Appendix 10-Final Terrestrial Ecological Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix 10-Final Terrestrial Ecological Assessment FINAL Ecological Impact Assessment MARINE INTAKE AND OUTFALL INFRASTRUCTURE SERVITUDE PROJECT, ZONE 10, COEGA SEZ, EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE, SOUTH AFRICA. FINAL ECOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Prepared for: Prepared for: COEGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION COEGA SEZ BUSINESS CENTRE; CORNER ALCYON ROAD AND ZIBUKO STREET; ZONE 1, COEGA SEZ, PORT ELIZABETH, SOUTH AFRICA. Prepared by: PORT ELIZABETH Also in Cape Town, East London, Johannesburg, Grahamstown, Maputo (Mozambique) and Romsey (UK) www.cesnet.co.za OCTOBER 2020 REVISIONS TRACKING TABLE CES Report Revision and Tracking Schedule Document Title: Draft Ecological Impact Assessment Report for the proposed Marine Servitude Project, Zone 10, Coega SEZ, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Client Name & Coega Development Corporation – Coega SEZ Business Centre, Address: Corner of Alcyon Road and Zibuko Street, Zone 1, Coega SEZ, Port Elizabeth, South Africa. Status: Final Ecological Impact Assessment Issue Date: October 2020 Lead Author: Ms Nicole Wienand Reviewer: Dr Greer Hawley-McMaster Study Leader/ Registered Dr Alan Carter Environmental Assessment Dr Chantel Bezuidenhout Practitioner – Approval: No. of hard No. electronic Report Distribution Circulated to copies copies CDC 0 1 DEFF All I&APs Report Version Final - October 2020 This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of CES’s appointment and contains intellectual property and proprietary information that is protected by copyright in favour of CES. The document may therefore not be reproduced, used or distributed to any third party without the prior written consent of CES. This document is prepared www.cesnet.co.za exclusively for use by CES’s client. CES accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part), use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior written permission of CES. The document is subject to all confidentiality, copyright, trade secrets rules and intellectual property law and practices of South Africa. Ecological Impact Assessment Contact Details: Junior Botanical Specialist and Report Writer Name Ms Nicole Wienand Designation Junior Botanical Specialist, CES E-mail [email protected] Contact Details: Ecological Specialist, Report Reviewer, and Quality Control Name Dr Greer Hawley-McMaster Designation Principal Environmental Consultant E-mail [email protected] www.cesnet.co.za Head Office Address: Tel: +27 (0)46 622 2364 67 African Street, Grahamstown, 6139 CES Environmental and Social Advisory Services MARINE SERVITUDE PROJECT ii Ecological Impact Assessment Contents of the Specialist Report The contents of this specialist report complies with the legislated requirements as described in Appendix 6 of the National Environmental Management Act (No 107 of 1998; NEMA) Regulations of 2014 (as amended) (GN R. 326 of 2017). SPECIALIST REPORT REQUIREMENTS ACCORDING TO APPENDIX 6 SECTION OF GN R. 982 OF 2014, AS AMENDED IN GN R. 326 OF 2017 OF REPORT 1. A specialist report prepared in terms of these Regulations must contain— Chapter 1 (a) details of— and (i) the specialist who prepared the report; and Appendix E (ii) the expertise of that specialist to compile a specialist report including a curriculum vitae; (b) a declaration that the specialist is independent in a form as may be Section 1.2 specified by the competent authority; (c) an indication of the scope of, and the purpose for which, the report Chapter 2 was prepared; (cA) an indication of the quality and age of base data used for the Section 3.1 specialist report; (cB) a description of existing impacts on the site, cumulative impacts Chapter 8 of the proposed development and levels of acceptable change; and Section 9.1 (d) the duration, date and season of the site investigation and the Section 2.4 relevance of the season to the outcome of the assessment; and 3.1 (e) a description of the methodology adopted in preparing the report or carrying out the specialised process inclusive of equipment and Chapter 3 modelling used; (f) details of an assessment of the specific identified sensitivity of the site related to the proposed activity or activities and its associated Chapter7 structures and infrastructure, inclusive of a site plan identifying site alternatives; (g) an identification of any areas to be avoided, including buffers; Section 9.1.3 (h) a map superimposing the activity including the associated Chapter 5; structures and infrastructure on the environmental sensitivities of Chapter 7 the site including areas to be avoided, including buffers; and Section 9.1.3 (i) a description of any assumptions made and any uncertainties or Section 2.4 gaps in knowledge; (j) a description