MARKETING UBER in the HIGHLY REGULATED BRITISH COLUMBIA MARKETPLACE March 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MARKETING UBER in the HIGHLY REGULATED BRITISH COLUMBIA MARKETPLACE March 2017 MARKETING UBER IN THE HIGHLY REGULATED BRITISH COLUMBIA MARKETPLACE March 2017 Roadblocks and Strategic Marketing Decisions by Uber in Vancouver, BC with Interviews from City Councillor Geoff Meggs, and Uber Public Policy Manager Michael van Hemmen. Authors: Al Leong, MBA and Jean Lachapelle, M.Eng., MBA March 2017 1 Uber’s Attempt To Disrupt Vancouver Stalls Uber’s global expansion met with resistance from taxicab Although the company companies in various cities around the world, including operates in the transportation industry, the folks at Uber Vancouver, Canada. Uber’s technology is innovative but would say that Uber is not a technically not disruptive, as it does not change the way transportation provider, nor does taxi services are provided, but it does create more efficiency. it employ cars and drivers. Uber By contrast, digital photography completely disrupted operates a system, or platform, and destroyed the film and photofinishing industry. And that connects passengers to drivers via smartphone. A ride sharing between cities has been around for at least mobile app sends an email to two decades. Uber’s disruption to the taxi industry may a car, based on the passenger’s come because it bypasses transportation and taxi bylaws, location. Transactions are regulations, and barriers to entry (such as training, fleet automatically billed to the rider, costs and insurance, plus the cost of medallions). who has a credit card on file with Uber, allowing for cashless transactions. The company’s BACKGROUND business model is simple. Uber recruits drivers and pays their Uber’s company story began in December 2008 when Travis Kalanick commercial taxi licence. It then and Garrett Camp went to Paris, France, to attend a LeWeb technology connects those drivers with local conference. When they decided to take a cab, they both realized how rental companies. Drivers receive difficult it was to get one. Shortly after they returned home, they developed passenger requests via the Uber an app for the iPhone that would help people get around. In January 2010, real-time app. Uber’s first prototype test ran in New York City and then San Francisco. For Uber, the strategic and March 2017 2 capital asset management advantages of this model and Bloomberg reported a study from Christopher are significant. The crowdsourced Uber driver bears Knittel, a professor at the MIT Sloan School of the burden of car ownership, maintenance and Management, which found racial discrimination costs. Moreover, Uber owns no fleet, which expands by Uber and Lyft drivers against black passengers and contracts based on supply and demand. Uber (pickup failure).The study found that Uber drivers is the world’s largest taxi company, but it owns no disproportionately cancelled on riders with “black- vehicles. sounding” names, even though the company The company has received billions in funding penalizes drivers who cancel frequently. from numerous investors and venture capitalists. Despite this tremendous success in raising money THE MARKET UNIQUENESS OF VANCOUVER, and its fast expansion plan, Uber has strong BRITISH COLUMBIA competitors in various geographical markets worldwide: Lyft and Curb in the USA, Grab in But what has happened in Vancouver? And, in fact, Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, in the entire province of British Columbia? Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines), Ola in Vancouver city councillor Geoff Meggs describes India, and Didi Chuxing in China. the unique situation that Uber faces in B.C. and in the Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD). EFFICIENCY—BUT WITH RISKS A primary reason for Uber’s lack of adoption is legal and related to insurance for prospective Uber The Uber system is efficient and cost-effective. Rides drivers; he stated that Uber drivers can’t get insured are requested by customers on the app and drivers throughout B.C. because the Insurance Corporation are crowdsourced using their own personal vehicle. of British Columbia (ICBC), a Crown corporation, has Fares are set by the company, prepaid by customers a legal monopoly on auto insurance in the province. with a credit card or PayPal, and are typically 20% However, drivers can get an insurance policy on to 50% less expensive than those of a taxicab ride. the ICBC website—it just appears to be expensive, Cars