DOCSLIB.ORG

Venerdì, 03 Luglio 2020 Assosoftwaredaypress Venerdì, 03 Luglio 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Venerdì, 03 Luglio 2020 Assosoftwaredaypress Venerdì, 03 Luglio 2020 AssoSoftwareDayPress venerdì, 03 luglio 2020 AssoSoftwareDayPress venerdì, 03 luglio 2020 Agenda digitale e Pubblica Amministrazione 03/07/2020 Corriere della Sera Pagina 29 5 LA vostra 03/07/2020 Il Sole 24 Ore Pagina 2 C.Fo. 6 Rinvio per PagoPa, diritto a innovare e centro unico dati Pa 03/07/2020 La Stampa Pagina 4 GIUSEPPE SALVAGGIULO 8 Semplificazioni, l' Anac avvisa il governo "Pericoloso affidarsi ai commissa ri" Agricoltura e Dogane 03/07/2020 Il Sole 24 Ore Pagina 25 Vincenzo Visco 10 fisco, una riforma organica per un sistema delegittimato Contabilità e Bilancio 02/07/2020 EutekneInfo 14 Sullo stesso immobile più agevolazioni per soggetti diversi 03/07/2020 Italia Oggi Pagina 41 PAGINA A CURA DI MASSIMILIANO FINALI 16 Un aiuto per pagare i fornitori Fatturazione Elettronica 03/07/2020 EutekneInfo 18 Ammesso il rimborso di quanto pagato a seguito di accertamento inoppugnato 03/07/2020 Agenda Digitale 20 Fattura elettronica, cosa fare se il codice fiscale è sbagliato 03/07/2020 Agenda Digitale 21 Fattura elettronica, il metodo per individuare i termini di detrazione dell' IVA 03/07/2020 Agenda Digitale 22 FatturaPA, cosa fare se il CIG è errato 02/07/2020 Agenda Digitale 23 Fatturazione in vacanza, come fare per nuclei familiari diversi 02/07/2020 Agenda Digitale 24 Fatture elettroniche, niente sanzioni se si sbaglia la consecutio temporum 03/07/2020 Italia Oggi Pagina 31 FRANCO RICCA 25 Recupero Iva anche con verifica Fisco e Dichiarazioni 03/07/2020 Italia Oggi Pagina 42 ROBERTO LENZU, COMPONENTE 27 Agevolazioni Covid, il comune può dire la sua 03/07/2020 Il Sole 24 Ore Pagina 29 Giorgio Gavelli 29 Appalti, le proroghe dei termini complicano il rilascio del Durf 03/07/2020 Il Messaggero Pagina 9 31 Assegno unico fino a 21 anni ma resta il rebus delle risorse 03/07/2020 La Nazione Pagina 25 33 Bonus in arrivo per le auto Euro 6 03/07/2020 Italia Oggi Pagina 33 EMILIO DE SANTIS 34 Commercialisti, ok al rimborso delle ritenute 03/07/2020 Italia Oggi Pagina 29 35 Dl Rilancio/2/ Medici, 128 mln per formazione 03/07/2020 EutekneInfo 36 Effetto duplicazione di credito per le imposte estere per il prestito titoli 03/07/2020 Il Messaggero Pagina 9 38 Fisco, il Mef vuole ridurre ancora il cuneo Per l' Iva ipotesi di tagli solo su singole voci 03/07/2020 Italia Oggi Pagina 37 40 Focus sugli Isa 500 e 230 03/07/2020 Italia Oggi Pagina 32 GIOVAMBATTISTA PALUMBO 41 I soldi allo sport? Spese di pubblicità 03/07/2020 Italia Oggi Pagina 9 GIORGIO SPAZIANI TESTA * 42 Il blocco di tutti gli sfratti per fine locazione o per morosità sospende l' applicazione del diritto nel campo delle locazioni 03/07/2020 EutekneInfo 44 Interventi limitati per il quadro RR di REDDITI PF 2020 03/07/2020 Il Sole 24 Ore Pagina 30 46 Niente superbonus per la nuova costruzione 03/07/2020 Il Sole 24 Ore Pagina 29 G.Gav. 48 Senza certificato serve liquidità 03/07/2020 EutekneInfo 49 Superbonus del 110% solo ai condomìni per gli interventi sulle parti comuni 03/07/2020 EutekneInfo 51 Trattamento integrativo riconosciuto in via automatica dal sostituto d' imposta Industria 4.0 03/07/2020 Il Sole 24 Ore Pagina 6 Nicoletta Picchio 52 «È una occasione unica per riprogettare il Paese» 02/07/2020 Digital 4 Biz 54 3 esempi di innovazione al servizio delle risorse umane 03/07/2020 Il Sole 24 Ore Pagina 14 Antonio Larizza 56 A Bressanone nasce il polo europeo della computer vision 02/07/2020 Corriere Comunicazioni 58 Advertising, il fuggi fuggi da Facebook non preoccupa Zuckerberg: "Nessun impatto" 02/07/2020 Corriere Comunicazioni 60 Associazioni no-profit contro il matrimonio Google-Fitbit: "Privacy a rischio" 03/07/2020 Corriere Comunicazioni 62 De Vecchis (Huawei): "Il 5G è questione di ecosistema" 02/07/2020 Agenda Digitale 64 Deepfake, perché bisogna prepararsi al peggio: le mosse di Facebook 03/07/2020 Corriere Comunicazioni 67 Gropelli (Etno): "Il 5G abilitatore di un modello di sviluppo più sostenibile" 02/07/2020 Agenda Digitale 68 Intelligenza artificiale e i volti del razzismo: così la tecnologia eredita i nostri difetti 02/07/2020 Corriere Comunicazioni 74 Intelligenza Artificiale, pubblicata online la strategia del Mise 03/07/2020 Italia Oggi Pagina 21 FRANCESCA SOTTILARO 75 L' innovazione per grandi e pmi 03/07/2020 Corriere Comunicazioni 