DOCSLIB.ORG

SCSL Press Clippings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE PRESS AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE Small fishing boats briefly skirt the shoreline at Aberdeen before heading out to sea. PRESS CLIPPINGS Enclosed are clippings of local and international press on the Special Court and related issues obtained by the Press and Public Affairs Office as at: Wednesday, 10 October 2007 Press clips are produced Monday through Friday. Any omission, comment or suggestion, please contact Martin Royston-Wright Ext 7217 2 Local News Former CDF Militia Leaders Sentenced by Special Court / SCSL Press Release Page 3 CDF to Now Serve…/ Awoko Page 4 Nigeria, 6 others to Raise $62m for Charles Taylor’s Trial / Awoko Page 5 Minimal Jail Sentences for CDF Accused / Concord Times Page 6 CDF Convicts Sentenced / Premier News Page 7 Short Jail Term for CDF Men / Independent Observer Page 8 CDF Indictees / The New Citizen Page 9 7 Years Sentence for CDF Indictees / The New Citizen Online Page 10 CDF Sentenced / Awareness Times Online Page 11 International News Sierra Leoneans Rate Special Court Highly But Say… / BBC world Service Trust Pages 12-13 BBC Trains Journalists in Transitional Justice Reporting / The Independent Pages 14-15 CDF Leaders Sentenced / The Patriotic Vanguard Page 16 Sierra Leone Court Sentences Militia Leaders to less than 10 years / Associated Press Pages 17-18 Sierra Leone jails pro-govt Militia Chiefs / Reuters Pages 19-20 Sierra Leone Militia Chiefs get six, eight years for War Crimes / Agence France-Presse Pages 21-22 Jail for S Leone Self-defence Duo / BBC Online Pages 23-24 Former S Leone Militia Men Jailed / Aljazeera.net Pages 25-26 Court Jails Sierra Leone Militia Chiefs / Press TV (Iran) Page 27 Former Kamajors Get Lighter Sentences / Christian Monitor Website Page 28 Two Former Militia Leaders Jailed By UN-Backed Tribunal in Country / UN News Page 29 UNMIL Public Information Office Media Summary / UNMIL Pages 30-32 3 Special Court for Sierra Leone Press and Public Affairs Office PRESS RELEASE Freetown, Sierra Leone, 9 October 2007 Former CDF Militia Leaders Sentenced by Special Court Two former leaders of Sierra Leone’s Civil Defence Forces (CDF) militia have received prison sentences following their convictions in August for war crimes committed during the country’s decade-long civil conflict. Justice Itoe said that while both Prosecution and Defence had recommended single, “global” sentences, the Court had decided to hand down separate sentences on each count for which the two accused had been found guilty. Moinina Fofana, who was convicted on 4 counts of the 8-count indictment, received sentences of 6 years for Count 2 (murder), 6 years for Count 4 (cruel treatment), 3 years for Count 5 (pillage), and 4 years for Count 7 (collective punishments). Allieu Kondewa, who was convicted on 5 counts, received sentences of 8 years for Count 2 (murder), 8 years for Count 4 (cruel treatment), 5 years for Count 5 (pillage), 6 years for Count 7 (collective punishments), and 7 years for Count 8 (conscripting or enlisting children under the age of 15 years into armed forces or groups or using them to participate actively in hostilities). Prosecutors had asked for longer terms of imprisonment, but Presiding Judge Justice Benjamin Itoe, in reading out today’s sentencing judgment, pointed to a number of mitigating factors which the Court held justified shorter sentences. These included the CDF’s efforts to restore Sierra Leone’s democratically- elected government which, the Trial Chamber noted, “contributed immensely to re-establishing the rule of law in this Country where criminality, anarchy and lawlessness...had become the order of the day”. The Court ordered that the sentences be served concurrently, meaning that Fofana will serve a total of 6 years and Kondewa will serve an 8 year sentence. The sentences will run from 29 May 2003, the date the two were taken into custody by the Special Court. #END 4 Awoko Wednesday, 10 October 2007 5 Awoko Wednesday, 10 October 2007 6 Concord Times Wednesday, 10 October 2007 7 Premier News Wednesday, 10 October 2007 [First part of article was omitted from newspaper] 8 Independent Observer Wednesday, 10 October 2007 9 The New Citizen Wednesday, 10 October 2007 10 The New Citizen Online Wednesday, 10 October 2007 http://www.thenewcitizen-sl.com 7 years sentence for CDF indictees Justice Itoe revealed that the date for the commencement of the jail term for the two CDF indictees takes effect from the date of their arrest, i.e. 29th May 2003 to the day of sentencing. According to the Presiding Judge, this means that Moinina Fofanah and Allieu Kondewa who were indicted on eight-court charges would now serve a jail term of three and four years respectively. The two former leaders of the Sierra Leone CDF militia were convicted of war crimes committed during Sierra Leone’s civil war. Trial Chamber 1 convicted Moinima Fofanah and Allieu