An Introduction to Post-Perovskite: the Last Mantle Phase Transition
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Global Mantle Flow and the Development of Seismic Anisotropy: Differences Between the Oceanic and Continental Upper Mantle Clinton P
Global Mantle Flow and the Development of Seismic Anisotropy: Differences Between the Oceanic and Continental Upper Mantle Clinton P. Conrad Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD 21218, USA Mark D. Behn Department of Geology and Geophysics Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA Paul G. Silver Department of Terrestrial Magnetism Carnegie Institution of Washington Washington, DC 20015, USA Submitted to Journal of Geophysical Research : July 3, 2006 Viscous shear in the asthenosphere accommodates relative motion between the Earth’s surface plates and underlying mantle, generating lattice-preferred orientation (LPO) in olivine aggregates and a seismically anisotropic fabric. Because this fabric develops with the evolving mantle flow field, observations of seismic anisotropy directly constrain flow patterns if the contribution of lithospheric fossil anisotropy is small. We use global viscous mantle flow models to characterize the relationship between asthenospheric deformation and LPO, and constrain the asthenospheric contribution to anisotropy using a global compilation of observed shear-wave splitting measurements. For asthenosphere >500 km from plate boundaries, simple shear rotates the LPO toward the infinite strain axis (ISA, the LPO after infinite deformation) faster than the ISA changes along flow lines. Thus, we expect ISA to approximate LPO throughout most of the asthenosphere, greatly simplifying LPO predictions because strain integration along flow lines is unnecessary. Approximating LPO ~ISA and assuming A-type fabric (olivine a-axis parallel to ISA), we find that mantle flow driven by both plate motions and mantle density heterogeneity successfully predicts oceanic anisotropy (average misfit = 12º). Continental anisotropy is less well fit (average misfit = 39º), but lateral variations in lithospheric thickness improve the fit in some continental areas. -
Al, Si Retained
Abstracts of Workshop on Transport Properties of the Lower Mantle, Yunishigawa-onsen, Tochigi-ken, Japan, 2008 Scale limits on free-silica seismic scatterers in the lower mantle Craig R. Bina Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, U.S.A. Seismic velocity anomalies and scatterers of seismic energy in the lower mantle often are attributed to subducted oceanic lithosphere. In particular, silica-saturated basalts in oceanic crust (MORB) under lower mantle conditions should contain high-pressure phases of free silica among assemblages otherwise dominated by silicate perovskite. Free silica phases such as stishovite are expected to generate seismic velocity anomalies that are fast by a few percent relative to surrounding ultramafic peridotite or harzburgite assemblages (Mattern et al. 2002, Bina 2003a, Ricard et al. 2005), and post-stishovite phases such as CaCl2-structured silica may also generate locally slow shear-wave velocity anomalies due to displacive shear-mode transitions (Bina 2003b, Lakshtanov 2007, Konishi et al. 2008). Such models, however, must address the thermodynamic instability of free silica phases in the presence of peridotites or harzburgites, as the silica will react with adjacent ferropericlase (magnesiowüstite) to form silicate perovskite. Thus, any free silica phases preserved in the lower mantle may persist as armored relics, in which silica phases are insulated from surrounding ferropericlase phases by coronas of silicate perovskite. This parallels the situation in crustal metamorphic rocks where, for example, staurolite crystals are often found as armored relics within garnet phases or spinel crystals can be found as relics armored by staurolite poikiloblasts (Whitney 1991, Gil Ibarguchi et al. -
Seismic Anisotropy: a Review of Studies by Japanese Researchers