of the findings and potential implications of such Chapter 9 findings on the impact of the proposed activity or activities; (k) any mitigation measures for inclusion in the EMPr; Section 8.1 (l) any conditions for inclusion in the environmental authorisation; and Section (m) any monitoring requirements for inclusion in the EMPr or 9.2 environmental authorisation; (n) a reasoned opinion— (i) whether the proposed activity, activities or portions thereof should be authorised; (iA) regarding the acceptability of the proposed activity or activities; Section 9.3 and (ii) if the opinion is that the proposed activity, activities or portions thereof should be authorised, any avoidance, management and CES Environmental and Social Advisory Services MARINE SERVITUDE PROJECT iii Ecological Impact Assessment mitigation measures that should be included in the EMPr, and where applicable, the closure plan; (o) a description of any consultation process that was undertaken during the course of preparing the specialist report; (p) a summary and copies of any comments received during any Section 2.5 consultation process and where applicable all responses thereto; and (q) any other information requested by the competent authority. N/A (No other information has yet been requested) 2. (2) Where a government notice by the Minister provides for any protocol or minimum information requirement to be applied to a specialist report, the requirements as indicated in such notice will apply. * This report has been prepared in accordance with Appendix 6 of the NEMA EIA Regulations, and not the newly released Protocols for the Specialist Assessment and Minimum Report Content Requirements for Environmental Impacts on Terrestrial Plant and Animal Species (GN R. 1150) gazetted on the 30th October 2020, as the specialist assessment was commissioned prior to September 2020 (please refer to Appendix F for date of the commissioning of this specialist study). This report relates to October 2020. CES Environmental and Social Advisory Services MARINE SERVITUDE PROJECT iv Ecological Impact Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PROJECT TEAM 1 1.1. Details and Expertise of the Specialists .............................................................. 1 1.2. Declaration ............................................................................................................. 2 2 INTRODUCTION 5 2.1. Project description ................................................................................................ 5 2.2. Project location ..................................................................................................... 7 2.3. Objectives and Terms of Reference ..................................................................... 9 2.4. Assumptions and limitations ................................................................................ 9 2.5. Public consultation ............................................................................................. 10 3 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 11 3.1. The Assessment .................................................................................................. 11 3.2. Species of Conservation Concern ..................................................................... 12 3.3. Sampling Protocol ............................................................................................... 12 3.4. Vegetation Mapping ............................................................................................ 12 3.5. Sensitivity Assessment ...................................................................................... 13 3.6. Ecological Impact assessment ........................................................................... 15 3.6.1 Impact rating methodology .............................................................................. 15 4 RELEVANT LEGISLATION 16 5 DESCRIPTION OF THE BIOPHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT ................................ 20 5.1. Climate ................................................................................................................. 20 5.2. Topography ......................................................................................................... 21 5.3. Soils and Geology ............................................................................................... 22 5.4. Vegetation and Floristics .................................................................................... 24 5.4.1 South African Vegetation Map ......................................................................... 24 5.4.2 Local – NMBM Metropolitan Open Space System (MOSS, 2009) and the NMBM Bioregional Plan (2015) ................................................................................. 26 5.4.3 Local – Coega Open Space Management Plan (OSMP, 2014) .......................
