A Bigger Splash’

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Bigger Splash’ The photographic source and artistic affinities of David Hockney’s ‘A bigger splash’ by MARTIN HAMMER DAVIDOCKNEY’S H A bigger splash (Fig.32), painted fifty years down from the more visible of the two trees, coincides roughly ago this year, features naturally in the artist’s current eightieth with the far-right corner of the diving-board. birthday retrospective, reviewed on pp.413–15.1 A canonical Aesthetic detachment reflected the circumstances of the pic- work in art history, the picture owes its wide appeal to many ture’s creation. A bigger splash was completed in Berkeley, where factors: legibility and economy; the visual wit inherent in im- Hockney was teaching from April to June 1967, and not in Los plying human action although no figure is visible; its evocation Angeles. In fact, the painting was the elaboration of an idea of an idyllic sunny environment, the dream of Arcadia trans- explored in two pictures produced the previous year, The little planted from the Roman Campagna to modern California; splash and The splash (both in private collections).4 n I that sense, Hockney’s precise, well-crafted execution; reproducibility; and A bigger splash comprised a distillation of Los Angeles, realised a lingering association with the Swinging Sixties and its good with the benefit of geographical and emotional distance. The vibrations. Yet the recent recycling of Hockney’s title for that of two previous versions had been sold in Hockney’s one-man a rather dark film about a Mediterranean holiday that goes bad- show at the Landau-Alan Gallery in New York in April 1967, ly wrong, suggests not merely the continuing resonance of the organised in conjunction with his London dealer, John Kas- work, but also its availability to less upbeat interpretations.2 nI min.5 The impulse to make the larger version that spring may reinserting A bigger splash into its specific historical and cultur- therefore have had a commercial dimension, looking ahead to al moment, and by employing close reading and comparative his next show. A bigger splash was exhibited early the following analysis (including with its photographic source, here identi- year at Kasmin’s, and was quickly sold.6 fied), the aim of this article is to bring out some of the complex- If audiences and collectors remote from Los Angeles relished ities and ambiguities of the painting. the exotic theme, they also doubtless appreciated Hockney’s The work draws one in, spatially and imaginatively. Judg- modern idiom. The intensity of colour, underlying clarity and ing from the grisaille reflections in the window, the urban set- geometry, and the use of flat, unmodulated paint, acrylic rather ting wraps around the pool, into which an individual has just than oil, applied with a roller, and with masking-tape establish- plunged, the human presence reduced to the merest suggestion ing sharp edges, would all have brought to mind the large ab- of fleshy pink at the base of the splash. The diving-board pro- stract paintings of Kenneth Noland or his British counterpart, jects from the viewer’s side of the pool. Metaphorically speaking Robyn Denny.7 Such artists were being exhibited to critical we, too, are encouraged to take the plunge, to seek out layers acclaim at Kasmin’s, which largely operated as a London out- of meaning and association beneath the serene, flat façade. Yet post of post-painterly Abstraction.8 Hockney recalled building that immersion coexists with an inbuilt distance. The diver has up A bigger splash initially as an arrangement of blocks of flat absented him- or herself, leaving us high and dry. The omission colour, which were then rendered representational through the of the section of the pool surround in the foreground serves to insertion of pockets of detail. Similarly, he noted that the close- disembody the viewer. Although the picture contains natural- ly related painting A lawn sprinkler (1967; Fig.33) ‘looked at one istic detail, it comes across as artfully contrived and simplified. point exactly like a symmetrical Robin [sic] Denny painting’.9 An image of implied momentary, perhaps spontaneous, action In A bigger splash, Hockney’s palette and diving-board could is suspended within a painting that appears highly controlled in be seen to allude to works by Denny such as Ted Bentley (1961; the manner of its execution, ‘a balanced composition’ in Hock- private collection) and Little man (1964–65; private collection).10 ney’s words.3 e W might register, for instance, that the white In the latter, the central vertical strip, animated surround and patch at the heart of the splash is positioned on the painting’s white border may even have triggered associations with pool central vertical axis. The unbroken transverse band at the far