DOCSLIB.ORG

Feasibility Study on the Utilization of High Sulfur Pet. Coke As a By-Product at SINOPEC Fujian Petrochemical Company Limited

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Feasibility Study on the Utilization of High Sulfur Pet. Coke As a By-Product at SINOPEC Fujian Petrochemical Company Limited NEDO-IC-OOER23 Feasibility Study on the Utilization of High Sulfur Pet. Coke as a By-Product at SINOPEC Fujian Petrochemical Company Limited March, 2001 New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) Entrusted to Chiyoda Corporation 020005084-7 Feasibility Study on the Utilization of High Sulfur Pet. Coke as a By-Product at SINOPEC Fujian Petrochemical Company Limited CHIYODA CORPORATION March, 2001 The investigation target : This basic survey carries out for Fujian Petrochemical Co. Ltd., Fujian Province, China. This project is the basic investigation for cutting down the greenhouse gas by the energy conservation introduction of technology of our country. The effective utilization of high sulfur petroleum coke Project in the petroleum refinery is planned, and the energy conservation cost performance of the project, the greenhouse- gas curtailment cost performance, profitability, circulation, etc. are investigated. Clean Development Mechanism which our company will carry out in the future (henceforth CDM) It aims at investigating that it should consider as the promising project connected. NEDO-IC-OOER23 Feasibility Study on the Utilization of High Sulfur Pet. Coke as a By-Product at SINOPEC Fujian Petrochemical Company Limited March, 2001 New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) Entrusted to Chiyoda Corporation Introduction This report is summarized the conclusions on Feasibility Study on the Utilization of High Sulfur Pet. Coke as a By-Product atSINOPEC Fujian Petrochemical Company Limited Fujian Province, China which Chiyoda Corporation was contracted as a joint implement project in the 2000 fiscal year from the New Energy and Industrial TechnologyDevelopment Organization (NEDO). The Third Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP3) was held in Kyoto, Japan in December 1997, and at the conclusion of the conference, the Kyoto Protocol was targeted for developed countries (including former USSR and Eastern Europe) to reduce their overall averaged emission rate of greenhouse effect gases such as carbon dioxide by at least 5 percent below 1990 levels between 2008 to 2012 in order to prevent the global warming. In the Kyoto Protocol, the reduction target for Japan is adopted to 6 percent. Joint Implementation(JI) and Clean Development Mechanism(CDM) are possible measures provided by the Kyoto Protocol to afford flexibility for achieving this goal positively acted to reduce the emissions of greenhouse effect gases collaboratively and distributing the result among numerous countries. The purpose of this basic survey is to find the Project, which contributes to the reduction of the greenhouse effect gas with the maintainable economic development in a partner's country, by introducing the Japanese energy conservation technology. It is also to aim at finding the possible project, which will be realized as Clean Development Mechanism with the corporation in Japan, through this feasibility study on the project planning need to be examined in details. Considering the above background and objective, this Effective utilization of high sulfur petroleum coke Project is selected and feasibility studies are conducted for Fujian Petrochemical Co. Ltd., Fujian Province, China.. The contents of this survey are to study the effects of the energy conservation and reduction of the greenhouse effect gas by the new provision of the Integrated gasification combined cycle(IGCC) facility which carried out the effective utilization of the petroleum coke. By carrying out this project, the investigation result which it not only can gain the reduction of the large greenhouse gas, but is that which satisfies the energy conservation goal and the profitability of refinery operation of the Fujian Petrochemical Co. Ltd., was obtained. For project realization, the detailed plot including the money raising will be examined with the counter partner, and it will correspond from now on. Finally, we, Chiyoda Corporation, wish to express our gratitude to the persons to be cooperated with this feasibility study, and sincerely hope that this report will be useful to all persons concerned. March, 2001 Chiyoda Corporation Member List for Feasibility Study Company Name Division/Dept./Group Title Name Chiyoda Ryuzo Energy Project Division Project Manager Corporation Watari NCF Team Chiyoda Tsutomu Domestic Business Dept. Manager Corporation Fujishiro Chiyoda Ryuichi Industrial Facility Project Division General Manager Corporation Araki Environmental Project Dept. Chiyoda Hisao Industrial Facility Project Division Assistant General Corporation Takahashi Environmental Project Dept. Manager Chiyoda Misao Industrial Facility