Learn to Test for Heteroscedasticity in SPSS with Data from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (2006)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Learn to Test for Heteroscedasticity in SPSS with Data from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (2006) Learn to Test for Heteroscedasticity in SPSS With Data From the China Health and Nutrition Survey (2006) © 2015 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved. This PDF has been generated from SAGE Research Methods Datasets. SAGE SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part 2015 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved. 1 Learn to Test for Heteroscedasticity in SPSS With Data From the China Health and Nutrition Survey (2006) How-to Guide for IBM® SPSS® Statistics Software Introduction In this guide you will learn how to detect heteroscedasticity following a linear regression model in IBM® SPSS® Statistical Software (SPSS), using a practical example to illustrate the process. You will find links to the example dataset and you are encouraged to replicate this example. An additional practice example is suggested at the end of this guide. The example assumes you have already opened the data file in SPSS. Contents 1. Heteroscedasticity 2. An Example in SPSS: Blood Pressure and Age in China 2.1 The SPSS Procedure 2.2 Exploring the SPSS Output 3. Your Turn 1 Heteroscedasticity Linear regression models estimated via Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) rest on several assumptions, one if which is that the variance of the residual from the Page 2 of 11 Learn to Test for Heteroscedasticity in SPSS With Data From the China Health and Nutrition Survey (2006) SAGE SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part 2015 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved. 1 model is constant and unrelated to the independent variable(s). Constant variance is called homoscedasticity, while non-constant variance is called heteroscedasticity. This example illustrates how to detect heteroscedasticity following the estimation of a simple linear regression model. 2 An Example in SPSS: Blood Pressure and Age in China This example uses two variables from the 2006 China Health and Nutrition Survey: • A person’s systolic blood pressure (systolic). • A person’s age, measured in years (age). There are 9178 respondents in this survey. Systolic blood pressure measures the pressure in a person’s arteries when their heart beats (contracts and pumps blood). In this dataset, this variable ranges from 70 to 240 with a mean of about 122 and a standard deviation of 18.14. Age is measured in years, and in this dataset it ranges from 17 to 95 with a mean of about 49 and a standard deviation of 15.19. Both of these variables are continuous, making them appropriate for simple regression. 2.1 The SPSS Procedure Before producing the simple regression model, it is a good idea to look at each variable separately. However, in the interest of space, we forgo doing so here. Readers should explore the SAGE Research Methods Dataset examples associated with Simple Regression and Multiple Regression for more information. You estimate a simple regression model in SPSS by selecting from the menu: Analyze → Regression → Linear In the Linear Regression dialog box that opens, move the systolic blood pressure Page 3 of 11 Learn to Test for Heteroscedasticity in SPSS With Data From the China Health and Nutrition Survey (2006) SAGE SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part 2015 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved. 1 variable (systolic) into the Dependent: window and move the age variable (age) into the Independent(s): window. Figure 1 shows what this looks like in SPSS. Figure 1: Selecting simple regression from the Analyze menu in SPSS. Because we want to explore whether there is evidence of heteroscedasticity among the residuals of this regression, we also want to produce a scatter plot that plots the standardized residuals on the Y-axis and the standardized predicted values of the dependent variable on the X-axis. Page 4 of 11 Learn to Test for Heteroscedasticity in SPSS With Data From the China Health and Nutrition Survey (2006) SAGE SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part 2015 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved. 1 First, we click the “Plots…” button on the right-hand side of the Linear Regression dialog box. That opens a second dialog box. In this second dialog box, move *ZRESID into the open box under Y: and *ZPRED into the open box under X: as shown in Figure 2 Figure 2: Producing a two-way scatter plot of standardized residuals and standardized predicted values for a regression model in the Linear Regression: Plots dialog box in SPSS. Once you are done, click Continue in this dialog box, and then click OK to perform the analysis. 