0400Saigon.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

0400Saigon.Pdf Twenty-five years ago this month, the Vietnam War came to an end with bewildering speed. The Fall of Saigon N April 30, 1975, North Viet- 1972 offensive against the South. The By Walter J. Boyne namese troops accepted the People’s Army of Vietnam needed surrender of Saigon and thus time to recuperate. snuffed out the Republic of OVietnam, humiliating Wash- Thieu’s Gambit ington in the process. Sai- South Vietnam’s president, Ngu- gon, within 24 hours, had become Ho yen Van Thieu, took advantage of Chi Minh City. The surrender of the Hanoi’s decision to refit and re-equip, capital and its prompt renaming—25 extending the South Vietnamese hold years ago this month—became the on territory wherever possible. The ultimate symbol of the failure of US result was that the South Vietnamese policy in Southeast Asia. army was spread out over a large For Americans, that day forever area and by late 1974 was ripe for will be remembered for the spectacle an attack. Its condition was worsened of overcrowded US helicopters flee- by the drying up of US assistance, a ing in a badly timed but well-executed drastic increase in inflation, and, as evacuation, their flight to safety con- always, flagrant corruption. trasting with the terror that gripped The January 1973 Paris peace ac- thousands of loyal South Vietnamese cords led to a near-total withdrawal left to their fates. The media presented of US forces in early 1973. In fall hundreds of wrenching scenes—tiny 1974, leaders in Hanoi had decided After more than two decades of boats overcrowded with soldiers and upon a two-year program to conquer fighting the Communists, the South family members, people trying to the South and unite the two countries Vietnamese army collapsed quickly in force their way onto the US Embassy under Communist rule. Called “Gen- early 1975, setting in motion chaotic grounds, Vietnamese babies being eral Offensive, General Uprising,” evacuations like this one from a roof- passed over barbed wire to waiting the program was designed so that a top in Saigon. hands and an unknown future. series of major military of fensives Saigon fell with bewildering speed. in 1975 would bring the South Viet- After 21 years of struggle against namese population to the point of the Communist forces, the South revolution and permit a conclusive Vietnamese army collapsed in just victory in 1976. weeks into a disorganized mass, un- North Vietnam was well aware able to slow, much less halt, forces of the disarray in American politics from the North. since President Richard M. Nixon’s In nearly 30 years of war, Hanoi had August 1974 resignation, and it de- defeated France and South Vietnam cided to test the waters. In January on the battlefield and the US at the 1975, it conquered Phuoc Long prov- negotiating table. The Communist ince on the border with Cambodia. regime was expert in manipulating North Vietnamese regular units, US opinion. For example, Hanoi had supplemented by local guerrillas, converted its debilitating defeat in routed the South Vietnamese army the 1968 Tet Offensive into a stun- in a mere three weeks. More than ning propaganda victory, one that 3,000 South Vietnamese troops were ultimately drove the United States killed or captured, and supplies worth out of the war. millions were lost to the invaders. Still, North Vietnam had suffered Although Phuoc Long was not par- about 50,000 casualties in Tet and ticularly important in either military was similarly mauled in its spring or economic terms, it was the first 68 AIR FORCE Magazine / April 2000 The Fall of Saigon UPI/Corbis–Bettmann AIR FORCE Magazine / April 2000 69 Vietnamese army’s defenses. If it were lost, Communist forces could easily cut South Vietnam in half. North Vietnam disguised its real UPI/Corbis–Bettmann assault by mounting pinprick attacks in the two northernmost provinces of South Vietnam. Minor though they were, they triggered a panic flight of more than 50,000 refugees that would have immense effect on battles soon to come. Northern forces isolated Ban Me Thuot by cutting off or blocking the main highways to it. On March 10, 1975, three North Vietnamese army divisions, well-equipped with tanks, assaulted the city, which was defended by two reinforced regiments of the 23rd Division. Despite a barrage of 122 mm artillery fire, the South South Vietnamese President Thieu withdrew his forces from the Central Highlands Vietnamese army, commanded by after Ban Me Thuot fell March 12. The North Vietnamese then moved to take over Maj. Gen. Pham Van Phu, fought well. Pleiku, triggering this exodus of soldiers and civilians. However, they were worn down and, by March 12, Dung had essentially province the North