imagery for Hockney. side of the pool occupies the horizontal centre of the painting, A bigger splash must have seemed poised, knowingly and ap- while the area above is bisected by zones describing the build- pealingly, between abstraction and figuration. It is also ambiva- ing and the flat blue sky. The perspective of the diving-board lent in tone. Although most perceive a celebratory intention, recedes in the direction of the small chair, and its ochre colour spectators might also identify an ironic aspect to Hockney’s de- is picked up in the building’s flat roof. A vertical, continuing pictions of the Californian good life. At the affirmative end of 1 C. Stephens and A. Wilson, eds.: exh cat. David Hockney, London (Tate 5 Exh. cat. David Hockney: New Paintings and Drawings, New York (Landau-Alan Britain), Paris (Centre Pompidou) and New York (Metropolitan Museum of Art) Gallery) 1967. 2017–18. 6 Exh. cat. David Hockney: a splash, a lawn, two rooms, two stains, some neat cushions 2 A Bigger Splash, directed by Luca Guadagnino. 2015. and a table . painted, London (Kasmin Ltd) January–February 1968. The paint- 3 N. Stangos: David Hockney by David Hockney, London and New York 1975, p.125. ing was purchased from Kasmin Ltd in 1981 by Sheridan, Marquess of Dufferin 4 Ibid., pp.124 and 161. and Ava. 386 m a y 2017 • c l i x • t h e b u r l i n g t o n m a g a z i n e LAY_HAMMER_DavidHockney.indd 386 13/04/2017 16:01 DAVID HOCKNEY’S ‘A BIGGER SPLASH’ 32. A bigger splash, by David Hockney. 1967. Canvas, 242.5 by 243.9 cm. (Tate, London; © David Hockney). the scale, outdoor pools were bound up with an erotic frisson the focus of family life, a latter-day ‘hearth’ for one commenta- in both hetero- and homosexual milieux. The motif offered an tor in 1967, Hockney’s variants on it could be seen to extend his obvious pretext for the display of nearly naked male bodies, as ‘assimilationist’ and domesticated vision of homosexual iden- adapted elsewhere by Hockney from magazines such as Phy- tity.12 One critic discerned oblique self-portraiture in this image sique Pictorial.11 Given the status of the pool in Los Angeles as of ‘undiluted pleasure and satisfaction’: 7 The Tate acquired Noland’s Gift (1961–62) in 1966, see http://www.tate.org. 10 Reproduced in D.A. Mellor: The Art of Robyn Denny, London 2002, pp.74 and 114. uk/art/artworks/noland-gift-t00898/text-catalogue-entry, accessed 17th January 11 On the gay dimension, see T. Stallings: ‘From Beefcake to Skatecake: Shifting 2017. Depictions of Masculinity and the Backyard Swimming Pool in Southern Cali- 8 See L. Tickner: ‘The Kasmin Gallery, 1963–1972’, Oxford Art Journal 30, 2 fornia’, in D. Cornell, ed.: Backyard Oasis: The Swimming Pool in Southern California (2007), p.263. Photography 1945–1982, Munich, London and New York 2012, pp.128–71. 9 Stangos, op. cit. (note 3), p.126. 12 C. Whiting: Pop L.A.: Art and the City in the 1960s, Berkeley 2006, p.124. t h e b u r l i n g t o n m a g a z i n e • c l i x • m a y 2017 387 LAY_HAMMER_DavidHockney.indd 387 13/04/2017 16:02 DAVID HOCKNEY’S ‘A BIGGER SPLASH’ 33. A lawn sprinkler, by David Hockney. 1967. Canvas, 122 by 122 cm. (Museum of Contemporary Art, Tokyo; © David Hockney). The subject of A Bigger Splash is both a disappearance and an was currently emerging in New York.15 The association with immersion – the vanishing of the diver, his entry into the Hockney’s image may seem far-fetched, although we should pool – which was surely Hockney’s way of dramatising his note that Duchamp was by then a focus of attention in Califor- own feelings on having arrived in America. He too had made nia, following his 1963 retrospective in Pasadena.16 In A bigger his getaway, had plunged into a new and delightful place. The splash one might also discern an ironic reference to Abstract artist does not actually show us his alter ego, the diver, revel- Expressionism. Hockney certainly knew the recent, more ling in the sudden silence of underwater. But he makes much pastoral work of Willem de Kooning, as in Merritt Parkway of the splash that hides him from us [. .] a flurry of excited (Fig.34), with its dramatic explosion of white floated against white paint into which the painter seems to have distilled all deep flat blue and audaciously applied with house-painters’ the happiness and energy of being young, and in love, and brushes. Hockney surely conceived his own fastidious and more exactly where you want to be; an ejaculation of joy.13 illustrative variation on the splash theme as a knowing refer- ence to such precursors, especially given that De Kooning’s By extension, the picture might be located within a minor art- 1959 sell-out show at the Sidney Janis Gallery in New York was istic tributary, rooted in Dada, whereby the splash motif is reviewed in Time magazine under the title ‘Big Splash’.
