Distrito Regional De Manejo Integrado Cerros De San Nicolás

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Distrito Regional De Manejo Integrado Cerros De San Nicolás PLAN DE MANEJO DEL DISTRITO REGIONAL DE MANEJO INTEGRADO CERROS DE SAN NICOLÁS DISTRITO REGIONAL DE MANEJO INTEGRADO CERROS DE SAN NICOLÁS PLAN DE MANEJO GRUPO BOSQUES Y BIODIVERSIDAD SUBDIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE RECURSOS NATURALES CORPORACIÓN AUTÓNOMA REGIONAL DE LAS CUENCAS DE LOS RÍOS NEGRO Y NARE CORNARE El Santuario – Antioquia 2018 PLAN DE MANEJO DEL DISTRITO REGIONAL DE MANEJO INTEGRADO CERROS DE SAN NICOLÁS REALIZACIÓN CORPORACIÓN AUTÓNOMA REGIONAL DE LAS CUENCAS DE LOS RÍOS NEGRO Y NARE CORNARE Subdirección General de Recursos Naturales Grupo Bosques y Biodiversidad COORDINADORA DE LA SUPERVISIÓN ELSA MARÍA ACEVEDO CIFUENTES Coordinadora Grupo Bosques y Biodiversidad, 2018 SUPERVISOR DAVID ECHEVERRI LÓPEZ Biólogo (E), Grupo Bosques y Biodiversidad, 2018 EQUIPO PROFESIONAL STIVEN BARRIENTOS GÓMEZ Ingeniero Ambiental, Grupo Bosques y Biodiversidad, 2018 DANIEL MARTÍNEZ CASTAÑO Biólogo, Grupo Bosques y Biodiversidad, 2018 SANTIAGO OSORIO YEPES Ingeniero Forestal, Grupo Bosques y Biodiversidad, 2018 EDUARDO ANTONIO RÍOS PINEDO Ingeniero Forestal, Grupo Bosques y Biodiversidad, 2018 JULIETH JOHANA VELASQUEZ AGUDELO Ingeniera Forestal, Grupo Bosques y Biodiversidad, 2018 PLAN DE MANEJO DEL DISTRITO REGIONAL DE MANEJO INTEGRADO CERROS DE SAN NICOLÁS ÍNDICE GENERAL 1. INTRODUCCIÓN ........................................................................................................................ 9 2. ANTECEDENTES ..................................................................................................................... 10 2.1. SISTEMA NACIONAL DE ÁREAS PROTEGIDAS - SINAP ............................................... 10 2.2. SISTEMA DEPARTAMENTAL DE ÁREAS PROTEGIDAS - SIDAP .................................. 11 2.3. DISTRITO REGIONAL DE MANEJO INTEGRADO CERROS DE SAN NICOLÁS............ 13 3. COMPONENTE DE DIAGNÓSTICO ......................................................................................... 15 3.1. ÁMBITO AMBIENTAL ........................................................................................................ 15 3.1.1. COMPONENTE ESPACIAL ....................................................................................... 15 3.1.2. COMPONENTE ATMOSFÉRICO .............................................................................. 20 3.1.3. COMPONENTE GEOSFÉRICO ................................................................................ 27 3.1.4. COMPONENTE HIDROSFÉRICO ............................................................................. 41 3.1.5. COMPONENTE ECOLÓGICO ................................................................................... 61 3.1.6. COMPONENTE BIÓTICO .......................................................................................... 90 3.2. ÁMBITO SOCIOECONÓMICO Y CULTURAL ................................................................. 114 3.2.1. SISTEMA SOCIAL ................................................................................................... 114 3.2.2. SISTEMA ECONÓMICO .......................................................................................... 130 3.2.3. SISTEMA CULTURAL ............................................................................................. 136 4. COMPONENTE DE ORDENAMIENTO .................................................................................. 140 4.1. CRITERIOS PARA LA ZONIFICACIÓN ........................................................................... 140 4.1.1. CRITERIOS BIOFÍSICOS ........................................................................................ 140 4.1.2. CRITERIOS SOCIOECONÓMICOS ........................................................................ 141 4.2. ZONIFICACIÓN AMBIENTAL .......................................................................................... 142 4.2.1. ZONA DE PRESERVACIÓN .................................................................................... 142 4.2.2. ZONA DE RESTAURACIÓN .................................................................................... 143 4.2.3. ZONA DE USO SOSTENIBLE ................................................................................. 143 4.2.4. OTRAS ZONAS ....................................................................................................... 