DOCSLIB.ORG

Dynasty of Kings Established the Dynasty of the Kings of Israel Prefigured the Eternal Kingship 3 of Jesus Christ

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dynasty of Kings Established the Dynasty of the Kings of Israel Prefigured the Eternal Kingship 3 of Jesus Christ UNIT 1: Story of the Old Testament Lesson Dynasty of Kings Established The dynasty of the kings of Israel prefigured the eternal kingship 3 of Jesus Christ. THE LESSON OVERVIEW e will focus on the establishment of the reigns of Saul, David, and Solomon. WBy what God establishes through them, Israel becomes a leading nation among nations. We also move from the Mosaic Covenant to the Davidic Covenant, which eventually includes the reign of the Messiah. Therefore, we can study the first kings of Israel and honor Christ as King of kings and Lord of lords. We focus on Saul’s meekness; although the term is not used, it is apparent as he takes the throne. David’s backstory as a shepherd in Bethlehem has a bearing on his understanding of the priestly office. Solomon’s devotion to the Name of the Lord God is the bedrock upon which Israel is built. GOLDEN TEXT: Genesis 49:10 The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be. 1. SAUL, THE FIRST KING (1 SAM. 8:4-9, 19-22; 9:17; 10:1, 17-25) 1 Samuel 8:4 Then all the elders of Israel gathered themselves together, and came to Samuel unto Ramah, 5 And said unto him, Behold, thou art old, and thy sons walk not in thy ways: now make us a king to judge us like all the nations. 9:17 And when Samuel saw Saul, the LORD said unto him, Behold the man whom I spake to thee of! this same shall reign over my people. 10:24 And Samuel said to all the people, See ye him whom the LORD hath chosen, that there is none like him among all the people? And all the people shouted, and said, God save the king. 1 Samuel 8 records a gathering of the elders of Israel before Samuel (8:4). Samuel was now old, and his sons, whom he had appointed to lead Israel, had chosen a sinful lifestyle, unlike their father. Instead of the appointment of another judge, the elders demanded a king. Samuel felt betrayed. However, Israel had ultimately rejected not Samuel but the Lord (v. 7). Rather than balk at their request, the Lord granted their desire, something He had foreseen long ago (v. 21; cf. Deut. 17:14-20). Samuel first saw Saul while Saul was looking for his father’s stray donkeys (1 Sam. 9:17). God revealed to Samuel that Saul was the man the Lord had chosen to be king. Samuel anointed Saul with oil as the first king (10:1). Samuel had already revealed the plan the night before, but Saul could not believe it because his tribe was the least (9:20, 21). Saul was not showing false humility. Saul’s modesty was also Adult Student Guide / September 20, 2020 Copyright 2020 – Illegal to photocopy 11 Lesson 3: Dynasty of Kings Established seen at his coronation. When he was called forward, he was found hiding among the supplies. The Israelites almost forcibly brought him forward to be recognized as king (10:21-23). The tension of the transition between the judges and the kings seemed to be resolved in this moment (v. 24). A new era began. A king arose with a meekness that pointed toward Christ, despite the tragic changes Saul would later go through. 2. DAVID, THE SHEPHERD KING (1 SAM. 16:1-13; 1 CHR. 17:1-15) 1 Samuel 16:11 And Samuel said unto Jesse, Are here all thy children? And he said, There remaineth yet the youngest, and, behold, he keepeth the sheep. And Samuel said unto Jesse, Send and fetch him: for we will not sit down till he come hither. 13 Then Samuel took the horn of oil, and anointed him in the midst of his brethren: and the Spirit of the Lord came upon David from that day forward. So Samuel rose up, and went to Ramah. 