DOCSLIB.ORG

Caring for Wild Places, Wildlife and Cultural Heritage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Caring for Wild Places, Wildlife and Cultural Heritage Caring for wild places, Wildcare inc. wildlife and cultural heritage AnnuAl RepoRt 2015 1 Contents About Wildcare 2 Wildcare Branches 4 Co-Chairs’ Report 6 Board of Management 8 Ceo’s Report 13 Facilitator’s Report 14 Special Feature: orange-bellied parrot 15 every Branch has a Story 16 Wildcare Gift Fund Committee 44 Wildcare Bequests 47 Wildcare Financial Report 48 2 Wildcare Annual Report About Wildcare With around 6,000 members, Wildcare is the Wildcare actively seeks to provide opportunities and support largest and fastest growing community volunteer for community engagement in its programs throughout the organisation dedicated to caring for the State’s State. Activities are grouped into five main activity areas and parks and reserves, flora, fauna and cultural are delivered either by local Branches or through special heritage. Its slogan is ‘caring for wild places, programs. the five activity areas are: wildlife and cultural heritage’. Community action in reserves – management of parks Wildcare provides management and support for volunteers and reserves. working in natural and cultural heritage conservation and Heritage care – cultural heritage conservation such reserve management throughout tasmania. It works in as excavation assistance, archival research and historic partnership with government agencies, notably the parks and site management. Wildlife Service, local government and private landholders and contributes over 500,000 hours of voluntary project work Nature care – nature conservation activities such as each year. whale rescue, wildlife surveys and caring for injured or orphaned wildlife. Wildcare is a community-based, not-for-profit volunteer Contents organisation founded in 1997 and incorporated in 1998. Wildcare office – support to members of Wildcare, including It is also a registered environmental organisation and a newsletter production, event management and processing of registered deductible gift recipient and is entitled to receive membership applications. tax deductible donations. It is managed by a Board of Special programs – large scale annual projects and programs Management composed of elected and nominated members. undertaken in co-operation with partners in government. the responsibility of the Board is to oversee Wildcare’s Special programs may require specialist skills and often strategic direction and allocate moneys under the Wildcare call for extended commitments. they include the Caring for Gift Fund. More information on the year’s activities of the Islands program and Campground Host program. Wildcare Gift Fund is provided elsewhere in this yearbook. As an environmental organisation, Wildcare must have a public Fund to receive donations. the public Fund is called the Wildcare Gift Fund and was established in 2005. Its purpose is to raise funds through tax-deductible donations to support reserve management projects and nature conservation projects in tasmania. As well as attracting funds for the general purposes of the Wildcare Gift Fund, tax deductible donations can be made to a number of ancillary funds within it, called natural partner Funds. they provide an opportunity for donors to give to specific purposes associated with the environmental objectives of Wildcare. these natural partner Funds include the tasmanian Coast Conservation Fund, Wildcarbon Fund, Whale Rescue Fund, Injured and orphaned Wildlife Fund and the World Heritage Wilderness Fund. 3 Wildcare Branches Wildcare is a membership organisation. Members Friends of Trevallyn Reserve can express interest in specific projects or focus Friends of Yorktown Historic Site their skills and interest in a particular reserve or Get Outside with Community location. Members can join in activities when and Get Outside with Community in Launceston where it suits them. And there is plenty to choose from! An insight into the diversity and geographic KarstWatch milaythina muka spread of Wildcare’s projects and activities can be Mole Creek Karst Care gleaned from this impressive listing of more than Native Animal Rescue 80 Branches around