DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Nunavut Impact Review Board 29 Mitik St. P.O. Box 1360 Cambridge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Nunavut Impact Review Board 29 Mitik St. P.O. Box 1360 Cambridge WWF-Canada Tel: (416) 489-8800 410 Adelaide St. West Toll-free: 1-800-26-PANDA Suite 400 (1-800-267-2632) Toronto, Ontario Fax: (416) 489-8055 Canada M5V 1S8 wwf.ca Nunavut Impact Review Board 29 Mitik St. P.O. Box 1360 Cambridge Bay NU X0B 0C0 [email protected] Re: WWF-Canada’s Final Written Submission to the NIRB’s Strategic Environmental Assessment in Baffin Bay and Davis Strait Dear NIRB: Thank you for the opportunity to submit comments to the Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB) on the Preliminary Findings Report for the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) in Baffin Bay and Davis Strait. WWF-Canada supports the SEA process and believes it is an important component in ensuring that offshore oil and gas activities in Canada’s Eastern Arctic are conducted safely with the lowest possible risk to human health and the environment, if such activities are to be carried out at all. We commend the NIRB for its efforts to engage stakeholders comprehensively throughout the SEA process. World Wildlife Fund (WWF) is one of the largest independent conservation organizations in the world, with projects in more than 100 countries. WWF-Canada creates solutions to the environmental challenges that matter most for Canadians. We work in places that are unique and ecologically important, so that wildlife, nature and people thrive together. With respect to our Arctic oil and gas and marine conservation work, WWF-Canada believes healthy coastal communities depend on healthy oceans. We are working in partnership with coastal communities, Indigenous peoples and other groups to advocate for marine protected areas and sustainable oceans management, and to ensure the rules governing offshore oil and gas activities are consistent with international best practices for safety, accountability and environmental protection. WWF-Canada has reviewed the Preliminary Findings Report (Public Registry ID 320496) and the Nunami Stantec documents Oil and Gas Life Cycle Activities and Hypothetical Scenarios (Public Registry ID 318009) and the Environmental Setting and Review of Potential Effects of Oil and Gas Activities (Public Registry ID 318010). Our final written submission below provides an assessment of these reports and includes an overview of the economic prospects of offshore oil and gas in the eastern Arctic, the downstream climate change impacts, and the prospect of development alternatives to offshore oil and gas, all of which are not being considered by the NIRB in its assessment but are a critical component of any fulsome and robust SEA process. Accompanying our submission is a series of maps showing ecologically and biologically sensitive areas in the SEA focus area, species diversity hotspots, shipping traffic, oil spill trajectories, and commercial fishing interests. As requested, we have also provided a table in Appendix A with our detailed comments on the reports, subsequent recommendations and references for further information. 1 WWF-Canada Tel: (416) 489-8800 410 Adelaide St. West Toll-free: 1-800-26-PANDA Suite 400 (1-800-267-2632) Toronto, Ontario Fax: (416) 489-8055 Canada M5V 1S8 wwf.ca Contents Contents ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 5 ᑎᑎᕋᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᔭᖅᓯᒪᓂᖏᑦ .............................................................................................................. 7 SOMMAIRE EXÉCUTIF ................................................................................................................................... 9 2. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................. 11 3. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 13 4. GENERAL COMMENTS ON THE BAFFIN BAY/DAVIS STRAIT SEA ..................................................... 16 4.1 Uncertain community economic benefits ...................................................................................... 18 4.2 No alternatives to oil and gas ......................................................................................................... 19 4.3 Insufficient baseline data ................................................................................................................ 20 4.4 Unknown scale of offshore operations and development ............................................................. 20 4.5 Challenges with community engagement and understanding ....................................................... 20 4.6 WWF-Canada summary and recommendations ............................................................................. 21 4.7 Key SEA international best practice resources ............................................................................... 22 5. ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AREAS .................................................................................................... 