Environmental Assessment Record

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Assessment Record U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management San Luis Valley Public Lands Center 1803 W. Hwy. 160 Monte Vista, CO 81144 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RECORD NUMBER: CO-500-2005-016-EA PLANNING UNIT: San Luis Resource Area PROJECT NAME: San Luis Resource Area Travel Management Plan SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) proposes travel management actions to manage access on public lands in the San Luis Resource Area (SLRA) that provide for appropriate levels of administrative and public access while sustaining the health and diversity of public land resources. These proposed actions are: 1) Modify “Area” designations; 2) Designate a route system through the specific designation of routes; 3) Address other goals and objectives that were identified through public scoping; and 4) Identify a travel management policy. The primary purpose of this Travel Management Plan (TMP) is to re-evaluate the transportation system and design a travel system that meets national and state BLM policies. The proposed action would improve soil, vegetation, hydrology, water quality, wildlife habitat conditions, and modify recreation setting and character throughout the project area by implementing travel management policies that will result in the reduction of route densities. Reclamation of closed routes that have a low potential to naturally revegetate will be prioritized based on their impacts to soils, hydrology, vegetation, water quality, and wildlife resources. Modification of “Area” Designations BLM proposes to modify public land designations in the SLRA from the Area #1 (Appendix 01A) designation of “open” and “limited” to a clearly defined “limited” category. Area #1 in the RMP was that area remaining outside of WSA and ACECs which were given the other area designated numbers. Motorized and mechanized off-route (cross-country) travel would be eliminated except in two small previously disturbed open areas. Those areas previously identified as closed areas would remain as closed areas. The SLRA consists of three categories of off-highway vehicle (OHV) “Area” designations that are used by BLM to manage vehicular use. “Off-Highway Vehicle” vs. “Off-Road Vehicle”: S-1 For many years, the term off-highway vehicle (OHV) has been used by the public, industry, and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) interchangeably with the term “off-road vehicle” (ORV). However, the term ORV has a legally established definition in the Presidential Executive Orders and the BLM’s related Title 43 Code of Federal Regulations 8340.1 Throughout this document the term “OHV” will be used, partly because it is a more commonly used term, but primarily because the regulations address all motorized vehicles which use roads and trails on BLM administered public land, and are not limited just to “off-road” vehicles. “Open” areas are locations on public lands without limitations or restrictions to full use and travel by OHVs (including cross-country travel). For the public lands administered by the BLM in the SLRA, Area #1 is designated open to OHV unless otherwise designated in a decision document. “Closed” areas are locations on public lands where no use or travel by motorized vehicle is allowed. The San Luis Hills Wilderness Study Area (WSA) is the only BLM-managed closed area in the SLRA and is closed to mechanized travel due to its status as a WSA. Sand Castle WSA, an area formerly administered by BLM, is now administered by the National Park Service (NPS) as part of Great Sand Dunes National Park. The Park Service has this area closed to motorized travel. “Limited” areas are public lands with some form of limitation or restriction for the full use of and travel by OHVs and mechanized conveyance (e.g., seasonal limitations due to crucial big game wintering and birthing periods, closed to cross-country motorized travel, or spring closure for road stability). Three Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACECs): Blanca Wetlands Habitat Management Area, McIntire Springs property, and the Trickle Mountain OHV area are in the limited category in the SLRA. The SLRA RMP identified 10 distinct areas in the SLRA under the jurisdiction of BLM (see Appendix 1A for map). Table Summary-1 describes the size of each management area and the travel management designation Table Summary-1: SLRA RMP Areas SLRA RMP Area Area Name Acres Designation 1 43 CFR 8340.0-5 states: As used in this part: (a) Off-road vehicle means any motorized vehicle capable of, or designed for, travel on or immediately over land, water, or other natural terrain, excluding: (1) Any nonamphibious registered motorboat; (2) Any military, fire, emergency, or law enforcement vehicle while being used for emergency purposes; (3) Any vehicle whose use is expressly authorized by the authorized officer, or otherwise officially approved; (4) Vehicles in official use; and (5) Any combat or combat support