DOCSLIB.ORG

Turkey Mission Report 2–6 November 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Turkey Mission Report 2–6 November 2019 Independent Oversight and Advisory Committee for the WHO Health Emergencies Programme Turkey Mission Report 2–6 November 2019 Dr Felicity Harvey Professor Hiroyoshi Endo Mrs Precious Matsoso ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Independent Oversight and Advisory Committee (IOAC) for the WHO Health Emergencies Programme is grateful to the Government of the Republic of Turkey for hosting the visit of the IOAC delegation during 2–6 November 2019 and to the WHO Secretariat at Headquarters (HQ), the Regional Office for Europe (EURO), the Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean (EMRO), and the Country Office in Turkey for facilitating the field missions. Special thanks go to the participants for graciously accepting the invitation to meet with the IOAC delegation and providing important insights into WHO’s work on country preparedness and the current response to the Syrian crisis. I. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Context The Republic of Turkey is a transcontinental country with a population of 82 million and shared borders with eight countries including Iraq, Iran and Syria. Owing to the 9-year conflict in the Syrian Arab Republic, which threatens the lives of an estimated 4 million people in the northwest of the country, around 3.67 million Syrians are thought to be living in Turkey, including 2.3 million who are registered under Temporary Protection. This represents the largest number of refugees hosted in any country in the world.1 The critical needs of this large population have placed enormous pressure on the existing infrastructure and services in Turkey, particularly health services. Turkey is located on the transit route to Europe from Asia and Africa and more than 200 million people per year are expected to travel via the new international airport in Istanbul starting from 2030. Turkey is prone to natural disasters such as floods, cyclones, earthquakes, tsunamis, landslides, and droughts, which could worsen in view of climate change. The country is also subject to outbreaks and epidemics of infectious diseases, as well as emerging and re-emerging diseases such as polio and measles. The complex geopolitical situation of the country, and the involvement of multiple actors across sectors, makes country preparedness and response capacity even more important. 1.2. Mission objectives and activities carried out The mandate of the IOAC is to provide independent scrutiny of the WHO Health Emergencies (WHE) Programme and to monitor WHO’s performance in health emergencies. The objective of the Turkey visit was to review WHO’s work in assisting the Government’s response to the Syrian crisis and in strengthening country preparedness in Turkey. WHO established a Country Office in Ankara in 1959 and a field office for covering cross-border operations into Syria in Gaziantep in 2014. The IOAC took a field trip to Gaziantep and met with the WHO team in charge of the cross-border operation in the northern part of Syria. During the visit to Gaziantep, the IOAC interviewed the Deputy Regional Humanitarian Coordinator for the Syrian Crisis, and the Director General for the European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (DG, ECHO), representatives of the International Organization for Migration (IOM), the UNHCR, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), UNICEF, Syria Relief & Development, and the WATAN Organization. In Ankara, the IOAC delegation met with the Deputy Minister of Health; the Directors-General of the respective Ministry of Health (MOH) divisions for migration, emergency health care services, and public health directorates; the Director-General of foreign affairs; and the President of the national disaster management authority for Turkey. The IOAC delegation also consulted the UN Resident Coordinator and representatives of partner agencies. The mission included a site visit to one of Ankara’s refugee health training centres to appraise the effectiveness of WHO’s support of the Government’s approach to 1 Source : https://www.unhcr.org/globaltrends2018 1 providing access to quality and equitable health care for the Syrian people living in Turkey. During the training centre visit, the delegation interviewed the head of the centre, Syrian health-care workers, Syrian patients, and the implementing partner ASAM (Association for Solidary with Asylum Seekers and Migrants). See annex for visit programme. II. SPECIFIC FINDINGS AND OBSERVATIONS 2.1. WHO Country Office in Turkey and the WHE Programme The IOAC was briefed by the WHO Representative in Turkey that clear