J. Phys. Earth, 43, 301-319, 1995 Seismic Anisotropy: A Review of Studies by Japanese Researchers Satoshi Kaneshima Departmentof Earth and Planetary Physics, Faculty of Science, The Universityof Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku,Tokyo 113,Japan 1. Preface Studies on seismic anisotropy in Japan began in the mid 60's, nearly at the same time its importance for geodynamicswas revealed by Hess (1964). Work in the 60's and 70's consisted mainly of studies of the theoretical and/or observational aspects of seismic surface waves. The latter half of the 70' and the 80's, on the other hand, may be characterized as being rich in body wave observations. Elastic wave propagation in anisotropic media is currently under extensiveresearch in exploration seismologyin the U.S. and Europe. Numerous laboratory experiments in the fields of mineral physics and rock mechanics have been performed throughout these decades. This article gives a review of research concerning seismic anisotropy by Japanese authors. Studies by foreign authors are also referred to whenever they are considered to be essential in the context of this article. The review is divided into five sections which deal with: (1) laboratory measurements of elastic anisotropy of rocks or minerals, (2) papers on rock deformation and the origin of seismic anisotropy relevant to tectonics and geodynarnics,(3) theoretical studies on the Earth's free oscillations, (4) theory and observations for surface waves, and (5) body wave studies. Added at the end of this article is a brief outlook on some current topics on seismic anisotropy as well as future problems to be solved. -
The Upper Mantle and Transition Zone
The Upper Mantle and Transition Zone Daniel J. Frost* DOI: 10.2113/GSELEMENTS.4.3.171 he upper mantle is the source of almost all magmas. It contains major body wave velocity structure, such as PREM (preliminary reference transitions in rheological and thermal behaviour that control the character Earth model) (e.g. Dziewonski and Tof plate tectonics and the style of mantle dynamics. Essential parameters Anderson 1981). in any model to describe these phenomena are the mantle’s compositional The transition zone, between 410 and thermal structure. Most samples of the mantle come from the lithosphere. and 660 km, is an excellent region Although the composition of the underlying asthenospheric mantle can be to perform such a comparison estimated, this is made difficult by the fact that this part of the mantle partially because it is free of the complex thermal and chemical structure melts and differentiates before samples ever reach the surface. The composition imparted on the shallow mantle by and conditions in the mantle at depths significantly below the lithosphere must the lithosphere and melting be interpreted from geophysical observations combined with experimental processes. It contains a number of seismic discontinuities—sharp jumps data on mineral and rock properties. Fortunately, the transition zone, which in seismic velocity, that are gener- extends from approximately 410 to 660 km, has a number of characteristic ally accepted to arise from mineral globally observed seismic properties that should ultimately place essential phase transformations (Agee 1998). These discontinuities have certain constraints on the compositional and thermal state of the mantle. features that correlate directly with characteristics of the mineral trans- KEYWORDS: seismic discontinuity, phase transformation, pyrolite, wadsleyite, ringwoodite formations, such as the proportions of the transforming minerals and the temperature at the discontinu- INTRODUCTION ity. -
Electrical Conductivity of Minerals and Rocks
1 Electrical conductivity of minerals and rocks Shun-ichiro Karato1 and Duojun Wang1,2 1: Yale University Department of Geology and Geophysics New Haven, CT, USA 2: Key Laboratory of Computational Geodynamics, Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences College of Earth Sciences Beijing 100049, China to be published in “Physics and Chemistry of the Deep Earth” (edited by S. Karato) Wiley-Blackwell 2 SUMMARY Electrical conductivity of most minerals is sensitive to hydrogen (water) content, temperature, major element chemistry and oxygen fugacity. The influence of these parameters on electrical conductivity of major minerals has been characterized for most of the lower crust, upper mantle and transition zone minerals. When the results of properly executed experimental studies are selected, the main features of electrical conductivity in minerals can be interpreted by the physical models of impurity-assisted conduction involving ferric iron and hydrogen-related defects. Systematic trends in hydrogen-related conductivity are found among different types of hydrogen-bearing minerals that are likely caused by the