Tax News & Views

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tax News & Views Tax News & Views Capitol Hill briefing. June 18, 2021 In this issue: Bipartisan Senate infrastructure ‘framework’ adds backers, Democrats plot budget reconciliation strategy ...... 1 Taxwriters focus on international issues, tax gap at FY 2022 budget hearings ...................................................... 6 House OKs corporate governance package with country-by-country financial reporting mandate ...................... 9 Bipartisan Senate infrastructure ‘framework’ adds backers, Democrats plot budget reconciliation strategy The prospects for an infrastructure package negotiated by a bipartisan group of senators appeared to brighten this week as more than one-fifth of the upper chamber lent its support to that effort; still, Senate Democratic budget writers and party leaders began plotting a path forward for a fiscal year 2022 budget resolution with reconciliation instructions that potentially could be used to move infrastructure-related provisions and tax policy changes to President Biden’s desk without Republican support. Tax News & Views Page 1 of 11 Copyright © 2021 Deloitte Development LLC June 18, 2021 All rights reserved. Bipartisan ‘framework’ details emerge Details of the Senate infrastructure “framework” – which was negotiated by a group of 10 senators led by Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., and Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio – began to emerge over the weekend of June 12, and negotiators on both sides of the aisle discussed its parameters with their respective colleagues over the course of this week. The bipartisan group, which also includes moderate senators such as Democrat Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Republican Mitt Romney of Utah, came together as prior infrastructure talks between President Biden and a group of GOP senators led by Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, began to founder and ultimately broke down on June 8. (For prior coverage, see Tax News & Views, Vol. 22, No. 29, June 11, 2021.) URL: https://dhub.blob.core.windows.net/dhub/Newsletters/Tax/2021/TNV/210611_1.html According to a two-page summary of the plan that began circulating on June 16, the package would call for $973 billion in spending over five years (the typical span of a highway reauthorization bill), and about $1.2 trillion over eight years. By contrast, President Biden’s infrastructure-focused American Jobs Plan called for about $2.2 trillion in spending over eight years, though the White House did reduce that figure considerably during negotiations with Sen. Capito. URL: https://static.politico.com/0a/08/398515524e38ab4807521dcfbd92/bipartisan-infrastructure-framework-two- pager-final-7.pdf The bulk of the spending would be focused on roads, bridges, rail and mass transit projects, and airports and waterways, with significant amounts also devoted to building out and updating energy, broadband, and water infrastructure. On the financing side, the Senate bipartisan framework leans heavily on repurposing previously approved coronavirus relief funding toward infrastructure and by tapping into public-private partnerships, an infrastructure bank, private activity bonds, and direct-pay municipal bonds to draw in private capital. Although the framework generally avoids tax increases, it does call for measures to increase revenue collections by addressing the tax gap (presumably by directing additional enforcement dollars to the Internal Revenue Service), imposing an annual surcharge on electric vehicles, and indexing to inflation the current excise tax rate on gasoline. It also would “adjust” customs user fees, which may imply simply extending certain fees beyond their otherwise scheduled expiration. It is important to note, however, that certain reports on June 17 suggested that the summary made public the day before is still evolving – especially as it relates to its suggested policies around the gas tax and the user fee on electric vehicles, which may have been dropped in the latest plan presented to the White House. (The administration in the past has rejected gas tax increases and new user fees on the grounds that they would fall on the low- and middle-income income taxpayers that the president has vowed to shield from tax hikes.) 21 senators on-board so far: Although the prospects in general for bipartisan infrastructure negotiations have ebbed and flowed over the past several weeks, the Senate framework appeared to be picking up support late Tax News & Views Page 2 of 11 Copyright © 2021 Deloitte Development LLC June 18, 2021 All rights reserved. this week. As of June 17, a total of 21 senators – 10 Democrats and 11 Republicans – were said to have lent their formal backing to the high-level framework. (The roster of Democratic supporters includes Independent Sen. Angus King of Maine, who caucuses with the Democrats.) Twenty of those senators released a statement June 16 expressing support for the framework “that provides an historic investment in our nation’s core infrastructure needs without raising taxes.” URL: https://www.portman.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/senators-statement-infrastructure Another notable Republican not among the 21 public supporters so far – Senate GOP Whip John Thune of South Dakota – lent cautious support to the bipartisan talks on June 16. “I think they’ve tried hard to come up with something that structurally accommodates both the imperatives of Republicans and Democrats…and they’ve done a good job with it,” Thune told reporters. Framework crosses the Capitol: In another notable development, Sens. Sinema and Portman, along with a handful of other key negotiators of the bipartisan Senate framework met with the House Problem Solvers Caucus on June 17 to discuss the plan. The Problem Solvers Caucus – led by Rep. Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., and Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa. – is a group of roughly 60 more centrist-minded Democrats and Republicans. The group released its own $1.2 trillion infrastructure plan on June 9 that broadly resembles the Senate framework. URL: https://problemsolverscaucus.house.gov/media/press-releases/problem-solvers-caucus-unveils-building-bridges- bipartisan-physical But progressives raise concerns… Building Republican support will prove critical if, after evaluating the framework in the coming days, President Biden and Democratic leaders choose to continue to give space for a bipartisan deal rather than revert to a Democrat-only infrastructure approach that more closely resembles Biden’s American Jobs Plan and his American Families Plan. (For prior coverage of the American Jobs Plan, which proposes to finance “hard” infrastructure investments with an array of tax increases on businesses, see Tax News & Views, Vol. 22, No. 19, Apr. 9, 2021; for prior coverage of the American Families Plan, which focuses on what the administration has characterized as “human” infrastructure investments in areas such as paid family and medical leave, universal child care, access to pre-kindergarten education, and free community college, financed mainly by tax increases on certain upper-income individuals and expanded funding for IRS enforcement efforts, see Tax News & Views, Vol. 22, No. 23, Apr. 30, 2021.) URL: https://dhub.blob.core.windows.net/dhub/Newsletters/Tax/2021/TNV/210409_1.html URL: https://dhub.blob.core.windows.net/dhub/Newsletters/Tax/2021/TNV/210430_1.html That is because many progressive Democrats are becoming increasingly concerned that any bipartisan deal will fall short of fully addressing the nation’s infrastructure needs, fear such a bill will not aggressively implement policies designed to address climate change, and feel that Democrats should lean into the president’s Tax News & Views Page 3 of 11 Copyright © 2021 Deloitte Development LLC June 18, 2021 All rights reserved. proposals to finance his plans by raising taxes on corporations and wealthy individuals – policies that they feel are popular among the general public. Due to Democrats’ razor-thin majorities in both the House and Senate, in essence every defection by a progressive Democrat would have to be balanced out by the addition of a GOP supporter in order for a bipartisan deal to clear Congress. “I would prefer bigger. I think this is a once-in-a-career type of opportunity to do what has to be done,” said House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal, D-Mass. “…We should take advantage of the moment. The public is on our side. The momentum is with us.” Other progressives are skeptical that certain moderate Democrats – Sens. Manchin and Sinema, in particular – would be there to support a subsequent reconciliation bill that includes Democratic priorities not addressed in the more narrowly focused bipartisan infrastructure framework. “It’s either going to happen and we know 100 percent for sure that it’s going to happen, or it’s not going to happen,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., said on June 15. “And I think that certainty of that second piece is going to determine a lot on our stances on the bipartisan piece.” Rep. Mark Pocan, D-Wis., echoed those sentiments. “[I]f anything would proceed – and people are saying there’s going to be other bills that will come – I think the expectation from many of us will be, well, then those things either come first, or there is some more ironclad way to guarantee it’s going to happen,” Pocan said. But that ironclad guarantee seems unlikely to materialize. Sen. Manchin, for his part, indicated June 16 that he would not promise his support for a subsequent reconciliation package without first seeing its details. “I’m not committing to that. I’m not committing to anything.
Recommended publications
  • June 11, 2021
    Transportation Update - June 11, 2021 Special Session Will be Called for June 14 Governor Walz has announced that he will call the legislature back for a special session on June 14th. The duration of the special session is unknown. Legislative leaders have said they would like to have agreement on all of the omnibus budget bills prior to the 14th so that all of the bills can be passed over the course of a few days. However, only 3 working groups have posted agreed-upon spreadsheets and contentious issues remain outstanding. If the budget for the FY22-23 biennium is not passed by June 30th, state government will shut down. Many observers expect the special session to go down to the wire on June 30th. For roadway construction projects, impacts will be felt prior to June 30th. MnDOT has indicated that notices will start to go out to contractors on June 16th if no budget has been passed regarding the need to begin making preparations for projects to shut down. Even if lawmakers do get a budget passed at the last minute, disruptions to construction projects could have costly consequences. Please send a message to the governor, House speaker and Senate majority leader regarding the importance of getting a budget passed as quickly as possible when legislators come back into session on the 14th. Take 3 minutes to send this Action Alert and help make a difference for transportation projects all across the state! Lawmakers have 3 weeks to pass budget as shutdown 'calamity' looms The threat of a state government shutdown looms larger with each passing day, and very little publicly known progress is being made.