77 La supply chain diventa più smart, alleanza Techsol-TiQ 03/07/2020 Italia Oggi Pagina 17 FILIPPO MERLI 79 Ora il Parkinson si può monitorare in smart working 02/07/2020 Corriere Comunicazioni 81 Più efficienza e ricavi: chi utilizza l' intelligenza artificiale "stacca" i concorrenti 03/07/2020 Corriere Comunicazioni 83 Recovery Plan, Dècina: 'Il 5G sarà la chiave di volta' 03/07/2020 La Nazione Pagina 26 84 Tomassini eletto presidente di Udith Lavoro e Previdenza 03/07/2020 La Repubblica Pagina 24 DI MARCO PATUCCHI 85 Il governo si rassegna alla fuga di Whirlpool Patuanelli: "C' è un piano B" 03/07/2020 La Nazione Pagina 5 86 Lo storico caffè piegato dal Covid «A casa 60 dipendenti, serve aiuto» Privacy e GDPR 02/07/2020 Agenda Digitale 88 App aziendali anti-covid e Immuni: molti punti aperti 03/07/2020 Italia Oggi Pagina 19 ANDREA SECCHI 91 Aziende-tigre grazie ai big data 03/07/2020 Agenda Digitale 93 Due anni di GDPR e ancora non ci siamo: il bilancio dell' UE 03/07/2020 Corriere della Sera Pagina 18 FRANCESCO BATTISTINI 96 Il procuratore Al Sawi, dalle inchieste sulle stragi all' immobilismo di oggi (molto gradito ad Al Sisi) 03/07/2020 Il Sole 24 Ore Pagina 24 Claudio TucciLaura Virli 98 In caso di un nuovo lockdown didattica a distanza regolamentata 02/07/2020 Agenda Digitale 100 Una Sanità migliore dopo il Covid? Ecco le quattro "T" che servono [§26452792§] venerdì 03 luglio 2020 Pagina 29 Corriere della Sera Agenda digitale e Pubblica Amministrazione foto LA vostra Ho ricevuto ieri dalla Regione Lombardia una mail in cui mi invita ad attivare lo Spid, l' Identità digitale, per accedere ai servizi online di Regione Lombardia e di altre Pubbliche amministrazioni. La mail si presenta con un video che spiega come procedere e finisce con un link per avviare la procedura. Peccato che il link non funzioni, informazione anche confermata dal Call Center dei servizi digitali di Regione Lombardia (800 0306060). Vorrei tanto sapere dai responsabili come è possibile che venga prodotto e diffuso un video con un simile errore, ovviamente tenendo presente che i soldi sono quelli nostri, cittadini lombardi. Maddalena Biliotti, Milano. Riproduzione autorizzata licenza Ars Promopress 2013-2020 - powered by Volo.com Pagina 5 [§26452793§] venerdì 03 luglio 2020 Pagina 2 Il Sole 24 Ore Agenda digitale e Pubblica Amministrazione il pacchetto innovazione Rinvio per PagoPa, diritto a innovare e centro unico dati Pa Spinta allo smart working, sanzioni più alte per imprese e professionisti senza Pec C.Fo. ROMA Un lungo insieme di norme per l' innovazione, rivolte soprattutto alla Pubblica amministrazione, compare nelle bozze del Dl semplificazioni. In questi giorni tra l' altro, il ministero dello Sviluppo economico ha spezzato la lunga impasse che aveva congelato le strategie nazionali sulla Blockchain (posta ora in consultazione pubblica) e quella sull' Intelligenza artificiale (ieri è stato pubblicato il documento definitivo post consultazione). Diritto a innovare Proprio queste due filiere tecnologiche, insieme a economia circolare, cloud computing, comunicazioni elettroniche, internet of things, smart city, rientrano tra quelle che potranno beneficiare della norma sul "diritto a innovare": le imprese che intendono sperimentare nuove iniziative possono presentare un progetto alla presidenza del consiglio per ottenere un' autorizzazione che sostituisce ad ogni effetto tutti gli atti di assenso, permessi, autorizzazioni, nulla osta di competenza di altre amministrazioni statali. PagoPa e identità digitale In considerazione dei ritardi legati all' emergenza Covid-19, i pagamenti alle pubbliche amministrazioni dovranno essere effettuati dai prestatori di servizi di pagamento esclusivamente attraverso PagoPA a partire dal 28 febbraio 2021 (e non dal 30 giugno 2020). Diverse le novità per i cittadini, ad esempio la possibilità di utilizzare l' identità digitale Spid anche per accedere a servizi delle concessionarie e delle controllate pubbliche. Oltretutto la verifica dell' identità digitale, attraverso l' applicazione AppIo, equivarrà alla esibizione del documento di identità nei casi in cui si richiede che questo sia trasmesso per via telematica. E attraverso AppIo le pubbliche amministrazioni dovranno rendere i propri servizi fruibili in rete direttamente da smartphone e tablet. Smart working e dati pubblici Spazio alle misure per favorire il "lavoro agile", come l' obbligo per le Pa di acquistare sistemi informatici