Connectionconnection
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Education of a Judge Begins Long Before Judicial Appointment
T H E EDUCATION O F A JUD G E … The Honourable Brian Lennox, Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice The education of a judge begins long before judicial appointment. Judges are first and foremost lawyers. In Canada, that means that they typically have an undergraduate university degree1, followed by a three‐year degree from a Faculty of Law, involving studies in a wide variety of legal subjects, including contracts, real estate, business, torts, tax law, family, civil and criminal law, together with practice‐ oriented courses on the application of the law. The law degree is followed by a period of six to twelve months of practical training with a law firm. Before being allowed to work as a lawyer, the law school graduate will have to pass a set of comprehensive Law Society exams on the law, legal practice and ethics. In total, most lawyers will have somewhere between seven and nine years of post‐high school education when they begin to practice. It is not enough to have a law degree in order to be appointed as a judge. Most provinces and the federal government2 require that a lawyer have a minimum of 10 years of experience before being eligible for appointment. It is extremely rare that a lawyer is appointed as a judge with only 10 years’ experience. On average, judges have worked for 15 to 20 years as a lawyer before appointment and most judges are 45 to 52 years of age at the time of their appointment. They come from a variety of backgrounds and experiences and have usually practised before the courts to which they are appointed. -
Literature Review Papers
THE CANADIAN SOUTHEAST ASIA REFUGEE HISTORICAL RESEARCH PROJECT: HEARTS OF FREEDOM LITERATURE REVIEW PAPERS Researchers: Peter Duschinsky, Colleen Lundy, Michael Molloy, Allan Moscovitch, and Stephanie P. Stobbe Unless otherwise noted, papers in the Resources section of this website may be reproduced for educational or non-commercial purposes as long as the use includes acknowledgement of the initial publication on the Hearts of Freedom (HOF) website and a link to the original article. THE CANADIAN SOUTHEAST ASIA REFUGEE HISTORICAL RESEARCH PROJECT: HEARTS OF FREEDOM (HOF) Cambodian Resettlement in Canada: A Literature Review Filipe Duarte, PhD Assistant Professor in School of Social Work at University of Windsor and a Research Assistant for Hearts of Freedom, in association with Carleton University This paper may be reproduced for educational or non-commercial purposes as long as it includes acknowledgement of its initial publication on the Hearts of Freedom website and a link to the original article. Please attribute as follows: Duarte, Filipe. (2020). Background Paper on the Archival Media Research: Toronto Star and the Globe and Mail (1975-1985). https://heartsoffreedom.org/research-papers-literature-reviews/ Abstract This background paper offers a detailed overview of the archival media research conducted on the historical records (microfilms and online databases) of two Canadian newspapers – the Toronto Star and The Globe and Mail, between May 1, 1975, and December 31, 1985. The archival media research reviewed between 20,000 and 25,000 results, on both newspapers, over a five-month period (February-June 2019). Research was undertaken by searching selected keywords identified in the book Running on Empty: Canada and the Indochinese Refugees, 1975-1980, written by Michael J. -
Aiyaz Alibhai
RELATED SERVICES Aiyaz Alibhai Commercial Litigation Partner | Vancouver Information Technology 604.643.1233 Intellectual Property [email protected] Marketing, Advertising & Product Compliance Privacy, Data Protection and Cybersecurity Technology RELATED INDUSTRIES Biography Education Aiyaz Alibhai is an intellectual property lawyer, specialising in intellectual property protection, RELATED FOCUS AREAS licensing and enforcement, technology transactions, privacy and data protection. His work Privacy and Data Protection encompasses structuring and negotiating contracts for complex technology projects, IT agreements, intellectual property