SONG-THRUSH SONG SOME Aspects of Song-Thrush (Turdus E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SONG-THRUSH SONG SOME Aspects of Song-Thrush (Turdus E (262) SONG-THRUSH SONG BY NOBLE ROLLIN SOME aspects of Song-Thrush (Turdus e. ericetorwm) song are dealt with below under the following headings: total output for the day, portion of day used, hour to hour variation, day-time singing, dawn and dusk singing, token singing, singing and roosting, dawn penetration, notes. The observations were made in Northumberland, at Glanton and at Wallsend, between 1927 and 1944, the penetration records mostly 1927-1933 inclusive and the remaining' records 1941-1944 inclusive. All times, unless stated otherwise, are in Local Apparent Time, i.e. time by the sun at the place of observation. TOTAL OUTPUT FOR THE DAY. In Fig. 1 are given three Glanton examples of the total output of song at three different stages in the breeding cycle. In these diagrams and the subsequent one in Fig. 3, the first full hour of singing is entered from the time of the first song. The first full hour is thus set partially forward from the first normal hour's timing, e.g. the June 13th singer in Fig. 1 began to sing at 1.57 a.m. and its output of song from 1.57 a.m. to 2.57 a.m. is shown as the first full hour. The first normal hour, 2.30 a.m. to 3.30 a.m. is also shown, the two hours overlapping by 27 minutes. The last hour of singing is treated in a similar manner, but in reverse. The diagrams therefore indicate besides hour to hour output, the first and last full hour of output, and an indication of the time of commencement and cessation of the day's singing. The April 9th record shows the total output hour by hour, of an unmated bird in the Bird Station area at Glanton. The full singing of this bird continued day after day and was very noticeable even to casual observation. So far as I was able to ascertain, this bird never obtained a mate, and eventually abandoned the territory. The June 13th graph is the total output of a bird observed in a wood a little over half a mile from Glanton. This bird was apparently at the pairing phase of its breeding cycle, as it was seen the previous day with its (presumed) mate sitting opposite it (see Note 1). During the day it passed slowly through its terri­ tory, taking the whole day to go from one end to the other and back. The June 12th graph shows the total output of a bird in the Bird Station area at Glanton, which was feeding a brood of three to five young, three days out of the nest. The total output for the day in the above instances, together with the length of the singing day (measured from the first song in the morning to the last song in the evening), is given in the following VOL. XXXVIII,] SONG-THRUSH SONG. 263 is FIGURE I.—Total Output of Song During the Day. 264 BRITISH BIRDS. [VOL. XXXVIII. table. Also included in the table is a record of the last singing of the season in the Station area, July 22nd, which amounted to a quarter of a minute for the whole day, and the output of the Walls- end " token " singing bird (Fig. 3), which is described later. Singing Output Day. of Song. April 9- Mateless bird in full song. 15 hrs. 00 mins. 377 mins. June 13- Bird apparently pairing. 18 hrs. 55 mins. 217 mins. June 12, Bird feeding young. 18 hrs. 16 mins. 33 mins. July 22. Last singing of season. 10 hrs. 11 mins. | min. May 17. " Token " singer. 17 hrs. 47 mins. 55 mins. This makes a somewhat direct correspondence between the stage in the breeding cycle and the output of singing in so far as the Glanton birds are concerned. The output for the day of the mate- less bird, 377 minutes, is respectively about twice and three and a half times the maximum figures given for the Sky-Lark (Alauda a. arvensis) and the Willow-Warbler (Phylloscopus t. trochilus) (antea, Vol. xxxvii, p. 87). Whilst it is extremely unlikely that any of these outputs are the maximum for the species, they suggest that the Song-Thrush occupies a high place for maximum output of song. PORTION OF DAY USED. The Song-Thrush's song is not continuous in the sense that the Sky-Lark's is, nor cut into more or less set lengths of continuity, as is the Willow-Warbler's. Thus, the unmated Song-Thrush averaged about 38 seconds of output of song for every minute it was occupied in singing and the total amount of time thus occupied in singing was 9 hrs. 55 mins. or 41% of the 24-hour day. This together with the time used in roosting is given in Fig. 2, which .shows graphically the