the State: Oil Spill Response Furneaux Islands - seabird and other wildlife CARes Coal Mines / Lime Bay Oil Spill Response King Island - seabird and other wildlife CARes Narawntapu Reserves Oil Spill Response North - seabird and other wildlife CARes Southern Caves Oil Spill Response Northwest - seabird and other wildlife Central North Wildlife Care and Rescue Oil Spill Response South - seabird and other wildlife Derwent Avenue Group for the Dave Burrows Walk Rivers Wild Care Dry Stone Wall Preservation Group Wildcare Wildlife Emergency Response and Recovery Unit Friends of Bass Strait Islands Tamar Island Wetlands Volunteers Friends of Coningham Nature Recreation Area Threatened Plants Tasmania Friends of Deal Island Wellington Park Bushcare Friends of Freycinet Whale Rescue First Response Team - Bruny Island Friends of Lillico Penguins Whale Rescue First Response Team - Devonport Friends of Maatsuyker Island Whale Rescue First Response Team - East Coast Friends of Maria Island Whale Rescue First Response Team - Eastern Shore Friends of Maria Island Marine Protected Area Whale Rescue First Response Team - Flinders Island Friends of Melaleuca Whale Rescue First Response Team - Freycinet Friends of Mt Field Whale Rescue First Response Team - King Island Friends of Redbill Point Conservation Area Whale Rescue First Response Team - Launceston Friends of Snake Island Whale Rescue First Response Team - Marrawah Friends of Tasman Island Whale Rescue First Response Team - Narawntapu Friends of the Franklin River Whale Rescue First Response Team - South Friends of the Freshwater Lobster Whale Rescue First Response Team - Stanley Friends of the Orange-bellied Parrot Whale Rescue First Response Team - Strahan Friends of Thompson’s Park Hut Wildcare Coastal Custodians 4 Wildcare Annual Report Wildcare Cradle Mt - Lake St Clair Wildcare Deslacs Friends of Bruny Island Quarantine Station Wildcare Friends of Fisher Island Wildcare Friends of Pittwater Orielton Lagoon Wildcare Friends of Tasmanian Whaleboats Wildcare Friends of the Penguin Cradle Trail Wildcare Friends of Woodvine Wildcare Gordon’s Hill NRA Wildcare Lumeah Point Wildcare Native Wildlife Rescue - Birralee Wildcare Roaring Beach Wildlife Rescue Wildcare SpLATs Wildcare SPRATS Wildcare Spring Bay Wildcare Tinderbox Marine Reserve Wildcare Veterinary Emergency Response Team Tasmania Wildcare Wildlife Rescue and Bush Babies Wildcare Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation Wildscool Voluntary Educators Friends of GIS Get Outside with Community (South) Wildcare Inc Office Wildcare Friends of Bonorong Wildcare Friends of Billy Brown Falls Wildcare Friends of Cradle Valley Walking Tracks Wildcare Friends of Narawntapu Wildcare Friends of the Steppes Reserve 5 Co-Chairs’ Report ANDREW SMITH SALLY SALIER Co-Chair(Appointed) Co-Chair(Elected) 2015 has been a year of great successes again. Around $200,000 has been allocated to projects, ranging Of course. This is Wildcare Inc. The volunteer from wildlife care support and Devil research to walking effort and the financial contribution of Wildcare Inc track maintenance in wilderness areas and the conservation continues to astound and make a real difference of the orange-bellied parrot. I thank everyone who has to our reserves, wildlife and cultural heritage. made a donation to the Wildcare Gift Fund or one of its sub-funds. the great thing about donating to Wildcare Inc there have also been continuing frustrations. of course, is that 100 per cent of your donation goes to where it is this is a large and complex organisation. It requires needed. there are no administration costs taken out. some serious management at Board of Directors’ level. I would very much like to thank the Gift Fund Committee the Directors have continued to work hard to make sure members, all of whom are volunteers, for their efforts members, Branches and the environment get the best reviewing and assessing applications to the Fund. More returns possible. A lot of this effort is invisible to members information is provided elsewhere in this yearbook about and people outside the organisation, but it is extremely what was funded by the Wildcare Gift Fund in 2015. important. one of the things that the Directors do, that