difference in the mobility of hydrogen. A comparison of experimental results with geophysically inferred conductivity shows: (1) Electrical conductivity of the continental lower crust can be explained by a combination of high temperature, high (ferric) iron content presumably associated with dehydration. (2) Electrical conductivity of the asthenosphere can be explained by a modest amount of water (~10-2 wt% in most regions, less than 10-3 wt% in the central/western Pacific). (3) Electrical conductivity of the transition zone requires a higher water content (~10-1 wt% in most regions, ~10-3 wt% in the southern European transition zone, ~1 wt% in the East Asian transition zone). -
Phase Transitions in Earth's Mantle and Mantle Mineralogy
Phase transitions in Earth’s Mantle and Mantle Mineralogy Upper Mantle Minerals: Olivine, Orthopyroxene, Clinopyroxene and Garnet ~13.5 GPa: Olivine Æ Wadsrlyite (DE) transition (ONSET TRANSITION ZONE) ~15.5 GPa: Pyroxene component gradually dissolve into garnet structure, resulting in the completion of pyroxene-majorite transformation >20 GPa: High CaO content in majorite is unfavorable at high pressure, leading to the formation of CaSiO3 perovskite ~24 GPa: Division of transition zone and lower mantle. Sharp transition silicate spinel to ferromagnesium silicate perovskite and magnesiowustite >24 GPa: Most of Al2O3 resides in majorite at transition zone pressures, a transformation from Majorite to Al-bearing orthorhombic perovskite completes at pressure higher than that of post-spinel transformation Lower Mantle Minerals: Orthorhobic perovskite, Magnesiowustite, CaSiO3 perovskite ~27 GPa: Transformation of Al and Si rich basalt to perovskite lithology with assemblage of Al-bearing perovskite, CaSiO3, stishovite and Al-phases Upper Mantle: olivine, garnet and pyroxene Transition zone: olivine (a-phase) transforms to wadsleyite (b-phase) then to spinel structure (g-phase) and finally to perovskite + magnesio-wüstite. Transformations occur at P and T conditions similar to 410, 520 and 660 km seismic discontinuities Xenoliths: (mantle fragments brought to surface in lavas) 60% Olivine + 40 % Pyroxene + some garnet Images removed due to copyright considerations. Garnet: A3B2(SiO4)3 Majorite FeSiO4, (Mg,Fe)2 SiO4 Germanates (Co-, Ni- and Fe- -
Revision 2 Invited Centennial Review
Revision 2 Invited Centennial Review High-Pressure Minerals Oliver Tschauner ORCID: 0000-0003-3364-8906 University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Geoscience, 4505 Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154-4010, U.S.A. This article is dedicated to occurrence, relevance, and structure of minerals whose formation involves high pressure. This includes minerals that occur in the interior of the Earth as well as minerals that are found in shock-metamorphized meteorites and terrestrial impactites. I discuss the chemical and physical reasons which render the definition of high-pressure minerals meaningful, in distinction from minerals that occur under surface-near conditions on Earth or at high temperatures in space or on Earth. Pressure-induced structural transformations in rock- forming minerals define the basic divisions of Earth’s mantle in the upper mantle, transition zone, and lower mantle. Moreover, solubility of minor chemical components in these minerals and the occurrence of accessory phases are influential in mixing and segregating chemical elements in Earth as an evolving planet. Brief descriptions of the currently known high-pressure minerals are presented. Over the past ten years more high-pressure minerals have been discovered than during the previous fifty years, based on the list of minerals accepted by the IMA. The previously unexpected richness in distinct high-pressure mineral species allows for assessment of differentiation processes in the deep Earth. Introduction 1.General aspects of compression of matter over large pressure ranges The pressure in Earth ranges from atmospheric to 136 GPa at the core-mantle boundary, and further, to 360 GPa in the center of the Earth (Dziewonski and Anderson 1981). -
Radial Seismic Anisotropy As a Constraint for Upper Mantle Rheology ⁎ Thorsten W
