Lassnet Conference Was Held at the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) in Delhi in 2009
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Thinking with Evidence Seeking Certainty, India Habitat Centre | New Delhi | New Delhi India Habitat Centre International Conference International Conference Making Truth 60 Sessions 3 Featured Sessions Opening and Closing Plenary 10-12 Dec 2016 net 9 am onwards LASS th the law and social science s 4 research network Thinking with Evidence Seeking Certainty, Making Truth Law and Social Sciences Research Network Conference Fourth Edition ABOUT THE CONFERENCE The inaugural LASSnet conference was held at the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) in Delhi in 2009. A subsequent conference was held at the Foundation for Liberal and Management Education (FLAME) in Pune in 2010. In 2012 the third LASSNet conference was a collaboration between the Law and Society Trust, Colombo, and the Department of Law, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. These conferences identified a number of priorities for the research, study and practice of law in South Asia. Intimate connections between Evidence and Law is one such fundamental question. The indeterminacy in law could be read both as a problem of truth and also as one that plagues disciplines. The question of evidence has been central to the formation of disciplines and the claims that they make upon knowledge. For initiatives such as LASSnet, the imperative of thinking with evidence — in these times of virtual virality, forensic imaginaries and ephemeral archives — serves as a fertile ground on which we can stage discussions of the perils, pleasures, meanings and methods of inter-disciplinarity. While disciplines are defined partially by the evidentiary protocols that they follow, the very nature of inter-disciplinary enquiry calls into crisis the idea of a single protocol. The methodological concerns with the seeking and making of certainty and truth implicate a whole range of disciplines: anthropology, art, history, law, religion, philosophy, politics, economics, literature, theatre, and science, to name just a few. The stakes in thinking with evidence are very high since doing so raises the core epistemological claims, regarding not just of what, but also how we know. This is rendered all the more difficult because the very grounds of evidence are themselves shifting terrain, subject not only to developments in science and technology but also to forms of historical consciousness and social knowledge. LASSnet 1 PROGRAMME SCHEDULE Severyna Magill, Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat Pieces of Paper, Evidence and Customary Law in South Africa in the Early 20th Century Natasha Erlank, University of Johannesburg, South Africa 8.00am – 9.00am: Registration and Tea Session 1.3 Saturday 10 December Roundtable Discussion: Session 1: 9.00am – 10.45am Sexuality, Gender Identity and Sedition Jacaranda 1 Session 1.1 Panel Coordinator: Svati P. Shah, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA Rites, Religion and Violence Chair & Discussant: Svati P. Shah, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA Silver Oak 1 Rohit De, Department of History, Yale University, New Haven, USA Aniruddhan Vasudevan, Department of Anthropology, University of Texas, Austin, USA Chair & Discussant: Manisha Sethi, Centre for the Study of Comparative Religions and Gautam Bhan, Indian Institute for Human Settlements, Delhi Civilizations, Jamia Millia Islamia, Delhi Nitya Vasudevan, Baduku Community College, Samvada, Bengaluru Routinization of Evidence and the Construction of ‘Truth’: The Relevance of Santhara among Jains Session 1.4 Deblina Dey, Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat Politics of Evidence Sati, Sacrifice and Sacred Space: Rights and Rites in Contemporary India and the Right to Health Care Saumya Saxena, University of Cambridge, UK Jacaranda 2 States of Karma: An Insight into Modern Structural Violence Kiran Konkipudi, Azim Premji University, Bengaluru Panel Coordinator: E. Premdas Pinto, Centre for Health and Social Justice, Delhi Narratives of Harm and Justice: Evidence and Epistemology in Indian and Tibetan cases Chair and Discussant: Vishwas Devaiah, Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global Tamara Relis, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK University, Sonipat Coercive and Targeted Population Control Policies, Public Health Counter-Evidence Session 1.2 and the Response of Courts to the Denial of Women’s Right to Health Care Evidencing Gender Abhijit Das, Sana Contractor and A. R. Nanda, Centre for Health and Social Justice, Delhi Silver Oak 2 Shifting Policies in a Weakened Public Health System and Judicial Response to Denial of Maternal & Reproductive Rights to Health Care Chair & Discussant: Ved Kumari, Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, Delhi E. Premdas Pinto, Surekha