vehicle when used in times of national defense emergencies. S-2 Table Summary-1: SLRA RMP Areas SLRA RMP Area Area Name Acres Designation #1 San Luis Valley General 389,279 Open with seasonal closure for critical winter wildlife habitat (except for those areas in an ACEC or WSA) #2 Trickle Mountain (containing Trickle Mountain ACEC) 44,521 Limited #32 Sand Castle WSA (Sand Castle ACEC and WSA) 3,595 Closed #4 Blanca (containing the Blanca Wetlands ACEC) 9,147 Limited #5 Elephant Rocks (containing Elephant Rocks ACEC) 1,852 Limited #6 La Jadero Canyon (containing La Jadero Canyon ACEC) 3,632 Limited #7 Los Mogotes (containing Los Mogotes ACEC) 33,456 Limited #8 San Luis Hills (containing San Luis Hills ACEC and WSA) 28,713 Limited in the ACEC; Closed in the WSA #9 Rio Grande River Corridor (containing Rio Grande River 2,640 Limited Corridor ACEC) #10 Cumbres and Toltec Scenic Railroad Corridor (containing 3,824 Limited Cumbres and Toltec Scenic Railroad Corridor ACEC) The proposed action would change the area designations for most of Area #1 from “open” to a category of "Limited to Designated Roads and Trails”. The exceptions to this change in Area #1 designation would be two small “open” areas, the Manassa Area of 179 acres and the Antonito Area of 81.9 acres (see Appendix 24). These unnamed areas would retain the “open” area designation. The proposed action would not change the designation of the remaining nine travel management Areas (TMAs). The San Luis Hills WSA was closed to motorized and mechanized use under the SLRA RMP and will remain closed under this TMP. The remaining eight areas in the San Luis Valley (listed in Table Summary-1) under the jurisdiction of BLM that were designated in the SLRA RMP as “limited” areas due to their ACEC designations will remain “limited”. Designation of Specific Routes and a Route Network For “Area #1”, the proposed action would further establish designated travel routes for administrative and public uses, and define the types of uses that are permitted on each route. The second proposed action under this TMP would designate a system of roads and trails as open (open/mitigate open), limited (limited/mitigate limited), and closed for the project area. These proposed actions would modify the acres listed in the RMP, thereby modifying the amount and percentages of area, miles, and routes to be managed. The proposed route network under this TMP would provide 1,037.9 miles of routes managed by BLM designated as open or limited (see Actions Common to All Action Alternatives). There would be 650.9 miles of routes open to the public for motorized uses. Ninety miles would be designated for non-motorized routes, and 2 Area #3 was the Sand Castle ACEC and a WSA. This area became part of the Great Sand Dunes National Park and is no longer under BLM administration. Therefore, this area will not be designated in this TMP and discussion of the area will be minimal. S-3 296.6 miles of routes would be limited to authorized motorized use. There would be 19.3 miles of routes in the limited category available for public non-motorized uses under the proposed action. The public would have available for recreational vehicle use during the winter months approximately 619.3 miles of existing motorized BLM routes and one open area for snowmobile use. The development of a designated travel management access system would modify the current use of “open” area designation allowing cross-country travel and user-created routes in Area #1 on 389,279 acres (75% of the resource area) to limited on designated routes. This would eliminate open cross-country travel and the potential for additional user-created routes which would occur under the “no action” alternative (Alternative A). The proposed route network would close approximately 31% of existing routes. Seasonal restrictions were implemented through planning actions in some ACECs including Trickle Mountain OHV, Blanca Wetland, McIntire Property, and Rio Grande Corridor. This TMP delineates and defines specific route designations (i.e., in addition to the change of “Area #1” designation from open to limited). These specific route designations are categorized into five categories: Open, Mitigate Open, Limit, Mitigate Limit, and Closed. The word “mitigate” is an indication during the route analysis that the ID Team identified by route that BLM had a responsibility and needed to follow up with redesign, modification, or monitoring of a route. Notes were taken to assist in prioritization of future work on some specific routes. “Open” routes are routes on public lands without limitations or restrictions to full use and travel by OHVs. “Mitigate Open” leaves the route open as defined above, but identifies that some form of management action above the custodial maintenance to improve the route should impacts be present and/or monitoring specific actions we planned would be taken by the BLM to maintain or improve the route should impacts be present or arise in the future (i.e., if identified through adaptive management monitoring).
