DOCSLIB.ORG

Reliable-Javascript.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reliable-Javascript.Pdf www.allitebooks.com www.allitebooks.com RELIABLE JAVASCRIPT® INTRODUCTION ................................................... xxi ▸ PART I LAYING A SOLID FOUNDATION CHAPTER 1 Practicing Skillful Software Engineering . .3 CHAPTER 2 Tooling Up . 29 CHAPTER 3 Constructing Reliable Objects . 81 ▸ PART II TESTING PATTERN-BASED CODE CHAPTER 4 Reviewing the Benefits of Patterns . .107 CHAPTER 5 Ensuring Correct Use of the Callback Pattern . 111 CHAPTER 6 Ensuring Correct Use of the Promise Pattern . 129 CHAPTER 7 Ensuring Correct Use of Partial Function Application . 145 CHAPTER 8 Ensuring Correct Use of the Memoization Pattern . 151 CHAPTER 9 Ensuring Correct Implementation of the Singleton Pattern . .161 CHAPTER 10 Ensuring Correct Implementation of the Factory Pattern . .173 CHAPTER 11 Ensuring Correct Implementation and Use of the Sandbox Pattern . .183 CHAPTER 12 Ensuring Correct Implementation of the Decorator Pattern . .205 CHAPTER 13 Ensuring Correct Implementation of the Strategy Pattern . .223 CHAPTER 14 Ensuring Correct Implementation of the Proxy Pattern . 239 CHAPTER 15 Ensuring Correct Implementation of Chainable Methods . .257 ▸ PART III TESTING AND WRITING WITH ADVANCED JAVASCRIPT FEATURES CHAPTER 16 Conforming to Interfaces in an Interface-Free Language . .271 CHAPTER 17 Ensuring Correct Argument Types . 289 CHAPTER 18 Ensuring Correct Use of call, apply, and bind . 311 CHAPTER 19 Ensuring Correct Use of Method‐Borrowing . .335 CHAPTER 20 Ensuring Correct Use of Mixins . .353 CHAPTER 21 Testing Advanced Program Architectures . .383 www.allitebooks.com ▸ PART IV SPECIAL SUBJECTS IN TESTING CHAPTER 22 Testing DOM Access . 413 CHAPTER 23 Ensuring Conformance to Standards . .435 ▸ PART V SUMMARY CHAPTER 24 Summary of the Principles of Test-Driven Development . 465 CHAPTER 25 Summary of JavaScript Idioms in This Book . 475 INDEX ........................................................... 489 www.allitebooks.com Reliable JavaScript® Lawrence D. Spencer Seth H. Richards www.allitebooks.com Reliable JavaScript® Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 10475 Crosspoint Boulevard Indianapolis, IN 46256 www.wiley.com Copyright © 2015 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana Published simultaneously in Canada ISBN: 978-1-119-02872-7 ISBN: 978-1-119-02873-4 (ebk) ISBN: 978-1-119-02874-1 (ebk) Manufactured in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: The publisher and the author make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation warranties of fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales or pro- motional materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for every situation. This work is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services. If professional assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. Neither the pub- lisher nor the author shall be liable for damages arising herefrom. The fact that an organization or Web site is referred to in this work as a citation and/or a potential source of further information does not mean that the author or the publisher endorses the information the organization or website may provide or recommendations it may make. Further, readers should be aware that Internet websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. For general information on our other products and services please contact our Customer Care Department within the United States at (877) 762-2974, outside the United States at (317) 572-3993 or fax (317) 572-4002. Wiley publishes in a variety of print and electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some material included with stan- dard print versions of this book may not be included in e-books or in print-on-demand. If this book refers to media such as a CD or DVD that is not included in the version you purchased, you may download this material at http://book- support.wiley.com. For more information about Wiley products, visit www.wiley.com. Library of Congress Control Number: 2015941920 Trademarks: Wiley, the Wiley logo, Wrox, the Wrox logo, Programmer to Programmer, and related trade dress are trade- marks or registered trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and/or its affiliates, in the United States and other countries, and may not be used without written permission. JavaScript is a registered trademark of Oracle America, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book. www.allitebooks.com We dedicate this book to all JavaScript developers who work hard to hone their craft. You are making the world a more beautiful place. www.allitebooks.com CrEDITS PrOJECT EDITOR BUSINEss MANAGER Christina Haviland Amy Knies TECHNICAL EDITORS AssOCIATE PUBLISHER Keith Pepin Jim