DOCSLIB.ORG

Philippines Country Development Cooperation Strategy 2019-2024

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Philippines Country Development Cooperation Strategy 2019-2024 UNCLASSIFIED Philippines PHOTO CAPTION GOES HERE COUNTRY DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION STRATEGY (CDCS) November 25, 2019 – November 25, 2024 COUNTRY DEVELOPME APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Figure 1. Map of the Philippines USAID PHILIPPINES CDCS 2020 – 2024 Draft September 18, 2019 – revised October 28, 2019 i Table of Contents ACRONYMS................................................................................................................. iii I. Executive Summary .............................................................................................. 1 USAID Philippines 2020 – 2024 Results Framework ....................................................... 3 II. Country Context .................................................................................................... 4 Salient Factors in Country Context, Challenges, and Opportunities ........................................ 4 The Philippines’ National Development Vision .............................................................................. 6 Country Roadmap, Self-Reliance, and Future Trajectory ............................................................. 7 Mission Vision for Country Transition ............................................................................................. 9 III. Strategic Approach ............................................................................................... 9 Efforts of other USG Actors ............................................................................................................. 14 IV. Results Framework .............................................................................................. 14 Development Objective 1: Democratic Governance Strengthened ........................................ 15 Development Objective 2: Inclusive, Market-Driven Growth Expanded ............................... 20 Development Objective 3: Environmental and Community Resilience Enhanced ............... 24 V. Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning ............................................................... 29 VI. Annexes ................................................................................................................ 30 USAID PHILIPPINES CDCS 2020 – 2024 ii ACRONYMS ALS Alternative Learning System ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations CDCS Country Development Cooperation Strategy C-TIP Countering Trafficking in Persons CLA Collaborating, Learning and Adapting CSO Civil Society Organization DO Development Objective DOH Department of Health EDGE Enhancing Development and Growth through Energy EITI Extractive Industry Transparency Imitative ELMIS Electronic Logistics Management Information System FDI Foreign Direct Investment GDP Gross Domestic Product GPH Government of the Philippines GNP Gross National Product HCI Human Capacity Index HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus IPS Indo-Pacific Strategy IPTI Indo-Pacific Transparency Initiative IR Intermediate Result ISIS Islamic State of Iraq and Syria J2SR Journey to Self-Reliance K-12 Kindergarten through 12th grade LGBTIQ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender/transsexual, Intersex and Queer/questioning LGU Local Government Unit MEL Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning MPA Marine Protected Areas MW Megawatts NRM Natural Resources Management NATO The North Atlantic Treaty Organization OFDA Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance OH Office of Health PDP Philippine Development Plan PFG Partnership for Growth PhilHealth Philippine Health Insurance Corporation RA Republic Act SME Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Sub-IR Sub-Intermediate Result TB Tuberculosis UN United Nations USAID United States Agency for International Development UHC Universal Health Care USG United States Government USAID PHILIPPINES CDCS 2020 – 2024 iii I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CDCS Goal USAID is prioritizing the Philippines’ journey to self-reliance and key pillars in the United States’ Indo-Pacific vision over the 2020 – 2024 strategic period. This country development cooperation strategy for the Philippines responds to multiple challenges that may impede that journey and negatively impact sustainable national development. Foremost is the changing geopolitical situation in Southeast Asia and how this impacts the Philippines. Regional powers are increasing their strategic interest and influence in the Philippines and have made significant investments in the infrastructure (digital and energy) and services sectors. As regional influence grows, USAID is concerned that resource concessions made outside of accepted market mechanisms that enable transparent procurement processes could harm long-term development in the Philippines if they bypass and subvert governance practices that would otherwise ensure transparency and accountability. Priority concessions include development of the energy and information communications infrastructure, the extraction of natural resources, particularly in areas under the control of indigenous peoples, and high value public infrastructure development. Concessions for these public resources made in the absence of adequate governance mechanisms potentially hinder the participation of other international investors, national businesses, and labor and may constrain future self-reliance.1 The U.S. government’s vision for the Indo-Pacific strongly resonates in the Philippines and guides this five-year development plan. Signature U.S. initiatives implemented in the Philippines, including the Indo-Pacific Transparency Initiative, Infrastructure Transaction Advisory Network, Digital Connectivity and Cybersecurity Partnership and Asia Enhancing Development and Growth through Energy, will advance the U.S.