Clinical Case Discussion Calculus Anuria in a Spina Bifida Patient, Who Had Solitary Functioning Kidney and Recurrent Renal Calc

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Clinical Case Discussion Calculus Anuria in a Spina Bifida Patient, Who Had Solitary Functioning Kidney and Recurrent Renal Calc Spinal Cord (2004) 42, 7–13 & 2004 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved 1362-4393/04 $25.00 www.nature.com/sc Clinical Case Discussion Calculus anuria in a spina bifida patient, who had solitary functioning kidney and recurrent renal calculi S Vaidyanathan*,1, BM Soni1, J-J Wyndaele2, AZ Buczynski3, E Iwatsubo4, M Stoehrer5, H Madersbacher6, R Peschel6, G Singh1, JWH Watt1, PL Hughes7 and P Sett1 1Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, District General Hospital, Southport, UK; 2Centrum Urologische Revalidatie, Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Edegem, Antwerpen, Belgium; 3Metropolitan Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Neurourology, Konstancin, Poland; 4Kyushu University School of Medicine, LWC Spinal Injuries Centre, Igisu, Iizuka, 820-8508, Japan; 5Urological Department, Berufsgenossenschaftliches, Murmau, Germany; 6University Klinik Innsbruck, Anichstrae 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria; 7Department of Radiology, District General Hospital, Southport, UK Study design: Clinical case report with comments by colleagues from Austria, Belgium, Germany, Japan, and Poland. Objectives: To discuss challenges in the management of spinal bifida patients, who have marked kyphoscoliosis and no vascular access. Setting: Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, UK. Methods: A female patient, who was born with spina bifida, paraplegia and solitary right kidney, had undergone ileal loop urinary diversion. Renal calculi were noted in 1986. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy was performed in 1989 and there was no residual stone fragment. However, she developed recurrence of calculi in the lower pole of the right kidney in 1991. Intravenous urography, performed in 1995, revealed right staghorn calculus and hydronephrosis. Chest X-ray showed markedly restricted lung volume due to severe kyphoscoliosis. In 2000, she was declared unsuitable for anaesthesia due to a lack of venous access and a high likelihood of difficulty in weaning off the ventilator in the postoperative period. In June 2002, she developed anuria (urine output ¼ 18 ml/24 h) due to ball-valve-type obstruction by a renal stone at the ureteropelvic junction. Urea: 14.4 mmol/l; creatinine: 236 ml/l. Ultrasound showed right hydronephrosis. Percutaneous nephrostomy was performed. Results: Following relief of urinary tract obstruction, there was postobstructive diuresis (3765 ml/24 h). However, the patient expired 19 days later due to progressive respiratory failure. Conclusion: In this spina bifida patient, who had reached the age of 35 years, severe kyphoscoliosis and lack of vascular access presented insurmountable challenges to implement the desired surgical procedure for removal of stones from a solitary kidney. Spinal Cord (2004) 42, 7–13. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101545 Keywords: spina bifida; anuria; kidney calculi Introduction A retrospective reviewof 327 patients withneural tube increased risk of renal calculus formation. Apart from a defects showed that there is a higher incidence of high incidence of nephrolithiasis, the prevalence of renal nephrolithiasis in patients with neural tube defects than parenchymal damage is also high in patients with spinal in the general population, and the risk of stone bifida. In all, 19.4% of the patients attending a recurrence is also elevated.1 Renal stones were noted multidisciplinary spina bifida clinic had renal parench- in 10.7% of those 12 years old or older. Interventional ymal damage.3 We present a case of calculus anuria in a management of the stones in these patients was 35-year-old female patient with spina bifida, who had associated with 87% recurrence rates after intervention. severe kyphoscoliosis and almost no vascular access. Rege et al2 observed that children with myelomeningo- coele, who had ileal conduit urinary diversion, had an Case history *Correspondence: S Vaidyanathan, Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, A 35-year-old female patient presented in 2002 with a District General Hospital, Town Lane, Southport PR8 6PN, UK history of not passing urine for approximately 24 h. The Calculus anuria in a spina bifida patient S Vaidyanathan et al 8 day before presentation, she had developed pain in the stomach and back. She had not passed urine from the urostomy. On the day of attending the hospital, she was noticed to be shivering and breathless. Past history included operations for hydrocephalus, spinal fixation, and renal stone. She had a solitary right kidney draining into an ileal loop urostomy. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy had previously been performed in 1989, when she was 22 years old. The initial puncture was unsuccessful, but a second puncture was made further laterally and the mid-pole calyx was accessed. The track was dilated and lithotripsy of intrapelvic stone was performed. Rescreening showed solitary lower pole calculus remaining, which was inaccessible from within. Therefore, another track was established to reach the lower pole calyx. Electrohy- draulic lithotripsy was performed. The patient was absolutely free of renal stones at the end of the Figure 2 IVU of 18 May 1999 shows the right calyceal system procedure. dilated. There is marked cortical thinning In 1991, a routine intravenous urography (IVU) showed opaque calculi in the lower pole of right kidney, which was functioning. In 1995, a routine IVU showed The patient was assessed in 2000 for pyelolithotomy. right staghorn calculus (Figure 1) and hydronephrosis. Her weight was 53.7 kg. Blood pressure was 145/95 Marked thoraco-lumbar scoliosis was noted. In 1997, a mmHg. The respiratory rate was 30 per minute at rest. routine IVU showed excretion of contrast by the right The patient became dyspnoeic on mild exertion. She had kidney. There was loss of cortical thickness with no daytime somnolence. She would sleep on an air dilatation of the pelvicalyceal system consistent with mattress with two pillows in a propped-up position. She chronic pyelonephritis. In May 1999, the IVU revealed a was very short with a protuberant abdomen. She had a dilated right calyceal system with marked cortical scar on the right side of the neck from a ventriculo-atrial thinning (Figure 2). In August 1999, MAG 3 renogram shunt. She had a more extensive scar on the left side of showed a single functioning right kidney demonstrating the neck. Creatinine clearance was 18 ml/min. Tidal poor uptake of 2.9% at 2 min. The excretion was slow. volume: 150 ml. Vital capacity: 470 ml. The results of An ultrasound scan of the right kidney was performed in arterial blood gas analysis, which were performed on 20 December 1999; the scan showed dilatation of the upper March 2000, were as follows. pole calyces with rather good overlying cortical thick- ness. However, there was loss of cortical thickness over the mid- and lower poles of the right kidney. A staghorn calculus was noted. pH 7.29 (7.32–7.45) pCO2 4.4 kPa (4.6–6.0) pO2 11.8 kPa (12.0–13.3) Actual bicarbonate: 16.2 mmol/l (20.0–32.0) Base excess: À8.6 mmol/l (À2.0–2.0) Standard bicarbonate: 18.1 mmol/l (22.0–26.0) Comment: acute metabolic acidosis The patient was considered unsuitable for anaesthesia for pyelolithotomy on account of the very high like- lihood of difficulty in weaning off the ventilator after a surgical procedure, which is to be performed under general anaesthesia. There was almost no venous access; the usual subclavian and jugular veins were not accessible because of previous surgical procedures for the ventriculo-atrial shunt. In June 2002, the patient’s mother brought her to the spinal unit with a history of not passing urine for about 24 h. An electrocardiogram showed sinus tachycardia, but no features attributable to hyperkalaemia. Urea: Figure 1 X-ray KUB of 28 March 1995 shows staghorn 14.7 mmol/l; creatinine: 224 m/l; bicarbonate: 13 mmol/l; calculus in right kidney sodium: 130 mmol/l; potassium: 4.0 mmol/l. The patient Spinal Cord Calculus anuria in a spina bifida patient S Vaidyanathan et al 9 was given meropenem 500 mg intravenously. Intrave- nous infusion of sodium bicarbonate 1.26% was started. Ultrasound revealed moderate hydronephrosis with calculi in the right kidney. Right nephrostomy was planned. During the radiological procedure, the patient was turned prone from the supine position. The heart rate decreased to 44 and oxygen saturation dropped to 67% on air. The patient was given atropine sulphate 0.6 mg intravenously. The heart rate increased to 110 and oxygen saturation rose to 99% while breathing air with 4 l of added oxygen. A single puncture of the right kidney was performed and an 8-Fr, locking pigtail catheter was inserted. The radiological procedure took less than 10 min and was accomplished without anaes- thesia or sedation. Following relief of urinary tract obstruction, there was postobstructive diuresis (3765 ml/ 24 h). At 2 weeks after nephrostomy, plasma creatinine was 125 m/l; urea: 5.2 mmol/l. Figure 4 CT of abdomen, performed on 25 June 2002 (5 days Chest X-rays taken at 4, 6 and 11 days after nephrostomy), shows that there is still moderate right after nephrostomy showed clear lungs; but the lung hydronephrosis. A gallstone is seen in the gall bladder. The left volume was restricted due to kyphoscoliotic deformity kidney is not identified of the vertebral column (Figure 3). A CT scan of the abdomen, which was performed 5 days after nephrost- omy, showed the nephrostomy tube located in the proper position within the right kidney. There was still moderate right hydronephrosis (Figure 4). There was no evidence of any perinephric or other abdominal collec- tion. The left kidney was not identified. A nephrosto- gram was performed 8 days after percutaneous nephrostomy. Calculi were seen in the pelvicalyceal system. There was some narrowing at the level of the pelvi-ureteric junction. However, contrast flowed freely into the right ureter and then into the ileal loop (Figure 5). This led us to conclude that anuria was the result from a ball-valve-type obstruction due to one of the calculi nowlying freely in the renal pelvis.
