DOCSLIB.ORG

ANNUAL Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ANNUAL Report ANNUAL REPORT BlackRock Authorised Contractual Scheme For the period from 27 June 2014 to 31 December 2014 About the Fund Manager BlackRock ACS US Equity Tracker Fund Nimish Patel, Managing Director and senior portfolio manager, is a member of This Annual Report covers the period from 27 June 2014 to 31 December 2014. BlackRock’s Institutional Index Equity team. Performance Table Mr. Patel’s service with the firm dates back to 2006, including his years with Barclays Global Investors (“BGI”), which merged with BlackRock in 2009. At BGI, Since Launch he served as a senior portfolio manager in the Institutional Index Equity team. 27.6.2014 In this role, he was responsible for overseeing all strategic client portfolios. Prior to 31.12.2014 to joining BGI, Mr. Patel was a portfolio manager in the Quantitative Management TOTAL RETURN (with net income reinvested) Group at Northern Trust Global Investments (“NTGI”) where he managed a broad Class T1A Accumulation Units range of portfolios including global index equity, global enhanced equity and indexed fixed income. Mr. Patel joined NTGI in 2003 following its acquisition of Deutsche Asset Management’s (“DeAM”)’s BlackRock ACS US Equity Tracker Fund +16.6% Quant and Index business. FTSE USA Index* +16.5% Mr. Patel joined DeAM (formerly Morgan Grenfell Asset Management) in 1997. During his tenure at All Fund figures quoted are based on bid-to-bid dealing prices (the price at which units are sold) and are calculated net of fees. Performance returns are cumulative. All returns are in Sterling. DeAM, Mr. Patel initially served as a Fund Manager’s assistant for UK Active Equity before transitioning * Figures from FTSE. to the Quantitative Investment Group where he served as a Transition Manager and Portfolio Manager. Mr. Patel is an Affiliate of The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (“ACCA”). All financial investments involve an element of risk. Therefore, the value of your investment and the income from it will vary and the return of your initial investment amount cannot be guaranteed. Changes in exchange rates may cause the value of an investment to fluctuate. Past performance is Investment Objective & Policy not a guide to future performance and should not be the sole factor of consideration when selecting a product. The aim of the BlackRock ACS US Equity Tracker Fund (the “Fund”) is to seek to achieve capital growth for investors by tracking closely the performance of the FTSE USA Index by investing in companies Distribution Payable in the Benchmark Index. Investment will be made directly into constituent companies and via other transferable securities giving exposure to such companies. The Fund may also invest in permitted T1A Accumulation The final accumulation distribution payable on 28 February 2015 is 1.0374p net per accumulation unit. money-market instruments, permitted deposits and units in collective investment schemes. Derivatives and forward transactions may be used for the purposes of efficient portfolio management. The Fund is the UK’s first tax transparent fund (“TTF”) and is a Fund of the BlackRock Authorised Contractual Scheme, a Co-Ownership Scheme constituted as a UCITS scheme under the Financial Conduct Authority’s (“FCA”) Collective Investment Schemes Sourcebook (“the Sourcebook”). The Fund was authorised by the FCA on 13 June 2014 and was established on 27 June 2014. A TTF is a collective investment scheme structure in accordance with the Finance Act 2012. Copies of Manager’s Reports and Prospectus are available on request. Dealing and Investor Services: 0800 44 55 22 blackrock.co.uk 1 BlackRock Authorised Contractual Scheme 2 ACS US Equity Tracker Fund continued Tracking Difference Tracking Error Tracking difference is defined as the difference in returns between a fund and its benchmark index. Realised tracking error is the annualised standard deviation of the difference in monthly returns between a fund and its benchmark index. Tracking error shows the consistency of the returns relative Cash management, efficient portfolio management techniques including securities lending and to the benchmark index over a defined period of time. transaction costs from rebalancing can have an impact on tracking difference. Anticipated tracking error is based on the expected volatility of differences between the returns of A fund’s tracking difference may be affected if the times at which a fund and its benchmark index a fund and the returns of its benchmark index. are priced are different. As the Fund is valued at midday, but the benchmark index is valued at the time the relevant markets close for business, the