Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points
1. The Division of State Police played a high-profile role in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic. The Federal Emergency Management Agency provided the State Police with $750 million to help the State cover COVID-19 pandemic response expenditures.
• Questions: Please provide a narrative of the Division of State Police’s role in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. What toll have the pandemic response activities taken on the health and well-being of Division of State Police employees?
The Office of Emergency Management (NJOEM) played a lead role in the State’s COVID-19 response. Major COVID-19 related activities performed by NJOEM include:
• Continuous State Emergency Operations Center Unit (SEOC) activation status throughout the pandemic to provide resource support and situational awareness reporting; • Coordination and supervision of the state All Hazard Incident Management Team to provide: planning and operational support, and coordination of federal, State and local stakeholder activities, for community-based testing sites, field medical stations, temporary morgues, Vaccination Mega Sites, and Community Based Vaccination Sites; • Logistics and resource support for testing supplies/kits, ventilators, and medicines, as well as the acquisition and management of the State’s entire personal protective equipment stockpile; • Public relations and information for testing and vaccination programs; • Oversight of financial expenditures for the COVID-19 response, and the administrative support for processing and reimbursement of the State’s $2.4 billion CRF grant; • The Superintendent of the State Police, Colonel Patrick Callahan serves as the State Director of Emergency Management. During the pandemic, the Colonel has the discretion to make additions, amendments, clarifications, exceptions, and exclusions to the terms of the Executive Orders.
Many personnel assigned to NJOEM have been required to work extra hours continuously throughout the pandemic to support COVID-19 operations as well as their routine state responsibilities. Although short-staffed, members performed in an exemplary manner, while dealing with their own personal challenges of the pandemic, such as the closure of childcare facilities and schools, remote learning, quarantining, etc. Members have struggled to take personal time and have lost accrued paid leave while trying to fulfill their increased work responsibilities. Certain NJOEM employees were eligible to carry over additional unused vacation time into 2021 because of their engagement in the COVID-19 response. Personnel are experiencing chronic stress, pandemic fatigue, and other mental and physical health challenges.
1 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
The Office of Employee & Organization Development (OEOD) within NJSP has been providing assistance to employees with mental health challenges. OEOD counseled employees on many issues related to the pandemic, i.e., adjusting to working remotely, home-schooling, anxiety, depression, risks of being an essential employee, anger, isolation, health concerns, grief, and loss.
Major COVID-19 related activities performed by OEOD include: • Numerous outreach activities via electronic media to include mass emails or AIC postings on OEOD availability, and mental health and wellness resources for dealing with COVID-19. Station commanders and PSTs throughout the state were contacted and offered support, as well as providing a coordination of Chaplains and OEOD support for Troopers assigned to the temporary morgues. • Telephonic and virtual electronic counseling sessions with employees, as well as, meetings with supervisors and resource providers. New hire orientations and various trainings were conducted virtually.
• Question: Please detail the uses of the $750 million in assistance from the Federal Emergency Management Agency to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.
NJOEM made FEMA-reimbursable purchases for all State agencies throughout the pandemic. The Division of State Police has legally encumbered, and/or legally spent, the FEMA assistance allotted to New Jersey to assist the State in combatting the COVID-19 pandemic. Our statewide initiatives to "slow" the spread, and our State’s all-out effort to protect the citizens of New Jersey against the spread of COVID-19, include many different programs. These programs range from PPE purchases and distribution, to standing up portable hospitals, to getting the vaccination sites up and running. The Division of State Police encompasses the Office of Emergency Management for the State and as such, it serves as the lead agency; however, we work in tandem with all divisions and departments across the state.
2. The State charged $62.5 million in Division of State Police salaries ($50.5 million) and administrative costs ($12.0 million) to its $2.4 billion Coronavirus Relief Fund allocation under the federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act of 2020. The federal law and United States Treasury guidance require that Coronavirus Relief Fund balances be used to cover costs incurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The federal government may disallow expenditures states charge to the Coronavirus Relief Fund that fall outside of permissible parameters.
2 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
• Questions: How did the Division of State Police determine salaries and administrative costs it could charge to the Coronavirus Relief Fund? Please detail the types of expenditures that were charged to the federal resources. Were regular salaries charged to the fund or only overtime expenditures? The salaries of what job titles were deemed to be eligible to be charged to the Coronavirus Relief Fund? Was there a benchmark that required a certain percentage of an employee’s time to be spent on verifiable COVID-19 response activities?
The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Treasurer of the State of New Jersey and the Division of State Police references the U.S. Department of Treasury Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) guidance for State government’s payroll expense eligibility for public safety personnel whose services were substantially dedicated to mitigating or responding to the COVID-19 public health emergency. To determine salary costs charged to the CRF, the Division of State Police used the New Jersey Comprehensive Financial System General Ledger and Payroll Ledger to determine eligible payroll costs for the period referenced in the MOU.
To identify eligible costs, the DSP Fiscal Control Bureau calculated all regular salary costs for enlisted members and removed all Federal Grant salary match along with General Ledger salary offsets. Overtime expenditures were excluded from the eligible cost calculation and overtime identified as COVID-19 related was submitted to FEMA for reimbursement.
The $12.0 million administrative costs charged to CRF were determined by the needs of the Division along with approval by the Governor’s Disaster Recovery Office and Treasury. These projects encompassed administrative costs, which support the mission of the Division of State Police and NJOEM in their management of this disaster and potentially those that may follow. The costs are as follows:
• NJOEM personnel salaries • Software and hardware upgrades to OEM • DSP Preparedness Bureau Pandemic Response Package • DSP Training Bureau COVID-19 preparation and management • Upgrade to the NJOEM State Emergency Operation’s real time situational reporting system for state and county OEMs • Emergency response vehicles
3. The State transferred $60.2 million of its federal Coronavirus Relief Fund allocation under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act of 2020 to the Division of State Police for P25 Radio System Upgrades. Additionally, the Governor’s FY 2022 Budget indicates the Department of Law and Public Safety will receive $2.7 million out of anticipated 9-1-1 System and Emergency Response Fee funds for a radio system upgrade.
3 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
• Questions: Please describe the P25 Radio System Upgrades that are being funded out of the State’s Coronavirus Relief Fund allocation and explain how the project is an eligible COVID-19-related use of federal CARES Act funding. What is the schedule for completing the project? Will the $60.2 million allocation fund the entire project? If not, how does the division anticipate financing the remaining project costs? How does the project relate to the recommended $2.7 million State funds Radio System Upgrade appropriation?
NJOEM submitted a Coronavirus Relief Funds Grant Application on behalf of 15 state agencies and 7,276 subscribers for consideration of an upgrade from the end of life 4.1 radio system to the P25 statewide radio system. The CRF Project was endorsed by a recommendation from Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Cyber Security and Infrastructure Agency (CISA), requesting that states identify communications as critical to help protect the health and safety of our citizens by ensuring that the communications industry has the requisite access and resources needed to keep Americans connected during these challenging times.
The Communications Bureau supported all aspects of the New Jersey statewide response to the public health emergency created by the impact of the Coronavirus. This support included providing communications at all Community Based Testing Sites (CBTS), Field Medical Stations (FMS) and Hospital Expansion locations, temporary morgues, Non-Congregate Sheltering locations and the deployment of the 100 ambulances through the National Ambulance Contract by the EMS Task Force. In addition, nearly 1,000 members of the National Guard were deployed and worked in coordination with state, county, and local agencies for many of these missions.
Public safety communications needed to be coordinated between hospitals, ambulance dispatch centers, statewide air medevac and numerous state and local agencies specifically in relation to the Coronavirus response. This required the deployment of Communications Bureau personnel, providing communication for convoy escorts of PPE, portable radio assets and the assignment and coordination of radio channels utilized in the coronavirus response.
This project will address the following gaps and were identified as immediate communications concerns: • Limitations for site coverage was further exposed as relief sites were established in locations that had not been previously used. End users experienced increased busy signals due to the increase in radio activity. Missed calls for assistance and officer safety concerns had to be mitigated. • Incompatibility issues required Mutual Link patches which now tied up 2 frequencies further exasperating the issues associated with the increase in radio system traffic. • A lack of frequency encryption increased the risk of having our signal interrupted and allowed for transmissions to be monitored with readily
4 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
available cell phone apps. This increased the risk and threat to law enforcement and exposed users to inadvertently broadcast Personal Identifiable Information (PII), medical sensitive patient data and decedent information. This caused members at FMS and Mortuary Sites to transmit information through other timelier means. • Interoperability problems caused several safety issues that needed to be addressed. Additional radios had to be temporarily acquired from state, county and local agencies and reassigned to members that needed to be trained on a different system. Impacted agencies now needed to monitor two radio frequencies. • Technical assistance in the field was overextended by state, county and local Communication Technicians who needed to address the numerous deficiencies encountered during the response phase of the pandemic. The challenges experienced during the first wave of the coronavirus pandemic will likely be repeated during a likely resurgence of the coronavirus in New Jersey and could lead to a radio system failure when it is needed most.
The below schedule outlines the upgrades funded in the P25 project which is divided into 3 Phases. Phase 1 was completed December of 2020, Phase 2 covers 2021 and the final phase 3, will be completed in 2022. The Phase 1 and Phase 2 were funded by the State’s Coronavirus Relief Fund. The $60.2 million will fund the entire project for the Division of State Police, Department of Corrections and other state agencies. However, there are other allied partners including SJTA and the Turnpike Authority, that will need to make investments to purchase radios compatible with the P25 system. The existing 4.1 system will be supported until P25 is fully implemented in 2022.
P25 Phase 1: $49.2 million (Completed December of 2020) • 909 mobile radios programmed, installed and deployed • 2,438 portable radios programmed and distributed • 2,840 portable radios for Department of Corrections • 1,000 portable radios programmed for 15 other state agencies • Accessories, chargers and extra batteries for each portable radio • Servers were updated at Hamilton and ROIC
P25 Phase 2: $11.0 million (Ongoing for 2021) • Deploy the remaining mobile radios for Troops A and B and any remaining vehicles • Upgrade the infrastructure at tower sites • Program and install new consoles at ODU sites • New tower site built for Department of Corrections • Upgrade Department of Corrections dispatch center • Install P25 capable radios for 3 of the 5 Agusta helicopters
P25 Phase 3: $2.7 million (2022) upon completion 2-year warranty begins
5 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
• Decommission the 4.1 system • Fully implement P25 statewide • Integrate encryption in phases • Install the remaining 2 P25 radios in the Agustahelicopters
4. The State transferred $19.9 million of its federal Coronavirus Relief Fund allocation to the Division of State Police for distribution to counties that did not receive a direct Coronavirus Relief Fund allocation from the federal government under the CARES Act of 2020. Only counties with 500,000 residents or more received such a direct payment. The CARES Act requires that Coronavirus Relief Fund allocations be used to offset costs incurred due to COVID-19. The federal government would recoup from the State any amount a county government spends in violation of federal guidelines.
• Questions: Please share the allocation of the $19.9 million in Coronavirus Relief Fund resources the State set aside for counties that did not receive aid directly from the federal government. Do grant agreements with recipient counties stipulate that the State would recoup any amount awarded to a county that the federal government would disallow and for that reason recover from the State as the original grantee? If so, please explain the recovery provision.
Applicant Name COVID-19 Costs Not Covered by Test Sites FEMA Eligible Amount Atlantic County $1,165,528.75 $357,500.00 Burlington County $565,094.06 $357,500.00 Cape May County $1,794,754.40 $357,500.00 Cumberland County $554,588.72 $357,500.00 Gloucester County $1,127,759.13 $357,500.00 Hunterdon County $226,177.00 $357,500.00 Mercer County $1,500,000.00 $357,500.00 Morris County $3,819,380.12 $357,500.00 Salem County $714,209.43 $357,500.00 Somerset County $3,124,968.25 $357,500.00 Sussex County $612,469.00 $357,500.00 Warren County $397,404.30 $357,500.00 Subtotals $15,602, 333.16 $4,290,000.00 Total $19,892,333.16
The Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the State and the counties specifically states that "Return to the grantee any unused grant funds or grant funds which are not supported by audit or other federal or state review of documentation 6 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
maintained by the subgrantee or which were otherwise not used in accordance with the CARES act."
5. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal government has awarded several billions of dollars to the State of New Jersey.
• Question: What are the department’s plans to maximize federal financial assistance during the COVID-19 pandemic and as the State recovers therefrom?
From the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Department of Law and Public Safety has, working with the Governor’s Office and Department of Treasury, availed itself of various federal funding streams to offset costs to the maximum extent allowable under those programs. These programs fall into three broad categories:
• Coronavirus recovery dollars, such as the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) and the forthcoming American Rescue Plan (ARP) programs;
• Specific federal reimbursement programs, such as disaster assistance funding from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA); and
• Federal grant programs that LPS is the designated entity to receive funding, such as the Emergency Management Performance Grant Supplemental (EMPG-S) and Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding (CESF) program.
LPS is also mindful of the need to maximize federal dollars while also preventing any duplication of benefits between these programs.
6. Many federal agencies and departments have waived certain requirements during the COVID-19 pandemic.
• Questions: What, if any, federal waivers has the department applied for during the COVID-19 pandemic? What waiver requests were approved and what waiver requests were denied? How many of these waivers have an opportunity to be extended?
The Department of Law and Public Safety sought waivers in two places:
• The Division of Highway Traffic Safety was subject to a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration blanket COVID-19 waiver issued in April 2020. These waived a number of HTS’s mandatory program requirements including the annual Seat Belt Use Observational Survey and participation in several national traffic safety enforcement crackdowns (ex. Click It or Ticket and Driver Sober or Get Pulled Over). These waivers were not automatically renewed for 7 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
the current FY 2021. However, states are eligible to apply for waivers this year for COVID-19 related reasons and New Jersey has applied for a waiver for the 2021 Seat Belt Use Observational Survey. The waiver request was submitted on March 25, 2021 and as of this writing no decision has been rendered by NHTSA.
• Grant awards – the Department sought extension of time on grant awards that were expiring during the pandemic, and the Federal Office of Victims of Crime and Office of Victims Witness allowed for leniency on grant match waivers, with the Department utilized for the benefit of its subgrantees.
7. The Federal Funds Information for States estimates that New Jersey State and local government entities will receive a combined $15.1 billion in federal assistance under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.
• Questions: Please detail the amounts the department anticipates receiving under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 and indicate the purposes for which the funds would be used. By what date would the funds have to be expended?
The Department of Law and Public Safety is aware of the estimated funding that may be distributed to it under ARP and awaits additional guidance from the federal government on allowability of the use of such funds.
8. Federal enactments and budget proposals often significantly affect State programs and fiscal resources. The Department of Law and Public Safety anticipates receiving $223.9 million in federal funds in FY 2022, which is a decrease of $15.5 million from the anticipated FY 2021 federal funding of $239.4 million. Actual federal fund revenues were $421.7 million in FY 2020, primarily as a result of one-time federal disaster assistance aid, and $319.4 million FY 2019.
• Questions: What are the principal reasons for the decline in federal funds projected in FY 2022? Please evaluate any impacts that these changes may have on programs operated by the department. How have the clients served by these programs been affected? To what extent have the department’s monitoring, regulatory, and administrative activities, including those measured by performance metrics, been affected?
The net decrease in the projected FY2022 awards can be attributed to a trend in the types of programs funded, with new funding opportunities now focusing on research and evaluation. The Federal government is steering away from continuously funding programs that have existed for more than a decade, but are evaluating the success of existing programs and researching ways to address the same problems using new approaches.
8 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
In addition, one of the Departments largest programs, the Federal Office for Victims of Crime’s Victims of Crime Act grant is facing a significant decrease in funding at the federal level. NJSP will no longer receive the federal Presidential Residence Protection Assistance grant as the current President of the United States does not have a residence in NJ. The Department also received a federal award in FY 2021 under the Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding program which is not expected to be awarded again FY 2022.
The Department continues to apply for funding opportunities when programs correlate with Department programs and priorities. New initiatives that aren’t planned for, are evaluated and applied for if they fit the Department’s mission however, these are not included in our projections as we are unaware of these funding announcements until they are released. There have been no changes in the Department’s monitoring, regulatory, or administrative activities due to the projected decrease in federal funds.
• Question: Are there any federal grants that the State did not receive in FY 2021 or FY 2020 due to a decrease or elimination of a federal grant program?
As mentioned above, the Victims of Crime Act grant program is facing significant decreases. The awards have decreased from $90,733,139 in FY19, to $60,445,762 in FY20, to $44,426,403 in FY21. The award for FY22 is expected to be roughly 28.7% lower than FY21, with an award of approximately $31,676,025.
9. According to the Governor’s FY 2022 Budget, the State received the following FY 2020 federal grants for disaster assistance totaling $244.1 million: COVID-19 Pandemic ($115.2 million), Super Storm Sandy ($102.7 million), and Other ($26.2 million).
• Questions: Please provide an overview of how these federal disaster assistance funds were expended or are planned to be expended. If any of the federal funds supported salaries, please provide details on how salaries were charged, including salary titles.
• COVID-19 Pandemic: $113.5 million of the $115.2 million for COVID-19 Pandemic was reimbursed for expenditures on PPE. The remaining $1.7 million was sent to local governments as reimbursement for emergency protective measures for COVID-19 expenses. • Super Storm Sandy: Of the $102.7 million for Super Storm Sandy, $85 million was reimbursed to local governments for Categories C, D, E, F and G, which are for permanent work for Roads and Bridges, Water Control Facilities, Public Buildings, Public Utilities, and Parks/Recreational facilities.
9 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
$9.5 million was spent on Hazard Mitigation projects. $3.1 million was spent on the administration of the disaster assistance funds. • The $3.1 million administration funds were mostly spent on the Recovery Bureau staff salaries consisting of: o 2 Lieutenants o 2 Sergeant First Class o 1 Supervising Administrative Analyst o 8 Administrative Analyst 4's o 6 Administrative Analyst 3's o 1 Administrative Analyst 1 o 4 Accountant 1's o 1 Tech Assistant o 13 Contract Staff • The remaining amount was spent on categories A and B, which are debris removal and emergency protective measures.
Other: Of the $26.2 million of other expenditures, approx. $8 million was spent on reimbursements for HMGP projects. The remainder was for public assistance: $2.6 million was reimbursed for Hurricane Irene (4021), $2 million was reimbursed for DR4264 projects and approx. $14 million was reimbursed for DR4368 projects.
10. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Governor has issued several executive orders that regulate the seating capacity of bars and restaurants and establish certain social distancing requirements. The COVID-19 pandemic and the restrictions have been detrimental to bars and restaurants, many of which have closed either temporarily or permanently in response to the public health emergency.
• Questions: Has the Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control experienced an increase in work volume due to the enforcement of these executive orders? Has additional staff been necessary to enforce COVID-19 related restrictions? How many plenary retail consumption licenses have been suspended or revoked for violations of the executive orders?
Since the pandemic began, the Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) has conducted 3,713 COVID-19 compliance inspections at licensed bars and restaurants to ensure compliance with Governor Murphy’s Executive Orders. In addition to conducting COVID-19 compliance inspections, the Division maintained the responsibility to conduct routine retail compliance inspections. During the pandemic, many Division resources were diverted to COVID-19 related matters. The Division on boarded six Investigators and two clerical staff to the Investigations Bureau over the course of the last year to fill vacancies that occurred prior to the pandemic. The Division also frequently collaborated with state, county and local law enforcement
10 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
partners to conduct COVID-19 operations. The Division continues to promote public safety and compliance during the pandemic.
As a result of increased activity by the Investigations Bureau, there was an increase in work volume related to COVID-19 enforcement actions. As of March 2021, the Enforcement Bureau’s workload increased by 21%. The Bureau opened 665 enforcement matters during the period from March 1, 2020 to March 1, 2021 as compared to the 550 opened enforcement actions from the prior year. The Enforcement Bureau has reviewed approximately 370 investigation reports regarding Executive Order violations. Of those 370 investigations, the Bureau has issued approximately 6 warning letters, 65 fine letters and 188 sets of formal disciplinary charges. These matters are in addition to the standard disciplinary matters handled by the Bureau on a regular basis.
The Division onboarded one clerical staff member to the Enforcement Bureau during the last year to fill a vacancy that existed prior to the pandemic. The Bureau adjusted operations to prioritize Executive Order violations resulting in a direct impact on the processing time for other disciplinary charges between approximately March 15, 2020 and December 31, 2020. To date, disposition of disciplinary actions against licensees for Executive Order violations have resulted in 65 fine letters (42 of which have been paid and closed), 42 monetary penalties in lieu of suspension, and 27 license suspensions. As of this writing, no licenses have been revoked.
• Question: Has the Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control observed an increase in the number of inactive plenary retail consumption licenses, also known as “pocket licenses,” as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic?
As of March 2021, there are approximately 1,347 inactive plenary retail licenses. That is an increase of 3.85% from the prior year.
The Division does not have a current methodology to determine whether the increase in inactive licenses is due to the pandemic. ABC will continue to monitor the status of inactive licenses upon completion of the license renewal term, which expires on June 30th.
11 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
11. The Governor’s FY 2022 Budget reflects the anticipation and receipt of a variety of federal grants. The following is a compilation of a few of the grants intended to provide support services for victims of crime.
Federal Grants Supporting Victims of Crimes*
Office or Division Name of Federal Anticipate FY 2021 FY 2020 Grant d FY 2022 Division of State Victim Centered Law $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 Police Enforcement Training Division of State Sex Offender $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 Police Notification and Registration Act (SORNA) Division of Criminal Victim Assistance $33,320,00 $51,378,00 $72,800,000 Justice Grants (VAG) 0 0 Division of Criminal Violence Against $3,710,000 $3.890,000 $3,890,000 Justice Woman Grant Division of Criminal Victims of Crime Act $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Justice (VOCA) Division of Criminal SORNA $225,000 $225,000 $255,000 Justice Victims of Crime Victims of Crime Act – $344,000 $344,000 $344,000 Compensation Building State Office Technology
Victims of Crime Victim Compensation $2,900,000 $2,900,000 $2,900,000 Compensation Award Office
*Data on federal grants was derived from the FY 2022 IBN 3110
• Questions: Please provide documentation on how each of the above grants for victims has been disseminated Statewide. Please include the names of the recipient agencies (State, county, municipal, or nonprofit) and the amounts allocated through each grant in FY 2019, FY 2020, and FY 2021. If a grant may be expended over a multi-year period, please provide that information.
Please see attachment A for the list of how each of the above grants for victims has been disseminated Statewide.
12. The “Criminal Injuries Compensation Act of 1971” governs compensation to crime victims for certain expenses they incur as a result of a crime. P.L.2019, c.380 revised this law to permit the Victims of Crime Compensation Office to 12 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
increase the maximum award for legal fees from $3,000 to $10,000 and to make limited awards for new services for victims. Although the list of eligible services and legal fee awards increased, the cap on a victim’s total award remained at $25,000.
• Questions: Please provide an overview of how P.L.2019, c.380 has affected Victims of Crime Compensation Office awards to victims of crime. Have total amounts changed? Has the composition of awards changed? Has the expansion of legal fees resulted in a decrease of the amount of reimbursements for other services? What has been the effect on the average amount of legal fees awarded?
Attachment B is an overview of VCCO’s claim payments by benefit type from FY 2018 through FY 2021. With the exception of attorney fees, no other benefit has significantly increased or changed due to the amendments to P.L. 2019, c.380. The decline in relocation assistance, transportation costs, and loss of earnings can be attributed to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, where families continue to face challenges with unemployment and locating affordable housing. Also, as victims continue to use telemedicine for their crime related treatment, it reduces the need for transportation cost reimbursement.
In FY 2021, it is projected that VCCO will award $1,031,155 for criminal rights legal fees compared to $616,219 awarded in FY 2020, resulting in a 67% increase with an average increase of approximately 23% per claim. Also, it should be noted that, since the maximum award increase from $3,000 to $10,000 for legal fees applies to services rendered on or after August 1, 2020, the Office anticipates this benefit to significantly increase over time.
Notwithstanding the legal fee increase for this fiscal year, VCCO’s overall claim award for FY 2021 is projected to be the same as the previous year at approximately $12 million.
13. The FY 2022 Governor’s Budget includes a recommended $2.6 million appropriation to develop software that would make law enforcement forfeiture actions more transparent.
A. Questions: Please describe the forfeiture transparency initiative in greater detail. What would be the functionalities of the software to be developed and how would they make forfeiture actions more transparent? Would the software only be for State law enforcement forfeiture actions? When is the software intended to become operational?
The Department of Law and Public Safety is working in conjunction with the 21 County Prosecutors Offices to update and improve forfeiture reporting and transparency in response to P.L. 2019, c.304. The law requires LPS to develop an asset seizure and
13 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
forfeiture reporting system and requires the 21 County Prosecutors Offices to compile and submit information about property seized and forfeited. The law also requires the LPS to establish and maintain a forfeiture case tracking system and searchable database on a publicly-accessible website.
The software will aid in capturing the required information from forfeiture actions at the 21 County Prosecutors Offices and transmit that data each quarter to the Division of Criminal Justice and will ultimately be populated into the case tracking system and searchable database on a publicly-accessible website.
The software will only cover State law enforcement actions and is expected to be operational in Fall of 2021.
B. Question: Is $2.6 million the complete cost of the software development, or just the first-year cost? What is the full estimated cost of the initiative? What would be the annual operating expenses once the new software becomes operational?
LPS expects that the $2.6 million will cover the complete cost of development and the first year of maintenance costs. It is anticipated that annual maintenance costs for the software will be $13,500 for the Division of Criminal Justice.
C. Question: Would the software be developed in-house or by a vendor? Please identify the vendor, if applicable. Would the department own the software or would it pay an annual user fee to a vendor for a set number of years? If the latter, please explain the contractual compensation arrangement.
The software will be developed by CSI Technology Group and will be in the form of an add-on module to the InfoShare™ case management and document management system.
14. The Capital Commission did not recommend funding the Department of Law and Public Safety’s requested $8.4 million for three capital projects. Of the requested amount, $4.5 million was for Division of State Police roof repairs and $1.0 million for a parking lot repair at the Office of Weights and Measures. The remaining $2.9 million was requested for repairs on, the refurbishing of, and new construction on the recently acquired Ravine Club property so that it may serve as a wellness center in an effort to “promote resiliency and support diversity within the Division of State Police.” According to the request, funding would be used to repair and maintain the pool and existing structures to augment the State Police’s current 90-year old gym and pool. A structure with separate office space would also be built for the Office of Peer Assistance to operate in a confidential environment and to serve as a small training center with a focus on multicultural competency. The building would function as a focal point for State Police Diversity, Equality, and Wellness.
14 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
A. Questions: Does the FY 2022 Governor’s Budget fund any of the above requested projects? Please list the capital needs of the department. Which projects does the department expect will be addressed in FY 2022 and what will be the expected funding sources? For the unfunded projects, how does the department intend to meet the capital needs? Please provide a list of all department capital projects completed in FY 2019, FY 2020, and FY 2021.
If the Roof Replacement Requests for the Hamilton Tech. Complex for $3.7 million are not funded, the State Police will continue to make roof repairs as necessary. In FY 2021, the Troop C Hamilton Sub-Station roof replacement has been funded in the amount of $890,000.
The following projects were completed or expected to be completed in FY 2022: • FY2018: Boiler replacement at Buena Vista Headquarters $1.1 Million out of APU C09 is still pending completion • FY2019: Equipment Upgrade Call Center Hamilton $500,000 out of APU C25 was completed • FY2020: NJSP HQ Computer Network Upgrade $3.359 Million out of APU C37 is still pending completion • FY2020: Microwave Uplink Bordentown to Berlin Towers $500,000 out of APU C38 was completed
B. Question: How will the State Police use the Ravine Club property if the requested construction and renovation project is not funded?
The Division of State Police will continue to use the Ravine Club property as a training and exercise facility.
15. In 2018, the Attorney General announced the creation of the Office of Public Integrity and Accountability, which is composed of a team of prosecutors and detectives tasked with eliminating corruption and misconduct in State and local government. The office also handles criminal civil rights investigations, including excessive force by police, and investigates claims of wrongful conviction. The office was established in FY 2020, when it expended $5.6 million. The Governor’s FY 2022 Budget recommends maintaining the FY 2022 appropriation at the FY 2021 level of $8.5 million.
• Questions: Please comment on the activities of the Office of Public Integrity and Accountability since inception. What have been the office’s accomplishments?
Corruption Bureau: Since OPIA was created, it has continued to carry out a number of priority missions for the Office of the Attorney General. The Corruption Bureau, which remains a core mission, has been vigilant in investigating and successfully
15 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
combating public corruption and holding accountable those who have violated the public’s faith. Since 2019, the Corruption Bureau has opened 268 cases, closed 655 cases, filed 71 complaint summonses or warrants, indicted 20 cases and secured 35 guilty pleas by way of Accusations (number of closed cases include cases opened in previous years and intakes that did not become an open case). The total number of defendants charged/indicted/pled is 131.
These investigations and prosecutions have ranged from a public servant taking bribes to lower a customer’s water bills by tens of thousands of dollars (State v. Guillermo Quinones), to a mayor stealing nearly $200K while using his official position to launder money (State v. Ronald DiMura), to law enforcement officers tampering with public records by filing false reports to cover-up inappropriate actions (State v. Jonathan Perez and State v. Ruben Morales), to old school political corruption where sitting officials and political candidates sell the authority of their public office or the office they are seeking to hold in exchange for money (State v. Sudhan Thomas, State v. Jason O’Donnell, State v. John Cesaro, State v. John Windish, State v. Mary Dougherty).
More recently, OPIA led the investigation into allegations that Department of Corrections employees at the Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women used excessive and improper force and criminally violated the New Jersey Department of Corrections’ Regulations and Procedures. OPIA is the lead agency investigating the matter, along with Department of Corrections, Special Investigations Division and the Hunterdon County Prosecutor’s Office. To date, OPIA has charged eight correctional police officers, including three sergeants in the investigation. All defendants have been charged with second degree Official Misconduct, while five of the eight have also been charged with second degree Aggravated Assault and four of the eight have been charged with third degree Tampering with Public Records.
It is this type of case, as well as the examples previously mentioned, that make up the critical work that is performed by OPIA. The Office of the Attorney General is working through OPIA to ensure that there will be accountability and where every public servant and public official understands that he or she must act with integrity or there will be consequences.
Integrity Bureau: The Integrity Bureau is tasked with supervising and conducting independent investigations of all fatal police use-of-force or in-custody deaths within the State. The bureau also consists of the Conviction Review Unit (CRU) and Cold Case Network. As mandated under the AG Directive 2019-4, the bureau opened and investigated 18 incidents in which a civilian died during a police encounter. Of these investigations, 9 involved officers firing their service weapons. The bureau also completed an investigation in which an officer was both shot and fired his service weapon, as well as completed an investigation where officers utilized a taser as a civilian stabbed himself. All these matters, in addition to 15 other investigations that were completed in 2019, have been prepared for presentment to the State Grand Jury.
16 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
Furthermore, the bureau publicly released 48 video recordings from 12 incidents, as well as responded to 92 OPRA requests. Presently, the Bureau is reviewing 12 non- fatal incidents which occurred in 2019 and 8 non-fatal incidents which occurred in 2020. The Integrity Bureau monitored 2 county grand jury presentations and concurred in the administrative closure of 3 cases at the county level.
Since 2019, the Conviction Review Unit received more than 450 referrals and 367 completed applications from individuals convicted of a criminal offense. Ten matters are in varying stages of re-investigation. More than 150 matters are currently in the screening stage of investigation. Nineteen (19) applicants have appeals pending in the courts or other active litigation ongoing. Therefore, these applications have been inactivated but can be re-instituted at the applicant’s request upon resolution of the appeal. The CRU early screening work is conducted by teams of former defense counsels paired with former prosecutors. The re-investigations are conducted by Deputy Attorneys General and OPIA detectives. We have also partnered with Rutgers Law school for two years. Here, students conduct the initial legal research on CRU cases under the supervision of OPIA staff and with the support of two law professors.
This past year, OPIA’s Cold Case Network Central has been established. Two Special Investigators with years of homicide experience have joined the Integrity Bureau and brings with them extensive expertise in the investigation of homicides and other violent crimes. Ocean, Mercer, and Middlesex County Prosecutors’ Offices have also committed to participate in this initiative. Case work has already begun and will be supported by the legal staff of the Integrity Bureau and the three participating prosecutors’ offices.
Special Investigations Bureau: OPIA’s Special Investigations Bureau (“SIB”) continues to handle allegations of misconduct involving violations of Standard Operating Procedures, State and Departmental Policies and Procedures, and NJ Administration Code within the Department of Law and Public Safety. The SIB also continues to conduct external investigations as assigned by OPIA to include the Department as well as County Prosecutor’s Offices where conflicts exist.
Additionally, the SIB revised the Internal Affairs Policy and Procedures which was issued by the Office of the Attorney General in December 2019. This was the most comprehensive update to the policy in over a decade. As a result, the SIB was tasked with creating a new training program for Internal Affairs (“IA”) Officers. Along with the assistance of various subject matter experts, the Unit created a new curriculum and trained Master trainers in all 21 counties. Under the new structure, the Master Trainers are responsible to train all IA officers within their jurisdiction under the supervision of the County Prosecutor. The SIB continues to have statewide oversight of this training program.
Office of Policing Policy: Since 2019, OPP has spearheaded the effort to revise New Jersey’s twenty-year-old Use of Force Policy. This culminated in the December 2020
17 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
Attorney General announcement of a new and comprehensive policy focusing on respect for all human life while utilizing force as a last resort, and an emphasis on de- escalation strategies. In 2020, through the efforts of OPP and the Office of Law Enforcement Professional Standards (“OLEPS”), the vision of a statewide Use-of- Force reporting system for law enforcement became reality. As of October 1, 2020, all law enforcement agencies were reporting their Use-of-Force incidents via this online portal. The data is then available for analysis by leaders at the local, county and state levels to inform on training and policy development, as well as to identify problematic trends in how force is utilized throughout the state. The Office of the Attorney General has also created a dashboard where the public will have access to this statewide Use- of-Force data. It is anticipated that this dashboard be launched within the next month.
OPP continues to work with the Police Training Commission (“PTC”) to improve training programs for all New Jersey law enforcement officers, as well as leads the effort to transition from “early warning systems” to more a comprehensive, evidence- based “early intervention systems” that incorporate officer resiliency initiatives. Specifically, AG Directive 2018-3 requires every law enforcement agency in New Jersey to establish an Early Warning System (EWS), which is a management tool designed to detect problematic patterns and trends in an officer’s behavior in order to address those issues before the conduct escalates into serious misconduct. As part of the Excellence in Policing Initiative, OPIA has been studying Early Warning Systems and Early Intervention Systems from around the country. The overall goal is to identify officers who may be heading for serious misconduct issues and provide the necessary resources to them at an early stage. The resources may include training, counseling, enhanced supervision, mentoring or reassignment.
• Questions: Please provide a breakdown of the actual or anticipated expenditures of the office in FY 2020, FY 2021, and FY 2022. Please detail the positions that are funded from these appropriations.
Fiscal Year Salaries Non-Salaries Total 2020 Actual $5.464 million $453,000 $5.917 million* 2021 Projected $7.091 million $1.426 million $8.517 million** 2022 Projected $7.091 million $1.426 million $8.517 million** *Funded within DCJ and OAG appropriations **One account was established for OPIA in FY 2021
16. The Division of State Police is once again recruiting to ensure adequate staffing to fulfill its many responsibilities. The FY 2022 Budget in Brief indicates that FY 2022 will commence with 2,957 troopers and end with 3,032 troopers. The growth is due to the graduation of the 161st State Trooper class in March of 2021 and the 162nd State Trooper class in the upcoming winter. The FY 2022 Budget in Brief further notes that the Governor recommends increasing State Police appropriations by $4.5 million in order to facilitate the 163rd recruit class.
18 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
• Questions: Please provide an update on the 162nd, 161st, 160th, and 159th recruit classes. How many persons applied for each recruit class? Were there sufficient applicants to fill each recruit class? How many qualified applicants resigned their commission due to the lapse in time between applying and the class commencing? What were the minority and gender percentages of the three most recent classes – the 161st, 160th, and 159th? Is the department satisfied that it is improving the diversity of recruit class enrollees without reducing the aptitude requirements of the recruits? How has each of these recruit classes contributed to the minority and gender membership of the Division of State Police? What are the planned commencement and graduation dates for the 162nd and 163rd recruit classes and what is the enrollment target? When will the recruit selection process begin for the 163rd recruit class?
A. Questions:
Please provide an update on the 162nd, 161st, 160th, and 159th recruit classes. How many persons applied for each recruit class?
Response: In 2017, 10,352 people applied. This applicant pool formed the 159th, and the first part of the 160th recruit classes. In 2019, 7,348 people applied, this applicant pool formed the second part of the 160th and the 161st recruit classes. In 2020, 5,885 people applied for the 162nd recruit class.
The 2017 pool of applicants was also utilized to form the 158th recruit class.
Were there sufficient applicants to fill each recruit class? Yes, there were sufficient applicants to fill each recruit class.
How many qualified applicants resigned their commission due to the lapse in time between applying and the class commencing? The following represent the respective applicant withdrawal numbers for each class. 159th Class (238), 160th Class (286), 161st Class (238), 162nd Class (105 current process as of 03/30/2021).
What were the minority and gender percentages of the three most recent classes – the 161st, 160th, and 159th? Please see attached spreadsheets containing the minority and gender percentages of the three most recent state police classes – 161st (Attachment C), 160th (Attachment D), and 159th (Attachment E).
Is the department satisfied that it is improving the diversity of recruit class enrollees without reducing the aptitude requirements of the recruits? Yes, the Division of State Police recently had the most diverse classes enter the academy. The vendor, APT, utilizes algorithms to create a diverse list of applicants who will move forward in the hiring process.
19 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
How has each of these recruit classes contributed to the minority and gender membership of the Division of State Police? Race and gender membership has also increased. For specific race and gender statistics please see the attached two reports titled “NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE MEMBERS BREAKDOWN BY RANK, RACE & GENDER (PRE – 159th Class dated 05/03/2019 (Attachment F) and POST 161st Class dated 03/29/2021 (Attachment G).
What are the planned commencement and graduation dates for the 162nd and 163rd recruit classes and what is the enrollment target? The anticipated commencement date for the 162nd State Police Recruit class is August 2021 and the planned graduation date is January 2022. The anticipated commencement of the 163rd Class State Police Recruit Class is February 2022 and the planned graduation is July 2022. The enrollment target is 200 recruits per class.
When will the recruit selection process begin for the 163rd recruit class? The Applicant Selection Process for the 163rd State Police Recruit Class initiated on March 28, 2021. The initial application will be accepted from March 28, 2021 to April 23, 2021.
• Question: Please provide a detailed budget for the 163rd, 162nd, and 161st recruit classes, respectively, divided between costs to be incurred in each of FY 2020, FY 2021, FY 2022, and FY 2023?
Response: Please see the attached spreadsheet detailing the budget breakdown for the 163rd, 162nd, and 161st recruit classes (Attachment H).
• Question: Please provide a breakdown of Division of State Police staffing allocations, by division and unit, and also indicate the number of civilian staff in each division or unit.
Response: Please see the attached DIVISION RECAPITULATION report dated 03/30/21 (Attachment I).
• Questions: Please provide an update on the number of troopers eligible for retirement in the next 10 years, per year. For the period between 2019 and 2021, please indicate, by year, the number of troopers who were eligible to retire, the number who actually retired, and the length of time that elapsed between retirement eligibility and actual retirement for each retiree. How do past and future retirements affect the minority ratios? Was there a detectible increase in retirements in 2020 and 2021 that can be attributed to a changing perception of law enforcement within society?
20 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
Please provide an update on the number of troopers eligible for retirement in the next 10 years, per year. Please see the attached report titled New Jersey State Police Attrition dated 03/31/2021 (Attachment J).
For the period between 2019 and 2021, please indicate, by year, the number of troopers who were eligible to retire, the number who actually retired, and the length of time that elapsed between retirement eligibility and actual retirement for each retiree. In FY 2019, 106 members were eligible to retire, of which 47 retired. In FY 2020, 167 members were eligible to retire, of which 124 retired. In FY 2021, 147 members are eligible to retire and as of April 2, 2021, 97 members have retired.
How do past and future retirements affect the minority ratios? All retirements will affect the minority ratio. Currently, DSP has seen in a rise in the percentages of minorities in the Division, but with the possible retirement of hundreds of troopers in the upcoming years, DSP will have to continue recruiting so that the Division will continue to represent the residents of New Jersey.
Was there a detectible increase in retirements in 2020 and 2021 that can be attributed to a changing perception of law enforcement within society? No, a review of all retirement exit interview paperwork did not reveal the public’s changing perception of law enforcement as a contributing factor to the individual member’s decision to retire. In 2020, 85 members retired and in 2021, 65 members retired as of April 1st.
• Questions: Please provide a statistical overview by gender and ethnicity within the Division of State Police as of the close of FY 2021. Please provide a gender and minority breakdown, by rank.
Response: Please see the attached NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE ENLISTED MEMBERS BREAKDOWN BY RANK, RACE, & GENDER report dated 03/29/2021 (Attachment K).
17. The Division of State Police has a long history of providing mutual aid to jurisdictions outside of New Jersey. Most recently, the State Police provided 50 State troopers at the request of Washington D.C. officials to support a peaceful transition of power of the federal government. The requests are through the Emergency Management Assistance Compact, a mutual aid agreement.
• Questions: Please list each Emergency Management Assistance Compact deployment in which the Division of State Police provided assistance outside of New Jersey in FY 2020 and FY 2021. For each mission: a) how many members of the Division of State Police, including troopers, were deployed; b) what were the dates of the deployment; c) what was the cost of the mission to the State of New Jersey; and d) if reimbursement was received, how much was received and from whom? 21 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
2020 • Puerto Rico LE Mission o 108 enlisted members, 4 civilians o 1/22/20 through 2/23/20 o Approximately $2.2 million o Mission submitted for reimbursement 12/2020. • California Ventilators to NJ o 100 ventilators were flown to NJ on loan from CA. There was no cost to this mission. • New York Pulse Oximetry to NJ o 50 pulse oximetry units were borrowed from NY. There was no cost to this mission. • Delaware Body Bags to NJ o 260 body bags were delivered to NJ. NJ replaced DE body bags after we received a shipment. No cost to this mission. • California Wildfires o 20 Forest Fire members and 3 vehicles o 9/2/20 through 10/3/20 o Approximately $555,000 o Mission reimbursement packet in final review.
2021 • NJSP to DC - Civil Unrest o 74 enlisted members o 1/6/21 through 1/8/21 o Approximately $274,000 o Mission reimbursement packet being compiled. • Intel to DC - Virtual Support to DC o 3 enlisted members, 4 civilians o 1/14/21 through 1/21/21 o Approximately $48,000 o Mission reimbursement packet being compiled. • California Gloves o NJ received 2,300,000 gloves from CA. o Cost to NJ will be approximately $391,000 o Cost to be reimbursed through FEMA Public Assistance.
18. P.L.2018, c.35, known as the Extreme Risk Protective Order Act of 2018 authorizes New Jersey courts to issue protective orders against individuals who pose a significant risk of personal injury to themselves or others by possessing or owning a firearm. The protective orders prohibit the subject from securing or possessing any permit or license allowing firearm possession during the protective-order period. It is a fourth-degree crime for a person to purposely or knowingly violate any provision of an extreme risk protective order.
22 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
• Questions: How many extreme risk protection orders have been issued and enforced since the enactment of the Extreme Risk Protective Order Act? How many firearms have been ordered to be surrendered as a result of this law? What expenditures have the Division of State Police or local law enforcement agencies incurred to store or destroy after one year those firearms or ammunition surrendered by individuals against whom temporary extreme risk protective orders or extreme risk protective orders are issued? To date, how many persons have been charged with, and convicted of, a violation of a temporary or final extreme risk protective order?
How many extreme risk protection orders have been issued and enforced since the enactment of the Extreme Risk Protective Order Act?
Information from the Administrative Office of the Courts, indicates that from the time period September 1, 2019, through January 24, 2021, there have been 474 Temporary Extreme Risk Protective Orders (TERPO) granted and 222 Final Extreme Risk Protective Orders (FERPO) granted. There are 177 TERPOs still pending a final hearing. As of January 24, 2021, there has been one charge filed for a violation of an Extreme Risk Protective Order under N.J.S.A. 2C:29(e).
How many firearms have been ordered to be surrendered as a result of this law?
The Extreme Risk Protective Order Act does not require the Attorney General to maintain any Statewide statistics on extreme risk protection orders, nor does the Attorney General’s directive. While we do not collect this information we have requested reporting from our own department. According to the New Jersey State Police, they have had 83 firearms ordered to be surrendered as a result of this law.
What expenditures have the Division of State Police or local law enforcement agencies incurred to store or destroy after one year those firearms or ammunition surrendered by individuals against whom temporary extreme risk protective orders or extreme risk protective orders are issued?
LPS can only speak to the expenditures of the Division of State Police. There have been no expenditures incurred by the Division as a result because the seized weapons are turned over to the respective County Prosecutor Offices for adjudication.
To date, how many persons have been charged with, and convicted of, a violation of a temporary or final extreme risk protective order?
Again, LPS’s answer is limited to the information internal to the Department. NJSP has not charged anyone with a violation. The Extreme Risk Protective Order Act does not require the Attorney General to keep any statewide statistics on extreme risk protection orders, nor does the Attorney General’s directive. The Division of Criminal
23 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
Justice and Office of Public Integrity and Accountability have not issued or enforced any extreme risk protection orders since the enactment of the Extreme Risk Protective Order Act.
19. Over the past few years, the Office of the Attorney General has been working on a variety of initiatives to restore the trust between law enforcement officers and the communities they serve. Specifically, the Attorney General issued a number of directives concerning law enforcement body-worn cameras and stored recordings, the release of video recordings depicting deadly force incidents, mandatory drug testing of officers, the establishment of an early warning system to detect “bad actors” in law enforcement, and Statewide standards on conducting certain police investigations.
• Question: Please provide an update on the successes and failures of these initiatives.
The Attorney General’s Excellence in Policing Initiative is changing the way law enforcement officers in New Jersey interact with the public. The success of these sweeping reforms will be measured by increased trust, accountability and transparency with the public and the increased safety of the public and law enforcement. We would not characterize any policies or Directives as failures, but our work is never done with updating and improving existing policies and procedures.
Through our initiatives, we are: limiting when officers may use force and ensuring that all are treated with dignity and respect; establishing a duty to intervene that requires all officers, regardless of rank, title or seniority, to intervene if they see an officer use excessive force; helping officers identify signs of mental illness, so they can more appropriately respond to individuals who do not present a threat to others; overhauling training and culture by modernizing police academy curricula, emphasizing a “guardian” mentality rather than a “warrior” mindset; promoting the psychological well- being of officers, to ensure their resiliency in the face of modern challenges; implementing state-of-the-art “early warning systems” that identify at-risk officers and helping agencies intervene before problems escalate; using body-worn camera footage as a training tool, after both serious incidents and routine encounters, to improve officer performance and behavior; requiring officers to submit detailed information into an online portal about every use of force in New Jersey within 24 hours of the incident, with a version of the portal accessible to the public; mandating protocols for more serious incidents – including officer-involved shootings and deaths- in-custody – to ensure independent grand jury investigations and the prompt release of body-worn camera footage; overhauling police departments’ internal disciplinary process to ensure officers are held accountable even in cases that don’t result in criminal charges; creating a statewide police licensing program, with the ability to permanently revoke the licenses of officers who engage in significant misconduct; establishing clear rules to ensure prosecutors promptly provide defendants with exculpatory evidence, including, where appropriate, information about the disciplinary
24 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
record of officers who will testify at trial; requiring police departments and county prosecutors to conduct an annual analysis of use-of-force incidents to identify trends, including any racial disparities; ensuring witnesses and victims feel safe reporting crimes without fear of deportation, by banning so-called “287(g) agreements” and limiting the types of voluntary assistance local police may provide to federal civil immigration authorities; issuing rules governing police interactions with LGBTQ+ individuals, to ensure every encounter is handled with dignity and respect; creating new mechanisms to divert at-risk juveniles away from formal court proceedings and towards social or familial support; instituting protocols for “victim-centered” sexual assault investigations, ensuring that officers treat victims with respect and understanding in the hours, days, and months after reporting an assault; and establishing one of the country’s first statewide “conviction review units,” to review claims of actual innocence by incarcerated individuals.
All of these initiatives and policies were created with robust stakeholder engagement. We’ve also engaged the community at every turn, since 2018, each of the 21 County Prosecutors holds quarterly community listening sessions to ensure engagement with the community.
B. Question: Please provide an overview of the current Statewide training of law enforcement officers in regard to implicit bias and cultural awareness, as well as how to interact with and recognize individuals with mental health issues, autism, and other disabilities.
In 2018, Attorney General Grewal directed that all sworn police within the Department of Law and Public Safety should take Implicit Bias training. Accordingly, during the year 2019, all sworn members of the NJ State Police and Detectives in the Division of Criminal Justice completed training developed and delivered by the country’s leading provider of such training to police, Fair and Impartial Policing, LLC (FIP). Approximately 3,000 sworn personnel received this training, which was delivered in- person during 4-hour sessions.
