DOCSLIB.ORG

2/27/20 Perverted Sodom and Gomorrah Jude 1:7 the Three

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2/27/20 Perverted Sodom and Gomorrah Jude 1:7 the Three 1 2 2/27/20 A. The introduction of Sodom and Gamorrah is to compare them to God’s judgment that fell on Perverted Sodom And Gomorrah the angels in verse six, “as Sodom and Jude 1:7 Gomorrah”. vs. 7a 1. The name Sodom “Sodoma”, means The three illustrations Jude used have the overarching burning. theme of God’s judgment of past apostates and the sin a. The city of Sodom is mentioned 48 times of unbelief. in the Bible. 1. Some in the nation of Israel apostatized by unbelief 1) Thirty-eight times in the Old to possess the land. Testament. 2. Some of the angels in heaven apostatized by 2) Ten times in the New Testament, once rebelling against God and being faithful. “Sodoma”. Rom. 9:29 3. The people of Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities b. Sodom was in the fertile plain of Jordan around them disbelieved the warning about God’s on the Southern end of the Dead Sea. destruction for their sinful living, being no different 1) From the area of Bethel where Abram than apostates. had pitched his tent we are told, “And * “as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities around Lot lifted his eyes and saw all the them in a similar manner to these, having given plain of Jordan, that it was well themselves over to sexual immorality and gone after watered everywhere (before the strange flesh, are set forth as an example, suffering the LORD destroyed Sodom and vengeance of eternal fire.” Gomorrah) like the garden of the LORD, like the land of Egypt as you The third illustration of the is about Sodom, go toward Zoar. Then Lot chose for Gomorrah, the cities around them characterized by himself all the plain of Jordan, and three things. Jude 1:7 Lot journeyed east. And they I. The comparison of their judgment. separated from each other.” Gen. II. The comparison of their sin. 13:10-11 III. The comparison of their castigation. 2) Lot favored the urban city life, “Abram dwelt in the land of Canaan, I. The comparison of their judgment. vs. 7a and Lot dwelt in the cities of the plain 3 4 and pitched his tent even as far as 3) Both Sodom and Gomorrah fell under Sodom.” Gen. 13:12 God’s Divine judgement, “Then the 3) The four kings from the region of LORD rained brimstone and fire on Babylon came down from the area of Sodom and Gomorrah, from the Damascus on the east side of the LORD out of the heavens.” Gen. Jordan as far as the Dead Sea to make 19:24 war against the five kings of the five 4) No coincidence the meaning of the cities in the Jordan plain for rebelling, two cities combined mean “burning not paying tribute in the 13th year of submersion”. their servitude to Chedorlaomer, meeting in the Valley of Siddim, B. The introduction of three other cities are also to where there was much asphalt, near compare them to God’s judgment that fell on Sodom. Gen. 14:1-10 the angels in verse six, “and the cities around 2. The city of Gomorrah means submersion. them”. vs. 7b a. The city of Gomorrah is mentioned 1. The two of cities are mentioned by name, twenty-four times in the Bible. “And the border of the Canaanites was from 1) Nineteen times it appears in the Old Sidon as you go toward Gerar, as far as Testament. Gaza; then as you go toward Sodom, 2) Five times in the New Testament. Gomorrah, Admah, and Zeboiim, as far as Matt. 10:15; Mk. 6:11: Rom. 9:29; Lasha.” Gen. 10:19 2Pet. 2:6; Jude 1:7 a. Admah “Admah”, meand red earth. b. Gomorrah was also located in the fertile * Admah appears five times in the Old plain of Jordan on the Southern end of Testament. Gen. 10:19; 14:2, 8; Deut. the Dead Sea. Gen. 13:10 29:23; Hos. 11:8 1) Every time Gomorrah is mentioned in b. Zeboiim “Ts@bo’ iym”, means gazelles. the Old Testament, Sodom is * Zeboiim is never mentioned in the New mentioned with her, nineteen times. Testament. 2) Every time Gomorrah is mentioned in c. Everyone knows about Sodom and the New Testament, Sodom is Gomorrah for falling under God’s Divine mentioned with her. judgment, but not Adman and Zeboiim. 5 6 1) The prophet Hosea used this important mountains where the angels told him detail speaking for God and His to flee, fearing he would die. Gen. promise to never forget the northern 19:19-21 Kingdom in their captivity to 2) The angels told Lot, “Hurry, escape Assyrian and their return from there. For I cannot do anything until Babylon, “How can I give you up, you arrive there.” Therefore the name Ephraim? How can I hand you over, of the city was called Zoar.” Gen. Israel? How can I make you like 19:24 Admah? How can I set you like 3) The confirmation of the city of Zoar Zeboiim? My heart churns within Me; being spared, “The sun had risen upon My sympathy is stirred.” Hos. 11:8 the earth when Lot entered Zoar. Then 2) The point is clear, ask anyone about the LORD rained brimstone and fire Admah and Zeboiim, they will on Sodom and Gomorrah, from the respond, “who”, these two cities are LORD out of the heavens. So He not remembered, but forgotten! overthrew those cities, all the plain, 2. The last city is also mentioned by name, all the inhabitants of the cities, and Zoar. what grew on the ground.” Gen. a. The city Zoar “Tso’ ar”, means 19:23-25 insignificant, perhaps being very small? 