Kondewa on a four-count with murder, cruel treatment, pillage and collective punishment while Allieu Kondewa was convicted on an additional count for the recruitment of child combatants under the age of 15. The three judge panel consisting of the Presiding Judge, Justice Benjamin Itoe, Justices Bankole Thompson and Pierre Boutet found the two indictees not guilty of two-counts of crimes against humanity and one-count of war crimes. Furthermore, Moinina Fofanah was not found guilty on the charge of recruiting child combatants. Delivering the verdict, Justice Itoe asserted that the sentence would sent a strong signal to anybody or pro-democracy civilian or militia groups to desist utilizing children as instruments of war in addition to strictly abiding to internationally accepted standards of war such as the Geneva Conventions and its additional protocols. 11 Awareness Times Online Tuesday, 9 October 2007 http://awarenesstimes.com/drwebsite/publish/index.shtml CDF Sentenced. Former CDF Director of War, Moinina Fofana, and Chief Initiator, Dr. Alieu Musa Kondewa, were this afternoon sentenced to six years and 8 years, respectively for their roles in the eleven- year civil war in Sierra Leone. Mr. Fofana received a sentence of six years less time already served in which case, he will serve an additional 21 months in prison. Dr. Kondewa received a sentence of eight years less time already served in which case, he will serve an additional 45 months in prison by our calculations. Fofana and Kondewa were leaders of the government-sponsored Civil Defence Forces (CDF) who fought alongside the West African defence force, ECOMOG, and loyal Sierra Leone armed forces to restore the democratically elected government of former President Ahmad Tejan Kabbah. Following the war, Kabbah and his government distanced themselves from the CDF and their leaders, including Kabbah’s former Deputy Minister of Defence and National Coordinator of the CDF, Chief Samuel Hunga Norman. Norman died while awaiting verdict in his trial in a prison cell in Senegal on February 22, 2007. Voters in Sierra Leone last month voted out Kabbah’s government in part due to their betrayal and neglect of Mr. Norman and the CDF, which twice took up arms to restore Kabbah and his government. Mr. Fofana and Dr. Kondewa were both found guilty August 2, 2007 on four counts each of violations of protocols of war under Article III Common to the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocols collectively known as war crimes. Additionally, Dr. Kondewa was found guilty on one count of international humanitarian laws for recruitment and enlistment of child soldiers. Neither of the CDF Accused was found guilty of the most serious offence of Crimes Against Humanity. The lone Sierra Leonean jurist on the Trial Chamber, Professor Roslo Bankole Thompson, rejected the majority verdict with a strongly worded dissenting opinion in favour of a not-guilty verdict for the CDF Accused. His two foreign colleagues, Canadian jurist, Pierre Boutet, and Cameroonian, Benjamin Mutanga Itoe, ruled against the CDF. The prosecutor on September 24 asked the court for a thirty-year prison sentence for each of the CDF leaders. Counsels for Dr. Kondewa and Mr. Fofana, Charles Francis Margai and Michiel Pestman, respectively, had asked the court for lighter sentences including four years for Fofana and three years for Kondewa. Margai and Pestman representing are expected to launch an appeal to the sentences for their respective clients. Should they fail in their appeals, the president of the country where the men are sent to serve their sentences will have the prerogative to ask the court for a pardon. The lone Sierra Leonean jurist on the three-judge panel, Prof. Roslo Bankole Thompson, reiterated his earlier objection that the CDF leaders were guilty of any crimes and did not offer any punishment for Mr. Fofana and Dr. Kondewa.. Alfred Munda SamForay CDF Defence Fund. 12 BBC World Service Trust Tuesday, 9 October 2007 Press Release Sierra Leoneans Rate Special Court Highly But Say it Could do Better More than two-thirds of Sierra Leoneans think their country’s UN-backed Special Court has performed well so far, although more than a quarter think the court is putting some of the wrong people on trial, according to a nationwide survey for the BBC World Service Trust. The household survey, carried out in July 2007 with Search for Common Ground and the International Center for Transitional Justice, explores knowledge and attitudes on transitional justice issues in the wake of Sierra Leone’s civil war, which ended five years ago. Sixty-eight percent of respondents say they think the Special Court’s performance to date has been “good” or “excellent.” An overwhelming majority of respondents (96%) say they are aware of the Special Court, although only 4% say they know a lot about its proceedings.
Recommended publications
  • Negotiating Peace in Sierra Leone: Confronting the Justice Challenge

