DOCSLIB.ORG

October 2003

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

a Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund FFORWARD with LLEICESTERSHIRE AAGGREGATE GGRANTS Bardon Quarry Leicestershire County Council Annual Report for DEFRA 2002 – 2003 October 2003 MAPS® aerial photography copyright of UK Perspectives. For further information please contact UK Perspectives c/o Infoterra Ltd, Arthur Street, Barwell, Leicestershire LE9 8GZ Tel: 01455 849207 Foreword Welcome to the first FLAG annual report covering the 2002/2003 financial year. Leicestershire County Council was very pleased to have been chosen by DEFRA as one of the Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund (ALSF) distributing bodies last year, since, as you will read later on, this county is one of the major aggregate producing areas of England. As such, many communities in Leicestershire have in the past, and still are, experiencing both the benefits and disadvantages of having aggregate sites on their doorstep. For them, the opportunities provided by FLAG in mitigating the impact of these substantial sites, has been most welcome. I think it is fair to say that for all concerned with FLAG during its first year of operation, it has been an exciting and rewarding time. To go from zero to a fully operational scheme within a few months was a challenge for potential applicants as well as for Leicestershire County Council. The majority of the applications have come from community groups and parish councils and I must commend them for both their foresight and dedication – preparing a grant aid application, organising the fund-raising and overseeing the works is a mammoth task. Sadly, there has been insufficient grant aid to assist every applicant and I am aware of a large number of potential projects that are still being developed and have yet to surface as applications. I hope that having read this report you will not only be impressed by what has already been achieved, but will support Leicestershire County Council in their bid to extend the current ALSF programme for at least a further 3 years after its current closing date of March 31st 2004. There is still much work to be done. Ernie White CC Leicestershire County Council Lead Cabinet Member for Community Services 1. Introduction FLAG (Forward with Leicestershire Aggregate Grants) was launched by Leicestershire County Council in September 2002, supported by money from the Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund (ALSF), the overall management of which rests with DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). The ALSF itself was launched in April 2002 by the then Environment Minister Michael Meacher, with the aim of helping to offset some of the environmental damage caused by aggregate extraction. It was designed to run as a two-year programme, with its funding coming from part of the income generated by the newly introduced Aggregates Levy. It will perhaps surprise those of you who don’t know Leicestershire well, that it is one of the three largest aggregate producing counties in England – over 16 million tonnes produced in 2001. As you can see from the map overleaf, aggregate sites are found across the whole county. Granite, limestone, ironstone, sand and gravel are extracted and many of the quarries lie close to residential areas, where the impact of these operations can sometimes be significantly felt. FLAG grants have specifically targeted those communities and areas most affected by aggregate extraction. The response from these communities has been so positive that the scheme is over- subscribed with a wide range of inventive and worthwhile grant applications. 2. Background Information Leicestershire has a long history of aggregate production, stretching back well into the 1800’s. The eastern side of the county has many ironstone quarries, many of which are now disused. In the central Leicestershire area along the River Soar, Wreake and Trent valleys, there have been and still are, extensive sand and gravel extraction sites. Similar mineral deposits are found elsewhere to the south and west of the county. Large quantities of granite are quarried in and around the Charnwood Forest and as far south as Sapcote, whilst substantial limestone quarries are found close to the Derbyshire border. Many of these sites, and especially those in the centre of the county, are found close to towns and villages. In some instances, there are strong links between the development of the aggregate sites themselves and the adjacent settlements. These aggregate sites have had, and are still having, a physical and visual impact on the surrounding communities. 