Additionally, OAG required that all 21 County Prosecutor Offices have at least one person from their sworn policing staff take FIP’s 2-day “Training of Trainers” and become certified to train on FIP’s curriculum in their home counties. NJSP Academy staff also completed the TOT training, and this training is provided to recruits in the academy. OAG has acquired the right to use this curriculum until 2022 for all of the certified trainers who completed the FIP course.
New Jersey’s law enforcement officers receive training from multiple sources regarding implicit bias and cultural awareness, as well as interacting with and recognizing individuals with mental health issues, autism, and other disabilities. Law Enforcement Officers first receive this training as recruits at the Police Academy; this training is mandated by the Police Training Commission (“PTC”).
25 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
The Department is currently developing Cultural and Implicit Bias training to deliver to all law enforcement officers in the state. That effort included Division of Criminal Justice personnel, representative of the OAG Office of Diversity, Equity, and inclusion, and a community and special interest organization representatives who regularly meet in an active working group.
The Division of Criminal Justice is also responsible developing and deploying training for all NJ law enforcement under the Attorney General’s Community Law Enforcement Affirmative Relations (CLEAR) Institute. The DCJ CLEAR team continues to develop, refine and offer trainings focused on more effectively interacting with members of the diverse communities served by law enforcement and educating police about specific cultures and people with special needs. Prior CLEAR trainings include:
• 2020-2021 Elective CLEAR Courses o Law Enforcement and the Sikh Community o Law Enforcement and the Muslim Community o Law Enforcement and the Black Community o Law Enforcement and the Asian Community o Law Enforcement and the Orthodox Jewish Community o Law Enforcement and the LGBTQ Community
• In 2018, all law enforcement officers were required to take a three hour course entitled Cultural Diversity, De-Escalation, and Bias Reporting. Included in this course was training concerning implicit bias. This course is specifically tailored to functions that prosecutors perform. This course was created by the Office of the Attorney General and the Division of Criminal Justice. The curriculum from this course was inserted in all PTC certified academies in 2019.
• In 2017, all law enforcement officers were required to take a six hour course entitled Police Response: De-Escalation Techniques For Individuals With Special Needs. The course was dual taught with a trained mental health worker and a law enforcement officer. The mental health worker would discuss how a person with different types of special needs, mental health issues, or developmental disabilities would present to a responding law enforcement officer. Autism was discussed in this course. A law enforcement officer taught how to specifically de-escalate an individual in crises with different special needs, mental health issues, and developmental disabilities which included autism. Law Enforcement Officers will be required to take this course again in 2022. The curriculum from this course was inserted in all PTC certified academies in 2019.
In addition to the CLEAR courses, the Attorney General’s Office also issued AG Directive 2019-3, a directive governing law enforcement interaction with transgender individuals. This training was created and made available on NJLearn and Power
26 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
DMS. All law enforcement officers were required to complete this training on interactions with transgender individuals.
And AG Directive 2020-14 established countywide working groups to address Mental Health and Special Needs Populations and Creating a Framework for Coordination with State Partners. This Directive tasks each County Prosecutor to convene a County Working Group to ensure there are adequate countywide protocols, programs and resources available to law enforcement to support those in mental health crisis, as well as those with developmental disabilities, cognitive impairments, substance use disorders, and intellectual disabilities.
C. Please provide an overview of any additional initiatives the department will implement to identify law enforcement officers who have a history of using excessive force and unequal treatment of suspects from different backgrounds.
Office of Policing Policy: On October 1, 2020, every law enforcement agency in New Jersey began reporting use-of-force incidents via the Attorney General’s Use-of- Force Portal. The portal captures incident level data about every use-of-force, including race and ethnicity of the subjects involved. The system allows internal affairs personnel, the chief law enforcement executive, the county prosecutor and staff at the Attorney General’s Office to track every use of force and monitor for problematic trends by agency, bureau or officer.
In December 2020, the Office of the Attorney General issued a comprehensive new statewide Use-of-Force policy, binding on all officers in New Jersey. In addition to emphasizing the sanctity of human life, the new policy contains a specific non- discrimination clause requiring officers to at all times treat every person equally without regard to the individual’s actual or perceived race, creed, color, national origin, ancestry, age, marital status, civil union status, domestic partnership status, affectional or sexual orientation, genetic information, sex, gender identity or expression, disability, nationality, familial status, or any other protected characteristic under N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 et seq.
The Use-of-Force Policy contains provisions that require a command level review of each individual Use-of-Force incident. The review must include all available materials, including reports, witness statements, medical records and body-worn camera (BWC) and other video evidence. The command level review must be undertaken by at least two levels of supervisors and receive a final approval or rejection by the law enforcement executive. The policy requires the command level review to include an analysis of whether force was used in a nondiscriminatory fashion to ensure officers are treating every person equally without discrimination based on race any protected characteristic.
In addition to the review of each individual Use-of-Force incident, the Attorney General’s Use-of Force policy requires the law enforcement executive to conduct an
27 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
annual review of the department’s overall uses of force. The annual review shall include analytical reports from the Use- of-Force Portal, an audit of BWC videos on a risk-based and random basis, internal affairs complaints and an analysis of the uses of force to ensure that force is being applied without discrimination based on race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, disability, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or any other protected category. Based on this review, the executive must consider the need for changes in departmental structure, policy, training or equipment and prepare a written report to the county prosecutor.
As part of the Excellence in Policing Initiative, the Attorney General issued an updated Internal Affairs Policy and Procedure (“IAPP”) in December 2019 and revised it in August of 2020. The IAPP is in effect in every law enforcement agency streamlines the process for the public to file internal affairs complaints, reduces the timelines to fully investigate the complaints and provide greater oversight of the internal affairs process by both the chief executive and the county prosecutor. Further, the IAPP requires that the background investigation of any new officer who previously worked in law enforcement must include a review of that candidate’s prior internal affairs files from every agency for which they were previously employed.
Finally, OPIA has been working with the Police Training Commission (PTC) to research police licensing systems from across the country and create a model for the professional licensure of New Jersey law enforcement officers. The eventual implementation of this system will ensure that officers who do not meet high standards will have their licenses revoked and be ineligible to work as law enforcement officers.
• Question: What funds are anticipated to be allocated toward initiatives that are intended to restore trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve in FY 2022?
The Attorney General has made restoring trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve a top priority since he took office in January 2018. Working within the Department of Law and Public Safety’s budgetary appropriations, the Attorney General has convened dozens of community-based information sessions to discuss a wide variety of law enforcement issues under the “21/21” program, which also mandates that each county prosecutor’s office hold a community engagement session every quarter. And after the 2018 establishment of the Office of Public Integrity and Accountability, the Attorney General launched the “Excellence in Policing” initiative in 2019 which, among other things, called for a reinvigoration of the Police Training Commission and formalized the Office of Policing Policy within OPIA.
The 2020 revisions to the state’s use of force policy – the most sweeping changes in decades – has at its core the objective of reestablishing trust between law enforcement and the community by centering use of force on the sanctity of life. OPIA and other LPS resources have been dedicated not only to revising the use of force policy, but to the establishment of a use of force portal in March 2021 that allows for
28 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
public access to view use of force reports for all law enforcement entities within the state. The portal, currently in a beta launch, will continue to be funded as it is refined and transparency capabilities bolstered.
In addition to the use of force portal, LPS is in the process of distributing $58 million in funding for law enforcement entities to purchase body-worn cameras – a proven method to increase transparency between law enforcement and the communities it serves. LPS also anticipates expending $2.6 million to stand up a publicly accessible website on forfeiture transparency, which will provide information about property seized and forfeited as reported by the 21 County Prosecutors’ Offices.
• Question: How has the Attorney General promoted diversity among all New Jersey law enforcement agencies?
In addition to substantial and sustained training described in responses above, the Attorney General has promoted diversity within its own policing ranks in numerous ways.
Within the Division of State Police, with approximately 2,700 sworn members, significant oversight and effort is made to the recruiting and qualification of candidates. The recruiting process is infused with outreach and intention to engage a broad and diverse group of applicants. Additionally, OAG provides training on EEO and Implicit Bias to police and civilian personnel who are engaged in background or candidate review process and dedicates senior level resources to the oversight of the entire process.
During 2020, despite the pandemic, OAG created a Working Group on Women and Equity in Policing comprised of members of Command Staff as well as senior leaders within OAG to focus specifically on the experience of women in DSP. The group devoted many hours of time in 6 different listening sessions – each of which lasted at least a half-day, to give all female sworn members an opportunity to speak candidly about their experiences and provide their suggestions and feedback. LPS has already begun implementing ideas and initiatives as a result.
The Division of State Police has created a new Diversity and Inclusion unit under the leadership of Major Carla Thomas, whose 26 years in DSP includes leading its recruitment and EEO functions.
The Department is currently engaged in the development of Guidelines for Promoting Diversity in Recruiting and Hiring Practices for Police Organizations in New Jersey, in accordance with P.L 2020, C.107, codified as N.J.S. 52:17B-4.9 to -4.12.
These guidelines will be applicable to all NJ law enforcement agencies and county prosecutors throughout the state and will provide guidance and require reporting for programs that seek to remedy past discrimination and/or a conspicuous imbalance or
29 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
disparity of minority representation among law enforcement personnel employed by such agencies.
20. P.L.2020, c.142 provided a $58 million supplemental appropriation to the Division of Criminal Justice for the New Jersey Statewide Body Worn Camera Program. The supplemental appropriation is to fund a grant program that supports police departments in purchasing body-worn cameras. As of March 24, 2021, the full $58 million is unexpended and uncommitted. In addition, the Governor does not recommend a program appropriation for FY 2022. Law enforcement agencies Statewide have been searching for funds to purchase body-worn cameras for their officers. The cost of this equipment ranges and includes not only the one-time purchase of the equipment, but maintenance, data storage, oversight, and possible replacement due to wear and tear. In FY 2020, a survey conducted by the Office of the Attorney General found that 45 percent of county and municipal police departments statewide had some or all of their officers equipped with body-worn cameras. Additionally, as of June of 2020, it was found that not all Division of State Police Troopers were equipped with such cameras.
• Questions: Please provide an update on the New Jersey Statewide Body Worn Camera Program. When will applications for body-worn camera grants be made available to counties and municipalities? How will the funds be allocated? Will there be a maximum grant amount per applicant? By what date does the department anticipate grant disbursements to begin?
The application documents were made available to eligible applications on March 22, 2021. The application period is open until April 30, 2021 and award notices will be sent on or about June 1, 2021. The grant period runs from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2025, allowing agencies that purchased BWCs earlier in the year to be reimbursed for those purchases. The funding amounts will be determined by dividing the available funding by the total amount of BWCs requested Statewide. This will become the amount each agency is awarded per BWC they intend to purchase, although all disbursements of funds will be done on a reimbursement basis. If this amount exceeds the cost of a BWC, agencies will be permitted to use the excess funding allotted per BWC to be used for ancillary equipment and storage costs associated with implementing and running a BWC program.
There is not a maximum amount per applicant; the application documents were designed to give the Department the ability to analyze the agencies’ requests, for reasonableness. Awards will be determined by multiplying the per BWC funding amount, as described above, by the agencies requested number of BWCs. Funding disbursements are expected to begin shortly after the award notifications. The funding will be disbursed based on an approved timeline of deliverables, allowing agencies to receive some upfront funding, while also allowing them to plan for future needs.
30 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
• Questions: To date, how many State Troopers have been equipped with body-worn cameras? If the Division of State Police has not equipped all State Troopers, what is the plan to provide cameras to the entire force? How many State Troopers assigned to vehicles have dashboard-mounted cameras in their vehicles?
Response: All Troopers who go on patrol at every Road Station are equipped with body worn cameras. The body-worn cameras are available at every road station and each Trooper primarily assigned to patrol is required to wear a body-worn camera during their shift. Therefore, all patrol Troopers are currently equipped with body-worn cameras. Similarly, all marked and unmarked vehicles primarily used for patrol are equipped with dashboard-mounted cameras (DIVR).
BODY-WORN CAMERA COUNTS: 1315 – Total number of Body 3 cameras currently assigned to Troopers • 63 will be deployed in the next 2 months to CIO • 55 will be deployed in the next 2 months to MSB • 83 will be deployed in the next 5 months to TSB • No plan for other units at this time as there is no policy or understanding of how the cameras would be managed and inventoried
VEHICLE DIVR COUNTS: 835 – Vehicles outfitted with DIVR systems • 780 – L3 DIVR systems currently deployed • We are transitioning away from L3 to Axon DIVRs • 55 – Axon Fleet 2 DIVR systems currently deployed • 82 will be deployed by the end of 2021 • Approximately 100 will be deployed in 2022
• Questions: To what extent has footage from body-worn and dashboard- mounted cameras contributed to successful criminal prosecutions? To what extent has camera footage led to the exoneration of individuals accused of criminal behavior?
Video footage from sources including body-worn and dashboard-mounted cameras, as well as footage from other cameras such as surveillance cameras mounted on businesses or residences, have become an essential tool in criminal investigations. All available video footage has become something Troopers look for during their investigations and often help confirm or dispel suspected criminal actions. However, it is difficult to quantify the exact extent that video footage has contributed to criminal prosecutions or exonerations.
Body Worn Cameras and Mobile Video Recorders go a long way toward either corroborating or debunking defense claims on encounters with law enforcement officers. A defendant is more likely to resolve a case when there is video evidence
31 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
showing that the defendant committed criminal conduct. Similarly, when video evidence does not support an indicted charge, that matter will not be indicted. However, we currently are not aware of data being collected that would be responsive to the prevalence or disposition of criminal matters that involved such devices.
21. The mission of the Bias Crime Unit in the Division of Criminal Justice is the statewide coordination of efforts to eliminate crimes motivated by prejudice against others based on race, color, religion, sexual orientation, gender, disability or ethnicity.
• Question: Please report on the activities of the Bias Crime Unit in FY 2021. What initiatives does the unit intend to pursue in FY 2022?
Bias Crimes Unit FY 2021 Snapshot The Bias Crimes Unit actively works in collaboration with New Jersey’s 21 County Prosecutor’s Offices, as well as its municipalities, to investigate bias crime incidents reported to our office. One recent case involved an attempted murder/bias crime incident in Clifton, which is presently being investigated and prosecuted by the DCJ Bias Crimes Unit. Additionally, due to the COVID-19 global pandemic, the Unit has seen an increase in “zoom bombing” cases, many of which involve racial and ethnic slurs. One incident where the offenders targeted a black fraternity and black sorority is currently being investigated by the Bias Crimes Unit.
A higher level of reporting bias crime incidents has been achieved with the use of our new reporting/ notification system, which went live at the end of the 2020. Civil Investigators and detectives have been able to respond to multiple complainants who utilized the new reporting system, as well as complainants who reported traditionally to DCJ directly.
The Bias Crimes Unit also continued to build upon its outreach and training activities in order to increase education on and awareness of bias crimes in communities throughout New Jersey. These events are often held in conjunction with the US Attorney’s Office, NJ OAG, NJ OHSP, NJ DCR, and County Prosecutors Offices. Plans for multiple trainings focusing on bias and domestic extremism are being planned for the remainder of FY 2021.
Notably, the Bias Crimes Unit hosted or facilitated the following activities in FY 2021 (July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021):
• July 2020 – Bias Crimes Training for all Ocean County Law Enforcement Officers • Sept. 24, 2020 – Statewide Bias Awareness Conferences for the Asian community • October 28, 2020 – Statewide Bias Awareness Conferences for the Black Community
32 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
• Three (3) Statewide Meetings with the Community Outreach Liaisons (July 8, 2020, Dec. 15, 2020, April 1, 2021) • Three (3) Statewide Meetings with the Bias Crime Liaisons (July 22, 2020, Feb. 18, 2021, TBD)) • January – March 2021 – 21/21 Bias Sessions – Each County Prosecutor’s Office will host either a Bias Awareness Session or a Youth Bias Task Force Session for community members in first quarter of 2021.
Bias Crimes Unit FY 2022 Snapshot The Bias Crimes Unit will continue to build upon its previous work, particularly by using the new bias reporting/notification system to pursue larger-scale bias crime investigations and prosecutions. The bias reporting/notification system will better enable DCJ to be involved at the outset, ensuring that these cases are investigated as thoroughly as possible.
The Bias Crimes Unit will also focus its energies on more serious bias crimes cases – those involving second or first degree charges. Using the NJSP UCR monthly bias report, DCJ will be able to identify “bias hotspots” to further focus investigative efforts on the most serious bias crime incidents. Identifying “hotspots” will also enable the Bias Crimes Unit to better target its outreach activities. Finally, the Bias Crimes Unit will also work closely with NJ OHSP to identify extremist groups that are presenting possible bias threats to the citizens of New Jersey.
Outreach training will remain a priority. The Bias Crimes Unit will continue its work with the DCJ Outreach Committee in planning educational sessions, awareness events, and trainings pertaining to bias crimes issues in New Jersey. Trainings will include curricula on how to recognize and report a bias incident and are designed to address both a law enforcement audience and a community audience.
The Bias Crimes Unit intend to pursue the following events during the rest of FY 2021 and FY 2022 (July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022):
• NJ Bias Crime Liaison Meeting & Training – Update the 21 County Bias Crime Liaisons on bias trends and statistics in NJ • NJ Community Outreach Liaison Meeting – Discuss outreach efforts by the 21 County Prosecutor’s Community Outreach Liaisons • April 6, 2021 – Bias Awareness Session for the Muslim-Jewish Advisory Council • April 26-30, 2021 – Statewide Bias Awareness Virtual Session – Presented by DCJ/OAG/US Attorney’s Office/DOJ • May 2021 – Bias Awareness Sessions – Two regional question & answer sessions open to the public • May 2021 – Extremism in New Jersey Sessions – Three sessions presented by DCR/DCJ/OHSP/Division of Mental Health
33 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
22. The Governor’s FY 2022 Budget recommends increasing the appropriation to the New Jersey Nonprofit Security Grant Pilot Program by $1.6 million from $1.2 million in FY 2021 to $2.8 million in FY 2022. This program provides funding to eligible nonprofit organizations across New Jersey at the greatest risk of terrorist attacks.
• Questions: Please explain the rationale for the recommended $1.6 million increase in the FY 2022 appropriation for the New Jersey Nonprofit Security Grant Pilot Program. Please specify the method that will be used to allocate the additional funding. Are the categories of nonprofits that are eligible for grants being expanded? For FY 2022, please provide an overview of the application process, including application requirements, deadlines, and anticipated award dates.
Growth was provided to offset a loss of one-time federal resources.
The method for selecting recipients is risk based, with risk consisting of threat, vulnerability and consequence. Applicants are required to have completed and submit a Vulnerability Risk Assessment (VRA) with their application. The VRA is typically conducted by a local/county/state law enforcement agency or private security firm. In cases where an agency cannot arrange a VRA by a law enforcement/security agency, applicants are permitted to use either the OHSP or DHS self-assessment tool. Whatever the approach, the results of the VRA will show an agency's threats, vulnerabilities and consequences. This document, along with the NSGP application form, is compared and scored by security experts. The scoring results are placed into a priority list for the Director of OHSP to review and approval. Applicants for the Target Hardening component of the grant program who have not received security grant funding in the past two grant cycles are given preference over those have received said funding. This condition does not apply to the Security Personnel component of the grant program in that applicants can apply and potentially be funded in successive years.
The categories of nonprofit organizations have always been broad in the sense that ALL nonprofit organizations that are registered IRS 501(c) (3) are eligible. Those nonprofit organizations that demonstrate the greatest risk due to their beliefs, ideologies and symbolic value are identified for funding based on available appropriated state funds.
The application process is typically held at the beginning of the state fiscal year. OHSP posts an "Applicant Workshop" for all interested nonprofit organizations to view. The recording provides information on all aspects of the application requirements. There are three important components to an application: Investment Justification (Application), VRA and copy of the IRS 501 (c) (3) letter. Applications are submitted electronically on the OHSP website. The open application period usually last between one to two months. Application intake/review/validation/scoring usually
34 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
takes about five weeks. Preparation/delivery of award notices occurs thereafter. The Period of Performance for the Security Personnel ($10,000) is one year. The Period of Performance for the Target Hardening ($50,000) is two years. The amount of funding for each is dependent on threat trends and the amount of appropriation annually. OHSP expects to award the SFY2022 NSGP funds by early Fall, 2021.
• Question: Please provide the allocation of FY 2020 and FY 2021 grants, including a list of grantees, the amounts awarded, and the intended use of the funds.
Please see Attachment L.
23. The State Police Expungement Unit within the State Bureau of Investigation ensures an individual’s right to privacy with the sealing and expunging of all criminal records ordered by the court. The unit is responsible for reviewing petitions and court orders to determine if they conflict with the intent of relevant law, and reviewing and disseminating expunged records for criminal justice agencies. P.L.2019, c.269, in part, expanded the petition process for a “clean slate” expungement.
The Governor’s FY 2022 Budget proposes a $1 million increase in the FY 2022 special purpose appropriation to the unit from $12 million in FY 2021 to $13 million in FY 2022. At the same time, the Administration intends to return an unexpended $11 million of the FY 2021 program appropriation to the State General Fund at the end of the fiscal year.
• Questions: Please provide an overview of how funds have been used each year in the Expungement Unit from FY 2018 to FY 2021. Please provide information concerning how funds are anticipated to be used in FY 2022. For what reasons is the special purpose appropriation recommended to increase to $13 million?
Responses:
Fiscal Year 2018 – ($337,416.80) Salaries, benefits $337,416
Fiscal Year 2019 – ($487,704.38) $367,704 Salaries, benefits Hardware / Software upgrades (Grant $120,000 Funds)
Fiscal Year 2020 – ($561,880.51) $561,880 Salaries, benefits
Fiscal Year 2021 – (Total Estimated Costs: $5,668,070.69) 35 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
Salaries, overtime, benefits $1,039,770 *This cost may increase depending on new hires’ start date Computers $280,906 Software Licenses File 360 $30,930.90 Imagetrust $6,437 Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Software Packages $89,980 Expungement File Scanning Project-Solix $2,133,621 InfoShare/CSI Software Packages $1,999,000 Infrastructure Support for Scanning Project Martin Paper Joggers $87,423
Fiscal Year 2022 – (Total Estimated Costs: $13,000,000)
Salaries, overtime, benefits $6,600,000 Software Support Kofax, File 360, Imagetrust $72,061 Idemia MAS software upgrade $636,000 Software Licenses File 360 $82,861 Imagetrust $27,093 InfoShare/CSI Maintenance $2,000,000 Information Technology Equipment Dell VXrail Server $795,000 Microsoft SQL licensing $68,000 Facility Space, Additional Office Furniture and Supplies $2,700,000
• Questions: Why is $11 million of resources in the special purpose account for the State Police Expungement Unit anticipated to be returned to the State General Fund at the end of FY 2021? Does this lapse suggest that the recommended FY 2022 appropriation may be too high?
The appropriation is not too high, and NJSP anticipates utilizing all appropriated funds in FY22. The expenditure of funds in FY21 was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, NJSP’s role in leading the State’s response, the challenges of hiring during a pandemic, and allocating staffing in physical worksites due to the paper-based processes required for expungement. NJSP has begun expanding the size of the Expungement Unit, and anticipates continuing to do while also increasing electronic process capabilities working with the Administrative Offices of the Courts.
• Questions: By job title category, please detail the number of staff employed in and salaries paid by the unit annually from FY 2018 to FY
36 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
2022. Please specify the number of expungement requests that have been made pursuant to P.L.2019, c.269 as well as the total number of expungement requests each year from FY 2018 to FY 2021.
Fiscal Year - 2018 Fiscal Year - 2019 Title Salary Title Salary Sergeant First Class 114,840.50 Sergeant First Class 114,840.50 Agency Service Rep. 2 $37,160.55 Agency Service Rep. 1 $38,661.83 Agency Service Rep. 2 $37,160.55 Agency Service Rep. 2 $42,208.52 Agency Service Rep. 1 $37,160.55 Agency Service Rep. 2 $42,208.52 Agency Service Rep. 2 $38,819.57 Agency Service Rep. 2 $43,610.75 Paralegal Tech. 1 $43,094.21 Agency Service Rep. 3 $48,761.66 Agency Service Rep. 3 $43,808.13 Agency Service Rep. 4 $50,353.48 Agency Service Rep. 4 $49,263.43 Paralegal Tech. 1 $50,949.81 Paralegal Tech. 1 $50,949.81 Paralegal Tech. 1 $50,949.81
37 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d) Fiscal Year - 2020 Fiscal Year - 2021 Title Salary Title Salary Sergeant First Class 114,840 Sergeant First Class 114,840.50 .50 Sergeant $102,32 Trooper $75,256.32 1.38 Agency Service Rep. 1 $27,925 Trooper $75,256.32 .91 Agency Service Rep. 1 $27,925 Sergeant $102,321.3 .91 8 Agency Service Rep. 1 $27,925 944 Hourly Rate $29.28 .91 Agency Service Rep. 1 $38,661 944 Hourly Rate $29.28 .83 Agency Service Rep. 2 $42,208 Agency Service Rep. 1 $30,978.33 .52 Agency Service Rep. 2 $42,208 Agency Service Rep. 1 $30,978.33 .52 Agency Service Rep. 2 $45,127 Agency Service Rep. 1 $30,978.33 .48 Agency Service Rep. 3 $50,353 Agency Service Rep. 1 $39,435.09 .48 Paralegal Tech. 1 $50,949 Agency Service Rep. 2 $43,052.64 .81 Paralegal Tech. 1 $52,988 Agency Service Rep. 2 $43,052.64 .01 Agency Service Rep. 4 $53,283 Agency Service Rep. 2 $46,030.00 .75 Agency Service Rep. 3 $51,360.58 Paralegal Tech. 1 $54,047.79 Paralegal Tech. 1 $56,126.76 Agency Service Rep. 4 $56,528.92 Additional Temporary $304,308.9 Enlisted Empl 0
Fiscal Year - 2022 Title Salary Sergeant First Class $114,840.50 Trooper $75,256.32 Trooper $75,256.32 Sergeant $102,321.38 944 Hourly Rate $29.28 944 Hourly Rate $29.28 Agency Service Rep. 1 $123,913.32 Agency Service Rep. 2 $138,090.00 Agency Service Rep. 3 $51,360.58 Paralegal Tech. 1 $112,253.52 Agency Service Rep. 4 $56,528.92 Additional Temporary Enlisted $304,308.90 38 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
ASR Trainee (34) $952,000.00 Paralegal Tech. 1 (34) $1,700,000. 00 Software Development Spec 1 $68,212.89 Technical Supp Spec 2 $65,163.03
Please specify the number of expungement requests that have been made pursuant to P.L.2019, c.269 as well as the total number of expungement requests each year from FY 2018 to FY 2021.
Expungement Requests FY 2018 to FY 2021 2018 - 9,968 2019- 14,638 2020 - 11,514 2021 - 3,833 Total (Up to and including March 30)
Pursuant to P.L.2019, c.269 Prior to P.L.2019, c.269 - 1,771 After to P.L.2019, c.269 -2,062
24. In February of 2021, three bills were enacted which permit and regulate the use of recreational marijuana in New Jersey. The enactments allow for the creation of a regulated marketplace for the recreational use of the drug, although recreational marijuana is not anticipated to be available for another year.
• Questions: In anticipation of the legalization of recreational marijuana, what steps has the Attorney General taken to ensure the safe implementation and proper enforcement of relevant laws? Which policies and procedures are to be implemented as a result of the passage of legislation legalizing recreational marijuana, including the department’s policies for enforcement of driving under the influence of marijuana or marijuana-related products?
In anticipation of the legalization law, and in response to the decriminalization laws, the Attorney General has provided up-to-date guidance and training for prosecutors and law enforcement across the State. The day the legislation was enacted, the Attorney General released guidance and several frequently asked questions that were posted on the AG’s website, along with links to the new laws for convenience. The Attorney General has updated these documents several times and will continue to do so as we move toward legalization. The Attorney General also recognized that the decriminalization law created a new charging system for various marijuana and hashish related offenses, and, therefore, the Attorney General also issued a marijuana reference card that succinctly outlines the laws for law enforcement.
39 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
The Attorney General also provided an overview and training to all law enforcement executives across the State soon after the laws were enacted. He also provided training to all of his deputy attorneys general and detectives, as well as other groups, such as the College and University Security Public Safety Association. The Attorney General anticipates participating in many more trainings throughout the coming months, as well, for prosecutors and law enforcement, including the NJSP.
Further, the Attorney General recognized that the new laws will be a sea change for law enforcement moving forward from decriminalization to legalization and that there should be a mechanism in place, and a group of individuals, to serve as constants in marijuana enforcement. Thus, the Attorney General requested that each County Prosecutor’s Office designate at least one marijuana liaison for the county. The designee(s) is the point of contact for law enforcement in that county and is the conduit to the Attorney General’s Office for questions, concerns, and keeping the AG up-to- date on enforcement of the marijuana laws within the county. The Attorney General also holds a weekly call with all of the marijuana liaisons to provide guidance and discuss issues that have arisen from the new laws.
Currently, the Attorney General’s Office is evaluating which policies and directives need to be amended due to the passage of the legalization law – this will also depend, however, on any legislative changes in the interim. Further, the Attorney General’s Office anticipates providing a more comprehensive policy on marijuana and regulated cannabis enforcement overall once we become aware of the particular regulations promulgated by the Cannabis Regulatory Commission. The Division of Highway Traffic Safety (DHTS) has partnered with the NJSP Regional Operations & Intelligence Center (NJ ROIC) and the NJSP Drug Monitoring Initiative (DMI) conduct an analysis (a “baseline” report) for future reference in keeping with lessons learned from states that have legalized recreational marijuana. It is anticipated that this reference will allow for improved comparison of impaired driving concerns before and after legalization.
The New Jersey State Police currently offers two different training courses specific to drug-impaired driving detection and enforcement: Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) and Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) training. Thirty-five (35) ARIDE classes have been scheduled for 2021. Six (6) ARIDE classes were taught in March 2021, fourteen (14) ARIDE classes are scheduled between April – August 2021, and fifteen (15) ARIDE classes are scheduled between September–December 2021. Three (3) DRE Schools have been scheduled for 2021. The first DRE Class was given in January 2021, the second DRE Class is scheduled to take place in April & May 2021, and the third DRE Class is scheduled to take place in September & October 2021. Further training specific to drug-impaired and marijuana-impaired driving is also being evaluated. The DHTS currently funds DRE and ARIDE training via the NJSP Alcohol and Drug Testing Unit.
40 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
Additionally, twelve (12) counties currently participate in DRE call-out programs: (1) Atlantic/Cape May; (2) Bergen; (3) Middlesex; (4) Monmouth; (5) Morris/Sussex; (6) Ocean; (7) Somerset/Hunterdon; (8) Union; and (9) Hudson. The New Jersey State Police offers a DRE call out program through the ROIC for all law enforcement agencies in New Jersey. Finally, DRE call-out programs are currently being explored in Essex, Gloucester/Cumberland/Salem, and Burlington Counties. The DRE call-out programs are currently funded by grants offered by the NJ Division of Highway Traffic Safety. The DHTS continues to work to bring all 21 NJ counties on board with DRE recall capabilities within the next federal fiscal year.
25. The State Police offers an Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) program to “bridge the gap” between the standardized field sobriety course and the Drug Recognition Expert course. The purpose of the ARIDE course is to impart general knowledge to police officers of drug impairment and the signs and symptoms of seven categories of drugs.
• Questions: Have there been any developments regarding the testing, approval, and use of testing devices to measure the amount of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the active ingredient in marijuana, in a person’s blood during a motor vehicle stop or during an investigation after a crash? Does the use of a Drug Recognition Expert, and the collection of blood and urine samples, remain the most reliable method of determining whether a person was driving under the influence of marijuana?
Currently, there is no established per-se level for THC in New Jersey. Within the scientific community, there is an unresolved debate as to whether impairment can be based on a toxicology level, similar to what is done with alcohol levels. According to information supplied by the Governor's Highway Safety Association, in addition to general impairment laws, there are options that states tend to use when addressing drug-impaired driving:
o Zero Tolerance laws make it illegal to drive with any measurable amount of specified drugs in the body. These laws are best suited for illegal drugs: if it is illegal to possess or use a drug, then it is reasonable to prohibit driving after the drug has been possessed and used. The option may no longer have relevance given the decriminalization legislation. • 16 states have zero tolerance laws in effect for one or more drugs o Per Se laws make it illegal to drive with amounts of specified drugs in the body that exceed set limits. o 5 states have per se laws in effect for one or more drugs o 17 states have zero tolerance or non-zero per se laws for marijuana. o 10 states have zero tolerance for THC or a metabolite. 41 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
o 3 states have zero tolerance for THC but no restriction on metabolites. o 4 states have specific per se limits for THC o 1 state (Colorado) has a permissible inference law for THC
Further, no testing devices have been deemed scientifically reliable in the courts of the United States. Oral fluid testing is currently being examined as a viable means of detecting recent use of drugs by the motoring public. Since there is no agreement within the scientific community as to a per se level of drug impairment, the use of a Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) remains the most effective tool currently available that law enforcement can utilize to determine drug impairment.
Even if oral fluid or any other bodily fluid testing was approved, the DRE will remain the preferred method of determining impairment, due to the fact there is no scientific evidence that supports a THC (or other drug) nanogram level equaling impairment like alcohol. This may also be correlated to marijuana being fat soluble and dissipating quickly in a person’s blood, while the person may still be impaired.
Finally, New Jersey’s implied consent law only applies to a person’s breath. Oral fluid and/or other bodily fluids would need to be included to allow law enforcement to obtain confirming evidence that supports the driver’s impairment.
• Questions: Please provide the position of the Attorney General regarding the need for additional training of law enforcement Statewide on the new laws regarding recreational marijuana usage. Are the current Drug Recognition Expert and ARIDE training programs sufficient to meet the anticipated increase in demand for these trained officers? Is additional State funding needed to meet this demand? If so, please estimate the amount required.
The NJSP Alcohol & Drug Testing Unit (ADTU) has seen an increase in requests for ARIDE and DRE training, with an expectation that trend will continue in the future. The Drug Recognition State Coordinator maintains that DRE training is extremely important however, ARIDE, SFST (Standardized Field Sobriety Testing), and DID (Drug Impaired Driving) training should be the main focus at this time.
Increasing the number of DREs will not necessarily correlate to an increased detection of impaired drivers. Paramount is the need to train statewide law enforcement members who are coming into contact more frequently with drivers exhibiting the signs and symptoms of drug impairment. In the event of a lawful arrest, they may subsequently request a DRE’s assistance and expertise. 42 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
Additional NJSP ADTU personnel will be needed to meet the current demand, as well as the expected increase in demand for training. Staff dedicated solely to the DRE and ARIDE programs will help ensure that the training is consistently administered uniformly throughout the state and to the highest standards set forth by the IACP (Internal National Association of Chiefs of Police).
The funding would come from anticipated tax revenue realized from the legalization of marijuana. As a result, the addition of eight (8) personnel, including training and equipment, would cost $5,417,625 in year one (2021), $1,591,443 in 2022, and $1,594,047 in 2022.
26. In response to an FY 2020 Discussion Point, the department reported that there was a consensus in the canine training community that canine drug recognition training standards would officially change once a final decision on the legalization of marijuana was made. The department further indicated that once a canine is imprinted on marijuana, it is not possible to retrain the canine to ignore the odor. Accordingly, the Division of State Police Canine Academy has stopped imprinting narcotic detection canines on the odor of marijuana. As of FY 2020, the Division of State Police Canine Response and Training Unit possessed two narcotic detection canines that were not imprinted on marijuana.
• Questions: Does the department continue to train drug recognition canines to detect marijuana? Please provide information on any updates to the training standards for these drug recognition canine teams, specifically, in relation to legalization of recreational marijuana. Please provide the current number of canine training facilities and the number of canine-handler drug detection teams. Please designate the specialty of each handler-canine drug detection team, including the number of teams that are currently trained to detect marijuana and the number that are trained without the ability to detect marijuana. Please provide the current estimated cost to train canine-handler drug detection teams.
Does the department continue to train drug recognition canines to detect marijuana? No, the New Jersey State Police Canine Response and Training (CRTU) stopped imprinting narcotic detection canines on the odor of marijuana in 2019.
Please provide information on any updates to the training standards for these drug recognition canine teams, specifically, in relation to legalization of recreational marijuana. There are currently 2 NJSP CRTU handlers in scent class #36 that are being trained in narcotic detection. The new canine teams will not be trained to detect marijuana. Marijuana imprinting will no longer be part of the NJSP canine narcotic detection training.
43 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
Please provide the current number of canine training facilities and the number of canine handler drug detection teams. The NJSP has only one training facility and currently 11 certified narcotic detection teams. The CRTU has no oversight of non NJSP certified canine trainers in the State of New Jersey. It is unknown how many certified narcotic detection teams are in New Jersey.
Please designate the specialty of each handler-canine drug detection team, including the number of teams that are currently trained to detect marijuana and the number that are trained without the ability to detect marijuana. All NJSP narcotic canines are trained to detect the same controlled dangerous substances. Currently new narcotic detection canines are imprinted on cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine, and ecstasy. The NJSP CRTU currently has 11 total narcotic detection canines. Nine are imprinted on marijuana (trained prior to 2019) and two are not.
Please provide the current estimated cost to train canine-handler drug detection teams. There is currently no charge to attend the NJSP CRTU Training Academy. The estimated cost of the salary to attend the school is $30,000.
27. The Department of Law and Public Safety annually outsources cases and assignments, retaining outside counsel for various reasons. The department also enters into client service agreements with other State departments to handle legal cases through outside counsel. In response to an OLS FY 2020 Discussion Point, the department provided documentation that State agencies paid approximately $22.3 million to outside counsel in calendar year 2018.
• Questions: Please provide a list of cases and assignments for which outside counsel was retained, including the amount paid per case for calendar years 2019, 2020, and 2021 to date. What percentage of outside counsel costs represents legal fees paid on a contingency basis? Which specific cases involve outside counsel retained pursuant to a contingency fee arrangement?
Please see attachment M, N and O for the list of cases for which outside counsel was retained for 2019, 2020 and 2021.
Calendar Year 2019. All fees were to outside council LeClairRyan and were 100% contingency fees for the Drew Lieb vs. State of New Jersey, OHSP case. The total payout was $47,655.94.
Calendar Year 2020. None.
Calendar Year 2021. None.
44 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
28. Diversity and inclusion in the workplace rose to prominence as a mainstream topic of interest in 2020.
• Questions: Please indicate the percentages of minorities and women in each of the department’s middle and senior management. Please detail any plans the department may have to increase the representation of minorities and women among its middle and senior managers.
Senior Managers/Department-Wide: counting the heads of each of the department’s divisions, offices and commission, in combination with the individuals who comprise the Executive Leadership Team
• Male: 45% • Female: 55% • White: 74% • Black: 20% • Hispanic/Latino: 3% • Asian: 3%
Middle Managers/Department-Wide: LPS is comprised of 13 divisions that have extremely diverse functions and reporting structures and there is no uniform mechanism for identifying and reporting middle management. Accordingly, we have reported below, the management data for our two largest groups of personnel for which we are able to provide meaningful metrics, specifically, within the approximately 2,700 sworn members of the Division of State Police, and within all individuals employed under attorney titles across the entire department.
Senior Managers/Division of State Police: Counting members of the Command Staff (Colonel, Lt. Colonels, Majors): • Male: 88% • Female: 12% • White: 78% • Black: 15% • Hispanic/Latino: 7% • Asian: 0%
2nd Tier Commanding Officers: Counting Captains and Lieutenants • Male: 91% • Female: 9% • White: 89% • Black: 5% • Hispanic/Latino: 6%
45 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
• Asian: 0% • 2 or More Races: 0% • Other: 0%
Senior Managers/Attorneys Department-Wide: Counting the Attorney General, 1st Assistant Attorney General, Assistant Attorneys General, Deputy Assistant Attorney General 1
• Male: 48% • Female: 52% • White: 78% • Black: 9% • Hispanic/Latino: 3% • Asian: 10%
2nd Tier Management/Attorneys Department-Wide: Counting Deputy Attorneys General 1 and Deputy Attorneys General 2
• Male: 41% • Female: 59% • White: 80% • Black: 10% • Hispanic/Latino: 5% • Asian: 4% • 2 or More Races:1%
It is a primary goal of the NJSP to ensure diversity and inclusion in all of facets of the Division and more importantly in middle and senior management. The Division has implemented dissemination strategies of promotional opportunities to all employees equally. The preferred criteria for a specific promotable position are accessible on the NJSP Intranet Page for all members to review. This allow the members the opportunity to review all postings for the specific position they may be interested in and any preferred criteria that has been listed for that position. The members may then review the Division of State Police Catalog of Benchmarks (Chapter 29), which is also posted on the NJSP Intranet Page. This Catalog defines benchmarks for specific ranks and then for each position. These along with any Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)/Operating Instructions (OIs) can assist our membership to develop a personalized career path and guide the member through the promotional process. The Professional Development Unit is also available to assist each member with resume and interview preparation.
In addition, to facilitate a fair and consistent hiring process, a diverse group of panelists are identified to interview prospective candidates. To ensure fairness and consistency, each candidate interviewed are asked the same questions; explanations must be given for disparity in scoring from one panelist to another. 46 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
The following response has been provided by the Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness, an in-but-not-of agency, regarding its workforce:
According to Civil Service Commission’s EEO Status Report as of January 2021, our total labor force is 101 and there are 17 positions allocated to the Official/Administrator Category. Of this, 53% are male and 47% are female and 6% Hispanic. In our Professionals category, we are 63% male and 37% female and 7% black, 9.5% Hispanic and 8% Asian. This would be the internal group eligible for promotions to the Official/Administrator category.
Over the past two years we have trained all our management participating in the hiring and selection process on Diversity and Implicit Bias. We have expanded our recruitment activities to reach more diverse groups from participating in job fairs such as Hispanic State Resource Fair and other CSC sponsored job fairs aimed at targeting diverse audiences, as well as on our own targeting more diverse universities.
Some ideas of plans to increase representation of women and minorities amongst middle and senior managers:
• We intend to implement change in our hiring process by incorporating diverse interview panels for all positions so we may have representation of gender and ethnic diversity. This will also enable our staff at all different levels to have opportunities to participate in the selection process and provide valuable input in the hiring process. • We plan to commit to filling vacancies to members who come from diverse backgrounds. • We plan to incorporate blind resume reviews to eliminate any bias. • We plan to utilize job titles that will enable us to increase diversity in our staff (i.e. Detective Trainee, Intelligence Analyst Apprentice) which will enable us to provide more opportunity for promotions of women and minorities when they become available. • We have committed to providing leadership training opportunities to develop staff for leadership positions.
• Questions: Please indicate any structures and elements of its culture that are known to the department as having had the effects of making minorities and women feel unwelcome and limiting diversity and inclusion. How does the department intend to address these structures and cultural elements? What initiatives has the department implemented in the last two years to further the diversity and inclusiveness of its workplace? Does the department intend to undertake any additional initiatives through the end of FY 2022?
47 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
The Department of Law and Public Safety has employed a Chief Diversity Officer since 2016, and through the Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (OEDI), has worked to strengthen its commitment to diversity and inclusion by establishing clear goals and benchmarks for progress. Under Attorney General Grewal, efforts include:
• Implicit bias training – mandated training for all NJ State Troopers, as well as all prosecutors and detectives employed by the Division of Criminal Justice and the 21 County Prosecutor Offices, and all Executive and Senior Management personnel.
• Mandatory Diversity & Inclusion training – a Department-wide 3-hour, in- person (prior to COVID-19) training.
• Division-specific diversity plans – each division within LPS was tasked with developing a diversity and inclusion plan that describe the specific steps that the division would take to reaffirm and strengthen its commitment to diversity. These plans include specific goals and objectives, and complements the Department’s Diversity and Inclusion Report. The 2018 division-specific plans are currently being evaluated as new plans for 2021 are drafted.
• Diversity Council and Employee Resource Groups – the Attorney General has supported the reconstitution of the Department’s Diversity Council (originally organized in 2013) in 2020, which grew the council to afford representation across all divisions and in accordance with the relative size of each division’s workforce. In creating the 2021 division-specific plans, divisions were required to include their Diversity Council representatives in the planning process
• Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) –Department-wide, employee-led groups that act as a central meeting point for the department’s thousands of employees and across multiple divisions. Current ERGs include those supporting Black, Latinos, women, Asian-American and Pacific Islanders, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender employees. New employees are made aware of the Diversity Council and ERGs upon onboarding, and the Department sends out regular messages encouraging cooperation – messaging that has not stopped during the COVID-19 pandemic.
• Diversity Month Initiatives – creating multiple initiatives for April 2021 to promote cultural understanding and recognize diverse contributors to our department’s mission
• Functional capabilities within Human Resources – added Talent Acquisition and Talent Management units with mandates to focus on diversity and inclusion. Hosting an Attorney Career Fair that includes outreach to all of the local bar associations, including the Asian Pacific American Lawyers 48 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
Association of New Jersey, the Association of Black Women Lawyers, the Garden State Bar Association, the Hispanic Bar Association of New Jersey, the Muslim Lawyers Association (collectively, the “Specialty Bar Associations”). Creating and publishing workforce metrics and analytics reporting on department-wide metrics as well as those within each of our divisions
• Diversity related observances – e.g. various recognition months, such as Black History, Women’s History, AAPI Heritage, Hispanic Heritage – comprised of guest speakers, panel discussion, video montages, educational content, celebratory messages, etc.
• Department-wide inclusive resources: o Lactation rooms o Quiet rooms (for prayer, mediation, reflection) o Non-binary/single-user rest rooms
• Stretch Assignment Portal – to provide equal access to employees interested in taking on assignments in other areas or to gain experience outside of their regular duties.
• Book Club – to promote cross-cultural exchange and education; enhance employee engagement across functional areas
• Supplier Diversity Initiatives for Outside Counsel o Developed law firm diversity questionnaire for all firms seeking to become approved counsel. o Hosted an informational session for attorneys on how to succeed in becoming outside counsel, including outreach to all Specialty Bar Associations and the NJ State Bar Association.
Specifically, within the New Jersey State Police, the Division established an Office of Employee Relations & Community Outreach which included the Diversity & Inclusion (D&I) Unit as part of its makeup. The mission of the D&I Unit will foster employee engagement. It will establish annual training for enlisted and civilian members, assist with the recruiting program, and enhance outreach initiatives. The members of the unit will be tasked with developing strategic plans to create inclusive and respectful workplaces throughout the Division. The importance of creating an internal culture that embraces diversity and inclusion will create an environment where current members of different backgrounds, talent and skillset can flourish.
In addition to the creation of the Diversity & Inclusion Unit which overall mission is to enhance the awareness and need for inclusion in the workplace for all groups, within the last two years the Division has instituted a mandatory Implicit 49 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
Bias training during the 2019 In-Service, in which every enlisted member participated in an interactive, in-person training customized 4-hour session which was successfully deployed as mandatory in- service training conducted by Fair & Impartial Policing, LLC, the nation’s leader in police training on implicit bias awareness for law enforcement. NJSP personnel were also trained by FIP as trainers so that they have the required expertise to train at the NJSP Academy as well as during future in-service opportunities; NJSP is licensed to utilize FIP’s proprietary training materials for this purpose. Civilian personnel have received training through LPS’s ODEI.
The following training has been previously deployed or will be available to law enforcement officers through the Community-Law Enforcement Affirmative Relations Institute (“CLEAR”):
2018 Mandatory CLEAR Course- Cultural Diversity, De-Escalation, & Bias Reporting 2020-2021 Elective CLEAR Courses -
• Law Enforcement and the Sikh Community • Law Enforcement and the Muslim Community • Law Enforcement and the Black Community • Law Enforcement and the Asian Community • Law Enforcement and the Orthodox Jewish Community • Law Enforcement and the LGBTQ Community
OHSP Response
In the last two years, in addition to training management on diversity and implicit bias, all OHSP staff have been trained on Valuing Diversity. We increased our internal communication on holidays/observances to educate our staff on increase awareness and respect of diversity.
We plan to conduct an employee engagement survey to identify any barriers to diversity and inclusion at our office, and identify where our strengths and weaknesses may be, and what we can do to improve our diversity and create an inclusive environment to attract and retain diverse candidates. We will implement initiatives to address based on the results of the survey.
50 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
JUVENILE JUSTICE COMMISSION
1. The State charged $8.0 million in Juvenile Justice Commission salaries to its $2.4 billion Coronavirus Relief Fund allocation under the federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act of 2020. The federal law and United States Treasury guidance require that Coronavirus Relief Fund balances be used to cover costs incurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The federal government may disallow expenditures states charge to the Coronavirus Relief Fund that fall outside of permissible parameters.