Recommended publications
  • Continent Urostomy Guide
    $POUJOFOU6SPTUPNZ(VJEF "QVCMJDBUJPOPGUIF6OJUFE0TUPNZ"TTPDJBUJPOTPG"NFSJDB *OD i4FJ[FUIF 0QQPSUVOJUZw CONTINENT UROSTOMY GUIDE Ilene Fleischer, MSN, RN, CWOCN, Author Patti Wise, BSN, RN, CWOCN, Author Reviewed by: Authors and Victoria A.Weaver, RN, MSN, CETN Revised 2009 by Barbara J. Hocevar, BSN,RN,CWOCN, Manager, ET/WOC Nursing, Cleveland Clinic © 1985 Ilene Fleischer and Patti Wise This guidebook is available for free, in electronic form, from United Ostomy Associations of America (UOAA). UOAA may be contacted at: www.ostomy.org • [email protected] • 800-826-0826 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 3 WHAT IS A CONTINENT UROSTOMY? . 4 THE URINARY TRACT . 4 BEFORE THE SURGERY . .5 THE SURGERY . .5 THE STOMA . 7 AFTER THE SURGERY . 7 Irrigation of the catheter(s) 8 Care of the drainage receptacles 9 Care of the stoma 9 Other important information 10 ROUTINE CARE AT HOME . 10 Catheterization schedule 11 How to catheterize your pouch 11 Special considerations when catheterizing 11 Care of the catheter 12 Other routine care 12 HELPFUL HINTS . .13 SUPPLIES FOR YOUR CONTINENT UROSTOMY . 14 LIFE WITH YOUR CONTINENT UROSTOMY . 15 Clothing 15 Diet 15 Activity and exercise 15 Work 16 Travel 16 Telling others 17 Social relationships 17 Sexual relations and intimacy 17 RESOURCES . .19 GLOSSARY OF TERMS . 20 BIBLIOGRAPHY . .21 1 INTRODUCTION Many people have ostomies and lead full and active lives. Ostomy surgery is the main treatment for bypassing or replacing intestinal or urinary organs that have become diseased or dysfunctional. “Ostomy” means opening. It refers to a number of ways that bodily wastes are re-routed from your body. A urostomy specifi cally redirects urine.
