DOCSLIB.ORG

Heathfield Stage 1 Surface Water Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heathfield Stage 1 Surface Water Management Plan Heathfield Stage 1 Surface Water Management Plan Final Report April 2015 East Sussex County Council County Hall St Anne's Crescent LEWES East Sussex BN7 1UE JBA Project Manager Rachel Huitson-Little Aberdeen House South Road Haywards Heath West Sussex RH16 4NG Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to Tom Schindl (East Sussex Draft Report v1 / February County Council) N/A 2014 Early issue - still requires final JBA QA and sign off Draft Report v2 / February Minor text amendments Tom Schindl (East Sussex 2014 (following internal QA) Country Council Final Report v3 / March Minor text amendments Tom Schindl (East Sussex 2014 (following ESCC review) County Council) “Way Forward” section Tom Schindl (East Sussex Draft Report v4 / April 2014 amended following ESCC County Council) review Further text amendments Tom Schindl (East Sussex Final Draft v5 / April 2015 undertaken by ESCC County Council) Contract This report describes work commissioned by Nick Claxton, on behalf of East Sussex County Council, by a letter dated 15/03/2013. East Sussex’s representative for the contract was Tom Schindl. Jenny Hill and Matthew Roberts of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by .................................................. Jennifer Hill BSc MSc Analyst Reviewed by ................................................. Rachel Huitson-Little MSc CEnv MCIWEM C.WEM Director Purpose This document has been prepared as a Draft Report for East Sussex County Council. JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the Client for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. JBA Consulting has no liability regarding the use of this report except to East Sussex County Council. Acknowledgements JBA would like to acknowledge and thank Wealden District Council, Southern Water, the Environment Agency and East Sussex County Council for all their assistance during this project. i List of Figures Figure 1-1: A map to identify the location of ordinary watercourses in Heathfield ................... 3 Figure 1-2: A figure to illustrate the integration of flood mechanisms. ..................................... 4 Figure 1-3: A map of Heathfield, the underlying geology and the surrounding constraints to development. ........................................................................................................ 5 Figure 3-1: The GeoPDF flood risk and recorded flooding incidents in Heathfield. ................. 12 Figure 3-2: A map of the flooding hotpot - Waldron Thorns ..................................................... 14 Figure 3-3: A photo from the site visit to Waldron Thorns showing a completely blocked gulley grate. .............................................................................................................. 15 Figure 3-4: A conceptual model to explain the surface water runoff problem in Heathfield ...... 15 Figure 3-5: A map of the flooding hotpot - Meadow Way ......................................................... 16 Figure 3-6: A map of area covered by the surface water flood risk quantification analysis ..... 17 Figure 3-7: The total number of receptors affected by deep water flooding at a 1 in 200 year return periods ................................................................................................... 19 Figure 4-1: Strategic development areas identified in Heathfield. ............................................ 20 Figure 5-1: Action plan flow diagram, applicable where asset condition has been attributed as the flood source. .................................................................................................. 26 List of Tables Table 1-1 Report layout ............................................................................................................. 7 Table 2-1 Partners involved in the SWMP process ................................................................... 8 Table 2-2 Stakeholders involved in the SWMP process ........................................................... 8 Table 2-3 Catchment data and data supplier ............................................................................ 9 Table 2-4 Flood risk modelling data and supplier ...................................................................... 9 Table 2-5 Data quality scoring system ...................................................................................... 10 Table 2-6 Received data and allocated quality score ................................................................ 10 Table 3-1 Source of flooding colour coding system .................................................................. 12 Table 3-2 Sewer flooding incidents, colour coding system ....................................................... 13 Table 3-3 Number of receptors in Heathfield at risk from surface water flooding ..................... 17 Table 3-4 Number of receptors in Waldron Thorns, Heathfield at risk from surface water flooding ..................................................................................................................... 18 Table 3-5 Number of receptors in Meadow Way, Heathfield at risk from surface water flooding ..................................................................................................................... 18 Table 3-6 Number of receptors in the flooding hotspots within Heathfield that are at risk of surface water flooding .............................................................................................. 