Project Division Manager Corporation Tateno Environmental Project Dept.. Chiyoda Yusuke Industrial Facility Project Division Manager Corporation Shimada Environmental Project Dept. Chiyoda Syozo Industrial Facility Project Division Manager Corporation Mori Environmental Project Dept.. Chiyoda Taro Energy Project Division Engineer Corporation Ogawa NCF Team Chiyoda Ginnjiro Front End Engineering Division General Manager Corporation Fujima Process Engineering Dept. Chiyoda Hiroo Detailed Engineering Division Engineering Corporation Tsuruta Mechanical Engineering Dept. 1 Consultant Chiyoda Hideki Energy Project Division Assistant General Corporation Hori NCF Team Manager Chiyoda Hiriyasu Detailed Engineering Division Assistant General Corporation Naito Electrical Engineering Dept. Manager Chiyoda Kumao Project Control Dept. Assistant General Corporation Sato Manager Chiyoda Musashi Energy Project Division Engineer Corporation Sekine NCF Team Chiyoda Toshio Detailed Engineering Division Assistant General Corporation Takano Control System Engineering Dept. Manager Chiyoda Taketoshi Detailed Engineering Division Engineer Corporation Machidaa Mechanical Engineering Dept.l Company Name Division/Dept./Group Title Name Chiyoda Takashi Detailed Engineering Division Engineering Corporation Noto Mechanical Engineering Dept.2 Consultant Chiyoda Kunio Detailed Engineering Division Assistant General Corporation Suzuki Control System Engineering Dept. Manager Chiyoda Shin taro Detailed Engineering Division Engineer Corporation Abe Control System Engineering Dept. Chiyoda Shizuo Detailed Engineering Division Engineering Corporation Ishikawa Mechanical Engineering Dept.l Consultant Chiyoda Tomoyoshi Detailed Engineering Division Assistant General Corporation Ohara Mechanical Engineering Dept.2 Manager Chiyoda Toshiyuki Procurement Division Assistant General Corporation Horiike Purchasing Dept. Manager Chiyoda Yukihiro Energy Project Division Engineer Corporation Yamamoto NCF Team Chiyoda Daisuke Domestic Business Dept. General Manager Corporation Wakabayashi Chiyoda Kouichi Domestic Business Dept. Assistant General Corporation Kara Manager Chiyoda Takashi Industrial Facility Project Division Manager Corporation Sakamoti Environmental Project Dept. Chiyoda Akemi International Business Dept. Manager Corporation Takahashi Contents Feasibility Study on the Utilization of High Sulfur Pet. Coke as a By-Product at SINOPEC Fujian Petrochemical Company Limited Fujian Province, China Summary.......................................................................................................................... S-l 1. Basis of Project ................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.1 Present Status of Partner Country.............................................................................. 1-3 1.1.1 Political, Economic and Social Conditions ..................................................... 1-3 1.1.2 Energy Situation ........................................................................................... 1-21 1.1.3 Needs for Projects for CDM.......................................................................... 1-71 1.2 The Need for Introduction of Energy Conservation Technology in the Target Industry ...............................................................................................1-77 1.3 Significance, Need, Effect of the Project Concerned, and Dissemination of the Results to Similar Industries..........................................1-79 2. Materialization of Project Plan........................................................................................ 2-3 2.1 Project Planning .........................................................................................................2-3 2.1.1 Outline of the Regional Conditions of the Project Site................................... 2-5 2.1.2 Description of Project ................................................................................... 2-17 2.1.3 Greenhouse gases, Etc. Targeted for This Project .........................................2-22 2.2 Overview of the Project Site (Company)............................................................... 2-23 2.2.1 Level of Interest at the Project Site................................................................2-23 2.2.2 State of Related Facilities at the Project Site (Company)............................. 2-26 2.2.3 Project Implementation Ability at the Project Site (Company) ..................... 2-41 (1) Technical ability ................................ 2-41 (2) Management system ..................................................................................... 2-41 (3) Management base and management policy................................................... 2-42 (4) Financial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report on Sustainability 2020 CEO Message