    [Show full text]
  • Suprapubic Cystostomy: Urinary Tract Infection and Other Short Term Complications A.T
    Suprapubic Cystostomy: Urinary Tract Infection and other short term Complications A.T. Hasan,Q. Fasihuddin,M.A. Sheikh ( Department of Urological Surgery and Transplantation, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center, Karachi. ) Abstract Aims: To evaluate the frequency of urinary tract infection in patients with suprapubic cystostomy and other complications of the procedure within 30 days of placement. Methods: Patients characteristics, indication and types of cystostomy and short term (within 30 days); complications were analyzed in 91 patients. Urine analysis and culture was done in all patients to exclude those with urinary tract infection. After 15 and 30 days of the procedure, urine analysis and culture was repeated to evaluate the frequency of urinary tract infection. The prevalence of symptomatic bacteriuria with its organisms was assessed. Antibiotics were given to the postoperative and symptomatic patients and the relationship of antibiotics on the prevention of urinary tract infection was determined. Results: Of the 91 cases 88 were males and 3 females. The mean age was 40.52 ± 18.95 with a range of 15 to 82 years.Obstructive uropathy of lower urinary tract.was present in 81% cases and 17(18.6%) had history of trauma to urethra. All these cases had per-urethral bleeding on examination while x-ray urethrogram showed grade H or grade III injury of urethra. Eighty two of the procedures were performed per-cutaneously and 7 were converted to open cystostomies due to failure of per-cutaneous approach. Nine patients had exploratory laparotomy. Duration of catheterization was the leading risk factor for urinary tract infection found in 24.1% at 15 days and 97.8% at 30 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Complications of Urinary Diversion
    Complications of Urinary Diversion Jennifer L. Dodson, M.D. Department of Urology Johns Hopkins University Types of Diversion Conduit Diversions Ileal conduit Colon conduit Continent Diversions Continent catheterizable reservoir Continent rectal pouch 1 Overview of Complications Mechanical Stoma problems Bowel obstruction Ureteral obstruction Reservoir perforation Metabolic Altered absorption Altered bone metabolism Growth delay Stones Cancer Conduit Diversions Ileal Conduit: Technically simplest Segment of choice Colon Conduit: Transverse or sigmoid Used when ileum not appropriate (eg: concomitant colon resection, abdominal radiation, short bowel syndrome, IBD) Early complications (< 30 days): 20-56% Late complications : 28-81% Risks: abdominal radiation abdominal surgery poor nutrition chronic steroids Farnham & Cookson, World J Urol, 2004 2 Complications of Ileal Conduit Campbell’s Urology, 8th Edition, 2002 Conduit: Bowel Complications Paralytic ileus 18-20% Conservative management vs NGT Consider TPN Bowel obstruction 5-10% Causes: Adhesions, internal hernia Evaluation: CT scan, Upper GI series Anastomotic leak 1-5 % Risk factors: bowel ischemia, radiation, steroids, IBD, technical error Prevention: Pre-operative bowel prep Attention to technical detail Stapled small-bowel Anastomosis (Campbell’s Blood supply, tension-free anastomosis, Urology, 8th Ed, 2004) realignment of mesentery Farnham & Cookson, World J Urol, 2004 3 Conduit Complications Conduit necrosis: Acute ischemia to bowel
    [Show full text]
  • Urinary Diversion: Ileovesicostomy/Ileal Loop/Colon Loop
    Urinary Diversion: Ileovesicostomy/Ileal Loop/Colon Loop Why do I need this surgery? A urinary diversion is a surgical procedure that is performed to allow urine to safely pass from the kidneys into a pouch on a person’s abdomen (belly). It is performed for people who have otherwise untreatable urinary incontinence (leakage) chronic urinary infections, or dangerous bladder conditions that may damage kidney function. The goal of these procedures is to improve a person’s long term health and quality of life. What is a stoma? A stoma is the end of the urinary diversion that protrudes through your abdominal wall. The stoma is red, moist, soft, and has no nerve endings. A pouch is placed around the stoma to collect the urine. You will meet with an enterostomal therapy nurse prior to surgery to find the optimal location for the stoma on your abdomen, provide education regarding stoma and skin management, and show you samples of the ostomy pouches that may be used over your stoma after surgery. What is done during the surgery? A urinary diversion surgery is performed in the operating room under general anesthesia (you are not awake for the procedure). The procedure can take 3 to 5 hours, depending on the complexity. Types of urinary diversions: 1. Ileovesicostomy. Department of Urology 734-936-7030 - 1 - In this procedure, the surgeon isolates a 15cm segment of intestine (ileum) from the GI tract. The bowels are then reconnected so that you will still have regular bowel movements, if you had regular movements before. A small hole is made in the bladder and the isolated segment is then sewn to the bladder.
