2012 Kentucky Equine Survey Released September 6, 2013
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
2012 Kentucky Equine Survey Released September 6, 2013 LINDA WILSON LINDA In Appreciation The undertaking of a comprehensive statewide equine survey requires the assistance and cooperation of many organizations, institutions and individuals. This project would not have been possible without the dedicated support from many people. A special note of appreciation is in order for the following groups and individuals who provided significant contributions to the 2012 Kentucky Equine Survey. The Governor’s Office of Agriculture Policy and the owners sent their contact information to NASS in the in- Agricultural Development Board: GOAP provided grant terest of benefiting the entire industry. In addition, many funding for much of the cost of this study. We appreciate of these individuals were responsible for completing the its willingness to recognize the equine industry as a vital survey itself. part of Kentucky’s agricultural industry and the crucial Key Individual Contributors: need to assess its size and distribution. • Jennifer Battat, statistician, National Agricultural University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food Statistics Service and Environment: UK initiated this project with a sub- • Leland Brown, former director, National Agricultural stantial internal investment of funds, in addition to nu- Statistics Service (retired March 2013) merous administrative, faculty, staff and graduate student • Shawn Clark, deputy director, National Agricultural hours to assist with grant development, industry fund- Statistics Service raising, survey design, survey promotion across the Com- • Bob Coleman, PhD, PAS, director for undergraduate monwealth and data collection and analysis from equine education in equine science and management and ex- events like horse shows, races and trail rides, as well as tension horse specialist in UK’s Department of Animal directly from Kentucky residents. and Food Sciences The Kentucky Horse Council: KHC coordinated and sub- • Nancy Cox, PhD, associate dean for research in UK’s mitted the grant proposal to GOAP, resulting in a success- College of Agriculture, Food and Environment and ful grant request. In addition, KHC helped solicit equine Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station director industry matching funds, including a large contribution • Alison Davis, director of the Community & Economic from its own reserves, and helped design the survey in- Development Initiative of Kentucky, director of under- strument. Finally, KHC assisted in collecting horse owner graduate studies and associate extension professor in names for submission to the surveying agency and in UK’s Department of Agricultural Economics compiling the final report. • Ginny Grulke, executive director, Kentucky Horse Council (retired August 2013) National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Depart- • Audrey Jarrett, 2012 Kentucky Equine Survey project ment of Agriculture: NASS worked with UK and KHC to coordinator design an appropriate survey instrument and served as • Stephanie Johnson, graduate student in UK’s Depart- the sole data collection agency, ensuring confidentiality ment of Agricultural Economics of the results. In addition, NASS summarized the data and • Jeff Lemmons, statistician, National Agricultural Statis- produced the equine operation inventory results. tics Service Industry Financial Contributors: Many equine associa- • Mary Rossano, PhD, associate professor in UK’s De- tions, operations and individuals contributed financially partment of Animal and Food Sciences to this effort. A complete list is available in both in the • Jill Stowe, PhD, director of UK’s Ag Equine Programs online appendix (link) and inside the back cover of this and associate professor UK’s Department of Agricul- report. tural Economics • Holly Wiemers, MA, communications director for UK’s Kentucky’s Equine Operation Owners: As with any sur- Ag Equine Programs vey, the accuracy of the results is a direct reflection of the completeness of the database. More than 13,000 horse Key Findings This comprehensive statewide survey of all breeds of horses, ponies, donkeys and mules was the first such study undertaken in Kentucky since 1977. Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 1 of the study was a statewide survey of equine Phase 2 of the project entailed an economic impact operations that included an inventory of all breeds of analysis of Kentucky’s equine industry. According equine, including horses, ponies, donkeys and mules. to three of the most commonly-used measures of It included a look at sales, income, expenses and as- economic impact: sets of those operations. Findings include: • The output effect, or the increase in sales of • Kentucky is home to 242,400 horses. total goods and services due to the presence of • There are approximately 35,000 equine opera- the equine industry, was measured at approxi- tions in Kentucky. mately $3 billion. • 1.1 million acres in Kentucky are devoted to • The employment effect, or the number of jobs equine use. created, was measured at 40,665. • The total value of the state’s equine and equine- • The value added effect, which is new income related assets is estimated at $23.4 billion. paid to workers, profits earned by businesses or • The total of all equine-related sales and income dividends paid to shareholders, was estimated for equine operations in 2011 was about $1.1 to be $1.4 billion. billion. • Total equine-related expenditures by equine op- In addition, the tax contribution of the equine in- erations in 2011 totaled about $1.2 billion; 77% of dustry to the state of Kentucky was approximately operating expenses are spent in Kentucky. $134 million. Equine Breeds in Kentucky Primary Use of Kentucky’s Equines Thoroughbred 54,000 Arabian and Half-Arabian 5,500 Trail riding/pleasure 79,500 Quarter Horse 42,000 Appaloosa 3,800 Broodmares 38,000 Tennessee Walking Horse 36,000 Belgian 3,300 Idle/not working 33,000 American Saddlebred 14,000 Morgan 2,000 Competition/show 24,500 Donkeys and mules 14,000 Percheron 1,600 Yearlings, weanlings and 23,000 Mountain Horse breeds 12,500 Paso Fino 1,500 foals Standardbred 9,500 Hackney Horse 1,100 Racing 15,000 Miniature Horses 7,000 Pinto (excludes Paint) 900 Other activities 13,000 Ponies 7,000 Clydesdale 200 Work/transportation 12,500 Paint 6,500 Other 20,000 Stallions at stud 3,900 Operations and Inventory 3,340 Equine Operations 20,900 Inventory 9 7 8 7,140 2,760 6,580 82,800 15,600 42,500 2 1,800 6 10,400 1,850 1 13,600 4,080 2,740 3,220 3 20,600 16,200 5 19,200 4 5 6 Background s with any key indus- The horse is the signature in- try, the equine indus- dustry of Kentucky, but cur- Atry prospers when it is mea- rent benchmarks are needed sured, growth opportunities WILSON LINDA to evaluate the impact of fu- assessed, challenges defined ture changes in the economy, and solutions proposed and the regulatory environment, endeavored. To effectively as- the business climate and the sess the industry, it is critical to changing American lifestyle. have a current inventory of the In addition, current bench- existing population of horses marks provide the informa- and equine operations. tion needed to assess opportu- nities for growth, corrections While Kentucky promotes for areas of contraction or itself as the “Horse Capital of identification of new markets the World,” the last thorough or opportunities. equine inventory in Kentucky was undertaken in 1977, leav- Finally, Kentucky’s national ing the industry with 35 years of changes, growth image is heavily based on the presence of the and contraction that were neither measured nor horse. Horses are one of the very cornerstones analyzed. of Kentucky’s culture. To allow these institutions and landscape wonders to become devalued due Kentucky’s equine landscape varies across the state. to neglect would affect jobs and income, not only In some areas, breeds and disciplines are localized, from equine operations, but also from the ancillary while others can be found in all parts of the state. businesses affected by tourism and hospitality, and And the equine industry extends far beyond “just” would ultimately take away the uniqueness and horses. We know of the operation- and horse-relat- cultural identity of Kentucky. ed activities, but we may forget about the numer- ous other sectors the equine industry touches. The In response to these needs, in 2011, the Univer- equine industry offers a number of unique, equine- sity of Kentucky and the Kentucky Horse Council, related tourism opportunities. There are ancillary with support by industry organizations spearhead- supporting businesses such as veterinarians and ed by the Kentucky Quarter Horse Association, farriers, as well as providers of fencing, feed, bed- the Kentucky Thoroughbred Farm Managers’ Club ding, insurance, laundry services, pharmaceuticals and Kentucky Thoroughbred Association/Ken- and specialized educational tucky Thoroughbred Owners opportunities. Some have and Breeders, and initial sup- even characterized Kentucky’s port from the University of equine industry, particularly Louisville, finally succeeded in in the Central Bluegrass re- securing funding for a large- gion, as an economic clus- scale, comprehensive equine ter, along with more familiar survey upon which future in- economic clusters like Napa dustry plans could be built. Valley (wine), Silicon Val- This was no small accomplish- ley (tech/computers) and the ment, because many groups, Research Triangle of North including the Kentucky Carolina. The existence of this Equine Education Project, type of business cluster