Recommended publications
  • David Hockney's Portrait of Sir David Webster to Be Offered in the Post
    PRESS RELEASE | LONDON DAVID HOCKNEY’S PORTRAIT OF SIR DAVID WEBSTER TO BE OFFERED IN THE POST-WAR AND CONTEMPORARY ART EVENING AUCTION THE PAINTING IS BEING SOLD TO RAISE VITAL FUNDS FOR LONDON’S ROYAL OPERA HOUSE CHRISTIE’S 20th CENTURY: PARIS TO LONDON SERIES 22 OCTOBER 2020 David Hockney, Portrait of Sir David Webster (1971, estimate: £11-18 million) London – Christie’s will present David Hockney’s Portrait of Sir David Webster, an exquisite tribute to Sir David Webster, the former General Administrator of the Royal Opera House and a defining influence, in the Post-War and Contemporary Art Evening Auction on 22 October 2020. Painted in 1971, it depicts Webster in the artist’s studio, seated upon a Mies van der Rohe ‘MR’ chair before a glass table. The painting is being offered by the Royal Opera House with an estimate of £11-18 million. Proceeds from the sale will contribute towards vital funding required by the world-renowned arts venue to alleviate the financial impact of coronavirus, the most serious crisis the organisation has had to face. This will allow the Royal Opera House not just to survive but to thrive in its future programming. Rendered on a grand scale, the work unites Hockney’s flair for human observation with his lifelong passion for opera. From 1975 until 1992, David Hockney would design sets for venues including Glyndebourne, the Metropolitan Opera in New York and the Royal Opera House itself. Inviting stylistic comparison with Hockney’s landmark double portraits produced between 1968 and 1975, Portrait of Sir David Webster demonstrates the meticulous exploration of space, perspective, lighting and compositional drama that would eventually come to inform his theatrical endeavours.
    [Show full text]
  • R.B. Kitaj: Obsessions
    PRESS RELEASE 2012 R.B. Kitaj: Obsessions The Art of Identity (21 Feb - 16 June 2013) Jewish Museum London Analyst for Our Time (23 Feb - 16 June 2013) Pallant House Gallery, Chichester, West Sussex A major retrospective exhibition of the work of R. B. R.B. Kitaj, Juan de la Cruz, 1967, Oil on canvas, Astrup Fearnley Museum of Modern Art, Oslo; If Not, Not, 1975, Oil and black chalk on canvas, Scottish Kitaj (1932-2007) - one of the most significant National Gallery of Modern Art, Edinburgh © R.B. Kitaj Estate. painters of the post-war period – displayed concurrently in two major venues for its only UK showing. Later he enrolled at the Ruskin School of Art in Oxford, and then, in 1959, he went to the Royal College of Art in This international touring show is the first major London, where he was a contemporary of artists such as retrospective exhibition in the UK since the artist’s Patrick Caulfield and David Hockney, the latter of whom controversial Tate show in the mid-1990s and the first remained his closest painter friend throughout his life. comprehensive exhibition of the artist’s oeuvre since his death in 2007. Comprised of more than 70 works, R.B. During the 1960s Kitaj, together with his friends Francis Kitaj: Obsessions comes to the UK from the Jewish Museum Bacon, Frank Auerbach and Lucian Freud were Berlin and will be shown concurrently at Pallant House instrumental in pioneering a new, figurative art which defied Gallery, Chichester and the Jewish Museum London. the trend in abstraction and conceptualism.