and technology licensing, collaboration agreements, R&D agreements, and e-commerce law issues. His expertise in litigation matters encompasses intellectual property litigation, unfair competition and trademark passing off litigation, brand protection, domain name disputes, trade mark oppositions, obtaining injunctive and restraining orders, business and cybercrimes. He has experience across all sectors, including aerospace, construction, life sciences and applied science industries, e-commerce businesses, hotel and hospitality businesses, fashion and retail sectors. He has presented on intellectual property protection for the fashion industry, intangible property protection strategies for Corporate General Counsel, customs and border protection and enforcement, privacy and data protection, block chain, board governance and cyber security issues. Professional achievements & leadership Professional -
Corporate Governance Into Its Global Context, to Show Its Significance for Modern Business Society
This second edition is intended to put corporate governance into its global context, to show its significance for modern business society. Written by the leading practitioners within the field, from 32 jurisdictions, this second edition will be a useful, 2ND EDITION first-hand reference material for practising lawyers and in-house attorneys who may counsel clients on their business in foreign countries. General Editor Akira Kawamura, India Rajiv K. Luthra, Sundeep South Korea Kyung-Yoon Lee Anderson Mori & Tomotsune Dudeja, Vaibhav Kakkar & Anshul & Richard J. Lee, Kim & Chang Preface Akira Kawamura, Jain, Luthra and Luthra Law Offices Spain Carlos Paredes Galego, Anderson Mori & Tomotsune Indonesia Hanim Hamzah, Uría Menéndez Foreword Martin Lipton, Wisnu Aji Wiradyo, Henry Sweden Peder Hammarskiöld Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz Manullang, Roosdiono & Partners & Sandra Hein Kaznova, Argentina Pablo García Morillo, Israel Rachel Levitan & Hammarskiöld & Co. Marval O’Farrell & Mairal Yael Navon, Levitan Sharon & Co. Taiwan Chun-yih Cheng, Australia Hiroyuki Kano & Italy Claudio Visco & Formosa Transnational GOVERNANCE CORPORATE CORPORATE Andrew Hay, Clayton Utz Ernesto Pucci, Macchi di Attorneys at Law Cellere Gangemi Brazil Marta Viegas, Tozzini Freire Thailand Kasma Visitkitjakarn Japan Hiroki Kodate, & Napat Siri-armart, SERIES INTERNATIONAL Canada Jay M. Hoffman & Anderson Mori & Tomotsune Tilleke & Gibbins James Klotz, Miller Thomson LLP GOVERNANCE Malaysia Wooi Hong Tan, Turkey Kayra Üçer Cayman Islands Louis Mooney & Zaid Ibrahim & Co & Zeynep Ahu Sazci, Hergüner Tim Dawson, Mourant Ozannes The Netherlands Bilgen Özeke Attorney Partnership INTERNATIONAL SERIES China Xu Ping & Wei Kao, Willem Calkoen, NautaDutilh Ukraine Timur Bondaryev King & Wood Mallesons Portugal Maria da Conceição & Anna Zorya, Arzinger France Jacques Buhart Cabaços, PLMJ, Law Firm United Kingdom & Nicolas Lafont, Charles Martin & Mark Slade, McDermott Will & Emery Russia Vassily Rudomino, Anton Dzhuplin, Victoria Sivachenko Macfarlanes LLP Germany Prof. -
National Directory of Courts in Canada
Catalogue no. 85-510-XIE National Directory of Courts in Canada August 2000 Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics Statistics Statistique Canada Canada How to obtain more information Specific inquiries about this product and related statistics or services should be directed to: Information and Client Service, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0T6 (telephone: (613) 951-9023 or 1 800 387-2231). For information on the wide range of data available from Statistics Canada, you can contact us by calling one of our toll-free numbers. You can also contact us by e-mail or by visiting our Web site. National inquiries line 1 800 263-1136 National telecommunications device for the hearing impaired 1 800 363-7629 Depository Services Program inquiries 1 800 700-1033 Fax line for Depository Services Program 1 800 889-9734 E-mail inquiries [email protected] Web site www.statcan.ca Ordering and subscription information This product, Catalogue no. 85-510-XPB, is published as a standard printed publication at a price of CDN $30.00 