guidance was received from the Regional Office for Europe (EURO) regarding implementation of WHE Programme reform in 2016 and that the Country Office organigram is currently being adapted to the strategic directions of the 13th General Programme of Work (GPW13) under EURO guidance. The IOAC noted that the Country Business Model was used as a benchmark in defining the Country Office’s structure but that the Regional Office adopted a flexible approach to meet country-specific needs, giving due weight to emergency preparedness activities across the European Region, as well as response to emergencies. The key areas of work with which the Country Office is supporting the MOH include non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and health promotion, mental health, migration and health, and refugee health and health security. The IOAC observed that there is fluid collaboration and support among the different units in the Country Office for its various projects and that the clear mandate for the WHE Programme has strengthened linkage among programmes. Finance and resource mobilization The WHO Country Office in Turkey holds the largest budget in the European Region, i.e. one third of the total budget, with $43.5 million of funding for 2019. Only $1 million of this was funded by assessed contributions and the rest was covered by voluntary contributions, which are being mobilized in-country in line with the Regional Office’s strategic direction. The IOAC commends the WHO Representative’s leadership in effectively engaging with in-country donor representatives: 65% of funding is raised at Country Office level, compared with 25% from HQ and 10% from EURO. For the cross-border operations in Gaziantep, HQ has played a key role in fundraising within the framework of the Whole of Syria approach. The IOAC noted that the Country Office raised more than 90% of funding from in-country donors in Turkey. Fundraising for the Whole of Syria approach has been done in a coordinated manner among HQ, EMRO, EURO, Country Offices and operational hubs, with an agreed internal funding allocation of 67% (Syria hub), 30.6% (Gaziantep hub), and 2.4% (Amman hub until closure of operations in Amman during 2018) for unearmarked funding; this is being adjusted as per the changing operational requirements and decided by consensus among all hubs. In 2019 a total of US$44 million was received for the cross-border operations in Gaziantep from 11-12 donors including the UK, USAID, OCHA and Japan. This figure indicates that WHO’s performance with respect to the Syria 2 crisis has gained credibility year by year, reflecting sustained confidence from donors. The initial budget of the office was $2.4 million in 2014, and the budget increased to $32 million in 2018. Commendably, more than 80% of the Whole of Syria budget has been used for activities. In managing financial uncertainty, WHO has shown the flexibility of constantly reviewing the organigram in Gaziantep as well as on a regular basis through Whole of Syria Strategic and Operational Reviews every 2–3 months. During its mission to Turkey, the IOAC witnessed the critical role of the Country Office and the importance of the delegation of authority for the WHO Representative in mobilizing and deploying resources at the country level. The Country Office has successfully raised US$3 million for health security between 2018 and 2021 and is pushing the agenda for country preparedness. While welcoming the Transformation Agenda, staff noted that resource mobilization should be done in a coordinated manner and that the WHO Country Office is best placed to liaise with in-country donors. The IOAC is pleased to see that the Country Office’s fundraising authority has increased, but is concerned that the additional workload and potential risks of handling funds could be a disincentive for WHO Representatives. The WHO Representative took the initiative to provide staff with training for project management to reduce risk and increase management of the donor funds through the WHO online learning platform ilearn, but there is no systematic career development programme to incentivise such training. The IOAC recommends that WHO empowers WHO Representatives and acquires adequate capacity for resource mobilization, and programme and risk management skills training at the country level. HR management In the Country Office in Ankara, there are 38 positions: 21 national staff, nine international staff and eight non-staff (those on Special Service Agreements, consultants and volunteers). As well as noting the great diversity of staff in the Country Office, the IOAC observed that the proportion of staff working on the WHE Programme is high, owing to cross-border operations