DOCSLIB.ORG

Lecture 4: Nilpotent and Solvable Lie Algebras Prof

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lecture 4: Nilpotent and Solvable Lie Algebras Prof 18.745 Introduction to Lie Algebras Fall 2004 Lecture 4: Nilpotent and Solvable Lie Algebras Prof. Victor Kaˇc Transcribed by: Anthony Tagliaferro Definition Given a Lie algebra g, define the following descending sequences of ideals of g; − (central series) g ⊃ [g; g] = g1 ⊃ [[g; g]; g] = g3 ⊃ [g3; g] = g4 ⊃ · · · ⊃ [gk 1; g] = gk ⊃ : : : (1) 0 0 0 00 − − (derived series) g ⊃ [g; g] = g ⊃ [g ; g ] = g ⊃ · · · ⊃ [g(k 1); g(k 1)] = g(k) ⊃ : : : (2) Exercise 4.1 Show that: a) All members of the central and derived series are ideals of g b) gk+1 ⊃ g(k) Solution a) First, let's show that gk is an ideal of g. Notice that: [gk; g] = gk+1 ⊂ gk (3) It therefore follows that gk is an ideal for all k. Now, let's show that g(k) is an ideal. To do this, we'll use induction on k. First notice that: [g(1); g] = [[g; g]; g] ⊂ [g; g] = g(1) (4) this is true since we know [g; g] ⊂ g. It follows that g(1) is an ideal of g. Now all we have to prove is that g(k) is an ideal if g(k−1) is one. Therefore, consider an arbitrary element x = [a; b] 2 [g(k); g] where a 2 g(k) and b 2 g. Then, by definition of g(k), a = [c; d] where c; d 2 g(k−1). Using the Jacobi identity, we find that: [[c; d]; b] = [[c; b]; d] + [c; [d; b]] (5) but, since g(k−1) is an ideal, [c; b]; [d; b] 2 g(k−1). Therefore, it follows that: − − [a; b] = [[c; d]; b] = [[c; b]; d] + [c; [d; b]] 2 [g(k 1); g(k 1)] = g(k) (6) Hence, since the element x = [a; b] was arbitrary, [g(k); g] ⊂ g(k) and therefore g(k) is an ideal for all k. b)We need to show that gk+1 ⊃ g(k). Again, we'll use induction on k. g(1) = [g; g] = g2 ) g(1) ⊂ g2 (7) Now consider an arbitrary element of g(k), x = [a; b] where a; b 2 g(k−1), we're assuming that since a 2 g(k−1), a 2 gk and also notice that b 2 g. Therefore [a; b] 2 [gk; g] = gk+1. Hence g(k) ⊂ gk+1 for all k. Definition A Lie algebra is called nilpotent (resp. solvable) if gk = 0 (resp. g(k) = 0) for k sufficiently large. 1 Remark Notice that it follows from Exercise 4.1b that a nilpotent Lie algebra is also solvable. Examples 1) Abelian Lie algebras are nilpotent. (1) C 2) The Heisenberg Lie Algebras Hk are nilpotent since Hk = and [[Hk; Hk]; Hk] = 0 F F (1) F (2) n F 3) b2= a + b, [a; b] = 0 is solvable. since b2 = b, b2 = 0 but it is not nilpotent since b2 = b for n ≥ 2. Exercise 4.2 Let bk(F) be the subalgebra of glk(F) consisting of all upper-triangular matrices F F and nk( ) be the subalgebra of glk( ) consisting of all strictly upper triangular matrices. Show that: a) bk(F) is a solvable Lie algebra (but not nilpotent) b) nk(F) is a nilpotent Lie algebra (in particular, n3(F) ≈ H1) Solution The gist of this problem is to show that the Lie bracket of any two upper triangular matrices is even more upper triangular. It will actually prove easier to prove part (b) first. b) First notice that if eij is a basis element of glk(F), then the quantity j − i tells us which diagonal the nonzero entry of eij lies on. Let's compute the Lie bracket [eij; emn] = δjmein − δniemj. Let's say that j − i = r and n − m = s. Then, when j = m, n − i = n + r − j = n + r − m = s + r, so n − i = r + s and similarly if n = i, then j − m = s + r. The payoff from this little bit of arithmetic comes from the following observation. First, define: h = x e jx 2 F; j − i ≥ m; i; j ≤ k (8) k;m nX ij ij ij o i;j Then, we've shown that [hk;m; hk;n] ⊂ hk;m+n. Notice also that nk(F) = hk;1 and bk(F) = hk;0. Also notice from the definition that hk;k+1 = 0. Proving that nk(F) is nilpotent is now trivial: F 2 2 nk( ) = hk;1 ⊂ hk;2 F 3 2 nk( ) = [hk;1; hk;1] ⊂ [hk;2; hk;1] ⊂ hk;3 . F k k nk( ) = hk;1 ⊂ hk;k+1 = 0 Therefore nk(F) is nilpotent. Now, on to proving bk(F) is solvable. a) To prove this, we will use a proposition that will appear later in these notes. The proposition states that if a Lie algebra contains a solvable ideal and if the Lie algebra modulo this ideal is solvable, then the ideal itself is solvable. Notice that nk(F) ⊂ bk(F) and that nk(F) is solvable (since it's nilpotent). Also notice that bk(F)=nk(F) = the set of diagonal matrices, which is abelian, hence solvable. Therefore, by the proposition, bk(F) is solvable. Notice that in particular, 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 F 8 0 1 0 1 0 19 n3( ) = span <q = 0 0 0 ; p = 0 0 1 ; c = 0 0 0 = (9) @0 0 0A @0 0 0A @0 0 0A : ; These matrices exactly satisfy the conditions for the Heisenberg algebra H1. Hence n3(F) ≈ H1. 