Branches will be familiar with, is the allocation of small Branches continue to apply for and receive grants internal project grants. the internal grants program has for projects, from various funding organisations. continued to support the work of our Branches. Almost $1 million has been received since 2010. these grants are managed by the Branches who apply Membership continues to grow. new Branches continue for them. the presidents or treasurers of the Branches to form. A massive amount of volunteer time is provided to work closely with Carol pacey, our “bookkeeper”, to ensure projects. Volunteering tasmania Inc developed a calculator bills are paid and project money is spent appropriately. to assist volunteer groups to work out how much value Carol also organises Director authorisation for every they contribute to their cause. this recognises the nature payment made from the Wildcare Inc bank accounts. of the practical work undertaken, the time away from other Many hundreds of payments are made each year. activities, the social capital value of the relationships and thank goodness for online business banking. lindie goodwill developed between the organisation receiving lupo, our Finance officer, keeps an eye on financial volunteer assistance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Short-Tailed Shearwater: a Review of Its Biology
    Corella, 1991 , 15(2): 45-52 A11srralasia11 Hird l?<'l'iews - N11111ber 3 THE SHORT-TAILED SHEARWATER: A REVIEW OF ITS BIOLOGY IRYNEJ SKIRA Department of Parks. Wiltllifc and Heritage, 134 Macquarie St.. Hobart. Tas 7000 {<eceived I May /990 The life history of the Short-tailed Shearwater Puffinus tenuirostris has been well documented since it first came to the attention of naturalists. Approximately 23 million birds breed in about 250 colonies in southeastern Australia from September to April. The Short-tailed Shearwater commences to breed when 4 to 15 years. During their completed lifetimes 27 per cent of all individuals produce no young and 19 per cent only one chick. Mortality is age-related with the median survival time for breeding being 9.3 years after first breeding. Many areas remain open for study, with a particular need for interdisciplinary research that includes oceanography. INTRODUCTION The Short-tailed Shearwater was one of the first Australian birds to be banded in large numbers The Short-tailed Shearwater Puffinustenuirostris, (Serventy 1957, 1961) and to be subjected to a commonly known as the Tasmanian muttonbird, long-term scientific study (Guiler et al. 1958). This is one of about I 00 species in the Procellarii­ study was commenced on Fisher Island in the formes. The diagno�tic feature of the order is the Furneaux Group of Tasmania in March 1947 by external nostrils produced into tubes extending Dominic Serventy formerly of the CSIRO onto the bill. Other distinctive features are the (Scrventy 1977) and continues to the present. 42 hooked and plated bill.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Tasmania's Offshore Islands and Their Role in Nature
    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 154, 2020 83 OVERVIEW OF TASMANIA’S OFFSHORE ISLANDS AND THEIR ROLE IN NATURE CONSERVATION by Sally L. Bryant and Stephen Harris (with one text-figure, two tables, eight plates and two appendices) Bryant, S.L. & Harris, S. 2020 (9:xii): Overview of Tasmania’s offshore islands and their role in nature conservation.Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 154: 83–106. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.154.83 ISSN: 0080–4703. Tasmanian Land Conservancy, PO Box 2112, Lower Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7005, Australia (SLB*); Department of Archaeology and Natural History, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601 (SH). *Author for correspondence: Email: [email protected] Since the 1970s, knowledge of Tasmania’s offshore islands has expanded greatly due to an increase in systematic and regional surveys, the continuation of several long-term monitoring programs and the improved delivery of pest management and translocation programs. However, many islands remain data-poor especially for invertebrate fauna, and non-vascular flora, and information sources