1) Zoar appears ten times in the Old Illustration Testament. Gen. 13:10; 14:2, 8; Isaiah said, “Woe is me, for I am undone! Because I 19:22, 23, 30; Deut. 34:2; Is. 15:5; am a man of unclean lips, And I dwell in the midst of Jer. 48:4, 34 a people of unclean lips; For my eyes have seen the 2) The king of Bela was also Zoar. Gen. King, The LORD of hosts.” God is the epitome of 14:2, 8 holiness, the heavens are not pure in His eyes. Is. 6:5; b. The city of Zoar is the only one of the Job 15:15b five cities that was spared from God’s Divine judgment. Application 1) The sparing of the overthrow of the 1. The sin of Sodom and Gomorrah, sexual city of Zoar was due to the request of promiscuity, in particular homosexuality, had never Lot to flee to Zoar instead of the 7 8 been questioned till recent with the pro-homosexual They spoke to the master of the house, the old acceptance in America and the world. man, saying, “Bring out the man who came to a. The city of Sodom is mentioned twice as much your house, that we may know him carnally!” as Gomorrah in both Old and New Testament Jud. 19:22 an example of the God’s judmgnet for their sin. d. “And there were also perverted persons in the b. The sin of Sodom was and is the practice of land. They did according to all the men having sex with men callled “sodomy”, the abominations of the nations which the LORD most unnatural way contrary to God’s design had cast out before the children of Israel.” and nature for a man and a woman. 1Kings 14:24 c. The men of Sodom knowing the two angels e. “For this reason God gave them up to vile were in Lot’s house asked for the angles. passions. For even their women exchanged the 1) “And they called to Lot and said to him, natural use for what is against nature. Likewise “Where are the men who came to you also the men, leaving the natural use of the tonight? Bring them out to us that we may woman, burned in their lust for one another, know them carnally.” Gen. 19:5 men with men committing what is shameful, 2) To deny that in fact the men could and would and receiving in themselves the penalty of their have had sex with the angels by sodomy is error which was due.” Rom. 1:26-27 ludicrous. 2. The sin of sodomites is distinct from 2. Homosexuals and pro-homosexual individuals are homosexuality. constantly saying the Bible does not condemn a. Sodomites in the Bible were sacred, homosexuality or that the words uses do not refer to consecrated male prostitutes to the service of homosexuality, let me give you a few to refute the lie. Astarte or Venus. Duet. 23:17; 1Kings 14:24; a. “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. 15:12; 22:46; 2Kings 23:7 It is an abomination.” Lev. 18:22 b. A Sodomits is not always homosexual, b. “If a man lies with a male as he lies with a sometimes called a “dog” or “perverted woman, both of them have committed an persons”. abomination. They shall surely be put to death. 1) “Do you not know that the unrighteous will Their blood shall be upon them.” Lev. 20:13 not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be c. “As they were enjoying themselves, suddenly deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, certain men of the city, perverted men, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor surrounded the house and beat on the door. sodomites.” 1Cor.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the Commonwealth
    Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in The Commonwealth Struggles for Decriminalisation and Change Edited by Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in The Commonwealth: Struggles for Decriminalisation and Change Edited by Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites © Human Rights Consortium, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NCND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN 978-1-912250-13-4 (2018 PDF edition) DOI 10.14296/518.9781912250134 Institute of Commonwealth Studies School of Advanced Study University of London Senate House Malet Street London WC1E 7HU Cover image: Activists at Pride in Entebbe, Uganda, August 2012. Photo © D. David Robinson 2013. Photo originally published in The Advocate (8 August 2012) with approval of Sexual Minorities Uganda (SMUG) and Freedom and Roam Uganda (FARUG). Approval renewed here from SMUG and FARUG, and PRIDE founder Kasha Jacqueline Nabagesera. Published with direct informed consent of the main pictured activist. Contents Abbreviations vii Contributors xi 1 Human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity in the Commonwealth: from history and law to developing activism and transnational dialogues 1 Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites 2