    [Show full text]
  • RICHARD PRINCE I CHANGED MY NAME, 1988 (I Never Had a Penny to My Name, So I Changed My Name.)
    MY ACCOUNT PREFERRED LOYALTY PROGRAM SIGN UP FOR EMAIL RECENTLY VIEWED WISH LIST MY BAG 0 FREE SHIPPING ON ORDERS OF $99 OR MORE DETAILS* Can we help you find something? WOMEN MEN UNDERWEAR FRAGRANCE HOME SALE PROJECTS 1 RICHARD PRINCE I CHANGED MY NAME, 1988 (I never had a penny to my name, so I changed my name.) Richard Prince, I Changed My Name, 1988 © Richard Prince LULU Acrylic and screen print on canvas (142.5 cm x 198.7 cm) Photographed by Willy Vanderperre at the Rubell Family Collection, Miami. Monochromatic Jokes Richard Prince’s Jokes series remains among his But if you bothered listening to one there was nothing most iconic. On the eve of a 2013 retrospective at recorded on it. New York’s Nahmad Contemporary Gallery, writer and Only white noise to greet you. kindred spirit Bill Powers riffed on the essence of He thought he might give the cassettes out at galleries like demo tapes. these works for the show’s catalog. The piece is Like musicians did at record labels to get signed. excerpted below. Within a year he began silk-screening jokes on canvas. He wasn’t a funny guy. He made them with black text on a white background, He wasn’t the life of the party. but then decided that wasn’t quite right. But most comedy isn’t about entertaining as it is about He painted over them. survival. There’s an installation shot in Spiritual America before And he wanted to live. he destroyed the paintings. He didn’t make art looking for love.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminsterresearch the Artist Biopic
    WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/westminsterresearch The artist biopic: a historical analysis of narrative cinema, 1934- 2010 Bovey, D. This is an electronic version of a PhD thesis awarded by the University of Westminster. © Mr David Bovey, 2015. The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the authors and/or copyright owners. Whilst further distribution of specific materials from within this archive is forbidden, you may freely distribute the URL of WestminsterResearch: ((http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/). In case of abuse or copyright appearing without permission e-mail [email protected] 1 THE ARTIST BIOPIC: A HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF NARRATIVE CINEMA, 1934-2010 DAVID ALLAN BOVEY A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Westminster for the degree of Master of Philosophy December 2015 2 ABSTRACT The thesis provides an historical overview of the artist biopic that has emerged as a distinct sub-genre of the biopic as a whole, totalling some ninety films from Europe and America alone since the first talking artist biopic in 1934. Their making usually reflects a determination on the part of the director or star to see the artist as an alter-ego. Many of them were adaptations of successful literary works, which tempted financial backers by having a ready-made audience based on a pre-established reputation. The sub-genre’s development is explored via the grouping of films with associated themes and the use of case studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction and Will Be Subject to Additions and Corrections the Early History of El Museo Del Barrio Is Complex
    This timeline and exhibition chronology is in process INTRODUCTION and will be subject to additions and corrections The early history of El Museo del Barrio is complex. as more information comes to light. All artists’ It is intertwined with popular struggles in New York names have been input directly from brochures, City over access to, and control of, educational and catalogues, or other existing archival documentation. cultural resources. Part and parcel of the national We apologize for any oversights, misspellings, or Civil Rights movement, public demonstrations, inconsistencies. A careful reader will note names strikes, boycotts, and sit-ins were held in New York that shift between the Spanish and the Anglicized City between 1966 and 1969. African American and versions. Names have been kept, for the most part, Puerto Rican parents, teachers and community as they are in the original documents. However, these activists in Central and East Harlem demanded variations, in themselves, reveal much about identity that their children— who, by 1967, composed the and cultural awareness during these decades. majority of the public school population—receive an education that acknowledged and addressed their We are grateful for any documentation that can diverse cultural heritages. In 1969, these community- be brought to our attention by the public at large. based groups attained their goal of decentralizing This timeline focuses on the defining institutional the Board of Education. They began to participate landmarks, as well as the major visual arts in structuring school curricula, and directed financial exhibitions. There are numerous events that still resources towards ethnic-specific didactic programs need to be documented and included, such as public that enriched their children’s education.
