DOCSLIB.ORG

River Access Guidelines Strategies for Managing Public Access to Our Rivers and Streams

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
River Access Guidelines Strategies for Managing Public Access to Our Rivers and Streams Franklin Conservation District River Access Guidelines Strategies for Managing Public Access to Our Rivers and Streams Report prepared for the Franklin Conservation District by Michael Leff, Executive Director, Massachusetts Association of Conservation Districts Funding provided by the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and February 2021 Environmental Affairs Franklin Conservation District River Access Initiative – final report (2/21/2021) Acknowledgements In the summer of 2019, the Franklin Conservation District (FCD) launched its Sustainable Public River Access initiative, thanks to a Land Conservation District Grant awarded by the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs. The initiative was led by environmental consultant Michael Leff, FCD Coordinator and now Executive Director of the Massachusetts Association of Conservation Districts. He can be reached at [email protected] | 413-326-6353. A great many individuals and organizations have participated in the initiative. The content and full scope of this report would not have been possible without their generous contributions of time and attention – and their passionate commitment to the important issue of maintaining sustainable public access to our waterways. A complete list of stakeholders engaged during the preparation of this report appears in the Appendix. Key participants are listed below: Bob Armstrong, Conway Selectboard and Conservation Commission Laurie Booshada, Deerfield resident Emily Boss, Franklin Land Trust Madeleine Charney, UMass Research Librarian Andrea Donlon, Connecticut River Conservancy Wendy Goodman, Greenfield resident Dan Greene, Good Bunch Farm Phillip Herzig, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Steve Libby, Vermont River Conservancy Kimberly Noake MacPhee, Franklin Regional Council of Governments Gina Rege Marzee, Williamsburg resident Carolyn Shores Ness, Deerfield Selectboard and Franklin Conservation District Ryan O’Donnell, Connecticut River Conservancy Michael Pattavina, Green River volunteer Jim Perry, Deerfield River Watershed Association Sgt. Thomas Provost, Massachusetts Environmental Police Erin Rodgers, Trout Unlimited Joe Rogers, Williamsburg resident and former FCD Coordinator Teri Rutherford, Good Bunch Farm Kristen Sykes, Appalachian Mountain Club Eric Twarog, Greenfield Director of Planning & Development Cover photo of tubers courtesy of Jim Perry, Deerfield River Watershed Association. All other photos by Michael Leff. Franklin Conservation District River Access Initiative – final report (2/21/2021) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Overview .................................................................................................... 1 Part A: Our Rivers as Public Resource ..................................................................................... 2 Part B: Issues, problems, usage trends .................................................................................... 4 Environmental degradation .............................................................................................. 5 Erosion and sedimentation Impaired water quality Diminished wildlife habitat Trash and dumping Human waste Safety concerns ................................................................................................................ 6 Traffic and parking Hazards and liability [BOX] ‘Free and equal’ access Competing uses ............................................................................................................... 8 Conflicting activities Noise, partying, and illicit behavior Homeless encampments Cultural clashes and social equity Other complications ....................................................................................................... 10 COVID-19 pandemic Limited finances [BOX] Case studies: Tales of Three Towns and a City Part C: Solutions, strategies, resources ................................................................................. 12 Closures: How not to solve the problem ......................................................................... 12 Sustainable river access smorgasbord ............................................................................. 12 Education / Outreach / Volunteers / Stewards Safety / Law enforcement / Emergency services Erosion / Environmental Equity / Social justice Coordination / Collaboration Study / Assess Model initiatives / Organizations/ Offers Money, the common denominator ................................................................................. 16 [BOX] Finding funding for the long haul State legislators State agencies Local / Regional actions Part D: Call to Action ............................................................................................................ 18 [BOX] ‘A Guide to Sustainable River Recreation Management Planning’ Appendix ............................................................................................................................. 