DOCSLIB.ORG

Cleve Hill Solar Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cleve Hill Solar Park CLEVE HILL SOLAR PARK THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSES TO SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED AT DEADLINE 3 August 2019 Revision A Document Reference: 12.3.1 Submitted: Deadline 4 www.clevehillsolar.com Responses to Written Representations Received at Deadline 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 2 Stakeholder Organisation Written Representations and The Applicant’s Responses 2 2.1 REP3-049 Canterbury City Council .......................................................................... 2 2.2 REP3-050 Faversham and Swale East Branch Labour Party ....................................... 5 2.3 REP3-054 Kent County Council on behalf of Kent County Council, Swale Borough Council and Canterbury City Council .............................................................................. 12 2.4 REP3-055 Swale Borough Council ......................................................................... 26 2.5 REP3-056 Swale Borough Council ......................................................................... 27 2.6 REP3-062 CPRE Kent (Biodiversity) ....................................................................... 30 2.7 REP3-063 CPRE Kent (Aviation Glare) ................................................................... 36 2.8 REP3-064 CPRE Kent (Construction Traffic) ........................................................... 38 2.9 REP3-065 CPRE Kent (Climate Change and Carbon Sequestration) ........................... 41 2.10 REP3-066 Faversham Creek Trust ......................................................................... 43 2.11 REP3-067 Faversham & Oare Heritage Harbour Group ............................................ 46 2.12 REP3-069 The Faversham Society ......................................................................... 49 2.13 REP3-070 The Faversham Society ......................................................................... 56 2.14 REP3-076 Helen Whately MP ................................................................................ 59 2.15 REP3-079 Kent Wildlife Trust ............................................................................... 61 2.16 REP3-082 Natural England ................................................................................... 63 3 Other Written Representations By members of the Public and The Applicant’s Responses ................................................................................................................ 72 3.1 REP2-072 / REP3-057 Bob Gomes (Ornithology) .................................................... 72 3.2 REP2-060 / REP3-058 Dr Bruno Erasin (Agricultural Land Classification) ................... 83 3.3 REP3-059 Dr Bruno Erasin (Environmental Risks from the Battery Storage System) ... 94 3.4 REP3-081 Matthew Hatchwell (Ecosystem Services, Managed Realignment and European Eel) ............................................................................................................. 95 3.5 REP3-083 Penelope Geoghegan ............................................................................ 98 3.6 REP3-085 Stephen Ledger ................................................................................... 98 3.7 AS-038 Dr Tim Ingram ....................................................................................... 101 4 Appendix A - Deadline 3 Responses Received Tracker ....................................... 110 Cleve Hill Solar Park Ltd Arcus Consultancy Services Ltd August 2019 Page i Responses to Written Representations Received at Deadline 3 List of Abbreviations AHLV Area of High Landscape Value ALC Agricultural Land Classification AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty AR HMA Arable Reversion Habitat Management Area BBPP Breeding Bird Protection Plan CCC Canterbury City Council CEMP Construction Environment Management Plan CHSP Cleve Hill Solar Park CHSPL Cleve Hill Solar Park Limited CNMP Construction Noise Management Plan CTMP Construction Traffic Management Plan DCO Development Consent Order DEFRA Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs EA Environment Agency EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ES Environmental Statement FGM HMA Freshwater Grazing Marsh Habitat Management Area FRA Flood Risk Assessment FTC Faversham Town Council GREAT Graveney Rural Environment Action Team Ha Hectares HGV Heavy Goods Vehicle HMA Habitat Management Area HMSG Habitat Management Steering Group HRA Habitat Regulations Assessment IDB Internal Drainage Board ISH Issue Specific Hearing KCC Kent County Council kV Kilovolt LBMP Landscape and Biodiversity Management Plan LIR Local Impact Report LNR Local Nature Reserve LVIA Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment MAFF Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food MEASS Medway Estuary and Swale Strategy MHWS Mean High Water Springs MR Managed Realignment MW Megawatt NPS National Policy Statement NSIP Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project PEIR Preliminary Environmental Information Report PINS Planning Inspectorate PRoW Public Rights of Way PV Photovoltaic RIAA Report to Inform Appropriate Assessment RR Relevant Representations SBC Swale Borough Council SPA Special Protection Area SoCG Statement of Common Ground SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest WWII World War Two Arcus Consultancy Services Ltd Cleve Hill Solar Park Ltd Page ii August 2019 Responses to Written Representations Received at Deadline 3 1 INTRODUCTION 1. This document provides Cleve Hill Solar Park Ltd’s (the Applicant’s) response to the Written Representations (WRs) submitted to the Planning Inspectorate (PINS) by Deadline 3 on 1 August 2019, relating to the Development Consent Order Application (the DCO Application) for Cleve Hill Solar Park (the Development). 