2 Also, we have proved that bk(F) is solvable, but we have yet to show that is not nilpotent. To demonstrate this, consider the commutator: [eii; eij] = eij for i < j. Since eii is in bk(F), it follows 2 2 3 k that eij 2 bk(F) , and therefore, eij 2 [bk(F); bk(F) ] = bk(F) . Hence eij 2 bk(F) for all k follows by induction. Thus bk(F) is not nilpotent. Remark Notice that any subalgebra and factor (quotient) algebra of a nilpotent (resp. solvable) Lie algebra is a nilpotent (resp. solvable) Lie algebra. Proposition 1) The center of a nonzero nilpotent Lie algebra g is nonzero. 2) If g/center(g) is a nilpotent Lie algebra, then g is a nilpotent Lie algebra. Proof a) Let k ≥ 2 be the minimal integer such that gk = 0. Then gk−1 6= 0 and [gk−1; g] = gk = 0. Hence gk−1 ⊂ center(g) b) If g/center(g) is a nilpotent Lie algebra then any commutator in g/center(g) of length k (k 0) is zero: 0 = [[: : : [a1 + e; a2 + e]; a3 + e]; : : : ; ak + e] (10) = [: : : [a1; a2]; a3]; : : : ; ak] + e (11) Hence in g, we have: [: : : [a1; a2]; : : : ; ak] 2 e, where e denotes the center of g. Hence any commutator of length k + 1 in g is zero, in other words, gk+1 = 0. Theorem (The Engel Characterization of Nilpotent Lie Algebras) A finite dimensional Lie algebra g is nilpotent if and only if ad a is a nilpotent operator for any a 2 g. Proof If g is nilpotent, then for k 0, any commutator of length k is zero, in particular, (ad a)kb = 0, being a commutator of length k + 1. Conversely, suppose (ad a)k = 0 for all a 2 g, k 0. Conside the adjoint representation defined by: g ! glg (12) a 7! ad a (13) Then ad g ⊂ glg is isomorphic to g=center(g) since center(g) = ker ad . So it suffices to prove that ad g is a nilpotent Lie algebra. Now, we can apply Engel's Theorem: all operators from ad g ⊂ glg are nilpotent, hence ad g ⊂ ng (the Lie algebra of strictly upper-triangular matrices, for some choice of a basis of g), and so ad g is a subalgebra of a nilpotent Lie algebra, hence is a nilpotent Lie algebra itself. In particular, we see that (ad a)dimg = 0. Discussion What follows is a discussion of the classification of finite dimensional nilpotent Lie algebras. 3 Consider only the 2-step nilpotent Lie algebras: g ⊃ e where e = center(g) and g¯ = g=e is abelian (if and only if g3 = 0). We have the following invariant of g: the map ', ' : g¯ ⊗ g¯ ! e (14) '(a¯ ⊗ ¯b) = [a; b] (15) Where a and b are the pre-images in g of a¯ and ¯b. The only condition on ' is skew-symmetry: '(¯b ⊗ a¯) = −'(a¯ ⊗ ¯b) (16) So we have a bijective correspondence between the set of 2-step nilpotent Lie algebras and the set of skew-symmetric maps (' : g¯ ⊗ g¯ ! center(g)). Exercise 4.3 Show that if g is 2-step nilpotent and dim center(g) = 1, then g ≈ Hk. Solution By definition, g is nilpotent if g=center(g) is abelian. Therefore, [g; g] ⊂ center(g). If the dimension of the center of g is one, the we can conclude that the derived algebra of galso has dimension one. Therefore, by a Exercise 2.3, we can conclude that: g = b2 ⊕ abn−2 or g = Hk ⊕ abn−2k−1 where abn denotes the n-dimensional Lie abelian algebra. However, b2 ⊕ abn−2 is not nilpotent. Therefore g = Hk ⊕ abn−2k−1. However, we know that dim(center(g))= 1, hence g = Hk. Remark As discussed in lecture, the next case, dim center(g) is a \wild" problem and the general classification of nilpotent Lie algebras is believed to be impossible, if not very difficult.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nilpotent Lie Groups and Hyperbolic Automorphisms ”