19 Table 5-1 Asset condition grade assessment taken from the Condition Assessment Manual ...................................................................................................................... 25 Table 5-2 Site specific actions priories according to repeated incidents occurring after 2000……………………………………………………………………………..…..27 ii Abbreviations AONB .............................. Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty AStGWF .......................... Areas Susceptible to Ground Water Flooding AStSWF .......................... Areas Susceptible to Surface Water Flooding BGS ................................ British Geological Society CAM ................................ Condition Assessment Manual CFMP .............................. Catchment Flood Management Plan CIL .................................. Community Infrastructure Levy DAP ................................. Drainage Area Plan DRN ................................ Digital River Network FRA ................................. Flood Risk Assessment ESCC .............................. East Sussex County Council FMfSW ............................ Flood Map for Surface Water LLFA ............................... Lead Local Flood Authority LFRMS ............................ Local Flood Risk Management Strategy NLPG .............................. National Land and Property Gazetteer NRD ................................ National Receptors Database RFCC .............................. Regional Flood and Coastal Communities RMA ................................ Risk Management Authority SAB ................................. SUDS Approving Body SDA ................................. Strategic Development Area SFRA .............................. Strategic Flood Risk Assessment SUDS .............................. Sustainable Drainage Systems SWMP ............................. Surface Water Management Plan uFMfSW .......................... updated Flood Map for Surface Water iii Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. .Error! Bookmark not defined. List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………….…….…..ii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………...……...……ii Abbreviations……………………………………………………………………………..…………..iii 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 What is a surface water management plan .................................................................. 1 1.2 Summary of aims and objectives .................................................................................. 1 1.3 Stages of SWMP development ..................................................................................... 2 1.4 Sources of flood risk ..................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Study area .................................................................................................................... 4 1.6 Using this report ............................................................................................................ 7 2 Preparation .................................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Partnership approach ................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Data collation and review.............................................................................................. 8 2.3 Source Pathway Receptor ............................................................................................ 11 3 Communicating the risk ............................................................................................. 11 3.1 GeoPDF ........................................................................................................................ 11 3.2 Priority areas ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gills Coulee Creek, 2006 [PDF]
    Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Bureau of Watershed Management Sediment TMDL for Gills Coulee Creek INTRODUCTION Gills Coulee Creek is a tributary stream to the La Crosse River, located in La Crosse County in west central Wisconsin. (Figure A-1) The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) placed the entire length of Gills Coulee Creek on the state’s 303(d) impaired waters list as low priority due to degraded habitat caused by excessive sedimentation. The Clean Water Act and US EPA regulations require that each state develop Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for waters on the Section 303(d) list. The purpose of this TMDL is to identify load allocations and management actions that will help restore the biological integrity of the stream. Waterbody TMDL Impaired Existing Codified Pollutant Impairment Priority WBIC Name ID Stream Miles Use Use Gills Coulee 0-1 Cold II Degraded 1652300 168 WWFF Sediment High Creek 1-5 Cold III Habitat Table 1. Gills Coulee use designations, pollutants, and impairments PROBLEM STATEMENT Due to excessive sedimentation, Gills Coulee Creek is currently not meeting applicable narrative water quality criterion as defined in NR 102.04 (1); Wisconsin Administrative Code: “To preserve and enhance the quality of waters, standards are established to govern water management decisions. Practices attributable to municipal, industrial, commercial, domestic, agricultural, land development, or other activities shall be controlled so that all waters including mixing zone and effluent channels meet the following conditions at all times and under all flow conditions: (a) Substances that will cause objectionable deposits on the shore or in the bed of a body of water, shall not be present in such amounts as to interfere with public rights in waters of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Drainage Changes in Uncompahgre Plateau-Grand