Recommended publications
  • Freshwater Fishes
    WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE state oF BIODIVERSITY 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction 2 Chapter 2 Methods 17 Chapter 3 Freshwater fishes 18 Chapter 4 Amphibians 36 Chapter 5 Reptiles 55 Chapter 6 Mammals 75 Chapter 7 Avifauna 89 Chapter 8 Flora & Vegetation 112 Chapter 9 Land and Protected Areas 139 Chapter 10 Status of River Health 159 Cover page photographs by Andrew Turner (CapeNature), Roger Bills (SAIAB) & Wicus Leeuwner. ISBN 978-0-620-39289-1 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES 2 Western Cape Province State of Biodiversity 2007 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Andrew Turner [email protected] 1 “We live at a historic moment, a time in which the world’s biological diversity is being rapidly destroyed. The present geological period has more species than any other, yet the current rate of extinction of species is greater now than at any time in the past. Ecosystems and communities are being degraded and destroyed, and species are being driven to extinction. The species that persist are losing genetic variation as the number of individuals in populations shrinks, unique populations and subspecies are destroyed, and remaining populations become increasingly isolated from one another. The cause of this loss of biological diversity at all levels is the range of human activity that alters and destroys natural habitats to suit human needs.” (Primack, 2002). CapeNature launched its State of Biodiversity Programme (SoBP) to assess and monitor the state of biodiversity in the Western Cape in 1999. This programme delivered its first report in 2002 and these reports are updated every five years. The current report (2007) reports on the changes to the state of vertebrate biodiversity and land under conservation usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Information Biological Conservation No Safe Haven: Protection Levels Show Imperilled South African Reptiles Not
    Supplemental Information Biological Conservation No safe haven: protection levels show imperilled South African reptiles not sufficiently safe- guarded despite low average extinction risk Krystal A. Tolley, Joshua Weeber, Bryan Maritz, Luke Verburgt, Michael F. Bates, Werner Conradie, Margaretha D. Hofmeyr, Andrew A. Turner, Jessica M. da Silva, Graham J. Alexander Supplemental Figures S1-S3 Figure S1. Species richness of threatened and Near Threatened reptiles in South Africa. 1 Figure S2. Reptile species richness in South Africa (darker shades indicate higher richness), with the current protected area network indicated by the black outlines. 2 Figure S3. Reptile species richness in South Africa (darker shades indicate higher richness), with the current protected area network indicated by the grey shaded polygons and the protected area expansion network indicated by black polygon outlines. 3 Appendix S1. Protocol for Measuring Protection Level for South African Reptiles The following process was applied to measure the level of protection for each species, using the interpreted distributions for the species (see main text). We evaluated the effectiveness of South Africa’s protected area network in ensuring that minimum viable populations of reptiles are protected. We set a conservation target for protection of at least 10 fragments of protected habitat, each with areas greater than 10 km2 (1000 ha) for a total of 100 km2 for each species. The fragment size was considered to be the minimum area that would support viable populations, with the total area considered to be the total area needed to safeguard the species survival into the future. The interpreted distributions for each species were then intersected with South Africa’s protected area network (Government of South Africa, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Medicinal Practices of Sacred Natural Sites: a Socio-Religious Approach for Successful Implementation of Primary
    Medicinal practices of sacred natural sites: a socio-religious approach for successful implementation of primary healthcare services Rajasri Ray and Avik Ray Review Correspondence Abstract Rajasri Ray*, Avik Ray Centre for studies in Ethnobiology, Biodiversity and Background: Sacred groves are model systems that Sustainability (CEiBa), Malda - 732103, West have the potential to contribute to rural healthcare Bengal, India owing to their medicinal floral diversity and strong social acceptance. *Corresponding Author: Rajasri Ray; [email protected] Methods: We examined this idea employing ethnomedicinal plants and their application Ethnobotany Research & Applications documented from sacred groves across India. A total 20:34 (2020) of 65 published documents were shortlisted for the Key words: AYUSH; Ethnomedicine; Medicinal plant; preparation of database and statistical analysis. Sacred grove; Spatial fidelity; Tropical diseases Standard ethnobotanical indices and mapping were used to capture the current trend. Background Results: A total of 1247 species from 152 families Human-nature interaction has been long entwined in has been