Vietnamese had was modeled on the US Army. It had captured the city. taken since 1972—and it was only about 750,000 troops, of which only It was at Ban Me Thuot that there 80 miles from Saigon. about 150,000 were combat troops. first occurred a phenomenon that This absolutely crucial event was They were well-equipped but poorly would increasingly undermine the scarcely noted in the American news supported, despite the Army’s huge South’s morale. Many of its army media. Washington had pledged to “re- logistics tail. officers used helicopters to pick up spond with decisive military force” to Giap in 1973 had become ill with their families and flee to the south any North Vietnamese violation of the Hodgkin’s disease, and power passed with them. Phu himself fled when 1973 accords. In the end, however, the to his protégé, Van Tien Dung, North the time came. US did nothing at all. Hanoi doubtless Vietnam’s only other four-star gen- South Vietnamese hordes then be- was encouraged to continue. eral. Dung, a short, square-faced gan to flee the countryside, crowding Oddly enough, Thieu was not dis- peasant who had worked his way up the main roads and the pathways in a couraged. That is because he contin- through the ranks, carefully infil- mass exodus for the coast, where they ued to believe in Nixon’s promises, trated his forces so that he was able ultimately jammed seaports seeking even after Nixon had been forced to to set up his headquarters at Loc transport to the south. The refugees resign, and he would continue to be- Ninh, only 75 miles north of Saigon. included not only those civilians lieve in those promises almost to the The elaborate preparations included who had helped the South’s army end, frequently musing about “when construction of an oil pipeline and or the Americans, but also a great the B-52s would return.” telephone grid that was impervious mass who had no reason to expect March 1975 saw Hanoi make its to electronic countermeasures. bad treatment from North Vietnam’s next seriously aggressive move. In Dung dictated tactics designed army. They were simply fleeing in the preceding two years, North Viet- to minimize casualties from the the general panic. nam’s army patiently moved into massed firepower upon which South The refugee crowd had another the South enormous quantities of Viet nam’s army had been trained to characteristic, one that would prove Soviet artillery, surface-to-air mis- rely. Unfortunately for the South to have a disastrous effect upon siles, and armored vehicles, along Vietnamese, their supplies of am- South Vietnamese resistance. South with 100,000 fresh troops. The Paris munition were badly depleted by Vietnamese soldiers were leaving the accords allowed more than 80,000 rampant inflation and severe reduc- line of battle to find their families North Vietnamese regular troops to tions in American aid. and escort them to safety. It was a remain in the South, and their num- natural response to the war, but it bers had already increased to more Final Battle Begins accelerated the dissolution of the than 200,000. Dung arrived at Loc Ninh via the South’s capability to resist. North Vietnamese regular and Ho Chi Minh Trail, now expanded guer rilla forces now numbered some from foot paths to include paved, two- Fatal Error 1 million, despite the heavy losses of lane highways with extensions that Thieu had believed the target of the previous decade. North Viet nam’s reached within 30 miles of Sai gon. Dung’s attack would be Pleiku. He army units, created by Gen. Vo Nguy- His first target was Ban Me Thuot, panicked on learning of the fall of en Giap, were weapons-intensive, a city in the Central Highlands and Ban Me Thuot and on March 14 with few logistics or support person- the capital of Darlac province. It was secretly ordered the withdrawal of nel. In contrast, South Vietnam’s army the absolutely vital link in the South the South’s forces from the Central 70 AIR FORCE Magazine / April 2000 Highlands. It was a monumental er- Unlike Kosovo where long-standing Thieu, a tough politician, had an ror, for no plans for the withdrawal ethnic hatred led to the killing of a almost childlike belief that holding had been drawn up, and the orders to few thousands, the slaughter here was these areas would give the United leave simply plunged the remaining between people of the same blood. As States time to exert its military troops into a mass of refugees whose many as 40,000 died on the road. The power and once again force the agonizing journey came to be called situation worsened when renegade North Vietnamese to negotiate. “the convoy of tears.” South Vietnamese army troops also North Vietnamese forces unleashed This flight of refugees was unlike began firing on the refugee columns.