145 5. COMPONENTE ESTRATÉGICO ............................................................................................ 147 5.1. VISIÓN DEL PLAN ESTRATÉGICO PARA EL DRMI ...................................................... 147 5.2. OBJETIVOS DE CONSERVACIÓN PARA EL DRMI ....................................................... 148 5.3. ACTORES PARA LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DEL PLAN DE MANEJO .............................. 148 5.4. VALORES OBJETO DE CONSERVACIÓN ..................................................................... 148 PLAN DE MANEJO DEL DISTRITO REGIONAL DE MANEJO INTEGRADO CERROS DE SAN NICOLÁS 5.5. IDENTIFICACIÓN DE AMENAZAS ................................................................................. 150 5.6. LINEAS ESTRATÉGICAS................................................................................................ 152 5.6.1. EDUCACIÓN AMBIENTAL Y PARTICIPACIÓN SOCIAL ........................................ 152 5.6.2. MANEJO DE LOS ECOSISTEMAS NATURALES ................................................... 154 5.6.3. DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE Y SERVICIOS AMBIENTALES ............................... 154 6. BIBLIOGRAFÍA ....................................................................................................................... 156 7. ANEXOS ................................................................................................................................. 165 7.1. COMPOSICIÓN TAXÓNOMICA ...................................................................................... 165 7.1.1. FLORA ..................................................................................................................... 165 7.1.2. AVES ....................................................................................................................... 183 PLAN DE MANEJO DEL DISTRITO REGIONAL DE MANEJO INTEGRADO CERROS DE SAN NICOLÁS ÍNDICE DE TABLAS Tabla 3.1 Distribución de los municipios en el DRMI ......................................................................... 17 Tabla 3.2 Distribución de las veredas en el DRMI ............................................................................. 17 Tabla 3.3. Estaciones climáticas cercanas al DRMI .......................................................................... 20 Tabla 3.4. Clases de clima en el DRMI, según Lang ......................................................................... 24 Tabla 3.5. Tipos de clima en el DRMI, según Caldas-Lang ............................................................... 25 Tabla 3.6. Unidades geológicas ......................................................................................................... 27 Tabla 3.7. Solicitudes mineras ........................................................................................................... 30 Tabla 3.8. Títulos mineros ................................................................................................................. 30 Tabla 3.9. Unidades geomorfológicas ................................................................................................ 33 Tabla 3.10. Pendientes ...................................................................................................................... 35 Tabla 3.11. Unidades de suelo .......................................................................................................... 37 Tabla 3.12. Unidades hidrográficas ................................................................................................... 42 Tabla 3.13. Promedio anual de la Oferta Hídrica Superficial Total (OHT) ......................................... 46 Tabla 3.14. Promedio anual de la Oferta Hídrica Superficial Disponible (OHD) ................................ 47 Tabla 3.15. Demanda hídrica calculada ............................................................................................. 49 Tabla 3.16. Clasificación del Índice de Uso del Agua (IUA) ............................................................... 49 Tabla 3.17. Índice de Uso del Agua (IUA) .......................................................................................... 49 Tabla 3.18.Acueductos en el área de influencia del DRMI................................................................. 50 Tabla 3.19. Concesiones en el área de influencia del DRMI .............................................................. 