20 Participants and other stakeholders River access sites studied Source plans and reports Funding resources World Café transcripts Franklin Conservation District River Access Initiative – final report (2/21/2021) Introduction and Overview Our rivers and streams are a cherished feature of the New England landscape, and nowhere more so than in Western Massachusetts. Clean water, scenic surroundings, and abundant recreational opportunities create a natural resource that has been enjoyed by generations of residents and visitors alike. These waterways are an important part of the region’s appeal – and that appeal has increasingly beckoned not only to local folk but to people in nearby population centers and beyond who are seeking rural relief from urban environments. So much so in recent years that heavy use of accessible rivers and streams poses a danger of their being “loved to death.” It’s critically important to address the issues caused by that trend in order to keep this precious resource truly accessible to would-be users, including local residents and out-of-town visitors. The situation has become all the more pressing in light of ongoing climate change, increasing the need for respite from higher temperatures everywhere and especially in cities. On top of that, the COVID-19 pandemic has both heightened the need for an outdoor escape and exacerbated the risks. All of that poses serious challenges since many popular sites are ill-equipped to handle the impacts of more people seeking relief from pressures and pursuing pleasurable outlets. And the impacts are numerous, ranging from streambank erosion to blocked roadways to cross-cultural clashes. Private landowners – whether individuals, municipalities, environmental agencies, or commercial entities – that may have welcomed neighbors and other local residents over the years are understandably concerned about the damage, noise, hazards, and other issues resulting from increased traffic. This has led to numerous popular sites being closed to the public – which has often just shifted the pressure to other spots up- or downstream. And there are no easy solutions. Nevertheless, the need for public access to our rivers and streams demands attention and exploration of possible strategies for creating – and maintaining – sustainable access. To that end, the Franklin Conservation District launched its Public River Access initiative during the summer of 2019, with grant funding from the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs. We set out to examine the issues, identify needs, and seek long-range solutions. We did that by researching experiences elsewhere, visiting numerous sites along several rivers in the region (focused particularly on the Deerfield River Watershed), meeting with a wide range of stakeholders – including landowners, nearby residents, municipal and state agency representatives, environmental organizations, and river users. This culminated in a special “World Café” forum, convened online in the spring of 2020. While we did not find ultimate solutions – nor did we expect to – we did compile numerous tips and strategies that we believe can help ease the problem. We documented the need for financial investment in ongoing oversight. Finally, we charted a way forward – a Call to Action – involving broad stakeholder involvement and creative coalitions. Our findings are presented in the pages that follow. 1 Franklin Conservation District River Access Initiative – final report (2/21/2021) Part A: Our Rivers as Public Resource “Clean, healthy rivers are the lifeblood of our communities and are vital to our health, safety, and quality of life. Most Americans live within a mile of river or stream, and much of our drinking water comes directly or indirectly from rivers and streams. Beyond providing all these useful services, rivers are also just plain fun. Rivers, streams, and their surrounding lands offer endless opportunities for swimming, fishing and boating, hiking, wildlife watching, and picnicking. Whether one is seeking exhilaration, solitude, or a much-needed break from the daily grind, there is a river our there beckoning us to come out and play.” – A Guide to Sustainable River Recreation Management Planning, American Rivers According to the “A Framework for Resilience: Responding to Climate Change in the Deerfield River Watershed” (Franklin Regional Council of Governments, 2019), “The Deerfield River Watershed covers an area of 665 square miles, and is home to one of the coldest and cleanest rivers in Massachusetts. It originates in the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DEERFIELD RIVER WATERSHED Assessment Report