3. Developing FLAG When developing FLAG, Leicestershire County Council officers drew on their many years of experience of initiating and running a wide range of environment-orientated grant programmes. Within the East Midlands region, Leicestershire has always been one of the leading grant aiding local authorities. Its SHIRE Grant programme currently provides over £550,000 for environmental and community based grants. It is interesting to note that the FLAG application form, grant aid conditions and assessment system have been adopted by at least one other ALSF distributing body as the basis of their operations. As well as complying with DEFRA’s requirements, FLAG was developed to complement rather than duplicate the SHIRE Grants programme, and in financial terms, plugs the funding gap below the ALSF schemes run by national distributing bodies like the Countryside Agency. In addition to its grant aid experience, the County Council is the Mineral Planning Authority for Leicestershire. This position provides it with a unique local knowledge of past and current aggregate extraction, contact with mineral operators, quarry liaison groups, parish councils, community groups and similar organisations. All of this experience was put to good use when developing FLAG and targeting potential applicants. 4. Administering FLAG The Environmental Action Team, within the County Council’s Community Services Department, manages FLAG’s day to day operation. This is the same team that helps to administer the SHIRE Environmental Grants programme and thus its staff are skilled in this type of work. Another advantage of this arrangement is that the Environmental Action Team is set within the same branch of the Community Services Department as the staff overseeing Minerals Development Control, Sport and Recreation, Village Halls and Historic Buildings. This working relationship assists potential applicants to develop their projects, assess applications and oversee the final work. Staff also have access to a huge range of professional expertise elsewhere within the Community Services Department and across the authority as a whole, including ecologists, archaeologists, quantity surveyors, building surveyors, civil engineers and solicitors. This helps to ensure that applicants are given the best advice, that their applications are assessed thoroughly and accurately, and that a high standard of work is achieved. 4.1 Marketing FLAG From the outset, it was clear that, because of the tight financial timetable set by DEFRA, the marketing of FLAG would need to be targeted at those communities and sites where there was the greatest likelihood of applications meeting the ALSF’s goals. To achieve this, officers undertook an internal consultation exercise that generated an initial short-list of 30 potential schemes. This exercise was progressed by contacting the organisations linked to the potential schemes so the benefits that FLAG might provide could be fully explored. In addition, press articles were written for the Leicestershire daily and weekly newspapers and the County Council’s own newspaper, “Leicestershire Matters” (circulated to over 260,000 households and also available on the LCC website). Elected members, officers and quarry liaison groups were briefed about FLAG, and every opportunity was taken through the many partnership organisations with which the County Council works, to publicise the scheme. This work paid off, with 57 enquires being received by the FLAG administrative officer. The marketing of FLAG does not stop when an application has been approved, since the FLAG administrative officer liaises with the applicant about ongoing publicity, an opening ceremony and the formal hand-over of the specially commissioned FLAG plaque. 4.2 Assessing FLAG applications To ensure that all applications were dealt with in a fair, consistent and systematic manner, a points based assessment scheme was developed. It should be stressed that the final assessment of any application takes place only after detailed discussions with the applicant and a visit to the site of the potential scheme. This contact aims to ensure that the application is as well considered and developed as possible – including exploring all potential funding avenues - and is ready for it’s final detailed assessment. The following criteria are used during the final assessment. • Demonstrable environmental impact – any application failing to reach the minimum score for demonstrable environmental impact cannot be considered for FLAG support. This aspect of the assessment system is also used to determine whether prospective applications will be eligible for FLAG support, thus saving the potential applicant’s time and effort in preparing something that might ultimately fail. The following factors are considered when assessing the extent of environmental impact: proximity of the potential scheme to aggregate sites the level of visual intrusion direct effects such as noise, dust and vehicle movements whether the aggregate
Recommended publications
  • Heritage 220 Q4 2015