and the donor-funded programmes on refugee health and health security. Out of 38 positions based in Ankara, 24 positions have been allocated to the WHE Programme. The field office in Gaziantep is run by a team of 26 staff including 17 professional positions. The IOAC noted an issue related to the HR policy to support staff working on emergencies from non-hardship duty stations. Cross-border operations in response to the Syria crisis are managed by the office in Gaziantep. But since Turkey is classified as a non-hardship duty station according to the UN hardship classifications, the staff in Gaziantep are not entitled to R&R or other packages for hardship duty stations set by the International Civil Service Commission.2 The IOAC recommends that WHO reviews the degree of hardship in offices working on emergencies, especially those carrying out cross-border operations (e.g.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Engagement Programme: Visit to the Cyprus Organisation Cyprus League Against Rheumatism (CYPLAR)
    Engagement Programme: Visit to the Cyprus organisation Cyprus League Against Rheumatism (CYPLAR) Participants: Prof. Hans Bijlsma, Dieter Wiek Events: Thursday, 9 May 2019: In the morning discussion with the President of the Health Community of the Cyprus National Parliament, Mr. Costas Constantinou and the Members of Parliament Dr. Adamos Adamou and Mr. Prokopis Prokopiou, and later in the morning discussion with the Minister of Health Mr. Constantinos Ioannou. In the afternoon 15:00 – 18:30 Conference «Work and People with Rheumatic Diseases» “DON’T DELAY CONNECT TODAY TIME2WORK” Saturday, 11 May, 12.00 – 14.00: Opening Ceremony of CYPLAR’s Event for the Annual Awareness Week. Goals: • Raise awareness for people with RMDS to show that they are able to work with a rheumatic disease if they receive the appropriate support. • Collaborate with stakeholders to implement policies to support people to enter/retain the labour market. In the Thursday morning events with members of the Cyprus Parliament and the Cyprus Health Minister in which Marios Kouloumas, President of Cyplar, Prof. Johannes W.J. Bijlsma and Dieter Wiek the VP of EULAR representing PARE explained the background and initiation of EULAR’s campaign Don’t Delay Connect Today and then focused on the importance of work. They outlined that it is still difficult in particular for young people with a rheumatic disease to get into work and people to stay at work, if they get a rheumatic disease. Also they stressed out that people with RMDs have long sick leave, or get an early retirement because of their illness which has an impact on the society They emphasised that with workplace adaptations, working time flexibility etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Bulletin July.Pdf
    July, 2014 - Volume: 2, Issue: 7 IN THIS BULLETIN HIGHLIGHTS: Polio spread feared over mass displacement 02 English News 2-7 Dengue: Mosquito larva still exists in Pindi 02 Lack of coordination hampering vaccination of NWA children 02 Polio Cases Recorded 8 Delayed security nods affect polio drives in city 02 Combating dengue: Fumigation carried out in rural areas 03 Health Profile: 9-11 U.A.E. polio campaign vaccinates 2.5 million children in 21 areas in Pakistan 03 District Multan Children suffer as Pakistan battles measles epidemic 03 Health dept starts registering IDPs to halt polio spread 04 CDA readies for dengue fever season 05 Maps 12,14,16 Ulema declare polio immunization Islamic 05 Polio virus detected in Quetta linked to Sukkur 05 Articles 13,15 Deaths from vaccine: Health minister suspends 17 officials for negligence 05 Polio vaccinators return to Bara, Pakistan, after five years 06 Urdu News 17-21 Sewage samples polio positive 06 Six children die at a private hospital 06 06 Health Directory 22-35 Another health scare: Two children infected with Rubella virus in Jalozai Camp Norwegian funding for polio eradication increased 07 MULTAN HEALTH FACILITIES ADULT HEALTH AND CARE - PUNJAB MAPS PATIENTS TREATED IN MULTAN DIVISION MULTAN HEALTH FACILITIES 71°26'40"E 71°27'30"E 71°28'20"E 71°29'10"E 71°30'0"E 71°30'50"E BUZDAR CLINIC TAYYABA BISMILLAH JILANI Rd CLINIC AMNA FAMILY il BLOOD CLINIC HOSPITAL Ja d M BANK R FATEH MEDICAL MEDICAL NISHTER DENTAL Legend l D DENTAL & ORAL SURGEON a & DENTAL STORE MEDICAL COLLEGE A RABBANI n COMMUNITY AND HOSPITAL a CLINIC R HOSPITALT C HEALTH GULZAR HOSPITAL u "' Basic Health Unit d g CENTER NAFEES MEDICARE AL MINHAJ FAMILY MULTAN BURN UNIT PSYCHIATRIC h UL QURAN la MATERNITY HOME CLINIC ZAFAR q op Blood Bank N BLOOD BANK r ishta NIAZ CLINIC R i r a Rd X-RAY SIYAL CLINIC d d d SHAHAB k a Saddiqia n R LABORATORY FAROOQ k ÷Ó o Children Hospital d DECENT NISHTAR a .