    [Show full text]
  • Detestable Offenses: an Examination of Sodomy Laws from Colonial America to the Nineteenth Century”
    “Detestable Offenses: An Examination of Sodomy Laws from Colonial America to the Nineteenth Century” Taylor Runquist Western Illinois University 1 The act of sodomy has a long history of illegality, beginning in England during the reign of Henry VIII in 1533. The view of sodomy as a crime was brought to British America by colonists and was recorded in newspapers and law books alike. Sodomy laws would continue to adapt and change after their initial creation in the colonial era, from a common law offense to a clearly defined criminal act. Sodomy laws were not meant to persecute homosexuals specifically; they were meant to prevent the moral corruption and degradation of society. The definition of homosexuality also continued to adapt and change as the laws changed. Although sodomites had been treated differently in America and England, being a sodomite had the same social effects for the persecuted individual in both countries. The study of homosexuals throughout history is a fairly young field, but those who attempt to study this topic are often faced with the same issues. There are not many historical accounts from homosexuals themselves. This lack of sources can be attributed to their writings being censored, destroyed, or simply not withstanding the test of time. Another problem faced by historians of homosexuality is that a clear identity for homosexuals did not exist until the early 1900s. There are two approaches to trying to handle this lack of identity: the first is to only treat sodomy as an act and not an identity and the other is to attempt to create a homosexual identity for those convicted of sodomy.
    [Show full text]
  • This Alien Legacy RIGHTS the Origins of “Sodomy” Laws in British Colonialism WATCH
    HUMAN This Alien Legacy RIGHTS The Origins of “Sodomy” Laws in British Colonialism WATCH This Alien Legacy The Origins of “Sodomy” Laws in British Colonialism Copyright © 2008 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-419-2 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org December 2008 1-56432-419-2 This Alien Legacy The Origins of “Sodomy” Laws in British Colonialism I. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 Three Trials ......................................................................................................... 1 Colonial Laws and Contemporary Defenders ........................................................ 4 II. “Sodomy,” Colonialism, and Codification ........................................................... 13 III. Colonial Power on the Street and over the Body ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT History
    LGBT History Just like any other marginalized group that has had to fight for acceptance and equal rights, the LGBT community has a history of events that have impacted the community. This is a collection of some of the major happenings in the LGBT community during the 20th century through today. It is broken up into three sections: Pre-Stonewall, Stonewall, and Post-Stonewall. This is because the move toward equality shifted dramatically after the Stonewall Riots. Please note this is not a comprehensive list. Pre-Stonewall 1913 Alfred Redl, head of Austrian Intelligence, committed suicide after being identified as a Russian double agent and a homosexual. His widely-published arrest gave birth to the notion that homosexuals are security risks. 1919 Magnus Hirschfeld founded the Institute for Sexology in Berlin. One of the primary focuses of this institute was civil rights for women and gay people. 1933 On January 30, Adolf Hitler banned the gay press in Germany. In that same year, Magnus Herschfeld’s Institute for Sexology was raided and over 12,000 books, periodicals, works of art and other materials were burned. Many of these items were completely irreplaceable. 1934 Gay people were beginning to be rounded up from German-occupied countries and sent to concentration camps. Just as Jews were made to wear the Star of David on the prison uniforms, gay people were required to wear a pink triangle. WWII Becomes a time of “great awakening” for queer people in the United States. The homosocial environments created by the military and number of women working outside the home provide greater opportunity for people to explore their sexuality.