1 Chronicles 17:7 Now therefore thus shalt thou say unto my servant David, Thus saith the LORD of hosts, I took thee from the sheepcote, even from following the sheep, that thou shouldest be ruler over my people Israel. By this point in the narrative, the Lord has rejected Saul for disobedience. In response, God sent Samuel to Jesse to anoint the next king over Israel. When Samuel saw Eliab, he was certain this man would be the one the Lord chose as the next king of Israel (1 Sam. 16:6). However, the Lord rejected him as king. What matters most to the Lord is not how someone looks on the outside, but the person’s heart toward Him (v. 7). Only when he saw David arrive from tending sheep did the Lord affirm to Samuel that David was to be His chosen servant. As David was anointed with oil, the Holy Spirit came upon and remained with him (v. 13). Unlike Saul, from whom the Lord removed His Spirit, the Lord would remain with David all his days. 1 Chronicles 17 begins with David “settled in his palace” (1 Chr. 17:1, NIV). He lamented to the prophet Nathan that, while he dwelled in a comfortable house, the ark of the Lord remained in a tent (v. 1). Nathan replied to King David that he should do whatever seemed right to him, for God was with him (v. 2). Apparently, David wanted to repay the Lord for all that He had done for him. But the Lord would have none of this. He had at no time requested that a house be built for Him (v. 6). He is not like the so-called gods of the other nations, who must be attended to in order to ensure they act favorably. Instead, the Lord had promised David to do things for and through him at the present time and in the future. For the present, the Lord promised to make David’s name great, to provide a peaceful place for Israel to live as a nation, and to give David rest from his enemies (17:8-10). For the future, the Lord promised that David’s descendants would be kings over God’s people, David’s son would be the one to build the Temple, and the Davidic dynasty would be an everlasting dynasty (vv. 11-14). 12 Copyright 2020 – Illegal to photocopy Adult Student Guide / September 20, 2020 UNIT 1: Story of the Old Testament 3. SOLOMON, THE BUILDER KING (1 CHR. 1:1-6; 6:1-11; 9:1-8) 2 Chronicles 1:1 And Solomon the son of David was strengthened in his kingdom, and the LORD his God was with him, and magnified him exceedingly. 6:1 Then said Solomon, The LORD hath said that he would dwell in the thick darkness. 2 But I have built an house of habitation for thee, and a place for thy dwelling for ever. 10 The LORD therefore hath performed his word that he hath spoken: for I am risen up in the room of David my father, and am set on the throne of Israel, as the LORD promised, and have built the house for the name of the LORD God of Israel. 9:5 And she said to the king, It was a true report which I heard in mine own land of thine acts, and of thy wisdom: 6 Howbeit I believed not their words, until I came, and mine eyes had seen it: and, behold, the one half of the greatness of thy wisdom was not told me: for thou exceedest the fame that I heard. David’s son Solomon became king and prepared to build the Temple. By this first act as king of Israel, Solomon set the agenda for his rule. One thousand burnt offerings were offered to the Lord (1 Chr. 1:6). In doing so, Solomon not only prepared the Temple to receive God’s presence (5:14) but also prepared the hearts of the people. Later, on the day the Temple was dedicated, Solomon led the people in a time of praise to the God of Israel. But first, he reminded the people of the word of the Lord to his father, David. God had been faithful to His promise that one of David’s sons would build a permanent structure for the Lord’s presence to dwell among His people (6:1-6). God established the house of David. Solomon built the house of God. The Davidic Covenant was the basis for the next era, propelling Israel forward. God established not only His name, but also the name and fame of David. Solomon’s name and fame reached the whole known world. In chapter 9, Solomon welcomed the Queen of Sheba (Ethiopia). She told him about the “report … of [his] acts” (v. 