Minatel John Peloquin PrOJECT COORDINATOR, COVER PrODUCTION MANAGER Brent Savage Kathleen Wisor PROOFREADER COPY EDITOR Nancy Carrasco Nancy Rapoport INDEXER MANAGER OF CONTENT DEVELOPMENT Johnna VanHoose Dinse & AssEMBLY Mary Beth Wakefield COVER DESIGNER Wiley MARKETING DIRECTOR David Mayhew COVER IMAGE © Getty Images/Andrew Rich MARKETING MANAGER Carrie Sherrill PrOFEssIONAL TECHNOLOGY & STRATEGY DIRECTOR Barry Pruett www.allitebooks.com ABOUT THE AUTHOrs LArrY SPENCEr is Vice President of Application Development at ScerIS, a software and ser- vices company in Sudbury, Massachusetts. He and his team create browser-based applications in AngularJS, with a C#/Web API/SQL Server back end. Larry’s 35-year career has included stints programming in COBOL, C, C++, C#, and even mainframe assembly language, but he says JavaScript is the most fun. A frequent speaker at Code Camps and other gatherings, Larry enjoys sharing his love of software with the development community. You can find his blog at http:// FascinatedWithSoftware.com. Larry’s outside interests include philosophy, chess, and classical guitar. He lives in Marlborough, Massachusetts. SETH RICHARDs has been crafting software professionally since 2002. He got his start program- ming embedded devices for the bar and nightclub industry and transitioned to web application development in 2007. He has worked on numerous web-based applications ranging from an enterprise-class geographic information system–centric physical asset management system to a social network for product discovery and recommendation. Seth graduated from Plymouth State College (now University) in Plymouth, New Hampshire, where he studied computer science and mathematics. He is currently pursuing his M.S. in Computer Science from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Seth’s blog can be found at http://blog .shrichards.com, and he can be followed on Twitter at @shrichards. www.allitebooks.com ABOUT THE TECHNICAL EDITOrs KEITH PEPIN has been developing sites and applications on the web for over 17 years. Early in his career, he fell in love with JavaScript and has been passionately building dynamic user experiences ever since. He is currently a Senior Software Engineer at Meltwater, and is using HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, AngularJS, Node.js, and MongoDB to build the next generation of their online market- ing intelligence platform. When not coding or spending time with his family, he enjoys other geeky pursuits, including all forms of games, comic books, painting, and sketching. JOHN PELOQUIN is a software engineer with over 10 years of JavaScript experience ranging across applications of all sizes. John earned his B.A. in Mathematics from U.C. Berkeley and is currently a lead engineer at Spreemo, a healthcare technology startup in NYC. Prior to editing this volume, John edited Professional Website Performance by Peter Smith (Wiley 2012) and Professional JavaScript for Web Developers, 3rd ed. by Nicholas Zakas (Wiley 2012). When he is not coding or collecting errata, John can occasionally be found doing stand-up comedy at an open mic. www.allitebooks.com ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thank you to my wife, Bethany, for her love and support while we wrote this book, and for endur- ing (or enjoying?) many husband-less nights and weekends while I worked to meet a deadline. –Seth Richards Thanks to my family for encouraging me to pursue my dreams. My dreams may include writing a book, but they begin and end with you. –Larry Spencer This book would not have been possible without the willingness of others to share their knowledge and expertise with us and the community at large in book, blog, and source-code format. Together, we’d like to acknowledge and thank: ➤ Douglas Crockford, for his exposure of good parts of JavaScript and his work on jsLint. ➤ Nicolas Zakas, for the numerous books and blog posts he wrote that acted as guides through JavaScript’s sometimes-treacherous waters, and also his maintenance of and contributions to ESLint. ➤ Stoyan Stefanov, for his instruction on applying pattern-based development to JavaScript. ➤ Robert C. Martin, for instilling in us the desire to write clean code. ➤ Fredrik Appelberg, for his creation of, and Dave Clayton for his contributions to, the AOP.js aspect-oriented programming framework. ➤ Mike Bostock, for inspiring us with the D3 library for SVG graphics.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Practical Unit Testing for Embedded Systems Part 1 PARASOFT WHITE PAPER