    [Show full text]
  • Coronavirus Timeline: Welsh and UK Government’S Response Research Briefing
    Welsh Parliament Senedd Research Coronavirus timeline: Welsh and UK Government’s response Research Briefing The table below highlights key developments in Wales and the UK in response to coronavirus (Covid-19). Senedd elections are held 6 May 2021 The people of Wales head to the polls to vote for the next Senedd / Welsh Parliament. Wales moves into alert level 3 3 May 2021 From today the whole of Wales is under alert level 3 restrictions, as confirmed by the First Minister on 30 April. The next review of the coronavirus restrictions is due by 13 May 2021 so will be carried out by the new Welsh Government following the Senedd election on 6 May 2021. The current Welsh Government previously indicated that Wales could move into alert level 2 on 17 May 2021. Senedd election to go ahead on 6 May 2021 27 April 2021 Th Welsh Elections (Coronavirus) Act 2021 requires the Welsh Ministers to review the holding of the 2021 Senedd election due to coronavirus. Following the fourth and final review, it was not deemed necessary to postpone the election. Review of the coronavirus regulations www.senedd.wales/research Coronavirus timeline: Welsh and UK Government’s response 23 April 2021 Following the required review of the coronavirus restriction regulations, the First Minister announces that from 26 April outdoor swimming pools, outdoor attractions, organised outdoor activities for up to 30 people and wedding receptions for up to 30 people can take place along with the reopening of outdoor hospitality. From 3 May 2021 gyms and leisure centres can reopen, extended households will be possible, children’s indoor activities and organised indoor activities for up to 15 people can begin again.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy and Institutional Responses to COVID-19 in the Middle East and North Africa: Egypt *
    Policy and Institutional Responses to COVID-19 in the Middle East and North Africa: Egypt * Summary The Egyptian government implemented a nationwide lockdown and social distancing measures to control the spread of COVID-19 starting in March 2020. The highest levels of the central government were responsible for executing the country’s policy and institutional response, which was coordinated through the Higher Committee to Combat Coronavirus chaired by the prime minister. The Ministry of Health and Population has played a key role in overseeing the government’s ongoing health response, releasing daily briefings on total confirmed cases, recoveries, and death rates across the country. Other state organizations, including the armed forces and state enterprises, have been mobilized to support the government’s response to the crisis. The government rapidly launched an online portal through the Crisis Management Unit within the Cabinet’s Information and Decision Support Center, which publishes and communicates a wide array of COVID-19-related information to the public through various media channels. The government launched a 24-hour hotline and a smartphone application to enable general access to resources and information on COVID-19. More recently, testing capacity—a challenge in the early months of the outbreak—has been expanded to include 57 laboratories nationwide, as well as mobile drive-through testing facilities. Moreover, the Ministry of Planning and Economic Development has launched an online COVID-19 policy tracker, which provides an interactive platform with details on the 432 COVID-19 policy response measures implemented by 77 government entities to date. Despite notable efforts to contain the initial spread of the virus, subsequent months saw an acceleration in daily-confirmed cases of COVID-19, with new cases reaching a peak of 1,774 on June 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief on India-Angola Relations
    Brief on India-Angola Relations Relations between India and Angola, one of the major oil producers in Africa, are underpinned by a vibrant energy partnership and date back to pre-independence era of Angola. In an act of solidarity, India supported Angolan freedom struggle against the Portuguese colonial rule till the country attained independence in 1975. Since then, the Indian leadership has retained robust ties with the reigning political establishment in Angola - MPLA (Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola). India established diplomatic relations with Angola in 1985. Angola has been supportive of India´s candidature to various posts in the UN and is sympathetic towards