    [Show full text]
  • Continent Urinary Reservoirs and Bladder Substitutes.Pdf
    ������������������ ��������������� ������������������� �������������������� ���������������� ��������������������� Continent Cutaneous Urinary Reservoirs and Bladder Substitutes Anatomy The bladder is an organ in the pelvis that collects, stores and expels urine. Urine is produced by the kidneys and travels down two tube-like structures called the ureters. The ureters connect the kidneys to the bladder. Urine leaves the bladder through another tube-like structure called the urethra. (Figure 1) Removal of the bladder (cystectomy) may be necessary in some people with bladder cancer, congenital disor- ders of the urinary tract, and in some people who have suffered surgical, traumatic or neurologic damage to the bladder. In these situations, another method of col- lecting and excreting urine must be found. The most common and easiest method for urinary diversion is to use a short piece of intestine as the connection between the ureters and the outside of the body (ileal or colon conduit). This type of diversion is easy for the patient to manage and has a low rate of complication. However, an ostomy bag must be worn at all times to collect urine. Newer surgical techniques are available which do not require the patient to wear an ostomy bag. These newer proce- dures involve creation of a continent urinary reser- voir that collects and stores urine. What is a Continent Urinary Reservoir and How is it Made? A continent urinary reser- voir is an internal “pouch” made from segments of the intestine. Urinary reservoirs can be made from small intestine alone, large intestine alone or from a combination of the above. (Figure 2) The bowel segments selected for use are disconnected from the remainder of the intestinal tract to avoid mixing the gastrointestinal contents (feces) with urine.
    [Show full text]
  • A Patient Guide to Urinary Diversions This Information Will Help You Understand Your Surgical Procedure
    Northwestern Memorial Hospital Patient Education CARE AND TREATMENT A Patient Guide to Urinary Diversions This information will help you understand your surgical procedure. It will be a resource for your ostomy care after leaving the hospital. Feel free to write down any questions you may have for To understand your physician and nurse. During your hospital stay, you will be visited by a wound, ostomy how your ostomy and continence (WOC) nurse. This nurse is trained and certified in the care of patients with an ostomy. The WOC nurse will work functions, you with your physician and staff nurses to aid you in your recovery. When you leave the hospital, the WOC nurse will continue to be a need to become resource person for you. familiar with the The urinary system urinary system. To understand how your ostomy functions, you need to become familiar with the urinary system (see Figure 1). The system’s main purpose is to remove urinary waste products from the body. Urine is produced in the kidneys, moves through the ureters and is stored in the bladder until urine is emptied. Urinary diversion – what is it? Sometimes the bladder must be removed or no Figure 1 longer can store urine. In these cases, some type of Kidneys bypass is needed. This is called a urinary diversion. Conditions which may lead to urinary diversion are: ■ Birth defects ■ Trauma ■ Infections ■ Tumors Ureters ■ Other blockages (not managed by conservative measures) There are several types of urinary diversions. The most common, an ileal conduit, involves a section of bowel that Bladder is removed and separated from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.
    [Show full text]
  • Icd-9-Cm (2010)
    ICD-9-CM (2010) PROCEDURE CODE LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESCRIPTION 0001 Therapeutic ultrasound of vessels of head and neck Ther ult head & neck ves 0002 Therapeutic ultrasound of heart Ther ultrasound of heart 0003 Therapeutic ultrasound of peripheral vascular vessels Ther ult peripheral ves 0009 Other therapeutic ultrasound Other therapeutic ultsnd 0010 Implantation of chemotherapeutic agent Implant chemothera agent 0011 Infusion of drotrecogin alfa (activated) Infus drotrecogin alfa 0012 Administration of inhaled nitric oxide Adm inhal nitric oxide 0013 Injection or infusion of nesiritide Inject/infus nesiritide 0014 Injection or infusion of oxazolidinone class of antibiotics Injection oxazolidinone 0015 High-dose infusion interleukin-2 [IL-2] High-dose infusion IL-2 0016 Pressurized treatment of venous bypass graft [conduit] with pharmaceutical substance Pressurized treat graft 0017 Infusion of vasopressor agent Infusion of vasopressor 0018 Infusion of immunosuppressive antibody therapy Infus immunosup antibody 0019 Disruption of blood brain barrier via infusion [BBBD] BBBD via infusion 0021 Intravascular imaging of extracranial cerebral vessels IVUS extracran cereb ves 0022 Intravascular imaging of intrathoracic vessels IVUS intrathoracic ves 0023 Intravascular imaging of peripheral vessels IVUS peripheral vessels 0024 Intravascular imaging of coronary vessels IVUS coronary vessels 0025 Intravascular imaging of renal vessels IVUS renal vessels 0028 Intravascular imaging, other specified vessel(s) Intravascul imaging NEC 0029 Intravascular
    [Show full text]
  • Ureterosigmoidostomy: a Useful Technique