    Negotiating Peace in Sierra Leone: Confronting the Justice Challenge

    Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue rDecembeerp 2007 ort Negotiating peace in Sierra Leone: Confronting the justice challenge Priscilla Hayner Report The Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue is an independent and impartial foundation, Contents based in Geneva, that promotes and facilitates 1. Introduction and overview 5 dialogue to resolve armed conflicts and reduce civilian suffering. 2. Background to the 1999 talks 8 114, rue de lausanne 3. Participation in the Lomé talks: April–July 1999 10 ch-1202 geneva 4. Amnesty in the Lomé process and Accord 12 switzerland The context 12 [email protected] t: + 41 22 908 11 30 Rapid agreement on a blanket amnesty 13 f: +41 22 908 11 40 A second look at the amnesty: was it unavoidable? 16 www.hdcentre.org The amnesty and the UN and other international participants 17 © Copyright 5. Other justice issues at Lomé 19 Henry Dunant Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, 2007 A Truth and Reconciliation Commission 19 Reproduction of all or Provisions for reparations 20 part of this publication The security forces and demobilisation of combatants 20 may be authorised only Reaching an agreement on power-sharing 21 with written consent and acknowledgement of the 6. After the agreement: a difficult peace 22 source. Slow implementation and near collapse of the accord 23 The International Center The Special Court for Sierra Leone 25 for Transitional Justice Implementing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission 26 assists countries pursuing Judicial reform efforts 28 accountability for past mass Creation of a new Human Rights Commission 28 atrocity or human rights abuse. It assists in the development Demobilisation, and reform of the armed forces and police 29 of integrated, comprehensive, and localized approaches to 7.
  • Profile of Internal Displacement : Sierra Leone

    Profile of Internal Displacement : Sierra Leone

    PROFILE OF INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT : SIERRA LEONE Compilation of the information available in the Global IDP Database of the Norwegian Refugee Council (as of 15 October, 2003) Also available at http://www.idpproject.org Users of this document are welcome to credit the Global IDP Database for the collection of information. The opinions expressed here are those of the sources and are not necessarily shared by the Global IDP Project or NRC Norwegian Refugee Council/Global IDP Project Chemin Moïse Duboule, 59 1209 Geneva - Switzerland Tel: + 41 22 799 07 00 Fax: + 41 22 799 07 01 E-mail : [email protected] CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 PROFILE SUMMARY 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 CAUSES AND BACKGROUND OF DISPLACEMENT 9 BACKGROUND TO THE CONFLICT 9 CHRONOLOGY OF SIGNIFICANT EVENTS SINCE INDEPENDENCE (1961 - 2000) 9 HISTORICAL OUTLINE OF THE FIRST EIGHT YEARS OF CONFLICT (1991-1998) 13 CONTINUED CONFLICT DESPITE THE SIGNING OF THE LOME PEACE AGREEMENT (JULY 1999-MAY 2000) 16 PEACE PROCESS DERAILED AS SECURITY SITUATION WORSENED DRAMATICALLY IN MAY 2000 18 RELATIVELY STABLE SECURITY SITUATION SINCE SIGNING OF CEASE-FIRE AGREEMENT IN ABUJA ON 10 NOVEMBER 2000 20 CIVIL WAR DECLARED OVER FOLLOWING THE FULL DEPLOYMENT OF UNAMSIL AND THE COMPLETION OF DISARMAMENT (JANUARY 2002) 22 REGIONAL EFFORTS TO MAINTAIN PEACE IN SIERRA LEONE (2002) 23 SIERRA LEONEANS GO TO THE POLLS TO RE-ELECT AHMAD TEJAN KABBAH AS PRESIDENT (MAY 2002) 24 SIERRA LEONE’S SPECIAL COURT AND TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION START WORK (2002-2003) 25 MAIN CAUSES OF DISPLACEMENT 28 COUNTRYWIDE DISPLACEMENT
  • Special Court for Sierra Leone Outreach and Public Affairs Office

