DOCSLIB.ORG

A Re-Evaluation of the Scarce Species at Highgate Common SSSI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A re-evaluation of the scarce species at Highgate Common SSSI, Staffordshire Focussing on the Aculeate Hymenoptera A. Jukes BSc (Hons) MIEEM October, 2010 Report title: – A re-evaluation of the scarce species at Highgate Common SSSI, Staffordshire Focussing on the Aculeate Hymenoptera By: Andy Jukes BSc (Hons) MIEEM Report number: IS1002 Client : Staffordshire Wildlife Trust and Natural England Staffordshire Wildlife Trust contact : Helen Dale (Reserves Manager) [email protected] atural England contact : Tom Holland [email protected] The author would like to thank Jeff Sim and the volunteers of Highgate Common for their help during the survey work and to Natural England for commissioning the survey. A re-evaluation of the scarce species at Highgate Common SSSI, Staffordshire 2 A.Jukes, 2010 [email protected] Contents 1 Background.................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Location......................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Recent history................................................................................................................ 5 1.3 Recent recording history ............................................................................................... 5 1.4 Brief............................................................................................................................... 6 1.5 Methodology.................................................................................................................. 6 1.5.1 Sweep netting............................................................................................................ 6 1.5.2 Spot sampling ........................................................................................................... 6 1.5.3 Recording effort........................................................................................................ 6 2 The scarce species.......................................................................................... 8 2.1 Scarce list for assessment (adapted from Jukes, 2004) ................................................. 8 3 Results............................................................................................................. 9 3.1 The scarce species – site status changes ....................................................................... 9 3.1.1 Key species ............................................................................................................... 9 3.1.2 Species not recorded............................................................................................... 11 3.1.3 Species not recorded but in the area ....................................................................... 12 3.1.4 Significant additions to the site inventory.............................................................. 12 3.1.5 Update of scarce species table (aculeates) .............................................................. 13 3.1.6 Update of scarce species (non-aculeate) ................................................................. 13 3.1.7 Incidental recording ................................................................................................ 13 3.1.8 New inventory total ................................................................................................ 13 4 omada fulvicornis DA analysis ............................................................. 15 4.1 Background ................................................................................................................. 15 4.1.1 Nomada fulvicornis ................................................................................................ 15 4.2 Methodology................................................................................................................ 15 4.3 Results ......................................................................................................................... 15 4.4 Comments .................................................................................................................... 15 5 Site quality.................................................................................................... 16 5.1 ISIS.................................................................................................................................. 16 5.1.1 Analysis of ISIS results........................................................................................... 16 5.1.2 So does this mean Highgate Common is less important? ....................................... 17 6 Enville Golf Course ..................................................................................... 19 6.1 Situation....................................................................................................................... 19 6.2 Contiguous management ............................................................................................. 19 7 Management recommendations ................................................................. 20 7.1 Bare ground and short turf.......................................................................................... 20 7.1.1 Bare ground creation............................................................................................... 21 7.2 Flowery areas.............................................................................................................. 23 7.3 Scrub............................................................................................................................ 24 7.4 Roadside verges........................................................................................................... 24 A re-evaluation of the scarce species at Highgate Common SSSI, Staffordshire 3 A.Jukes, 2010 [email protected] 7.5 Public pressure............................................................................................................ 24 8 Recommendations for further work.......................................................... 25 8.1 Species......................................................................................................................... 25 8.1.1 Andrena nigrospina (solitary bee)........................................................................... 25 8.1.2 Meloe proscarabaeus (oil beetle) ............................................................................ 25 8.1.3 Nomada fulvicornis ................................................................................................ 25 8.2 Habitat......................................................................................................................... 25 8.2.1 Enville Golf Course ................................................................................................ 25 8.2.2 Heathland network.................................................................................................. 25 8.2.3 Heathland Partnership............................................................................................. 26 References ............................................................................................................ 27 Annexes................................................................................................................. 28 Figures FIGURE 3.1: MELOE PROSCARABAEUS . OIL BEETLE .................................................. 11 FIGURE 3.2: TIMARCHA TEEBRICOSA . BLOODY NOSE BEETLE . STATUS IS STABLE AND DISTRIBUTION INCREASED ACROSS HIGHGATE COMMON ........................ 11 FIGURE 3.3: LASIOPOGO CICTUS . THE SPRING ROBBERFLY .................................. 14 FIGURE 7.1: MAIN EXPOSURE (A REA 1) IN 2005..................................................... 20 FIGURE 7.2: MAIN EXPOSURE (A REA 1) IN 2010..................................................... 20 FIGURE 7.3: APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS FOR NEW SCRAPES (X1-6) ........................ 22 FIGURE 7.4: ARTIFICIALLY CREATED SCRAPE WITH MANMADE “SNUFFLE HOLES ”. THIS SCRAPE WAS USED BY ADREA IGROSPIA AND IN 2010 ..................... 23 FIGURE 7.5: BURLISH TOP , WORCESTERSHIRE . EXTENSIVE ASTERACEAE FORAGING ....................................................................................................................... 24 A re-evaluation of the scarce species at Highgate Common SSSI, Staffordshire 4 A.Jukes, 2010 [email protected] 1 Background 1.1 Location Highgate Common SSSI is a lowland heathland at the near southern-most tip of Staffordshire located at OS grid reference SO838898. It is located in a shallow, sandstone depression surrounded by plantations and secondary woodland which serves to elevate the depression’s micro-climate. Beyond the site lies a primarily arable landscape in all directions with occasional intensive grazed pasture and woodland blocks. There is an adjacent golf course (Enville Golf Course) that was once part of the same piece of common land as Highgate Common and therefore possesses similar heathland elements, in particular heather and acid grassland. This golf course may be of importance to Highgate Common as an ancillary site. (See section 6 for more detail on the two sites relationship) Enville Golf Course has been the subject to an invertebrate survey in 2010 (Jukes, 2010a). 1.2 Recent history Highgate Common has a history of disturbance and public usage. It was once possible to drive a car across the site and motorcycles were frequently ridden on the open areas of the Common,
Recommended publications
  • Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of Different Forest Habitats in the National Park Keller- Wald-Edersee (Germany, Hessen)

    Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of Different Forest Habitats in the National Park Keller- Wald-Edersee (Germany, Hessen)

    ©Ampulex online, Christian Schmid-Egger; download unter http://www.ampulex.de oder www.zobodat.at AMPULEX 4|2012 Fuhrmann: Wegwespen des Nationalparks Kellerwald-Edersee Die Wegwespenfauna (Hymenoptera: Pompi- lidae) unterschiedlicher Waldstandorte des Nationalparks Kellerwald-Edersee Markus Fuhrmann Zum Großen Wald 19 | 57223 Kreuztal | Germany | [email protected] Zusammenfassung Es werden Ergebnisse der Untersuchung von Wegwespen drei verschiedener Waldstandorte des Nationalparks Kellerwald-Edersee vorgestellt. Während zwei der drei Wälder typische bodensaure Buchenwaldstandorte unterschiedlichen Alters verkörpern, ist der dritte Standort ein steiler Eichengrenzwald, der stark mit Kiefern bewachsen ist. Insgesamt kommen Daten von 717 gefangenen Individuen in 17 Arten zur Auswertung. Die Fauna setzt sich auf den bodensauren Buchenwaldstandorten aus weit verbreiteten euryöken Wegwespen zusammen. Auffällig ist, dass allein 628 Wegwespen in 14 Arten von einer isolierten Windwurffläche des Sturmes Kyrill stammen. Demgegenüber konnten in einem sehr alten, aufgelichteten Buchenwald nur 56 Exemplare in fünf Arten gefangen werden. Wegwespen haben in aufgelichte- ten, „urwaldähnlichen“ Buchenwäldern ihr Aktivitätsmaximum in den Frühjahrsmonaten. Auf Lichtungen hingegen kommen neben Frühjahrsarten auch Hochsommer-Pompiliden vor. Es zeigte sich, dass das Vorkommen der Pompiliden im Wesentlichen durch ein für die Entwicklung der Larven geeignetes Mikroklima innerhalb des Waldes bestimmt wird, und weniger durch die Spinnendichte und die Verfügbarkeit von Nestrequisiten. Summary Markus Fuhrmann: The fauna of Spider Wasps (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of different forest habitats in the National Park Keller- wald-Edersee (Germany, Hessen). Pompilid wasps were studied in three different forest types in the Nationalpark Kellerwald-Edersee (Germany, Hesse, Waldeck-Frankenberg). Two woods were red beech forests, the third was a boundary oak wood. The oak wood yet was dominated by pines.
  • (Aculeata) in Birch Stands of the Air-Polluted Area of Northern Bohemia