    Heritage 220 Q4 2015

    www.loughboroughnats.org No. 220 1 October - 31 December 2015 Editorial Panel: Helen Ikin, Steve Woodward, Jim Graham. Hon. Secretary: Sue Graham, 5 Lychgate Close, Cropston, Leics. LE7 7HU (0116-2366474) CLASSIFIED RECORDS The original records from which Heritage is compiled will no longer be archived at the Leicestershire and Rutland Environmental Records Centre, County Hall. The committee is looking for a new home for them. MAMMALS Several members have sent in Hedgehog sightings this quarter, one was reported to HB by a gardener in Spinney Hill Park in November, the first there for several years; SFW had fresh droppings in his Groby garden on 11 October; one was photographed in the garden on a trail camera on 23 & 24 October, and one was crossing a road in Groby on 1 November about 9 pm. PJD had droppings in her Quorn garden on 13 and 27 October, TB had one sleeping in her hedgehog house in Quorn but it was not in hibernation as it was not always in the house IN THIS EDITION and was seen in the garden in the first week of January. HI had one in her Woodhouse garden – CLASSIFIED RECORDS snapped by a trail camera on the night of 5 October. A small one and a larger one, who Ÿ Mammals Page 1 weighed in at 640 g, came for food several nights Ÿ between early October and 12 November. A Birds Page 2 neighbour in Woodhouse had one or two different Ÿ ones visiting her garden. Hedgehogs seem to have Reptiles, Amphibians & Fish Page 5 been late going into hibernation – the weather was mild in late autumn.
  • Heritage 217 Q1 2015

    Heritage 217 Q1 2015

    No. 217 1 January - 31 March 2015 Editorial Panel: Helen Ikin, Steve Woodward, Jim Graham. Hon. Sec. Sue Graham, 5 Lychgate Close, Cropston, Leicester. LE7 7HU. Tel: 0116-2366474 A View From The Armchair To live and grow up in a house with a lovely garden is a real privilege. For a naturalist it can provide hours of fun and a realisation that even in an area that we consider familiar there is still much to learn. My father built the house in Quorn in Leicestershire in the early 1950s after demolishing three small cottages that were initially on the site. My parents and sister moved into the house on its completion in 1955. I was born in the house a year later. My father was, and still is, a keen naturalist and during my childhood he held a ringing licence and ringed birds in our garden. Birds have now been ringed in the garden for 60 years and this has provided us with a wealth of information. The garden which is some 80 feet long and 40 feet wide, borders onto a mixed woodland called Kaye’s Plantation. I started bird ringing in 1974 and, after attaining my C-permit a short time later, started to use a mist net in the garden which added to the variety of birds ringed. Since we started we have caught some 57 species some of which have taken us by surprise including: Common Gull, Kingfisher, Lesser Spotted Woodpecker and Firecrest. The fourth Siskin I had ever caught in the garden in April 1976 IN THIS EDITION was wearing a Russian ring! It had been ringed near Liepaya in Latvia in October the previous year.
  • Heritage 211 Q3 2013

    Heritage 211 Q3 2013

    No. 211 1 July - 30 September 2013 Editorial Panel: Helen Ikin, Steve Woodward, Jim Graham. Hon. Sec. Judy Johnson, 27 Sandalwood Road, Loughborough, Leics. LE11 3PR (01509-214711) IVY Hedera helix - A PLANT FOR ALL SEASONS Ivy, our only evergreen native climbing plant, is well known to butterfly enthusiasts as being the second generation food plant of the Holly Blue larvae but I suspect far fewer appreciate its importance to large numbers of moth species such as The Chestnut, Dark Chestnut, Dark Sword-grass, Tawny Pinion, Green-brindled Crescent, The Satellite and Red-line Quaker. It is also one of two main larval food plants of an attractive little geometer moth, the Yellow-barred Brindle, whose other main food plant is the Holly - like the Holly Blue! Ivy also provides important winter hibernating cover for The Brimstone, The Peacock and numerous other insect species. It gives protection to hibernating insects and roosting birds in the worst of the winter's weather when the countryside becomes a wind-swept, hostile place to all living organisms and when decent shelter can make all the difference between life and death to creatures fighting to stay alive and doing their best to avoid being blown into oblivion! Like many another conservation-minded person, I guess, I went through a phase in my life when I thought that Ivy growing on trees was a bad thing and should therefore be prevented by cutting IN THIS EDITION CLASSIFIED RECORDS Ÿ Mammals Page 2 Ÿ Birds Page 3 Ÿ Reptiles and Amphibians Page 7 Ÿ Fish Page 8 Ÿ Butterflies Page 9 Ivy © Stephen Woodward Ÿ Moths Page 13 through the stems - how dangerous a little Ÿ Beetles Page 15 knowledge can be! With the passage of time and more knowledge, I now realise that Ivy is Ÿ Other Insects Page 18 ecologically one of our most important native plant Ÿ species and often more important than some of Plants and Ferns Page 22 the tree species up which it climbs for support.
  • Appendix 2 - Site Assessments

