DOCSLIB.ORG

Modelling Radiation Exposure and Radionuclide Transfer for Non-Human Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modelling Radiation Exposure and Radionuclide Transfer for Non-Human Species Modelling Radiation Exposure and Radionuclide Transfer for Non-human Species Report of the Biota Working Group of EMRAS Theme 3 Environmental Modelling for RAdiation Safety (EMRAS) Programme FOREWORD Environmental assessment models are used for evaluating the radiological impact of actual and potential releases of radionuclides to the environment. They are essential tools for use in the regulatory control of routine discharges to the environment and also in planning measures to be taken in the event of accidental releases; they are also used for predicting the impact of releases which may occur far into the future, for example, from underground radioactive waste repositories. It is important to check, to the extent possible, the reliability of the predictions of such models by comparison with measured values in the environment or by comparing with the predictions of other models. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has been organizing programmes of international model testing since the 1980s. The programmes have contributed to a general improvement in models, in transfer data and in the capabilities of modellers in Member States. The documents published by the IAEA on this subject in the last two decades demonstrate the comprehensive nature of the programmes and record the associated advances which have been made. From 2002 to 2007, the IAEA organised a programme titled “Environmental Modelling for RAdiation Safety” (EMRAS). The programme comprised three themes: Theme 1: Radioactive Release Assessment Working Group on the revision of IAEA Handbook of parameter values for the prediction of radionuclide transfer in temperate environments (Technical Reports Series (TRS) 364). Working Group on model testing related to countermeasures applied to the intake of iodine-131 from the Chernobyl accident. Working Group on testing of models for the environmental behaviour of tritium and carbon-14 following routine and accidental releases. Working Group on testing of models for predicting the behaviour of radionuclides in freshwater systems and coastal areas. Theme 2: Remediation Assessment Working Group on testing of models for the remediation of the urban environment. Working Group on modelling the transfer of radionuclides from naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM). Theme 3: Protection of the Environment Working Group on the review of data and testing of models for predicting the transfer of radionuclides to non-human biological species. This report describes the work of the Biota Working Group under Theme 3. The IAEA wishes to acknowledge the contributions of the Working Group Leaders, B. Howard and N. Beresford (both of the United Kingdom), as well as J. Vives i Batlle (United Kingdom) and T. Yankovich (Canada) to the editorial preparation of this report. The IAEA Scientific Secretary for this publication was initially M. Balonov and subsequently D.M. Telleria both of the Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety. CONTENTS SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................. 2 CHAPTER 2. MODEL DESCRIPTIONS................................................................................. 3 2.1. Common elements .............................................................................................. 3 2.1.1. Dosimetry ............................................................................................. 3 2.1.2. Transfer................................................................................................. 4 2.1.3. Reference organisms ............................................................................ 5 2.1.4. Assessment structure............................................................................ 5 2.2. Atomic Energy Canada Limited (AECL) approach ........................................... 5 2.3. RESRAD-BIOTA............................................................................................... 6 2.4. ERICA (Environmental Risk from Ionising Contaminants – Assessment and Management) ............................................................................................... 6 2.5. FASSET (Framework for the Assessment of Environmental Impact)............... 7 2.6. England and Wales Environment Agency R&D128 (EA R&D128) ................. 8 2.7. LIETDOS-BIO ................................................................................................... 8 2.8. DosDiMEco........................................................................................................ 8 2.9. ECOMOD........................................................................................................... 9 2.10. EDEN 2 (Elementary Dose Evaluation for Natural Environment) .................. 10 2.11. CASTEAUR ..................................................................................................... 11 2.12. EPIC DOSES3D............................................................................................... 12 2.13. FASTer ............................................................................................................. 13 2.13.1. Transfer to herbivores and carnivores ................................................ 13 2.14. D-MAX............................................................................................................. 16 2.15. LAKECO-B...................................................................................................... 18 2.15.1. Transfer module.................................................................................. 18 2.15.2. Dose module....................................................................................... 20 2.16. SÚJB approach................................................................................................. 22 CHAPTER 3. COMPARISON OF UNWEIGHTED ABSORBED DOSE RATES.......... 23 3.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 23 3.2. Description of the exercise ............................................................................... 23 3.3. Statistical analysis methodology ...................................................................... 24 3.3.1. Exploratory data analysis................................................................... 