Posted on Authorea 23 Jul 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159551318.88959325 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. neoytmsrie Cbloae l 00.Sbtnilifraini vial noe-xliainof over-exploitation on available is and information declines consequences Substantial population cascading Aggravatedly, negative 2020). and 2016). al. extinction Miller et species and future than (Ceballosa Lamkin 2014, and graving services 2014, more al. current ecosystem et be previous, al. on Pimm to 2017, et The that appearing Alroy vary DeVos demonstrate and are clearly 2015, methodologies (Brook 2014). extirpations they rates but estimation “background” al. rate) the their al. extinction et than natural and et above Ceballos the far measures DeVos than are occurring higher of 2015, rates times variety extinction naturally 10,000 current a to 2015). al. of 100 using al. between et extinction estimated et be Ceballos (to Ceballos and been 2014, 2014, the have die-off by 2014, al. rates caused anthropogenic et al. al. not extinction (Pimm is to et et level it Pimm global lead and (Pimm 2017, issue the losses species global Alroy at a activities and biodiversity but human (Brook natural severe of not species Eventually, result is except other a loss date biodiversity of as expiration contrast, but cost In an globalization, the has 2015). at planet al. expiry this et our on Ceballos extending species are every we and process because Technology, natural a and is Agriculture Extinction of University [email protected] Banda author: 0000-0002-6338-4254) Forestry, Corresponding ID: (ORCID of India College Pradesh, Uttar Sciences, Banda-210001, Wildlife of Department Maheshwari world Aishwarya globalized the in inevitable is Extinction pandemic coronavirus recent and 2010) (Gilbert Letter risk disease increased US an consequences. estimated similar to an the leads lost of also have one loss we US be Such and and might change al. 2019). (COVID-19) 2003) land-cover et (OECD Ehrnfeld to (Ceballosa 2011 owing 2006, to perspective services 1997 globalization al. ecosystem the in et year in Groom Substantial per humans 2005, 2020). trillion by Assessment, al. resources more Ecosystem et natural be (Ceballosa Millennium to of services 2020, appearing over-exploitation ecosystem al. are on on et extirpations demonstrate available Ceballos consequences and 2014, cascading clearly is declines negative they al. population information Aggravatedly, and et but al. Pimm extinction 2016). rate) 2017, Miller species et Alroy extinction and estimation than DeVos and Lamkin natural graving their (Brook lead 2015, 2014, and the rates losses “background” al. measures than al. the et biodiversity of higher than DeVos et variety severe above 2015, times far a Ceballos Eventually, result 10,000 are using a 2014, al. rates to estimated 2015). as extinction et 100 current been al. but between that Ceballos have al. et globalization, be rates 2014, et the (Pimm (to extinction by Ceballos vary species future al. caused 2014, and methodologies sapiens occurring et not current Homo naturally Pimm is al. previous, of except it 2017, The et extinction and date Alroy 2014). (Pimm issue and expiration and level global die-off an (Brook global a anthropogenic has species the but to planet other at natural this of not activities is cost on human loss the of species biodiversity at every contrast, expiry and In our process 2015). extending natural are a we is because Extinction - abstract No Abstract 2020 23, July 1 Maheshwari world Aishwarya globalized the in inevitable is Extinction ad nvriyo giutr n Technology and Agriculture of University Banda 1 1 $ -1tilo e erfo addgaainduring degradation land from year per trillion 6-11 oosapiens Homo $ 4-20 Posted on Authorea 23 Jul 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159551318.88959325 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. ttegoa ee.Boiest osrainadgoaiaincno eanioae u edt be- to need development but hegemonic isolated question remain that References: development cannot sustainable globalization for conservation and strategies biodiversity conservation integrated of the paradigms. more agenda Biodiversity especially the of underpin globalization, part may level. in come – “Vasud- global changes family of one philosophy to the is civilization susceptible world Indian at An whole is the resources. that – natural Kutumbakam” of livelihoods haiva exploitation over of by recent part about brought in changes major Dying” Great the centuries “the two is alter past to Biodiversity unmanageable