    [Show full text]
  • God's Character in the Bible and the Koran Toward a Theology of Beauty
    Home :: Perspective Digest http://www.perspectivedigest.org/?issue=18-3 Perspective Digest God’s Character in the Bible and the Koran Christians and Muslims see the characteristics of God from quite different perspectives. Larry L. Lichtenwalter Toward a Theology of Beauty God intended that religion and art should be complementary expressions of His own character. Jo Ann Davidson The Trinity in the Old Testament The Hebrew Scriptures offer some telling glimpses into the nature of God. Jiří Moskala End Times and Salvation Eschatology is the anticipation of Christ’s multifaceted historical works of salvation from creation to new creation. 1 of 2 7/9/2013 1:25 PM God’s Character in the Bible and the Koran :: Perspective Digest http://www.perspectivedigest.org/article/110/archives/18-3/god-s-characte... Perspective Digest - a publication of the Adventist Theological Society Christians and Muslims see the characteristics of God from quite different perspectives. Larry L. Lichtenwalter It comes as no surprise that the Bible and the Koran create unique worldviews. Sacred writings generate worldviews in keeping with their respective meta‑narrative, reasoning, and symbolism. The assertions that each worldview both presuppose and project about God, the world, and human beings profoundly affect the adherent’s identity, spiritual experience, and ethics. There are many similarities and differences between biblical and koranic thought about the being and character of God. On the one hand, the concept of God in the Koran is significantly similar to the concept of God in the Bible. Many of the same attributes of God are asserted in both.
    [Show full text]
  • The Troubling Acts of God in the Old Testament: Noah’S Flood, Sodom and Gomorrah, the Egyptian Firstborn, the Destruction of the Canaanites Mako A
    The Troubling Acts of God in the Old Testament: Noah’s Flood, Sodom and Gomorrah, the Egyptian Firstborn, the Destruction of the Canaanites Mako A. Nagasawa Last modified: March 29, 2019 Introduction: Questioning the Character of God in the Old Testament In the Old Testament, God responded to certain human choices by taking human life. Those acts include the flood of Noah (Gen.7 – 8), the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah (Gen.18), the slaying of the Egyptian firstborn (Ex.12), the death of Aaron’s sons Nadab and Abihu (Lev.10:1 – 3), the slaying of disobedient Israelites (Num.11:1 – 2), the earth opening under Korah and his rebellion (Num.16), the battle with the Midianites and Moabites (Num.22 – 25; 31), the conquest of Jericho and the Canaanites (Gen.15:16 – 21; Josh.1 – 7), and the slaying of Uzzah who touched the ark of God (2 Sam.5). I have written about God’s treatment of Israel elsewhere, so here I will limit my comments to the general category of God taking human life, especially in the flood of Noah, Sodom and Gomorrah, the Egyptian firstborn, and the Canaanites. Any time we see human injustice and evil, we must ask, ‘What kind of god do we expect?’ What are the alternatives? There are three main options: 1. A god who does nothing and looks the other way 2. A god who is actually part of the evil and mischief, like Zeus stirring up the Trojan War 3. A god who responds to human evil and injustice by stopping it in some way In general, I would rather have a god who responds to human evil by stopping it in some way.