2.2 Exploring the SPSS Output Figure 3 presents five tables of results that are produced by the simple linear regression procedure in SPSS. The fifth table is produced because we asked SPSS to produce plots using the standardized residuals. The fourth table in Figure 3, outlined in red, includes the results of the regression model itself. Figure 3: Simple regression of systolic blood pressure on age, 2006 China Health Page 5 of 11 Learn to Test for Heteroscedasticity in SPSS With Data From the China Health and Nutrition Survey (2006) SAGE SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part 2015 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved. 1 and Nutrition Survey. Page 6 of 11 Learn to Test for Heteroscedasticity in SPSS With Data From the China Health and Nutrition Survey (2006) SAGE SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part 2015 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved. 1 Page 7 of 11 Learn to Test for Heteroscedasticity in SPSS With Data From the China Health and Nutrition Survey (2006) SAGE SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part 2015 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved. 1 The first three tables in Figure 3 report the independent variable(s) entered into the model, some summary fit statistics for the regression model, and an analysis of variance for the model as a whole. While detailed examination of these tables is beyond the scope of this example, we note in the second table that R Square measures the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable explained by the model, which in this case consists of a single independent variable. An R Square of 0.157 means that approximately 15.7% of the variance in systolic blood pressure is accounted for by age. The fourth table in Figure 3, outlined in red, presents the estimates of the intercept, or constant, and the slope coefficient. The results report an estimate of the intercept (or constant) as equal to approximately 98.56. The constant of a simple regression model can be interpreted as the average expected value of the dependent variable when the independent variable equals zero. In this case, our independent variable, age, can never be zero, so the constant by itself does not tell us much. The estimated value for the slope coefficient linking age to systolic blood pressure is estimated to be approximately 0.47. This represents the average marginal effect of age on systolic blood pressure, and can be interpreted as the expected change on average in the dependent variable for a one-unit increase in the independent variable. For this example, that means that every increase in age of 1 year is associated with an average increase of about 0.47 in systolic blood pressure. The fourth table in Figure 3 reports that this estimate is statistically significantly different from zero, with a p-value well below 0.001. This leads us to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there does appear to be a positive relationship between a person’s age and their systolic blood pressure in China. Figure 4 presents a plot with the standardized residuals of this regression on the Y-axis and the standardized predicted values of the dependent variable on the X- Page 8 of 11 Learn to Test for Heteroscedasticity in SPSS With Data From the China Health and Nutrition Survey (2006) SAGE SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part 2015 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved. 1 axis. Figure 4 shows that the vertical spread of the residuals is relatively low for respondents with lower predicted levels of systolic blood pressure. However, as we move left to right and the predicted level of systolic blood pressure increases, we see the vertical spread of the residuals also increasing. This spread appears to shrink somewhat at the very highest predicted values for systolic blood pressure. Overall, Figure 4 shows a pattern in the variance of the residuals, meaning that we appear to have evidence of heteroscedasticity. Figure 4: Two-way scatter plot of standardized residuals from the regression shown in forth table of Figure 3 on the Y-axis and standardized predicted values of the dependent variable from that regression on the X-axis, 2006 China Health and Nutrition Survey. Page 9 of 11 Learn to Test for Heteroscedasticity in SPSS With Data From the China Health and Nutrition Survey (2006) SAGE SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part 2015 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved. 1 Unfortunately, SPSS does not include any formal tests of heteroscedasticity. Users can create macros within SPSS to perform specific functions not built into the software, but that process is beyond the scope of this example. Example code for a macro that includes the Breusch–Pagen test, and a tutorial video on how to use it, can be found at the following links: http://www.spsstools.net/Syntax/RegressionRepeatedMeasure/Breusch- PaganAndKoenkerTest.sps https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QcX4jqPn14 Applying the steps of the Breusch–Pagen test to this example results in a test statistic of 652.33. When compared to a Chi-squared distribution with 1 degree of Page 10 of 11 Learn to Test for Heteroscedasticity in SPSS With Data From the China Health and Nutrition Survey (2006) SAGE SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part 2015 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Recommended publications
  • Understanding Linear and Logistic Regression Analyses