25 3.3.2. Normality tests....................................................................................25 3.3.3. Calculation of reference data and scoring of each approach for performance........................................................................................ 28 3.3.4. Issues in results interpretation ............................................................ 28 3.4. Results .............................................................................................................. 29 3.4.1. Identification of outliers ..................................................................... 29 3.5. Discussion......................................................................................................... 36 3.5.1. Effect of number of daughter products............................................... 37 3.5.2. Effect of soil/sediment depth and target position............................... 38 3.6. Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 46 CHAPTER 4. COMPARISON OF PREDICTED WHOLE-BODY ACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS........................................................................................... 48 4.1. Exercise description.......................................................................................... 48 4.2. Application of the participating models ........................................................... 48 4.2.1. AECL approach.................................................................................. 48 4.2.2. RESRAD-BIOTA............................................................................... 49 4.2.3. ERICA ................................................................................................ 50 4.2.4. FASSET.............................................................................................. 50 4.2.5. DosDiMEco........................................................................................ 51 4.2.6. ECOMOD (Russia)............................................................................ 51 4.3. Results .............................................................................................................. 51 4.4. Statistical analyses............................................................................................ 65 4.4.1. Evaluation of statistical analyses........................................................ 66 4.5. Discussion......................................................................................................... 68 4.6. Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 70 CHAPTER 5. FRESHWATER SCENARIO: PERCH LAKE ........................................... 72 5.1. Scenario description......................................................................................... 72 5.2. Application of models to the scenario .............................................................. 72 5.2.1. RESRAD-BIOTA..............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Do Radioactive Materials Move Through the Environment to People?
    5. How Do Radioactive Materials Move Through the Environment to People? aturally occurring radioactive materials Radionuclides can be removed from the air in Nare present in our environment and in several ways. Particles settle out of the our bodies. We are, therefore, continuously atmosphere if air currents cannot keep them exposed to radiation from radioactive atoms suspended. Rain or snow can also remove (radionuclides). Radionuclides released to them. the environment as a result of human When these particles are removed from the activities add to that exposure. atmosphere, they may land in water, on soil, or Radiation is energy emitted when a on the surfaces of living and non-living things. radionuclide decays. It can affect living tissue The particles may return to the atmosphere by only when the energy is absorbed in that resuspension, which occurs when wind or tissue. Radionuclides can be hazardous to some other natural or human activity living tissue when they are inside an organism generates clouds of dust containing radionu- where radiation released can be immediately clides. absorbed. They may also be hazardous when they are outside of the organism but close ➤ Water enough for some radiation to be absorbed by Radionuclides can come into contact with the tissue. water in several ways. They may be deposited Radionuclides move through the environ- from the air (as described above). They may ment and into the body through many also be released to the water from the ground different pathways. Understanding these through erosion, seepage, or human activities pathways makes it possible to take actions to such as mining or release of radioactive block or avoid exposure to radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Basics
    Environmental Impact Statement for Remediation of Area IV \'- f Susana Field Laboratory .A . &at is radiation? Ra - -.. - -. - - . known as ionizing radiatios bScause it can produce charged.. particles (ions)..- in matter. .-- . 'I" . .. .. .. .- . - .- . -- . .-- - .. What is radioactivity? Radioactivity is produced by the process of radioactive atmi trying to become stable. Radiation is emitted in the process. In the United State! Radioactive radioactivity is measured in units of curies. Smaller fractions of the curie are the millicurie (111,000 curie), the microcurie (111,000,000 curie), and the picocurie (1/1,000,000 microcurie). Particle What is radioactive material? Radioactive material is any material containing unstable atoms that emit radiation. What are the four basic types of ionizing radiation? Aluminum Leadl Paper foil Concrete Adphaparticles-Alpha particles consist of two protons and two neutrons. They can travel only a few centimeters in air and can be stopped easily by a sheet of paper or by the skin's surface. Betaparticles-Beta articles are smaller and lighter than alpha particles and have the mass of a single electron. A high-energy beta particle can travel a few meters in the air. Beta particles can pass through a sheet of paper, but may be stopped by a thin sheet of aluminum foil or glass. Gamma rays-Gamma rays (and x-rays), unlike alpha or beta particles, are waves of pure energy. Gamma radiation is very penetrating and can travel several hundred feet in air. Gamma radiation requires a thick wall of concrete, lead, or steel to stop it. Neutrons-A neutron is an atomic particle that has about one-quarter the weight of an alpha particle.