are dispersed across numerous platforms. While more than 90% of Tasmania’s offshore islands are statutory reserves, many are impacted by a range of disturbances, particularly invasive species with no decision-making framework in place to prioritise their management. This paper synthesises the significant contribution offshore islands make to Tasmania’s land-based natural assets and identifies gaps and deficiencies hampering their protection. A continuing focus on detailed gap-filling surveys aided by partnership restoration programs and collaborative national forums must be strengthened if we are to capitalise on the conservation benefits islands provide in the face of rapidly changing environmental conditions and pressure for future use.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fisher Island Field Stat Ion-With an Account of Its Principal Fauna and Flora
    PAPEHS AND .PROCEEDINGS tW 'THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TASMANIA, V'OLl.lME 92 THE FISHER ISLAND FIELD STAT ION-WITH AN ACCOUNT OF ITS PRINCIPAL FAUNA AND FLORA By E. R. GUILER, D. L. SERVENTY AND J. H. WILLIS (WITH 2 PLATES AND 9 TEXT FTGURESj t GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF FISHER ISLAND AND ITS MUTTON~BIRD ROOKERIES * INTRODUCTION mately 0'75 acres. The shoreline measures about Fisher Island Oat. 40° 10' S., long. 148° 16' E.) 530 yards and the greatest length, from North is among the smallest of the archipelago of islands Point to South Point, is 150 yards. Its elevation is comprising the Furneaux Group in eastern Bass about 19 feet above spring high-water mark. Strait. It lies off the southern shoreline of the Like the other islands in the Furneaux Group, major island in the group, Flinders Island, in Fisher Island is part of the basement Devonian Adelaide Bay, a portion of Franklin Sound which granite which forms the hills and mountain ridges separates Flinders Island from Cape Barren Island in the archipelago. On Flinders Island the low­ (fig. 1). Its convenient location to Lady Barron lying plains are covered by Tertiary alluvium and (the main port of Flinders Island, about 220 yards sands, with calcareous deposits in restricted areas. distant), its proximity to important commercial Limited Siluro-Devonian quartzites and slates also mutton-birding islands and the presence of a small, occur, and in the northern part of Adelaide Bay, at easily handled nesting colony of mutton-birds Petrifaction Bay, are exposures of Tertiary vesicu­ (PufJinus tenuirostris (Temminck), made it the lar basalts.
    [Show full text]
  • Atoll Research Bulletin No. 348 Plants of the Reef
    ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 348 PLANTS OF THE REEF ISLANDS OF THE NORTHERN GREAT BARRIER REEF F. RAYMOND FOSBERG AND DAVID R STODDART ISSUED BY NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION WASHINGTON D. C., USA JULY 1991 PLANTS OF THE REEF ISLANDS OF THE NORTHERN GREAT BARRIER REEF Abstract This paper records more than 380 species of vascular plants in 86 families from some 80 islands of the Great Barrier Reef north of 16'57's. The list increases by an order of magnitude the generally perceived species diversity of the coral islands of the Great Barrier Reef. Introduction This paper lists the plants of the coral islands of the Great Barrier Reef north of Sudbury Cay (Latitude 16'57's.); it extends to Arden Island, Dove Island and Masig (Yorke) Island in Latitude g045'S. It is based primarily on large collections made by Stoddart (1107 numbers, generally each in five sets) from 40,islands or island-groups, and sight records from a further 19 island-groups, obtained during detailed mapping of reef islands between 16'57's (Sudbury Cay) and 11'36's (Raine Island). These collections have been augmented by the collections made subsequently by R. Bucklcy and H. Heatwole, deposited in the Queensland Herbarium, and made available to us by that institution. We have attempted to include, so far as possible, previous literature records (dating back to collections by Sir Joseph Banks on Cook's first expedition in Endeavour), together with specimens we have found in various herbaria. Unfortunately we have been unable to trace (with few exceptions) the collections made by G.