23 5.1 Ecologically and Biologically Significant Areas (EBSAs), Significant Benthic Areas (SBAs) and species diversity hotspots ........................................................................................................................... 23 5.2 EBSAs ............................................................................................................................................... 25 5.2.1 Eclipse Sound/Navy Board Inlet .......................................................................................... 26 5.2.2 Admiralty Inlet .................................................................................................................... 27 5.2.3 Lancaster Sound .................................................................................................................. 27 5.2.4 Hatton Basin/Labrador Sea/Davis Strait ............................................................................. 27 5.2.5 Baffin Bay Shelf Break ......................................................................................................... 27 5.2.6 North Baffin Bay .................................................................................................................. 27 5.2.7 Southern Baffin Bay ............................................................................................................ 27 5.2.8 Eastern Baffin Island Coastline ............................................................................................ 28 5.2.9 Isabella Bay ......................................................................................................................... 28 5.2.10 Scott Inlet ............................................................................................................................ 28 5.2.11 North Water Polynya .......................................................................................................... 28 2 WWF-Canada Tel: (416) 489-8800 410 Adelaide St. West Toll-free: 1-800-26-PANDA Suite 400 (1-800-267-2632) Toronto, Ontario Fax: (416) 489-8055 Canada M5V 1S8 wwf.ca 5.2.12 Jones Sounds Entrance ....................................................................................................... 28 5.2.13 Jones Sounds: Hell Gate/Cardigan Strait ............................................................................ 28 5.3 Significant Benthic Areas (SBAs) ..................................................................................................... 29 5.4 Abundance and Species diversity hotspots .................................................................................... 30 6. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF OIL AND GAS ................................................................................. 33 6.1 Seismic testing and underwater noise ............................................................................................ 33 6.1.1 Comments on the treatment of seismic testing and underwater noise in the SEA ........... 33 6.1.2 Detailed comments – Preliminary Findings Report ............................................................ 36 6.1.3 Detailed comments – Nunami Stantec Report ................................................................... 45 6.1.4 References – Seismic and ocean noise only ........................................................................ 48 6.2 Well Blowouts and Major Accidents ............................................................................................... 49 6.2.1 Risk ...................................................................................................................................... 49 6.2.2 History of blowouts and major accidents ........................................................................... 51 6.3 Chronic spills and pollution ............................................................................................................. 55 6.4 Shipping ........................................................................................................................................... 58 6.4.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 59 6.4.2 Disturbance and conflicts with marine mammals .............................................................. 59 6.4.3 Underwater noise from ships ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Department of Environment– Wildlife Division