relatively small amount (5 hrs. 5 mins. or 21%) of the day remaining for feeding and other daily activities of this unmated bird. HOUR TO HOUR VARIATION. In regard to the hour to hour variation, in all three graphs in Fig. 1 there is a morning block of song in which the dawn peak is highest (See Note II) and there is a block of song in the evening which reaches into dusk, but whose peak is not necessarily included in dusk. Judging by the all-day records I have made so far, this appears to be the typical construction of a Song-Thrush's daily song. Increased output over this basic pattern appears to be obtained not so much by raising the height of the peaks, though this may be done, as by filling in the space between them by more persistent day-time singing. VOL. XXXVIII.] SONG-THRUSH SONG. 265 DAY-TIME SINGING. A rather different type of observation was made on a bird at Wallsend which was kept under observation for a whole season. The first singing began in November and continued into December, when it ceased with the onset of wintry weather. The song was resumed again about mid-February and the bird continued to occupy its territory for the rest of the season. Systematic observa­ tions were begun in March. Observations were made on the territory in the morning from approximately 8.50 a.m. to 8.55 a.m., British Summer Time, and later double Summer Time. Out of ninety-one day-time observations from March to the beginning of August inclusive, this bird was heard singing only ten times, once in March, four times in May and five times in June. Some observa­ tions were also made near noon and in the afternoon in March and April, but no song was heard in twenty-six such observations. This shows that, for this bird at least, day-time singing was unusual. Similar observations were made on two other territories in the vicinity where the birds also began their singing season in November. A hundred and twenty observations were made on each and the results corresponded closely with those of the first bird. One of them was never heard in the day-time at all and the other was heard only six times. FIGURE 2,—Portion of Day used in Various Activities. Another Song-Thrush, which took up its territory for the first time in the first half of March, sang more freely in the day-time as it became established, and was heard singing on eight out of seven­ teen day-time observations during this month. However, in April, May and June, it too lapsed into virtual day-time silence, being heard only four times out of fifty-four observations. In July and early August what I presumed was the same bird came into full day-time singing again, being heard ten times out of twenty-four observations. The loud end-of-season singing of this bird became quite a feature in the area as the " silent month " of August approached, and on July 31st I found that it was singing sufficiently loudly for me to hear it at a distance of three quarters of a mile (over land). The bird continued in full song till August 8th, when it ceased for the season. 266 BRITISH BIRDS. [VOL. XXXVIII. DAWN AND DUSK SINGING. Dawn and dusk records were also made on the first-mentioned bird, which was so silent in the day-time. It is worthy of note that during eight dawn records and seven dusk records made at intervals from the beginning of March to the beginning of August, not &i a single occasion did this bird fail to sing, thus showing it to be a systematic twilight singer which was relatively quiet in the day-time. Similar, though less systematic, observations were made on the other three mentioned birds, and they revealed substantially the same state of affairs. Finally, three all-day records were made on the first mentioned birds, in April, May and early July. Fig. 3 is an example of these and gives a good idea of the type of singing indulged in by this bird. All three records agreed in conforming to the basic pattern of Song-Thrush song already outlined under Hour to Hour Variation. The total outputs for the day for these all-day records 13 1 1 FIGURE 3.—Total Output of Song During the Day. were 27, 55 and 42 minutes respectively, thus conforming to the type of output found in the Glanton bird feeding young out of the nest. TOKEN SINGING. It is clear, then, that these Wallsend birds, after they have established themselves in their territories with more or less day-time singing, normally relapse for most of the rest of the season into an abbreviated morning and evening reassertion by song of their territorial claim.