53 Tabla 3.20. Rangos de clasificación del ICA ...................................................................................... 56 Tabla 3.21. Índice de Calidad del Agua (ICA) en los principales afluentes del Río Negro ................. 57 Tabla 3.22. Categorías de clasificación del IACAL ............................................................................ 57 Tabla 3.23. Índice de Alteración Potencial de la Calidad del Agua (IACAL) ...................................... 58 Tabla 3.24. Vertimientos en el área de influencia del DRMI .............................................................. 59 Tabla 3.25. Zonas de vida ................................................................................................................. 61 Tabla 3.26. Ecosistemas en el DRMI ................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Caracterización Funcional De Plantas Y Su Utilidad En La Selección De Especies Para La Restauración Ecológica De Ecosistemas Altoandinos Biota Colombiana, Vol
    Biota colombiana ISSN: 0124-5376 ISSN: 2539-200X Instituto Alexander von Humboldt Cogollo Calderón, Angélica María; Velasco Linares, Patricia; Manosalva, Leonardo Caracterización funcional de plantas y su utilidad en la selección de especies para la restauración ecológica de ecosistemas altoandinos Biota colombiana, vol. 21, núm. 1, 2020, Enero-Junio, pp. 1-15 Instituto Alexander von Humboldt DOI: https://doi.org/10.21068/c2020.v21n01a01 Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49163257001 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Redalyc Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto DOI: 10.21068/c2020.v21n01a01 Caracterización funcional de plantas y su utilidad en la selección de especies para la restauración ecológica de ecosistemas altoandinos Functional characterization of plants and their utility in the selection of species for the ecological restoration of high-Andean ecosystems Angélica María Cogollo Calderón , Patricia Velasco Linares , Leonardo Manosalva Resumen Para iniciar un proceso de restauración en áreas disturbadas, es importante seleccionar especies vegetales nativas que aporten diversidad funcional al ecosistema en recuperación y permitan el establecimiento de nuevos individuos hacia etapas sucesionales más avanzadas. Evaluamos 14 rasgos de historia de vida en 20 especies de una zona de transición entre bosque altoandino y páramo en la reserva Aguas Vivas, Soacha, Colombia. Registramos información de tipos de polinización y dispersión, hábito de crecimiento, altura máxima, tipo y tamaño del fruto, número de semillas por fruto, textura de la hoja, tipo de indumento, área foliar, área foliar específica, nitrógeno foliar, contenido foliar de materia seca y dureza foliar.
    [Show full text]
  • Iloza Et Al GEB 170226
    1 Phylogenetic patterns of rarity in a regional species pool of tropical woody plants 2 M. Isabel Loza, Iván Jiménez, Peter M. Jørgensen, Gabriel Arellano, Manuel J. Macía, 3 Vania W. Torrez, and Robert E. Ricklefs 4 M. Isabel Loza: Department of Biology, University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, 63121, 5 USA and Herbario Nacional de Bolivia, Campus Universitario Cota-Cota, calle 27, 6 Correo Central Cajón Postal 10077, La Paz, Bolivia. [email protected] 7 Iván Jiménez: Center for Conservation and Sustainable Development, Missouri 8 Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA; and Department of 9 Biology, University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, 63121, USA. 10 [email protected] 11 Peter M. Jørgensen: Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 12 63166, USA. [email protected] 13 Gabriel Arellano: Center for Tropical Forest Science – ForestGEO, Smithsonian 14 Tropical Research Institute.NMNH-MRC 166, West Loading Dock, 10th and 15 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20560, USA. 16 [email protected] 17 Manuel J. Macía: Departamento de Biología, Área de Botánica, Universidad 18 Autónoma de Madrid, Calle Darwin 2, ES–28049 Madrid, Spain. 19 [email protected] 20 Vania W.Torrez: Division of Plant Conservation and Population Biology, Department 21 of Biology, University of Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, [email protected] 22 Robert E. Ricklefs: Department of Biology, University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, 23 63121, USA. [email protected] 24 25 Running title: Phylogenetic patterns of rarity 26 27 Keywords: Andean floras, Bolivia, habitat breadth, geographical range size, local 28 abundance, Madidi, rarity, phylogenetic conservatism, phylogenetic signal.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the International Palm Society Vol. 58(4) Dec. 2014 the INTERNATIONAL PALM SOCIETY, INC
