The Salmon Canning Industry
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
COUNTRY SECTION United States Fishery Products
Validity date from COUNTRY United States 22/01/2021 00499 SECTION Fishery products Date of publication 28/07/2007 List in force Approval number Name City Regions Activities Remark Date of request 1000025102 GET SEAFOOD, INC. Winter Haven Florida PP 08/04/2013 1000025909 Fagan Alligator Products, Inc. Dade City Florida PP 1000084596 Sea-Trek Enterprises, Inc. East Greenwich Rhode Island PP O! 10/07/2008 1000112376 Pontchartrain Blue Crab Slidell Louisiana PP 14/04/2010 1000113172 Fishermen's Ice & Bait, Inc. Madeira Beach Florida PP 1000113708 Beck's Smokery Pompano Beach Florida PP 1000113902 Colorado Boxed Beef Co. Port Everglades Florida CS 16/11/2011 1000114005 D & D Seafood Corporation Marathon Florida PP 1000114027 BAMA SEA PRODUCTS St. Petersburg Florida PP 1000114048 Moon's Seafood Company W. Melbourne Florida PP O! 1000114049 Glanbia Performance Nutrition (Manufacturing), Inc., Florida Sunrise Florida PP 13/10/2017 Facility 1000114069 Placeres & Sons Seafood Hialeah Florida PP 1000114070 Webb's Seafood, Inc. Youngstown Florida PP 14/10/2009 1000114156 Cox's Wholesale Seafood, Inc. Tampa Florida PP 1000114170 Kings Seafood, Inc. Port Orange Florida PP 1 / 59 List in force Approval number Name City Regions Activities Remark Date of request 1000114326 Optimus, Inc. Dba Marky's Miami Florida PP 1000115645 AMERIQUAL FOODS LLC Evansville Indiana PP 06/02/2019 1000115810 Henriksen Fisheries, Inc Sister Bay Wisconsin PP 1000117125 RB Manufacturing LLC Salt Lake City Utah PP 08/01/2015 1000120312 Stauber Performance Ingredients, Inc. Florida New York PP 08/08/2019 1000120556 Plenus Group, Inc. Lowell Massachusetts PP 06/05/2008 1000120753 GARBO LOBSTER LLC Groton Connecticut PP 17/10/2016 1000121950 True World Foods, NY LLC Elizabeth New Jersey PP Aq 1000122358 Lamonica Fine Foods, Inc. -
Fishery Publications
124 COMMERCIAL FISHERIES REVIEW Vol. 26, o. RECENT FISHERY PUBLICATIONS SSR-Fish. No. 481 - Air and Water Temperatur e B a nd FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Stream Flow Data, Convict Creek, Mono County Ca Iforma. 1950 to 1962. by Harry D. Kennedy, 50 pp., PUBLICATIONS Apnl 1964. Extent of Acid Mine Pollution in the United StateB Af THESE PROCESSED PUBLICATIONS ARE AVA I LABLE rREE r~ THE or. riCE or INrDRMATION, U. S. rlSH AND WILOLlrE SERVICE, WASHINGTON, fe1tmg1l='lsh and Wildlife , by-eowaz:a-r.Klnney,-cir· D. C. 20402. TYPES Of PUBLICATIONS ARE DESIGNATED AS rOLLDWS: cu ar ~:rpp.. 111us .. processed, June 1964. crs • CURRENT rlSHERY STATISTICS Of THE UNITEO STATES. THE rOLL 011 I NO MARIIET NEWS LEA rLETS ARE AVA I LABL£ ,~ THE rL • rlSHERY LEArLETS. rlSHERY MARKET NE\o'S""SEiiViCr;u.~u OF c.D>4HERCI A L FISHERIES ~NL • REPRINTS or RFPORTS ON fDREIGN fiSHERIES. RH. 510, 1815 N. FORT NYER OR., ARLINGTON, VA. 22209. SEP •• SE~RATES (REPRINTS) fRO~ CONNERCIAL fISHERIES.!!f.Yl.£!. SSR •• fiSH •• SPECIAL SCIENTifiC REPDRTS •• fISHERIES (LI~ITED DISTRIBUT ION). Number Title MNL-l1 - Fishing Industry 1I1Spaln, 1963 , 8 pp. Number Title MNL-26 - Taiwan Fisheries In 1963. 21 pp., CFS-3540 - Frozen Fishery Products, June 1964, 8 pp. MNL-40 - Moroccan Fishing Industry, 1962/63, 19 pp , CFS-3551 - Massachusetts Landings, January 1964.6 pp. CFS-3552 - Louisiana Landings, 1963 Annual Summary, THE FOLLOoII~ PUBLICATIONS ~E AVAILABLE Q!!U F~ THE m. 8 pp. CIFIC ~ HENTIONEO. CFS-3553 - Shrimp Landings, January 1964, 5 pp. CFS-3555 - Shrimp Landings, February 1964, 5 pp. -
A Rapid, Easily Used Test Kit to Determine Histamine Concentrations in Fish