    EDUCATION • ÉDUCATION METHODOLOGY Understanding linear and logistic regression analyses Andrew Worster, MD, MSc;*† Jerome Fan, MD;* Afisi Ismaila, MSc† SEE RELATED ARTICLE PAGE 105 egression analysis, also termed regression modeling, come). For example, a researcher could evaluate the poten- Ris an increasingly common statistical method used to tial for injury severity score (ISS) to predict ED length-of- describe and quantify the relation between a clinical out- stay by first producing a scatter plot of ISS graphed against come of interest and one or more other variables. In this ED length-of-stay to determine whether an apparent linear issue of CJEM, Cummings and Mayes used linear and lo- relation exists, and then by deriving the best fit straight line gistic regression to determine whether the type of trauma for the data set using linear regression carried out by statis- team leader (TTL) impacts emergency department (ED) tical software. The mathematical formula for this relation length-of-stay or survival.1 The purpose of this educa- would be: ED length-of-stay = k(ISS) + c. In this equation, tional primer is to provide an easily understood overview k (the slope of the line) indicates the factor by which of these methods of statistical analysis. We hope that this length-of-stay changes as ISS changes and c (the “con- primer will not only help readers interpret the Cummings stant”) is the value of length-of-stay when ISS equals zero and Mayes study, but also other research that uses similar and crosses the vertical axis.2 In this hypothetical scenario, methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of General Linear Models (GLM) to Assess Nodule Abundance Based on a Photographic Survey (Case Study from IOM Area, Pacific Ocean)
    minerals Article Application of General Linear Models (GLM) to Assess Nodule Abundance Based on a Photographic Survey (Case Study from IOM Area, Pacific Ocean) Monika Wasilewska-Błaszczyk * and Jacek Mucha Department of Geology of Mineral Deposits and Mining Geology, Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Cracow, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The success of the future exploitation of the Pacific polymetallic nodule deposits depends on an accurate estimation of their resources, especially in small batches, scheduled for extraction in the short term. The estimation based only on the results of direct seafloor sampling using box corers is burdened with a large error due to the long sampling interval and high variability of the nodule abundance. Therefore, estimations should take into account the results of bottom photograph analyses performed systematically and in large numbers along the course of a research vessel. For photographs taken at the direct sampling sites, the relationship linking the nodule abundance with the independent variables (the percentage of seafloor nodule coverage, the genetic types of nodules in the context of their fraction distribution, and the degree of sediment coverage of nodules) was determined using the general linear model (GLM). Compared to the estimates obtained with a simple Citation: Wasilewska-Błaszczyk, M.; linear model linking this parameter only with the seafloor nodule coverage, a significant decrease Mucha, J. Application of General in the standard prediction error, from 4.2 to 2.5 kg/m2, was found. The use of the GLM for the Linear Models (GLM) to Assess assessment of nodule abundance in individual sites covered by bottom photographs, outside of Nodule Abundance Based on a direct sampling sites, should contribute to a significant increase in the accuracy of the estimation of Photographic Survey (Case Study nodule resources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Simple Linear Regression Model
    The Simple Linear Regression Model Suppose we have a data set consisting of n bivariate observations {(x1, y1),..., (xn, yn)}. Response variable y and predictor variable x satisfy the simple linear model if they obey the model yi = β0 + β1xi + ǫi, i = 1,...,n, (1) where the intercept and slope coefficients β0 and β1 are unknown constants and the random errors {ǫi} satisfy the following conditions: 1. The errors ǫ1, . , ǫn all have mean 0, i.e., µǫi = 0 for all i. 2 2 2 2. The errors ǫ1, . , ǫn all have the same variance σ , i.e., σǫi = σ for all i. 3. The errors ǫ1, . , ǫn are independent random variables. 4. The errors ǫ1, . , ǫn are normally distributed. Note that the author provides these assumptions on page 564 BUT ORDERS THEM DIFFERENTLY. Fitting the Simple Linear Model: Estimating β0 and β1 Suppose we believe our data obey the simple linear model. The next step is to fit the model by estimating the unknown intercept and slope coefficients β0 and β1. There are various ways of estimating these from the data but we will use the Least Squares Criterion invented by Gauss. The least squares estimates of β0 and β1, which we will denote by βˆ0 and βˆ1 respectively, are the values of β0 and β1 which minimize the sum of errors squared S(β0, β1): n 2 S(β0, β1) = X ei i=1 n 2 = X[yi − yˆi] i=1 n 2 = X[yi − (β0 + β1xi)] i=1 where the ith modeling error ei is simply the difference between the ith value of the response variable yi and the fitted/predicted valuey ˆi.
