Sharan Burrow Re-Elected General Secretary of ITUC

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sharan Burrow Re-Elected General Secretary of ITUC Thursday 6 December 2018 Sharan Burrow re-elected General Secretary of ITUC The ACTU congratulates former President Sharan Burrow on being re-elected as General Secretary of the International Trade Union Confederation for another four-year term. Sharan came to the ACTU after a career as a teacher and after serving in various positions in the Australian Education Union, where she was elected President in 1992. Sharan was elected President of the ACTU from 2000 to 2010 serving alongside two Secretaries, Greg Combet and Jeff Lawrence. Sharan was first elected General Secretary at the ITUC in 2010 and has led the international trade union movement through a period of immense change in the structure of the global economy. During her time as President she has been a tireless advocate for the expansion of the rights of workers across the globe, continuing the work she began in Australia. Quotes attributable to ACTU Secretary Sally McManus: “The ACTU and the Australian union movement congratulates Sharan Burrow on her re-election as General Secretary of the ITUC. “Sharan has spent her working life in service of working people, not only in Australia but around the world. “It is a great source of pride for Australian unionists to have one of our own serving working people in this key position. We look forward to working with Sharan over the next four years to change the rules so working people everywhere can have more job security, safer workplaces and better wages while reversing the destructive march of neoliberal economics.” ENDS Media contact: Peter Green 0400 764 200, ACTU Media: 03 9664 7315 .
Recommended publications
  • Fairness Versus Choice: the Contested Discourses of 'Australian'
    Fairness Versus Choice: The Contested Discourses Of ‘Australian’ And ‘UnAustralian’ Values In The Industrial Relations Debate. Dr Kathie Muir Senior Lecturer, Gender, Work and Social Inquiry, School of Social Science, University of Adelaide Email: [email protected] Abstract The ACTU’s ‘Your rights at work’ campaign has broken new ground in employing SkyChannel and television advertising to deliver a unified and slick message about the dangers of the government’s WorkChoices legislation. President Sharan Burrow applauded ‘courageous working Australians’ prepared to stand up for their rights, families and communities by fighting to preserve national values of fairness, decency and a fair-go in the face of an ‘unprecedented attack’ on the rights of ordinary working people by the Howard government. The campaign therefore relied upon romanticised visions of nationalism as fairness, decency and people caring for each other, which Secretary Combet argued ‘beat as strongly in the hearts of [contemporary] Australians as they have for generations’. The appeal of this vision of fairness was (and is) essential to their on-going campaign to defeat the legislation and the coalition at the next federal election. Similarly, the government has sought to delegitimise the union campaign as undemocratic, bad for the economy, and out of date with current workplace realities; in other words, ‘unAustralian’. This paper examines the competing ways nationalism, fairness and choice have been deployed within both the government’s promotion of WorkChoices legislation and in the ACTU’s campaign to overturn the legislation. Fairness Versus Choice: The Contested Discourses Of ‘Australian’ And ‘UnAustralian’ Values In The Industrial Relations Debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Five Years in Building Workers' Power
    TWENTY FIVE YEARS IN BUILDING WORKERS’ POWER TWENTY FIVE YEARS IN Twenty-ve years ago when TWENTY FIVE YEARS IN BUILDING WORKERS’ POWER TWENTYWORKERS’ YEARS IN BUILDING FIVE GEFONT was formed, we had our BUILDING WORKERS’ POWER oce in a bag with a few sheets of paper and some les. Our total fund was personal savings accumulated together about 1,250 rupees. Those of us who were working full-time in the union had no xed place to sit or time to eat. But we had limitless passion to work for the working class. In crisis, we asked our cadres to contribute a day’s salary to the union. The well-equipped GEFONT oce today and its property of about 120 million rupees is the earning of those hardships. >dzlQmsf] ljsf;df klRr; jif{ years in building workers’power 1989-2014 Silver Jubilee Special General Federation of Nepalese Trade Unions (GEFONT) P.O.Box: 10652, Man Mohan Labour Building GEFONT Plaza, Putali Sadak, Kathmandu, Nepal. GEFONT publication 135 Tel: 977-1-4168000, Fax: 977-1-4168001, e-mail: [email protected] Trade Union Rights Silver Jubilee Special 1 Trade Union Rights Silver Jubilee Special 2014 September Editors Bishnu Rimal Umesh Upadhyaya Supporting Team Bidur Karki (Compilation) Kabindra Shekhar Rimal (Material compiling) Usha Kiran Bhandari (Translation) Mukunda Kattel (Translation) Manoj Pandey (Story wiriting) Deepa Dawadi (Decoding) Sunil Neuapne (Story writing) Kabindra Shrestha (Photo) Publication Management Bishnu Lamsal Jitendra Jonchhe Jitendra Shrestha Gunaram Acharya Lay-out Design Mahendra Shrestha Kiran Mali Published by General Federation of Nepalese Trade Unions (GEFONT) Man Mohan Labour Building, GEFONT Plaza, Putalisadak, Kathmandu, Nepal PO Box: 10652 Tel: + 977 1 4168000 Fax: + 977 1 4168012 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.gefont.org Price: Nrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Resisting Howard's Industrial Relations