• Questions: How did the Juvenile Justice Commission determine salaries it could charge to the Coronavirus Relief Fund? Were regular salaries charged to the fund or only overtime expenditures? The salaries of what job titles were deemed to be eligible to be charged to the fund? Was there a benchmark that required a certain percentage of an employee’s time to be spent on verifiable COVID-19 response activities?
Based on U.S. Treasury guidance for allowable uses of the Coronavirus Relief Fund, JJC’s custodial titles were identified for this charge. Non-custody/non-security positions who may have performed verifiable COVID-19 response activities were not included. Only regular salary charges for the time-period of March 13, 2020 – June 30,2020 were included based on actual salary expenditures. The full amount of the salary charges between March 13, 2020 and June 30, 2020 was charged.
The below titles were charged to the fund: • Correctional Police Officer JJC • Senior Correctional Police Officer JJC • Senior Investigator Parole • Correctional Police Captain JJC • Correctional Police Lieutenant JJC • Correctional Police Sergeant JJC
2. The Juvenile Justice Commission requested $20.3 million for 27 capital projects in FY 2022. Of this amount: $11.9 million was for construction projects, including facility renovations and upgrades; $5.4 million was for preservation projects, including roof replacements and security enhancements; $967,000 was for environmental projects; $929,000 was for infrastructure projects; $583,000 was planned for compliance projects; and $460,000 was planned for acquisition projects. Of the amount requested by the Juvenile Justice Commission, the Capital Commission recommended only $2.9 million for funding in FY 2022.
• Questions: Does the FY 2022 Governor’s Budget fund any of the above requested projects? Please provide a list of the capital needs of the 51 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
Juvenile Justice Commission. Which projects does the commission expect will be addressed in FY 2022 and what will be the expected funding sources? For the unfunded projects, how does the commission intend to meet the capital needs? Please provide a list of all commission capital projects completed in FY 2019, FY 2020, and FY 2021. Please provide an update on the costs associated with the Bordentown Juvenile Medium Secure Facility basement redesign which had been planned to provide alternate classroom space.
The projects recommended by the Capital Commission have been included in the FY2022 Governor’s Budget, totaling $2.9 million, specifically:
Roof Replacements $1,827,000 This funding will replace roofs at the following locations: Valentine Hall flat roofs ($234,000), JMSF South ($1.166 million) and Costello Prep ($427,000).
Suicide Resistance Improvements at Pinelands RCH $$566,000 This project will renovate the bathroom and shower areas by installing suicide resistant infrastructure that will allow the facility to also comply with the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) guidelines.
Security Camera and Video Equipment Installation $523,000 This funding is for security camera and video equipment installation projects of $205,000 and $318,000 at the DOVES Building and NRI-RSC, respectively. These projects will address blind areas of the facility to comply with PREA guidelines.
Capital projects completed in FY 2019, FY 2020, and FY 2021 Costello Prep/Bathroom/Shower Renovation $ 647,699 2019 Tramburg/Roof Replacement $ 1,461,415 2019 Hayes/JMSF North/South/Security Camera Project $ 441,664 2019 Valentine Hall/Condensing Unit/Chiller Replacement $ 294,553 2019 Vineland Prep/Gym RTU HVAC Replacement $ 793,018 2019 Vineland Prep/Admin. Building Kitchen Hood Project $ 499,504 2019 52 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
JMSF-North Gym & Admin/Roof & HVAC Replacement $ 1,183,132 2020 Ocean RCH/Roof Replacement Project $ 585,725 2020 Vocational Building/Roof Replacement Project $ 641,319 2020 Warren RCH/Bathroom/Shower Renovation $ 801,503 2020
Pinelands RCH/Security Camera Project $ 226,458 2021 JMSF North/Alternative Classroom Space $ 4,518,076 Active Ocean RCH/Security Camera Project $ 194,937 COVID- 19 Re-Start Ocean RCH/Sewer Line Project $ 150,000 COVID- 19 Stop Work
The following projects have a shortfall and have a completed design or a new design: DOVES RCH/Roof Project Phase 1 $ 550,000 Design NJTS Sewer Plant Decommissioning $583,240 Shortfall $ 400,000 Design
Any emergent capital needs that were not funded as part of the FY2022 budget process can be considered for an appropriation using Interdepartmental Funding from Treasury, specifically Life Safety Funding.
Bordentown Juvenile Medium Secure Facility basement redesign update:
The current total cost for the JMSF North/Alternative Classroom Space project (S0596-00) is $4,518,040. The project is approximately 99% complete and has moved into the punch list and close-out phase. Numerous delays resulted from the COVID- 19 shut down, including delays of up to 6 months for delivery of materials and work stoppages due to limited access to facilities as a safety precaution during the pandemic. The JJC anticipates having the education space fully operational by Fall 2021.
3. The Governor’s FY 2022 Budget in Brief indicated that the average daily population of the Juvenile Justice Commission’s facilities decreased an estimated 94 juveniles partially due to delays in sentencing as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The average daily population totaled 297 in FY 2020 and
53 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
is projected at 203 in FY 2021 and 275 in FY 2022. The Administration indicated that a similar population decline in Department of Corrections facilities allowed for the consolidation of Department of Corrections facilities, thus freeing up resources for new and increased services across the Department of Corrections and the Juvenile Justice Commission.
• Questions: Please describe the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Juvenile Justice Commission and its facilities. Since the beginning of the pandemic, how many juveniles have been newly committed to commission facilities? Has anyone been newly sentenced to serve a term in a commission facility? In projecting an average daily population of 275 in its facilities in FY 2022, what assumptions did the commission make regarding the resumption of criminal sentencing? Is the commission aware of any changes in the crime rate by juveniles during the COVID-19 pandemic that would grow the average daily population in FY 2022?
The pandemic has had a significant impact on overall populations at JJC facilities. First, S-2519, signed by the Governor in October 2020, awards public health emergency credits to certain inmates, juveniles, and parolees during a public health emergency. As of April 1, 85 JJC youth have been released early as a result of public health emergency credits. In addition, 27 youth had their dispositions modified by the courts in response to the pandemic. This allowed youth to be released early when appropriate and was done in cooperation with the Office of the Public Defender and Rutgers Law School’s Criminal & Youth Justice Clinics. JJC also shortened the target length of stay for youth ordered to attend a JJC residential community home as a condition of probation from 5-6 months to 4 months, resulting in the early release of 34 probationers. In total, as of April 1, 146 youth have been released early as a result of early release efforts undertaken in the face of the public health crisis.
Regarding admissions to the JJC, in the first year of the pandemic, between 3/8/2020 and 3/7/2021, 89 youth were admitted to the JJC as the result of term of commitment/incarceration imposed by the court, and 32 were admitted directly to residential community homes as a condition of probation imposed by the court, for a total of 121 new admissions resulting from court action. During the previous one-year period, between 3/8/2019 and 3/7/2020, the commitment figure was 167 and the probationer figure was 93, for a total of 260 admissions through court action. However, one year prior to that, for the period of 3/8/2018 to 3/7/2019, the commitment figure was 161 and the probationer figure was 98, for a total of 259 admissions through court action. So, while JJC populations have been declining for many years, court actions leading to placement with the JJC actually increased by one youth in the year leading up to the pandemic. The JJC anticipates that the reduction in recent admissions is the direct result of the pandemic.
54 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
Also notable is that pre-pandemic, secure care average daily population at JJC was experiencing an uptick. During the first half of 2019, the secure care population was 167 youth, and during the second half of 2019, right before the crisis hit, it was up to 188. These increases were not unexpected, as JJC anticipated continuing, modest increases in population as a result of housing waived youth with the JJC following the full implementation of S-2003. Waived cases take longer to resolve in court, and because the law was not explicitly retroactive, cases that were filed prior to the law’s passage often resulted in those youth continuing to be sentenced to DOC instead of JJC. With time, all such youth are coming/will come to JJC. Waived youth also have longer lengths of stay/terms of commitment, which increases daily population over time.
These pre-pandemic trends are part of the assumptions JJC used to project increases in JJC populations post-pandemic. The JJC has no reason to believe that the overall population reductions, driven by reductions in admissions and by shortened lengths of stay tied to early release, both of which are tied to the public health crisis, will be maintained once the public health crisis has abated. Another variable that impacted JJC post-pandemic population projections is that during the public health crisis, certain serious and violent crimes have experienced an increase. [NCCCJ - Impact Report: COVID-19 and Crime (counciloncj.org)] Throughout the country, it has been reported that jurisdictions have seen significant increases in crimes committed by juveniles, specifically car thefts and burglaries. For New Jersey, these statistics are tracked in the Uniform Crime Report published by the State Police. Juvenile data regarding the time period of the pandemic is not yet available through the UCR.
As these cases move through court, and as court delays related to a suspension of jury trials and other challenges presented by and during the crisis are mitigated and those pending cases get resolved, the JJC could see an increase in admissions, which together with the return to pre-pandemic lengths of stay, will likely increase populations to, or close to, pre-pandemic levels.
• Question: Please provide information on the new and increased services that will benefit the juveniles in the care of the Juvenile Justice Commission after the State will have realized savings from the consolidation of Department of Corrections facilities.
The consolidation of Department of Corrections facilities, and any resulting savings, have no impact on the JJC, as the JJC is not part of the Department of Corrections.
4. In response to an FY 2020 OLS Discussion Point, the Juvenile Justice Commission noted that both the New Jersey Training School for Boys, Jamesburg, in Monroe Township and the Juvenile Female Secure Care and Intake Facility, Hayes, in Bordentown were scheduled for closure upon the opening of three new 48-bed state-of-the-art regional facilities. The Juvenile 55 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
Justice Commission projected the completion of the Southern and Central Region Facilities in October 2024, while the Northern Facility would likely be completed approximately one year later. At the time of discussion, a northern location had yet to be determined.
The closing of these facilities is part of the New Jersey Juvenile Justice Commission’s plan to improve outcomes for youth with smaller regional facilities, which are closer to home to maximize opportunities for family participation in the juveniles’ rehabilitative process.
• Questions: Please provide an updated timetable or schedule for the new Juvenile Justice Commission facilities and the planned closure dates for the existing facilities. What is the estimated cost to build each facility? Does the commission anticipate needing additional correction and civilian personnel to staff three facilities versus two? If so, please provide the JCC’s anticipated staffing plan. If the northern facility has been located, please provide further information on the planned location.
Regarding plans to replace NJTS and Hayes with three regional, more therapeutic and developmentally-appropriate facilities that are closer to youths’ hometowns, to date, Treasury, in partnership with the JJC, and with input from the advocacy community, issued a Scope of Work to engage an architectural firm to develop a prototype design for these new facilities that represents the best possible spaces we can create for young people who require secure placement. The JJC awaits final approval from the Governor’s Office before embarking on next steps. Meanwhile, JJC’s efforts to continue to improve programs and supports at its current facilities are progressing steadily.
In January 2018, $169 million in bond funding was secured for this project. More specific cost estimates cannot be determined without a completed design plan and authorized start date for the project. Staffing needs, including juvenile correctional police officers, are dependent upon the physical plant and must comply with certain ratios as required under PREA and other requirements. However, if the JJC is authorized to proceed with the prototype design as developed, it does not anticipate needing any additional staff to operate these facilities, as the new facilities reflect a significant reduction in JJC’s overall secure care capacity. In fact, JJC anticipates the possibility of a modest reduction in staffing needs stemming from the modern design with improved lines of sight and other design improvements. Detailed staffing analyses, however, are not available at this time. Once the JJC initiates the project, it would take several years before new or renovated spaces will be able to be fully occupied. Similarly, closure dates for existing JJC facilities cannot be determined until construction begins. 56 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
A site for the northern facility has not been identified. The JJC has made it a priority and has modified policies and regulations to maximize opportunities to house those youth who are eligible for placement in the residential program that is geographically closest to their home community, in order to facilitate family and community engagement. The JJC is supportive of this principle extending to youth placed in secure care.
5. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal government has awarded several billions of dollars to the State of New Jersey.
• Question: What are the commission’s plans to maximize federal financial assistance during the COVID-19 pandemic and as the State recovers therefrom?
JJC has actual costs of $5,073,619 and projected costs of $16,776,845 (Total: $21,850,464) directly related to COVID-19. To date, the Department of Treasury, Office of Management and Budget has received $8,033,469 in CARES Act funding on behalf of JJC for salary expenses and JJC has directly received $274,535 in FEMA funding for operational expenses. The projected FEMA reimbursement for JJC is estimated at $2,234,214 (Total: $2,508,750). As the pandemic continues, COVID-19 costs continue to accumulate and JJC continues to collect and prepare data to submit for the next FEMA reimbursement.
The COVID-19 actual and projected costs included the following expenses directly related to the pandemic: • Civilian and Custody staff salary and overtime • Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) • COVID-19 positive cleanings / enhanced weekly cleanings • COVID-19 related supplies • COVID-19 related equipment • COVID-19 testing and vaccinations • N95 Mask fit testing • Lexan Partitions
6. Many federal agencies and departments have waived certain requirements during the COVID-19 pandemic.
• Questions: For what, if any, federal waivers has the commission applied during the COVID-19 pandemic? What waiver requests were approved and what waiver requests were denied? How many of these waivers have an opportunity to be extended?
57 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
In compliance with the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA), each state is required to audit identified facilities for compliance with the federal law each year. The audit process requires in-person visits to the identified facilities. DOJ waived this requirement due to the COVID-19 pandemic and permitted virtual tours to replace in- person visits for the 2019 audit cycle. The JJC facilities that were included in the 2019 cycle were found to be in compliance with PREA. The JJC awaits further information for the 2020 audit cycle.
7. The Federal Funds Information for States estimates that New Jersey State and local government entities will receive a combined $15.1 billion in federal assistance under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.
• Questions: Please detail the amounts the commission anticipates receiving under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 and indicate the purposes for which the funds would be used. By what date would the funds have to be expended?
The Department is not currently aware of any substantially dedicated funding for the Juvenile Justice Commission under ARP, but will continue to see opportunities that may exist as additional guidance is provided by the federal government for the various programs.
8. Diversity and inclusion in the workplace rose to prominence as a mainstream topic of interest in 2020.
• Questions: Please indicate the percentages of minorities and women in each of the commission’s middle and senior management. Please detail any plans the commission may have to increase the representation of minorities and women among its middle and senior managers.
Of JJC’s middle and upper management staff, 41% identify themselves as a race other than white, and 25% of this category are women. The JJC identified the upper and middle management of the agency as those individuals with executive-level decision- making and supervisory responsibilities including the Executive Director, Deputy Executive Directors, Chief Administrative Officer, Office Directors, those individuals reporting directly to the identified leadership positions, including Unit Managers, and others with policy and decision-making authority including, for example, Superintendents and Assistant Superintendents. This category of middle and upper management totaled 93 individuals. The JJC is committed to ensuring diversity throughout its workforce and specifically among those in positions of authority. The agency continues to identity pathways to enhance diversity and inclusion throughout the agency as detailed below.
58 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
• Questions: Please indicate any structures and elements of its culture that are known to the commission as having had the effects of making minorities and women feel unwelcome and limiting diversity and inclusion. How does the commission intend to address these structures and cultural elements? What initiatives has the commission implemented in the last two years to further the diversity and inclusiveness of its workplace? Does the commission intend to undertake any additional initiatives through the end of FY 2022?
As part of its Diversity and Inclusion Plan, the JJC has identified that recruiting and disqualification practices in relation to the JJC academy recruit classes may pose obstacles that disproportionately discourage and/or disqualify minority and female candidates among Juvenile Correctional Police Officers (JCPO) in particular. As a part of the JJC Diversity and Inclusion Plan, the JJC has collected and analyzed recruit class data specifically to determine whether attrition among JCPO applicants varies by race/ethnicity and gender, and in turn, whether any practices might be adjusted to increase diversity among JCPOs employed by the JJC. Potential JCPOs were contacted and identified reasons that they did not attend a pre-employment screening. The JJC used this information and has taken steps to address some of the barriers that include providing more flexibility in scheduling pre-employment screening dates and times to include evenings and weekend sessions, allowing more time to gather required personal documents, and utilizing email, in addition to U.S. mail, to ensure prompt communication. In addition, the JJC revised the written communications sent to JCPO applicants to ensure that they were clear and welcoming, and changed the requirement that business attire be required for the screening session.
Additionally, as part of the JJC’s Diversity and Inclusion Plan, Diversity and Inclusion training for all JJC staff was implemented in 2019; 88% of all JJC supervisors have been trained and the JJC is developing a plan to reach 100%. Going forward, as a part of JJC’s New Employee Orientation every new employee receives training on Diversity and Inclusion. While JJC law enforcement staff are required to complete implicit bias training, the JJC is considering the addition of implicit bias training for civilian staff as well.
In 2020, the JJC Diversity and Inclusion Committee was expanded to include additional employee representation from various offices and position levels. The committee is continuing the work of achieving the goals established in the JJC’s Diversity and Inclusion Plan.
The JJC is also developing a Youth Worker Apprentice Program that combines the efforts to increase workforce diversity to develop a workforce that is representative of the youth that JJC serves, while also promoting the rehabilitation and success of paroled youth. In 2021, the JJC will implement an initiative to hire youth released from JJC custody as part-time youth worker trainees. Providing access to meaningful, paid 59 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2021-2022
Discussion Points (Cont’d)
employment and job training opportunities is among the most effective strategies for ensuring the long-term success of youth returning home from confinement. Additionally, current JJC residents will benefit from the “credible messenger” approach currently emerging in youth justice as a best practice, whereby people with lived experience in the justice system provide peer-to-peer support to those currently system-involved.
Finally, the JJC is working collaboratively with Rutgers University, which is among the most diverse universities in the nation, to offer a Juvenile Justice and Youth Development (JJYD) curriculum to proactively develop interest among the next generation of workers seeking employment with youth serving organizations in New Jersey, and to in turn increase the likelihood that the JJC workforce will grow even more diverse in the future. The JJYD program is an innovative, interdisciplinary program model which incorporates highly respected departments, units, and leaders from across Rutgers University. Undergraduate and Professional Education opportunities are designed to attract, recruit, train, and retain a workforce prepared to address the demands of juvenile justice and to work with young people impacted by the justice system. The JJYD minor is currently implemented at Rutgers University’s Camden and Newark campuses. To date, of the seven students who have graduated with the JJYD minor, 86% were minority. Of the 33 students currently enrolled in the JJYD minor program, 91% are minority. The major is currently in development.
60 SORNA issued through DSP
Subgrants are not issued within this grant Victims of Crime Act (VOCA Grant) FFY 2017 FFY 2017 FFY 2017 Subgrant # Subgrantee Name Amount Subgrant # Subgrantee Name Amount Subgrant # Subgrantee Name Amount V-01-17 Atlantic County $654,638 VCS-09-17 Hudson County $80,000 VS-36-17 Middlesex County SANE $85,661 V-02-17 Bergen County $386,535 VCS-11-17 Mercer County $80,000 VS-36B-17 Middlesex County SANE $86,195 V-03-17 Burlington County $426,305 VCS-12-17 Middlesex County $80,000 VS-37-17 Monmouth County SANE $94,636 V-04-17 Camden County $817,834 VCS-13-17 Monmouth County $80,000 VS-37B-17 Monmouth County SANE $93,665 V-05-17 Cape May County $348,883 VCS-19-17 Sussex County $80,000 VS-38-17 Morris County SANE $82,895 V-06-17 Cumberland County $446,666 VCS-20-17 Union County $80,000 VS-38B-17 Morris County SANE $82,139 V-07-17 Essex County $1,205,554 VCS-21-17 Warren County $80,000 VS-39-17 Ocean County SANE $87,015 V-08-17 Gloucester County $425,169 VHL-01-17 Womanspace $202,297 VS-39B-17 Ocean County SANE $88,009 V-09-17 Hudson County $641,709 VHT-01-17 AVANZAR $535,000 VS-40-17 Passaic County SANE $93,112 V-10-17 Hunterdon County $239,032 VN-1-17 VINE $356,153 VS-40B-17 Passaic County SANE $92,491 V-11-17 Mercer County $584,372 VS-25-17 Atlantic County SANE $86,902 VS-41-17 Salem County SANE $72,000 V-12-17 Middlesex County $590,330 VS-25-17 Atlantic County SANE $86,902 VS-41B-17 Salem County SANE $72,000 V-13-17 Monmouth County $614,254 VS-25B-17 Atlantic County SANE $86,942 VS-42-17 Somerset County SANE $72,000 V-14-17 Morris County $367,494 VS-26-17 Bergen County SANE $85,548 VS-42B-17 Somerset County SANE $72,000 V-15-17 Ocean County $610,998 VS-26B-17 Bergen County SANE $87,369 VS-43-17 Sussex County SANE $72,000 V-16-17 Passaic County $545,769 VS-27-17 Burlington County SANE $87,975 VS-43B-17 Sussex County SANE $72,000 V-17-17 Salem County $269,988 VS-27B-17 Burlington County SANE $88,703 VS-44-17 Union County SANE $87,185 V-18-17 Somerset County $305,643 VS-28-17 Camden County SANE $105,926 VS-44B-17 Union County SANE $87,155 V-19-17 Sussex County $295,263 VS-28B-17 Camden County SANE $105,512 VS-45-17 Warren County SANE $72,000 V-20-17 Union County $442,981 VS-29-17 Cape May County SANE $72,000 VS-45B-17 Warren County SANE $72,000 V-21-17 Warren County $280,583 VS-29B-17 Cape May County SANE $72,000 VS-65-17 DCJ-FNE State Pay Project $1,300,000 V-26-17 NJ Division of Law $2,300,000 VS-30-17 Cumberland County SANE $84,193 VSAI-2-17 Ramapo College $290,267 Division On Aging - Office Of the Public V-66-17 $375,316 Cumberland County SANE Guardian VS-30B-17 $82,459 V-80-17 JJC $65,000 VS-31-17 Essex County SANE $107,391 V-83-17 Rutgers Law School $481,084 VS-31B-17 Essex County SANE $111,647 V-85-17 The College of New Jersey $347,108 VS-32-17 Gloucester County SANE $85,999 V-86-17 Department of Human Services $136,550 VS-32B-17 Gloucester County SANE $87,102 V-95-17 DOC $96,000 VS-33-17 Hudson County SANE $99,716 V-99-17 NJ Coalition to End Domestic Violence $237,768 VS-33B-17 Hudson County SANE $96,654 VCS-02-17 Bergen County $80,000 VS-34-17 Hunterdon County SANE $72,000 VCS-03-17 Burlington County $80,000 VS-34B-17 Hunterdon County SANE $72,000 VCS-04-17 Camden County $80,000 VS-35-17 Mercer County SANE $93,846 VCS-07-17 Essex County $80,000 VS-35B-17 Mercer County SANE $91,958 Victims of Crime Act (VOCA Grant) FFY 2018 FFY 2018 FFY 2018 Subgrant # Subgrantee Name Amount Subgrant # Subgrantee Name Amount Subgrant # Subgrantee Name Amount DASI - Domestic Abuse & Sexual Assault VAG-28-18 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton VAG-65-18 HVP-01-18 AtlantiCare Regional Medical Center $1,999,733 $199,272 Intervention Services $390,620
HVP-02-18 Capital Health System $1,790,529 VAG-29-18 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton $314,227 VAG-66-18 Deirdre O'Brien Child Advocacy Center, Inc. $305,428 Domestic Abuse and Sexual Assault Crisis VAG-30-18 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton VAG-178-18 HVP-03-18 Center for Family Services $625,649 $351,028 Center of Warren Count y $400,000 HMH Hospitals Corp. (Jersey Shore Domestic Abuse and Sexual Assault Crisis VAG-32-18 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton VAG-67-18 HVP-04-18 University Medical Center) $949,789 $367,114 Center of Warren County $381,022 Domestic Abuse and Sexual Assault Crisis VAG-33-18 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton VAG-68-18 HVP-05-18 Jersey City Medical Center $1,188,229 $231,261 Center of Warren County $399,552 HVP-06-18 Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital $1,444,225 VAG-34-18 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton $289,039 VAG-69-18 Essex County Family Justice Center $400,000 HVP-07-18 St. Joseph's Health $1,869,088 VAG-35-18 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton $329,799 VAG-70-18 Essex County Family Justice Center $400,000 HVP-08-18 Trinitas Regional Medical Center $980,581 VAG-36-18 Center for Family Services, Inc. $345,124 VAG-71-18 Essex County Family Justice Center $400,000 HVP-09-18 University Hospital $1,937,959 VAG-37-18 Center for Family Services, Inc. $400,000 VAG-72-18 Exhale Women's Fellowship, Inc. $119,500 VAG-01-18 180 Turning Lives Around, Inc. $400,000 VAG-38-18 Center for Family Services, Inc. $400,000 VAG-73-18 Family Service Bureau of Newark $400,000 VAG-02-18 180 Turning Lives Around, Inc. $400,000 VAG-39-18 Center for Family Services, Inc. $400,000 VAG-74-18 Family Service Bureau of Newark $250,000 VAG-03-18 180 Turning Lives Around, Inc. $400,000 VAG-40-18 Center for Family Services, Inc. $400,000 VAG-75-18 Family Service League $184,332 VAG-04-18 A Partnership for Change (APFC) $352,394 VAG-41-18 Center for Family Services, Inc. $400,000 VAG-76-18 FP YouthOutCry Foundation, Inc. $397,950 VAG-05-18 A Partnership for Change (APFC) $376,295 VAG-42-18 Center for Great Expectations $400,000 VAG-77-18 Harambe Social Services, Inc. $268,925 VAG-06-18 Access Family Services, Inc. $400,000 VAG-43-18 Center for Great Expectations $398,217 VAG-78-18 Hetrick-Martin Institute - New Jersey $400,000 Alternatives to Domestic Violence (ADV) Hispanic Family Center of Southern New VAG-07-18 Bergen County Department of Human VAG-44-18 Center for Hope and Safety VAG-79-18 Jersey Services (BCDHS) $241,875 $400,000 $272,935 Hispanic Family Center of Southern New VAG-08-18 American Friends Service Committee VAG-45-18 Center for Hope and Safety VAG-80-18 $417,450 $400,000 Jersey $310,403 VAG-09-18 AVANZAR $325,560 VAG-46-18 Central Jersey Legal Services $400,000 VAG-81-18 Hope Sheds Light $394,244 VAG-10-18 AVANZAR $376,268 VAG-47-18 Central Jersey Legal Services $363,000 VAG-82-18 Hudson County CASA (CASA) $339,810 VAG-11-18 Bergen County CASA $400,000 VAG-48-18 City of Newark $400,000 VAG-83-18 Independence: A Family of Services, Inc. $400,000
VAG-12-18 Camden Center for Law and Social Justice $318,163 VAG-49-18 City of Newark $400,000 VAG-84-18 Instruments of Righteousness $399,600
VAG-13-18 Camden Center for Law and Social Justice $247,568 VAG-50-18 City of Newark $400,000 VAG-85-18 Ironbound Community Corporation $400,000 VAG-14-18 CarePoint Health Foundation, Inc. $268,269 VAG-51-18 City of Newark $400,000 VAG-86-18 Jersey Battered Women's Service, Inc. $103,032 CASA for Children of Atlantic and Cape May VAG-15-18 VAG-52-18 City of Newark VAG-87-18 Jersey Battered Women's Service, Inc. Counties $200,000 $400,000 $400,000 CASA for Children of Atlantic and Cape May VAG-16-18 VAG-53-18 Coalition Against Rape & Abuse, Inc. VAG-88-18 Jersey Battered Women's Service, Inc. Counties $200,000 $300,000 $366,769 Jewish Family Service of Clifton-Passaic, VAG-17-18 CASA for Children of Essex County, Inc. VAG-54-18 County of Middlesex VAG-89-18 $400,000 $186,700 Inc. $400,000 Jewish Family Service of MetroWest VAG-18-18 CASA of Mercer and Burlington Counties VAG-55-18 CASA (CASA) of Union County VAG-90-18 $400,000 $363,822 (JFSMW) $400,000 Jewish Family Service of MetroWest VAG-19-18 CASA of Mercer and Burlington Counties VAG-56-18 CASA of Camden County, Inc. VAG-91-18 $400,000 $300,000 (JFSMW) $400,000 CASA of Cumberland, Gloucester & Salem VAG-20-18 CASA of New Jersey VAG-57-18 VAG-92-18 La Casa de Don Pedro, Inc. $399,615 Counties $399,704 $400,000 CASA of Cumberland, Gloucester & Salem VAG-21-18 CASA of Ocean County VAG-58-18 VAG-93-18 Legal Services of New Jersey $399,798 Counties $399,526 $400,000 CASA of Somerset, Hunterdon, & Warren CASA of Cumberland, Gloucester & Salem VAG-22-18 VAG-59-18 VAG-94-18 Legal Services of New Jersey Counties, Inc. $135,252 Counties $398,146 $400,000 CASA of Somerset, Hunterdon, & Warren CASA of Cumberland, Gloucester & Salem VAG-23-18 VAG-60-18 VAG-95-18 Legal Services of Northwest Jersey Counties, Inc. $281,234 Counties $399,760 $400,000 CASA of Somerset, Hunterdon, & Warren VAG-24-18 VAG-61-18 CASA of Monmouth County, Inc. VAG-96-18 Legal Services of Northwest Jersey Counties, Inc. $287,064 $387,808 $388,596 VAG-25-18 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton $399,905 VAG-62-18 CASA of Morris and Sussex Counties $368,390 VAG-97-18 LGBT Rain Foundation $400,000 VAG-26-18 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton $389,497 VAG-63-18 CASA of Morris and Sussex Counties $235,467 VAG-98-18 LifeTies, Inc. $400,000 DASI - Domestic Abuse & Sexual Assault VAG-27-18 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton VAG-64-18 VAG-99-18 Main Street Counseling Center $277,922 Intervention Services $369,822 $380,800 Victims of Crime Act (VOCA Grant) FFY 2018 FFY 2018 FFY 2018 Subgrant # Subgrantee Name Amount Subgrant # Subgrantee Name Amount Subgrant # Subgrantee Name Amount VAG-100-18 Manavi, Inc. $400,000 VAG-138-18 Safe & Sound Somerset, Inc. $400,000 VAG-172-18 YWCA Eastern Union County $338,280 VAG-101-18 Mercy Center Corporation $375,523 VAG-139-18 Safe in Hunterdon, Inc. $400,000 VAG-173-18 Zufall Health Center $121,654 National Center for Civic Innovation/Newark VAG-102-18 VAG-140-18 Safe in Hunterdon, Inc. VCA-01-18 AVANZAR Community Solutions $400,000 $100,000 $290,000 VAG-103-18 New Jersey Association on Correction $367,534 VAG-141-18 Safe in Hunterdon, Inc. $400,000 VCA-02-18 YWCA Bergen County - Healing Space $290,000 VAG-104-18 New Jersey Association on Correction $288,260 VAG-174-18 Salem County Women's Services $138,218 VCA-03-18 Contact of Burlington County $290,000 Center for Family Services (Camden VAG-105-18 New Jersey Association on Correction VAG-175-18 Salem County Women's Services VCA-04-18 $384,945 $156,514 Count y) $290,000 VAG-106-18 New Jersey Association on Correction $378,316 VAG-176-18 Salem County Women's Services $182,640 VCA-05-18 Coalition Against rape and Abuse, Inc. $290,000 Center for Family Services (Cumberland VAG-107-18 New Jersey Association on Correction VAG-177-18 Salem County Women's Services VCA-06-18 $399,562 $177,122 County) $290,000 Family Service League - SAVE of Essex VAG-108-18 New Jersey Association on Correction VAG-142-18 Sanar Wellness Institute VCA-07-18 $386,062 $337,264 County $290,000 New Jersey Coalition Against Sexual Servicios Latinos de Burlington County, Inc. Center for Family Services (Glouocester VAG-109-18 VAG-143-18 VCA-08-18 Assault $240,000 (SELBUC) $400,000 County) $290,000 New Jersey Coalition to End Domestic Carepoint Health Foundation - Hudson VAG-110-18 VAG-144-18 Seton Hall University School of Law VCA-09-18 Violence $600,000 $325,884 SPEAKS $290,000 New Jersey Coalition to End Domestic VAG-111-18 VAG-145-18 St. Francis Community Center, LBICC, Inc. VCA-10-18 SAFE in Hunterdon Violence $400,000 $120,138 $290,000 New Jersey Coalition to End Domestic Sussex County Children's Advocacy Center, VAG-112-18 VAG-146-18 VCA-11-18 WomanSpace, Inc. Violence $400,000 Inc., Ginnie's House $398,824 $290,000 New Jersey Coalition to End Domestic Sussex County Children's Advocacy Center, VAG-113-18 VAG-147-18 VCA-12-18 Middlesex County Center for Empowerment Violence $400,000 Inc., Ginnie's House $248,340 $290,000 The Alcove Center for Grieving Children and VAG-114-18 New Jersey Crime Victims' Law Center VAG-148-18 VCA-13-18 180 Turning Lives Around, Inc. $393,168 Families, Inc. $399,804 $290,000 VAG-115-18 Newark Community Street Team $400,000 VAG-149-18 The Center for Great Expectations $399,221 VCA-14-18 Morris CARES $290,000 VAG-116-18 NJ 2-1-1 Partnership $398,646 VAG-150-18 The Center for Great Expectations $396,909 VCA-15-18 St. Francis Counseling Service $290,000 VAG-117-18 Northeast New Jersey Legal Services $310,803 VAG-151-18 The College Of New Jersey $399,867 VCA-16-18 Passaic County Women's Center $290,000 VAG-118-18 Northeast New Jersey Legal Services $256,988 VAG-152-18 The Foundation for University Hospital $400,000 VCA-17-18 Salem County Women's Services $290,000 VAG-119-18 Northeast New Jersey Legal Services $359,546 VAG-153-18 The Foundation for University Hospital $400,000 VCA-18-18 Zufall Health Center $290,000 Domestic Violence Abuse & Sexual Assault VAG-120-18 Northeast New Jersey Legal Services VAG-154-18 The United Advocacy Group, Inc. VCA-19-18 $358,074 $395,472 Intervention Services $290,000 VAG-121-18 Oasis - A Haven for Women and Children $190,663 VAG-155-18 The United Advocacy Group, Inc. $395,472 VCA-20-18 Union County Rape Crisis Center $290,000 Domestic Abuse & Sexual Assault Crisis VAG-122-18 Partners for Women and Justice VAG-156-18 United Community Corporation VCA-21-18 $487,757 $400,000 Center $290,000 VAG-123-18 Partners for Women and Justice $320,694 VAG-157-18 Volunteer Lawyers for Justice $400,000 VCR-1-18 Division on Civil Rights $1,800,000 VAG-124-18 Partners for Women and Justice $301,427 VAG-158-18 Wafa House, Inc. $400,000 VHL-01-18 Womanspace $225,000 VAG-125-18 Partners for Women and Justice $469,057 VAG-159-18 Womanspace, Inc. $218,163 VN-1-18 VINE $356,153 VAG-126-18 Passaic County CASA (CASA) $400,000 VAG-160-18 Womanspace, Inc. $400,000 VS-65-18 DCJ-FNE State Pay Project $1,300,000 Division On Aging - Office Of the Public VAG-127-18 Passaic County CASA (CASA) VAG-161-18 Womanspace, Inc. V-66-18 $400,000 $400,000 Guardian $400,000 VAG-128-18 Passaic County CASA (CASA) $400,000 VAG-162-18 Women Aware, Inc. $400,000 V-80-18 Juvenile Justice Commission $65,000 VAG-129-18 Prevention Education, Inc. $246,312 VAG-163-18 Women Aware, Inc. $400,000 V-83-18 Rutgers University $750,000 VAG-130-18 Protection From Abuse Security Services $50,736 VAG-164-18 WomenRising, Inc. $53,600 V-84-18 Rutgers University $5,000,000 VAG-131-18 Real House Recovery, Inc. $479,110 VAG-165-18 Women's Rights Information Center $324,907 V-85-18 The College of New Jersey VAG-132-18 Rutgers Law School $366,225 VAG-166-18 Wynona's House, Inc. $400,000 V-94-18 State Office of Witness Advocacy $295,438
VAG-133-18 Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey $309,855 VAG-167-18 Wynona's House, Inc. $294,357 VAG-134-18 Safe & Sound Somerset, Inc. $400,000 VAG-168-18 YWCA Bergen County $399,988 VAG-135-18 Safe & Sound Somerset, Inc. $275,000 VAG-169-18 YWCA Bergen County $362,961 VAG-136-18 Safe & Sound Somerset, Inc. $400,000 VAG-170-18 YWCA Eastern Union County $382,352 VAG-137-18 Safe & Sound Somerset, Inc. $300,000 VAG-171-18 YWCA Eastern Union County $379,260 Victims of Crime Act (VOCA Grant) FFY 2019 FFY 2019 FFY 2019 Subgrant # Subgrantee Name Amount Subgrant # Subgrantee Name Amount Subgrant # Subgrantee Name Amount Bergen County Alternatives to Domestic Mercer County SANE TRC-01-19 Care Plus NJ, Inc. $1,500,000 VCH-02-19 Violence $500,000 VS-32-19 $88,920 Catholic Charities Providence House – Middlesex County SANE TRC-02-19 University Hosptial - Newark $1,223,766 VCH-03-19 Burlington $500,000 VS-33-19 $87,097 New Jersey Association on Correction Monmouth County SANE TRC-03-19 Newark Community Street Team $1,206,572 VCH-04-19 (CCWC) $500,000 VS-34-19 $92,315 TRC-04-19 Jersey City Medical Center $1,436,271 VCH-05-19 Coalition Against Rape and Abuse, Inc. $500,000 VS-35-19 Morris County SANE $82,131 V-01-19 Atlantic County $733,231 VCH-06-19 Center for Family Services $500,000 VS-36-19 Ocean County SANE $89,934 V-02-19 Bergen County $393,929 VCH-07-19 Clara Maas -The Safe House $500,000 VS-37-19 Passaic County SANE $91,504 V-03-19 Burlington County $437,416 VCH-08-19 Center for Family Services $500,000 VS-38-19 Salem County SANE $72,000 V-04-19 Camden County $677,775 VCH-09-19 WomenRising $500,000 VS-39-19 Somerset County SANE $72,000 V-05-19 Cape May County $358,888 VCH-10-19 WomanSpace, Inc. $500,000 VS-40-19 Sussex County SANE $72,000 V-06-19 Cumberland County $472,546 VCH-11-19 Women Aware $500,000 VS-41-19 Union County SANE $87,451 V-07-19 Essex County $1,166,224 VCH-12-19 180 Turning Lives Around, Inc. $500,000 VS-42-19 Warren County SANE $72,000 V-08-19 Gloucester County $421,181 VCH-13-19 Jersey Battered Women’s Service, Inc. $500,000 VS-65-19 DCJ-FNE State Pay Project $2,400,000 V-09-19 Hudson County $676,492 VCH-14-19 Catholic Charities (Ocean County) $500,000 New Jersey Association on Correction Hunterdon County $262,870 V-10-19 VCH-15-19 (PCWC) $500,000 V-11-19 Mercer County $619,275 VCH-16-19 Salem County Women’s Services $500,000 V-12-19 Middlesex County $577,937 VCH-17-19 Safe and Sound Somerset, Inc. $500,000 Domestic Violence Abuse & Sexual Assault Monmouth County $581,130 V-13-19 VCH-18-19 Intervention Services $500,000 V-14-19 Morris County $334,891 VCH-19-19 YWCA of Eastern Union County $500,000 Domestic Abuse & Sexual Assault Crisis Ocean County $597,934 V-15-19 VCH-20-19 Center of Warren County $500,000 V-16-19 Passaic County $544,956 VN-1-19 VINE $366,838 V-17-19 Salem County $258,662 VS-22-19 Atlantic County SANE $88,667 V-18-19 Somerset County $330,772 VS-23-19 Bergen County SANE $87,451 V-19-19 Sussex County $292,747 VS-24-19 Burlington County SANE $88,667 V-20-19 Union County $472,367 VS-25-19 Camden County SANE $103,612 V-21-19 Warren County $288,777 VS-26-19 Cape May County SANE $72,000 V-66-19 Office of the Public Guardian $400,000 VS-27-19 Cumberland County SANE $80,865 V-85-19 The College of New Jersey $1,000,000 VS-28-19 Essex County SANE $116,175 V-94-19 State Office of Witness Advocacy $500,000 VS-29-19 Gloucester County SANE $86,793 V-99-19 Covenant House New Jersey $530,354 VS-30-19 Hudson County SANE $96,418 VCH-01-19 AVANZAR $500,000 VS-31-19 Hunterdon County SANE $72,000 Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) FFY 2018 FFY 2018 Subgrant # Subgrantee Name Amount Subgrant # Subgrantee Name Amount VAWA-10-18 180 Turning Lives Around, Inc. - DVRT $66,667 VAWA-55-18 A Partnership for Change $45,000 VAWA-11-18 Atlantic Co. Women's Center - DVRT $66,667 VAWA-56-18 Carepoint Helath Foundation $33,180 Bergen Co Alternatives to Domestic Violence - VAWA-12-18 DVRT $66,667 VAWA-57-18 Center for Family Services Inc $45,000 VAWA-13-18 Catholic Charities Providence House $66,667 VAWA-58-18 Center for Family Services Inc. $45,000 Catholic Charities Providence House - Ocean VAWA-14-18 - DVRT $66,667 VAWA-59-18 Central Jersey Legal Services $45,000 Domestic Abuse & Sexual Assault Crisis VAWA-15-18 Center For Family Services, Inc. - DVRT $66,667 VAWA-60-18 Center of Warren Co. $45,000
VAWA-16-18 Center For Family Services, Inc. - DVRT $66,667 VAWA-61-18 Hispanic Family Center of Southern NJ, Inc. $45,000 Coalition Against Rape and Abuse, Inc. - VAWA-17-18 DVRT $66,667 VAWA-62-18 Legal Services of New Jersey $45,000 Domestic Abuse & Sexual Assault Crisis VAWA-18-18 Center of Warren Co. - DVRT $66,667 VAWA-63-18 Main St. Counseling Center $45,000 Domestic Abuse & Sexual Assault New Jersey Association on Correction - Libre VAWA-19-18 Intervention Services - DVRT $66,667 VAWA-64-18 de Violencia $45,000 New Jersey Battered Women's Servce, Inc. - New Jersey Association on Correction - Safe VAWA-20M-18DVRT $66,667 VAWA-65-18 and Sober in Passaic $43,841 New Jersey Association on Correction - VAWA-21-18 DVRT $66,667 VAWA-66-18 Safe and Sound Somerset, Inc. $45,000 New Jersey Association on Correction - The Alcove Center for Grieving Children and VAWA-22-18 DVRT $66,667 VAWA-67-18 Families $45,000 VAWA-23M-18Safe and Sound Somerset, Inc. - DVRT $66,667 VAWA-68-18 Wynona's House, Inc. $45,000 VAWA-24M-18SAFE in Hunterdon - DVRT $66,667 VAWA-69-18 YWCA of Eastern Union County $45,000 VAWA-25M-18Salem Co. Women's Services - DVRT $66,667 VAWA-70-18 YWCA of Eastern Union County $45,000 VAWA-26-18 The Safe House - DVRT $66,667 VAWA-71-18 YWCA of Eastern Union County $45,000 VAWA-27-18 Womanspace, Inc. - DVRT $18,333 VAWA-72-18 New Jersey CASA $86,611 VAWA-27-18 Womanspace, Inc. - DVRT $48,334 VAWA-73-18 New Jersey CASA $90,000 VAWA-28-18 Women Aware, Inc. - DVRT $66,667 VAWA-74-18 NJ Coalition to End Domestic Violnce $86,611 VAWA-29-18 WomenRising - DVRT $66,667 VAWA-84-18 Division of State Police $100,000 VAWA-30M-18YWCA of Eastern Union Co. - DVRT $66,667 VAWA-85-18 NJ Administrative Office of the Courts $175,000 VAWA-46-18 Passaic County $50,547 VAWA-86-18 Department of Corrections $86,611 VAWA-52-18 180 Turning Lives Around $45,000 VAWA-88-18 Department of Human Services $89,872 VAWA-53-18 A Partnership for Change $45,000 Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) FFY 2019 FFY 2019 Subgrant # Subgrantee Name Amount Subgrant # Subgrantee Name Amount VAWA-10-19 180 Turning Lives Around, Inc. - DVRT $53,333 VAWA-57-19 Center for Family Services (Gloucester) $45,000 VAWA-11-19 Atlantic Co. Women's Center - DVRT $53,333 VAWA-58-19 Central Jersey Legal Services $45,000 Bergen Co Alternatives to Domestic Violence - Domestic Abuse & Sexual Assault Crisis VAWA-12-19 DVRT $53,333 VAWA-59-19 Center of Warren Co. $44,239 Catholic Charities Providence House - VAWA-13-19 Burlington - DVRT $53,333 VAWA-60-19 Essex County Family Justice Center $42,161 Catholic Charities Providence House - Ocean VAWA-14-19 - DVRT $53,333 VAWA-61-19 Hetrick Martin $44,998 Center For Family Services, Inc. - DVRT VAWA-15-19 (Cumberland) $53,333 VAWA-62-19 Hispanic Family Center $45,000 Center For Family Services, Inc. - DVRT VAWA-16-19 (Gloucester) $53,333 VAWA-63-19 Jersey Battered Womens Service $45,000 Coalition Against Rape and Abuse, Inc. - VAWA-17-19 DVRT $53,333 VAWA-64-19 Legal Services of New Jersey $45,000 Domestic Abuse & Sexual Assault Crisis VAWA-18-19 Center of Warren Co. - DVRT $53,333 VAWA-65-19 Main Street Counseling $45,000 Domestic Abuse & Sexual Assault VAWA-19-19 Intervention Services - DVRT $53,333 VAWA-66-19 New Community Harmony House $45,000 New Jersey Battered Women's Servce, Inc. - VAWA-20-19 DVRT $53,333 VAWA-67-19 New Jersey Association on Correction $45,000 New Jersey Association on Correction VAWA-21-19 (CCWC) - DVRT $53,333 VAWA-68-19 New Jersey Association on Correction $45,000 New Jersey Association on Correction VAWA-22-19 (PCWC) - DVRT $53,333 VAWA-69-19 New Jersey Association on Correction $45,000 VAWA-23-19 Safe and Sound Somerset, Inc. - DVRT $53,333 VAWA-70-19 NJCASA $45,000 VAWA-25-19 Salem Co. Women's Services - DVRT $53,333 VAWA-71-19 Safe+Sound Somerset, Inc. $45,000 VAWA-26-19 The Safe House - DVRT $53,333 VAWA-72-19 New Jersey CASA $90,000 VAWA-27-19 Womanspace, Inc. - DVRT $53,333 VAWA-73-19 New Jersey CASA $86,611 VAWA-28-19 Women Aware, Inc. - DVRT $53,333 VAWA-74-19 NJ Coalition to End Domestic Violence $86,611 VAWA-29-19 WomenRising - DVRT $53,333 VAWA-77-19 YWCA of Union County $45,000 VAWA-30-19 YWCA of Eastern Union Co. - DVRT $53,333 VAWA-78-19 YWCA of Union County $45,000 VAWA-36-19 Cumberland County $20,911 VAWA-79-19 YWCA of Union County $27,850 VAWA-52-19 180 Turning Lives Around $45,000 VAWA-79-19 YWCA of Union County $17,150 VAWA-53-19 A Partnership for Change (DATA) $45,000 VAWA-84-19 Division of State Police $100,000 VAWA-54-19 A Partnership for Change (PREP) $45,000 VAWA-85-19 NJ Administrative Office of the Courts $175,000 VAWA-55-19 Carepoint Health Foundation $31,452 VAWA-86-19 Department of Corrections $86,611 VAWA-56-19 Center for Family Services (Cumberland) $45,000 VAWA-88-19 Department of Human Services $89,872 Victims of Crime Act Training Grant FFY 2018 Subgrant # Subgrantee Name Amount VT‐1‐18 Rutgers University $849,999 SORNA issued through DCJ
Funds not received for FFY2018 & FFY2019 VOCA Building State Technology Grant
There are no subgrants issued under this grant. This grant is being used within VCCO to enhance the Claims Processing System being used. Victims of Crime Act Compensation Award
Subgrants are not issued within the VOCA Compensation Award. All funds received are utilized to process claims and payments to victims of crime. Victims of Crime Compensation Office Payouts for FY18 through FY21*
Provider Type FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21* % Increase FY21 Pay Pay Pay Projected Trend FY18 to FY21 To date: March 30, 2021
ATTORNEY CIVIL $809.00 ATTORNEY CIVIL
ATTORNEY CRIMINAL RIGHTS $137,654.77 $326,457.58 $616,219.87 $1,031,155.56 649% $773,366.67 ATTORNEY CRIMINAL RIGHTS
ATTORNEY PRIVATE $27,487.70 $36,473.52 $43,630.52 $60,162.13 119% $45,121.60 ATTORNEY PRIVATE
CRIME SCENE CLEAN-UP $20,141.30 $25,549.58 $18,103.72 $23,400.49 16% $17,550.37 CRIME SCENE CLEAN-UP
CRIME SCENE - Personal Property $789.55 $2,638.44 $253.11 -68% $189.83 CRIME SCENE - Personal Property
CRIME SCENE - Replacement Services $1,714.11 $6,071.97 $8,506.01 $11,039.85 544% $8,279.89 CRIME SCENE - Replacement Services
ECONOMIC SUPPORT ECONOMIC SUPPORT Child Care $84,958.33 $119,271.92 $140,017.89 $80,793.33 -5% $60,595.00 Child Care Domestic Serv/Home Health Assis $105,451.30 $131,392.31 $166,584.46 $168,256.67 60% $126,192.50 Domestic Serv/Home Health Assis Home/Auto Modification/Medical Equip $49,189.26 $3,942.97 $75,603.23 $56,332.24 15% $42,249.18 Home/Auto Modification/Medical Equip Other $420.00 $1,965.40 $389.48 $2,733.33 551% $2,050.00 Other Relocation Services $1,309,290.87 $1,763,757.43 $1,843,517.43 $1,448,233.03 11% $1,086,174.77 Relocation Services Relocation Personal Property Loss $25,691.13 $60,577.22 $13,989.05 -46% $10,491.79 Relocation Personal Property Loss Stolen Cash $1,328.00 $831.00 $1,700.00 $800.00 -40% $600.00 Stolen Cash Transportation(all) $84,552.72 $72,039.26 $68,117.24 $19,310.59 -77% $14,482.94 Transportation(all)
EMERGENCY $10,725.41 $6,492.95 $14,631.66 $81,885.16 663% $61,413.87 EMERGENCY
FUNERAL/BURIAL $1,633,376.16 $1,914,921.78 $1,841,455.59 $2,399,688.49 47% $1,799,766.37 FUNERAL/BURIAL
LOSS OF EARNINGS $710,599.07 $1,200,206.59 $1,031,504.15 $832,862.15 17% $624,646.61 LOSS OF EARNINGS
LOSS OF SUPPORT $2,074,931.91 $2,825,336.26 $3,356,913.32 $3,230,150.35 56% $2,422,612.76 LOSS OF SUPPORT
MEDICAL/DENTAL $1,958,336.62 $1,870,580.34 $2,048,650.34 $1,739,063.97 -11% $1,304,297.98 MEDICAL/DENTAL
MENTAL HEALTH $735,412.93 $761,375.59 $743,086.39 $822,560.03 12% $616,920.02 MENTAL HEALTH
OTHER Other Provider Type FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21* % Increase FY21 Pay Pay Pay Projected Trend FY18 to FY21 To date: March 30, 2021 Miscellaneous $6,210.26 $80.00 $1,628.76 $2,053.07 -67% $1,539.80 Miscellaneous VCCO Assessments $482.00 $179.00 $300.00 $56.00 -88% $42.00 VCCO Assessments
Grand Total $8,952,262.72 $11,093,406.13 $12,084,584.72 $12,024,778.60 $9,018,583.95 Grand Total
* Projected through 6/30/2021
Attachment C
Demographics of the 161st State Police Class
Race/Gender # Entered # In Training # Resigned Percentage
WM 125 94 31 65.28%
WF 4 2 2 1.39%
HNM 0 0 0 0.00%
HNF 0 0 0 0.00%
HM 41 30 11 20.83%
HF 1 1 0 0.69%
BM 12 5 7 3.47%
BF 1 1 0 0.69%
AM 6 2 4 1.39%
AF 3 2 1 1.39%
AIM 0 0 0 0.00%
Al F 0 0 0 0.00%
OM 0 0 0 0.00%
OF 0 0 0 0.00%
2 or More M 2 1 1 0.69%
2 or More F 0 0 0 0.00%
Not Reported M 5 4 1 2.78%
Not Reported F 0 0 0 0.00%
Not Reported / Not Reported 2 2 0 1.39%
TOTAL 202 144 58 100.00%
Attachment D
Demographics of the 160th State Police Class
Race/Gender # Entered # In Training # Resigned Percentage
WM 119 95 24 57.58%
WF 14 10 4 6.06%
HNM 1 1 0.61%
HNF 0 0 0.00%
HM 41 32 9 19.39%
HF 8 7 1 4.24%
BM 14 10 4 6.06%
BF 1 1 0.61%
AM 7 7 4.24%
AF 0 0 0.00%
AIM 0 0 0.00%
Al F 0 0 0.00%
OM 0 0 0.00%
OF 0 0 0.00%
2 or More M 3 1 2 0.61%
2 or More F 1 1 0.61%
Not Reported M 0 0 0.00%
Not Reported F 0 0 0.00% TOTAL 209 165 44 100.00%
Attachment E
Demographics of the 159th State Police Class
Race/Gender # Entered # In Training # Resigned Percentage
WM 105 76 29 64.96%
WF 8 7 1 5.98%
HNM 0 0 0.00%
HNF 0 0 0.00%
HM 28 17 11 14.53%
HF 0 0 0.00%
BM 11 7 4 5.98%
BF 1 1 0.85%
AM 1 1 0.85%
AF 0 0 0.00%
AIM 1 1 0.85%
Al F 0 0 0.00%
2 or More M 3 2 1 1.71%
2 or More F 1 1 0.85%
Not Reported M 5 4 1 3.42%
Not Reported F 0 0 0.00%
TOTAL 164 117 47 100.00%
Attachment F NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE ENLISTED MEMBERS
BREAKDOWN BY RANK. RACE & GENDER
White Black Hispanic Asian Am.Indian Others Total
MaJe Female Total MaJe Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Total
Cot 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
LTC 4 0 4 1 0 l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
Maj. 15 1 16 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19
Capt. 54 3 57 1 1 2 5 0 5 0 0 0 I 0 1 0 0 65
Lt. 196 17 213 9 1 10 12 0 12 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 238
SFC 171 9 180 12 1 13 12 1 13 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 207
DSFC 99 3 102 5 0 5 8 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 116
SSgt. 150 1 151 4 0 4 14 0 14 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 172
Sgt. 235 12 247 12 3 15 36 2 38 11 0 11 3 0 3 0 0 314
DSG 134 9 143 9 0 9 21 1 22 4 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 179
Tpr.I 290 6 296 13 0 13 45 0 45 7 0 7 1 0 1 0 0 362
Det.I 122 2 124 3 0 3 18 0 18 2 1 3 2 0 2 0 0 150
Tpr. II 35 4 39 0 0 0 11 2 13 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 55
Det.11 18 4 22 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23
Tpr. 502 34 536 90 3 93 161 10 171 23 I 24 5 1 6 2 2 832
Det. 28 2 30 l 0 1 8 0 8 l 0 1 0 0 0 l 1 41
Total 2,054 107 2,161 164 9 173 351 16 367 56 3 59 15 1 16 3 3 2,779
Attachment G NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE ENLISTED MEMBER BREAKDOWN BY RANK, RACE & GENDER
Wbite Black Hispanic Asian Am Indian Others Total
Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total
CoL 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
LTC 4 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 :.\l.tj. 13 2 15 2 1 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20
Capt. 43 6 49 3 0 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54
Lt. 182 14 196 10 2 12 12 l 13 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 222
SFC 155 7 162 9 1 10 14 1 15 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 191 DSFC 87 5 92 7 0 7 14 0 14 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 ss,- 144 2 146 4 0 4 15 0 15 5 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 171 Sgt. 241 11 252 11 2 13 40 2 42 8 0 8 1 0 1 0 0 0 316
7 0 7 16 0 16 3 2 0 0 0 DSG 127 8 135 5 0 0 0 163 Tpr.l 201 3 204 11 0 11 31 0 31 6 0 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 253
Det.I 90 l 91 2 0 2 13 0 13 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 110
Tpr.ll 97 6 103 22 0 22 45 1 46 8 1 9 1 0 1 0 0 0 181
Det.ll 50 7 57 4 0 4 12 0 12 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 76
Tpr. 664 48 712 82 6 88 196 17 213 25 2 27 10 1 11 16 1 17 1,.068
Det. 26 l 27 1 0 l 3 0 3 1 0 I 0 0 0 1 0 l 33
Total 121 176 12 415 22 437 65 5 70 18 1 17 1 2,125 2,246 188 19 18 2,978
Attachment H
New Jersey State Police FY 2021 – FY 2023 Projected Expenses 161st, 162nd and 163rd Recruit Class Costs Per Fiscal Year (based on 200 Recruits)
Recruit Class FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 Total Cost
161st $5,045,644 $0 $0 $5,045,644
162nd $2,290,014 $2,755,630 $0 $5,045,644
163rd $0 $5,045,644 $0 $5,045,644
Total Expenditures $7,335,658 $7,801,274 $0 $15,136,932
Attachment I
Attachment J
NJSP ATTRITION
YEAR REASON FOR RETIREMENT ATTRITION VALUE April Current number of eligible enlisted members able to retire with 25 82 2021 years of service 2021 Members who will gain eligibility to retire with 20 years of service 296 (119 th t hrough 128th NJSP Classes) 2021 Mandatory retirements with less than 25 years of service 7 2022 Members eligible to retire with 25 years of service (117th NJSP Class) 81 2022 Members who will gain eligibility to retire with 20 years of service 40 (129 th and 130th NJSP Class) 2022 Mandatory retirements with less than 25 years of service 17 2023 Members eligible to retire with 25 years of service (118 th NJSP Class) 117 2023 Members who will gain eligibility to retire with 20 years of service 123 (131st through 134th NJSP Class) 2023 Mandatory retirements with less than 25 years of service 16 2024 Members who will gain eligibility to retire with 20 years of service 186 (135th through 138th NJSP Class) 2024 Mandatory retirements with less than 25 years of service 20 2025 Members who will gain eligibility to retire with 20 years of service 272 (139th through 143rd NJSP Class) 2025 Mandatory retirements with less than 25 years of service 23 2026 Members eligible to retire with 25 years of service (119 th through 296 128t h NJSP Class) 2026 Members who will gain eligibility to retire with 20 years of service 92 (144 th and 145t h NJSP Class) 2026 Mandatory retirements with less than 25 years of service 34 2027 Members eligible to retire with 25 years of service (129th and 130th 40 NJSP Class) 2027 Members who will gain eligibility to retire with 20 years of service 68 (1 46th and 147 th NJSP Class) 2027 Mandatory retirements with less than 25 years of service 20 2028 Members eligible to retire with 25 years of service (131st through 123 134th NJSP Class) 2028 Members who will gain eligibility to retire with 20 years of service 157 (14 8th and 149 th NJSP Class) 2028 Mandatory retirements with less than 25 years of service 22 2029 Members who will gain eligibility to retire with 25 years of service 186 (135th through 138th NJSP Class) 2029 Members who will gain eligibility to retire with 20 years of service 99 (150 th NJSP Class) 2029 Mandatory retirements with less than 25 years of service 22 2030 Members eligible to retire with 25 years of service (139th through 272 143rd NJSP Class) 2030 Mandatory retirements with less than 25 years 29 2031 Members who will gain eligibility to retire with 25 years of service 92 (144th and 145th NJSP Class) 2031 Mandatory retirements with less than 25 years 11
Historically, the majority of retirements within the NJSP are based on 25 years of service. Members rarely retire with more than 20 years of service and less than 25 years of service.