    Appendix 2 - Site Assessments

    Appendix 2 - Site Assessments Basis of Date of Survey SHLAA alternative Landscape Overview of ecological value/ Enhancement SHLAA Site Location (where Site Description Ecological Connectivity Rating Site Ref evidence (where Comments risks from development Opportunities applicable) applicable) PSE107 Beacon View Farm Quorn 09/08/2018 PSI in floodplain loss of grassland B employment site PSE210 Part of North of Leicester SUE x within PSH210 dwelling with glasshouses, hard standing. Overgrown garden to rear with self set Links to linear woodland along PSE233 Nursery Granite Way 01/09/2018 C birch willow and understorey of brambles Granite Way and nettles (etc) Dominated by arable land but with some Adjacent to M1 habitat corridor and lower with some important features on PSE24 East of Fairway Road Shepshed Aug-18 X X grassland a hedgerow network and broad B woodland site and immediately adjacent laeaved plantation bare ground forming part of existing Queniborough brook runs adjacent- PSE343 The Burrows Queniborough x aerial images industrial estate. Areas of rank grassland B requirement to buffer and scrub to south retention and buffering of ditch, Dominated by arable land and bisected PSE345 Derby Road Dishley Aug-18 X X X mititgation should ebe acheivable on B by a wet ditch site Industrial site with area of mown Including adequate buffers to adjacent Adjacent to 2 LWSs- Dishley PSE356 Derby Road Dishley Aug-18 x x grassland and tall ruderal/ rank grassland LWSs should be adequate to mitigate B Grange and Black Brook on west side any on site losses Tall ruderal habitat within larger grassland/arable land parcel.
  • A Review of Freshwater Fish in Leicestershire and Rutland by Andrew Heaton, County Recorder for Fish, 2013

    A Review of Freshwater Fish in Leicestershire and Rutland by Andrew Heaton, County Recorder for Fish, 2013

    A Review of Freshwater Fish in Leicestershire and Rutland By Andrew Heaton, County Recorder for Fish, 2013 1. Introduction 1.1 The Historic View Lacking the trout-haunted chalk streams or salmon-spawning upland rivers, Leicestershire and Rutland (L&R) have tended to be little regarded in fishery terms. Even the main coarse rivers (Soar, Welland) were not seen as measuring up to the Severn or Thames. In “The Compleat Angler”, Izaak Walton’s only reference to Leicestershire is to name it as one of the counties through which the Trent flows (forming the county boundary for a relatively short distance near Castle Donington). 1.2 Previous Studies There appear to have been few previous reviews or studies of fish populations related specifically to Leicestershire and/or Rutland. Browne (1889) listed L&R’s fish (also including details of fossil fish from the two counties). The wording used in the 1889 document was repeated almost exactly in Browne’s contribution to the Victoria County History (1907), though there is differentiation of River and Brook Lamprey in the 1889 publication, a distinction that was slightly confused in the VCH. Through the 20th Century, fish surveys were undertaken by the various water authorities, providing the information relevant to Leicestershire and Rutland mapped in Maitland (1972) and Davies et al (2004). Onions (2008, 2009) gave an overview of Leicestershire fish. 1.3 Recording Fish Whilst the bulk of fish surveys are undertaken by Environment Agency (EA) fisheries teams, utilising techniques such as netting and electrofishing, other people are recording fish and generating distribution maps.
  • Space for Wildlife 2010

