DOCSLIB.ORG

Africans' Perceptions About China: a Sneak Peek from 18 Countries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Africans' Perceptions About China: a Sneak Peek from 18 Countries WWW.AFROBAROMETER.ORG Africans’ perceptions about China: A sneak peek from 18 countries Edem Selormey (PhD) Director of Capacity Building Afrobarometer 3 September 2020 Background • Africa’s engagement with China has been growing over the past decades and has extended to a large array of sectors. • At the 2018 China-Africa Cooperation Forum, China announced it would be providing $60 billion in financial support to Africa. • Perceptions of African citizens on their governments’ engagement with China have been the subject of scrutiny and debate among analysts. • China’s growing role in Africa has drawn criticism. This has included claims that: ➢ China is in Africa only to access natural resources. ➢ It wants to buy up Africa’s land. ➢ It mainly employs Chinese rather than local labor. ➢ Chinese companies provide sub-standard services and products, under-sell and weaken local competitors. • China has also been severely criticized for its willingness to work with autocratic or less-than-transparent regimes. What is Afrobarometer? • Afrobarometer is a pan-African, non-partisan survey research network that provides reliable data on Africans’ experiences and evaluations of democracy, governance, and quality of life. • Started in 12 African countries in 1999. Round 8 surveys in 2019/2020 are planned in at least 35 countries. • Goal: To give the public a voice in policymaking by providing high-quality public opinion data to policymakers, policy advocates, civil society organizations, academics, news media, donors and investors, and ordinary Africans. • All AB data and analysis are available free of charge to anyone who wants to use them. Methodology • Nationally representative sample of adult citizens o All respondents are randomly selected. o Sample is distributed across [regions/states/provinces] and urban/rural areas in proportion to their share in the national population. o Every adult citizen has an equal chance of being selected. • Face-to-face interviews In the language of the respondent’s choice. • Standard questionnaire allows comparisons across countries and over time. • Sample sizes of 1,200 or 2,400 adult citizens yield margins of sampling error of +/-2 to 3 percentage points at a 95% confidence level. “Afrobarometer … is the gold standard for independent opinion polls in Africa.” – Linda Thomas-Greenfield, former U.S. Asst. Sec. of State for African Affairs Where Afrobarometer works Recap of Afrobarometer 2014/2015 findings Latest Round 8 (2019/2020) findings: Sneak peek from 18 countries Best model for development | 18 countries | 2019/2020 United States 32% China 23% Former colonial power 11% South Africa 11% Other countries 6% None 2% We should follow our own country's model 7% 0% 20% 40% 60% Respondents were asked: In your opinion, which of the following countries, if any, would be the best model for the future development of our country, or is there some other country in Africa or elsewhere that should be our model? Best model for development: China vs. USA (%) | 18 countries | 2019/2020 60 55 China 46 U.S. 43 41 43 39 40 38 36 36 37 34 35 32 32 30 28 28 28 25 25 24 23 23 21 21 23 21 20 20 1919 20 18 17 15 14 13 11 10 0 Mali Kenya Tunisia Nigeria Ghana Gabon Malawi Angola Guinea Lesotho Ethiopia Uganda Namibia average Botswana 18-country Sierra Leone Sierra Burkina Faso Cabo Verde Cabo Côte d'Ivoire Respondents were asked: In your opinion, which of the following countries, if any, would be the best model for the future development of our country, or is there some other country in Africa or elsewhere that should be our model? China as best model for development | 16 countries | 2014-2020 2014/2015 2019/2020 Burkina Faso 20% 39% Mali 36% 38% Côte d'Ivoire 26% 28% Nigeria 25% 28% Botswana 24% 25% Guinea 22% 25% Gabon 29% 24% 16-country average 22% 23% Kenya 24% 23% Uganda 19% 23% Lesotho 18% 20% Malawi 17% 20% Tunisia 24% 19% Ghana 15% 18% Cabo Verde 21% 14% Sierra Leone 18% 13% Namibia 22% 11% Respondents were asked: In your opinion, which of the following countries, if any, would be the best model for the future development of our country, or is there some other country in Africa or elsewhere that should be our model? External influencers Rating external influencers | 18 countries | 2019/2020 China 59% 15% United States 58% 13% Regional superpower 49% 17% Former colonial power 46% 24% Russia 38% 16% Regional organization 55% 11% United Nations agencies 54% 11% African Union 50% 13% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Somewhat positive/Very positive Somewhat negative/Very negative Respondents were asked: In general, do you think that the economic and political influence of each of the following organizations/countries on [your country] is mostly positive, mostly negative, or haven’t you heard enough to say? 85% Cabo Verde 79% 80% Guinea 76% Perceived positive 80% Mali 92% 80% influence of China Burkina Faso 78% 70% | 18 countries Côte d'Ivoire 77% 65% | 2014-2020 Kenya 76% 62% Nigeria 67% 18-country average 59% 57% Botswana 74% 2019/2020 Respondents were asked: Do you Ethiopia 57% think that the economic and 56% political influence of each of the Gabon 78% 2014/2015 following countries on [your 60% 16-country average 65% country] is mostly positive, mostly 55% negative, or haven’t you heard Lesotho 48% enough to say: China? 