    Palms Journal of the International Palm Society Vol. 58(4) Dec. 2014 THE INTERNATIONAL PALM SOCIETY, INC. The International Palm Society Palms (formerly PRINCIPES) Journal of The International Palm Society Founder: Dent Smith The International Palm Society is a nonprofit corporation An illustrated, peer-reviewed quarterly devoted to engaged in the study of palms. The society is inter- information about palms and published in March, national in scope with worldwide membership, and the June, September and December by The International formation of regional or local chapters affiliated with the Palm Society Inc., 9300 Sandstone St., Austin, TX international society is encouraged. Please address all 78737-1135 USA. inquiries regarding membership or information about Editors: John Dransfield, Herbarium, Royal Botanic the society to The International Palm Society Inc., 9300 Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, United Sandstone St., Austin, TX 78737-1135 USA, or by e-mail Kingdom, e-mail [email protected], tel. 44-20- to [email protected], fax 512-607-6468. 8332-5225, Fax 44-20-8332-5278. OFFICERS: Scott Zona, Dept. of Biological Sciences (OE 167), Florida International University, 11200 SW 8 Street, President: Leland Lai, 21480 Colina Drive, Topanga, Miami, Florida 33199 USA, e-mail [email protected], tel. California 90290 USA, e-mail [email protected], 1-305-348-1247, Fax 1-305-348-1986. tel. 1-310-383-2607. Associate Editor: Natalie Uhl, 228 Plant Science, Vice-Presidents: Jeff Brusseau, 1030 Heather Drive, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 USA, e- Vista, California 92084 USA, e-mail mail [email protected], tel. 1-607-257-0885.
    [Show full text]
  • C6 Noncarice Sedge
    CYPERACEAE etal Got Sedge? Part Two revised 24 May 2015. Draft from Designs On Nature; Up Your C 25 SEDGES, FOINS COUPANTS, LAÎCHES, ROUCHES, ROUCHETTES, & some mostly wet things in the sedge family. Because Bill Gates has been shown to eat footnotes (burp!, & enjoy it), footnotes are (italicized in the body of the text) for their protection. Someone who can spell caespitose only won way has know imagination. Much of the following is taken verbatim from other works, & often not credited. There is often not a way to paraphrase or rewrite habitat or descriptive information without changing the meaning. I am responsible for any mistakes in quoting or otherwise. This is a learning tool, & a continuation of an idea of my friend & former employer, Jock Ingels, LaFayette Home Nursery, who hoped to present more available information about a plant in one easily accessible place, instead of scattered though numerous sources. This is a work in perpetual progress, a personal learning tool, full uv misstakes, & written as a personal means instead of a public end. Redundant, repetitive, superfluous, & contradictory information is present. It is being consolidated. CYPERACEAE Sauergrasgewächse SEDGES, aka BIESIES, SEGGEN Formally described in 1789 by De Jussieu. The family name is derived from the genus name Cyperus, from the Greek kupeiros, meaning sedge. Many species are grass-like, being tufted, with long, thin, narrow leaves, jointed stems, & branched inflorescence of small flowers, & are horticulturally lumped with grasses as graminoids. Archer (2005) suggests the term graminoid be used for true grasses, & cyperoid be used for sedges. (If physical anthropologists have hominoids & hominids, why don’t we have graminoids & graminids?) There are approximately 104 genera, 4 subfamilies, 14 tribes, & about 5000 species worldwide, with 27 genera & 843 species in North America (Ball et al 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Epilist 1.0: a Global Checklist of Vascular Epiphytes