    (Aculeata) in Birch Stands of the Air-Polluted Area of Northern Bohemia

    JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 49, 2003 (4): 148–158 Hymenoptera (Aculeata) in birch stands of the air-polluted area of Northern Bohemia E. KULA1, P. TYRNER2 1Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Brno, Czech Republic 2Litvínov Grammar School, Litvínov, Czech Republic ABSTRACT: The Hymenoptera (Aculeata) fauna was studied in birch stands (Betula pendula Roth) of colder areas of Northern Bohemia using the method of Moericke’s yellow traps. Altogether 159 species were trapped; the most important were Andrena lappona, Vespula vulgaris, Halictus sp., Trypoxylon minus and Vespula rufa. Only 12.7% of the species are widely spread in this ecosystem type. In 1990–1994 and in 1995–1999 we compared the abundance of the fauna and discovered that many species of the families Apidae and Sphecidae receded from the birch stands due to changing site conditions (light, weed infestation). Keywords: Hymenoptera; Aculeata; Betula pendula; Moericke’s yellow traps; Northern Bohemia Birch (Betula pendula Roth) stands have been a sub- The attention of the majority of authors was focused stitute forest community for dead spruce stands in the on warmer localities of Bohemia that have a greater and air-polluted area of Northern Bohemia since 1980. The more interesting range of fauna (BALTHASAR 1954, fauna of this area has been the object of long-term inves- 1972; KOCOUREK 1966), in contrast to localities where tigations in the Děčín Sandstone Uplands. In this area we the climate is colder and more humid (TYRNER 1988, collected 861 species of moths (KULA 1997a); in addition, 1995). the crown fauna of birch includes 119 species of caterpil- The objective of the present study is to document the lars (KULA 1997b) and 71 species of bugs (KULA 1999).
  • Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate Survey 2020

    Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate Survey 2020

    Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate survey 2020 (Coleoptera, Diptera and Aculeate Hymenoptera) Nigel Jones & Dr. Caroline Uff Shropshire Entomology Services CONTENTS Summary 3 Introduction ……………………………………………………….. 3 Methodology …………………………………………………….. 4 Results ………………………………………………………………. 5 Coleoptera – Beeetles 5 Method ……………………………………………………………. 6 Results ……………………………………………………………. 6 Analysis of saproxylic Coleoptera ……………………. 7 Conclusion ………………………………………………………. 8 Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera – true flies, bees, wasps ants 8 Diptera 8 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results ……………………………………………………………. 9 Aculeate Hymenoptera 9 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results …………………………………………………………….. 9 Analysis of Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera … 10 Conclusion Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera .. 11 Other species ……………………………………………………. 12 Wetland fauna ………………………………………………….. 12 Table 2 Key Coleoptera species ………………………… 13 Table 3 Key Diptera species ……………………………… 18 Table 4 Key aculeate Hymenoptera species ……… 21 Bibliography and references 22 Appendix 1 Conservation designations …………….. 24 Appendix 2 ………………………………………………………… 25 2 SUMMARY During 2020, 811 invertebrate species (mainly beetles, true-flies, bees, wasps and ants) were recorded from Millichope Park and a small area of adjoining arable estate. The park’s saproxylic beetle fauna, associated with dead wood and veteran trees, can be considered as nationally important. True flies associated with decaying wood add further significant species to the site’s saproxylic fauna. There is also a strong
  • Diversity and Resource Choice of Flower-Visiting Insects in Relation to Pollen Nutritional Quality and Land Use

    Diversity and Resource Choice of Flower-Visiting Insects in Relation to Pollen Nutritional Quality and Land Use