tracking difference of the Fund at its valuation point may Cash management, efficient portfolio management techniques including securities lending and appear to be higher than if the Fund and the benchmark index were priced at the same time. transaction costs from rebalancing can have an impact on tracking error as well as the return differential between the Fund and the benchmark index. Importantly, these impacts can be either The table below compares the realised Fund performance against the performance of the relevant positive or negative depending on the underlying circumstances. benchmark index during the period from 27 June 2014 to 31 December 2014. An explanation for the difference is provided: A fund’s tracking error may be affected if the times at which a fund and its benchmark index are priced are different. As the Fund is valued at midday, but the benchmark index is valued at the time Fund return Benchmark return the relevant markets close for business, the tracking error of the Fund at its valuation point may for the period for the period appear to be higher than if the Fund and the benchmark index were priced at the same time. 27.6.2014 27.6.2014 Tracking to 31.12.2014 to 31.12.2014 difference Explanation of the tracking difference The table below shows the anticipated tracking error of the Fund (disclosed in the prospectus Before costs and after adjusting for the on an ex ante basis) against the realised tracking error of the Fund as at 31 December 2014. Realised difference in valuation point of the Fund tracking error is annualised and calculated using data since inception as the Fund has been trading for and the pricing point of the benchmark fewer than 36 months. A return history fewer than 36 months is not considered statistically significant. index, the performance of the Fund relative to the benchmark index has Anticipated Realised +16.6%* +16.5% +0.1% been in line with expectations. Tracking Error Tracking Error Explanation for difference * Performance is calculated net of fees and reported for the Fund’s class T1A Accumulation Units. The Fund has tracked its benchmark index within its anticipated Up to 2.50%* +2.41%* tracking error. * Figures represent the anticipated tracking error and realised tracking error for the Fund’s class T1A Accumulation Units. 3 BlackRock Authorised Contractual Scheme 4 Performance Record Net Asset Value Annualised Ongoing Charges Detailed in the following table are the charges used to meet the costs of running the Fund, which Net Asset Value include the costs of marketing and distribution. These charges reduce the potential growth of your Net Asset Value per Unit investments. The charges may vary from year to year. The charges exclude portfolio trade-related costs, Unit Class Units in Issue £ p except costs paid to the custodian/depositary and entry/exit charges paid to an underlying collective 31 December 2014* T1A Accumulation 367,361,940 424,174,751 115.5 investment scheme (if any). * Fund launched on 27 June 2014. 27.6.2014 Unit Class to 31.12.2014†* Income (Net Accumulations) T1A Accumulation 0.17% T1A Accumulation Units † Ongoing charges figures are based on annualised expenses for the period ended 31 December 2014. Calendar Year Pence per Unit * Fund launched on 27 June 2014. 2015†* 1.0374 † To 28 February. * Fund launched on 27 June 2014. Capital (Unit Prices) T1A Accumulation Units Highest Lowest Offer Price Bid Price Calendar Year p p 2014†* 117.7 98.96 † To 31 December. * Fund launched on 27 June 2014. Risk and Reward Profile Lower risk Higher risk Typically lower rewards Typically higher rewards Unit Class T1A Accumulation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ` The risk indicator was calculated incorporating historical or simulated historical data and may not be a reliable indication of the future risk profile of the unit class. ` The risk category shown is not guaranteed and may change over time. ` The lowest category does not mean risk free. For more information on this, please see the Fund’s Key Investor Information Documents (KIIDs), which are available at www.blackrock.com. 5 BlackRock Authorised Contractual Scheme 6 Investment Report Portfolio Statement at 31 December 2014 Summary of Performance over the Period Holding or Market % of During the period from 27 June 2014 to 31 December 2014, the Fund was up 16.6%*, compared with its Nominal Value Total Net benchmark, the FTSE USA Index, which was up by 16.5%. Value Investment £ Assets UNITED STATES – 99.79% Fund Manager’s Commentary Stock market volatility increased in the third quarter of 2014 as high valuations started to worry Aerospace & Defence – 2.29% investors because of potential interest rate rises and mounting geopolitical risks. In this environment, 3,800 B/E Aerospace 141,399 0.03 US large-cap stocks benefited from the fact they are perceived as being more stable than their smaller 22,161 Boeing 1,846,786 0.44 peers. US stock markets regained their strength in the middle of the quarter however, driven largely 10,970 General Dynamics 968,357 0.23 by, albeit temporary, suggestions that geopolitical risks had abated and a period in which investors 1,900 KLX 50,265 0.01 treated bad economic news as good.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tax Transparent Funds in the UK
