DOCSLIB.ORG

Private Capital Law Firms: Real Estate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Private Capital Law Firms: Real Estate PRIVATE CAPITAL LAW FIRMS: REAL ESTATE PRIVATE CAPITAL LAW FIRMS: REAL ESTATE We break down the activity of law firms involved in private equity real estate (PERE) deals advised on by number, value, deal type and location. Fig. 1: Law Firms by Number of PERE Deals, 2017 - 2018 YTD Fig. 2: Law Firms by Number of PERE Deals, 2000 - 2018 YTD (As at May 2018) (As at May 2018) No. of Known PERE Deal Proportion of All No. of Known PERE Deal Proportion of All Firm Firm Assignments PERE Deals Assignments PERE Deals Clifford Chance 56 4% Clifford Chance 136 4% PwC Legal 52 4% Loyens & Loeff 91 3% Loyens & Loeff 45 3% Houthoff Buruma 84 3% CMS Hasche Sigle 44 3% Dentons 83 3% Dentons 43 3% PwC Legal 82 3% Houthoff Buruma 43 3% CMS Hasche Sigle 76 2% DLA Piper 39 3% DLA Piper 61 2% GSK Stockmann 26 2% Simpson Thacher & 56 2% Bartlett Greenberg Traurig 22 2% Linklaters 54 2% Van Doorne 22 2% Greenberg Traurig 45 1% Source: Preqin Source: Preqin Fig. 3: Largest PERE Deals, 2017 - 2018 YTD (As at May 2018) Asset Legal Advisor(s) Deal Size (mn) Logicor Clifford Chance, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett 12,250 EUR Monogram Residential Trust Jones Day, Goodwin 3,000 USD Fidal, PwC Legal, Wargny Katz et Associés, White & Case, De Pardieu Brocas Maffei, Coeur Défense 1,720 EUR EY Legal, Franklin, Lasaygues & Associés Netherlands, Retail Portfolio Deloitte, Houthoff Buruma, NautaDutilh, Loyens & Loeff 1,600 EUR 20 Fenchurch Street Mayer Brown, BLP, CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang 1,280 GBP The Leadenhall Building Berwin Leighton Paisner, Herbert Smith Freehills, Mayer Brown 1,150 GBP Germany, Industrial Portfolio Jones Day 1,280 EUR Sony Center Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Greenberg Traurig, P+P Pöllath + Partners, PwC Legal 1,100 EUR Ballantyne Corporate Park Nelson Mullins, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, Troutman Sanders 1,200 USD European Logistics Portfolio Goodwin 1,000 EUR Source: Preqin Fig. 4: Law Firms by Number of Single-Asset PERE Deals, Fig. 5: Law Firms by Number of Portfolio PERE Deals, 2017 - 2018 YTD (As at May 2018) 2017 - 2018 YTD (As at May 2018) 50 48 5% Proportion of Single-Asset 18 17 7% Proportion of Portfolio 40 40 16 6% 40 35 4% 14 13 34 12 5% 12 Deals 28 Deals 30 26 3% 10 9 4% 22 8 8 7 7 7 20 18 2% 6 3% 16 6 5 2% 10 1% 4 No. of Portfolio Deals 2 1% No. of Single-Asset Deals 0 0% 0 0% Dentons Dentons DLA Piper PwC Legal DLA Piper Simmons PwC Legal Freehills Simmons & Van Doorne HerbertSmith Loyens & Loeff Loyens & Loeff Clifford Chance Clifford Chance GSK Stockmann Drees & Sommer Houthoff Buruma CMSHasche Sigle Houthoff Buruma GreenbergTraurig GreenbergTraurig No. of Single-Asset Deals Proportion of Single-Asset Deals No. of Portfolio Deals Proportion of Portfolio Deals Source: Preqin Source: Preqin 1 © 2018 Preqin Ltd. / www.preqin.com PRIVATE CAPITAL LAW FIRMS: REAL ESTATE Fig. 6: Prominent Law Firms* Involved in PERE Deals by Asset Location, 2017 - 2018 YTD (As at May 2018) North America Europe Asia & Rest of World Sklar Kirsh Clifford Chance Herbert Smith Freehills DLA Piper PwC Legal Clayton UTZ Jackson Walker Loyens & Loeff Arnold Bloch Leibler Stewart & Bonnet CMS Hasche Sigle HauckSchuchardt Goodwin Dentons PwC Legal King & Spalding Houthoff Buruma SMNG Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH Cole Schotz DLA Piper - Duval & Stachenfeld GSK Stockmann - Olshan Grundman Frome Rosenzweig & Wolosky Van Doorne - Simpson Thacher & Bartlett Greenberg Traurig - Nelson Mullins - - Source: Preqin Fig. 7: Prominent Law Firms* Involved in PERE Deals by Deal Size, 2017 - 2018 YTD (As at May 2018) Less than $50mn $50-99mn $100-249mn $250-500mn $500-999mn $1bn or More Simpson Thacher Houthoff Buruma PwC Legal Clifford Chance Cheuvreux Notaires Jones Day & Bartlett Van Doorne Dentons Dentons Clifford Chance DLA Piper Jones Day Freshfields Loyens & Loeff Loyens & Loeff PwC Legal Addleshaw Goddard Goodwin Bruckhaus Deringer Chiomenti Dentons Greenberg Traurig Loyens & Loeff Dentons PwC Legal Studio Legale DLA Piper Clifford Chance DLA Piper Lovells Greenberg Traurig Mayer Brown Sklar Kirsh White & Case Greenberg Traurig Norton Rose Fulbright Clifford Chance Clifford Chance Wargny Katz Wargny Katz NautaDutilh DLA Piper Allen & Overy Brown