    Nilpotent Lie groups and hyperbolic automorphisms Manoj Choudhuri and C. R. E. Raja Abstract A connected Lie group admitting an expansive automorphism is known to be nilotent, but all nilpotent Lie groups do not admit expansive au- tomorphism. In this article, we find sufficient conditions for a class of nilpotent Lie groups to admit expansive automorphism. Let G be a locally compact (second countable) group and Aut(G) be the group of (continuous) automorphisms of G. We consider automorphisms α of G that have a specific property that there is a neighborhood U of identity such that n ∩n∈Zα (U) = {e} - such automorphisms are known as expansive. The struc- ture of compact connected groups admitting expansive automorphism has been studied in [6], [7], [17], [10] and it was shown in [10] that a compact connected group admitting an expansive automorphism is abelian. The same problen has been studied for totally disconnected groups as well, see [9] and [16] for com- pact totally disconnected groups and a recent paper of Helge Glockner and the second named author ([8]) for locally compact totally disconnected groups. In [14], Riddhi Shah has shown that a connected locally compact group admitting expansive automorphism is nilpotent. The result was known previously for Lie groups (see Proposition 7.1 of [8] or Proposition 2.2 of [14] for a proof of this fact and further references). But all nilpotent Lie groups do not admit expansive automorphism which can be seen easily by considering the circle group. In this article, we try to classify a class of nilpotent Lie groups which admit expansive automorphism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fourier Transform for Nilpotent Locally Compact Groups. I
    Pacific Journal of Mathematics THE FOURIER TRANSFORM FOR NILPOTENT LOCALLY COMPACT GROUPS. I ROGER EVANS HOWE Vol. 73, No. 2 April 1977 PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 73, No. 2, 1977 THE FOURIER TRANSFORM FOR NILPOTENT LOCALLY COMPACT GROUPS: I ROGER E. HOWE In his work on nilpotent lie groups, A. A. Kirillov intro- duced the idea of classifying the representations of such groups by matching them with orbits in the dual of the lie algebra under the coadjoint action. His methods have proved extremely fruitful, and subsequent authors have refined and extended them to the point where they provide highly satisfac- tory explanations of many aspects of the harmonic analysis of various lie groups. Meanwhile, it appears that nonlie groups are also amenable to such an approach. In this paper, we seek to indicate that, indeed, a very large class of separable, locally compact, nilpotent groups have a Kirillov- type theory. On the other hand, elementary examples show that not all such groups can have a perfect Kirillov theory. The precise boundary between good and bad groups is not well defined, and varies with the amount of technical complication you can tolerate. At this stage, the delineation of the boundary is the less rewarding part of the theory, and will be deferred to a future publication. In the present paper, we lay some groundwork, and then discuss a particularly nice special case, which also has significance in the general picture. Since Kirillov's approach hinges on the use of the lie algebra and its dual, the first concern in imitating his theory is to find a lie algebra.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Lie Algebras and the Theorem of Ado
    An introduction to Lie algebras and the theorem of Ado Hofer Joachim 28.01.2012 An introduction to Lie algebras and the theorem of Ado Contents Introduction 2 1 Lie algebras 3 1.1 Subalgebras, ideals, quotients . 4 1.2 Nilpotent, solvable, simple and semisimple Lie algebras . 5 2 The representation theory of Lie algebras 7 2.1 Examples . 7 2.2 Modules, submodules, quotient modules . 7 2.3 Structure theorems: Lie and Engel . 8 3 The theorem of Ado for nilpotent Lie algebras. How can a faithful representation be constructed? 11 3.1 Ad hoc examples . 11 3.2 The universal enveloping algebra . 11 3.2.1 Tensor products and the tensor algebra . 11 3.2.2 The universal enveloping algebra of a Lie algebra . 12 3.2.3 The Poincare-Birkhoff-Witt theorem . 12 3.3 Constructing a faithful representation of h1 ............................... 