    Department of Environment– Wildlife Division Wildlife Research Section Department of Environment Box 209 Igloolik, NU X0A 0L0 Tel: (867) 934-2179 Fax: (867) 934-2190 Email: [email protected] Frequently Asked Questions Government of Nunavut 1. What is the role of the GN in issuing wildlife research permits? On June 1, 1999, Nunavut became Canada’s newest territory. Since its creation, interest in studying its natural resources has steadily risen. Human demands on animals and plants can leave them vulnerable, and wildlife research permits allow the Department to keep records of what, and how much research is going on in Nunavut, and to use this as a tool to assist in the conservation of its resources. The four primary purposes of research in Nunavut are: a. To help ensure that communities are informed of scientific research in and around their communities; b. To maintain a centralized knowledgebase of research activities in Nunavut; c. To ensure that there are no conflicting or competing research activities in Nunavut; and d. To ensure that wildlife research activities abide by various laws and regulations governing the treatment and management of wildlife and wildlife habitat in Nunavut. 2. How is this process supported by the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement? Conservation: Article 5.1.5 The principles of conservation are: a. the maintenance of the natural balance of ecological systems within the Nunavut Settlement Area; b. the protection of wildlife habitat; c. the maintenance of vital, healthy, wildlife populations capable of sustaining harvesting needs as defined in this article; and d. the restoration and revitalization of depleted populations of wildlife and wildlife habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Canadian High Arctic-North Greenland
    15/18: LME FACTSHEET SERIES CANADIAN HIGH ARCTIC-NORTH GREENLAND LME tic LMEs Arc CANADIAN HIGH ARCTIC-NORTH GREENLAND LME MAP 18 of Central Map Arctic Ocean LME North Pole Ellesmere Island Iceland Greenland 15 "1 ARCTIC LMEs Large ! Marine Ecosystems (LMEs) are defined as regions of work of the ArcNc Council in developing and promoNng the ocean space of 200,000 km² or greater, that encompass Ecosystem Approach to management of the ArcNc marine coastal areas from river basins and estuaries to the outer environment. margins of a conNnental shelf or the seaward extent of a predominant coastal current. LMEs are defined by ecological Joint EA Expert group criteria, including bathymetry, hydrography, producNvity, and PAME established an Ecosystem Approach to Management tropically linked populaNons. PAME developed a map expert group in 2011 with the parNcipaNon of other ArcNc delineaNng 17 ArcNc Large Marine Ecosystems (ArcNc LME's) Council working groups (AMAP, CAFF and SDWG). This joint in the marine waters of the ArcNc and adjacent seas in 2006. Ecosystem Approach Expert Group (EA-EG) has developed a In a consultaNve process including agencies of ArcNc Council framework for EA implementaNon where the first step is member states and other ArcNc Council working groups, the idenNficaNon of the ecosystem to be managed. IdenNfying ArcNc LME map was revised in 2012 to include 18 ArcNc the ArcNc LMEs represents this first step. LMEs. This is the current map of ArcNc LMEs used in the This factsheet is one of 18 in a series of the ArcCc LMEs. OVERVIEW: CANADIAN HIGH ARCTIC-NORTH GREENLAND LME The Canadian High Arcc-North Greenland LME (CAA) consists of the northernmost and high arcc part of Canada along with the adjacent part of North Greenland.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Evaluation of Strike-Slip Displacements Along and Bordering Nares Strait
    Polarforschung 74 (1-3), 129 – 160, 2004 (erschienen 2006) In Search of the Wegener Fault: Re-Evaluation of Strike-Slip Displacements Along and Bordering Nares Strait by J. Christopher Harrison1 Abstract: A total of 28 geological-geophysical markers are identified that lich der Bache Peninsula und Linksseitenverschiebungen am Judge-Daly- relate to the question of strike slip motions along and bordering Nares Strait. Störungssystem (70 km) und schließlich die S-, später SW-gerichtete Eight of the twelve markers, located within the Phanerozoic orogen of Kompression des Sverdrup-Beckens (100 + 35 km). Die spätere Deformation Kennedy Channel – Robeson Channel region, permit between 65 and 75 km wird auf die Rotation (entgegen dem Uhrzeigersinn) und ausweichende West- of sinistral offset on the Judge Daly Fault System (JDFS). In contrast, eight of drift eines semi-rigiden nördlichen Ellesmere-Blocks während der Kollision nine markers located in Kane Basin, Smith Sound and northern Baffin Bay mit der Grönlandplatte zurückgeführt. indicate no lateral displacement at all. Especially convincing is evidence, presented by DAMASKE & OAKEY (2006), that at least one basic dyke of Neoproterozoic age extends across Smith Sound from Inglefield Land to inshore eastern Ellesmere Island without any recognizable strike slip offset. INTRODUCTION These results confirm that no major sinistral fault exists in southern Nares Strait. It is apparent to both earth scientists and the general public To account for the absence of a Wegener Fault in most parts of Nares Strait, that the shape of both coastlines and continental margins of the present paper would locate the late Paleocene-Eocene Greenland plate boundary on an interconnected system of faults that are 1) traced through western Greenland and eastern Arctic Canada provide for a Jones Sound in the south, 2) lie between the Eurekan Orogen and the Precam- satisfactory restoration of the opposing lands.