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/32 Pleistocene drainage changes in Uncompahgre Plateau-Grand Valley region of western Colorado, including formation and abandonment of Unaweep Canyon: a hypothesis Scott Sinnock, 1981, pp. 127-136 in: Western Slope (Western Colorado), Epis, R. C.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 32nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 337 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1981 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuckoo Trail & Low Weald Circular
    eastsussex.gov.uk 1 Cycling in East Sussex: Avenue Verte Route Guide Cuckoo Trail & Low Weald circular As an alternative to the roller coaster with fine views of the South Downs. roads of the High Weald, try this The land is a mixture of lush pasture delightful ride. It follows the flatter and arable fields, surrounded by lanes to the west of the Cuckoo Trail hedgerows and verges filled with wild and the toughest climb is only 55 flowers. Lovely old houses can be metres – a small challenge compared glimpsed at every turn of the road. to some of the other rides. Golden Cross – Polegate Polegate – Arlington Reservoir Take care crossing the busy A22 at Make your way from Polegate north- Golden Cross and rejoin the network west towards Abbot’s Wood and of quiet lanes through Chiddingly follow the bridleway on a mixture of with the impressive Chiddingly Place surfaces – at times it is a wonderful at the far end of the hamlet. Through smooth, stone-based track and at Stonehill, the route leads back to others it can be muddy after wet Horam on the A267. A gentle descent weather. Before long you are on the on the wonderful Cuckoo Trail south lane network which leads into the of Horam under a canopy of trees, village of Arlington. Shortly after takes you through Hailsham back crossing the Cuckmere River, keep to Polegate and the starting point. an eye out for the bridleway to the right that takes you past Arlington Places of Interest → Reservoir and onto Station Road, Cuckoo Trail: Wildlife Art Trail Lying to north of Berwick.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehill, Horam Guide Price £725,000
    STONEHILL, HORAM GUIDE PRICE £725,000 East Knowle, Stonehill, Horam, Heathfield, East Sussex, TN21 0JN An imposing 1920's built detached family home positioned well off the road in a desirable lane location on the borders of Horam and Chiddingly and set on a bold plot of approximately 2.25 acres (tbv) incorporating formal gardens with wild areas and woodland. The accommodation features a sitting room with inglenook style fireplace, separate dining room, study, large double glazed conservatory and three bedrooms. It is fair to say that the property requires modernisation and offers great potential. The house is approached via a gated driveway providing parking for a number of vehicles. 27 High Street, Heathfield, East Sussex, TN21 8JR Tel: 01435 862211- Fax: 01435 864303 Email: [email protected] BRANCHES AT CROWBOROUGH, HEATHFIELD, TUNBRIDGE WELLS, SOUTHBOROUGH, TONBRIDGE & ASSOCIATED LONDON OFFICE DINING ROOM: Leaded light windows in square bay. Picture rail. Radiator. Serving SITUATION: East Knowle is situated on the borders of Chiddingly village and Horam hatch from the kitchen. some 5 miles north west of Hailsham and 5 miles south of the market town of Heathfield. Local buses are within half a mile serving Eastbourne and Tunbridge Wells. Chiddingly KITCHEN: Window overlooking the rear garden. Range of fitted wall and base was founded on seven hills which Stone Hill is one and is situated in this low Weald cupboards and inset one and a half bowl sink. Inset electric hob with oven under. Part area. Chiddingly benefits from its own well reputed local Inn and Church and Primary tiled walls.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Flooded Forest and Floating Meadow Fish Assemblages
    Journal of Fish Biology (2008) 72, 629–644 doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01752.x, available online at http://www.blackwell-synergy.com A comparison of flooded forest and floating meadow fish assemblages in an upper Amazon floodplain S. B. CORREA*†,W.G.R.CRAMPTON‡, L. J. CHAPMAN§k AND J. S. ALBERT{ *Zoology Department, University of Florida, 223 Bartram Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611–8525, U.S.A.,‡Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816-2368, U.S.A.,§McGill University, Biology Department, 1205 Avenue Docteur Penfield, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1B1 Canada, kWildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10460, U.S.A. and {Department of Biology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504-2451, U.S.A. (Received 31 August 2006, Accepted 20 October 2007) Matched sets of gillnets of different mesh-sizes were used to evaluate the degree to which contiguous and connected flooded forest and floating meadow habitats are characterized by distinct fish faunas during the flooding season in the Peruvian Amazon. For fishes between 38–740 mm standard length (LS) (the size range captured by the gear), an overriding pattern of faunal similarity emerged between these two habitats. The mean species richness, diversity, abundance, fish mass, mean and maximum LS, and maximum mass did not differ significantly between flooded forest and floating meadows. Species abundances followed a log-normal distribution in which three species accounted for 60–70% of the total abundance in each habitat. Despite these similarities, multivariate analyses demonstrated subtle differences in species composition between flooded forest and adjacent floating macrophytes.
