Protecting Research Values: the Day Mines Group of Record$ University of Idaho Library

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Protecting Research Values: the Day Mines Group of Record$ University of Idaho Library PROTECTING RESEARCH VALUES: THE DAYMINES GROUP OFRECORD$ UNIVERSITY OFIDAHO LIBRARY Richard C. Davis BARRY DAY, son of a general store operator in them, in several accessions, to the University of Idaho. the small mining town of Wardner, in the Coeur There they remained piled in the library basement until d'Alene mining region of northern Idaho, staked his resources could be found to process them and make Hercules lode claim atop a ridge above Burke Canyon them available to researchers. A collection this large in 1889. Continually for twelve years Harry and his was beyond the everyday processing capabilities of the partners labored before one of them struck rich ore on Special Collections Department. Since these records June 2, 1901.1. As if in a classic tale of the West, within were thought to have value greater than the local weeks the Hercules became a mine, and by the end of histories of the individual companies represented--parti­ the year the Days and their partners were rich. For over cularly so as the archival literature had previously given forty years thereafter, the Days expanded their mineral relatively little attention to the research values of indus­ ,holdings. The Hercules played out by 1925 but with trial records--two subvention grants were obtained. Hercules profits the Days gained control of Tamarack Under the first, from the National Historical Publica­ & Custer Consolidated, Dayrock, and Sherman Lead tions and Records Commission, the author was mines, which continued for decades as notable silver­ employed as project archivist from late '1986 into 1989; lead-zinc producers. The "Day Interests" also swallowed under the second, from the U.S. Department of Educa­ up numerous smaller concerns, many of them never tion, Michael Tarabulski was employed in the same productive, but each representing some former owner's capacity in 1991-1992.3 dreams of wealth. My first sight of the Day mining records, on Decem­ Harry's son Henry L. Day reorganized twelve of the ber 2, 1986, gave the impression of an amorphous mass, mining companies controlled by his family into one overflowing from ramshackle shelves, heaped up on the firm, Day Mines, Inc., with headquarters in Wallace, basement floor: unlabeled cartons, loose handfuls of Idaho, in 1947. Day Mines then owned 719 patented correspondence, drawers out of filing cabinets, bundles claims in the Coeur · d'Alenes, amounting to 10,000 of file folders tied with string, shipping crates of diverse acres, the largest body of mineral lands in the region. sizes, leather-bound volumes large and small, diplomas, As the local mines faltered, Day Mines, Inc., searched framed photographs, chest x-rays, and other items. In the American West for new mineral properties, even­ such a state it was impossible to accurately gauge the tually operating gold, silver, lead, copper and other volume of this material, but the best guess was a little mines in the states of Washington, Utah, Colorado, and under 2,000 cubic feet. In the weeks ahead, each box, the province of British Columbia, as well as in Idaho. file drawer, volume, or cluster of loose material had to When Henry L. Day retired in 1972, management be inspected one at a time to identify--or at least make passed from the hands of the Day family, and in 1981 a preliminary guess at--its creator, date, and type 6f the Hecla Mining Company, drawn by Day Mines, Inc.'s record so that this information could be placed in a rich mineral reserves, acquired the Day empire through an exchange of stock, making Hecla for a time the largest silver mining company in the United States.z RICHARD C. DAVIS, Manuscripts-Archives Hecla had no interest in Day .Mines' older records, Librarian at the University of Idaho, presented an early and between 1981 and 1984 Henry L. Day donated form of this paper to the MHA 1992 convention in 19 20 Day Mines Oroup o/Recorch ' personal computer database. Once sorted and printed, in 1984. The great bulk date between the 1910s and the the resulting crude "preliminary inventory" provided a early 1950s. Most of it derives from lead, silver, and zinc glimpse of how complex the collection was, how many mining and milling in the Coeur d'Aienes and the companies, partnerships, and persons had been respon­ related smelters in Northport, Washington, and Carne­ sible for creating it; the first real knowledge of what we gie, Pennsylvania, but there are small amounts from had. With preliminary inventory in hand, student assis­ gold, silver, and copper ventures in other Western states tants could begin roughing out the arrangement of each and Canada. By the time the initial mass of the Day company's records, one company at a time. collection had been sorted by company, boxed, and By the summer of 1987 enough was known about the shelved, the