53% Uganda 58% (% who say “somewhat positive” Malawi 50% or “very positive”) 50% 48% Namibia 66% 47% Ghana 34% Angola 43% 41% Sierra Leone 55% 29% Tunisia 42% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 78% Cabo Verde 78% 72% Influence of China Gabon 87% 72% Kenya 75% | 18 countries 70% Mali 91% 64% | 2014-2020 Guinea 72% 61% Tunisia 74% 61% Namibia 76% 60% Burkina Faso 77% 56% 16-country average 71% Respondents were asked: How 2019/2020 55% much influence do you think 18-country average 54% China’s economic activities in Nigeria 67% 2014/2015 [our country] have on our 53% economy, or haven’t you Côte d'Ivoire 70% 52% heard enough to say? Botswana 76% (% who say “a lot” or “some”) 52% Ghana 61% Angola 51% 50% Lesotho 61% Ethiopia 45% 43% Uganda 57% 36% Malawi 59% 19% Sierra Leone 58% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Development assistance Heard of Chinese loans/development assistance | 18 countries | 2019/2020 100% 80% 74% 67% 58% 60% 57% 57% 53% 52% 52% 50% 50% 48% 46% 45% 41% 40% 39% 40% 29% 28% 24% 20% 0% Mali Kenya Tunisia Nigeria Ghana Gabon Malawi Angola Guinea Lesotho Ethiopia Uganda Namibia Botswana Sierra Leone Burkina Faso Cabo Verde Côte d'Ivoire 18 country average Respondents were asked: To your knowledge, does China give loans or development assistance to our country’s government, or haven’t you had a chance to hear about this? 92% Kenya 87% 91% Guinea 63% Views on loans/development 87% Ghana 68% 87% assistance from China Uganda 64% 84% | 18 countries Mali 44% 83% | 2019/2020 Nigeria 57% 82% Gabon 58% 81% Angola 75% 79% Côte d'Ivoire 48% Namibia 79% Respondents who said they are 78% 78% aware of Chinese loans or Ethiopia 60% development assistance, were 77% Burkina Faso 38% asked: 18-country average 77% - Do you think that our 58% 72% government is required to repay Malawi 56% China for the loans and Cabo Verde 66% development assistance it 56% 63% provides to [our country]? Sierra Leone 30% 60% - Do you think our government Tunisia 41% has borrowed too much money Botswana 57% from China? 31% 37% Lesotho 47% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Government is required to repay China for loans Government borrowed too much money from China Gabon 39% 34% China conditionality on Burkina Faso 36% 29% Sierra Leone 32% 51% loans/assistance Lesotho 32% 27% compared to other Côte d'Ivoire 32% 27% countries Guinea 26% 41% 18 country average 24% 41% | 18 countries Nigeria 24% 36% | 2019/2020 Ghana 24% 42% Tunisia 23% 33% Respondents who said they are aware of Chinese loans or Uganda 21% 36% development assistance, were Namibia 21% 43% asked: When the government of Ethiopia 20% 60% China gives loans or development assistance to [our Kenya 17% 68% country], do you think they put Malawi 15% 31% more requirements or fewer requirements on our government Angola 14% 29% compared to other donor Botswana 13% 54% countries, or haven’t you heard Cabo Verde 10% 70% enough to say? Mali 6% 21% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Somewhat/many more requirements Somewhat/far fewer requirements International language for children to learn Best international language for children to learn | 18 countries | 2019/2020 1% 9% 2% English 4% French Arabic 14% Chinese Other Don't know 71% Respondents were asked: In thinking about the future of the next generation in our country, which of these international languages, if any, do you think is most important for young people to learn? WWW.AFROBAROMETER.ORG Thank you Follow our releases on #VoicesAfrica on Twitter and Facebook. Do your own analysis of Afrobarometer data – on any question, for any country and survey round. It’s easy and free at www.afrobarometer.org/online-data-analysis..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lack of Safe Water, Sanitation Spurs Growing Dissatisfaction with Government Performance
    Afrobarometer Round 6 New data from 36 African countries Dispatch No. 76 | 22 March 2016 Lack of safe water, sanitation spurs growing dissatisfaction with government performance Afrobarometer Dispatch No. 76 | Corah Walker Summary If water is fundamental to life and human dignity, no issue is more pressing for 663 million people for whom access is still lacking (United Nations, 2015). As World Water Day (March 22) reminds us, safe and readily available water is a human right and an important contributor to public health, whether it is used for drinking, washing, food production, or recreational purposes. Contaminated water and inadequate sanitation help transmit diseases such as diarrhea, cholera, dysentery, and typhoid; diarrheal deaths due to unclean drinking water are estimated at 502,000 each year, most of them of young children (World Health Organization, 2015). Improved access to safe water and sanitation boosts economic growth, contributes to poverty reduction, and is highly relevant to achieving all of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), from health and education to food security and environmental sustainability (World Bank, 2014). Substantial progress was made under the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) initiative; worldwide, the target of reducing by half the proportion of the population without sustainable access to safe drinking water was met in 2010. But in sub-Saharan Africa, most countries fell short, and achieving the new SDG No. 6 – ensuring access to water and sanitation for all by 2030 – will require intensive and sustained action. In observance of World Water Day, new findings from Afrobarometer’s Round 6 surveys in 36 African countries give voice to citizens who call on their governments to address inadequate water supply and sanitation as a top priority.