are clean, if not cleaner, than taxicabs. Riders and it’s rated at the same class as limousine and cab can select from several types of transportation drivers. options available: cars, minivans and luxury cars Meggs stated, “Unlike Montreal, Ottawa, (“UberSELECT”). In communities with populations Toronto or Edmonton, the City of Vancouver has over 30,000, getting an Uber takes as little as three an overlapping jurisdiction with its provincial to five minutes, depending on the time of day. Fares counterpart. This means that both the city and the are pre-set and prepaid, and routes are mapped province have their rules and requirements, mostly with GPS. Passengers no longer have unscrupulous complementary but not always, in the transportation taxicab drivers who take the long route or drive in sector. For example, the provincial regulators set circles to increase the fare. Assaults on Uber drivers the number of taxis in each jurisdiction and issue are uncommon, since customers must register passenger transportation licences, while the city their identity and have a valid credit card or PayPal adds rules such as a criminal background check and account to get a ride (there’s an audit trail). a chauffeur permit from the Vancouver Police, as well However, as of December 1, 2016, as reported as a low-emission vehicle requirement (which favours by WhosDrivingYou.org, there have been 46 alleged such vehicles as the Toyota Prius). The additional assaults by drivers, 206 alleged sexual assaults and uniqueness of Vancouver, besides the fact that the harassments, 9 alleged kidnappings and 10 deaths. city is not an amalgamated municipality, is that its The BBC reported that an Indian Uber driver was auto insurance is regulated and controlled by the charged and subsequently convicted of rape in 2015, provincial government, i.e., ICBC.” March 2017 3 Furthermore, there are safety and service quality UBER’S RESPONSE concerns regarding Uber drivers. Taxicab companies argue that established During an interview with Michael van Hemmen, protocols for criminal background checks and public policy manager at Uber, we asked specific taxicab driver screening, as well as licensing, questions about the company’s market entry into eliminate these issues of public safety and Vancouver and their approach to marketing in this discrimination. The added cost of licensing unique environment. We asked about their approach (arguably quality control) is included in the taxi to managing not only ICBC and the insurance policy licensing fee, which runs upward of $1 million, issue, but also about lobbying governments to and that’s why a taxicab ride costs almost twice as change rules about insurance. much as one from Uber or Lyft. Councillor Meggs Van Hemmen stated, “So the insurance regime is stated, “The City of Vancouver’s position was that different in B.C. than that in other provinces. From we wanted to move to ride sharing in a way that a policy perspective, the mode that we see best is protected the assets that we feel we have as a result coalitions. It’s one thing for a single company to of the taxi system. So we think there’s some real say, “We want you to change these rules,” but what benefits to it.” He characterized Uber as “very we’re also doing is we’re going around to a variety pleasant people, but the overlying message was of stakeholders, including the Vancouver Board of rude”. Trade, the Suzuki Foundation and other types of The additional regulations from the City of organizations, such as tourism and the cruise ship Vancouver in the tourism sector, as well as in the industry, and highlighting the benefits that this transportation industry, stem from the fact that “the improved urban mobility provides not just for Uber, stakeholders are extra-fussy,” says Meggs. “If there is but for their organizations, their stakeholders and an opportunity for the taxi industry to innovate and society more broadly. As government hears from meet this competition, we would welcome that.” a wide variety of stakeholders that this actually should be done and it should be done sooner rather than later, that’s when government starts to pay more attention and it starts to act.” And when probed about whether he thought marketing efforts in Vancouver were different from those of other jurisdictions that do not have these policy issues, van Hemmen elaborated on the subject. “These challenges arise everywhere. So there’s truth in that. We’re continuing to iterate and evolve products. There’s politics associated. In many ways, it’s the same. When you’re looking to change March 2017 4 or update rules, the way that you encourage that • Proposing a partnership or alliance strategy chance to happen is to engage potential customers with taxi companies to avoid competition, or partners, and in that sense, it is marketing.” which would result in lower wages, as the “You have to remember, we’re a very young success of Uber lies in the promise of always company,” said van Hemmen, who seemed to having passengers suggest that policies, plans and strategies were not • Incorporating a feature on the app to provide fully in place and Uber was learning as it acted, or riders with the option of choosing a standard reacted, to governments