    Report on Sustainability 2020 CEO message As I write this, the world is contending with the health and economic effects of a global pandemic which has not only impacted lives, but has brought about disruptions to fnancial markets, businesses, and the way we work and live. Mark Little president and chief executive offcer This crisis is highlighting how interconnected environmental, social and economic systems are. Responding and recovering from the effects of the pandemic and fostering resiliency will require cooperation and collaboration among all stakeholders. Our collective actions can have an enormous impact when we work together to fnd solutions. At Suncor we use our purpose – Our purpose embodies to provide trusted energy that enhances people’s lives, while caring for each other and our commitment to the earth – to guide our decisions and actions. sustainability and is our As much as our world has changed through COVID-19, Suncor remains fully committed to our strategy, sustainability leadership and our role in the energy transition to a low-carbon future. guide in these times of Our commitment is unwavering and continues to be at the heart of everything we do. uncertainty. We all have a We continue to see outstanding progress being made on the social goal we’ve set, including role to play in our shared increasing the participation of Indigenous Peoples in energy development. In 2019, we spent more than $800 million with Indigenous businesses, representing 8% of our total supply chain energy future. spend. We have also increased the number of Petro-Canada™ stations that are Indigenous-owned Mark Little and operated.
    [Show full text]
  • Petroleum Coke
    Report No. 72 PETROLEUM COKE by SAMUEL C. SPENCER October 1971 A private report by the 0 PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA I * CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION, . 1 2 SUMMARY . * . , . Economic Aspects ...................... 6 Technical Aspects ..................... 10 3 INDUSTRY STATUS . , . , , . 17 Trends . .................... 17 Applications . , . .................... 29 Fuel . .................... 31 Aluminum (anodes) .................... 32 MetallurgicalCoke .................... 36 Chemicals . .................... 37 Formed Shapes . .................... 38 Other Uses . , .................... 39 4 DEVELOPMENTOF COKING PROCESSES . , , , , . , . 41 5 CHEMISTRY ......................... 47 Composition ........................ 47 Basic Chemistry ...................... 52 6 DELAYED COKING. ...................... 59 Review of Process ..................... 59 Process Description .................... 68 Materials of COnStrUctiOn ................. 83 Process Discussion ..................... 84 Process Variations and Innovations ............. 93 Cost Estimates ....................... 95 Capital Costs ...................... 96 Production Costs ..................... 100 Needle Coke Economics ................... 112 V CONTENTS 7 FLUID COKING ........................ 119 Review of Process ..................... 119 Process Description .................... 129 Materials of Construction ................. 133 Process Discussion ..................... 140 Process Variations and Innovations ............. 144 Cost Estimates
    [Show full text]
  • Petronor Annual Report 2020
    PETRONOR E&P LIMITED (ABN 87 125 419 730) Annual Report and Financial Statements For the year ended 31 December 2020 Annual Report 31 December 2020 PetroNor E&P Limited CONTENTS Group at a glance statement 2 Chairman’s statement 3 Chief Executive Officer Strategic Review 4 Annual statement of reserves 6 Directors’ report 10 Auditor’s independence declaration 20 Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income 21 Consolidated statement of financial position 22 Consolidated statement of changes in equity 23 Consolidated statement of cash flows 24 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 25 Directors’ declaration and statement of responsibility 51 Independent Auditor’s report to the members 52 Glossary and Definitions 55 Corporate directory 55 Page | 1 Annual Report 31 December 2020 PetroNor E&P Limited GROUP AT A GLANCE STATEMENT KEY FIGURES 2020 2019 EBITDA (USD mill) 33.97 49.00 EBIT (USD mill) 29.33 45.77 Net profit / (loss) (USD mill) 11.15 (5.76) 2P Reserves (MMbbl) 12.62 10.76 2C Contingent Resources (MMbbl) 8.81 7.31 2020 HIGHLIGHTS AND SUBSEQUENT EVENTS Completed a capital raise of NOK 340 million in March 2021. PetroNor has increased its indirect ownership in PNGF Sud up to 16.83% through increasing is shareholding in Hemla E&P Congo and Hemla Africa Holding. The latter transaction is awaiting approval by the EGM 4th May 2021. PNGF Sud production had a 4% growth in the oil production compared to 2019 with a gross field average production of 22,713 bopd in 2020. PetroNor has re-established a highly attractive exploration portfolio in the West African margin through the entry in the Esperança and Sinapa licenses in Guinea-Bissau at highly attractive terms following the acquisition of SPE Guinea-Bissau AB from Svenska Petroleum Exploration AB.