actual volume was found to be about 1,600 mining records and the functions they had served to cubic feet. Once appraisal standards were established, begin drafting tentative appraisal guidelines, initially 42 percent of this--bulky records mostly in long runs of based on a test-case analysis of the records of one firm, routine material--could fairly readily be segregated for the Hercules Mining Company, which at that time discard in the first two years of the project. The last included about 300 cubic feet (since reduced to 73 cubic year of work saw another 23 percent weeded based on feet). These guidelines considered both evidential and closer inspection of the files. This left about 560 cubic informational values, were influenced by a desire to feet of material, about 35 percent of the original bulk.S retain unique information, and were intended to If this reduction seems alarming, consider the statistics balance information against bulk.4 In February 1988 the claimed for the federal government of the United guidelines and analysis were circulated for criticism States, where under 2 percent of all the records ever from three categories of experts: historical researchers; produced become archives. However, in the National subject experts "knowledgeable about a particular dis· Archives, and, as I will try to show, in our treatment of cipline" as creators of records5, in our case mining the Day mining records, these reduction figures "repre­ executives and engineers; and fellow archivists with sent volume and not information."9 prior experience in business records. (We knew of no In an attempt to gain a sense of the sources found archivists with prior experience with such a collection of useful by mining historians, I examined a variety of mining records.6) We asked a total of eighteen persons. published monographs. The majority of mining his­ Only eight actually made substantive comment, but the tories, I found, either have avoided unpublished sources review process publicized the collection among people altogether or cite only personal papers and scattered most likely to appreciate its potential and perhaps individual manuscripts in repositories. About a half­ reassured some historians who might have feared Idaho dozen of those I examined used such primary material was infested with vandal archivists intent upon trashing as records of county clerks and recorders, courts, mining the sources of history. As one critic remarked, he had districts, labor unions, and documents filed with com­ "read the report like .a historian, prepared to complain panies registration agencies and stock exchanges.to I about the discard of potentially meaningful materials, found something more than a dozen mining histories but find myself without any complaints of that sort."7 listing corporate records in their bibliographies. Not all Our referees, it turned out, made vital contributions in of them used these records in an important way, and provoking some reconsideration of the relative value of many of those which did seemed to have found value specific record types. only in the correspondence contained therein.tt Most of We identified and inventoried records of a total those that went beyond correspondence were still limi­ of ninety-two mining corporations and/or partnerships ted to narrative materials. Joseph Cash, Working tlJe (counting corporate reorganizations and name changes), Homestake, cited individual reports, lists, and letters in three corporations engaged in activities not related the Homestake Mining Company's records in Lead, directly to mining, and ten persons, all of whom were South Dakota. David and Brenda Stone, Hardrock either members of the Day family or key members of Oold, claimed reliance upon the records of the Alaska business enterprises dominated by the Day family. Juneau Gold Mining Company, in the possession of the These materials were assigned to eighty-seven manu­ Alaska Light & Power Company. James W. Byrkit, script groups, arranged, and inventoried. Groups varied Forging tlJe Copper Collar, found in "the old United in size and diversity from a single item, the Records of Verde Copper Company records, provided by Jerome the Fern Mining Company, one book of directors' historian Herbert V. Young, ... a rich vein," noting in minutes, to the 76 cubic feet, after appraisal and weed­ particular the use of reports by mine operators and ing, of the records of the Tamarack & Custer Consoli­ detectives for owners' and managers' political concerns. dated Mining Company. The earliest records are a few John Fahey's J7Je Days o/ t!Je Hercules, based on the fragments in the papers of Harry Day dating from the Day material when it was still in private hands, largely 1880s; the most recent are among the letters and clip­ used the letters of Harry Day, somewhat pre-selected by pings of Henry L. Day which extend almost to his death Henry L. Day.tz Few books on mining history seem to Mming History Association 1.994 Annual 21 have depended upon non-narrative record types.