    [Show full text]
  • Radionuclides (Including Radon, Radium and Uranium)
    Radionuclides (including Radon, Radium and Uranium) Hazard Summary Uranium, radium, and radon are naturally occurring radionuclides found in the environment. No information is available on the acute (short-term) noncancer effects of the radionuclides in humans. Animal studies have reported inflammatory reactions in the nasal passages and kidney damage from acute inhalation exposure to uranium. Chronic (long-term) inhalation exposure to uranium and radon in humans has been linked to respiratory effects, such as chronic lung disease, while radium exposure has resulted in acute leukopenia, anemia, necrosis of the jaw, and other effects. Cancer is the major effect of concern from the radionuclides. Radium, via oral exposure, is known to cause bone, head, and nasal passage tumors in humans, and radon, via inhalation exposure, causes lung cancer in humans. Uranium may cause lung cancer and tumors of the lymphatic and hematopoietic tissues. EPA has not classified uranium, radon or radium for carcinogenicity. Please Note: The main sources of information for this fact sheet are EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) (5), which contains information on oral chronic toxicity and the RfD for uranium, and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's (ATSDR's) Toxicological Profiles for Uranium, Radium, and Radon. (1) Uses Uranium is used in nuclear power plants and nuclear weapons. Very small amounts are used in photography for toning, in the leather and wood industries for stains and dyes, and in the silk and wood industries. (2) Radium is used as a radiation source for treating neoplastic diseases, as a radon source, in radiography of metals, and as a neutron source for research.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.2.43A Radiation-Dominated Model of the Universe
    6 BIG BANG COSMOLOGY – THE EVOLVING UNIVERSE 6.2.43A radiation-dominated model of the Universe R We have just seen that in the early Universe, the dominant energy density is that due to the radiation within the Universe. The Friedmann equation that was described in Chapter 5 (Box 5.4) can be solved for such conditions and the way in which the scale factor varies with time for such a model is shown in Figure 6.7. One important feature of such a model is that the scale factor varies in the following way: R(t) ∝ t1/2 (6.17) 0 t −4 Because the energy density of radiation is dominant for times when R(t)/R(t0) < 10 , all cosmological models which start at t = 0 with R(0) = 0, will go through a phase Figure 6.73The evolution of the that is well described by this radiation-dominated model. Thus we are in the rather scale factor with time in a remarkable position that regardless of which type of cosmological model best cosmological model in which the dominant contribution to the describes the Universe at the present, we can be reasonably confident that we energy density arises from the know how the scale factor varied with time in the first few tens of thousands of radiation within the Universe years of the big bang. (i.e. during the radiation-dominated However, the temperature of the background radiation varies with scale factor era). according to T(t) ∝ 1/R(t) (Equation 6.6). It follows that during the radiation- dominated era the temperature of the background radiation varies with time according to T(t) ∝ t −1/2 (6.18) This describes how temperature changes with time in an expanding universe where the energy density of radiation is the dominant component.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Safety in Fluoroscopy
    Radiation Safety for New Medical Physics Graduate Students John Vetter, PhD Medical Physics Department UW School of Medicine & Public Health Background and Purpose of This Training . This is intended as a brief introduction to radiation safety from the perspective of a Medical Physicist. Have a healthy respect for radiation without an undue fear of it. The learning objectives are: . To point out the sources of ionizing radiation in everyday life and at work. To present an overview of the health effects of ionizing radiation. To show basic concepts and techniques used to protect against exposure to ionizing radiation. Further training in Radiation Safety can be found at: https://ehs.wisc.edu/radiation-safety-training/ Outline . Ionizing Radiation . Definition, Quantities & Units . Levels of Radiation Exposure . Background & Medical . Health Effects of Radiation Exposure . Stochastic & Deterministic . Limits on Radiation Exposure . Rationale for Exposure Limits . Minimizing Radiation Exposure . Time, Distance, Shielding, Containment Definition of Ionizing Radiation . Radiation can be thought of as energy in motion. Electromagnetic radiation is pure energy that moves at the speed of light in the form of photons and includes: radio waves; microwaves; infrared, visible and ultraviolet light; x-rays and γ-rays. A key difference between these forms of electromagnetic radiation is the amount of energy that each photon carries. Some ultraviolet light, and X-rays and Gamma-rays have enough energy to remove electrons from atoms as they are absorbed, forming positive and negatively charged ions. These forms of radiation are called ionizing radiation. Radio waves, microwaves, infrared and visible light do not have enough energy to ionize atoms.
    [Show full text]
  • PE1128 Radiation Exposure in Medical Imaging
    Radiation Exposure in Medical Imaging This handout answers questions about radiation exposure and what Seattle Children’s Hospital is doing to keep your child safe. Medical imaging uses machines and techniques to provide valuable information about your child’s health. It plays an important role in helping your doctor make the correct diagnosis. Some of these machines use radiation to get these images. We are all exposed to small amounts of radiation in normal daily life from soil, rocks, air, water and even some of the foods we eat. This is called background radiation. The amount of background radiation that you are exposed to depends on where you live and varies throughout the country. The average person in the United States receives about 3 milli-Sieverts (mSv) per year from background radiation. A mSv is a unit of measurement for radiation, like an inch is a unit of length. Which medical MRI and ultrasound do not use ionizing (high-energy) radiation to make imaging exams images. MRI uses magnets and radio waves, and ultrasound uses sound waves. use radiation? Diagnostic An X-ray is a form of energy that can pass through your child’s bones and Radiography tissues to create an image. The image created is called a radiograph, sometimes referred to as an “X-ray.” X-rays are used to detect and diagnose conditions in the body. CT scan A CT (computed tomography) scan, sometimes called a “CAT scan,” uses X-rays, special equipment, and computers to make pictures that provide a multidimensional view of a body part.
    [Show full text]
  • General Terms for Radiation Studies: Dose Reconstruction Epidemiology Risk Assessment 1999
    General Terms for Radiation Studies: Dose Reconstruction Epidemiology Risk Assessment 1999 Absorbed dose (A measure of potential damage to tissue): The Bias In epidemiology, this term does not refer to an opinion or amount of energy deposited by ionizing radiation in a unit mass point of view. Bias is the result of some systematic flaw in the of tissue. Expressed in units of joule per kilogram (J/kg), which design of a study, the collection of data, or in the analysis of is given the special name Agray@ (Gy). The traditional unit of data. Bias is not a chance occurrence. absorbed dose is the rad (100 rad equal 1 Gy). Biological plausibility When study results are credible and Alpha particle (ionizing radiation): A particle emitted from the believable in terms of current scientific biological knowledge. nucleus of some radioactive atoms when they decay. An alpha Birth defect An abnormality of structure, function or body particle is essentially a helium atom nucleus. It generally carries metabolism present at birth that may result in a physical and (or) more energy than gamma or beta radiation, and deposits that mental disability or is fatal. energy very quickly while passing through tissue. Alpha particles cannot penetrate the outer, dead layer of skin. Cancer A collective term for malignant tumors. (See “tumor,” Therefore, they do not cause damage to living tissue when and “malignant”). outside the body. When inhaled or ingested, however, alpha particles are especially damaging because they transfer relatively Carcinogen An agent or substance that can cause cancer. large amounts of ionizing energy to living cells.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Electromagnetic Radiation?