    [Show full text]
  • Screening-Level Hazard Characterization of Petroleum Coke
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency June 2011 Hazard Characterization Document SCREENING-LEVEL HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION Petroleum Coke Category SPONSORED CHEMICALS Petroleum coke, green CASRN 64741-79-3 Petroleum coke, calcined CASRN 64743-05-1 The High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program1was conceived as a voluntary initiative aimed at developing and making publicly available screening-level health and environmental effects information on chemicals manufactured in or imported into the United States in quantities greater than one million pounds per year. In the Challenge Program, producers and importers of HPV chemicals voluntarily sponsored chemicals; sponsorship entailed the identification and initial assessment of the adequacy of existing toxicity data/information, conducting new testing if adequate data did not exist, and making both new and existing data and information available to the public. Each complete data submission contains data on 18 internationally agreed to “SIDS” (Screening Information Data Set1,2) endpoints that are screening-level indicators of potential hazards (toxicity) for humans or the environment. The Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) is evaluating the data submitted in the HPV Challenge Program on approximately 1400 sponsored chemicals by developing hazard characterizations (HCs). These HCs consist of an evaluation of the quality and completeness of the data set provided in the Challenge Program submissions. They are not intended to be definitive statements regarding the possibility of unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment. The evaluation is performed according to established EPA guidance2,3 and is based primarily on hazard data provided by sponsors; however, in preparing the hazard characterization, EPA considered its own comments and public comments on the original submission as well as the sponsor’s responses to comments and revisions made to the submission.
    [Show full text]
  • Negativliste. Fossil Energi
    Bilag 6. Negativliste. Fossil energi Maj 2017 Læsevejledning til negativlisten: Moderselskab / øverste ejer vises med fed skrift til venstre. Med almindelig tekst, indrykket, er de underliggende selskaber, der udsteder aktier og erhvervsobligationer. Det er de underliggende, udstedende selskaber, der er omfattet af negativlisten. Rækkeetiketter Acergy SA SUBSEA 7 Inc Subsea 7 SA Adani Enterprises Ltd Adani Enterprises Ltd Adani Power Ltd Adani Power Ltd Adaro Energy Tbk PT Adaro Energy Tbk PT Adaro Indonesia PT Alam Tri Abadi PT Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd Africa Oil Corp Africa Oil Corp Alpha Natural Resources Inc Alex Energy Inc Alliance Coal Corp Alpha Appalachia Holdings Inc Alpha Appalachia Services Inc Alpha Natural Resource Inc/Old Alpha Natural Resources Inc Alpha Natural Resources LLC Alpha Natural Resources LLC / Alpha Natural Resources Capital Corp Alpha NR Holding Inc Aracoma Coal Co Inc AT Massey Coal Co Inc Bandmill Coal Corp Bandytown Coal Co Belfry Coal Corp Belle Coal Co Inc Ben Creek Coal Co Big Bear Mining Co Big Laurel Mining Corp Black King Mine Development Co Black Mountain Resources LLC Bluff Spur Coal Corp Boone Energy Co Bull Mountain Mining Corp Central Penn Energy Co Inc Central West Virginia Energy Co Clear Fork Coal Co CoalSolv LLC Cobra Natural Resources LLC Crystal Fuels Co Cumberland Resources Corp Dehue Coal Co Delbarton Mining Co Douglas Pocahontas Coal Corp Duchess Coal Co Duncan Fork Coal Co Eagle Energy Inc/US Elk Run Coal Co Inc Exeter Coal Corp Foglesong Energy Co Foundation Coal