    Special Court for Sierra Leone Outreach and Public Affairs Office

    SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE OUTREACH AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE The Bumbuna dam PRESS CLIPPINGS Enclosed are clippings of local and international press on the Special Court and related issues obtained by the Outreach and Public Affairs Office as at: Tuesday, 15 May 2012 Press clips are produced Monday through Friday. Any omission, comment or suggestion, please contact Martin Royston-Wright Ext 7217 2 Local News Special Court Prosecutor Appluads Sierra Leoneans / Premier News Page 3 Special Court Prosecutor Appluads Sierra Leoneans / Concord Times Page 4 Black Scorpion Hunts Johnny Paul / Ariogbo Page 5 International News Charles Taylor And The Fallacy of the Special Court / Newstime Africa Pages 6-9 Liberia: Taylor Speaks Tomorrow…/ The New Dawn Pages 10-11 Is Mercy the Best Course? / The Independent Online Pages 12-14 Relevance of ICC Judgment Against Charles Taylor to SL / The Island Pages 15-17 Taylor Prosecutor Visits Sierra Leone / UPI.Com Page 18 Start of Mladic Trial Shows Persistence Pays / Human Rights Watch Pages 19-20 ICC Seeks to Arrest Ntaganda, Mudacumura for DRC Crimes / Voice of America Page 21 3 Premier News Tuesday, 15 May 2012 4 Concord Times Tuesday, 15 May 2012 Special Court Prosecutor Appluads Sierra Leoneans 5 Ariogbo Tuesday, 15 May 2012 6 Newstime Africa Tuesday, 15 May 2012 Charles Taylor and the fallacy of the Special Court Written by Alfred Munda SamForay Charles Taylor Before we get to the matter of Prosecutor versus Charles Gbankay Taylor and the myths and fallacy of the Special Court for Sierra Leone, let’s address some myths about Charles Taylor himself.
  • The Meaning of a Militia: Understanding the Civil Defence Forces of Sierra Leone

    The Meaning of a Militia: Understanding the Civil Defence Forces of Sierra Leone

    African Affairs, 106/425, 639–662 doi: 10.1093/afraf/adm054 C The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal African Society. All rights reserved ! THE MEANING OF A MILITIA: UNDERSTANDING THE CIVIL DEFENCE FORCES OF SIERRA LEONE DANNY HOFFMAN ABSTRACT This article is an adapted, narrative version of an expert witness report the author wrote for the Defence of one of the accused before the Spe- cial Court for Sierra Leone. The case against the Civil Defence Forces militia was predicated in part on the argument that the CDF was a mil- itary organization with military-style command and control. Based on a close reading of the Prosecution’s military expert witness report and the author’s ethnographic research with the militia, the article outlines a case for understanding the CDF as the militarization of a social network rather than as a military organization. This framing has implications not only for post-conflict adjudication, but for how we think about and intervene in violent contexts throughout contemporary West Africa. ON 14 JUNE 2005 COLONEL RICHARD IRON TOOK THE WITNESS STAND in the case against the Civil Defence Forces at the Special Court for Sierra Leone. The Court was trying those accused of bearing ‘greatest responsi- bility for serious violations of humanitarian law and Sierra Leonean law’ during the latter half of the country’s ten-year war. Iron, a British officer, was in Freetown to answer the Defence’s challenge to a report he wrote on behalf of the Prosecution. Iron’s report did not speak directly to the ultimate issue, the Court’s terminology for the guilt or innocence of the accused.
  • G U I N E a Liberia Sierra Leone