    [Show full text]
  • Auditor: an R Package for Model-Agnostic Visual Validation and Diagnostics
    auditor: an R Package for Model-Agnostic Visual Validation and Diagnostics APREPRINT Alicja Gosiewska Przemysław Biecek Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science Warsaw University of Technology Warsaw University of Technology Poland Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Mechanics [email protected] University of Warsaw Poland [email protected] May 27, 2020 ABSTRACT Machine learning models have spread to almost every area of life. They are successfully applied in biology, medicine, finance, physics, and other fields. With modern software it is easy to train even a complex model that fits the training data and results in high accuracy on test set. The problem arises when models fail confronted with the real-world data. This paper describes methodology and tools for model-agnostic audit. Introduced tech- niques facilitate assessing and comparing the goodness of fit and performance of models. In addition, they may be used for analysis of the similarity of residuals and for identification of outliers and influential observations. The examination is carried out by diagnostic scores and visual verification. Presented methods were implemented in the auditor package for R. Due to flexible and con- sistent grammar, it is simple to validate models of any classes. K eywords machine learning, R, diagnostics, visualization, modeling 1 Introduction Predictive modeling is a process that uses mathematical and computational methods to forecast outcomes. arXiv:1809.07763v4 [stat.CO] 26 May 2020 Lots of algorithms in this area have been developed and are still being develop. Therefore, there are countless possible models to choose from and a lot of ways to train a new new complex model.
    [Show full text]
  • Heteroscedastic Errors
    Heteroscedastic Errors ◮ Sometimes plots and/or tests show that the error variances 2 σi = Var(ǫi ) depend on i ◮ Several standard approaches to fixing the problem, depending on the nature of the dependence. ◮ Weighted Least Squares. ◮ Transformation of the response. ◮ Generalized Linear Models. Richard Lockhart STAT 350: Heteroscedastic Errors and GLIM Weighted Least Squares ◮ Suppose variances are known except for a constant factor. 2 2 ◮ That is, σi = σ /wi . ◮ Use weighted least squares. (See Chapter 10 in the text.) ◮ This usually arises realistically in the following situations: ◮ Yi is an average of ni measurements where you know ni . Then wi = ni . 2 ◮ Plots suggest that σi might be proportional to some power of 2 γ γ some covariate: σi = kxi . Then wi = xi− . Richard Lockhart STAT 350: Heteroscedastic Errors and GLIM Variances depending on (mean of) Y ◮ Two standard approaches are available: ◮ Older approach is transformation. ◮ Newer approach is use of generalized linear model; see STAT 402. Richard Lockhart STAT 350: Heteroscedastic Errors and GLIM Transformation ◮ Compute Yi∗ = g(Yi ) for some function g like logarithm or square root. ◮ Then regress Yi∗ on the covariates. ◮ This approach sometimes works for skewed response variables like income; ◮ after transformation we occasionally find the errors are more nearly normal, more homoscedastic and that the model is simpler. ◮ See page 130ff and check under transformations and Box-Cox in the index. Richard Lockhart STAT 350: Heteroscedastic Errors and GLIM Generalized Linear Models ◮ Transformation uses the model T E(g(Yi )) = xi β while generalized linear models use T g(E(Yi )) = xi β ◮ Generally latter approach offers more flexibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Comparisons of the Mann-Whitney U and Permutation Tests
    Power Comparisons of the Mann-Whitney U and Permutation Tests Abstract: Though the Mann-Whitney U-test and permutation tests are often used in cases where distribution assumptions for the two-sample t-test for equal means are not met, it is not widely understood how the powers of the two tests compare. Our goal was to discover under what circumstances the Mann-Whitney test has greater power than the permutation test. The tests’ powers were compared under various conditions simulated from the Weibull distribution. Under most conditions, the permutation test provided greater power, especially with equal sample sizes and with unequal standard deviations. However, the Mann-Whitney test performed better with highly skewed data. Background and Significance: In many psychological, biological, and clinical trial settings, distributional differences among testing groups render parametric tests requiring normality, such as the z test and t test, unreliable. In these situations, nonparametric tests become necessary. Blair and Higgins (1980) illustrate the empirical invalidity of claims made in the mid-20th century that t and F tests used to detect differences in population means are highly insensitive to violations of distributional assumptions, and that non-parametric alternatives possess lower power. Through power testing, Blair and Higgins demonstrate that the Mann-Whitney test has much higher power relative to the t-test, particularly under small sample conditions. This seems to be true even when Welch’s approximation and pooled variances are used to “account” for violated t-test assumptions (Glass et al. 1972). With the proliferation of powerful computers, computationally intensive alternatives to the Mann-Whitney test have become possible.
