DOCSLIB.ORG

PIER 34 Something Possible Everywhere Something Possible

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PIER 34 Something Possible Everywhere Something Possible NYC 1983–84 NYC PIER 34 Something Possible Everywhere Something Possible PIER 34 Something Possible Everywhere NYC 1983–84 PIER 34 Something Possible Everywhere NYC 1983–84 Jane Bauman PIER 34 Mike Bidlo Something Possible Everywhere Paolo Buggiani NYC 1983–84 Keith Davis Steve Doughton John Fekner David Finn Jean Foos Luis Frangella Valeriy Gerlovin Judy Glantzman Peter Hujar Alain Jacquet Kim Jones Rob Jones Stephen Lack September 30–November 20 Marisela La Grave Opening reception: September 29, 7–9pm Liz-N-Val Curated by Jonathan Weinberg Bill Mutter Featuring photographs by Andreas Sterzing Michael Ottersen Organized by the Hunter College Art Galleries Rick Prol Dirk Rowntree Russell Sharon Kiki Smith Huck Snyder 205 Hudson Street Andreas Sterzing New York, New York Betty Tompkins Hours: Wednesday–Sunday, 1–6pm Peter White David Wojnarowicz Teres Wylder Rhonda Zwillinger Andreas Sterzing, Pier 34 & Pier 32, View from Hudson River, 1983 FOREWORD This exhibition catalogue celebrates the moment, thirty-three This exhibition would not have been made possible without years ago, when a group of artists trespassed on a city-owned the generous support provided by Carol and Arthur Goldberg, Joan building on Pier 34 and turned it into an illicit museum and and Charles Lazarus, Dorothy Lichtenstein, and an anonymous incubator for new art. It is particularly fitting that the 205 donor. Furthermore, we could not have realized the show without Hudson Gallery hosts this show given its proximity to where the the collaboration of its many generous lenders: Allan Bealy and terminal building once stood, just four blocks from 205 Hudson Sheila Keenan of Benzene Magazine; Hal Bromm Gallery and Hal Street. One of the great pleasures of this exhibition is the way it Bromm, Sam Kogon, Alex Markwith, and Don Meris; Light and reconnects us to the waterfront, particularly through the lens of Toby Buggiani; Julie Davis; Delaware Art Museum and Margaret Andreas Sterzing’s cinematic photographs. As Mike Bidlo and Winslow, Assistant Curator of Contemporary Art; Asher Edelman David Wojnarowicz suggest, there is a deep connection between and Edelman Arts; Eric Javits; Kim E. Jones; Hebe Joy; and the the flow of the Hudson River—the unceasing traffic under and Leslie-Lohman Museum of Gay and Lesbian Art; P.P.O.W. Gallery across it—and the constant flux of creation that is so central to and Wendy Olsoff and Anneliis Beadnell; Tom Rauffenbart; art-making in this city. Beatricia Sagar; and Anders Wahlstedt Fine Art. Something Possible Everywhere: Pier 34 NYC, 1983–84 We would like to acknowledge the following individuals owes its success to the dedication and hard work of numerous whose energy and commitment have been integral to the achieve- individuals and institutions. First and foremost, we thank all of ment and success of this exhibition: Howard Singerman, Phyllis the artists who worked at Pier 34 and are the inspiration for this and Joseph Caroff Chair of the Department of Art and Art History exhibition. We are tremendously grateful to the exhibition cura- and Executive Director; Joachim Pissarro, Bershad Professor and tor, Jonathan Weinberg, for his passion and dedication to this Director; Jocelyn Spaar, Curatorial Assistant; Jenn Bratovich, important and underexamined aspect of the early 1980s down- Gallery Assistant; Phi Nguyen, Preparator; and our Joan Lazarus town art scene; and to photographer Andreas Sterzing, whose Exhibition Fellows Mikey Estes and Susan Breyer. The catalogue collaboration has been instrumental in the creation of this exhi- owes it thoughtful design to Tim Laun and Natalie Wedeking, bition and catalogue. Thank you to the numerous artists who with timely editorial support from Amelia Kutschbach. We also contributed recollections for the catalogue and to those who express our gratitude to Hunter President Jennifer J. Raab, contributed on other artists’ behalf. The outpouring of enthusi- Provost Dr. Lon Kaufman, and Dean Andrew J. Polsky for their asm by so many involved with Pier 34 is beyond touching. ongoing support of the Hunter College Art Galleries. —Sarah Watson, Chief Curator; Annie