the appears in it overexploitation now Unarguably, their and and extinction urbanization. times. resources In of sixth and as pace natural 2020). the such deforestation facing of international accelerated globally fragmentation, demand are al. has the threats ever-increasing habitat et we resources, an similar diseases, Ceballosa natural that is from and 2015, of there suffers doubt species harvesting biodiversity al. invasive beyond unsustainable global et of is and the (Ceballos trade unregulated It and history change, purposeful of climate 2010). been years pollution, has billion it al. 4.5 however, cases, Earth’s et legislations, many the priority and (Hoffmann in laws highest spectacular international extinction the been and mass on have national are and failures conservation conventions and wildlife the treaties, ecosystems and 2010). international (FAO natural environment several land biodiversity, of of agricultural change, degradation on climate and biodiversity present, destruction of At of restoration through causes restricts recover food it major to for demand and the vigor global loss natural of example, For biodiversity their one lost 2017). is have al. expansion or et recover agriculture (Moreno-Mateos stops to recent exploitation slow and their either 2010) after even (Gilbert are consequences. risk ecosystems similar disease degraded the increased such of an Furthermore, US to one leads estimated be also an might loss (COVID-19) lost Such US pandemic have 2019). and coronavirus we (OECD change Ecosystem 2011 and land-cover to Millennium 2003) to 1997 2020, owing Ehrnfeld during services al. 2006, ecosystem et al. in (Ceballosa year et perspective globalization Groom the 2005, in Assessment, humans by resources natural Mrn-aesD abe B oe C oe P rno ,Loe-´pzJ,MCaknML, L´opez-L´opez McCrackin J, JA, Aronson HP, Jones PC, Jones EB, Barbier Press, biological- D, Island deep-time Moreno-Mateos Synthesis. Well-being: and 12. Human contemporary and comparing Ecosystems 2005. of Assessment. challenge Ecosystem the Millennium On 11. 2016. AI. Miller M, Lamkin 10. GomM,Mff K arl,C.20.Picpe fCnevto ilg,SnurAssociates, Sinauer Biology, B Conservation A, of Angulo 2010, Principles C, Hilton-Taylor Assessment M, 2006. Hoffmann Resources CR. https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2010.644 9. Carroll, Nature Forest GK, disease. Global less Meffe means MJ, species Groom More 2010. 8. 2010. N. (FAO). Gilbert, Organization 7. Agriculture and Conservation and Society. and Environment Food Biodiversity, 6. on Effects background Globalisation: normal 2003. the Estimating D. Ehrnfeld 2014. SL. 5. Pimm PR, extinction Stephens mass JL, sixth Gittleman ongoing LN, the Joppa via JM, DeVos annihilation Biological 4. modern 2020. Accelerated R. 2015. Dirzo TM. PR, Palmer Ehrlichb G, RM, Ceballosa Pringle Lett. A, 3. Biol. Garcia AD, biology. Barnosky extinction PR, in Ehrlich prediction G, and Ceballos inference process, 2. Pattern, 2017. J. Alroy BW, Brook 1. eiP oty ,BnysJR 07 nhooei csse itrac n h eoeydebt. recovery the and disturbance ecosystem Anthropogenic 2017. JMR. Benayas D, Montoya P, Meli DC Washington, 1503–1509. 330: Science 785–789. vertebrates. 66: world’s BioScience the rates. of extinction status the on conservation of Impact The 2010. Sunderland. http://www.fao.org/forestry/fra/fra2010/en/ 99-111. 1: 452–462 Society, 13596–13602. 29: Biology 117: Conservation USA Sci extinction. Acad species Natl of Proc rate declines. and e1400253. losses 1: population Advances vertebrate Science by extinction. signaled mass sixth the Entering losses: species human-induced http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0828 20160828. 13: h ,Bok M ucatS,CretrK,e al. et KE, Carpenter SH, Butchart TM, Brooks M, ¨ ohm 2 $ -1tilo e erfo addegradation land from year per trillion 6-11 $ -0tilo per trillion 4-20 Posted on Authorea 23 Jul 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159551318.88959325 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. TeOgnsto o cnmcC-prto n eeomn OC)21.Boiest:Finance Biodiversity: 2019. (OECD) Development and Co-operation Economic for Sexton Organisation CM, Roberts The PH, Raven 14. LN, Joppa JL, Gittleman TM, Brooks R, Abell CN, Jenkins SL, Pimm 13. n h cnmcadBsns aefrAto,rpr rprdfrteG niomn Ministers’ Environment G7 the for prepared report Action, 2019. for May Case 5-6 Business Meeting, and Economic the Science protection. and and distribution, extinction, of rates their and 1246752. species 344: of biodiversity The 2014. JO. 14163. 8: Communications Nature 3