    [Show full text]
  • Why the Bay Area Should Say “No” to Coal and Petroleum Coke Exports
    Why the Bay Area should say “No” to Coal and Petroleum Coke Exports Big coal and oil companies are looking for ways to ship their dirty commodities abroad from U.S. ports. As Northwest communities push back against proposed export terminals in Washington and Oregon, the companies have turned to their next target: the Bay Area. If coal and petroleum coke-carrying trains come to our area, coal dust from open rail cars will threaten community health by polluting our air, land and water. Thousands of people on the West Coast are leading a grassroots movement against coal exports. It’s time to let big coal and oil know that their exports aren’t welcome in California. Where is the coal coming from? To reach Bay Area ports, coal trains from mines in the Powder River Basin (PRB) or the Utah and Colorado region travel through many communities including Sacramento, Richmond, Stockton, Pittsburg, Bakersfield, Fresno, Merced and Modesto. And these trains are already on the move.1 Where is petcoke coming from, and what is it? • Petroleum coke, or petcoke, is a solid carbon byproduct that results from oil refining processes. When petcoke is burnt, it emits 5 to 10 percent more carbon dioxide 2) per (C0 unit of energy than coal. On average, one ton of petcoke yields 53.6 percent more CO2 than a ton of coal.2 Petcoke also emits toxic residues, from heavy metals to sulfur. • Petcoke is so dirty that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency bans it from being burned in our country. Yet, the EPA still allows it to be exported abroad, pushing the pollution offshore.
    [Show full text]
  • SB1 Webinar : 2021 Q1 Update June 1St 2021, E
    SB1 Webinar : 2021 Q1 Update June 1st 2021, E. Alhomouz (Chairman), K. Søvold (CEO), C. Frimann-Dahl (CTO), M. Barrett (Geosc. Director) Teodor Sveen-Nilsen (SB1) March 2020 Balanced portfolio across the E&P value chain Portfolio Overview 1 Production base – Congo-Brazzaville – PNGF Sud/Bis > Net production of 3850 bopd > Low cost and high margin production with significant organic growth potential > Operated by Perenco, a world-class operator of mature assets in emerging markets 2 Redevelopment – Nigeria – Aje Field (OML 113) > Producing asset with significant upside potential, acquired at a low entry cost > Preparing a revised development plan to increase field production to 25,000 boepd > Transaction with Panoro and YFP – awaiting governmental approval Reserves and Resources (mmbbl, net)1, 2, 3 3 Exploration – The MSGBC ”hot-spot” Material 2C upsides > Exploration assets with significant potential 2P reserves primarily to be targeted in ~4 bn bbls prospective resource3 in existing Congo Congo and Nigeria production > Sinapa and Esperança 4A/5A in Guinea 18.7 ~4 bn barrels Bissau; A4 exploration block in Gambia; ROP 0.2 6.8 (unrisked) & SOSP disputed blocks in Senegal 7,3 20.2 2P 2C Prospective 1) Congo: PNGF Bis constitutes 6.8 mmbbls of 2C resources in Congo. PetroNor has the right to enter into the PNGF Bis license with net working interest of 23.56% with Perenco as operator. Nigeria: Estimates according to independent competent person’s report prepared by AGR. Volumes as of 1 Jan 2021 on PNGF Sud (AGR 10/3/2021); 2 2) Nigeria: Resources are subject to completion of the Aje transaction (initial net working economic interest of 13.08%, 17.4% within three years based on project payout phases).