Recommended publications
  • Quantifying Homelessness
    Snapshot of an Object in Motion: Quantifying Homelessness by Hannah Rabinovitch B.A., Middlebury College, 2009 Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Public Policy in the School of Public Policy Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences © Hannah Rabinovitch 2015 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2015 Approval Name: Hannah Rae Rabinovitch Degree: Master of Public Policy Title: Snapshot of an Object in Motion: Quantifying Homelessness Examining Committee: Chair: Doug McArthur Director, School of Public Policy, SFU J. Rhys Kesselman Senior Supervisor Professor John Richards Supervisor Professor Dominique M. Gross Internal Examiner Professor Date Defended/Approved: March 4, 2015 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Ethics Statement iv Abstract Politicians and planners increasingly require statistics to justify expenditures on social issues such as housing and homelessness. The federal government is now requiring communities that receive federal homelessness funding to develop local portraits of homelessness. Communities across Canada have shifted their goals from managing towards ending homelessness. This study explores the most useful way to measure homelessness for developing solutions to it and measure progress on reducing homelessness. Key issues are identified from expert interviews and four case studies. Three methods of homeless enumeration are assessed. Cost and implementation complexity, and comprehensiveness emerge as a major trade-off. Conducting infrequent comprehensive point-in-time counts is the recommended approach, along with establishing locally integrated administrative homelessness management information systems to track trends using administrative data. Also important are considerations of contextualizing homelessness within broader socio-economic trends, measuring dynamics of homelessness such as average duration, and using enumeration results to guide funding priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Inaugural (First) Council Meeting Minutes
    2 FIRST COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES DECEMBER 5, 2011 The First Meeting of the Council of the City of Vancouver was held on Monday, December 5, 2011, at 5:05 pm in the Council Chamber, Third Floor, City Hall. PRESENT: Mayor Gregor Robertson Councillor George Affleck Councillor Elizabeth Ball Councillor Adriane Carr Councillor Heather Deal Councillor Kerry Jang Councillor Geoff Meggs Councillor Andrea Reimer Councillor Tim Stevenson Councillor Tony Tang ABSENT: Councillor Raymond Louie CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE: Penny Ballem, City Manager CITY CLERK’S OFFICE: Marg Coulson, City Clerk Laura Kazakoff, Meeting Coordinator MAYOR’S ADDRESS Mayor Robertson advised that the Inaugural Ceremony took place earlier this day at the Creekside Community Centre, and the text of his Inaugural Address will be available for viewing on the City’s website at vancouver.ca. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MOVED by Councillor Jang SECONDED by Councillor Deal THAT this Council resolve itself into Committee of the Whole, Mayor Robertson in the Chair. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY First Council Meeting Minutes, Monday, December 5, 2011 2 COMMUNICATIONS 1. Deputy and Acting Mayors – December 5, 2011 to December 7, 2014 MOVED by Councillor Stevenson THAT Council approve the following appointment of Deputy and Acting Mayors for December 5, 2011 to December 7, 2014: 2011 December 5-31 Councillor Louie 2012 January Councillor Jang February Councillor Deal March Councillor Reimer April Councillor Stevenson May Councillor Meggs June Councillor Tang July Councillor Ball August Councillor Affleck
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Monthly Meeting Tuesday, September 19, 2017