    Practical Unit Testing for Embedded Systems Part 1 PARASOFT WHITE PAPER Table of Contents Introduction 2 Basics of Unit Testing 2 Benefits 2 Critics 3 Practical Unit Testing in Embedded Development 3 The system under test 3 Importing uVision projects 4 Configure the C++test project for Unit Testing 6 Configure uVision project for Unit Testing 8 Configure results transmission 9 Deal with target limitations 10 Prepare test suite and first exemplary test case 12 Deploy it and collect results 12 Page 1 www.parasoft.com Introduction The idea of unit testing has been around for many years. "Test early, test often" is a mantra that concerns unit testing as well. However, in practice, not many software projects have the luxury of a decent and up-to-date unit test suite. This may change, especially for embedded systems, as the demand for delivering quality software continues to grow. International standards, like IEC-61508-3, ISO/DIS-26262, or DO-178B, demand module testing for a given functional safety level. Unit testing at the module level helps to achieve this requirement. Yet, even if functional safety is not a concern, the cost of a recall—both in terms of direct expenses and in lost credibility—justifies spending a little more time and effort to ensure that our released software does not cause any unpleasant surprises. In this article, we will show how to prepare, maintain, and benefit from setting up unit tests for a simplified simulated ASR module. We will use a Keil evaluation board MCBSTM32E with Cortex-M3 MCU, MDK-ARM with the new ULINK Pro debug and trace adapter, and Parasoft C++test Unit Testing Framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Machine Learning in the Browser
    Machine Learning in the Browser The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:38811507 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Machine Learning in the Browser a thesis presented by Tomas Reimers to The Department of Computer Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in the subject of Computer Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts March 2017 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Background . .3 1.2 Motivation . .4 1.2.1 Privacy . .4 1.2.2 Unavailable Server . .4 1.2.3 Simple, Self-Contained Demos . .5 1.3 Challenges . .5 1.3.1 Performance . .5 1.3.2 Poor Generality . .7 1.3.3 Manual Implementation in JavaScript . .7 2 The TensorFlow Architecture 7 2.1 TensorFlow's API . .7 2.2 TensorFlow's Implementation . .9 2.3 Portability . .9 3 Compiling TensorFlow into JavaScript 10 3.1 Motivation to Compile . 10 3.2 Background on Emscripten . 10 3.2.1 Build Process . 12 3.2.2 Dependencies . 12 3.2.3 Bitness Assumptions . 13 3.2.4 Concurrency Model . 13 3.3 Experiences . 14 4 Results 15 4.1 Benchmarks . 15 4.2 Library Size . 16 4.3 WebAssembly . 17 5 Developer Experience 17 5.1 Universal Graph Runner .
    [Show full text]
  • CSS Browser Selector Plus: a Javascript Library to Support Cross-Browser Responsive Design Richard Duchatsch Johansen Talita C
    CSS Browser Selector Plus: A JavaScript Library to Support Cross-browser Responsive Design Richard Duchatsch Johansen Talita C. Pagani Britto Cesar Augusto Cusin W3C Accessibility WG Member and Assistant Coordinator Professor at Faculdade Paraíso do Senior Front-end Developer at of Educational Projects - MStech Ceará and W3C Accessibility WG Eventials – Rua Itapaiúna, 2434 Rua Joaquim Anacleto Bueno, 1-42 Member – Rua da Conceição, 1228 São Paulo – SP – Brazil, Zip Code Bauru – SP – Brazil, Juazeiro do Norte – CE – Brazil, 05707-001 Zip Code 17047-281 Zip Code 63010-465 +55 14 9711-7983 +55 14 3235-5500 +55 15 8100-4466 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT means you can use CSS Media Queries to tweak a CSS for a Developing websites for multiples devices have been a rough task mobile devices, printer or create a responsive site. for the past ten years. Devices features change frequently and new Media queries is an extension to the @media (or media=”” devices emerge every day. Since W3C introduced media queries attribute, in <link> tag) specification on CSS, allowing in CSS3, it’s possible to developed tailored interfaces for multiple declaration of conditional queries expressions to detect particular devices using a single HTML document. CSS3 media queries media features, such as viewport width, display color, orientation have been used to support adaptive and flexible layouts, however, and resolution [1], as shown on Table 1. it’s not supported in legacy browsers. In this paper, we present CSS Browser Selector Plus, a cross-browser alternative method Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel, Cross-Platform Unit Testing for Real-Time Embedded Systems