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper No. 130 RESOURCES: LAND, CHIEFS and COALITION-BUILDING in AFRICA by Kate Baldwin
    Working Paper No. 130 WHEN POLITICIANS CEDE CONTROL OF RESOURCES: LAND, CHIEFS AND COALITION-BUILDING IN AFRICA by Kate Baldwin AFROBAROMETER WORKING PAPERS Working Paper No. 130 WHEN POLITICIANS CEDE CONTROL OF RESOURCES: LAND, CHIEFS AND COALITION- BUILDING IN AFRICA by Kate Baldwin April 2011 Kate Baldwin is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Florida and Visiting Scholar, Center for the Study of Democratic Politics, Princeton University. Mailing address: 308A Robertson Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544. Telephone: 917-375-7614. Fax: 609-258-5014. E-mail: [email protected] . Copyright Afrobarometer i AFROBAROMETER WORKING PAPERS Editor Michael Bratton Editorial Board E. Gyimah-Boadi Carolyn Logan Robert Mattes Leonard Wantchekon Afrobarometer publications report the results of national sample surveys on the attitudes of citizens in selected African countries towards democracy, markets, civil society, and other aspects of development. The Afrobarometer is a collaborative enterprise of the Centre for Democratic Development (CDD, Ghana), the Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA), and the Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP) with support from Michigan State University (MSU) and the University of Cape Town, Center of Social Science Research (UCT/CSSR). Afrobarometer papers are simultaneously co-published by these partner institutions and the Globalbarometer. Working Papers and Briefings Papers can be downloaded in Adobe Acrobat format from www.afrobarometer.org . Idasa co-published with: Copyright Afrobarometer ii When Politicians Cede Control of Resources: Land, Chiefs and Coalition-Building in Africa Abstract 1 Why would politicians give up power over the allocation of critical resources to community leaders? This article examines why many African governments have ceded power over the allocation of land to non-elected traditional leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Socialization, Public Opinion, and Polling
    Political Socialization, Public Opinion, and Polling asic Tenants of American olitical Culture iberty/Freedom People should be free to live their lives with minimal governmental interference quality Political, legal, & of opportunity, but not economic equality ndividualism Responsibility for own decisions emocracy Consent of the governed Majority rule, with minority rights Citizen responsibilities (voting, jury duty, etc.) olitical Culture vs. Ideology Most Americans share common beliefs in he democratic foundation of government culture) yet have differing opinions on the proper role & scope of government ideology) olitical Socialization Process through which an individual acquires particular political orientations, beliefs, and values at factors influence political opinion mation? Family #1 source for political identification Between 60-70% of all children agree with their parents upon reaching adulthood. If one switches his/her party affiliation it usually goes from Republican/Democrat to independent hat factors influence political opinion mation? School/level of education “Building good citizens”- civic education reinforces views about participation Pledge of Allegiance Volunteering Civic pride is nation wide Informed student-citizens are more likely to participate/vote as adults Voting patterns based on level of educational attainment hat factors influence political opinion rmation? Peer group/occupation Increases in importance during teen years Occupational influences hat factors influence political opinion mation? Mass media Impact
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights of Round 6 Survey Findings from 36 African Countries