Daleta & Deepak Kumar, Centre for Health and Social Justice, Delhi Dilemmas and Conflicts in the Interface of Therapeutic and Medico-legal Evidence Between Myths and Meanings of ‘Misuse’: Citing the ‘Unscrupulous Wife’ in Domestic and the Issues of Right to Treatment of the Survivors of Sexual Violence: Violence Litigations in India Padma Deosthali and Sangita Rege, Senior Research Fellow, CEHAT, Mumbai Jhuma Sen, Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat ‘Doctored’ Evidence to ‘cul-de-sac’ of Evidence: The Challenges in Fixing Marginalisation of Women in Seeking Justice from District Courts in Haryana under the Accountability of Medical Doctors in Patient Rights Violations in the Private Health Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Care Sector LASSnet 3 E. Premdas Pinto, Centre for Health and Social Justice, Delhi and Akhila Vasan, Karnataka Janaarogya Chaluvali, Bengaluru Tea: 10.45am - 11.15am Session 2: 11.15am – 1.00pm Session 1.5 Evidence, Truth and Justice Session 2.1 Willow The Whole isn’t the Sum of its Parts: Continuums of Feminist Political Thought and Practice, Chair & Discussant: Latika Vashist, Indian Law Institute, Delhi A Panel Dedicated to Priya Thangarajah Silver Oak 1 What is ‘Truth’ and ‘Justice’? Challenges and Dynamics within the Transitional Justice Processes in Sri Lanka Panel Coordinators: Ponni Arasu, Gautam Bhan and Siddharth Narrain Bhavani Fonseka, Centre for Policy Alternatives, Colombo, Sri Lanka Chair & Discussant: Uma Chakravarti, Feminist Historian, Delhi Evidentiary Instant: Seeing, Wording, and the Line of Testimony Fazil Moradi, Research Network, Law, Organization, Science and Technology, “Deconstructing Activist Spaces in Post-War Sri Lanka”: Dilemmas of Feminist Politics University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany Cayathri Divakalala, Institute for Social Justice, Sydney, Australia Thinking with Evidence: A Case of Enforced Disappearances in Jammu and Kashmir Fuzzy Logic: Trans* Identities and Legibility before the Law Gazala Peer, Centre for the Study of Law and Governance, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi Chayanika Shah, LABIA, Mumbai The Alumni of Massacres: Self-evidence and Legal Phenomenology Kunan Poshpora 1991 : What the Case Diary Remembers Arnab Chatterjee, Former Fellow, Indian Institute of Advanced Studies, Shimla Shrimoyee Nandini Ghosh, Centre for the Study of Law and Governance, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi Voices from the Margins: Revisiting Women’s Liberation, Seeking Alliances Session 1.6 Ranjana Padhi, Independent activist and writer, Bhubaneswar Law, Technology and Evidence Gulmohar Session 2.2 Chair & Discussant: Usha Ramanathan, Independent Researcher, Delhi Unmaking Reason as Evidence Silver Oak 2 Draft DNA Profiling Bill: The Social Costs of Setting up a Technical Evidence Collection Machinery Chair & Discussant: Pritam Baruah, Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global Bhavna Jha, Independent Researcher, Bengaluru University, Sonipat Regulation in the Face of Scientific Uncertainty and Limited Evidence: The Case of Nanotechnology Before, Behind and Beneath the ‘Case’: Reversing the Jurisprudential Perspective on Indrani Barpujari, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Good Governance & Analysis, Bhopal Legal Reasoning From Science in Lab to Regulatory Rules: Translocations of GM Mosquitoes Peer Zumbansen, Dickson Poon Transnational Law Institute, King’s College, London, UK Mahendra Shahare, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi Remorse in Mitigation of Sentence: The Anomaly of Judicial Confidence Despite The Force of Evidence: DNA and Law in India Conceptual Indeterminacy Manpreet Dhillon, Centre for the Study of Law and Governance, Jawaharlal Nehru Andra le Roux-Kemp, School of Law, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong University, Delhi LASSnet 5 Legal Pluralism, Documents and Evidence: Exploring Judicial Reasoning in the Religious The Paper Book: Law, Context and Writing in a hierarchical judicial system and Civil Courts of Kanpur Shishir Bail, School of Policy and Governance, Azim Premji University, Bengaluru Suchandra Ghosh & Anindita Chakrabarti, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Session 2.5 Session 2.3 Evidence, Law and Governmentality Colonial and Post Colonial Legalscapes Willow Jacaranda 1 Chair and Discussant: R. Sudarshan, Jindal School of Government and Public Policy, Chair & Discussant: Radhika Singha, Centre for Historical Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat University, Delhi ‘Economic Pragmatism’ in Calculation of Minimum Wages: Challenges to the Policy Navigating the Colonial and the Postcolonial: Legal Elites of 20th Century South Asia Sophy Joseph, National Law School of India University, Bengaluru Cynthia Farid, University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, USA Understanding Conflict