Public Annex B

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Public Annex B ICC-01/09-01/11-104-AnxB 03-06-2011 1/29 CB PT Public Annex B ICC-01/09-01/11-104-AnxB 03-06-2011 2/29 CB PT Analysis Chart – INCRIM Disclosure Package 3 I. A. 1 – Attack ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................3 I. A. 2 – Widespread ................................................................................................................................................................................................3 I. A. 3 – Systematic...................................................................................................................................................................................................4 I. A. 4 – Directed against any civilian population.............................................................................................................................................4 I. A. 5 – The conduct was committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population...............4 I. A. 6 – The perpetrator knew that the conduct was part of or intended the conduct to be part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population .....................................................................................................................................................................4 I. B ‐ Specific constituent elements of the Counts ................................................................................................................................................5 I. B. 1 ‐ Count 1 ‐ Murder Article 7(1)(a) ..............................................................................................................................................................5 I. B. 1. a – The perpetrator killed one or more persons.................................................................................................................................5 I. B. 1. b – Intent and Knowledge .....................................................................................................................................................................5 I. B. 1. c – Conduct was part of a widespread or systematic attack against any civilian population...................................................5 I. B. 1. d – Conduct was intended to be part of a widespread or systematic attack against any civilian population.......................5 I. B. 2 – Count 2 – Deportation or Deportation or forcible transfer of population Article 7(1)(d) ...........................................................5 I. B. 2. a – The perpetrator deported or forcibly transferred, without ground permitted under international law, one or more persons to another State or location, by expulsion or other coercve acts..................................................................................................5 I. B. 2. b – Such person or persons were lawfully present in the area from which they were so deported or transferred..............6 I. B. 2. c – The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established the lawfulness of such presence...................6 I. B. 2. d – The conduct was committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack direct against a civilian population ...........6 I. B. 2. e – The perpetrator new that the conduct was part of or intended the conduct to be part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population .................................................................................................................................................6 I. B. 3 – Count 3 – Torture Article 7(1)(f) .............................................................................................................................................................6 I. B. 3. a – The perpetrator inflicted severe physical or mental pain or suffering upon one or more persons ..................................6 I. B. 3. b – Such person or persons were in the custody or under the control of the perpetrator .........................................................7 I. B. 3. c – Such pain or suffering did not arise only from, and was not inherent in or incidental to, lawful sanctions .................7 I. B. 3. d – Intent ...................................................................................................................................................................................................7 I. B. 3. e – The conduct was committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population .......7 I. B. 3. f – The perpetrator knew that the conduct was part of or intended the conduct to be part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civiliam population ................................................................................................................................................7 1 ICC-01/09-01/11-104-AnxB 03-06-2011 3/29 CB PT I. B. 4 – Count 4 – Persecution Article 7(1)(h) .....................................................................................................................................................7 I. B. 4. a – The perpetrator severely deprived, contrary to international law, one or more persons of fundamental rights ..........7 I. B. 4. b – The perpetrator targeted such person or persons by reason of the identity of a group or collectivity or targeted the group or collectivity as such..............................................................................................................................................................................8 I. B. 4. c – Such targeting was based on political grounds...........................................................................................................................8 