per issue. The following additional shipping charges apply for delivery outside Canada: Single issue United States CDN $ 6.00 Other countries CDN $ 10.00 This product is also available in electronic format on the Statistics Canada Internet site as Catalogue no. 85-510-XIE at a price of CDN $12.00 per issue. To obtain single issues or to subscribe, visit our Web site at www.statcan.ca, and select Products and Services. All prices exclude sales taxes. The printed version of this publication can be ordered by • Phone (Canada and United States) 1 800 267-6677 • Fax (Canada and United States) 1 877 287-4369 • E-mail [email protected] • Mail Statistics Canada Dissemination Division Circulation Management 120 Parkdale Avenue Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0T6 • And, in person at the Statistics Canada Reference Centre nearest you, or from authorised agents and bookstores. -
Court File No. CV-18-00611214-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT of JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST B E T W E E N: SEARS CANADA INC., by ITS CO
Court File No. CV-18-00611214-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST B E T W E E N: SEARS CANADA INC., BY ITS COURT-APPOINTED LITIGATION TRUSTEE, J. DOUGLAS CUNNINGHAM, Q.C. Plaintiff - and - ESL INVESTMENTS INC., ESL PARTNERS LP, SPE I PARTNERS, LP, SPE MASTER I, LP, ESL INSTITUTIONAL PARTNERS, LP, EDWARD LAMPERT, EPHRAIM J. BIRD, DOUGLAS CAMPBELL, WILLIAM CROWLEY, WILLIAM HARKER, R. RAJA KHANNA, JAMES MCBURNEY, DEBORAH ROSATI, and DONALD ROSS Defendants BOOK OF AUTHORITIES OF THE DEFENDANTS WILLIAM HARKER, WILLIAM CROWLEY, DONALD ROSS, EPHRAIM J. BIRD, JAMES MCBURNEY, AND DOUGLAS CAMPBELL MOTION TO STRIKE RETURNABLE APRIL 17, 2019 March 29, 2019 CASSELS BROCK & BLACKWELL LLP 2100 Scotia Plaza 40 King Street West Toronto, ON M5H 3C2 William J. Burden LSO #: 15550F Tel: 416.869.5963 Fax: 416.640.3019 [email protected] Wendy Berman LSO #: 32748J Tel: 416.860.2926 Fax: 416.640.3107 [email protected] Lawyers for the Defendants William Harker, William Crowley, Donald Ross, Ephraim J. Bird, James McBurney, and Douglas Campbell 2 TO: LAX O’SULLIVAN LISUS GOTTLIEB LLP 145 King Street West, Suite 2750 Toronto, ON M5H 1J8 Matthew P. Gottlieb LSO#: 32268B Tel: 416.644.5353 Fax: 416.598.3730 [email protected] Andrew Winton LSO #: 54473I Tel: 416.644.5342 Fax: 416.598.3730 [email protected] Philip Underwood LSO#: 73637W Tel: 416.645.5078 Fax: 416.598.3730 [email protected] Lawyers for the Plaintiff AND TO: BENNETT JONES LLP Barristers and Solicitors 1 First Canadian Place Suite 3400 P.O. Box 130 Toronto, ON M5X 1A4 Richard Swan LSO #:32076A Tel: 416.777.7479 Fax: 416.863.1716 [email protected] Jason Berall LSO #: 68011F Tel: 416.777.5480 Fax: 416.863.1716 [email protected] Lawyers for the Defendants R. -
District Name
District name Name Party name Email Phone Algoma-Manitoulin Michael Mantha New Democratic Party of Ontario [email protected] 1 416 325-1938 Bramalea-Gore-Malton Jagmeet Singh New Democratic Party of Ontario [email protected] 1 416 325-1784 Essex Taras Natyshak New Democratic Party of Ontario [email protected] 1 416 325-0714 Hamilton Centre Andrea Horwath New Democratic Party of Ontario [email protected] 1 416 325-7116 Hamilton East-Stoney Creek Paul Miller New Democratic Party of Ontario [email protected] 1 416 325-0707 Hamilton Mountain Monique Taylor New Democratic Party of Ontario [email protected] 1 416 325-1796 Kenora-Rainy River Sarah Campbell New Democratic Party of Ontario [email protected] 1 416 325-2750 Kitchener-Waterloo Catherine Fife New Democratic Party of Ontario [email protected] 1 416 325-6913 London West Peggy Sattler New Democratic Party of Ontario [email protected] 1 416 325-6908 London-Fanshawe Teresa J. Armstrong New Democratic Party of Ontario [email protected] 1 416 325-1872 Niagara Falls Wayne Gates New Democratic Party of Ontario [email protected] 1 416 212-6102 Nickel Belt France GŽlinas New Democratic Party of Ontario [email protected] 1 416 325-9203 Oshawa Jennifer K. French New Democratic Party of Ontario [email protected] 1 416 325-0117 Parkdale-High Park Cheri DiNovo New Democratic Party of Ontario [email protected] 1 416 325-0244 Timiskaming-Cochrane John Vanthof New Democratic Party of Ontario [email protected] 1 416 325-2000 Timmins-James Bay Gilles Bisson -