A Rapid, Easily Used Test Kit To Determine Histamine Concentrations in Fish Brinton M. Miller, Chari G. Johnson, and David J. Ledden Neogen Corporation Lansing, Michigan 48912 BACKGROUND Recently the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced it was improving its histamine policy in the revised Compliance Policy Guide 7108.24 Decomposition and Histamine “Raw, Frozen Tuna and Mahi-Mahi; Camred Tuna; and Related Species” (Fed. Reg. v. 601149, August 3, 1995; pp. 39754-39756). In summary the FDA: . lowered the Defect Action Level (DAL) to 50 ppm for decomposition. eliminated the requirement that findings of < 200 ppm had to be confirmed by organoleptic tests [i.e., histamine determination alone is sufficient]. l application of the revised DAL applies to raw and frozen tuna and mahi-mahi; and furthermore, on a case-by-case basis histamine levels r 50 ppm to < 500 ppm may be used as evidence of decomposition in other species. l the Action Level (AL) of 500 ppm will apply to species of fish that have been implicated in histamine poisoning outbreaks. The FDA notice calls our attention to the fact that ”. ..nonvolatile spoilage compounds such as histamine remain in the product (the fish) and can be determined reliably by chemical analysis.” The most commonly used method for histamine determination is AOAC Official Method 977.13-- the fluorometric method, which received Final Action approval in 1987. This method has three phases: First - extraction of histamine from it matrix (fish).This phase consists of a methanol extraction of histamine from (blended) fish followed by heating (60 “C) and filtrations (Fig. -
Trends in the Utilization and Production of Seafood Byproducts
Advances in Seafood Byproducts 351 Alaska Sea Grant College Program • AK-SG-03-01, 2003 Trends in the Utilization and Production of Seafood Byproducts Hans Nissen Atlas-Stord, Inc., Kansas City, Missouri Abstract Seafood companies in the North Pacific and Alaska generate a significant volume of seafood byproducts and could benefit environmentally and economically by utilizing these byproducts. Today many of the compa- nies have integrated a fish meal plant to process seafood byproduct into valuable high quality fish meal and oil which is sold worldwide in com- petition with other protein meals. In order to justify the investment in a production facility to utilize the byproduct the annual volume must be considered. The trend has been to combine the byproduct from various plants in order to have enough volume to make the operation feasible. In Alaska with many small processors at remote locations this can be a difficult task, and the reason much of the seafood byproduct today is still being dumped or disposed at landfills. We have considered a pro- cess where the byproduct is collected at the different sites and brought to a central location where it is hydrolyzed into silage and dried using a carrier liquid drying process (CLD) producing a stable product that can be marketed worldwide. Introduction As a fish meal equipment manufacturer we are in many cases the first in line to get the call when a fish processor, for various reasons, must con- sider how to utilize the fish byproduct from his process. The reasons can include new environmental regulations regarding disposal of byproduct, or an increase in disposal cost from the local landfill or from the person who hauls the byproduct away. -
Alaska Park Science 19(1): Arctic Alaska Are Living at the Species’ Northern-Most to Identify Habitats Most Frequented by Bears and 4-9
National Park Service US Department of the Interior Alaska Park Science Region 11, Alaska Below the Surface Fish and Our Changing Underwater World Volume 19, Issue 1 Noatak National Preserve Cape Krusenstern Gates of the Arctic Alaska Park Science National Monument National Park and Preserve Kobuk Valley Volume 19, Issue 1 National Park June 2020 Bering Land Bridge Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve National Preserve Denali National Wrangell-St Elias National Editorial Board: Park and Preserve Park and Preserve Leigh Welling Debora Cooper Grant Hilderbrand Klondike Gold Rush Jim Lawler Lake Clark National National Historical Park Jennifer Pederson Weinberger Park and Preserve Guest Editor: Carol Ann Woody Kenai Fjords Managing Editor: Nina Chambers Katmai National Glacier Bay National National Park Design: Nina Chambers Park and Preserve Park and Preserve Sitka National A special thanks to Sarah Apsens for her diligent Historical Park efforts in assembling articles for this issue. Her Aniakchak National efforts helped make this issue possible. Monument and Preserve Alaska Park Science is the semi-annual science journal of the National Park Service Alaska Region. Each issue highlights research and scholarship important to the stewardship of Alaska’s parks. Publication in Alaska Park Science does not signify that the contents reflect the views or policies of the National Park Service, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute National Park Service endorsement or recommendation. Alaska Park Science is found online at https://www.nps.gov/subjects/alaskaparkscience/index.htm Table of Contents Below the Surface: Fish and Our Changing Environmental DNA: An Emerging Tool for Permafrost Carbon in Stream Food Webs of Underwater World Understanding Aquatic Biodiversity Arctic Alaska C. -