    REGULAR MONTHLY MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2017 1. LOCATION: Maritime Labour Centre, 1880 Triumph Street, Vancouver, BC 2. CHAIRPERSON: 1st Vice President Terry Engler 3. ADOPTION OF PREVIOUS MINUTES: MSC that the minutes of the July 19, 2017 meeting be adopted. 4. CREDENTIALS: The following credentials were received since the last VDLC meeting: (* = recredentialled, A = alternate) BCGEU Local 603 HEU Lions Gate Local Steve Anderson Sherree Alm BCTF – Burnaby Assoc. Unifor Local 2002 Frank Bonvino * Nancy Eaton Jones Katie Marsh Luis Poblete Dave McPhee * James Sanyshyn * USW Local 1944, Unit 63 Leanne Sjodin * Julie Kadir Daniel Tétrault CUPE Local 1004 Andy Healey MSC to obligate/seat the delegate(s). MSC to consider Executive Recommendation regarding the Vancouver Municipal By-election candidate endorsements immediately following the President’s Report. 5. PRESIDENT’S REPORT: Political Action The Vancouver by-election to replace Councilor Geoff Meggs will be on October 14 and the Vancouver School Board trustees will be elected that same day. The VDLC’s multi-union vetting committee had representation from CUPE Locals 15, 391, and 1004, VSTA, VESTA, BCGEU, Operating Engineers, TWU/USW, IAFF 18, FPSE, MoveUP, and Unifor. Their recommendations will be voted on at this meeting. Tuesday, September 19, 2017 VDLC Regular Monthly Minutes page 2 Labour Day The VDLC booth at Labour Day 2017 was very busy at Holland Park in Surrey. Our balloon clown was very popular and we had VDLC pencils, balloons, reflector/flashers, smartphone card holders, and waterless tattoos to give away as well as various literature. Trout Lake Park has been booked for the 2018 Labour Day in Vancouver and a letter is being sent to the New Westminster and District Labour Council inviting them to collaborate next year.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes, Wednesday, July 13, 2016 2
    REPORT TO COUNCIL STANDING COMMITTEE OF COUNCIL ON CITY FINANCE AND SERVICES JULY 13, 2016 A Regular Meeting of the Standing Committee of Council on City Finance and Services was held on Wednesday, July 13, 2016, at 9:33 am, in the Council Chamber, Third Floor, City Hall. PRESENT: Councillor Geoff Meggs, Chair* Mayor Gregor Robertson* Councillor George Affleck Councillor Elizabeth Ball Councillor Adriane Carr Councillor Heather Deal* Councillor Melissa De Genova Councillor Kerry Jang Councillor Raymond Louie Councillor Andrea Reimer Councillor Tim Stevenson, Vice-Chair* CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE: Sadhu Johnston, City Manager CITY CLERK’S OFFICE: Rosemary Hagiwara, Deputy City Clerk Katrina Leckovic, Deputy City Clerk Maria Castro, Meeting Coordinator *Denotes absence for a portion of the meeting. MATTERS ADOPTED ON CONSENT MOVED by Councillor Ball THAT items 4 and 5 be adopted on consent. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (Councillor Deal and Mayor Robertson absent for the vote) 1. Presentation - Independent Advisory Group on Real Estate Licensee Conduct Carolyn Rogers, Chair, Independent Advisory Group (IAG) on Real Estate Regulation in BC presented the IAG report on Conduct and Practices in the Real Estate Industry in British Columbia, and responded to questions. Standing Committee of Council on City Finance and Services Minutes, Wednesday, July 13, 2016 2 2. Family Room: Housing Mix Policy for Rezoning Projects June 20, 2016 Housing Policy and Projects staff provided a presentation and responded to questions. The Committee heard from two speakers in support of the recommendations. * * * * * The Committee recessed at 11:54 am and reconvened at 12:30 pm. * * * * * MOVED by Councillor Louie THAT the Committee recommend to Council A.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Vancouver Councils Dating from 1886 to 2011 PDF File
    2008 - 2011 • Mayor Gregor Robertson • Suzanne Anton • David Cadman • George Chow • Heather Deal • Kerry Jang • Raymond Louie • Geoff Meggs • Andrea Reimer • Tim Stevenson • Ellen Woodworth 2005 - 2008 • Mayor Sam Sullivan • Suzanne Anton • Elizabeth Ball • David Cadman • Kim Capri • George Chow • Heather Deal • Peter Ladner • B.C. Lee • Raymond Louie • Tim Stevenson City of Vancouver Councils dating back to 1886 2 OF 48 2002 - 2005 • Mayor Larry W. Campbell • Fred Bass • David Cadman • Jim Green • Peter Ladner • Raymond Louie • Tim Louis • Anne Roberts • Tim Stevenson • Sam Sullivan • Ellen Woodsworth 1999 - 2002 • Mayor Philip Owen • Fred Bass • Jennifer Clarke • Lynne Kennedy • Daniel Lee • Don Lee • Tim Louis • Sandy McCormick • Gordon Price • George Puil • Sam Sullivan City of Vancouver Councils dating back to 1886 3 OF 48 1996 - 1999 • Mayor Philip Owen • Don Bellamy • Nancy A. Chiavario • Jennifer Clarke • Alan Herbert • Lynne Kennedy • Daniel Lee • Don Lee • Gordon Price • George Puil • Sam Sullivan 1993 - 1996 • Mayor Philip Owen • Donald Bellamy • Nancy A. Chiavario • Jennifer Clarke • Craig Hemer • Maggie Ip • Lynne Kennedy • Jenny Kwan • Gordon Price • George Puil • Sam Sullivan City of Vancouver Councils dating back to 1886 4 OF 48 1990 - 1993 • Mayor Gordon Campbell • Donald Bellamy • Tung Chan • Libby Davies • Bruce Eriksen • Philip Owen • Gordon Price • George Puil • Harry Rankin • Patricia Wilson • Bruce Yorke 1988 - 1990 • Mayor Gordon Campbell • Jonathan Baker • Donald Bellamy • Libby Davies • Bruce Eriksen • Philip Owen • Gordon Price • George Puil • Harry Rankin • Carole Taylor • Sandra Wilking City of Vancouver Councils dating back to 1886 5 OF 48 1986 - 1988 • Mayor Gordon Campbell • Jonathan Baker • Donald Bellamy • Helen Boyce • Ralph Caravetta • Libby Davies • Bruce Eriksen • Philip Owen • Gordon Price • George Puil • Carole Taylor 1984 - 1986 • Mayor Michael Harcourt • Donald Bellamy • May Brown • Gordon Campbell • Libby Davies • Bruce Eriksen • Marguerite Ford • George Puil • Harry Rankin • W.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Vancouver Regional District Board of Directors
    GREATER VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD) Board of Directors held at 9:05 a.m. on Friday, February 26, 2016 in the 2nd Floor Boardroom, 4330 Kingsway, Burnaby, British Columbia. MEMBERS PRESENT: Port Coquitlam, Chair, Director Greg Moore Pitt Meadows, Director John Becker Vancouver, Vice Chair, Director Raymond Louie Port Moody, Director Mike Clay Anmore, Director John McEwen (departed at Richmond, Director Malcolm Brodie 9:44 a.m.) Richmond, Director Harold Steves Belcarra, Director Ralph Drew Surrey, Director Bruce Hayne Bowen Island, Director Maureen Nicholson Surrey, Director Linda Hepner Burnaby, Director Derek Corrigan (arrived at Surrey, Director Mary Martin 9:07 a.m.) Surrey, Director Barbara Steele Burnaby, Director Sav Dhaliwal Surrey, Director Judy Villeneuve Burnaby, Director Colleen Jordan Tsawwassen, Director Bryce Williams (arrived at Coquitlam, Director Craig Hodge 9:46 a.m.) Coquitlam, Director Richard Stewart Vancouver, Director Heather Deal Delta, Director Lois Jackson Vancouver, Director Kerry Jang Electoral Area A, Director Maria Harris Vancouver, Director Geoff Meggs (departed at Langley City, Director Rudy Storteboom 9:44 a.m.) Langley Township, Director Charlie Fox Vancouver, Director Andrea Reimer Langley Township, Director Bob Long Vancouver, Director Gregor Robertson Maple Ridge, Director Nicole Read Vancouver, Director Tim Stevenson New Westminster, Director Jonathan Cote West Vancouver, Director Michael Smith North
    [Show full text]
  • YOF CITY CLERK's DEPARTMENT VANCOUVER Access to Information & Privacy
    ~YOF CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT VANCOUVER Access to Information & Privacy File No.: 04-1000-20-2017-402 July 25, 2018 Re : Request for Access to Records under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the "Act") I am responding to your request of October 20, 2017 for: All ·correspondence between [email protected] and any @vancouver.ca email address from January 1, 2014 to October 20, 2017. All responsive records are attached. Some information in the records has been severed, (blacked out), unders.13(1), s.14, s.16(1) (a), s.16(1)(b), s.17(1) and s.22(1) of the Act. You can read or download this section here: http: I /www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/ bclaws new/ document/ID/ freeside/96165 00 Under section 52 of the Act you may ask the Information & Privacy Commissioner to review any matter related to the City's response to your request. The Act allows you 30 business days from the date you receive this notice to request a review by writing to: Office of the Information & Privacy Commissioner, info®oipc. bc.ca or by phoning 250-387-5629. If you request a review; please provide the Commissioner's office with: 1) t he request number assigned to your request (#04-1 000-20-201 7-402); 2) a copy of this letter; 3) a copy of your original request for information sent to the City of Vancouver; and 4) detailed reasons or grounds on which you are seeking the review. Please do not hesitate to contact the Freedom of Information Office at [email protected] if you have any questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenant Organizing and the Campaign for Collective Bargaining Rights in British Columbia, 1968–75