India´s interest for membership in an expanded UNSC, J&K, and terrorism etc. Angola supported India’s election to the UNSC’s non- permanent seat for the period 2021-22. The first high level visit from India took place in May 1986 with the visit of Late Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi to Angola which was reciprocated by President of Angola José Eduardo dos Santos in April 1987. PM Dr. Manmohan Singh met with President Jose Santos on the sidelines of the G-8 meeting at L’Aquila, Italy on July 10, 2009. During his visit to Johannesburg to attend the BRICS Summit in July 26, 2018, Angolan President Lourenco met Prime Minister Modi and discussed ways to enhance trade and investment between the two countries and also to deepen cooperation in sectors like Energy, agriculture and food processing and pharmaceuticals. Angolan Minister for External Relations Joao Bernardo de Miranda visited India in May 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health Report of the National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health
    Report of the National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health Report of the National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health Report of the National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health Report of the Report of the National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health Report of the National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health National Commission on Report of the Macroeconomics and Health National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, 2005 EQUITABLE DEVELOPMENT • HEALTHY FUTURE Report of the National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health Ministry of Health & Family Welfare Government of India, New Delhi August 2005 © Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India September 2005 ISBN 81-7525-633-8 This Report does not address tertiary care and related areas such as super speciality hospital development in the public or private sector, telemedicine, medical tourism, environmental pollution or food safety etc. though they are all equally important. The Commission Report is based on background papers which can be accessed from the NCMH website www.mohfw.nic.in. They have also been published in two companion volumes. This report was written during the period April 1, 2004 - March 31, 2005. Printed at: Cirrus Graphics Private Limited B 261, Phase I, Naraina Industrial Area, New Delhi 110 028 Tel: + 91 11 51411507/1508 Fax: +91 11 51417575 email: [email protected] Editors: Pranay G. Lal and Byword Editorial Consultants Cover design: Quote Design Studio ii REPORT OF THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON MACROECONOMICS AND HEALTH Members of the National Commission on Macroeconomics & Health Shri P.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf | 579.29 Kb
    COVID-19 Georgia Situation Report # 20 as of 23 October 2020 This report was produced by the Office of UN Resident Coordinator in collaboration with UN AFPs and international partners. It covers the period of 9-23 October 2020. HIGHLIGHTS Wearing masks outdoors in Tbilisi, Kutaisi and Batumi is “strictly recommended” 5 more regional clinics will begin receiving fever patients Restaurants and entertainment facilities in Tbilisi, Municipality of Mtskheta and Imereti will close at 22:00 1200 additional inpatient beds available in Georgia’s capital StopCov fund has accumulated GEL 134,412,350 as of 23 October 2020 9,751 24,562 183 4,408 Total recovered Confirmed cases Total deaths People in quarantine Source: www.stopcov.ge 23 October 2020 Georgia Situation Overview 23 Oct - Head of the Government Administration Natia Mezvrishvili announced that wearing masks outdoors in Tbilisi, Kutaisi and Batumi is “strictly recommended”, underscoring that the police and labor inspection will monitor the enforcement of the recommendation. 23 Oct - According to Health Minister Ekaterine Tikaradze, starting today, 5 more regional clinics in Sagarejo, Tetritskaro, Kutaisi, Akhaltsikhe, and Lanchkhuti will begin receiving fever patients. 20 Oct - restaurants and entertainment facilities in the Municipality of Mtskheta, located north to the capital city of Tbilisi, are banned from operating after 22:00. 15 Oct - Health Minister Ekaterine Tikaradze announced today that 4 additional clinics in Tbilisi will be used in the COVID-19 management process, making 1200 inpatient beds available in Georgia’s capital. 15 Oct - restaurants and entertainment facilities in Georgia’s capital Tbilisi, and in the western Imereti region are banned from operating past 22:00.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks by Dr. Zhu CHEN, the Chinese Health Minister at the Opening Ceremony of the ECOSOC AMR Regional Ministerial Meeting On