    Highlights of Round 6 survey findings from 36 African countries Afrobarometer Round 6 New data from across Africa Table of contents Priority problems and investments ........................................................................................ 2 Infrastructure............................................................................................................................. 3 Lived poverty............................................................................................................................ 4 Tolerance .................................................................................................................................. 5 Electrification ............................................................................................................................ 6 Water and sanitation ............................................................................................................... 7 Health care ............................................................................................................................... 8 Media freedom ........................................................................................................................ 9 Regional integration .............................................................................................................. 10 Youth engagement ............................................................................................................... 11 Trustworthy institutions ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Human Subjects Protection Issues Related to Large Sample Surveys
    Summary of Human Subjects Protection Issues Related to Large Sample Surveys U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics Joan E. Sieber June 2001, NCJ 187692 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs John Ashcroft Attorney General Bureau of Justice Statistics Lawrence A. Greenfeld Acting Director Report of work performed under a BJS purchase order to Joan E. Sieber, Department of Psychology, California State University at Hayward, Hayward, California 94542, (510) 538-5424, e-mail [email protected]. The author acknowledges the assistance of Caroline Wolf Harlow, BJS Statistician and project monitor. Ellen Goldberg edited the document. Contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Bureau of Justice Statistics or the Department of Justice. This report and others from the Bureau of Justice Statistics are available through the Internet — http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2 Limitations of the Common Rule with respect to survey research 2 2. Risks and benefits of participation in sample surveys 5 Standard risk issues, researcher responses, and IRB requirements 5 Long-term consequences 6 Background issues 6 3. Procedures to protect privacy and maintain confidentiality 9 Standard issues and problems 9 Confidentiality assurances and their consequences 21 Emerging issues of privacy and confidentiality 22 4. Other procedures for minimizing risks and promoting benefits 23 Identifying and minimizing risks 23 Identifying and maximizing possible benefits 26 5. Procedures for responding to requests for help or assistance 28 Standard procedures 28 Background considerations 28 A specific recommendation: An experiment within the survey 32 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evidence from World Values Survey Data
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive The return of religious Antisemitism? The evidence from World Values Survey data Tausch, Arno Innsbruck University and Corvinus University 17 November 2018 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/90093/ MPRA Paper No. 90093, posted 18 Nov 2018 03:28 UTC The return of religious Antisemitism? The evidence from World Values Survey data Arno Tausch Abstract 1) Background: This paper addresses the return of religious Antisemitism by a multivariate analysis of global opinion data from 28 countries. 2) Methods: For the lack of any available alternative we used the World Values Survey (WVS) Antisemitism study item: rejection of Jewish neighbors. It is closely correlated with the recent ADL-100 Index of Antisemitism for more than 100 countries. To test the combined effects of religion and background variables like gender, age, education, income and life satisfaction on Antisemitism, we applied the full range of multivariate analysis including promax factor analysis and multiple OLS regression. 3) Results: Although religion as such still seems to be connected with the phenomenon of Antisemitism, intervening variables such as restrictive attitudes on gender and the religion-state relationship play an important role. Western Evangelical and Oriental Christianity, Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism are performing badly on this account, and there is also a clear global North-South divide for these phenomena. 4) Conclusions: Challenging patriarchic gender ideologies and fundamentalist conceptions of the relationship between religion and state, which are important drivers of Antisemitism, will be an important task in the future. Multiculturalism must be aware of prejudice, patriarchy and religious fundamentalism in the global South.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights of Round 6 Survey Findings from 36 African Countries