    G U I N E a Liberia Sierra Leone

    The boundaries and names shown and the designations Mamou used on this map do not imply official endorsement or er acceptance by the United Nations. Nig K o L le n o G UINEA t l e a SIERRA Kindia LEONEFaranah Médina Dula Falaba Tabili ba o s a g Dubréka K n ie c o r M Musaia Gberia a c S Fotombu Coyah Bafodia t a e r G Kabala Banian Konta Fandié Kamakwie Koinadugu Bendugu Forécariah li Kukuna Kamalu Fadugu Se Bagbe r Madina e Bambaya g Jct. i ies NORTHERN N arc Sc Kurubonla e Karina tl it Mateboi Alikalia L Yombiro Kambia M Pendembu Bumbuna Batkanu a Bendugu b Rokupr o l e Binkolo M Mange Gbinti e Kortimaw Is. Kayima l Mambolo Makeni i Bendou Bodou Port Loko Magburaka Tefeya Yomadu Lunsar Koidu-Sefadu li Masingbi Koundou e a Lungi Pepel S n Int'l Airport or a Matotoka Yengema R el p ok m Freetown a Njaiama Ferry Masiaka Mile 91 P Njaiama- Wellington a Yele Sewafe Tongo Gandorhun o Hastings Yonibana Tungie M Koindu WESTERN Songo Bradford EAS T E R N AREA Waterloo Mongeri York Rotifunk Falla Bomi Kailahun Buedu a i Panguma Moyamba a Taiama Manowa Giehun Bauya T Boajibu Njala Dambara Pendembu Yawri Bendu Banana Is. Bay Mano Lago Bo Segbwema Daru Shenge Sembehun SOUTHE R N Gerihun Plantain Is. Sieromco Mokanje Kenema Tikonko Bumpe a Blama Gbangbatok Sew Tokpombu ro Kpetewoma o Sh Koribundu M erb Nitti ro River a o i Turtle Is. o M h Sumbuya a Sherbro I.
  • Litigating Child Recruitment Before the Special Court for Sierra Leone

    Litigating Child Recruitment Before the Special Court for Sierra Leone

    Litigating Child Recruitment Before the Special Court for Sierra Leone NOAH B. NOVOGRODSKY* In May 2004, the Special Court for Sierra Leone issued a landmark decision finding that an individual may be held criminally responsible for the offense of recruiting' child soldiers into armed conflict. As a hybrid tribunal established by the United Nations and the Government of Sierra Leone to try those who "bear the greatest responsibility" for serious violations of international humanitarian law committed during the country's civil war after November 1996, the Special Court is the first international criminal body to indict a person for the crime of recruiting and employing children in war. The decision in the case of Sam Hinga Norman now aligns this emerging doctrine of international humanitarian law with general international human rights protections, as * Professor Noah Novogrodsky is the director of the University of Toronto Faculty of Law International Human Rights Clinic (IHRC). The attached brief was filed with the Special Court for Sierra Leone on November 4, 2003. Mora Johnson, Elyse Korman, Robin Reinertson, and David Wei of the IHRC drafted substantial parts of the brief and contributed to this article. 1. Recruitment is defined in Article 4 of the Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone as "[c]onscripting or enlisting children under the age of 15 years into armed forces or groups using them to participate actively in hostilities." The implication of this Article is that a child under the age of fifteen cannot meaningfully consent to enlist or participate in armed conflict. See The Secretary-General, Report of the Secretary-Generalon the Establishment of a Special Court for Sierra Leone, U.N.
  • Sierra Leone: Whether a Person Who Did Not Participate in the General