Recommended publications
  • Not for Publication Until Released by the House Subcommittee on Defense Committee on Appropriations
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS STATEMENT OF VICE ADMIRAL LUKE M. McCOLLUM, U.S. NAVY CHIEF OF NAVY RESERVE BEFORE THE HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS FISCAL YEAR 2021 NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE March 3, 2020 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 4 NAVY RESERVE FORCE ................................................................................................................................... 5 Commander, Navy Reserve Forces Command (CNRFC) ........................................................................... 5 Commander, Naval Air Forces Reserve (CNAFR) ...................................................................................... 5 Commander, Naval Information Force Reserve (CNIFR) .......................................................................... 6 Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) ........................................................................................ 7 PERSONNEL ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Civilian Skills .............................................................................................................................................. 7
    [Show full text]
  • The Mayaguez Rescue O
    On Cambodia’s Koh Tang in 1975, US forces fought the last battle of the Southeast Asia War. USAF photo The Mayaguez Rescue By George M. Watson Jr. n May 12, 1975, a Cam- the Air Force helicopter crews were Two Khmer Rouge gunboats are seen bodian gunboat carrying compelled to carry out a mission for during seizure of the US container ship communist Khmer Rouge which they had no formal training. Mayaguez. O soldiers boarded and The ship and its crew were recov- seized Mayaguez, a US container ship ered, but the cost—in lost service lives They were haunted by North Korea’s sailing from Hong Kong to Thailand and damaged equipment—was high. 1968 seizure of USS Pueblo and its and passing along the coast of Cam- A Mayday distress signal from the Navy crew members, who were held bodia. Coming less than two weeks Mayaguez radio operator guided a Navy for 11 months. after the fall of Saigon and the end P-3 patrol aircraft to the vessel the morn- The US had no formal relations of the Vietnam War, Washington had ing after it was seized. The ship was with the new communist dictatorship no choice but to respond, and it did. riding at anchor about 34 miles from the in Phnom Penh, but it retained formi- The answer was a rescue mission. Cambodian harbor town of Kompong dable military forces in Thailand and The effort, afflicted by rushed planning Som, near a spit of land called Tang the Philippines. For one thing, the and poor intelligence, was chaotic.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam War: Saigon Evacuation After Action Report
    Vietnam War: Saigon Evacuation After Action Report Summary of the evacuation of Saigon, South Vietnam under Operation Frequent Wind: Operations Analysis Group, report no. 2-75. (16 May 1975) BACM RESEARCH WWW.PAPERLESSARCHIVES.COM About BACM Research – PaperlessArchives.com BACM Research/PaperlessArchives.com publishes documentary historical research collections. Materials cover Presidencies, Historical Figures, Historical Events, Celebrities, Organized Crime, Politics, Military Operations, Famous Crimes, Intelligence Gathering, Espionage, Civil Rights, World War I, World War II, Korean War, Vietnam War, and more. Source material from Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA), Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Secret Service, National Security Council, Department of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Department of Justice, National Archive Records and Administration, and Presidential Libraries. http://www.paperlessarchives.com Vietnam War: Saigon Evacuation After Action Report Summary of the evacuation of Saigon, South Vietnam under Operation Frequent Wind: Operations Analysis Group, report no. 2-75. On 29 April 1975, Operation Frequent Wind was executed, and 1373 American citizens, 5595 Vietnamese and Third Country Nationals were successfully evacuated by helicopter from the American Embassy Saigon and the DAO compound. Status of events, planning, activation, evacuation operations, lessons learned, and after-action reports regarding Operation Frequent Wind are all covered in this document. Also include several National Security Agency helicopter pilot radio transmissions during the Saigon evacuation transcript sheets. This 16 May 1975 report was declassified on 31 December 1985. .,. U"CLAS~I~ltU ' . SBHFfHENT'~l HEADQUARTERS OF . THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF· PACIFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS GROUP FPO SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 96610 OPERATIONS, ANALYSIS. GROUP REPORT NO.