-Philippines Indo-Pacific partnership. This new, five-year development strategy also responds to long-standing structural challenges and current developments in the country’s political economy. These strategic priorities inform the Mission’s five-year goal that will help ensure that the Philippines is a well-governed and more self-reliant Indo-Pacific partner. Commitment and Capacity Successive government administrations have prioritized social inclusion and the protection of the rights of vulnerable peoples. Commitment to social group equality, however, remains among the lowest Roadmap indicators for the Philippines. This reflects challenges faced by many Filipinos, including activists, to safeguard their interests. Adherence to the norms of liberal democracy appears to be declining as well. Despite a high capacity civil society and media, as reflected in USAID’s Journey to Self-Reliance (J2SR) Roadmap metrics, these institutions are less resilient than expected and subject to political pressure. The Mission’s concern that counter-vailing institutions of democratic governance is weakening undergirds the first development objective in this strategy: Democratic Governance Strengthened. Inclusive economic growth is another government priority, yet a higher percent of Filipino families live below established poverty lines than found in other leading economies in Southeast Asia. The country’s low Roadmap indicators for poverty rate and gross domestic product (GDP) per capita reflect this finding. The Philippines has one of the highest rates of income inequality in the Southeast Asian and Pacific region. Educational quality is also low. The World Bank recommended in 2013 that the Philippines prioritize inclusive growth for future national development. In 2017, the World Bank recommended that the Philippines increase its investment in human capital to achieve critical health and education outcomes. Further, they argued, doing so is critical to compete against other dynamic USAID PHILIPPINES CDCS 2020 – 2024 Draft September 18, 2019 – revised October 28, 2019 1 economies in an advancing technological future.2 The GPH faces challenges to fully implement its inclusive growth development agenda. Policy reforms are vulnerable to challenges from vested interests that dominate local and national politics. Social programs to build human capital and deliver better services require sufficient fiscal space to fund government priorities. Improvements in tax policy and tax administration have generated more revenues; however, the tax-to-GDP ratio in the Philippines remains among the lowest in the region. A larger concern is that government agencies often fail to successfully develop and execute their budgets. The Mission will prioritize effective domestic resource mobilization to advance self-reliance. The Mission will strengthen local systems to counter these obstacles in the Philippines’ Journey to Self-Reliance. The Philippines has sufficient resources at hand to fund its own ambitious development agenda; however, it lacks efficient systems to mobilize national resources to implement actions necessary to realize its national agenda. USAID is working through each of its technical offices to move forward needed policy reforms and to strengthen government processes at the line level to implement the necessary investments. The Mission is supporting the private sector to leverage USAID’s work and take this further. Civil Society has a key role, and is supported by USAID, to ensure development priorities are inclusive of the greater population and are carried forward in a transparent and accountable manner. Assisting host country institutions to redefine their relationships with the government will strengthen national self-reliance and contribute to redefining the current relationship between the USG and the GPH. These concerns motivate the Mission’s second development objective:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Philippines's Constitution of 1987