2. Table 1.1 lists the organisations which made submissions at Deadline 3. The Applicant has responded to the points raised by these stakeholders in Section 2 of this document. 3. A further 12 WRs were submitted by members of the public. These responses have been grouped by topic and are addressed on that basis in Section 3 of this document. 4. References to the Application documentation are provided where necessary according to the reference system set out in the Cleve Hill Solar Park Examination Library. Table 1.1: List of organisations which submitted Written Representations PINS Written Representation Received from Reference REP3-049 Canterbury City Council REP3-050 Faversham and Swale East Branch Labour Party REP3-054 Kent County Council on behalf of Kent County Council, Swale Borough Council and Canterbury City Council REP3-055 Swale Borough Council REP3-056 Swale Borough Council REP3-062 CPRE Kent REP3-063 REP3-064 REP3-065 REP3-066 Faversham Creek Trust REP3-067 Faversham & Oare Heritage Harbour Group REP3-069 The Faversham Society REP3-070 The Faversham Society REP3-076 Helen Whately MP REP3-079 Kent Wildlife Trust REP3-082 Natural England 5. Other representations received from members of the public raising issues in addition to those covered in other responses have also been addressed. Table 1.2 sets out the representations addressed in this document by author and the topics raised. Table 1.2 List of Representations Received at Deadline 3 from Members of the Public requiring responses PINS Representation Received Topics Raised Reference from REP2-072 Bob Gomes Ornithology REP3-057 REP2-060 Dr Bruno Erasin Agricultural Land Classification REP3-058 REP3-059 Dr Bruno Erasin Environmental Risks from the Battery Storage System REP3-081 Matthew Hatchwell Ecosystem Services and Managed Realignment European Eel REP3-083 Penelope Geoghegan Scale, location, appearance, wildlife, construction traffic route, alternatives (solar panels on new housing) REP3-085 Stephen Ledger Policy, need, environmental, alternatives AS-038 Dr Tim Ingram Climate change, biodiversity loss, carbon sequestration, flooding, ornithology Cleve Hill Solar Park Ltd Arcus Consultancy Services Ltd August 2019 Page 1 Responses to Written Representations Received at Deadline 3 2 STAKEHOLDER ORGANISATION WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS AND THE APPLICANT’S RESPONSES 2.1 REP3-049 Canterbury City Council Table 2.1: The Applicant’s Comments on Canterbury City Council’s Written Representation Ref. Statement Applicant’s Comment TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 PRE-APPLICATION ENQUIRY 1 TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 PRE-APPLICATION ENQUIRY 2 In paragraph 28 of its Local Impact Report The Applicant notes these comments. (LIR) submitted on 31st July 2018, CCC advised that it would provide further comments once an independent assessment on the landscape impact of the proposed development had been carried out. Since the issue specific hearing on 23rd July 2019, CCC have reviewed the independent assessment and remain of the view that the proposed development would have a detrimental impact on the setting of the Seasalter Marshes Landscape Character Area (LCA) and the North Kent Marshes Area of High Landscape Value (AHLV). However, CCC wish to make the following additional comments on landscape and visual amenity matters, particularly in relation to the methodology and choice of viewpoints used to inform the Applicant’s Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) and the Applicant’s assessment of the landscape effects of the proposed development. Methodology 3 Overall, CCC raise no objections to the The Applicant stands by its initial assessment of landscape methodology used in the LVIA submitted by value for the AHLV (North Kent Marshes) based on policy LB2 the Applicant. However, CCC consider that the (Canterbury
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MANAGEMENT of the MARSHES