Recommended publications
  • 345 Fieldfare Put Your Logo Here
    Javier Blasco-Zumeta & Gerd-Michael Heinze Sponsor is needed. Write your name here Put your logo here 345 Fieldfare Fieldfare. Adult. Male (09-I). Song Thrush FIELDFARE (Turdus pilaris ) IDENTIFICATION 25-26 cm. Grey head; red-brown back; grey rump and dark tail; pale underparts; pale flanks spotted black; white underwing coverts; yellow bill with ochre tip. Redwing Fieldfare. Pattern of head, underwing co- verts and flank. SIMILAR SPECIES Song Thrush has orange underwing coverts; Redwing has reddish underwing coverts; Mistle Thrush has white underwing coverts, but lacks pale supercilium and its rump isn’t grey. Mistle Thrush http://blascozumeta.com Write your website here Page 1 Javier Blasco-Zumeta & Gerd-Michael Heinze Sponsor is needed. Write your name here Put your logo here 345 Fieldfare SEXING Male with dark or black tail feathers; red- dish feathers on back with blackish center; most have a broad mark on crown feathers. Female with dark brown tail feathers but not black; dull reddish feathers on back with dark centre (but not blackish); most have a thin mark on crown feathers. CAUTION: some birds of both sexes have similar pattern on crown feathers. Fieldfare. Sexing. Pattern of tail: left male; right fe- male. Fieldfare. Sexing. Pat- AGEING tern of Since this species doesn’t breed in Aragon, only crown feat- 2 age groups can be recognized: hers: top 1st year autumn/2nd year spring with moult male; bot- limit within moulted chestnut inner greater co- tom female. verts and retained juvenile outer greater coverts, shorter and duller with traces of white tips; pointed tail feathers.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Methods of the Song Thrush.-A Recent Review by Clark (Wilson Bull
    September 1976 . GENERAL NOTES 497 the weight loss is impressive, particularly since these caged birds had access to a super- abundant food supply. Ricklefs (1968) analyzed the relationship between maximum nestling weight and average adult weight for individual species. For this he constructed a ratio (R) of the asymptote from the growth curve to the average adult weight. Ratios greater than 1.10 were most common in aerial feeders, while ratios less than 0.90 were most common for ground feeders. Also, species with high R values tended to have long nestling periods. The ratio for Monk Parakeets was 1.28. This was somewhat higher than the intermediate levels that might be expected of an arboreal and ground feeder such as this species. However, the high R value of Monk Parakeets is in accord with what would be expected in species with similarly long nestling periods. Since the energy requirements for nestlings is the sum of maintenance energy and energy for growth, a low growth rate would tend to decrease the rate of energy demand for a nestling. If the number of surviving offspring is limited by the rate at which the parents can deliver energy to the young, then changes in the factors tending to lower the rate of energy demand of the nestlings could increase the number of potential offspring reared by the parents. One way to effect such a change is to lower the growth rate. However a low growth rate also increases the chances for predation and other nest losses by increasing the time in the nest.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Turdus Philomelos)
    The role of blunt egg pole characteristics for recognition of eggs in the song thrush (Turdus philomelos) Lenka Polacikovᡠ1,2,4), Bård G. Stokke3), Petr Procházka2), Marcel Honza2), Arne Moksnes3) & Eivin Røskaft3) (1 Department of Zoology, Palacký University, tr.ˇ Svobody, 26, CZ-771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic; 2 Institute of Vertebrate Biology, v. v. i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Kvetnᡠ8, CZ-603 65 Brno, Czech Republic; 3 Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway) (Accepted: 9 November 2009) Summary Colour and speckling of avian eggshells play important roles in egg recognition behaviour. However, only a few studies have paid attention to whether specific parts of eggs may be more important than others in rejection decisions by hosts. We hypothesised that the blunt pole in song thrush (Turdus philomelos) eggs possesses important cues for recognition of own eggs because this is the most visible part of the egg in the nest. We examined host response towards conspecific eggs painted blue either at the blunt or sharp poles, and used unpainted conspecific eggs as a control. We found, as predicted, that the experimental eggs painted blue at the blunt poles were rejected significantly more often than the experimental eggs unpainted at this pole. Rejection rates of experimental eggs were higher with increasing differences in number of spots between the two poles of own eggs. Our results confirmed that the essential cues used for egg discrimination in song thrushes are found at the blunt egg pole. Keywords: brood parasitism, egg discrimination, eggshell characteristics, recognition cues, rejection behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Methods for the Field Survey and Monitoring of Breeding Short-Eared Owls (Asio Flammeus) in the UK: Final Report from Pilot Fieldwork in 2006 and 2007