Essential and Toxic Elements in Sardines and Tuna on the Colombian Market
Food Additives & Contaminants: Part B Surveillance ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tfab20 Essential and toxic elements in sardines and tuna on the Colombian market Maria Alcala-Orozco, Prentiss H. Balcom, Elsie M. Sunderland, Jesus Olivero- Verbel & Karina Caballero-Gallardo To cite this article: Maria Alcala-Orozco, Prentiss H. Balcom, Elsie M. Sunderland, Jesus Olivero-Verbel & Karina Caballero-Gallardo (2021): Essential and toxic elements in sardines and tuna on the Colombian market, Food Additives & Contaminants: Part B, DOI: 10.1080/19393210.2021.1926547 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/19393210.2021.1926547 Published online: 08 Jun 2021. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tfab20 FOOD ADDITIVES & CONTAMINANTS: PART B https://doi.org/10.1080/19393210.2021.1926547 Essential and toxic elements in sardines and tuna on the Colombian market Maria Alcala-Orozco a,b, Prentiss H. Balcomc, Elsie M. Sunderland c, Jesus Olivero-Verbel a, and Karina Caballero-Gallardo a,b aEnvironmental and Computational Chemistry Group, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zaragocilla Campus, University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia; bFunctional Toxicology Group, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zaragocilla Campus, University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia; cJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The presence of metals in canned fish has been associated with adverse effects on human health. Received 15 January 2021 The aim of this study was to evaluate risk-based fish consumption limits based on the concentra Accepted 2 May 2021 tions of eight essential elements and four elements of toxicological concern in sardines and tuna KEYWORDS brands commercially available in the Latin American canned goods market. -
Refashioning Production in Bristol Bay, Alaska by Karen E. Hébert A
Wild Dreams: Refashioning Production in Bristol Bay, Alaska by Karen E. Hébert A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology) in the University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Fernando Coronil, Chair Associate Professor Arun Agrawal Associate Professor Stuart A. Kirsch Associate Professor Barbra A. Meek © Karen E. Hébert 2008 Acknowledgments At a cocktail party after an academic conference not long ago, I found myself in conversation with another anthropologist who had attended my paper presentation earlier that day. He told me that he had been fascinated to learn that something as “mundane” as salmon could be linked to so many important sociocultural processes. Mundane? My head spun with confusion as I tried to reciprocate chatty pleasantries. How could anyone conceive of salmon as “mundane”? I was so confused by the mere suggestion that any chance of probing his comment further passed me by. As I drifted away from the conversation, it occurred to me that a great many people probably deem salmon as mundane as any other food product, even if they may consider Alaskan salmon fishing a bit more exotic. At that moment, I realized that I was the one who carried with me a particularly pronounced sense of salmon’s significance—one that I shared with, and no doubt learned from, the people with whom I conducted research. The cocktail-party exchange made clear to me how much I had thoroughly adopted some of the very assumptions I had set out simply to study. It also made me smile, because it revealed how successful those I got to know during my fieldwork had been in transforming me from an observer into something more of a participant. -
