Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Surprised at Nothing by Kristi Lee Kristi Lee Net Worth 2021, Age, Height, Weight, Biography, Wiki. Famous news director Kristi Lee is known worldwide for her show The Bob and Tom Show. She is also associated with TV shows like Kristi Lee Uninterrupted. In her career, she worked for many TV channels. Perhaps you know a thing or two about Kristi Lee, however, how well do you know about Kristi Lee? For instance, how old is she? How about her height moreover her net worth?. In another case Kristi Lee might be a stranger, fortunately for you we have compiled all you need to know about Kristi Lee’s personal life, today’s net worth as of 2021, her age, height, weight, career, professional life, and more facts. Well, if your all set, here is what we know. Table of Contents. Early life and Biography: Kristi was born on 17th July 1960 in Indianapolis, Indiana. Her birth name was Theresa Renee Rose. She completed her graduation from the Ben Davis High School located at Indianapolis. After that, she was admitted to the Indiana University. Her first taste of work was at the school’s radio station WBDG. Age, Height, Weight & Body Measurement. Kristi Lee’s age is 60 years old as of today’s date 18th June 2021 having been born on 17 July 1960. Though, she is 1.75 m tall, she weighs about 56 kg. Personal Life: Affair, Boyfriend, Husband, Kids. As a wife, Kristi was not that successful as she was in her career. She got married three times, and each of them ended in a divorce. She has two daughters, named Sophie and Ava. The skills that make Kristi different from others are excellent communication skills, enthusiasm, and vivacity. Her zodiac sign is Cancer. Career, Awards & Nominations: As a television engineer, Kristi worked at WRTV for six years. At that time, she was finding it hard to earn enough money for her expenses. So she joined the WFBQ Q95 as a part-time disc jockey. Some other great personalities who worked at that time in the station were Tom Griswold and Bob Kevoian. Lee was also seen working for ESPN and ESPN2 as a sideline reporter. At the time, she covered events like auto racing, lacrosse, and X Games. She also worked as the sideline reporter for NBA’s Indiana Pacers. But the show for which she got all the fame and appreciation was The Bob and Tom Show. Lee announced about parting ways with the show on 11th January 2016. She told that she was associated with them for 12 long years and it is time for her to enjoy a break. But the break was not too long as on the 8th of July 2016, it was announced by the producers of the show that Lee will be back on 11th July 2016. During the break, Lee was doing podcasts like the Kristi Lee Uninterrupted. Until now, Lee did not receive any notable awards she is still working hard, and the column will be filled very soon. Though she was inducted in the Ben Davis High School Wall of Fame, her first school, where she worked for the WBDG station. Kristi Lee’s Net Worth & Salary in 2021. She earned a lot in her illustrious career as a news director. Her shows became famous which helped her in gaining the wealth she has today. Other than TV, she earned a handsome amount of fortune from Radio too. As of 2021, the estimated net worth of Kristi Lee is around $500 thousand, and it is increasing rapidly. Possible Surprise Debut For Tonight’s AEW Double Or Nothing 2021 PPV. Below are the wrestlers that will compete in the Casino Battle Royal at tonight’s AEW Double Or Nothing 2021 PPV (the winner of this match will earn a future AEW World Championship match): – Brian Pillman Jr. – Penta El Zero Miedo. There’s one empty slot in this match and the Wrestling Observer speculated that it could be former WWE Superstar Andrade: “The surprise, I mean I don’t want to say this, because it may be someone not as good as this, or it may be later, or it may fall through — but we know they’ve been talking to Andrade. If it’s him and he wins, actually him and Kenny Omega is a great match on paper, but that’s a TripleMania main event and that’s in August.” WATCH: Paige’s Big Knockers (Part 2): • ON THIS DAY IN WWF HISTORY (May 30, 1993) – WWF Wrestling Challenge. On this day in 1993, the World Wrestling Federation aired an episode of their weekly TV show ‘WWF Wrestling Challenge’. It was broadcasted from the Exposition Building in Portland, Maine and featured pre-taped matches, interviews & storyline segments on the road to the ‘WWF King of the Ring 1993’ PPV. Kristi Lee Uninterrupted. Kristi Lee Uninterrupted is a lifestyle podcast that brings you interviews from people you may have heard of before and people who you may not know, but all of them have a fascinating story. Kristi tackles comedy, business, behind the scenes of the big show as well as the occasional girls night out, where the topics can get a bit spicy. If you have something to add to the show or would like to contact Kristi, find all the contact information at KristiLeeNews.com. Episodes. Frank Caliendo: The Master of Voices Finds His Own. You are no doubt familiar with comedian Frank Caliendo’s work. You have seen him on the Fox Network, Mad TV, Fox NFL Sunday, Frank TV on TBS and more. His impressions of John Madden, President Donald Trump, Jeff Goldblum, Ted Knight, Morgan Freeman, Liam Neesen, and countless others have also made him a semi-regular on The Bob and Tom Show. On the podcast today we find out