DOCSLIB.ORG

Large Springs of East Tennessee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Large Springs of East Tennessee Large Springs of East Tennessee GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1755 Prepared in cooperation with the Tennessee Department of Conservation and Com­ merce, Division of Geology and Division of Heater Resources GEOr" TUCSON, Large Springs of East Tennessee By P-C. P. SUN, J. H. CRINER, and J. L. POOLE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1755 Prepared in cooperation with the Tennessee Department of Conservation and Com­ merce, Division of Geology and Division of Water Resources UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library catalog card for this publication appears after page 52. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract__ _1_________________.______________.__________________ 1 Introduction _______________________________________________________ 1 Purpose and scope of the investigation___________________________ 1 Previous investigations.._______________________________________ 2 Geography ___________________________________________________ 3 Location and description of the area.____________________________ 3 Climate._____________________________________________________ 5 Geology and hydrology of springs_________________________________ 6 Summary of geologic conditions_______-___-_______--____-_____-- 6 Hydrologic settings of springs.______-_________--__--__--__---_-_ 8 Sprin gs_ _ _______________________________________________________ 8 Ground water and its relation to springs________________________ 9 Use and yield of water from springs_____-____-___--________-_-_ 9 Magnitude and variability of springs___________________________ 13 Quality of water from springs__________-______--__--__---_____-- 14 Discharge of ground water from storage by springs________________ 17 Correlation of spring discharges________-____-_---__--___-__--___ 22 Application of base-flow analysis and spring-discharge correlations _-._____ 24 Descriptions of springs_____________________________________________ 25 References_ _____________________________________________________ 52 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Map showing physiographic provinces of Tennessee and the area described in this report.__________________________ 2. Relation between topography, geology, and the location of springs._ ____________________________________________ 3. Locations of springs in east Tennessee__________________ 10 4. Minimum, average, and maximum discharges of springs __ 12 5. Variability of 82 selected springs of the second, third, and fourth magnitudes..__________________________________ 14 6. Relation between variability and discharge of 82 selected springs ______________________________________________ 15 7. Recession curve for Mill Spring, near Jefferson City.------- 18 8. Hydrograph of discharge from Mill Spring, Jefferson County, for 1953 and 1954_____._..__._.____.....____-.-_- . 19 m IV CONTENTS Page FIGURE 9. Geologic map and section of the vicinity of Mill Spring, Jefferson County--_-___-_---------_-----------.__-___. 21 10. Correlation graph for Bacon Spring, Anderson County, and Mill Spring, Jefferson County_-_-_-.---_-----_-_-_-.____ 23 11-30. Maps of east Tennessee counties showing location of springs and stations recording precipitation data: 11. Anderson County.________________________________ 32 12. Blount County-..---.--.---____________________ 33 13. Bradley County.._____-___-_.___-__________ 34 14. Carter County___________-___-_-___-___--_____-_ 35 15. Grainger County._______________________________ 36 16. Greene County_-_-_-__-_-_-_---_--_------__----__ 37 17. Hamblen County__-----__--__----_----.-------_--_ 38 18. Hamilton County___-_-____-__--__-_----_-___-___- 39 19. Jefferson County..______________________________ 40 20. Knox County____-_-__-_____-__-__-_____________- 41 21. London County________________________________ 42 22. McMinn County________________________________ 43 23. Meigs County______._____________________________ 44 24. Monroe Cour>ty___-__________-___-__--_--___-___- 45 25. Polk County____________-__-_____-___-__-___-__-- 46 26. Rhea County___________________________________ 47 27. Roane County__________________________________ 48 28. Sevier County__-__________-___-__--_--_--__------ 49 29. Sullivan County-_--_-_-_----------_-------------- 50 30. Unicoi County___________-____-_-__---__--______ 51 TABLES Page TABLE 1. Geologic formations in east Tennessee______________________ 7 2. Chemical analyses of water from representative springs in east Tennessee. ____-_____.._____-__________-_-___--__--__-- 16 3. Records of springs in east Tennessee______________________ 26 LARGE SPRINGS OF EAST TENNESSEE By P-C. P. SUN, J. H. CEINEE, and J. L. POOLE ABSTRACT Springs constitute an important source of water in east Tennessee, and many individual springs are capable of