    DEERFIELD RIVER WATERSHED Assessment Report 2004-2008 Downstream of Fife Brook Dam The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs 251 Causeway Street, Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114-2119 Mitt Romney GOVERNOR Kerry Healey LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR Tel: (617) 626-1000 Fax: (617) 626-1181 Ellen Roy Herzfelder or (617) 626-1180 SECRETARY http://www.state.ma.us/envir November 19, 2004 Dear Friends of the Deerfield River Watershed: It is with great pleasure that I present you with the Assessment Report for the Deerfield River Watershed. The report helped formulate the 5-year watershed action plan that will guide local and state environmental efforts within the Deerfield River Watershed over the next five years. The report expresses some of the overall goals of the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, such as improving water quality, restoring natural flows to rivers, protecting and restoring biodiversity and habitats, improving public access and balanced resource use, improving local capacity, and promoting a shared responsibility for watershed protection and management. The Deerfield River Watershed Assessment Report was developed with input from the Deerfield River Watershed Team and multiple stakeholders including watershed groups, state and federal agencies, Regional Planning Agencies and, of course, the general public from across the Watershed. We appreciate the opportunity to engage such a wide group of expertise and experience as it allows the state to focus on the issues and challenges that might otherwise not be easily characterized. From your input we have identified the following priority issues: • Water Quantity • Water Quality • Fish Communities • Wildlife and Terrestrial Habitat • Open Space • Recreation I commend everyone involved in this endeavor.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MANY STORIES of 1704 NARRATIVE SUMMARY Memorial
    THE MANY STORIES OF 1704 NARRATIVE SUMMARY Memorial Hall Museum, in collaboration with Native and French Canadian cultural organizations, proposes to fully develop an exemplary website, focusing on the Deerfield Attack of 1704, which demonstrates a model approach for museums to depict and voice diverse perspectives of history in a way that is engaging and compelling to the general public. This project will demonstrate an innovative use of technology (both website design and programming tools) that can assist museums in meeting their goal to offer multiple historical perspectives. This website will be widely promoted to public audiences, and will be rigorously evaluated to measure whether desired outcomes have been attained. Technological tools, applications, and products created to support this approach will be extensively disseminated to the museum community to facilitate widespread adoption of this model. A prototype of the proposed site can be viewed at http://www.digitalgizmo.com/pvma/1704/prototype/index.html. BACKGROUND The Deerfield Attack of 1704 was a major battle in Queen Anne’s War, one of the series of wars known collectively as the French and Indian Wars that were fought between France and England, with their Native American allies. On February 29, 1704, the bucolic town of Deerfield, Massachusetts of today was, for one brief, three- hour span, the main stage of violent clashing among European colonial empires, diverse Native American nations, and personal ambitions. The French led 48 French and 200 Abenaki, Pennacook, Kanien’kehaka (Mohawk), and Wendat (Huron) soldiers in an attack, resulting in a decisive victory, with the death or capture of more than half of Deerfield’s 291 residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcanada Hydro Northeast Inc. Deerfield River Project (Lp 2323)
    TRANSCANADA HYDRO NORTHEAST INC. DEERFIELD RIVER PROJECT (LP 2323) LOW IMPACT HYDROPOWER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION ATTACHMENT C PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Overview TransCanada Hydro Northeast, Inc. (the Company) owns and operates the Deerfield River Project (the Project) on the Deerfield River, a major tributary to the Connecticut River. The Project is located in Bennington and Windham Counties in Vermont, and in Berkshire and Franklin Counties in Massachusetts. It consists of eight developments: Somerset, Searsburg, Harriman, Sherman, Deerfield No. 5, Deerfield No. 4, Deerfield No. 3 and Deerfield No.2, having a total installed capacity of 86 megawatts (MW). All dam operations and generation operations are controlled remotely from the Deerfield River Control Center in Monroe Bridge Massachusetts, located near the Deerfield No. 5 Dam. The Project area encompasses about a 65-mile reach of the river, including reservoirs. Two other developments not owned by the company are also located within this area. They are Brookfield Renewable Power’s Bear Swamp Project located downstream of the Deerfield No. 5 development; and Consolidated Edison’s Gardner Falls Project located downstream of the Deerfield No. 3 development. Exhibit 1 depicts the general Project area. Settlement Agreement The Deerfield River Project was one of the first FERC Projects to be relicensed under a comprehensive Settlement Agreement approach executed in 1994. A five-year cooperative consultation process involving state and federal resource agencies, various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the licensee (at that time New England Power Company) resulted in settlement by the parties. The process of reaching this agreement included examination of the power and non-power tradeoffs and effects of a wide variety of operational scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Deerfield and CT River Project History.Pmd