    [Show full text]
  • ROC Curve Analysis and Medical Decision Making
    ROC curve analysis and medical decision making: what’s the evidence that matters for evidence-based diagnosis ? Piergiorgio Duca Biometria e Statistica Medica – Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche Luigi Sacco – Università degli Studi – Via GB Grassi 74 – 20157 MILANO (ITALY) [email protected] 1) The ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) The ROC curve is the statistical tool used to analyse the accuracy of a diagnostic test with multiple cut-off points. The test could be based on a continuous diagnostic indicant, such as a serum enzyme level, or just on an ordinal one, such as a classification based on radiological imaging. The ROC curve is based on the probability density distributions, in actually diseased and non diseased patients, of the diagnostician’s confidence in a positive diagnosis, and upon a set of cut-off points to separate “positive” and “negative” test results (Egan, 1968; Bamber, 1975; Swets, Pickett, 1982; Metz, 1986; Zhou et al, 2002). The Sensitivity (SE) – the proportion of diseased turned out to be test positive – and the Specificity (SP) – the proportion of non diseased turned out to be test negative – will depend on the particular confidence threshold the observer applies to partition the continuously distributed perceptions of evidence into positive and negative test results. The ROC curve is the plot of all the pairs of True Positive Rates (TPR = SE), as ordinate, and False Positive Rates (FPR = (1 – SP)), as abscissa, related to all the possible cut-off points. An ROC curve represents all of the compromises between SE and SP can be achieved, changing the confidence threshold.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating the Variance of a Propensity Score Matching Estimator for the Average Treatment Effect
    Observational Studies 4 (2018) 71-96 Submitted 5/15; Published 3/18 Estimating the variance of a propensity score matching estimator for the average treatment effect Ronnie Pingel [email protected] Department of Statistics Uppsala University Uppsala, Sweden Abstract This study considers variance estimation when estimating the asymptotic variance of a propensity score matching estimator for the average treatment effect. We investigate the role of smoothing parameters in a variance estimator based on matching. We also study the properties of estimators using local linear estimation. Simulations demonstrate that large gains can be made in terms of mean squared error, bias and coverage rate by prop- erly selecting smoothing parameters. Alternatively, a residual-based local linear estimator could be used as an estimator of the asymptotic variance. The variance estimators are implemented in analysis to evaluate the effect of right heart catheterisation. Keywords: Average Causal Effect, Causal Inference, Kernel estimator 1. Introduction Matching estimators belong to a class of estimators of average treatment effects (ATEs) in observational studies that seek to balance the distributions of covariates in a treatment and control group (Stuart, 2010). In this study we consider one frequently used matching method, the simple nearest-neighbour matching with replacement (Rubin, 1973; Abadie and Imbens, 2006). Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) show that instead of matching on covariates directly to remove confounding, it is sufficient to match on the propensity score. In observational studies the propensity score must almost always be estimated. An important contribution is therefore Abadie and Imbens (2016), who derive the large sample distribution of a nearest- neighbour propensity score matching estimator when using the estimated propensity score.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report Statistical Research Unit Goteborg University Sweden
    Research Report Statistical Research Unit Goteborg University Sweden Testing for multivariate heteroscedasticity Thomas Holgersson Ghazi Shukur Research Report 2003:1 ISSN 0349-8034 Mailing address: Fax Phone Home Page: Statistical Research Nat: 031-77312 74 Nat: 031-77310 00 http://www.stat.gu.se/stat Unit P.O. Box 660 Int: +4631 773 12 74 Int: +4631 773 1000 SE 405 30 G6teborg Sweden Testing for Multivariate Heteroscedasticity By H.E.T. Holgersson Ghazi Shukur Department of Statistics Jonkoping International GOteborg university Business school SE-405 30 GOteborg SE-55 111 Jonkoping Sweden Sweden Abstract: In this paper we propose a testing technique for multivariate heteroscedasticity, which is expressed as a test of linear restrictions in a multivariate regression model. Four test statistics with known asymptotical null distributions are suggested, namely the Wald (W), Lagrange Multiplier (LM), Likelihood Ratio (LR) and the multivariate Rao F-test. The critical values for the statistics are determined by their asymptotic null distributions, but also bootstrapped critical values are used. The size, power and robustness of the tests are examined in a Monte Carlo experiment. Our main findings are that all the tests limit their nominal sizes asymptotically, but some of them have superior small sample properties. These are the F, LM and bootstrapped versions of Wand LR tests. Keywords: heteroscedasticity, hypothesis test, bootstrap, multivariate analysis. I. Introduction In the last few decades a variety of methods has been proposed for testing for heteroscedasticity among the error terms in e.g. linear regression models. The assumption of homoscedasticity means that the disturbance variance should be constant (or homoscedastic) at each observation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Simple Linear Regression Analysis the Simple