    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 1-1-2017 Parallel, Cross-Platform Unit Testing for Real-Time Embedded Systems Tosapon Pankumhang University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Computer Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Pankumhang, Tosapon, "Parallel, Cross-Platform Unit Testing for Real-Time Embedded Systems" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1353. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/1353 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. PARALLEL, CROSS-PLATFORM UNIT TESTING FOR REAL-TIME EMBEDDED SYSTEMS __________ A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Daniel Felix Ritchie School of Engineering and Computer Science University of Denver __________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy __________ by Tosapon Pankumhang August 2017 Advisor: Matthew J. Rutherford ©Copyright by Tosapon Pankumhang 2017 All Rights Reserved Author: Tosapon Pankumhang Title: PARALLEL, CROSS-PLATFORM UNIT TESTING FOR REAL-TIME EMBEDDED SYSTEMS Advisor: Matthew J. Rutherford Degree Date: August 2017 ABSTRACT Embedded systems are used in a wide variety of applications (e.g., automotive, agricultural, home security, industrial, medical, military, and aerospace) due to their small size, low-energy consumption, and the ability to control real-time peripheral devices precisely. These systems, however, are different from each other in many aspects: processors, memory size, develop applications/OS, hardware interfaces, and software loading methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Onclick Event-Handler
    App Dev Stefano Balietti Center for European Social Science Research at Mannheim University (MZES) Alfred-Weber Institute of Economics at Heidelberg University @balietti | stefanobalietti.com | @nodegameorg | nodegame.org Building Digital Skills: 5-14 May 2021, University of Luzern Goals of the Seminar: 1. Writing and understanding asynchronous code: event- listeners, remote functions invocation. 2. Basic front-end development: HTML, JavaScript, CSS, debugging front-end code. 3. Introduction to front-end frameworks: jQuery and Bootstrap 4. Introduction to back-end development: NodeJS Express server, RESTful API, Heroku cloud. Outputs of the Seminar: 1. Web app: in NodeJS/Express. 2. Chrome extensions: architecture and examples. 3. Behavioral experiment/survey: nodeGame framework. 4. Mobile development: hybrid apps with Apache Cordova, intro to Ionic Framework, progressive apps (PWA). Your Instructor: Stefano Balietti http://stefanobalietti.com Currently • Fellow in Sociology Mannheim Center for European Social Research (MZES) • Postdoc at the Alfred Weber Institute of Economics at Heidelberg University Previously o Microsoft Research - Computational Social Science New York City o Postdoc Network Science Institute, Northeastern University o Fellow IQSS, Harvard University o PhD, Postdoc, Computational Social Science, ETH Zurich My Methodology Interface of computer science, sociology, and economics Agent- Social Network Based Analysis Models Machine Learning for Optimal Experimental Experimental Methods Design Building Platforms Patterns
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Testing Is a Level of Software Testing Where Individual Units/ Components of a Software Are Tested. the Purpose Is to Valid
    Unit Testing is a level of software testing where individual units/ components of a software are tested. The purpose is to validate that each unit of the software performs as designed. A unit is the smallest testable part of software. It usually has one or a few inputs and usually a single output. In procedural programming a unit may be an individual program, function, procedure, etc. In object-oriented programming, the smallest unit is a method, which may belong to a base/ super class, abstract class or derived/ child class. (Some treat a module of an application as a unit. This is to be discouraged as there will probably be many individual units within that module.) Unit testing frameworks, drivers, stubs, and mock/ fake objects are used to assist in unit testing. METHOD Unit Testing is performed by using the White Box Testing method. When is it performed? Unit Testing is the first level of testing and is performed prior to Integration Testing. BENEFITS Unit testing increases confidence in changing/ maintaining code. If good unit tests are written and if they are run every time any code is changed, we will be able to promptly catch any defects introduced due to the change. Also, if codes are already made less interdependent to make unit testing possible, the unintended impact of changes to any code is less. Codes are more reusable. In order to make unit testing possible, codes need to be modular. This means that codes are easier to reuse. Development is faster. How? If you do not have unit testing in place, you write your code and perform that fuzzy ‘developer test’ (You set some breakpoints, fire up the GUI, provide a few inputs that hopefully hit your code and hope that you are all set.) If you have unit testing in place, you write the test, write the code and run the test.