5). When she first heard this report, she did not believe the nations’ tales about Solomon (v. 6). Among kings of the ancient world, none exceeded his renown, except for perhaps Alexander the Great. CALL TO DISCIPLESHIP All three kings had character flaws to face. Saul started well, but he ended in a grievous state. David was a man of blood who was confronted by Nathan the prophet as a murderer and adulterer. Solomon started well, but later indulged in idolatry and possibly returned to the Lord late in life. The point is that all three kings had their own struggles submitting to the Lord, the true King of Israel.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Capetian France (987–1328)
    FORUM Capetian France (987–1328) Introduction Damien Kempf If “France is a creation of its medieval history,”1 the rule of the Cape- tian dynasty (987–1328) in particular is traditionally regarded as the beginning of France as a nation.2 Following the narrative established by Joseph Strayer’s influential bookOn the Medieval Origins of the Mod- ern State, historians situate the construction of the French nation- state in the thirteenth century, under the reigns of Philip Augustus (1180– 1223) and Louis IX (1226–70). Territorial expansion, the development of bureaucracy, and the centralization of the royal government all con- tributed to the formation of the state in France.3 Thus it is only at the end of a long process of territorial expansion and royal affirmation that the Capetian kings managed to turn what was initially a disparate and fragmented territory into a unified kingdom, which prefigured the modern state. In this teleological framework, there is little room or interest for the first Capetian kings. The eleventh and twelfth centuries are still described as the “âge des souverains,” a period of relative anarchy and disorder during which the aristocracy dominated the political land- scape and lordship was the “normative expression of human power.”4 Compared to these powerful lords, the early Capetians pale into insignifi- cance. They controlled a royal domain centered on Paris and Orléans and struggled to keep at bay the lords dominating the powerful sur- rounding counties and duchies. The famous anecdote reported by the Damien Kempf is senior lecturer in medieval history at the University of Liverpool.
    [Show full text]
  • Y Chromosome of Aisin Gioro, the Imperial House of Qing Dynasty
    Y Chromosome of Aisin Gioro, the Imperial House of Qing Dynasty YAN Shi1*, TACHIBANA Harumasa2, WEI Lan‐Hai1, YU Ge1, WEN Shao‐Qing1, WANG Chuan‐Chao1 1 Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China 2 Pen name * Please contact [email protected] Abstract House of Aisin Gioro is the imperial family of the last dynasty in Chinese history – Qing Dynasty (1644 – 1911). Aisin Gioro family originated from Jurchen tribes and developed the Manchu people before they conquered China. By investigating the Y chromosomal short tandem repeats (STRs) of 7 modern male individuals who claim belonging to Aisin Gioro family (in which 3 have full records of pedigree), we found that 3 of them (in which 2 keep full pedigree, whose most recent common ancestor is Nurgaci) shows very close relationship (1 – 2 steps of difference in 17 STR) and the haplotype is rare. We therefore conclude that this haplotype is the Y chromosome of the House of Aisin Gioro. Further tests of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) indicates that they belong to Haplogroup C3b2b1*‐M401(xF5483), although their Y‐STR results are distant to the “star cluster”, which also belongs to the same haplogroup. This study forms the base for the pedigree research of the imperial family of Qing Dynasty by means of genetics. Keywords: Y chromosome, paternal lineage, pedigree, family history, haplogroup, Qing Dynasty This research was supported by the grants from the National Science Foundation of China (31271338), and from Ministry of Education (311016).