Prior to COVID legislature, mandatory retirements were imposed on members who turn 55 years of age even if 25 years of service was not achieved.
Attachment K
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE ENLISTED MEMBERS BREAKDOWN BY RANK, RACE & GENDER Date of Data: 3/29/2021 *NOTE: Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding of figures.
WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN AM.INDIAN Others TOTAL
MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL
Col. 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
LTC 4 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 % 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%
Maj. 13 2 15 2 1 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 % 0.4% 0.1% 0.5% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7%
Capt. 43 6 49 3 0 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 ¾ 1.4% 0.2% 1.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.8%
Lt. 182 14 196 10 2 12 12 I 13 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 222 % 6.1% 0.5% 6.6% 0.3% 0.1% 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.5%
SFC 155 7 162 9 l 10 14 l 15 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 191 % 5.2% 0.2% 5.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% 0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.4%
DSFC 87 5 92 7 0 7 14 0 14 l 0 l 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 ¾ 2.9% 0.2% 3.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.8%
SSgt. 144 2 146 4 0 4 15 0 15 5 0 5 l 0 1 0 0 0 171 % 4.8% 0.1% 4.9% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.7%
Sgt. 241 11 252 11 2 13 40 2 42 8 0 8 1 0 1 0 0 0 316 % 8.1% 0.4% 8.5% 0.4% 0.1% 0.4% 1.3% 0.1% 1.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.6%
DSG 127 8 135 7 0 7 16 0 16 3 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 % 4.3% 0.3% 4.5% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.5%
WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN AM.INDIAN Others TOTAL
MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL
Tpr. I 201 3 204 11 0 11 31 0 31 6 0 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 253 % 6.8% 0.1% 6.9% 0.4% 0.0% 0.4% 1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.5%
Det. I 90 l 91 2 0 2 13 0 13 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 110 % 3.0% 0.0% 3.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.4% 0.0% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.7%
Tpr. II 97 6 103 22 0 22 45 1 46 8 1 9 1 0 1 0 0 0 181 ¾ 3.3% 0.2% 3.5% 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% 1.5% 0.0% 1.5% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.1%
Det.Il 50 7 57 4 0 4 12 0 12 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 % 1.7% 0.2% 1.9% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.4% 0.0% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.6%
Tpr. 664 48 712 82 6 88 196 17 213 25 2 27 10 1 11 16 1 17 1068 ¾ 22.3% 1.6% 23.9% 2.8% 0.2% 3.0% 6.6% 0.6% 7.2% 0.8% 0.1% 0.9% 0.3% 0.0% 0.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.6% 35.9%
Det. 26 1 27 1 0 1 3 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 33 % 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1%
TOTAL 2125 121 2246 176 12 188 415 22 437 65 5 70 18 1 19 17 1 18 2978 71.4% 4.1% 75.5% 5.9% 0.4% 6.3% 13.9% 0.7% 14.7% 2.2% 0.2% 2.4% 0.6% 0.0% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.6% 100%
ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
Law Firm Matter Approved Amount ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Bennett, Shareefah N. $135.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. NJ Transit $3,245.38 State of New Jersey v. Melchionne, Peter State of New Jersey v. Simoldoni, Laura State of New Jersey v. Andolini, ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield Tracy $1,950.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey vs. Montecino, Justine $915.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Graham-Bennett, Shareefah $4,950.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Douglas Starks (Stark) $7,344.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Leslie Prince $875.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Allan Lewis, Jr. $2,175.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Wortman, Edward $4,311.85 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. LeCount, William $4,914.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Stephanie Hudson $1,162.50 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield IMO: Elie C. Jones (Judge Bonnie Mizdol) $960.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Gisselle Lopez $1,710.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Sierra, Natividad $1,380.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Fahy, Joseph $5,386.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. DEP $495.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Lester Thompson $4,395.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield SoNJ v. Michelle M. Smith $855.00 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton MVC v. Morales, Santos $294.00 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton MVC v. Jackson, Charles $1,065.64 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton MVC v. William Ofosu-Appiah $1,079.76 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton Motor Vehicle Commission v.Andrew J. Roe, IV OAL Docket No.: MVH-9135-18 $575.56 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton Motor Vehicle Commission v. Andrew Halder OAL Docket No. : MVH-11514-18 $158.00 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton Motor Vehicle Commission v. Keith McCauley OAL Docket No. : MVH-11516-18 $438.04 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton Motor Vehicle Commission v.Pinchus Mendlowitz OAL Docket No. : MVH 16941-2018 $268.00 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton MVC v. Joseph Petrillo $320.00 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD NJT Insurance Coverage Issue in Tangia Price, et al. v. NJT $7,735.00 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Bradley C. Peterson v. Administrator Christopher Holmes, et al $197.62 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Victoria Williams-Faux vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1812-16 $59,114.66 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Tina Diamond-Ostasz vs. State of New Jersey Department of Education, et al. Docket No.: BUR-L-682-17 $66,882.46 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Jackie Alexander, et al v. Detective Miguel Holguin, et al $220.00 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Scott Ionno vs. NJ Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: CUM-L-437-17 $81,460.88 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Marianito Ruiz v. Correctional Officer Jerry Stretch, et al $50,186.87 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Alson Alston vs. National Conference of Bar Examiners, et al. Civil Action# 147-cv-4508; CO-AG-17 $990.00 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Multi-Family Conduit Bond Program - Vista Village Apartments ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Project $31,175.24 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Haynes, John Craig vs. Dr. Ihoma Nwachukwi, et al. $26,367.25 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency - Al Gomer Residences Project $17,997.05 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency - Daughters of Israel Residences Project $19,275.32 Special Counsel Designation and Retention: NJ Transit Insurance Coverage Issues in the Case of Kathleen ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Shanahan vs. New Jersey Transit $4,290.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Alternative Investments - General $2,736.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Protege Partners $1,248.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Investments in Winton Futures Fund, Ltd. $43,248.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Solus Alternative Asset Mgmt, LLP $12,672.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Hitec Vision VII, LP $3,216.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Blackstone Property Partners (post-closing matters) $13,056.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - OZSC, LP (post-closing) $1,392.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - OZNJ private Opportunities, LP (post-closing) $1,728.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - OZNJ Real Asset Opportunities, LP (post-closing) $6,048.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Och-Ziff Real Estate Fund II, LP (post-closing matters) $1,152.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Dyal Capital Partners III, LP (post-closing matters) $7,472.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Blackstone Tac Opps Residential Opportunities (post-closing matters) $5,856.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - RC Woodley Park, LP (post-closing matters) $2,736.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Starboard Leaders Fund LP (post-closing matters) $1,824.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Complex Transaction - Tetralogic Pharmaceuticals Corp. Note Exchange $144.00 Division of Investment - Federal Securities - Determination of Cash Management Fund Status for Purpose of Rule Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston 144A Transactions $1,488.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Crayhill Capital Management LP Separate Account (post-closing transaction) $7,440.00
Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Alternative Investment - Sycamore Partners III, L.P. DOL # 17-64336 (post-closing matters) $8,880.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Alternative Investment - Owl Rock Capital Technology Finance Corp. (initial transaction) $53,856.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Alternative Investment - Owl Rock Capital Newco LLC (initial transaction) $83,136.00
Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - Owl Rock Capital Technology Holdings, LLC (initial transaction) $40,800.00 Ballard Spahr LLP - Baltimore State Police Captains Labor Negotiations - STFA $30,041.60 Ballard Spahr LLP - Baltimore State Troopers Fraternal Association, et al. v. State of New Jersey, et al. $165.40 Birchmeier and Powell LLC Tuckahoe Motor Vehicle Commission v. Victor J. Cardin OAL Docket No. : MVH 11511-18 $930.00 Birchmeier and Powell LLC Tuckahoe Motor Vehicle Commission v. Robert W. Fauver, III OAL Docket No. : MVH 16945-18 $1,515.00 Birchmeier and Powell LLC Tuckahoe Motor Vehicle Commission v. Steve Carides,Jr OAL Docket No.: MVH 2528-19 $975.00 Birchmeier and Powell LLC Tuckahoe Motor Vehicle Commission v. Steven C. Lockwood OAL Docket No.: MVH 5029-19 $600.00 Birchmeier and Powell LLC Tuckahoe Motor Vehicle Commission v. Jacob R. Harrison OAL Docket No. : MVH 5790-19 $780.00 Blumberg & Wolk, LLC, Woodbury Drury, Jeffrey vs. University Correctional Health Care, et al. $5,065.84 David Zeiss vs. State of New Jersey, Department of Community Affairs, Division of Fire & Safety, Glenn Smyth, in his Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont official and individual capacity Docket No.: CPM-L-545-14 $18,427.53 Micaela P. Bennett vs. State of New Jersey, Elizabeth Connolly, Dawn Hall Apgar, Lynn Kovich, Christina Mongon, Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Lisa Ciaston and Theresa McQuaide Docket No.: MER-L-1774-15 $270,242.58 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Thomas Abraham v. John Pushko, et al $20,150.96 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Michelle Barker vs. The State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1133-16 $328,333.18 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Tina Young vs. State of New Jersey Docket No.: CPM-L-83-17 $16,583.22 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Thomas A. Capps, Jr. vs. Rowan University, et al. Docket No.: GLO-L-1124-16 $29,151.93 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Penelope Mauer vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-197-17 $37,032.53 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Tara Kumor vs. ACRO Service Corporation, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1331-17 $32,787.95 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Viktoriya Usachenok vs. State of New Jersey Department of the Treasury, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1577-17 $93,617.23 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Deborah Gross-Quatrone vs. Bonnie Mizdol, et al. Civil Action No.: 2:17-cv-13111-MCA-LDW $31,703.54 LaMonica R. Cross vs. State of New Jersey, Office of Attorney General, Division of Criminal Justice, et al. Docket No.: Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont CAM-L-242-18 $33,353.79
Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Diane Scott, Phillip Dowdell and Denise Hollingsworth vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-3425-17 $144,374.51 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Gary DeMarzo and Samuel Lashman vs. Cape May County Prosecutor, et al. Docket No.: CPM-L-129-13 $232,558.11 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Manuel Pontes, Ph.D. vs. Rowan University Docket No.: CAM-L-4324-18 $2,361.44 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont $65.00 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont In re $60.00 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Onslo Rose vs. Rowan University - APPEAL $10,898.68 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont David Zeiss v. SONJ, DCA, Div of Fire & Safety, Glenn Smyth (APPEAL) $3,628.42 Buonadonna & Benson, Vineland Motor Vehicle Commission v. Paulette White OAL Docket No. : MVH 13405-18 $1,680.00 Buonadonna & Benson, Vineland Motor Vehicle Commission v. Edward J. Perez $5,471.80 Buonadonna & Benson, Vineland Motor Vehicle Commission v. Kristin J. Williams (Conner) OAL Docket No.: MVH 5026-19 $1,095.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Shanahan, Kathleen v. NJT $57,033.12 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Goldstein, Allen and Irene Goldstein vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $3,676.55 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Kirchheimer, Stefanie vs. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al. $8,865.58 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Moore, Michael v. State of New Jersey $1,353.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Georandy Johnson v. Greystone Park Psychiatric Hospital, et al $33,996.30 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Peterson, Bradley v. Administrator Christopher Holmes, et al. $990.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Brooks, Darlene L. vs. Cynthia R.Kern,, et al. $18,596.38 Amalgamated Transit Union, NJ State Joint Council v. NJ TRANSIT; Workers' Compensation Retroactive Claim CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Amalgamated Transit Union Local 823 v. NJ Transit Bus Co. $7,860.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Fiore, Tania vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $704.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Clifton Miller vs. State of New Jersey Docket No.: 18-10354 $4,405.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Langford, Fayebien vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $3,692.59 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Paraison, Marie vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $10,144.70 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Rollins, Valerie vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $2,727.50 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Holley, Lilian, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al $8,896.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Corrado, Rosalie J. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $6,583.70 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Davis, Jean vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $6,699.40 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Ramireaz, Judith vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $1,878.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Osby, Gwendolyn, et al v. Edward Gilliard, et al $2,880.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Nizomov, Vakhobjon, et al v. Michael D. Jones, et al $2,416.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Amalgamated Transit Union Local 823 v. NJ Transit Bus Co., Inv $4,340.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Giardina v. Barilli $3,020.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Non Litigation: Availability of Worker's Compensation for $1,424.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Mariano, Maria vs. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey $4,919.22 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Miebach, Kimberly vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation $1,632.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Marc (Talib) Goodson v. Ashleigh Mitchell-Ricci $10,152.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Stefanie Whitfield vs. State of New Jersey Claim No. 16-8008 $1,419.50 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Taylor, Robin vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $2,064.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Kah, Saihou vs. NJ Transit Rail Ops. $1,266.00 CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO Easement Acquisition - Berkeley Township $140,735.52 Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC, Morristown NJ TRANSIT - EMPLOYMENT COUNSEL HUMAN RESOURCES/POLICIES & PROCEDURES $2,185.00 Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC, Morristown Anthony Alleyne vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation $13,145.60 Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC, Morristown Andrew Poulos vs. State of New Jersey, Office of the Comptroller, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-2263-18 $25,658.66 Investigation of Anonymous Complaint Regarding Violations of the New Jersey Conscientious Employee Protection Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC, Morristown Act at the Schools Development Authority $84,505.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Latimer, Jahmel J., et al. v. Kathleen Waldron, et al. (Wm Paterson Univ) $15,175.50 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Garrett Collick, et al v. William Paterson University, et al $104,555.32 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Healey, Robert, et al. v. State of New Jersey $109,657.86 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange L.C. v. MCPO, et al $12,537.55 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Janean Owens vs. Brian Ambroise, et al. Civil Action No.: 3:17-cv-07159-PGS-LHG $19,761.72 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange A.F. and M.D. vs. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: HNT-L-0359-17 $411,243.80 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange NJEDA - State Office Buildings New Money Bonds 2017 $43,664.32 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Legal Services regarding Stabilization and Recovery of Atlantic City (Atlantic City) $315.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Legal Services Regarding Stabilization and Recovery of Atlantic City (Pilot/Tax Appeals) $467,310.48 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Legal Services Regarding Stabilization and Recovery of Atlantic City (Litigation Against Atlantic City) $761.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Legal Services Regarding Stabilization and Recovery of Atlantic City (Municipal Utility Authority) $1,626.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Jessica Morales, et al vs. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-2606-17 $15,276.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Tamasa Nobles, et al vs. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-2644-17 $9,122.44 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange S.D. vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: HNT-L-0049-18 $475.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Marianne Brown, et al vs. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-503-18 $22,645.24 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange S.C. vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: HNT-L-0099-18 $450.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange B.T. vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: HNT-L-0098-18 $225.00 The Atlantic City Policeman's Benevolent Association Local 24, the Atlantic City Superior Officers' Association v. City of Atlantic City, State of New Jersey, New Jersey Division of Local Government Services in the DCA, Timothy Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Cunningham, et al. $53,953.80 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Maplight A NJ Non Profit Corp. v. State of NJ, Office Of The Governor, NJ State Archives, Joseph R. Klett $20,828.80 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange B.D. vs. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: HNT-L-0235-18 $2,957.12 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange A.H. vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: HNT-L-0259-18 $275.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange A.R. vs. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: HNT-L-0261-18 $450.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange C.C. vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: HNT-L-0260-18 $250.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange J.M. vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: HNT-L-0262-18 $225.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Joseph Nolan v. City of Atlantic City $19,949.80 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange C.L. vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: SOM-L-958-18 $3,047.88
The Atlantic City Policeman's Benevolent Association Local 24, the Atlantic City Superior Officers' Association v. City Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange of Atlantic City, SONJ, New Jersey Division of Local Government Services in the DCA, Robert Long, et als. $43,324.52
Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority - Federal Highway Reimbursement Revenue Notes Refunding 2018 $40,387.68 New Jersey Economic Development Authority -School Facilities Construction Bonds - New Jersey Schools Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Development Authority Proposed Disposition of Mary Costello Elementary School in Gloucester $1,375.00 Retention for Representation Related to Requests for Access to Privileged or Confidential Records of Governor Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Christopher J. Christie $6,895.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes Series Fiscal 2019 $29,005.12 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Multi-Family Revenue Bonds 2018 $72,527.10 New Jersey Economic Development Authority - School Facilities Construction Bonds - New Jersey Schools Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Development Authority Proposed Disposition of Passaic Leonard Place Elementary School Parcel $525.00 New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority - Federal Highway Reimbursement Revenue Notes, 2016 Series B Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Term Loan Agreement Modification $15,093.20 New Jersey Economic Development Authority - School Facilities Construction - New Money & Refunding Bonds FY Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange 2019 $32,217.48 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority - Transportation Program Bonds Fiscal Year 2019 $35,364.16 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority -Post-Issuance CIF/ELF/HEFT/HETI Grant Agreements Advice $13,497.40 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange NJCU NJ 50 Trademark/ Copyright $225.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange IMO BM, Dept of Law & Public Safety - APPEAL $1,953.14 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Josh Vadell, et als v. City of Atlantic City, State of New Jersey & Department of Community Affairs $29,578.52 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Richard Andrews, et al v. City of AC, et al $11,127.96 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange William Anderson, et al, et al v. City of AC, et al $13,578.88 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Investigation of $116,048.78 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange D.H. vs. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: HNT-L-92-19 $1,400.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange New Jersey Legislative Select Oversight Committee - $93,715.30 Connell Foley LLP, Roseland Katherine Brennan vs. A bert J. Alvarez, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-34-19 $467,339.28 Covington & Burling, Washington Union County ARRA Claims $360.00 Covington & Burling, Washington CMS Medicaid Disallowance Matters (Ctrs for Medicare & Medicaid Svs) $14,060.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP ARC THE TUNNEL PROJECT - GENERAL $3,353.90 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice Non-Commissioned Officers Association (CJ Investigators) $25,717.40 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice Superior Officers Association (CJ Investigators) $24,415.92 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Howard Commons Residential Transaction $4,624.48 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law Officer Housing $3,915.95 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Easement Acquisition - Longport $14,732.70 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Easement Acquisition - Bay Head $76,964.34 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Althea Hylton-Lindsay v. William Paterson University, et al $15,966.28 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Drew, Sr., Calvin N. and Stephanie h/w vs. NJ Transit Corporation, et al $672.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA - Parcels C/C-1 Mixed Use Transaction $6,887.12 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Arpad, Seres vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $80.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Nurses Quarters $3,634.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Easement Acquisition - Pacaud, Victoria % HL Collins III - Block 66; Lot 18 - Bay Head $20.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Alizadeh, Hamid vs. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and NJ Transit Corp., et al. $8,758.56 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Edwards, Geneithe I. vs. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc. and Salvatore Vicari, Jr. $7,550.41 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Jackson-Locklear, Marquesa C., et al. v. William Paterson University, et al. $295,932.68 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Estate of Frank Lagano v. State of New Jersey $72,174.70 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Neil Yellin vs. NJ Transit, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-7930-16 $50,786.76 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Duminiak, Karla vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, et al. $12,265.78 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Pramuk, Dylan vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $1,387.61 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Sprick, Dennis vs. New Jersey Transit, et al $8,772.83 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Sirotic, Dean vs. Tutor Perini Corp., et al $1,248.56 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Barber, Ronald vs. Sgt. Strasser, et al $8,918.78 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Bowman, Thomas vs. George S. Hail, Inc., et al. $311.28 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Bojkiu, Serveta, et al v. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $29,769.82 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Xue Jhe He vs. Guttenberg NJ Police, et al. $1,082.32 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Colt, Jeffrey and Betsy Tsai vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $32,294.82 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Property Acquistion & Condemnation Litigation Related to Rebuild by Design - Meadowlands Project $3,312.50 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Lodging Area $1,840.16 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Gill, Nia vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $16,022.34 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP New Jersey Transit vs. Ronald T. Lewis $32.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Alba, Paul vs. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, et al. $3,066.30 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Carroll, John vs. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al. $16,464.44 Moore, Steven vs. NJ Transit Corp. A/K/A and/or D/B/A "NJ Transit" and/or New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc." DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP and Mario Rioja $3,584.96 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Burnett, Larry vs. Gary P. Foley, et al. $7,712.71 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Mousa, Hashem M. vs. Gerard Goreh, et al. $5,597.44 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Cody, Darren vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $814.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Davis, Tracy vs. Eric Lopez, et al,. $1,050.24 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA - Special Counsel for Municpal Law - Mixed-Use Barker Circle Sale and Redevelopment $8,007.44 State of New Jersey & New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice, FOP 91 (Collective Negotiations for a Successor DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Agreement) $17,006.55
DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Conunissary/PX Transaction $7,734.40 Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority Special Counsel for Municipal Law -Warehouse/Post Office DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Transaction $7,519.36 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Xue Jhe He v. Guttenberg NJ Police, et al $348.69 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Reyes, Leopoldo vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $1,296.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Alvaran, Miguel vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $1,785.76 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Valisha Desir vs. John F. Russo, Jr. Docket No.: OCN-L-611-19 $24,266.66 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Isabella Basile, et al. vs. Greystone Park Psychiatric Hospital, et al. Docket No.: MRS-L-768-18 $29,661.74 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Investigation of Anonymous Complaint Regarding NJ Conscientious Employee Protection Act-Personnel File $47,877.70 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon RODRIGUEZ, HECTOR VS CORRECTIONS, ET AL. $5,246.91 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Rosenberg, Michael, et al. vs. Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Inc., et al. $40,491.06 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Lewis, David vs. Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center, et al $260.00 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Vespe, Michael D., et al. vs. Roy Sandau, D.O., et al. $5,477.50 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Sanders, Michole vs. Ocean County Bd. of Freeholders, et al. $720.00 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Kenly, Tyrone vs. Rutgers State University, et al. $35,146.01 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Cagnina, Anthony vs. Gary Lanigan, et al $12,821.93 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Baker, Scott vs. Joy Camarillo, et al. $12,065.21 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Baker,Forrest vs. South Woods State Prison, et al. $2,928.00 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Victor Razumov, an incapacitated person, et al vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $28,431.86 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Szemple, Craig Francis v. UMDNJ, UCHC, et al $3,123.96 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Dorval, Jean vs. Abu Ahsan, MD, et al $210.00 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Brown, Takeisha; A.A.P., et al vs. Newark Extenden Care Facility, Inc., et al. $18,984.97 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Ukawabutu, Rumiejah vs. Dr. Abu Ahsan, et al $1,668.22 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Morehead, Desiree vs. Rutgers/RWJMS; IMO: $57,146.18 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Figatner, Robert vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al.; IMO: $97,055.43 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Perez, Jose, et al v. Warren A. Chiodo, DPM, et al. $17.66 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Colantoni, Anthony vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $1,296.90 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Morillo, Amy, et al v. University Hospital, et al. $46,744.75 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Visconti, John; Administrator of the Estate of Kristi Lynn Rose Visconti; Dec'd vs. Lasanta Horana, MD, et al. $7,223.01 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Lamar, Valarie vs. Jennifer Petrillo, MD, et al. $27,702.69 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Woszczyk, Magdalena vs. Rutgers; IMO $14,345.68 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Henshaw, George, et al v. Robert Weiss, MD, et al $26,891.36 Dvorak & Associates, LLC, New Brunswick Mikhaeel, Neveen v. Frederick V. Fitzgerald, et al.; Frederick V. Fitzgerald v. Robert McNamara, et al. $2,701.70 Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh NJHMFA - Telephone Heights - Prepayment Opinion and Advice $7,500.00 Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh FMERA - Advice on Bond and Loan Transactions - Financing of Acquisition from US Dept of Army $4,712.50 Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh NJHMFA - Single Family Mortgage-Backed Securities Program - SEC Rule 15Ga-1 Disclosure Filings $712.50 Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh NJHCFFA - State Contract Bonds (Hospital Asset Transformation Program) $6,600.08 Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh NJHMFA Georgia King Village Project $38,202.44 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Single Family Variable Rate Bonds 2005 Series O and 2005 Series Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh N - Renewal of Barclays Bank Liquidity Facility $7,695.00 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Single Family Variable Rate Bonds 2005 Series R 2008 Series BB - Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh Renewal of TD Bank Standby Bond Purchase Agreements $12,196.76 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh $4,702.50 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Multifamily Conduit Revenue Bonds (Colt Arms Apartments Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh Project), Series 2016A - Follow-Up Work $10,000.00 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Multi-Family Conduit Revenue Bonds Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh t $19,575.44 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Renewal Remarketing or Refunding of Multi-Family Housing Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh Revenue Bonds, 2013 Series 5 and 6 $9,832.50 Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Colts Arm Apartments Project -Insurance Proceeds Opinion $6,897.00 Pia Wilson vs. New Jersey Transit, James Schworn, Anthony Bak, Ed Baksa and Robert Lavell Docket No.: ESX-L- Eric S. Pennington, P.C., South Orange 0094-17 $104,142.77 Eric S. Pennington, P.C., South Orange Jose Rivera vs. New Jersey Transit & James Schworn Docket No.: ESX-L-8621-16 $25,603.11 Ammar Gadalla and Maria Fatima Gadalla vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-810- Eric S. Pennington, P.C., South Orange 17 $1,440.00 Eric S. Pennington, P.C., South Orange Usama Henien and Estela Euceda v. NJ Department of Corrections Docket No.: ESX-L-3669-15 $3,075.00 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Oliver, Lorenzo v. Merrill Main, Ph.D., et al $918.72 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Swackhamer, Richard D., et al v. Kesler Institute for Rehabilitation, et al. $8,193.71 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Labell, Pamela; A.A.P. of Estate of Jimmy R. Labell v. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $365.00 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Gold, Daniel vs. Steven Recih, MD, et al $10,220.25 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Perren, Michael, et al vs. Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, et al $72,192.25 Farkas & Donohue, LLC , an infant, et al. vs. Robert Wood Johnson Health System, et al. $37,081.84 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Sapp, Wyatt vs. Newark Beth Isreal Medical Center, et al $121,176.68 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Sisco, Nancy, et al v. Chan W. Park, MD, et al. $180,568.51 Farkas & Donohue, LLC an infant, et al vs. Owobamoshola Shonowo, MD, et al $119,512.87 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Economidis, Maria vs. Susannah Wise, MD, et al. $17,235.45 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Sutherland, Vanessa vs. Andrei Botea, MD, et al $4,661.24 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Pickard, Lynn; Executrix of David Pickard; Dec'd vs. Dr. Dale G. Schaar, et al $45,132.03 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Parra, Maria vs. Steven M. Shulman, MD, et al $6,952.32 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Perkins, William vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections; Rutgers University Healthcare $3,676.64 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Neals, Lionel, et al vs. Mark Adams, MD, et al $31,125.50 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Ward, Rashawn vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $39,356.92 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Ramirez, Elsa Flores vs. University Hospital, et al. $1,681.95 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Struck, Michael vs. Robert Heary, MD, et al. $9,678.72 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Piszar, Janet, Executrix of the Estate of Stephen Piszar vs. Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, et al. $4,594.40 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Martin, Akintola Hanif vs. University Hospital Newark, et al. $14,017.80
ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
State of New Jersey & NJ Superior Officers Law Enforcement Association (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Genova Burns LLC, Newark Agreement) $19,077.19 State of New Jersey & NJ Law Enforcement Supervisor Association (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Genova Burns LLC, Newark Agreement) $36,030.14
Genova Burns LLC, Newark State of New Jersey & NJ Investigators Association, FOP 174 (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $35,572.09 Genova Burns LLC, Newark Investigation at $38,568.02 Genova Burns LLC, Newark Christopher Carlini vs. New Jersey State Parole Board1 et al. Docket No.: BUR-L-2616-18 $13,525.00 Genova Burns LLC, Newark State of New Jersey & PBA Local 105 (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement 2019-2023) $37,048.28 Genova Burns LLC, Newark State and AFSCME Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement for Contract ending June 30, 2019 $29,126.73 Genova Burns LLC, Newark State and Local 195 IFTE and Local 32BJ NJ State Motor Vehicle Employees Union SEIU-AFL CIO 2019-2023 $46,497.21 Genova Burns LLC, Newark NJ Law Enforcement Commanding Officers Assoc. Successor Agreement for contract expiring June 30, 2019 $14,724.23 Gibbons P.C., Newark AFT v. Kean University - OER 9840 $49,431.10 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Asia Alternatives Mgmt, LLC $684.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Heitman Core Property Fund $3,591.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark CIR - Committee of Interns and Residents - Union Contract Negotiations $225.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark International Union of Operating Engineers Local 68 $6,112.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark Teamster Local Union 97 $34,002.98 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - GSO Credit - A Partners LP (post-closing) $3,675.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - GSO Energy Partners - A (LP) (post-closing) $412.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Blackstone Tactical Opportunities Fund - A LP (RA) (post-closing) $1,162.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark CWA (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $100.87 Gibbons P.C., Newark Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine AAUP (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $33,259.12 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - TPG Real Estate Partners II, LP (post-closing matters) $1,817.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - PW Real Estate Fund III, LP (post-closing matters) $150.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - TSG7 B, LP (post-closing matters) $187.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Brookfield Capital Partners IV, LP (post-closing matters) $525.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark CWA Local 1031, Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $36,951.66 Gibbons P.C., Newark Community Care Providers Union $12,832.90 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Silver Lake Partners, IV, LP (post-closing matters) $8,255.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Goldman Sachs NJ II, LP $957.60 Gibbons P.C., Newark DOI - Alternative Investment - Hammes Partners III, LP (post-closing) $732.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit - Operational Advice $20,280.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit Corporation; NJ TransitGrid $70,713.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit Corporation; Positive Train Control $649,024.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark DOI - Alternative Investment - Stonepeak Infrastructure Fund III, LP - Post-Closing Matters $450.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit Corp. - Property Acquisition $19,748.75 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - BCA Cap I L.P. DOL # 17-64309 (post-closing matters) $5,437.50 CIR-The Committee of Interns and Residents Union Contract Negotiations (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Gibbons P.C., Newark Agreement) $51,536.40
Gibbons P.C., Newark State Troopers Fraternal Association v. State of New Jersey & Division of State Police Court Docket#: MER-L-713-18 $8,574.31 State Troopers Fraternal Association and State of New Jersey Division of State Police - Amended Unfair Practice Gibbons P.C., Newark Charge $125.44 Health & Professional and Allied Employees {HPAE) - Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine (Collective Negotiations Gibbons P.C., Newark for a Successor Agreement) $62,986.25 Gibbons P.C., Newark DOI - Alternative Investment - TPG Real Estate Partners III, LP (post-closing matter) $175.00 Retention for Legal Services for the Administrator of the Department of Law and Public Safety Regarding Gibbons P.C., Newark Prosecutorial Issues $869.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark Council of State Colleges & Universities, AFT AFL/CIO $41,070.34 International Union of Operating Engineers Local 68 at Rowan University -School of Osteopathic Medicine (Collective Gibbons P.C., Newark Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $4,461.50 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
Gibbons P.C., Newark State Troopers Fraternal Association (STFA) - Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement $25,525.74 State Troopers Non-Commissioned Officers Association (STNCOA) - Collective Negotiations for a Successor Gibbons P.C., Newark Agreement $14,238.21 Gibbons P.C., Newark State Troopers Superior Officers Association (STSOA) - Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement $9,005.42 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Alternative Investment -Aermont Capital Real Estate Fund IV SCS (initial transaction) $39,900.00
Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment -Alternative Investment -Aermont Capital Real Estate Fund IV SCS (post-closing matters) $12,060.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - Oak Hill Capital Partners III, L.P. (post-closing matters) $1,687.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Alternative Investment -TSG8, LP (initial transaction) $40,827.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark Legal Challenge to 2018 OLC Wire Act Opinion $157,807.00
Gibbons P.C., Newark State Troopers Fraternal Association (STFA) - Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement for 2019-2023 $21,839.28 Gibbons P.C., Newark New Jersey Legislative Select Oversight Committee - $2,873.68 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Alternative Investment -Brookfield Capital Partners V, L.P. (initial transaction) $43,115.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment -Alternative Investment - Brookfield Capital Partners V, L.P. (post-closing matters) $787.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark River Line Diesels on March 31, 2019; and Articulated Buses on July 21, 2019 $17,737.39 Gibbons P.C., Newark EDA Task Force - Advice to State Comptroller's Office $31,974.35
Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - Warburg Pincus China-Southeast Asia II, L.P. (initial transaction) $38,902.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark CROSS BORDER AND LEVERAGED LEASE TRANS- ACTIONS $1,002.30 Gray Miller Persh LLC, Washington NJPBA - FCC Matters, State Treasurer and the NJPBA $7,228.50 New Jersey Public Broadcasting Authority - Federal Communication Commission Spectrum Incentive Auction Gray Miller Persh LLC, Washington Broadcast Band Repacking Advice $7,149.50 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Glenn, Christina A/K/A Christiana Rezireksyon, et al. v. DCPP, et al. $33,060.22 Concetta Militano a/k/a Connie Militano, et al v. New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services (DYFS) a/k/a Division Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge of Child Protection and Permancey (DSPP), et al $920.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Yvette Gibbons vs. The New Jersey Department of Law & Public Safety, et al. Docket No.: UNN-L-2766-14 $86,958.55 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Gonzalez, Zenaida, et al. v. State of New Jersey, et al. $70,232.75 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Escobar, Neomi v. Newark Beth Israel Medical Ctr, et al. $3,622.50 Torres, Stephanie, Parent & Legal Guardian of Amaryllis Gomez v. State of New Jersey; Department of Children & Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Families, et al. $18,084.15 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Centrella, Lorraine, et al. v. Woodbridge Development Center, et al. $950.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Stephanie Carter-Green vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: CUM-L-580-15 $201,783.14 Jaclyn B. Jiras vs. State of NJ, NJ State Police, Colonel Joseph Fuentes, individually and in his official capacity and Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Captain Mark Santiago, individually and in his official capacity $27,931.80 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge R.C. v. DYFS (n/k/a Division of Child Protection & Permanency), et al. $59,828.50 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Daria Mammen vs. State of NJ Division of State of State Police, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-128-16 $19,321.50 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Doe, John v. State of New Jersey, et al. $34,680.35 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Christopher Birardi vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections Docket No.: MID-L-4193-16 $91,957.31 Doe, John as Parent and Legal Guardian of John Doe, Jr., et al. v. New Jersey Department of Children & Families, et Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge al. $34,018.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Eunice Hirya v. SONJ, et al $10,960.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Melanie Wilson vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Civil Action No.: 1:16-cv-07915 (RBK-JS) $157,317.49 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Jane Jones v. Pi Kappa Alpha International Fraternity, Inc., et al $40,910.31 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Lieutenant Dawn Shyner vs. State of NJ et al. Docket No.: MER-L-2294-16 $4,845.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Jacqueline Hawkins-Stiles, et al v. DCPP $16,315.59 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Terence Smith vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections Docket No.: MID-L-1231-17 $28,845.10 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Penelope Mauer vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-197-17 $41,964.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Cayden Michael Douris, et al vs. Bridgeway Rehabilitation Services, Inc, et al. Docket No.: MRS-L-1876-17 $4,680.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge American Strategic Insurance Corp. vs. Jordyn Massood, et al Docket No.: CAM-L-3427-17 $100.00 K.K.G. (formerly K.D.) an infant by her Parents, Andrea Konow-Garretson and Janet Garretson vs. The State of New Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency ("DCPP) $5,690.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge NJEDA Technology Centre of New Jersey PILOT Agreement Amendment and possible Tax Appeal $120.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge University Place Tax $15,515.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Jermaine Curry and Tori Curry vs. New Jersey State Prison, et al. Docket No.: MON-L-937-18 $40,581.20 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Isabella Basile, et al v. Greystone Park Psychiatric Hospital, et al. Docket No.: MRS-L-768-18 $21,025.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Karen Vitulli vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1419-18 $4,875.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge M.H. vs. Stockton University, et al. $108,832.87 New Jersey Economic Development Authority Special Counsel -Technology Centre of New Jersey Condominium Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Project $1,760.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge v. LPS $19,391.18 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Meg Yatauro vs. Kevin Bolden, et al. Docket No.: CAM-L-1901-14 $21,509.95 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge NJ Facility ID # 10702; Licensure Violation Infant Dec'd); IMO $1,700.00 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark Corey Bland & Virginia Bland v. City of Newark et al $1,306.00 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark Charles Ken Zisa v. John Haviland, et al $182,060.46 Luther Lopez v .. Theresa L. Egan, et al. United States District Court, Southern District of New York Civ. No.: 1:19-cv- Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark 828-UA. $4,220.00 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark Advice Regarding Employment Inquiry $18,359.29 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark Economic Development Authority - State Tax Incentive Programs $20,639.00 Hardin, Kundla, McKeon & Poletto, Springfield (T) Medina, Angel vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $20,056.62 Hardin, Kundla, McKeon & Poletto, Springfield (T) Kolias, Goergia, Executrix, et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al $16,289.04 Hardin, Kundla, McKeon & Poletto, Springfield (T) Martin, Akintola Hanif vs. University Hospital Newark, et al. $10,438.57 Hardin, Kundla, McKeon & Poletto, Springfield (T) Epps, Yolanda vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $3,055.00 HILL WALLACK, Princeton NJT - Secaucus Transfer Station - Rt 23 Condemnation, Alstrom Trans., Doyle, CM Trucking, etc., $900.00 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Mills, Whitlock LL (NJHMFA) $4,540.72 HILL WALLACK, Princeton NJT-69th Bridge - Property Acquisition - "C" $1,940.00 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Somerville & New Bridge Landing (River Edge) $61,441.76 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Beach Haven (Bateman) $1,664.72 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Manufacturers and Traders Trust Co. v. Marina Bay Towers Urban Renewal II, et al. $44,094.73 HILL WALLACK, Princeton NJT - Hoboken Terminal Redevelopment $27,120.87 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Windmill Properties, Block 79, Lot 1 & 2 - Atlantic City $3,485.28 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Nahla Jebara, Block 18, Lot 3 - Long Beach Township $0.00 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Varunan Sivalingam, Block 18.61, Lot 1.03 - Long Beach Township $1,265.12 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Barbara Kaplan, Block 18.67, Lot 3 - Long Beach Township $39,603.42 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Sheldon Bonovitz, Block 20.03, Lot 4 - Long Beach Township $80.08 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Richard Kowazlski, Block 20.35, Lot 1.04 - Long Beach Township $4,814.72 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Thomas Kline, Block 20.37, Lot 1.05 - Long Beach Township $495.60 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Jeanette Frankenberg, Block 20.45, Lot 4 - Long Beach Township $29,809.55 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Nancy Roncati, Block 20.67, Lot 4 - Long Beach Township $60.00 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Richard Carolan; Block 20.68; Lot 1 - Long Beach Township $847.60 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Stonis Family, LLC; Block 20.82; Lot 1 - Long Beach Township $23,373.14 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Donald Goldberg; Block 20.87; Lot 4 - Long Beach Township $2,145.12 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Shanin Spector; Block 20.89; Lot 5 - Long Beach Township $480.96 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Robert Helemian; Block 20.109; Lot 1.04 - Long Beach Township $1,024.32 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Joel Golden; Block 20.117; Lot 7 - Long Beach Township $19,370.86 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - William Mascharka; Block 20.127; Lot 1.03 - Long Beach Township $241.76 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - LNM Group, LLC; Block 20.129; Lot 1.10 - Long Beach Township $13,864.96 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Richard Tavoso - Block 4; Lots 1, 1.01 - Mantoloking Boro $17,680.76 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - North Beach, 1003, LLC, Block 18.03, Lot 4 - Long Beach Township $602.00 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Aberdeen-Matawan Station Transit Oriented Development Project $3,154.05
Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC English, Tamika, Administratrix of the Estate of Herman English, Deceased, et al v. NJ Transit Corporation, et al. $70,324.64 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Ritchey, Douglas vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $4,928.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Blunt, Jamil vs. New Jersey Tranist, et al. $3,669.05 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Ellis, Kenneth vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $31,130.63 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Arzuaga, Luis v. NJTRO, Inc. $13,862.62 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Maher, Terry vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,869.49 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Jimenez, Enrique vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,484.40 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Tumfour, Carruthers vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,948.80 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Holmes, Sandra vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,105.08 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC D'Amico, Nicole, et al. vs. John E. Mayo, Sr., et al. $808.68 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Bonsall, William and Sheri Bonsall; his wife vs. State of New Jersey, New Jersey Transit, et al. $55,336.61 Burnett, Merium and Jesse James, h/w vs. National Railroad Passenger Corporation a/k/a Amtrak and New Jersey Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Transit Corporation $256.96 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Gooding, Francis vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $4,928.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Jenkins, Jermaine, et al. v. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $12,288.24 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Fitzsimmons, Jesse vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $433.68 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Conrad, Steven vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operatins, Inc. $15,214.30 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Bentivenga, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,928.88 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Byers, Raymond vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,009.04 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Albanese, Vincent John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $5,168.50 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Leonard, Brian vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $528.16 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Carfi, Raffaele and Joana Carfi, husband and wife vs. NJ Transit, et al. $224.40 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Quinones, Raniel, et al v. New Jersey Transit Corp. $769.52 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Nanney, Sandra, et al v. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $554.32 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Beck, James vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $9,379.58 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Powers, Kevin vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $4,004.70 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Johnson, George A. vs. Jason J. Abbruscato, et al $8,274.85 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Otti, Lucia, et al v. Jean G. Pierre, et al. $5,145.51 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Joseph R. Cifaelli vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,157.91 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Thomas Dougan vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $37,580.75 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Smith, Stephanie vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $18,037.26 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Robinson, Caroly vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $23,311.85 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Kirkland, Kamilah vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $14,489.68 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Bonelli, Santo vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al. $10,456.50 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Buttigieg, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $14,901.51 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Gaspartich, Robert vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $20,913.43 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Wheaton, William P. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $7,835.80 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Wilson, Marcel vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (NJT) $7,457.47 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Davis, Dwayne vs. Heriberto Delgado, et al $5,506.87 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Elshabazz, Abdul vs. Betty Harris-Wilson, et al. $5,216.11 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Brandon Joy v. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc $1,572.32 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Carfi, The Estate of Raffaele, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al. $5,463.61 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Dollson, Angelice vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $6,241.03 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Lopez, Epifanio vs. New Jersey Transit-Walter Rand Transportation Center and/or ABC Corporation, et al. $4,375.84 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Lambert, Joseph vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,182.68 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Byers, Raymond, et al. vs. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) $9,330.98 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Clark, Calvin vs. NJ Transit Rail $2,030.94 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Matthews, Reginald B. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc $624.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Raghunandan, Omash vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,160.56 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Julien, Marie E. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $752.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Robino, Anthony vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (NJT) $758.16 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Gabriel, Anthony vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations $768.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Ronca, William vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations Inc. (NJT) $1,246.40 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Mari, Mark vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $5,739.72 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Cavanagh, Thomas vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $292.08 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Alverio, Melanie, et al v. New Jersey Transit Corproation, et al. $434.72 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Holmes, Sandra vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $495.84 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis Special Counsel Designation - State Retirement Plans and State Health Benefit Plans $24,466.51 Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis New Jersey Department of Education - Pension Tax Advice Regarding Renaissance Schools $27,039.15 Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis NJHMFA - Formation of an OPEB Trust $5,248.60 Application IRC Provisions. State Pensions Statutes and Unclaimed Property Law to Unclaimed Individual Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis Contr butions to State Pension Plans $0.00 Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis State Retirement Plans - $109.80 Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis State Retirement Plans - $164.70
Jasinski, P.C., Newark Communication Workers of America, Local 1040 (Collective Negotiations with CWA for a Successor Agreement) $11,315.00 Joel M. M klacki, Passaic Motor Vehicle Commission v. Lisandro Lorenzo OAL Docket No. : MVH-11995-18 $1,890.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City ARC THE TUNNEL PROJECT - GENERAL $7,653.75 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Harvey Cedars, Borough of v. Harvey and Phyllis Karan, et al. $6,640.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Mantoloking $585.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Brick $625.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Falls LP % Dr. C. Rossakis - Block 4; Lots 8. 8.01 - Mantoloking Boro $555.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Thomas Tullo - Block 37, Lot 8 - Brick Township $390.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Joan Dunphy - Block 38, Lot 7 - Brick Township $180.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Michael Verzaleno Trust - Block 39; Lot 2 - Brick Township $992.46 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - JC & JMP Spaccarotella - Block 42.03; Lot 1 - Brick Township $585.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Robert Merrell - Block 46.02; Lot 29.01 - Brick Township $1,410.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Fenelon Properties, Inc. - Block 52.01; Lot 11 - Brick Township $760.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Ronald O'Malley - Block 58; Lot 6 - Brick Township $105.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Thoams Mamakos - Block 58; Lot 10 - Brick Township $255.00 NJ Transit Corp; County Yard/Delco Lead/Megal Lead Acquisitions, Surface Transportation Board and Federal Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell - Denver Railroad Proceedings and Property Interest Acquisitions $135,135.00 Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell - Denver NJ Transit Corporation - Gateway Program Financing $64,968.57 Proposed Re-Assignment of Trackage Rights from Norfolk Southern to Dover Delaware Railroad and Related Surface Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell - Denver Transportation Board Issues $8,855.00 Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, Edison MVC v. Brian E. Kowasa $1,980.00 Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, Edison Motor Vehicle Commission v. Felix Della-Vecchia OAL Docket No. : MVH-10622-2018 $1,200.00 Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, Edison Motor Vehicle Commission v. Jake B. Pascucci OAL Docket No. : MVH 11517-18 $1,875.00 Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, Edison Motor Vehicle Commission v. Frederick C. Bott, Jr. OAL Docket No.: MVH 5024-19 $1,815.00 Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, Edison Motor Vehicle Commission v. Robert Moser OAL Docket No.: MVH 8383-19 $1,470.00 Kent & McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry Hill Christopher Triola vs. William Finkle Civil Action No.: 3821-2018 $6,037.31 The Estate of Ernest A. Franciotti, et al v. New Jersey Veterans Memorial Home - Vineland, et al. Docket No.: CUM-L- Kent & McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry Hill 460-18 $6,800.00 Kent & McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry Hill State of New Jersey v. Matt Daher $16,567.50 Kent & McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry Hill State of New Jersey v. Douglas McGill $600.00 Kent & McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry Hill State of New Jersey v. Celeste Jones $2,325.00 Kent & McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry Hill State of New Jersey v. Norman R. Vaughan, Jr. $1,080.00 Krompier & Tamn, L.L.C., Parsippany Antonio Jones vs. NJ DOC Central Transport, et al $12,583.50 Krompier & Tamn, L.L.C., Parsippany Durmer, Joel E. vs. Sumalatha Mannava, MD $2,292.50 Krompier & Tamn, L.L.C., Parsippany Banda, John vs. Sumalatha Mannava, MD $4,421.37 Kutak Rock LLP, Omaha NJT - Retirement and Health & Welfare Plans (Retirement) $31,902.20 Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Philadelphia Griffin, Twana and Hiwatha Bunn vs. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc., et al $256.00 Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Philadelphia Fosetta, Christopher v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, et al. $2,680.00 Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Philadelphia Wright, Gi bert v. New Jersey Transit $1,464.00 Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Philadelphia Burnett, Hafeez vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation $32.00 Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Philadelphia Gooding, Francis vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $560.00 Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Philadelphia Judge, Jeffrey vs. Evelyn Lewis, Larry Lewis and New Jersey Transit $64.00 Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Philadelphia Gooding, Francis vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $11,383.00 Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Philadelphia Bentivenga, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $14,656.00 Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Philadelphia Byers, Raymond vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $21,040.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Philadelphia Brown, Alice vs. New Jersey Transit $20,309.04 Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Philadelphia Joy, Brendan vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $6,992.00 Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Philadelphia Kreitz, Jr., George vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $80.00 Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Philadelphia Robinson, Lewis and Latif Comegys vs. New Jersey Transit $12,378.40 Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Philadelphia Quinones, Raniel, et al v. New Jersey Transit Corp. $96,797.05 Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Philadelphia James Flakker v. NJ Transit Rail Operations Inc $21,296.00 Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Philadelphia Holley, Lilian, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al $19,024.00 Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Philadelphia Little, Tony vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $3,728.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Kenny, Linda v. Peter Garcia (State of NJ) $3,280.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Dana S. Register v. NJ DOC $9,527.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Wahab, Atiya v. State of New Jersey, et al. $12,238.00 Kelcey Burgess vs. State of New Jersey (Department of Environmental Protection and Division of Fish and Wildlife) Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Docket No.: HNT-L-0205-16 $4,056.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Henien, Usama, et al. v. New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. $1,535.00 Carol Gorga Williams vs. Linda B. Kenney, et al. Linda B. Kenney, et al v. Peter Garcia, et al. Docket No.: MON-L-202- Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville 03 $24,732.68 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Marquis Harris vs. New Jersey Department of Human Services, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-0243-16 $42,192.26 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Kevin Ball vs. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Docket No.: HUD-L-4880-17 $42,419.50 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Sean Tonner vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections and Jerome Scott Docket No.: MID-L-7507-17 $21,224.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville James Fleming vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: CUM-L-750-17 $23,128.38 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Joseph Torres vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1859-16 $78,135.61 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Erin Shelton vs. State of New Jersey - New Jersey State Police, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1587-16 $21,987.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Alan B. Dillion v. SONJ et al $32,421.81 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Joan Lombard vs. New Jesrey Department of Transportation Case No.: l:18-CV-01319-RBK-KMW $28,514.99 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Alexandra M. Bittle vs. Ancora Psychiatric Hospital, Harry Beam Docket No.: BUR-L- $20,797.88 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Kevin T. Flood v. Public Defender Joseph Krakora, et al $2,969.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Gerald T. Boswell vs. Office of the Public Defender, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1066-03 $13,292.00
Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Melissa Urban vs. Office of Attorney Ethics of the Supreme Court of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-381-18 $17,718.50 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Flavia Stoval, Pro Se vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $1,392.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Kerry Lynn Asbury v. State of NJ, et al. $2,702.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Diane Scott, et al v. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-3425-17 $10,248.04 OSHA Whistleblower Complaint filed by against NJ TRANSIT Corporation and Steven Santoro, Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Executive Director under the Federal Railroad Safety Act ("FRSA") $620.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Ratarsha Willis v. Carl Walker. et al. - APPEAL $7,786.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville IMO BM, Dept of Law & Public Safety - APPEAL $600.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Leslie O'Robertson v. State of NJ, et al $11,732.16 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Atiya Wahab v. State of New Jersey, et al. (APPEAL) $780.00 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Mildalia Madlinger vs.New Jersey Transit Corporation Docket No.: ESX-L-4844-14 $21,030.00 Katrina Osborne vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation and Kevin Ruff, Individually and John Does 1-5 Docket No.: ESX- LeClair Ryan, Richmond L-2151-15 $102,535.93 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Klugman, Jeffrey v. New Jersey Transit, et al. $3,219.50 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Monica Goulbourne vs. New Jersey Veteran's Memorial Home-Paramus Docket No.: BER-L-2114-16 $37,125.00 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Lieb, Drew v. State of New Jersey, Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness $49,316.75 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Pia Wilson Vs. NJ Transit, et. al $339,517.19 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Jose Rivera vs. NJ Transit & James Schworn $94,852.89 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Marianna Tropeano vs. NJ Transit Police Department, et al. Docket No.: MID-L-1734-17 $173,832.14 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Maria Brito v. Ramapo College $440.00 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Christina Gaskins vs. Harold U. Johnson, Jr., et al. Case No.: H-18-2194 $3,046.72 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Legal Challenge to 2018 OLC Wire Act Opinion $9,600.00 Lenox, Socey, Formidoni, Brown, Giordano, Cooley & Casey, LLC, Lawrenceville Budden, Christopher L., et al v. William Paul Block, DO, et al $3,745.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
Lenox, Socey, Formidoni, Brown, Giordano, Cooley & Casey, LLC, Lawrenceville Sylla, Kemo; A.A.P., et al vs. Thomas Hegy, MD, et al $23,163.67 Lite DePalma Greenberg Bradley C. Peterson v. Administrator Christopher Holmes, et al $53,788.27 Locke Lord LLP (EAPD), Boston DOI - Alternative Investment - Aether Real Assets SONJ Fund LP $49,975.20 Retention for Legal Services for Administrator of the Department of Law & Public Safety Regarding the Edna Mahan Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Roseland Correctional Facility for Women $317,356.74 Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Roseland Representation of the Office of the Governor Retention for Legal Services $768,274.69 Lukas, LaFuria, Gutierrez & Sachs, LLP, McLean NJ Transit's Positive Train Control Project/Radio Frequency Spectrum FCC Matters $4,356.00 NJT - Acquisition of Portions of Properties Known as One and Two Penn Plaza East, Newark, NJ (NJT Lum, Drasco & Positan, LLC, Roseland Headquarters), and Matters Related Thereto $108,820.77 Lynch & Lynch, Garden City Holmes-Moses, Iraida vs. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey $7,864.75 Lynch & Lynch, Garden City Fetahu, Valdona v. New Jersey Transit Corp. $64,464.90 Lynch & Lynch, Garden City Huerta, Michael A. vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $464.00 Lynch & Lynch, Garden City Wallace, Karen vs. New Jersey Transit Corp. and Carlos Trujillo $8,057.75 Lynch & Lynch, Garden City Henry, Kathleen vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $40,415.00 Lynch & Lynch, Garden City Kim, Jung Kui and Won Kim vs. NJ Transit Bus Operations and Justen Oriolo $16,036.00 Lynch & Lynch, Garden City Lan, Mario and Elizabeth Lan vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $13,819.54 Lynch & Lynch, Garden City Lee, Vong vs. Justen Oriolo, et al $16,944.00 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange NJHMFA - Captial Program Fund Revenue Bonds - Redemption of 2004 and/or 2007 Series Bond $18,727.50 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program - Villa Victoria Apartments Project $25,364.57 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program - Grace West Apartments Project $25,476.98
M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program - The Station at Grant Avenue Project $25,373.35
M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program - Manahawkin Family Apartments Project $22,939.47
M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program - Waretown Family Apartments Project $22,866.04 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority State Contract Refunding Bonds 2018 $41,500.00 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Multi-Family Conduit Bond Program - Howell Family Apartments M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange Project $25,359.41
M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Camden Townhouses, Series 2017 F Bonds Remarketing 2019 $6,637.50 New Jersey Economic Development Authority - Current Refunding of School Facilities Construction Refunding Bonds, 2009 Series AA School Facilities Construction Bonds, 2009 Series BB and School Facilities Construction Bonds, 2010 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange Series CC-2 $45,000.00 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program - Oceanport Gardens I Project $30,441.04 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange State of New Jersey -Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series Fiscal 2020 $16,137.50 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Onyekaomelu, Peter and Kamilah vs. UMDNJ, et al (appeal) $2,245.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Newton, Andowah, et al v. Anthony Yang, MD, et al. $23,983.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Gibbs, Jamal vs. University Correctionl Healthcare, et al. $51,749.60 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Kisby, Jessica vs. NJ DOC, et al. $1,325.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Sutherland, Vanessa vs. Andrei Botea, MD, et al $44,548.74 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Samia-Sabahia, Rachel; a/k/a Baby Lo Gatto vs. Andrew Rubenstein, MD, et al. $15,932.03 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Lombardi, Christopher; Dec'd vs. Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences, et al $15,755.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Suriano, Immacolata; Dec'd, et al v. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $6,019.70 Marcucci, Kimberly; Administratrix of the Estate of Christopher Marcucci, Dec'd vs. Robert Wood Johnson University MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Hospital, et al. $6,118.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Sleiman, Helena; Executrix of the Estate of Antoine Sleiman; Dec'd vs. Michael Piscopiello, MD, et al. $24,945.80 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Harris, Fresnel vs. University Hospital, et al. $744.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Rouse, Terry C. vs. Sgt. Starks, et al $3,197.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Neals, Lionel, et al vs. Mark Adams, MD, et al. $23,857.25 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Vervan, Joseph, representative of Nancy Vervan; Dec'd vs. University Hospital, et al $480.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Ward, Rashawn vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $29,958.26 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Hurley, Melissa, et al vs. Steven R. Berkman, MD, et al. $22,097.44 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Jackson, Michele; Guardian, et al v. University Hospital, et al. $1,530.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Semmon, Ebony; A.A.P., et al vs. University Correctional Health Care, et al. $40,759.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Bogar, Joseph E. vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $37,651.46 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Johnson, Shyemah vs. University Hospital; IMO: $516.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Ventura, Henry, Estate of , et al vs. Rutgers University, et al; IMO $20,043.68 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Thakkar, Rajesh vs. Rutgers Dental School of Newark, NJ $6,499.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Rinaldi, Donald, et al v. University Hospital, et al. $11,718.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Martin, Akintola Hanif vs. University Hospital Newark, et al. $17,128.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Figueroa, Orlando vs. Antonios Mammis, MD, et al. $1,280.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Cordero,Thomas J., Jr.; Estate of , et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al $780.00 Marino, Tortorella & Boyle, P.C., Chatham State of New Jersey v. Christopher J. Christie $9,100.00 McCarter & English, LLP - Newark NJ New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority -Transportation System Bonds Refunding 2018 $55,654.46
McCarter & English, LLP - Newark NJ New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority - Revisions to Post-Issuance Tax Compliance Procedures 2018 $5,413.50 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Villapando, Maurine A. v. Raritan Bay Medical Center, et al. $6,187.68 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Clarification of Unit Petitions - Group Y $11,400.00 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Robinson, Raphael, et al v. new Jersey Transit Rail Operaions, Inc. $9,988.96 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Jenkins, Leslie E. v. Montclair State University, et al. $45,067.60 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Tarboro, Oscar v. Board of Trustees, Public Employees' Retirement System $6,800.00 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Tietze, Deborah v. New Jersey Pinelands Commission $157,483.04 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Anderson, George III, v. NJDMAVA, et al. $62,999.84 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ CNJSCL AFT-CIO - Faculty/Professional Staff Unit (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement $425.00 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Peoples, Christine v. Montclair State University $2,780.00 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ TANGIA PRICE v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT, JAMES SCHWORN, PAUL KELLY and JOHN WASILAK, $148,241.10 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ NJ Transit Corporation - Labor Counsel - Employee Compensation Issues $840.00 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Demusso, Sergio vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $163.04 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Township of Little Falls v. Montclair State University $49,323.80 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Crus, Israel vs. Leamon McKenzie, et al $8,977.23 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ NJ Transit Corporation - Labor Counsel - Amalgamated Transit Union Contracts $2,735.00 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, NJHMFA Labor Counsel - Representation of NJHMFA in Negotiations for a Successor Collective Negotiations Morristown NJ Agreement with CWA Local 1032 $27,350.00 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Negotiations between the New Jersey Transit Police Department and the Fraternal Order of Police, Local 37 related Morristown NJ to the collective bargaining agreement $35,290.48 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, NJHMFA Labor Counsel - Representation of NJHMFA in Negotiations for a Collective Negotiations Agreement with Morristown NJ CWA Local 1032 for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30,2023 $60,020.80 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ NJ Transit Police Dept. Local 304 - Labor Negotiations - Successor Memorandum Agreement $22,558.00 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ NJ Transit Dept - CWA Local 1032 - AFL CIO - Labor Negotiations - Fare Enforcement Officers $42,844.50 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ NJHMFA Labor Counsel - Employee Arbitration over Termination $760.00 McGivney, Kluger, Clark & Intoccia, P.C., Florham City Belfand, Seman vs. Raymond Petosa and New Jersey Transit Corporation, C-83585-444 $31,734.85 McKool Smith, Dallas NJT v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, et al. $1,796.28 McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, L.L.C., Roseland State of NJ Master Energy Efficiency Lease Purchase - FY 2013 $26,236.59 McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, L.L.C., Roseland NJESAA - Series 2017 Bonds $815.86 McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, L.L.C., Roseland NJ Higher Education Student Assistance Authority 2018 Series Bonds $741.78 McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, L.L.C., Roseland NJ Higher Education Student Assistance Authority 2019 Series Bonds $54,579.57 New Jersey Transit Corporation - Extension of Federally Taxable Grant Anticipation Note, Series 2015 Revolving McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, L.L.C., Roseland Credit Agreement $5,332.50 McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, L.L.C., Roseland New Jersey Transit-Gateway Program Project $30,292.50 State of New Jersey Master Energy Efficiency Lease Purchase Agreement IRS Code Section 179D Deduction Advice McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, L.L.C., Roseland and Opinions $2,880.00 Michael A. Armstrong & Associates, LLC, Willingboro Boswell, Gerald v. Office of the Public Defender, et al. $4,885.00 Michael A. Armstrong & Associates, LLC, Willingboro Kenny, Linda v. Peter Garcia (State of NJ) $6,687.02 Michael A. Armstrong & Associates, LLC, Willingboro State of New Jersey v. Timothy Ballard $150.00 Michael A. Armstrong & Associates, LLC, Willingboro State of New Jersey v. Caldwell, Isaiah $3,341.94 Michael A. Armstrong & Associates, LLC, Willingboro Gerald T. Boswell vs. Office of the Public Defender, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1066-03 $250.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Kadonsky, Steven vs. Abu Ahsan, MD, et al $3,526.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Feltynowski, Kelly A. vs. Andrew G. Kaufman, MD, et al. $5,229.33 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Geiger, Edgar C., III; Estate of, et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al $3,065.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park McNellis-Wallace, Eileen, et al v. Anthony Salerno, MD, et al. $960.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Aly, Angie vs. John Wessel, et al $25,114.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Mcfeeley, William, et al vs. Sunny Kar, D.O., et al. $21,087.21 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Sherry Leaks, et al v. New Jersey Veterans Memorial Home Menlo Park, et al. Docket No.: MID-L-2506-18 $13,463.55 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Ward, Rashawn vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $22,521.87 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Jill Goldstein, et al v. New Jersey Veterans Memorial Home - Paramus, et al. Docket No.: BER-L-4839-18 $13,082.87 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Deshefy, Jeffrey R. Jr., et al v. Michael G. Nosko, MD, et al $6,298.05 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Nassis, Joanne vs. Hetal Gor, MD, et al $4,588.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Roxas, Estate of Salvatoris vs. University Hospital, et al; IMO: $3,240.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Keating, Gwendolyn vs. Don Yoon Cha, MD, et al; imo $7,434.40 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park ; an infant; the Estate of: IMO: $2,560.70 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Olivera, Mario A. vs. Dr. Jisun Cha $4,448.64 Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia Toolen, William, et al. v. State of New Jersey $69,869.56 Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia PBA 105 (Collective Negotiation for a Successor Agreement) $24,254.52 Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia State PBA, State Law Enforcement Unit (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $49,256.67 Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia New Jersey Investigators Association, Lodge 174 (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $39.35 Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia New Jersey Law Enforcement Supervisors Association (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $19,283.04 Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia New Jersey Law Enforcement Commanding Officers Association (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $28,215.50 Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia New Jersey Superior Officers Law Enforcement Unit (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $2,244.16 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and Rhoads, LLP, Retention for Legal Services for Administrator of the Department of Law & Public Safety Regarding the Edna Mahan Philadelphia Correctional Facility for Women $28,910.64 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Triebe, Robert v. State of NJ, et al. $8,145.16 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Schoenstein, Matthew, et al. v. Richard E. Constable, III. Commissioner, et al. $5,029.88 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Monica Miller v. NJDOC Docket No.: ESX-L-4170-14 Docket No.: ESX-L-4170-14 $10,369.00 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Juan Daniel Perez vs. New Jersey City University, et al. Docket No.: HUD-L-1845-14 $5,340.16 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Smith, Diamond, Estate of, et al. v. State of New Jersey, Division of Child Protection & Permanency, et al. $59,222.92 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Karen Shanks vs. Newark Public Schools, et al. Docket No.: UNN-L-3016-15 $940.00 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Lavern Sanders vs. Division of Children and Family Services, et al. Docket No.: HUD-L-1533-16 $42,273.13 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Claims Against HESAA: Debt Collection Practices $23,761.80 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Rose Richardson v. State of NJ, Office of the Attorney General $26,211.43 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Efthimia N. Christie, ED.D vs. Kean University, et al. Docket No.: UNN-L-739-17 $29,341.36 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Cayden Michael Douris, et al vs. Bridgeway Rehabilitation Services, Inc, et al. Docket No.: MRS-L-1876-17 $42,995.50 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Julienne Whitten vs. Kean University, et al. Docket No.: MID-L-6549-17 $14,590.86 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Bruce Skoorka v. Kean University, et al $6,153.50 Ammar Gadalla and Maria Fatima Gadalla vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-810- Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston 17 $14,769.79 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Usama Henien and Estela Euceda v. NJDOC, et al Docket No.: ESX-L-3669-15 $39,503.36 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Danielle Reed, et al. v. NJ Department of Community Affairs, et al $10,760.72 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Kelly Craig Hagen v. New Jersey Higher Education Student Assistance Authority, et al $2,000.40 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Edward Thompson v. SONJ, et al $8,488.24 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Linda Lockard-Phillips vs. State of New Jersey Claim Petition Numbers: 2015-4970 & 2015-4972 $3,472.48 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Harold Damas v. SONJ, et al $3,127.60 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Anthony Biasi v. NJDOT $3,024.88 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Roberta Cole and John Cole vs. Johnson and Johnson, Inc., et al. Docket No.: MID-L-07272-18AS $2,220.68 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Linda Kwon v. SoNJ, et al $4,018.88 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Keith Stopko vs. New Jersey Attorney General, et al. $280.00 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Simon, Sabu, et al vs. Joel Sheinfeld, MD, et al. $56.18 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Grassia, Maurice R., Jr; Executor of the Estate of Elizabeth K. Grassia v. Underwood Memorial Hospital, et al. $1,960.00 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Redmond, Phillip A., II vs. Virtua West Jersey Health System, et al. $28,007.02 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Gueye, Lateefah; F/K/A; Lateefah Whitfield; Guardian of ; an infant vs. William Scorza, et al $15,244.27 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Doglio, Jaime A., et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson Medical Group, et al. $36,884.50 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Morales, Maria, et al v. Gregory Peck, DO, et al $28,976.32 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Nicole DeBiase v. NJTransit $66,707.45 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Salvemini, Mauro, et al v. Naieml Nassiri, MD, et al $210.00 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Verdi, Shannon & Ralph vs. Anthony P. Salerno, MD, et al. $1,078.18 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Economidis, Maria vs. Susannah Wise, MD, et al. $19,303.11 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin DiNapoli, Jill vs. Anthony Salerno, M.D. $47,906.22 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Maronski, Walter, et al v. Kennedy Health System, Inc., et al $62,633.62 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Anthony Desantis vs. New Jersey Transt, et al. Docket No.: 14-3578 $2,840.00 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Brian Weimer vs. Ancora Psychiatric Hospital, et al. Docket No.: ATL-L-2399-17 $21,122.15 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Bricker, Barbara, et al. v. Kennedy Health System, et al $861.87 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Semmon, Ebony; A.A.P., et al vs. University Correctional Health Care, et al. $18,251.75 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Johnstone, John L., A.A.P., et al vs. Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center, Inc., et al $5,218.16 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Sinnes, Keri, et al vs. Kennedy Health System, et al $12,016.92 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Krupp, Otto vs. Rutgers Biomedical Health Services $3,710.00 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Rosu, Dylan vs. Atlanticare Regional Medical Center City Campus, et al; IMO $2,867.52 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Johnson, Shyemah vs. University Hospital; IMO: $3,263.50 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Bok, Barbara vs. Shari, Reitzen, MD, et al; IMO $18,747.58 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Hirschhorn, Steven; Estate of, et al v. Rutgers University Hospital, et al. $300.00
Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Special Counsel Designation - State of New Jersey, Department of Treasury, Appointment as Disclosure Counsel $95,281.30 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - TPG Start, LP (post-closing matters) $190.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Knight Tao, LP, 2015 Investment - New Series (post-closing matters) $2,185.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Blackstone Real Estate Debt Strategies III, LP (post-closing matters) $2,232.50 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - SONJ Private Opportunities II, LP - 2016 Additional Investment (post-closing matters) $570.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Benefit Street Partner Special Situations Fund L.P. (post closing matter) $332.50 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - CVC Capital Partners VII, L.P. (initial transaction) $23,275.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - CVC Capital Partners VII, L.P. (post-closing) $3,515.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco DOI - Alternative Investment - Prologis European Properties Fund II $2,232.50 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco DOI - Alternative Investment - The Resolute Fund II, LP - Post Closing Matters $475.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority Advice on Offering Document Disclosure $1,815.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco DOI - Alternative Investment - Glendon Opportunities Fund II, L.P. - Post-Closing Matters $2,565.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco DOI - Alternative Investment - TPG Growth IV, LP - Initial Transaction $9,832.50 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco DOI - Alternative Investment - The Rise Fund - Initial Transaction $8,597.50 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco DOI - Alternative Investment - The Rise Fund - Post-Closing Matters $475.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - Vista Equity Partners VII, LP (initial transaction) $16,102.50 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment -Alternative Investment - Vista Equity Partners VII, LP (post-closing matters} $332.50 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - KSL Capital Partners V (initial transaction) $13,965.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Alternative Investment -KSL Capital Partners V (post-closing matters) $5,000.00 Division of Investment -Complex Transactions -Lubert-Adler Real Estate Fund VI-B, L.P. -Sale of Interest (initial Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco transaction) $16,482.50 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment -Alternative Investment -TPG The Rise Fund II (initial transaction) $25,602.50
Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Alternative Investment -Homestead Capital USA Farmland Fund III, L.P. (initial transaction) $16,862.50 Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - Homestead Capital USA Farmland Fund III, L.P. (post-closing Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco matters) $1,852.50
Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - Hellman & Friedman Capital Partners VI - Post Closing Matters $4,980.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - Gleacher Mezzanine Fund - Post Closing Matters $297.50 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
O`Brien & Ryan, LLP Pollitt-Milcarek, Regina, MIchael Milcarek (w/h) vs. Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center, Inc., et al. $20,133.85 O`Brien & Ryan, LLP Mills, Dawn, et al. vs. Kennedy Memorial Hospital-Stratford Division, et al $55,057.73 O`Brien & Ryan, LLP Kelly, John J.; Dec'd, et al vs. Lourdes Health System, et al $45,887.27 O`Brien & Ryan, LLP Welch, Kathleen, et al v. Kennedy University Hospital, Inc., et al. $30,788.66 O`Brien & Ryan, LLP Sinnes, Keri, et al vs. Kennedy Health System, et al $60,068.11 Nock, Tyronne; Administrator of the Estate of Adrienne Nock; Dec'd vs. Kennedy Memorial Hospital-Washington O`Brien & Ryan, LLP Twp., et al $23,725.25 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA NJHMFA - Multi-Family Conduit Bond Program; No Brunswick Crescent (Royal Village) Project $17,172.89 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA NJHMFA - Garden Spires Project $36,242.91 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA NJHMFA - Spruce Spires Project $36,134.96 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency - 540 Broad Street Apartments Project $2,105.30 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency - Single Family Housing Revenue Bonds - 2018 $841.12 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency - Single Family Housing Revenue Bonds - 2019 $51,036.14 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP, New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Multifamily Revenue Bonds, 2016 Series B - Undisbursed Bond PHILADELPHIA Proceeds Advice $960.00 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Lincoln Court (#1213) Prepayment Opinion and Advice $4,393.67 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Garcia, Agustin vs. Correctional Medical Services, et al $9,522.10 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Vespe, Michael D., et al. vs. Roy Sandau, D.O., et al. $7,987.76 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Graham, Alquan vs. Ahmar Shakir, D.O., et al. $450.00 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Schroll, Rulla v. Southern Ocean Medical Center, et al. $13,991.67 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Brewer, Jeffrey, et al v. Centra State Medical Center, et al $29,826.68 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch , an infant, et al vs. Owobamoshola Shonowo, MD, et al $51,807.48 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Yetman, Walter; Administrator, et al vs. University Medical Center of Princeton at Plainsboro, et al $13,064.80 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Ramirez, Elsa Flores vs. Rutgers Medical School, et al. $741.00 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Gomez, Hiccson vs. Timothy J. Kennedy, MD, et al $6,821.91 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Mohamadi, Carmen; Dec'd, et al v. Rutgers, et al. $5,097.58 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch San Filippo, Peter; Estate of, et al v. Seth Kipins, MD, et al $1,100.00 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Gomez, Hiccson vs. Timothy J. Kennedy, MD, et al. $12,866.00 O'Toole Scrivo Fernandez Weiner Van Lieu, LLC, Cedar Grove Harborfields Youth Detention Facility $12,154.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Rodrigues-Marques, Jose vs. Courtney M. Morrison, et al. $11,616.00 A.M., a minor by her Guardian Jennifer Morales v. State of New Jersey, Division of Youth and Family Services, et al. Pashman Stein, Hackensack Claim# 09-12778 $11,329.88 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
Pashman Stein, Hackensack Bradley C. Peterson v. Administrator Christopher Holmes, et al $160.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Pessoa, Orlene vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $12,730.70 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Bryan, Ivor vs. Jametta C. Jackson, et al. $208.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Ortiz, Nicolas vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al $9,245.70 Pashman Stein, Hackensack D.R. vs. DCF, et al Docket No.: HUD-L-3423-16 $2,705.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Agostinho, Tatianne vs. Skarirah Miller, et al. $5,015.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Ramos, Elena Garcia vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $1,584.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Fortunato, Jenny vs. Luis Ortiz, et al. $7,944.50 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Bartel, Lauren Roxaya vs. Carlos F. Caballero and NJ Transit Corp. $7,397.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Texidor, Ray vs. Raul Minos, et al $320.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Gonzalez, Humberto vs. Donald E. Williamson, Jr., et al. $9,090.20 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Maldonado, Rafael vs. Aishah S. Griffin, et al. $512.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Burlingame, Robert P. vs. Yoely Santos, et al. $3,349.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Oh, Seungmin vs. Angelo O. Huaranga, et al. $1,109.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Alvarez, Manuel C. vs. Raymond David Marrow, et al. $208.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Adamson, Cheryl vs. Seymour M. Rose, et al. $1,424.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Anderson, Shaquanah vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $720.00 PAUL WEISS RIFKIND WHARTON GARRISON, New York George E. Norcross, et al v. Philip D. Murphy, et al $463,176.32 Pearlman & Miranda, LLC, Bloomfield NJEDA - Energy Resilience Bank - Trinitas Regional Medical Center Financing $22,543.78 Pearlman & Miranda, LLC, Bloomfield NJEDA - Energy Resilience Bank - South Monmouth Regional Sewerage Authority Financing $19,171.44
Pearlman & Miranda, LLC, Bloomfield New Jersey Economic Development Authority - Energy Resilience Bank - Hunterdon Medical Center Financing 2018 $16,777.28 New Jersey Economic Development Authority - Energy Resilience Bank - RWJ Barnabas Health Medical Center Pearlman & Miranda, LLC, Bloomfield Financing 2018 $10,671.50 Pillsbury Winthrop LLP - New York Defense Distributed vs. Grewal $57,089.92 Post & Schell, PC, Philadelphia Schenk, Patrick, et al v. Lisa Dertr, DO, et al. $26,914.65 Post & Schell, PC, Philadelphia Tereshko, Rochelle vs. Kennedy University Hospital, Inc., et al. $10,786.85 Post & Schell, PC, Philadelphia Crosley, Diane, et al v. Anil K. Nair, M.D., et al $5,555.00 Post & Schell, PC, Philadelphia Weiss, Doris; Estate of vs. Silver Care Operations, LLC, et al; IMO $280.00 Potters & Della Pietra LLP, Fairfield Yvette Cruz vs. State of NJ, et al. Docket No.: MRS-L-1733-15 $86,490.94 Potters & Della Pietra LLP, Fairfield Rosiland White vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. Docket No.: ESX-L-5893-17 $14,595.00 Potters & Della Pietra LLP, Fairfield Estate of Frank Lagano v. Bergen County Prosecutor's Office, et al $75,327.85 Quiñones Law, PLLC, New York Economic Development Authority Incentives Task Force $72,476.55 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law $984.00 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Pistol Range $16,208.70 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Pinebrook Road Commerce Center $246.00 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, FMERA - Marina $16,866.50 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Fitness Center $6,642.00 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Hicks, Martha v. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections $84,174.00 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Parcel B $19,726.00 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Theodore Warfield, Sr. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. MER-L-465-16 $27,169.92 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, NJ TRANSIT Corporation - Property Acquisition Counsel Hudson Tunnel Project $18,127.50 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, NJ Transit Corporation; Property Acquisitions Counsel - County Yard $48,258.50 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, FMERA Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Bowling Center $14,802.00 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, FMERA Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Eatontown DPW $1,756.50 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Shaulic Brown vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-339-18 $6,090.00 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority Special Counsel for Municipal Law - F-1 Parcel $41,768.80 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Bellwether Behavorial Health Contract $74,500.50 Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Shanahan, Kathleen v. NJT, et al. $113,842.64 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Alfieri, Anthony v. NJT $240.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cabaj, Maria, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al $26,200.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Linton, Susan vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $6,472.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rojas, Ely vs. New Jersey Transit $13,353.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kosich, Natalie; Admin. of Estate of Sergei Kosich, et al v. Hackensack University Medical Center, et al $2,105.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Murray, Lureene and Nathaniel Brown, her husband vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $36,795.77 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Dykeman, William v. Abu Ahsan, MD, et al $4,537.26 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Tramontano, Danielle, et al v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $17,168.92 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Queller, Martin, et al v. Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, et al $145.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kozak, et al, Matthew vs. Ana Mendez, et al $26,374.20 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Chehade Pierre vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $7,400.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Deshong, Shina vs. New Jersey Transit $7,520.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kozak, Jr., Edwin vs. Ana Mendez, et al. $3,488.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Esposito, Dominic v. New Jersey Transit, et al. $608.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Biggs, Jonathan, et al. vs. Wilson Herrera-Perez, et al. $5,344.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP D'Angiolillo, Robert vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $12,339.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Shtarker, Natalya v. Wilson Herrera-Perez, et al $5,056.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Lazar, Roslyn, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al. $3,410.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Saavedra, Marisa and Richard vs. Wilson Herrera-Perez, et al $5,695.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Miller, Ricky vs. Paul Lagana, et al $3,247.50 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Aranov, Vlad vs. Wilson Herrerra-Perez, et al. $4,784.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Wojcik, Iwona vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $304.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP West, Thmas vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $192.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Ritchwood, Randy vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations $896.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Vinci, Angela vs. Wilson Herrea-Perez, et al. $4,656.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Ruberry, Frank vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $249.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Szumski, Amy;G/A/L, or , a minor vs. Abdulla Al-Khan, MD, et al. $56,795.50 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Guererra, Michael vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $8,429.44 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Neglia, Joseph, et al. vs. Mayeyu Logistic, LLC, et al. $24,876.72 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Yu, Alex, et al vs. Delka Trucking, Inc., et al $5,904.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Edwards, Urica vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $701.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Belitzky, David, et al vs. Delka Trucking, Inc., et al. $4,864.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Siev, Justin vs. Wilson Herrera-Perez, et al. $4,832.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Griso, Raven, et al v. Ke ka Trucking Inc., et al $4,936.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Almeida, Antonio, et al v. NJ Transit, et al. $544.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Beauzil, Anne Marie, et al. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $368.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cu kin, Frank vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $17,604.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Sisco, Nancy, et al v. Chan W. Park, MD, et al. $45.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Panebianco, Brian vs. Delka Trucking, Inc., et al. $4,192.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Guadalupe, Angel; Estate of, et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $51,836.65 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Desai, Samir vs. Wilson Herrera-Perez, et al. $5,072.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Sapp, Wyatt vs. University Hospital, et al $123,393.46 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Nurge, Kyle vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $11,354.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Grice, Montia, et al v. University Hospital, et al. $71,377.95 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Singleton, Elijah vs. NJ DOC, et al. $5,213.12 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Gialamas v. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc. $2,088.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP 8/19/2016 NJT Two Bus Collision - Request for Pre-Litigation $23,770.40 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Hoboken Terminal Rail Accident of 9/29/16 $773.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Anthony, Kiliek Dashawn vs. Timothy W. Baptist, et al. $42,845.53 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Tramontano, Danielle and Lauren Dunham vs. New Jersey Transit Railroad $50,213.65 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Valoroso, Robert and Kimberly Valoroso, his wife vs. Delks Trucking, Inc., et al. $10,197.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rhoden, Cordell vs. New Jersey Transit Corproation $38,234.61 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Duminiak, Karla vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, et al. $12,727.92 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Dopkin, Deborah C. and Mark Dopkin vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $11,504.94 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Dertouzos, Claire vs. New Jersey Transit, Inc., et al. $11,132.03 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Banks, Bambie J. and Claude Zongo vs. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc., et al. $23,201.80 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Gormley, Keri H. vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $12,581.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bhalla, Deepti Chanana and Varun Bhalla vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation and Thomas Gallagher $25,212.07 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Guevara-Rodriguez, Franklin vs. James Roberts, et al. $19,345.37 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Gelber, Douglas A., et al. vs. NJ Transit Corporation, et al. $39,369.49 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Lucas, Neil John vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $16,332.92 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Martinez, Dilenia vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $9,793.73 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Wong-Stewart, Bridgette vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $6,573.99 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Turner, Ruth vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $7,731.44 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kest, Sheldon vs. New Jersey Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $20,798.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Alto, Michelle and Carlos Pagan vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $3,732.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Stritto, Paul Dello v. Eric Lackawanna Railroad, et al. $48,273.28 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Henricus, Adrianus Rudolfus vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al $19,315.12 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Ward, Karl and Jaclyn Strassberg (a/k/a Jaclyn Ward) v. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al $11,746.76 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Subramaniam, et al, Bagyalakshmi vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit $19,532.92 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Gillespie, Jason and Christina Gillespie vs. Ronald T. Lewis, New Jersey Transit Corporation $97,913.71 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mulligan, Gregory and Vanessa Mulligan (h/w) vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation $8,479.50 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Elliott, Devin K., et al v. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $23,084.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Campbell, Demari vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $10,428.20 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cerrati, Corinne and Richard Myslinski, h/w; Nicole Safran vs. New Jersey Transit $22,508.15 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Crespo, Savannah, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al. $19,551.37 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Meister, Peter H., et al v. Verizon New Jersey, Inc., et al. $18,593.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Linson, Sean vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation and Port Authority of New York & New Jersey $8,744.60 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Michelle McLean vs. NJ Transit Corporation, et al $19,246.65 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Raybon, Khalilah, et al v. NJ Transit Corp., et al $22,371.99 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Biba-Nesimi, Resmie vs. New Jersey Transit Corportation, et al. $11,925.66 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mavrovitis, Evan vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $9,920.50 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Simmons, Robert vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $9,663.65 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Gsellmeier, Eric vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $2,481.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Daniels-Peters, Robin vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Corporation, Inc. $20,240.62 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rovinsky, Steven vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $1,528.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cordero, Evelyn vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $16,510.23 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Graber, Staci Ann vs. New Jersey Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $16,133.23 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Genovese, Gene vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc $13,682.79 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rosario, Elisa vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $15,064.47 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mahvidi, Ali vs. NJ Transit $8,386.75 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Muscianisis, William vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, LLC $22,392.93 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Stanton, Daniel vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $9,114.50 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Lopez, Rosario vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $17,641.87 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cohen, Susan vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $14,193.64 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Perkins, Rahman vs. Thomas Galagher, et al. $8,547.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kertesz, John and Laverne Maryann Kertesz vs. Consolidated Rail Corporatio, et al $23,976.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Aparviz, Gholam vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $10,359.88 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rodriguez, Noelia vs. NJ Transit, et al. $28,543.55 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Valente, Justin vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations $15,074.68 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Oriolo, Michael vs. Thomas Gallagher, et al. $6,226.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Morales, Viandy vs. Giusepe Nicotra $12,885.70 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Grud, Smantha M. vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $11,213.68 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Aguilar, Gerald, et al v. NJ Transit Corp. D/B/A NJ Transit $9,799.71 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bessim, Metin, et al. vs. NJ Transit Corp. D/B/A NJ Transit $2,038.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Fan, Hanchang, et al v. NJ Transit Corp. D/B/A NJ Transit $1,721.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Grassi, Thomas, et al v. NJ Transit Corp. D/B/A NJ Transit $1,508.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Scelzo, Michael vs. NJ Transit Corp. D/B/A NJ Transit $1,664.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Williams, Emogene v. NJ Transit Corp. D/B/A NJ Transit $1,236.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Sabat, Allan vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $15,321.35 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Smith, Paul, et al v. New Jersey Transit Corporation a/k/a NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $11,266.27 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cheong, Amy, et al. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation a/k/a NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $5,239.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Loor, Angela and Christian Loor, Per Quod vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $15,384.49 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Minervini, Leonardo, et al vs. New Jersey Transit, et al $15,954.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bowes, Felicia and Shomari Griffiths vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al $10,979.17 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Parham, Denise and Kevin Parham vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al $10,615.01 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Gassama, Malick D., et al v. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $16,686.92 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Posluszny, Richard vs. New Jersey Transit, et al $9,994.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Delossantos, Martin vs. NJ Transit, et al. $9,909.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Domino, Ahmad vs. University Hospital, et al $3,217.32 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Richards, Denise, et al vs. Michael Smerina, MD, et al $3,651.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Soto, Antonio vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,745.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bonzeca, Jospeh vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,204.84 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Malchow, Fredrick vs. Central Railroad of New Jersey, et al. $10,522.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Insalaco, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,844.24 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Tarabocchia, Judy, et al vs. NJ Transit Corporation, et al. $9,039.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Washington, Craig, et al vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et a. $9,103.40 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Hidetoshi Ichimura v. NJ Transit, et al. $11,704.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Domenico Magliano vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $12,894.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mitchell, Newbria H. vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al $5,002.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Dailey, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al. $854.32 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Horace, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al $12,764.72 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Moore, Bruce, et al. vs. Larry Wiley, et al. $5,884.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Ding, Feng Eileen, et al vs. NJ Transit, et al $12,141.21 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cruz-Cooke, Erika vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $552.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Vital, et al, Antonio vs. New Jersey Transit Corp, et al $4,029.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Williamson, Marquel vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $7,068.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Guerrero, Babette vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation and/or ABC Corporation, et al. $7,402.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Baker, Ralph vs. Paul Fishman, et al. $5,176.58 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Chew, John vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $6,109.81 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Peluso, Danielle vs. Thomas Gallagher, et al. $4,511.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Barnes, Tonia vs. Thomas Gallagher, et al. $5,811.48 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kazanchy, Jr., Thomas vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al. $3,754.22 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Del Toro, Eulises vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $5,766.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Hertel, Donald C. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al $4,137.07 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Holloway, Cassandra vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,096.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kindler, et al. vs. New Jersey Department of Transportation, et al. $4,690.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Hill, Michelle, et al vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $5,204.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Colon-Jordan, Newrka, et al v. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $4,558.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bessette, James M. vs. New Jersey Transit, et al $4,141.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bailey, Keith, et al v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,777.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Valle, Alexis vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $8,950.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Herb, Jovie Mae vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $2,146.90 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Van Dam, Jennifer, et al v. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $1,680.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP De Almeida, Daniel, et al v. Ravi Munvr, MD, et al $9,182.53 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mitchell, Newbria H., et al v. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al $272.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mazzetti, George vs. A bert A. Scott, et al. $688.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Sequeria, Marbelly vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations,Inc. $382.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP NJ Transit Bus & Garbage Truck Collision $1,120.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Julio Tavarez v. NJ Transit (APPEAL) $960.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Pt. Pleasant Beach $23,935.12 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Kane, William - Block 8; Lot 3 - Point Pleasant Beach $331.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Gurgo, Michael - Block 13.07; Lot 4 - Point Pleasant Beach $2,977.21 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Courtney M. Alesso 2012 Trust - Block 13.07; Lot 5 - Point Pleasant Beach $38,680.45 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Van Kralingen Resident Trust II - Block 17.02; Lot 1.01 - Point Pleasant Beach $39,060.88 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Jeanne Hamilton - Block 17.02; Lot 1.02 - Point Pleasant $2,713.50 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - La Plante, Dennis - Block 17.02; Lot 1.03 - Point Pleasant Beach $67,413.58 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Connie Coppola and John Zaza - Block 17.02; Lot 1.04 - Point Pleasant Beach $4,965.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - The Ippolito Corp - Block 17.02; Lots 2.01, 3 - Point Pleasant Beach (Driftwood Motel) $5,305.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - James Kincade and Lynn Vande Stouwe; Block 17.02, Lot 2.02 - Point Pleasant Beach $357.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Sarnasi, Charles - Block 17.02; Lot 2.04 - Point Pleasant Beach $1,755.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Rogers, Robert - Block 17.02; Lot 2.05 - Point Pleasant Beach $2,049.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Point Beach House, LLC - Block 17.02; Lot 4 - Point Pleasant Beach $237.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Rinaolo, Robert - Block 17.02; Lot 5 - Point Pleasant Beach $1,977.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Mahasagar Properties - Block 17.02; Lot 6 - Point Pleasant Beach $2,267.50
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Edward & Mary Jo Nervi, Marianne F. Mongello - Block 17.02; Lot 7 - Point Pleasant Beach $369.00 Easement Acquisition - 1402 Ocean Partnership Limited Liability Company - Block 17.02; Lot 9.00 - Point Pleasant Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Beach $2,485.89 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Levy, Adam - Block 17.02; Lot 11 - Point Pleasant Beach $1,410.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Lee & Carolyn Angioletti - Block 17.02; Lot 12 - Point Pleasant Beach $582.00
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Bradshaw's Beach Homeowners Assn - Block 17.02; Lots 13, 14 - Point Pleasant Beach $250.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Todd Lyons - Block 28.02; Lot 1 - Point Pleasant Beach $1,984.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Point Pleasant Beach Surf Club - Block 28.02; Lot 2 - Point Pleasant Beach $2,637.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Risden's Beach Corp. - Block 46.02; Lots 1, 3 - Point Pleasant Beach $1,370.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold EASEMENT- Beach Condo Association - Point Pleasant Beach Codemnation $165.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Addeo Gina - Block 179.03; Lot 5.02 - Point Pleasant Beach $65,940.12 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Fisher, Steven - Block 179.03; Lot 5.03 - Point Pleasant Beach $75.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Girgis, Ihab - Block 179.03; Lot 5.04 - Point Pleasant Beach $15,449.68
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Ocean Ventures @ Bay Pt Dunes, Inc. - Block 179.03; Lots 5.06, 5.08 - Point Pleasant Beach $71,880.45 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Brod, Craig - Block 179.03; Lot 5.07 - Point Pleasant Beach $32,372.72 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Labowsky, Andrew - Block 179.03; Lot 5.09 - Point Pleasant Beach $33,606.03 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Bayhead Point Homeowners Assn - Block 179.03; Lot 9 - Point Pleasant Beach $16,767.00
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Bay Pointe Dune Homeowners Assoc - Block 179.04; Lots 2, 3, 4 - Point Pleasant Beach $157.00 Easement Acquisition - Carter & Ocean Avenues Sub. Homeowners Assn - Block 179.04; Lot 5 - Point Pleasant Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Beach $564.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - The Ippolito Right of Way, part B. 179.04, Lot 5 $2,307.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Korzenowski v. DEP (APPEAL) $90.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Risden's Beach Corp v. DEP $16,386.95 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Plutarco Flores vs. State of New Jersey, et al Docket No.: MRS-811-16 $154,637.28 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Courtney Jackson vs. New Jersey City University, et al. Docket No.: HUD-L-4563-17 $110,692.84 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Michelle Provenzano vs. Montclair State University, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-758-17 $14,572.50 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Curt A. Allison vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation Docket No.: ESX-L-5577-18 $2,480.00 New Jersey Legislative Select Oversight Committee New Jersey Schools Development Authority Saiber, LLC, Florham Park $36,412.80 Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP Harrisburg New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program - Heritage Village at Galloway Project $30,310.66 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Kamienski, Paul v. Ocean County Prosecutor's Office, et al. $22,497.72 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Estate of Frank Lagano v. State of New Jersey $92,481.39 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Evans, Lee vs. Newark City, et al. $2,880.16 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Newton, Andowah, et al v. Anthony Yang, MD, et al. $16,896.74 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2019
Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Economidis, Maria vs. Susannah Wise, MD, et al. $3,067.60 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Kent, Ryan vs. St. Peter's University Hospital, et al $18,358.99 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Spurgeon, Dwayne vs. A. Narvaze, Corrections Officer, et al. $8,569.00 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park , an infant by her guardian ad litem, Nicole Williams, et al vs. Karen Koscica, D.O., et al. $37,843.46 , an infant, by his guardian ad litem Rachel Prehn and Michael Borga, individually and as his parentws Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park vs. Santiago Caasi, M.D., et al. $9,819.15 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Martin, Akintola Hanif vs. University Hospital Newark, et al. $4,883.16 Retention for Legal Services for the Administrator of the Department of Law & Public Safety Regarding the Office of Sills Cummis & Gross P.C., Newark the State Medical Examiner $770.00 Representation of the Office of the Governor Retention for Legal Services for Undertaking a Systemic Review of the Sills Cummis & Gross P.C., Newark Hiring and Vetting Practices of the Governor-Elect's Transition Office $550,344.75 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Washington DC Pension Project 2017 $23,907.69 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Washington DC Advice and Representation in Potential Litigation Related to Municipal Financial Matters in Atlantic City $33,829.00 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Washington DC Federal Oversight/Inquiries of NJ Transit $13,748.00 Application IRC Provisions. State Pensions Statutes and Unclaimed Property Law to Unclaimed Individual Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Washington DC Contr butions to State Pension Plans $118,575.00 Stahl & DeLaurentis, P.C., Runnemede Mullins, James M. Jr.,; Estate of, by Enza Gattinelli; A.A.P. vs. Naveen Malik, DO, et al $1,835.00 Strasser & Associates, P.C., Paramus Motor Vehicle Commission v. Steven Audenried OAL Docket No.: MVH 0622-18 $1,364.30 Strasser & Associates, P.C., Paramus Motor Vehicle Commission v. Dalton Garr OAL Docket No. : MVH 13517-18 $2,333.95 Strasser & Associates, P.C., Paramus Motor Vehicle Commission v. Sean T. Hubbard OAL Docket No. : MVH 00682-19 $1,515.00 Strasser & Associates, P.C., Paramus Motor Vehicle Commission v. Nathan D. Keller $1,410.00 Strasser & Associates, P.C., Paramus Motor Vehicle Commission v. Robert J. Apgar, Jr. OAL Docket No. : MVH 6775-19 $585.00 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Quinones, Raniel, et al v. New Jersey Transit Corp. $17,332.00 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Finnemen, Nassir vs. NJ Transit Corporation $9,730.48 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Poole, Renee vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $6,698.75 Volpe and Koenig, PC NJT Intellectual Property $33,933.51 Walden Macht & Haran LLP - New York Economic Development Authority Incentives Task Force $3,794,519.13 Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP - New Fetahu, Valdona v. New Jersey Transit Corp. $1,140.00 Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP - New Hoboken Train Crash - Pending Inquiry by the National Transportation Safety Board $7,903.41 Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP - New In the Estate of Margaret Matthews - Medicaid Lien $4,395.00 Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP - New Christina Gaskins vs. Harold U. Johnson, Jr., et al. Case No.: H-18-2194 $3,850.00 Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP - New Dr. Harshad Patel, et al v. Richard Crist, et al $3,983.50 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Law Firm Matter Approved Amount ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Environmental Protection $600.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. NJ Transit $720.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Graham-Bennett, Shareefah $1,860.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Douglas Starks (Stark) $720.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Leslie Prince $375.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Allan Lewis, Jr. $645.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Wortman, Edward $0.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Sierra, Natividad $180.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Fahy, Joseph $1,335.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Lester Thompson $2,055.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield SoNJ v. Winebrenner, Richard $7,702.50 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield Patel, Renuka v. Caraballo, Zorana $4,710.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield SoNJ v. Morgan, Reginald $4,423.31 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Guevara, Robin $3,487.50 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Jason Swartwood $517.50
