DOCSLIB.ORG

On the Lattice of S-Subnormal Subgroups*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On the Lattice of S-Subnormal Subgroups* View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector JOURNAL OF ALGEBRA 148, 42-52 (1992) On the Lattice of S-Subnormal Subgroups* A. BALLESTER-BOLINCHES Departammt D’Algehm, Uniwrsitat de Val&cia, C/Doctor Moliner, 50, E-46100 Burjassot, Valencia, Spain K. DOERK Fachbereich Mnthematik, Johannes Gutenberg-linillersitiit, Postfach 3980, D-6500 Maim, Germmy AND M. D. PEREZ-RAMOS Departament D’AIgebra, Unioersitat de Val&ia, C/Doctor Moliner, 50, E-46100 Burjassot, Valencia, Spain Conmunicated by Gernot Stroth ReceivedMay 18, 1990 1. INTRODUCTION All groups considered are finite. It is well known that the set of all subnormal subgroups of a group G is a lattice. Now, assume that 5 is a subgroup-closed saturated formation containing the class of all nilpotent groups. It is known that the inter- section of two g-subnormal subgroups of a soluble group G is an S-subnormal subgroup of G (cf. [6, 5,2]). One might wonder if the set of all g-subnormal subgroups of a soluble group is a lattice. The answer is negative in general (see [2]), but there exist subgroup-closed saturated formations containing properly the class of all nilpotent groups for which the lattice property holds. In this paper, we obtain the exact description of the subgroup-closed saturated formations 5 of soluble groups such that the set of all g-subnormal subgroups is a lattice for every soluble group. 2. PRELIMINARIES In this section we collect some definitions and notations as well as some known results. * Researchpartially supported by DGICYT-proyecto No. PS87-005%CO2-02. 42 0021.8693192 $5.00 CopyrIght 0 1992 by Academic Press. Inc. Al, nghfs 01 reproductron ,n any form reserved S-SUBNORMALsuBGRouPs 43 First recall that if 5 is a saturated formation and G is a group, a maxi- mal subgroup A4 of G is said to be S-normal in G if the primitive group G/M, E 5, and B-abnormal otherwise (M, = n { Mg ( g E G} ). A subgroup H of a group G is called S-subnormal in G if either H = G or there exists a chain H=H,<H,-,< ... <H,=G such that Hi+, is a maximal g-normal subgroup of Hi, for every i = 0, .. n - 1. If M is a maximal subgroup of a group G such that M, = 1, we will say that M is a core-free maximal subgroup of G, and if X is a class of groups we denote char 3E= (pi P/C, E X}, where C, denotes the cyclic group of order p. Recall that the boundary b(X) of a class of groups X consists of all groups G satisfying G 6 3Zand G/N E X for all 1 # N u G. If rc is a set of prime numbers, let G and 6, denote the classesof soluble and soluble n-groups, respectively. ‘$2 denotes the class of all nilpotent groups. The following results will turn out to be crucial in the proof of our main result. (2.1) LEMMA [S, Theorem 1.3.111. Zf H is a subnormal subgroup of a finite group G, then Sot(G) normalizes H. (2.2) LEMMA[2]. Let G e !R& where 5 is a saturatedformation, and let E be an S-maximal subgroup of G satisfying G = EF(G). Then E is an B-normalizer of G. (2.3) LEMMA [3, 11. Let G be a group and let 3 be a saturatedforma- tion. If G5 is abelian, then G8 is complemented in G and any two com- plements in G of G5 are conjugate. The complements are the S-normalizers of G. (2.4) LEMMA[4, Hilfssatz 1.31. Let H be a group with a unique minimal normal subgroup M, where A4 is a q-group. If p is a prime distinct from q then H has a faithful irreducible representation over GF(p). (2.5) LEMMA [7, Lemma 1.11. Let 5 be a subgroup-closed saturated formation. Zf H is @subnormal in G and H < U < G, then H is S-subnormal in U. For details about formations the reader is referred to [4]. 