    Sierra Leone: Whether a Person Who Did Not Participate in the General

    RIR Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada www.irb-cisr.gc.ca Français Home Contact Us Help Search canada.gc.ca Home > Research > Responses to Information Requests RESPONSES TO INFORMATION REQUESTS (RIRs) New Search | About RIR's | Help 03 April 2003 SLE41345.E Sierra Leone: Whether a person who did not participate in the general strike of 1997 and 1998 as decreed by the exiled Armed Forces Revolutionary Council (AFRC) would be targeted by the Kamajors and, if so, protection available; areas of the country in which the Kamajors still have influence Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board, Ottawa The Kamajor militias are traditional hunters who fought against the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) rebels during Sierra Leone's eleven-year armed conflict (IRIN 14 Feb. 2003; UNHCR/ACCORD 13-14 Nov. 2000), which President Ahmad Tejan Kabbah declared over on 18 January 2002 (HRW 2003). The editor of Sierra Leone Web (SLW) said, in correspondence with the Research Directorate, that the Kamajors, meaning "hunter" in Mende, are of the Mendes ethnic group and so were active in the southern and eastern regions of the country (21 Mar. 2003). The profile on Sierra Leone in the final report of the 6th European Country of Origin Information Seminar, states that the Civil Defence Forces (CDF) were a "major player" in the civil war and that, in the southern region of the country, they called themselves the Kamajors while in the north and north-east, they called themselves Tamboro (UNHCR/ACCORD 13-14 Nov. 2000, 149). The report further noted that, although the "stronghold" of the Kamajor militia was in Bo, they also had a "strong base" in the centre of the country (ibid.).
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    Table of Contents Introduction 1 The political context 2 The West Africa sub-region 5 International response to the human rights crisis 8 United Nations 8 The UN Observer Mission in Sierra Leone 9 The UN special conference on Sierra Leone 11 OAU and ECOWAS 13 Human rights violations during the period of AFRC rule 16 Arbitrary arrest and detention 17 Torture and extrajudicial executions 18 The use of the death penalty by the AFRC 21 Human rights abuses by AFRC and RUF forces since February 1998 22 "Operation no living thing" 24 Human rights abuses by rebel forces since July 1998 29 Children at the centre of the violence 32 Abduction of children 34 The abuse of children by rebel forces 34 Victims and perpetrators of human rights abuses 35 Recruitment of children by Civil Defence Forces 35 Efforts by the international community to meet the needs of children 36 Human rights violations by ECOMOG forces 38 Human rights violations by Civil Defence Forces 41 Refugees and internally displaced people - still at risk 44 Refugees in Guinea and Liberia 44 Internally displaced people 47 Accountability for human rights abuses 48 Detentions and trials after February 1998 49 The committee of investigation 51 Trials before the High Court 52 Trials before court martial 55 The death penalty - a violation of human rights 57 Harsh prison conditions 59 Long-term measures for the protection and respect of human rights 61 Reform of the legal and judicial system 62 Restructuring the armed forces 62 Human rights training for the police force 63 The National Commission for Human Rights and Democracy 64 1 SIERRA LEONE 1998 - a year of atrocities against civilians Introduction During 1998 the scale of atrocities against civilians in Sierra Leone has reached unprecedented levels.
  • Scs L-2Eo1-C)~- T ~ 07 MAR 2003 7~~3 the SPECIAL COURT for SIERRA LEONE Mjda (}:T)-6 ~

    Scs L-2Eo1-C)~- T ~ 07 MAR 2003 7~~3 the SPECIAL COURT for SIERRA LEONE Mjda (}:T)-6 ~

    Scs L-2eo1-C)~- T ~ 07 MAR 2003 7~~3 THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE MjdA (}:t)-6 ~. CASE NO. SCSL - 03 - -I THE PROSECUTOR Against SAM HINGA NORMAN INDICTMENT The Prosecutor, Special Court for Sierra Leone, under Article 15 of the Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone (the Statute), charges: SAM HINGA NORMAN with CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE 3 COMMON TO THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS AND OF ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL II, and OTHER SERIOUS VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW in violation of Articles 2, 3 and 4 of the Statute, as set forth below: \ THE ACCUSED 1. SAM HINGA NORMAN, (the ACCUSED) was born on I January 1940, in Ngolala Village, Mongeri (or Monghere), Valunia Chiefdom, Bo District, in the Southern Province of the Republic of Sierra Leone. 2. The ACCUSED served in the Armed Forces of the Republic of Sierra Leone from about 1959 to 1972 rising to the rank of Captain. In 1966 he graduated from the Mons Officer Cadet School in Aldershot, United Kingdom. The ACCUSED has served as Liaison Representative and Chiefdom Spokesman in Mongeri, Valunia Chiefdom, as Regent Chief of Jaiama Bongor Chiefdom, and as Deputy Minister of Defence for Sierra Leone. He is currently serving as the Minister of the Internal Affairs for Sierra Leone. PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/4805d2/ s GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 3. At all times relevant to this Indictment, a state of armed conflict existed in Sierra Leone. For the purposes of this Indictment the organized armed factions involved in this conflict included the Civil Defence Forces (CDF) fighting against the combined forces of the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) and the Armed Forces Revolutionary Council (AFRC).
  • The Hybrid Tribunal in Sierra Leone⊗