State of New Jersey v. Jacalyn Medina; James Sattely; Keith Bachman; Margaret Foti; Frances ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield McGrogan; Gary Wilcox; Christopher Kazlau; Robert Vinci $3,690.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Swartwood, Jason $3,277.50 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Agustin Larrea $735.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State v. Jeffrey Juarez-Hernandez $135.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. James L. Spruill $720.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State v. Jennifer Jurkin $532.50 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield Mahlof, Gerilyn and David v. Jean, Gregory $4,260.00 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton MVC v Mayo, John $246.00 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton Motor Vehicle Commiaaion v. Stelian Rosu OAL Docket No.; MVH 15590-17 $987.00
Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton Motor Vehicle Commission v. Howard Hemingway OAL Docket No.: MVH 6552-19 $200.00
Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton Motor Vehicle Commission v.Deron L. Marshall OAL Docket No. : MVH 9497-19 $519.00 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton Motor Vehicle Commission v. Sahil Kulgod OAL Docket No. : MVH-17681-19 $196.00 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD NJT Insurance Coverage Issue in Tangia Price, et al. v. NJT $4,053.50
ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Victoria Williams-Faux vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1812-16 $30,069.50
ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Tina Diamond-Ostasz vs. State of New Jersey Department of Education, et al. Docket No.: BUR-L-682-17 $98,158.07
ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Scott Ionno vs. NJ Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: CUM-L-437-17 $7,564.51 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Marianito Ruiz v. Correctional Officer Jerry Stretch, et al $36,774.25
ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Alson Alston vs. National Conference of Bar Examiners, et al. Civil Action# 147-cv-4508; CO-AG-17 $4,598.88 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Gerald Hill White #979242 vs. Sco. R. Sorrell $8,935.36 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Haynes, John Craig vs. Dr. Ihoma Nwachukwi, et al. $1,210.00 Special Counsel Designation and Retention: NJ Transit Insurance Coverage Issues in the Case of ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Kathleen Shanahan vs. New Jersey Transit $1,430.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Sharon Eckert vs. State of New Jersey and Sergeant Christopher Labruna Docket No.: MER-L- $14,456.26 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Felix Mickens v. Shanta Ellis, et al $17,832.18 Leslie Robertson v. State of New Jersey, Department of Law & Public Safety, Juvenile Justice ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Commission, et als $16,737.50 Shanta Ellis v. State of New Jersey, Department of Law & Public Safety, Juvenile Justice Commission, et ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD als $640.00
ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program - Tamarack Station Project $9,686.72 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Remarketing of Multi-Family Conduit Revenue Bonds ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD (Carrino Plaza Apartments Project) $1,365.00 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD State and IBEW Local 30 $5,750.00 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency -Montgomery Heights II Project - Extension of Forward ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Commitment Maturity Date $838.50
Ashurst LLP, New York New Jersey Economic Development Authority -Offshore Wind Port Private Partnership $369,548.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Alternative Investments - General $2,064.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Davidson Kempner Institutional Partners Fund $768.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Investments in Winton Futures Fund, Ltd. $3,888.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Solus Alternative Asset Mgmt, LLP $1,776.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Blackstone Property Partners (post-closing matters) $9,072.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe XI, LP $7,296.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - OZSC II, LP (post-closing) $4,608.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Dyal Capital Partners III, LP (post-closing matters) $1,056.00
Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Blackstone Tac Opps Residential Opportunities (post-closing matters) $3,456.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - RC Woodley Park, LP (post-closing matters) $11,472.00
Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Centerbridge Credit Partners, LP (post-closing matters) $8,832.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Owl Rock Capital Corporation (post-closing matter) $1,008.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Starboard Leaders Fund LP (post-closing matters) $864.00
Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Complex Transaction - Tetralogic Pharmaceuticals Corp. Note Exchange $1,824.00
Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Crayhill Capital Management LP Separate Account (post-closing transaction) $3,312.00 Division of Investment -Alternative Investment - Owl Rock Capital Technology Finance Corp. (initial Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston transaction) $816.00 Division of Investment -Alternative Investment - Owl Rock Capital Technology Finance Corp. (post-closing Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston matters) $1,200.00
Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - Owl Rock Capital Newco LLC (post-closing matters) $16,848.00
Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - Ardian Co-Invest Side Car Vehicle (initial transaction} $48,576.00
Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Alternative Investment Ardian Buyout Fund VII (initial transaction) $119,136.00
Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Alternative Investment Ardian Buyout Fund VII (post-closing matters) $1,632.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Alternative Investment MBK Partners Fund V, L.P. (initial transaction) $56,688.00 Division of Investment - Alternative Investment AIMS/NJ Multi-Strategy Portfolio LLC (post-closing Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston matters) $15,264.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston DOI - Alternate Investment - Stellex Capital Partners II, LP $41,232.00 Ballard Spahr LLP - Baltimore Chris Ann Jaye v. US Attorney General William Barr, et al $31,809.00
Birchmeier and Powell LLC Tuckahoe Motor Vehicle Commission v. Steven C. Lockwood OAL Docket No.: MVH 5029-19 $450.00
Birchmeier and Powell LLC Tuckahoe Motor Vehicle Commission v. Jacob R. Harrison OAL Docket No. : MVH 5790-19 $120.00 Blumberg & Wolk, LLC, Woodbury Steve Morgan v. PFRS $2,040.00 Blumberg & Wolk, LLC, Woodbury Drury, Jeffrey vs. University Correctional Health Care, et al. $31,922.17 Blumberg & Wolk, LLC, Woodbury Steven Nordaby v. PFRS $1,280.00 Blumberg & Wolk, LLC, Woodbury Noe Perez v. PFRS $2,460.00 Blumberg & Wolk, LLC, Woodbury Vincent Tatarek v. PFRS $3,945.60
Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Lisa R. Easley vs. The New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: BUR-L-94-13 $48,801.79
Micaela P. Bennett vs. State of New Jersey, Elizabeth Connolly, Dawn Hall Apgar, Lynn Kovich, Christina Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Mongon, Lisa Ciaston and Theresa McQuaide Docket No.: MER-L-1774-15 $415,412.25 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Thomas Abraham v. John Pushko, et al $57,584.51
Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Michelle Barker vs. The State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1133-16 $60,277.69 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Tina Young vs. State of New Jersey Docket No.: CPM-L-83-17 $4,384.00
Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Thomas A. Capps, Jr. vs. Rowan University, et al. Docket No.: GLO-L-1124-16 $46,361.60 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Penelope Mauer vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-197-17 $51,945.21
Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Tara Kumor vs. ACRO Service Corporation, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1331-17 $40,417.91
Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Deborah Gross-Quatrone vs. Bonnie Mizdol, et al. Civil Action No.: 2:17-cv-13111-MCA-LDW $30,209.28 LaMonica R. Cross vs. State of New Jersey, Office of Attorney General, Division of Criminal Justice, et al. Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Docket No.: CAM-L-242-18 $60,739.42 Diane Scott, Phillip Dowdell and Denise Hollingsworth vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L- Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont 3425-17 $322,158.78 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Manuel Pontes, Ph.D. vs. Rowan University Docket No.: CAM-L-4324-18 $7,661.58 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Onslo Rose vs. Rowan University - APPEAL $340.00 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Pedro (Peter) Mendoza v. SoNJ $31,076.27 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont David Zeiss v. SONJ, DCA, Div of Fire & Safety, Glenn Smyth (APPEAL) $1,225.08 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Thomas Capps v. Rowan University et al (APPEAL) $4,777.24
Micaela P. Bennett vs. State of New Jersey, Elizabeth Connolly, Dawn Hall Apgar, Lynn Kovich, Christina Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Mongon, Lisa Ciaston and Theresa McQuaide (AAPEAL) $30,588.45 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Shanahan, Kathleen v. NJT $87,817.24 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Goldstein, Allen and Irene Goldstein vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $1,504.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Moore, Michael v. State of New Jersey $4,629.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Fiore, Tania vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,193.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Clifton Miller vs. State of New Jersey Docket No.: 18-10354 $2,010.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Langford, Fayebien vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $18,049.55 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Paraison, Marie vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $13,531.29 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Rollins, Valerie vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $9,959.18 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Holley, Lilian, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al $17,745.74 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Davis, Jean vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $16,943.76 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Ramireaz, Judith vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $14,235.93 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Osby, Gwendolyn, et al v. Edward Gilliard, et al $8,275.13 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Nizomov, Vakhobjon, et al v. Michael D. Jones, et al $6,975.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Bemberry, Terry vs. Darlene Easley-Brown, et al $7,775.99 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Giardina v. Barilli $4,033.36 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Mariano, Maria vs. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey $15,234.83 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Marc (Talib) Goodson v. Ashleigh Mitchell-Ricci $422.95 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Stefanie Whitfield vs. State of New Jersey Claim No. 16-8008 $2,909.50 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Easley, Darlene T., et al vs. Deen M. Jones, et al. $2,196.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Taylor, Robin vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $160.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Kah, Saihou vs. NJ Transit Rail Ops. $2,319.25 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Willingham, Michael vs. New Jersey Transit $3,864.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Fiora, Frank vs. Edward Gilliard, et al. $1,296.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Vitale, Nick, et al vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $1,776.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL IMO Soloman Amzi-Roland Lightener (Liens filed against the SoNJ and officials in the SoNY) $4,821.91 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Office of Attorney Ethics v. $8,560.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT In the Matter of William Shorter, Dept. of Corrections (APPEAL) $9,195.00 CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO Easement Acquisition - Berkeley Township $16,065.00 Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC, Morristown Tara Murphy, et al v. SONJ, et al $486.25 Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC, Morristown New Jersey Transit Corporation vs. Todd Charles Barretta $52,559.03
Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC, Morristown NJ TRANSIT - EMPLOYMENT COUNSEL HUMAN RESOURCES/POLICIES & PROCEDURES $75.00 Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC, Morristown Anthony Alleyne vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation $46,908.31
Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC, Morristown Andrew Poulos vs. State of New Jersey, Office of the Comptroller, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-2263-18 $100.00
Investigation of Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC, Morristown $26,350.00 Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC, Morristown Andrew Poulos v. SoNJ, et al (APPEAL) $11,181.28 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Latimer, Jahmel J., et al. v. Kathleen Waldron, et al. (Wm Paterson Univ) $14,469.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Garrett Collick, et al v. William Paterson University, et al $90,654.48 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Healey, Robert, et al. v. State of New Jersey $2,780.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange L.C. v. MCPO, et al $23,799.60
Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Janean Owens vs. Brian Ambroise, et al. Civil Action No.: 3:17-cv-07159-PGS-LHG $6,055.00
Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange A.F. and M.D. vs. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: HNT-L-0359-17 $1,109,866.75 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange NJEDA - State Office Buildings New Money Bonds 2017 $4,983.68 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Legal Services Regarding Stabilization and Recovery of Atlantic City (Pilot/Tax Appeals) $648,776.56 Tamasa Nobles, et al vs. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-2644- Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange 17 $30,251.56 Marianne Brown, et al vs. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-503- Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange 18 $68,487.72 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange A.H. vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: HNT-L-0259-18 $715.00
Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange A.R. vs. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: HNT-L-0261-18 $740.00 The Atlantic City Policeman's Benevolent Association Local 24, the Atlantic City Superior Officers' Association v. City of Atlantic City, SONJ, New Jersey Division of Local Government Services in the DCA, Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Robert Long, et als. $44,657.24 Retention for Representation Related to Requests for Access to Privileged or Confidential Records of Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Governor Christopher J. Christie $1,430.00 New Jersey Economic Development Authority - School Facilities Construction - New Money & Refunding Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Bonds FY 2019 $1,699.59
Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Josh Vadell, et als v. City of Atlantic City, State of New Jersey & Department of Community Affairs $4,905.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Richard Andrews, et al v. City of AC, et al $12,169.16 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange William Anderson, et al, et al v. City of AC, et al $6,932.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Investigation of $248,055.56
Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange K.F. vs. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: HNT-L-98-19 $877.00
Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange C.P. vs. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: HNT-L-99-19 $925.00
Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Shanta Ellis vs. New Jersey Juvenile Justice Commission, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-907 $37,031.60 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Kenneth J. Sirakides, Jr., et al v. Hon. Gurbir S. Grewal, et al $43,072.96 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Georgina Sirakides v. Vincent Parenti, et al $248,599.45 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange New Jersey Legislative Select Oversight Committee - $210.00
New Jersey Economic Development Authority - Refunding of School Facilities Construction Refunding Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Bonds, 2011 Series EE and School Facilities Construction Refunding Bonds, 2011 Series GG $1,580.06 New Jersey Economic Development Authority -State Pension Funding Bonds, 1997 Series A - Follow-Up Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Work $5,279.72
Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Multi-Family Revenue Bonds 2019 $39,275.97 New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority -FY 2020 New Money Bonds & Remarketing of Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Transportation Program Notes, 2014 Series BB-2 $45,175.12 Leslie 0. Robertson vs. The State of New Jersey Department of Law & Public Safety Docket No.: BUR-L- Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange 1339-16 $67,252.08 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange New Jersey Economic Development Authority - New Spring Health III, LP $8,428.44 New Jersey Economic Development Authority -FY 2020 Transportation Project Sublease Revenue Bonds Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange (New Jersey Transit Corporation) $40,074.32 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Investigation $470,799.56 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange William Anderson, et al v. City of Atlantic City, et al $8,961.16 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Edward Scanlon IV v. Valerie Lawson et al $1,287.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Investigation of the $20,592.88 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Investigation Re Handling of Sussex County Assault Allegations $47,917.12 Connell Foley LLP, Roseland Katherine Brennan vs. Albert J. Alvarez, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-34-19 $393,811.00 Covington & Burling, Washington CMS Medicaid Disallowance Matters (Ctrs for Medicare & Medicaid Svs) $1,680.00
DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice Non-Commissioned Officers Association (CJ Investigators) $13,850.14
DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice Superior Officers Association (CJ Investigators) $6,546.04
DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Howard Commons Residential Transaction $2,060.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law Officer Housing $3,362.64 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Easement Acquisition - Longport $9,538.39 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Easement Acquisition - Ocean City $75.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Easement Acquisition - Bay Head $107,935.51 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Althea Hylton-Lindsay v. William Paterson University, et al $460.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA - Parcels C/C-1 Mixed Use Transaction $22,378.88 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Huerta, Michael A. vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $3,176.88
DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Property Acquisition and Condemnation Litigation related to Rebuild by Design - Hudson Project $5,917.10 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Nurses Quarters $441.92
DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Alizadeh, Hamid vs. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and NJ Transit Corp., et al. $12,891.46
DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Edwards, Geneithe I. vs. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc. and Salvatore Vicari, Jr. $5,000.18 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Jackson-Locklear, Marquesa C., et al. v. William Paterson University, et al. $4,531.70 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Lee, Vong vs. Justen Oriolo, et al $10,827.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Estate of Frank Lagano v. State of New Jersey $46,094.05 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Neil Yellin vs. NJ Transit, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-7930-16 $74.90 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Duminiak, Karla vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, et al. $768.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Sirotic, Dean vs. Tutor Perini Corp., et al $184.25 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Bowman, Thomas vs. George S. Hail, Inc., et al. $187.36 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Bojkiu, Serveta, et al v. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $4,425.10 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Colt, Jeffrey and Betsy Tsai vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $46,073.18
DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Property Acquistion & Condemnation Litigation Related to Rebuild by Design - Meadowlands Project $59,387.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Lodging Area $4,846.88 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Gill, Nia vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $4,417.82 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Alba, Paul vs. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, et al. $14,394.43 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Carroll, John vs. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al. $3,021.49 Moore, Steven vs. NJ Transit Corp. A/K/A and/or D/B/A "NJ Transit" and/or New Jersey Transit Bus DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Operations, Inc." and Mario Rioja $18,691.74 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Burnett, Larry vs. Gary P. Foley, et al. $4,074.80 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Mousa, Hashem M. vs. Gerard Goreh, et al. $21,046.57 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Aguilar, Miguel vs. Rose A. Mann, et al. $8,268.76 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Cody, Darren vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $2,393.30 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Davis, Tracy vs. Eric Lopez, et al,. $5,946.26 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA - Special Counsel for Municpal Law - Mixed-Use Barker Circle Sale and Redevelopment $7,311.12 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP English, Tamika, et al v. NJ Transit Corporation, et al. $2,912.00 State of New Jersey & New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice, FOP 91 (Collective Negotiations for a DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Successor Agreement) $22,019.33 Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Conunissary/PX DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Transaction $12,073.33 Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority Special Counsel for Municipal Law -Warehouse/Post DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Office Transaction $6,325.84 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Xue Jhe He v. Guttenberg NJ Police, et al $120.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Reyes, Leopoldo vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $1,523.52 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Alvaran, Miguel vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $2,144.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Valisha Desir vs. John F. Russo, Jr. Docket No.: OCN-L-611-19 $73,743.78
DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Isabella Basile, et al. vs. Greystone Park Psychiatric Hospital, et al. Docket No.: MRS-L-768-18 $31,029.10 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Estime, Michael vs. New Jersey Transit $15,005.98 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Wallach, Scott vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $4,368.00
DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Samuels, Michael vs. Rose A. Mann, et al. and Rose A. Mann v. Nasser M.Bajes, et al. $2,303.90 Investigation of DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP $920.94
DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Investigation at $7,835.00 Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Expo Theater and DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Optional Properties $2,819.60 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon RODRIGUEZ, HECTOR VS CORRECTIONS, ET AL. $16,900.95
Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Rosenberg, Michael, et al. vs. Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Inc., et al. $165.00 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Sanders, Michole vs. Ocean County Bd. of Freeholders, et al. $680.00 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Kenly, Tyrone vs. Rutgers State University, et al. $1,060.00 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Cagnina, Anthony vs. Gary Lanigan, et al $21,224.60 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Baker, Scott vs. Joy Camarillo, et al. $8,235.00 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Baker,Forrest vs. South Woods State Prison, et al. $160.00 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Victor Razumov, an incapacitated person, et al vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $28,739.50 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Pagliaroli, Kenneth vs. NJ DOC, et al. $2,259.00 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Szemple, Craig Francis v. UMDNJ, UCHC, et al $115.81 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Brown, Takeisha; A.A.P., et al vs. Newark Extenden Care Facility, Inc., et al. $10,422.04 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Morehead, Desiree vs. Rutgers/RWJMS; IMO: $1,222.44 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Figatner, Robert vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al.; IMO: $74,480.93 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Morillo, Amy, et al v. University Hospital, et al. $23,108.16 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Lamar, Valarie vs. Jennifer Petrillo, MD, et al. $8,548.95 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Woszczyk, Magdalena vs. Rutgers; IMO $18,047.59 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Henshaw, George, et al v. Robert Weiss, MD, et al $2,600.00 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Pinson, Anthony vs. Sharmalie Perera, MD, et al $19,880.60 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Dossantos, Jonathan and Sandra vs. John Langenfeld, et al. $6,734.64 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Skoudris, Karen $7,175.72 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Scott, Albert vs. Cristan Anderson, MD $5,377.64 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Eng, Howard, et al v. Sall Myers Medical Associates, et al. $4,130.72
Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh Retention of Counsel for the New Jersey Department of Agriculture for Intellectual Property Matters $1,916.48
Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh FMERA - Advice on Bond and Loan Transactions - Financing of Acquisition from US Dept of Army $21,271.25
Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh NJHMFA - Single Family Mortgage-Backed Securities Program - SEC Rule 15Ga-1 Disclosure Filings $285.00 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Prepayment Opinion and Advice - Federation Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh Apartments (#238) $7,500.00 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program - Riverside Village Senior Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh Apartments, Phase II Project $31,350.00 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program - Riverside Village Family Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh Apartments, Phase I Project $32,044.48 New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority - State Contract Bonds Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh $14,755.08 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Prepayment Opinion & Advice - Allen Young (#433) Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh Project $7,500.00 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Prepayment Opinion & Advice - Tamarack/Ferry Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh Station (#1321HP10) $7,500.00 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program - Peter J. McGuire Preservation Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh Project $32,120.41 New Jersey Economic Development Authority - Refunding of Municipal Rehabilitation Bonds, 2003 Series Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh A and 2003 Series B (Federally Taxable) $39,858.86 Pia Wilson vs. New Jersey Transit, James Schworn, Anthony Bak, Ed Baksa and Robert Lavell Docket Eric S. Pennington, P.C., South Orange No.: ESX-L-0094-17 $29,101.08
Eric S. Pennington, P.C., South Orange Jose Rivera vs. New Jersey Transit & James Schworn Docket No.: ESX-L-8621-16 $29,265.93 Eric S. Pennington, P.C., South Orange Cynthia Huggins v. NJ Transit Corp, et al $1,520.00 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Oliver, Lorenzo v. Merrill Main, Ph.D., et al $160.00 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Gold, Daniel vs. Steven Recih, MD, et al $503.24
Farkas & Donohue, LLC an infant, et al. vs. Robert Wood Johnson Health System, et al. $5,512.50 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Sapp, Wyatt vs. Newark Beth Isreal Medical Center, et al $8,548.33 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Sisco, Nancy, et al v. Chan W. Park, MD, et al. $22,982.90 Farkas & Donohue, LLC an infant, et al vs. Owobamoshola Shonowo, MD, et al $28,278.14 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Pickard, Lynn; Executrix of David Pickard; Dec'd vs. Dr. Dale G. Schaar, et al $42,679.02 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Parra, Maria vs. Steven M. Shulman, MD, et al $28,128.72 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Neals, Lionel, et al vs. Mark Adams, MD, et al $18,761.25 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Ward, Rashawn vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $25,630.86 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Struck, Michael vs. Robert Heary, MD, et al. $6,495.62
Farkas & Donohue, LLC Piszar, Janet, Executrix of the Estate of Stephen Piszar vs. Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, et al. $20.40 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Martin, Akintola Hanif vs. University Hospital Newark, et al. $10,004.77 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Talian, Charles vs. Dr. Gregory Peck, a physician, et al. $31,689.64
Elizabeth Vecchio, et al v. State of New Jersey, Department of Health, Division of Mental Health and Farkas & Donohue, LLC Addiction Services, et al. Docket No.: MRS-L-185-19 $5,060.58 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Farkas & Donohue, LLC Infant vs. Joseph Barone, MD, et al.; IMO: $7,250.08
Farkas & Donohue, LLC Montroy, Sharin L; A.A.P. of the Vincent Montroy; Estate of vs. David A. August, MD, et al. $10,530.90 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Pimentel, Beronica, et al vs. George Stoupakis, MD, et al. $8,867.23 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Mejia, Alexandra vs. Rutgers, et al; IMO $13,039.64 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Mayers, Tracy vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $10,682.50 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Galley, Cheryl vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $11,006.86 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Squier Hall $33,752.50 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Phillipsburg LaGuerre, et al, Marie Chantal v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al. $25,545.48 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Williams, Ricky vs. New Jersey Transit $42,102.09 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority (FMERA) - Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Phillipsburg Eatontown Barracks $290.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Marchan, Candy vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $13,505.98 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Escobar, Zully Salgado vs. Chandler A. Minard, et al. $128.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Jayathunga, et al vs. NJ Transit, et al. $32,483.44 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Garcia, Javier vs. Betty J. Weaver, et al. $18,465.92 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Marchan, Candy vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operaitons, Inc. $41,239.10 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Litus, Estate of Joseph T., et al v. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $10,727.35 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Jourdain, Marlande vs. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, et al. $22,710.73 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Francois, Alcius N. vs. John Doe, et al. $19,763.75 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Henry, Julius vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $19,726.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Mensah-Horsey, Miriam vs. Martin L. Emanuel, et al. $10,798.71 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Alford, Alonzo vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (NJT) $13,169.80 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Fox, Neva Rae vs. NJ Transit, et al. $9,097.66 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Velez, Luis O. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (NJT) $6,351.53 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Ijames, Dwayne vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $5,818.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Kemet, Pharoah vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (NJT) $3,833.60 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Bell, Jr., Henry vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,735.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Marchan, Leticia R., et al v. NJ Transit, et al. $7,935.30
Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency CHOICE# 13-08 Leewood Villages at Rowand Pond - Phillipsburg Foreclosure Action against Renaissance Pond 1, LLC $46,108.50 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Coronel, Edison A. vs. NJT Corp., et al. $416.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Santana, Gabriel vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $3,984.00 Garrity and Knisely, Boston Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority $11,582.50 Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C., Clinton Kpode, Olga vs. NJ Transit, et al. $9,329.87 Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C., Clinton Preblick, Carole vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $5,568.04 Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C., Clinton Pitt, Floyd R. vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al $11,060.23 Genova Burns LLC, Newark CWA (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $3,060.00 Genova Burns LLC, Newark Wage Freeze Grievances $50.00
Genova Burns LLC, Newark International Association of Fire Fighters, et al v. City of Atlantic City, New Jersey, et al $100,606.05 John F. Russo, Jr. vs. State of New Jersey Administrative Office of the Courts Civil Action No.: 3:17-cv- Genova Burns LLC, Newark 02762-FLW-TJB $32,190.00
Genova Burns LLC, Newark Michelle Provenzano vs. Montclair State University, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-758-17 $27,984.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Genova Burns LLC, Newark IBEW Local 30, State Government Management Unit $10,972.50 Communications Workers of America -Collectiye Negotiations with CWA for a Successor Agreement Genova Burns LLC, Newark 2019-2023) $70,344.03 State of New Jersey & NJ Superior Officers Law Enforcement Association (Collective Negotiations for a Genova Burns LLC, Newark Successor Agreement) $11,870.00 State of New Jersey & NJ Law Enforcement Supervisor Association (Collective Negotiations for a Genova Burns LLC, Newark Successor Agreement) $6,644.90 State of New Jersey & NJ Investigators Association, FOP 174 (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Genova Burns LLC, Newark Agreement) $5,942.55 Genova Burns LLC, Newark Investigation at $940.00
Genova Burns LLC, Newark Christopher Carlini vs. New Jersey State Parole Board1 et al. Docket No.: BUR-L-2616-18 $48,213.90 Genova Burns LLC, Newark IAFF, AFLO-CIO Local 198 v. City of Atlantic City, et al $48,000.80
Genova Burns LLC, Newark Angelo DeMaio, et al v. Atlantic City, State of NJ, Department of Community Affairs $27,907.50
Genova Burns LLC, Newark State of New Jersey & PBA Local 105 (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement 2019-2023) $94,571.61 State and AFSCME Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement for Contract ending June 30, Genova Burns LLC, Newark 2019 $12,102.50 State and Local 195 IFTE and Local 32BJ NJ State Motor Vehicle Employees Union SEIU-AFL CIO 2019- Genova Burns LLC, Newark 2023 $16,711.98 NJ Law Enforcement Commanding Officers Assoc. Successor Agreement for contract expiring June 30, Genova Burns LLC, Newark 2019 $15,184.89
Genova Burns LLC, Newark CWA Local 1031, Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine, Successor Agreement $17,293.84
Genova Burns LLC, Newark Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine AAUP (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $9,460.12
Genova Burns LLC, Newark Rowan University and Teamsters Local Union 97 (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $12,700.00 Representation of NJ Transit for General Railroad Labor Matters With the Brotherhood of Locomotive Genova Burns LLC, Newark Engineers and Trainmen $80,591.72 PBA State Law Enforcement Unit (SLEU) - Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement for 2019- Genova Burns LLC, Newark 2023 $2,985.00
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 68 at Rowan University - School of Osteopathic Genova Burns LLC, Newark Medicine (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $3,162.50 Genova Burns LLC, Newark Representation of NJ transit for the 2019 Legislative Inquiry $190,653.54 Genova Burns LLC, Newark SoNJ Department of Labor and Workforce Development and CWA $5,525.00
Genova Burns LLC, Newark Rowan SOM - Committee of Interns & Residents (CIR) Successor Agreement $3,475.00 Genova Burns LLC, Newark IFPTE continuing negotiations regarding COVID-19 related issues $6,925.00 Genova Burns LLC, Newark AFSCME continuing negotiations regarding COVID-19 related issues $5,500.00 Genova Burns LLC, Newark IBEW Local 33 continuing negotiations regarding COVID 19 related matters $1,650.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark AFT v. Kean University - OER 9840 $472.44 Gibbons P.C., Newark Heitman Core Property Fund $2,188.80 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Northwood Real Estate Partners, LP Fund $487.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark CIR - Committee of Interns and Residents - Union Contract Negotiations $100.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Gibbons P.C., Newark Teamster Local Union 97 $1,275.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Real Estate Capital Asia Partners IV, LP $787.50
Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Blackstone Tactical Opportunities Fund - Real Estate (post-closing) $945.00
Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Blackstone Real Estate Partners VII, LP (post-closing matters) $2,512.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - GSO Credit - A Partners LP (post-closing) $1,462.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - GSO Energy Partners - A (LP) (post-closing) $700.00
Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Blackstone Tactical Opportunities Fund - A LP (RA) (post-closing) $3,982.50
Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Blackstone Tactical Opportunities Fund - A (PE) (post-closing) $2,107.50
Gibbons P.C., Newark Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine AAUP (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $11,335.00
Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - TPG Real Estate Partners II, LP (post-closing matters) $4,595.00
Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Brookfield Capital Partners IV, LP (post-closing matters) $787.50 CWA Local 1031, Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Gibbons P.C., Newark Agreement) $400.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Community Care Providers Union $14,960.39 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Silver Lake Partners, IV, LP (post-closing matters) $3,187.50
Gibbons P.C., Newark DOI - Alternative Investment - Blackstone capital Partners V (post- closing matter) $1,275.00
Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - JLL Fund VI, LP - Post closing Matters $525.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark DOI - Alternative Investment - Elliot Associates, LP Fund $2,062.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit - Operational Advice $55,931.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit Corporation; NJ TransitGrid $207,722.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit Corporation; Positive Train Control $751,250.50
Gibbons P.C., Newark DOI - Alternative Investment - Stonepeak Infrastructure Fund III, LP - Post-Closing Matters $19,422.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit Corp. - Property Acquisition $4,134.00
Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - BCA Cap I L.P. DOL # 17-64309 (post-closing matters) $9,010.00 CIR-The Committee of Interns and Residents Union Contract Negotiations (Collective Negotiations for a Gibbons P.C., Newark Successor Agreement) $33,980.70 State Troopers Fraternal Association v. State of New Jersey & Division of State Police Court Docket#: Gibbons P.C., Newark MER-L-713-18 $50.00 Health & Professional and Allied Employees {HPAE) - Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine (Collective Gibbons P.C., Newark Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $28,242.50
Gibbons P.C., Newark DOI - Alternative Investment - TPG Real Estate Partners III, LP (post-closing matter) $975.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Council of State Colleges & Universities, AFT AFL/CIO $89,048.38
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 68 at Rowan University -School of Osteopathic Medicine Gibbons P.C., Newark (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $2,000.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Gibbons P.C., Newark State Troopers Fraternal Association (STFA) - Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement $950.00 State Troopers Non-Commissioned Officers Association (STNCOA) - Collective Negotiations for a Gibbons P.C., Newark Successor Agreement $6,445.00 State Troopers Superior Officers Association (STSOA) - Collective Negotiations for a Successor Gibbons P.C., Newark Agreement $3,342.11
Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - Oak Hill Capital Partners III, L.P. (post-closing matters) $712.50
Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - TSG8, LP (post-closing matters) $6,442.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark Legal Challenge to 2018 OLC Wire Act Opinion $35.00
Gibbons P.C., Newark State of New Jersey (Kean University) v. Council for New Jersey State Colleges Local AFT $69,555.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Investigation of $19,155.05 Gibbons P.C., Newark State of New Jersey vs. Terence P. Flynn $1,120.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark State of New Jersey vs. Mara E. Zazzali-Hogan $4,420.00 State Troopers Fraternal Association (STFA) - Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement for Gibbons P.C., Newark 2019-2023 $39,808.12 Gibbons P.C., Newark Council of State Colleges & Universities, AFT Adjunct Unit $16,385.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark New Jersey Legislative Select Oversight Committee - Lynn Haynes $11,239.50
Gibbons P.C., Newark River Line Diesels on March 31, 2019; and Articulated Buses on July 21, 2019 $13,807.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark EDA Task Force - Advice to State Comptroller's Office $14,473.50 Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - Warburg Pincus China-Southeast Asia II, L.P. (post- Gibbons P.C., Newark closing matters) $18,877.50
Gibbons P.C., Newark Community Care Providers Unions (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $50.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Community Care Workers Union Representation for DHS $16,371.74
Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Alternative Investment -DivcoWest Fund VI, LP (initial transaction) $39,100.00
Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Alternative Investment -Silver Lake Partners VI L.P. (initial transaction) $53,782.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark DOI - Stonepeak Renewable Fund LP (Initial Transaction) $3,412.50 Gray Miller Persh LLC, Washington NJPBA - FCC Matters, State Treasurer and the NJPBA $13,634.00 New Jersey Public Broadcasting Authority - Federal Communication Commission Spectrum Incentive Gray Miller Persh LLC, Washington Auction Broadcast Band Repacking Advice $3,910.50 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Glenn, Christina A/K/A Christiana Rezireksyon, et al. v. DCPP, et al. $34,758.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Smith, Diamond, Estate of, et al. v. State of New Jersey, Division of Child Protection & Permanency, et al. $15,241.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Yvette Gibbons vs. The New Jersey Department of Law & Public Safety, et al. Docket No.: UNN-L-2766- Woodbridge 14 $9,705.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Gonzalez, Zenaida, et al. v. State of New Jersey, et al. $46,175.49 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Torres, Stephanie, Parent & Legal Guardian of v. State of New Jersey; Department of Woodbridge Children & Families, et al. $67,693.26 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Stephanie Carter-Green vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: CUM-L-580-15 $150,857.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Jaclyn B. Jiras vs. State of NJ, NJ State Police, Colonel Joseph Fuentes, individually and in his official Woodbridge capacity and Captain Mark Santiago, individually and in his official capacity $8,170.20 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Daria Mammen vs. State of NJ Division of State of State Police, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-128-16 $6,515.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Doe, John v. State of New Jersey, et al. $61,834.45 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Leslie Robertson v. JJC et al $39,573.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Christopher Birardi vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections Docket No.: MID-L-4193-16 $43,190.64 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Doe, John as Parent and Legal Guardian of et al. v. New Jersey Department of Children & Woodbridge Families, et al. $23,793.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Melanie Wilson vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Civil Action No.: 1:16-cv-07915 (RBK-JS) $44,135.05 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Jane Jones v. Pi Kappa Alpha International Fraternity, Inc., et al $71,546.80 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Lieutenant Dawn Shyner vs. State of NJ et al. Docket No.: MER-L-2294-16 $535.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Jacqueline Hawkins-Stiles, et al v. DCPP $120.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Terence Smith vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections Docket No.: MID-L-1231-17 $51,091.01 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Matthew Mongioi v. Stockton University $27,259.59 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, University Place Tax $240.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Jermaine Curry and Tori Curry vs. New Jersey State Prison, et al. Docket No.: MON-L-937-18 $140,924.13 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Karen Vitulli vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1419-18 $55,613.01 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, M.H. vs. Stockton University, et al. $15,032.50 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, New Jersey Economic Development Authority Special Counsel -Technology Centre of New Jersey Woodbridge Condominium Project $3,475.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Meg Yatauro vs. Kevin Bolden, et al. Docket No.: CAM-L-1901-14 $10,180.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Fernandez, Dorine, Executor, et al. vs. Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, et al. $4,535.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Shanta Ellis v. JJC et al $10,980.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, K.L., an Infant, et al v. University Hospital. et al $14,517.25 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Felix Mickens v. Shanta Ellis, et al $15,210.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Kenneth Little vs. Gary M. Lanigan, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-2859-11 $71,082.33 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Niema Jones v. DCF $24,371.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Jake Stouch and Kristine Bodnar v. DCPP et al $48,897.75 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge NJ Facility ID # 10702; Licensure Violation ( Infant Dec'd); IMO $1,880.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Womack, Drrick; Dec'd vs. University Hospital, et al $1,180.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Juanita Taylor v. DCPP et al $5,170.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Vicent, Brian vs. Johnson & Johnson, et al. $1,300.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Hastaba, Gerard, et al. vs. John Walker, MD, et al. $25,126.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Allia, Serena, A.A,P., et al vs. University Hospital, et al. $200.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge DOI - Representation of the NJ Division of Investment with respect to the Blueprint Capital Advisors, LLC $37,570.00 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark Corey Bland & Virginia Bland v. City of Newark et al $11,861.00 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark Sean Lavin v. PFRS $1,780.00 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark Charles Ken Zisa v. John Haviland, et al $188,410.58 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark Jason Ulrich v. PFRS $3,780.00 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark Christopher Castles v. PFRS $3,355.00 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark David Martinez v. PFRS $2,109.00 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark Paul Dzialo v. PFRS $1,460.00 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark Curtis Prilo v. PFRS $600.00 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark Economic Development Authority - State Tax Incentive Programs $11,752.50 Representation of NJHMFA with respect to Roebling Urban Renewal Associations, L.L.C. Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark $28,390.00 Hardin, Kundla, McKeon & Poletto, Springfield (T) Medina, Angel vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $3,950.00
Hardin, Kundla, McKeon & Poletto, Springfield (T) Kolias, Goergia, Executrix, et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al $16,461.24 Hardin, Kundla, McKeon & Poletto, Springfield (T) Martin, Akintola Hanif vs. University Hospital Newark, et al. $13,960.40 Hardin, Kundla, McKeon & Poletto, Springfield (T) Epps, Yolanda vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $2,638.04 Hardin, Kundla, McKeon & Poletto, Springfield (T) Pingatore, John, et al. v. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $12,045.00 HAWKINS DELAFIELD & WOOD LLP, NEW New Jersey Schools Development Authority - Review of School Facilities Construction Bond Post- YORK Issuance Tax Questionnaire Responses 2019 $1,720.36 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Mills, Whitlock LL (NJHMFA) $2,496.05 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Somerville & New Bridge Landing (River Edge) $98,202.15 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Long Beach $2,460.00 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Beach Haven (Bateman) $100.00
HILL WALLACK, Princeton Manufacturers and Traders Trust Co. v. Marina Bay Towers Urban Renewal II, et al. $8,605.20 HILL WALLACK, Princeton NJT - Hoboken Terminal Redevelopment $23,115.76
HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Windmill Properties, Block 79, Lot 1 & 2 - Atlantic City $60.16
HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Barbara Kaplan, Block 18.67, Lot 3 - Long Beach Township $56,464.52
HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Richard Kowazlski, Block 20.35, Lot 1.04 - Long Beach Township $220.56
HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Thomas Kline, Block 20.37, Lot 1.05 - Long Beach Township $3,992.16
HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Jeanette Frankenberg, Block 20.45, Lot 4 - Long Beach Township $2,795.60
HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Ghada Jebara, Block 20.47, Lot 4 - Long Beach Township $200.00
HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Nancy Roncati, Block 20.67, Lot 4 - Long Beach Township $737.20
HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Richard Carolan; Block 20.68; Lot 1 - Long Beach Township $17,041.84
HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Stonis Family, LLC; Block 20.82; Lot 1 - Long Beach Township $23,879.84
HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Donald Goldberg; Block 20.87; Lot 4 - Long Beach Township $124.96
HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Shanin Spector; Block 20.89; Lot 5 - Long Beach Township $4,218.65
HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Robert Helemian; Block 20.109; Lot 1.04 - Long Beach Township $1,344.16 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Joel Golden; Block 20.117; Lot 7 - Long Beach Township $822.80
HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Richard Tavoso - Block 4; Lots 1, 1.01 - Mantoloking Boro $540.00
HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - North Beach, 1003, LLC, Block 18.03, Lot 4 - Long Beach Township $7,572.81 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Aberdeen-Matawan Station Transit Oriented Development Project $10,905.48 Representation of NJ Transit in the Acquisition of Property For the Proposed Northern Bus Facility HILL WALLACK, Princeton (Ridgefield Park) and Related Legal Services, $23,480.88 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Hines, Lamere IMO: SD-21055-01-830 $160.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Ellis, Kenneth vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $16.80 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Arzuaga, Luis v. NJTRO, Inc. $8,006.20 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Maher, Terry vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $27,338.25 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Jimenez, Enrique vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $11,235.64 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC D'Amico, Nicole, et al. vs. John E. Mayo, Sr., et al. $0.32
Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Bonsall, William and Sheri Bonsall; his wife vs. State of New Jersey, New Jersey Transit, et al. $14,352.01 Burnett, Merium and Jesse James, h/w vs. National Railroad Passenger Corporation a/k/a Amtrak and Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC New Jersey Transit Corporation $945.12 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Gooding, Francis vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $8,400.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Jenkins, Jermaine, et al. v. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $15,834.32 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Bentivenga, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $28,310.12 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Byers, Raymond vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $20,654.70 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Albanese, Vincent John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $5,146.23 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Leonard, Brian vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $273.68 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Nanney, Sandra, et al v. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $7,727.86 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Arzuaga, Luis vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $64.56 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Beck, James vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $306.64 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Powers, Kevin vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $16,056.59 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Johnson, George A. vs. Jason J. Abbruscato, et al $11,403.15 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Otti, Lucia, et al v. Jean G. Pierre, et al. $16,014.86 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Thomas Dougan vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $22,752.07 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Smith, Stephanie vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $4,379.78 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Neuder, Cynthia I. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $6,619.17 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Robinson, Caroly vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $4,792.85 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Kirkland, Kamilah vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $11,226.67 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Bonelli, Santo vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al. $17,824.82 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Buttigieg, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $5,396.08 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Gaspartich, Robert vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $8,767.49 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Wheaton, William P. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $16,086.33 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Wilson, Marcel vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (NJT) $9,189.61 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Davis, Dwayne vs. Heriberto Delgado, et al $11,290.69 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Elshabazz, Abdul vs. Betty Harris-Wilson, et al. $13,412.50 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Brandon Joy v. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc $896.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Carfi, The Estate of Raffaele, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al. $24,237.91 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Dollson, Angelice vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $7,954.69 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Lopez, Epifanio vs. New Jersey Transit-Walter Rand Transportation Center and/or ABC Corporation, et Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC al. $9,770.79 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Flakker, James vs. New Jersey Rail Operations, Inc. $14,671.49 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Lambert, Joseph vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $10,586.61 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Byers, Raymond, et al. vs. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) $15,227.51 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Clark, Calvin vs. NJ Transit Rail $6,085.55 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Matthews, Reginald B. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc $940.78 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Raghunandan, Omash vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $9,131.19 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Julien, Marie E. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $826.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Robino, Anthony vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (NJT) $3,992.49 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Gabriel, Anthony vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations $9,940.74 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Ronca, William vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations Inc. (NJT) $12,939.06 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Mari, Mark vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $23,501.61 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Cavanagh, Thomas vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $5,521.39 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Alverio, Melanie, et al v. New Jersey Transit Corproation, et al. $8,572.93 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Johnson, Seletha vs. Betty L. Harris-Wilson, et al $1,527.21 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Holmes, Sandra vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $7,839.77
Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC McIntosh, Suzanne K. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation a/k/a NJ Transit Corp., et al. $6,044.11 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Yurick, Robert vs. New Jersey Transit Rail $5,741.88 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Herrick, Robert vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $14,154.04 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Melendez, Eric vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $13,618.48 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Rawls, Patricia vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $13,869.22 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Press, Christopher vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $26,257.72 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Thielfoldt, Jessica v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $15,239.56 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Attarta, Medhat vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, In. $5,522.11 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Estrada, Amy L. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $4,374.03 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Velazquez, Benjamin vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $8,380.20 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Herron, Raymond vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et a. $1,502.24 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Chudzik, William v. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $7,120.20 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Gianna, Jr., Salvatore vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, inc. $5,593.20 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Smith, Stephanie vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $673.92 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Mitchell, Rachele vs. John Doe and New Jersey Transit $3,281.02 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC GEICO, a/s/o Carolyn Smith vs. James Sheil, et al. $1,231.62 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Hartzell, Lois & Joseph vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Ops. $1,248.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Ali, Rahim vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $6,498.60
Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Representation of New Jersey Transit - Melendez vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,656.32 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Stilletti, Michael vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,825.68 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Dixon, Kyle vs. Patricia Lynch vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $352.00
Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Representation of New Jersey Transit - Jodi Asay vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, et al. $8,084.56
Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis Special Counsel Designation - State Retirement Plans and State Health Benefit Plans $33,041.18
Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis New Jersey Department of Education - Pension Tax Advice Regarding Renaissance Schools $2,484.60 Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis NJHMFA - Formation of an OPEB Trust $726.75 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis State Retirement Plans - $343.04 Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis State Retirement Plans - $560.26 Unclaimed Property Administration - Advice on Federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis Preemption of New Jersey Unclaimed Property Laws $29,991.30 Communication Workers of America, Local 1040 (Collective Negotiations with CWA for a Successor Jasinski, P.C., Newark Agreement) $14,875.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Thomas Tullo - Block 37, Lot 8 - Brick Township $560.00
John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - JC & JMP Spaccarotella - Block 42.03; Lot 1 - Brick Township $840.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Kevin Klingert - Block 50.02; Lot 18 - Brick Township $910.00
John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - D. Castelbanco - Block 52.01; Lots 1, 15 - Brick Township $525.00
John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City NJ TRANSIT CORPORATION - Property Acquisitions Counsel - Hudson Tunnel Project $15,220.00
NJ Transit Corp; County Yard/Delco Lead/Megal Lead Acquisitions, Surface Transportation Board and Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell - Denver Federal Railroad Proceedings and Property Interest Acquisitions $73,419.50 Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell - Denver NJ Transit Corporation - Gateway Program Financing $298,347.00 Proposed Re-Assignment of Trackage Rights from Norfolk Southern to Dover Delaware Railroad and Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell - Denver Related Surface Transportation Board Issues $2,117.50 Representation of NJ Transit: The Assignment of Operating Rights on the Beesleys Point Secondary Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell - Denver Track- STB Issues $30,838.50