    [Show full text]
  • Including Jquery Is Not an Answer! - Design, Techniques and Tools for Larger JS Apps
    Including jQuery is not an answer! - Design, techniques and tools for larger JS apps Trifork A/S, Headquarters Margrethepladsen 4, DK-8000 Århus C, Denmark [email protected] Karl Krukow http://www.trifork.com Trifork Geek Night March 15st, 2011, Trifork, Aarhus What is the question, then? Does your JavaScript look like this? 2 3 What about your server side code? 4 5 Non-functional requirements for the Server-side . Maintainability and extensibility . Technical quality – e.g. modularity, reuse, separation of concerns – automated testing – continuous integration/deployment – Tool support (static analysis, compilers, IDEs) . Productivity . Performant . Appropriate architecture and design . … 6 Why so different? . “Front-end” programming isn't 'real' programming? . JavaScript isn't a 'real' language? – Browsers are impossible... That's just the way it is... The problem is only going to get worse! ● JS apps will get larger and more complex. ● More logic and computation on the client. ● HTML5 and mobile web will require more programming. ● We have to test and maintain these apps. ● We will have harder requirements for performance (e.g. mobile). 7 8 NO Including jQuery is NOT an answer to these problems. (Neither is any other js library) You need to do more. 9 Improving quality on client side code . The goal of this talk is to motivate and help you improve the technical quality of your JavaScript projects . Three main points. To improve non-functional quality: – you need to understand the language and host APIs. – you need design, structure and file-organization as much (or even more) for JavaScript as you do in other languages, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing and Debugging Tools for Reproducible Research
    Testing and debugging Tools for Reproducible Research Karl Broman Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, UW–Madison kbroman.org github.com/kbroman @kwbroman Course web: kbroman.org/Tools4RR We spend a lot of time debugging. We’d spend a lot less time if we tested our code properly. We want to get the right answers. We can’t be sure that we’ve done so without testing our code. Set up a formal testing system, so that you can be confident in your code, and so that problems are identified and corrected early. Even with a careful testing system, you’ll still spend time debugging. Debugging can be frustrating, but the right tools and skills can speed the process. "I tried it, and it worked." 2 This is about the limit of most programmers’ testing efforts. But: Does it still work? Can you reproduce what you did? With what variety of inputs did you try? "It's not that we don't test our code, it's that we don't store our tests so they can be re-run automatically." – Hadley Wickham R Journal 3(1):5–10, 2011 3 This is from Hadley’s paper about his testthat package. Types of tests ▶ Check inputs – Stop if the inputs aren't as expected. ▶ Unit tests – For each small function: does it give the right results in specific cases? ▶ Integration tests – Check that larger multi-function tasks are working. ▶ Regression tests – Compare output to saved results, to check that things that worked continue working. 4 Your first line of defense should be to include checks of the inputs to a function: If they don’t meet your specifications, you should issue an error or warning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art, Science, and Engineering of Fuzzing: a Survey
    1 The Art, Science, and Engineering of Fuzzing: A Survey Valentin J.M. Manes,` HyungSeok Han, Choongwoo Han, Sang Kil Cha, Manuel Egele, Edward J. Schwartz, and Maverick Woo Abstract—Among the many software vulnerability discovery techniques available today, fuzzing has remained highly popular due to its conceptual simplicity, its low barrier to deployment, and its vast amount of empirical evidence in discovering real-world software vulnerabilities. At a high level, fuzzing refers to a process of repeatedly running a program with generated inputs that may be syntactically or semantically malformed. While researchers and practitioners alike have invested a large and diverse effort towards improving fuzzing in recent years, this surge of work has also made it difficult to gain a comprehensive and coherent view of fuzzing. To help preserve and bring coherence to the vast literature of fuzzing, this paper presents a unified, general-purpose model of fuzzing together with a taxonomy of the current fuzzing literature. We methodically explore the design decisions at every stage of our model fuzzer by surveying the related literature and innovations in the art, science, and engineering that make modern-day fuzzers effective. Index Terms—software security, automated software testing, fuzzing. ✦ 1 INTRODUCTION Figure 1 on p. 5) and an increasing number of fuzzing Ever since its introduction in the early 1990s [152], fuzzing studies appear at major security conferences (e.g. [225], has remained one of the most widely-deployed techniques [52], [37], [176], [83], [239]). In addition, the blogosphere is to discover software security vulnerabilities. At a high level, filled with many success stories of fuzzing, some of which fuzzing refers to a process of repeatedly running a program also contain what we consider to be gems that warrant a with generated inputs that may be syntactically or seman- permanent place in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Goal Unit Testing Regression Testing Automation