    July 2013 JONES DAY COMMENTARY Tax TransparenT Funds in The uK In January 2012, HM Treasury proposed the consultation process. The main changes relate to the introduction of contractual schemes for collective transfer of units and conditions for investment by retail investment. The main objective of introducing investors. Other changes reflect discussion about the contractual schemes was stated as being to ensure application of partnership and insolvency law. that the uK is able to compete for a share of the market in European pooled funds following the In addition, the Financial Services Authority (now implementation of the undertakings for Collective replaced by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) Investment in Transferable Securities (“uCITS”) IV and the Prudential Regulation Authority) issued a Directive in July 2011, which allows uCITS funds to consultation paper in February (CP13/5) addressing establish master-feeder arrangements. the proposals for tax transparent funds and the new rules (to be included in the FCA’s Collective Following on from the initial consultation period, HM Investment Schemes Handbook (“COll”)) which will Treasury published several drafts of the Collective enable contractual schemes to be authorised and Investment in Transferable Securities (Contractual regulated. The Tax Regulations were also updated. Scheme) Regulations 2012/13 (the “Regulations”) together with drafts of three complementary tax On 12 June, the Regulations (SI 2013/1388) were Regulations.1 published on legislation.gov.uk, together with an explanatory memorandum (a previous version of On 31 January 2013, HM Treasury published a further which had been published on 27 March). draft of the Regulations and an accompanying update.
    [Show full text]
  • FORM 10-Q Kosmos Energy Ltd
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013 o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number: 001-35167 Kosmos Energy Ltd. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Bermuda 98-0686001 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) Clarendon House 2 Church Street Hamilton, Bermuda HM 11 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: +1 441 295 5950 Not applicable (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x Noo Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Pensions Committee, 16/03/2017
    PENSIONS COMMITTEE ________________________________________________ Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 7.00 p.m. Town Hall, Mulberry Place, 5 Clove Crescent, London E14 2BG This meeting is open to the public to attend. Members: Vice Chair: Councillor Clare Harrisson Councillor Gulam Kibria Choudhury, Councillor Andrew Cregan, Councillor Md. Maium Miah, Councillor Abdul Mukit MBE, Councillor Candida Ronald and Councillor Andrew Wood Tony Childs (Co-optee Admitted Bodies Representative) and Kehinde Akintunde (Unions Representative) Substitutes: Councillor Marc Francis, Councillor Ayas Miah and Councillor Rajib Ahmed [The quorum for this body is 3 voting Members]. Contact for further enquiries: Scan this code to Nishaat Ismail, Democratic Services. view an electronic 1st Floor, Town Hall, Mulberry Place, 5 Clove Crescent, E14 2BG agenda E-mail: [email protected] Tel: 020 7364 4120 Web:http://www.towerhamlets.gov.uk/committee Public Information Attendance at meetings. The public are welcome to attend meetings of the Committee. However seating is limited and offered on a first come first served basis. Audio/Visual recording of meetings. Should you wish to film the meeting, please contact the Committee Officer shown on the agenda front page. Mobile telephones Please switch your mobile telephone on to silent mode whilst in the meeting. Access information for the Town Hall, Mulberry Place. Bus: Routes: 15, 277, 108, D6, D7, D8 all stop near the Town Hall. Docklands Light Railway: Nearest stations are East India: Head across the bridge and then through complex to the Town Hall, Mulberry Place Blackwall station. Across the bus station then turn right to the back of the Town Hall complex, through the gates and archway to the Town Hall.