Rudnick et Associés et Associés CMS Cameron De Pardieu De Pardieu Norton Rose Fulbright NautaDutilh Deloitte McKenna Nabarro Brocas Maffei Brocas Maffei Olswang Freshfields Jackson Walker Houthoff Buruma Eversheds Sutherland Gide Loyrette Nouel Fidal Bruckhaus Deringer Stewart & Bonnet Lovells Linklaters FAIRWAY King & Spalding EY Legal - - - Fidal - White & Case - - - - - Lasaygues & Associés - - - - - Franklin Source: Preqin Fig. 8: Prominent Law Firms* Involved in PERE Deals by Asset Type, 2017 - 2018 YTD (As at May 2018) Office Residential Retail Industrial Mixed Use Hotel Land Simmons & Clifford Chance Dentons DLA Piper Van Doorne GSK Stockmann Noerr LLP Simmons Jung & Schleicher CMS Hasche Sigle Houthoff Buruma Houthoff Buruma PwC Legal Drees & Sommer Clifford Chance Rechtsanwalte Rotthege PwC Legal PwC Legal Clifford Chance Loyens & Loeff King & Spalding PwC Legal Wassermann Loyens & Loeff Goodwin PwC Legal EY Legal Dentons CMS Hasche Sigle Wagensonner Houthoff Buruma Loyens & Loeff DLA Piper Van Doorne DLA Piper Jones Day HEUSSEN Source: Preqin CONTACT US We hope that you find the data in this report useful and welcome any feedback you may have. If you would like to learn more about the methodology used or share data for our future reports, please contact [email protected] or get in touch with your account manager. *Unless otherwise noted, firms are included in tables based on number of known deals advised on within the given criteria. In the event of a tie, firms with the same number of known deals are ranked according to the deals’ aggregate value. If you would like to learn more about the methodology used or share data for our future reports, please contact [email protected]. 2 © 2018 Preqin Ltd. / www.preqin.com.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Asia-Pacific Investigations Review 2018
    THE INVESTIGATIONS REVIEW OF THE AMERICAS 2018 – A Global Investigations Review Special Report THE ASIA-PACIFIC INVESTIGATIONS REVIEW 2018 Published by Global Investigations Review in association with AlixPartners Kim & Chang Archer & Angel King & Wood Mallesons DLA Piper Linklaters FTI Consulting Nishimura & Asahi Herbert Smith Freehills Tilleke & Gibbins Hogan Lovells WongPartnership LLP GIR Globwww.globalinvestigationsreview.comal Investigati ons Review The law and practice of international investigations Global Investigations Review GIR The law and practice of iinnternternatiatioonalnal investigationsinvestigations The Asia-Pacific Investigations Review 2018 A Global Investigations Review Special Report The Asia-Pacific Investigations Review 2018 Senior co-publishing business development manager George Ingledew Senior co-publishing manager Edward Perugia [email protected] Tel: +1 202 831 4658 Head of production Adam Myers Editorial coordinator Iain Wilson Chief subeditor Jonathan Allen Senior production editor Simon Busby Senior subeditor Anna Andreoli Editor, Global Investigations Review David Vascott Editor in chief David Samuels Cover image credit: ismagilov/iStock/Thinkstock Subscription details To subscribe please contact: Tel: +44 20 3780 4242 Fax: +44 20 7229 6910 [email protected] No photocopying. CLA and other agency licensing systems do not apply. For an authorised copy contact Edward Perugia ([email protected]) The information provided in this publication is general and may not apply in a specific situation. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any legal action based on the information provided. This information is not intended to create, nor does receipt of it constitute, a lawyer–client relationship. The publishers and authors accept no responsibility for any acts or omissions contained herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Rankings 2015 2015
    GLOBAL M&A MARKET REVIEW LEGAL RANKINGS 2015 2015 GLOBAL M&A LEGAL ADVISORY RANKINGS The Bloomberg M&A Advisory League Tables are the definitive publication of M&A advisory rankings. The CONTENTS tables represent the top financial and legal advisors across a broad array of deal types, regions, and industry sectors. The rankings data is comprised of mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, spin-offs, debt-for-equity- 1. Introduction swaps, joint ventures, private placements of common equity and convertible securities, and the cash 2. Global M&A Year in Review injection component of recapitalization according to Bloomberg standards. 