    [Show full text]
  • R.B. Kitaj Papers, 1950-2007 (Bulk 1965-2006)
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt3q2nf0wf No online items Finding Aid for the R.B. Kitaj papers, 1950-2007 (bulk 1965-2006) Processed by Tim Holland, 2006; Norma Williamson, 2011; machine-readable finding aid created by Caroline Cubé. UCLA Library, Department of Special Collections Manuscripts Division Room A1713, Charles E. Young Research Library Box 951575 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1575 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.library.ucla.edu/libraries/special/scweb/ © 2011 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid for the R.B. Kitaj 1741 1 papers, 1950-2007 (bulk 1965-2006) Descriptive Summary Title: R.B. Kitaj papers Date (inclusive): 1950-2007 (bulk 1965-2006) Collection number: 1741 Creator: Kitaj, R.B. Extent: 160 boxes (80 linear ft.)85 oversized boxes Abstract: R.B. Kitaj was an influential and controversial American artist who lived in London for much of his life. He is the creator of many major works including; The Ohio Gang (1964), The Autumn of Central Paris (after Walter Benjamin) 1972-3; If Not, Not (1975-76) and Cecil Court, London W.C.2. (The Refugees) (1983-4). Throughout his artistic career, Kitaj drew inspiration from history, literature and his personal life. His circle of friends included philosophers, writers, poets, filmmakers, and other artists, many of whom he painted. Kitaj also received a number of honorary doctorates and awards including the Golden Lion for Painting at the XLVI Venice Biennale (1995). He was inducted into the American Academy of Arts and Letters (1982) and the Royal Academy of Arts (1985).
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    SCHIRMER/MOSEL VERLAG CUVILLIÉSSTRASSE 14 A • D-81679 MÜNCHEN TELEFON 089/21 26 70- 0 • TELEFAX 089/33 86 95 e - mail: press@schirmer- mosel.com Munich, September 2017 PRESS RELEASE Hidden treasures: Discovered only recently, the autobiography of American painter R. B. Kitaj is published for the first time ever R. B. Kitaj: Confessions of an Old Jewish Painter Preface by David Hockney th R. B. Kitaj R. B. Kitaj (1932-2007) is one of the most intriguing 20 -century artists. Confessions of an Born into a Russo-Jewish family near Cleveland, Ohio, 17-year-old Kitaj Old Jewish Painter Preface by David Hockney spent 5 years at sea aboard a Norwegian freighter. He went on to study art Edited and with an epilogue by in New York and Vienna. A Royal College of Art stipend made him move Eckhart J. Gillen to London where he became a celebrated artist. Curating The Human Clay, 400 pages, 212 ill. in colour a 1976 show of figurative comtemporary British artists, he coined the term ISBN 978-3-8296-0813-8 “School of London” for the artistic circle around Francis Bacon, Frank Auerbach, € 39.80 £ 44.00 US $ 45.00 Available immediately! Lucian Freud, and Leon Kossoff. In 1991 he was elected a member of the Royal Academy, one of only three American painters to be thus honored in the history of the institution. A major 1994 retrospective at London’s Tate Gallery failed to produce Kitaj’s international breakthrough but was unanimously panned by British “I was born on a Norwegian cargo ship critics instead.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is Your Favourite Artist and What Is Your Favourite Piece of Art Work?