    Remarks by Dr. Zhu CHEN, the Chinese Health Minister at The Opening Ceremony of the ECOSOC AMR Regional Ministerial Meeting on Promoting Health Literacy (9:30 am, April 29, 2009, Beijing) Honorable Under Secretary-General of the United Nations, Mr. Sha Zukang, President of the United Nations Economic and Social Council, Ms. Lucas Assistant Director-General of World Health Organization, Mr. Alwan, Distinguished ministers, delegates, ladies and gentlemen: Good morning! I am very pleased to attend the opening ceremony of the ECOSOC Annual Ministerial Review Regional Ministerial Meeting on Promoting Health Literacy. On behalf of the Chinese Ministry of Health, I’d like to congratulate the convening of the meeting, and extend warm welcome to all the delegates from Ministries of Health of various states, relevant United Nations agencies, academic institutions both at home and abroad as well as representatives of non-governmental organizations who come all the way to the meeting. The United Nations Economic and Social Council has set the theme of this meeting as “Promoting Health Literacy”, which I strongly believe is a very good one and I highly appreciate the unswerving and tireless efforts made by the United Nations Economic and Social Council to promote the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. As we all know, the United Nations Millennium Summit established the Millennium Development Goals, three of which are directly related to health and universal access to health knowledge is essential for achieving these three goals. A study on reducing infant and young children mortality conducted by the World Health Organization indicated that each year, 1.7 million people die from diarrheal diseases all over the world, and diarrhea is a major cause of death in infants, about 94% of diarrhea deaths can be prevented through the cultivation of good health habits.
    [Show full text]
  • Tackling the Shadow Economy English)
    LATVIA Title of the policy or measure (in Tackling the shadow economy English) Case study/good practice name The council for prevention of the ‘shadow economy’ (Ēnu ekonomikas padome) and “Action plan of public authorities for combatting ‘shadow economy’ in 2016-2020” Country Latvia Sectors Macroeconomics, combatting the ‘shadow economy’ Target Groups Society in general, entrepreneurs Short sentence summarising the The measure relates to inter-institutional supervision, planning, coordination measure and analyses of activities to prevent the shadow economy. This also includes action plans, according to the needs of relevant bodies. Background Background context Under a need to revitalise the economy, as part of structural reforms the driving the Latvian Government decided to address the issue of reducing the shadow implementation of the economy. measure When was the measure Since 2010, on-going implemented? (including Several complementary documents adopted: start date and end date/ongoing) “Action Plan to Reduce Shadow Economy and Promote Fair Competition 2010- 2013” (not in force) “Action plan of public authorities for combatting ‘shadow economy’ in 2016- 2020” Names(s) of From 16 September 2014 until 1 October 2017, the council has comprised the authorities/bodies/ following 19 members (4 of them are representatives of social partners): prime minister (chair), minister of economics, minister of finances, minister of organisations involved interior, minister of welfare, minister of transport, minister of justice, minister of health, minister of agriculture, prosecutor general, head of the Corruption Prevention and Combating Bureau, head of the State Labour Inspectorate, head of the State Revenue Service, chief of the State police, head of the Health Inspectorate, president of Employers’ Confederation of Latvia, head of the Latvian Association of Local and Regional Governments, head of Free Trade Union Confederation of Latvia and president of Latvian Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance Tools and Framework for Health in All Policies