12 3.4 Ado’s theorem for nilpotent Lie algebras . 13 3.5 Constructing a faithful representation for the standard filiform Lie algebra of dimension 4 . 14 3.6 Constructing a faithful representation for an abelian Lie algebra . 15 4 The theorem of Ado 16 4.1 Derivations . 16 4.2 Direct and semidirect sums of Lie algebras . 16 4.3 Proof of Ado’s theorem . 17 4.4 Proof of Neretin’s lemma . 18 4.5 Constructing a faithful representation of the 2-dimensional upper triangular matrices . 19 4.6 Constructing a faithful representation of an abstract Lie algebra . 19 1 Hofer Joachim An introduction to Lie algebras and the theorem of Ado Introduction Lie groups and Lie algebras are of great importance in modern physics, particularly in the context of (continu- ous) symmetry transformations.
    [Show full text]
  • Linear Groups, Nilpotent Lie Algebras, and Identities
    Representing Lie algebras using approximations with nilpotent ideals Wolfgang Alexander Moens∗ 2015 Abstract We prove a refinement of Ado’s theorem for Lie algebras over an algebraically-closed field of characteristic zero. We first define what it means for a Lie algebra g to be approximated with a nilpotent ideal, and we then use such an approximation to construct a faithful repre- sentation of g. The better the approximation, the smaller the degree of the representation will be. We obtain, in particular, explicit and combinatorial upper bounds for the minimal degree of a faithful g-representation. The proofs use the universal enveloping algebra of Poincar´e-Birkhoff-Witt and the almost-algebraic hulls of Auslander and Brezin. Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Preliminaries 3 2.1 The nil-defect of a Lie algebra . 3 2.2 Almost-algebraic Lie algebras . 4 3 Quotientsoftheuniversalenvelopingalgebra 4 3.1 Filtrations...................................... 5 3.2 Notation....................................... 5 3.3 From filtrations to weights and submodules . .. 5 arXiv:1703.00338v1 [math.RA] 1 Mar 2017 3.4 Propertiesofthequotientmodule. .. 7 4 Proof of the main results 8 5 Application: representations of graded Lie algebras 8 1 Introduction The classical theorem of Ado and Iwasawa states that every finite-dimensional Lie algebra g over a field F admits a finite-dimensional, faithful representation. That is: there exists a natural number n and a homomorphism ϕ : g gln(F) of Lie algebras with ker(ϕ)= 0 . −→ { } ∗ This research was supported by the Austrian Science Foundation FWF (Grant J3371-N25). 1 But it is in general quite difficult to determine whether a given Lie algebra g admits a faith- ful representation of a given degree n.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation of Lie Algebra with Application to Particles Physics
    REPRESENTATION OF LIE ALGEBRA WITH APPLICATION TO PARTICLES PHYSICS A Project Report submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in MATHEMATICS by Swornaprava Maharana (Roll Number: 411MA2129) to the DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS National Institute Of Technology Rourkela Odisha - 768009 MAY, 2013 CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the project report entitled Representation of the Lie algebra, with application to particle physics is the bonafide work carried out by Swornaprava Moharana, student of M.Sc. Mathematics at National Institute Of Technology, Rourkela, during the year 2013, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the Degree of Master of Science In Mathematics under the guidance of Prof. K.C Pati, Professor, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela and that the project is a review work by the student through collection of papers by various sources. (K.C Pati) Professor Department of Mathematics NIT Rourkela ii DECLARATION I hereby declare that the project report entitled Representation of the Lie algebras, with application to particle physics submitted for the M.Sc. Degree is my original work and the project has not formed the basis for the award of any degree, associate ship, fellowship or any other similar titles. Place: Swornaprava Moharana Date: Roll No. 411ma2129 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT It is my great pleasure to express my heart-felt gratitude to all those who helped and encouraged me at various stages. I am indebted to my guide Professor K.C Pati for his invaluable guid- ance and constant support and explaining my mistakes with great patience. His concern and encouragement have always comforted me throughout.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1907.02925V2 [Math.DG] 10 Jul 2020 Thereof)
    Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications SIGMA 16 (2020), 065, 14 pages Solvable Lie Algebras of Vector Fields and a Lie's Conjecture Katarzyna GRABOWSKA y and Janusz GRABOWSKI z y Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Poland E-mail: [email protected] z Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland E-mail: [email protected] Received February 04, 2020, in final form July 02, 2020; Published online July 10, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2020.065 Abstract. We present a local and constructive differential geometric description of finite- dimensional solvable and transitive Lie algebras of vector fields. We show that it implies a Lie's conjecture for such Lie algebras. Also infinite-dimensional analytical solvable and transitive Lie algebras of vector fields whose derivative ideal is nilpotent can be adapted to this scheme. Key words: vector field; nilpotent Lie algebra; solvable Lie algebra; dilation; foliation 2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: 17B30; 17B66; 57R25; 57S20 1 Introduction Sophus Lie began to study the so-called continuous groups around 1870. He was led to these ob- jects by two motives. One was to extend to differential equations the results of Galois theory for algebraic equations; the second to study the transformation groups of general geometrical struc- tures, in particular, to study and extend the properties of the group of contact transformations and \canonical" transformations, i.e., groups that arose in differential geometry and classical mechanics. We should remark, however, that the objects that Lie studied are not groups in the present day sense of the word.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0910.3540V1 [Math.RT] 19 Oct 2009 W,W] Htae Oue O H I Algebra Lie the Wa, LW, for TZ, OW, Modules Ch, Whittaker BO, Ta, On2, WZ]
    BLOCKS AND MODULES FOR WHITTAKER PAIRS PUNITA BATRA AND VOLODYMYR MAZORCHUK Abstract. Inspired by recent activities on Whittaker modules over various (Lie) algebras we describe some general framework for the study of Lie algebra modules locally finite over a subalgebra. As a special case we obtain a very general setup for the study of Whittaker modules, which includes, in particular, Lie algebras with triangular decomposition and simple Lie algebras of Cartan type. We describe some basic properties of Whittaker modules, including a block decomposition of the category of Whittaker modules and certain properties of simple Whittaker modules under some rather mild assumptions. We establish a connection between our general setup and the general setup of Harish-Chandra subalgebras in the sense of Drozd, Futorny and Ovsienko. For Lie algebras with tri- angular decomposition we construct a family of simple Whittaker modules (roughly depending on the choice of a pair of weights in the dual of the Cartan subalgebra), describe their annihilators and formulate several classification conjectures. In particular, we construct some new simple Whittaker modules for the Virasoro al- gebra. Finally, we construct a series of simple Whittaker modules for the Lie algebra of derivations of the polynomial algebra, and consider several finite dimensional examples, where we study the category of Whittaker modules over solvable Lie algebras and their relation to Koszul algebras. 1. Introduction arXiv:0910.3540v1 [math.RT] 19 Oct 2009 The original motivation for this paper stems from the recent activi- ties on Whittaker modules for some infinite dimensional (Lie) algebras, which resulted in the papers [On1, On2, Ta, BO, Ch, OW, TZ, LW, Wa, LWZ, WZ].