idonei all' attività dei lavoratori da remoto. Viene poi disciplinata la Piattaforma notifiche della pubblica amministrazione, dove i cittadini potranno trovare caricati digitalmente gli atti, i provvedimenti, gli avvisi e le comunicazioni oggetto di notificazione incluse quelle relative alla riscossione. Arriva anche la norma per accelerare la razionalizzazione delle migliaia di data center disseminati a livello nazionale. La presidenza del consiglio, si legge, «promuove lo sviluppo di un' infrastruttura ad alta affidabilità distribuita sul territorio nazionale» per il consolidamento dei vari centri. Sanzioni se non si indica la Pec Per le società, tranne che per quelle di nova costituzione, scatta Riproduzione autorizzata licenza Ars Promopress 2013-2020 - powered by Volo.com Pagina 6 [§26452793§] venerdì 03 luglio 2020 Il Sole 24 Ore Agenda digitale e Pubblica Amministrazione il raddoppio delle sanzioni (fino a 2mila euro) per mancata comunicazione della posta elettronica certificata (ora domicilio digitale) al registro delle imprese. Le imprese individuali sono invece sottoposte alla sanzione prevista dall' articolo 2194 del codice civile in misura triplicata, quindi fino a 1.548 euro.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware Karen Sbriglio, Firemen’S ) Retirement System of St
    EFiled: Aug 06 2021 03:34PM EDT Transaction ID 66784692 Case No. 2018-0307-JRS IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KAREN SBRIGLIO, FIREMEN’S ) RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ST. ) LOUIS, CALIFORNIA STATE ) TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, ) CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL ) BUILDING LABORERS’ LOCAL NO. ) 79 GENERAL FUND, CITY OF ) BIRMINGHAM RETIREMENT AND ) RELIEF SYSTEM, and LIDIA LEVY, derivatively on behalf of Nominal ) C.A. No. 2018-0307-JRS Defendant FACEBOOK, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) PUBLIC INSPECTION VERSION ) FILED AUGUST 6, 2021 v. ) ) MARK ZUCKERBERG, SHERYL SANDBERG, PEGGY ALFORD, ) ) MARC ANDREESSEN, KENNETH CHENAULT, PETER THIEL, JEFFREY ) ZIENTS, ERSKINE BOWLES, SUSAN ) DESMOND-HELLMANN, REED ) HASTINGS, JAN KOUM, ) KONSTANTINOS PAPAMILTIADIS, ) DAVID FISCHER, MICHAEL ) SCHROEPFER, and DAVID WEHNER ) ) Defendants, ) -and- ) ) FACEBOOK, INC., ) ) Nominal Defendant. ) SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) I. SUMMARY OF THE ACTION...................................................................... 5 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ....................................................................19 III. PARTIES .......................................................................................................20 A. Plaintiffs ..............................................................................................20 B. Director Defendants ............................................................................26 C. Officer Defendants ..............................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • Facebook, Inc. Annual Report 2016
    Facebook, Inc. Annual Report 2016 Form 10-K (NASDAQ:FB) Published: April 27th, 2016 PDF generated by stocklight.com UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 __________________________ FORM 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 __________________________ (Mark One) x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 or ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 001-35551 __________________________ FACEBOOK, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) __________________________ Delaware 20-1665019 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) 1601 Willow Road, Menlo Park, California 94025 (Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code) (650) 543-4800 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) __________________________ Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Class A Common Stock, $0.000006 par value The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (Title of each class) (Name of each exchange on which registered) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None (Title of class) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes¨ No x Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Instagram Officially Part of Facebook 7 September 2012
