask your teacher to open it. Apply: Reproduction (P2) Essay: Sexual vs asexual reproduction Question 1 Write a 200-250-word essay in response to the following question: "If there were only asexual reproduction, how would this affect the world as we know it?" Use the project space below to construct your essay. You may wish to use a mind map to brainstorm your ideas and the text widget to write your essay. Career: Reproduction (P2) As a child from a small village in Slovenia, Simona Kralj-Fišer didn't know she wanted to be a scientist. She didn't even know that such a profession existed. Simona thought that the only way to have a career in science was to be an astronaut, with the next best option to be a medical doctor. And so she dreamed of becoming a doctor. When Simona had to choose the subjects she wanted to study in school she was torn between her interests in biology, psychology, geography, and literature. Finally, she settled on biology – and soon realised there was more to science than just medicine and space travel. Now, she is a researcher and lecturer of behavioural genetics at the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, where she's a specialist in the curious mating behaviours of nephilid spiders. There's no shortage of interesting and exciting things when it comes to the spiders, like how female spiders are physically incapable of mating more than twice in their lives. But what fascinates Simona the most about the spiders is possibly the most bizarre aspect of their behaviour – female spiders eat their mates after mating. It's a thrilling thing to watch, although Simona admits she always hopes the poor male spider will survive its romantic encounter! Like many other scientists, every day at work is different for Simona. She does everything from the most technical work that involves rearing her spiders and doing lab maintenance, to carrying out experiments, analysing data, writing papers, and teaching her students. But her favourite thing to do is watch her spiders at work. When she isn’t attending to her arachnids, Simona makes time for her hobbies, which include reading, hiking, collecting mushrooms and fruit from the forest, and spending time with her family. Question 1 Imagine: ​When she took biology at school Simona discovered that there was more to science than being a doctor or astronaut. In fact, there is a science angle to many of the activities we undertake or interests that we have in our everyday lives. Write down two or three things that you enjoy doing, and some of the different ways that science is involved in these. Cosmos Live Learning team Lesson authors: Deborah Taylor and Samantha Webber Editors: Bill Condie, Jim Rountree and James Whitmore Artists: Robyn Adderly and Anton Banulski ​Education director: Daniel Pikler Image credits: Getty images, Shutterstock and iStock. Video credits: Flinders University, Mark Drollinger and YouTube..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Role of Unconditional Parental Regard in Autonomy-Supportive
    Journal of Personality 84:6, December 2016 VC 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The Role of Unconditional Parental DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12194 Regard in Autonomy-Supportive Parenting Guy Roth,1 Yaniv Kanat-Maymon,2 and Avi Assor1 1Ben-Gurion University of the Negev 2IDC Herzliya Abstract Two studies explored the role of parents’ unconditional positive regard (UCPR) as perceived by adolescents and young adults in promoting the effectiveness of specific parenting practices that may support offspring’s academic autonomous motivation. Study 1 tested the hypothesis that UCPR predicts rationale-giving and choice-provision practices and, at the same time, mod- erates their relations with adolescents’ autonomous motivation. Study 2 replicated the association between UCPR and the parental practices, and further explored the role of parents’ authenticity as an antecedent of UCPR and parental autonomy support. Study 1 included 125 adolescents and Study 2 considered 128 college-students and their mothers. The offspring reported on their perceptions of their mothers and on their autonomous motivation, and the mothers reported on their sense of authenticity. Both studies found consistent associations between UCPR and parenting practices that may support autonomous motivation. Moreover, Study 1 demonstrated that the rationale giving and choice provision were more strongly related to adolescents’ autonomous motivation when adolescents perceived mothers as high on UCPR. Finally, Study 2 dem- onstrated that mothers’ authenticity predicted UCPR, which in turn was related to autonomy-supportive parenting. Findings support the assumption that parents’ autonomy-supportive practices are more effective when accompanied by UCPR. In the last few decades, research anchored in self-determination and psychological well-being (Grolnick, 2003; Grolnick et al., theory (SDT; Ryan & Deci, 2000) has demonstrated the advan- 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Prenatal Cotinine Levels and ADHD Among Offspring