    [Show full text]
  • Nilpotent Lie Groups
    Chapter 1 Nilpotent Lie groups In this chapter, we define the basic notions from Lie theory and explain the relations between Lie groups and Lie algebras. 1.1 Basics of Lie groups and Lie algebras Definition 1.1.1. A Lie group G is a group that is at the same time a C1 differentiable manifold, such that the group operations are C1 maps1. The identity element of G is denoted by e. Write Lg and Rg respectively for the left and right translations by g 2 G, i.e. Lgh = gh and Rgh = hg for all g 2 G. For example, for a finite dimensional vector space V , GL(V ) = flinear automorphism A of V with det A 6= 0g d is a Lie group. GL(V ) is written as GL(d; R) if V = R . The Lie algebra g of G is the tangent space TeG of G at e. For example, the Lie algbera of GL(V ) is the space of endomorphisms gl(V ) = End(V ) = flinear isomorphisms of V g. The Lie algebra is a vector space. However, to be a Lie algebra, the vector spaces needs to be endowed with an additional structure called the Lie bracket, which we will define now. −1 Given an element g 2 G, the map Ψg : h ! ghg is a continuous automorphism of G. In particular, it sends e to e and is differentiable. 1In fact, G being a topological manifold with continuous group operations would guar- antee the existence of such a desired C1 structure, or even real analytic structure.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Cohomology of Nilpotent Lie Algebras Bulletin De La S
    BULLETIN DE LA S. M. F. CH.DENINGER W. SINGHOF On the cohomology of nilpotent Lie algebras Bulletin de la S. M. F., tome 116, no 1 (1988), p. 3-14 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=BSMF_1988__116_1_3_0> © Bulletin de la S. M. F., 1988, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la revue « Bulletin de la S. M. F. » (http: //smf.emath.fr/Publications/Bulletin/Presentation.html) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/ conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ Bull. Soc. math. France, 116, 1988, p. 3-14. ON THE COHOMOLOGY OF NILPOTENT LIE ALGEBRAS BY CH. DENINGER AND W. SINGHOF (*) RESUME. — A une algebre de Lie graduee Q de dimension finie on associe un polynome P(fl). La longueur de P(fl) donne une borne inferieure pour la dimension de la cohomologie totale de fl. II y a des applications au rang toral des varietes differentiables et a la cohomologie des algebres stabilisateurs de Morava. ABSTRACT. — We associate to a graded finite dimensional Lie algebra Q a polynomial P(fl). The length of P(e) gives a lower bound for the dimension of the total cohomology of fl. There are applications to the toral rank of differentiable manifolds and to the cohomology of the Morava stabilizer algebras. 1. Introduction Our main objective in this note is to give lower bounds for the dimension of the total cohomology of finite dimensional nilpotent Lie algebras.
    [Show full text]
  • LIE ALGEBRAS and ADO's THEOREM Contents 1. Motivations
    LIE ALGEBRAS AND ADO'S THEOREM ASHVIN A. SWAMINATHAN Abstract. In this article, we begin by providing a detailed description of the basic definitions and properties of Lie algebras and their representations. Afterward, we prove a few important theorems, such as Engel's Theorem and Levi's Theorem, and introduce a number of tools, like the universal enveloping algebra, that will be required to prove Ado's Theorem. We then deduce Ado's Theorem from these preliminaries. Contents 1. Motivations and Definitions . 2 1.1. Historical Background. 2 1.2. Defining Lie Algebras . 2 1.3. Defining Representations of Lie Algebras . 5 2. More on Lie Algebras and their Representations . 7 2.1. Properties of Lie Algebras. 7 2.2. Properties of Lie Algebra Representations . 9 2.3. Three Key Implements . 11 3. Proving Ado's Theorem . 16 3.1. The Nilpotent Case . 17 3.2. The Solvable Case . 18 3.3. The General Case . 19 Acknowledgements . 19 References . 20 The author hereby affirms his awareness of the standards of the Harvard College Honor Code. 1 2 ASHVIN A. SWAMINATHAN 1. Motivations and Definitions 1.1. Historical Background. 1 The vast and beautiful theory of Lie groups and Lie algebras has its roots in the work of German mathematician Christian Felix Klein (1849{1925), who sought to describe the geometry of a space, such as a real or complex manifold, by studying its group of symmetries. But it was his colleague, the Norwe- gian mathematician Marius Sophus Lie (1842{1899), who had the insight to study the action of symmetry groups on manifolds infinitesimally as a means of determining the action locally.