Wischmeyer, Associate Curator 9 Andreas Sterzing, David and Mike at the Pier, 1983 INTRODUCTION THE PIER 34 EXPERIMENT JONATHAN WEINBERG In one of Andreas Sterzing’s most beautiful photographs of In 1932, when the enormous building on Pier 34 first took Pier 34, Mike Bidlo and David Wojnarowicz sprawl out on the its place in the network of shipping terminals around Manhat- grass that has mysteriously grown inside the waterfront build- tan, part of what was then the largest port in the world, Bidlo ing. Bidlo and Wojnarowicz’s pose recalls the relaxed posture and Wojnarowicz’s lazy posture amid the ruins of the waterfront of the male figures in Édouard Manet’s Le Dejeuner sur l’Herbe. would be unthinkable. It is just as incongruous today given the Wojnarowicz sexily lolls back as Bidlo speaks to him; both are wealthy neighborhood’s transformation into fashionable prom- oblivious to the endless stream of traffic of the Holland Tunnel, enades and million-dollar condos, not to mention the presence running just beneath the pier, and the thousands of commut- of heightened security at the entrances of the Holland Tunnel ers pouring into the Financial District to the south. Painted to guard against terrorist attacks. How did such a monumen- behind them on the wall is an enormous head outlined in black. tal structure, at such a key location—straddling the Tunnel’s Their friend, Luis Frangella, had likely only just finished it, air-shaft towers—come to be abandoned, and how did it become but it fuses so perfectly with the cracked and stained plaster, it an epicenter for art-making in the 1980s? seems ancient, like a fresco in Pompeii. Indeed, the dilapidated Something Possible Everywhere: Pier 34 NYC, 1983–84 state of the building, with its rusted institutional light fixtures revisits this extraordinary place and time when Wojnarowicz, dangling from the ceiling, broken glass dividers, and crumbling Bidlo, and many of their friends effectively seized a city-owned floors, suggests that some sort of Pompeian disaster has recently pier and filled it with art. Sterzing’s remarkable photographs, occurred, emptying the space of its dockworkers and all their along with related images by Peter Hujar, Marisela La Grave, ceaseless activity. But, if so, Bidlo and Wojnarowicz are oblivious and Dirk Rowntree, document how these artists turned the to it, as they relax in this strange urban pastoral. Ward Line shipping terminal at the foot of Canal Street into 11 a series of makeshift art galleries and studios. Accompanying in this city for years said it was the first time they experienced these photographs are paintings and sculptures, made by the fulfillment in terms of contact with the art scene and strangers.”1 many artists who worked on the pier. Sadly almost all of the art In their statement Bidlo and Wojnarowicz speak of Pier 34 made in this unique locale no longer exists—Jean Foos managed almost as a curated exhibition that happened over a matter of to salvage a window-shade bracket that jutted out from Wojn- months. Yet Wojnarowicz actually “discovered” the Ward Line arowicz’s Krazy Kat mural; David Finn drew some figure studies terminal at Pier 34 in 1981 and began to paint animals and cartoon on city-government stationery he found on-site. The presence characters on its walls and on those of Pier 28 further south.2 of contemporaneous work in the exhibition makes tangible the The name Ward Line, which was emblazoned on the facade of physicality of the waterfront art and its larger aesthetic context. the terminal building at the time, refers to the Ward Line New The artists who worked on Pier 34 crossed generations, York and Cuba Mail Steamship Company. The enterprise, best from established figures like Alain Jacquet and Ruth Kligman to known for its boats that went back and forth to Cuba before emerging artists like Steven Doughton and Rhonda Zwillinger; World War II, went out of business in the 1950s, but the building they worked in a variety of media and styles, from the perfor- name stuck. In 1932 the government built the enormous struc- mance art of Kim Jones and Paolo Buggiani to the expressionism ture, with its waiting rooms, offices, and vast hangarlike loading of Judy Glantzman and Stephen Lack. This diversity, combined area at the back, which they originally leased to the Clyde-Mal- with