    Instagram officially part of Facebook 7 September 2012 family," Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg said in announcing the deal in April. "Now, we'll be able to work even more closely with the Instagram team to also offer the best experiences for sharing beautiful mobile photos with people based on your interests." Facebook said that it planned to let the San Francisco-based startup grow independently while tapping into Instagram expertise to improve ways for people to share pictures on the social network. Instagram on Thursday became part of Facebook as the social network completed its billion-dollar acquisition of "So many of us at Facebook love using Instagram the smartphone photo-sharing service. to share moments with our friends," Facebook vice president of engineering Mike Schroepfer said in a blog post. Instagram on Thursday became part of Facebook "That's why we're so excited to bring Instagram to as the social network completed its billion-dollar Facebook and see what we can create together," acquisition of the smartphone photo-sharing he continued. "We also can't wait to work with the service. talented Instagram team to improve the mobile experience." "Very excited to announce that we're now officially joining the Facebook family," Instagram co-founder Facebook users have increasingly taken to Kevin Systrom said in a Facebook post tagged as accessing the social network using smartphones or being made using a mobile phone in Japan. tablet computers. "I'm psyched for the next chapter of this long (c) 2012 AFP journey." US regulators in August closed an investigation into Facebook's deal to buy the startup behind photo-sharing smartphone application Instagram, taking no action.
    [Show full text]
  • Facebook's Emotional Contagion Experiment As a Challenge
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Cogitatio Press (E-Journals) Media and Communication (ISSN: 2183-2439) 2016, Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 75-85 doi: 10.17645/mac.v4i4.579 Article Facebook’s Emotional Contagion Experiment as a Challenge to Research Ethics Jukka Jouhki 1,*, Epp Lauk 2, Maija Penttinen 1, Niina Sormanen 2 and Turo Uskali 2 1 Department of History and Ethnology, University of Jyväskylä, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland; E-Mails: [email protected] (J.J.), [email protected] (M.P.) 2 Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland; E-Mails: [email protected] (E.L.), [email protected] (N.S.), [email protected] (T.U.) * Corresponding author Submitted: 31 January 2016 | Accepted: 12 April 2016 | Published: 10 October 2016 Abstract This article analyzes the ethical discussion focusing on the Facebook emotional contagion experiment published by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2014. The massive-scale experiment manipulated the News Feeds of a large amount of Facebook users and was successful in proving that emotional contagion happens also in online environments. However, the experiment caused ethical concerns within and outside academia mainly for two intertwined reasons, the first revolving around the idea of research as manipulation, and the second focusing on the problematic definition of informed consent. The article concurs with recent research that the era of social media and big data research are posing a significant challenge to research ethics, the practice and views of which are grounded in the pre social media era, and reflect the classical ethical stances of utilitarianism and deontology.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Sjc-12946 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Supreme
    SJC-12946 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT ATTORNEY GENERAL MAURA HEALEY, Petitioner-Appellee, v. FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant-Appellant. On Appeal from an Order of the Superior Court for Suffolk County BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE COMMON SENSE MEDIA IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER-APPELLEE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAURA HEALEY Joseph Jerome (BBO #683012) Ariel Fox Johnson Common Sense Media 699 8th St, Suite C150 San Francisco, CA 94103 (415) 863-0600 [email protected] Counsel for Amicus Curiae Common Sense Media November 13, 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................................. 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ....................................................... 6 PREPARATION OF AMICUS BRIEF DECLARATION ..................................... 