3. THE LATTICEOF ~-SUBNORMALSUBGROUPS (3.1) LEMMA. Let G be a group and let H be an S-subnormal subgroup of G, where 5 is a subgroup-closed saturated formation. Then H5 is sub- normal in G. 44 BALLESTER-BOLINCHES, DOERK, AND PbREZ-RAMOS Proof: We argue by induction on the order of G. Let N be a minimal normal subgroup of G. Then HN/N is @subnormal in G, so that HsN is subnormal in G. If HN is a proper subgroup of G, then H n is subnormal in HN by Lemma 2.5. Therefore H” is subnormal in G and the lemma is true. So we can assume G = HN for each minimal normal subgroup N of G. This implies that H is contained in a core-free S-normal maximal subgroup of G. But then G is an S-group and H n = 1 is subnormal in G. (3.2) LEMMA. Let C%= {rc;: ie I} be a partition of z, a set of prime num- bers, and let 5 be the saturated formation of soluble groups locally defined by the formation function f given by f(p) = G=,, if p E 71, and ig 1, and f(q) = 0, if q $7t. Then G is an B-group if and only if G is a soluble n-group with a normal Hall ni-subgroup, for every i E 1. Proof Assume that GE 3. We see that G has a normal Hall rci-subgroup for each i E 1 by induction on [Gl. Let N be a minimal normal subgroup of G and let p E rc, the prime divisor of )Nj. If H is a Hall rci-subgroup of G, then Nd H and H/N is a Hall rci-subgroup of G/N. By induction we deduce that H is a normal subgroup of G. Now, let A be a Hall rcj-subgroup of G with j# i. Then A n N = 1 and since AN/N is a Hall nj-subgroup of G/N, we have that AN CI G. If AN < G, then A 4 AN and A a G. Therefore we can assume that G = AN and A is a maximal sub- group of G. Since GE 5, we have that G/A, E 6,, but then A = A, because AlA, E C,, that is, A is a normal subgroup of G. The converse is clear since the chief factors of a such group G are @central. (3.3) THEOREM. Let 3 be a subgroup-closed saturated formation of soluble groups containing ‘92, the class of all nilpotent groups, and let f be the full and integrated local formation function defining 5. Then 5 satisfies the following condition: (*) “If H, and H, are two @subnormal subgroups of GE G, then (H,, Hz) is an g-subnormal subgroup of G”, tf and only tf f can be described in the following way: “There exists a partition (zi}iSl of P, the set of all prime numbers, such that f (p) = 6,, for every prime number p E ni and for every i E I”. Proof Assume that the formation 5 = LF( f) as above satisfies (*). It is well known that f(p) is a subgroup-closed formation for every prime p (cf. [4, Hilfssatz 2.21). We split the first part of the proof into the following steps: (1) For each prime number p E P, every primitive group GE 5 n (b(f(p)) is cyclic. ~-SUBNORMAL sum3RouPs 45 It is clear that G has a unique minimal normal subgroup N, and evidently N must be a q-group, where p #q E P. Therefore there exists an irreducible and faithful G-module V, over GF(p). We claim that G has a unique maximal subgroup M such that MG = 1, which provides the result. Assume that M1 and M, are maximal subgroups of G, M, # M2 and (Mi)G = 1, i = 1, 2. Then Mi Ed. Consider now the semidirect product H = [V,,] G, with respect to the action of G on VP. Clearly H# 5, so H8 = V,, and G is not B-subnormal in H. But for i = 1,2, VPMi is g-normal maximal subgroup of H, and Mi is S-subnormal in V,M,, because 1/,M, E 6,f(p) = f(p) c 5, that is, Mi is G-subnormal in H. Since 8 satisfies (*), we have that G = (M,, M2) is $j-subnormal in H, which is a contradiction. (2) If p and q are prime numbers and q E char(f(p)), then P E char(f(q))- Assume that C,$f(q) and consider an irreducible and faithful C,-module VP over GF(p). Then the semidirect product [ V,]C,, with respect to the action of C, on VP, belongs to gnb(f(q)), which contradicts (1). (3) If p and q are prime numbers and p E char(f(q)), then char(.f(p)) = char(.f(q)). If r E P and r E char(f(q))\char(f(p)), then r # q and C, Ef(r), because of (2). Consider now an irreducible and faithful C,-module I/, over GF(r). Then [ V,] C, E i-j n b(f(p)), a contradiction with (1). (4) If p, qE P and p Echar(f(q)), then GPcf(q).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Finite Groups Whose «-Maximal Subgroups Are Subnormal
