DOCSLIB.ORG

Zinnov Zones 2019 ER&D Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zinnov Zones 2019 ER&D Services Zinnov Zones 2019 ER&D Services December 2019 Zinnov Proprietary Confidential 1 01 ER&D Services Market Overview Ø Global Corporate ER&D Spend v Z1000 R&D Spend by vertical v Overall Digital Engineering Spend 02 Zinnov Zones ER&D Service provider Ratings 2019 Zinnov Proprietary Confidential 2 Global ER&D spend is resilient and has witnessed growth despite slowdown and geo-political factors Global ER&D Spend – USD B DIGITAL ENGINEERING SPEND 2,155 GLOBALLEGACY ER&D SPEND DIGITAL ENGINEERING SPEND OVERALL ER&D SPEND 19% 1,358 53% 1141 OF ER&D SPEND 1,103 BY 2025 12% 404 204 1% 1% 2.8 X Increase in Digital Engineering spend by 2025 899 1014 954 Focus of ER&D Spenders Product Development Velocity Product Ownership Experience Alternate Revenue Streams 2013 2019 2025E Process & Quality Control Biz Model & Tech Convergence Zinnov Proprietary Confidential Source: Zinnov Z1000 database, Zinnov Research & Analysis 3 Global ER&D spend is resilient and has witnessed growth despite slowdown and geo-political factors All figures in USD B ER&D Spend (2019) 2018 2019 Y0Y 7% YoY USD 1,358 B Software & Consumer Medical Automotive Telecom Industrial Semiconductor Aerospace Internet Electronics Devices 21% 4% 196 158 162 151 9% 5% 9% 8% 80 80 10% 5% 76 76 73 70 65 71 54 57 45 48 Zinnov Proprietary Confidential Source: Zinnov Z1000 database, Zinnov Research & Analysis 4 Growth in digital engineering spend is accelerating across industries Enterprises continue to invest in digital engineering initiatives to stay relevant CAGR USD B USD 404 B 19% 1,141 Digital Engineering Spend (2019) Digital Engineering Spend (2025E) All figures in USD B 22% 527 16% 15% 16% 80 12% 10% 20% 160 60 32 33 24 24 32 13 12 11 19 11 Software & Internet Telecom Automotive Consumer Electronics Medical Devices Semiconductor Industrial Zinnov Proprietary Confidential Source: Zinnov Z1000 database, Zinnov Research & Analysis 5 Engineering is a core function in services verticals Digital Engineering Spend (All figures in USD B) DRIVING THE CORE BFSI Retail ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE 32 18% 87 19 21% 59 Created a streaming video unit in 2018 to embrace online video. Launched • Robo-Investment Advisory • Transformation of in-store ESPN Plus and Disney • Payments Tech shopping experience Plus 21% • Telematics based insurance • Connected products for • Fraud Detection Management monitoring and feedback Services-led • Customer Insights & • Omni-channel experiences Intelligence TARGETED INVESTMENTS verticals’ • Robotic automation share of 2019 Spends 11 B on tech 2025E annually and focus areas digital include AI, ML, block engineering Healthcare Payers & Providers Media & Technology chain, and big data spend by 18 19% 51 11 23% 39 2025 LEADERSHIP TO DRIVE INNOVATION • Remote patient monitoring • OTT • Diagnosis prediction • AI/ML based content Walmart appointed • Healthcare robots recommendation and tagging Suresh Kumar as CTO & • Patient experience platforms • Targeted advertising using CDO (ex- Google, • Physician assistance tech intelligent platforms Microsoft, Amazon, IBM) Zinnov Proprietary Confidential Source: Zinnov Z1000 database, Zinnov Research & Analysis 6 Large IT Service Providers are betting on ER&D capabilities to drive growth ACQUISITIONS IMPACT ER&D Services growth rate is consistently outpacing IT services’ • Acquired for USD 4.1 B in 2019 USD 4 B • Gained access to new verticals, • In combined revenues, making it a delivery geographies, and horizontals global leader for ER&D • “One stop shop” for full stack engineering & digital requirements • New Brand launched “Cognizant • Acquired Softvision for ~USD 0.5 B in Softvision” 2018 • Access to Romania for digital • Enhanced capabilities in AI, VR, IoT, engineering talent etc. • Focus on developing platforms • Fairway’s San Diego office is Accenture’s new “Engineering • Acquired Fairway Technologies, a US Innovation” center based firm with a focus on platform • Accenture has shown a strong focus engineering services on platform engineering services and has an 8,000 member team Zinnov Proprietary Confidential Source: Zinnov M&A database 7 Large ER&D deals continue to sustain momentum Drivers of Large ER&D deals Large ER&D deals ~USD 15 B Building the Digital TCV of large ER&D deals signed in the last ~3 years Core for Large 1 Enterprises Carving Out Partner of Choice 44% Legacy Products for Enterprise Of large ER&D Deals had SOFTWARE in scope for Software Cos. & 2 3 GCoEs Enterprises Globalization of IOT Managed Private Equity Services Related 