I. B. 4. d – The conduct was committed in connection with any act referred to in article 7, paragraph 1, of the Staute or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court......................................................................................................................................................8 I. B. 4. e – The conduct was committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack direct against a civilian population............8 I. B. 4. f – The perpetrator knew that the conduct was part of or intended the conduct to be part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civiliam population ................................................................................................................................................8 II. A Indirect Co‐Perpetration Article 25(3)(a)........................................................................................................................................................9 II. A. 1 – Existence of an agreement or common plan between two or more persons ................................................................................9 II. A. 2 – Coordinated essential contribution by each co‐perpetrator resulting in the realisation of the objective elements of the crime...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................9 II. A. 3 – Control over the organization.............................................................................................................................................................10 II. A. 4 – Organized and hierarchical apparatus of power.............................................................................................................................14 II. A. 5 – Execution of the crimes secured by almost automatic compliance by the subordinates with the orders given by the leader........................................................................................................................................................................................................................17 II. A. 6 – The suspect fulfils the subjective elements of the crime charged...............................................................................................17 II. A. 7 – The suspect and the other co‐perpetrators must all be mutually aware and mutually accept that implementing their common plan may result in the realization of the objective elements of the crime.................................................................................18 II. A. 8 – The suspect must be aware of the factual circumstances enabling him to exercise joint control over the crime...............18 II. B Common Purpose Article 25(3)(d) .................................................................................................................................................................21 II. B. 1 – A crime within the jurisdiction of the Court is attempted or committed by a group of persons acting with a common purpose....................................................................................................................................................................................................................21 II. B. 2 – The individual contributed to the crime in any way other than those set out in Article 25(3)(a) to (c) of the Statute.......21 II. B. 3 – The contribution was intentional .......................................................................................................................................................24
Recommended publications
  • FORD Bibafia - Moi Airaghi, Who Also Refused
    I.. AR IlIhau PHOTOCOPIERS The nation FOR THE DYNAMIC OFFICE ** No., 9621, Nairobi, Thursday, November 14, 1991 Price KSh7/00 Yffiiister named in House corruption d By MIJTHUI MWM and And for the first time in the notriety even by members of his Mr Mungai drew continuous Biwott to follow suit. (A letter sixth Parliament, backbenchers Asian community. applause when he started his I'eOI.eIl MIAL flMAD - from the Lonrho chief to Prof snoutea aown vcerresiaent me 1vr, wno was contributing speeca but was nesiegeci with Saitoti alleging corruption in gov- The MP for Mold yesterday George Saitoti when he sugested to the Prevention of Corruption points of order by the front hench ernment circles was this week asked leaders accused of corrup- thev should not talk of tribalism (Amendment) Bill, caused an up- when he began to equate tribal- published in the Press). - tion to repent and resign and at while discussing corruption, roar in the House after he tabled ism with corruption. But on a point of order, the Mo t the same time tabled a list of The House was fully charged a list of 220 names of executives Amid shouts of 'Biehop MP for Bunyala, Mr Peter names of parastatal heads from during Mr Mungai's contribution from a sin?le ethnic group who Mungai!" "Archbishop of Mob!" Okondo, said Mr Biwott had al- By JOSEPH OLWENY one ethnic cmnmunity. and debate tendled to degenerate headed various parastatals. the legisiatoi said corruption was ready cleared himself by threat- The Vice-Chancellors Committee Mr Njenga Mungai named the into a shooting match.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties and Party Systems in Kenya
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Elischer, Sebastian Working Paper Ethnic Coalitions of Convenience and Commitment: Political Parties and Party Systems in Kenya GIGA Working Papers, No. 68 Provided in Cooperation with: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Suggested Citation: Elischer, Sebastian (2008) : Ethnic Coalitions of Convenience and Commitment: Political Parties and Party Systems in Kenya, GIGA Working Papers, No. 68, German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA), Hamburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/47826 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya in Crisis