    WHATHAT ISIS ELELECTRT R OMAGNETICOMAGNETIC RADIAADIATITIONON? MEET A PLANETARY SCIENTIST — Dr. Carlé Pieters, Brown University How are radio waves, visible light, and X-rays similar? They are all types of electromagnetic radiation. All three travel — radiate — What do you do? and are made or detected by electronic (or magnetic) sensors, like a T.V., a digital camera, or a dentist’s X-ray machine. Types of electromagnetic radiation with which we are most familiar include ultraviolet light (causing sunburn), infrared light (in remote controls), and microwaves (in ovens). Electromagnetic radiation is made of electromagnetic waves. It is classified by the distance from the crest of one wave to the crest of the next — the wavelength. These waves can be thousands of miles long, like radiowaves, or smaller than an atom, like gamma rays! Collectively, these wavelengths make a spectrum — the electromagnetic spectrum. The shorter the wavelength, the more energetic the electromagnetic radiation. Radio waves, including microwaves, have long wavelengths and relatively low energy levels. Visible light, ultraviolet rays, X-rays, and gamma rays have shorter wavelengths and correspondingly higher levels of energy. The wavelengths of ultraviolet light, X-rays, and gamma rays are short enough to interact with human tissue and even alter DNA. What have you investigated on the Moon? Radiation Cosmic and Ultraviolet Visible Infrared Type X-Rays Microwaves and Radio Waves Gamma Rays Light Light Light 0.01 10 400 700 1 million nanometers nanometers nanometers nanometers nanometers Relative Why should we return to the Moon? Size tip of atomic atom molecule bacterium butterflyastronaut buildings nucleus a pin (you!) WHATHAT ISIS REFLECTANCEEFLECTANCE SPECPECTRTROSCOPYOSCOPY? If someone wants to become a scientist, what should they do? Spectroscopy is the study of the electromagnetic radiation emitted, absorbed, or reflected by an object.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Glossary
    Radiation Glossary Activity The rate of disintegration (transformation) or decay of radioactive material. The units of activity are Curie (Ci) and the Becquerel (Bq). Agreement State Any state with which the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has entered into an effective agreement under subsection 274b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Under the agreement, the state regulates the use of by-product, source, and small quantities of special nuclear material within said state. Airborne Radioactive Material Radioactive material dispersed in the air in the form of dusts, fumes, particulates, mists, vapors, or gases. ALARA Acronym for "As Low As Reasonably Achievable". Making every reasonable effort to maintain exposures to ionizing radiation as far below the dose limits as practical, consistent with the purpose for which the licensed activity is undertaken. It takes into account the state of technology, the economics of improvements in relation to state of technology, the economics of improvements in relation to benefits to the public health and safety, societal and socioeconomic considerations, and in relation to utilization of radioactive materials and licensed materials in the public interest. Alpha Particle A positively charged particle ejected spontaneously from the nuclei of some radioactive elements. It is identical to a helium nucleus, with a mass number of 4 and a charge of +2. Annual Limit on Intake (ALI) Annual intake of a given radionuclide by "Reference Man" which would result in either a committed effective dose equivalent of 5 rems or a committed dose equivalent of 50 rems to an organ or tissue. Attenuation The process by which radiation is reduced in intensity when passing through some material.