    Streamlining a Workflow Jeffrey Falgout Daniel Wilkey [email protected] [email protected] Science, Discovery, and the Universe Bloomberg L.P. Computer Science and Mathematics Major Background Regression Testing Jenkins instance would begin running all Bloomberg L.P.'s main product is a Another useful tool to have in unit and regression tests. This Jenkins job desktop application which provides sufficiently complex systems is a suite would then report the results on the financial tools. Bloomberg L.P. of regression tests. Regression testing Phabricator review and signal the author employs many computer programmers allows you to test very high level in an appropriate way. The previous to maintain, update, and add new behavior which can detect low level workflow required manual intervention to features to this product. bugs. run tests. This new workflow only the The product the code base was developer to create his feature branch in implementing has a record/playback order for all tests to be run automatically. Goal feature. This was leveraged to create a Many of the tasks that a programmer regression testing framework. This has to perform as part of a team can be framework leveraged the unit testing automated. The goal of this project was framework wherever possible. to work with a team to automate tasks At various points during the playback, where possible and make them easier callback methods would be invoked. An example of the new workflow, where a Jenkins where impossible. These methods could have testing logic to instance will automatically run tests and update the make sure the application was in the peer review.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Unit Testing
    INTRODUCTION TO UNIT TESTING In C#, you can think of a unit as a method. You thus write a unit test by writing something that tests a method. For example, let’s say that we had the aforementioned Calculator class and that it contained an Add(int, int) method. Let’s say that you want to write some code to test that method. public class CalculatorTester { public void TestAdd() { var calculator = new Calculator(); if (calculator.Add(2, 2) == 4) Console.WriteLine("Success"); else Console.WriteLine("Failure"); } } Let’s take a look now at what some code written for an actual unit test framework (MS Test) looks like. [TestClass] public class CalculatorTests { [TestMethod] public void TestMethod1() { var calculator = new Calculator(); Assert.AreEqual(4, calculator.Add(2, 2)); } } Notice the attributes, TestClass and TestMethod. Those exist simply to tell the unit test framework to pay attention to them when executing the unit test suite. When you want to get results, you invoke the unit test runner, and it executes all methods decorated like this, compiling the results into a visually pleasing report that you can view. Let’s take a look at your top 3 unit test framework options for C#. MSTest/Visual Studio MSTest was actually the name of a command line tool for executing tests, MSTest ships with Visual Studio, so you have it right out of the box, in your IDE, without doing anything. With MSTest, getting that setup is as easy as File->New Project. Then, when you write a test, you can right click on it and execute, having your result displayed in the IDE One of the most frequent knocks on MSTest is that of performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolia-Thesis.Pdf
    Joni Korpi Adaptive Web Design As applied to the design process of a web application Metropolia University of Applied Sciences Bachelor of Engineering Media Technology Bachelor’s Thesis 16.3.2012 Abstract Author Joni Korpi Title Adaptive Web Design As applied to the design process of a web application Number of Pages 36 pages Date 18.3.2012 Degree Bachelor of Engineering Degree Programme Media Technology Specialisation option Digital Media Instructors Aarne Klemetti, Senior Lecturer Harri Airaksinen, Principal Lecturer This thesis explored the usage of adaptive web design techniques in the design process of a reservation and inventory management web application, New Reserve. It attempted to uncover issues a designer is likely to face when moving from a tradi- tional web design process to an adaptive one. Most issues uncovered were related to keeping visual design appealing and attempt- ing to support multiple input methods, such as touch screens and mice, at the same time. Using a fluid grid for visual design was found to be difficult, as they caused problems when elements start stretching beyond their optimal maximum dimensions, and when element dimensions are determined in a mix of percentage units and absolute units. Intentionally leaving empty space in wide designs and using the alternative "border-box" model were found to alleviate these problems. Using the "Mobile First" approach for design was found to be recommended, as the amount of mobile internet users is set to overtake desktop internet users very soon. The approach also helps in keeping designs cruft-free. Making images adapt to mo- bile sizes and bandwidth restrictions was found to be difficult, but there is hope for a standards-based technique to deal with this in the near future.
    [Show full text]