    [Show full text]
  • Westport, Connecticut Department of Public Works Town Hall, 110 Myrtle Avenue Westport, Connecticut 06880 (203) 341 1120
    WESTPORT, CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TOWN HALL, 110 MYRTLE AVENUE WESTPORT, CONNECTICUT 06880 (203) 341 1120 MEMORANDUM Date: 04/08/2020 To: Conservation Commission From: Edward Gill, Engineer II Re: 222 Wilton Road, Appl. #IWW-10978-20 Reference Materials Reviewed: Application, Westport Conservation Commission, dated 03/12/2020. Plan prepared by J. Edwards & Associates, LLC entitled “Proposed Site Plan, Lot B, 222 Wilton Road, Westport, Connecticut,” dated 08/10/2015 as revised to 01/28/2016. Plan prepared by Brautigam Land Surveyors, P.C. entitled “Improvement Location Survey Prepared for FBCH CT Holdings LLC, 222 Westport – Wilton Road, Westport, Connecticut,” dated 01/15/2019. Plan prepared by Landtech entitled “Proposed Site Improvement Plan, Prepared for FBCH Holdings, LLC, 222 Wilton Road, Westport, CT,” dated 02/05/2020 as revised to 04/08/2020. Corresponding Stormwater Management Report dated 03/11/2020. Dear Conservation Commission: Our office has reviewed the proposed activity as depicted by the above referenced documents. Based on these criteria, we offer the following comments: 1. Project Description. The applicant is proposing to legalize changes to a previously approved permit for a single-family residence. These changes include construction of a patio and placement of significant fill within the 100-foot upland review setback from wetlands located on a neighboring property. The applicant is also proposing to remove a septic system installed within the 100-foot setback, construct a code complying system outside the setback, and remove a portion of the driveway previously approved for removal. 2. Flood & Erosion Control Board (FECB). The project will be subject to an administrative review from the associated staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Chalvington with Ripe Parish Council
    WARTLING PARISH COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES OF THE FULL COUNCIL MEETING OF 9th January 2019 held at The Reid Hall, Boreham Street 52 Present Councillors K Stevens (Chairman), R Lawrence, D Kehl, C Paterson and W Reid. A Stevens (Clerk) and eight members of the public were also in attendance. 53 Apologies for Absence No apologies for absence were received from any Parish Councillors. Apologies for absence were also received from County Councillor B Bentley and District Councillor P Doodes. 54 Minutes of the Previous Meeting The Minutes of the Full Council Meeting held on the 7th November 2018, were read, confirmed as a true and accurate record, and signed by the Chairman. 55 Minutes of the Planning Meeting The draft Minutes of the Planning Meeting held on the 17th December 2018 were read and adopted by the Full Council. 56 Clerk’s Report on Matters’ Arising All matters arising were included elsewhere on the agenda. 57 Disclosures of Interests There were no disclosures of interest on any items on this agenda nor were there any changes to the Register of Interests. The meeting was then suspended. 58 Reports from the County Councillor on matters from the County Council affecting this Parish. County Councillor B Bentley sent a written report in which he said; Please accept my apologies for this evening’s meeting. Unfortunately, for 2019, Parish Councils in the Wealden East, County Council Division have scheduled their meetings in such a way that they clash throughout the year. Wartling and Horam now hold their meetings on the same Wednesday dates and Hooe and Herstmonceux meet on the same Mondays.