17% Portfolio 4 5 Opportunities of large ER&D deals involved “BUILD THE NEW” Companies Zinnov Proprietary Confidential Source: Zinnov Z1000 database, Zinnov Research & Analysis 8 Ø Overall ER&D Zones 2019 v ER&D Zones – Small and Medium Service providers 2019 Ø Horizontal Ratings v Design & Simulation engineering v User experience engineering v Platform engineering 01 ER&D Services Market Overview v Quality Assurance engineering Ø Vertical Ratings v Automotive v Aerospace v Construction & Heavy Machinery v Consumer Electronics v Consumer Software 02 Zinnov Zones ER&D Service provider Ratings 2019 v Enterprise Software v Energy & Utilities v Industrial Automation v Medical devices v Semiconductor v Telecommunication v Transport Zinnov Proprietary Confidential 9 Overall ER&D Ratings 2019 Altran HCL Akka Technologies Alten TCS AF IAV L&T TS Wipro HARMAN* Bertrandt EDAG Cognizant Expansive GlobalLogic QuEST Global Itransition Cyient Tech Mahindra R Systems Capgemini Tata Technologies Infosys Aspire Systems Mindteck Tata Elxsi EPAM Caresoft Global Tieto Persistent Systems UST Global Sasken Infogain eInfochips Mphasis KPIT Technologies Cerium Systems Happiest Minds e-Zest Sonata Software TO THE NEW Musala Soft VVDN Technologies Niche Embitel Net Solutions Dextra Technologies SoftDel PathPartner Scale & Scalability, # of Verticals serviced, Client Spread Client serviced, Verticals of # Scalability, & Scale Daffodil Software Service providers with dotted lines have been evaluated based on Emerging Established Zinnov’s analysis and understanding Specialization, R&D practice maturity (depth and maturity of services), Innovation & IP, Eco-System Linkages, Customer input Zinnov Proprietary Confidential Source: Zinnov Research & Analysis *HARMAN Connected Services 10 ER&D Zones – Small and Medium Service providers 2019* Infogain Sasken VVDN Happiest Minds Technologies Leadership Zone Mphasis R Systems Itransition TO THE Expansive NEW Sonata Software Aspire Systems Mindteck Caresoft Global Cerium Systems Bristlecone Execution Zone Musala Soft Embitel e-Zest Net Solutions Dextra Technologies Niche SoftDel PathPartner Daffodil Software Breakout Zone Scale & Scalability, # of Verticals serviced, Client Spread Client serviced, Verticals of # Scalability, & Scale Emerging Established Specialization, R&D practice maturity (depth and maturity of services), Innovation & IP, Eco-System Linkages, Customer input Zinnov Proprietary Confidential *ER&D service revenue < $150M Source: Zinnov Research & Analysis 11 Ø Overall ER&D Zones 2019 v ER&D Zones – Small and Medium Service providers 2019 Ø Horizontal Ratings v Design & Simulation engineering v User experience engineering v Platform engineering 01 ER&D Services Market Overview v Quality Assurance engineering Ø Vertical Ratings v Automotive v Aerospace v Construction & Heavy Machinery v Consumer Electronics v Consumer Software 02 Zinnov Zones ER&D Service provider Ratings 2019 v Enterprise Software v Energy & Utilities v Industrial Automation v Medical devices v Semiconductor v Telecommunication v Transport Zinnov Proprietary Confidential 12 Design and Simulation Engineering Ratings 2019 TCS Altran L&T TS HARMAN Alten Connected Wipro Expansive Services HCL Tech Mahindra Tata Technologies Capgemini Tata Elxsi QuEST Global Cognizant Cyient GlobalLogic KPIT Technologies eInfochips EPAM UST Global Happiest Minds Caresoft Global Tieto PathPartner Niche Persistent Systems Mphasis VVDN technologies Scale & Scalability, # of Verticals serviced, Client Spread Client serviced, Verticals of # Scalability, & Scale Service providers with dotted lines have been evaluated based on Emerging Established Zinnov’s analysis and understanding Specialization, R&D practice maturity (depth and maturity of services), Innovation & IP, Eco-System Linkages, Customer input Zinnov Proprietary Confidential Source: Zinnov Research & Analysis 13 User Experience Engineering Ratings 2019 Accenture TCS HCL Altran Expansive Capgemini Wipro Tech Mahindra Tata Elxsi EPAM Tieto HARMAN Connected GlobalLogic L&T TS Services Persistent Systems KPIT Technologies Alten QuEST Global UST Global Cyient Mphasis Tata Technologies Niche Happiest Minds Infogain R Systems Softdel Itransition e-Zest Scale & Scalability, # of Verticals serviced, Client Spread Client serviced, Verticals of # Scalability, & Scale Service providers with dotted lines have been evaluated based on Emerging Established Zinnov’s analysis and understanding Specialization, R&D practice maturity (depth and maturity of services), Innovation & IP, Eco-System Linkages, Customer input Zinnov Proprietary Confidential Source: Zinnov Research & Analysis 14 Platform Engineering Ratings 2019 Accenture HARMAN TCS Connected Wipro Services HCL Expansive Cognizant Altran Capgemini Persistent Systems Tech Mahindra L&T TS EPAM Tata Elxsi Alten Tata Technologies QuEST Global GlobalLogic UST Global Happiest Minds KPIT Tieto Aspire Mphasis Systems Itransition R Systems Infogain Daffodil Software Musala Soft Sonata Software Niche Cyient Mindteck Net