Recommended publications
  • University of Oklahoma Graduate College
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE POTENTIAL FIELD STUDIES OF THE CENTRAL SAN LUIS BASIN AND SAN JUAN MOUNTAINS, COLORADO AND NEW MEXICO, AND SOUTHERN AND WESTERN AFGHANISTAN A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By BENJAMIN JOHN DRENTH Norman, Oklahoma 2009 POTENTIAL FIELD STUDIES OF THE CENTRAL SAN LUIS BASIN AND SAN JUAN MOUNTAINS, COLORADO AND NEW MEXICO, AND SOUTHERN AND WESTERN AFGHANISTAN A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE CONOCOPHILLIPS SCHOOL OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS BY _______________________________ Dr. G. Randy Keller, Chair _______________________________ Dr. V.J.S. Grauch _______________________________ Dr. Carol Finn _______________________________ Dr. R. Douglas Elmore _______________________________ Dr. Ze’ev Reches _______________________________ Dr. Carl Sondergeld © Copyright by BENJAMIN JOHN DRENTH 2009 All Rights Reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..……1 Chapter A: Geophysical Constraints on Rio Grande Rift Structure in the Central San Luis Basin, Colorado and New Mexico………………………………………………………...2 Chapter B: A Geophysical Study of the San Juan Mountains Batholith, southwestern Colorado………………………………………………………………………………….61 Chapter C: Geophysical Expression of Intrusions and Tectonic Blocks of Southern and Western Afghanistan…………………………………………………………………....110 Conclusions……………………………………………………………………………..154 iv LIST OF TABLES Chapter A: Geophysical Constraints on Rio Grande Rift Structure in the Central
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals of the San Luis Valley and Adjacent Areas of Colorado Charles F
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/22 Minerals of the San Luis Valley and adjacent areas of Colorado Charles F. Bauer, 1971, pp. 231-234 in: San Luis Basin (Colorado), James, H. L.; [ed.], New Mexico Geological Society 22nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 340 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1971 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiographic Subdivisions of the San Luis Valley, Southern Colorado
    113 PHYSIOGRAPHIC SUBDIVISIONS OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY, SOUTHERN COLORADO by J. E. UPsolvf University of Idaho Moscow, Idaho EDITOR'S NOTE: The New Mexico Geological Society v is grateful to the Journal of Geology for permission to re- print this classic article. After 32 years the work still re- WVO. • mains the most quoted reference in its field on the basin. AP.. _ AC . I The photographs were retaken under Mr. Upson's direc- / tion and duplicate the originals as closely as possible, with –rt 1 the exception of Figure 5, which was taken a short distance ,0 "north" of the mouth of the Rio Costilla. Slight editorial /y .R changes in punctuation and capitalization were made on p 3, the article to conform to present day usage. Denver 70 0 0) INTRODUCTION 3 , CID The San Luis Valley, forming the upper end of the u) great valley of the Rio Grande, is one of the most impres- sive topographic features of southern Colorado. As orig- inally outlined by Siebenthal, 1 it is a great lowland about 150 miles long and 50 miles in maximum width, flanked on the east by the linear Sangre dc Cristo Range and on 0 7/, / the west by the eastern portion of the more extensive San 3 0 0N405 Juan Mountains. It is, in a sense, part of the chain of in- t4 •O 4. SP O V4 / termontane basins, or parks,2 lying west of the Southern ` 1,1‘0 AN Rocky Mountain front ranges, but is unlike the others in Llt IS q` having no southern mountain border.