    KENYA IN CRISIS Africa Report N°137 – 21 February 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. THE ELECTION CRISIS ............................................................................................. 2 A. A TIGHT AND TENSE RACE ...................................................................................................2 1. Coalition building ......................................................................................................3 2. The issues...................................................................................................................4 B. THE RIGGING OF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION ....................................................................6 III. THE SECURITY CRISIS.............................................................................................. 9 A. PROTEST AND REPRESSION....................................................................................................9 B. ESCALATION IN THE RIFT VALLEY ......................................................................................10 1. The rise of Kalenjin warriors in the North Rift .......................................................11 2. The return of Mungiki..............................................................................................13 3. Coast Province: the next theatre of violence?..........................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya Election History 1963-2013
    KENYA ELECTION HISTORY 1963-2013 1963 Kenya Election History 1963 1963: THE PRE-INDEPENDENCE ELECTIONS These were the last elections in pre-independent Kenya and the key players were two political parties, KANU and KADU. KADU drew its support from smaller, less urbanized communities hence advocated majimboism (regionalism) as a means of protecting them. KANU had been forced to accept KADU’s proposal to incorporate a majimbo system of government after being pressured by the British government. Though KANU agreed to majimbo, it vowed to undo it after gaining political power. The majimbo constitution that was introduced in 1962 provided for a two-chamber national legislature consisting of an upper (Senate) and lower (House of Representative). The Campaign KADU allied with the African People’s Party (APP) in the campaign. KANU and APP agreed not to field candidates in seats where the other stood a better chance. The Voting Elections were marked by high voter turnout and were held in three phases. They were widely boycotted in the North Eastern Province. Violence was reported in various parts of the country; four were killed in Isiolo, teargas used in Nyanza and Nakuru, clashes between supporters in Machakos, Mombasa, Nairobi and Kitale. In the House of Representative KANU won 66 seats out of 112 and gained working majority from 4 independents and 3 from NPUA, KADU took 47 seats and APP won 8. In the Senate KANU won 19 out 38 seats while KADU won 16 seats, APP won 2 and NPUA only 1. REFERENCE: NATIONAL ELECTIONS DATA BOOK By Institute for Education in Democracy (published in 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • THE KENYA GAZETTE Published by Authority of the Republic of Kenya
    THE KENYA GAZETTE Published by Authority of the Republic of Kenya (Registered as a Newspaper at the G.P.O.) Vol. LXVII-No. 49 NAIROBI, 2nd November 1965 Price: Sh. 1 CONTENTS GAZETIT NOTICES OAZE~~ENonces--(Contd.) P*OE / PAGE Appointments, etc. .. 1298 1 Liquor Licensing . 1312 The Interpretation and General Provisions Act- Patents . .. Temporary Transfers of Powers . 1298 Probate and Administration . The Land Adjudication Act-Appointments . 1298 Bankruptcy Jurisdiction . The Regulation of Wages and Conditions of Employ- ment Act-Appointments, etc. 1298, 1309 The Companies Act-Dissolution . The Agriculture Act-Management Orders, etc. 1299 The Trade Unions Act-Registrations . The Agricultural Development Corporation Act, 1965- The African Christian Marriage and Divorce Act- Appointments .. .. .. .. .. .. 1299 Licensed Ministers . The Kenya Tea Development Authority Order, 1964- The Societies Rules-Registrations, etc. Appointments . 1300 Lost Policies . The Local Government Regulations, 1963- Nominations .. .. .. .. .. .. 1300 South African Mutual Life Assurance Society-Notice of Annual General Meeting . The Prisons Act-Appointment . 1300 Local Government Notices . The Probation of Offenders (Case Committees) Rules- Changes of Name . Appointment, etc. .. .. .. .. .. 1300 The Dairy Industry (Inspectors) Regulations, 1964-- SUPPLEMENT No. 84 Revocation . .. 1300 Legislative Supplement Vacancies . 1301 LEGALNOTICE No. PAGE 271-The Constitution of Kenya-Proclamation . 459 E.A. Customs and Excise Department-Auction Notice .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1303 (Published as a Special Issue on 1st November 1965) The Trust Land Act-Setting Apart of Land . 1306 1 SUPPLEMENT No. 85 The Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa--Court Calendar, 1966 . 1309 Legislative Supplement LEGALNOTICE No. PAGE The Mining Act-Declaration 1309 . .. 272-The Constitution (Amendment of Laws) (Promissary Oaths) Order, 1965 . 461 The Cotton Lint and Seed Marketing Act-Seed Cotton Prices, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Owns the Land? Blood and Soil Issues in the Kenyan Rift Valley