    Diversity and resource choice of flower-visiting insects in relation to pollen nutritional quality and land use Diversität und Ressourcennutzung Blüten besuchender Insekten in Abhängigkeit von Pollenqualität und Landnutzung Vom Fachbereich Biologie der Technischen Universität Darmstadt zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doctor rerum naturalium genehmigte Dissertation von Dipl. Biologin Christiane Natalie Weiner aus Köln Berichterstatter (1. Referent): Prof. Dr. Nico Blüthgen Mitberichterstatter (2. Referent): Prof. Dr. Andreas Jürgens Tag der Einreichung: 26.02.2016 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 29.04.2016 Darmstadt 2016 D17 2 Ehrenwörtliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit ehrenwörtlich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit entsprechend den Regeln guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis selbständig und ohne unzulässige Hilfe Dritter angefertigt habe. Sämtliche aus fremden Quellen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Gedanken sowie sämtliche von Anderen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Daten, Techniken und Materialien sind als solche kenntlich gemacht. Die Arbeit wurde bisher keiner anderen Hochschule zu Prüfungszwecken eingereicht. Osterholz-Scharmbeck, den 24.02.2016 3 4 My doctoral thesis is based on the following manuscripts: Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2011): Land-use intensity in grasslands: changes in biodiversity, species composition and specialization in flower-visitor networks. Basic and Applied Ecology 12 (4), 292-299. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2014): Land-use impacts on plant-pollinator networks: interaction strength and specialization predict pollinator declines. Ecology 95, 466–474. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M , Blüthgen, N. (in prep.): Land-use intensification triggers diversity loss in pollination networks: Regional distinctions between three different German bioregions Weiner, C.N., Hilpert, A., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N.
  • Виды Рода Agenioideus Ashmead, 1902 (Hymenoptera, Pompilidae) Фауны Беларуси

    Виды Рода Agenioideus Ashmead, 1902 (Hymenoptera, Pompilidae) Фауны Беларуси

    Общая биология Выпуск 6/2018 9 УДК 595.794.23(476) А. С. Шляхтёнок Государственное научно-производственное объединение «Научно-практический центр Национальной академии наук Беларуси по биоресурсам», ул. Академическая, 27, 220072 Минск, Республика Беларусь, [email protected] ВИДЫ РОДА AGENIOIDEUS ASHMEAD, 1902 (HYMENOPTERA, POMPILIDAE) ФАУНЫ БЕЛАРУСИ В результате 30-летних сборов в регионе отловлено 215 экземпляров ос рода Agenioideus, относящихся к двум видам: A. cinctellus (98,7%) и A. sericeus (1,3%). A. cinctellus встречается на всей территории республики, а A. sericeus обнаружен только в её южной части. Виды, зарегистрированные на территории Беларуси, обитают преимущественно в открытых биотопах. Наибольшая активность выявленных видов приходится на июль. На основании изучения полученного материала и литературных источников, была составлена определительная таблица из 6 видов рода Agenioideus. Работа выполнена при поддержке Белорусского республиканского фонда фундаментальных исследований (договор № Б15-049). Ключевые слова: Беларусь; фауна; экология; Hymenoptera; Pompilidae; Agenioideus; определительная таблица; распространение. Рис. 24. Библиогр.: 15 назв. A. S. Shlyakhtyonok The Scientific and Practical Center for Bioresources of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 27, Akademicheskaya str., 220072 Minsk, Belarus, [email protected] THE SPECIES OF THE GENUS AGENIOIDEUS ASHMEAD, 1902 (HYMENOPTERA, POMPILIDAE) OF THE BELARUSIAN FAUNA As a result of 30-year gathering in the region, 215 specimens of the genus Agenioideus, belonging to two species, were caught: A. cinctellus (98.7%) and A. sericeus (1.3%). A. cinctellus is found throughout the entire territory of the republic, and A. sericeus is found only in its southern part. The species registered in Belarus live mainly in open biotopes. The peak of activity of the identified species is in July.
  • Final Report 1

    Final Report 1

    Sand pit for Biodiversity at Cep II quarry Researcher: Klára Řehounková Research group: Petr Bogusch, David Boukal, Milan Boukal, Lukáš Čížek, František Grycz, Petr Hesoun, Kamila Lencová, Anna Lepšová, Jan Máca, Pavel Marhoul, Klára Řehounková, Jiří Řehounek, Lenka Schmidtmayerová, Robert Tropek Březen – září 2012 Abstract We compared the effect of restoration status (technical reclamation, spontaneous succession, disturbed succession) on the communities of vascular plants and assemblages of arthropods in CEP II sand pit (T řebo ňsko region, SW part of the Czech Republic) to evaluate their biodiversity and conservation potential. We also studied the experimental restoration of psammophytic grasslands to compare the impact of two near-natural restoration methods (spontaneous and assisted succession) to establishment of target species. The sand pit comprises stages of 2 to 30 years since site abandonment with moisture gradient from wet to dry habitats. In all studied groups, i.e. vascular pants and arthropods, open spontaneously revegetated sites continuously disturbed by intensive recreation activities hosted the largest proportion of target and endangered species which occurred less in the more closed spontaneously revegetated sites and which were nearly absent in technically reclaimed sites. Out results provide clear evidence that the mosaics of spontaneously established forests habitats and open sand habitats are the most valuable stands from the conservation point of view. It has been documented that no expensive technical reclamations are needed to restore post-mining sites which can serve as secondary habitats for many endangered and declining species. The experimental restoration of rare and endangered plant communities seems to be efficient and promising method for a future large-scale restoration projects in abandoned sand pits.
  • The Campanulaceae of Ohio1