    [Show full text]
  • POLYNYAS in the CANADIAN ARCTIC Analysis of MODIS Sea Ice Temperature Data Between June 2002 and July 2013
    Canatec Associates International Ltd. POLYNYAS IN THE CANADIAN ARCTIC Analysis of MODIS Sea Ice Temperature Data Between June 2002 and July 2013 David Currie 7/16/2014 Using daily sea ice temperature grids produced from MODIS optical satellite imagery, polynya occurrences in the Canadian Arctic and Northwest Greenland were mapped with a spatial resolution of one square kilometer and a temporal resolution of one week. The eleven year dataset was used to identify and measure locations with a high probability of open water occurrence. This approach appears to be most suitable for the spring months, when polynyas and shore leads represent the only open water in the region. An analysis of the results at several geographic scales reveals considerable yearly variation in polynya extents, although the relatively short period studied makes identifying trends rather difficult. Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Goals ............................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Source Data ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 MODIS Sea Ice Temperature Product MOD29/MYD29 ....................................................................... 6 Landsat Quicklook
    [Show full text]
  • Uria Lomvia) and Black-Legged Kittiwakes (Rissa Tridactyla
    A First Count of Thick-billed Murres ( Uria lomvia ) and Black-legged Kittiwakes ( Rissa tridactyla ) Breeding on Bylot Island ANTHONY J. G ASTON 1, 4 , MARC -A NDRÉ CYR 2, and KIERAN O’D ONOVAN 3 1Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3 Canada 2Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Place Vincent Massey, 351 St. Joseph Boulevard, Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0H3 Canada 3308a Klukshu Avenue, Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 3Y1 Canada 4Corresponding author: [email protected] Gaston, Anthony J., Marc-André Cyr, and Kieran O’Donovan. 2017. A first count of Thick-billed Murres ( Uria lomvia ) and Black-legged Kittiwakes ( Rissa tridactyla ) breeding on Bylot Island. Canadian Field-Naturalist 131(1): 69 –74. https:// doi.org/10.22621/cfn.v 131i 1.1953 Bylot Island, part of Sirmilik National Park, supports two major breeding colonies of intermingled Thick-billed Murres ( Uria lomvia ) and Black-legged Kittiwakes ( Rissa tridactyla ): at Cape Hay near the northwest tip and at Cape Graham Moore at the opposite end of the island. Although the size of these colonies has been estimated previously, there is no information on how the estimates were made, except for Thick-billed Murres at Cape Hay in 1977, when the numbers were based on sampling only about 30% of the colony. In 2013, high-resolution digital photographs of the whole area of both colonies were taken in July, when most birds were probably incubating eggs. Individual birds were counted on the photographs, and the numbers were corrected for image quality and converted to numbers of breeding pairs based on correction factors from another High Arctic colony.
    [Show full text]
  • Polar Continental Shelf Program Science Report 2019: Logistical Support for Leading-Edge Scientific Research in Canada and Its Arctic
    Polar Continental Shelf Program SCIENCE REPORT 2019 LOGISTICAL SUPPORT FOR LEADING-EDGE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN CANADA AND ITS ARCTIC Polar Continental Shelf Program SCIENCE REPORT 2019 Logistical support for leading-edge scientific research in Canada and its Arctic Polar Continental Shelf Program Science Report 2019: Logistical support for leading-edge scientific research in Canada and its Arctic Contact information Polar Continental Shelf Program Natural Resources Canada 2464 Sheffield Road Ottawa ON K1B 4E5 Canada Tel.: 613-998-8145 Email: [email protected] Website: pcsp.nrcan.gc.ca Cover photographs: (Top) Ready to start fieldwork on Ward Hunt Island in Quttinirpaaq National Park, Nunavut (Bottom) Heading back to camp after a day of sampling in the Qarlikturvik Valley on Bylot Island, Nunavut Photograph contributors (alphabetically) Dan Anthon, Royal Roads University: page 8 (bottom) Lisa Hodgetts, University of Western Ontario: pages 34 (bottom) and 62 Justine E. Benjamin: pages 28 and 29 Scott Lamoureux, Queen’s University: page 17 Joël Bêty, Université du Québec à Rimouski: page 18 (top and bottom) Janice Lang, DRDC/DND: pages 40 and 41 (top and bottom) Maya Bhatia, University of Alberta: pages 14, 49 and 60 Jason Lau, University of Western Ontario: page 34 (top) Canadian Forces Combat Camera, Department of National Defence: page 13 Cyrielle Laurent, Yukon Research Centre: page 48 Hsin Cynthia Chiang, McGill University: pages 2, 8 (background), 9 (top Tanya Lemieux, Natural Resources Canada: page 9 (bottom
    [Show full text]
  • Baffin Fan and Its Inverted Rift System of Arctic Eastern Canada; Is This Another Beaufort-Mackenzie Basin?