supplying the large quantities needed for mu­ nicipal and industrial supplies. Most of the springs in east Tennessee issue from solution openings and fractured and faulted zones in limestone and dolomite of the Knox Group, Chickamauga Limestone, and Conasauga Group. The ability of these rocks to yield a sustained flow of water to springs is dependent on a system of interconnected openings through which water can infiltrate from the land surface and move to points of natural discharge. Ninety springs were selected for detailed study, and 84 of these are analyzed in terms of magnitude and variability of discharge. Of the 84 springs analyzed, 4 flow at an average rate of 10 to 100 cfs (cubic feet per second), 62 at an average rate of 1 to 10 cfs, and 18 at an average rate of 1 cfs or less. Of the 90 springs, 75 are variable in their discharge; that is, the ratio of their fluctuations to their average discharges exceeds 100 percent. Mathematical analysis of the flow recession curve of Mill Spring near Jefferson City shows that the hydrologic system contributing to the flow of the spring has an effective capacity of about 70 million cubic feet of water. The rate of deple­ tion of this volume of water, in the absence of significant precipitation, averages 0.0056 cfs per day between the time when the hydrologic system is full and the time when the spring ceases to flow. From such a curve it is possible to determine at any time the residual volume of water remaining in the system and the expected rate of decrease in discharge from that time to cessation of flow. Correlation of discharge measurements of 22 springs with those of Mill Spring shows that rough approximations of discharge can be projected for springs for which few measurements are available. Seventeen of the springs analyzed in this manner show good correlation with Mill Spring: that is, their coefficients of correlation were 0.70 or better as compared with a perfect correlation factor of 1.00 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE INVESTIGATION Springs are important sources of water for municipal, domestic, and farm use in east Tennessee; however, many are not developed, because of their inaccessibility or the lack of information regarding their adequacy and dependable low flows available for small-industry and community supplies. A spring discharging 450 gpm (gallons per 2 LARGE SPRINGS OF EAST TENNESSEE minute), or about 1 cfs (cubic foot per second), is capable of supplying a town of 6,500 population, if one assumes a per capita consumption of 100 gpd (gallons per day). The 90 springs described in this report were selected for study because their average yield was estimated to be 450 gpm or more. The primary purpose of the investigation has been to study the hydrologic characteristics of some of the larger undeveloped springs in east Tennessee, their variations in discharge, and the chemical character of water from a few selected springs. An additional objec­ tive has 'been to interpret the continuous records of one spring for the purpose of predicting flow from other springs in similar geologic and hydrologic settings. Although completely satisfactory correla­ tions of this type could not be made on the basis of available data and records, the study contributed greatly to the knowledge of the relation of springs to geology, precipitation, and the general ground-water conditions. Field work for this investigation began in 1950 as a continuation of > the reconnaissance of ground-water resources of east Tennessee, in which more than 960 springs were observed and described. The present study included the selection of little-used representative springs whose average discharges were initially estimated to exceed 450 gpm and therefore are considered to be adequate for moderate industrial or small municipal supplies. Ninety such springs were measured monthly for periods of 1 to 4 years, water samples were collected from typical springs for chemical analysis, and observations made as to color and temperature of the water and geologic settings of the springs. Records of discharge collected throughout the study show that the average flow from 62 of the 90 springs was greater than 450 gpm. This investigation was made by the U.S. Geological Survey as a part of the statewide program of water-resources studies in cooperation with the Division of Geology and Division of Water Resources, Tennessee Department of Conservation. Fieldwork was done in cooperation with the Division of Geology prior to the establishment of the Division of Water Resources, and this report was prepared under the joint
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download the PDF of Jubilee Centers in the Episcopal Church in East Tennessee