documented for use against eighteen the history of humanity. Apart from deriving natural categories of diseases common in tropical and sub- resources, humans have a deep rooted tradition of tropical landscapes. Though the reported species venerating nature which is extensively observed are clustered around a few widely distributed across continents (Verschuuren 2010). The tradition families, 71% of them are uniquely represented from has attracted attention of researchers and policy- any single biogeographic region. The use of multiple makers for its impact on local ecological and socio- species in treating an ailment, high use value of the economic dynamics. Ethnomedicine that emanated popular plants, and cross-community similarity in from this tradition, deals health issues with nature- disease treatment reflects rich community wisdom to derived resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Plant Diversity and Endemism in Namibia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Stellenbosch University SUNScholar Repository Bothalia 36,2: 175-189(2006) Patterns of plant diversity and endemism in Namibia P. CRAVEN* and P VORSTER** Keywords: Namibia, phytogeography, plant endemism ABSTRACT Species richness, endemism and areas that are rich in both species and endemic species were assessed and mapped for Namibia. High species diversity corresponds with zones where species overlap. These are particularly obvious where there are altitudinal variations and in high-lying areas. The endemic flora o f Namibia is rich and diverse. An estimated 16% of the total plant species in Namibia are endemic to the country. Endemics are in a wide variety o f families and sixteen genera are endemic. Factors that increase the likelihood o f endemism are mountains, hot deserts, diversity o f substrates and microclimates. The distribution of plants endemic to Namibia was arranged in three different ways. Firstly, based on a grid count with the phytogeographic value of the species being equal, overall endemism was mapped. Secondly, range restricted plant species were mapped individually and those with congruent distribution patterns were combined. Thirdly, localities that are important for very range-restricted species were identified. The resulting maps of endemism and diversity were compared and found to correspond in many localities. When overall endemism is compared with overall diversity, rich localities may consist o f endemic species with wide ranges. The other methods identify important localities with their own distinctive complement of species. INTRODUCTION (1994). It was based on distributional data per magiste­ rial district following Merxmiiller (1966-1972), as well Species diversity was traditionally measured by count­ as other literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Driftsands Nature Reserve Complex PAMP
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Driftsands Nature Reserve is situated on the Cape Flats, approximately 25 km east of Cape Town on the National Route 2, in the Western Cape Province. The reserve is situated adjacent to the Medical Research Centre in Delft and is bounded by highways and human settlement on all sides. Driftsands is bound in the northwest by the R300 and the National Route 2 and Old Faure road in the south. The northern boundary is bordered by private landowners, while the eastern boundary is formed by Mfuleni Township. The Nature Reserve falls within the City of Cape Town Metropolitan Municipality. The reserve experiences a Mediterranean-type climate with warm dry summers, and cool wet winter seasons. Gale force winds from the south east prevail during the summer months, while during the winter months, north westerly winds bring rain. Driftsands Nature Reserve represents of one of the largest remaining remnants of intact Cape Flats Dune Strandveld which is classified as Endangered, and harbours at least two Endangered Cape Flats endemics, Muraltia mitior and Passerina paludosa. The Kuils River with associated floodplain wetlands, dune strandveld depressions and seeps are representative of a wetland type that has been subjected to high cumulative loss, and provides regulatory ecosystem services such as flood attenuation, ground water recharge/discharge and water quality improvement. The site provides access for cultural and/or religious practices and provides opportunities for quality curriculum based environmental education. Driftsands Nature Reserve is given the highest priority rating within the Biodiversity Network (BioNet), the fine scale conservation plan for the City of Cape Town.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fine-Scale Conservation Plan for Cape Lowlands Renosterveld: Technical Report