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2021 EpiList 1.0: a global checklist of vascular epiphytes Zotz, Gerhard ; Weigelt, Patrick ; Kessler, Michael ; Kreft, Holger ; Taylor, Amanda Abstract: Epiphytes make up roughly 10% of all vascular plant species globally and play important functional roles, especially in tropical forests. However, to date, there is no comprehensive list of vas- cular epiphyte species. Here, we present EpiList 1.0, the first global list of vascular epiphytes based on standardized definitions and taxonomy. We include obligate epiphytes, facultative epiphytes, and hemiepiphytes, as the latter share the vulnerable epiphytic stage as juveniles. Based on 978 references, the checklist includes >31,000 species of 79 plant families. Species names were standardized against World Flora Online for seed plants and against the World Ferns database for lycophytes and ferns. In cases of species missing from these databases, we used other databases (mostly World Checklist of Selected Plant Families). For all species, author names and IDs for World Flora Online entries are provided to facilitate the alignment with other plant databases, and to avoid ambiguities. EpiList 1.0 will be a rich source for synthetic studies in ecology, biogeography, and evolutionary biology as it offers, for the first time, a species‐level overview over all currently known vascular epiphytes. At the same time, the list represents work in progress: species descriptions of epiphytic taxa are ongoing and published life form information in floristic inventories and trait and distribution databases is often incomplete and sometimes evenwrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
    Monday, November 9, 2009 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Native Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions; Proposed Rule VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:08 Nov 06, 2009 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\09NOP3.SGM 09NOP3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS3 57804 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 215 / Monday, November 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR October 1, 2008, through September 30, for public inspection by appointment, 2009. during normal business hours, at the Fish and Wildlife Service We request additional status appropriate Regional Office listed below information that may be available for in under Request for Information in 50 CFR Part 17 the 249 candidate species identified in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. General [Docket No. FWS-R9-ES-2009-0075; MO- this CNOR. information we receive will be available 9221050083–B2] DATES: We will accept information on at the Branch of Candidate this Candidate Notice of Review at any Conservation, Arlington, VA (see Endangered and Threatened Wildlife time. address above). and Plants; Review of Native Species ADDRESSES: This notice is available on Candidate Notice of Review That Are Candidates for Listing as the Internet at http:// Endangered or Threatened; Annual www.regulations.gov, and http:// Background Notice of Findings on Resubmitted endangered.fws.gov/candidates/ The Endangered Species Act of 1973, Petitions; Annual Description of index.html.
    [Show full text]
  • 4Th International Canopy Conference Abstracts
    4th International Canopy Conference “Tropical versus Temperate Forests” 10 - 17 July 2005 in Leipzig, Germany Abstracts edited by Martin Unterseher 4th International Canopy Conference “Tropical versus Temperate Forests” 10 - 17 July 2005 in Leipzig, Germany Abstracts edited by Martin Unterseher Printed by Merkur - Druck- und Kopierzentrum GmbH Hauptmannstr. 4 04109 Leipzig www.merkurdruck.de [email protected] Published by order of Faculty of Bioscience, Pharmacy, and Psychology Institute of Biology I Department of Systematic Botany and Botanical Garden Johannisallee 21-23 04103 Leipzig GERMANY Editor and Layout: Martin Unterseher System: LATEX The 4th International Canopy Conference taking place in Leipzig, Germany, 10-17 July 2005 www.uni-leipzig.de/leipzigcanopycrane/conference Conference Secretariat: Ms. Ogarit Uhlmann MSc. F&U confirm Permoserstr. 15 04318 Leipzig GERMANY ogarit@fu-confirm.de The authors take responsibility for the quality of the contents. All rights reserved © University of Leipzig ISBN 3-934178-51-0 Contents I Lectures 1 1 Vascular Epiphytes in Forest Canopies 3 1.1 The life history of vascular epiphytes – does it differ from other perennials? 4 1.2 Biogeography of vascular epiphytes in South-East of Brazi . 5 1.3 Andes versus Amazon – patterns of vascular epiphyte diversity on different spatial scales . 6 1.4 Long-term changes in epiphyte assemblages – dynamics and underlying mechanisms . 7 1.5 Litter decomposition within epiphytic Bird’s Nest Ferns (Asplenium spp.) in a range of forest habitats in Sabah, Malaysia . 8 1.6 Spatiotemporal variation in population dynamics of epiphytic orchids . 9 1.7 The ecology of vascular epiphytes on Ficus crassiuscula host trees in a Peruvian cloud forest .