6 INTEREST OF THE AMICUS CURIAE .............................................................. 7 ARGUMENT ....................................................................................................... 10 I. The public has yet to learn the effectiveness of Facebook’s App Developer Investigation and Facebook has a history of poor oversight of app developers. 13 II. Facebook’s internal privacy program and review processes have not stopped the company from engaging in problematic practices involving teens and teens’ data, including with third-party apps. ................................................................ 18 III. Facebook as a third-party app has itself taken advantage of minors in violation of other
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Sjc-12946 Commonwealth
    Supreme Judicial Court for the Commonwealth Full Court: SJC-12946 Filed: 11/13/2020 10:47 AM SJC-12946 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT ATTORNEY GENERAL MAURA HEALEY, Petitioner-Appellee, v. FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant-Appellant. On Appeal from an Order of the Superior Court for Suffolk County BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE COMMON SENSE MEDIA IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER-APPELLEE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAURA HEALEY Joseph Jerome (BBO #683012) Ariel Fox Johnson Common Sense Media 699 8th St, Suite C150 San Francisco, CA 94103 (415) 863-0600 [email protected] Counsel for Amicus Curiae Common Sense Media November 13, 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................................. 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ....................................................... 6 PREPARATION OF AMICUS BRIEF DECLARATION ..................................... 6 INTEREST OF THE AMICUS CURIAE .............................................................. 7 ARGUMENT ....................................................................................................... 10 I. The public has yet to learn the effectiveness of Facebook’s App Developer Investigation and Facebook has a history of poor oversight of app developers. 13 II. Facebook’s internal privacy program and review processes have not stopped the company from engaging in problematic practices involving teens and teens’ data, including with third-party apps. ................................................................ 18
    [Show full text]
  • Cyber Liability Focus Facebook, Inc. 1
    Client Report – Cyber Liability Focus Facebook, Inc. _________________________________________________________________________ Company Profile Credit Details Location 1601 Willow Rd Overall Credit Risk High Risk Menlo Park, CA www.facebook.com Number of Legal Derogatory 34 Company Type Public Items Liability Amount $1,873.00 Formerly Known As N/A Experian Intelliscore 5.00 SIC Code 7374 SIC Code Description Computer Processing And Data Preparation Experian Intelliscore Percentile 4.00 % of companies score lower and And Processing Services have higher credit risk Established N/A Experian Commercial IntelliscoreSM is an all-industry commercial model using business information to predict business risk. Its Sales (in millions) $5,089.00 predictiveness is among the best on the market today The objective of the Commercial Intelliscore Model is to predict seriously Employees 4619 derogatory payment behavior. Possible score range from 0 to 100, where 0 is high risk and 100 is low risk Total OSHA Violations N/A -Liability Amount is the total dollar amount of debtor’s legal liability, including accounts in collection, tax liens,judgments and/or bankruptcies OSHA is an arm of the Department of Labor that conducts inspections of company facilities with the goal of preventing work-related injuries, illnesses and deaths. -The Number of Legal Derogatory items are the sum of Tax-Lien Worksites that do not meet health and/or safety standards at the time of inspection may Count, Bankruptcy,Judgment, Collection-Counter and UCC Derog receive an OSHA violation. Business Description Facebook, Inc. operates as a social networking company worldwide. The company builds tools that enable users to connect, share, discover, and communicate with each other; enables developers to build social applications on Facebook or to integrate their Websites with Facebook; and offers products that enable advertisers and marketers to engage with its users.