    [Show full text]
  • IA UK FUNDS REGIME WORKING GROUP Final Report to HM Treasury Asset Management Taskforce
    IA UK FUNDS REGIME WORKING GROUP Final report to HM Treasury Asset Management Taskforce 6 June 2019 ADDENDUM on Onshore Professional Fund proposals – 11 March 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD FROM THE IA CEO ............................................................................... 4 CHAIRMAN’S FOREWORD ....................................................................................... 5 GROUP MEMBERSHIP / ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 8 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 15 Background ............................................................................................................... 15 Purpose of group and report ....................................................................................... 16 Wider context ............................................................................................................ 16 Guiding pillars for moving forward ............................................................................... 17 1. OPPORTUNITIES FOR INNOVATION ................................................................. 18 How the UK fund regime can support innovation .......................................................... 19 Long-Term Asset Fund ................................................................................................ 21 Onshore Professional
    [Show full text]
  • Taxation of Investments in Funds Jon Garrett Agenda
    Taxation of investments in funds Jon Garrett Agenda 1. Overview 2. UK funds 3. Offshore funds 4. Non-resident capital gains 2 1. Overview 3 Overview Types of funds Offshore Traditional UK Traditional Mutual Funds (USA) Open Ended Investment Company Unit Investment Trusts (USA) Authorised Unit Trust Common Contractual Fund (Ire) Investment Trust SICAV/SICAF (Lux/France) Real Estate Investment Trust BEVAK/BEVEK (NL/Belgium) Exchange Traded Fund VCIC/ICAV (Ire) Authorised Contractual Scheme Exchange Traded Fund UK Alternative Offshore Alternative UK Limited Partnership Hedge Fund (typically Cayman Islands) Unauthorised Unit Trust Jersey (/G) Property Unit Trust Venture Capital Trust Exchange Traded Fund 4 Overview Investment by life companies Structural investments Reinsured funds Policy Policy Holders Holders Life Company Life Company Reinsurance contract OEIC/TTF Reinsurer Assets Assets 5 2. Taxation of UK Funds 6 Taxation of UK Funds Regulated Funds In the UK, regulated funds are typically established as: • Open-Ended Investment Company (“OEIC”), also known as an Investment Company with Variable Capital (“ICVC”) • Authorised Unit Trust (“AUT”) • Authorised Contractual Scheme (“ACS”) In the UK, these entities are typically authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) and, if so, are also known as Authorised Investment Funds (“AIFs”) – which can be confused with Alternative Investment Funds. 7 Taxation of UK Funds OEIC – Open Ended Investment Companies Characteristics Taxation in the fund • A company • Taxed at a basic
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing an Investment Vehicle European Real Estate Fund Regimes
    Choosing an investment vehicle European Real Estate Fund Regimes May 2019 www.pwc.com/realestate This content is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional advisors. Introduction This booklet aims to provide an overview of the most common European collective investment vehicles (CIVs) suitable for investment in real estate, including their legal form, as well as their regulatory and tax position. The AIFM Directive entered into force on Many countries offer attractive tax facilities, 22 July 2013 and has been implemented by including tax exemptions, to their local real EU Member States, which had to consider estate CIVs. In many countries, these tax both regulatory matters and changes to facilities are not available to real estate CIVs Uwe Stoschek fund and investor taxation. This has resulted investing from a different jurisdiction. Therefore, in significant changes in the European real there are still important steps to take until there Partner, estate fund landscape. AIFMD has forced is a level playing field for real estate CIVs also Global Real Estate Tax fund managers and investors to change from a tax perspective. Our country specialists