    [Show full text]
  • Kellen Applauds Congress for Passing COVID-19 Recovery Legislation Looking Ahead from Here We Celebrate the Passage of a Roughly
    Kellen Applauds Congress for Passing COVID-19 Recovery Legislation Looking Ahead from Here We celebrate the passage of a roughly $900 billion coronavirus stimulus package combined with a $1.4 trillion spending package to fund government programs through fiscal year 2021. There is no doubt that this will benefit all our clients and the country as a whole. Let’s take a closer look at the agreement in three ways – (1) what does it represent, (2) what does it do, and (3) what could it mean? What does it represent? In spite of this deal coming at the last possible moment and requiring three temporary funding resolutions to avert a partial government shutdown, it does represent a bipartisan breakthrough and the second largest stimulus package in history. The coronavirus stimulus provides a substantial infusion of aid. At the same time, however, it comes awfully late and offers only short-term relief. Clearly, the need is still so much greater. An Historic Need As the negative impacts of the pandemic are so extensive, allow me to focus just on one aspect in greater detail. Before the coronavirus pandemic, more than 35 million people struggled with hunger in the United States, including more than 10 million children, according to Feeding America. In 2020, we are looking at more than 54 million people, including 17 million children who could experience food insecurity. Feeding America has seen a 60 percent increase in food assistance needs since March. About 40 percent of these people have never had to rely on charitable food assistance before now.
    [Show full text]
  • BGR-Washington-Updat
    To: Jackson Cox (Chairman) and APCAC Delegates From: Loren Monroe, Jonathan Mantz, William Crozer, Noelle Carter & Olivia Earenfight Subject: APCAC Doorknock Meetings Recap Date: July 14, 2016 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Jackson and 2017 APCAC Doorknock Delegates, Please find a recap of the 2017 APCAC Doorknock below. As in year’s past, this covers issues discussed during meetings and keen insights gained as well as any appropriate follow-up items. The broad takeaway from this year’s Doorknock is that while Congress remains engaged on APCAC priority issues, including trade expansion and tax reform, there is still a significant amount of uncertainty regarding the new administration’s priorities, which continues to complicate the policy environment on Capitol Hill. That being said, it is clear that the administration is dedicated to reforming the trade agenda around the concept of “fair trade” (i.e. deficit reduction and enforcement) and this is finding acceptance, even if tacitly, on the Hill. Further, the administration promises to expend significant political capital on tax reform, which will find broad support in the House and Senate, but key differences remain around overarching priorities and the scope and scale of reform. It will be important to remain engaged on APCAC’s priority issues of - trade, tax reform, and travel (APEC Business Travel Card). Trade will remain a front-and-center issue with the administration moving ahead with NAFTA renegotiation and identifying other trade agreements for review. Pending the outcome of the healthcare debate, tax reform discussions are also right around the corner. As we heard consistently in our meetings, APCAC is one of the few organizations engaging on these issues from the perspective of American business men and women abroad and continued engagement on these issues is extremely important.