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:44 constituteproject.org Philippines's Constitution of 1987 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:44 Table of contents Preamble . 3 ARTICLE I: NATIONAL TERRITORY . 3 ARTICLE II: DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLES AND STATE POLICIES PRINCIPLES . 3 ARTICLE III: BILL OF RIGHTS . 6 ARTICLE IV: CITIZENSHIP . 9 ARTICLE V: SUFFRAGE . 10 ARTICLE VI: LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT . 10 ARTICLE VII: EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT . 17 ARTICLE VIII: JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT . 22 ARTICLE IX: CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSIONS . 26 A. COMMON PROVISIONS . 26 B. THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION . 28 C. THE COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS . 29 D. THE COMMISSION ON AUDIT . 32 ARTICLE X: LOCAL GOVERNMENT . 33 ARTICLE XI: ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC OFFICERS . 37 ARTICLE XII: NATIONAL ECONOMY AND PATRIMONY . 41 ARTICLE XIII: SOCIAL JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS . 45 ARTICLE XIV: EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ARTS, CULTURE, AND SPORTS . 49 ARTICLE XV: THE FAMILY . 53 ARTICLE XVI: GENERAL PROVISIONS . 54 ARTICLE XVII: AMENDMENTS OR REVISIONS . 56 ARTICLE XVIII: TRANSITORY PROVISIONS . 57 Philippines 1987 Page 2 constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:44 • Source of constitutional authority • General guarantee of equality Preamble • God or other deities • Motives for writing constitution • Preamble We, the sovereign Filipino people, imploring the aid of Almighty God, in order to build a just and humane society and establish a Government that shall embody our ideals and aspirations, promote the common good, conserve and develop our patrimony, and secure to ourselves and our posterity the blessings of independence and democracy under the rule of law and a regime of truth, justice, freedom, love, equality, and peace, do ordain and promulgate this Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Diaspora Philanthropy: the Philippine Experience
    Diaspora Philanthropy: The Philippine Experience ______________________________________________________________________ Victoria P. Garchitorena President The Ayala Foundation, Inc. May 2007 _________________________________________ Prepared for The Philanthropic Initiative, Inc. and The Global Equity Initiative, Harvard University Supported by The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation ____________________________________________ Diaspora Philanthropy: The Philippine Experience I . The Philippine Diaspora Major Waves of Migration The Philippines is a country with a long and vibrant history of emigration. In 2006 the country celebrated the centennial of the first surge of Filipinos to the United States in the very early 20th Century. Since then, there have been three somewhat distinct waves of migration. The first wave began when sugar workers from the Ilocos Region in Northern Philippines went to work for the Hawaii Sugar Planters Association in 1906 and continued through 1929. Even today, an overwhelming majority of the Filipinos in Hawaii are from the Ilocos Region. After a union strike in 1924, many Filipinos were banned in Hawaii and migrant labor shifted to the U.S. mainland (Vera Cruz 1994). Thousands of Filipino farm workers sailed to California and other states. Between 1906 and 1930 there were 120,000 Filipinos working in the United States. The Filipinos were at a great advantage because, as residents of an American colony, they were regarded as U.S. nationals. However, with the passage of the Tydings-McDuffie Act of 1934, which officially proclaimed Philippine independence from U.S. rule, all Filipinos in the United States were reclassified as aliens. The Great Depression of 1929 slowed Filipino migration to the United States, and Filipinos sought jobs in other parts of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking the Hong Kong Tour Bus Hostage Tragedy in Manila to the ICJ? Developing a Framework for Choosing International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms
    Taking the Hong Kong Tour Bus Hostage Tragedy in Manila to the ICJ? Developing a Framework for Choosing International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms AMY LA* Table of Contents PROLOGUE ................................................... 674 I. THE MANILA HOSTAGE TRAGEDY: UNANSWERED QUESTIONS AND UNSERVED JUSTICE ..................... 675 A. The Calm Before the Storm ............................... 676 B. "Storming" the Bus ..................................... 677 C. Nine Lives, One Incomplete Report, and Three Forums .......... 678 D. The ICJ as the Fourth Forum? ............................. 680 H. ADJUDICATING THE HOSTAGE TRAGEDY BY THE ICJ? THE (IN)APPLICABILITY OF LEGAL STANDARDS ................. 681 A. Third-Party Dispute Settlements v. Negotiation ................. 682 B. Formal Adjudication by the ICJ v. Other Third-Party Settlements . 683 C. Re-examining the Hostage Tragedy Impasse: Why Not the ICJ? ... 684 1. Preference for Less Public Methods? The Necessity for "Airing Dirty Laundry" ..................................... 685 2. Retrospective or "Win-Lose" Situation? The Necessity for Breaking a Chain of Abuses ............................ 685 3. Unclear Laws: The Lack of Detailed, Robust Standards for Adjudication . ....................................... 687 a. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Or Was It Ordinary Negligence? .............................. 687 b. International Convention Against the Taking of Hostages: A Far Less Direct Method ............................ 689 III. THE ICJ OR OTHER SETTLEMENT MECHANISMS?