Representation of NJ Transit to review freight operating trackage rights agreement between NJ Transit Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell - Denver and Conrail for the Freehold & Southern secondary tracks in Monmouth & Ocean Counties $3,465.00 Katrina Osborne vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation and Kevin Ruff, Individually and John Does 1-5 Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP, Woodbury Docket No.: ESX-L-2151-15 $109,507.92 Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP, Woodbury Pia Wilson Vs. NJ Transit, et. al $309,740.62 Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP, Woodbury Jose Rivera vs. NJ Transit & James Schworn $121,345.03
Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP, Woodbury Marianna Tropeano vs. NJ Transit Police Department, et al. Docket No.: MID-L-1734-17 $117,453.71
Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP, Woodbury Cynthia Huggins vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-1317-19 $93,887.40 Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP, Woodbury LiFang Du v. NJ Transit $89,945.50 Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP, Woodbury Ronnie Brumant v. NJ Transit $6,015.00 Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP, Woodbury Allegations of Discrimination in Employment Practices of NJ State Police $5,920.00 Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, Edison Motor Vehicle Commission v. Bernard L. McCullers $1,170.00 Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, Edison Motor Vehicle Commission v. Robert Moser OAL Docket No.: MVH 8383-19 $1,650.00
Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, Edison Motor Vehicle Commission v. Anthony F. Sarlo OAL Docket No. : MVH 11451-19 $1,880.43
Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, Edison Motor Vehicle Commission v. Jonathan A. Donan OAL Docket No.: MVH-15486-19 $120.00 Kent & McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry Hill Christopher Triola vs. William Finkle Civil Action No.: 3821-2018 $4,566.58 The Estate of Ernest A. Franciotti, et al v. New Jersey Veterans Memorial Home - Vineland, et al. Docket Kent & McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry Hill No.: CUM-L-460-18 $40.00 Kent & McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry Hill State of New Jersey v. Celeste Jones $1,618.46 Kent & McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry Hill State of New Jersey v. Torres, Fernando $900.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Kent & McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry Hill SoNJ v. Hartman, Emilie $1,507.50 Kent & McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry Hill State of New Jersey v. Fonseca, Tressa $6,260.88 Kent & McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry Hill State of New Jersey v. Bueno, Damalia $7,198.45 Kutak Rock LLP, Omaha NJT - Retirement and Health & Welfare Plans (Retirement) $6,486.00 Law Office of Brian J. Levine John Doe vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MID-L-915-16 $5,170.00 Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Philadelphia Little, Tony vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $23,520.30 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Kenny, Linda v. Peter Garcia (State of NJ) $13,953.59 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Dana S. Register v. NJ DOC $10,369.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Wahab, Atiya v. State of New Jersey, et al. $962.50 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Kelcey Burgess vs. State of New Jersey (Department of Environmental Protection and Division of Fish Lambertville and Wildlife) Docket No.: HNT-L-0205-16 $3,100.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Kevin Klepadlo v. PFRS $3,602.50 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Marquis Harris vs. New Jersey Department of Human Services, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-0243-16 $340.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Kevin Ball vs. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Docket No.: HUD-L-4880-17 $171,741.31 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Deneen A. Matani v. PFRS $9,287.50 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Sean Tonner vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections and Jerome Scott Docket No.: MID-L-7507-17 $22,755.84 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., James Fleming vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: CUM-L-750-17 $13,428.94 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Joseph Torres vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1859-16 $58,278.50 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Erin Shelton vs. State of New Jersey - New Jersey State Police, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1587-16 $50,322.96 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Alan B. Dillion v. SONJ et al $48,544.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Joan Lombard vs. New Jesrey Department of Transportation Case No.: l:18-CV-01319-RBK-KMW $29,789.60 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Alexandra M. Bittle vs. Ancora Psychiatric Hospital, Harry Beam Docket No.: BUR-L- $34,091.42 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Kevin T. Flood v. Public Defender Joseph Krakora, et al $20,279.50 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Gerald T. Boswell vs. Office of the Public Defender, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1066-03 $24,228.50 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Melissa Urban vs. Office of Attorney Ethics of the Supreme Court of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER- Lambertville L-381-18 $10,292.50 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Kerry Lynn Asbury v. State of NJ, et al. $2,120.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., David Rullo v. PFRS $2,480.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Jeremy Dusenbery v. PFRS $4,720.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Ratarsha Willis v. Carl Walker. et al. - APPEAL $5,120.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Leslie O'Robertson v. State of NJ, et al $8,706.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Shanta Ellis v. JJC, et al $16,127.50 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Ian M. Schweizer vs. New Jersey State Police Colonel Patrick J. Callahan, et al. Docket No.: SSX-L-28- Lambertville 19 $27,791.15 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Louis Pierce v. Gary Lanigan, et al $19,760.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Frank Hubbard v. Gary Lanigan, et al $9,187.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Georgina Sirakides v. Vincent Parenti et al and Kenneth Franco v. NJ State Police et al $81,731.70 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Jake Stouch and Kristine Bodnar v. DCPP, et al $39,900.68 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Albert Anderson v. PFRS $2,020.00
ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Lum, Drasco & Positan, LLC, Roseland Alexis Perozo v. PFRS $5,140.08 Lum, Drasco & Positan, LLC, Roseland SoNJ, Banking & Insurance and CWA Local 1033 $13,634.40
Lum, Drasco & Positan, LLC, Roseland Prelitigation Letter - New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance $10,420.00 Lum, Drasco & Positan, LLC, Roseland Nathan J. Johnson vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-416-14 $112,911.96 Lum, Drasco & Positan, LLC, Roseland RITA OGHOGHOME V. SoNJ, ET AL $9,552.64 Lynch & Lynch, Garden City Lee, Vong vs. Justen Oriolo, et al $1,920.00
M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange NJHMFA - Captial Program Fund Revenue Bonds - Redemption of 2004 and/or 2007 Series Bond $7,510.00 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange NJHMFA Conduit Bond Program - Greater Englewood Apartments Project $25,855.76
New Jersey Economic Development Authority - Current Refunding of School Facilities Construction Refunding Bonds, 2009 Series AA School Facilities Construction Bonds, 2009 Series BB and School M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange Facilities Construction Bonds, 2010 Series CC-2 $5,355.00 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program - Pilgrim Baptist Village I & II M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange Project $30,135.85
M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange New Jersey Transit Corporation -Revolving Credit Facility -2019 Grant Anticipation Note $20,021.00
M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange State of New Jersey -Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series Fiscal 2020 $10,000.00 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Multi-Family Conduit Bond Program -Post Road M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange Gardens Apartments Project $30,551.76 New Jersey Economic Development Authority - Fall 2019 School Facilities Construction Bonds New M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange Money and Refunding $29,817.00 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency ISDA 2018 U.S. Resolution Stay Protocol Bilateral M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank $6,660.00
M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Willows at Whiting Project - Follow-Up Work 2020 $4,792.50 New Jersey Economic Development Authority -Reissuance of a Portion of the School Facilities M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange Construction Refunding Bonds, 2015 Series VV $17,000.00 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange Emergency State General Obligation Bonds COVID-19) $14,402.50 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Newton, Andowah, et al v. Anthony Yang, MD, et al. $24,719.50 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Gibbs, Jamal vs. University Correctionl Healthcare, et al. $14,056.50 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Sutherland, Vanessa vs. Andrei Botea, MD, et al $36,561.49 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Lombardi, Christopher; Dec'd vs. Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences, et al $22,221.95 Marcucci, Kimberly; Administratrix of the Estate of Christopher Marcucci, Dec'd vs. Robert Wood Johnson MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls University Hospital, et al. $5,236.90
MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Sleiman, Helena; Executrix of the Estate of Antoine Sleiman; Dec'd vs. Michael Piscopiello, MD, et al. $77,644.39 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Neals, Lionel, et al vs. Mark Adams, MD, et al. $57,473.45 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Ward, Rashawn vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $21,749.90 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Hurley, Melissa, et al vs. Steven R. Berkman, MD, et al. $18,538.43 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Semmon, Ebony; A.A.P., et al vs. University Correctional Health Care, et al. $57,829.78 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Bogar, Joseph E. vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $73,420.70 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Thakkar, Rajesh vs. Rutgers Dental School of Newark, NJ $345.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Martin, Akintola Hanif vs. University Hospital Newark, et al. $15,630.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Figueroa, Orlando vs. Antonios Mammis, MD, et al. $21,023.40 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Martin, Akintola Hanif vs. University Hospital Newark, et al. (APPEAL) $3,545.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Koch, Kassandra vs. Shabbar Danish, et al $11,151.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Finnerty, Elizabth P. vs. University Hospital, et al. $25,042.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Mejia, Alexandra vs. Rutgers, et al; IMO $15,637.81
Analysis of Possible Conflict of Interest of Mary Catherine Cuff, Brielle $9,375.00 McCarter & English, LLP - Newark NJ NJEDA - Tech Council Ventures, L.P. $1,470.00 New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority - Revisions to Post-Issuance Tax Compliance McCarter & English, LLP - Newark NJ Procedures 2018 $5,582.50 McCarter & English, LLP - Newark NJ New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority - Refunding Bonds 2019 $52,046.70 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Clarification of Unit Petitions - Group Y $15,010.00 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Robinson, Raphael, et al v. new Jersey Transit Rail Operaions, Inc. $13,552.75 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Jenkins, Leslie E. v. Montclair State University, et al. $226.20 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ TANGIA PRICE v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT, JAMES SCHWORN, PAUL KELLY and JOHN WASILAK, $5,400.00 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ NJ Transit Corporation - Labor Counsel - Employee Compensation Issues $250.00 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Behling, Cynthia vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,985.12 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Demusso, Sergio vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $6,869.35 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Township of Little Falls v. Montclair State University $26,185.00
McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Negotiations between the New Jersey Transit Police Department and the Fraternal Order of Police, Local Morristown NJ 37 related to the collective bargaining agreement $7,530.00
McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, NJHMFA Labor Counsel - Representation of NJHMFA in Negotiations for a Collective Negotiations Morristown NJ Agreement with CWA Local 1032 for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30,2023 $14,015.00 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ NJ Transit Police Dept. Local 304 - Labor Negotiations - Successor Memorandum Agreement $14,640.00 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ NJ Transit Dept - CWA Local 1032 - AFL CIO - Labor Negotiations - Fare Enforcement Officers $6,346.00 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Arbitrations between NJ Transit Bus Operations and Amalgamated Transportation Union - A-Pillar Cases Morristown NJ With Various Locals and PERC Matter $276,975.23 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Amalagamated Transit Union and NJ Transit Bus Operations Inc. - ATU Local 819 $10,885.00 McGivney, Kluger, Clark & Intoccia, P.C., Florham City Belfand, Seman vs. Raymond Petosa and New Jersey Transit Corporation, C-83585-444 $17,657.00 McGivney, Kluger, Clark & Intoccia, P.C., Florham Michelson, Eric vs. New Jersey Transit $0.00 McGivney, Kluger, Clark & Intoccia, P.C., Florham Morgan, Anthony vs. N.J. Transit Corporation, et al. $6,702.00 McKool Smith, Dallas NJT v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, et al. $114,481.03 McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, L.L.C., State of NJ Master Energy Efficiency Lease Purchase - FY 2013 $3,062.50 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, L.L.C., NJ Higher Education Student Assistance Authority 2019 Series Bonds $815.90 McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, L.L.C., NJ Higher Education Student Assistance Authority 2020 Series Bonds $55,159.29 McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, L.L.C., State of New Jersey Master Energy Efficiency Lease Purchase Agreement Roseland $990.00 McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, L.L.C., Investigation at the $129,780.32 Michael A. Armstrong & Associates, LLC, Kenny, Linda v. Peter Garcia (State of NJ) $12,376.48 Michael A. Armstrong & Associates, LLC, Willingboro Gerald T. Boswell vs. Office of the Public Defender, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1066-03 $17,935.00 Michael A. Armstrong & Associates, LLC, Frank Hubbard vs. Gary Lanigan, et al. Civil Action No.: 18-2055-AET-DEA $12,915.00 Michael A. Armstrong & Associates, LLC, Louis Pierce vs. Gary Lanigan, et al. Civil Action No.: 15-7970 $16,267.50 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Kadonsky, Steven vs. Abu Ahsan, MD, et al $280.00
Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Geiger, Edgar C., III; Estate of, et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al $840.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Ward, Rashawn vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $15,732.85 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Keating, Gwendolyn vs. Don Yoon Cha, MD, et al; imo $16,815.40
Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Elizabeth Vecchio, et al vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MRS-L-185-19 $16,127.05 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Cajuste, Olga vs. Justin Sambol, MD $3,540.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Labega, Shawn vs. JFK Medical Center, et al. $5,007.18 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Sellow, David vs. Ihuoma Nwachukwu $8,120.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Jackson, Vince vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al $2,640.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Dondero, Kristen, et al vs. Yaakov Abdelhak, MD, et al. $5,400.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Lambert, Jr., John, et al. vs. Trinitas Regional Medical Center, et al. $4,154.64
Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Geiger, Edgar C., Estate of, et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $10,555.66 Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia Toolen, William, et al. v. State of New Jersey $23,145.00
Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Schoenstein, Matthew, et al. v. Richard E. Constable, III. Commissioner, et al. $27,162.26
Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Juan Daniel Perez vs. New Jersey City University, et al. Docket No.: HUD-L-1845-14 $445.68
Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Smith, Diamond, Estate of, et al. v. State of New Jersey, Division of Child Protection & Permanency, et al. $692.00
Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Lavern Sanders vs. Division of Children and Family Services, et al. Docket No.: HUD-L-1533-16 $5,682.56 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Claims Against HESAA: Debt Collection Practices $13,240.74 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Rose Richardson v. State of NJ, Office of the Attorney General $5,610.20
Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Efthimia N. Christie, ED.D vs. Kean University, et al. Docket No.: UNN-L-739-17 $19,311.73 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Vanessa Penn vs. Thomas McMahon, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-100-17 $13,843.90
Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Kathleen Angellella vs. State of New Jersey Department of Education, et al. Docket No.: MID-L-2416-17 $9,878.64 Cayden Michael Douris, et al vs. Bridgeway Rehabilitation Services, Inc, et al. Docket No.: MRS-L-1876- Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston 17 $14,610.01 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Julienne Whitten vs. Kean University, et al. Docket No.: MID-L-6549-17 $1,060.00
Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Usama Henien and Estela Euceda v. NJDOC, et al Docket No.: ESX-L-3669-15 $398.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Danielle Reed, et al. v. NJ Department of Community Affairs, et al $8,461.30 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Edward Thompson v. SONJ, et al $27,781.76
Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Linda Lockard-Phillips vs. State of New Jersey Claim Petition Numbers: 2015-4970 & 2015-4972 $583.96 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Harold Damas v. SONJ, et al $568.44 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Anthony Biasi v. NJDOT $18,757.62 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Linda Kwon v. SoNJ, et al $2,743.00
Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Middlesex, et als v. Sylvia Engel, et als $10,561.61 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Felix Mickens vs. Shanta Ellis, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1533-19 $1,900.00 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston IBEW Local 400 v. Tinton Falls and Department of Community Affairs $7,700.00 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Morales, Maria, et al v. Gregory Peck, DO, et al $740.00 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Santiago, Janice; A.A.P. of Jovanny Santiago vs. Kennedy Health Care Facilities, et al. $200.00 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin DiNapoli, Jill vs. Anthony Salerno, M.D. $9,529.32 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Maronski, Walter, et al v. Kennedy Health System, Inc., et al $252,809.35 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Brian Weimer vs. Ancora Psychiatric Hospital, et al. Docket No.: ATL-L-2399-17 $320.00 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Semmon, Ebony; A.A.P., et al vs. University Correctional Health Care, et al. $36,510.21 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Sinnes, Keri, et al vs. Kennedy Health System, et al $61,021.28 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Krupp, Otto vs. Rutgers Biomedical Health Services $10,535.33 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Johnson, Shyemah vs. University Hospital; IMO: $12,440.05 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Bok, Barbara vs. Shari, Reitzen, MD, et al; IMO $85,057.49 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Hirschhorn, Steven; Estate of, et al v. Rutgers University Hospital, et al. $4,636.00 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Enoch, Kathleen, et al v. MIchael G. Nosko, MD, et al $28,613.71 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey an infant by his Parents and NaturalGuardians, Nina Swain and Derrick Sansbury Warner Coleman & Goggin vs. Anthony P. Salerno, MD, et al $18,249.69 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Lubeski, Matthew, et al vs. St. Peter's University Hospital, et al. $11,920.00 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Ferguson, Rashaun vs. Peter Nogan, et al $5,307.00 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Rose Richadson v. SoNJ et al (APPEAL) $560.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Anacap Financial Partners II, LP $552.50 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - TPG Growth Fund II, L.P. $7,220.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Roark Capital Partners, III, LP $570.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - AnaCap Financial Partners, III, LP (post-closing) $190.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - TPG Opportunity Partners, III and Related Separate Account $190.00 Special Counsel Designation - State of New Jersey, Department of Treasury, Appointment as Disclosure Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Counsel $84,913.62
Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Blackstone Energy Partners, II LP (post-closing matters) $522.50 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Cerberus - NJ Loan Fund, LP (post-closing) $2,137.50 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Anacap Credit Opportunities II, LP (post-closing) $237.50 Division of Investment - Separate Account Managed by Golden Tree Asset Management (post-closing Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco matters) $4,892.50
Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Knight Tao, LP, 2015 Investment - New Series (post-closing matters) $665.00 Division of Investment - SONJ Private Opportunities II, LP - 2016 Additional Investment (post-closing Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco matters) $427.50 Division of Investment - Separate Account Managed by BlackRock Alternative Advisors (post-closing Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco matters) $380.00
Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Benefit Street Partner Special Situations Fund L.P. (post closing matter) $95.00
Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - CVC Capital Partners VII, L.P. (initial transaction) $10,687.50 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco DOI - Alternative Investment - Prologis European Properties Fund II $2,422.50
Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco DOI - Alternative Investment - Glendon Opportunities Fund II, L.P. - Initial Transaction $28,025.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco DOI - Alternative Investment - TPG Growth IV, LP - Post-Closing Matters $380.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco DOI - Alternative Investment - The Rise Fund - Initial Transaction $475.00
Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment -Alternative Investment - Vista Equity Partners VII, LP (post-closing matters} $190.00
Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - TPG The Rise Fund II (post-closing matters) $11,970.00 Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - Homestead Capital USA Farmland Fund III, L.P. (post- Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco closing matters) $285.00 Division of Investment -Alternative Investment - TPG Partners VI, L.P. -Post Closing Matters (post-closing Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco matters) $665.00 Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - Hellman & Friedman Capital Partners VI - Post Closing Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Matters $127.50
Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - Gleacher Mezzanine Fund - Post Closing Matters $255.00
Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - KPS Special Situations Fund, V, L.P. (initial transaction) $17,907.50 Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - KPS Special Situations Mid-Cap Fund, L.P. (initial Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco transaction) $5,320.00
Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - Vista Foundation Fund IV, L.P. (initial transaction) $8,882.50 Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - Golden Tree Credit Opportunities, LLP (post-closing Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco matters} $8,122.50
Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment -Alternative Investment - CVC Capital Partners VIII (initial transaction) $10,355.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
O`Brien & Ryan, LLP Pollitt-Milcarek, Regina, MIchael Milcarek (w/h) vs. Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center, Inc., et al. $110.00 O`Brien & Ryan, LLP Mills, Dawn, et al. vs. Kennedy Memorial Hospital-Stratford Division, et al $9,450.96 O`Brien & Ryan, LLP Kelly, John J.; Dec'd, et al vs. Lourdes Health System, et al $41,517.76 O`Brien & Ryan, LLP Welch, Kathleen, et al v. Kennedy University Hospital, Inc., et al. $48,941.39 O`Brien & Ryan, LLP Sinnes, Keri, et al vs. Kennedy Health System, et al $122,251.05 Nock, Tyronne; Administrator of the Estate of Adrienne Nock; Dec'd vs. Kennedy Memorial Hospital- O`Brien & Ryan, LLP Washington Twp., et al $54,520.14 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA NJHMFA - Conduit Bond Program - Marveland Crescent Project $234.18 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency - 540 Broad Street Apartments Project $30,160.00 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency -Conduit Bond Program - Wemrock Senior Living LLP, PHILADELPHIA Project $18,167.73 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency - Single Family Housing Revenue Bonds - 2019 $614.46 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program - Sencit Liberty Apartments LLP, PHILADELPHIA Project $29,158.63 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program - Franklin Square Village LLP, PHILADELPHIA Project $28,927.50 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency New Horizons Phase I Omnibus Amendment Review $2,000.00 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Prepayment Opinion and Advice - Keyport Legion LLP, PHILADELPHIA Apartments (#369) $4,000.00 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency New Horizons Phase I Project, Series 2017 A Bonds - LLP, PHILADELPHIA Follow-Up Work $2,000.00 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency -Single Family Housing Revenue Bonds - Fall 2020 LLP, PHILADELPHIA Financing $54,155.81 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Garcia, Agustin vs. Correctional Medical Services, et al $480.00 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Geiger, Edgar C., III; Estate of, et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al $98.00 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Schroll, Rulla v. Southern Ocean Medical Center, et al. $10,224.69 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Brewer, Jeffrey, et al v. Centra State Medical Center, et al $100.00 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch an infant, et al vs. Owobamoshola Shonowo, MD, et al $18,856.53 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Yetman, Walter; Administrator, et al vs. University Medical Center of Princeton at Plainsboro, et al $42,008.24 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Gomez, Hiccson vs. Timothy J. Kennedy, MD, et al $272.68 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Mohamadi, Carmen; Dec'd, et al v. Rutgers, et al. $23,577.52 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Martin, Akintola Hanif vs. University Hospital Newark, et al. $5,806.28 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch San Filippo, Peter; Estate of, et al v. Seth Kipins, MD, et al $7,289.32 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Gomez, Hiccson vs. Timothy J. Kennedy, MD, et al. $6,315.24 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Martin, Akintola Hanif vs. University Hospital Newark, et al. (APPEAL) $7,030.80 Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon, LLC, West Long Branch Geiger, Edgar C., Estate of, et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $15,236.29 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Militano, Concetta; A/K/A Connie Militano, et al. v. DYFS $1,380.60 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Rodrigues-Marques, Jose vs. Courtney M. Morrison, et al. $16,193.00 A.M., a minor by her Guardian Jennifer Morales v. State of New Jersey, Division of Youth and Family Pashman Stein, Hackensack Services, et al. Claim# 09-12778 $39,461.30 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Pessoa, Orlene vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $7,639.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Bryan, Ivor vs. Jametta C. Jackson, et al. $6,464.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Ortiz, Nicolas vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al $26,452.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack D.R. vs. DCF, et al Docket No.: HUD-L-3423-16 $903.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Agostinho, Tatianne vs. Skarirah Miller, et al. $31,208.60 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Ramos, Elena Garcia vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $12,483.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Fortunato, Jenny vs. Luis Ortiz, et al. $26,620.34 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Bartel, Lauren Roxaya vs. Carlos F. Caballero and NJ Transit Corp. $6,184.52 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Texidor, Ray vs. Raul Minos, et al $11,023.90 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Gonzalez, Humberto vs. Donald E. Williamson, Jr., et al. $35,448.20 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Jiang, David vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al $9,616.80 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Maldonado, Rafael vs. Aishah S. Griffin, et al. $10,615.60 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Burlingame, Robert P. vs. Yoely Santos, et al. $14,264.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Oh, Seungmin vs. Angelo O. Huaranga, et al. $36,518.60 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Alvarez, Manuel C. vs. Raymond David Marrow, et al. $21,327.30 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Adamson, Cheryl vs. Seymour M. Rose, et al. $14,017.10 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Anderson, Shaquanah vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $8,240.50 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Kim, Hyunsook, et al v. NJ Transit Corp., et al $7,572.10 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Ballesteros, Celedonia vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $7,051.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Ballesteros, Rogelio vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $7,664.80 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Balchan, Andy B. vs. Alton C. Harper, et al. $11,510.20 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Hernandez, Vanesa vs. Anwarul H. Chowdhury, et al. $4,176.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Sigel, Daniel vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al $1,024.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Londono, Zenaida vs. NJ Transit Corp a/k/a NJ Transit, et al. $4,415.90 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Zenfi Networks LLC v. NJ Transit $12,725.00 PAUL WEISS RIFKIND WHARTON GARRISON, New York George E. Norcross, et al v. Philip D. Murphy, et al $184,275.53
Pearlman & Miranda, LLC, Bloomfield New Jersey Economic Development Authority - Energy Resilience Bank - Ocean County Utilities Authority $5,295.06
Pearlman & Miranda, LLC, Bloomfield New Jersey Economic Development Authority -Energy Resilience Bank - University Hospital $9,341.37 New Jersey Economic Development Authority -Energy Resilience Bank - RWJ Barnabas Health Jersey Pearlman & Miranda, LLC, Bloomfield City Medical Center Project $1,782.00
Pearlman & Miranda, LLC, Bloomfield New Jersey Economic Development Authority-Energy Resilience Bank-Bergen County Utilities Authority $11,527.87 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Post & Schell, PC, Philadelphia Schenk, Patrick, et al v. Lisa Dertr, DO, et al. $925.00 Post & Schell, PC, Philadelphia Tereshko, Rochelle vs. Kennedy University Hospital, Inc., et al. $1,002.50 Post & Schell, PC, Philadelphia Hence, Janice, Dec'd, et al. vs. Louis Balsama, D.O., et al $10,608.00 Potters & Della Pietra LLP, Fairfield Yvette Cruz vs. State of NJ, et al. Docket No.: MRS-L-1733-15 $12,295.00
Potters & Della Pietra LLP, Fairfield Rosiland White vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. Docket No.: ESX-L-5893-17 $77,268.45 Potters & Della Pietra LLP, Fairfield Estate of Frank Lagano v. Bergen County Prosecutor's Office, et al $44,671.48 Quiñones Law, PLLC, New York Economic Development Authority Incentives Task Force $734,990.62 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law $4,265.50 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown FMERA - Marina $15,217.50 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Fitness Center $3,013.50 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown Hicks, Martha v. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections $45,541.20 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Parcel B $45,469.00 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown NJ TRANSIT Corporation - Property Acquisition Counsel Hudson Tunnel Project $270.00 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown NJ Transit Corporation; Property Acquisitions Counsel - County Yard $13,477.50 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown FMERA Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Bowling Center $5,207.00 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown FMERA Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Eatontown DPW $799.50 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown Robert Sorrell v. NJ DOC, et al $42,942.00 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown Shaulic Brown vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-339-18 $119,166.39 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority Special Counsel for Municipal Law - F-1 Parcel $5,494.00 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown Bellwether Behavorial Health Contract $126,863.34 In the Matter of Reallocation of Judiciary Clerk 1, Judiciary Clerk 2, Judiciary Account Clerk 1, Court Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Services Representatives and Judiciary Clerk Driver from the Competitive to the Non competitive Morristown Diviision of the Career Service $34,275.00 Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Shanahan, Kathleen v. NJT, et al. $345,247.47 Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Efthimia N. Christie, ED.D vs. Kean University, et al. Docket No.: UNN-L-739-17 $20,669.24 Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Vanessa Penn vs. Thomas McMahon, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-100-17 $11,413.96 Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Kathleen Angellella vs. State of New Jersey Department of Education, et al. Docket No.: MID-L-2416-17 $5,454.00 Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Edward Thompson v. SONJ, et al $18,036.40 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Harold Damas v. SONJ, et al $33,476.50 Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Anthony Biasi v. NJDOT $11,782.50 Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Linda Kwon v. SoNJ, et al $3,261.09 Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Felix Mickens vs. Shanta Ellis, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1533-19 $2,191.03 Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Captain Sherri Schuster (Badge # 5787) v. SoNJ et al $24,184.00 Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Lavern Sanders vs. Division of Children and Family Services, et al (APPEAL) $1,317.52 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Alfieri, Anthony v. NJT $528.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cabaj, Maria, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al $33,360.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Linton, Susan vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $19,945.67 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rojas, Ely vs. New Jersey Transit $18,565.40
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Murray, Lureene and Nathaniel Brown, her husband vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $1,607.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Tramontano, Danielle, et al v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $5,354.93 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Chehade Pierre vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $13,197.64 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Deshong, Shina vs. New Jersey Transit $19,579.96 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Biggs, Jonathan, et al. vs. Wilson Herrera-Perez, et al. $176.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP D'Angiolillo, Robert vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $11,816.68 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Shtarker, Natalya v. Wilson Herrera-Perez, et al $160.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Saavedra, Marisa and Richard vs. Wilson Herrera-Perez, et al $208.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Miller, Ricky vs. Paul Lagana, et al $330.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP West, Thmas vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $649.40 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Ritchwood, Randy vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations $1,120.00
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Szumski, Amy;G/A/L, or , a minor vs. Abdulla Al-Khan, MD, et al. $95,408.44 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Guererra, Michael vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $6,645.02 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Neglia, Joseph, et al. vs. Mayeyu Logistic, LLC, et al. $232.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Yu, Alex, et al vs. Delka Trucking, Inc., et al $256.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Culkin, Frank vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $6,796.84 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Sisco, Nancy, et al v. Chan W. Park, MD, et al. $5,117.45
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Goldstein, Allen and Irene Goldstein vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $3,781.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Panebianco, Brian vs. Delka Trucking, Inc., et al. $240.00
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Guadalupe, Angel; Estate of, et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $115.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Desai, Samir vs. Wilson Herrera-Perez, et al. $192.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Sapp, Wyatt vs. University Hospital, et al $32,473.62 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Nurge, Kyle vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,744.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Grice, Montia, et al v. University Hospital, et al. $487.30 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rosa, Junior v. Jenny Villamarin, et al. $15,904.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Davis-John, Moire vs. Jamie Ferruzola-Gherard, et al. $35,111.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Anthony, Kiliek Dashawn vs. Timothy W. Baptist, et al. $47,283.34 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Tramontano, Danielle and Lauren Dunham vs. New Jersey Transit Railroad $31,715.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rhoden, Cordell vs. New Jersey Transit Corproation $112.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Duminiak, Karla vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, et al. $9,904.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Oliveira-Silveira, Allan, et al vs. Marco Quijije, et al. $6,745.00
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Banks, Bambie J. and Claude Zongo vs. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc., et al. $43,513.16 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Gormley, Keri H. vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $17,995.22 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Fedor, David R. vs. NJ Transit, et al $23,320.95
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bhalla, Deepti Chanana and Varun Bhalla vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation and Thomas Gallagher $14,624.22 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Guevara-Rodriguez, Franklin vs. James Roberts, et al. $14,072.70 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Gelber, Douglas A., et al. vs. NJ Transit Corporation, et al. $24,067.90 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Lucas, Neil John vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $2,880.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Martinez, Dilenia vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $1,886.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Wong-Stewart, Bridgette vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $11,249.30 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Turner, Ruth vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $10,419.64 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kest, Sheldon vs. New Jersey Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $13,732.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Sylvestro-Hassid, Gloria and Haim Hassid, her spouse vs. NJ Transit, et al. $1,255.75 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Alto, Michelle and Carlos Pagan vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $5,031.99 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Stritto, Paul Dello v. Eric Lackawanna Railroad, et al. $384.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Henricus, Adrianus Rudolfus vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al $27,793.00
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Ward, Karl and Jaclyn Strassberg (a/k/a Jaclyn Ward) v. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al $7,538.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Subramaniam, et al, Bagyalakshmi vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit $10,630.55
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Gillespie, Jason and Christina Gillespie vs. Ronald T. Lewis, New Jersey Transit Corporation $115,084.12
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mulligan, Gregory and Vanessa Mulligan (h/w) vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation $2,192.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Elliott, Devin K., et al v. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $13,502.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Campbell, Demari vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,066.00
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cerrati, Corinne and Richard Myslinski, h/w; Nicole Safran vs. New Jersey Transit $8,350.22 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Crespo, Savannah, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al. $1,905.50 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Alpicano-Guevara, et al v. Marco Quijije, et al. $20,960.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Meister, Peter H., et al v. Verizon New Jersey, Inc., et al. $3,952.00
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Linson, Sean vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation and Port Authority of New York & New Jersey $6,645.72 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Michelle McLean vs. NJ Transit Corporation, et al $5,515.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Raybon, Khalilah, et al v. NJ Transit Corp., et al $27,034.43 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Biba-Nesimi, Resmie vs. New Jersey Transit Corportation, et al. $2,224.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mavrovitis, Evan vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $2,136.00 Cayden Michael Douris, et al vs. Bridgeway Rehabilitation Services, Inc, et al. Docket No.: MRS-L-1876- Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP 17 $14,946.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Simmons, Robert vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $4,813.01 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Daniels-Peters, Robin vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Corporation, Inc. $29,387.39 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rovinsky, Steven vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $1,176.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cordero, Evelyn vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $4,144.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Graber, Staci Ann vs. New Jersey Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $3,227.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Genovese, Gene vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc $4,956.46 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rosario, Elisa vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $10,986.06 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Muscianisis, William vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, LLC $14,688.28 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Stanton, Daniel vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $1,584.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Lopez, Rosario vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $320.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cohen, Susan vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $3,554.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Perkins, Rahman vs. Thomas Galagher, et al. $5,944.90
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kertesz, John and Laverne Maryann Kertesz vs. Consolidated Rail Corporatio, et al $608.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Aparviz, Gholam vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $10,691.90 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rodriguez, Noelia vs. NJ Transit, et al. $39,452.96 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Oriolo, Michael vs. Thomas Gallagher, et al. $1,504.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Morales, Viandy vs. Giusepe Nicotra $20,989.44 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Grud, Smantha M. vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $1,913.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Aguilar, Gerald, et al v. NJ Transit Corp. D/B/A NJ Transit $10,920.15 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bessim, Metin, et al. vs. NJ Transit Corp. D/B/A NJ Transit $8,559.50 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Fan, Hanchang, et al v. NJ Transit Corp. D/B/A NJ Transit $1,559.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Grassi, Thomas, et al v. NJ Transit Corp. D/B/A NJ Transit $1,978.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Scelzo, Michael vs. NJ Transit Corp. D/B/A NJ Transit $1,892.36 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Williams, Emogene v. NJ Transit Corp. D/B/A NJ Transit $3,964.24 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cordero, Carmen vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,637.36 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Fiore, Tania vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,336.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Sabat, Allan vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $15,139.31
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Smith, Paul, et al v. New Jersey Transit Corporation a/k/a NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $8,579.38
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cheong, Amy, et al. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation a/k/a NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $3,313.32 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Loor, Angela and Christian Loor, Per Quod vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $7,202.66 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Minervini, Leonardo, et al vs. New Jersey Transit, et al $224.00
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bowes, Felicia and Shomari Griffiths vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al $9,087.14 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Parham, Denise and Kevin Parham vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al $4,543.08 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Gassama, Malick D., et al v. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $6,233.44 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Posluszny, Richard vs. New Jersey Transit, et al $12,309.60 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Delossantos, Martin vs. NJ Transit, et al. $2,241.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Soto, Antonio vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $480.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bonzeca, Jospeh vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $8,777.54 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Malchow, Fredrick vs. Central Railroad of New Jersey, et al. $9,152.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Insalaco, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $4,541.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Tarabocchia, Judy, et al vs. NJ Transit Corporation, et al. $5,048.28 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Darr, Muhammad W. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $10,403.72 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Langford, Fayebien vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $80.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Washington, Craig, et al vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et a. $18,734.34 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Hidetoshi Ichimura v. NJ Transit, et al. $11,017.08 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Domenico Magliano vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $32,204.60 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rollins, Valerie vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $1,392.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Paraison, Marie vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $1,360.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mitchell, Newbria H. vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al $6,622.90 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Dailey, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al. $1,441.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Holley, Lilian, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al $12,018.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Horace, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al $11,928.04 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Moore, Bruce, et al. vs. Larry Wiley, et al. $23,951.98 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Ding, Feng Eileen, et al vs. NJ Transit, et al $19,663.66 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cruz-Cooke, Erika vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $9,373.12 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Fuchs, Christoph vs. Alex Fortunato, et al $9,762.29 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Vital, et al, Antonio vs. New Jersey Transit Corp, et al $6,036.25 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Williamson, Marquel vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $22,838.23 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Davis, Jean vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $3,192.00
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Guerrero, Babette vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation and/or ABC Corporation, et al. $16,545.19 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Baker, Ralph vs. Paul Fishman, et al. $225.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Peluso, Danielle vs. Thomas Gallagher, et al. $3,312.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Barnes, Tonia vs. Thomas Gallagher, et al. $5,248.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kazanchy, Jr., Thomas vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al. $23,824.05 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Del Toro, Eulises vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $6,448.28 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Hertel, Donald C. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al $23,262.70 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Holloway, Cassandra vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $10,604.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kindler, et al. vs. New Jersey Department of Transportation, et al. $20,962.75 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Ramireaz, Judith vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $3,232.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Hill, Michelle, et al vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $14,694.66 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Osby, Gwendolyn, et al v. Edward Gilliard, et al $6,697.75 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Colon-Jordan, Newrka, et al v. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $1,248.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bessette, James M. vs. New Jersey Transit, et al $13,713.45 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bailey, Keith, et al v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $15,445.99 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Valle, Alexis vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $7,527.95 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Herb, Jovie Mae vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $3,770.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Van Dam, Jennifer, et al v. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $14,474.56 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Nizomov, Vakhobjon, et al v. Michael D. Jones, et al $5,310.10 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bemberry, Terry vs. Darlene Easley-Brown, et al $6,739.65 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP De Almeida, Daniel, et al v. Ravi Munvr, MD, et al $2,115.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mitchell, Newbria H., et al v. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al $6,102.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mazzetti, George vs. Albert A. Scott, et al. $4,706.39 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Sequeria, Marbelly vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations,Inc. $2,325.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Baez, Irving vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $12,531.19 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Smith, Karen vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $9,715.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Ali, Rahim vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,020.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mariano, Maria vs. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey $3,106.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Julio Tavarez v. NJ Transit (APPEAL) $256.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Im, Hyo Suk vs. John W. Graham, et al. $12,268.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Beach, Wayne vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $10,907.84 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Miebach, Kimberly vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation $1,853.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rawlins-Williams, Sonia vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,502.36 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Easley, Darlene T., et al vs. Deen M. Jones, et al. $4,266.15 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Taylor, Robin vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $4,955.50 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kah, Saihou vs. NJ Transit Rail Ops. $1,664.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Willingham, Michael vs. New Jersey Transit $1,194.70 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kavouras, Maria, et al. vs. Darre Carpizo, MD, et al. $15,880.81 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Morgan, Joseph vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al. $1,090.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Dauble, Elizabeth vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $3,632.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Ivory, Debra vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $5,124.96 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Spagnoli, Thomas C. and Elba Spagnoli vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation $1,123.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Wogisch, Gary T., et al vs. Manes P. Saint Georges, et al. $4,268.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Perez, Pedro, Estate of, et al vs. New Jersey Transit, et al $1,376.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Vitale, Nick, et al vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $2,270.97 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Dossantos, Jonathan and Sandra vs. John Langenfeld, et al. $13,368.83 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP John Doe v. SoNJ et al $5,530.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bustamonte, Rasheedah vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,280.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Pastore, Douglas vs. New Jersey Transit $5,909.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP In the Matter of William Shorter, Dept. of Corrections (APPEAL) $3,350.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bilenker, Arthur, et al v. Kessler Institute for Rehabilittaion, et al. $9,983.49 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Pt. Pleasant Beach $24,735.68
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Korzeniowski Trust - Block 1.01; Lot 2 - Point Pleasant Beach $120.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Kane, William - Block 8; Lot 3 - Point Pleasant Beach $3,720.00
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Gurgo, Michael - Block 13.07; Lot 4 - Point Pleasant Beach $1,725.00
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Courtney M. Alesso 2012 Trust - Block 13.07; Lot 5 - Point Pleasant Beach $5,375.54
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Van Kralingen Resident Trust II - Block 17.02; Lot 1.01 - Point Pleasant Beach $1,695.00
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Jeanne Hamilton - Block 17.02; Lot 1.02 - Point Pleasant $11,605.90
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - La Plante, Dennis - Block 17.02; Lot 1.03 - Point Pleasant Beach $9,022.92
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Connie Coppola and John Zaza - Block 17.02; Lot 1.04 - Point Pleasant Beach $7,427.24 Easement Acquisition - The Ippolito Corp - Block 17.02; Lots 2.01, 3 - Point Pleasant Beach (Driftwood Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Motel) $18,566.00 Easement Acquisition - James Kincade and Lynn Vande Stouwe; Block 17.02, Lot 2.02 - Point Pleasant Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Beach $30.00
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Sarnasi, Charles - Block 17.02; Lot 2.04 - Point Pleasant Beach $15,598.50
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Rogers, Robert - Block 17.02; Lot 2.05 - Point Pleasant Beach $15,557.63
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Point Beach House, LLC - Block 17.02; Lot 4 - Point Pleasant Beach $11,508.95
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Rinaolo, Robert - Block 17.02; Lot 5 - Point Pleasant Beach $1,500.00
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Mahasagar Properties - Block 17.02; Lot 6 - Point Pleasant Beach $3,612.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Easement Acquisition - Edward & Mary Jo Nervi, Marianne F. Mongello - Block 17.02; Lot 7 - Point Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Pleasant Beach $2,910.00 Easement Acquisition - 1402 Ocean Partnership Limited Liability Company - Block 17.02; Lot 9.00 - Point Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Pleasant Beach $3,004.75
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Levy, Adam - Block 17.02; Lot 11 - Point Pleasant Beach $4,245.00
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Lee & Carolyn Angioletti - Block 17.02; Lot 12 - Point Pleasant Beach $3,000.00 Easement Acquisition - Bradshaw's Beach Homeowners Assn - Block 17.02; Lots 13, 14 - Point Pleasant Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Beach $510.00
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Todd Lyons - Block 28.02; Lot 1 - Point Pleasant Beach $24,220.00
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Point Pleasant Beach Surf Club - Block 28.02; Lot 2 - Point Pleasant Beach $5,055.00
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Risden's Beach Corp. - Block 46.02; Lots 1, 3 - Point Pleasant Beach $1,755.00
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold EASEMENT- Beach Condo Association - Point Pleasant Beach Codemnation $60.00
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Addeo Gina - Block 179.03; Lot 5.02 - Point Pleasant Beach $135.00
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Girgis, Ihab - Block 179.03; Lot 5.04 - Point Pleasant Beach $1,005.00 Easement Acquisition - Ocean Ventures @ Bay Pt Dunes, Inc. - Block 179.03; Lots 5.06, 5.08 - Point Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Pleasant Beach $45.00
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Brod, Craig - Block 179.03; Lot 5.07 - Point Pleasant Beach $15,285.00
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Labowsky, Andrew - Block 179.03; Lot 5.09 - Point Pleasant Beach $323.68
Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Bayhead Point Homeowners Assn - Block 179.03; Lot 9 - Point Pleasant Beach $33,087.00 Easement Acquisition - Bay Pointe Dune Homeowners Assoc - Block 179.04; Lots 2, 3, 4 - Point Pleasant Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Beach $6,735.00 Easement Acquisition - Carter & Ocean Avenues Sub. Homeowners Assn - Block 179.04; Lot 5 - Point Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Pleasant Beach $9,092.70 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - The Ippolito Right of Way, part B. 179.04, Lot 5 $1,608.95 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Risden's Beach Corp v. DEP $4,295.00 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Plutarco Flores vs. State of New Jersey, et al Docket No.: MRS-811-16 $9,455.33
Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Courtney Jackson vs. New Jersey City University, et al. Docket No.: HUD-L-4563-17 $7,536.50
Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Michelle Provenzano vs. Montclair State University, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-758-17 $5,775.18
Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Curt A. Allison vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation Docket No.: ESX-L-5577-18 $98,883.93 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Investigation $16,822.72 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Investigation $45,906.53 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park investigation #2 $38,337.16 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Captain Sherri Schuster (Badge # 5787) v. SoNJ et al $178,275.31 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Saiber, LLC, Florham Park George Delgrosso v. State of New Jersey, et al $26,373.87
Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Melissa Connett by her power of attorney Bernice Webster v. Kean University, et al $54,469.20 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program - Cooper Plaza Preservation Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP Harrisburg Project $30,193.14 Representation of the New Jersey Department of the Treasury with respect to the Trenton Hotel Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP Harrisburg Foreclosure $5,108.25 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Kamienski, Paul v. Ocean County Prosecutor's Office, et al. $5,092.00 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Estate of Frank Lagano v. State of New Jersey $28,361.00 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Evans, Lee vs. Newark City, et al. $20,137.83 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Newton, Andowah, et al v. Anthony Yang, MD, et al. $33,758.26 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Kent, Ryan vs. St. Peter's University Hospital, et al $22,845.85 an infant by her guardian ad litem, Nicole Williams, et al vs. Karen Koscica, D.O., et Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park al. $53,308.25 an infant, by his guardian ad litem Rachel Prehn and Michael Borga, individually and as Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park his parentws vs. Santiago Caasi, M.D., et al. $23,076.75 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Martin, Akintola Hanif vs. University Hospital Newark, et al. $16,120.04 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Hastaba, Gerard, et al. vs. John Walker, MD, et al. $25,495.00
Representation of the Office of the Governor Retention for Legal Services for Undertaking a Systemic Sills Cummis & Gross P.C., Newark Review of the Hiring and Vetting Practices of the Governor-Elect's Transition Office $2,783.50 Sills Cummis & Gross P.C., Newark Shelley Pritchett v. SoNJ et al (APPEAL) $275,909.90 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Washington DC Pension Project 2017 $183,152.47
Strasser & Associates, P.C., Paramus Motor Vehicle Commission v. Sean T. Hubbard OAL Docket No. : MVH 00682-19 $954.70 Strasser & Associates, P.C., Paramus Motor Vehicle Commission v. Nathan D. Keller $1,005.48
Strasser & Associates, P.C., Paramus Motor Vehicle Commission v. Robert J. Apgar, Jr. OAL Docket No. : MVH 6775-19 $3,636.50 Strasser & Associates, P.C., Paramus Motor Vehicle Commission v. Finley Brown OAL Docket No.: MVH 11739-19 $2,499.45 Strasser & Associates, P.C., Paramus Motor Vehicle Commission v. Alin Francois OAL Docket No.: MVH 15252-19 $1,524.65
Strasser & Associates, P.C., Paramus Motor Vehicle Commission v. Luis A. Martinez OAL Docket No. : MVH 18086-19 $2,160.00 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Quinones, Raniel, et al v. New Jersey Transit Corp. $38,086.88 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Finnemen, Nassir vs. NJ Transit Corporation $5,572.00 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Kidd-Beswick, Deborah vs. New Jersey Transit d/b/a River Line Train, et al. $28,941.07 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Richards-Thomas, Nicola vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation $15,488.01 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Poole, Renee vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $14,143.44 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Pratt, Peggy vs. Ramon Javier, et al. $32,215.71 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Leto, Lea vs. NJ Transit $11,576.85 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Johnston, Purification vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $17,794.83 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Begley, Nellie vs. Deborah E. Lewis, et al. $9,890.00 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Maldonado, Janay L. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation $3,306.00 Volpe and Koenig, PC NJT Intellectual Property $78,069.77 Walden Macht & Haran LLP - New York Economic Development Authority Incentives Task Force $8,785,474.50