    MANAGEMENT of the MARSHES An analysis of the intentions of farmers and landowners in respect of marsh management post ESA and Environmental Stewardship. Strumpshaw Fen, RSPB Produced by Farm Conservation. Funded by the Broads Authority and the Norfolk Biodiversity Partnership. October 2014 MANAGEMENT of the MARSHES The report is a Broads Authority and Norfolk Biodiversity Partnership initiative, undertaken by Farm Conservation Limited, supported by Broads Authority for mapping, and working with Natural England. Project manager Andrea Kelly, Senior Ecologist (Broads Authority) Anne Casey, Coordinator Norfolk Biodiversity Partnership Acknowledgements: ;OHURZHYLK\L[V[OLTHU`MHYTLYZHUKSHUKV^ULYZ^OV[VVR[OL[YV\ISL[VÄSSPUVUSPULVYWHWLY X\LZ[PVUUHPYLZ4HU`V[OLYMHYTLYZ[OLUHSZV[VVRWHY[PU[LSLWOVULX\LZ[PVUUHPYLZVYMHJL[VMHJLPU[LY]PL^Z ;OHURZHSZVNV[VZL]LYHS-HYT(K]PZLYZ^OVNH]L[OLPYHK]PJLHUK[OLILULÄ[VM[OLPYL_WLYPLUJLMYLLS`HUK generously, particularly Robert Camps and Richard MacMullen. Thanks also to Andrea Kelly, Broads Authority and Mike Edwards, Natural England for assisting with design of the questionaire and scoping the project, to Norfolk Biodiversity Partnership who funded the work, and to Sam Neal at NBIS who provided some of the data. We also acknowledge the contribution made by the Communications Team at Anglia Farmers, particularly :HT)HYYLSSHUK7H\S)HSL^OVOLSWLKKL]LSVW[OLVUSPULX\LZ[PVUUHPYLHUKMVY[OLÄUHSWYVK\J[PVU of the report. Citation: Authors: Gelpke S, Thompson H, and Walker H, (29th October 2014) Management of the Marshes. Broads Authority
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Residential Development, Land Off Barrowby Road, Grantham Lincolnshire
    GLADMAN DEVELOPMENTS LTD PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, LAND OFF BARROWBY ROAD, GRANTHAM LINCOLNSHIRE Environmental Impact Assessment Environmental Statement December 2014 14268-R02 v3 ES COPYRIGHT The copyright of this document remains with Aspect Landscape Planning Ltd. The contents of this document therefore must not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part for any purpose without the written consent of Aspect Landscape Planning Ltd. Aspect Landscape Planning Ltd Hardwick Business Park Noral Way Banbury Oxfordshire OX16 2AF t 01295 276066 f 01295 265072 e [email protected] w www.aspect-landscape.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 3 CONTEXT................................................................................................................................................. 3 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................................. 3 THE PROJECT TEAM ................................................................................................................................... 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................... 8 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 8 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REGULATIONS ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Manual for the Survey and Evaluation of the Aquatic Plant and Invertebrate Assemblages of Grazing Marsh Ditch Systems
    A manual for the survey and evaluation of the aquatic plant and invertebrate assemblages of grazing marsh ditch systems Version 6 Margaret Palmer Martin Drake Nick Stewart May 2013 Contents Page Summary 3 1. Introduction 4 2. A standard method for the field survey of ditch flora 5 2.1 Field survey procedure 5 2.2 Access and licenses 6 2.3 Guidance for completing the recording form 6 Field recording form for ditch vegetation survey 10 3. A standard method for the field survey of aquatic macro- invertebrates in ditches 12 3.1 Number of ditches to be surveyed 12 3.2 Timing of survey 12 3.3 Access and licences 12 3.4 Equipment 13 3.5 Sampling procedure 13 3.6 Taxonomic groups to be recorded 15 3.7 Recording in the field 17 3.8 Laboratory procedure 17 Field recording form for ditch invertebrate survey 18 4. A system for the evaluation and ranking of the aquatic plant and macro-invertebrate assemblages of grazing marsh ditches 19 4.1 Background 19 4.2 Species check lists 19 4.3 Salinity tolerance 20 4.4 Species conservation status categories 21 4.5 The scoring system 23 4.6 Applying the scoring system 26 4.7 Testing the scoring system 28 4.8 Conclusion 30 Table 1 Check list and scoring system for target native aquatic plants of ditches in England and Wales 31 Table 2 Check list and scoring system for target native aquatic invertebrates of grazing marsh ditches in England and Wales 40 Table 3 Some common plants of ditch banks that indicate salinity 50 Table 4 Aquatic vascular plants used as indicators of good habitat quality 51 Table 5a Introduced aquatic vascular plants 53 Table 5a Introduced aquatic invertebrates 54 Figure 1 Map of Environment Agency regions 55 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Milton Keynes Energy Mapping Project - Summary Report
    Milton Keynes Energy Mapping Project - Summary Report Final 30 Nov 2012 Centre for Sustainable Energy t. 0117 934 1400 3 St Peter’s Court f. 0117 934 1410 Bedminster Parade [email protected] Bristol BS3 4AQ www.cse.org.uk Registered company no. 2219673 Registered charity no. 298740 Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 4 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Terms of reference ..................................................................................................................................... 9 2 Existing low and zero carbon technologies ........................................................................................................10 3 Potential for low and zero carbon technologies ................................................................................................12 3.1 Wind power ..............................................................................................................................................12 3.1.1 Methodology .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Green Infrastructure to Combat Climate Change