    The Hybrid Tribunal in Sierra Leone⊗

    Wrong-sizing international justice? The hybrid tribunal in Sierra Leone⊗ Chandra Lekha Sriram Word count: 11,425 Introduction: what size should international justice be? Even as the International Criminal Court undertakes investigations in Uganda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, policymakers and academics continue to debate what the “right” tools to respond to past atrocities are. Naturally there are concerns that justice must be done, weighed against concerns that weak states will be destabilized by attempts at accountability.1 While many have celebrated the entry into force of the ICC statute, and the exercise of universal jurisdiction, the United States continues to challenge both of these tools of international justice as undemocratic and illegitimate.2 There are also reasons to be concerned that tools of international justice, operating as they do very far from the victims and sites of the original crimes, may simply fail to accomplish what we hope for.3 The ad hoc criminal tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda are both being encouraged to complete work by 2008, having prosecuted relatively few cases over the course of more than a decade, but having contributed significantly to the corpus of international law. International justice may be developing, but it has its limits. Yet it is also the case that after civil war or internal atrocity, domestic courts are often unable or unwilling to seriously pursue cases. This leaves a potential gap, one that some believe can be filled by a device between the national and the international—the hybrid or mixed tribunal. While these tribunals are said by some to be an example of “right-sizing” international justice, the 2 case of the Special Court for Sierra Leone suggests that, perhaps, we ought not be so sanguine.4 While perhaps a necessary compromise, I suggest, the Court suffers from the limits of being a partially domestic court, in terms of resources and mandate, but also from the limits of being a partially international court, in that it is viewed by many as foreign.
  • Home Office, from Information Obtained from a Variety of Sources

    Home Office, from Information Obtained from a Variety of Sources

    SIERRA LEONE ASSESSMENT OCTOBER 2000 Country Information and Policy Unit Asylum Appeals Policy Unit CONTENTS Scope of Document 1.1 - 1.5 II GEOGRAPHY A. Location, Climate, Population and Language 2.1 B. Economy 2.2 III HISTORY A. 1961 - 1996 3.1 - 3.5 B. Armed Insurrections 3.6 - 3.8 C. 1996 - 1997 3.9 - 3.16 IV INSTRUMENTS OF THE STATE A. Judiciary 4.1 - 4.8 B. Security Forces 4.9 C. Police and Prisons 4.10 - 4.11 D. Civil Defence Force 4.12 V HUMAN RIGHTS A. Introduction B. Security situation 5.1 - 5.4 5.5 - 5.37 (i). Recent event (ii). Revolutionary United Front (iii). United Nations 5.38 - 5.39 5.40 - 542 5.43 - 5.47 C. SPECIFIC GROUPS 5.48 - 5.51 Minorities/Ethnicity 1 5.52 - 5.57 Women 5.58 - 5.62 Children OTHER ISSUES Freedom of Association and Assembly Freedom of the Press 5.63 Freedom of Religion 5.64 - 5.69 Freedom to Travel and Internal Flight 5.70 - 5.72 5.73 - 5.75 ANNEX A: Common Abbreviations/Political Parties ANNEX B: Prominent People ANNEX C: Chronology of Major Events Bibliography 2 I. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 This assessment has been produced by the Country Information & Policy Unit, Immigration & Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a variety of sources. 1.2 The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive, nor is it intended to catalogue all human rights violations.
  • Special Court for Sierra Leone in The

    Special Court for Sierra Leone in The

    O SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER Before : Justice George Gelaga King, Presiding Judge Justice Emmanuel Ayoola Justice Renate Winter Justice Raja Fernando Justice Jon M. Kamanda Registrar : Herman von Hebel Date : 28 May 2008 PROSECUTOR Against MOININA FOFANA ALLIEU KONDEWA (Case No.SCSL-04-14-A) JUDGMENT Office of the Prosecutor : Defence Counsel for Moinina Fofana: Stephen Rapp Wilfred Davidson Bola-Carrol Christopher Staker Mohamed Pa-Momo Fofana Karim Agha Joseph Kamara Defence Counsel for Allieu Kondewa : Régine Gachoud Yada Williams Elisabeth Baumgartner Osman Jalloh Bridget Osho Francis Banks-Kamara PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/b31512/ CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 A. THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE ..................................................................................... 2 B. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND ................................................................................ 3 1. The Armed Conflict in Sierra Leone: The Kamajors and the Civil Defence Forces ............... 3 (a) The Kamajors ........................................................................................................................... 3 (b) The Civil Defence Forces ........................................................................................................ 4 2. The Indictment ........................................................................................................................