    Highlights of Round 6 survey findings from 36 African countries Afrobarometer Round 6 New data from across Africa Table of contents Priority problems and investments ........................................................................................ 2 Infrastructure ....................................................................................................................... 3 Lived poverty ...................................................................................................................... 4 Tolerance............................................................................................................................. 5 Electrification....................................................................................................................... 6 Water and sanitation .......................................................................................................... 7 Health care ......................................................................................................................... 8 Media freedom ................................................................................................................... 9 Regional integration ......................................................................................................... 10 Youth engagement .......................................................................................................... 11 Trustworthy institutions .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Where to Start? Aligning Sustainable Development Goals with Citizen Priorities
    Afrobarometer Round 6 New data from across Africa Dispatch No. 67 | 17 December 2015 Where to start? Aligning Sustainable Development Goals with citizen priorities Afrobarometer Dispatch No. 67 | Thomas Bentley, Markus Olapade, Pauline Wambua, and Nora Charron Summary On 1 January 2016, the United Nations’ new development agenda will take effect. Titled “Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” it extends and supplements the 2015 Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) aimed at addressing social, economic, and environmental challenges facing citizens around the globe. The SDGs set high targets on a very broad range of issues: ending poverty, achieving food security, ensuring healthy lives, high-quality education, gender equality, sustainable water management, and affordable and reliable energy, among others – 17 goals in all, supported by 169 targets (UN, 2015). Where to start? What to prioritize, amidst so many needs and ambitions? The UN notes that implementation will require “the participation of all countries, all stakeholders and all people,” taking into account “different national realities, capacities, and levels of development and respecting national policies and priorities” (UN, 2015, pp. 2-3). One place to start in identifying priorities is to ask the people. For governments and civil- society activists, country-level data on popular priorities (publicly available for analysis at www.afrobarometer.org/online-data-analysis) can help guide agenda-setting and investment decisions to address the most important sustainable development challenges. In its sixth round of surveys (2014/2015), Afrobarometer asked citizens in 36 countries, who together represent more than three-fourths of the continent’s population, what they consider the most important problems that their governments should address and what their priorities are for investing their country’s resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Indicators for Support for Economic Integration in Latin America
    Pepperdine Policy Review Volume 11 Article 9 5-10-2019 Indicators for Support for Economic Integration in Latin America Will Humphrey Pepperdine University, School of Public Policy, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/ppr Recommended Citation Humphrey, Will (2019) "Indicators for Support for Economic Integration in Latin America," Pepperdine Policy Review: Vol. 11 , Article 9. Available at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/ppr/vol11/iss1/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Public Policy at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pepperdine Policy Review by an authorized editor of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Indicators for Support for Economic Integration in Latin America By: Will Humphrey Abstract Regionalism is a common phenomenon among many countries who share similar infrastructures, economic climates, and developmental challenges. Latin America is no different and has experienced the urge to economically integrate since World War II. Research literature suggests that public opinion for economic integration can be a motivating factor in a country’s proclivity to integrate with others in its geographic region. People may support integration based on their perception of other countries’ models or based on how much they feel their voice has political value. They may also fear it because they do not trust outsiders and the mixing of societies that regionalism often entails. Using an ordered probit model and data from the 2018 Latinobarómetro public opinion survey, I find that the desire for a more alike society, opinion on the European Union, and the nature of democracy explain public support for economic integration.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Results Afrobarometer Round 7 Survey in the Gambia, 2018 Compiled By: Centre for Policy, Research and Strategic Studi