    Who is your favourite artist and what is your favourite piece of art work? I was recently asked who my favourite artist was and found it a difficult question to answer. There are so many artists who I could say are my favourite and for many different reasons. I chose Mark Rothko because in 2016 we took some students to the Abstract Expressionism Exhibition at the RA and whilst standing in front of Rothko’s paintings I felt like the artist had achieved his aim. His prime concern was to create an art form that stood in its own, not a mere reporting of what was seen or thought by the artist. He was interested in engaging the viewer in a timeless experience through the immediacy of the canvas. Abstract Expressionist art invites artist and viewer to meet. While the artist expresses their emotions and conveys a sense of their presence in the work, the viewer’s perception is the final component in the mix. The intensity of this encounter can also (and it was) be heightened by the way the work is displayed. Mark Rothko Red on Maroon, 1959 Mark Rothko Mark Rothko (1903-70) was an American painter of Latvian Jewish descent. He did not personally subscribe to any art movement, but he is generally identified as an abstract expressionist. He wrote; “A painting lives by companionship, expanding and quickening in the eyes of the sensitive observer.” Favourite artworks The following slides are some of our favourite artworks and they are all very different works by very different artists.
    [Show full text]
  • William Gropper's
    US $25 The Global Journal of Prints and Ideas March – April 2014 Volume 3, Number 6 Artists Against Racism and the War, 1968 • Blacklisted: William Gropper • AIDS Activism and the Geldzahler Portfolio Zarina: Paper and Partition • Social Paper • Hieronymus Cock • Prix de Print • Directory 2014 • ≤100 • News New lithographs by Charles Arnoldi Jesse (2013). Five-color lithograph, 13 ¾ x 12 inches, edition of 20. see more new lithographs by Arnoldi at tamarind.unm.edu March – April 2014 In This Issue Volume 3, Number 6 Editor-in-Chief Susan Tallman 2 Susan Tallman On Fierce Barbarians Associate Publisher Miguel de Baca 4 Julie Bernatz The Geldzahler Portfoio as AIDS Activism Managing Editor John Murphy 10 Dana Johnson Blacklisted: William Gropper’s Capriccios Makeda Best 15 News Editor Twenty-Five Artists Against Racism Isabella Kendrick and the War, 1968 Manuscript Editor Prudence Crowther Shaurya Kumar 20 Zarina: Paper and Partition Online Columnist Jessica Cochran & Melissa Potter 25 Sarah Kirk Hanley Papermaking and Social Action Design Director Prix de Print, No. 4 26 Skip Langer Richard H. Axsom Annu Vertanen: Breathing Touch Editorial Associate Michael Ferut Treasures from the Vault 28 Rowan Bain Ester Hernandez, Sun Mad Reviews Britany Salsbury 30 Programs for the Théâtre de l’Oeuvre Kate McCrickard 33 Hieronymus Cock Aux Quatre Vents Alexandra Onuf 36 Hieronymus Cock: The Renaissance Reconceived Jill Bugajski 40 The Art of Influence: Asian Propaganda Sarah Andress 42 Nicola López: Big Eye Susan Tallman 43 Jane Hammond: Snapshot Odyssey On the Cover: Annu Vertanen, detail of Breathing Touch (2012–13), woodcut on Maru Rojas 44 multiple sheets of machine-made Kozo papers, Peter Blake: Found Art: Eggs Unique image.
    [Show full text]
  • David Hockney Drawing from Life 27 February – 28 June 2020
    David Hockney Drawing from Life 27 February – 28 June 2020 Image: David Hockney “No. 1201”, 14th March 2012, iPad Drawing © David Hockney Teachers’ Notes Information and Activities for Teachers These notes focus on Hockney’s drawing practice and on a small number of interconnecting themes developed over the artist’s career. They are intended to help students look critically at Hockney’s work, and enable group discussion. They can be used to assist teaching in the Gallery as well as in the classroom. The questions, discussion points and activities are aimed at Key Stage 3-5 Secondary Art, but can be adapted for younger age groups and your students’ needs. The suggestions for activities are designed for students and teachers to explore and further research the work of David Hockney, and create their own work in response. 1 Teachers’ guidelines David Hockney: Drawing from Life Teachers Practical Drawing Workshop 16 May 2020 10.00-15.30 The first major exhibition devoted to David Hockney’s drawings in over twenty years, David Inspired by the exhibition, this practical CPD Hockney: Drawing from Life, explores Hockney session aims to energise teachers’ practice of as a draughtsman from the 1950s to the present drawing and portraiture and inspire confidence by focusing on depictions of himself and a in drawing techniques. Artist Robin Lee Hall will small group of sitters close to him: his muse, work with the group to improve technical skills, Celia Birtwell; his mother, Laura Hockney; experiment with drawing approaches and develop and friends, the curator, Gregory Evans, ideas to take back to the classroom.