    Green Infrastructure to Combat Climate Change A Framework for Action in Cheshire, Cumbria, Greater Manchester, Lancashire, and Merseyside March 2011 Prepared by Community Forests Northwest for the Northwest Climate Change Partnership European Union European Regional Development Fund European Union European Regional Development Fund Contents Executive Summary 5 The Vision 7 The Case for Combating Climate Change 9 The Case for Green Infrastructure 11 Developing the Framework for Action 12 The North West Climate Change Action Plan 12 The GRaBS Project 13 Delivering the Framework for Action 14 How to Deliver? 14 Who to Deliver? 14 District and Neighbourhood Level Delivery 14 Pan-Authority (or Sub/City Region) Level Delivery 15 The Actions 16 1. Overarching Actions 18 2. Managing Surface Water 23 3. Managing High Temperatures 26 4. Carbon Storage and Sequestration 29 5. Managing Riverine Flooding 32 6. Food Production 35 7. Material Substitution 38 8. Providing Low Carbon Fuels 40 9. Reducing the Need to Travel by Car 43 10. Helping Other Species Adapt 45 11. Managing Visitor Pressure 48 12. Reducing Soil Erosion 51 13. Managing Water Resources 54 14. Managing Coastal Flooding 56 Legislative and Policy Context 60 EU Legislation and Policy 60 UK Legislation, Policy and Guidance 60 Abbreviations 62 Organisations Shaping the Framework 63 4 Photo: McCoy Wynne Executive Summary The latest scientific evidence has reinforced the regeneration, low carbon economy, transport, health, fact that climate change is the greatest threat recreation, tourism, agriculture, and biodiversity. to our social well being and economic future. It is imperative that we all take what action we The Framework should be delivered by a broad range can now in order to both reduce greenhouse gas of organisations and professions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Drainage Channel Biodiversity Manual
    The Drainage Channel Biodiversity Manual Integrating wildlife and flood risk management The Drainage Channel Biodiversity Manual Integrating wildlife and flood risk management This document should be cited as: Buisson, R. S. K., Wade, P. M., Cathcart, R. L., Hemmings, S. M., Manning, C. J. & Mayer, L. (2008). The Drainage Channel Biodiversity Manual: Integrating Wildlife and Flood Risk Management. Association of Drainage Authorities and Natural England, Peterborough. Contents Page Foreword 1 Introduction 1 2 Background A manual for drainage channel biodiversity 2 Historical background 2 Wetland visions 4 Flood risk management 5 Flooding – processes and consequences 5 A changing climate 7 3 The drainage channel system and its management Multiple functions of drainage channels 9 The system – flood risk management 10 The system – biodiversity value 13 Underpinning ecological processes 15 The system – its biodiversity potential 18 4 Making decisions about intervention The wider-system approach 19 Planning for nature conservation 20 Targeting drainage channels for biodiversity enhancement 20 Making decisions – consultation 21 Compliance with legislation and policy 21 Government policy requirements 29 Water Level Management Plans 30 IDB Biodiversity Action Plans 31 Making decisions - emergency works 31 5 Management techniques Introduction 33 Choosing techniques 33 Core components of a channel management programme 34 Timing of vegetation cutting 34 Use of machinery 38 Techniques for specific interests 40 Techniques to apply for protected species
    [Show full text]
  • Bure Valley Discover Toolkit
    DISCOVER It’s our nature! For most of human history our lives have What’s more nature makes us feel good. been shaped by the local landscape: our Close your eyes and think of somewhere survival depended on knowing it well. really beautiful. The chances are your Knowledge of the wildlife and the habitats beautiful place was outdoors. Perhaps around us was second nature when most there was a river nearby (water makes of us worked on the land and walked to us feel really good), maybe the sun was our work places. Today you might think shining through the fresh leaves of a tree, we no longer need nature but the more and there’s a good chance birds were you think about your connections with singing in the background or a butterfly nature – and we hope this guide will was chasing around. inspire you to think about them – the The DISCOVER section of this guide more you see them everywhere. What’s introduces you to some of the important the paper in this book made from? What habitats that are found in the Bure Valley are you breathing, without even noticing, Living Landscape and tells you about the while you read this? wildlife you can discover here. Do I really need healthy ecosystems of our food plants depend on the ecosystems and a wildlife rich landscape? that maintain healthy soils. Much of the land in the Bure and Ant valleys is farmland. All Even if you are sitting indoors while you read of this farmland, whether producing crops or this, the life-giving oxygen in the next breath livestock, depends on supplies of fresh water.