    Summary of Results Afrobarometer Round 7 Survey in the Gambia, 2018 Compiled by: Centre for Policy, Research and Strategic Studies (CEPRASS) Afrobarometer Round 7 Summary of Results for the Gambia, 2018 Afrobarometer is a pan-African, non-partisan research network that conducts public attitude surveys on democracy, governance, economic conditions, and related issues in countries across Africa. Six rounds of surveys were conducted between 1999 and 2015, and Round 7 surveys were carried out in 2016-2018. Afrobarometer conducts face-to-face interviews in the language of the respondent’s choice with nationally representative samples of 1,200 or 2,400 respondents. Afrobarometer is produced collaboratively by social scientists from across Africa. Coordination is provided by the Center for Democratic Development (CDD) in Ghana, the Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) in South Africa, the Institute for Development Studies (IDS) at the University of Nairobi in Kenya, and the Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP) in Benin. Michigan State University (MSU) and the University of Cape Town (UCT) provide technical support to the network. The Afrobarometer National Partner in the Gambia, the Center for Policy, Research and Strategic Studies, interviewed a nationally representative, random, stratified probability sample of 1,200 adult Gambians from 23 July-12 August 2018. A sample of this size yields country-level results with a margin of error of +/-3 percentage points at a 95% confidence level. The Ghana Center for Democratic Development provided technical backstopping for the survey. Technical details of the survey, including descriptions of stratification and household selection, translation languages, and related information, can be found in the survey Technical Information Form that follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion Survey: Residents of Armenia
    Public Opinion Survey: Residents of Armenia February 2021 Detailed Methodology • The survey was conducted on behalf of “International Republican Institute’s” Center for Insights in Survey Research by Breavis (represented by IPSC LLC). • Data was collected throughout Armenia between February 8 and February 16, 2021, through phone interviews, with respondents selected by random digit dialing (RDD) probability sampling of mobile phone numbers. • The sample consisted of 1,510 permanent residents of Armenia aged 18 and older. It is representative of the population with access to a mobile phone, which excludes approximately 1.2 percent of adults. • Sampling frame: Statistical Committee of the Republic of Armenia. Weighting: Data weighted for 11 regional groups, age, gender and community type. • The margin of error does not exceed plus or minus 2.5 points for the full sample. • The response rate was 26 percent which is similar to the surveys conducted in August-September 2020. • Charts and graphs may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding. • The survey was funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development. 2 Weighted (Disaggregated) Bases Disaggregate Disaggregation Category Base Share 18-35 years old n=563 37% Age groups 36-55 years old n=505 34% 56+ years old n=442 29% Male n=689 46% Gender Female n=821 54% Yerevan n=559 37% Community type Urban n=413 27% Rural n=538 36% Primary or secondary n=537 36% Education Vocational n=307 20% Higher n=665 44% Single n=293 19% Marital status Married n=1,059 70% Widowed or divorced n=155 10% Up
    [Show full text]
  • South Africans Increasingly Dissatisfied with Their Elected Leaders' Performance
    Dispatch No. 65 | 24 November 2015 South Africans increasingly dissatisfied with their elected leaders’ performance Afrobarometer Dispatch No. 65 | Rorisang Lekalake Summary 2015 has been a tumultuous year for South Africa’s democracy. A number of key government officials have been embroiled in corruption scandals, most notably the alleged mismanagement of state funds in the construction of President Jacob Zuma’s private residence in Nkandla, KwaZulu-Natal. An investigation led by the Public Protector found that state funds were employed for non-security installations and determined that the president should repay “a reasonable percentage” of these costs (Public Protector of South Africa, 2014). While civic groups called for greater government accountability, opposition demands for President Zuma to account to the National Assembly and reimburse the state led to numerous clashes, and parliamentary security had to be called during last February’s State of the Nation address. While the corruption scandal awaits resolution in the courts – and the headlines – student protests have succeeded in forcing the government, already plagued by mediocre news on the economic and unemployment fronts, to accept a freeze on higher education tuition for 2016. Data from the 2015 Afrobarometer survey suggest that elected leaders may not escape unscathed by the year’s events. Public approval of the performance of the president, members of Parliament (MPs), and local government councillors has declined. The president’s approval rating is at its lowest level since 2000, well below the regional average for presidents. Unsurprisingly, public approval is generally higher in rural areas and among black South Africans, the ANC’s traditional electorate.
    [Show full text]