    The Campanulaceae of Ohio1

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by KnowledgeBank at OSU 142 WIENS ET AL. Vol. 62 THE CAMPANULACEAE OF OHIO1 ROBERT W. CRUDEN2 Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Ohio State University, Columbus 10 In Ohio the family Campanulaceae is represented by three genera: Campanula, Lobelia, and Specularia; and eleven species, of which five are common throughout the state and two are quite limited in their distribution. Following the key to species each species is briefly described, and distribution, common names, chromosome numbers, if known, and other pertinent data are given. Chromosome numbers are those given in Darlington and Wylie (1956) and in the papers of Bowden (1959a, 1959b). Average time of flowering is indi- ^ontribution Nc. 666 of the Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University. Research completed while a National Science Foundation Co-operative Fellow. 2Present address: Department of Botany, University of California, Berkeley 4, California. THE OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE 62(3): 142, May, 1962. No. 3 CAMPANULACEAE OF OHIO 143 cated as well as the extreme flowering dates as determined from a study of her- barium material. The genera and species are arranged alphabetically. Distri- bution maps are included. A dot represents a collection of a particular species in a given county. No attempt has been made to indicate the general area of collection within the county, as a majority of herbarium specimens do not have this information. It should also be pointed out that many of the collections examined are forty or more years old and thus the distribution maps do not neces- sarily indicate present distribution.
  • Bees and Wasps of the East Sussex South Downs

    Bees and Wasps of the East Sussex South Downs

    A SURVEY OF THE BEES AND WASPS OF FIFTEEN CHALK GRASSLAND AND CHALK HEATH SITES WITHIN THE EAST SUSSEX SOUTH DOWNS Steven Falk, 2011 A SURVEY OF THE BEES AND WASPS OF FIFTEEN CHALK GRASSLAND AND CHALK HEATH SITES WITHIN THE EAST SUSSEX SOUTH DOWNS Steven Falk, 2011 Abstract For six years between 2003 and 2008, over 100 site visits were made to fifteen chalk grassland and chalk heath sites within the South Downs of Vice-county 14 (East Sussex). This produced a list of 227 bee and wasp species and revealed the comparative frequency of different species, the comparative richness of different sites and provided a basic insight into how many of the species interact with the South Downs at a site and landscape level. The study revealed that, in addition to the character of the semi-natural grasslands present, the bee and wasp fauna is also influenced by the more intensively-managed agricultural landscapes of the Downs, with many species taking advantage of blossoming hedge shrubs, flowery fallow fields, flowery arable field margins, flowering crops such as Rape, plus plants such as buttercups, thistles and dandelions within relatively improved pasture. Some very rare species were encountered, notably the bee Halictus eurygnathus Blüthgen which had not been seen in Britain since 1946. This was eventually recorded at seven sites and was associated with an abundance of Greater Knapweed. The very rare bees Anthophora retusa (Linnaeus) and Andrena niveata Friese were also observed foraging on several dates during their flight periods, providing a better insight into their ecology and conservation requirements.
  • Pick Your Poison: Molecular Evolution of Venom Proteins in Asilidae (Insecta: Diptera)

    Pick Your Poison: Molecular Evolution of Venom Proteins in Asilidae (Insecta: Diptera)