    GOVERNANCE TOOLS AND FRAMEWORK FOR HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES Written by: Louise St-Pierre, National Collaborating centre for Healthy Public Policy Assisted by: Geneviève Hamel, National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy Geneviève Lapointe, Institut national de santé publique du Québec David McQueen, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Matthias Wismar, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .....................................................................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................................1 I. GOVERNANCE TOOLS FOR COLLABORATIVE WORK ..................................................................................8 II. HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT AS A SPECIFIC GOVERNANCE TOOL FOR HIAP ....................................11 III. ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK AND CASE STUDIES .........................................................................................13 IV. CASE STUDIES OF COUNTRIES ................................................................................................................18 Case study – England ...............................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • In the Shadow of Revolution: a Decade of Authoritarian Hardening in Azerbaijan*
    In the Shadow of Revolution: A Decade of Authoritarian Hardening in Azerbaijan* Cory Welt George Washington University [email protected] July 2014 WORKING PAPER * For citation as a working paper. 1 Over the last ten years, Azerbaijan’s ranking on the “democracy index” of the U.S.-based nongovernmental organization Freedom House has reflected the country’s slide from a “semi- consolidated” authoritarian regime to a “consolidated” authoritarian one.1 This change in regime type has not come suddenly. It has been the result of a gradual hardening of authoritarian governance since 2003, the year Ilham Aliyev became president. It might be difficult at first to grasp the significance of this shift in classification. Azerbaijan was hardly democratic under President Aliyev’s father, Heydar Aliyev, from 1993 to 2003. During the senior Aliyev’s rule, however, the regime allowed at least some freedom to civil society and media. Since then, the regime has become increasingly authoritarian across all indicators, but the collapse of space for nongovernmental forces to engage freely in the public sphere has been especially pronounced. Azerbaijan’s slide into consolidated authoritarianism has coincided with a decade of regime change from below in Azerbaijan’s two neighborhoods of post-Soviet Eurasia and the Middle East. From the color revolutions of 2003-2005 to the Arab Spring of 2010-2011 and Ukraine’s EuroMaidan of 2013-2014, the Azerbaijani government repeatedly has witnessed the fall of less consolidated authoritarian governments all around it. While it is difficult to determine precisely how much the power of these examples has contributed to Azerbaijan’s authoritarian hardening, a few connections are clear.
    [Show full text]
  • Portfolios of Union Ministers Announced Following Cabinet Reshuffle
    Vol. * XXXVI. No. 11 * KAVARATTI *TUESDAY * 13 JULY 2021. Price Rs. 2. Health ID Generation Portfolios of Union Ministers Announced under NDHM Kavaratti : Advisor to Following Cabinet Reshuffle Administrator Shri A. Anbarasu, IAS directed to all the Govt. employees and their family members to create their health ID either through the NDHM web portal, directly or by utilizing IT/ NIC/CSC, including any other facilities where internet is available. For the residents of Kavaratti, the services of NDHM counter at the New DHS building (near Pharmacy) can be availed between 10 AM to 5 PM, on all working days. The National Digital Health Mission (NDHM) is a digital health ecosystem aimed to provide every citizen of India with a unique health ID, digitilized health record with identifiers for doctors and health facilities. NDHM is expected to bring efficiency The President Ram Nath Kovind, Vice President Shri Venkaiah Naidu, Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi and other members of Council of and transparency in Ministers at a Swearing-in Ceremony at Rashtrapati Bhavan in New Delhi. healthcare services in the country. It will New Delhi : Portfolios Hardeep Singh Puri is Bhupender Yadav will Giriraj Singh is Minister Dr Rajkumar Ranjan integrate various digital of Union Ministers the Minister for Petroleum be the Labour Minister. for Rural Development Singh will be Minister of health services to creat and will continue in the an ecosystem which announced the following JD(U) leader and Panchayati Raj. G State for External Affairs can assimilate existing recent Cabinet reshuffle. Housing and Urban Ramchandra Prasad Kishan Reddy is the new and Education.
    [Show full text]