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Earth and Planetary Science Letters 267 (2008) 213–227 www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Radial seismic anisotropy as a constraint for upper mantle rheology ⁎ Thorsten W. Becker a, , Bogdan Kustowski b, Göran Ekström c a Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA b Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge MA, USA c Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY, USA Received 26 July 2007; received in revised form 9 November 2007; accepted 22 November 2007 Available online 8 December 2007 Editor: R.D. van der Hilst Abstract Seismic shear waves that are polarized horizontally (SH) generally travel faster in the upper mantle than those that are polarized vertically (SV), and deformation of rocks under dislocation creep has been invoked to explain such radial anisotropy. Convective flow of the upper mantle may thus be constrained by modeling the textures that progressively form by lattice-preferred orientation (LPO) of intrinsically anisotropic grains. While azimuthal anisotropy has been studied in detail, the radial kind has previously only been considered in semi-quantitative models. Here, we show that radial anisotropy averages as well as radial and azimuthal anomaly-patterns can be explained to a large extent by mantle flow, if lateral viscosity variations are taken into account. We construct a geodynamic reference model which includes LPO formation based on mineral physics and flow computed using laboratory-derived olivine rheology. Previously identified anomalous vSV regions beneath the East Pacific Rise and relatively fast vSH regions within the Pacific basin at ~150 km depth can be linked to mantle upwellings and shearing in the asthenosphere, respectively. -
No.294 "Flow and Seismic Anisotropy in the Mantle Transition Zone: Shear
第294回ジオダイナミクスセミナー Deformation of olivine and implicationsfor the dynamics of Earth’s upper mantle Speaker:Tomohiro Ohuchi (Postdoctral Fellow, GRC) 主催:愛媛大学地球深部ダイナミクス研究センター 日時:4/22(金)午後 4時30分~ Abstract 場所:総合研究棟4F 共通会議室 Crystallographic preferred orientation (CPO) of olivine, which is developed by dislocation creep, controls the seismic anisotropy in the upper mantle. One of the remarkable observations on the upper mantle near subduction zones is a striking rotation of fast direction of shear-wave splitting across an arc. Trench-normal fast directions are observed in the back-arc side, but trench-parallel ones are observed in the fore-arc side (e.g, Smith et al., 2001; Nakajima and Hasegawa, 2004). The rotation of fast direction of shear-wave splitting has been attributed to the transition of mantle-flow direction from trench-normal flow (in the back-arc side) to trench-parallel flow (in the fore-arc side) under the assumption that the A-type olivine fabric (developed by the (010)[100] slip system), which has a seismic fast-axis orientation subparallel to the shear direction, is assumed to be the unique cause of seismic anisotropy (e.g., Russo and Silver, 1994). However, this model is not fully supported by other observations such as geodetic observations. Recent laboratory results have shown that the flow-parallel shear wave splitting is caused not only by A- type olivine fabric but also by C- (developed by the (100)[001] slip system) and E-type (by the (001)[100] slip system) olivine fabrics (Jung and Karato, 2001; Katayama et al., 2004). Moreover, flow-perpendicular shear wave splitting is also found to be caused by the B-type olivine fabric (developed by the (010)[001] slip system) (Jung and Karato, 2001). -
Chapter 20. Fabric of the Mantle
Chapter 20 Fabric of the mantle A nisotropy this edition. There was a very large section on anisotropy since it was a relatively new concept And perpendicular now and now to seismologists. There was also a large section devoted to the then-novel thesis that seismic transverse, Pierce the dark soil and as velocities were not independent of frequency, they pierce and pass Make bare the and that anelasticity had to be allowed for in esti secrets of the Earth's deep heart. mates of mantle temperatures. Earth scientists no longer need to be convinced that anisotropy Shelley, Prometheus Unbound and anelasticity are essential elements in Earth physics, but there may still be artifacts in tomo Anisotropy is responsible for large variations in graphic models or in estimates of errors that seismic velocities; changes in the orientation of are caused by anisotropy. At the time of the mantle minerals, or in the direction of seismic first edition of this book - 1989 - the Earth waves, cause larger changes in velocity than can was usually assumed to be perfectly elastic and be accounted for by changes in temperature, isotropic to the propagation of seismic waves. composition or mineralogy. Plate-tectonic pro These assumptions were made for mathemati cesses, and gravity, create a fabric in the mantle. cal and operational convenience. The fact that Anisotropy can be microscopic - orientation of a large body of seismic data can be satisfacto crystals - or macroscopic - large-scale lamina rily modeled with these assumptions does not tions or oriented slabs and dikes. Discussions of prove that the Earth is isotropic or perfectly velocity gradients, both radial and lateral, and elastic. -