Leader their approach and look not only at national mentioned in this publication will be very happy PwC Germany rules, but also at EU rules and guidelines. to help you by providing further information on At the same time, the new passports for any of the fund vehicles described. +49 30 2636-5286 professional investor funds provide new +49 160 5820641 options. Managers must consider where they [email protected] apply for authorisation to obtain the licence, paying close attention to legal and tax aspects, as well as available business infrastructure and personal resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Structuring and Managing a Collective Investment Vehicle (CIV)
    Structuring and Managing a Collective Investment Vehicle (CIV) Dean Handley Asset Servicing, EMEA June 2014 Information Classification: Confidential Agenda 1 Authorised Contractual Schemes 2 CIV Governance and Structure 2 Information Classification: Confidential Authorised Contractual Schemes (1) BACKGROUND • ACS designed as a new regulated tax transparent fund vehicle primarily to facilitate the setting up of pooled “master funds” under UCITS IV as in order for “master-feeder” structures to be attractive to investors on a cross border basis the master fund needs to be a tax transparent fund (other jurisdictions already had TTFs). It was expected that investors such as pension funds and life companies will also find contractual schemes attractive. The vehicle itself is not a taxable entity and suffers no tax directly • The two types of TTF are the co-ownership scheme, where participants in the scheme own the assets beneficially as tenants in common. The scheme is not legally separate from the participants, so that assets are acquired, managed and disposed of directly on their behalf by the manager, while the depositary holds legal title as custodian. The other form is a partnership scheme which is a limited partnership under the Limited Partnership Act 1907 • Regulations aim to ensure that an ACS will be regulated in much the same way as an Authorised Unit Trust or Open Ended Investment Company. UMBRELLA STRUCTURES • The treasury has confirmed that the FCA will not be able to authorise limited partnership schemes using an ‘umbrella’ structure so the proposed rules in the consultation paper will reflect this provision. Only co-ownership schemes will be able to be part of an umbrella structure INVESTOR ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA • Treasury’s legislation requires units in an ACS to only be issued to either a professional or a large investor or an existing ACS investor due to the small risk that foreign courts might not recognise UK legislation that limits liability of participants in a TTF.
    [Show full text]
  • Responsible Investment & the Stewardship
    Responsible Investment & The Stewardship Funds AV612388_SP99883_0721.indd 1 22/07/21 10:39 AM What this guide covers We hope the information in this guide is helpful and that it broadens your knowledge of what it means to invest responsibly, how we do this at Aviva and why we believe it’s important to deliver responsible investment solutions for our customers. Here’s what the following pages cover: Here for you today, for a better tomorrow 3 Our expertise 4 What are the Stewardship Funds? 5 Stewardship philosophy and criteria 7 Exclusions, engagement and outcomes 8 Governance of the Stewardship Funds 12 Stewardship Lifestyle Strategy 13 – 15 Helping you to understand risk 16 Risk warning codes 17 Appendix 19 Glossary 24 – 25 2 The Stewardship Funds and responsible investment AV612388_SP99883_0721.indd 2 22/07/21 10:39 AM Here for you today, for a better tomorrow “ Everyone wants to do the right thing for themselves, their families and the world we live in. They need businesses like ours to help them do that. At Aviva, we use our scale, influence and experience to help our customers, our people and the communities we’ve served for over 300 years. We want to help give our customers the confidence to make informed savings and investment choices. Through the investments we make together, we can create a fairer, greener and better world for everyone. We’re with you today, for a better tomorrow.” Amanda Blanc, Aviva Group CEO “Being responsible – in both life and investing – should never be about creating an ethical straitjacket, but there are a few guiding principles and rules of thumb that can help us all.