    [Show full text]
  • Live Oysters
    LIVE OYSTERS West Coast There are an infinite number of names and harvest locations for these oysters. They are all the same species with only two exceptions. The species that are cultured on the West Coast are: Crassostrea gigas - Originated from Japan Crassostrea sikameo - Kumamoto, really a sub species of gigas Ostrea lurida - Olympia The gigas is a Pacific oyster indigenous to Japan that is widely grown in California and the Pacific Northwest. Different names are used to describe where the oysters were harvested. Generally it is a bay, beach, island or canal. The Kumamoto is a sub species of the gigas and is raised from British Columbia to Mexico. Most oyster connoisseurs recognize the Washington and Oregon Kumamoto as the true Kumamoto. The Kumamotos from this area tend to be the smaller, sweeter variety that is familiar to most people. The California Kumamoto is also nice but is a bit larger in size. Technically the California Kumamoto is a hybrid between a gigas and a Kumamoto. The mortality rate of the seed/spat of a Kumamoto is very high, thus yields in the oyster beds are never as high as the grower would like. Therefore, they tend to be less available and more expensive. This may be one of the reasons that the hybrid Kumamoto was developed, to have a stronger oyster that survived better and could be produced in larger quantities. All but one west coast oyster falls into the first category of gigas. The exception is the Olympia. The Olympia is the only indigenous oyster to the west coast.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of Rubbish Tips As an Additional Food Source for the Kelp Gull and the Pacific Gull in Tasmania
    The Significance of Rubbish Tips as an Additional Food Source for the Kelp Gull and the Pacific Gull in Tasmania by e.­ e--~'" (& G. M. Coulson, B.A. (Hans.), Dip.Ed. (Melb.) and .J~ R.I. Coulson, B .Sc., Dip.Ed. (Melb.) Being a thesis submitted in part fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Environmental Studies Centre for Environmental Studies University of Tasmania August, 1982 nl\, (l,_ '/ Cl-- \'\~'.2. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to our supervisors, Dr. A.M.M. Richardson and Dr. J.J. Todd, and our external advisors, Mr. A.W.J. Fletcher and Mr. J.G.K. Harris, for their guidance in the preparation and planning of this thesis. Mrs. L. Ramsay typed the thesis. Mr. D. Barker (Tasmanian Museum, Hobart) and Mr. R.H. Green (Queen Victoria Museum, Launceston) gave us access to their gull collections. Mr. G. Davis assisted with the identification of chitons. Officers of the Tasmanian National Parks and Wildlife Service provided information, assistance, equipment and specimens, and officers of the Tasmanian Department of the Environment gave us information on tips. The cities and municipalities in south-east Tasmania granted permission to study gulls at tips under their control, and we are particularly grateful for the co-operation shown by council staff at Clarence, Hobart and Kingborough tips. Mr. R. Clark allowed us to observe gulls at Richardson's Meat Works, Lutana. CONTENTS ABSTRACT 1 1. INTRODUcriON 3 2. GULL POPULATIONS IN THE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE 7 2.1 Population Increases 8 2.1.1 Population size and rates·of change 10 2.1.2 Growth of breeding colonies 13 2.2 Reasons for the Population Increase 18 2.2.1 Protection 18 2.2.2 Greater food availability 19 2.3 Effects of Population Increase 22 2.3.1 Competition with other species 22 2.3.2 Agricultural pests 23 2.3.3 Public health risks 24 2.3.4 Urban nesting 25 2.3.5 Aircraft bird-strikes 25 2.4 Future Trends 26 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles from the Islands of Tasmania(PDF, 530KB)
    REPTILES FROM THE ISLANDS OF TASMANIA R.H. Green and J.L. Rainbird June 1993 TECHNICAL REPORT 1993/1 QUEEN VICTORIA MUSEUM AND ART GALLERY LAUNCESTON Reptiles from the islands of Tasmania by R.H. Green and J.L. Rainbird Queen VICtoria Museum, Launceston ABSTRACT Records of lizards and snakes from 110 islands within the pOlitical boundaries of Tasmania are summarised. Dates, literature, references and materials collected are given, together with some comments on numerical status and breeding conditions. INTRODUCTION Very little has been published on the distribution of reptiles which occur on the smaller islands around Tasmania. MacKay (1955) gave some notes on a collection of reptiles from the Furneaux Islands. Rawlinson (1967) listed and discussed records of 13 species from the Furneaux Group and 10 species from King Island. Green (1969) recorded 12 species from Flinders Island and Mt