    Prenatal Cotinine Levels and ADHD Among Offspring Andre Sourander, MD, PhD,a,b,c Minna Sucksdorff, MD,a,d Roshan Chudal, MBBS, MPH, PhD,a Heljä-Marja Surcel, PhD,e,f Susanna Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki, PhLic,a David Gyllenberg, MD, PhD,a,g,h Keely Cheslack-Postava, PhD,c Alan S. Brown, MD, MPHc,i OBJECTIVES: An association between maternal smoking during pregnancy and offspring abstract attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been shown across several studies based on self-reports. No previous studies have investigated the association of nicotine exposure measured by cotinine levels during pregnancy and offspring ADHD. METHODS: In this population-based study, 1079 patients born between 1998 and 1999 and diagnosed with ADHD according to the International Classification of Diseases and 1079 matched controls were identified from Finnish nationwide registers. Maternal cotinine levels were measured by using quantitative immunoassays from maternal serum specimens collected during the first and second trimesters of pregnancy and archived in the national biobank. RESULTS: There was a significant association between increasing log-transformed maternal cotinine levels and offspring ADHD. The odds ratio was 1.09 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–1.12) when adjusting for maternal socioeconomic status, maternal age, maternal psychopathology, paternal age, paternal psychopathology, and child’s birth weight for gestational age. In the categorical analyses with cotinine levels in 3 groups, heavy nicotine exposure (cotinine level .50 ng/mL) was associated with offspring ADHD, with an odds ratio of 2.21 (95% CI 1.63–2.99) in the adjusted analyses. Analyses by deciles of cotinine levels revealed that the adjusted odds for offspring ADHD in the highest decile was 3.34 (95% CI 2.02–5.52).
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Early Childhood Investment by Offspring Genotype
    Child-Driven Parenting: Differential Early Childhood Investment by Offspring Genotype Asta Breinholt, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan Dalton Conley, Department of Sociology, Princeton University & NBER Word count (including references): 6,428 Abstract Socioeconomically advantaged families can draw on greater economic, social and cultural resources to compensate for adverse child development or to reinforce positive child development. Previous research has shown differential parental response by socioeconomic status to children's birth weight, early cognitive ability, and school outcomes – all early life predictors of later socioeconomic success. This study considers an even earlier predictor: children's genotype. The study analyzes (1) whether parents reinforce or compensate for children’s genetic propensity towards educational success, and (2) whether reinforcement (or compensation) differs by family socioeconomic status. Using data from the Avon Longitudinal Survey of Parents and Children (N=7,291), we construct polygenic scores for educational attainment and regress these on cognitively stimulating parenting in early childhood. We use a number of modeling strategies to address the concern that child’s genotype may be proxying unmeasured parent characteristics. Results show that lower SES parents provide more cognitively stimulating activities during early childhood to children with higher polygenic scores for educational attainment, while higher SES parents do not alter their behavior in response to the revealed genetic predisposition of offspring. 1 Introduction There is a growing interest in how children socialize parents. Studies have looked at whether parents’ political and religious opinions and behaviors and even parents’ likelihood of divorce are affected by the sex of their children (Aksoy, 2017; Conley & McCabe, 2012; Conley & Rauscher, 2013; Hamoudi & Nobles, 2014; B.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Mating and Its Relationship to Alternative Modes of Gestation in Male-Pregnant Versus Female-Pregnant fish Species