Carissima Mathen*
C h o ic es a n d C o n t r o v e r sy : J udic ia l A ppointments in C a n a d a Carissima Mathen* P a r t I What do judges do? As an empirical matter, judges settle disputes. They act as a check on both the executive and legislative branches. They vindicate human rights and civil liberties. They arbitrate jurisdictional conflicts. They disagree. They bicker. They change their minds. In a normative sense, what judges “do” depends very much on one’s views of judging. If one thinks that judging is properly confined to the law’s “four comers”, then judges act as neutral, passive recipients of opinions and arguments about that law.1 They consider arguments, examine text, and render decisions that best honour the law that has been made. If judging also involves analysis of a society’s core (if implicit) political agreements—and the degree to which state laws or actions honour those agreements—then judges are critical players in the mechanisms through which such agreement is tested. In post-war Canada, the judiciary clearly has taken on the second role as well as the first. Year after year, judges are drawn into disputes over the very values of our society, a trend that shows no signs of abating.2 In view of judges’ continuing power, and the lack of political appetite to increase control over them (at least in Canada), it is natural that attention has turned to the process by which persons are nominated and ultimately appointed to the bench. -
The Rt. Hon. Antonio Lamer, Chief Justice of Canada and of the Supreme Court of Canada, Is Pleased to Welcome Mr
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA PRESS RELEASE OTTAWA, January 8,1998 -- The Rt. Hon. Antonio Lamer, Chief Justice of Canada and of the Supreme Court of Canada, is pleased to welcome Mr. Justice Ian Binnie to the Court. He stated: “I am very pleased that in the legacy of our late colleague, John Sopinka, another member of the Court has been selected directly from the legal profession. It is important that this Court always be aware of the realities of the practising Bar so that we do not lose sight of the practical effect of our judgments. I am sure that Mr. Justice Binnie, who is counsel of the highest standing in the profession, will make a very valuable and lasting contribution to this Court.” Chief Justice Lamer spoke to Mr. Justice Binnie this morning to congratulate him on his appointment. Mr. Justice Binnie has indicated that he will be available to commence his duties at the Court as of the 26th of January. However, he will not be sitting that week, nor during the two following weeks as the Court is in recess, in order that he may prepare for the Quebec Reference case which will proceed, as scheduled, during the week of February 16th. Mr. Justice Binnie’s swearing-in will take place on February 2, 1998 at 11:00 a.m. in the main courtroom. Ref.: Mr. James O’Reilly Executive Legal Officer (613) 996-9296 COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA COMMUNIQUÉ DE PRESSE OTTAWA, le 8 janvier 1998 -- Le très honorable Antonio Lamer, Juge en chef du Canada et de la Cour suprême du Canada, a le plaisir d’accueillir M. -
Transgressing the Division of Powers: the Case of the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement
Transgressing the Division of Powers: The Case of the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement Christa Scholtz and Maryna Polataiko Abstract In 1975, the Bourassa government received legal advice that the James Bay Northern Quebec Agreement exceeded provincial jurisdiction. Legal counsel advised the constitutionality of the Agreement be secured through formal constitutional amendment. No such amendment was sought. Based on authorized access to Premier Bourassa’s archived dossier on the Agreement’s negotiation, this article sets out the following: 1) why the provincial government sought to encroach on federal juris- diction; 2) the strategic means employed to insulate the Agreement from s. 91(24) litigation; and 3) provincial negotiators’ views on how judges would approach the Agreement going forward. This article confirms theoretical expectations about when governments might coordinate to transgress federalism’s division of powers: a high probability that courts would find a transgression occurred, and a high political cost should governments not coordinate on a transgression strategy. Keywords: federalism, James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement, constitutional law, division of powers, judicial politics, bargaining Résumé En 1975, le gouvernement de Robert Bourassa a reçu un avis juridique qui stipulait que la Convention de la baie James et du Nord québécois transcendait les compétences provinciales. Le conseiller juridique a donc recommandé de garantir la constitutionnalité de cette Convention au moyen d’un amendement constitutionnel -
REAL PROPERTY REPORTS Fifth Series/Cinqui`Eme S´Erie Recueil De Jurisprudence En Droit Immobilier VOLUME 52 (Cited 52 R.P.R
REAL PROPERTY REPORTS Fifth Series/Cinqui`eme s´erie Recueil de jurisprudence en droit immobilier VOLUME 52 (Cited 52 R.P.R. (5th)) EDITORS-IN-CHIEF/REDACTEURS´ EN CHEF Jeffrey W. Lem, B.COMM., LL.B., LL.M. John Mascarin, M.A., LL.B. Director of Titles for the Province of Ontario Aird & Berlis LLP Toronto, Ontario Toronto, Ontario QUEBEC EDITOR/REDACTEUR´ POUR LE QUEBEC´ Fredric Carsley, B.A., B.C.L., LL.B. De Grandpr´e Chait LLP/s.e.n.c.r.l. Montr´eal, Qu´ebec ASSOCIATE EDITORS/REDACTEURS´ ADJOINTS Reuben M. Rosenblatt, Q.C., LSM Bruce Ziff, B.A., LL.B., M.LITT. Minden Gross LLP Faculty of Law, University of Alberta Toronto, Ontario Edmonton, Alberta Paul De Francesca, B.A.A., LL.B. Craig R. Carter, B.SC., LL.B., LL.M. De Francesca Law Office Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP Toronto, Ontario Toronto, Ontario CARSWELL EDITORIAL STAFF/REDACTION´ DE CARSWELL Cheryl L. McPherson, B.A.(HONS.) Director, Primary Content Operations Sarah Bourne, B.A., LL.B. Product Development Manager Julia Fischer, B.A.(HONS.), LL.B. Nicole Ross, B.A., LL.B. Supervisor, Legal Writing Supervisor, Legal Writing Andrea Andrulis, B.A., LL.B., LL.M. Eden Nameri, B.A., LL.B. Senior Legal Writer Senior Legal Writer Martin-Fran¸cois Parent, LL.B., LL.M., Jackie Bowman DEA (PARIS II) Senior Content Editor Bilingual Legal Writer REAL PROPERTY REPORTS, a national series of annotated topical law re- Recueil de jurisprudence en droit immobilier, une s´erie nationale de ports, is published 12 times per year. -
COVID-19 Guide: In-Person Hearings at the Federal Court
COVID-19 Guide: In-person Hearings at the Federal Court OVERVIEW This guide seeks to outline certain administrative measures that are being taken by the Court to ensure the safety of all individuals who participate in an in-person-hearing. It is specifically directed to the physical use of courtrooms. For all measures that are to be taken outside of the courtroom, but within common areas of a Court facility, please refer to the guide prepared by the Courts Administrative Service, entitled Resuming In-Person Court Operations. You are also invited to view the Court’s guides for virtual hearings. Additional restrictions may apply depending on the evolving guidance of the local or provincial public health authorities, and in situations where the Court hearing is conducted in a provincial or territorial facility. I. CONTEXT Notwithstanding the reopening of the Court for in-person hearings, the Court will continue to schedule all applications for judicial review as well as all general sittings to be heard by video conference (via Zoom), or exceptionally by teleconference. Subject to evolving developments, parties to these and other types of proceedings are free to request an in-person hearing1. In some instances, a “hybrid” hearing, where the judge and one or more counsel or parties are in the hearing room, while other counsel, parties and/or witnesses participate via Zoom, may be considered. The measures described herein constitute guiding principles that can be modified by the presiding Judge or Prothonotary. Any requests to modify these measures should be made as soon as possible prior to the hearing, and can be made by contacting the Registry.