    Ureterosigmoidostomy: A Useful Technique Pages with reference to book, From 133 To 135 M. Sajjad Husain, Farakh A. Khan ( Department of Urology Postgraduate Medical Institute, Lahore. ) Abstract Eight patients of bladder extrophy who had ureterosigmoidostomy have been retrospectively analysed. Six patients experienced no postoperative complications. There was no mortality. Open transcolonic mucosa to mucosa proves to be a useful technique of anastomosis. This type of urinary diversion is socially acceptable to Pakistani patients (JPMA 33:13 3, 1983). Introduction Ureterosigmoidostomy was first reported as a procedure for urinary diversion in 1952 by Simon. This attempt was a partial success and posed problems because of infection and leakage at the site of anastomosis. There has been various improvisations since. Coffey (1921). introduced submucosal tunnel to prevent reflux and Nesbit (1949) devised mucosa to mucosa anastomosis to prevent the formation of stricture. Later end to side mucosal anastomosis was described (Cordonnier, 1950). Leadbetter and Clarke (1955) combined the techniques of Coffey and Nesbit. In 1950 ileal conduit was popularised as a procedure for urinary diversion and as a result ureterosigmoidostorny went out of favour (Bricker, 1950). Results of long term Critical evaluation of patients who had ileal conduit diversion were disappointing (Stevens and Eckstein, 1977; Nieh et al., 1978; Jones et al., 1980; Philip et al., 1980; Orr et al., 1981). The pendulum is therefore likely to swing back in favour of a simpler technique i.e. open transcolonic method with formation of submucosal tunnel and direct mucosal anastomosis developed by Goodwin et al.(1953). We report a retrospective review of our experience with open transcolonic method and direct mucosal anastomosis technique in Pakistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Management of Urolithiasis in Patients After Urinary Diversion
    Surgical Management of Urolithiasis in Patients after Urinary Diversion Wen Zhong1, Bicheng Yang1, Fang He2, Liang Wang3, Sunil Swami4, Guohua Zeng1* 1 Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Guangzhou, China, 2 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China, 3 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson, Tennessee, United States of America, 4 Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America Abstract Objective: To present our experience in surgical management of urolithiasis in patients after urinary diversion. Patients and Methods: Twenty patients with urolithiasis after urinary diversion received intervention. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, percutaneous based antegrade ureteroscopy with semi-rigid or flexible ureteroscope, transurethral reservoir lithotripsy, percutaneous pouch lithotripsy and open operation were performed in 8, 3, 2, 6, and 1 patients, respectively. The operative finding and complications were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results: The mean stone size was 4.563.1 (range 1.5–11.2) cm. The mean operation time was 82.0611.5 (range 55–120) min. Eighteen patients were rendered stone free with a clearance of 90%. Complications occurred in 3 patients (15%). Two patients (10%) had postoperative fever greater than 38.5uC, and one patient (5%) suffered urine extravasations from percutaneous tract. Conclusions: The percutaneous based procedures, including percutaneous nephrolithotomy, antegrade ureteroscopy with semi-rigid ureteroscope or flexible ureteroscope from percutaneous tract, and percutaneous pouch lithotripsy, provides a direct and safe access to the target stones in patients after urinary diversion, and with high stone free rate and minor complications.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Status of Flexible Ureteroscopy in Urology
    Review Article Korean J Urol 2015;56:680-688. http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.10.680 pISSN 2005-6737 • eISSN 2005-6745 Current status of flexible ureteroscopy in urology Sung Yong Cho Department of Urology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is being performed for the surgical management of upper urinary tract pathology. With the development of surgical instruments with improved deflection mechanisms, visuality, and durability, the role of RIRS has expanded to the treatment of urinary calculi located in the upper urinary tract, which compensates for the shortcomings of shock wave litho- tripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. RIRS can be considered a conservative treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) or for postoperative surveillance after radical treatment of UTUC under an intensive surveillance program. RIRS has a steep learning curve and various surgical techniques can be used. The choice of instruments during RIRS should be based on increased surgical efficiency, decreased complications, and improved cost-benefit ratio. Keywords: Laser lithotripsy; Surgical equipment; Transitional cell carcinoma; Urolithiasis This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. INTRODUCTION or working channels. Flexible ureteroscopes were not widely utilized until the introduction of the new flexible 1. The expanding role of retrograde intrarenal ureteroscope and the holmium:yttrium aluminium garnet surgery in upper urinary tract pathology (YAG) laser system in the 1990s [4-8].