    Multiple mating and its relationship to alternative modes of gestation in male-pregnant versus female-pregnant fish species John C. Avise1 and Jin-Xian Liu Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697 Contributed by John C. Avise, September 28, 2010 (sent for review August 20, 2010) We construct a verbal and graphical theory (the “fecundity-limitation within which he must incubate the embryos that he has sired with hypothesis”) about how constraints on the brooding space for em- one or more mates (14–17). This inversion from the familiar bryos probably truncate individual fecundity in male-pregnant and situation in female-pregnant animals apparently has translated in female-pregnant species in ways that should differentially influence some but not all syngnathid species into mating systems char- selection pressures for multiple mating by males or by females. We acterized by “sex-role reversal” (18, 19): a higher intensity of then review the empirical literature on genetically deduced rates of sexual selection on females than on males and an elaboration of fi multiple mating by the embryo-brooding parent in various fish spe- sexual secondary traits mostly in females. For one such pipe sh cies with three alternative categories of pregnancy: internal gesta- species, researchers also have documented that the sexual- tion by males, internal gestation by females, and external gestation selection gradient for females is steeper than that for males (20). More generally, fishes should be excellent subjects for as- (in nests) by males. Multiple mating by the brooding gender was fl common in all three forms of pregnancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Maternal-Offspring Conflict Leads to the Evolution of Dominant Zygotic Sex
    Heredity (2002) 88, 102–111 2002 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0018-067X/02 $25.00 www.nature.com/hdy Maternal-offspring conflict leads to the evolution of dominant zygotic sex determination JH Werren1, MJ Hatcher2 and HCJ Godfray3 1Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester NY 14627, USA; 2School of Biology , University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK; 3NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK Sex determination in many species involves interactions males more negatively effect fitness within the family, a male among maternally expressed genes (eg, mRNA’s and pro- heterogametic (XY male) sex determining system evolves, teins placed into the egg) and zygotically expressed genes. whereas when females more negatively effect fitness in the Recent studies have proposed that conflicting selective family, a female heterogametic (ZW female) system evolves. pressures can occur between maternally and zygotically Individuals with the dominant sex allele are one sex, and the expressed sex determining loci and that these may play a opposite sex is determined by maternally-expressed genes role in shaping the evolution of sex determining systems. in individuals without the dominant sex allele. Results there- Here we show that such genetic conflict occurs under very fore suggest that maternal-zygotic conflict could play a role general circumstances. Whenever sex ratio among progeny in the early evolution of chromosomal sex determining sys- in a family affects the fitness of either progeny in that family tems. Predictions are made concerning the patterns of or maternal fitness, then maternal-zygotic genetic conflict expression of maternal and zygotic sex determining genes occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Biol2007 Sex and Sexual Selection
    BIOL2007 SEX AND SEXUAL SELECTION BIOL2007 SEX AND SEXUAL SELECTION EVOLUTIONARY QUESTIONS ABOUT SEX Sex is fun, but is also still a puzzle for evolutionary biologists. Today we will explore: A) The evolution of sex 1) What is the evolutionary advantage of recombination and sex? 2) What is the optimal sex ratio? B) Evolution of sexual dimorphism - sexual selection 3) Why are there sexually dimorphic "secondary sexual characteristics" - Darwin called characters "secondary sexual" if they were dimorphic but weren't directly involved in gamete production or transmission. There are many OTHER interesting questions that could be asked. For example: 4) Why has meiosis evolved to share chromosomes equally between gametes? 5) Why are mitochondria and other organelles NOT shared equally between the sexes? 6) Why are there only 2 sexes anyway; not 3, 5, or 100? 7) Why do different kinds of sex determination evolve (e.g. chromosomes, environment)? These and similar questions are answered in more detail in Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology and in Sex, Genes and Evolution in the 3rd year. This lecture is just a sampler of the many areas covered. WHAT IS SEX? In mammals, reproduction requires sex. In the rest of the animals, plants, and prokaryotes this is not necessarily true. Sex is usually (but not always) associated with reproduction; however reproduction often happens without sex. Sex is actually a smorgasbord of characters: Recombination - prokaryotes and eukaryotes Meiosis - eukaryotes only Anisogamy - unequal gamete size - multicellular eukaryotes Dioecy - Separate sexes - vs. hermaphroditism and monoecy All of these are complex traits, and therefore almost certainly adaptations. But for what? Recombination seems to be the lowest common denominator of all sex, and perhaps the key.