    [Show full text]
  • PROGRESSING OPPORTUNITIES Annual Report 2019 SUSTAINABLE RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
    PetroNor E&P Limited | Annual Report 2019 PROGRESSING OPPORTUNITIES Annual Report 2019 SUSTAINABLE RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT PetroNor E&P, listed on the Oslo Axess (PNOR), is an independent oil and gas company led by an experienced board and management team, with substantial experience in oil and gas exploration, appraisal, development and production. PetroNor E&P listed on Oslo Axess 12 September 2019 Contents Strategic Report Governance Financial Report Highlights 1 The Board and senior management 22 Declaration of independence 32 Company overview 2 Directors‘ report 24 Consolidated statement of profit or loss Our portfolio 4 and other comprehensive income 33 Chairman’s statement 10 Consolidated statement of financial position 34 Chief Executive Officer Q&A 12 Consolidated statement of changes in equity 35 Annual statement of reserves 16 Consolidated statement of cash flows 36 Responsible business 20 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 37 Directors’ declaration and statement of responsibility 70 Independent Auditor’s Report 71 Unaudited additional shareholder information 73 Glossary and definitions 75 Corporate directory 76 Strategic Report Governance Financial Report Highlights 2019 highlights and subsequent events Assets • Following our entry in 2017 into a producing asset in Republic of Congo (Brazzaville) West Africa, 2019 has been a year to cement our • 10.5% indirect participation interest in the licence success and focus on further expansion through the group of PNGF Sud (Tchibouela II, Tchendo II and merger between the former African Petroleum Tchibeli-Litanzi II) through Hemla E&P Congo SA. Corporation Ltd and PetroNor, and to increase activity in West Africa, primarily in Nigeria. • The Group holds the right to negotiate, in good faith, the terms of the adjacent licence of PNGF Bis and a • Since our acquisition of the interest in the PNGF Sud 14.7% indirect participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Tutorial: Delayed Coking Fundamentals
    Tutorial: Delayed Coking Fundamentals Paul J. Ellis Christopher A. Paul Great Lakes Carbon Corporation Port Arthur, TX Prepared for presentation at the AIChE 1998 Spring National Meeting New Orleans, LA March 8-12, 1998 Topical Conference on Refinery Processing Tutorial Session: Delayed Coking Paper 29a Copyright 1998 Great Lakes Carbon Corporation UNPUBLISHED March 9, 1998 1 ABSTRACT Great Lakes Carbon Corporation has worked closely with refineries producing delayed coke in all forms, fuel grade (shot or sponge), anode grade (sponge), and electrode grade (needle) since start-up of the company's first calcining operation in 1937. With on-going research in the area of delayed coking since 1942, Great Lakes Carbon (GLC) has operated delayed coking pilot units including an excellent large-scale pilot unit with a coke drum 0.3 meter (1 ft) diameter by 2.1 meters (7 ft) long and has developed physical models which explain coke formation in coke drums. Knowledge of commercial delayed coking units as well as that of the GLC Pilot Delayed Coker is used in this tutorial paper to describe the formation and uses of the three types of structures of delayed petroleum coke: needle, sponge, and shot. Troubleshooting tips are included on many aspects of the delayed coking drum cycle including: steam stripping, water quenching, coke cutting, drum warm-up, and drum switching technique. Suggestions and descriptions of delayed coking unit hardware are included. The objective of this tutorial paper is to acquaint the non-refinery technologist and further the knowledge of refinery personnel with the delayed coking operation, delayed coking unit hardware, types of coke that can be produced, coke formation models, and the uses of petroleum coke.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Potential