    Space for Wildlife 2010

    Space for Wildlife Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Biodiversity Action Plan 2010 – 2015 Version: December 2010 Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Leicestershire and Rutland Biodiversity Action Plan 1.2 Wildlife habitats – the current resource 1.3 Leicestershire and Rutland - key facts 1.4 Leicestershire and Rutland Biodiversity Action Plan habitats 2. Priority BAP habitats 3. Promoting the creation of new wildlife habitat in the wider countryside 4. Survey, monitor and promote favourable management of existing good sites through the Local Wildlife Sites system 5. Species Action Plans 6. Access and Biodiversity 7. Community Participation Plan 8. Further information on habitats and species 8.1 Space for Wildlife – Priority Habitats 8.2 Space for Wildlife – Priority Species 9. Important areas for wildlife in Leicestershire and Rutland 10. Habitat creation information 1. Introduction 1.1 Leicestershire and Rutland Biodiversity Action Plan Biodiversity is the variety of life in all its forms and the habitats where it occurs. In 1992, at the ‘Earth Summit’ in Rio de Janeiro, the UK Government signed the Biodiversity Convention. This was followed up by the publication of Biodiversity: The UK Action Plan , in 1994, with the stated goal ‘to conserve and enhance biological diversity in the UK....‘. One way this is to be achieved is through Local Biodiversity Action Plans, which aim to focus resources to conserve and enhance biodiversity by means of local partnerships, taking account of national and local priorities. To this end surveys of the local habitat resource (Bowen & Morris 1996) and key species (Lott 1997) in Leicestershire and Rutland, were published. A working group of representatives from 19 organisations, lead by Leicestershire and Rutland Wildlife Trust, used this information to draw up the local plan, “Biodiversity Challenge: An Action Plan for Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland”, which was produced in 1998.
  • Space for Wildlife 2010

    Space for Wildlife 2010

    Space for Wildlife Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Biodiversity Action Plan 2010 – 2015 Version: December 2010 Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Leicestershire and Rutland Biodiversity Action Plan 1.2 Wildlife habitats – the current resource 1.3 Leicestershire and Rutland - key facts 1.4 Leicestershire and Rutland Biodiversity Action Plan habitats 2. Priority BAP habitats 3. Promoting the creation of new wildlife habitat in the wider countryside 4. Survey, monitor and promote favourable management of existing good sites through the Local Wildlife Sites system 5. Species Action Plans 6. Access and Biodiversity 7. Community Participation Plan 8. Further information on habitats and species 8.1 Space for Wildlife – Priority Habitats 8.2 Space for Wildlife – Priority Species 9. Important areas for wildlife in Leicestershire and Rutland 10. Habitat creation information 1. Introduction 1.1 Leicestershire and Rutland Biodiversity Action Plan Biodiversity is the variety of life in all its forms and the habitats where it occurs. In 1992, at the ‘Earth Summit’ in Rio de Janeiro, the UK Government signed the Biodiversity Convention. This was followed up by the publication of Biodiversity: The UK Action Plan , in 1994, with the stated goal ‘to conserve and enhance biological diversity in the UK....‘. One way this is to be achieved is through Local Biodiversity Action Plans, which aim to focus resources to conserve and enhance biodiversity by means of local partnerships, taking account of national and local priorities. To this end surveys of the local habitat resource (Bowen & Morris 1996) and key species (Lott 1997) in Leicestershire and Rutland, were published. A working group of representatives from 19 organisations, lead by Leicestershire and Rutland Wildlife Trust, used this information to draw up the local plan, “Biodiversity Challenge: An Action Plan for Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland”, which was produced in 1998.
  • Heritage 202 Q2 2011