the site-specificity of works by artists like John Fekner and lory Steamship Line and later to the Ward Line.3 By the 1960s Teres Wydler, challenges the stereotypes of the 1980s art scene the advent of air transportation and container shipping, which as a conservative turn toward easel painting that was driven by demanded acres of space, rendered Pier 34 and most of Manhat- the market. Indeed the chief instigators of the Pier 34 experi- tan’s other port facilities obsolete. New York City’s near-bank- ment, Wojnarowicz and his cohort, Bidlo, self-consciously saw ruptcy in the 1970s, along with the protracted controversy over the site as anticommercial. As rumors spread in the spring of the future of the Westway highway project, meant that there 1983 of what was happening on the waterfront, the two artists were no funds to renovate or demolish the waterfront structures released a statement to friends in the press that explained their as they fell into disrepair and eventual ruin. Yet in a city where ethos of resisting the gallery system and creating an opportunity space was and continues to be at a premium, these enormous for anyone “to explore any image in any material on any surface buildings lured artists.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • George Bellows on Monhegan Island
    David Peters Corbett The World Is Terrible and It Is Not There at All: George Bellows on Monhegan Island Painted on Monhegan Island off the coast of Maine during the summer of 1913, George Bellows’s small oil on panel Churn and Break (fig. 1) depicts a shore and its surrounding sea. The observer’s gaze encounters a mound of dark, almost black, rocks, which glisten with trails of moisture and light. To the left, the sea, sweeping in a great wave up against the rocks, threatens to overtop the ridge. In the midground, further dramatic swells rise and fall, and overhead, in a dreary sky, Bellows’s paint describes the insistent perpendicular fall of rain. Above the rocks and to the right, a plume of spray, dense and gray and white, jets up in a balletic swirl of creamy pigment. Bellows’s painting uses dazzling mixed brushwork to portray the variety of forms and textures of this scene, from the fluid lines and sinuous handling of the fore- ground sea to the dragged marks that describe the descending curtain of rain and cast a shadowy veil across the distance. The world we are confronted by in Churn and Break seems to fall into two disparate levels of experience: on the one hand, a discrete, self-contained universe of vital but inhuman matter, formed by the crashing sea and mute shoreline; on the other, an intimately human domain, the gestural runs and virtuoso flourishes of Bellows’s hand and brush.1 Despite this apparently radical division, the two levels also merge fleetingly into a single identity.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Realists
    NEW YORK REALISTS 1 9 0 0 - 1 9 1 4 H U H ROBERT ENRI , GEORGE L KS , JO N SLOAN $ W I LL I A M G LACKEN S , ERN ES T L AWS ON V SHINN GEORGE BELLOWS , E ERETT f GLENN O AND GUY P DU . COLEMAN ENE BOIS FEBRU RY $I$ H TO R H 5TH 1 3 A Q MA C , 9 7 WH I TN EY MU SEU M O F AMER IC A N A RT TEN WES T E IG H T H S TREE T NEW YORK F O R E WO R D TH E title Realists is perhaps too confining a term under which to group such individualists as the nine artists whose work is represented in this exhibition . But considered in relation to the more academic school of the early years of si nifi the century , the word might justly claim a special g cance . All these men had this in common $ that they turned directly to nature and did not scorn any phase of the f r human scene as fit subjects o their art . Space does not allow the inclusion of other distinguished artists who also were associated with this group $ but the nine men in the present exhibition may be considered as representative of a Vital and significant phase of American art . INTRODU CTION E do not with sufficient plainness or sufficient profoundness address circum f ourselves to life , nor dare we chant our times and social a . ff M st nce Banks and tari s , the newspaper and the caucus , ethodism U $at foun f and nitarianism , are and dull to dull people , but rest on the same of of dations wonder as the town of Troy , and the temple Delphos , and are as swiftly passing away .