Report of the Working Group on the Application of Genetics in Fisheries and Mariculture
,.· Mariculture Committee ICES CM 1996/F:2 ZJlo REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE APPLICATION OF GENETICS IN FISHERIES AND MARICULTURE Faro, Portugal 19-23 February 1996 This report is not to be quoted without prior consuItation with the General Secretary. The document is areport of an expert group under the auspices ofthe International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views ofthe Council. International Council for the Exploration ofthe Sea Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer Pala:gade 2-4 DK-1261 Copenhagen K Denmark • TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE INTRODUCTION . 1.1 Attendance . 1.2 Working form .. 2 TERMS OF REFERENCE 1996 (C.Res.1995,2:28) 2 2.1a Selective fisheries 2 2.1 b Genetically modified organisms (GMO) 3 2.2 Management units / genetic resources 5 2.3a Genetic brood stock management 10 2.3b Good stocking practice 12 2.4 National activity reports and international cooperation 13 2.5 The 1997 ICESINASCO Symposium 13 3 WORKING GROUP BUSINESS 14 3.1 Comments on Working Group function 14 3.2 Comments on travel funds for WG members 14 3.3 Suggestions for WGAGFM Term of Reference and meetings in 1997 14 APPENDIX 1: National activity reports 16 APPENDIX 2: Terms ofReference 1996 (C.Res.1995, 2:28) 54 APPENDIX 3: Participants at the WGAGFM meeting in Faro 1996 55 APPENDIX 4: WGAGFM member list per April 1996 56 .. 1 INTRODUCTION Aeeordant with C.Res. 2:28 adopted at the 1995 Annual Scienee Conferenee in Aalborg, Denmark, the Working Group on the Applieation of Geneties in Fisheries and Marieulture (WGAGFM; Chairman J. -
Potential Consumer Acceptance of Canned Bighead Carp: a Structural Model Analysis CAROLE R
Marine Resource Economics. Volume 10. pp. 101-116 073&.136OW5 S3.M * ,00 Primed in ihe USA. All nghls reserved. Copyright O 1995 Marine Resources Foundation Potential Consumer Acceptance of Canned Bighead Carp: A Structural Model Analysis CAROLE R. ENGLE PIERRE-JUSTIN KOUKA Aquaculture/Fisheries Center University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff 1200 N. University Drive Pine Bluff, AR 71601 Abstract The effects of socio-demographic factors on consumer ratings of product attributes of an experimental canned bighead product were analyzed. OLS techniques were used to evaluate the effects of experience consuming other canned fish products, race, gender, age, and income on the taste, tex- ture, appearance, and aroma of canned bighead. A logit analysis was then used to measure the effects of these variables on binary choice variables related to preference comparisons and willingness-to-pay as much for canned bighead as for canned salmon and canned tuna. Responses between the com- parisons of canned bighead and canned salmon or canned tuna varied. In- come, region, and gender significantly affected ratings on product attributes while taste variables significantly affected consumers' willingness-to-pay as much for canned bighead as for canned tuna. Conditional probabilities showed more clearly the effects of age, income, and gender on taste ratings, the subsequent effects of taste on preferences, and ultimately on willingness-to- pay. Probabilities estimated showed that canned bighead competes more fa- vorably with canned tuna than with canned salmon. Keywords consumer preferences, structural model analysis, logit. marketing, aquaculture Introduction Bighead carp (Hypophthalmicthys nobilis) have been raised in Arkansas in poly- culture with catfish in commercial fish ponds in an attempt to improve water quality since the 1970s. -
A Review of Guidance on Fish Consumption in Pregnancy: Is It Fit for Purpose? Public Health Nutrition