    [Show full text]
  • Commission on Filipinos Overseas
    UN EGM on Strengthening the Demographic Evidence Base For The Post-2015 Development Agenda, New York, 5-6 October 2015 STOCK ESTIMATE OF FILIPINOS OVERSEAS Commission on Filipinos Overseas Experts Group Meeting “Strengthening the demographic evidence base for the post-2015 development agenda” United Nations Headquarters, New York, on 5-6 October 2015 Session 4. Demographic evidence from administrative data: Frencel Tingga (Commission on Filipinos Overseas) – Example of estimation of the stock of overseas migrant workers 1 UN EGM on Strengthening the Demographic Evidence Base For The Post-2015 Development Agenda, New York, 5-6 October 2015 SDGS AND SOME MIGRATION-RELATED GOALS • Protect labour rights and promote safe and secure working environments of all workers, including migrant workers • Facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility of people • Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls • Reduce the transaction costs of migrant remittances Session 4. Demographic evidence from administrative data: Frencel Tingga (Commission on Filipinos Overseas) – Example of estimation of the stock of overseas migrant workers 2 UN EGM on Strengthening the Demographic Evidence Base For The Post-2015 Development Agenda, New York, 5-6 October 2015 COMMISSION ON FILIPINOS OVERSEAS The Commission on Filipinos Overseas is a government agency mandated to promote and uphold the interests of overseas Filipinos and preserve and strengthen their ties with the Philippine Motherland. - Batas Pambansa 79 Session 4. Demographic evidence from administrative data: Frencel Tingga (Commission on Filipinos Overseas) – Example of estimation of the stock of overseas migrant workers 3 UN EGM on Strengthening the Demographic Evidence Base For The Post-2015 Development Agenda, New York, 5-6 October 2015 CFO PROGRAMS AND SERVICES Session 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Law and Hong Kong's Bilateral Relations
    External Relations of Hong Kong: The Most Neglected Subject in International Relations? Colonial Law: Promulgated by the UK Basic Law: As Authorized by the NPC of PRC › No Nullifying Power › Full Sovereignty from PRC The Central People's Government shall be responsible for the foreign affairs relating to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China shall establish an office in Hong Kong to deal with foreign affairs. The Central People's Government authorizes the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region to conduct relevant external affairs on its own in accordance with this Law. Representatives of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region may, as members of delegations of the Government of the People's Republic of China, participate in negotiations at the diplomatic level directly affecting the Region conducted by the Central People's Government. The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region may on its own, using the name ""Hong Kong, China "", maintain and develop relations and conclude and implement agreements with foreign states and regions and relevant international organizations in the appropriate fields, including the economic, trade, financial and monetary, shipping, communications, tourism, cultural and sports fields. WTO: “Tariff” APEC: “Economy” FIFA: “Domestic League” The application to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of international agreements to which the People's Republic of China is or becomes a party shall be decided by the Central People's Government, in accordance with the circumstances and needs of the Region, and after seeking the views of the government of the Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Agreement Between the Republic of Turkey and the Republic of the Philippines Concerning the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments
    Bilateral Investment Treaty between Turkey and Philippines This document was downloaded from ASEAN Briefing (www.aseanbriefing.com) and was compiled by the tax experts at Dezan Shira & Associates (www.dezshira.com). Dezan Shira & Associates is a specialist foreign direct investment practice, providing corporate establishment, business advisory, tax advisory and compliance, accounting, payroll, due diligence and financial review services to multinationals investing in emerging Asia. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY AND THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES CONCERNING THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS The Republic of Turkey and the Republic of the Philippines , hereinafter called the Contracting Parties; Desiring to promote greater economic cooperation between them, particularly with respect to investment by investors of one Contracting Party in the territory of the other Contracting Party; Recognizing that the reciprocal promotion and protection of such investments favour the economic prosperity of both Contracting Parties; Have agreed as follows: ARTICLE 1 Definitions For the purpose of this Agreement; l. The term "investor" means: (i) with respect to the Republic of the Philippines, individuals who are citizens of the Philippines within the meaning of its Constitution, (ii) with respect to the Republic of Turkey natural persons deriving their status as nationals of Turkey according to its applicable law, (iii) with respect to both countries, legal entities, namely, companies, associations of companies, trading