    [Show full text]
  • Articulos/Articles Arte De Apropiación
    Páginas de Filosofía, Año XVI, Nº 19 (enero-julio 2015), 80-95 Departamento de Filosofía, Universidad Nacional del Comahue ISSN: 0327-5108; e-ISSN: 1853-7960 http://revele.uncoma.edu.ar/htdoc/revele/index.php/filosofia/index ARTICULOS/ARTICLES ARTE DE APROPIACIÓN. RECONSIDERACIONES ALREDEDOR DEL PROBLEMA DE LOS INDISCERNIBLES EN DANTO APPROPRIATION ART: A REASSESSMENT OF DANTO'SAPPROACH TO THE PROBLEM OF INDISCERNIBLE COUNTERPARTS Gemma Argüello Manresa Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Lerma Resumen: En este trabajo se desarrollan los argumentos que Arthur Danto elaboró en torno al significado metafórico y el estilo con el objetivo de mostrar si es posible que su modelo permita comprender nuevas formas de Arte de Apropiación. Éstas engloban las prácticas recientes en las que los artistas hacen réplicas más o menos exactas de otras obras que han sido importantes en la historia del arte. Palabras clave: Arte de Apropiación, metáfora, estilo. Abstract: In this paper Arthur Danto’s arguments about metaphorical meaning and style are analyzed in order to show whether it is possible that his model works for understanding new ways of Appropriation Art. These are recent artistic practices in which artists make more or less accurate copies of other artworks that have been important in Art History. Keywords: Appropriation art, Metaphor, Style. Sobre el Arte de Apropiación y sus distintas formas En este trabajo me voy a concentrar en la forma en que Arthur Danto podría enfrentar ciertas prácticas contemporáneas de Arte de Apropiación, las cuales han pasado muchas veces desapercibidas por sus críticos, y que, de hecho, también serían ejemplos idóneos para abordar el problema de los indiscernibles en el arte, más que las obras de Warhol 81 ARTE DE APROPIACIÓN a las que Danto les tuvo tanta estima.
    [Show full text]
  • HARD FACTS and SOFT SPECULATION Thierry De Duve
    THE STORY OF FOUNTAIN: HARD FACTS AND SOFT SPECULATION Thierry de Duve ABSTRACT Thierry de Duve’s essay is anchored to the one and perhaps only hard fact that we possess regarding the story of Fountain: its photo in The Blind Man No. 2, triply captioned “Fountain by R. Mutt,” “Photograph by Alfred Stieglitz,” and “THE EXHIBIT REFUSED BY THE INDEPENDENTS,” and the editorial on the facing page, titled “The Richard Mutt Case.” He examines what kind of agency is involved in that triple “by,” and revisits Duchamp’s intentions and motivations when he created the fictitious R. Mutt, manipulated Stieglitz, and set a trap to the Independents. De Duve concludes with an invitation to art historians to abandon the “by” questions (attribution, etc.) and to focus on the “from” questions that arise when Fountain is not seen as a work of art so much as the bearer of the news that the art world has radically changed. KEYWORDS, Readymade, Fountain, Independents, Stieglitz, Sanitary pottery Then the smell of wet glue! Mentally I was not spelling art with a capital A. — Beatrice Wood1 No doubt, Marcel Duchamp’s best known and most controversial readymade is a men’s urinal tipped on its side, signed R. Mutt, dated 1917, and titled Fountain. The 2017 centennial of Fountain brought us a harvest of new books and articles on the famous or infamous urinal. I read most of them in the hope of gleaning enough newly verified facts to curtail my natural tendency to speculate. But newly verified facts are few and far between.