3. Global M&A Heat Map Bloomberg M&A delivers real-time coverage of the M&A market from nine countries around the world. We 4. Global M&A Regional Review provide a global perspective and local insight into unique deal structures in various markets through a 5. Global M&A League Tables network of over 800 financial and legal advisory firms, ensuring an accurate reflection of key market trends. 7. Americas M&A Regional Review Our quarterly league table rankings are a leading benchmark for legal and financial advisory performance, 8. Americas M&A League Tables and our Bloomberg Brief newsletter provides summary highlights of weekly M&A activity and top deal trends. 10. EMEA M&A Regional Review 11. EMEA M&A League Tables Visit {NI LEAG CRL <GO>} to download copies of the final release and a full range of market specific league 15. APAC M&A Regional Review table results. On the web, visit: http://www.bloomberg.com/professional/solutions/investment-banking/.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Report 2019
    LEGAL REPORT 2019 IN THIS SECTION 2 Global review 10 Americas 3 League tables 13 Asia Pacific 5 Project list 16 EMEA FEATURES CROSS-BORDER DEALS BOOST LAWYERS INTERNATIONAL LAW FIRMS FACE A MORE HOSTILE GLOBAL POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT BUT THE LARGE-SCALE CROSS-BORDER DEALS THEY THRIVE ON KEEP ON COMING. APPETITE FOR RENEWABLE AND EMERGING MARKET DEALS IS HEALTHY WHILE SOME DEVELOPED AREAS ARE SLOWING DOWN. The Refinitiv Project Finance International (PFI) In addition, there is a tendency for some firms annual survey of the legal industry shows that on both sides of the pond to build up teams in activity in the global projects market remains niche areas and to see how it works out. Some strong, with plenty of activity both in cross- might be successful, others not. border financings and the larger domestic deals. Our annual survey includes an editorial review The survey details all deals with a capital value of of the market with a wrap-up of all the movers more than US$500m transacted in the 12 months to and shakers in the NY projects market over the end-September each year in order to examine the previous year. market for major projects around the world. One of the most significant moves in NY was This year, there has been some movement at the top that of tax equity expert David Burton, who left of the table with Clifford Chance moving to the top, Mayer Brown for Norton Rose Fulbright’s New just ahead of Allen & Overy, a reversal from last year. York office.
    [Show full text]
  • The Charter – a Short History
    The Charter – a short history The Mindful Business Charter was born out of discussions between the in house legal team at Barclays and two of their panel law firms, Pinsent Masons and Addleshaw Goddard, along the following lines: The people working in their businesses are highly driven professionals; We do pressured, often complex, work which requires high levels of cognitive functioning; We thrive on that hard work and pressure; In amongst that pressure and hard work there is stress, some of which is unnecessary; When we are stressed we work less productively, and it is not good for our health; and If we could remove that unnecessary stress, we would enable people to work more effectively and efficiently, as well as be happier and healthier. They also recognised that the pressure and stress come from multiple sources, often because of unspoken expectations of what the other requires or demands. Too often lawyers will respond to requests for work from a client with an assumption that the client requires the work as quickly as possible, whatever the demands that may make on the individuals involved, and whatever the impact upon their wellbeing, their families and much else besides. The bigger and more important the client, the greater the risk of that happening. The development of IT has contributed to this. As our connectivity has increased, there has been an inexorable drift towards an assumption that simply because we can be contactable and on demand and working 24/7, wherever we may be, that we should be. No-one stopped to think about this, to challenge it, to ask if it was what we wanted, or what we should do, or needed to do or if it was a good idea, we just went with the drift, perhaps fearful of speaking out, perhaps fearful that if we took a stand, the client would find another law firm down the road who was prepared to do whatever was required.