    BTO Research Report No. 496 Developing methods for the field survey and monitoring of breeding Short-eared owls (Asio flammeus) in the UK: Final report from pilot fieldwork in 2006 and 2007 A report to Scottish Natural Heritage Ref: 14652 Authors John Calladine, Graeme Garner and Chris Wernham February 2008 BTO Scotland School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA Registered Charity No. SC039193 ii CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................v LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................v LIST OF APPENDICES...........................................................................................................vi SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... viii CRYNODEB............................................................................................................................xii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................................................................................xvi 1. BACKGROUND AND AIMS...........................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Nest-Site Provision Experiment for Long-Eared Owls to Attempt To
    Notes Nest-site provision experiment for Long-eared Owls To attempt to improve the breeding success of Long-eared Owls Asio otus, artificial nest- sites were provided in an area where the owls were known to overwinter. The nests provided consisted of two types: old potato or apple-picker baskets made of willow, with the handles removed, and baskets of a similar shape made of wire-netting. Three willow baskets and six wire baskets were sited in November 1979, in a small Cambridgeshire wood of mixed deciduous trees, comprising mainly willow Salix, silver birch Betula, oak Quercus and hawthorn Crataegus. All the baskets were fixed to suitable trees at a height of approximately 5 m, and then each lined with sticks of various lengths and thicknesses to provide a firm base. 140. Long-eared Owl Asio otus on nest in willow basket provided as artificial nest-site, Cambridgeshire, May 1981 (D.J. Gamer) continued... 376 Notes 377 During the first year, 1980, none of the baskets was used, but in 1981 one of the willow baskets was occupied by a pair of Long-eared Owls (plate 140), which had a clutch of three eggs, of which two hatched, and two young fledged. Current literature states that Long-eared Owls nest in the same area each year, but not in the same nest. This is probably due to the fact that natural sites (e.g. old birds' nests and squirrels' dreys) are destroyed over winter and do not last for a further year. With this experiment using these more substantial nests, it is hoped that the same site will be used in succeeding years.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 74/Thursday, April 16, 2020/Notices
    21262 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Notices acquisition were not included in the 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA Comment (1): We received one calculation for TDC, the TDC limit would not 22041–3803; (703) 358–2376. comment from the Western Energy have exceeded amongst other items. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Alliance, which requested that we Contact: Robert E. Mulderig, Deputy include European starling (Sturnus Assistant Secretary, Office of Public Housing What is the purpose of this notice? vulgaris) and house sparrow (Passer Investments, Office of Public and Indian Housing, Department of Housing and Urban The purpose of this notice is to domesticus) on the list of bird species Development, 451 Seventh Street SW, Room provide the public an updated list of not protected by the MBTA. 4130, Washington, DC 20410, telephone (202) ‘‘all nonnative, human-introduced bird Response: The draft list of nonnative, 402–4780. species to which the Migratory Bird human-introduced species was [FR Doc. 2020–08052 Filed 4–15–20; 8:45 am]‘ Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.) does restricted to species belonging to biological families of migratory birds BILLING CODE 4210–67–P not apply,’’ as described in the MBTRA of 2004 (Division E, Title I, Sec. 143 of covered under any of the migratory bird the Consolidated Appropriations Act, treaties with Great Britain (for Canada), Mexico, Russia, or Japan. We excluded DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 2005; Pub. L. 108–447). The MBTRA states that ‘‘[a]s necessary, the Secretary species not occurring in biological Fish and Wildlife Service may update and publish the list of families included in the treaties from species exempted from protection of the the draft list.