    RESISTING HOWARD’S INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ‘REFORMS’: AN ASSESSMENT OF ACTU STRATEGY Tom Bramble ‘We are facing the fight of our lives. The trade union movement will be judged on how effectively we meet this challenge’ (AMWU National Secretary, Doug Cameron, May 2005). Howard’s planned industrial relations (IR) legislation confronts Australian unions with their worst nightmare. This is obviously the case for rank and file members who face a savage attack on their conditions, but the legislation is also terrifying for the union bureaucracy. Since Federation, Australian capitalism has operated on the basis of mediating class conflict at the workplace through arbitration and conciliation. This did not mean that class conflict was absent, or that the arbitration system was not itself a weapon in this conflict, only that at the base of any such conflict was a recognition by employers and the state of the legitimacy of the union bureaucracy in the industrial relations process. With its WorkChoices legislation, the Howard government has signalled an onslaught on this entire system and, with it, the central role of union officials in the system of structured class relationships. The purpose of this article is to provide a critical assessment of the strategy drawn up by the ACTU to resist WorkChoices. Although there are differences of emphasis within their ranks, the ACTU executive and office bearers have pursued a strategy with five main components. First, to convince employers that they are wrong to break from the system that has served them well for a century. Second, to lobby the ALP at state and federal levels.
    [Show full text]
  • In May 2000, Sharan Burrow Became the Second Woman to Be Elected President of the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU)
    In May 2000, Sharan Burrow became the second woman to be elected President of the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU). In December 2004, Sharan was the first woman to be elected President of the world union body, the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU), which represents 148 million workers in 231 affiliated organisations across 150 countries. In 2006 Sharan went on to be elected President of the newly founded International Trade Union Confederation that now represents some 168 million workers in 155 countries worldwide. In October 2000, Sharan also became the first woman to be elected President of the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions Asia Pacific Region Organisation. Sharan was born in 1954 in Warren, a small town in western New South Wales (NSW), into a family with a long history of involvement in unions and the struggle to improve the lives of working people. Her great, great grandfather participated in the shearers' strike of 1891/92, becoming one of the first organisers for the Australian Workers' Union and standing for the state seat of Cobar for the fledgling Australian Labor Party in 1896. Sharan studied teaching at the University of NSW in 1976 and began her teaching career in high schools around country NSW. She became an organiser for the NSW Teachers' Federation, based in Bathurst, and was President of the Bathurst Trades and Labour Council during the 1980s. Sharan was elected senior vice-president of the NSW Teachers' Federation and became president of the Australian Education Union (AEU) in 1992. She represented the AEU on the ACTU Executive through the 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • G20 2014: Perspectives from Mike Callaghan Business, Civil Society, Labour, Tim Costello Robert Milliner Think Tanks and Youth Holly Ransom Heather Smith