Whipple Azzarello, LLC, Morristown - Subpoena from the State of New Jersey Commission of Investigation $15,847.84 Wiley Malehorn Sirota & Raynes, Morristown George Delgrosso v. SoNJ, et al $10,845.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2020
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP - New York Fetahu, Valdona v. New Jersey Transit Corp. $0.00 Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP - New York In the Estate of Margaret Matthews - Medicaid Lien $1,705.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
FIRM Matter Approved Amount ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Swartwood, Jason $1,650.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State v. Jeffrey Juarez-Hernandez $630.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of NJ v. Guevara, Robin $540.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of NJ v. Mata, Betty $510.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield Mahlof, Gerilyn and David v. Jean, Gregory $420.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Guevara, Robin $105.00 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program -OAHS ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Netherwoods Village Project $26,437.20 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Victoria Williams-Faux vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1812-16 $12,449.90 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Felix Mickens v. Shanta Ellis, et al $10,712.32 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD NJT Insurance Coverage Issue in Tangia Price, et al. v. NJT $5,225.00 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Dr. Terry Ramnanan v. Colin Keiffer, et al $4,730.00 New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency -Montgomery Heights II Project - ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Extension of Forward Commitment Maturity Date $3,919.50 Tina Diamond-Ostasz vs. State of New Jersey Department of Education, et al. Docket ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD No.: BUR-L-682-17 $3,735.32 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Gerald Hill White #979242 vs. Sco. R. Sorrell $935.00 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Haynes, John Craig vs. Dr. Ihoma Nwachukwi, et al. $820.00 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Marianito Ruiz v. Correctional Officer Jerry Stretch, et al $680.00 Special Counsel Designation and Retention: NJ Transit Insurance Coverage Issues in ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD the Case of Kathleen Shanahan vs. New Jersey Transit $357.50 Ashurst LLP, New York New Jersey Economic Development Authority -Offshore Wind Port Private Partnership $519,215.32 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Owl Rock Co-Investment Vehicle (post-closing matter) $1,680.00 Division of Investment - Alternative Investment - Owl Rock Capital Newco LLC (post- Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston closing matters) $384.00 Ballard Spahr LLP - Baltimore Chris Ann Jaye v. US Attorney General William Barr, et al $7,044.00 Blumberg & Wolk, LLC, Woodbury Drury, Jeffrey vs. University Correctional Health Care, et al. $6,065.00 Deborah Gross-Quatrone vs. Bonnie Mizdol, et al. Civil Action No.: 2:17-cv-13111-MCA- Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont LDW $37,930.36 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Tara Kumor vs. ACRO Service Corporation, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1331-17 $31,564.02 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Penelope Mauer vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-197-17 $22,883.64 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Review of $22,459.04 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Thomas Capps v. Rowan University et al (APPEAL) $19,627.80 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Arupa Barua v. SoNJ, et al $12,785.72 Diane Scott, Phillip Dowdell and Denise Hollingsworth vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Docket No.: ESX-L-3425-17 $12,731.50 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Pedro (Peter) Mendoza v. SoNJ $11,758.20 Micaela P. Bennett vs. State of New Jersey, Elizabeth Connolly, Dawn Hall Apgar, Lynn Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Kovich, Christina Mongon, Lisa Ciaston and Theresa McQuaide (AAPEAL) $4,858.79 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Manuel Pontes, Ph.D. vs. Rowan University (APPEAL) $2,590.60 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Tina Young vs. State of New Jersey Docket No.: CPM-L-83-17 $1,584.36 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Thomas Abraham v. John Pushko, et al $1,057.00 Lisa R. Easley vs. The New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: BUR-L- Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont 94-13 $497.00 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Michelle Barker vs. The State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1133-16 $367.00 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Manuel Pontes, Ph.D. vs. Rowan University Docket No.: CAM-L-4324-18 $107.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Arupa Barua v. SoNJ et al $12,545.50 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Davis, Jean vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $2,640.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Shanahan, Kathleen v. NJT $792.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT IMO Soloman Amzi-Roland Lightener (Liens filed against the SoNJ and officials in the LAUREL SoNY) $489.00 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT LAUREL Vitale, Nick, et al vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $464.84 Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC, Morristown Anthony Alleyne vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation $8,555.00 Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC, Morristown New Jersey Transit Corporation vs. Todd Charles Barretta $7,264.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Investigation at $232,884.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Legal Services Regarding Stabilization and Recovery of Atlantic City (Pilot/Tax Appeals) $193,798.84 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Investigation of $110,180.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Georgina Sirakides v. Vincent Parenti, et al $90,141.26 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Investigation Re Handling of Sussex County Assault Allegations $72,276.00 New Jersey Economic Development Authority - Refunding of School Facilities Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Construction Refunding Bonds, 2011 Series EE and School Facilities Construction Orange Refunding Bonds, 2011 Series GG $65,058.08 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West A.F. and M.D. vs. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: Orange HNT-L-0359-17 $61,262.50 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Marianne Brown, et al vs. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. Docket Orange No.: MER-L-503-18 $9,230.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West New Jersey Public Broadcasting Authority Advice & Counsel on Digital Rights Orange Management $7,499.36 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange William Anderson, et al v. City of Atlantic City, et al $3,787.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
The Atlantic City Policeman's Benevolent Association Local 24, the Atlantic City Superior Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Officers' Association v. City of Atlantic City, SONJ, New Jersey Division of Local Orange Government Services in the DCA, Robert Long, et als. $2,753.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Edward Scanlon IV v. Valerie Lawson et al $1,120.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Orange Kenneth J. Sirakides, Jr., et al v. Hon. Gurbir S. Grewal, et al $460.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Josh Vadell, et als v. City of Atlantic City, State of New Jersey & Department of Orange Community Affairs $94.00 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Leslie 0. Robertson vs. The State of New Jersey Department of Law & Public Safety Orange Docket No.: BUR-L-1339-16 $40.00 Connell Foley LLP, Roseland Adele Bonar et al v. NJ School Development Authority et al $144,919.25 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Easement Acquisition - Bay Head $20,438.50 Property Acquistion & Condemnation Litigation Related to Rebuild by Design - DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Meadowlands Project $18,540.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Colt, Jeffrey and Betsy Tsai vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $13,072.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Estate of Frank Lagano v. State of New Jersey $9,617.44 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA - Parcels C/C-1 Mixed Use Transaction $8,534.24 Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority Special Counsel for Municipal Law - DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Conunissary/PX Transaction $8,343.46 Property Acquisition and Condemnation Litigation related to Rebuild by Design - Hudson DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Project $5,500.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Howard Commons Residential $3,620.00 Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority Special Counsel for Municipal Law - DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Expo Theater and Optional Properties $3,320.00 Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority Special Counsel for Municipal Law - DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Warehouse/Post Office Transaction $2,610.56 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Alvaran, Miguel vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $1,712.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Davis, Tracy vs. Eric Lopez, et al,. $1,452.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Cody, Darren vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $1,328.00 Moore, Steven vs. NJ Transit Corp. A/K/A and/or D/B/A "NJ Transit" and/or New Jersey DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Transit Bus Operations, Inc." and Mario Rioja $976.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Alba, Paul vs. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, et al. $592.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Reyes, Leopoldo vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $560.00 Edwards, Geneithe I. vs. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc. and Salvatore Vicari, DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Jr. $416.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Huerta, Michael A. vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $352.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Lee, Vong vs. Justen Oriolo, et al $304.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Wallach, Scott vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $304.00 Isabella Basile, et al. vs. Greystone Park Psychiatric Hospital, et al. Docket No.: MRS-L- DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP 768-18 $260.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Carroll, John vs. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al. $226.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Estime, Michael vs. New Jersey Transit $95.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Valisha Desir vs. John F. Russo, Jr. Docket No.: OCN-L-611-19 $60.00 DeCotiis, FitzPatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Burnett, Larry vs. Gary P. Foley, et al. $23.00 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Victor Razumov, an incapacitated person, et al vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $8,114.18 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon RODRIGUEZ, HECTOR VS CORRECTIONS, ET AL. $957.00 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Baker, Scott vs. Joy Camarillo, et al. $770.00 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Cagnina, Anthony vs. Gary Lanigan, et al $390.00 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Skoudris, Karen $23,041.56 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Pinson, Anthony vs. Sharmalie Perera, MD, et al $13,177.38 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Lamar, Valarie vs. Jennifer Petrillo, MD, et al. $7,780.00 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Karayanis, Athena vs. MaryEllen P. Brucato, et al. $3,155.12 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C., Cranford Woszczyk, Magdalena vs. Rutgers; IMO $2,673.86 Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Multi-Family Conduit Bond Program - Pittsburgh Norman Towers Project $16,387.50 Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, FMERA - Advice on Bond and Loan Transactions - Financing of Acquisition from US Pittsburgh Dept of Army $8,482.50 Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Single Family Housing Revenue Bond Pittsburgh Resolution - Hedging of Mortgage Loans $8,094.00 Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh General Obligation New Money Bonds 2018 $7,696.50 Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh NJHMFA - $7,638.00 Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Retention of Counsel for the New Jersey Department of Agriculture for Intellectual Pittsburgh Property Matters $2,298.00 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Neals, Lionel, et al vs. Mark Adams, MD, et al $23,580.43 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Tauriello, Phillip vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $17,487.31 Farkas & Donohue, LLC McKoy, Ken M. vs. John Thomas Capo, et al. $13,221.83 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Elsebai, Ahmad, et al v. State of New Jersey, et al. $12,725.14 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Pimentel, Beronica, et al vs. George Stoupakis, MD, et al. $8,311.32 Farkas & Donohue, LLC , a minor, by his mother Folasade Aremu and Folasade Aremu, individually $6,956.73 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Parra, Maria vs. Steven M. Shulman, MD, et al $5,953.96 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Mejia, Alexandra vs. Rutgers, et al; IMO $4,785.49 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Pickard, Lynn; Executrix of David Pickard; Dec'd vs. Dr. Dale G. Schaar, et al $4,250.00 Farkas & Donohue, LLC , Infant vs. Joseph Barone, MD, et al.; IMO: $3,338.56 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Farina, Charles, et al vs. Howard Waksman, MD, et al $2,530.58 Montroy, Sharin L; A.A.P. of the Vincent Montroy; Estate of vs. David A. August, MD, et Farkas & Donohue, LLC al. $2,392.87 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Martin, Akintola Hanif vs. University Hospital Newark, et al. $2,103.60 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Decker, Nora, Decker, Dara and Decker, Martin $1,185.48 Farkas & Donohue, LLC Sapp, Wyatt vs. Newark Beth Isreal Medical Center, et al $911.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
Farkas & Donohue, LLC Talian, Charles vs. Dr. Gregory Peck, a physician, et al. $239.76 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency CHOICE# 13-08 Leewood Villages Phillipsburg at Rowand Pond - Foreclosure Action against Renaissance Pond 1, LLC $36,176.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Phillipsburg Alford, Alonzo vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (NJT) $8,329.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Phillipsburg Williams, Ricky vs. New Jersey Transit $5,640.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Phillipsburg Garcia, Javier vs. Betty J. Weaver, et al. $5,512.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Phillipsburg Henry, Julius vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $2,400.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Phillipsburg Kemet, Pharoah vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (NJT) $2,304.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Phillipsburg Fox, Neva Rae vs. NJ Transit, et al. $1,761.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Phillipsburg Marchan, Leticia R., et al v. NJ Transit, et al. $1,494.25 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Phillipsburg Ijames, Dwayne vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $960.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Phillipsburg Galley, Cheryl vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $928.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Phillipsburg Jayathunga, et al vs. NJ Transit, et al. $501.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Phillipsburg Santana, Gabriel vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $480.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Phillipsburg Velez, Luis O. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (NJT) $456.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Phillipsburg Jourdain, Marlande vs. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, et al. $233.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Phillipsburg Marchan, Candy vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $208.00 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Cappelli LLC, Phillipsburg Bell, Jr., Henry vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $144.00 Garrity and Knisely, Boston Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority $6,150.00 Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C., Clinton Pitt, Floyd R. vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al $1,632.00 Genova Burns LLC, Newark International Association of Fire Fighters, et al v. City of Atlantic City, New Jersey, et al $14,437.00 Representation of NJ Transit for General Railroad Labor Matters With the Brotherhood of Genova Burns LLC, Newark Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen $7,890.00 Genova Burns LLC, Newark Representation of NJ Transit - Compliance Matter - Equal Pay Act Legal Advice $7,805.00 Genova Burns LLC, Newark IAFF, AFLO-CIO Local 198 v. City of Atlantic City, et al $7,087.50 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
State of New Jersey & PBA Local 105 (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Genova Burns LLC, Newark Agreement 2019-2023) $4,605.00 Genova Burns LLC, Newark CWA (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $3,460.00 Genova Burns LLC, Newark Angelo DeMaio, et al v. Atlantic City, State of NJ, Department of Community Affairs $1,884.50 Christopher Carlini vs. New Jersey State Parole Board1 et al. Docket No.: BUR-L-2616- Genova Burns LLC, Newark 18 $1,400.00 John F. Russo, Jr. vs. State of New Jersey Administrative Office of the Courts Civil Genova Burns LLC, Newark Action No.: 3:17-cv-02762-FLW-TJB $860.00 Rowan University and Teamsters Local Union 97 (Collective Negotiations for a Genova Burns LLC, Newark Successor Agreement) $350.00 Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine AAUP (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Genova Burns LLC, Newark Agreement) $50.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit Corporation; Positive Train Control $128,900.50 Division of Investment - Alternative Investment -DivcoWest Fund VI, LP (initial Gibbons P.C., Newark transaction) $35,810.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit Corporation; NJ TransitGrid $24,956.00 DOI - Alternative Investment - Stonepeak Infrastructure Fund III, LP - Post-Closing Gibbons P.C., Newark Matters $10,860.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark DOI - Stonepeak Renewable Fund LP (Initial Transaction) $8,132.50 State Troopers Fraternal Association (STFA) - Collective Negotiations for a Successor Gibbons P.C., Newark Agreement for 2019-2023 $7,297.33 Gibbons P.C., Newark Community Care Providers Unions (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $5,780.00 State Troopers Superior Officers Association (STSOA) - Collective Negotiations for a Gibbons P.C., Newark Successor Agreement $4,674.89 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit - Operational Advice $4,012.50 Representation of NJ Transit Property Acquisition - Remaining Floors of One Penn Plaza Gibbons P.C., Newark East $3,994.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - Blackstone Energy Partners (post-closing matters) $450.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Council of State Colleges & Universities, AFT Adjunct Unit $0.00 Gordon & Rees LLP - Oakland Claims Against HESAA: Debt Collection Practices $2,400.00 Gray Miller Persh LLC, Washington NJPBA - FCC Matters, State Treasurer and the NJPBA $3,239.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Blueprint Capital Advisors LLC v. State of NJ, Dept of Treasury, DOI $58,500.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Jermaine Curry and Tori Curry vs. New Jersey State Prison, et al. Docket No.: MON-L- Woodbridge 937-18 $43,568.40 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Karen Vitulli vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1419-18 $32,384.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Hastaba, Gerard, et al. vs. John Walker, MD, et al. $18,042.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Torres, Stephanie, Parent & Legal Guardian of v. State of New Jersey; Woodbridge Department of Children & Families, et al. $14,203.75 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Niema Jones v. DCF $13,302.50 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Stephanie Carter-Green vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: CUM-L-580-15 $11,923.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Juanita Taylor v. DCPP et al $9,489.50 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Jake Stouch and Kristine Bodnar v. DCPP et al $6,870.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Yvette Gibbons vs. The New Jersey Department of Law & Public Safety, et al. Docket Woodbridge No.: UNN-L-2766-14 $5,025.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Shanta Ellis v. JJC et al $4,055.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Kenneth Little vs. Gary M. Lanigan, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-2859-11 $2,360.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Matthew Mongioi v. Stockton University $2,250.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge K.L., an Infant, et al v. University Hospital. et al $1,335.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, NJEDA Technology Centre of New Jersey PILOT Agreement Amendment and possible Woodbridge Tax Appeal $800.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Leslie Robertson v. JJC et al $285.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Melanie Wilson vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Civil Action No.: 1:16-cv-07915 (RBK-JS) $280.00 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, Woodbridge Meg Yatauro vs. Kevin Bolden, et al. Docket No.: CAM-L-1901-14 $160.00 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark Charles Ken Zisa v. John Haviland, et al $14,551.00 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark Paul Dzialo v. PFRS $7,560.00 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Representation of NJHMFA with respect to Newark $6,275.00 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark David Martinez v. PFRS $2,939.00 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark Economic Development Authority - State Tax Incentive Programs $1,085.00 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark Curtis Prilo v. PFRS $307.50 Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark Jason Ulrich v. PFRS $105.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
Hardin, Kundla, McKeon & Poletto, Springfield (T) Perkins, Alazaya; A.A.P. of Aiyon Bell, et al vs. Dmali Campbell, MD, et al. $6,930.00 Hardin, Kundla, McKeon & Poletto, Springfield (T) Martin, Akintola Hanif vs. University Hospital Newark, et al. $4,200.00 Hardin, Kundla, McKeon & Poletto, Springfield (T) Pingatore, John, et al. v. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $1,705.00 Hardin, Kundla, McKeon & Poletto, Springfield (T) Medina, Angel vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $280.00 Hardin, Kundla, McKeon & Poletto, Springfield (T) Kolias, Goergia, Executrix, et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al $20.00 Representation of NJ Transit in the Acquisition of Property For the Proposed Northern HILL WALLACK, Princeton Bus Facility (Ridgefield Park) and Related Legal Services, $34,898.27 HILL WALLACK, Princeton NJT - Hoboken Terminal Redevelopment $1,060.00 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Aberdeen-Matawan Station Transit Oriented Development Project $400.00 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Richard Carolan; Block 20.68; Lot 1 - Long Beach Township $60.00 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Thomas Kline, Block 20.37, Lot 1.05 - Long Beach Township $20.00 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Shanin Spector; Block 20.89; Lot 5 - Long Beach Township $20.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Johnson, Jerome C. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (NJT) $15,029.92 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Byers, Raymond vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $9,184.08 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Rawls, Patricia vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $7,613.63 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Press, Christopher vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $6,556.96 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Hartzell, Lois & Joseph vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Ops. $6,220.36 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Dollson, Angelice vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $4,818.32 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Velazquez, Benjamin vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $4,776.69 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Thomas Dougan vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $4,548.82 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Fernandes, Narciso vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $4,344.86 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Carfi, The Estate of Raffaele, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al. $3,897.14 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Raghunandan, Omash vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,600.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Neuder, Cynthia I. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $3,499.88 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Traversa, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,322.87 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Bentivenga, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,123.84 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Jimenez, Enrique vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,028.88 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Alverio, Melanie, et al v. New Jersey Transit Corproation, et al. $2,976.80 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Flakker, James vs. New Jersey Rail Operations, Inc. $2,974.01 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Ali, Rahim vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,705.70 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Holmes, Sandra vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,699.80 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Clark, Calvin vs. NJ Transit Rail $2,611.80 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Herrick, Robert vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,422.92 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Kenney, Brian vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (NJT) $2,271.12 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Gianna, Jr., Salvatore vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, inc. $2,011.76 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Representation of New Jersey Transit - Melendez vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,000.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Chudzik, William v. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,853.12 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Cavanagh, Thomas vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,825.04 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Albanese, Vincent John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,740.72 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Belden, Richard vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (NJT) $1,572.82 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Mari, Mark vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,440.32 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Byers, Raymond, et al. vs. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) $1,306.72 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Lambert, Joseph vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,302.72 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Nanney, Sandra, et al v. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,298.08 Lopez, Epifanio vs. New Jersey Transit-Walter Rand Transportation Center and/or ABC Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Corporation, et al. $1,274.32 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Melendez, Eric vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,169.28 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Dixon, Kyle vs. Patricia Lynch vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $929.28 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Elshabazz, Abdul vs. Betty Harris-Wilson, et al. $928.24 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Ronca, William vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations Inc. (NJT) $835.04 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Ferguson-Butler, Renee B., et al vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $770.80 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Bonelli, Santo vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al. $727.36 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Gabriel, Anthony vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations $634.48 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Yurick, Robert vs. New Jersey Transit Rail $512.48 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Powers, Kevin vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $400.80 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Representation of New Jersey Transit - Jodi Asay vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, et al. $336.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Buttigieg, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $323.92 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Tartaro, Jane vs. Township of Middleton, et al. $272.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Stilletti, Michael vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $256.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Mitchell, Rachele vs. John Doe and New Jersey Transit $240.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Wheaton, William P. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $128.40 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Estrada, Amy L. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $48.00 Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis Special Counsel Designation - State Retirement Plans and State Health Benefit Plans $6,537.60 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City NJ Transit Corp - Property Acquisitions Counsel Raritan Bridge Project $23,757.50 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Thomas Tullo - Block 37, Lot 8 - Brick Township $14,915.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City NJ TRANSIT CORPORATION - Property Acquisitions Counsel - Hudson Tunnel Project $7,420.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Kevin Klingert - Block 50.02; Lot 18 - Brick Township $5,802.00 Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell - Denver NJ Transit Corporation - Gateway Program Financing $59,636.50 NJ Transit Corp; County Yard/Delco Lead/Megal Lead Acquisitions, Surface Transportation Board and Federal Railroad Proceedings and Property Interest Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell - Denver Acquisitions $20,867.00 Representation of NJ Transit: The Assignment of Operating Rights on the Beesleys Point Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell - Denver Secondary Track- STB Issues $2,425.50 Representation of NJ Transit to review freight operating trackage rights agreement between NJ Transit and Conrail for the Freehold & Southern secondary tracks in Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell - Denver Monmouth & Ocean Counties $885.50 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP, Woodbury Allegations of Discrimination in Employment Practices of NJ State Police $279,190.10 Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP, Woodbury Pia Wilson Vs. NJ Transit, et. al $50,935.70 Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP, Woodbury Jose Rivera vs. NJ Transit & James Schworn $16,241.00 Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP, Woodbury Cynthia Huggins vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-1317-19 $15,448.76 Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP, Woodbury Ronnie Brumant v. NJ Transit $8,695.00 Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP, Woodbury Marianna Tropeano vs. NJ Transit Police Department, et al. Docket No.: MID-L-1734-17 $8,061.00 Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, Edison MVC v. Jerry Lucante $675.00 Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, Edison Motor Vehicle Commission v. Robert Moser OAL Docket No.: MVH 8383-19 $390.00 Kent & McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry Hill State of New Jersey v. Bueno, Damalia $1,440.00 Kent & McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry Hill State of NJ v. Batten, Zane $495.00 Kent & McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry Hill State of New Jersey v. Epstein, Beth $480.00 Krompier & Tamn, L.L.C., Parsippany Kelaher, Margaret, by her POA, et al. vs. Sadia M. Chaudhary, MD, et al. $9,738.75 Law Office of Brian J. Levine John Doe vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MID-L-915-16 $340.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Kevin Ball vs. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Docket No.: HUD-L- Lambertville 4880-17 $40,614.11 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Sean Tonner vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections and Jerome Scott Docket No.: Lambertville MID-L-7507-17 $25,906.60 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Gerald T. Boswell vs. Office of the Public Defender, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1066-03 $18,834.75 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Georgina Sirakides v. Vincent Parenti et al and Kenneth Franco v. NJ State Police et al $11,672.45 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Joseph Torres vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1859-16 $6,500.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Ratarsha Willis v. Carl Walker. et al. - APPEAL $4,380.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Kevin T. Flood v. Public Defender Joseph Krakora, et al $4,037.50 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Jake Stouch and Kristine Bodnar v. DCPP, et al $3,082.35 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Ian M. Schweizer vs. New Jersey State Police Colonel Patrick J. Callahan, et al. Docket Lambertville No.: SSX-L-28-19 $2,600.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Dana S. Register v. NJ DOC $2,320.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville David Rullo v. PFRS $2,240.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Louis Pierce v. Gary Lanigan, et al $1,840.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Jeremy Dusenbery v. PFRS $1,520.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Frank Hubbard v. Gary Lanigan, et al $1,240.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Deneen A. Matani v. PFRS $960.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Alexandra M. Bittle vs. Ancora Psychiatric Hospital, Harry Beam Docket No.: BUR-L- $740.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Wahab, Atiya v. State of New Jersey, et al. $620.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Albert Anderson v. PFRS $600.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Melissa Urban vs. Office of Attorney Ethics of the Supreme Court of New Jersey, et al. Lambertville Docket No.: MER-L-381-18 $320.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Lambertville Noemi Rodriguez v. PFRS $320.00 New Jersey Economic Development Authority -Venture Fund - Activate Venture II Annex Locke Lord LLP (EAPD), Boston Fund L.P. $5,880.00 Love and Long, L.L.P., Newark New Jersey Economic Development Authority -Offshore Wind Port Private Partnership $165,444.00 Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Roseland CARES Act $300,000.00 Retention for Legal Services for Administrator of the Department of Law & Public Safety Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Roseland Regarding the Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women $126,458.00 Lum, Drasco & Positan, LLC, Roseland George Delgrosso vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MRS-L-1401-19 $22,490.81 Lum, Drasco & Positan, LLC, Roseland Nathan J. Johnson vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L $18,058.50 Lum, Drasco & Positan, LLC, Roseland RITA OGHOGHOME V. SoNJ, ET AL $10,513.14 Lum, Drasco & Positan, LLC, Roseland Nathan J. Johnson vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-416-14 $1,600.00 NJT - Acquisition of Portions of Properties Known as One and Two Penn Plaza East, Lum, Drasco & Positan, LLC, Roseland Newark, NJ (NJT Headquarters), and Matters Related Thereto $703.52 Lynch & Lynch, Garden City Lee, Vong vs. Justen Oriolo, et al $6,392.00 NJHMFA - Prepayment Opinion & Advice - Clara Barton ASL (#1138A) and Clara Barton M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange Manor (#1138B) $7,290.00 NJHMFA - Captial Program Fund Revenue Bonds - Redemption of 2004 and/or 2007 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange Series Bond $2,565.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Bogar, Joseph E. vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $68,922.50 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Sleiman, Helena; Executrix of the Estate of Antoine Sleiman; Dec'd vs. Michael Knolls Piscopiello, MD, et al. $24,995.25 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Neals, Lionel, et al vs. Mark Adams, MD, et al. $20,575.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Lloyd-Jones, Tomas vs. Latimore-Collier, MD, et al. $20,007.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Gwinner, Taryn, et al v. Hackensack Meridian Health a/k/a Hackensack University Knolls Medical Center, et al. $18,288.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Naedele, Cheryl, et al. vs. Mark J. Zucker, MD, et al. $17,194.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Figueroa, Orlando vs. Antonios Mammis, MD, et al. $12,125.45 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Polynice, Edwin vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al $10,858.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Finnerty, Elizabth P. vs. University Hospital, et al. $9,876.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Mejia, Alexandra vs. Rutgers, et al; IMO $7,843.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Semmon, Ebony; A.A.P., et al vs. University Correctional Health Care, et al. $7,595.50 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Saginor, Hailey vs. Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences $6,857.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Newton, Andowah, et al v. Anthony Yang, MD, et al. $6,660.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Martin, Akintola Hanif vs. University Hospital Newark, et al. (APPEAL) $4,930.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Lombardi, Christopher; Dec'd vs. Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences, et al $3,946.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Koch, Kassandra vs. Shabbar Danish, et al $3,137.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Martin, Akintola Hanif vs. University Hospital Newark, et al. $775.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Ruiz-Soto, Maria (Yashira), et al vs. Rutgers University, et al. $600.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Knolls Gibbs, Jamal vs. University Correctionl Healthcare, et al. $180.00 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter Arbitrations between NJ Transit Bus Operations and Amalgamated Transportation Union - LLP, Morristown NJ A-Pillar Cases With Various Locals and PERC Matter $23,865.32 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Clarification of Unit Petitions - Group Y $2,060.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Amalagamated Transit Union and NJ Transit Bus Operations Inc. - ATU Local 819 $840.00 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter Negotiations between the New Jersey Transit Police Department and the Fraternal Order LLP, Morristown NJ of Police, Local 37 related to the collective bargaining agreement $280.00 McGivney, Kluger, Clark & Intoccia, P.C., Florham City Belfand, Seman vs. Raymond Petosa and New Jersey Transit Corporation, C-83585-444 $9,680.00 McGivney, Kluger, Clark & Intoccia, P.C., Florham City Morgan, Anthony vs. N.J. Transit Corporation, et al. $1,388.00 McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, L.L.C., Roseland Investigation at the $1,907.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Hart, Dylan, et al. vs. RWJ University Children's Hospital, et al. $6,120.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Keating, Gwendolyn vs. Don Yoon Cha, MD, et al; imo $4,500.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Jackson, Vince vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al $2,180.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Johnson, Corey vs. Andrew Kaufman, Atlantic Health System, University Hospital $1,931.60 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Dondero, Kristen, et al vs. Yaakov Abdelhak, MD, et al. $900.00 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey , an infant by his Parents and NaturalGuardians, Nina Swain and Warner Coleman & Goggin Derrick Sansbury vs. Anthony P. Salerno, MD, et al $10,153.85 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Johnson, Shyemah vs. University Hospital; IMO: $9,540.54 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Sinnes, Keri, et al vs. Kennedy Health System, et al $9,379.72 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Enoch, Kathleen, et al v. MIchael G. Nosko, MD, et al $8,021.34 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Hirschhorn, Steven; Estate of, et al v. Rutgers University Hospital, et al. $5,845.00 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Maronski, Walter, et al v. Kennedy Health System, Inc., et al $5,417.40 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Semmon, Ebony; A.A.P., et al vs. University Correctional Health Care, et al. $3,983.75 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Lubeski, Matthew, et al vs. St. Peter's University Hospital, et al. $3,463.30 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Rose Richadson v. SoNJ et al (APPEAL) $1,500.00 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Ferguson, Rashaun vs. Peter Nogan, et al $500.00 Special Counsel Designation - State of New Jersey, Department of Treasury, Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Appointment as Disclosure Counsel $32,005.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Review of Investor Relations Website $1,045.00 Nock, Tyronne; Administrator of the Estate of Adrienne Nock; Dec'd vs. Kennedy O`Brien & Ryan, LLP Memorial Hospital-Washington Twp., et al $18,325.59 O`Brien & Ryan, LLP Sinnes, Keri, et al vs. Kennedy Health System, et al $17,020.93
ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
Pashman Stein, Hackensack Rodrigues-Marques, Jose vs. Courtney M. Morrison, et al. $160.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Ramos, Elena Garcia vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $160.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Gonzalez, Humberto vs. Donald E. Williamson, Jr., et al. $112.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Londono, Zenaida vs. NJ Transit Corp a/k/a NJ Transit, et al. $80.00 New Jersey Economic Development Authority-Energy Resilience Bank-RWJ Barnabas Pearlman & Miranda, LLC, Bloomfield Health Newark $10,981.40 Lee, Sun; Testator of the Estate of Yok Mee Leung; Dec'd vs. Palace Rehabilitation & Post & Schell, PC, Philadelphia Care Center, LLC, et al. $10,700.00 Post & Schell, PC, Philadelphia Hence, Janice, Dec'd, et al. vs. Louis Balsama, D.O., et al $7,817.00 Potters & Della Pietra LLP, Fairfield Rosiland White vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. Docket No.: ESX-L-5893-17 $17,935.00 Potters & Della Pietra LLP, Fairfield Yvette Cruz vs. State of NJ, et al. Docket No.: MRS-L-1733-15 $80.00 Quiñones Law, PLLC, New York Economic Development Authority Incentives Task Force $5,381.39 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown NJ Transit Corporation; Property Acquisitions Counsel - County Yard $13,105.00 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown FMERA Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Bowling Center $7,986.00 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown Ernest Perez v. August J. Licameli, et al $7,365.00 In the Matter of Reallocation of Judiciary Clerk 1, Judiciary Clerk 2, Judiciary Account Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti Clerk 1, Court Services Representatives and Judiciary Clerk Driver from the Competitive LLP, Morristown to the Non competitive Diviision of the Career Service $3,930.00 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Pinebrook Road Commerce Center $3,792.50 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown Hicks, Martha v. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections $2,665.00 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown Robert Sorrell v. NJ DOC, et al $1,090.00 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown FMERA - Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Fitness Center $840.50 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority Special Counsel for Municipal Law - F- LLP, Morristown 1 Parcel $123.00 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown Shaulic Brown vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-339-18 $50.00 Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Anthony Biasi v. NJDOT $17,135.95 Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Shanahan, Kathleen v. NJT, et al. $14,425.00 Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Edward Thompson v. SONJ, et al $12,715.00 Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Lavern Sanders vs. Division of Children and Family Services, et al (APPEAL) $6,040.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Linda Kwon v. SoNJ, et al $3,649.00 Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Felix Mickens vs. Shanta Ellis, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1533-19 $2,294.00 Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Captain Sherri Schuster (Badge # 5787) v. SoNJ et al $2,063.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP John Doe v. SoNJ et al $18,020.00 Cayden Michael Douris, et al vs. Bridgeway Rehabilitation Services, Inc, et al. Docket Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP No.: MRS-L-1876-17 $16,271.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Anthony, Kiliek Dashawn vs. Timothy W. Baptist, et al. $15,074.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Morales, Viandy vs. Giusepe Nicotra $11,231.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Domenico Magliano vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $10,203.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Dossantos, Jonathan and Sandra vs. John Langenfeld, et al. $8,998.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Beach, Wayne vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $8,520.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kavouras, Maria, et al. vs. Darre Carpizo, MD, et al. $8,219.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Linton, Susan vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $7,987.50 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Chehade Pierre vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $7,487.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Guerrero, Babette vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation and/or ABC Corporation, et al. $7,310.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bailey, Keith, et al v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $6,803.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Malchow, Fredrick vs. Central Railroad of New Jersey, et al. $6,287.55 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kah, Saihou vs. NJ Transit Rail Ops. $6,035.15 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Hill, Michelle, et al vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $5,584.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Banks, Bambie J. and Claude Zongo vs. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc., et al. $5,549.37 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Gelber, Douglas A., et al. vs. NJ Transit Corporation, et al. $5,451.80 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rojas, Ely vs. New Jersey Transit $5,328.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Easley, Darlene T., et al vs. Deen M. Jones, et al. $5,274.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Jimenez, Lillian, et al vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al $5,032.00 Smith, Paul, et al v. New Jersey Transit Corporation a/k/a NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Transit, et al. $4,896.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Subramaniam, et al, Bagyalakshmi vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit $4,768.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kazanchy, Jr., Thomas vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al. $4,700.78 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Willingham, Michael vs. New Jersey Transit $4,458.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Tramontano, Danielle, et al v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $4,361.50 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Baez, Irving vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,965.50 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rosario, Elisa vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $3,632.89 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Genovese, Gene vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc $3,618.70 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Van Dam, Jennifer, et al v. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $3,480.02 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kindler, et al. vs. New Jersey Department of Transportation, et al. $3,478.91 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Insalaco, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,403.35 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Nurge, Kyle vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,390.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Horace, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al $3,377.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rawlins-Williams, Sonia vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,207.75 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Gormley, Keri H. vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $3,177.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kest, Sheldon vs. New Jersey Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $3,176.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cook, Deborah M. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,097.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Guererra, Michael vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,044.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Henricus, Adrianus Rudolfus vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al $2,928.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Zong, Xue Fang: Pre-Litigation $2,928.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Campbell, Demari vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,922.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bowes, Felicia and Shomari Griffiths vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al $2,918.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Morgan, Joseph vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al. $2,832.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rosa, Junior v. Jenny Villamarin, et al. $2,809.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP D'Angiolillo, Robert vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,752.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Goldstein, Allen and Irene Goldstein vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $2,737.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Fiore, Tania vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,708.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mitchell, Newbria H., et al v. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al $2,700.23 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Fuchs, Christoph vs. Alex Fortunato, et al $2,652.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Taylor, Robin vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $2,515.40 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Raybon, Khalilah, et al v. NJ Transit Corp., et al $2,496.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Daniels-Peters, Robin vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Corporation, Inc. $2,464.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Wogisch, Gary T., et al vs. Manes P. Saint Georges, et al. $2,464.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Pastore, Douglas vs. New Jersey Transit $2,452.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Grud, Smantha M. vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $2,384.00 Ward, Karl and Jaclyn Strassberg (a/k/a Jaclyn Ward) v. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Transit, et al $2,304.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Vital, et al, Antonio vs. New Jersey Transit Corp, et al $2,261.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Aguilar, Gerald, et al v. NJ Transit Corp. D/B/A NJ Transit $2,246.25 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Posluszny, Richard vs. New Jersey Transit, et al $2,208.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Hidetoshi Ichimura v. NJ Transit, et al. $2,195.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cohen, Susan vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $2,192.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Spagnoli, Thomas C. and Elba Spagnoli vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation $2,186.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bonzeca, Jospeh vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,161.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Sabat, Allan vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,144.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Guevara-Rodriguez, Franklin vs. James Roberts, et al. $2,038.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Perez, Pedro, Estate of, et al vs. New Jersey Transit, et al $2,032.00 Bhalla, Deepti Chanana and Varun Bhalla vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation and Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Thomas Gallagher $1,973.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Scelzo, Michael vs. NJ Transit Corp. D/B/A NJ Transit $1,936.10 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Duffy, Lisa vs. Emre Kayaalp, et al $1,845.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Gassama, Malick D., et al v. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $1,840.45 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Biba-Nesimi, Resmie vs. New Jersey Transit Corportation, et al. $1,676.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Darr, Muhammad W. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $1,658.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Tramontano, Danielle and Lauren Dunham vs. New Jersey Transit Railroad $1,640.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Peluso, Danielle vs. Thomas Gallagher, et al. $1,488.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Alto, Michelle and Carlos Pagan vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $1,486.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mulligan, Gregory and Vanessa Mulligan (h/w) vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation $1,472.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Dauble, Elizabeth vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $1,440.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Perkins, Rahman vs. Thomas Galagher, et al. $1,365.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Fan, Hanchang, et al v. NJ Transit Corp. D/B/A NJ Transit $1,284.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Ivory, Debra vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $1,264.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mitchell, Newbria H. vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al $1,248.23 Cheong, Amy, et al. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation a/k/a NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Transit, et al. $1,221.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Vitale, Nick, et al vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $1,216.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bustamonte, Rasheedah vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,136.70 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Deshong, Shina vs. New Jersey Transit $1,136.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Ding, Feng Eileen, et al vs. NJ Transit, et al $1,119.87 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Williamson, Marquel vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $1,104.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Del Toro, Eulises vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,088.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mazzetti, George vs. Albert A. Scott, et al. $1,082.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Colon-Jordan, Newrka, et al v. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $992.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Valle, Alexis vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $992.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bilenker, Arthur, et al v. Kessler Institute for Rehabilittaion, et al. $940.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Holloway, Cassandra vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $898.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bemberry, Terry vs. Darlene Easley-Brown, et al $896.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cordero, Evelyn vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $848.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Simmons, Robert vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $816.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Hertel, Donald C. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al $800.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Turner, Ruth vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $785.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rodriguez, Noelia vs. NJ Transit, et al. $784.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Smith, Karen vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $772.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Soto, Antonio vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $759.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Oriolo, Michael vs. Thomas Gallagher, et al. $752.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Herb, Jovie Mae vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $685.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Moore, Bruce, et al. vs. Larry Wiley, et al. $677.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Im, Hyo Suk vs. John W. Graham, et al. $640.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Wong-Stewart, Bridgette vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $535.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Culkin, Frank vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $520.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Martinez, Dilenia vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $517.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Graber, Staci Ann vs. New Jersey Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $496.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mavrovitis, Evan vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $464.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Holley, Lilian, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al $464.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Osby, Gwendolyn, et al v. Edward Gilliard, et al $448.00 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Stanton, Daniel vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $428.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Crespo, Savannah, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al. $395.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Aparviz, Gholam vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $351.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cruz-Cooke, Erika vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $336.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Delossantos, Martin vs. NJ Transit, et al. $324.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Paraison, Marie vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $320.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Meister, Peter H., et al v. Verizon New Jersey, Inc., et al. $288.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Loor, Angela and Christian Loor, Per Quod vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $288.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Barnes, Tonia vs. Thomas Gallagher, et al. $256.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cordero, Carmen vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $208.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kertesz, John and Laverne Maryann Kertesz vs. Consolidated Rail Corporatio, et al $112.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Ramireaz, Judith vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $48.00 Easement Acquisition - Bay Pointe Dune Homeowners Assoc - Block 179.04; Lots 2, 3, 4 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold - Point Pleasant Beach $2,175.00 Easement Acquisition - Risden's Beach Corp. - Block 46.02; Lots 1, 3 - Point Pleasant Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Beach $1,425.00 Easement Acquisition - Bayhead Point Homeowners Assn - Block 179.03; Lot 9 - Point Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Pleasant Beach $825.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Pt. Pleasant Beach $735.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Rinaolo, Robert - Block 17.02; Lot 5 - Point Pleasant Beach $270.00 Easement Acquisition - Point Beach House, LLC - Block 17.02; Lot 4 - Point Pleasant Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Beach $225.00 Easement Acquisition - Bradshaw's Beach Homeowners Assn - Block 17.02; Lots 13, 14 - Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Point Pleasant Beach $225.00 Easement Acquisition - Lee & Carolyn Angioletti - Block 17.02; Lot 12 - Point Pleasant Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Beach $165.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - The Ippolito Right of Way, part B. 179.04, Lot 5 $150.00 Easement Acquisition - Carter & Ocean Avenues Sub. Homeowners Assn - Block Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold 179.04; Lot 5 - Point Pleasant Beach $135.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - La Plante, Dennis - Block 17.02; Lot 1.03 - Point Pleasant Beach $120.00 Easement Acquisition - The Ippolito Corp - Block 17.02; Lots 2.01, 3 - Point Pleasant Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Beach (Driftwood Motel) $120.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Todd Lyons - Block 28.02; Lot 1 - Point Pleasant Beach $60.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Rogers, Robert - Block 17.02; Lot 2.05 - Point Pleasant Beach $45.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Korzeniowski Trust - Block 1.01; Lot 2 - Point Pleasant Beach $30.00 Easement Acquisition - 1402 Ocean Partnership Limited Liability Company - Block 17.02; Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Lot 9.00 - Point Pleasant Beach $30.00 Easement Acquisition - Point Pleasant Beach Surf Club - Block 28.02; Lot 2 - Point Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Pleasant Beach $30.00 Rutter & Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Levy, Adam - Block 17.02; Lot 11 - Point Pleasant Beach $15.00 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Curt A. Allison vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation Docket No.: ESX-L-5577-18 $27,763.95 ALL MATTERS WITH APPROVED INVOICES IN 2021 THRU MARCH 31
Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Melissa Connett by her power of attorney Bernice Webster v. Kean University, et al $11,317.80 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park investigation #2 $1,406.04 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Captain Sherri Schuster (Badge # 5787) v. SoNJ et al $1,007.75 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Investigation $1,002.61 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Courtney Jackson vs. New Jersey City University, et al. Docket No.: HUD-L-4563-17 $225.00 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Investigation $155.44 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park George Delgrosso v. State of New Jersey, et al $120.00 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Hastaba, Gerard, et al. vs. John Walker, MD, et al. $22,594.37 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Evans, Lee vs. Newark City, et al. $15,874.60 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Newton, Andowah, et al v. Anthony Yang, MD, et al. $15,731.00 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham , an infant by her guardian ad litem, Nicole Williams, et al vs. Karen Park Koscica, D.O., et al. $11,650.96 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Estate of Frank Lagano v. State of New Jersey $5,850.00 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham , an infant, by his guardian ad litem Rachel Prehn and Michael Borga, Park individually and as his parentws vs. Santiago Caasi, M.D., et al. $1,677.00 Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, Florham Park Martin, Akintola Hanif vs. University Hospital Newark, et al. $1,280.08 Sills Cummis & Gross P.C., Newark Shelley Pritchett v. SoNJ et al (APPEAL) $7,805.40 Clements, Lara, et al vs. Cherry Hill Operating, LLC D/B/A St. Mary's Center for Stahl & DeLaurentis, P.C., Runnemede Rehabilitation & Healthcare, et al $1,020.00 Stahl & DeLaurentis, P.C., Runnemede Mullins, James M. Jr.,; Estate of, by Enza Gattinelli; A.A.P. vs. Naveen Malik, DO, et al $445.00 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Finnemen, Nassir vs. NJ Transit Corporation $5,269.00 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Johnston, Purification vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $2,608.00 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Maldonado, Janay L. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation $776.68 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Poole, Renee vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $384.00 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Quinones, Raniel, et al v. New Jersey Transit Corp. $224.00 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Begley, Nellie vs. Deborah E. Lewis, et al. $223.00 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Pratt, Peggy vs. Ramon Javier, et al. $112.00 Walden Macht & Haran LLP - New York Economic Development Authority Incentives Task Force $362,790.79 Wiley Malehorn Sirota & Raynes, George Delgrosso v. SoNJ, et al $100.00