    [Show full text]
  • January 1980
    A I A t B in this issue: Interview With Secretary Hidalgo JANUARY 1980 MAGAZINE OF'THE U.S. NAVY - 57th YEAR OF PUBLICATION JANUARY 1980 NUMBER 756 Chief of Naval Operations: ADM Thomas B. Hayward .Chiefof.lnformation: RADM David M. Cooney OIC Navy hternal Relations Act: CAPT Robert K. Lewis Jr. Director, NlRA Print Media Div: LT Christine A. Zebrowski Features 6 "WITHOUT LEADERSHIP,THERE IS NO GUIDANCE. .:' New SecNav sees the Navy from different perspectives Page 20 12 HITTING THE RAMP Snowmobile champ feels at home in Iceland 13 THE CELERY STUMPED THEM American sailors spend seven days in Romania 17 NORFOLK MAKES THE CONNECTION Family Services Center phones are ringing 20 "SEND THESE,THE HOMELESS, TEMPEST-TOST, TO ME.. ." 7th Fleet rescues Vietnamese refugees from South China Sea 24 WHIPPLE'S HUMAN LINK TO FREEDOM Four crewmen receive Navy and Marine Corps medals 26 YOUR OBLIGATIONS No. 14 in a series on Navy Rights and Benefits 32 THEY'REMORE THAN ENTERTAINERS Chuting Stars perform aerial acrobatics 42 ALL HANDSINDEX FOR 1979 Page 26 bepartrnents 2 Currents 38 Bearings 48 Mail Buoy Covers Front: Old hands in new positions: SecNav Edward Hidalgo (left) and Deputy SecDef W. Graham Claytor Jr. Photo by Dave Wilson. Inside Front: LT Phil Camp wins the Fourth Annual Marine Corps Marathon with a winning time of 2: 19.35 for the 26.2 mile course. LT Camp is a flight instructor for VT-6. Pen- sacola, Fla. Photo by James Thresher, The Washington Post. Staff: Editor: John Coleman; News Editor: Joanne E. Dumene Associates: Richard Hosier (Layout), Michael Tuffli (Art), Edward Jenkins (Research).
    [Show full text]
  • The Perspective of One of the Last Eleven Marines to Leave Vietnam
    Escape, Surrender, or Fight: The Perspective of One of the Last Eleven Marines to Leave Vietnam Interviewer: Jack Tsintolas Interviewee: Terry J. Bennington Instructor: Alex Haight Date: February 17, 2015 Table of Contents Interviewee Release Form……………….………………………………………...………3 Interviewer Release Form....................................................................................................4 Statement of Purpose…………………….……………………………...…………....…...5 Biography….…………………………………………………………...………………….6 The Vietnam War: Plagued with Politics from the Start…………….……………………8 Interview Transcription………………………………………………………..................23 Interview Analysis……………………………………………………………………….63 Appendix...……………………………………………………………………………….69 Works Consulted……………………………………………………………....................72 Statement of Purpose The purpose of this Oral History Project is to provide a greater understanding and a new perspective of the Fall of Saigon through an interview with Mr. Terry Bennington, a retired Marine Security Guard, who experienced the North Vietnamese takeover firsthand. As the culmination of the long Vietnam War, the Fall of Saigon is a perfect example of the United States’ role in world affairs and how politics failed the war effort. Mr. Bennington’s memories will provide a primary source as to what transpired in Vietnam during the Fall of Saigon as well as to promote further study on this momentous event in United States history. Biography of Terry J. Bennington Terry J Bennington was born on November 15th, 1952 in Bellaire, Ohio. When he was four years old, his mother committed suicide. When Bennington’s father remarried, his family moved to Bridgeport, Ohio. He went to Bridgeport High School, but ran around nearby on Wheeling Island, which is in Wheeling, West Virginia. In high school Bennington participated in his school’s wrestling team and placed second in the state in his junior year for his weight class.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fall of Sai Gon 30 April 1975