    [Show full text]
  • Facebook 2015 Proxy Statement
    1601 Willow Road Menlo Park, California 94025 April 24, 2015 To Our Stockholders: You are cordially invited to attend the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Annual Meeting) of Facebook, Inc. to be held at the Santa Clara Marriott, located at 2700 Mission College Boulevard, Santa Clara, California 95054, on June 11, 2015, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time. The matters expected to be acted upon at the meeting are described in detail in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy statement. You may cast your vote over the Internet, by telephone, or by completing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage-prepaid envelope to ensure that your shares will be represented. Your vote by proxy will ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting regardless of whether or not you attend in person. Returning the proxy does not deprive you of your right to attend the meeting and to vote your shares in person. We look forward to seeing you at the meeting. Mark Zuckerberg Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Menlo Park, California IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 11, 2015: THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND THE ANNUAL REPORT ARE AVAILABLE AT www.proxyvote.com Facebook, Inc. 1601 Willow Road Menlo Park, California 94025 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JUNE 11, 2015 To Our Stockholders: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Facebook, Inc. will be held at the Santa Clara Marriott, located at 2700 Mission College Boulevard, Santa Clara, California 95054, on June 11, 2015, at 11:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Ανάμεσα Σε Google & Facebook,Στα Άδυτα Του Facebook Στο Μοσχάτο
    Ανάμεσα σε Google & Facebook Ανάμεσα στην Σκύλα και την Χάρυβδη. Ανάμεσα στην Σκύλα και την Χάρυβδη. Είμαστε στην εποχή που μεταξύ της Google και του Facebook διαμορφώνεται, διακινείται και διαχέεται σχεδόν όλη η παγκόσμια δημοσιογραφική παραγωγή (εκτός Κίνας και Ρωσίας). Είμαστε επίσης στην εποχή που… Ανάμεσα στην Σκύλα και την Χάρυβδη. Είμαστε στην εποχή πουμεταξύ της Google και του Facebook διαμορφώνεται, διακινείται και διαχέεται σχεδόν όλη η παγκόσμια δημοσιογραφική παραγωγή (εκτός Κίνας και Ρωσίας). Είμαστε επίσης στην εποχή που χωρίς τη μεσολάβηση αυτών των δύο εταιρειών και των υπηρεσιών τους, κάθε δημοσιογραφική παραγωγή, ανεξάρτητα από την πηγή της, είναι καταδικασμένη στη σχετική ή πλήρη αφάνεια. Δηλαδή έχει καταστεί αδύνατον για οποιονδήποτε επαγγελματία της επικοινωνίας ή της δημοσιογραφίας, κάποιον ακτιβιστή ή κάποιο δημόσιο πρόσωπο να «βγει» από τον κύκλο των υπηρεσιών αυτών χωρίς να υποστεί ποινή περιθωριοποίησης. Η Google και το Facebook αποτελούν με διάφορους τρόπους και σε διαφορετικά πεδία ολοκληρωτικά μονοπώλια. Κάθε συζήτηση για την ελευθερία του λόγου και την ελεύθερη διακίνηση των ιδεών στις ημέρες μας, ιδίως στη Δύση, δεν μπορεί παρά να αφορά τη ρύθμιση και τον έλεγχο των πρακτικών αυτών των εταιριών. Η ρύθμιση αυτή, αν θέλουμε να είναι ουσιώδης, δεν μπορεί να είναι αυτορρύθμιση, δεν μπορεί να δοθεί στους ίδιους τους ιδιωτικούς αυτούς κολοσσούς η εξουσία της νομοθέτησης και της οριοθέτησης του δημόσιου λόγου και της διαχείρισης των δημόσιων και ιδιωτικών δεδομένων πάνω στα οποία κτίστηκαν. Όπως έγραφα σχετικά με τα “fake news” στον ιστοχώρο του περιοδικού Δημοσιογραφία: «…η ιδέα να δοθεί στην Google και την Facebook η ευθύνη να «ελέγχει» και να «λογοκρίνει» την «ψευδοειδησεογραφία» κινείται προς λάθος κατεύθυνση:δίνει ακόμα περισσότερη εξουσία και αρμοδιότητα επί του τι λέγεται δημοσίως στο διαδίκτυο στις δύο αυτές εταιρείες, οι οποίες για λόγους νομικής προστασίας τους και μόνο θα έχουν κάθε κίνητρο να λογοκρίνουν το διαδίκτυο σε βαθμό που θα κάνει την Κίνα να μοιάζει με όαση πολυφωνίας.