    Baffin Fan and its inverted rift system of Arctic eastern Canada; is this another Beaufort-Mackenzie Basin? Christopher Harrison* Geological Survey of Canada, 615 Booth St., Ottawa, ON, K1A 0E9, Canada e-mail: [email protected] Thomas A. Brent Geological Survey of Canada, 3303-33rd St. NW, Calgary, AB, T2L 2A7, Canada and Gordon N. Oakey Geological Survey of Canada, 1 Challenger Dr., Dartmouth, NS, B2Y 4A2, Canada. Summary Baffin Fan is a twelve km thick sedimentary wedge of Eocene to Pleistocene age in northwestern Baffin Bay; size and resource potential comparable to Beaufort-Mackenzie Basin (Figure 1). Notable is syntectonic sedimentation with possible volcanism and rifting in the Cretaceous-Danian. Sequences associated with inversion in the later Paleocene and Eocene display out-of-graben thrust anticlines formed over horst blocks in Lady Ann and Lancaster Sound basins. The Oligocene to mid-Miocene is associated with fluvial-deltaic systems; replaced since then by glacial-interglacial sequences including submarine canyons and deep-water fans. Exploration targets are located in Lancaster Sound, and a Baffin Bay fairway that runs 220 km northwestward to east of Coburg Island. Sixty-five percent of prospects are located under Neogene cover. Fourteen are each greater than 70 km2, and five are between 334 and 592 km2. Based on drilling success rates elsewhere and the existence of a petroleum system, 12 of the 40 mapped structures may contain hydrocarbons in significant quantity. Introduction Emerging areas for offshore exploration in Arctic eastern Canada are located on the continental margins of Labrador Sea and Baffin Bay, and in the fault-controlled grabens that underlie some of the larger bays and the entrances to several major inter-island channels.
    [Show full text]
  • NIRB Uuktuutinga Ihivriuqhikhamut #125443 Prince Leopold Island Migratory Bird Sactuary Permit & Nirjutiqarvik NWA Wildlife Viewing Permit
    NIRB Uuktuutinga Ihivriuqhikhamut #125443 Prince Leopold Island Migratory Bird Sactuary Permit & Nirjutiqarvik NWA wildlife viewing permit Uuktuutinga Qanurittuq: Amendment Havaap Qanurittunia: Puulaktunik Takuyaktuiyunik Akuiyunik Aihinit Uuktuutinga Ublua: 1/29/2019 5:24:34 PM Period of operation: from 0001-01-01 to 0001-01-01 Piumayaat Angirutinga: from 0001-01-01 to 0001-01-01 Havauhikhaq Ikayuqtinga: Nansen Weber Canadian Arctic Holidays Ltd. PO 1252 STN MAIN Yellowknife NWT X1A 2n9 Canada Hivayautit Nampanga:: 2503084656, Kayumiktukkut Nampanga:: QANURITTUT Tukihiannaqtunik havaariyauyumayumik uqauhiuyun Qablunaatitut: Number of personnel covered under permit: Maximum 10Project objectives: View the arctic flora and fauna on Prince Leopold Island and Coburg Island with guests from Arctic Watch Wilderness Lodge. Project location: Prince Leopold Island MBS and Nirjutiqarvik NWAPrince Leopold Island MBS (74°N 090°W)Nirjutiqarvik NWA (75°57′N 79°18′W)Please keep in mind that I do not have exact location of the airstrips for both Prince Leopold Island or Coburg Island since I have not visited either. They both have twin-otter landing strips walking distance from the viewpoints we wish to visit. Proposed dates and Duration of Visit:We would like to fly and land a Summit Air Twin-Otter too both Prince Leopold Island and Coburg Island. We will be using the airstrips that are already designated on the islands and then walk to the cliffs and waters edge. No vessel, all-terrain vechiles or helicopters will be used in either location. Proposed dates for visiting both locations are August 2-4, 2019 weather permitting. This is a one-day visit, with an approximate 3-4 hour viewing at each location.
    [Show full text]
  • (Ebsas) in the Eastern Arctic Biogeographic Region of the Canadian Arctic
    Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) Proceedings Series 2015/042 Central and Arctic Region Proceedings of the regional peer review of the re-evaluation of Ecologically and Biologically Significant Areas (EBSAs) in the Eastern Arctic Biogeographic Region of the Canadian Arctic January 27-29, 2015 Winnipeg, MB Chairperson: Kathleen Martin Editor: Vanessa Grandmaison and Kathleen Martin Fisheries and Oceans Canada 501 University Crescent Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N6 December 2015 Foreword The purpose of these Proceedings is to document the activities and key discussions of the meeting. The Proceedings may include research recommendations, uncertainties, and the rationale for decisions made during the meeting. Proceedings may also document when data, analyses or interpretations were reviewed and rejected on scientific grounds, including the reason(s) for rejection. As such, interpretations and opinions presented in this report individually may be factually incorrect or misleading, but are included to record as faithfully as possible what was considered at the meeting. No statements are to be taken as reflecting the conclusions of the meeting unless they are clearly identified as such. Moreover, further review may result in a change of conclusions where additional information was identified as relevant to the topics being considered, but not available in the timeframe of the meeting. In the rare case when there are formal dissenting views, these are also archived as Annexes to the Proceedings. Published by: Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat 200 Kent Street Ottawa ON K1A 0E6 http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas-sccs/ [email protected] © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2015 ISSN 1701-1280 Correct citation for this publication: DFO.