    [Show full text]
  • “Summer of '82” Curated by Dan Cameron June 5 – July 5, 2019
    “Summer of ’82” Curated by Dan Cameron June 5 – July 5, 2019 Buster Cleveland Arch Connelly Jane Dickson Luis Frangella Judy Glantzman Becky Howland Stephen Lack Lee Quiñones David Sandlin Hope Sandrow Kenny Scharf Russell Sharon Tabboo! Tseng Kwong Chi Tom Warren David Wojnarowicz Martin Wong Summer of ’82 looks at the work of seventeen artists who were all active in the emergent Lower Manhattan art scene during the early 1980s, with a particular focus on work produced during the year 1982. Rather than serve as an overview of early 1980’s stylistics, the premise of the exhibition is to consider the emergence of a new bohemian generation at a moment when Fun Gallery had opened the year before on East 10th Street, followed by Gracie Mansion Gallery and Nature Morte. Looking back, the summer of ’82 was the moment that gave birth to both Details Magazine and Heresies’ Collective’s Racism issue, to Keith Haring and Jean-Michel Basquiat. The sounds of that summer were ESG, Blondie, Michael Jackson’s Thriller, Soft Cell’s Tainted Love, Laurie Anderson’s O Superman, and Grandmaster Flash’s The Message. It was the summer of ET, Rambo, and Bladerunner, not to mention the heyday of Rene Ricard, Tehching Hsieh and Art on the Beach. 1982 gave us the finest wine vintages in a generation and the greatest World Cup of living memory. We saw Rudi Fuchs’ Documenta, Valentino’s ‘retrospective’ at the Met, watched England sink Argentina’s ‘Belgrano,’ applauded as the Joyce Theater re-opened, partied at Danceteria, Studio 54, the Mudd Club, and Peppermint Lounge, and gave money to the first fundraiser for the Gay Men’s Health Crisis, hosted by Larry Kramer.
    [Show full text]
  • Sampling Real Life: Creative Appropriation in Public Spaces
    Sampling Real Life: Creative Appropriation in Public Spaces Elsa M. Lankford Electronic Media & Film (EMF) Towson University [email protected] I. Introduction Enter an art museum or a library and you will find numerous examples of appropriation, all or most of which were most likely legal at the time. From the birth of copyright and the idea that an author, encompassed as a writer, artist, composer, or musician, is the creator of a completely original work, our legal and moral perceptions of appropriation have changed. Merriam-Webster defines appropriation in multiple ways, two of which apply to the discussion of art and appropriation. The first, “to take exclusive possession of” and the second “to take or make use of without authority or right.”1 The battle over rights and appropriation is not one that is only fought in the courtroom and gallery, it also concerns our own lives. Many aspects of our lives involve appropriation, from pagan holidays appropriated into the Christian calendar to the music we listen to, even to the words we speak or write appropriated from other countries and cultures. As artists, appropriation in many forms makes its way into works of any media. The topic of appropriation leads to a discussion of where our creative ideas come from. They, in some sense, have been appropriated as well. Whether we overhear a snippet of a conversation that ends up woven into a creative work or we take a picture of somebody, unknowingly, as they walk down a tree-shadowed street, we are appropriating life. For centuries, artists have been inspired by public life, and the stories and images of others have been appropriated into their work.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review Are Intended Director on His fi Rst Visit to the Gallery
    THE April – March NATIONAL GALLEY TH E NATIONAL GALLEY April – March – Contents Introduction 5 In June , Dr Nicholas Penny announced During Nicholas Penny’s directorship, overall Director’s Foreword 8 his intention to retire as Director of the National visitor numbers have grown steadily, year on year; Gallery. The handover to his successor, Dr Gabriele in , they stood at some . million while in Acquisitions 10 Finaldi, will take place in August . The Board they reached over . million. Furthermore, Loans 17 looks forward to welcoming Dr Finaldi back to this remarkable increase has taken place during a Conservation 24 the Gallery, where he worked as a curator from period when our resource Grant in Aid has