    A Fine-Scale Conservation Plan for Cape Lowlands Renosterveld: Technical Report MAIN REPORT September 2003 Amrei von Hase Mathieu Rouget Kristal Maze Nick Helme Report No. CCU 2/03 Cape Conservation Unit Botanical Society of South Africa Pvt Bag X 10 7735 Claremont www.botanicalsociety.org.za/ccu Key Partners and Sponsors of the Cape Lowlands Renosterveld Project TABLE MOUNTAIN FUND 2 Acknowledgements Many individuals and organizations have contributed generously to the Cape Lowlands Renosterveld Project to whom the Botanical Society and the project team are greatly indebted. We express our appreciation to you in this section and in addition have provided acknowledgement to others in sections of this report where their contribution was relevant. We are particularly indebted to our key project partners, the Western Cape Nature Conservation Board (WCNCB), for putting their full support behind the project from its inception as well as their many contributions to the project. In Scientific Services we especially thank the late Chris Burgers, Helen de Klerk, Ernst Baard, Annelise le Roux, Guy Palmer and Andrew Turner for their guidance in the project planning and initiation stages, particularly on data and GIS matters. We are tremendously grateful to Chris who generously and infectiously shared with us his wealth of knowledge about the lowlands. In Operations we express our appreciation to the business unit managers, extension officers and regional ecologists who played a vital role particularly in shaping the final products of the project. We are especially grateful to Anton Wolfaardt and Chris Martens. Wendy Paisley of the Cape Conservation Unit (CCU) of the Botanical Society provided invaluable administrative and organizational support to the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • Sand Mine Near Robertson, Western Cape Province
    SAND MINE NEAR ROBERTSON, WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE BOTANICAL STUDY AND ASSESSMENT Version: 1.0 Date: 06 April 2020 Authors: Gerhard Botha & Dr. Jan -Hendrik Keet PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE SAND MINE AREA ON PORTION4 OF THE FARM ZANDBERG FONTEIN 97, SOUTH OF ROBERTSON, WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE Report Title: Botanical Study and Assessment Authors: Mr. Gerhard Botha and Dr. Jan-Hendrik Keet Project Name: Proposed expansion of the sand mine area on Portion 4 of the far Zandberg Fontein 97 south of Robertson, Western Cape Province Status of report: Version 1.0 Date: 6th April 2020 Prepared for: Greenmined Environmental Postnet Suite 62, Private Bag X15 Somerset West 7129 Cell: 082 734 5113 Email: [email protected] Prepared by Nkurenkuru Ecology and Biodiversity 3 Jock Meiring Street Park West Bloemfontein 9301 Cell: 083 412 1705 Email: gabotha11@gmail com Suggested report citation Nkurenkuru Ecology and Biodiversity, 2020. Section 102 Application (Expansion of mining footprint) and Final Basic Assessment & Environmental Management Plan for the proposed expansion of the sand mine on Portion 4 of the Farm Zandberg Fontein 97, Western Cape Province. Botanical Study and Assessment Report. Unpublished report prepared by Nkurenkuru Ecology and Biodiversity for GreenMined Environmental. Version 1.0, 6 April 2020. Proposed expansion of the zandberg sand mine April 2020 botanical STUDY AND ASSESSMENT I. DECLARATION OF CONSULTANTS INDEPENDENCE » act/ed as the independent specialist in this application; » regard the information contained in this
    [Show full text]
  • AFRICAN HERP NEWS ISSN 1017-6187 No
    AFRICAN HERP NEWS ISSN 1017-6187 No. 36 December 2003 CONTENTS AFRICAN HERP NEWS E DITORIAL.____________________ l NEWSLETTER OF THE S HORT C OMMUNICATIONS MENEGON M et al. Nguu North forest reserve, Tanzania.___ 2 HERPETOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION OF AFRICA N ATURAL HISTORY NOTES CUNNINGHAM PL & W ADANK. Geochelone pardalis. ____ 9 CUNNINGHAM PL & W ADANK. Pachydactylus turneri 10 GEOGRAPHICAL D ISTRIBUTION RASMUSSEN JB. Micrelaps vaillanti 12 SCHMIDT WR & SCOTT E. Lamprophis-- swazicus-------- 14 DU TOIT DA & ALBLAS A. Nucras livida 15 ESTERHUIZEN A et al. Varanus albigularis 16 BROAD LEY DG & VAN DAELE P. Colopus wahlbergi 20 BAUER AM & LAMB T. Pachydactylus fasciatus 20 H ERPETOLOGICAL S URVEYS CUNNINGHAM M et al. Cockscomb Mt. South Africa. ____22 RECENT AFRICAN H ERPETOLOGICAL LITERATURE_____ _ _ 26 NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS_ _____________38 HAA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.________ _ ____40 No. 36 December 2003 Af rican Herp News N o. 36 December 2003 HERPETOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION OF AFRICA http:/ /www. wits.ac.za/haa EDITORIAL FOUNDED 1965 The HAA is dedicated to the study and conservation of African reptiles and amphibians. Membership is open to anyone with an interest in the African herpetofauna. Members receive the It is now over a year since issue 35 of African Herp News and this long Association's journal, African Journal of Herpetolog,; (which publishes review papers, research overdue issue is replete with natural history and distribution notes, along with articles, short communications and book reviews - subject to peer review) and newsletter, Africa,i the latest update on African Herp literature from Bill Branch (apologies from Herp News (which includes short communications, life history notes, geographical distribution notes, herpetological survey reports, venom and snakebite notes, short book reviews, the editor for the delay).