    [Show full text]
  • High Arctic PEMT Layers
    High Arctic PEMT Layers Table of Contents General Sensitivity Notes .............................................................................................................................. 3 Sensitivity Layers ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Grid Cell Sensitivity Rating ............................................................................................................................ 3 Polar Bear ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Rationale for Selection .............................................................................................................................. 3 Key habitat ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Sustainability Factors ................................................................................................................................ 4 Susceptibility to Oil and Gas Activities ...................................................................................................... 5 Potential Effects of Climate Change ......................................................................................................... 5 Sensitivity Ranking ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Climatic Regions of the Canadian Arctic Islands J.B
    ARCTIC VOL. 34, NO. 3 (SEPTEMBER 198l), P. 225-240 Climatic Regions of the Canadian Arctic Islands J.B. MAXWELL’ ABSTRACT. As a result of a comprehensive assessment of the climate of the Canadian Arctic Islands and adjacent waters, five climatic regions were identified. The regional boundaries were delineated by an analysis of the influence of the major climatic controls while further regional subdivisions were arrived at through consideration of the fields of the standard observed meteorological elements. Short discussions of the climatic characteristics of each sub-region are given and tables outlining values of selected climatic elements are presented. A brief discussion of climatic change across the entire area is included. Key words: Canadian Arctic Islands, climate, climatic change, meteorology RESUME: Suite & une evaluation dttailke du chatdes iles Arctiques canadiennes et des eaux adjacentes, cinq regions climatiques ont kt6 identifikes. Les bornes rtgionale ont CtC tracks au moyen de I’analyse de I’influence des principaux contrbles climatiques, et les subdivisions regionales ont tte dCterminees par I’etude des champs des elhents mkteorologiques standards ayant et6 observes. De courtes discussions des caracttristiquesclimatiques de chaque sous-reion sont presentees, ainsi que destableaux signalant les valeurs de certains des elements climatiques. Une courte discussion du changement climatique dans toute la region parait aussi. Traduit par Maurice Guibord, Le Centre FranGais, The University of Calgary. INTRODUCTION r The vast area of land and water that makes up the Canadian Arctic has long been popularly regarded. as a region of fairly uniform climatic conditions - a “polar desert” with little diversity and strikingly harsh weather throughout the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Oil Residence Time with GPS-Drifters
    Marine Pollution Bulletin 150 (2020) 110644 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Pollution Bulletin journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpolbul Measuring oil residence time with GPS-drifters, satellites, and Unmanned T Aerial Systems (UAS) ∗ Oscar Garcia-Pinedaa, , Yannis Androulidakisb, Matthieu Le Hénaffc,d, Villy Kourafaloub, Lars R. Holee, HeeSook Kangb, Gordon Staplesf, Ellen Ramirezg, Lisa DiPintoh a Water Mapping, LLC, Gulf Breeze, FL, USA b Department of Ocean Sciences, University of Miami/RSMAS, Miami, FL, USA c Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies (CIMAS), UM/RSMAS, Miami, FL, USA d NOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory (AOML), Miami, FL, USA e Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Allegt. 70, 5007 Bergen, Norway f MDA Corporation, Vancouver, Canada g Satellite Analysis Branch. NESDIS, NOAA, Greenbelt, MD, USA h Office of Response and Restoration, NOAA's Ocean Service, Seattle, WA,USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: As oil production worldwide continues to increase, particularly in the Gulf of Mexico, marine oil spill pre- Satellite remote sensing paredness relies on deeper understanding of surface oil spill transport science. This paper describes experiments Drifters carried out on a chronic release of crude oil and aims to understand the residence time of oil slicks using a UAS combination of remote sensing platforms and GPS tracked drifters. From April 2017 to August 2018, we per- formed multiple synchronized deployments of drogued and un-drogued drifters to monitor the life time (re- sidence time) of the surface oil slicks originated from the MC20 spill site, located close to the Mississippi Delta. The hydrodynamic design of the two types of drifters allowed us to compare their performance differences.
    [Show full text]