been Framing 28 to . falling. One of the key objectives of the Gallery Exhibitions 32 This, however, is the moment at which to over the last few years has been to improve the Displays 44 refl ect on the directorship of Nicholas Penny, experience for this growing group of visitors, Education 48 the eminent scholar who has led the Gallery so and to engage them more closely with the Scientifi c Research 52 successfully since February . As Director, Gallery and its collection. This year saw both Research and Publications 55 his fi rst priority has been the security, preservation the introduction of Wi-Fi and the relaxation Public and Private Support of the Gallery 60 and enhanced display of the Gallery’s pre-eminent of restrictions on photography, changes which Trustees and Committees of the National Gallery Board 66 collection of Old Master paintings for the benefi t of have been widely welcomed by our visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • AN EXAMINATION of ART FORGERY and the LEGAL TOOLS PROTECTING ART COLLECTORS Leila A
    ARE YOU FAUX REAL? AN EXAMINATION OF ART FORGERY AND THE LEGAL TOOLS PROTECTING ART COLLECTORS Leila A. Amineddoleh | Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal Document Details All Citations: 34 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 59 Search Details Jurisdiction: National Delivery Details Date: July 19, 2016 at 9:02 PM Delivered By: kiip kiip Client ID: KIIPLIB02 Status Icons: © 2016 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. ARE YOU FAUX REAL? AN EXAMINATION OF ART..., 34 Cardozo Arts &... 34 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 59 Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 2016 Article ARE YOU FAUX REAL? AN EXAMINATION OF ART FORGERY AND THE LEGAL TOOLS PROTECTING ART COLLECTORS r1 Leila A. Amineddoleh a1 Copyright (c) 2016 Yeshiva University; Leila A. Amineddoleh INTRODUCTION 61 I. BACKGROUND 62 A. Rise in Authorship 62 B. The Existence of Forgeries 64 C. A Robust Art Market Leads to Increasing Prices and the Prevalence of Forgeries 66 1. The Current Market is Full of Forgeries 66 2. There is a Circular Relationship: The Art Market Thrives, Prices Increase, and 69 Connoisseurship Gains Greater Importance II. HOW THE LAW GRAPPLES WITH AUTHENTICITY 70 A. The First High Profile Authentication Battle in US Courts: Hahn v. Duveen 70 III. WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE “AUTHENTIC”? 72 A. Authenticity as a Three-Legged Stool 72 B. The Vulnerability of Modern Masters Leads to the Shuttering of One of the Most 74 Prestigious American Galleries C. Sometimes There is No Definitive Answer Regarding Authorship 79 D. Authenticity Disputes Have Altered the Landscape for Art Experts 80 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognized Stature: Protecting Street Art As Cultural Property
    Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property Volume 12 Issue 2 Article 2 7-1-2013 Recognized Stature: Protecting Street Art as Cultural Property Griffin M. Barnett Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/ckjip Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Griffin M. Barnett, Recognized Stature: Protecting Street Art as Cultural Property, 12 Chi. -Kent J. Intell. Prop. 204 (2013). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/ckjip/vol12/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. RECOGNIZED STATURE: PROTECTING STREET ART AS CULTURAL PROPERTY Griffin M. Barnett INTRODUCTION I was very embarrassed when my canvases began to fetch high prices, I saw myself condemned to a future of painting nothing but masterpieces. —Henri Matisse1 Copyright © 2013, Griffin Barnett; Chicago-Kent College of Law. Associate, Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff, LLP, Washington, DC. The author holds a JD, cum laude, from American University Washington College of Law and a BA in International Studies from Johns Hopkins University. The author would like to thank his family and friends for their unwavering love and support, and Professor Joshua J. Kaufman for providing the impetus for writing this Article. ** Photograph provided by Fine Art Auctions Miami. 1 Frequently asked questions, BANKSY, http://web.archive.org/web/2013062716574 1/http://www.banksy.co.uk/QA/qaa.html (accessed by searching http://www.banksy.co.