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Related Vulnerabilities Among Migrants in Armenia
    Rapid needs assessment: COVID-19 RELATED VULNERABILITIES AMONG MIGRANTS IN ARMENIA The opinions expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the report do not imply expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries. IOM is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As an intergovernmental organization, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to: assist in meeting the operational challenges of migration; advance understanding of migration issues; encourage social and economic development through migration; and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. This publication was made possible through support provided by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, under the terms of "Enhancing Migrants' Rights and Good Governance in Armenia Georgia" project. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Assessment and report prepared by Eurasia Partnership Foundation Edited by Adrian Loxton Publisher: International Organization for Migration 17 route des Morillons 1211 Geneva 19 Switzerland Tel: +41.22.717 91 11 Fax: +41.22.798 61 50 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.iom.int © 2020 International Organization for Migration (IOM) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective, a Book of Essays, Cambridge, Massachusetts, the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1962, Ii +456 P
    BOOK REVIEWS ALEXANDER GERSCHENKRON, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective, A Book of Essays, Cambridge, Massachusetts, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1962, ii +456 p. It is only since 1957-1959 that the concept of "modernization," of which "industrialization" is the central constituent, became a dominant topic among American economists and historians. I t shows that American academic circles have taken to heart such realistic and practical questions as the challenge of the industrial might of Communist Russia exemplified by the Sputnik, and the fate of the new developing countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America, and their future courses. A. Gerschenkron, head of the Institute of Economic History at Harvard University, is a renowned student of European economic history, particularly the economic history of Soviet Russia. Together with W. W. Rostow and his associates, he was one of the first to raise these questions in the academic world and direct the efforts towards their answer. The present volume contains 14 essays published between 1952 and 1961, together with 1 postscript and 3 appendices. The first eight essays are devoted to the development of Gerschenkron's theory of industrialization and to case studies of Italy, Russia and Bulgaria based on his theory; the remaining six deal with so do-economic changes in Soviet Russia. These latter include three remarkable eassays in which the author treats of the attitude of the Soviet people to industrialization by analysing Soviet literary productions; many problems worth further examination are raised. In the present review, however, the reviewer intends to limit himself to the first part of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Equality Results: Case Studies: Maldives
    About the Asian Development Bank ADB’s vision is an Asia and Pacific region free of poverty. Its mission is to help its developing member countries substantially reduce poverty and improve the quality of life of their people. Despite the region’s many successes, it remains home to two-thirds of the world’s poor: 1.8 billion people who live on less than $2 a day, with 903 million struggling on less than $1.25 a day. ADB is committed to reducing poverty through inclusive economic growth, environmentally sustainable growth, and regional integration. Based in Manila, ADB is owned by 67 members, including 48 from the region. Its main instruments for helping its developing member countries are policy dialogue, loans, equity investments, guarantees, grants, and technical assistance. Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines www.adb.org ISBN 978-92-9092-157-8 Publication Stock No. RPS102676 Printed in the Philippines Maldives Case Studies.indd 1 11/26/10 2:25 PM Gender Equality Results Case Studies: Maldives © 2010 Asian Development Bank All rights reserved. Published 2010. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9092-190-5 Publication Stock No. RPS102676 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Gender equality results case studies: Maldives. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2010. 1. Gender equality. 2. Maldives. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Risk Country Profile: Maldives (2021): the World Bank Group and the Asian Development Bank