    [Show full text]
  • AUDIO Sizewellc ISH10 Sessi
    AUDIO_SizewellC_ISH10_Session3_2708202 1 00:06 Good afternoon, everybody. Welcome back. I hope you were able to have a reasonable bite to eat in the half an hour since we were last together. 00:16 We are now at item DS drugi have on marine ecology and I want to look at the Environment Agency position in their written representation summarise annex B. Before I do that, just let me say so it is 25 to two now. We have got quite a lot to get through. I think that's if we do it in three, brisk 90 minute sessions. We should get there. So Environment Agency Mr. Scared or perhaps Dr. Markham. In relation to the revised DC application, you're the first set of revisions, the agency said this, you said that you thought the stock comparatives for smells were wrong. There was not enough information on the UK area and the mean and the percentage figures are the same. So there would appear to be an error in that. You also say withdraw test about you have a duty to ensure to excuse me a duty to ensure the conservation and maintain the diversity of freshwater fish, salmon, sea trout and eels and to conserve their aquatic environment which includes smelt. The way you put the objection on this ground, I must say sounds it suggests it's largely technical. And in colloquial terms, it sounds so your heart is not in it. In the in the solution column us after reciting all those things you simply say unless otherwise stipulated our fisheries powers equally apply to smelters to other species.
    [Show full text]
  • PAGHAM HARBOUR LOCAL NATURE RESERVE Management Plan
    RSPB PAGHAM HARBOUR LOCAL NATURE RESERVE Management Plan 2013 – 2018 Authors: Adrian Thomas, Nick Brooks, Rob Carver, Ivan Lang, Kathryn Hampson, Kathy Eels and Debbie Barnes, v. P1 1 Contents of the plan 1. SITE INFORMATION 1.1. Location and statutory information 1.1.1. Site location and relevant authorities 1.1.2. Aerial photographic coverage 1.1.3. Statutory, planning and other designations 1.1.4 Statutory site condition assessment 1.1.5 Tenure 1.1.6. Public access 1.2. Environmental information 1.2.1. Geology and soils 1.2.2. Hydrology 1.3. Biological information 1.3.1. Recording areas 1.3.2. Data sources and under-recorded groups 1.3.3. Habitats 1.3.4. Vegetation communities 1.3.5. Important plant and animal species 1.3.6. Population trends of important plant and animal species 1.4 Archaeology 1.5. Visitors and public affairs 1.5.1. Where are we now? 1.5.2. What is the profile of your visitors? 1.5.3. Visitor capacity, facilities and services. 1.6 History of recent management 2. EVALUATION and RATIONALE FOR MANAGEMENT 2a. Conservation 2a.1. Current issues and constraints 2a.2. Identification of the Features Influencing Management of the site 2a.3. Condition of the Features Influencing Management and the Main Factors affecting them 2a.4. Habitat management to enhance the visitor experience 2a.5. Predicted impacts of climate change on existing and potential important Features 2a.6. Rationale for any changes to conservation objectives and targets 2b. Visitors and public affairs 2c Demonstration use 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Ch a I R M a N : Si R Jo H N La W T O N CBE, FRS
    Adapting Institutions to Climate Change CHAIRMAN : SIR JOHN LAWTON CBE, FRS Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Presented to Parliament by Command of Her Majesty March 2010 Cm 7843 £26.60 The cover image of an adaptation snakes and ladders board depicts some of the risks and opportunities presented by climate change. A key to the images is provided below: 2: Elderly lady warm at home in the winter 6: New crop opportunities – vines 15: Cracked soil as a result of drought 17: Increased UK tourism 18: Extreme weather 21: Increased risk of flooding 22: New species in UK – dragonfly 24: New crops – sunflowers 29: Increased winter temperatures 31: Loss of species – purple saxifrage 34: Increased UK tourism – more cars on the road 39: Increased average temperatures 45: People queuing for drinking water 47: Species loss – dotterel The cover image was drawn for the RCEP by Guy Allen. © Crown Copyright 2010 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and other departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. For any other use of this material please contact the Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU or e-mail: [email protected]. ISBN: 9780101784320 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2349252 03/10 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Set-Aside Land for Wildlife