    Diocese of East Tennessee Jubilee Centers DIOCESAN JUBILEE OFFICER – DIOCESE OF EAST TENNESSEE Cameron Ellis Phone: 865-414-5742 E-mail: [email protected] For questions or applying to be a center, or copies, please contact me. Middle East Region – Knoxville CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD – KNOXVILLE Designated November, 2015 (Sponsor – Church of the Good Shepherd – Knoxville) 5409 Jacksboro Pike, Knoxville, TN 37918 ………………………………………..Ph: 865-687-9420 E-mail: [email protected] ………………………………………………Fax: 865-689-7056 Website: http://goodshepherdknoxville.org/ Becky Blankenbeckler, Program Director The Church of the Good Shepherd has an exceptional outreach program consisting of many ministries and mission trips that are applicable for all ages. To support these ministries, they conduct very creative “FUN”draising events such as Ladies Tea and Fashion Show, Coach Bag Bingo, and special collections of food and money for specific projects e.g. preparing and packaging 10,000 meals to feed the hungry in Guatemala; and 20,000 meals to serve in the 18 county radius. They offer a FISH Food pantry, Deliver Mobile Meals, build wheelchair ramps at homes serving those with Cerebral Palsy and the elderly, etc. There are too many ministries to list in this brief space, but please visit their website or speak with a member, or Becky, or The Rev. Ken Asel. Middle East Region – Knoxville ST. JAMES FEEDING MINISTRIES Re-commissioned June 2011 Designated June 2002 (Sponsor – St. James – Knoxville) 1101 Broadway NE Knoxville TN 37917 ..........................................................................................................Ph: 865.523.5687 E-mail: [email protected] ......................................................................................................................Fax: 865.522.2979 Website: http://stjamesknox.dioet.org/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/St-James-Episcopal-Church-of-Knoxville Contact: The Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Valley Texas 1851 – 1951 Ann Joseph
    Tennessee Valley Texas 1851 – 1951 Ann Joseph © 1986 by Ann Joseph All rights reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America by Stillhouse Hollow Publishers Inc. P.O. Box 769, Temple, Texas 76503 DEDICATION This hook is dedicated to all those descendants who graciously shared their memories and photos of family and neighbor, to their ancestors whose courage and contributions inspired this modest memorial to the pioneer spirit, and to m y parents, Cecil and Mae Francis, whose love of the land and its people was passed on to their children. Austin, Texas August, 1985 Table of Contents FOREWORD ................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. THE SETTLEMENT: 1851 -1951............... Error! Bookmark not defined. ALLEN-DRAPER-HOWELL...................... Error! Bookmark not defined. BIGHAM ........................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. BIRDSONG ..................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. BOUNDS .......................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. CORNELISON - CROW - WHITELEY .. Error! Bookmark not defined. COX ................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. CRASS ................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. EUBANKS ........................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. FRANCIS .......................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tri-Annual Publication of the East Tennessee Historical Society
    Vol. 26, No. 2 August 2010 Non-Profit Org. East Tennessee Historical Society U.S. POStage P.O. Box 1629 PAID Knoxville, TN 37901-1629 Permit No. 341 Knoxville, tenn ANDERSON KNOX BLEDSOE LOUDON BLOUNT MARION BRADLEY McMINN CAMPBELL MEIGS CARTER MONROE CLAIBORNE MORGAN COCKE POLK CUMBERLAND RHEA FENTRESS ROANE GRAINGER GREENE SCOTT HAMBLEN SEQUATCHIE HAMILTON SEVIER HANCOCK SULLIVAN HAWKINS UNICOI A Tri-Annual Publication of JEFFERSON UNION JOHNSON WASHINGTON The East Tennessee Historical Society Heritage Programs from The easT Tennessee hisTorical socieTy Were your ancestors in what is now Tennessee prior to statehood in 1796? If so, you are eligible to join the First The easT Tennessee hisTorical socieTy Families of Tennessee. Members receive a certificate engraved with the name of the applicant and that of the Making history personal ancestor and will be listed in a supplement to the popular First Families of Tennessee: A Register of the State’s Early Settlers and Their Descendants, originally published in 2000. Applicants must prove generation-by-generation descent, as well as pre-1796 residence for the ancestor. The We invite you to join one of the state’s oldest and most active historical societies. more than 14,000 applications and supporting documentation comprise a unique collection of material on our state’s earliest settlers and are available to researchers at the McClung Historical Collection in the East Members receive Tennessee History Center, 601 S. Gay St. in downtown Knoxville. • Tennessee Ancestors—triannual genealogy