    [Show full text]
  • A Method to Obtain the Lie Group Associated with a Nilpotent Lie Algebra
    An International Journal Available online at www.sciencedirect.com computers & .o,~.o~ ~_~o,.=o~. mathematics with applications ELSEVIER Computers and Mathematics with Applications 51 (2006) 1493-1506 www.elsevier.com/locate/camwa A Method to Obtain the Lie Group Associated with a Nilpotent Lie Algebra J. C. BENJUMEA, F. J. ECHARTE, J. Nr~I~EZ Departamento de Geometrfa y Topologia Facultad de MatemSticas, Universidad de Seville Apdo. 1160. 41080--Seville, Spain <j cbenj umea><eehar te><j nvaldes>~us, es A. F. TENORIO Dpto. de Economfa, M4todos Cuantitativos e H a Econdmica Universidad Pablo de Olavide Ctra. Utrera km. 1, 41013-Seville, Spain aftenvil@upo, es (Received November 2005; accepted December 2005) Abstract--According to Ado and Cm'tan Theorems, every Lie algebra of finite dimension can be represented as a Lie subalgebra of the Lie algebra associated with the general linear group of matrices. We show in this paper a method to obtain the simply connected Lie group associated with a nilpotent Lie algebra, by using unipotent matrices. Two cases are distinguished, according to the nilpotent Lie algebra is or not filiform. (~) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords--Lie group, Nilpotent Lie algebra, Filiform Lie algebra, Unipotent matrices. 1. INTRODUCTION At present, the mathematical research (and scientific research in general) cannot be understood without the help of computers. Since Apple and Haken, in 1976, proved the four color conjecture by using computers, the use of this tool has increased, first, like a supplementary support and, second, like a fundamental resource in this kind of research. It is so, in spite of the refusal of the mathematicians in accepting as many such procedures as the validity of proofs based on computational methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Lie Theory for Nilpotent L-Algebras
    ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS Lie theory for nilpotent L -algebras 1 By Ezra Getzler SECOND SERIES, VOL. 170, NO. 1 July, 2009 anmaah Annals of Mathematics, 170 (2009), 271–301 Lie theory for nilpotent L -algebras 1 By EZRA GETZLER Dedicated to Ross Street on his sixtieth birthday Abstract The Deligne groupoid is a functor from nilpotent differential graded Lie algebras concentrated in positive degrees to groupoids; in the special case of Lie algebras over a field of characteristic zero, it gives the associated simply connected Lie group. We generalize the Deligne groupoid to a functor from L -algebras concentrated in degree > n to n-groupoids. (We actually construct the1 nerve of the n-groupoid, which is an enriched Kan complex.) The construction of gamma is quite explicit (it is based on Dupont’s proof of the de Rham theorem) and yields higher dimensional analogues of holonomy and of the Campbell-Hausdorff formula. In the case of abelian L algebras (i.e., chain complexes), the functor is the Dold-Kan simplicial set. 1 1. Introduction Let A be a differential graded (dg) commutative algebra over a field K of characteristic 0. Let be the simplicial dg commutative algebra over K whose n-simplices are the algebraic differential forms on the n-simplex n. Sullivan [Sul77, 8] introduced a functor A Spec .A/ dAlg.A; / 7! D from dg commutative algebras to simplicial sets; here, dAlg.A; B/ is the set of morphisms of dg algebras from A to B. (Sullivan uses the notation A for this func- h i tor.) This functor generalizes the spectrum, in the sense that if A is a commutative This paper was written while I was a guest of R.
    [Show full text]