    FINITE GROUPS WHOSE «-MAXIMAL SUBGROUPS ARE SUBNORMAL BY AVINO'AM MANN Introduction. Dedekind has determined all groups whose subgroups are all normal (see, e.g., [5, Theorem 12.5.4]). Partially generalizing this, Wielandt showed that a finite group is nilpotent, if and only if all its subgroups are subnormal, and also if and only if all maximal subgroups are normal [5, Corollary 10.3.1, 10.3.4]. Huppert [7, Sätze 23, 24] has shown that if all 2nd-maximal subgroups of a finite group are normal, the group is supersolvable, while if all 3rd-maximal sub- groups are normal, the group is solvable of rank at most 2 (see below for the defi- nitions of the terms employed). Continuing this, Janko [8] has determined all nonsolvable finite groups, all of whose 4-maximal subgroups are normal, and also proved some results on the structure of solvable groups with the same property. Later, he has also determined all finite simple groups, all of whose 5-maximal subgroups are normal [9]. The present paper deals with similar problems. Our main concern is with the class of groups defined in the title. In §2, we derive some simple properties of these groups. For «^5, we extend the aforementioned results of Huppert and Janko to cover also our case (i.e., replacing normality by subnormality), and prove some results under slightly more general assumptions. In §3 we study solvable groups with subnormal «-maximal subgroups. If the order of the group in question has enough distinct prime divisors, the structure of the group is very limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Finite Groups with Pro-Normal Subgroups
    FINITE GROUPS WITH PRO-NORMAL SUBGROUPS T. A. PENG The purpose of this paper is to study a class of finite groups whose subgroups of prime power order are all pro-normal. Following P. Hall, we say that a subgroup H of a group G is pro-normal in G if and only if, for all x in G, H and 771 are conjugate in (77, 77x), the subgroup generated by 77 and 77*. We shall determine the structure of all finite groups whose subgroups of prime power order are pro-normal. It turns out that these groups are in fact soluble ¿-groups. A ¿-group is a group G whose subnormal subgroups are all normal in G. The struc- ture of finite soluble ¿-groups has been determined by Gaschiitz [l]. Are soluble ¿-groups precisely those groups whose subgroups of prime power order are all pro-normal? The answer is yes. Thus our study furnishes another characterization of soluble /-groups. Except for the definitions given above, our terminology and notation are standard (see, for example, M. Hall [2]). We first prove two general facts about pro-normal subgroups. Lemma 1. Let H be a pro-normal subgroup of a group G and let K be a subgroup of G containing 77. Then H is subnormal in K if and only if H is normal in K. Proof. Let H be subnormal in K. We may assume that there is a subgroup Loi G such that 77 is normal in L and L is normal in K. Let x be any element of K.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Residual of a Factorized Group with Widely Supersoluble
    On the residual of a factorized group with widely supersoluble factors Victor S. Monakhov and Alexander A. Trofimuk Department of Mathematics and Programming Technologies, Francisk Skorina Gomel State University, Gomel 246019, Belarus e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: alexander.trofi[email protected]† Abstract. Let P be the set of all primes. A subgroup H of a group G is called P-subnormal in G, if either H = G, or there exists a chain of subgroups H = H0 ≤ H1 ≤ ... ≤ Hn = G, |Hi : Hi−1| ∈ P, ∀i. A group G is called widely supersoluble, w-supersoluble for short, if every Sylow subgroup of G is P-subnormal in G. A group G = AB with P-subnormal w-supersoluble subgroups A and B is studied. The structure of its w-supersoluble resid- ual is obtained. In particular, it coincides with the nilpotent residual of the A-residual of G. Here A is the formation of all groups with abelian Sylow sub- groups. Besides, we obtain new sufficient conditions for the w-supersolubility of such group G. Keywords. widely supersoluble groups, mutually sn-permutable sub- groups, P-subnormal subgroup, the X-residual. Mathematics Subject Classification. 20D10, 20D20. arXiv:2002.06355v2 [math.GR] 3 Mar 2020 Introduction Throughout this paper, all groups are finite and G always denotes a finite group. We use the standard notations and terminology of [6]. The formations of all nilpotent, supersoluble groups and groups with abelian Sylow subgroups are denoted by N, U and A, respectively. The notation Y ≤ X means that Y is a subgroup of a group X and P be the set of all primes.