    [Show full text]
  • In Death Not Divided Tombstone Survey & Burial Places of East Tennessee Civil War Veterans
    In Death Not Divided Tombstone Survey & Burial Places of East Tennessee Civil War Veterans A Regional project of the East Tennessee Historical Society in partnership with affiliate and local societies In commemoration of the Civil War Sesquicentennial, the East Tennessee Historical Society is sponsoring a project to identify the burial places of East Tennessee Civil War soldiers, as well as any Civil War soldier buried in the region. Individuals and historical, genealogical, lineage, and other organizations are invited to participate. The second goal of the project is to survey the condition of the tombstones, indicating if they are broken, legible or illegible, military or private. It is hoped that the project will spur the marking of graves and/or repair of tombstones. The forms submitted for the project will become part of a East Tennessee Civil War graves collection in the McClung Historical Collection, where, given the forces of time and progress, they will be a permanent record of the stones, their locations, and conditions. The database of information is slated to launch in October 2013 and can be accessed via the East Tennessee Historical Society website. Criteria for veteran inclusion _____________________________________________ • Union and Confederate • Soldier from East Tennessee with service in East Tennessee regiment or other • Soldier who served from East Tennessee, buried in East Tennessee or elsewhere • East Tennessee soldier who died in prison, battle, or military hospital, even if burial place unknown • Any Civil War
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee, 2015: Highlights
    IWPR #R453 www.statusofwomendata. org The Status of Women in Tennessee, 2015: Highlights Women in Tennessee have made considerable advances in recent years but still face inequities that often prevent them from reaching their full potential. Since the 2004 Status of Women in the States report was published, the gender wage gap in Tennessee has narrowed, a higher percentage of women have bachelor’s degrees, and women are more likely to work in managerial or professional occupations. Yet, as in all other states, women in Tennessee are less likely than men to be in the labor force and more likely to live in poverty. Women also continue to be underrepresented in the state legislature. If current trends continue, women in Tennessee Women hold 17.4% will not see equal pay until the year 2057.* of seats in the state legislature. Key Findings Tennessee . Tennessee’s best grade is in the area of employment and earnings, for Report Card Summary which it receives a C-. Its worst grades are in health and well-being, Political Participation D- reproductive rights, and political participation, for which it gets a D-. Employment & Earnings C- . Tennessee women who work full-time, year-round earn 84 cents on the dollar compared with similarly employed men. Work & Family D . Approximately 30.1 percent of those working in science, technology, Poverty & Opportunity D engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields in Tennessee are women, compared with 28.8 percent nationwide. Reproductive Rights D- . As of 2015, there are no women of color from Tennessee in the U.S. Health & Well-Being D- Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • State Abbreviations
    State Abbreviations Postal Abbreviations for States/Territories On July 1, 1963, the Post Office Department introduced the five-digit ZIP Code. At the time, 10/1963– 1831 1874 1943 6/1963 present most addressing equipment could accommodate only 23 characters (including spaces) in the Alabama Al. Ala. Ala. ALA AL Alaska -- Alaska Alaska ALSK AK bottom line of the address. To make room for Arizona -- Ariz. Ariz. ARIZ AZ the ZIP Code, state names needed to be Arkansas Ar. T. Ark. Ark. ARK AR abbreviated. The Department provided an initial California -- Cal. Calif. CALIF CA list of abbreviations in June 1963, but many had Colorado -- Colo. Colo. COL CO three or four letters, which was still too long. In Connecticut Ct. Conn. Conn. CONN CT Delaware De. Del. Del. DEL DE October 1963, the Department settled on the District of D. C. D. C. D. C. DC DC current two-letter abbreviations. Since that time, Columbia only one change has been made: in 1969, at the Florida Fl. T. Fla. Fla. FLA FL request of the Canadian postal administration, Georgia Ga. Ga. Ga. GA GA Hawaii -- -- Hawaii HAW HI the abbreviation for Nebraska, originally NB, Idaho -- Idaho Idaho IDA ID was changed to NE, to avoid confusion with Illinois Il. Ill. Ill. ILL IL New Brunswick in Canada. Indiana Ia. Ind. Ind. IND IN Iowa -- Iowa Iowa IOWA IA Kansas -- Kans. Kans. KANS KS A list of state abbreviations since 1831 is Kentucky Ky. Ky. Ky. KY KY provided at right. A more complete list of current Louisiana La. La.