    [Show full text]
  • Nesting of the Acrocephalus Warblers
    Acta zoologica cracoviensia, 46(2): 97-195, Kraków, 30 June, 2003 Nesting of the Acrocephalus warblers Zygmunt BOCHEÑSKI and Piotr KUŒNIERCZYK Received: 14 Feb 2003 Accepted: 26 May 2003 BOCHEÑSKI Z., KUŒNIERCZYK P. 2003. Nesting of the Acrocephalus warblers. Acta zoo- logica cracoviensia, 46(2): 97-195. Abstract. The paper contains data concerning nest sites, material, construction, shape, and sizes in the majority of Acrocephalus species. The descriptions are based on field studies, museum specimens, and literature. The system proposed by CLEMENTS (2000) including 36 species in the genus Acrocephalus has been adopted. Similarities and differ- ences in nesting of 32 species and four subspecies are studied in the last chapter on the ba- sis of 38 characters assembled in Table XLI. They do not always reflect systematic relations of warblers within the genus Acrocephalus on the basis of molecular data. Key words: genus Acrocephalus, nest site, nest material, nest construction, nest shape, nest sizes. Z. BOCHEÑSKI (corresponding author), Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Ani- mals, P.Ac.Sc., 31-016 Kraków, S³awkowska 17, Poland. E-mail: [email protected] P. KUŒNIERCZYK, Ludwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, P. Ac.Sc., 53-114 Wroc³aw, Rudolfa Weigla 12, Poland. I. INTRODUCTION The genus Acrocephalus seems not to be defined unequivocally. From time to time it resembles a “witch’s sack”, to which various ornithologists place, according to their predilections, various species of Sylviinae, apart of a few, which are always in this genus. Those additional species are in- cluded in other genera, set up especially for them by other researchers .
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Species I Have Seen World List
    bird species I have seen U.K tally: 279 US tally: 393 Total world: 1,496 world list 1. Abyssinian ground hornbill 2. Abyssinian longclaw 3. Abyssinian white-eye 4. Acorn woodpecker 5. African black-headed oriole 6. African drongo 7. African fish-eagle 8. African harrier-hawk 9. African hawk-eagle 10. African mourning dove 11. African palm swift 12. African paradise flycatcher 13. African paradise monarch 14. African pied wagtail 15. African rook 16. African white-backed vulture 17. Agami heron 18. Alexandrine parakeet 19. Amazon kingfisher 20. American avocet 21. American bittern 22. American black duck 23. American cliff swallow 24. American coot 25. American crow 26. American dipper 27. American flamingo 28. American golden plover 29. American goldfinch 30. American kestrel 31. American mag 32. American oystercatcher 33. American pipit 34. American pygmy kingfisher 35. American redstart 36. American robin 37. American swallow-tailed kite 38. American tree sparrow 39. American white pelican 40. American wigeon 41. Ancient murrelet 42. Andean avocet 43. Andean condor 44. Andean flamingo 45. Andean gull 46. Andean negrito 47. Andean swift 48. Anhinga 49. Antillean crested hummingbird 50. Antillean euphonia 51. Antillean mango 52. Antillean nighthawk 53. Antillean palm-swift 54. Aplomado falcon 55. Arabian bustard 56. Arcadian flycatcher 57. Arctic redpoll 58. Arctic skua 59. Arctic tern 60. Armenian gull 61. Arrow-headed warbler 62. Ash-throated flycatcher 63. Ashy-headed goose 64. Ashy-headed laughing thrush (endemic) 65. Asian black bulbul 66. Asian openbill 67. Asian palm-swift 68. Asian paradise flycatcher 69. Asian woolly-necked stork 70.