    P a n o r o E n e r g y ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Exploring the Potential www.panoroenergy.com PANORO ENERGY - 2019 ANNUAL REPORT | Page: 2 Page COMPANY OVERVIEW Company Overview 02 Panoro Energy ASA is an independent exploration and production Financial and Operational highlights 03 (E&P) company headquartered in London and listed on the Oslo CEO Letter 05 Stock Exchange with ticker PEN. The Company holds production, development, and exploration assets in North and West Africa. Directors’ report 2019 07 The North African portfolio comprises a participating interest in five producing oil field concessions, the Sfax Offshore Exploration Permit Annual statement of reserves 2019 20 (SOEP), and the Ras El Besh concession, all in the region of the city Annex reserves statement 23 of Sfax, Tunisia. The operations in West Africa include the Dussafu License offshore southern Gabon and OML 113 offshore western Corporate Governance 25 Nigeria (which is classified as held for sale). Consolidated statement of In addition to discovered hydrocarbon reserves and resources, the 28 comprehensive income assets also hold significant exploration potential. Consolidated statement of 29 financial position Consolidated statement of 31 changes in equity Consolidated cash flow statement 32 Notes to the consolidated 33 financial statements Panoro Energy ASA parent company 70 income statement Panoro Energy ASA parent company 71 balance sheet Panoro Energy ASA parent company 72 statement of cash flow Panoro Energy ASA notes to the 73 financial statements Declaration from
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Management Report for the First Half 2021
    Translation of a report originally issued in Spanish. In the event of a discrepancy, the Spanish version prevails. ABOUT THIS REPORT The Interim Management Report of the Repsol Group1 should be read in conjunction with the consolidated Management Report for 20202. In conjunction with this report, Repsol has published condensed interim consolidated financial statements3 for the first half of 2021 (hereinafter, “interim financial statements for the first half of 2021”). The Board of Directors of Repsol, S.A. approved both reports of Repsol, S.A. at its meeting of July 28, 2021. The financial information contained in this document, unless expressly indicated otherwise, has been prepared in accordance with the Group’s reporting model, as described below: Repsol presents its segment results including joint ventures and other companies that are jointly managed in accordance with the Group’s investment percentage, considering operational and economic indicators within the same perspective and degree of detail as those for companies consolidated under the full consolidation method. Thus, the Group considers that the nature of its businesses and the way in which results are analyzed for decision- making purposes are adequately reflected in this report. Given the nature of its business and in order to make its disclosures more readily comparable with those of its peers, the Group relies on Adjusted Net Income when measuring the results of each business segment. Adjusted Net Income means the current cost of supply (CCS), net of taxes and minority interests and excluding certain specific items of income and expense (“Special items”). For current cost of supply (CCS) earnings, the cost of volumes sold is calculated on the basis of procurement and production costs incurred during the period in question and not based on weighted average cost, which is the accepted methodology under European accounting law and regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidated Financial Statements and Auditor's Report
    WorldReginfo - 772dcdb9-06b0-4e41-9a7e-e370402a651f WorldReginfo - 772dcdb9-06b0-4e41-9a7e-e370402a651f WorldReginfo - 772dcdb9-06b0-4e41-9a7e-e370402a651f WorldReginfo - 772dcdb9-06b0-4e41-9a7e-e370402a651f WorldReginfo - 772dcdb9-06b0-4e41-9a7e-e370402a651f WorldReginfo - 772dcdb9-06b0-4e41-9a7e-e370402a651f WorldReginfo - 772dcdb9-06b0-4e41-9a7e-e370402a651f WorldReginfo - 772dcdb9-06b0-4e41-9a7e-e370402a651f WorldReginfo - 772dcdb9-06b0-4e41-9a7e-e370402a651f WorldReginfo - 772dcdb9-06b0-4e41-9a7e-e370402a651f WorldReginfo - 772dcdb9-06b0-4e41-9a7e-e370402a651f WorldReginfo - 772dcdb9-06b0-4e41-9a7e-e370402a651f WorldReginfo - 772dcdb9-06b0-4e41-9a7e-e370402a651f REPSOL Group 2017 Consolidated financial statements Translation of a report originally issued in Spanish. In the event of a discrepancy, the Spanish language version prevails WorldReginfo - 772dcdb9-06b0-4e41-9a7e-e370402a651f Translation of a report originally issued in Spanish. In the event of a discrepancy, the Spanish language version prevails. Repsol, S.A. and investees comprising the Repsol Group Balance sheet at December 31, 2017 and 2016 € Million ASSETS Note 12/31/2017 12/31/2016 Intangible assets: 10 4,584 5,109 a) Goodwill 2,764 3,115 b) Other intangible assets 1,820 1,994 Property, plant and equipment 11 24,600 27,297 Investment property 67 66 Investments accounted for using the equity method 12 9,268 10,176 Non-current financial assets 7 2,038 1,204 Deferred tax assets 23 4,057 4,746 Other non-current assets 7 472 323 NON-CURRENT ASSETS 45,086 48,921 Non-current
    [Show full text]