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Grande and Conejos Counties, Colorado Volume II: a Natural Heritage Inventory and Assessment of Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Rio Grande and Conejos Counties
    Biological Inventory of Rio Grande and Conejos Counties, Colorado Volume II: A Natural Heritage Inventory and Assessment of Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Rio Grande and Conejos Counties Colorado Natural Heritage Program College of Natural Resources, 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Biological Inventory of Rio Grande and Conejos Counties, Colorado Volume II: A Natural Heritage Inventory and Assessment of Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Rio Grande and Conejos Counties Prepared for: Colorado Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street Room 718 Denver, Colorado 80203 Prepared by: Joe Rocchio, Denise Culver, Steve Kettler, and Robert Schorr March 2000 Colorado Natural Heritage Program College of Natural Resources 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 ii USER’S GUIDE The Biological Inventory of Rio Grande and Conejos Counties, conducted by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, consists of two essentially distinct projects that are highly integrated with respect to methodology and fieldwork. This report reflects the separate nature of the projects by being organized in a two-volume set. Both projects utilized the same Natural Heritage methodology that is used throughout North America, and both searched for and assessed the plants, animals, and plant communities on the Colorado Natural Heritage Program’s list of rare and imperiled elements of biodiversity. Each volume prioritizes potential conservation areas based on the relative significance of the biodiversity they support and the urgency for protection of the site. All information explaining Natural Heritage methodology and ranks is repeated in each volume, so that each volume can stand-alone and be used independently of the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Inventory in the Pike's Stockade Area, Conejos
    An Archaeological Inventory in the Pike’s Stockade Area, Conejos County, Colorado by Kevin D. Black Principal Investigator Colorado Historical Society with a contribution by Bruce Wahle Denver Chapter Colorado Archaeological Society Sponsored by Colorado Historical Society Office of the State Archaeologist of Colorado Program for Avocational Archaeological Certification Denver, Colorado Colorado State Permits #2004–21, 2005–6, 2006–41 October 2007 Abstract During the 2004–2006 field seasons, an archaeological survey was conducted east of Sanford, Colorado as part of the training available in the Program for Avocational Archaeological Certification (PAAC). The project thus used volunteers largely from the Colorado Archaeological Society (CAS) already enrolled in PAAC, supervised and trained by the Assistant State Archaeologist from the Colorado Historical Society. The inventory was completed on about 907 acres of the Pike’s Stockade State Historic Monument (PSSHM) in Conejos County, Colorado. The study tract encompassed a low shrubland environment on and around a volcanic mesa named Sierro del Ojito, bordering the wooded floodplain of the Conejos River, at elevations of 2,296–2,495 m. This area was intensively surveyed primarily to train PAAC volunteers in archaeological inventory and mapping methods. In addition, this portion of southern Colorado had been the subject of relatively little archaeological research interest, and the PSSHM—as a regional property of the Colorado Historical Society—made a logical choice for a PAAC survey project. As a result of the survey a total of 37 sites and 26 isolated finds (IFs) were recorded, including both American Indian and non-Indian materials. Historic period non-Indian sites comprise a rather diverse mix of artifact scatters, cairns, fences, stone enclosures, and rock inscriptions related primarily to ranching and recreational activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology of the San Luis Valley, Colorado: an Overview
    HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY, COLORADO AN OVERVIEW—AND A LOOK AT THE FUTURE By Philip A. Emery Al2O3Geohydrology 2910 Star Drive Lake Havasu City, Arizona 86406 A note from the author—During the period Most of the streamflow is derived from snowmelt 1966–1980, I was either collecting data, interpreting data, or from about 4,700 mi2 of watershed in the surrounding writing reports regarding the San Luis Valley. Other duties mountains. The northern part of the valley is internally at other locales prevented me from working nearly full time drained and is referred to as the “closed basin”. The lowest on the valley, as I did from 1966 to 1972. In any case, I part of the closed basin is known locally as the “sump”. devoted considerable time and effort investigating the val- The southern part of the valley is drained by the Rio Grande ley’s water resources and, therefore, I am both honored and and its major tributary the Conejos River. pleased to author this paper for GSA. The U.S. Geological The climate of the San Luis Valley is arid and is Survey transferred me to Alamosa 30 years ago when I was characterized by cold winters, moderate summers, and appointed Project Chief of a 5-year hydrologic study of the much sunshine. The average annual precipitation is about San Luis Valley. I departed Colorado in 1972. I returned to 7.5 inches and potential evapotranspiration exceeds the valley in 1979 to testify in a trial regarding rules and 40 inches. Average annual temperature is about 42°F, with regulations proposed by the Colorado State Engineer, and extremes of -50°F and 91°F.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Mineral Potential of Public Lands Located Within Proposed Solar Energy Zones in Colorado