    WHO OWNS THE LAND? BLOOD AND SOIL ISSUES IN THE KENYAN RIFT VALLEY PART 1: The passion with which millions of citizens valued their presidential vote in the stolen 2007 presidential elections can be reflected in scenes of the bloody post-election clashes today that engulfed Rift Valley, Nyanza, Coast, Nairobi, Western and to a less extent in other parts of the country. Nakuru was the latest epicenter of inter ethnic murders. The violent reactions to rigged elections may reflect the pain of deep and historically rooted injustices some of which predate Kenya’s independence in 1963. They are in fact motivated and exacerbated by landlessness, joblessness, and poverty believed to be heavily contributed towards by the prevailing political status quo that has dominated Kenya since independence. This is a system that has continuously perpetrated, in successive fashion, socio- economic injustices that have been seamlessly transferred from one power regime to the next. The Land issue With a fast growing population in Kenya, limited resources including land and jobs, have severely been put in extreme pressure. Responsive political operatives cognizant of this reality have appreciated the importance of incorporating progressive policies that seek to aggressively address poverty, landlessness, unequal distribution of resources and unemployment, as a matter of priority (in their party manifestoes) if any social stability is to be maintained in Kenya. Without doubt, the opposition party ODM sold an attractive campaign package that sought to address historic land injustices, unemployment, inequitable resource sharing and poverty through a radical constitutional transformation, under the framework of the people-tailored Bomas Constitution Draft.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Parliament of Kenya
    The National Assembly History of The Parliament of Kenya FactSheet No.24 i| FactSheet 24: History of The Parliament of Kenya History of The Parliament of Kenya FactSheet 24: History of The Parliament of Kenya Published by: The Clerk of the National Assembly Parliament Buildings Parliament Road P.O. Box 41842-00100 Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254 20 221291, 2848000 Email: [email protected] www.parliament.go.ke © The National Assembly of Kenya 2017 Compiled by: The National Assembly Taskforce on Factsheets, Online Resources and Webcasting of Proceedings Design & Layout: National Council for Law Reporting |ii The National Assembly iii| FactSheet 24: History of The Parliament of Kenya Acknowledgements This Factsheet on History of the Parliament of Kenya is part of the Kenya National Assembly Factsheets Series that are supposed to enhance public understanding, awareness and knowledge of the work of the Assembly and its operations. It is intended to serve as easy guide for ready reference by Members of Parliament, staff and the general public. The information contained here is not exhaustive and readers are advised to refer to the original sources for further information. This work is a product of concerted efforts of all the Directorates and Departments of the National Assembly, and the Parliamentary Joint Services. Special thanks go to the Members of the National Assembly Taskforce on Factsheets, Online Resources and Webcasting of Proceedings, namely, Mr. Kipkemoi arap Kirui (Team Leader), Mr. Emejen Lonyuko, Mr. Robert Nyaga, Mr. Denis Abisai, Mr. Stephen Mutungi, Mr. Bonnie Mathooko, Maj. (Rtd.) Bernard Masinde, Mr. Enock Bosire, and Ms. Josephine Karani.
    [Show full text]
  • Secessions, Majimboism and the Federalist Debate in Africa: a Comparative Study of South Sudan, Kenya and Nigeria
    UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI INSTITUTE OF DIPLOMACY AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES SECESSIONS, MAJIMBOISM AND THE FEDERALIST DEBATE IN AFRICA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SOUTH SUDAN, KENYA AND NIGERIA KEVIN KARANGI KARIUKI R52/80323/2012 A RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN THE PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE OF MASTERS IN INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT MANAGEMENT, INSTITUTE OF DIPLOMACY AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, (IDIS), UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI SEPTEMBER 2014 Declaration This project is my original work and has not been submitted for degree to any other University. Signature.................................................... Date..................................................... Kevin Karangi Kariuki This project has been submitted for examination with our approval as University supervisors. Signature.................................................... Date..................................................... Dr. Ibrahim Farah ii Acknowledgments First and foremost, ALL Glory goes to God for seeing me this far. I am forever grateful to the following persons; Dr.Ibrahim Farah, the project supervisor, for his assistance, encouragement and guidance in making the project a success. I also thank all the lecturers who in one way or another have made this work a success and also for the knowledge they have imparted to me since I joined UON in 2012. I would like to acknowledge my parents, Mr. and Mrs. Karangi who have been loving and caring parents and supported me whole heartedly. I truly thank you for all the support you have given me. I also extend my sincere thanks to my brothers Ian Kimani, Martin Robi and David Kinuthia for their encouragement. I would also like to thank Mercy Gathoni for her words of encouragement and prayers. Gen. J W Karangi¸ Chief of The Kenya Defense Forces, for the assistance he gave me by providing research material and for sharing his priceless thoughts on the topic at hand which has led to a successful project.