Chappell Island and Green and McGarvie (1971) recorded 9 spedes from King Island following fauna surveys In both locations. Rawlinson (1974) listed 15 species as occurring on the Tasmanian mainland, 12 on islands in the Furneaux Group and 9 on King Island. Hutchinson et al. (1989) gave some known populations of Pseudemoia pretiosa on islands off the southern coast, and haphazard and opportunistic collecting has produced occasional records from various small islands over the years. In 1984 Nigel Brothers, a field biologist with the Tasmanian Department of Environment and Parks, Wildlife and Heritage, commenced a programme designed to gain a greater knowledge of the small and uninhabited isrands around Tasmania. The survey Involved landing on rocks and small islands which might support vegetation and fauna and to record observations and collect specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Flinders Council Planning Scheme 2012
    Joins Map 34 L o w I s l e t s Legend Draft Flinders Council 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 Low Density Residential General Industrial Metres Planning Scheme 2012 - Zoning Rural Living Rural Resource Map Scale 1 : 25,000 when printed at A3 1:25000 Series Environmental Living Utilities Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 55 Map 39 of 81 Urban Mixed Use Environmental Management ´ Base data from theLIST, © State of Tasmania Community Purpose Port and Marine Land title data current as of 30/04/2012 Recreation Particular Purpose General Business Locality Boundary Before taking any action based on data shown on this map it should first be verified with a Planning Officer of Date: 15/05/2012 Flinders Council. Doc. Version: 0 Prepared by L o Joins Map 35 n g g P o i n t t R o a d Whitemark Chalky Island Joins Map 41 Reef Island Mile Island Little Chalky Island R e e f I s l a n d Isabella Island Legend Draft Flinders Council 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 Low Density Residential General Industrial Metres Planning Scheme 2012 - Zoning Rural Living Rural Resource Map Scale 1 : 25,000 when printed at A3 1:25000 Series Environmental Living Utilities Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 55 Map 40 of 81 Urban Mixed Use Environmental Management ´ Base data from theLIST, © State of Tasmania Community Purpose Port and Marine Land title data current as of 30/04/2012 Recreation Particular Purpose General Business Locality Boundary Before taking any action based on data shown on this map it should first be verified with a Planning Officer of Date: 15/05/2012 Flinders Council.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vegetation Communities Scrub, Heathland and Coastal Complexes
    Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark The Vegetation Communities Scrub, heathland and coastal complexes Correa alba Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark 1 Scrub, heathland and coastal complexes Community (Code) Page Acacia longifolia coastal scrub (SAL) 12 Banksia marginata wet scrub (SBM) 14 Broad-leaf scrub (SBR) 16 Coastal heathland (SCH) 18 Coastal scrub (SSC) 21 Coastal scrub on alkaline sands (SCA) 23 Eastern riparian scrub (SRE) 25 Eastern scrub on dolerite (SED) 28 Heathland on calcareous substrates (SCL) 30 Kunzea ambigua regrowth scrub (SKA) 32 Leptospermum glaucescens heathland and scrub (SLG) 34 Leptospermum lanigerum scrub (SLL) 37 Leptospermum scoparium heathland and scrub (SLS) 39 Leptospermum with rainforest scrub (SRF) 41 Melaleuca pustulata scrub (SMP) 43 Melaleuca squamea heathland (SMM) 45 Melaleuca squarrosa scrub (SMR) 47 Rookery halophytic herbland (SRH) 49 Scrub complex on King Island (SSK) 51 Spray zone coastal complex (SSZ) 53 Subalpine heathland (SHS) 55 Western regrowth complex (SWR) 57 Western subalpine scrub (SSW) 59 Western wet scrub (SWW) 61 Wet heathland (SHW) 63 Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark 1 General description The communities in this section are structurally and floristically variable and are divided into mapping Scrubs, heathlands and the diverse complexes that units on the basis of the nature or identity of the they may form are, with a few notable exceptions, dominant or most common species, and to a lesser dominated by scleromorphic species. The canopy extent on structure and habitat. structure of the woody plants in these communities varies from 30 to 100% solid crown cover and is usually 5 m or less in height.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmanian Island Restoration by Christmas