    Heritage 202 Q2 2011

    No. 202 1 April – 30 June 2011 Editorial Panel: Helen Ikin, Steve Woodward, Jim Graham. Hon. Sec. Judy Johnson, 27 Sandalwood Road, Loughborough, Leics. LE11 3PR (01509-214711) CLASSIFIED RECORDS A dead Pygmy Shrew was found in J & CG’s Holwell garden and another dead shrew, yet to MAMMALS be identified, on a path at Grace Dieu. Five members have seen Hedgehogs, ATO Only one report of a bat was received this has two visiting his Loughborough garden, the quarter, from HS at Quorn where one was larger one has blond spikes with two brown circling the garden in early May. patches. GF has had as many as three regularly visiting his Scraptoft garden, DAP saw a medium IN THIS EDITION specimen on the road verge in Quorn at about 4 pm on 9 May and one triggered a security light in Groby. CLASSIFIED RECORDS The only squashed Hedgehog was near Ÿ Lount. HB remarks that he rarely sees dead Mammals Page 1 Hedgehogs now as he cycles around Leicester and east Leicestershire and wonders of they are Ÿ Birds Page 2 becoming smarter or scarcer? Ÿ Reptiles and Amphibians Page 8 Molehills were noted throughout the quarter at Swithland and also recorded at Ÿ Fish Page 8 Bradgate, Peckleton, Grace Dieu and in Bob’s Closs behind the Community Centre at Ÿ Dragonflies and Damselflies Page 9 Thringstone. Ÿ Rabbits were plentiful and healthy in Grasshoppers and Bushcrickets Page 10 Swithland and other sightings came from New Ÿ Lount, Sheet Hedges Wood and Prestwold Hall, Butterflies Page 10 Quorn, Wymondham, Woodhouse and around the nature reserves at Holwell.
  • Heritage 198 Q2 2010

    Heritage 198 Q2 2010

    No. 198 1 April – 30 June 2010 Editorial Panel: Helen Ikin, Steve Woodward, Jim Graham. Hon. Sec. Judy Johnson, 27 Sandalwood Road, Loughborough, Leics. LE11 3PR (01509-214711) RECORDS OF RARE OR UNUSUAL SPECIES If a species has not been found in the county before or is rare in the county, the sighting usually needs to be confirmed by a second person, ideally someone familiar with that species. A good photograph may be acceptable as conclusive evidence if it shows the distinguishing features of the species. The verification panel may not be able accept the IN THIS EDITION record if there is no actual evidence or corroboration of the sighting. CLASSIFIED RECORDS Each group of organisms, such as Woodlice, Ÿ Mammals Page 2 Fungi or Craneflies, has a County Recorder who is keen to help with identification and verification or Ÿ Birds Page 3 can suggest someone nearer who can help. Several County Recorders are LNC members. Ÿ Fish Page 8 Unusual species should be reported as soon as Ÿ Reptiles and Amphibians Page 10 possible to the relevant County Recorder so that Ÿ there is a good chance of the organism still being Dragonflies & Damselflies Page 11 at the site. In groups, such as insects, where it is Ÿ Butterflies Page 12 possible to collect a specimen, the actual insect may be shown to the County Recorder. It may be Ÿ Moths Page 14 possible to confirm the sighting without killing the insect and it can then be returned to the site. Ÿ Other Insects Page 18 To find the County Recorder for a group, or Ÿ Other Invertebrates Page 23 someone else who can confirm the record, contact Ÿ one of the Heritage editors or Gareth Price, the Flowering Plants & Ferns Page 24 Community Ecologist at the Leics.
  • Download Our Rewilding the Soar Valley Leaflet