    [Show full text]
  • HCC Sports Leaders
    Sports Club Directory Sport Club Website Archery The High Weald Archery Club https://www.thwac.co.uk/ American Football Hellingly American Foootbal https://hellinglyhounddogs.com/ Eastbourne Rovers https://www.eastbourneroversac.co.uk/ Athletics Lewes Athletics Club https://www.lewesac.co.uk/ Badminton Eastbourne Badminton https://philip6908.wixsite.com/edba Baseball Kent Mariners https://www.kentmariners.co.uk/ Basketball Eastbourne Lions Basketball https://www.lionsbasketball.club/ Boxing Eastbourne Boxing Club http://eastbourneboxingclub.co.uk/ https://www.heathfield.net/clubs-and-groups/cross-in-hand-bowls- Bowls Cross in Hand Bowls Club club/299 Cuckmere Valley Canoe Club https://cvcc.org.uk/ Canoeing Hastings Canoe Club https://www.hastingscanoeclub.org.uk/ Cheerleading Zodiac Allstars https://www.zodiacallstars.com/ Brighton Indoor Climbing Extreme Ventures https://www.extremeventures.co.uk/indoor-climbing/ Climbing The Ordinary Climbers Polegate https://www.theordinaryclimbers.com/ Clip ‘n climb Tonbridge https://www.clipnclimbtonbridge.co.uk/ Chimera Climbing Tunbridge Wells https://www.chimeraclimbing.com/ Buxted CC https://buxtedpark.play-cricket.com/ Uckfield Anderida CC https://uckfieldanderida.play-cricket.com/ Ringmer CC https://ringmercc.play-cricket.com/ Cricket Pevensey CC https://pevensey.play-cricket.com/ Heathfield Park CC https://heathfieldpark.play-cricket.com/home Mayfield CC https://www.mayfieldcricketclub.co.uk/ Cross-Country Running Eastbourne Rovers Athletics Club https://www.eastbourneroversac.co.uk/ Reasearched
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering 18 U.S.C. § 1959 a Manual for Federal Prosecutors
    Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering 18 U.S.C. § 1959 A Manual for Federal Prosecutors December 2006 Prepared by the Staff of the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20005 (202) 514-3594 Frank J. Marine, Consultant Douglas E. Crow, Principal Deputy Chief Amy Chang Lee, Assistant Chief Robert C. Dalton Merv Hamburg Gregory C.J. Lisa Melissa Marquez-Oliver David J. Stander Catherine M. Weinstock Cover Design by Linda M. Baer PREFACE This manual is intended to assist federal prosecutors in the preparation and litigation of cases involving the Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering Statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1959. Prosecutors are encouraged to contact the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section (OCRS) early in the preparation of their case for advice and assistance. All pleadings alleging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1959 including any indictment, information, or criminal complaint, and a prosecution memorandum must be submitted to OCRS for review and approval before being filed with the court. The submission should be approved by the prosecutor’s office before being submitted to OCRS. Due to the volume of submissions received by OCRS, prosecutors should submit the proposal three weeks prior to the date final approval is needed. Prosecutors should contact OCRS regarding the status of the proposed submission before finally scheduling arrests or other time-sensitive actions relating to the submission. Moreover, prosecutors should refrain from finalizing any guilty plea agreement containing a Section 1959 charge until final approval has been obtained from OCRS. The policies and procedures set forth in this manual and elsewhere relating to 18 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Glen Trails Special Use Permit Trail and Warming Hut Construction
    United States Department of Agriculture Great Glen Trails Forest Special Use Permit Service Trail and Warming Hut August 2005 Construction Scoping Report Androscoggin Ranger District White Mountain National Forest Greens Grant Coos County, New Hampshire For Information Contact: Joe Gill Eastern Region Winter Sports Team Specialist Androscoggin Ranger District White Mountain National Forest 300 Glen Road Gorham, NH 03581 (603)466-2713, ext 221 FAX/TTY (603) 466-2856 www.fs.fed.us/r9/white or Susan Howle Interdisciplinary Team Leader Eastern Region Winter Sports Team 99 Ranger Road Rochester, VT 05767 (802)767-4261 ext 543 FAX/TTY (802)767-4777 Page 1 of 5 What is the Forest Service Proposing? The Androscoggin Ranger District of the White Mountain National Forest has received a special use permit application from Great Glen. They are proposing to construct and