Forensic Chemistry
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education Page 1 of 8 www.accessscience.com Forensic chemistry Contributed by: Jay A. Siegel Publication year: 2014 Part of the field of forensic science, which is defined as the application of the methods of science to legal matters, either civil or criminal. There is no precise definition of forensic chemistry. As practiced in forensic science laboratories today, it goes well beyond the application of the methods of chemistry to the analysis of evidence in civil and criminal cases. Many forensic chemists use a microscope to analyze evidence as much or more than any analytical chemistry instrument. In some cases, such as the morphological analysis of hair, no chemistry may be done on the evidence even though a forensic chemist may do the analysis. Increasingly, forensic chemical analysis may be performed on types of evidence that are not normally considered to be chemical evidence. These include chemical development of fingerprints and gunshot residue and chemical analysis of inks and papers in cases involving questioned documents. In many of these situations, the analysis is not done by forensic chemists in the chemistry section, but by fingerprint, firearms, or questioned-document examiners. See also: CRIMINALISTICS . Types of Forensic Chemical Evidence In theory, virtually any material can become evidence in a civil or criminal matter and may thus be subject to forensic chemical analysis. In practice, there a few common types of evidence that are largely analyzed, at least in part, by chemical means. The following are the major types. Controlled substances and other drugs These are sometimes called illicit drugs, dangerous drugs, abused drugs, or street drugs. In the United States, they are referred to as controlled substances because they are included within a set of federal Uniform Controlled Substances statutes. Half of all criminal cases submitted to U.S. forensic science laboratories are controlled-substance cases. Controlled substances can be found in powdered, solid, or liquid forms; as tablets or capsules; or as plants and plant extracts. They can also be found inside the body in blood or other body fluids. In the latter cases, the drugs are usually analyzed by a forensic toxicologist rather than a forensic chemist, although both disciplines use the same type of analytical procedures and instruments, and forensic toxicology a really a branch of forensic chemistry. Half of all forensic toxicology cases involve the analysis of ethyl alcohol (ethanol). Ethanol is not a controlled substance and is subject to control by drunk driving and public intoxication laws. Alcohol is analyzed in blood or breath using analytical chemical methods such as gas chromatography, infrared spectroscopy, and visible spectroscopy. See also: FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY . AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education Page 2 of 8 www.accessscience.com Blood and other body fluids Most forensic scientists and crime labs include the analysis of blood and other body fluids in the area of forensic biology, but many of the methods of analysis used in these types of evidence are essentially analytical chemistry. Presumptive screening tests for body fluids are usually chemical tests, although some are immunological. Even DNA extractions, amplifications, and separations by electrophoresis and subsequent fluorescence analysis involve chemical tests. See also: FORENSIC BIOLOGY . Trace evidence Trace evidence does not have a specific definition. It usually means evidence that occurs in such small quantities that it is examined principally by microscopy of one form or another. Some cases involve such small quantities of evidence that only a microscope is used for analysis. In spite of such heavy reliance on microscopy, trace evidence is usually analyzed by forensic chemists who are trained in the principles and uses of microscopes that range from low-power stereomicroscopes to scanning electron microscopes. Included in the area of trace evidence are explosive and fire residues, hairs and fibers, glass and soils, plastics and other polymers, inks and papers, paints and coatings, and miscellaneous materials. Not only are microscopes themselves used in these analyses, but also instruments that incorporate microscopes, such as microspectrophotometers, are used. Pattern evidence Forensic chemistry, but perhaps not forensic chemists, is becoming increasingly involved in the analysis of pattern evidence. This includes fingerprints, firearms, and questioned documents as well as footwear and tire treads. Few are the days in which fingerprints were lifted from surfaces by brushing them with a fine-particle fingerprint powder. Today there are many types of chemicals that react with the oils, fats, and proteins in fingerprint residues, forming characteristic color reactions that can be used to visualize latent fingerprints. The technique of “superglue fuming” employs cyanoacrylate (adhesive) to coat and visualize latent fingerprints. A variety of dyes can then be used along with appropriate lasers or alternative light sources to further enhance the print. See also: FINGERPRINT . Chemical methods have long been used to visualize gunshot residues. Reagents are applied to garments or other surfaces and color the materials that are ejected with a bullet from the barrel of a gun. Analytical chemical methods can be used to identify particles of gunshot primer that are deposited on the hands of someone who fires a weapon. As mentioned previously, ink and paper analysis is becoming increasingly important in the examination of questioned documents. Most of the methods used to characterize inks and paper involve analytical chemistry. See also: ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY . AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education Page 3 of 8 www.accessscience.com Theory and Purpose of Chemical Analysis of Evidence Two principal processes are involved in the analysis of forensic evidence: identification and comparison. Identification is the process of discovering and elucidating relevant chemical and physical properties of an object or material. For some forensic evidence, identification may include quantitative as well as qualitative analysis. All evidence is identified to one degree or another. What makes forensic chemistry unique with respect to other types of chemistry is that there is nearly always a goal of associating the evidence from a crime scene with someone or something that is alleged to have been involved with the crime. This association is always made by a comparison of the evidentiary material with a known person or object. The ultimate goal of forensic examination is to be able to associate evidence with just one person or object, to the exclusion of all others. This association is termed individualization. Individualization is seldom accomplished by discovering and elucidating the chemical properties of the evidence. If individualization is possible, it is always accomplished by evaluating physical characteristics such as the pattern of ridges in a fingerprint, the pattern of markings put on a bullet by the barrel during firing, or the unique characteristics of a person’s handwriting. The sole exception to this is when DNA from biological material is compared to DNA from a suspect or victim, or a crime scene. In DNA typing, certain repeat sequences of DNA are characterized and compared. Population frequencies of these sequences in the human genome are known, and the probability of a chance occurrence can be computed. The chance that two people will have exactly the same DNA type is extremely small, such that a concurrence is a strong indicator of uniqueness and thus individualization. See also: QUALITATIVE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS ; QUANTITATIVE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS . Because it is otherwise not possible to individualize chemical evidence to a particular source, the goal is to characterize it chemically given the limitations of time and quantity of evidence and the purposes of the analysis. The amount of chemical testing that is done on evidence depends on the quantity, quality, and type of evidence that is present. Schemes of Chemical Analysis For most types of chemical evidence, there are some well-defined schemes of analysis. Even for those types for which schemes have not been developed, there are some basic principles that apply in most cases. These principles, to the extent possible, are described below. Evidence must be preserved An example of this occurs in the analysis of ink on a questioned document. Examiners are often called on to compare the ink on two documents or to compare the ink on a document with that in a writing implement such as a pen. This usually involves removing some of the ink for chemical analysis without defacing the document. It is not permissible to cut out pieces of the writing on the document, because it may have to be analyzed for other purposes such as handwriting characteristics. Such destruction is called spoilage and can result in the evidence being inadmissible in court. Tiny hole punches are often used in such cases. The hole in the punch has a diameter AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education Page 4 of 8 www.accessscience.com that is less than the width of the writing stroke, so the essential characteristics of the handwriting are maintained. Some instrumental techniques, such as laser Raman spectrometry, allow the ink to be analyzed on the paper. Evidence must be conserved In cases in which forensic chemical analysis would consume all of the evidence, special arrangements and notifications must be made so that the prosecution and defense are aware of the limitations and the defendant’s rights are preserved. This means that the natural order of testing (see below) may be disrupted so that nondestructive tests are done first. Testing Within the limitations imposed by the need to conserve evidence, testing usually proceeds from the least to the most discriminating. If the evidence is an unknown powder or liquid, a number of screening tests can be applied to get into the right “ballpark” and narrow down the possibilities. The next test may be separation by thin-layer, gas–liquid, or liquid chromatography to ascertain the number of substances in the sample.