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Ecological Restoration Strategies for Penisula Shale
    Towards ecological restoration strategies for Peninsula Shale Renosterveld: testing the effects of disturbance-intervention treatments on seed germination on Devil’s Peak, Cape Town by Penelope Anne Waller Dissertation presented in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science at the University of Cape Town, Department of Environmental and Geographical Sciences Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, Cape Town University of Cape Town Supervisor: Dr Pippin Anderson Co-supervisor: Dr Pat Holmes September 2013 The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town D eclarationeclarationeclaration I, the undersigned, know the meaning of plagiarism and declare that all of the work in the document, save for that which is properly acknowledged, is my own. University of Cape Town Signature: _____________________________ Date: ____________________________ i AAbstractbstractAbstract The ecological restoration of Peninsula Shale Renosterveld is essential to redress its conservation- target shortfall. The ecosystem is Critically Endangered and, along with all other renosterveld types in the Cape lowlands, declared ‘totally irreplaceable’. Further to conserving all extant remnants, ecological restoration is required to play a critical part in securing biodiversity and to meeting conservation targets. Remnants of Peninsula Shale Renosterveld are situated either side of the Cape Town city bowl and, despite formal protection, areas of the ecosystem are degraded and require restoration intervention.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Consequences of Dioecy in Angiosperms: the Effects of Breeding System on Speciation and Extinction Rates
    EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES OF DIOECY IN ANGIOSPERMS: THE EFFECTS OF BREEDING SYSTEM ON SPECIATION AND EXTINCTION RATES by JANA C. HEILBUTH B.Sc, Simon Fraser University, 1996 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Zoology) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA July 2001 © Jana Heilbuth, 2001 Wednesday, April 25, 2001 UBC Special Collections - Thesis Authorisation Form Page: 1 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada http://www.library.ubc.ca/spcoll/thesauth.html ABSTRACT Dioecy, the breeding system with male and female function on separate individuals, may affect the ability of a lineage to avoid extinction or speciate. Dioecy is a rare breeding system among the angiosperms (approximately 6% of all flowering plants) while hermaphroditism (having male and female function present within each flower) is predominant. Dioecious angiosperms may be rare because the transitions to dioecy have been recent or because dioecious angiosperms experience decreased diversification rates (speciation minus extinction) compared to plants with other breeding systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Data List Special Edition
    Newsletter of the Southern African Botanical Diversity Network Volume 6 No. 3 ISSN 1027-4286 November 2001 Invasive Alien Plants Part 2 Southern Mozambique Expedition Living Plant Collections: Lowveld, Mozambique, Namibia REDSABONET NewsDATA Vol. 6 No. 3 November LIST 2001 SPECIAL EDITION153 c o n t e n t s Red Data List Features Special 157 Profile: Ezekeil Kwembeya ON OUR COVER: 158 Profile: Anthony Mapaura Ferraria schaeferi, a vulnerable 162 Red Data Lists in Southern Namibian near-endemic. 159 Tribute to Paseka Mafa (Photo: G. Owen-Smith) Africa: Past, Present, and Future 190 Proceedings of the GTI Cover Stories 169 Plant Red Data Books and Africa Regional Workshop the National Botanical 195 Herbarium Managers’ 162 Red Data List Special Institute Course 192 Invasive Alien Plants in 170 Mozambique RDL 199 11th SSC Workshop Southern Africa 209 Further Notes on South 196 Announcing the Southern 173 Gauteng Red Data Plant Africa’s Brachystegia Mozambique Expedition Policy spiciformis 202 Living Plant Collections: 175 Swaziland Flora Protection 212 African Botanic Gardens Mozambique Bill Congress for 2002 204 Living Plant Collections: 176 Lesotho’s State of 214 Index Herbariorum Update Namibia Environment Report 206 Living Plant Collections: 178 Marine Fishes: Are IUCN Lowveld, South Africa Red List Criteria Adequate? Book Reviews 179 Evaluating Data Deficient Taxa Against IUCN 223 Flowering Plants of the Criterion B Kalahari Dunes 180 Charcoal Production in 224 Water Plants of Namibia Malawi 225 Trees and Shrubs of the 183 Threatened
    [Show full text]