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity As a Resource: Plant Use and Land Use Among the Shuar, Saraguros, and Mestizos in Tropical Rainforest Areas of Southern Ecuador
    Biodiversity as a resource: Plant use and land use among the Shuar, Saraguros, and Mestizos in tropical rainforest areas of southern Ecuador Die Biodiversität als Ressource: Pflanzennutzung und Landnutzung der Shuar, Saraguros und Mestizos in tropischen Regenwaldgebieten Südecuadors Der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades Dr. rer. nat. vorgelegt von Andrés Gerique Zipfel aus Valencia Als Dissertation genehmigt von der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 9.12.2010 Vorsitzender der Promotionskommission: Prof. Dr. Rainer Fink Erstberichterstatterin: Prof. Dr. Perdita Pohle Zweitberichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Willibald Haffner To my father “He who seeks finds” (Matthew 7:8) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, I wish to express my gratitude to my supervisor, Prof. Dr. Perdita Pohle, for her trust and support. Without her guidance this study would not have been possible. I am especially indebted to Prof. Dr. Willibald Haffner as well, who recently passed away. His scientific knowledge and enthusiasm set a great example for me. I gratefully acknowledge Prof. Dr. Beck (Universität Bayreuth) and Prof. Dr. Knoke (Technische Universität München), and my colleagues and friends of the Institute of Geography (Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg) for sharing invaluable comments and motivation. Furthermore, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to those experts who unselfishly shared their knowledge with me, in particular to Dr. David Neill and Dr. Rainer Bussmann (Missouri Botanical Garden), Dr. Roman Krettek (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Mykologie), Dr. Jonathan Armbruster, (Auburn University, Alabama), Dr. Nathan K. Lujan (Texas A&M University), Dr. Jean Guffroy (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Orleans), Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • HENRIQUE CHUPIL.Pdf
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ HENRIQUE CHUPIL USO DE GRÃOS DE PÓLEN NA IDENTIFICAÇÃO DE PLANTAS E PARA EXAMINAR A PARTIÇÃO DE NICHO ALIMENTAR ENTRE BEIJA-FLORES NO SUL DO BRASIL CURITIBA 2013 HENRIQUE CHUPIL USO DE GRÃOS DE PÓLEN NA IDENTIFICAÇÃO DE PLANTAS E PARA EXAMINAR A PARTIÇÃO DE NICHO ALIMENTAR ENTRE BEIJA-FLORES NO SUL DO BRASIL Dissertação apresentada como requisito parcial à obtenção do grau de Mestre em Ecologia e Conservação do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Setor de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Paraná. Orientador: James Joseph Roper Ph.D. CURITIBA 2013 AGRADECIMENTOS Agradeço ao meu orientador James Joseph Roper pela orientação concedida, por todas as sugestões durante o desenvolvimento do trabalho e auxílio nas análises e redação da dissertação. Aos membros da banca examinadora, Dra. Isabela Galarda Varassin e Dra. Andréa C. Araújo. À Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior que, através do Programa de Reestruturação e Expansão das Universidades Federais, concedeu a bolsa de mestrado. Ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, incluindo a coordenação, secretaria e a todos os professores pela amizade e dois anos de muita dedicação e conhecimento, em especial à Professora Rosana Moreira da Rocha e Isabela Galarda Varassin, que também auxiliaram disponibilizando alguns materiais. Aos meus pais, Valdemar Chupil e Sueli Chupil, minha irmã Priscila Chupil e minha noiva Fernanda Locatelli Machado pelo incentivo, carinho, auxílio e dedicação. Aos biólogos Fabiano Maia e Dimitri de Quadros Wilberg pele auxílio com a identificação de algumas espécies de plantas e ao fotógrafo Hudson Garcia pela disponibilização de fotos de beija-flores.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Oklahoma Native Plant Society, Volume 7, Number 1