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Life in the Shang Dynasty Shang Rulers and Gods Top 10
    Summary Life in the Shang Dynasty Map showing the expanse of the Shang Dynasty Shang society was divided into different classes. At the top Did you know? were the royal family, and then priests and administrative Warriors were able to join The Shang Dynasty, also known as the Yin between 1523 and 1028 BCE. THE UPPER classes. Members of the aristocracy were well-respected, and the upper classes. The CLASSES more successful they were Dynasty, ruled the Yellow River Valley in the had clothes made from the finest materials. They were often in battle, the higher they second millenium BCE (approx 1675-1046BCE). given the responsibility of governing small areas. could rise! Life was very different for peasants, who were at the bottom Did you know? The Shang Dynasty succeeded the Xia Dynasty of the social ladder. The majority of the population was in this THE LOWER Peasants were governed and was followed by the Zhou Dynasty. bracket were limited to farming crops and selling handmade by local aristocrats, and CLASSES had little hope of leaving items for a profit. Some lower classes were buried with their masters, leading archaeologists to believe they were slaves. their life of peasantry. It was the first Chinese Dynasty for which there is Shang people ate a varied diet! The basic food was millet, a Did you know? written and archaeological evidence. type of grain, but barley and wheat were also grown. Shang The people of the Shang FOOD farmers were also skilled, growing vegetables and beans. Fish Dynasty also kept domesticated animals, The Dynasty expanded its territory and moved were caught in the rivers, and some animals (for example deer such as pigs, dogs, goats its capital city on several occasions.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Chinese Muslims' Migration Into Malaysia
    27 Dirasat The History of Chinese Muslims’ Migration into Malaysia Dhul 1438 - September Hijjah, 2017 Ma Hailong School of Ethnology and Sociology, Qinghai Nationalities University The History of Chinese Muslims’ Migration into Malaysia Ma Hailong School of Ethnology and Sociology, Qinghai Nationalities University 4 Dirasat No. 27 Dhul Hijjah, 1438 - September 2017 © King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies, 2017 King Fahd National Library Cataloging-In-Publication Data Hailong, Ma The history of Chinese Muslims migration into Malaysia, / Ma Hailong - Riyadh, 2018 36 p ; 16.5 x 23 cm ISBN: 978-603-8206-48-0 1 - Islam - China - History I - Title 210.9151 dc 1439/4588 L.D. no. 1439/4588 ISBN: 978-603-8206-48-5 Table of Content Abstract 6 Introduction 7 The History of Chinese Muslim in Malaysia before the Twentieth Century 9 The History of Chinese Muslims in Malaysia in the Mid-Twentieth Century 12 The History of Chinese Muslims Who Migrated into Malaysia after the 1980s 13 • Studying Abroad and Migration 13 • Exploring Business and Migration 19 • Job Search and Migration 23 The General Situation of Chinese Muslims in Malaysia 25 Conclusion 27 References 31 5 6 Dirasat No. 27 Dhul Hijjah, 1438 - September 2017 Abstract The purpose of this paper is to examine the history of the Chinese Muslims who moved to Malaysia and explain the different factors that have influenced this migration at different historical stages. I separate this history mainly into two parts, namely, before the twentieth century and from the twentieth century onward. Before the twentieth century, the majority of Chinese Muslims who streamed into Malaysia were Chinese immigrants who became Chinese Muslims by converting to Islam.
    [Show full text]
  • (1MDB); Malaysian
    Case 2:20-cv-05910 Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 1 of 280 Page ID #:1 1 DEBORAH CONNOR, Chief Money Laundering and Asset Forfeiture Section (MLARS) 2 MARY BUTLER, Chief, International Unit WOO S. LEE, Deputy Chief, International Unit 3 BARBARA Y. LEVY, Trial Attorney JOSHUA L. SOHN, Trial Attorney 4 JONATHAN BAUM, Trial Attorney Criminal Division 5 United States Department of Justice 1400 New York Avenue, N.W., 10th Floor 6 Washington, D.C. 20530 Telephone: (202) 514-1263 7 Email: [email protected] 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. CV 20-5910 14 Plaintiff, VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR 15 v. FORFEITURE IN REM 16 ONE DRAWING ENTITLED “SELF- [18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(A) and (C)] 17 PORTRAIT” BY JEAN-MICHEL 18 BASQUIAT, [F.B.I.] 19 Defendant. 20 21 The United States of America (the “government”) brings this complaint against 22 the above-captioned asset and alleges as follows: 23 PERSONS AND ENTITIES 24 1. The plaintiff is the United States of America. 25 2. The defendant in this action is One Drawing entitled “Self-Portrait” by 26 Jean-Michel Basquiat more particularly described in Attachment A (“DEFENDANT 27 ASSET”). 28 Case 2:20-cv-05910 Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 2 of 280 Page ID #:2 1 3. The DEFENDANT ASSET was previously owned by Christopher Joey 2 McFarland (“McFarland”), who agreed, through counsel, to surrender it to the 3 government, and executed a stipulation relinquishing all right, title, and interest in the 4 DEFENDANT ASSET in connection with case number CV 19-1327 DSF (PLAx), 5 United States v.