    [Show full text]
  • Painters Painting Cat Bn.FH11
    el cinema del CCCB Miró, l'altre, Pere Portabella Painters Painting Miró, l'altre, Pere Portabella 14 DES. 2008 1 XCÈNTRIC 14/DES/08 Entrevista amb Pere Portabella Després de Nocturn 29 (en 35 mm.) va ser quan va tenir lloc el teu pas al format de 16 mm., amb els tres curtmetratges sobre Joan Miró. Explica'ns com van sorgir. Em van demanar que col·laborés en una exposició (Miró-Altre) organitzada pel col·legi d'Arquitectes. Es tractava de donar un panorama de l'obra de Miró, abans, durant i després de la guerra (1936-1939). Denunciar la manipulació de la qual era objecte Miró pel règim durant lAny Miró declarat pel Ministeri d'Informació i Turisme el 1969 (murals pertot arreu, el volien nomenar membre Miró, l'altre, Pere Portabella de l'Acadèmia...). Així van néixer Aidez lEspagne (Miró 1937), Premis Nacionals i Miró, laltre, totes del 1969 . [...] Miró, laltre és una aproximació al treballador, al pintor, a l'home. Painters Painting Vulguis o no, Miró amb el seu nom i la seva presència desperta de seguida la imatge de l'artista tradicional com a geni creador Miró, l'altre, Pere Portabella. Espanya, 1969, 15 min, vídeo inaccessible. El film el que pretén és una presa de contacte amb Painters Painting: The New York Art Scene 1940-1972, Emile de l'home i la seva activitat. La banda sonora provoca aquest Antonio. EUA, 1972, 116 min, 35 mm distanciament irònic, que va trencant constantment amb l'altra imatge. PAINTERS PAINTING Vaig rodar precisament la realització d'un mural (en les vidrieres del Col·legi d'Arquitectes de Barcelona) perquè m'interessava el Painters painting és un gran collage documental sobre fet que després ell mateix ho destruís.
    [Show full text]
  • Year 10 Photography Project Introduction to David Hockney and Joiners
    Year 10 Photography Project Introduction to David Hockney and Joiners About Hockney • Born on July 9, 1937 in Bradford, Yorkshire, England, David Hockney is considered one of the most influential British artists of the twentieth century. In the years (1982-87) Hockney explored the use of the camera, making composite images of Polaroid photographs arranged in a rectangular grid. • Later he used regular 35- millimetre prints to create photocollages, compiling a ‘complete’ picture from a series of individually photographed details. Because the photographs were taken from different perspectives and at slightly different times, the result is work that has an affinity with Cubism. • These collages, he used to call “joiners”, have different subjects from portraits to still life, and from representational to abstract styles. • Hockney’s creation of the “joiners” occurred accidentally. He noticed in the late sixties that photographers were using cameras with wide- angle lenses to take pictures. He did not like such photographs because they always came out somewhat distorted. Working on a painting of a living room and terrace in Los Angeles, he took Polaroid shots of the living room and glued them together as a preparatory work, not intending for them to be a composition on their own. Upon looking at the final composition, he realized it created a narrative, as if the viewer was moving through the room. He began to work more and more with photography after this discovery and even stopped painting for a period of time to exclusively pursue this new style of photography. • As well as narrative, there is layered time.
    [Show full text]