    [Show full text]
  • Problem Solvers Caucus Members in Bipartisan Letter to President Trump Problem Solvers Ask Trump to Sit Down, Discuss Tax Cuts, Infrastructure
    RELEASE: Josh Gottheimer and Tom Reed Lead 35 Problem Solvers Caucus Members in Bipartisan Letter to President Trump Problem Solvers Ask Trump To Sit Down, Discuss Tax Cuts, Infrastructure Washington, D.C. – Today, Congressmen Josh Gottheimer (NJ-5) and Tom Reed (NY- 23) announced that they led 35 Members of the Problem Solvers Caucus in sending a bipartisan letter to President Trump to request a meeting to discuss the group’s priority issues: tax reform and infrastructure investment. 35 Members from the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus signed on to the letter. The Problem Solvers Caucus, co-chaired by Gottheimer and Reed, is committed to bringing Members together across party lines and finding areas of agreement on key issues like lowering taxes and improving infrastructure to help the American people. “The Problem Solvers Caucus would like to begin discussions with you immediately on the possibility of tax reform and infrastructure legislation. Addressing either issue, on a broad bipartisan basis, could give a significant boost to our economy and provide Americans with confidence that government can work for them,” the Members wrote. The Members who signed this letter are: Mike Coffman, Jim Costa, Ryan A. Costello, Charlie Crist, Carlos Curbelo, Charles W. Dent, Elizabeth Esty, Brian K. Fitzpatrick, Mike Gallagher, Vicente Gonzalez, Josh Gottheimer, Lynn Jenkins, Bill Johnson, David P. Joyce, John Katko, Adam Kinzinger, Daniel Lipinski, Thomas MacArthur, Patrick Meehan, Stephanie N. Murphy, Richard M. Nolan, Tom O’Halleran, Scott H. Peters, Jared Polis, Tom Reed, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Jacky Rosen, Bradley S. Schneider, Kurt Schrader, Darren Soto, Thomas R. Suozzi, Glenn ‘GT’ Thompson, Fred Upton, Peter Welch, David Young The full letter from the Problem Solvers Caucus can be found below: Dear President Trump, Americans want to see their government solve problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal and State Legislative Update
    Federal and State Legislative Update John Gallagher - The VGM Group Jay Witter - AAHomecare 2020 2020 ~ The GOOD • HR 8158 BUDGET NEUTRALITY ACT • NIV Removed from Competitive Bidding Program • 3 Months Delay in Sequestration 2% ROUND 2021 COMPETITIVE BIDDING WINS • On October 27, the program was substantially altered to allow only “off –the-shelf” orthotic braces to be bid, with the remaining product categories removed. CMS proposed several payment options for these items in rural, non-rural and competitive bid areas, a matter of critical concern to our members. 2020 ~ The GOOD Federal Impact in the HME Community • $138 million back to HME providers through suspension of 2% sequestration cut with more to come following a recent three-month extension of the pause. • Share of the $88 billion CARES Act relief payments during the pandemic by ensuring HME providers were included among eligible health care categories. • 32% rate increase for non-bid, non-rural areas (75/25 blend) and extending 50/50 blend for rural areas through duration of COVID-19 PHE. • Significant regulatory waivers and flexibilities on respiratory care, proof of delivery, and authorization for Medicaid beneficiaries; many of these policy changes have also been adopted by Medicaid programs, MCOs, and other major payers, as well. • Passage of legislation to fix outdated budget neutrality provisions that had been severely impacting rural oxygen Medicare reimbursements – the culmination of a multi-year grassroots advocacy effort by HME stakeholders spearheaded by AAHomecare and VGM. 2020 ~ The GOOD • Telehealth Waivers • Thune Bill • Provider Relief Fund • Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) • Covid-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDL) 2020 ~ THE BAD • Three Month Delay to 2% Sequestration ~ Need extended Relief • CMS proposed several payment options for these items in rural, non-rural and competitive bid areas, a matter of critical concern to our members.
    [Show full text]
  • (In)Access to Healthcare Bios
    MEET OUR SPEAKERS Adam P. Carbullido Adam P. Carbullido is the director of policy and advocacy of the Association of Asian Pacific Community Health Organizations (AAPCHO), where he is responsible for developing and implementing the association’s legislative and regulatory strategy. In this role, Adam leads AAPCHO’s engagement with Members of Congress, Administration officials, national partners, and other community stakeholders to advance policies that improve health access and outcomes of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders and the community health providers that serve them in the United States, U.S. territories, and Freely Associated States. He is the co-chair of the National Council of Asian Pacific Americans (NCAPA) Health Committee. Prior to joining AAPCHO in December 2018, Adam worked for nearly a decade in the U.S. House of Representatives advocating for the rights and priorities of his home island of Guam and other U.S. territories. He served as chief of staff to Congresswoman Madeleine Z. Bordallo of Guam. He also served as Congresswoman Bordallo’s communications director and senior policy advisor for health, immigration, and tax issues. Adam received his Bachelor of Business Administration from the University of Notre Dame in South Bend, Indiana. He resides in Washington, D.C. with his partner Bobby. MEET OUR SPEAKERS Representative Ami Bera Congressman Ami Bera represents California’s 7th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives. A first-generation American born and raised in California, Bera is guided by a desire to serve his community. It’s that commitment to service that led him to become a doctor and later run for Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • March 29, 2021 the Honorable Nancy Pelosi
    March 29, 2021 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Speaker of the House Minority Leader U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House of Representatives H-232, U.S. Capitol H-204, U.S. Capitol Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Speaker Pelosi and Leader McCarthy: As Members of the bipartisan House Problem Solvers Caucus, we are united in the idea that there are commonsense solutions to many of our country's toughest challenges. We are writing to urge a return to regular order in the House, with full committee consideration of legislation and more open rules on the House floor. With narrow majorities in the House and Senate, we need bipartisan support and solutions to get bills passed in both houses and ultimately signed into law by the President. The best way to do this is by having a deliberative and open process that promotes transparency and allows members to help shape legislation through committee hearings, markups, and floor amendments. We should not be afraid to deliberate and debate. As you know, in recent weeks, most bills have been fast-tracked to the House floor, bypassing committees; closed rules have constrained Members' ability to offer amendments and provide valuable input on issues that impact all our communities. This has created a rushed process with a lack of Member input and transparency, greatly limiting the potential for success in the Senate, and it is also encouraging dilatory tactics from some in the minority party. A return to regular order will help end that approach, ensure the long-term functionality of the institution, and help prevent damage to the House.