Recommended publications
  • HMC 125 Year Book Narrative 042816.Indd
    Celebrating 125 Years PERSISTENCE PERSPECTIVE POSITION Hecla’s management team, Burke, Idaho, ca. 1901. Left to right: Fremont Rowe, Doc Evans, Ed Torkelson, Chet Lawrence, Charles Foreman, Pete Ratoni, Ed “Spud” Murphy, Bert Sloan. Burke was the location of the original Hecla mine (as well as the Hercules and the Star); at its height, as many as 1,400 people lived along its single street at the bottom of Burke Canyon. On the cover, a 1927 photograph of workers from the Hecla mine is juxtaposed with a 2015 photo of miners at Hecla’s newest operating property: the Casa Berardi gold mine in Quebec. TABLE OF CONTENTS 02 05 11 19 34 36 40 Foreword Persistence: Perspective: Position: Mining in the Responsibility Milestones The First 100 Years The Last 25 Years The Future 21st Century Hecla’s management team, Burke, Idaho, ca. 1901. Left to right: Fremont Rowe, Doc Evans, Ed Torkelson, Chet Lawrence, Charles Foreman, Pete Ratoni, Ed “Spud” Murphy, Bert Sloan. Burke was the location of the original Hecla mine (as well as the Hercules and the Star); at its height, as many as 1,400 people lived along its single street at the bottom of Burke Canyon. On the cover, a 1927 photograph of workers from the Hecla mine is juxtaposed with a 2015 photo of miners at Hecla’s newest operating property: the Casa Berardi gold mine in Quebec. CAPITALIZED FOR HALF A MILLION DOLLARS AND INCORPORATED ON OCTOBER 14, 1891, HECLA MINING COMPANY STANDS TODAY AS THE LAST OF THE PIONEER MINING COMPANIES OF NORTH IDAHO’S FABLED SILVER VALLEY — THE OLDEST U.S.-BASED PRECIOUS METALS MINING COMPANY AND THE LARGEST PRIMARY SILVER PRODUCER IN THE UNITED STATES.
    [Show full text]
  • Hecla Mining Company 2015 Annual Report
    2015 Annual Report Hecla Mining Company was founded in 1891 in North Idaho’s fabled Silver Valley. One hundred twenty-five years later, it’s the oldest U.S.-based precious metals mining company – and the largest primary silver producer in the United States. On the cover, three miners pose with hand tools in front of a jackleg drill lit by a single candle. They’re underground at the original Hecla mine in Burke, Idaho, which yielded more than nine million tons of ore before closing in 1944. Today, modern methods – such as this mechanized rock bolter at the Greens Creek mine – dramatically increase not only miner safety, but also efficiency and productivity. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (Dollars in thousands except in per share and per ounce amounts / as of December 31) FINANCIAL DATA & RATIOS 2015 2014 Sales of products $ 443,567 $ 500,781 Gross profit 38,511 85,201 Cash flow provided by operating activities 106,445 83,124 Net income (loss) (86,968) 17,824 Net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders (87,520) 17,272 Basic income (loss) per common shares (0.23) 0.05 Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments 155,209 209,665 Capital expenditures 160,716 151,089 Total assets 2,221,925 2,262,064 YEAR-END DATA Common shares outstanding (in thousands) 378,113 367,377 Weighted average number of shares outstanding for the year – basic (in thousands) 373,954 353,442 Employees 1,404 1,354 OPERATIONAL DATA Silver production (oz) 11,591,603 11,090,506 Gold production (oz) 189,327 186,997 Lead production (tons) 39,965 40,255 Zinc production (tons)
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho Mining and Exploration, 2011