    CLIMATE RISK COUNTRY PROFILE MALDIVES COPYRIGHT © 2021 by the World Bank Group 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org © Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 8632 4444; Fax +63 2 8636 2444 www.adb.org This work is a product of the staff of the World Bank Group (WBG) and the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and with external contributions. The opinions, findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work are those of the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the views or the official policy or position of the WBG, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments it represents or of ADB, its Board of Governors, or the governments they represent. The WBG and ADB do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work and do not make any warranty, express or implied, nor assume any liability or responsibility for any consequence of their use. This publication follows the WBG’s practice in references to member designations, borders, and maps. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work, or the use of the term “country” do not imply any judgment on the part of the WBG or ADB, their respective Boards, or the governments they represent, concerning the legal status of any territory or geographic area or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The mention of any specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by either the WBG or ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Philippines – Armenia (Am) Trade Relations Armenia In
    PHILIPPINES – ARMENIA (AM) TRADE RELATIONS ARMENIA IN BRIEF1 GENERAL INFORMATION ECONOMIC INDICATORS CAPITAL GDP YerevAn US$13.3 B AREA GDP PER CAPITA 29,743 sq. km. US$9,178 POPULATION GDP GROWTH RATE 3,021,324 3.8 % GOVERNMENT INFLATION RATE ParliAmentAry 1.6% HEAD OF STATE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE President Armen Sarkissian 17.9% HEAD OF GOVERNMENT CURRENCY Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan DrAm (AMD) RELIGION EXCHANGE RATE ArmeniAn Apostolic 92.6%, EvAngelicAl 1%, other 1US$ = 483.7AMD 2.4%, none 1.1%, unspecified 2.9% (2011 est.) LANGUAGES ArmeniAn (officiAl) 97.9%, Kurdish (spoken by Yezidi minority) 1%, other 1% (2011 est.) REGIONAL/INTERNATIONAL AFFILIATIONS AsiAn Development Bank (ADB), InternAtionAl MonetAry Fund (IMF), BlAck SeA Economic CooperAtion (BSEC), CommonweAlth of Independent States (CIS), EurAsiAn Economic Union (EAEU), United Nations (UN), World TrAde OrgAnizAtion (WTO), Among others 1 The World Factbook, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/am.html 2 Trading Economics Prepared by the Market Innovation Division 1 DTI - EXPORT MARKETING BUREAU PHILIPPINES – ARMENIA (AM) TRADE RELATIONS PHILIPPINES-ARMENIA TRADE RELATIONS PH-AM BILATERAL MERCHANDISE TRADE FOB in US$2 TOTAL EXPORTS TO IMPORTS FROM BALANCE OF YEAR TRADE ARMENIA ARMENIA TRADE 2015 139,267 81,234 58,033 23,201 2016 236,564 196,490 40,074 156,416 2017 115,478 110,478 5,000 100,478 2018 229,465 174,855 54,610 120,245 2019 176,047 173,752 2,295 171,457 % CAGR 6.0% (55.4) 20.9% PH-Armenia Total Merchandise PH-Armenia Balance of Trade Trade
    [Show full text]
  • Philippines, March 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Philippines, March 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: PHILIPPINES March 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of the Philippines (Republika ng Pilipinas). Short Form: Philippines (Pilipinas). Term for Citizen(s): Filipino(s). Capital: Manila. Click to Enlarge Image Major Cities: Located on Luzon Island, Metropolitan Manila, including the adjacent Quezon City and surrounding suburbs, is the largest city in the Philippines, with about 12 million people, or nearly 14 percent of the total population. Other large cities include Cebu City on Cebu Island and Davao City on Mindanao Island. Independence: The Philippines attained independence from Spain on June 12, 1898, and from the United States on July 4, 1946. Public Holidays: New Year’s Day (January 1), Holy Thursday (also called Maundy Thursday, movable date in March or April), Good Friday (movable date in March or April), Araw ng Kagitingan (Day of Valor, commonly called Bataan Day outside of the Philippines, April 9), Labor Day (May 1), Independence Day (June 12), National Heroes Day (last Sunday of August), Bonifacio Day (celebration of the birthday of Andres Bonifacio, November 30), Eid al Fitr (the last day of Ramadan, movable date), Christmas Day (December 25), Rizal Day (the date of the execution by the Spanish of José Rizal in 1896, December 30). Flag: The flag of the Philippines has two equal horizontal bands of blue (top) and red with a white equilateral triangle based on the hoist side; in the center of the triangle is a yellow sun with eight primary rays (each containing three individual rays), and in each corner of the triangle is Click to Enlarge Image a small yellow five-pointed star.
    [Show full text]