    [Show full text]
  • Muslim Relations in the Politics of Nationalism and Secession in Kenya
    1 MUSLIM RELATIONS IN THE POLITICS OF NATIONALISM AND SECESSION IN KENYA Hassan J. Ndzovu Moi University, Kenya PAS Working Papers Number 18 ISSN Print 1949-0283 ISSN Online 1949-0291 Edited by Charles Stewart, Emeritus Professor University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Program of African Studies Northwestern University 620 Library Place Evanston, Illinois 60208-4110 U.S.A 2 Abstract Within Kenya’s political scene, racial and ethnic identities play a crucial role in creating division in Muslims’ political engagement. Since independence, the racial and ethnic antagonism among them has weakened a united Muslim’ voice whenever political issues concerning the community arose. As Kenya was preparing for independence, a section of Muslims (Arab Muslims) living at the coast agitated to secede from the rest of Kenya. This demand for secession led to a hostile relationship between the Arab Muslims and other non-Arab Muslim leaders in the country. One effect of this political development is the lasting impact it had on post-independence Muslim politics. The events set a pattern for mistrust between the Arab Muslims and non-Arab Muslims in Kenya. This absence of unity has influenced the way the political elites in Kenya perceive the Muslim community in general. Politicians in Kenya are known to have capitalized on the disunity among Muslims to prevent any united political front from the community. As a result the Muslim community has felt politically marginalized. It is this perceived marginalization which Kenyan Muslims are presently striving to overcome. 3 Introduction In this article, I would like to bring forward the argument that within Kenya’s political scene, racial and ethnic identities play a crucial role in creating division in Muslims’ political engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • Tweeting Government: an Analysis of Kenya's National
    TWEETING GOVERNMENT: AN ANALYSIS OF KENYA’S NATIONAL EXECUTIVE LEADERS’ USE OF TWITTER AS A COMMUNICATION TOOL PATRICK WANJOHI GITHINJI UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY-AFRICA FALL, 2017 TWEETING GOVERNMENT: AN ANALYSIS OF KENYA’S NATIONAL EXECUTIVE LEADERS’ USE OF TWITTER AS A COMMUNICATION TOOL by PATRICK WANJOHI GITHINJI A Thesis Submitted to the School of Science and Technology in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirement for the Degree of Master of Arts in Communication Studies UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY-AFRICA FALL, 2017 i Student’s Declaration I, the undersigned, declare that this is my original work and has not been submitted to any other college, institution or university other than the United States International University- Africa in Nairobi for academic credit. Signed: ________________________ Date: __________________ Patrick W. Githinji (ID No 645313) ii Approval Page In accordance with United States International University – Africa policies, this thesis is accepted as partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Master of Arts in Communication Studies Signed: ________________________ Date: _____________________ Lucy Wanjiku Gichaga, Ph.D. Supervisor & Assistant Professor, School of Communications, Cinematics and Creatives Arts Signed: ________________________ Date: _____________________ Kioko Ireri, Ph.D. Chair, Department of Journalism & Corporate Communications Signed: _______________________ Date: ____________________ Prof. Valerie P. Adema, Ph.D. Dean, School of Communications, Cinematics and Creatives Arts iii Copyright Copyright ©2017 By Patrick W. Githinji iv Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my thesis advisors, Dr. Lucy Wanjiku Gichaga, Department of Journalism, USIU-Africa and Prof. Nancy Muturi, A.Q Miller School of Journalism and Mass Communications, Kansas State University (USA). The door to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Prizewinning Dissertation 2018