    Idaho Mining and Exploration, 2011 Virginia S. Gillerman Earl H. Bennett Idaho Geological Survey Morrill Hall, Third Floor Staff Report S-12-3 University of Idaho November 2012 Moscow, Idaho 83844-3014 Idaho Mining and Exploration, 2011 Virginia S. Gillerman Earl H. Bennett Staff Reports present timely information for public distribution. This publication may not conform to the agency’s standards. Idaho Geological Survey Morrill Hall, Third Floor Staff Report S-12-3 University of Idaho November 2012 Moscow, Idaho 83844-3014 Contents Introduction ………………………………………………………………………….... 1 Metal Mining …………………………………………………………………………. 4 Phosphate Mining …………………………………………………………………….. 7 Other Industrial Minerals ………………………………………………………………10 Energy ………………………………………………………………………………….11 Exploration ……………………………………………………………………………..13 State Activities …………………………………………………………………………22 Figures Figure 1. Major mining areas in Idaho ………………………………………….…........2 Figure 2. Yearly non-fuel mineral production in Idaho ………………………….…......3 Figure 3. Value by commodity for 2010 production………...…………………………..3 Figure 4. Galloway at top of #4 shaft, Lucky Friday mine …………………………......5 Figure 5. Surface Exploration, U.S. Silver ………………………………………….6 Figure 6. Construction at New Jersey mill, Kellogg…………………………………….7 Figure 7. Construction at Monsanto’s new Blackfoot Bridge phosphate mine ….…......9 Figure 8. Simplot’s Smoky Canyon mine, Panel F, aerial view …….……………..…...9 Figure 9. Industrial mineral producers …………………………………………………10 Figure 10. Stratigraphic and seismic section, Bridge Resources well, Payette Co…......12 Figure 11. Mineral exploration in Idaho, 2011 …………………………………………13 Figure 12. Cross-section with location of Hecla’s projects, 2011 ……………………...15 Figure 13. Hecla’s Star-Morning exploration at Burke ………………………………...16 Figure 14. Orogrande Shear Zone, Premium Exploration project……………………....18 Figure 15. Formation Metals’ construction layout, Idaho Cobalt Project…....................18 Figure 16. Midas Gold’s Yellow Pine deposit map and drill section ………….….…..20 Figure 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Hecla Mining Company 2017 Annual Report
    CREATING VALUE THROUGH INNOVATIVE MINING 2017 ANNUAL REPORT Greens Creek Admiralty Island, Alaska Kinskuch Alice Arm, BC Opinaca / Wildcat Rock Creek James Bay, Quebec Silver Valley Noxon, Montana Wallace, Idaho Casa Berardi Vancouver, BC Montanore Val d’Or, Quebec Libby, Montana Val d’Or, Quebec Coeur d’Alene, Idaho Fayolle Val d’Or, Quebec Heva–Hosco Lucky Friday Val d’Or, Quebec Mullan, Idaho Monte Cristo Esmeralda County, Nevada San Juan Silver Creede, Colorado operating mine pre-development project San Sebastian Durango, Mexico exploration project corporate office Innovations such as the tele-remote load-haul-dump at Greens Creek and the automated shaft at Casa Berardi can increase productivity and safety, generating significant returns on investment. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (Dollars in thousands except in per-share and per-ounce amounts. As of December 31.) FINANCIAL DATA 2017 2016 Sales of products $ 577,775 $ 645,957 Gross profit 156,986 191,506 Cash flow provided by operating activities 115,878 225,328 Net income (loss) (23,519) 69,547 Net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders (24,071) 68,995 Basic income (loss) per common share (0.06) 0.18 Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments 219,865 198,894 Capital expenditures 105,393 163,128 YEAR-END DATA Common shares outstanding (in thousands) 399,176 395,287 Weighted average number of shares outstanding for the year – basic (in thousands) 397,394 386,416 Employees 1,431 1,396 OPERATIONAL DATA Silver production (oz) 12,484,844 17,177,317 Gold production (oz) 232,684
    [Show full text]