maintain 1.3 miles of cross-country ski trails and a warming hut approximately 20 feet by 20 feet. Great Glen feels that there is a need to expand their trail system to service the northern New Hampshire cross-country skiing population to offer more varied and challenging terrain and provide a more efficient trail system. All of the additional trail system and warming hut will occur inside their current trail system area (Figure 2). Background Great Glen Trails operates a Nordic ski area on lands conveyed by its parent company, the Mount Washington Summit Road Company (Auto Road), to the United States in 1993 (Figure 1). Upon conveyance, the Auto Road retained easements for a trail system. Several of these easements have proven to be impractical to construct without creating undesirable impacts on the natural resources in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • ! 1! a Millennium-Length Reconstruction of Bear River Stream Flow, Utah 1! 2
    1! A millennium-length reconstruction of Bear River stream flow, Utah 2! 3! DeRose, R.J., USDA, Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis, Rocky Mountain Research 4! Station, 507 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401, Email: [email protected], Phone: 801-625- 5! 5795 6! Bekker, M.F., Department of Geography, 690 SWKT, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 7! 84602. 8! Wang, S.-Y., Plant, Soil, and Climate Department, 4820 Old Main Hill, Utah State University, 9! Logan, UT 84322-4820. 10! Buckley, B.M., Tree Ring Lab, Room 108, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia 11! University, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964 12! Kjelgren, R.K., Plant, Soil, and Climate Department, 4820 Old Main Hill, Utah State University, 13! Logan, UT 84322-4820. 14! Bardsley, T, Western Water Assessment, 2242 West North Temple, Salt Lake City, UT 84116. 15! Rittenour, T.M., Department of Geology, 4505 Old Main Hill, Utah State University, Logan, UT 16! 84322-4505. 17! Allen, E.B., United States Geological Survey, 4200 New Haven Road, Columbia, MO 65201. 18! 19! 1! ! 20! Abstract: The Bear River contributes more water to the eastern Great Basin than any other river 21! system. It is also the most significant source of water for the burgeoning Wasatch Front 22! metropolitan area in Northern Utah. Despite its importance for water resources for the region’s 23! agricultural, urban, and wildlife needs, our understanding of the variability of Bear River’s 24! stream flow derives entirely from the short instrumental record (1943-2010). Here we present a 25! 1,200-year calibrated and verified tree-ring reconstruction of stream flow for the Bear River that 26! explains 67% of the variance of the instrumental record over the period from 1943-2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Limited Company Accounts 18.2
    REPORT OF THE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE AND UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2019 FOR THE CHIDDINGLY COMMUNITY SHOP LTD THE CHIDDINGLY COMMUNITY SHOP LTD CONTENTS OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2019 Page Company Information 1 Report of the Director 2 Income Statement 3 Balance Sheet 4 Notes to the Financial Statements 5 Report of the Accountants 7 Trading and Profit and Loss Account 8 THE CHIDDINGLY COMMUNITY SHOP LTD COMPANY INFORMATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2019 REGISTERED OFFICE: Farley Farm Yard Muddles Green Chiddingly Lewes East Sussex BN8 6HW REGISTERED NUMBER: IP031345 (England and Wales) ACCOUNTANTS: Aequitas Limited 1 Swan Wood Park Gun Hill Horam East Sussex TN21 0LL Page 1 THE CHIDDINGLY COMMUNITY SHOP LTD REPORT OF THE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2019 The management committee have pleasure in presenting its report with the financial statements of the society for the year ended 31 March 2019. PRINCIPAL ACTIVITY The principal activity of the society in the year under review was that of a community shop. ON BEHALF OF THE OFFICERS: ........................................................................ James Porter Committee member Date: ........................................................................ Stuart Appleton Committee member Date: Page 2 THE CHIDDINGLY COMMUNITY SHOP LTD INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2019 31.3.19 31.3.18 Notes £ £ REVENUE 80,863 74,605 Cost of sales 51,697 49,248 GROSS PROFIT 29,166 25,357 Administrative
    [Show full text]