    [Show full text]
  • The Zhou Dynasty Around 1046 BC, King Wu, the Leader of the Zhou
    The Zhou Dynasty Around 1046 BC, King Wu, the leader of the Zhou (Chou), a subject people living in the west of the Chinese kingdom, overthrew the last king of the Shang Dynasty. King Wu died shortly after this victory, but his family, the Ji, would rule China for the next few centuries. Their dynasty is known as the Zhou Dynasty. The Mandate of Heaven After overthrowing the Shang Dynasty, the Zhou propagated a new concept known as the Mandate of Heaven. The Mandate of Heaven became the ideological basis of Zhou rule, and an important part of Chinese political philosophy for many centuries. The Mandate of Heaven explained why the Zhou kings had authority to rule China and why they were justified in deposing the Shang dynasty. The Mandate held that there could only be one legitimate ruler of China at one time, and that such a king reigned with the approval of heaven. A king could, however, loose the approval of heaven, which would result in that king being overthrown. Since the Shang kings had become immoral—because of their excessive drinking, luxuriant living, and cruelty— they had lost heaven’s approval of their rule. Thus the Zhou rebellion, according to the idea, took place with the approval of heaven, because heaven had removed supreme power from the Shang and bestowed it upon the Zhou. Western Zhou After his death, King Wu was succeeded by his son Cheng, but power remained in the hands of a regent, the Duke of Zhou. The Duke of Zhou defeated rebellions and established the Zhou Dynasty firmly in power at their capital of Fenghao on the Wei River (near modern-day Xi’an) in western China.
    [Show full text]
  • The Military Economy of Seventeenth Century Sri Lanka: Rhetoric and Authority in a Time of Conquest
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles The Military Economy of Seventeenth Century Sri Lanka: Rhetoric and Authority in a Time of Conquest A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Cenan Pirani 2016 © Copyright by Cenan Pirani 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Military Economy of Seventeenth Century Sri Lanka: Rhetoric and Authority in a Time of Conquest by Cenan Pirani Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Sanjay Subrahmanyam, Chair From the end of the sixteenth century, the overseas administrative arm of the Portuguese Crown, the Estado da Índia Oriental, sought to gain complete territorial control of the island of Sri Lanka and outlined the tenets of the military project dubbed in administrative letters, “the Conquest of the Island of Ceylon”. Such efforts however would be impeded by military rebellions (ie. mutinies and desertions) by native military personnel in Portuguese service, where a rebellion that occurred in 1630 severely weakened the Estado's position in the island from which it could not recover. The specific event, the death of a Portuguese general at the hands of his own Christianized native troop, left a deep imprint on Portuguese memory. Decades later, the chronicler Fernão de Queiroz claimed the event, which paved the way for the European's eventual removal from the island by 1658, bore testament to the unbridgeable cultural and religious schism between the Portuguese and the native Sinhala people, an established viewpoint in current historiography. This study focuses attention on the documentation in Portuguese, English, Spanish, and ii Sinhalese written during the more active moments of the conquest period (1580-1640) in order to test such well-established views.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynastic Rule of China
