Durham E-Theses
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Durham E-Theses Can Motor Skills Training Improve Academic Performance? A Structured Motor Skills Intervention for Young Children. KATSIPATAKI, MARIA How to cite: KATSIPATAKI, MARIA (2013) Can Motor Skills Training Improve Academic Performance? A Structured Motor Skills Intervention for Young Children., Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10579/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 I Can Motor Skills Training Improve Academic Performance? A Structured Motor Skills Intervention for Young Children. Maria Katsipataki A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Education Durham University 2013 II ABSTRACT The thesis explores the relationship between motor and academic skills. According to previous research, motor skills difficulties can affect academic outcomes. Furthermore, there is growing evidence supporting the relationship between the motor and academic areas. As part of this investigation a motor skills intervention was developed that aimed to make improvements in the performance of the reading, maths and motor skills of young children in mainstream education. The “Motor Skills Intervention for the Early Years” that was subsequently developed represented a new approach to intervention combining direct and indirect motor tasks resulting in a pragmatic, hybrid intervention. The research involved 56 typically developing children (TDC) attending two English primary schools with a mean age of 58 months randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group. Children were assessed in their motor and academic skills both before and after the intervention. The intervention was delivered for a period of 11 weeks with two weekly sessions for each school. Preliminary findings appear to be promising, showing a large effect size for motor skills, and medium to smaller effects for reading and maths. The motor skills of manual dexterity and ball skills were significantly improved in children within the experimental group. Improving motor skills in TDC is important in its own right, due to its strong preventative role. Based on these findings, it is concluded that a hybrid approach to motor skills intervention can improve specific motor skills and yield small effects to academic skills within TDC. Future research from this study might include follow-up assessments to identify possible benefits on the academic areas of reading and maths in the long term. In addition, these findings can be used to inform future research and, if replicated with a larger sample, to inform educational policies for school-based interventions. III Table of Contents TITLE PAGE………………………..I ABSTRACT…………………………II TABLE OF CONTENTS…………....III LIST OF TABLES…………………..IX LIST OF FIGURES………………….IX STATEMENT OF COPYRIGHT…...X ACKNOWLEDGMENTS…………..XI DEDICATIONS…………………….XIII CHAPTER 1 ................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY ......................................................................... 1 1.1.Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Origins of the Study ............................................................................................ 3 1.3. Research Problem ............................................................................................... 5 1.3.1. Aims and objectives of the research ................................................................ 6 1.3.2. The significance of the thesis and potential impact ......................................... 6 1.4. Research Questions ............................................................................................. 8 1.5. Rationale for the Structure of the Thesis ............................................................ 8 CHAPTER 2 ............................................................................................................... 10 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ......................................................................... 10 2.1.Introduction ........................................................................................................ 10 2.2. GENES-ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ....................................... 10 2.2.1. Nature and Nurture ........................................................................................ 11 2.3. Current Research & Trends .............................................................................. 16 2.4. MOTOR DEVELOPMENT.................................................................................. 20 2.4.1. Motor Development in Infancy ...................................................................... 21 2.4.1.1. Theories of Early Motor Development ................................................... 24 2.4.1.2. Maturational Period ................................................................................ 24 2.4.1.3. Information Processing Period ................................................................ 29 2.4.1.4 Dynamic Systems Approach .................................................................... 34 2.5. Dynamic Systems & Motor Learning ............................................................... 40 2.6. Theories of Motor Control ................................................................................ 41 IV 2.7. Summary of Main Points .................................................................................. 44 2.8. COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................... 48 2.8.1. Early Links between Cognition and Motor Skills.......................................... 49 2.8.2. Contemporary Links between Cognition and Motor Skills ........................... 50 2.8.3. Embodied Cognition ...................................................................................... 53 2.8.3.1. Main Principles of Embodied Cognition .................................................... 54 2.9. Cognitive Skills Involved in Reading & Maths ................................................ 57 2.9.1. Language & Literacy Acquisition .................................................................. 58 2.9.2. Maths.............................................................................................................. 59 2.9.3. Motor & Cognitive Skills in Reading and Maths .......................................... 61 2.10. EVIDENCE OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MOTOR SKILLS & COGNITIVE FUNCTIONING ............................................................................... 63 2.10.1. Developmental Disorders Co-morbidity Evidence ...................................... 63 2.10.2. Theories on Co-morbidity ............................................................................ 64 2.10.2.1. Causal Modelling Approach ..................................................................... 65 2.10.3. Developmental Dyslexia .............................................................................. 70 2.10.4. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder .................................................... 71 2.10.5. Developmental Coordination Disorder ........................................................ 73 2.10.6. Autistic Spectrum Disorder & Specific Language Impairment ................... 75 2.10.7. Physical Activity & Academic Performance Evidence ............................... 78 2.10.7.1. Physical Activity, Physical Fitness, Motor Control and Motor Skill Development ............................................................................................................ 81 2.10.8. Motor Skills & Reading-Maths Performance Research Evidence ............... 83 2.11. Risk Factors for Physical & Academic Performance in the Mainstream ....... 85 2.12. Parental Styles & Lifestyle: Effects on Physical Activity & Academic Performance ............................................................................................................. 87 2.13. Consideration of an Opposing Evidence Base ................................................ 89 2.14. Summary of Main Points ................................................................................ 91 2.15. EXISTING MOTOR SKILL INTERVENTIONS.............................................. 94 2.15.1. Selection Criteria ......................................................................................... 96 2.15.2. Types of Interventions ................................................................................. 96 2.15.2.1. Process/Deficit Approach ......................................................................... 97 2.15.2.2. Auditory Integration Therapy ................................................................... 98 2.15.2.3. Primary Movement Programme ...............................................................