    [Show full text]
  • RISK MANAGEMENT and PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY Legal Business May 2014 November 2010 Legal Business 3 RISK MANAGEMENT and PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY
    RISK MANAGEMENT AND PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY Legal Business May 2014 November 2010 Legal Business 3 RISK MANAGEMENT AND PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY 50 Legal Business May 2014 Photographs DANIEL THISTLETHWAITE LEGAL BUSINESS AND MARSH UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES Our annual Legal Business/Marsh risk round table saw law firm risk specialists share their views on the effect that greater scrutiny on financial stability is having on the market MARK McATEER he ghosts of Halliwells, Dewey & placed on firms by insurers and the SRA thing, while the laws applicable to LLPs LeBoeuf and Cobbetts still loom over financial stability? say quite another. large. Our 2014 risk management Sandra Neilson-Moore, Marsh: All of our report, published in March, showed client firms are being asked questions by Nicole Bigby, Berwin Leighton Paisner: A that a significant number of the UK’s the regulator around financial stability, lot of it is to be seen to be regulating what the Ttop 100 law firms have received more than one borrowings and partner compensation. The SRA feels is a public interest issue. If there visit from the Solicitors Regulation Authority SRA is, of course, trying to accomplish two was another significant collapse, it would (SRA) in the last couple of years and financial key things: one, to preserve the reputation of be criticised for not having asked these stability has rapidly moved to the top of its the profession and two, to secure protection questions, or not, at least, demonstrating agenda. In June 2013, the regulator announced for clients. In my view however, (and that it was taking an active interest, so that 160 firms across England and Wales were notwithstanding its best intentions) the there is a measure of self-interest and self- under intensive supervision due to the state of SRA will probably be no more able to spot a protection about it.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Firm Climate Change Scorecard 2 Table of Contents
    OCTOBER 2020 Updated March 16, 2021 THE 2020 LAW FIRM CLIMATE CHANGE SCORECARD CLIMATE SCORES FOR VAULT 100 LAW FIRMS 1 CLIMATE SCORE FIRMS Cozen O’Connor Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton A Schulte Roth & Zabel Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Arent Fox Irell & Manella Cooley Littler Mendelson Davis Wright Tremaine Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky, & Popeo Drinker Biddle & Reath Pepper Hamilton B Fenwick & West Seyfarth Shaw Fish & Richardson WilmerHale Goodwin Procter Winston & Strawn Ballard Spahr Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton Boies Schiller Flexner Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner McDermott Will & Emery Debevoise & Plimpton Nixon Peabody Duane Morris Proskauer Rose C Foley Hoag Quinn Emmanuel Urquhart & Sullivan Fox Rothschild Williams & Connolly Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson Willkie Farr & Gallagher Jenner & Block Alston & Bird Katten Muchin Rosenman Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel, & Frederick Blank Rome Locke Lord Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft Mayer Brown Cahill Gordon & Rendell Morgan, Lewis & Bockius Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton Morrison & Foerster Covington & Burling Norton Rose Fulbright Crowell & Moring O’Melveny & Myers Davis Polk & Wardwell Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe Dechert Paul Hastings Dentons Perkins Coie D DLA Piper Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Foley & Lardner Reed Smith Greenberg Traurig Ropes & Gray Haynes and Boone Steptoe & Johnson Holland & Knight Susman Godfrey Hughes Hubbard & Reed Troutman Sanders Jones Day Venable K & L Gates Wachtell,
    [Show full text]
  • The City Consortium Solicitor Training Programme
    The City Consortium Solicitor Training Programme What is the City Consortium? We are a group of six leading, global law firms: Why train with the City Consortium? • Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer • Linklaters On the City Consortium Solicitor • Herbert Smith Freehills • Norton Rose Fulbright Training Programme you will: • Hogan Lovells • Slaughter and May • study an advanced and extensive integrated legal and skills curriculum alongside your peers What is the City Consortium Solicitor Training Programme? • receive exclusive invitations to guest lectures, by leading City The route to solicitor qualification is changing. Consortium practitioners, on This has given us the unique opportunity to partner with current transactions, disputes and BPP University Law School to create the market-leading City market trends Consortium Solicitor Training Programme. This programme will: • enjoy live transaction-based • provide you with the optimum preparation to pass the new workshops, led by experienced SQE assessments lawyers from City practice • equip you with the knowledge, technical and interpersonal skills • go beyond the law to develop your you will need for your career in one of our firms knowledge of business strategy, finance and legal technology, You will be supported throughout by BPP’s expert tutors and their and your project and people state-of-the-art EdTech, including: management skills • a personalised adaptive learning platform • learn about the mindset, self- • simulated SQE assessment practice with 1,000s of multiple awareness and resilience required choice questions to sustain a long and successful career in the law • a virtual law firm to enhance your digital, commercial and legal skills Your success is our success.