how Frank is changing his stand up act to be more Frank Cal. Tuned In. The voice, we’ve heard forever – at home, at work, in the car. The laugh, too – it’s essential to local pop culture, a staple of Indianapolis’ ambient noise. That voice, that laugh and so much more belong to Kristi Lee, known by many as the news director of Indianapolis-based WFBQ-FM’s Bob and Tom Show. At home though, in Zionsville, she’s simply known as a friend, as a neighbor, as a mother. And she likes it that way. “Once I get to Zionsville,there’s adetachment from the hustle and bustle,” she said during our chat – one I’d initially been nervous about. Any tension, however, faded as my familiarity with that voice and that laugh gave Lee an aura that was less renown and more relative. “The biggest thing about Zionsville is the sense of community,” she continued. “This is the quality of life I was looking for.” After living here for nearly three years after a lifetime spent on Indianapolis’ north and west sides, Lee admits Zionsville was an afterthought – but one that quickly moved to the front burner when the time was right. “I’d always admired Zionsville from afar,” said the nearly 30-year Q95 employee. “I mentioned to a friend how I’d always thought it would be nice to live there. She said, ‘Well, why don’t you?’ And I said, ‘Well, why don’t I?’ A light bulb had gone off.” Tom, Kristi, Chick, Jimmy Pardo and Bob broadcast from the Bahamas in 2001. Three months later, her home was sold and a new Boone County abode had been located. It is there she’s raising her daughters, Ava and Sophie. They attend school in town and ride their bikes to Dairy Queen; Lee reads and naps and plays with her dogs and “putzes in the garden,” as she puts it. All things that constitute the public’s image of a radio star, no doubt. “People think I have the rock and roll lifestyle we joke about on the air,andI’ve had my fun,” assures Lee. “But people would be surprised at how quieted down it is now. I’m surprised at it, actually.” Twasn’t always that way. Gunner, Paul Poteet and Kristi as Madonna. Since joining the Bob and Tom Show in 1984 – quite an honor in and of itself – Lee also has worked extensively for ESPN and for the Indiana Pacers. She covered the first three X Games and many other events for the Worldwide Leader, was the sideline face of the hometown NBA franchise during its rise to prominence and is an anchor of the Bob and Tom Comedy Tour. “Kristi is the true workhorse of our show,” says Bob Kevoian – the “Bob” in Bob and Tom – before correcting himself in typically humorous fashion: “I’m guessing here, but I don’t think Kristi would care for the term ‘workhorse.’Kristi is the news unicorn of the Bob and Tom show, and we couldn’t do itwithout her.” If those experiences and that kind of praise weren’t remarkable enough, how Lee got her start is a testament to fate. “In high school a kid told me to take a radio class because it was an easy credit,” said the Ben Davis graduate. “I did, and no one had ever said this to me;I credit this man to this day. Dana Webb was my teacher, and he looked at me and said, ‘You got some talent, kid.’ That changed my life.” The emotion was evident in her eyes as she recounted an unsolicitedemail she recently received from Webb. “It said, ‘Keep up the good work, I respect what you’re doing. I’m so proud of you,’” said Lee, beaming. “I have no idea where he is; haven’t heard from him in 30 years. To hear that meant everything to me.” daughters Ava and Sophie. Now, with so much in the rearview mirror, so much still lies ahead for Lee. She’s active with charity work, active in a Zionsville church and has no plans to slow down. She’ll remain a part of the Bob and Tom show, “as long as they’ll have me.” Someday she’d like to acquire more space, maybe the farmland she’s always coveted. But, much like her radio persona, the local iteration of Kristi Lee is not moving. With the kind of unwavering certainty one normally reserves for stating herphone number, or the name of her first born, Lee repeats herself by telling me, “I’ll be in Zionsville as long as they’ll have me.” Seems as though we’ll be hearing that voice and that laugh for a long time to come. Surprise Split Again at Supreme Court. This is a strange U.S. Supreme Court session. First LGBTQ groups lined up on opposite sides of a case (see Mahanoy v. BL). Now, they’ve lined up inapposite to where they were 10 years ago. The latter comes in Americans for Prosperity v. California, which had oral argument Monday (April 26). The oral argument encompassed two cases out of California, one brought by Americans for Prosperity Foundation and the other by the Thomas More Law Center. The groups sued the state of California over its requirement that charities disclose to the state the names and addresses of their major donors. They say the forced requirement violates the First Amendment rights of the groups and their donors. And they note that charities that do not comply with the requirement are prohibited from fundraising in California. (Currently, only New York and New Mexico have similar requirements.) Interestingly, 10 years ago, the Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest LGBTQ political group, chastised the anti-LGBTQ group National Organization for Marriage over its “aggressive legal strategy to keep its donors secret….” HRC said NOM’s position “begs the question, what are they