    HISTORY OF HYDROELECTRIC DEVELOPMENT ON THE CONNECTICUT AND DEERFIELD RIVERS HISTORY OF HYDROELECTRIC DEVELOPMENT ON THE CONNECTICUT AND DEERFIELD RIVERS INTRODUCTION increasingly complex. While the Depression limited further growth of the industry, a new era emerged In 1903, Malcolm Greene Chace (1875-1955) and after World War II, with streamlined management Henry Ingraham Harriman (1872-1950) established structures and increased regulations and Chace & Harriman, a company that, in its many government involvement (Cook 1991:4; Landry and incarnations over the course of the following Cruikshank 1996:2-5). The first of the 14 decades, grew into one of the largest electric utility hydroelectric facilities built on the Connecticut and companies in New England. The company built a Deerfield rivers by Chace & Harriman and its series of hydroelectric facilities on the Connecticut successors were developed in the early 1900s, and Deerfield rivers in Vermont, New Hampshire shortly after the potential of hydroelectric power and western Massachusetts, which were intended was realized on a large scale. Subsequent facilities to provide a reliable and less expensive alternative were constructed during the maturation of the to coal-produced steam power. Designed primarily industry in the 1920s, and two of the stations were to serve industrial centers in Massachusetts and completed in the post-World War II era. The history Rhode Island, the facilities also provided power to of the companies that built these stations is residential customers and municipalities in New intrinsically linked with broader trends in the history England. Chace & Harriman eventually evolved of electricity, hydropower technology, and industrial into the New England Power Association (NEPA) architecture in America.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucy Terry Prince: "Singer of History" David R
    Contributions in Black Studies A Journal of African and Afro-American Studies Volume 9 Special Double Issue: African American Article 15 Double Consciousness 1992 Lucy Terry Prince: "Singer of History" David R. Proper Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cibs Recommended Citation Proper, David R. (1992) "Lucy Terry Prince: "Singer of History"," Contributions in Black Studies: Vol. 9 , Article 15. Available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cibs/vol9/iss1/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Afro-American Studies at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Contributions in Black Studies by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Proper: Lucy Terry Prince: "Singer of History" DavidR. Proper LUCY TERRY PRINCE: "SINGER OF HISTORY"· UCH IN THE achievementsof Jupiter Hammon of Long Island and Lucy Terry Prince of Massachusetts and Vermont offers food for comparison. The M pioneer blackpoetandpoetessshareraceand literarypriorityas wellassocial status as chattel property in 18th century America. Hammon has already received a measureof recognition as the first publishedAfro-Americanpoet, withhisbroadsideAn EveningThought; Salvationby ChristWithPenetential Cries, in 1761.Hammon's fame, nevertheless, rests on but seven poems and four prose pieces discovered eighty-seven years ago.' Lucy Terry Prince, on the other hand,is credited with buta singlepoem,composed fourteen years before Hammonand
    [Show full text]
  • Deerfield River Watershed Association
    A Watershed-Based Plan to Maintain the Health and Improve the Resiliency of the Deerfield River Watershed Franklin Regional Council of Governments Staff: Kimberly Noake MacPhee, P.G., CFM, Land Use and Natural Resources Program Manager Mary Chicoine, Senior Land Use and Natural Resources Planner Ryan Clary, Senior GIS Specialist Alyssa Larose, Land Use and Natural Resources Planner Megan Rhodes, AICP, Senior Transportation/Land Use Planner With technical assistance provided by: Fuss & O’Neill, Inc., Erik Mas, PE Field Geology Services, John Field, Ph.D., P.G. and Nicolas Miller Franklin Conservation District Deborah Shriver Consulting, Deborah M. Shriver Acknowledgements: Watershed stakeholders provided valuable comments and insight during the development of this plan. This plan also benefitted from the assistance and advice of the following organizations and individuals: Brian Yellen, Researcher, Department of Geosciences, UMass Amherst Andy Fisk, Executive Director, Connecticut River Conservancy Rita Thibodeau, District Conservationist, USDA, NRCS Carrie Banks, MA Division of Ecological Restoration, Dept. Fish & Game Erin Rodgers, Ph.D., Western New England Project Coordinator, Trout Unlimited Michael B. Cole, Ph.D., Cole Ecological Will Sloan Anderson, Franklin Land Trust Photographs: Cover Deerfield River landscape Matthew MacPherson http://mattmacpherson.com Pp. 2-3 Deerfield River landscape Matthew MacPherson http://mattmacpherson.com P. 11 Flooding in Deerfield Town of Greenfield P. 39 Crowningshield property Franklin Land Trust P. 45 Dam sites Erin Rodgers, Trout Unlimited Pp. 82-105 Maps, figures and photos Field Geology Services This project has been financed with Federal Funds from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to the Massachusetts Depart- ment of Environmental Protection (the Department) under an s.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Cold Outside