    [Show full text]
  • Subgroup Growth: an Introduction
    Subgroup growth: An introduction Ashok Rajaraman 301121276 [email protected] November 30, 2011 Abstract A major topic in geometric group theory is the counting the number of subgroups of finite index in a group. This ties into the classification of finite simple groups, as well as classical geometric group theory, to culminate in a theorem similar in spirit to Gromov's theorem on polynomial growth of finitely generated groups. This short paper captures some of the elementary results in this field. 1 Introduction Let us associate the following function with a group G: n 7! an (G) ; where an (G) is a natural number which denotes the number of subgroups of index n in G. This is the subgroup growth function of G [1]. This function is well defined if the value of an (G) is finite for all values of n 2 N. The study of the behaviour of this function was motivated by the need to classify infinite groups by some invariant. Infinite groups with the same `type' of subgroup growth are expected to show similar properties, as we shall see later on. In turn, subgroup growth has been the motivation for some major fields in group theory, such as strong approximation and linearity conditions for linear groups. The completion of the classification of finite simple groups proved a major turning point in the field, and a comprehensive theory of subgroup growth has been formulated by the works of Lubotzky, Segal, Mann [2], Larsen [3] and Ilani [4], to name a few. However, the tools used to analyze subgroup growth date much farther into the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Subnormality, Ascendancy, and the Minimal Condition on Subgroups
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector JOURNAL OF ALGEBRA 41, 58-78 (1976) Subnormality, Ascendancy, and the Minimal Condition on Subgroups B. HARTLEY Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, England AND T. A. PENG Department of Mathematics, University of Singapore Communicated by J. E. Roseblade Received June 19, 1974 1. INTRODUCTION In his recent papers [l 1, 121, Wielandt has given a very elegant treatment of subnormality in finite groups, leading to a number of criteria for a subgroup of a finite group to be subnormal. The well-known fact, first proved by Baer, that every left Engel element of a finite group lies in the Fitting subgroup, appears as a special case of Wielandt’s results; this is because an element of finite group lies in the Fitting subgroup if and only if the cyclic subgroup it generates is subnormal. Wielandt has also extended some of his results to groups satisfying the maximal condition on subgroups; our concern here is to extend them to groups satisfying Min, the minimal condition on subgroups. As a by-product, we obtain some alternative proofs of known results about left Engel elements of groups satisfying Min. It is appropriate in infinite groups to consider not only subnormal sub- groups, but also subgroups belonging to series of a group other than finite ones. In particular we shall consider ascendant subgroups. A subgroup H of a group G is ascendant in G (written H asc G) if there is an ordinal p and subgroups {H,: 01 < p} of G such that H = HO, H, Q H,+,(a: < p), f-L = UacuHa if p < p is a limit ordinal, and H, = G.
    [Show full text]
  • Groups with All Subgroups Subnormal
    Groups with all subgroups subnormal Carlo Casolo Dipartimento di Matematica “Ulisse Dini”, Universit`adi Firenze, I-50134 Firenze Italy e-mail: [email protected]fi.it Otranto, 4 - 8 giugno 2007 2 Contents 1 Locally nilpotent groups 5 1.1 Commutators and related subgroups . 5 1.2 Subnormal subgroups and generalizations . 11 1.3 Classes of groups . 15 1.4 Nilpotent groups and their generalizations . 23 1.5 Classes of locally nilpotent groups . 29 1.6 Preliminaries on N1 ......................... 39 2 Torsion-free Groups 43 2.1 Locally nilpotent torsion–free groups . 43 2.2 Isolators . 45 2.3 Torsion–free N1-groups . 49 3 Groups of Heineken and Mohamed 55 3.1 General remarks . 55 3.2 Basic construction . 57 3.3 Developements . 62 3.4 Minimal non-N groups . 67 4 Bounded defects 71 4.1 n-Baer groups . 71 4.2 Roseblade’s Theorem . 74 4.3 First applications . 81 5 Periodic N1-groups 83 5.1 N1-groups of finite exponent . 83 5.2 Extensions by groups of finite exponent . 97 5.3 Periodic hypercentral N1-groups . 101 6 The structure of N1-groups 105 6.1 Solubility of N1-groups . 105 6.2 Fitting Groups . 107 6.3 Hypercentral and Smith’s groups . 112 6.4 The structure of periodic N1-groups . 119 3 4 CONTENTS 7 Beyond N1 125 7.1 Generalizing subnormality . 125 7.2 Groups with many subnormal subgroups . 129 7.3 The subnormal intersection property. 137 7.4 Other classes of locally nilpotent groups . 139 Chapter 1 Locally nilpotent groups In this chapter we review part of the basic theory of locally nilpotent groups.