    [Show full text]
  • Females Manipulate Behavior of Caring Males Via Prenatal Maternal Effects
    Females manipulate behavior of caring males via prenatal maternal effects Matthieu Paqueta,1 and Per T. Smisetha aInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, United Kingdom Edited by Tom Tregenza, University of Exeter, Cornwall, Penryn, United Kingdom, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Douglas Futuyma May 11, 2017 (received for review December 1, 2016) In species with biparental care, there is sexual conflict as each (9–11), thereby providing a potential tool for manipulating the parent is under selection to minimize its personal effort by shifting behavior of caring males. For example, by producing smaller eggs, as much as possible of the workload over to the other parent. females could redirect the costs of parental care from the prenatal Most theoretical and empirical work on the resolution of this period, when they pay the full costs of egg production, toward the conflict has focused on strategies used by both parents, such as postnatal period, when the costs of rearing young are shared with negotiation. However, because females produce the eggs, this the male (9). Alternatively, females may deposit yolk androgens might afford females with an ability to manipulate male behavior that modulate offspring begging behavior in a way that alters the via maternal effects that alter offspring phenotypes. To test this male’s perception of offspring need, thereby increasing male hypothesis, we manipulated the prenatal conditions (i.e., presence contributions to care (9–11). Thus, if prenatal maternal effects or absence of the male), performed a cross-fostering experiment, influence the resolution of sexual conflict over care, this would and monitored the subsequent effects of prenatal conditions on introduce an asymmetry of power between the two sexes, with the Nicro- offspring and parental performance in the burying beetle female gaining the upper hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Intestate Inheritance Rights for Adopted Persons
    STATE STATUTES Current Through February 2016 WHAT’S INSIDE Intestate Inheritance Rights Birth parents and for Adopted Persons adopted children Adoptive parents and Leaving a will is the best way to ensure that heirs or adopted children descendants may inherit from your estate. Issues of property distribution may arise when a birth parent Adopted children who are not included in a will or adoptive parent dies without making a valid will or without naming an heir to particular property Summaries of State laws (referred to as intestacy). In these cases, State law determines who may inherit from whom. Laws in all 50 States, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, To find statute Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, information for a and the Virgin Islands specify an adopted person’s particular State, right to inherit from the estate of either adoptive or go to birth parents. https://www.childwelfare. gov/topics/systemwide/ laws-policies/state/. Children’s Bureau/ACYF/ACF/HHS 800.394.3366 | Email: [email protected] | https://www.childwelfare.gov Intestate Inheritance Rights for Adopted Persons https://www.childwelfare.gov Birth Parents and Adopted Children Adoptive Parents and Adopted Generally, the court decree that finalizes the adoption Children ends the legal relationship between the birth parent Upon the entry of the final adoption decree, the adopted (also referred to as the biological or natural parent in child is treated by law as if he or she had been born to the the statutes) and the adopted child. There are, however, adopting parents. The adopted child, therefore, gains the exceptions to this policy in some States.
    [Show full text]
  • Parent-Offspring Conflict and the Evolution of Dispersal Distance
    vol. 175, no. 1 the american naturalist january 2010 Parent-Offspring Conflict and the Evolution of Dispersal Distance Jostein Starrfelt1,* and Hanna Kokko1,2 1. Laboratory of Ecological and Evolutionary Dynamics, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, Viikinkaari 1, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland; 2. Research School of Biology (Botany and Zoology), Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia Submitted December 21, 2008; Accepted August 18, 2009; Electronically published November 12, 2009 and May 1977; Kokko and Lo´pez-Sepulcre 2006). The rea- abstract: Parent-offspring conflict emerges in many different con- son for conflict between individual-level selection and texts, but a rarely emphasized perspective is that of space as a resource that is allocated or acquired through dispersal. Early theoretical work population-level performance is that dispersal is perilous: has shown that there are different optima in rates of dispersal between the behavior of moving through unknown territories en- parents and offspring. Here we examine this principle when space tails mortality risks, and individuals can thus be selected is explicitly modeled and dispersal is achieved through a dispersal to avoid it, unless sufficiently counterbalanced by disper- kernel. We find a consistent pattern that selection favors longer dis- sal-favoring mechanisms such as kin competition (Ham- persal distances under maternal control of dispersal (e.g., maternal ilton and May 1977), inbreeding avoidance (Bengtsson tissue surrounding a seed) compared with scenarios where offspring 1978), or spatiotemporal variability in resources (Van themselves control dispersal (as in many animals). Intriguingly, off- Valen 1971). Populations, on the other hand, depend on spring control leads to better resource utilization (higher habitat occupancy) in equilibrium scenarios than does maternal control.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Perspectives in the Evolution of Parental Care in Ray-Finned Fishes
    Evolution, 59(7), 2005, pp. 1570±1578 PHYLOGENETIC PERSPECTIVES IN THE EVOLUTION OF PARENTAL CARE IN RAY-FINNED FISHES JUDITH E. MANK,1,2 DANIEL E. L. PROMISLOW,1 AND JOHN C. AVISE1 1Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602 2E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Among major vertebrate groups, ray-®nned ®shes (Actinopterygii) collectively display a nearly unrivaled diversity of parental care activities. This fact, coupled with a growing body of phylogenetic data for Actinopterygii, makes these ®shes a logical model system for analyzing the evolutionary histories of alternative parental care modes and associated reproductive behaviors. From an extensive literature review, we constructed a supertree for ray-®nned ®shes and used its phylogenetic topology to investigate the evolution of several key reproductive states including type of parental care (maternal, paternal, or biparental), internal versus external fertilization, internal versus external gestation, nest construction behavior, and presence versus absence of sexual dichromatism (as an indicator of sexual selection). Using a comparative phylogenetic approach, we critically evaluate several hypotheses regarding evolutionary pathways toward parental care. Results from maximum parsimony reconstructions indicate that all forms of parental care, including paternal, biparental, and maternal (both external and internal to the female reproductive tract) have arisen repeatedly and independently during ray-®nned ®sh evolution. The most common evolutionary transitions were from external fertilization directly to paternal care and from external fertilization to maternal care via the intermediate step of internal fertilization. We also used maximum likelihood phylogenetic methods to test for statistical correlations and contingencies in the evolution of pairs of reproductive traits.