    Download Our Rewilding the Soar Valley Leaflet

    The River Soar rises in the extreme south of For centuries the river ‘floodplain’ (the area that is liable to joins them all together, forming a corridor that wildlife can become covered in water when the river swells and bursts its move along. It is probable that many of these places would Leicestershire and flows slowly northwards banks after heavy rain) was covered in an open landscape of not survive in isolation. They are dependent upon the through a shallow valley. Fed by a number of large meadows where hay was grown and cattle and other floodplain to function naturally, to prevent them drying out streams and smaller rivers, it grows in size and domesticated animals grazed. Change was gradual, but the and to bring in plant seeds, fish and other animals in the ‘Enclosure’ movement from the 16 th century onwards spelt flood water. Some of our wildlife, such as the rare black joins with the River Trent on the Nottinghamshire the end of most of the open landscape. In its place was a poplar tree, need natural processes such as flooding to create border. The valley’s landscape has changed network of small fields, bounded by hedges that had wet bare ground so the tree’s seeds are able to germinate. historically probably been confined to places such as greatly over the last few thousand years and will parish boundaries. The valley is also a place for people to live, work and enjoy continue to do so. The only question is how. themselves, but it must be used sustainably if it is to stay that The Industrial Revolution triggered an era of much more way.
  • Back to a Wilder Future

    Back to a Wilder Future

    Leicestershire and Rutland WildMembership magazine Winter/Spring 2020 Back to a wilder future Simon Bentley & John Clarkson look at the past and future of Leicestershire and Rutland’s wildlife Wet, wet, wet From wild winter walks to managing floods naturally Meet our new CEO We welcome Tim Graham from Manx Wildlife Trust Leicestershire & Rutland Wildlife Trust Leicestershire & Rutland Wildlife Trust We hope you enjoy your 36 page membership magazine. Welcome to your All the local news and features from your Wildlife Trust, plus national news and stories Wild Leicestershire from Wildlife Trusts around the UK. & Rutland Thank you for your support! Contents Happy New Year! Wildlife Presenter 4 Nick Baker gives his ‘Teal of Approval’ 12 Melissa Harrison on 7 connecting with winter this year We say thank you 8 to LRWT Director Simon Bentley, and John Clarkson looks ahead to the next 20 years Take a wild winter walk 14 around Cossington Meadows Feed the Discover how we’re 14 birds this 16 working with nature to winter help prevent flooding The climate and ecological emergencies demand with Vine urgent action and we are already playing our part. Find out how legacies 20 We are at a time of challenge and opportunity. 18 have saved wild places House Farm 2020 will see a new agenda to generate in Leicestershire and international targets for the next ten years, As winter progresses, small hopefully building a new culture that will deliver Rutland birds must work harder to the start of nature’s recovery. Just imagine a Wilder Future where nature-based solutions help find food.
  • Heritage 215 Q3 2014

    Heritage 215 Q3 2014

    No. 215 1 July - 30 September 2014 Editorial Panel: Helen Ikin, Steve Woodward, Jim Graham. Hon. Sec. Sue Graham, 5 Lychgate Close , Cropston, Leics. LE7 7HU Tel: 0116-2366474 WINGED INVASION One late July evening my village of Scraptoft suffered an invasion. They came out of the air in their thousands and despite strong local opposition and many casualties most of the invaders, apparently from neighbouring Humberstone, penetrated our defences and immediately went to ground. The following morning little evidence remained of their coming, apart from a scattering of torn-off wings on lawns and garden paths but underground preparations were already underway for an attempted take-over of the territory. The above event to which I was a fascinated eye-witness concerned not human invading forms but the mating flight of countless Black Garden Ants – future queens and their princely suitors – from nests over a wide area, simultaneously triggered by the warm sultry weather. The first hint of their coming had been given by IN THIS EDITION the local Spotted Flycatchers which started making purposeful, upward sorties from high trees to bring CLASSIFIED RECORDS luscious beak-fulls of food to their clamorous Ÿ Mammals Page 4 young. Then over the distant spire of Humberstone church, a gathering flock of gulls could be seen Ÿ Birds Page 5 wheeling and dipping and clumsily darting – an unmistakeable sign that ants were on the wing. Ÿ Reptiles and Amphibians Page 9 Gradually the gulls drifted closer until, through Ÿ Fish Page 10 binoculars, the cause of their activity could clearly Ÿ be seen.