    [Show full text]
  • UV Radiation (PDF)
    United States Air and Radiation EPA 430-F-10-025 Environmental Protection 6205J June 2010 Agency www.epa.gov/ozone/strathome.html UV Radiation This fact sheet explains the types of ultraviolet radiation and the various factors that can affect the levels reaching the Earth’s surface. The sun emits energy over a broad spectrum of wavelengths: visible light that you see, infrared radiation that you feel as heat, and ultraviolet (UV) radiation that you can’t see or feel. UV radiation has a shorter wavelength and higher energy than visible light. It affects human health both positively and negatively. Short exposure to UVB radiation generates vitamin D, but can also lead to sunburn depending on an individual’s skin type. Fortunately for life on Earth, our atmosphere’s stratospheric ozone layer shields us from most UV radiation. What does get through the ozone layer, however, can cause the following problems, particularly for people who spend unprotected time outdoors: ● Skin cancer ● Suppression of the immune system ● Cataracts ● Premature aging of the skin Did You Since the benefits of sunlight cannot be separated from its damaging effects, it is important to understand the risks of overexposure, and take simple precautions to protect yourself. Know? Types of UV Radiation Ultraviolet (UV) radiation, from the Scientists classify UV radiation into three types or bands—UVA, UVB, and UVC. The ozone sun and from layer absorbs some, but not all, of these types of UV radiation: ● tanning beds, is UVA: Wavelength: 320-400 nm. Not absorbed by the ozone layer. classified as a ● UVB: Wavelength: 290-320 nm.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal and External Exposure Exposure Routes 2.1
    Exposure Routes Internal and External Exposure Exposure Routes 2.1 External exposure Internal exposure Body surface From outer space contamination and the sun Inhalation Suspended matters Food and drink consumption From a radiation Lungs generator Radio‐ pharmaceuticals Wound Buildings Ground Radiation coming from outside the body Radiation emitted within the body Radioactive The body is equally exposed to radiation in both cases. materials "Radiation exposure" refers to the situation where the body is in the presence of radiation. There are two types of radiation exposure, "internal exposure" and "external exposure." External exposure means to receive radiation that comes from radioactive materials existing on the ground, suspended in the air, or attached to clothes or the surface of the body (p.25 of Vol. 1, "External Exposure and Skin"). Conversely, internal exposure is caused (i) when a person has a meal and takes in radioactive materials in the food or drink (ingestion); (ii) when a person breathes in radioactive materials in the air (inhalation); (iii) when radioactive materials are absorbed through the skin (percutaneous absorption); (iv) when radioactive materials enter the body from a wound (wound contamination); and (v) when radiopharmaceuticals containing radioactive materials are administered for the purpose of medical treatment. Once radioactive materials enter the body, the body will continue to be exposed to radiation until the radioactive materials are excreted in the urine or feces (biological half-life) or as the radioactivity weakens over time (p.26 of Vol. 1, "Internal Exposure"). The difference between internal exposure and external exposure lies in whether the source that emits radiation is inside or outside the body.
    [Show full text]
  • Gamma-Ray Interactions with Matter
    2 Gamma-Ray Interactions with Matter G. Nelson and D. ReWy 2.1 INTRODUCTION A knowledge of gamma-ray interactions is important to the nondestructive assayist in order to understand gamma-ray detection and attenuation. A gamma ray must interact with a detector in order to be “seen.” Although the major isotopes of uranium and plutonium emit gamma rays at fixed energies and rates, the gamma-ray intensity measured outside a sample is always attenuated because of gamma-ray interactions with the sample. This attenuation must be carefully considered when using gamma-ray NDA instruments. This chapter discusses the exponential attenuation of gamma rays in bulk mater- ials and describes the major gamma-ray interactions, gamma-ray shielding, filtering, and collimation. The treatment given here is necessarily brief. For a more detailed discussion, see Refs. 1 and 2. 2.2 EXPONENTIAL A~ATION Gamma rays were first identified in 1900 by Becquerel and VMard as a component of the radiation from uranium and radium that had much higher penetrability than alpha and beta particles. In 1909, Soddy and Russell found that gamma-ray attenuation followed an exponential law and that the ratio of the attenuation coefficient to the density of the attenuating material was nearly constant for all materials. 2.2.1 The Fundamental Law of Gamma-Ray Attenuation Figure 2.1 illustrates a simple attenuation experiment. When gamma radiation of intensity IO is incident on an absorber of thickness L, the emerging intensity (I) transmitted by the absorber is given by the exponential expression (2-i) 27 28 G.
    [Show full text]