  • MAY 2021 INVESTOR FACT SHEET Investor Inquiries 800.HECLA91 (800.432.5291) [email protected]
    MAY 2021 INVESTOR FACT SHEET Investor Inquiries 800.HECLA91 (800.432.5291) [email protected] HECLA-MINING.COM Hecla Mining Company is the largest U.S. silver producer and the third largest U.S. producer of both zinc and lead. Hecla owns and operates mines on district-sized land packages in mining-friendly North American jurisdictions: Greens Creek in Alaska, one of the largest and highest-margin primary silver mines in the world; the Lucky Friday silver mine in North Idaho; and the Casa Berardi gold mine in Quebec. In addition to its diversified silver and gold operating and cash- flow generating base, Hecla has a number of exploration properties and pre-development projects in world-class silver and gold mining districts throughout North America. 2020 silver production was 13.5 million ounces and 208,962 ounces of gold production. 2021 estimated production is 12.9-14.0 million ounces of silver and 185,000-193,000 ounces of gold. The company is positioned to weather COVID-19 with strong assets, an established action plan, senior notes due in 2028, and solid liquidity. Multiple Secure Revenue Streams Share Performance NYSE: HL Strong Cash Flow Flexibility Low Political Risk Jurisdictions end of Q1: 03/31/21, (1) as of 05/10/21 (1) Share Price: $7.16 Strong (1) 52-Week Range: $2.47 – $8.45 Healthy Cash Margins Investment Established Work Force Basic Shares: 535.3 million Fundamentals Fully Diluted: 545.5 million Market Capitalization: $3.8B (1) Strong Financial Position Commitment to Safety High-Quality Operations OPERATING MINES Greens Creek – Admiralty Island, Alaska ■ One of the world’s largest and lowest-cost primary silver mines.
    [Show full text]
  • HMC Fact Sheet 05102017.Indd
    May 2017 Investor Fact Sheet www.hecla-mining.com Hecla Mining Company is not only the largest and one of the lowest-cost U.S. silver producers, and the third largest U.S. producer of both zinc and lead, but also a growing gold producer. Hecla owns and operates four mines on district-sized land packages in mining-friendly North American jurisdictions: Greens Creek in Alaska, one of the largest and highest-margin primary silver mines in the world; the newly revitalized Lucky Friday silver mine in North Idaho; the San Sebastian silver-gold mine near Durango, Mexico; and the Casa Berardi gold mine in Quebec. In addition to its diversified silver and Share Performance NYSE: HL gold operating and cash-flow generating base, Hecla has a number of exploration properties and pre- end of Q1: 03/31/17, (1) as of 04/27/17 development projects in seven world-class silver and gold mining districts in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. Share Price: $ 5.33(1) 52-Week Range: $ 3.83 – $7.64(1) 2016 saw record silver production of 17.2 million ounces with 233,929 ounces of gold production, with Basic Shares: 395.8 million silver production exceeding the Company’s expectations for 2016. The Company is suspending Lucky Fully Diluted: 399.8 million Friday and Company-wide 2017 silver production estimates, because it is unable to predict when the Market Capitalization: $ 2.11B (1) ongoing strike at the Lucky Friday mine will be resolved. Multiple Secure Revenue Streams Strong Cash Flow Flexibility Low Political Risk Jurisdictions Strong Healthy Cash Margins Investment Established Work Force Fundamentals Strong Financial Position Commitment to Safety Four High-Quality Operations Operating Mines Greens Creek – Admiralty Island, Alaska ■ One of the world’s largest and lowest-cost primary silver mines.
    [Show full text]