    [Show full text]
  • Usefulness of Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Postoperative Evaluation of Urinary Diversion Surgery
    Daniel Rodríguez B, et al. GÉNITOURINARIO Usefulness of multidetector computed tomography in the postoperative evaluation of urinary diversion surgery Daniel Rodríguez B(1), Richard Mast V(1), Albert Pons E(1), Eugenia de Lama S(1), Francesc Vigués J(2), Oscar Natoli V(1). 1. Radiology Department, Hospital Universitaria de Bellvitge, L´Hospitalet de Llobregat. Barcelona - España. 2. Urology Department, Hospital Universitaria de Bellvitge, L´Hospitalet de Llobregat. Barcelona - España. Abstract: Urinary diversion surgeries are procedures that are becoming more frequent, as their indications are not only neoplastic, being useful also in managing other diseases. Due to this increase, it is not uncommon to observe secondary complications, whether in the early postoperative period (less than 30 days after surgery) or later (more than 30 days). Within these are alterations in intestinal motility (paralytic ileus, blockage), anastomotic leaks, fluid collections (lymphocele, urinoma, abscess), fistulas, parastomal herniation, ureteral obstruction, urolithiasis and tumor recurrence. Given the large number of surgical techniques used in these procedures, it is important to know the resulting anatomical changes, occasionally difficult to evaluate. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is of great use in the study of these patients, especially with multiplanar reconstruction techniques, adequately representing the affected urinary and extra-urinary structures, and their relationship to adjacent structures, enabling their accurate and quick identification. Keywords: Cystectomy, Multidetector computed tomography, Postoperative complications, Urinary diversion. Resumen: Las cirugías de derivación urinaria son procedimientos que cada vez son más frecuentes, ya que sus indicaciones no son sólo neoplásicas, siendo también útiles en el manejo de otras patologías. Debido a este incremento, no es infrecuente observar complicaciones secundarias, ya sean en el postoperatorio temprano (menos de 30 días después de la cirugía) o tardío (más de 30 días).
    [Show full text]
  • Urolithiasis After Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion: a Comparison of Minimally Invasive Therapies
    Urolithiasis After Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion: A Comparison of Minimally Invasive Therapies Lindsay L. Hertzig, Markian R. Iwaszko, Laureano J. Rangel, David E. Patterson, Matthew T. Gettman and Amy E. Krambeck* From the Department of Urology and Division of Biostatistics (LJR), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota Abbreviations Purpose: We report our experience with ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolitho- and Acronyms tomy and shock wave lithotripsy for symptomatic stone disease in patients with GFR ϭ glomerular filtration rate ileal conduit urinary diversion. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients PCNL ϭ percutaneous treated with cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion from 1982 to June nephrolithotomy 2010 in whom urolithiasis subsequently developed. ϭ SWL shock wave lithotripsy Results: We identified 77 patients with urolithiasis requiring surgical interven- UTI ϭ urinary tract infection tion after ileal conduit urinary diversion. Average age at treatment was 62.5 years (range 30 to 82). Mean followup was 7.1 years (range 0.1 to 24.3). The Accepted for publication December 5, 2012. primary therapy mode was percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 48 patients (62.3%), Study received institutional review board ap- extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in 20 (26.0%) and ureteroscopy in 9 proval. * Correspondence: Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St. (11.6%). Average stone size was greater in the nephrolithotomy group than in the Southwest, Rochester, Minnesota 55905 (tele- ureteroscopy and lithotripsy groups (2.1 vs 0.9 and 1.0 cm, respectively, phone: 507-284-9983; FAX: 507-284-4951; e-mail: p Ͻ0.0001). Total complication rates were similar, including 29% for nephrolitho- [email protected]).
    [Show full text]