    [Show full text]
  • Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Francis
    Case 3:20-cv-04444-LB Document 1 Filed 07/02/20 Page 1 of 87 1 BOTTINI & BOTTINI, INC. Francis A. Bottini, Jr. (SBN 175783) 2 [email protected] Albert Y. Chang (SBN 296065) 3 [email protected] Yury A. Kolesnikov (SBN 271173) 4 [email protected] 7817 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 102 5 La Jolla, California 92037 Telephone: (858) 914‐2001 6 Facsimile: (858) 914‐2002 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Natalie Ocegueda 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 NATALIE OCEGUEDA, derivatively on Case No. _______________ 11 behalf of FACEBOOK, INC., 12 Plaintiff, VERIFIED SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT FOR: 13 vs. 14 1. BREACH OF FIDUCIARY MARK ZUCKERBERG, SHERYL DUTY; 15 SANDBERG, MARC ANDREESSEN, 2. AIDING AND ABETTING ANDREW W. HOUSTON, ERSKINE B. 16 BREACH OF FIDUCIARY BOWLES, JEFFREY D. ZIENTS, SUSAN DUTY; 17 DESMOND‐HELLMANN, NANCY 3. ABUSE OF CONTROL; KILLEFER, TRACEY T. TRAVIS, ROBERT 18 4. UNJUST ENRICHMENT; M. KIMMITT, REED HASTINGS, PETER and 19 A. THIEL, and DOES 1–30, Defendants, 5. VIOLATION OF SECTION 20 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES ‐ and ‐ EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. 21 FACEBOOK, INC., DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 22 Nominal Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint 1 Case 3:20-cv-04444-LB Document 1 Filed 07/02/20 Page 2 of 87 1 Plaintiff Natalie Ocegueda (“Plaintiff”), by and through counsel, brings this 2 shareholder derivative action on behalf of Facebook and against certain present and 3 former directors and officers of Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook” or the “Company”). In 4 support of these claims, Plaintiff alleges the following (1) upon personal knowledge 5 with respect to the matters pertaining to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s ownership of Facebook 6 stock; and (2) upon information and belief with respect to all other matters, based upon 7 the investigation undertaken by counsel, which included, inter alia, (a) the Company’s 8 public filings with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • FB CA MOOC Case Paper-Based Formatted
    Reputation Crisis? The Case of Facebook Cambridge Analytica Reputation Crisis? The Case of Facebook – Cambridge Analytica Introduction On May 6, 2020, Facebook announced the first members of its Oversight Board – a new system for content governance and enforcement. These members, coming from different countries and backgrounds, would exercise independent judgments over Facebook’s most important content decisions.1 The establishment of the Oversight Board followed vehement criticism over Facebook’s data handling, especially in connection with the 2016 U.S. election and the Brexit. In both cases, Facebook had allegedly colluded with the political advertising firm Cambridge Analytica to manipulate and influence voters. Even more so, many of political ads published on Facebook were not fact-checked, which enabled companies such as Cambridge Analytica to produce ads that were based on untruthful information – fake news – and target them to people who they researched it would resonate with the most. The exposure of the scandal led to an uproar online as well as offline. For the first time in history, governments and the public started to seriously examine the issue of data privacy and take measures to protect it. The scandal also shook up the tech industry. In October 2019, Twitter banned all political ads altogether, and in the following month, Google limited targeting of political ads to broad categories only, such as sex, age, or postal code. Facebook, on the contrary, announced in January 2020 – in defense of free speech – that it would not ban political ads on its platform nor limit how such ads could be targeted to specific groups of people, nor fact-check them.2 Facebook declared that it aimed to balance the commitment to free expression with values of privacy, authenticity, safety, and dignity.3 Its stance was, at the very least, deemed controversial.
    [Show full text]
  • Facebook, Inc. (Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter) (Name of Person(S) Filing Proxy Statement If Other Than the Registrant)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ____________________________________________ SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. ) ____________________________________________ Filed by the Registrant. ý Filed by a Party other than the Registrant. ¨ Check the appropriate box: ¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement ¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ý Definitive Proxy Statement ¨ Definitive Additional Materials ¨ Soliciting Material under § 240.14a-12 Facebook, Inc. (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): ý No fee required. ¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: ¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. ¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount Previously Paid: (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: (3) Filing Party: (4) Date Filed: 1 1601 Willow Road Menlo Park, California 94025 April 14, 2017 To Our Stockholders: You are cordially invited to attend the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Annual Meeting) of Facebook, Inc.
    [Show full text]