    \ Institute of Lea Terrestial V 7 Ecology Managing set-aside land for wildlife • a • Natural Conzonment Ranch Court á \ Institute of •,„„zip.„,Terrestrial my Ecology Managing set-aside land for wildlife /NSTII1JTE OFTERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY BUSHESTATE, PENICUIK MIDLOTHIAN 0126 OQB Natural Environment Research Council á \ Institute of inizs%. Terrestrial N/ 7 Ecology Managing set-aside land for wildlife ITE research publication no. 7 L G Firbank, H R Arnold, B C Eversham, J 0 Mountford, G L Radford, M G Telfer, J R Treweek, N R C Webb and T C E Wells LONDON: HIVISO Natural Environment Research Council ©Crown copyright 1993 Applications.for reproduction should be made to HMSO ISBN 0 11 701568 7 INSTRUTE OF TERRESTRKL ECOLOCIY BUSH ESTATE, PENICUIK MIDLOTHIAN .1 0126 008 The Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (ITE) is a component research organisation within the Natural Environment Research Council. The Institute is part of the Terrestrial and Freshwater Sciences Directorate, and was established in 1973 by the merger of the research stations of the Nature Conservancy with the Institute of Tree Biology. It has been at the forefront of ecological research ever since. The six research stations of the Institute provide a ready access to sites and to environmental and ecological problems in any part of Britain. In addition to the broad environmental knowledge and experience expected of the modem ecologist, each station has a range of special expertise and facilities. Thus, the Institute is able to provide unparallelled opportunities for long-term, multidisciplinary studies of complex environmental and ecological problems. ITE undertakes specialist ecological research on subjects ranging from micro-organisms to trees and mammals, from coastal habitats to uplands, from derelict land to air pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • Medway Agriculture Research Project
    MEDWAY AGRICULTURE RESEARCH PROJECT Kent & Sussex FWAG Kent Office: Coldharbour Farm, Wye, Ashford, Kent TN25 5DB telephone 01233 813186 www.fwag.org.uk [email protected] MEDWAY AGRICULTURE RESEARCH PROJECT Contents Page SUMMARY 555 1. INTRODUCTION 666 1.1 Introduction 6 1.2 Background to study 6 1.3 Approach to study 7 1.4 General description of study area 7 1.5 Farming in the study area - an overview 8 1.6 Acknowledgements 999 2. INFORMATION STUDY 101010 2.1 Farming background ––– national 101010 2.1.1Overview 10 2.1.2 Relevant 2009 key figures and trends for England 10 2.1.3 Agricultural support 11 2.1.4 Agricultural economics 13 2.1.5 Input prices 14 2.1.6 The horticulture sector 15 2.2 Recent changes and developments / impacts 171717 2.2.1 Overview 17 2.2.2 Bluetongue in Kent 17 2.2.3 Foot and Mouth Disease in Kent (FMD) 17 2.2.4 Waste Regulations 18 2.2.5 Cross-compliance 19 2.2.6 Catchment Sensitive Farming 19 2.2.7 Nitrate Vulnerable Zones 20 2.2.8 Climate change 22 2.3 PolicyPolicy,,,, incentives andandand opportunities 252525 2.3.1 Overview 25 2.3.2 CAP reform and Single Payment Scheme 25 2.3.3 Environmental Stewardship (agri-environment schemes) 26 2.3.4 England Woodland Grant Scheme 27 2.3.5 Campaign for the Farmed Environment (CFE) 28 2.3.6 RDPE / Leader 29 2.3.7 Market led initiatives 32 2.3.8 Direct marketing 33 2.4 Farming background ––– regional 343434 2 2.4.1 Overview 34 2.4 2 Pressures and opportunities 34 2.4.3 Land use and farming sectors 34 2.4.4 Designated areas 35 2.5 Farming background ––– Kent area 373737
    [Show full text]