    [Show full text]
  • On Groups with All Subgroups Almost Subnormal
    On groups with all subgroups almost subnormal. Eloisa Detomi Dipartimento di Matematica, Facolt`a di Ingegneria, Universit`a degli Studi di Brescia, via Valotti 9, 25133 Brescia, Italia. [email protected] Abstract In this paper we consider groups in which every subgroup has finite index in the nth term of its normal closure series, for a fixed integer n. We prove that such a group is the extension of a finite normal subgroup by a nilpotent group, whose class is bounded in terms of n only, provided it is either periodic or torsion-free. 2000 Mathematics subject classification: primary 20E15, 20F19 A subgroup H of a group G is said to be almost subnormal if it has finite index in some subnormal subgroup of G. This occurs when H has finite index in some term H G;n, G;n−1 n ≥ 0, of its normal closure series in G; recall that H G;0 = G and HG;n = HH . A finite-by-nilpotent group has every subgroup almost subnormal, and for finitely generated groups the converse holds (see [8, 6.3.3]). Note that, if a group G has a finite normal subgroup N such that G=N is nilpotent of class n, then each subgroup H of G has finite index in HG;n. For n = 1 the converse is settled by a well-known Theorem by B. Neumann [10]: a group G, in which every subgroup H has finite index in its normal closure HG, is finite-by-abelian. Later, Lennox [7] considered the case in which n is larger than 1 and there is also a bound on the indices.
    [Show full text]
  • On Groups in Which Subnormal Subgroups of Infinite Rank Are
    ON GROUPS IN WHICH SUBNORMAL SUBGROUPS OF INFINITE RANK ARE COMMENSURABLE WITH SOME NORMAL SUBGROUP ULDERICO DARDANO AND FAUSTO DE MARI Abstract. We study soluble groups G in which each subnormal subgroup H with infinite rank is commensurable with a normal subgroup, i.e. there exists a normal subgroup N such that H ∩ N has finite index in both H and N. We show that if such a G is periodic, then all subnormal subgroups are commensurable with a normal subgroup, provided either the Hirsch-Plotkin radical of G has infinite rank or G is nilpotent-by-abelian (and has infinite rank). 2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 20F16, Secondary: 20E07, 20E15. Keywords: transitivity, core-finite, normal-by-finite, close to normal 1. Introduction and statement of results A group G is said to be a T -group if normality in G is a transitive relation, i.e. if all subnormal subgroups are normal. The structure of soluble T -groups was well described in the 1960s by Gasch¨utz, Zacher and Robinson (see [14]). Then, taking these results as a model, several authors have studied soluble groups in which subnormal subgroups have some embedding property which “approximates” normality. In particular, Casolo [2] considered T∗-groups, that is groups in which any subnormal subgroup H has the property nn (nearly normal), i.e. the index |HG : H| is finite. Then Franciosi, de Giovanni and Newell [11] considered T ∗-groups, that is groups in which any subnormal subgroup H has the property cf (core-finite, normal-by-finite), i.e. the index |H : HG| G is finite.
    [Show full text]
  • A CLASS of C-GROUPS
    A CLASS OF c-GROUPS A. R. CAMINA and T. M. GAGEN (Received 18 December 1967; revised 25 March 1968) In a paper by Polimeni [3] the concept of a c-group was introduced. A group is called a c-group if and only if every subnormal subgroup is characteristic. His paper claims to characterize finite soluble c-groups, which we will call /sc-groups. There are some errors in this paper; see the forthcoming review by K. W. Gruenberg in Mathematical Reviews. The following theorem is the correct characterization. We are indebted to the referee for his suggestions which led to this generalization of our original result. THEOREM. Let G be a finite soluble group and L its nilpotent residual {i.e. the smallest normal subgroup of G such that G\L is nilpotent). Then G is an fsc-group if and only if (i) G is a T-group (i.e. every subnormal subgroup is normal), (ii) the Fitting subgroup F of G is cyclic and F'D.L, (iii) for every prime divisor p of the order of F, the Sylow p-subgroup of G is cyclic or quaternion, (iv) if a Sylow 2-subgroup of G is quaternion, then G/<w> is a c-group, where u2 = 1, u e F. NOTE. Properties of T-groups will be used without comment, see Gaschiitz [1]. PROOF: SUFFICIENCY. Clearly every subnormal subgroup of G is normal, (i). Condition (iii) implies that the Sylow 2-subgroups of G are either abelian or quaternion of order 8. For if a Sylow 2-subgroup S of G is non-abelian then the derived subgroup S' has order 2 and is contained in F by [1] and so by (iii), S is quaternion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Classification of Quasithin Groups I, II, by Michael Aschbacher And
    BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 43, Number 1, Pages 115–121 S 0273-0979(05)01071-2 Article electronically published on July 5, 2005 The classification of quasithin groups I, II, by Michael Aschbacher and Stephen D. Smith, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vols. 111–112, American Mathe- matical Society, Providence, RI, 2004, 1221 pp., US$228.00, ISBN 0-8218-3410-X (Vol. 111), 0-8218-3411-8 (Vol. 112) In 1983, Danny Gorenstein announced the completion of the Classification of the Finite Simple Groups. This announcement was somewhat premature. The Classification of the Finite Simple Groups was at last completed with the publica- tion in 2004 of the two monographs under review here. These volumes, classifying the quasithin finite simple groups of even characteristic, are a major milestone in the history of finite group theory. It is appropriate that the great classifica- tion endeavor, whose beginning may reasonably be dated to the publication of the monumental Odd Order Paper [FT] of Feit and Thompson in 1963, ends with the publication of a work whose size dwarfs even that massive work. 1. Placing quasithin groups in the classification scheme Let us first understand the place of quasithin groups in the overall scheme. Feit and Thompson proved that every nonabelian finite simple group has even order. This focussed attention on the prime 2 and, more specifically, on the centralizers of involutions (elements of order 2). Brauer and Fowler had proved that if H is the centralizer of an involution in a finite simple group G,then|G| < (|H|2)!.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes for Group Theory and Representation Theory
    Notes for Group Theory and Representation Theory Ting Gong Started Mar. 14, 2019. Last revision August 7, 2019 Contents 1 Review for Basic Terms 1 1.1 Basic Concepts of Groups and Morphisms . .1 1.2 Two Interesting Examples . .5 1.3 Commutators . .6 1.4 Products of Groups . .7 1.5 Minimal Normal Subgroups and Composition Series . .9 1.6 Study of Abelian Groups . 11 1.7 Group Action . 13 2 Sylow Theory 15 2.1 The Sylow Theorems . 15 2.2 Classification of Groups . 16 3 Normal and Subnormal Structure 17 4 Commutators 18 5 Transfer 19 i Chapter 1 Review for Basic Terms 1.1 Basic Concepts of Groups and Morphisms Definition 1.1.1. A nonempty set G with operation ∗ is a group if x; y 2 G, the following properties are satisfied: (i) Closure: x ∗ y 2 G (ii) Associativity: (x ∗ y) ∗ z = x ∗ (y ∗ z) (iii) Identity: 9e 2 G such that e ∗ x = x ∗ e = x (iv) Inverse: 9x−1 2 G such that xx−1 = x−1x A group is called Abelian if we have an extra property: (v) Commutativity: xy = yx Definition 1.1.2. Let b = axa−1, where x; a 2 G, we call b the conjugate of x by a Remark 1.1.3. One can prove the following statements easily: (i) inverses are unique in a group (ii) identity is unique in a group (iii) right and left cancellations holds in groups It is natural to consider we do the operation multiple times on the same element, say n.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Subgroups in Finite Groups
    LARGE SUBGROUPS IN FINITE GROUPS STEFANOS AIVAZIDISy AND THOMAS MULLER¨ ∗ Abstract. Following Isaacs (see [Isa08, p. 94]), we call a normal subgroup N of a finite group G large, if CG(N) 6 N, so that N has bounded index in G. Our principal aim here is to establish some general results for systematically producing large subgroups in finite groups (see Theorems A and C). We also consider the more specialised problems of finding large (non-abelian) nilpotent as well as abelian subgroups in soluble groups. 1. Introduction Let G be a finite group and suppose that N is a normal subgroup of G such that CG(N) 6 N. Then we call N a large subgroup of G. The motivation for naming such a subgroup \large" stems from the observation that if N ¢G, then the factor group G= CG(N) is isomorphically embedded in Aut(N), and so jG : CG(N)j 6 jAut(N)j. Thus, if N is large, it follows that jG : Nj 6 jAut(N)j, so that N has bounded index in G. There are a number of examples of large subgroups in the literature. For instance, if G is soluble then the (standard) Fitting subgroup F(G) of G is large. Also, if G is π-separable and Oπ0 (G) = 1, then Oπ(G) is large (this result is known as the Hall{Higman Lemma 1.2.3). Moreover, if G is any finite group, then the generalised Fitting subgroup F∗(G) of G is large. We briefly recall the definition of Bender's subgroup F∗(G).
    [Show full text]