    WALL NOTE TWO: THE FALL OF SAI GON 30 APRIL 1975 DANIEL R. ARANT [email protected] DATE OF INFORMATION: 06 MAY 2008 "We must ensure that any major foreign policy commitment has the full support and understanding of the American people....." GEORGE H. W. BUSH, 41st President of the United States. "The American soldiers who fought in the war did so out of a sense of duty to their country, but their country betrayed them by sending them to an unconscionable war." PHILIP CAPUTO, U.S. Marine infantry platoon leader in Viet Nam and author of A Rumor of War. "... the leaders who planned and executed the war did not understand what they were getting into. The values and ideals we stood for were correct, but it was the wrong war in the wrong place - a place we did not know." RICHARD HOLBROOKE, Foreign Service diplomat in Viet Nam. "Those Americans who went to Vietnam fought for freedom, a truly noble cause. This battle was lost not by those brave Americans and South Vietnamese troops who were waging it but by political misjudgments and strategic failure at the highest levels of government." RONALD REAGAN, 40th President of the United States. "The Vietnam War was a political war that imposed restraints on the military that prevented use of power that we had readily available. ... it was very difficult to tell friend from foe, hence the Calley affair." ADM. THOMAS H. MOORER, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (1970-1974). "It was a disastrous, insane, imperial invasion of a weirdo Third World country." TIMOTHY LEARY.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vietnam War
    Fact Sheet 1: Introduction- the Vietnam War Between June 1964 and December 1972 around 3500 New Zealand service personnel served in South Vietnam. Unlike the First and Second World Wars New Zealand’s contribution in terms of personnel was not huge. At its peak in 1968 the New Zealand force only numbered 543. Thirty-seven died while on active service and 187 were wounded. The Vietnam War – sometimes referred to as the Second Indochina War – lasted from 1959 to 1975. In Vietnam it is referred to as the American War. It was fought between the communist Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam) and its allies, and the US-supported Republic of Vietnam in the south. It ended with the defeat of South Vietnam in April 1975. Nearly 1.5 million military personnel were killed in the war, and it is estimated that up to 2 million civilians also died. This was the first war in which New Zealand did not fight with its traditional ally, Great Britain. Our participation reflected this country’s increasingly strong defence ties with the United States and Australia. New Zealand’s involvement in Vietnam was highly controversial and attracted protest and condemnation at home and abroad. A study of New Zealand’s involvement in the Vietnam War raises a number of issues. As a historical study we want to find out what happened, why it happened and how it affected people’s lives. This war meant different things to different people. The Vietnam War was, and still is, an important part of the lives of many New Zealanders.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam: Tet Offensive Resource Packet
    Virginians at War Vietnam: Tet Offensive Resource Packet Contains: Glossary, Timeline, Images, Discussion Questions, Additional Resources Program Description: Virginians at War: The Tet Offensive explores the experience of Virginians that fought during the critical Tet Offensive in 1968, a turning point of the Vietnam War. Launched by the North Vietnamese Army on 30 January, the coordinated attack against thirteen different provincial capitals throughout South Vietnam took Americans and South Vietnamese by surprise. The result was a costly, long campaign that ended in a hard –fought military victory for the United States and South Vietnamese. However, the