    [Show full text]
  • Hell of Torah Part 3 of 6: Sodom & Gomorrah; Shadrach, Meshach, and Abed-Nego (Presented Around April 2015)
    Hell of Torah Part 3 of 6: Sodom & Gomorrah; Shadrach, Meshach, and Abed-Nego (Presented around April 2015) The following text is based on a message from Corner Fringe Ministries that was presented by Daniel Joseph. The original presentation can be viewed at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxmAaIm3Ve4 *Portions of the video message have been edited to present a written document. All the Scripture verses are from the New King James Version unless otherwise noted and are in the red text. Therefore, it is recommended that this document is printed in color. The Hebrew is to be read from right to left. We are in our third week of our series The Hell of Torah. Over the last couple weeks, we've looked at the reality of the judgment that is to come upon the entire world. We have looked at the fact that that judgment is going to be manifested through fire, and that fire is going to be Torah, the Law of God. Now, this week I want to take a closer look at the effects that this fiery judgment is going to have specifically how it's going to impact all of humanity. When you look at Scripture closely, you realize that the fiery judgment that is coming upon the earth is not just going to be something that is experienced by the wicked alone. You will find that the righteous are also going to experience the hell of Torah. However, for the righteous, the experience is going to be somewhat different compared to the wicked.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminalising Homosexuality and Understanding the Right to Manifest
    Criminalising Homosexuality and Understanding the Right to Manifest Religion Yet, while the Constitution protects the right of people to continue with such beliefs, it does not allow the state to turn these beliefs – even in moderate or gentle versions – into dogma imposed on the whole of society. Contents South African Constitutional Court, 19981 Overview 4 Religion and proportionality 11 Religion and government policy 21 Statements from religious leaders on LGBT matters 25 Conclusion 31 Appendix 32 This is one in a series of notes produced for the Human Dignity Trust on the criminalisation of homosexuality and good governance. Each note in the series discusses a different aspect of policy that is engaged by the continued criminalisation of homosexuality across the globe. The Human Dignity Trust is an organisation made up of international lawyers supporting local partners to uphold human rights and constitutional law in countries where private, consensual sexual conduct between adults of the same sex is criminalised. We are a registered charity no.1158093 in England & Wales. All our work, whatever country it is in, is strictly not-for-profit. 1 National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality and Another v Minister of Justice and Others [1998] ZACC 15 (Constitutional Court), para. 137. 2 3 Criminalising Homosexuality and Understanding the Right to Manifest Religion Overview 03. The note then examines whether, as a The origin of modern laws that expanding Empire in Asia, Africa and the matter of international human rights law, Pacific. For instance, the Indian Penal Code 01. Consensual sex between adults of the adherence to religious doctrine has any criminalise homosexuality of 1860 made a crime of ‘carnal knowledge same-sex is a crime in 78 jurisdictions.2 bearing on whether the state is permitted to 05.
    [Show full text]
  • BLE 2022 (Pdf)
    THE SCHOOL OF ARCHAEOLOGY, VERITAS INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY AND THE COLLEGE OF ARCHAEOLOGY & BIBLICAL HISTORY, TRINITY SOUTHWEST UNIVERSITY Bible Land Expedition, Holy Land Tour 2022 “Discovering the Biblical World” 3 EXCITING OPTIONS! Option #1: Sodom Dig + Tour of Jordan and Israel (27 Feb–13 March 2022) Option #2: Tour of Jordan and Israel (4–13 March 2022) Option #3: Tour of Israel (6–13 March 2022) [Note: add 3 days for travel, 2 at the beginning, 1 at the end) Your Expert Teachers/Guides*: Dr Steven Collins and Dr Gary Byers OVERVIEW: BLE, and countless other churches and organizations, offer Holy Land Tours. But the title “Holy Land Tour” is where the similarity ends. The fact is, there isn’t another tour available that does, or can do, what a BLE tour does. Our guides and lecturers are expert Bible scholars and archaeologists, not local guides trained to cater to religious pilgrims as opposed to people interested in real biblical history and the archaeology that reveals it so dramatically. Not only will you experience the Holy Land’s breathtaking panoramas and biblical sites, but also you’ll see minute details illuminating biblical stories, subtleties that only expert eyes can reveal. BLE tours also balance both Old and New Testament history as it happened in both the Transjordan (Jordan) and Cisjordan (Israel). We also limit group size to a single bus (unlike many of the large tours that have multiple buses and spend more time waiting at restroom stops than actually visiting sites!), which is a real plus. The 2022 theme, “Discovering the Biblical World,” focuses on great biblical characters like Abraham, Moses, Joshua, Kings David and Solomon, Elijah, John the Baptist, and Jesus.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Catholic Sexual Ethics Are Profoundly Misguided, and the Problem Reaches Back Centuries Into the Foundational Texts of Early Christianity