    International Development ISSN 1470-2320 Prizewinning Dissertation 2018 No.18-KL Decentralisation: Road to Development or Bridge to Nowhere? Estimating the Effect of Devolution on Infrastructure Spending in Kenya Kurtis Lockhart Published: February 2019 Department of International Development London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street Tel: +44 (020) 7955 7425/6252 London Fax: +44 (020) 7955-6844 WC2A 2AE UK Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.lse.ac.uk/internationalDevelopment/home.aspx Candidate Number: 91345 MSc in Development Management 2018 Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree Decentralisation: Road to Development or Bridge to Nowhere? Estimating the Effect of Devolution on Infrastructure Spending in Kenya Word Count: 10,081 Abstract Does the decentralisation of state institutions result in a more equitable distribution of public goods in the African context? To answer this question this study examines a natural experiment in Kenya where the new 2010 Constitution devolved political and fiscal powers to 47 newly-established county governments. A difference-in-differences strategy is employed that exploits heterogeneity in the ethnic alignment of each county to the president. This effectively varies the intensity of the ‘treatment’ of devolution across counties. Using data on road expenditure across all 47 counties from 2010 to 2017, this study finds that the devolution of state structures in Kenya resulted in a significantly more equitable distribution of road spending. These results represent an important contrast to the prevailing view in the literature that asserts that decentralisation reforms in sub-Saharan Africa have largely failed to live up to expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • SWAHILI MUSLIM PUBLICS and POSTCOLONIAL EXPERIENCE AFRICAN EXPRESSIVE CULTURES Patrick Mcnaughton, Editor Associate Editors Catherine M
    SWAHILI MUSLIM PUBLICS and POSTCOLONIAL EXPERIENCE AFRICAN EXPRESSIVE CULTURES Patrick McNaughton, editor Associate editors Catherine M. Cole Barbara G. Hoffman Eileen Julien Kassim Koné D. A. Masolo Elisha Renne Z. S. Strother SWAHILI MUSLIM PUBLICS and POSTCOLONIAL EXPERIENCE Kai Kresse Indiana University Press This book is a publication of Indiana University Press Office of Scholarly Publishing Herman B Wells Library 350 1320 East 10th Street Bloomington, Indiana 47405 USA iupress.indiana.edu © 2018 by Kai Kresse All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences— Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1992. Manufactured in the United States of America Cataloging information is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN 978-0-253-03753-4 (hardback) ISBN 978-0-253-03754-1 (paperback) ISBN 978-0-253-03755-8 (ebook) 1 2 3 4 5 23 22 21 20 19 18 Contents Preface vii Acknowledgments xiii Part I: Conceptualizations 1 Introduction: Past Present Continuous: Postcolonial Experience, Intellectual Practice, and the Struggle for Meaning 3 2 Muslim Publics, Postcolonial Imaginations, and the Dynamics of Self-Positioning 34 Part II: Readings 3 Colonial Experience and Future Anticipations: Sheikh Al-Amin Mazrui and Swahili Islamic Pamphlets, 1930–32 61 4 The Voice of Justice: An Islamic Newspaper in Postcolonial Kenya, 1972–82 105 5 “Get Educated with Stambuli!”: An Open Discussion Platform on Local Islamic Radio, 2005–07 147 6 Conclusion: Toward the Understanding of Understanding: Elements of a Swahili Intellectual Tradition 190 References 213 Index 233 Preface The time of existence and experience, the time of entanglement .
    [Show full text]