Discovery of Post-Perovskite and New Views on the Core–Mantle Boundary Region
Discovery of Post-Perovskite and New Views on the Core–Mantle Boundary Region Kei Hirose1 and Thorne Lay2 DOI: 10.2113/GSELEMENTS.4.3.183 phase transition of MgSiO3 perovskite, the most abundant component the core and by mantle convection should exist in the boundary layer. of the lower mantle, to a higher-pressure form called post-perovskite Chemical heterogeneity is likely to Awas recently discovered for pressure and temperature conditions in the exist in the boundary layer as a vicinity of the Earth’s core–mantle boundary. This discovery has profound result of ancient residues of mantle implications for the chemical, thermal, and dynamical structure of the lowermost differentiation and/or subsequent contributions from deep subduction mantle called the D” region. Several major seismological characteristics of the of oceanic lithosphere, partial melt- D” region can now be explained by the presence of post-perovskite, and the ing in the ultralow-velocity zone specific properties of the phase transition provide the first direct constraints on (ULVZ) just above the core–mantle boundary (CMB), and core–mantle absolute temperature and temperature gradients in the lowermost mantle. chemical reactions. The current Here we discuss the current understanding of the core–mantle boundary region. understanding of D” resulting from recent progress in characterizing KEYWORDS: post-perovskite, phase transition, D” layer, seismic discontinuity this region is reviewed below. INTRODUCTION DISCOVERY OF THE POST-PEROVSKITE Large anomalies in seismic wave velocities have long been PHASE TRANSITION observed in the deepest several hundred kilometers of the For several decades, MgSiO3 perovskite has been recognized mantle (the D” region) (see Lay and Garnero 2007) (FIG. -
A Natural Template for Seismic Anisotropy in Subduction Wedges, Geophys
PUBLICATIONS Geophysical Research Letters RESEARCH LETTER The Ronda peridotite (Spain): A natural template 10.1002/2014GL062547 for seismic anisotropy in subduction wedges Key Points: Jacques Précigout1 and Bjarne S. G. Almqvist2 • Origin of seismic anisotropy and inferred mantle dynamics in 1Institut des Sciences de la Terre d’Orléans, UMR-CNRS 7327, Université d’Orléans, Orléans, France, 2Department of Earth subduction zones • Natural documentation of olivine Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden fabric across a paleolithosphere • Transitional olivine fabric as source for shear wave splitting in mantle wedges Abstract The origin of seismic anisotropy in mantle wedges remains elusive. Here we provide documentation of shear wave anisotropy (AVs) inferred from mineral fabric across a lithosphere-scale vestige of deformed Supporting Information: mantle wedge in the Ronda peridotite. As predicted for most subduction wedges, this natural case • Figures S1 and S2 exposes a transition from A-type to B-type olivine fabric that occurs with decreasing temperature and enhanced grain boundary sliding at the expense of dislocation creep. We show that B-type fabric AVs Correspondence to: (maximum of 6%) does not support geophysical observations and modeling, which requires 8% AVs. J. Précigout, – [email protected] However, an observed transitional olivine fabric (A/B) develops at intermediate temperatures (800 1000°C) and can generate AVs ≥ 8%. We predict that the A/B-type fabric can account for shear wave splitting in contrasting subduction settings, exemplified by the Ryukyu and Honshu subduction wedges. The Ronda Citation: Précigout, J., and B. S. G. Almqvist peridotite therefore serves as a natural template to decipher the mantle wedge deformation from seismic (2014), The Ronda peridotite (Spain): anisotropy.