    [Show full text]
  • Lexington Quadrangle Virginia
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY OF THE LEXINGTON QUADRANGLE VIRGINIA KENNETH F. BICK REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS I VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jomes L. Colver Commissioner of Minerol Resources ond Stote Geologist CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VI RGI N IA 1960 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY OF THE LEXINGTON QUADRANGLE VIRGINIA KENNETH F. BICK REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS I VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jomes L. Colver Commissioner of Minerol Resources ond Stote Geologist CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VI RGI N IA 1960 Couuowwoer,rn op Vtncrwre DopenrupNr op Puncnesrs exo Supptv Rrculroxn 1960 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Richmond. Virginia MenvrN M. SurHnnr,eNn, Director BOARD Vrcron W. Stnwenr, Petersburg, Chairtnan G. Ar,vrn MessnNnunc, Hampton, Viee'Chairman A. Pr,urvrnr BmnNn, Orange C. S. Cenrnn, Bristol ANpnpw A. Fenr,pv, Danville WonrnrrvcroN FauLKNEn, Glasgow SvoNpv F. Slter,r,, Roanoke EnwrN H. Wrr,r,, Richmond Wrr,r,renr P. Wooor,nv. Norfolk CONTENTS Pece Abstract. '"*i"#:;;;;: . : ::: , : ::.:::::::::..::::::. :.::.::::::: ::,r Z Geography 8 Purpose. 4 Previous Work. Present Work and Acknowledgements. 5 Geologic Formations. 6 Introduction. 6 Precambrian System. 6 Pedlar formation 6 Precambrian and Cambrian Systems. 6 Discussion. 6 Swift Run formation 8 Catoctin greenstone. I Unieoiformation...... ......... I Hampton(Harpers)formation. .......... I Erwin (Antietam) quartzite. Cambrian System . I0 Shady (Tomstown) dolomite 10 Rome (Waynesboro) formation.... ll Elbrook formation. 12 Conococheague limestone. l3 Ordovician System. ......., 14 Chepultepeclimestone. .......... 14 Beekmantown formatron. 14 New Market limestone. 15 Lincolnshire limestone. 16 Edinburg formation. 16 Martinsburg shale... 17 SilurianSystem. ......... 18 Clinchsandstone..... .......... 18 Clinton formation.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPLANATORY TEXT for GEOLOGIC MAP of NORTH CAROLINA By
    North Carolina State Library t ( f jleigh NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT William P. Saunders, Director %*fo _ DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jasper L. Stuckey, State Geologist BULLETIN NUMBER 71 EXPLANATORY TEXT FOR GEOLOGIC MAP OF NORTH CAROLINA By Jasper L. Stuckey and Stephen G. Conrad RALEIGH 1958 Norffe Carolir* St** NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT William P. Saunders, Director DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jasper L. Stuckey, State Geologist BULLETIN NUMBER 71 EXPLANATORY TEXT FOR GEOLOGIC MAP OF NORTH CAROLINA By Jasper L. Stuckey and Stephen G. Conrad RALEIGH 1958 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT GOVERNOR LUTHER H. HODGES, Chairman Raleigh MILES J. SMITH, First Vice Chairman Salisbury WALTER J. DAMTOFT, Second Vice Chairman Canton CHARLES S. ALLEN ..__„___ Durham W. B. AUSTIN Jefferson F. J. BOLING Siler City H. C. BUCHAN, JR North Wilkesboro SCROOP W. ENLOE, JR Spruce Pine VOIT GILMORE Southern Pines R. M. HANES Winston-Salem LEO H. HARVEY Kinston CHARLES H. JENKINS - __..._...Ahoskie AMOS R. KEARNS High Point H. C. KENNETT Durham R.W.MARTIN Raleigh CECIL MORRIS Atlantic HUGH M. MORTON Wilmington W. EUGENE SIMMONS Tarboro T.MAX WATSON Spindale LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Raleigh, North Carolina February 4, 1958 To His Excellency, HONORABLE LUTHER H. HODGES Governor of North Carolina Sir: I have the honor to submit herewith manuscript for publication as Bulletin No. 71, "Explanatory Text for Geologic Map of North Carolina". This text is an essential part of the new geologic map of North Carolina. The new geologic map and this explanatory text contain a summary of the best information pres- ently available on the geology of North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1839-G, H
    Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H i i i I ' i ' i ' X- »-v l^,:^ Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia By ROBERT T. RYDER Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia By CHRYSA M. CULLATHER Chapters G and H are issued as a single volume and are not available separately U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS-APPALACHIAN BASIN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DALLAS L. PECK, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data (revised for vol. G-H) Evoluation of sedimentary basins Appalachian basin. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1839 A-D, G-H) Includes bibliographies. Supt. of Docs. no.:19.3:1839-G Contents: Horses in fensters of the Pulaski thrust sheet, southwestern Virginia / by Arthur P. Schultz [etc.] Stratigraphic framework of Cam­ brian and Ordovician rocks in central Appalachian basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia / by Robert T.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Memories
