Recommendations for Security and Safety Co-Engineering Merge ITEA2 Project # 11011
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Template V 2.0 MERgE ITEA2 Project # 11011 ITEA2 – Project #11011 Multi-Concerns Interactions System Engineering 01.12.2012 to 31.03.2016 - Project Deliverable D3.4.4 – Part A (Stéphane Paul, TRT) Task 3.4 – Advanced concepts in safety and security co-engineering (Laurent RIOUX, TRT) WP3 – Advanced multi-concerns engineering concepts (Sam MICHIELS, KUL) Status [ ] Draft Document Created : 18.08.2015 [ ] To be reviewed Last edited : 22.04.2016 [X] Final Due date : 28.02.2016 Confidentiality [X] Public (for public distribution) Ready for review :01.02.2016 [ ] Restricted (only MERgE internal use) Document Version : 1.0 [ ] Confidential (only for individual partner(s)) Pages : 166 Contributors : TRT, ALL4TEC, ONERA, STUK Executive summary Nowadays, safety and security are two risk-driven activities that are tackled separately, giving rise to the indus- trial challenge of efficiently and economically co-engineering these two specialities. It is evident that there is a major opportunity to share on onomastics1, algorithms, (formal) methods and tools, in particular to reach higher levels of assurance at contained costs. Deliverable D3.4.4 is split in two parts. Part A (this document) is an extensive state of the art on safety and se- curity co-engineering of software intensive critical information systems. It essentially covers academic publica- tions and industry standards. Part B (companion document) first reports on two prototype tools dedicated to safety and security co- engineering. The first prototype was designed and developed by MERgE partners based on safety and security requirements from the MERgE software-defined radio test case. The document recalls the requirements and presents the high-level design. Assessment results of this prototype can be found in deliverable D1.1.1d – TCS Evaluation. The second prototype, called AVATAR, is developed by Télécom ParisTech and was identified dur- ing our study of the state of the art. We performed an in-depth assessment of this academic tool. Based on the experience we gained during the state of the art work (of which a synthesis is provided in Part B) and tool proto- typing work, Part B proceeds with research and development recommendations for new federative approaches, whilst remaining realistic with respect to industrial constraints, i.e. costs, legacy workbenches, training con- straints, etc. Note: the executive summary is common to both parts A and B. 1 Study of names and naming. D3.4.3 Recommendations for Security and Safety Co-engineering MERgE ITEA2 Project # 11011 Version Content Resp. Partner Date 0.01 Creation of the document D3.4.4 based on D3.4.3. S. Paul (TRT) 18/08/2015 Enhancement of the state of the art. L. Rioux (TRT) J. de Oliveira (TRT) G. Gailliard (TCS) J.-L. Gilbert (TCS) T. Wiander (STUK) F. Vallée (All4Tec) M. Bakkali (All4tec) A. Faucogney (All4tec) J. Brunel (ONERA) D. Chemouil (ONERA) 0.02 Extension of the state of the art with the papers from Stéphane Paul (TRT) 22/09/2015 the ISSE’15 workshop. 0.03 Further enhancement of the state of the art. Stéphane Paul (TRT) 07/10/2015 0.04 Split of the document in two parts. Stéphane Paul (TRT) 24/11/2015 0.05 Correction of reference errors. Stéphane Paul (TRT) 04/01/2016 0.06 Correction of the document template. S. Paul (TRT) 07/01/2016 L. Rioux (TRT) F. Vallée (All4Tec) M. Bakkali (All4Tec) J. Brunel (ONERA) 0.07 Extended §6. Stéphane Paul (TRT) 07/01/2016 0.08 Extended state of the art (academic & standards). Stéphane Paul (TRT) 15/01/2016 Cleaning up of comments & of references. Update of Extended Executive Summary to align with content in Part B. 0.09 Internal review. Philippe Bonnot (TRT) 01/02/2016 Minor corrections. Stéphane Paul (TRT) Extension of §6. 0.99 Peer review. Grégory Gailliard (TCS) 16/02/2016 1.00 Final submission. Stéphane Paul (TRT) 16/02/2016 Reviewed & Accepted Name Partner Independent Reviewer G. Gailliard Thales Communications & Security (outside WP) Validation from Manage- S. Michiels Katholieke Universiteit Leuven ment Board 2 / 166 D3.4.3 Recommendations for Security and Safety Co-engineering MERgE ITEA2 Project # 11011 Contents Recommendations for Security and Safety Co-engineering (Release n°3) ................................................... 1 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 13 1.1 Purpose of the document ......................................................................................................................... 13 1.2 Scope of the document ............................................................................................................................ 13 1.3 Motivations ............................................................................................................................................... 13 1.4 Targeted audience.................................................................................................................................... 14 1.5 Structure of the document ........................................................................................................................ 14 2 State of the art in safety and security co-engineering research ............................................................. 16 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 16 2.2 Chronological review ................................................................................................................................ 16 3 Overview of safety and security standards ............................................................................................... 91 3.1 Overview of safety standards ................................................................................................................... 93 3.1.1 Transverse safety standards ....................................................................................................... 93 3.1.2 Automotive safety standards ....................................................................................................... 94 3.1.3 Aviation safety standards ............................................................................................................ 95 3.1.4 Space safety standards ............................................................................................................. 101 3.1.5 Railway safety standards ........................................................................................................... 101 3.1.6 Medical devices safety standards.............................................................................................. 103 3.1.7 Nuclear safety standards ........................................................................................................... 104 3.1.8 Process industry safety standards ............................................................................................ 105 3.2 Overview of security standards .............................................................................................................. 105 3.2.1 Regulation .................................................................................................................................. 105 3.2.2 Scope ......................................................................................................................................... 106 3.2.3 Cross-domain standards ........................................................................................................... 108 3.2.4 Aerospace domain specific security standards ......................................................................... 110 3.2.5 Nuclear domain specific security standards .............................................................................. 111 3.3 Overview of standards transverse to safety and security....................................................................... 112 3.4 Analysis of standards w.r.t. safety and security co-engineering concerns ............................................. 113 3.4.1 Analysis of transverse safety standards .................................................................................... 113 3.4.2 Analysis of automotive safety standards ................................................................................... 113 3.4.3 Analysis of aviation safety standards ........................................................................................ 114 3.4.4 Analysis of space safety standards ........................................................................................... 114 3.4.5 Analysis of railway safety standards ......................................................................................... 114 3.4.6 Analysis of medical devices safety standards ........................................................................... 114 3.4.7 Analysis of nuclear safety standards ......................................................................................... 114 3.4.8 Overall analysis ......................................................................................................................... 115 3.5 Detailed analysis of the taxonomy of safety and security standards ..................................................... 116 4 A state of the art in safety and security co-engineering in industry .................................................... 118 4.1.1 Market offers .............................................................................................................................