    [Show full text]
  • Sons, Daughters, and Arab-American Family Dynamics: Does a Child's Gender Matter? Sanaa Al Harahsheh Wayne State University
    Wayne State University DigitalCommons@WayneState Wayne State University Dissertations 1-1-2011 Sons, daughters, and arab-american family dynamics: does a child's gender matter? Sanaa Al Harahsheh Wayne State University, Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations Recommended Citation Al Harahsheh, Sanaa, "Sons, daughters, and arab-american family dynamics: does a child's gender matter?" (2011). Wayne State University Dissertations. Paper 366. This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wayne State University Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. SONS, DAUGHTERS, AND ARAB-AMERICAN FAMILY DYNAMICS: DOES A CHILD’S GENDER MATTER? by SANAA ALHARAHSHEH DISSERTATION Submitted to the Graduate School of Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 2011 MAJOR: SOCIOLOGY Approved by: ____________________________________ Advisor Date ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my husband Wasfi Almeshagbeh, for his unconditional love, support, and encouragement. To my children, the light and the love of my life. To my parents, for their continuous love, support, prayers, and inspiration. To my sisters and brothers for all the support and encouragement. To Dr. Mary Sengstock, for her continuous guidance, advice, outstanding professionalism, and support. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The moment has finally come to turn over the final page of this dissertation after a long academic journey at Wayne State University. However, I would not have reached this end point without these extraordinary individuals and I am greatly indebted. First and foremost I would like to thank God for providing me with patience, knowledge, capacity, courage, and placing so many people in my life to help get through this educational journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Brain Size and Parental Care in Carnivores (Mammal) JOHN L
    Proc. Natd. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 91, pp. 5495-5497, June 1994 Evolution Female brain size and parental care in carnivores (mammal) JOHN L. GITTLEMAN Department of Zoology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-0810 Communicated by George C. Williams, February 24, 1994 (receivedfor review October 12, 1993) ABSTRACT Comparative studies indicate that species dif- 26) and African lions (27), a mother is assisted by multiple ferences in mammalian brain size relate to body size, ecology, males and/or females. Communal duties include similar and life-history traits. Previous analyses failed to show intra- parental behaviors as shown in biparental systems, except sexual or behavioral patterns ofbrain size in mammals. Across that communal nursing is an added feature occasionally the terrestrial Carnivora, I find to the contrary. Differences in shown in some species. A crucial difference is that in both female, but not male, brain size associate with a fundamental biparental and communal species, parental care by an adult ecological and evolutionary characteristic of female behavior. other than the mother confers significant reduction in time Other factors equal, females that provide the sole parental care and energy ofmaternal feeding, guarding, and den attendance have larger brains than those of biparental or communal (28-30). Of the three parental systems in carnivores, single species. For females, more parental investment accompanies female care reflects the most intensive behavioral and ener- larger brains. Future comparative studies of mammalian brain getic demands. size must recognize that some patterns arise independently in Thus, assuming that brain size is associated with increased the two sexes. information processing (1, 4-6, 31), it is predicted that females of species that care for young exclusively on their Among mammal species, brain weight reflects differences in own will have larger brains relative to their body weight than body size, ecology, and life histories (1).
    [Show full text]