    Mountain Memories By Gene A. Morrell April 2014 2 Author’s note From December 1977 through January 1979, I wrote “Mountain Memories,” a weekly column, which was published in the Sullivan County News in Blountville, Tennessee. These local and family history columns were based on my research of published sources and on oral history derived from my interviews of a number of county residents, many of whom have since passed away. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first time that all the columns have been published at one time in a single publication. The columns are listed by the dates they were printed in the newspaper, and I have added a headline to each column to aid readers in quickly determining its topic. Hundreds of individual names and place names are mentioned in the columns, and, to aid readers in locating information of particular interest to them, I have included an index at the end of this book. Gene A. Morrell 3 December 15, 1977 Introduction History abounds in East Tennessee and, especially, Sullivan County. This is not just history as written in textbooks, or as constituted in established historical monuments, but is also the oral history of local communities that has been handed down from generation to generation. This history also includes family histories contained on the yellowing, aged pages of old family Bibles, letters from long forgotten relatives, and bits and pieces of papers with timeless notes of births, deaths, or marriages. Far too often these irreplaceable Bibles or other records have been thoughtlessly destroyed or lost.
    [Show full text]
  • METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT of NASHVILLE and DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE V
    12/16/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 2, 2020 Session METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 18-987-II Anne C. Martin, Chancellor ___________________________________ No. M2019-01587-COA-R3-CV ___________________________________ In this judicial review of an administrative decision, the trial court reversed the civil service commission’s decision to reinstate a police officer to his position upon finding that the commission’s reversal of the police department’s termination of the employee was arbitrary and capricious. The employee has appealed. Having determined that the findings of the civil service commission were supported by substantial and material evidence but that its ultimate decision was arbitrary and capricious, we affirm the judgment of the trial court reversing the commission’s decision. Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Chancery Court Affirmed; Case Remanded THOMAS R. FRIERSON, II, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which JOHN W. MCCLARTY and KRISTI M. DAVIS, JJ., joined. Kim C. Gilleland and Lisa G. Woolley, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, and Jack Byrd, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, David Terrazas. Robert E. Cooper, Jr., and Allison L. Bussell, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County. OPINION I. Factual and Procedural History The respondent, David Terrazas, had been employed as a police officer with the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department (“MNPD”) for approximately eight years prior to his termination from that position.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Supreme Court Order Extending Limits on In-Person
    03/25/2020 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE IN RE: COVID-19 PANDEMIC ______________________ No. ADM2020-00428 ______________________ ORDER CONTINUING SUSPENSION OF IN-PERSON COURT PROCEEDINGS AND EXTENSION OF DEADLINES On March 13, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Chief Justice of the Tennessee Supreme Court declared a state of emergency for the Judicial Branch of Tennessee government and activated a Continuity of Operations Plan for the courts of Tennessee. See Tenn. Const. Art. VI, § 1; Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 16-3-501 to 16-3-504 (2009); Moore-Pennoyer v. State, 515 S.W.3d 271, 276-77 (Tenn. 2017); Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 49. This state of emergency constitutes a “disaster” for purposes of Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 49 and Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-1-116. In light of ongoing concerns, the Tennessee Supreme Court hereby continues the suspension of in-person court proceedings and the extension of deadlines as set forth in this order. We again emphasize that the local and state courts of the State of Tennessee are open and will remain open under all circumstances, subject to the provisions of this order. Under the constitutional, statutory, and inherent authority of the Tennessee Supreme Court, we adopt the following provisions. All in-person proceedings in all state and local courts in Tennessee, including but not limited to municipal, juvenile, general sessions, trial, and appellate courts, shall be suspended from the close of business on Friday, March 13, 2020, through Thursday, April 30, 2020, subject to the exceptions below.
    [Show full text]