outcome of the campaign had a significantly negative impact on support for the war in the United States, from which the nation would not fully recover. Copyright: Virginia War Memorial Foundation, 2006 Length: 18:59 Streaming link: https://vimeo.com/367038067 Featured Speakers: MSG Lonnie S. Ashton, Montross SPC Orthea Harcum, Richmond MSG Lauren P. Bands, Colonial Heights LT Hugh D. Keogh, Midlothian COL Robert C. Barrett, Jr., Colonial Heights SGT Prentis Lee, Clifton LT COL Frank S. Blair, Richmond SP/4 Powhatan “Red Cloud” Owen, Charles City MSG Charles M. Carter, Warsaw SGM Douglass I. Randolph, Charlotte Court House SGT Earl E. Cousins, Ashland MAJ John A. Rawls, M.D., Mechanicsville CPT James H. Dement, Jr., Richmond 1st LT Cathie Lynn Solomonson, R.N., Woodbridge 1st LT Daniel G. Doyle, Richmond 1st LT James F. Walker, Roanoke LT COL John D. Edgerton, Williamsburg For a transcript of this program and more information on the Vietnam War, please visit vawarmemorial.org/learn/resources/vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • Theater of Rescue: Cultural Representations of U.S. Evacuation from Vietnam (「救済劇場」:合衆国によるベトナム 撤退の文化表象)
    Ayako Sahara Theater of Rescue: Cultural Representations of U.S. Evacuation from Vietnam (「救済劇場」:合衆国によるベトナム 撤退の文化表象) Ayako Sahara* SUMMARY IN JAPANESE: 本論文は、イラク撤退に関して 再び注目を集めたベトナム人「救済」が合衆国の経済的・軍 事的・政治的パワーを維持する役割を果たしてきたと考察し、 ベトナム人救済にまつわる表象言説を批判的に分析する。合 衆国のベトナムからの撤退が、自国と同盟国の扱いをめぐる 「劇場」の役割をいかに果たしたのかを明らかにすることを その主眼としている。ここで「劇場」というのは、撤退が単 一の歴史的出来事であっただけではなく、その出来事を体験 し目撃した人々にとって、歴史と政治が意味をなす舞台とし て機能したことを問うためである。戦争劇場は失敗に終わっ たが、合衆国政府が撤退作戦を通じて、救済劇を立ち上げた ことの意味は大きい。それゆえ、本論文は、従来の救済言説 に立脚せず、撤退にまつわる救済がいかにして立ち上がり、 演じられ、表象されたかを「孤児輸送作戦」、難民輸送と中 央情報局職員フランク・スネップの回想録を取り上げて分析 する。 * 佐原 彩子 Lecturer, Kokushikan University, Tokyo and Dokkyo University, Saitama, Japan. 55 Theater of Rescue: Cultural Representations of U.S. Evacuation from Vietnam It wasn’t until months after the fall of Saigon, and much bloodshed, that America conducted a huge relief effort, airlifting more than 100,000 refugees to safety. Tens of thousands were processed at a military base on Guam, far away from the American mainland. President Bill Clinton used the same base to save the lives of nearly 7,000 Kurds in 1996. But if you mention the Guam Option to anyone in Washington today, you either get a blank stare of historical amnesia or hear that “9/11 changed everything.”1 Recently, with the end of the Iraq War, the memory of the evacuation of Vietnamese refugees at the conclusion of the Vietnam War has reemerged as an exceptional rescue effort. This perception resonates with previous studies that consider the admission of the refugees as “providing safe harbor for the boat people.”2 This rescue narrative has been an integral part of U.S. power, justifying its military and political actions. In response, this paper challenges the perception of the U.S. as rescuing allies.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol 9 Issue 3 Hof.Indd
    Air Commando JOURNAL Publisher Air Commando Norm Brozenick / [email protected] Editor-in-Chief Association Paul Harmon / [email protected] Managing Editor Air Commando Association Board of Directors Richard Newton Chairman of the Board : Maj Gen Norm Brozenick, USAF (Ret) Senior Editor Scott McIntosh / [email protected] President: Col Dennis Barnett, USAF (Ret) Contributing Editor Vice President: Ron Dains CMSgt Bill Turner, USAF (Ret) Treasurer: Contributing Editor Col David Mobley, USAF (Ret) Joel Higley Public Affairs/Marketing Director Executive Director: Maj Gen Rich Comer, USAF (Ret) Melissa Gross / [email protected] Directors: Graphic Designer CMSgt Tom Baker, USAF (Ret) Jeanette Elliott / [email protected] CMSgt Heather Bueter, USAF (Ret) Col Steve Connelly, USAF (Ret) Lt Col Max Friedauer, USAF (Ret) “The Air Commando Journal... Lt Col Chris Foltz, USAF (Ret) SMSgt Hollis Tompkins, USAF (Ret) Massively Successful! I save all mine.” Additional Positions & Advisors: Lt Gen Marshall “Brad” Webb SES Bill Rone, (Ret) Executive Financial Advisor Former AFSOC Commander Col Jerry Houge, USAF (Ret) Chaplain (Used with permission by Lt Gen Webb) CMSgt Mike Gilbert, USAF (Ret) Attorney Sherri Hayes, GS-15, (Ret) Civilian Advisor Mike Moore, Financial Development Advisor ADVERTISERS IN THIS ISSUE Air Commando Association ......................................................... 