    How Natural is Nature? Augustine’s Sexual Ethics1 Center for Lesbian and Gay Studies, Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley February 20, 2003 Ó Bernadette J. Brooten Roman Catholic sexual ethics are profoundly misguided, and the problem reaches back centuries into the foundational texts of early Christianity. To grasp the church’s false priorities, we need only think of recent headlines. Vatican moves to bar celibate gay men from the priesthood. Catholic priest leaves the mother of his two children to die in bed of a drug overdose. Church lawyers claim that a six-year old boy was contributorily negligent in his being sexually abused by a priest. Church board dismissed accusations of clergy sexual abuse by females. Vatican warns Roman Catholic politicians against enacting laws allowing for same-sex marriage. 1 A version of this piece has appeared in Norwegian as “Naturen, loven og det alminnelige : En systematisk analyse av tidlige kristne forestillinger om seksualitet,” in Naturlig Sex? Seksualitet og kjønn i den kristne antikken, ed. Halvor Moxnes, Jostein Børtnes, and Dag Øistein Endsjø (Oslo: Gyldendal, 2002) 73–98; a different version will appear as “Nature, Law, and Custom in Augustine’s On the Good of Marriage,” in Walk in the Ways of Wisdom: Essays in honor of Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza, ed. Shelly Matthews, Cynthia Kittredge, and Melanie Johnson-DeBaufre (New York: Trinity Press International, forthcoming fall 2003). Ó Bernadette J. Brooten 1 How does all of this fit together? Is the church hierarchy simply being inconsistent here? It plans to bar celibate men from the priesthood, allows a heterosexually active priest who leaves his partner in bed to die to remain in active ministry, charges that a six-year old boy is partially responsible for his own abuse, refuses to take seriously the allegations of girls and women, and actively works against loving, consensual, long-term relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Witnessing Lot's Wife
    !1 Ariell Watson November 5, 2015 Lumen et Vita Symposium Witnessing Lot’s Wife: Traumatic Memory and Vicarious Trauma In Judeo-Christian popular imagination, the cities of “Sodom and Gomorrah” epitomize sinful hedonism and divine annihilation. In the midst of the apocalyptic scene of sulfur, fire, and destruction in the book of Genesis, we find a peculiar verse: “But Lot’s wife, behind him, looked back, and she became a pillar of salt.”1 This paper will interpret the biblical text as a tale of traumatic memory, examine the risk of vicarious trauma to caregivers, and affirm best practices in trauma care. In order to understand the role of traumatic memory and trauma care in this story, one must first identify the disruptive experiences that may have haunted Lot’s wife. The text offers very little insight to her past; we know neither her name nor her opinion of the events that led up to the family’s hasty departure from their home. One can infer, however, that Lot’s wife had witnessed several traumatic scenes in the previous hours: a mob at the door of her house; neighbors threatening to assault her husband and break in to their home; Lot offering up their unwed daughters to the sexual appetites of the crowd; and the hasty extraction of her family. On the way to safety, Lot’s wife made her fateful mistake: she “looked back,” against the angel’s instruction. Scholarly opinions diverge regarding whether the danger of “looking back” arose from the pain of grief, or from disobedience of divine injunction.
    [Show full text]
  • Deconstructing Sodom and Gomorrah: a Historical Analysis Of
    Deconstructing Sodom and Gomorrah: A Historical Analysis of the Mythology of Black Homophobia A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Lance E. Poston December 2018 © 2018 Lance E. Poston. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled Deconstructing Sodom and Gomorrah: A Historical Analysis of the Mythology of Black Homophobia by LANCE E. POSTON has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Katherine Jellison Professor of History Joseph Shields Interim Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT POSTON, LANCE E., PH.D., December 2018, History Deconstructing Sodom and Gomorrah: A Historical Analysis of the Mythology of Black Homophobia Director of Dissertation: Katherine Jellison This dissertation challenges the widespread myth that black Americans make up the most homophobic communities in the United States. After outlining the myth and illustrating that many Americans of all backgrounds had subscribed to this belief by the early 1990s, the project challenges the narrative of black homophobia by highlighting black urban neighborhoods in the first half of the twentieth century that permitted and even occasionally celebrated open displays of queerness. By the 1960s, however, the black communities that had hosted overt queerness were no longer recognizable, as the public balls, private parties, and other spaces where same-sex contacts took place were driven underground. This shift resulted from the rise of the black Civil Rights Movement, whose middle-class leadership – often comprised of ministers from the black church – rigorously promoted the respectability of the race.
    [Show full text]