    Dynastic Rule of China 7th Chapter 7 Sui Dynasty (589-618) How did this kingdom rise to power? In 589, Yang Jian conquered Chen Kingdom and unified China for first time in 400 years. Chien founded Sui Dynasty at Changan and became emperor; was later called Wen Di. How did this dynasty govern China? Emperors Wen Di and Yang Di are remembered for harsh rule. Forced many peasants to fight in army to work on public works projects. What belief systems did this dynasty encourage? Discourage? Wen Di, though himself a Buddhist, encouraged practice of Buddhism, Confucianism, and Daoism. How did this dynasty affect daily life in China? Grand canal promoted domestic trade by connecting Yellow and Yangzi rivers. Rebuilding the Great Wall provided security from northern raiders. List two ways this dynasty helped unite China? Undertook extensive public works projects. Extended military control over large stretches of China. Tang Dynasty (A.D. 618-907) How did this dynasty rise to power? In 618, Li Shi Min captured Changan and Luoyang. Li Shi Min made himself Emperor Dai Zong in 626. How did this dynasty govern China? Under Wu Zhao, China’s only empress, the Tang ruled one of the most geographical extensive empires in Chinese history. Government composed of departments, each with its own area. Bureaucrats upheld Confucian ideals by acting as artists and politians. What belief systems did this dynasty encourage? Discourage? Confucianism, Buddhism, and Daoism flourished, though Buddhism repressed during the reign of Emperor Wu Zong. How did this dynasty affect daily life? Equal-field system limited power or rural aristocracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Memories of the House of Este in England
    THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION AND ASSOCIATION ON NOBILITY (TICAN) Memories of the House of Este in England The Royal House of Windsor, in their veins runs the blood of the oldest Italian Dynasty Carmelo Currò Troiano & Don Salvatore Ferdinando Antonio Caputo (George, by the Grace of God, of Great Britain, France and Ireland, King, Defender of the Faith, Prince-Elector of Hanover, Duke of Brunswick. ca. 1714, the year of his succession, by Sir Godfrey Kneller) Memories of the House of Este in England The Este Royal Family still reigns, and with the world's most famous monarchy. It reigns under another name, because now is called Windsor. In their veins, however, runs the blood of the oldest Italian Dynasty. Among the many states of late medieval Italy, one stands out for its unfamiliarity to an English audience and for its neglect in historical research: that of the Este family, lords (later Dukes) of the cities of Ferrara, Modena and Reggio in northern Italy. Welf IV d'Este, son of Alberto Azzo II, moved to Germany, first to Carinthia and then to Bavaria, giving rise to one of the most important families in European history, the Guelphs. This in turn ultimately led to the ascension to the English throne in 1714 with George I of England. The Este constituted, with the Savoy, the longest Italian family dynastic among the various lordships that from the Middle Ages to the Risorgimento (The Resurgence) dominated the small states that made up the boot of Italy controlled for long periods a portion that practically reached from the Adriatic Sea to the Tyrrhenian Sea until the Republic of Lucca, acting as cushion between the states of the Church and those in the north, Venice, Mantua and Milan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stuart Dynasty
    A /**. N B?iiilV Scot'and *B000448613* THE STUART DYNASTY: SHORT STUDIES OF ITS RISE, COURSE, AND EARLY EXILE. THE LATTER PRAWN FROM PAPEES IN HER MAJESTY'S POSSESSION AT WINDSOR CASTLE. BY PERCY M. THORNTON, AUTHOR OF ' ' FOREIGN SECRETARIES OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY ' ; HARROW SCHOOL AND ITS SURROUNDINGS'; 'THE BRUNSWICK ACCESSION*; ETC, ETC. (s < C#A> ^ LONDON: WILLIAM RIDGWAY, 169, PICCADILLY, W. 1891. &0 HER MOST GRACIOUS MAJESTY VICTOKIA, QUEEN OF GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND, EMPRESS OF INDIA, THESE RESEARCHES AMONG ANCESTRAL RECORDS OF THE ROYAL HOUSE OF STUART ARE, BY PERMISSION, INSCRIBED BY HER MAJESTY'S DUTIFUL AND DEVOTED SUBJECT AND SERVANT, PERCY MELVILLE THORNTON. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from National Library of Scotland http://www.archive.org/details/stuartdynastysho1891thor PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. A favourable reception, quite beyond expectation, has induced me to publish an edition of this work at a popular price. In so doing I shall not attempt to cope in detail with the opinions of some sixty too lenient critics, but content myself with a justification of that via media which I claim to have taken in regard to the controversy which continues between the two schools who respectively laud and execrate the Stuart name. That I am not so far from the truth in my estimate as some critics suppose, is, I think, manifest from the strong objection taken to my conclusions by the White Rose organs on one hand, and the Daily News and several journals in sj'mpathy with it on the other; while the fact that a majority of my critics have expressed themselves in favour of a juste milieu being observed in estimating the merits and demerits of the unfortunate Stuart race, leads one to believe that some protest against the ipse dixit school of historians was needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Louis XIII (1610-1643) Richelieu As Chief Minister
    French Monarchy – Dynastic change from Valois to Bourbon 16th Century – French Wars of Religion 1562-1589 sons of Henry II and Catherine de Medici become the last of the Valois Kings of France 1589 – Wars of Religion end with victory of Henry IV, Bourbon Prince of Navarre 1589-1610 (assassinated) start of the Bourbon dynasty (through French Revolution) married to Marie de Medici, who becomes Regent for son Louis XIII (1610-1643) Richelieu as Chief Minister Louis XIV (1643-1715) Mazarin as Chief Minister (died 1661) then personal rule of the King Louis XIII in 1611 After his father’s death in 1610 Cardinal Richelieu 1637 Chief minister to Louis XIII Armand Jean du Plessis Portrait by Phillipe de Champaigne Richelieu 1640 Triptych Bust of Cardinal Richelieu by Italian sculptor Gian Lorenzo Bernini, 1641 Louis XIII 1610-1643 Phillipe de Champaigne The Fronde (1648 -1653) The Fronde Fronde (slingshot) was the name given to that faction; I will give you the etymology of it….. Someone once said, in jest, that the Parlement of Paris acted like the schoolboys, who fling stones, and run away when they see the constable, but meet again as soon as he turns his back. This was thought a very apt comparison. It came to be a subject for ballads, and, upon the peace between the King and Parlement, it was revived and applied to those who still did not agree with the Court …. We therefore resolved that night to wear hatbands made in the form of a sling, and had a great number of them made ready to be distributed….
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysian Perceptions of China Ibrahim Abu Bakar Head of Islamic Religion and the Malay Custom the Idea to Form the Federation of Malaysia in His Respective State
    HAOL, Núm. 7 (Primavera, 2005), 93-105 ISSN 1696-2060 MALAYSIAN PERCEPTIONS OF CHINA Ibrahim Abu Bakar National University of Malaysia, Malaysia. E-mail: [email protected] Recibido: 27 Febrero 2005 / Revisado: 20 Marzo 2005 / Aceptado: 09 Mayo 2005 / Publicado: 15 Junio 2005 Resumen: Malaysia consisting of Malaya, Politically and historically Malaysia was Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore gained her created on 16 September 1963 after Malaya, independence from the British on 16 September Singapore, Sabah and Sarawak had agreed to 1963. Malaya gained her independence from form the Federation of Malaysia. Singapore, the British on 31 August 1957. In 1965 Sabah and Sarawak gained their independence Singapore was independent from Malaysia. from the British Government through the Malaysia is a parliamentary democratic and Federation of Malaysia. However, Singapore capitalistic nation. Moreover, Malaysia is a withdrew from the Federation of Malaysia in multi-religious and multiracial nation. Malaysia 1965 and since then Singapore has been an has been populated by the Malays, Chinese, independent nation in the southern part of Indians and others. The Malays are Muslims Malaysian Peninsula. and Islam is the religion of the Federation of Malaysia. Malaysia has a very long history with Malaya is the English name for the Malay name China but China never colonizad certain areas Tanah Melayu (the Malay land) or in Malaysia and then the British colonized the Semenanjung Tanah Melayu (the Malay whole Malaysia. Malaysian perceptions of peninsula). Malaya gained her independence China are influenced by many internal and from the British Government on 31 August external factors such as the politico-ideologies, 1957 after the Malayans demanded the economic development as well as the national, independence of Malaya.
    [Show full text]