    Tenant Organizing and the Campaign for Collective Bargaining Rights in British Columbia, 1968–75 Paul S. Jon* Part 1: INTRODUCTION n 2018, the British Columbia Court of Appeal (BCCA) rejected an attempt by approximately 450 tenants of the Regent Hotel, a Iformer single-room occupancy residence in Vancouver, to join their claims against the landlords as a class action. Instead, in Gates v Sahota,1 the BCCA ordered the tenants to proceed individually with their claims of systemic mistreatment to dispute resolution at the Residential Tenancy Branch, on the grounds that, under the Residential Tenancy Act,2 it has exclusive jurisdiction over most disputes between landlords and tenants. In denying tenants the capacity to pursue systemic grievances against their landlords as a unified class, the BCCA inGates v Sahota reinforced an understanding of residential tenancies as individual contractual relationships regulated under a provincially centralized bureaucracy. Within this regime, tenants cannot engage in collective bargaining or take collective action against their landlords (such as withholding rent) for fear of breaching individual contractual obligations. Indeed, the idea of a union seems out of place in the context of landlord-tenant relations. However, there was a window in British Columbia’s history when tenants’ unions seemed a real possibility. British Columbia’s Residential Tenancy Act, which currently governs the relationship between landlords and the approximately 1.5 million residential tenants in the province,3 is the most recent iteration of * The author would like to thank Douglas C. Harris for his ongoing guidance and supervision, and Nicholas Blomley and the editors and anonymous reviewers at BC Studies for their comments on earlier drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • New Metro Study Group Money
    VANCOUVER EDITION MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2015 Vol. 5 • No. 34 Federal election Transportation, land use planning MONEY AND NEW METRO PARTNERSHIPS STUDY By Karenn Krangle GROUP Canada’s cities and towns want the federal government not only to commit more money for urban projects and infrastructure but also to work with municipalities as partners, Federation Metro Vancouver’s new transportation planning and of Canadian Municipalities president Raymond Louie said governance review task force meets for the fi rst time today last week. to consider ways the governance structure for TransLink He told a small session at last week’s Union of B.C. can be improved and to look at how transit can linked more Municipalities convention that the FCM’s campaign to raise eff ectively with the regional growth strategy. awareness of municipal issues is gaining momentum during Th e task force is a sub-group of Metro’s inter-government the federal election through online tools and outreach to and fi nance committee. candidates. “Th e sub-committee will prepare a report that examines “Our goals are to place municipal issues front and centre in the role of transportation planning within the GVRD regional the campaign and put pressure on federal parties to respond, planning function and the role of transportation planning change the framing of the coverage of municipalities with within TransLink governance structure,” the terms of reference their hands out — because that was the refrain, ‘We can’t do attached to the meeting agenda says. “Th e objective is to it without you,’ – but rather, we’re off ering our hands out in compare the two independent regional planning functions, to partnership,” he told about 25 people at the session.
    [Show full text]
  • Scots in British Columbia's Interwar Fishing Industry1
    “Mon – he’s a gran’ fish”: Scots in British Columbia’s Interwar Fishing Industry1 M ICHAEL E. VANCE isitors to the Empire Exhibition at Wembley between 1924 and 1925 would have seen among the numerous exhibits of imperial Vproducts a large window display of canned salmon constructed by the Anglo-British Columbia Packing Company. Careful observers may have noted that the can label consisted “of two circular designs.” In the left design [were] written in block letters the words “Wee Scottie” and the “Anglo-British Columbia Packing Co. Ltd. London and Vancouver, B.C.” The right design contain[ed] a representation of a boy in highland clothes riding a salmon, and holding in his hand a tin of Wee Scottie salmon. Immediately