    GETTING C-C-COLD OUTSIDE? EXPLORE WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS’ GREAT INDOORS! With the holidays come and gone, real Yankee-style winter typically gets a grip on this part of New England. And for the hardy outdoor types, we’ve got plenty of chill-weather sports and activities to offer. But for those who prefer snuggling in to bundling up, there’s still lots to see and do, in places where you won’t need mittens and boots. If knowledge and fun warm your hearts (and minds!) rejoice in the fact that our region is truly rich in excellent museums, and best of all, they’re not the stuffy keep-quiet-don’t-touch type. Virtually all feature hands-on experiences for all ages, and participation is encouraged. One of the coolest “exploratoriums” we offer isn’t even in Western Massachusetts, though it’s just minutes over the Connecticut state line. That’s the fabulous New England Air Museum, located in Windsor Locks. Their collection contains over 100 aircraft ranging from early flying machines to supersonic jets. Located in the heart of downtown Springfield, Massachusetts, the Springfield Museums offers access to four world-class museums and (in warmer weather, of course) the Dr. Seuss National Memorial Sculpture Garden, all under a single admission. At the Springfield Science Museum the dinosaur exhibit spans two galleries and includes real dinosaur tracks and fossils, a life-sized Tyrannosaurus rex model, a replica of a stegosaurus skeleton, a surround-sound Jurassic Theater experience, and more. The Lyman and Merrie Wood Museum of Springfield History is known for its local history research facilities, its comprehensive program of changing exhibitions, its diverse educational offerings, and its wide ranging collections illuminating the history of the Connecticut River Valley.The Indian Motocycle Collection is the largest collection of Indian cycles and memorabilia in the world and the Firearms Collection includes more than 1600 firearms, with the largest collection of Smith & Wesson guns in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut River Flow Restoration Study Report
    Connecticut River Flow Restoration Study STUDY REPORT A watershed-scale assessment of the potential for flow restoration through dam re-operation THE NATURE CONSERVANCY, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST The Connecticut River Flow Restoration Study A watershed-scale assessment of the potential for flow restoration through dam re-operation Katie Kennedy, The Nature Conservancy Kim Lutz, The Nature Conservancy Christopher Hatfield, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Leanna Martin, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Townsend Barker, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Richard Palmer, University of Massachusetts Amherst Luke Detwiler, University of Massachusetts Amherst Jocelyn Anleitner, University of Massachusetts Amherst John Hickey, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Kennedy, K., K. Lutz, C. Hatfield, L. Martin, T. Barker, R. Palmer, L. Detwiler, J. Anleitner, J. Hickey. 2018. The Connecticut River Flow Restoration Study: A watershed-scale assessment of the potential for flow restoration through dam re-operation. The Nature Conservancy, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and University of Massachusetts Amherst. Northampton, MA. Available: http://nature.org/ctriverwatershed For a quick, easy-to-read overview of the Connecticut River Watershed Study, see our companion “Study Overview” document, available at: http://nature.org/ctriverwatershed June 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Deerfield River & Lower Connecticut River Tactical Basin Plan
    Deerfield River & Lower Connecticut River Tactical Basin Plan Green River, Guilford December 2019 | Public Draft Tactical Basin Plan was prepared in accordance with 10 VSA § 1253(d), the Vermont Water Quality Standards1, the Federal Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 130.6, and the Vermont Surface Water Management Strategy. Approved: ----------------------------------------- ------------------------- Emily Boedecker, Commissioner Date Department of Environmental Conservation -------------------------------------- ------------------------- Julie Moore, Secretary Date Agency of Natural Resources Cover Photo: Green River in Guilford – Marie L. Caduto The Vermont Agency of Natural Resources is an equal opportunity agency and offers all persons the benefits of participating in each of its programs and competing in all areas of employment regardless of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, sexual preference, or other non-merit factors. This document is available in alternative formats upon request. Call 802-828-1535 i Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 1 What is a Tactical Basin Plan ................................................................................................. 3 A. The Vermont Clean Water Act ........................................................................................... 4 B. Vermont Water Quality Standards ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Waters of Vermont