    [Show full text]
  • April 1, 2021 the Honorable Joseph R. Biden
    April 1, 2021 The Honorable Joseph R. Biden, Jr. The Honorable Pete Buttigieg President of the United States Secretary The White House U.S. Department of Transportation Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20590 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Speaker of the House Minority Leader U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 The Honorable Chuck Schumer The Honorable Mitch McConnell Majority Leader Minority Leader U.S. Senate U.S. Senate Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Dear President Biden, Secretary Buttigieg, Speaker Pelosi, and Leaders Schumer, McCarthy, and McConnell: We write to you as members of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus, a group of 29 Republicans and 29 Democrats in the House of Representatives who work together to find common ground on issues of pressing concern to our communities. As the 117th Congress begins to debate various infrastructure proposals, we are writing to ask that you continue to promote a bipartisan path forward. The Problem Solvers Caucus has officially endorsed this position, garnering the support of more than 75 percent of Members. Infrastructure has long been one of our nation’s most important needs. We believe that a bipartisan bill would summon the highest level of support for the large investment needed to repair and modernize our infrastructure for the 21st century. A robust investment in our infrastructure would also create millions of good-paying jobs for hard-working Americans and help accelerate America’s post-pandemic economic recovery. As part of the infrastructure discussion, we wanted to emphasize that the following general principles have bipartisan support within our group: o Sustainable long-term funding for in-demand projects in our communities; o Providing overdue investments in critical infrastructure projects, such as broadband deployment, transportation networks, and water infrastructure; and o Improving the resilience of our nation’s infrastructure in the face of natural disasters.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Directory NEVADA
    164 Congressional Directory NEVADA NEVADA (Population 2010, 2,700,551) SENATORS DEAN HELLER, Republican, of Carson City, NV; born in Castro Valley, CA, May 10, 1960; education: B.B.A., specializing in finance and securities analysis, University of Southern California, 1985; professional: institutional stockbroker and broker / trader on the Pacific Stock Exchange; Chief Deputy State Treasurer, Public Funds Representative; Nevada State Assembly- man, 1990–94; Secretary of State, 1994–2002; founding member of the Boys and Girls Club of Western Nevada Community College Foundation; married: Lynne Heller; children: Hillary, Harris, Drew, and Emmy; committees: Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs; Commerce, Science, and Transportation; Finance; Veterans’ Affairs; elected to the 110th Congress on No- vember 7, 2006, reelected to two succeeding Congresses, when he resigned to become a U.S. Senator; appointed May 3, 2011, to the U.S. Senate for the term ending January 3, 2013, to fill the vacancy caused by the resignation of U.S. Senator John E. Ensign; took the oath of office on May 9, 2011; elected to the U.S. Senate on November 6, 2012. Office Listings http://heller.senate.gov https://www.facebook.com/SenDeanHeller https://twitter.com/SenDeanHeller 324 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 ....................................................... (202) 224–6244 Chief of Staff.—Mac Abrams. FAX: 228–6753 Legislative Director.—Sarah Timoney Paul. Communications Director.—Megan Taylor. Scheduler.—Meron Bayu. 8930 West Sunset Road, Suite
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Directory
    20 Congressional Directory CALIFORNIA pital, 2006; Woman of the Year, Women’s Image Network, 2006; Visionary Leadership Award, San Francisco Democratic Party, 2006; Award, Native American Heritage Association, 2007; Champion Award for Public Service, Endangered Species Coalition, 2007; Lifetime Achieve- ment Award, City Year San Jose / Silicon Valley, 2008; Breakfast of Champions, Afterschool Alliance, 2008; Transportation Leader’s Award, National Stone, Sand, and Gravel Association, 2008; John H. Chafee Congressional Environmental Award, Association of American Railroads, 2008; Legislative Leadership Award, National Association of Clean Water Agencies, 2008; Leg- islator of the Year Award, American Planning