    [Show full text]
  • Cms Convention on Migratory Species
    CMS Distr. GENERAL CONVENTION ON MIGRATORY UNEP/CMS/Resolution 9.8 SPECIES ORIGINAL: ENGLISH RESPONDING TO THE CHALLENGE OF EMERGING AND RE-EMERGING DISEASES IN MIGRATORY SPECIES, INCLUDING HIGHLY PATHOGENIC AVIAN INFLUENZA H5N1 Adopted by the Conference of the Parties at its Ninth Meeting (Rome, 1-5 December 2008) Aware that diseases of wildlife are a normal cause of mortality and morbidity, and conscious that emerging or re-emerging diseases of wildlife can have serious implications for the status of migratory and non-migratory species, especially when populations are small and fragmented; Noting that the increased frequency of such diseases has been linked to processes of landscape fragmentation, unsustainable land-use choices, pollution and other types of ecosystem disruption, these being, in turn, the consequences of unsustainable pressure on resources as highlighted by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment; and further noting that climate change is expected to result in changes in disease distribution and emergence due to altered physiological conditions for hosts and parasites, resulting in the spread of novel micro-organisms with unpredictable consequences or the re-emergence of pathogens in new geographic locations; Noting also that domestic animals, wild animals and humans share many pathogens, with wildlife sometimes being natural reservoirs of pathogens that can cause disease in domestic livestock, and that such pathogens have the potential significantly to affect both public health, food production, livelihoods and wider economies;
    [Show full text]
  • Competing Against the Best in the US
    Law firm management Competing against the best in the US With consistent tier 1 status in The Legal 500 rankings within the areas of finance, REITs, and tax in the US guide, and banking, M&A, and projects in the Latin America guide, Helen Donegan, US editor (content) at The Legal 500, recently sat down with Evan Cohen to take a closer look at the strategy behind the growing success of Clifford Chance’s US team hen you're asked to lead a region identified as the top strategic priority for one of the world's largest globally integrated firms, you are faced with two distinct but intertwined challenges: supporting your firm's global ambitions while also developing a domestic strategy thatW addresses the challenges unique to your local market. It's no easy task. But Evan Cohen – who was elected Clifford Chance's managing partner for the Americas in 2013 – has likely exceeded the firm's expectations based on the increasingly impressive results his US team has produced in recent years. 6 fivehundred February 2020 February 2020 fivehundred 7 Law firm management “In my view, we’re not a Magic Circle firm in the US; we're a strong US firm comprised of US lawyers competing against US firms for domestic work” Initially, not many in the market support of the global management global firm had already established speak Spanish. There was one senior took notice. But that's beginning to committee. They have left us to get tier 1 status in other legal markets associate in our Washington, DC office change.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Registration List: Alpha by Last Name
    FINAL REGISTRATION LIST: ALPHA BY LAST NAME 32ND ANNUAL Challenges and Opportunities in International Franchising 1 Mark Abell Maury Baskin David Bond Partner Shareholder Partner Bird & Bird LLP Littler Mendelson Fieldfisher LLP 15 Fetter Lane 1150 17th Street, Suite 900 Riverbank House London, EC4A 1JP Washington, DC 20036 2 Swan Lane United Kingdom Phone: (202) 842-3400 London, EC4R 3TT Phone: +44 (20) 7415-6000 United Kingdom Luciana Bassani Phone: +44 (20) 7861-4000 Cristina Ruiz de Aeda Dannemann Siemsen Bigler & Ipanema Jausas Moreira Silvia Bortolotti Passeig de Gracia 103, #7 Rua Marques de Olinda, 70 Partner Barcelona, 08008 Rio De Janeiro, 22251-040 Buffa Bortolotti & Mathis Spain Brazil Via Alfieri, 19 Phone: 34 (934) 150088 Phone: 55 (21) 5531811 Torino, 10121 Italy Walter Aguirre Jen Beck Phone: +39 (0) 115741111 Managing Partner VP & Assistant General Counsel Aguirre Abogado & Asesores S.A.C. International Dairy Queen Michael Brennan CAlle Boulevard 162, Of. 1204, El Polo 7505 Metro Boulevard Partner Lima, Minneapolis, MN 55439-0286 DLA Piper LLP (US) Peru Phone: (952) 830-0200 203 North LaSalle Street, #1900 Phone: (511) 717-6900 Chicago, IL 60601-1210 Rocio Belda De Mergelina Phone: (312) 368-4048 Kay Ainsley, CFE Partner Managing Director J&A Garrigues, SLP Jeffrey Brimer, CFE MSA Worldwide Hermosilla 3 COO 2163 Ector Place Madrid, 28001 Alexius, LLC Kennesaw, GA 30152 Spain 1509 York Street Phone: (770) 794-0746 Phone: 34 (915) 145200 Suite 300 Denver, CO 80206 Gustavo Alcocer Sheryl Bennett Phone: (720) 465-5001 Partner, Corporate & Commercial Law Group Attorney-Advisor Chair U.S. Department of Commerce Grayson Brown Olivares & CIA, S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Just and Accountable Development
    Just and Accountable Development 2014 Annual Report & 2015 Review 38 COUNTRIES ISLP at Work 3 170 PROJECTS Letter from the Co-Presidents 4 Letter from the Executive Director 5 Natural Resources 6 Vulnerable Communities 6 Case Study: Kenya’s Kerio Valley 7 Investment, Trade & Tax 8 Economic & Social Development 8 Case Study: Liberia Boosts Small Businesses 9 Strengthening Media Freedoms 10 Supporting Civil Society 11 Law Firms and Barristers’ 57 Chambers Partnerships 12 LAW FIRMS Awards & Publications 12 Volunteers 13 10 LANGUAGES Donors 14 Financial Statements 14 Board of Directors and Staff 15 22,000 Law Firm Donors 16 PRO BONO HOURS 2 A GLOBAL IMPACT ISLP at Work ISLP’s mission is to foster just and accountable development which is sustainable, supportive of human rights, and strengthens the rule of law, by mobilizing our unique network of highly skilled and experienced pro bono lawyers to advise civil society and governments. NATURAL VULNERABLE CIVIL SOCIETY 25 RESOURCES COMMUNITIES SPACE COUNTRIES WITH ONSITE MISSIONS ECONOMIC ANTI- INVESTMENT, & SOCIAL CORRUPTION TRADE & TAX $9.5m DEVELOPMENT IN DONATED SERVICES 3 LETTERS Letter from the “ We cannot thank enough those of our many friends for generously Letter from the providing the financial, service, and moral support to permit us to Co-Presidents realize our dream.” Co-Presidents Dear Friends, would have worked in some 60 countries in sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, Asia, Latin America, and Eastern Europe; and that we would have a widely–recognized record As the 2014 Annual Report goes to press, ISLP has completed a comprehensive strategic of significant accomplishment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Guide to Challenging and Enforcing Arbitration Awards
    Global Arbitration Review The Guide to Challenging and Enforcing Arbitration Awards General Editor J William Rowley QC Editors Emmanuel Gaillard, Gordon E Kaiser and Benjamin Siino Second Edition © Law Business Research 2021 The Guide to Challenging and Enforcing Arbitration Awards Second Edition General Editor J William Rowley QC Editors Emmanuel Gaillard, Gordon E Kaiser and Benjamin Siino Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd This article was first published in May 2021 For further information please contact [email protected] gar © Law Business Research 2021 Publisher David Samuels Account Managers Marta Jurkowska and Samuel Romp Editorial Coordinator Georgia Goldberg Production Operations Director Adam Myers Head of Content Production Simon Busby Copy-editor Caroline Fewkes Proofreaders Felicia Rosas and Martin Roach Published in the United Kingdom by Law Business Research Ltd, London Meridian House, 34-35 Farringdon Street, London, EC4A 4HL, UK © 2021 Law Business Research Ltd www.globalarbitrationreview.com No photocopying: copyright licences do not apply. The information provided in this publication is general and may not apply in a specific situation, nor does it necessarily represent the views of authors’ firms or their clients. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any legal action based on the information provided. The publishers accept no responsibility for any acts or omissions contained herein. Although the information provided was accurate as at April 2021, be advised that this
    [Show full text]