    Sharan Burrow G20 2014: Perspectives from Mike Callaghan business, civil society, labour, Tim Costello Robert Milliner think tanks and youth Holly Ransom Heather Smith Number 9 | March 2014 G20 2014: PERSPECTIVES FROM BUSINESS, CIVIL SOCIETY, LABOUR, THINK TANKS AND YOUTH The Lowy Institute for International Policy is an independent policy think tank. Its mandate ranges across all the dimensions of international policy debate in Australia – economic, political and strategic – and it is not limited to a particular geographic region. Its two core tasks are to: • produce distinctive research and fresh policy options for Australia’s international policy and to contribute to the wider international debate. • promote discussion of Australia’s role in the world by providing an accessible and high quality forum for discussion of Australian international relations through debates, seminars, lectures, dialogues and conferences. Funding to establish the G20 Studies Centre at the Lowy Institute for International Policy has been provided by the Australian Government. The views expressed in the contributions to this Monitor are entirely the authors’ own and not those of the Lowy Institute for International Policy or of the G20 Studies Centre. G20 2014: PERSPECTIVES FROM BUSINESS, CIVIL SOCIETY, LABOUR, THINK TANKS AND YOUTH TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview 3 Mike Callaghan Opening comments from the Australian sherpa 5 Dr Heather Smith Unlocking private sector led growth and investment 7 Robert Milliner The G20 as part of a wider community 16 Tim Costello
    [Show full text]
  • The International Trade Union Movement
    Chapter 4 The International Trade Union Movement John P. Windmuller, Stephen K. Pursey & Jim Baker* I. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW A. TO 1914 1. The international trade union movement is built on the foundations of millions of local unions. Trade unions form, develop and pursue their primary tasks of defending and improving the conditions of life and work of their members mainly within national systems of industrial relations. Yet, for well over a century, trade unions have also had international interests and commitments, many of * John P. Windmuller (†) has been Martin P. Chaterwood Professor in the New York State School of Industrial and Labour Relations at Cornell University since 1951, specializing in international and comparative labour relations. Stephen K. Pursey was Head of the Economic and Social Policy Department of the ICFTU, and is currently Director of the Multilateral Cooperation Department at the ILO (E-mail: [email protected]). Jim Baker is Coordinator of the Council of Global Unions, composed of Global Union Federations, the International Trade Union Confederation, and the Trade Union Advisory Committee to the OECD (E-mail: [email protected]). R. Blanpain, Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations in Industrialized Market Economies, pp. 75–100 ©2014 Kluwer Law International BV, The Netherlands. 75 76 John P. Windmuller, Stephen K. Pursey & Jim Baker which they have expressed through international trade union organizations. The purpose of this chapter is to briefly recall this history so that the emerging new features of international unionism can be seen in perspective.1 2. Two different types of international trade union organizations established themselves securely in the last decades of the nineteenth century and the first decade of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Driving Force BIRTH and EVOLUTION of TRIPARTISM – ROLE the ILO WORKERS’ GROUP the ILO in 1991 and Was Appointed Deputy Director-General in 1996
    THE DRIVING FORCE The Driving Force Beyond stating that the International Labour Organization has, since 1919, had a unique tripartite structure, with the participation of govern- BIRTH AND EVOLUTION ments and employers’ and workers’ organizations, not much has been written about how tripartism actually works. In our days, the question is even sometimes asked: what is the “added value” of the social partners OF TRIPARTISM – ROLE in discussing and deciding on labour and social policies? Equally, the fundamental link between social justice and industrial peace — and indeed peace in general — is frequently overlooked. However, the world of labour is not an isolated area and cannot be treated in a vacuum. This OF THE ILO WORKERS’ GROUP book tries to show how tightly intermeshed it is with the world economy and political circumstances and how tripartite cooperation influences them. It also shows how this labour agenda has crystallized and promoted universally recognized human rights. It recounts the story of the hundred years of the ILO from the perspec- tive of the Workers’ Group. The goals and guiding principles of the first Kari Tapiola modern multilateral organization set up at the Paris Peace negotiations in 1919 were determined by the trade unions and social reformers. The body of International Labour Standards lies on the foundation which, above all, the Workers’ Group has advanced. At the same time, social justice also calls for direct negotiations and agreement between the trade unions and the employers. The book gives examples of the dynamics at work between the three groups of the ILO and explains how, over time, the force that has driven its agenda has been the Workers’ BIRTH AND EVOLUTION OF TRIPARTISM – ROLE THE ILO WORKERS’ GROUP Group.