    FOLLOW THE YELLOW BOAT ROAD HELP US RAISE $140,000 for TASMANIAN ISLAND RESTORATION BY CHRISTMAS The Pennicott Foundation Dockhead Building, Franklin Wharf, Hobart 7000 Good Afternoon, On behalf of the Pennicott Foundation and Friends of Fisher Island (Wildcare Inc.), I am writing to seek your urgent help to save our breeding seabirds and restore island ecosystems through the eradication of introduced pests. Island restoration is an ongoing commitment for the Pennicott Foundation as Tasmania’s off-shore islands are subject to the global environmental crisis brought on by invasive species such as rats and cats. The impact of introduced pests on our island wildlife is devastating. At George Rocks, black rats have wiped out the island’s population of white-faced storm-petrels and common diving-petrels. These are Tasmania’s smallest seabirds and they rely on predator-free islands to raise their chicks. Black rats are one of the most voracious introduced animals on islands; eating seabird eggs and chicks, reptiles and their eggs, tree nesting birds, invertebrates, native vegetation and seeds, and whatever else is available. The Pennicott Foundation has a proud track-record of successfully supporting the eradication of introduced pests from Tassie’s off-shore islands. On Tasman Island, tens of thousands of seabirds were killed each year by feral cats; the boulder fields were strewn with their feathers and half eaten bodies. Through our financial support, working with Friends of Tasman Island and Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife, Tasman Island is now cat-free and the seabirds are safe. Unfortunately, this type of devastation is common on seabird islands with introduced predators.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Habitat Modifications to Sandy Oceanfront Beaches in the U.S
    INVENTORY OF HABITAT MODIFICATIONS TO SANDY OCEANFRONT BEACHES IN THE U.S. ATLANTIC COAST BREEDING RANGE OF THE PIPING PLOVER (CHARADRIUS MELODUS) AS OF 2015: MAINE TO NORTH CAROLINA January 2017 revised March 2017 Prepared for the North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service by Terwilliger Consulting, Inc. Tracy Monegan Rice [email protected] Recommended citation: Rice, T.M. 2017. Inventory of Habitat Modifications to Sandy Oceanfront Beaches in the U.S. Atlantic Coast Breeding Range of the Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus) as of 2015: Maine to North Carolina. Report submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Hadley, Massachusetts. 295 p. 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 4 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Development ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Public and NGO Beachfront Ownership ............................................................................................... 9 Beachfront Armor ............................................................................................................................... 10 Sediment Placement ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Assessment of Beach Nesting and Migratory Shorebirds in Tasmania
    Conservation assessment of beach nesting and migratory shorebirds in Tasmania Dr Sally Bryant Nature Conservation Branch, DPIWE Natural Heritage Trust Project No NWP 11990 Tasmania Group Conservation assessment of beach nesting and migratory shorebirds in Tasmania Dr Sally Bryant Nature Conservation Branch Department Primary Industries Water and Environment 2002 Natural Heritage Trust Project No NWP 11990 CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT OF BEACH NESTING AND MIGRATORY SHOREBIRDS IN TASMANIA SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Summary of Information Compiled during the 1998 –1999 Shorebird Survey. Information collected Results Survey Effort Number of surveys undertaken 863 surveys Total number of sites surveyed 313 sites Number of islands surveyed 43 islands Number of surveys on islands 92 surveys Number of volunteers 75 volunteers Total number of participants 84 participants Total number of hours spent surveying 970 hours of survey Total length of all sites surveyed 1,092 kilometres surveyed Shorebird Species No of shorebird species observed 32 species No of shorebird species recorded breeding 13 species breeding Number of breeding observations made 294 breeding observations Number of surveys with a breeding observation 169 surveys Total number of sites where species were breeding 92 sites Highest number of species breeding per site 5 species breeding Total number of species records made 3,650 records Total number of bird sightings 116,118 sightings Site Disturbance Information Number of surveys with disturbance information recorded 407 surveys Number of individual
    [Show full text]