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 424 SURFACE WATERS OF VERMONT BY C. H. PIERCE Prepared in cooperation with the STATE OF VERMONT WASHINGTON GOVEENMENT PBINTING OFFICE 1917 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BK PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 25 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Cooperation................................................................ 8 Division of work.......................................................... 8 Definition of terms......................................................... 9 Explanation of data........................................................ 9 Accuracy of field data and computed results................................ 11 Gaging stations maintained in Vermont..................................... 12 St. Lawrence River basin................................................. 13 Lake Champlain drainage basin......................................... 13 General features................................................... 13 Gaging-station records.............................................. 14 Lake Champlain at Burlington, Vt.............................. 14 Lake Champlain outlet (Richelieu River) at Chambly, Province of Quebec.1................................................. 20 Poultney Eiver near Fair Haven, Vt............................ 25 Otter Creek at Middlebury,
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Population Sampling
    2005 Deerfield River Watershed Fish Population Assessment Robert J. Maietta Watershed Planning Program Worcester, MA January, 2007 CN: 223.4 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Ian Bowles, Secretary Department of Environmental Protection Arleen O’Donnell, Acting Commissioner Bureau of Resource Protection Glenn Haas, Acting Assistant Commissioner Division of Watershed Management Glenn Haas, Director Introduction Fish population surveys were conducted in the Deerfield River Watershed during the late summer of 2005 using techniques similar to Rapid Bioassessment Protocol V as described originally by Plafkin et al.(1989) and later by Barbour et al. (1999). Standard Operating Procedures are described in MassDEP Method CN 075.1 Fish Population SOP. Surveys also included a habitat assessment component modified from that described in the aforementioned document (Barbour et al. 1999). Fish populations were sampled by electrofishing using a Smith Root Model 12 battery powered backpack electrofisher. A reach of between 80m and 100m was sampled by passing a pole mounted anode ring, side to side through the stream channel and in and around likely fish holding cover. All fish shocked were netted and held in buckets. Sampling proceeded from an obstruction or constriction, upstream to an endpoint at another obstruction or constriction such as a waterfall or shallow riffle. Following completion of a sampling run, all fish were identified to species, measured, and released. Results of the fish population surveys can be found in Table 1. It should be noted that young of the year (yoy) fish from most species, with the exception of salmonids are not targeted for collection. Young-of-the-year fishes which are collected, either on purpose or inadvertently, are noted in Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Recreation Recreation Outdoor Massachusetts the Wildlife
    Photos by MassWildlife by Photos Photo © Kindra Clineff massvacation.com mass.gov/massgrown Office of Fishing & Boating Access * = Access to coastal waters A = General Access: Boats and trailer parking B = Fisherman Access: Smaller boats and trailers C = Cartop Access: Small boats, canoes, kayaks D = River Access: Canoes and kayaks Other Massachusetts Outdoor Information Outdoor Massachusetts Other E = Sportfishing Pier: Barrier free fishing area F = Shorefishing Area: Onshore fishing access mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/fba/ Western Massachusetts boundaries and access points. mass.gov/dfw/pond-maps points. access and boundaries BOAT ACCESS SITE TOWN SITE ACCESS then head outdoors with your friends and family! and friends your with outdoors head then publicly accessible ponds providing approximate depths, depths, approximate providing ponds accessible publicly ID# TYPE Conservation & Recreation websites. Make a plan and and plan a Make websites. Recreation & Conservation Ashmere Lake Hinsdale 202 B Pond Maps – Suitable for printing, this is a list of maps to to maps of list a is this printing, for Suitable – Maps Pond Benedict Pond Monterey 15 B Department of Fish & Game and the Department of of Department the and Game & Fish of Department Big Pond Otis 125 B properties and recreational activities, visit the the visit activities, recreational and properties customize and print maps. mass.gov/dfw/wildlife-lands maps. print and customize Center Pond Becket 147 C For interactive maps and information on other other on information and maps interactive For Cheshire Lake Cheshire 210 B displays all MassWildlife properties and allows you to to you allows and properties MassWildlife all displays Cheshire Lake-Farnams Causeway Cheshire 273 F Wildlife Lands Maps – The MassWildlife Lands Viewer Viewer Lands MassWildlife The – Maps Lands Wildlife Cranberry Pond West Stockbridge 233 C Commonwealth’s properties and recreation activities.
    [Show full text]