    [Show full text]
  • Judith Bernstein Selected Press Pa Ul Kasmin Gallery
    JUDITH BERNSTEIN SELECTED PRESS PA UL KASMIN GALLERY Judith Bernstein Shines a Blacklight on Trump’s Crimes We cannot ignore the fact that Americans voted for Trump. Jillian McManemin Feburary 16, 2018 Judith Bernstein, “President” (2017), acrylic and oil on canvas, 90 x 89 1/2 inches (all images courtesy the artist and Paul Kasmin Gallery) People pay to watch a real fuck. In the heyday of Times Square porn the “money shot” was developed to prove that the sex-on-film was real and not simulated. The proof? Cum. The (male) ejaculation onto the body of his co-star. In her debut solo show at Paul Kasmin Gallery, Judith Bernstein unveils Money Shot, a series of large- scale paintings starring the Trump administration, its horrific present and terrifying potential future. The gallery is outfitted with blacklight, which alters the paintings even during daytime hours. The works glow orange, green, violet, and acid yellow against pitch black. The unstable colors signal that nothing will ever look or be the same as it was before. But, this isn’t the dark of night. This place is tinged with psychedelia. The distortions border on 293 & 297 TENTH AVENUE 515 WEST 27TH STREET TELEPHONE 212 563 4474 NEW YORK, NY 10001 PAULKASMINGALLERY.COM PA UL KASMIN GALLERY nauseating. The room spins as we stand still. We oscillate between terror and gut-busting laughter, as we witness what we once deemed unimaginable. Judith Bernstein, “Money Shot – Blue Balls” (2017), acrylic and oil on canvas, 104 x 90 1/2 inches Our eyes adjust at different speeds to the dark.
    [Show full text]
  • Deborah Kass & Betty Tompkins
    “FRONTRUNNER Presents: Deborah Kass & Betty Tompkins,” by Shana Beth Mason for Frontrunner, January 29, 2021. FRONTRUNNER Presents: Deborah Kass & Betty Tompkins At one point or another within the last ten years, I’ve laughed, cried, gossiped and shared meals with Betty Tompkins (alongside her husband, Bill Mutter) and Deborah Kass (alongside her wife, Patricia Cronin). So it’s fair to say that both of these women mean a great deal to me. They are not only world-renowned artists who have been cruelly under-represented and under-appreciated for most of their creative lives, but they are true mentors in every sense. Their experiences and their wisdom are windows into an art world long gone – for many reasons, rightly so – and have deeply permeated their respective visual vocabularies. Deborah Kass (b. 1952, San Antonio, TX) received her BFA in Painting at Carnegie Mellon University and attended the Whitney Museum Independent Study Program. Her works are in the permanent collections of MoMA, The Whitney Museum, The National Portrait Gallery (Washington, D.C.), The Smithsonian Institution, and The Jewish Museum (New York). She has presented work at the Venice Biennale, the Istanbul Biennale, and in 2012 was the subject of a mid-career retrospective at the Andy Warhol Museum in Pittsburgh. She is currently a Senior Critic at the Yale University MFA Painting Program. Kass is represented by Gavlak Gallery (Los Angeles/Palm Beach) and Kavi Gupta (Chicago). Betty Tompkins (b. 1945, Washington, D.C.) received her BFA from Syracuse University, then taught at Central Washington State College (Ellensburg), where she received her graduate degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Jackson Pollock
    It doesn't make much difference how the paint is put on as long as something has been said. Technique is just a means of arriving at a statement. SYNOPSIS In its edition of August 8th, 1949, Life magazine ran a feature article about Jackson Pollock that bore this question in the headline: "Is he the greatest living painter in the United States?" Could a painter who flung paint at canvases with a stick, who poured and hurled it to create roiling vortexes of color and line, possibly be considered "great"? New York's critics certainly thought so, and Pollock's pre-eminence among the Abstract Expressionists has endured, cemented by the legend of his alcoholism and his early death. The famous 'drip paintings' that he began to produce in the late 1940s represent one of the most original bodies of work of the century. At times they could suggest the life- force in nature itself, at others they could evoke man's entrapment - in the body, in the anxious mind, and in the newly frightening modern © The Art Story Foundation – All rights Reserved For more movements, artists and ideas on Modern Art visit www.TheArtStory.org world. KEY IDEAS Pollock's tough and unsettled early life growing up in the American West shaped him into the bullish character he would become. Later, a series of influences came together to guide Pollock to his mature style: years spent painting realist murals in the 1930s showed him the power of painting on a large scale; Surrealism suggested ways to describe the unconscious; and Cubism guided his understanding of picture space.
    [Show full text]