Taylor, C. , Emmett, P., Emond, A., & Golding, J. (2018). A review of guidance on fish consumption in pregnancy: Is it fit for purpose? Public Health Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980018000599 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record License (if available): CC BY Link to published version (if available): 10.1017/S1368980018000599 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Cambridge University Press at https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/public-health-nutrition/article/review-of-guidance-on- fish-consumption-in-pregnancy-is-it-fit-for-purpose/BC3BB20A2D848F5CF5AED90C86413F85 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Public Health Nutrition: page 1 of 11 doi:10.1017/S1368980018000599 Review Article A review of guidance on fish consumption in pregnancy: is it fit for purpose? Caroline M Taylor*, Pauline M Emmett, Alan M Emond and Jean Golding Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK Submitted 17 November 2017: Final revision received 14 February 2018: Accepted 14 February 2018 Abstract Objective: Public health messages to reduce Hg exposure for pregnant women have focused exclusively on advice on fish consumption to limit Hg exposure, with little account being taken of the positive contribution of fish to nutritional quality. -
A Market Analysis Towards the Further Development of Seaweed Aquaculture in Ireland
Part 1 A Market Analysis towards the Further Development of Seaweed Aquaculture in Ireland Principal authors Máirtín Walsh, BIM Lucy Watson, BIM Part 1 A Market Analysis towards the Further Development of Seaweed Aquaculture in Ireland. Principal authors Máirtín Walsh, BIM Lucy Watson, BIM Contributions from Geoff Robinson, BIM Christine Maggs, QUB Maeve Edwards, NUIG This document is an output of the project, PBA/SW/07/001(01), ‘Development and demonstration of viable hatchery and ongrowing methodologies for seaweed species with identified commercial potential’. This project is carried out under the Sea Change Strategy with the support of the Marine Institute and the Marine Research Sub-programme of the National Development Plan, 2007-2013. Table of Contents Page Executive Summary 3 1 Introduction 5 1.1 The Wild Resource 5 1.2 Project, PBA/SW/07/001(01) 5 1.3 Guiding Policy 6 1.4 The Opportunity 7 2 Industry Overview 9 3 Harvesting and Processing Seaweed to Market 12 3.1 Processing Palmaria palmata and Laminaria digitata 12 3.2 Adding Value through Processing 16 3.3 Milling / Grinding 18 3.4 Extraction 19 4 Markets 21 4.1 Food Products 21 4.2 Agricultural Products 21 4.3 Cosmetic Products 21 4.4 Pricing 22 5 Developing the Domestic Market for Seaweed Products 24 5.1 Increased Production Capacity 24 5.2 Improving Processing Capability 24 5.3 Supporting New Product Development 25 5.4 Provision of consumer information and in-store Promotional Material 25 5.5 Improving the Profile of Seaweed amongst Retailers 26 5.6 Expertise within the Seaweed -
An Ethnography of Old Harbor and Ouzinkie, Alaska
BLACK DUCKS AND SALMON BELLIES An Ethnography of Old Harbor and Ouzinkie, Alaska by Craig Mishler Technical Memorandum No. 7 A Report Produced for the U.S. Minerals Management Service Cooperative Agreement 14-35-0001-30788 March 2001 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence 333 Raspberry Road Anchorage, Alaska 99518 This report has been reviewed by the Minerals Management Service and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Service, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. ADA PUBLICATIONS STATEMENT The Alaska Department of Fish and Game operates all of its public programs and activities free from discrimination on the basis of sex, color, race, religion, national origin, age, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. For information on alternative formats available for this and other department publications, please contact the department ADA Coordinator at (voice) 907- 465-4120, (TDD) 1-800-478-3548 or (fax) 907-586-6595. Any person who believes she or he has been discriminated against should write to: Alaska Department of Fish and Game PO Box 25526 Juneau, AK 99802-5526 or O.E.O. U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ...............................................................................................................................iii List of Figures ...............................................................................................................................iii