hiding? Is it that they realize it’s no longer popular to be openly anti-gay?” Around the time of the campaign to pass Proposition 8 –to ban same-sex marriage— in California, various LGBTQ activists used information about contributors to anti-LGBTQ groups to target for protests, boycotts, and bad publicity. NOM filed lawsuits in federal court, seeking to prevent the disclosure of its donor information. The reporting of such information is required each year on tax-exempt organizations’ Form 990 to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. Specifically, it is reported on “Schedule B,” also known as “Schedule of Contributors.” NOM appealed its cases to the U.S. Supreme Court and was twice rebuffed for review. Fast-forward to Monday’s oral argument: Justice Brett Kavanaugh highlighted HRC’s support of the two groups fighting California’s donor disclosure requirement. Kavanaugh read a quote from the brief submitted by HRC, the NAACP, the ACLU, and others: “ “A critical corollary of the freedom to associate is the right to maintain the confidentiality of one’s associations absent a strong governmental interest in disclosure. If the state could categorically demand disclosure of associational information, the ability of citizens to organize to defend values out of favor with the majority would be seriously diminished.” And, like with the Mahanoy case, LGBTQ individuals and groups are on opposite sides in the donor dispute. U.S. Senator Tammy Baldwin, one of the Senate’s two openly LGBTQ members, joined a brief submitted by other LGBTQ supporters, taking sides in support of California’s disclosure requirement. So, too, did the openly lesbian attorneys general of Massachusetts and Michigan. Senator Baldwin and both senators from Illinois and Massachusetts as well as Cory Booker of New Jersey and others said, in their brief, “California has a clear and substantial government interest—namely, preventing fraud, self-dealing and criminal tax evasion—for requiring this limited confidential disclosure….” Senators’ brief makes note that the “trajectory over the last ten years has been stark and unrelenting.” They cited the controversial Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission. decision in 2010 that said the government could not restrict corporate and organizational donations to political causes. “Rampant violation of that decision’s transparency predicate has allowed such influencers to wield that power anonymously, through dark-money expenditures,” said Baldwin and the other senators. “The next goal, as the arguments by [Americans for Prosperity] and many amici make plain, is for dark-money contributors to secure broad constitutional protection of their anonymous influence, so they can attack any and all disclosure requirements in other contexts….” The Supreme Court, in the two consolidated cases over California’s donor disclosure requirement, is reviewing the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals decision that upheld the California requirement. The Ninth Circuit said the requirement serves the important governmental interest of protecting the public against fraud. The information California’s requirement seeks is the same information provided by tax-exempt groups to the IRS on Schedule B of IRS Form 990. Neither the IRS nor California allow the information to be disclosed, but the groups challenging California’s requirement say the state has repeatedly failed to protect the confidentiality of the information. “There’s nothing California can do at this point that would convince reasonable donors and charities that have seen the dismal record of confidentiality lapses that now those have truly been fixed,” said Derek Shaffer, an attorney for the Prosperity Foundation, during oral argument. In a brief to the Supreme Court in support of the Prosperity and Law Center complaint, the anti-LGBT “Proposition 8 Legal Defense Fund” said there was a “well-documented and judicially acknowledged history of severe harm suffered by supporters of California’s Proposition 8 whose identities were publicly disclosed….” The statewide initiative Proposition 8 banned marriage for same-sex couples in that state in 2008 but was later overturned through litigation. The acting solicitor general under President Trump weighed in on the side of the two charitable groups; the acting solicitor general under President Biden has weighed in on the side of the California requirement but urged the Supreme Court to vacate the Ninth Circuit decision. “The federal reporting provision does not compel disclosure, but rather constitutes a condition for receiving a governmental subsidy in the form of tax exemptions and deductibility,” wrote Acting Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar. “….The disclosure requirement clearly furthers important governmental interests in policing fraud and abuse; other means of obtaining the same information would be less effective and less efficient; and petitioners have not shown that donors who contribute to charitable organizations in general will be exposed to a reasonable probability of threats and harassment as would be necessary to establish that the disclosure provision is facially invalid.” But Prelogar said the Ninth Circuit ruling was “incomplete” and should be remanded to determine what burden the California requirement “places on the associational rights” of the challenging groups.