    1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Colorado SEZ Mineral Assessment July 2012 CONTENTS NOTATION .............................................................................................................................. vii SIGNATURE PAGE ................................................................................................................ ix SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 1 S.1 Antonito Southeast SEZ .......................................................................................... 1 S.2 De Tilla Gulch SEZ ................................................................................................ 2 S.3 Fourmile SEZ .......................................................................................................... 3 S.4 Los Mogotes East SEZ............................................................................................ 3 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Purpose of Report ................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Legal Description of the Subject Lands .................................................................. 5 1.3 Methodology and Resources ................................................................................... 7 1.4 Locatable Minerals.................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cochetopa Hills Vegetation Management Project Environmental Assessment
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service March 2014 Cochetopa Hills Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Vegetation Management Forests Gunnison Ranger District Project Environmental Assessment Saguache County, Colorado Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official: John Murphy, District Ranger, Gunnison Ranger District, GMUG NF Contact: Arthur Haines, District Silviculturist Gunnison Ranger District, GMUG NF Phone: 970 642-4423 Email: [email protected] The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14 th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cochetopa Hills Vegetation Management Project Environmental Assessment Table of Contents 1. PROPOSED ACTION/PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION........................................................1 1.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the San Luis Hills, South-Central Colorado Richard L
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/22 Geology of the San Luis Hills, south-central Colorado Richard L. Burroughs, 1971, pp. 277-287 in: San Luis Basin (Colorado), James, H. L.; [ed.], New Mexico Geological Society 22nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 340 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1971 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Life at Ken-Caryl at Life
    Ken-Caryl Ranch Master Association • www.ken-carylranch.org Vol. XXXVI, No. 23 Nov. 6, 2013 Like us on at www.facebook.com/ken-carylranch KCR Veterans Monument To Receive Pro Bono Concrete Work Submitted by Byron Wicks, Aspen Meadows project would be funded by donations from The Veterans Monument Committee has ner. A $500 contribution reaches the “Bronze” Several weeks ago, Aspen Meadow resident the residents, friends of Ken-Caryl Ranch and developed a number of ways for the benefac- level with the appropriate recognition. Chris Sullivan notified the Ken-Caryl Ranch local businesses. tors to be recognized based on the amount Corporate sponsorship will be recognized Veterans Monument committee of a project There are no current plans to have either of their contributions. Private donors con- similarly at a different location at the monu- that he was involved in regarding construc- the Master Association or the Metropolitan tributing $1,000 or more will be recognized at ment. Corporate sponsorship can be in terms tion efforts to support American Veterans. District contribute money to the fund. Con- the “Silver” level. Their names will be engraved of cash donations, materials or construction Chris had been following the articles in Life tributions of any amount are welcome and at the monument if they so desire. Con- activities. Specific levels of corporate recog- at Ken-Caryl and determined that the project all will be acknowledged and recognized in tributors donating $750 or more will be rec- nition will be posted on the Veterans Monu- might qualify for support from the Decorative writing.
    [Show full text]
  • National Forests. of Colorado $
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BI5CELLANEOUS PUBLICATION N218 ! NATIONAL FORESTS. OF COLORADO $ Snowmass Lake ai\d Peak Holy Cross National forest Prepared by the Forest Service Issued May, 192S ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BK PKOCUKKD PROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS U.S.GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, I). C. AT IS CENTS PEE COPY THE NATIONAL FORESTS OF COLORADO CONTENTS Page. Page. National forests 1 The national forests of Colorado— Fire 'protection 1 Continued. Forest management 3 The. White River National Forest. 18 Research 5 The Leadville National Forest 20 Reforestation 5 The Cochetopa National Forest 21 Grazing (i Tile Holy Cross National Forest__ 23 Game (5 The Gunnison National Forest 23 Recreation 7 Tlie Grand Mesa National Forest-. 25 The national forests of Colorado S The TTncompahgre National Forest- 27 Organization 10 The San Juan National Forest 28 The Pike National Forest 10 Tin1 Montezuma National Forest- 30 The Colorado National Forest 12 The Rio Grande National Forest— 30 The Arapaho National Forest 11 The San Isabel National Forest 32 The Routt National Forest 17 The forest trees of Colorado 34 NATIONAL FORESTS The chief purpose of the national forests is the conservation of wood and water. In this respect all national forests are alike. They are also alike in that all resources—forage, wild life, recrea­ tion, and other resources as well as wood and water—are managed with the object of deriving from them the greatest possible contribu­ tion to the general public welfare. On the other hand, details of management are different on different forests because of local con­ ditions.
    [Show full text]