Association, 2008; Humane Champion, Humane Society of the United States, 2008; Legislator of the Year Award, Information and Technology Industry Council, 2008; Vera Shultz Visionary Leadership Award, Marin Women’s Commis- sion, 2009; 25th Annual Leadership Conference Award, Cyprus and Hellenic Leadership, 2009; Aviation Safety Award, National Air Traffic Controllers Association, 2009; Legislator of the Year Award, California Primary Care Association, 2009; Children’s Champion Award, Global Action for Children, 2009; Award, Oxfam America, 2009; Legislator of the Year Award, Air Quality Management District, 2009; National Transportation Leadership Award for the 21st Century, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2009; Defender of Children Award, First Focus Campaign for Children, 2010; Golden Triangle Award,
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the Freshman 116Th
    2018 Meet the Freshmen: Both House and Senate Biographical, electoral, and district data for all new members to the 116th Congress November 9, 2018 Data compiled 9am; Election results may have changed slightly National Journal Presentation Center Roadmap Senate House 2 Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) Background Sinema has represented Arizona's 9th congressional district since 2012. Prior to her public-service career, she worked as a social worker, attorney, professor, and instructor at the Center for Progressive Leadership, a Washington-based institute that trains activists in progressive policies. In 2010, she was elected to the Arizona State Senate, where she sponsored several bills aimed at curbing Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s immigration policies, including targeted documentation checks. In Congress, Sinema was a member of the Blue Dog Coalition (comprised of conservative Democrats) as well as the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus. She has a center-left voting record. In 2015 and 2016, she did not vote for Nancy Pelosi for majority leader. In 2017, she voted with President Trump’s position roughly half of the time. She is the first openly bisexual Congress member. State Profile Biography Election Results State: Arizona First Elected: 2018 2018 General Status: Junior Senator Party: Democrat Kyrsten Sinema (D) 50% Serving with: John Kyl (R) Birth Date: 07/12/1976 Martha McSally (R) 48% Cook PVI: R+5 Education: PhD, Arizona State University, School of Justice and Social Inquiry, 2009-2012;JD, Arizona State University, 2002-2004;MSW, Social Work, Arizona State University, 1997-1999;Attended, Brigham Young University Family: Divorced Slide updated: November 13, 2018 Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2021 Non-Partisan Groups Active in NH DC Based with A
    View as Webpage February 2021 Please share and ask others to sign-up Click Here Brought to you by ARTICLE 10 and Consuming Government Share the NH Common Denominator News so they add themselves to distribution CLICK HERE TOP NEWS: 1) Open Democracy teams got 100 towns/cities to have warrant articles pushing for Fair Non-Partisan Redistricting, but your NH Government thinks Gerrymandering is great. More Information 2) Braver Angels Northern NE Alliance February 16th 7pm Register Here 3) NH State House News - Click Here for weekly Open Democracy Action updates 4) NH Ranked Choice Voting Speakers are available, have a group that should learn what is happening?E - mail to schedule a NH RCV to speak to your group. 5) Have basic questions see NHPR Ask Civics 101 Podcasts.C lick Here 6) American Promise Lobby Day Training 1 Feb. 24th 7:30pm to 8:00pm Register Here 7) Open Democracy Book Club "Unrigged by David Daley" March 4th 7pm. Register Here 8) Braver Angels Franklin County VT - March 4th workshop for Skills for Bridging the Divide.R egister Here 9) Next NH Ranked Choice Voting State Wide MeetingM arch 6th 9am E-mail to get the invite 10) Politics for the People Book Club Feb. 21st 7pm ET. Click Here "In the Balance of Power" 11) Business for America starting new voting rights activities. Click Here 12) The Re-United States movie was released. Click Here for viewing options. Based on the Book. 13) Civics 101 Insurrection, Protest, Terrorism, Seditions, Coup podcast. Click Here. 14) Polarization as Plague Click Here Season 1 Finale (part 1) podcast from The Purple Principle 15) Did you take the 8 minute NH Voter Survey from The People NH? Non-Partisan Groups Active in NH DC based with a NH chapter What they do: Getting the US Congress to work together.
    [Show full text]