below … [were] written the words “Mon – he’s a gran’ fish.”2 As one of the leading interwar producers of canned salmon in British Columbia,3 the abc Packing Company would have taken advantage of the Empire Exhibition to promote its product, but according to the company history, it was the firm’s owner and president, Henry Ogle Bell-Irving, who had championed the “Wee Scottie” design. Early in 1914, he had arranged for a donation of a large quantity of canned salmon for the war effort but insisted it be labelled with the brand. As a consequence of his action, “Wee Scottie” canned salmon became 1 An earlier version of this article was presented at the conference entitled “British Columbia: Re-Thinking Ourselves,” University of British Columbia, Vancouver, May 2003. The author is grateful to Renée Hulan, Douglas Vaisey, Geoff Meggs, Robert McDonald, and the anonymous readers for their encouragement and helpful advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Convention Update
    APRIL 29 - MAY 2, 2015 • 52nd ANNUAL CUPE BC CONVENTION • VANCOUVER BC convention update TOP STORY FRIDAY, MAY 1 Agenda Highlights 9 am SECRETARY-TREASURER’S REPORT Paul Faoro 10 am MAY DAY PRESENTATION A History of Action video 11 am NATIONAL SECRETARY-TREASURER’S REPORT Charles Fleury 2 pm KEYNOTE SPEAKER Stephen Lewis Time to build a better Canada: 4 pm BC NDP LEADER John Horgan Moist fires up delegates 8 pm - 1 am CUPE National President Paul Moist brought Gregor Robertson by implying that CUPE’s RECEPTION AND DANCE delegates out of their seats on Thursday endorsement of Vision Vancouver was Music by Incognito Stanley Park Ballroom (2nd floor) with a rousing convention address that somehow corrupt. congratulated B.C. activists for their solidarity in recent campaigns and called on “CUPE is proud of our political activity,” he all members to help elect an NDP federal said, “and we will not be silenced by right- government in the fall. wingers.” Convention Moist saluted the 27,000 K-12 members Turning to the federal scene, Moist said who supported the BCTF during last year’s that defeating the Harper Conservatives on is on strike, the CUPE 608 members who spent 10 October 19 means talking about more than months on the line while the United Church what to vote against. Twitter! pushed to close Naramata Centre, the CUPE Win an iPad! 7000 members who have been locked out “We need to reclaim our democracy. How @JeffVirtanen Paul Moist gives inspiring by Southern Railway since January 5, and about a federal government that respects speech at #cupebc15 and condemns CUPE 873 for its “Imagine a World Without free collective bargaining rights? How about possible job cuts on Vancouver Island.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSTAINABLE OR SPENT FORCE? Review of Metro Vancouver Labour Relations Function
    SUSTAINABLE OR SPENT FORCE? Review of Metro Vancouver Labour Relations Function James E. Dorsey, Q.C. March 3, 2011 Metro Vancouver Population by Municipality – 2009 Surrey 19.3% (446,561) Belcarra Vancouver 0.03% (681) 27.1% (628,621) Lions Bay 0.1% (1,398) Arnmore 0.1% (2,160) Burnaby Bowen Island 9.6% (222,802) 0.2% (3,608) Pitt Meadows 0.8% (17,915) White Rock 0.8% Richmond (19,102) 8.3% (193,255) Electoral Area A 1.0% (22,131) Langley City 1.1% (25,526) Port Moody 1.4% (32,998) Coquitlam 5.3% (123,213) West Vancouver Port Coquitlam 1.9% (43,307) Langley Township 2.4% (56,446) 4.5% (103,267) Delta North Van City Maple Ridge 2.1% (48,881) 4.3% (99,862) New Westminster 3.2% (75,051) North Van District 2.8% (65,016) 3.7% (86,725) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION – “NOTABLE EXCEPTION” IS IN CRISIS ............................. 1 1.1 Labour Relations Specialist Review and Report Commissioned ........................... 1 2.0 MUNICIPAL AND REGIONAL DISTRICT CONTEXT AND AUTONOMY .... 3 3.0 LABOUR NEGOTIATION “FUNCTION” AND REGIONAL BUREAU............. 7 3.1 Participating Member Status and Employee Groups .............................................. 9 3.2 Governance, Meetings, Decision-Making and Confidentiality ............................ 10 4.0 B.C. REGIONAL MUNICIPAL EMPLOYER NEGOTIATIONS (1964 – 2010) .. 15 4.1 B. C. Municipal Multi-Employer Bargaining Outside Metro Vancouver ........... 15 4.2 Municipal Labour Relations Bureau (1964 – 1972) ................................................. 16 4.3 Labour Relations Committee and Rejection of Accreditation (1972 – 1978) ....... 17 4.4 Legal Challenges, Reviews and Organizational Change (1978 - 1984) ...............
    [Show full text]