52 The Air Commando Journal publication is free to all current members of the Air Commando Association. Anytime Flight Members ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE City of Duluth - Communications Office
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE City of Duluth - Communications Office 411 West First Street, Duluth, Minnesota 55802 218-730-5230 | www.duluthmn.gov | Emily Larson, Mayor For more information contact Kate Van Daele, Public Information Officer 218-730-5309 DATE: 10/13/2019 SUBJECT: Media Advisory: Operation Frequent Wind Homecoming Press Conference BY: Kate Van Daele, Public Information Officer Media Advisory Operation Frequent Wind Homecoming Press Conference October 15, 2019 1:00 p.m. Duluth City Hall, Mayor's Reception Room [Duluth, MN] Operation Frequent Wind took place on April 30th, 1975 when the USS Duluth and 17 other U.S. ships rescued between 36,000 – 40,000 Saigon refugees as a part of the Vietnam War. The USS Duluth was only supposed to hold 800 marines, took on over 2,000 refugees by placing them in every nook and cranny of the ship. Chinh Pham who was ten at the time of the evacuation and his family were among those to be rescued. Forty-four years later Mr. Pham, his sister, and their parents will make a special trip to Duluth to see the place that the ship that rescued them was named after. The Pham family will meet with Duluth Mayor Emily Larson on Tuesday, October 15, at 1:00 p.m. in the Mayor’s Reception Room of City Hall before leaving to tour the USS Duluth exhibit at the Duluth Depot at 2:00 p.m. From there the family will visit the USS Duluth anchor monument on the lakewalk before paying their respects at the Northland Vietnam Veterans Memorial.
    [Show full text]
  • Billie Joe Williams
    WALL NOTE FOURTEEN: BILLIE JOE WILLIAMS DANIEL R. ARANT [email protected] DATE OF INFORMATION: 07 OCTOBER 2013 “WHEN THE LEGEND BECOMES FACT, PRINT THE LEGEND.” QUOTED FROM JOHN FORD’S THE MAN WHO SHOT LIBERTY VALANCE STARRING JOHN WAYNE, JAMES STEWART, AND LEE MARVIN. 01. SUMMARY. One of the perennial “tour guide stories” at the Vietnam Veterans Memorial is that two servicemen with the exact same name died on the same day. The name of Billie Joe WILLIAMS is inscribed twice on 01W 094. It may make for an interesting story, maybe similar to both John ADAMS and Thomas JEFFERSON dying on 04 July 1826. Two servicemen named Billie Joe WILLIAMS died during the Viet Nam conflict but not on the same day. PFC Billie Joe WILLIAMS, USMC died on 21 March 1966, the result of the shoot down of a UH-34D Seahorse helicopter. Maj. (posthumous Lt. Col.) Billie Joe WILLIAMS, USAF died on 09 December 1972, the result of the shoot down of a RF-4C Phantom II. PFC WILLIAMS more properly belongs on panel 06E; Lt. Col. WILLIAMS is on the correct panel. I can only assume that an unintended error placed the names together. A. In the spirit of “full disclosure,” I, for a short time, told the “Billie Joe WILLIAMS Story.” But fortunately, a few weeks after I became a volunteer, a visitor’s inquiry “set me straight.” See paragraph 08. B. There are also a Billy Joe WILLIAMS and a Billy WILLIAMS on the Wall. (01) Maj. Billy Joe WILLIAMS, USA. Advisory Team 3, MACV Advisors.
    [Show full text]