    ISSN 1536-7738 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Journal of the Oklahoma Native Plant Society Volume 7, Number 1, December 2007 1 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Journal of the Oklahoma Native Plant Society 2435 South Peoria Tulsa, Oklahoma 74114 Volume 7, Number 1, December 2007 ISSN 1536-7738 Managing Editor: Sheila Strawn Technical Editor: Patricia Folley Technical Advisor: Bruce Hoagland CD-ROM Producer: Chadwick Cox Website: http://www.usao.edu/~onps/ The purpose of ONPS is to encourage the study, protection, propagation, appreciation and use of the native plants of Oklahoma. Membership in ONPS shall be open to any person who supports the aims of the Society. ONPS offers individual, student, family, and life memberships. 2007 Officers and Board Members President: Kim Shannon Librarian: Bonnie Winchester Vice-president: Gloria Caddell Website Manager: Chadwick Cox Secretary: Paula Shryock Photo Poster Curators: Treasurer: Mary Korthase Sue Amstutz & Marilyn Stewart Membership Database: Tina Julich Color Oklahoma Chair: Tina Julich Past President: Constance Murray Conservation Chair: Chadwick Cox Board Members: Field Trip Chair: Patricia Folley Paul Buck Mailings Chair: Karen Haworth Ron Tyrl Merchandise Chair: Susan Chambers Lynn Michael Nominating Chair: Paula Shryock Monica Macklin Photography Contest Chair: Tina Julich Elfriede Miller Publications Chair: Sheila Strawn Stanley Rice Publicity Chairs: Central Chapter Chair: Lou Duke/ Kim Shannon & Marilyn Stewart Marilyn Stewart Wildflower Workshop Chair: Cross-timbers Chapter Chair: Constance Murray Paul Richardson Cover photo: Courtesy of Patricia Folley. Mycology Chapter Chair: Clark Ovrebo “This Opuntia polyacantha was Northeast Chapter Chair: Sue Amstutz blooming away on a rocky shore on Jed Gaillardia Editor: Chadwick Cox JohnsonLakeintheWichitaMountains Harriet Barclay Award Chair: Wildlife Refuge.
    [Show full text]
  • *Wagner Et Al. --Intro
    NUMBER 60, 58 pages 15 September 1999 BISHOP MUSEUM OCCASIONAL PAPERS HAWAIIAN VASCULAR PLANTS AT RISK: 1999 WARREN L. WAGNER, MARIE M. BRUEGMANN, DERRAL M. HERBST, AND JOEL Q.C. LAU BISHOP MUSEUM PRESS HONOLULU Printed on recycled paper Cover illustration: Lobelia gloria-montis Rock, an endemic lobeliad from Maui. [From Wagner et al., 1990, Manual of flowering plants of Hawai‘i, pl. 57.] A SPECIAL PUBLICATION OF THE RECORDS OF THE HAWAII BIOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR 1998 Research publications of Bishop Museum are issued irregularly in the RESEARCH following active series: • Bishop Museum Occasional Papers. A series of short papers PUBLICATIONS OF describing original research in the natural and cultural sciences. Publications containing larger, monographic works are issued in BISHOP MUSEUM four areas: • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Anthropology • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Botany • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Entomology • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Zoology Numbering by volume of Occasional Papers ceased with volume 31. Each Occasional Paper now has its own individual number starting with Number 32. Each paper is separately paginated. The Museum also publishes Bishop Museum Technical Reports, a series containing information relative to scholarly research and collections activities. Issue is authorized by the Museum’s Scientific Publications Committee, but manuscripts do not necessarily receive peer review and are not intended as formal publications. Institutions and individuals may subscribe to any of the above or pur- chase separate publications from Bishop Museum Press, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-0916, USA. Phone: (808) 848-4135; fax: (808) 841-8968; email: [email protected]. Institutional libraries interested in exchanging publications should write to: Library Exchange Program, Bishop Museum Library, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-0916, USA; fax: (808) 848-4133; email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]