    [Show full text]
  • USCIS - H-1B Approved Petitioners Fis…
    5/4/2010 USCIS - H-1B Approved Petitioners Fis… H-1B Approved Petitioners Fiscal Year 2009 The file below is a list of petitioners who received an approval in fiscal year 2009 (October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009) of Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker, requesting initial H- 1B status for the beneficiary, regardless of when the petition was filed with USCIS. Please note that approximately 3,000 initial H- 1B petitions are not accounted for on this list due to missing petitioner tax ID numbers. Related Files H-1B Approved Petitioners FY 2009 (1KB CSV) Last updated:01/22/2010 AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 10042060. (Posted 04/20/10) uscis.gov/…/menuitem.5af9bb95919f3… 1/1 5/4/2010 http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Resource… NUMBER OF H-1B PETITIONS APPROVED BY USCIS IN FY 2009 FOR INITIAL BENEFICIARIES, EMPLOYER,INITIAL BENEFICIARIES WIPRO LIMITED,"1,964" MICROSOFT CORP,"1,318" INTEL CORP,723 IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,695 PATNI AMERICAS INC,609 LARSEN & TOUBRO INFOTECH LIMITED,602 ERNST & YOUNG LLP,481 INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,440 UST GLOBAL INC,344 DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP,328 QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,320 CISCO SYSTEMS INC,308 ACCENTURE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,287 KPMG LLP,287 ORACLE USA INC,272 POLARIS SOFTWARE LAB INDIA LTD,254 RITE AID CORPORATION,240 GOLDMAN SACHS & CO,236 DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP,235 COGNIZANT TECH SOLUTIONS US CORP,233 MPHASIS CORPORATION,229 SATYAM COMPUTER SERVICES LIMITED,219 BLOOMBERG,217 MOTOROLA INC,213 GOOGLE INC,211 BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCH SYSTEM,187 UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND,185 UNIV OF MICHIGAN,183 YAHOO INC,183
    [Show full text]
  • Hamon Asian Funds
    The Directors of the Manager of the Fund whose names appear on page 3 accept responsibility for the information contained in this document. To the best of the knowledge and belief of the Directors of the Manager of the Fund (who have taken all reasonable care to ensure that such is the case) the information contained in this document is in accordance with the facts and does not omit anything likely to affect the import of such information and the Directors of the Manager of the Fund accept responsibility accordingly. HAMON ASIAN FUNDS A unit trust established in Ireland as an undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities and regulated pursuant to the European Communities (Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities) Regulations, 2003, as amended (An Umbrella Fund) PROSPECTUS for the ASIAN MARKET LEADERS FUND HAMON GREATER CHINA FUND (each a “Sub-Fund” and together “the Sub-Funds”) Dated 16 January 2008 The USD Class Units of Asian Market Leaders Fund were admitted to listing on the Irish Stock Exchange on 22nd December 1995. The Directors do not expect that an active secondary market will develop in the USD Class Units. No application has been made for the USD Class Units to be listed on any other stock exchange. Distribution of this document is not authorised unless it is accompanied by a copy of the latest annual report of each of the Sub-Funds and, if published thereafter, the latest half-yearly report. Such reports will form part of this Prospectus. Neither the admission of Units of the Fund to listing on the Official List and trading on the Main Market of the Irish Stock Exchange nor the approval of the Prospectus pursuant to the listing requirements of the Irish Stock Exchange shall constitute a warranty or representation by the Irish Stock Exchange as to the competence of service providers to or any other party connected with the Fund, the adequacy of information contained in the Prospectus or the suitability of the Fund for investment purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from Commission file number to 1-16411 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) DELAWARE 95-4840775 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification incorporation or organization) Number) 1840 Century Park East, Los Angeles, California 90067 www.northropgrumman.com (Address of principal executive offices and internet site) (310) 553-6262 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, $1 par value New York Stock Exchange Pacific Exchange Series B Convertible Preferred Stock New York Stock Exchange 7.25% Equity Security Units New York Stock Exchange Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨ Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation
    Die Umsetzung marktneutraler Anlagestrategien in regulierten UCITS-Investmentfonds Von der Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Leipzig genehmigte DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doctor rerum politicarum (Dr. rer. pol.) vorgelegt von Master of Science Franziska Bolle geboren am 11. Juli 1988 in Stendal Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Frank Schuhmacher Prof. Dr. Matthias Schmidt Tag der Verleihung: 17. Mai 2017 I Inhaltsverzeichnis I Abkürzungsverzeichnis ............................................................................................. V II Symbolverzeichnis ................................................................................................... IX III Abbildungsverzeichnis .............................................................................................. X IV Tabellenverzeichnis ................................................................................................. XI 1 Das Potenzial des Offshore-Fonds im regulierten Mantel .................................................. 1 A Zulässiges Portfolio unter UCITS ................................................................ 4 2 Die Konstruktion des Fondsportfolios ............................................................................. 4 2.1 Das Assetuniversum .............................................................................................. 6 2.2 Quantitative Risikomischung .................................................................................. 9 2.2.1 Anlagebeschränkungen .................................................................................
    [Show full text]