    toxins Article Pick Your Poison: Molecular Evolution of Venom Proteins in Asilidae (Insecta: Diptera) Chris M. Cohen * , T. Jeffrey Cole and Michael S. Brewer * Howell Science Complex, East Carolina University, 1000 E 5th St., Greenville, NC 27858, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (C.M.C.); [email protected] (M.S.B.) Received: 5 November 2020; Accepted: 20 November 2020; Published: 24 November 2020 Abstract: Robber flies are an understudied family of venomous, predatory Diptera. With the recent characterization of venom from three asilid species, it is possible, for the first time, to study the molecular evolution of venom genes in this unique lineage. To accomplish this, a novel whole-body transcriptome of Eudioctria media was combined with 10 other publicly available asiloid thoracic or salivary gland transcriptomes to identify putative venom gene families and assess evidence of pervasive positive selection. A total of 348 gene families of sufficient size were analyzed, and 33 of these were predicted to contain venom genes. We recovered 151 families containing homologs to previously described venom proteins, and 40 of these were uniquely gained in Asilidae. Our gene family clustering suggests that many asilidin venom gene families are not natural groupings, as delimited by previous authors, but instead form multiple discrete gene families. Additionally, robber fly venoms have relatively few sites under positive selection, consistent with the hypothesis that the venoms of older lineages are dominated by negative selection acting to maintain toxic function. Keywords: Asilidae; transcriptome; positive selection Key Contribution: Asilidae venoms have relatively few sites under positive selection, consistent with the hypothesis that the venoms of older lineages are dominated by negative selection acting to maintain toxic function.
  • Mountain Plants of Northeastern Utah

    Mountain Plants of Northeastern Utah

    MOUNTAIN PLANTS OF NORTHEASTERN UTAH Original booklet and drawings by Berniece A. Andersen and Arthur H. Holmgren Revised May 1996 HG 506 FOREWORD In the original printing, the purpose of this manual was to serve as a guide for students, amateur botanists and anyone interested in the wildflowers of a rather limited geographic area. The intent was to depict and describe over 400 common, conspicuous or beautiful species. In this revision we have tried to maintain the intent and integrity of the original. Scientific names have been updated in accordance with changes in taxonomic thought since the time of the first printing. Some changes have been incorporated in order to make the manual more user-friendly for the beginner. The species are now organized primarily by floral color. We hope that these changes serve to enhance the enjoyment and usefulness of this long-popular manual. We would also like to thank Larry A. Rupp, Extension Horticulture Specialist, for critical review of the draft and for the cover photo. Linda Allen, Assistant Curator, Intermountain Herbarium Donna H. Falkenborg, Extension Editor Utah State University Extension is an affirmative action/equal employment opportunity employer and educational organization. We offer our programs to persons regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age or disability. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Robert L. Gilliland, Vice-President and Director, Cooperative Extension
  • Bloor Homes Midlands Land Off Bridgnorth Road, Wombourne

    Bloor Homes Midlands Land Off Bridgnorth Road, Wombourne

    Site Allocations Publication Plan Response Form Part A: Your Details (Please Print) Please ensure that we have an up to date email wherever possible, or postal address at which we can contact you. Your Details Agent’s Details (if applicable) Title Mr First Name Gary Last Name Stephens E-mail Address gary.stephens@marrons- planning.co.uk Job Title Planning Director (if applicable) Organisation Bloor Homes Limited Marrons Planning (if applicable) Address Bridgeway House, Bridgeway, Stratford-upon-Avon Post Code CV37 6YX Telephone Number 01789 339963 Please note the following: Representations cannot be kept confidential and will be available for public scrutiny, however your contact details will not be published. Your details will be added to our Local Plans Consultation database. All comments made at the Preferred Options stage have been taken into account in the production of the Publication Plan and will be submitted to the Inspector. The Publication Plan is a regulatory stage and any representations should relate to the legal compliance and soundness of the document. Please note your representation should cover succinctly all the information, evidence and supporting information necessary to support/justify the representation and the suggested change as there will not normally be a subsequent opportunity to make further representations. After this stage, further submissions will be only at the request of the Inspector, based on the matters and issues he/she identifies for examination. Part B: Please use a separate sheet for each representation Please complete a new form for each representation you wish to make. 1. To which part of the Site Allocations (SAD) Publication Plan does this representation relate? Paragraph Policy SAD2: Wombourne C: Site Reference 283 Proposals Map 2.
  • Diptera): a Life History, Molecular, Morphological

    Diptera): a Life History, Molecular, Morphological

    The evolutionary biotogy of Conopidae (Diptera): A life history, molecular, morphological, systematic, and taxonomic approach Joel Francis Gibson B.ScHon., University of Guelph, 1999 M.Sc, Iowa State University, 2002 B.Ed., Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto, 2003 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2011 Joel Francis Gibson Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de Pedition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your Tile Votre r&ference ISBN: 978-0-494-83217-2 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-83217-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these.