    [Show full text]
  • ACTU 75Th Anniversary Commemorative Booklet.Pdf
    AUSTRALIAN COUNCIL OF TRADE UNIONS’ 75th anniversary COMMEMORATIVE BOOKLET Autographs THE ACTU 75 YEARS STRONG When union delegates gathered in the Victorian Trades Hall in 1927 to establish the Australian Council of Trade Unions they had a clear vision — to lift the living standards and quality of working life of working people. And their strategy to achieve this was also clear — to build union organisation of the workforce on a national basis. 75 years further on, the ACTU, its affiliated unions and their members can celebrate a proud record of achievement on behalf of working Australians and the community. The industrial gains are many: decades of wage increases through the award system and campaigns in the field, safer workplaces, equality for women, improvements in working hours, entitlements to paid holidays and better employment conditions, and the establishment of a universal superannuation system. The ACTU has played a role in all of these achievements, but has contributed to fairness and justice in the community as well – contributing to Australia’s post-war development and immigration program, the social security system, Medicare and education — to name just a few areas of policy. The ACTU has also represented Australian unionism in the international arena, opposing discrimination and oppression and supporting human rights. The ACTU aid agency, APHEDA — Union Aid Abroad, contributes to humanitarian projects in many countries. The enduring commitment of working Australians to a fairer society is reflected in the continuing fight to protect the fundamental principles of unionism. The right to organise and the right to collectively bargain sit at the heart of the 21st century struggle for a just Australia, just as it did throughout the previous century.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Leaders at the Annual Meeting 2017
    Labour Leaders at the Annual Meeting 2017 A community of 13 Labour Leaders join in Davos to help inspire responsive and responsible leadership Sharan Burrow, General Secretary, International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), Brussels BA; diplomas in education and special education. Former President, Australian Council of Trade Unions. Member of the Board: Australia Institute; Global Reporting Initiative Stakeholder Council; Committee for Melbourne. Expertise: education, industrial relations, social policy. Stephen Cotton, General Secretary, International Transport Workers' Federation, United Kingdom General Secretary of the International Transport Workers' Federation (ITF), the federation of international transport unions. Some 700 unions, representing more than 4.8 million transport workers from 150 countries, are members of the ITF. The Federation organizes workers in ships, ports, railways, road freight and passenger transport, inland waterways, fisheries, tourism and civil aviation. It is dedicated to the advancement of independent and democratic trade unionism and to the defence of fundamental human and trade union rights. John Evans, General Secretary, Trade Union Advisory Committee to the OECD, France Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, University of Oxford. Formerly: teacher in Introductory Economics; Economist, Trades Union Congress, London; positions with International Federation of Commercial, Clerical and Technical Employees, Geneva; Research Officer, European Trade Union Institute, Brussels. Since 2012, Chief Economist, International Trade Union Confederation, Brussels. Formerly, not-for-profit board positions including with the Global Reporting Initiative and the Helsinki Group. Member: Comit+® M+®dicis, Amundi Group; Conseil d'Orientation; IDDRI; Council of Ruskin College, Oxford. Dennis H. George, General Secretary, Federation of Unions of South Africa, South Africa PhD Candidate with Da Vinci Institute of Technology, Masters Degree with Da Vinci Institute of Technology.
    [Show full text]