    [Show full text]
  • British Birds
    British Birds Vol. 58 No. j MAY 1965 Territory and food of the Song Thrush By P. W. Davies and D. W. Snow A STUDY OF the Song Thrush Turdusphilomelos was carried out over three years (1954-56) in and around the Oxford Botanic Garden and in Marley Wood on the Wytham Estate about 3 miles from the centre of Oxford. To a large extent it ran parallel with a simultaneous study of the Blackbird T. merula in the same areas (Snow 19 5 6,19 5 8a and 19 5 8b), but different emphasis was placed on different aspects of the biology of the two species according to their apparent interest and the opportuni­ ties for observation. The Oxford Botanic Garden supports many Song Thrushes which, like the Blackbirds there, are comparatively tame owing to their association with man, whereas the woodland thrushes are shy and far fewer observations could be made on them. A high proportion of the garden thrushes were colour-ringed, either as nestlings or when trapped as adults, but no attempt was made to colour-ring the wood­ land ones. In contrast to the Blackbirds, many Song Thrushes, ringed while passing through in search of food, were never seen again, and others held territories for very short periods. Consequently, a much more continuous trapping effort was needed in order to be able to identify the birds resident at any time. As a result of consistently colour-ringing and watching the garden thrushes, it was found that there was little difficulty in determining the sex of each individual, even if unringed, mainly from its behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Trip Report June 21 – July 2, 2017 | Written by Guide Gerard Gorman
    Austria & Hungary: Trip Report June 21 – July 2, 2017 | Written by guide Gerard Gorman With Guide Gerard Gorman and Participants: Jane, Susan, and Cynthia and David This was the first Naturalist Journeys tour to combine Austria and Hungary, and it was a great success. We visited and birded some wonderfully diverse habitats and landscapes in 12 days — the forested foothills of the Alps in Lower Austria, the higher Alpine peak of Hochkar, the reed beds around Lake Neusiedler, the grasslands and wetlands of the Seewinkel in Austria and the Hanság in Hungary, the lowland steppes and farmlands of the Kiskunság east of the Danube, and finally the pleasant rolling limestone hills of the Bükk in north-east Hungary. In this way, we encountered diverse and distinct habitats and therefore birds, other wildlife, and flora, everywhere we went. We also stayed in a variety of different family-run guesthouses and lodges and sampled only local cuisine. As we went, we also found time to take in some of the rich history and culture of these two countries. Wed., June 21, 2017 We met up at Vienna International Airport at noon and were quickly on our way eastwards into Lower Austria. It was a pleasant sunny day and the traffic around the city was a little heavy, but we were soon away from the ring-road and in rural Austria. Roadside birds included both Carrion and Hooded Crows, several Eurasian Kestrels, and Barn Swallows zoomed overhead. Near Hainfeld we drove up a farm road, stopped for a picnic, and did our first real birding.
    [Show full text]
  • Song Thrush Factfile
    Song Thrush factfile This factfile intends to provide the background information necessary for teachers to use the lesson plans and worksheets confidently. A number of other websites that may be useful include Wikipedia, ARKive, © Tony Wills BBC Nature, Naturenet, RSPB and The Wildlife Trust. Song Thrush Latin: Turdus philomelos The Song thrush is a familiar and popular garden songbird whose numbers are declining seriously, making it a Red list species. Song thrushes are smaller, and browner than the Mistle thrush. The song thrush has a distinctive song, with repeating musical phrases. It builds a neat mud-lined cup nest in a bush or tree, and then lays four or five dark-spotted blue eggs. The female incubates the eggs alone for between 10 and 17 days, the chicks fledge after a similar time again. They will attempt to raise two or three broods a year. They utilise habitats which include bushes and trees such as woods, hedgerows, parks and gardens across the UK. Song thrushes are preyed on by cats and birds of prey, whilst they feed on worms, fruit and snails; smashing them against stones to break the shell. Intensive farming practices, have been blamed for a serious and rapid decline in populations. The introduction of pesticides, and the removal of field boundaries such as hedgerows have decreased the availability of both food and shelter for the song thrush and many other species. Farms in the past tended to contain a number of different habitat types including, ponds, woodland areas, crops and open fields supporting a variety of flowering plants.
    [Show full text]