    Chapter 2 Simple Linear Regression Analysis The simple linear regression model We consider the modelling between the dependent and one independent variable. When there is only one independent variable in the linear regression model, the model is generally termed as a simple linear regression model. When there are more than one independent variables in the model, then the linear model is termed as the multiple linear regression model. The linear model Consider a simple linear regression model yX01 where y is termed as the dependent or study variable and X is termed as the independent or explanatory variable. The terms 0 and 1 are the parameters of the model. The parameter 0 is termed as an intercept term, and the parameter 1 is termed as the slope parameter. These parameters are usually called as regression coefficients. The unobservable error component accounts for the failure of data to lie on the straight line and represents the difference between the true and observed realization of y . There can be several reasons for such difference, e.g., the effect of all deleted variables in the model, variables may be qualitative, inherent randomness in the observations etc. We assume that is observed as independent and identically distributed random variable with mean zero and constant variance 2 . Later, we will additionally assume that is normally distributed. The independent variables are viewed as controlled by the experimenter, so it is considered as non-stochastic whereas y is viewed as a random variable with Ey()01 X and Var() y 2 . Sometimes X can also be a random variable.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Logistic Regression: from Basic Concepts to Interpretation with Particular Attention to Nursing Domain
    J Korean Acad Nurs Vol.43 No.2, 154 -164 J Korean Acad Nurs Vol.43 No.2 April 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.2.154 An Introduction to Logistic Regression: From Basic Concepts to Interpretation with Particular Attention to Nursing Domain Park, Hyeoun-Ae College of Nursing and System Biomedical Informatics National Core Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea Purpose: The purpose of this article is twofold: 1) introducing logistic regression (LR), a multivariable method for modeling the relationship between multiple independent variables and a categorical dependent variable, and 2) examining use and reporting of LR in the nursing literature. Methods: Text books on LR and research articles employing LR as main statistical analysis were reviewed. Twenty-three articles published between 2010 and 2011 in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing were analyzed for proper use and reporting of LR models. Results: Logistic regression from basic concepts such as odds, odds ratio, logit transformation and logistic curve, assumption, fitting, reporting and interpreting to cautions were presented. Substantial short- comings were found in both use of LR and reporting of results. For many studies, sample size was not sufficiently large to call into question the accuracy of the regression model. Additionally, only one study reported validation analysis. Conclusion: Nurs- ing researchers need to pay greater attention to guidelines concerning the use and reporting of LR models. Key words: Logit function, Maximum likelihood estimation, Odds, Odds ratio, Wald test INTRODUCTION The model serves two purposes: (1) it can predict the value of the depen- dent variable for new values of the independent variables, and (2) it can Multivariable methods of statistical analysis commonly appear in help describe the relative contribution of each independent variable to general health science literature (Bagley, White, & Golomb, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Njit-Etd2007-041
    Copyright Warning & Restrictions The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a, user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use” that user may be liable for copyright infringement, This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. Please Note: The author retains the copyright while the New Jersey Institute of Technology reserves the right to distribute this thesis or dissertation Printing note: If you do not wish to print this page, then select “Pages from: first page # to: last page #” on the print dialog screen The Van Houten library has removed some of the personal information and all signatures from the approval page and biographical sketches of theses and dissertations in order to protect the identity of NJIT graduates and faculty. ABSTRACT PROBLEMS RELATED TO EFFICACY MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSES by Sibabrata Banerjee In clinical research it is very common to compare two treatments on the basis of an efficacy vrbl Mr pfll f Χ nd Υ dnt th rpn f ptnt n th t trtnt A nd rptvl th
    [Show full text]