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2021 Microsoft Partner of the Year Award Winners and Finalists
    2021 Microsoft Partner of the Year Award Winners and Finalists The Microsoft Partner of the Year Awards acknowledge outstanding achievements and innovations from across our global partner ecosystem. This impressive group of partners and their solutions demonstrates amazing agility and creativity in building new technologies across the intelligent cloud to edge, all with the goal of exceeding customer expectations by bringing technology to life in meaningful ways. This year’s group of winners and finalists is an inspiring reflection of the impact our partner ecosystem enables through the innovative technologies they continue to build for our mutual customers. Across categories including Azure, Modern Work & Security, and Social Impact, our partners are dedicated to helping customers solve challenges and truly work to support our mission to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Congratulations to this year’s winners and finalists, which have shown exceptional expertise, dedication to our customers, and care for our world through a year of change. Table of contents Partner of the Year Awards: Category Winners • Azure • Business Applications • Modern Work & Security • Industry • Social Impact • Business Excellence Category Finalists Country/Region Winners 2021 Microsoft Partner of the Year Award Winners – Category Azure 2021 Microsoft Partner of the Year Award Winners – Category 2021 Microsoft Partner of the Year Award Winners – Category Azure AI Icertis United States www.icertis.com Icertis’ strategic bet with Microsoft on Azure AI is delivering strong customer success and leadership positioning in the contract lifecycle management market. Hundreds of customers have been empowered through over 10 million contracts valued at more than $1 trillion, and in 40+ languages across 90+ countries.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Performance Related Share Grant
    October 3, 2018 Grant of performance shares to Corporate executive officers The Board of Directors of Capgemini SE, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, has decided during its meeting on October 3, 2018, to grant a total of 1 384 530 performance shares of the company Capgemini SE to employees and corporate officers of the Company and its French and foreign subsidiaries. Out of this total, reduced versus last year due to the share price evolution, 61 000 performance shares have been granted to Mr. Paul Hermelin, Chairman and CEO, and to Messrs. Thierry Delaporte and Aiman Ezzat, Chief Operating Officers, as follows: Board of Directors decision on As a reminder 03.10.2018 2018 % of the total 2017 % of the (total number of authorized (total number of shares total shares granted) amount * granted) authorized amount Mr. P. Hermelin 28 000 35,000 2.07% Chairman and CEO Mr. T. Delaporte 16 500 3,62% n/a n/a Chief Operating Officer Mr. A. Ezzat 16 500 n/a n/a Chief Operating Officer * Ceiling of 10% of the maximum allocation authorized by the Shareholders' Meeting of May 23, 2018 (23rd resolution) for the total allocation to Corporate executive officers For each of the Corporate executive officers, the final vesting of the shares, after a three-years acquisition period, is subject to the completion of the following performance conditions: • A market performance condition (35%) based on the comparative performance of the Capgemini SE share against the average performance of a basket of eight comparable companies in the same business
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Registration Document Annual Financial Report Contents
    2014 REGISTRATION DOCUMENT ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CONTENTS 1 4 Presentation of the Company Financial Information 129 and its activities 5 4.1 Analysis on Capgemini 2014 Group consolidated 1.1 Milestones in the Group’s history and its values 6 results AFR 130 1.2 The Group’s activities 8 4.2 Consolidated accounts AFR 136 1.3 Main Group subsidiaries and simplified 4.3 Comments on the Cap Gemini S.A. Financial organization chart 13 Statements AFR 195 1.4 The market and the competitive environment 15 4.4 Cap Gemini S.A. financial statements AFR 197 1.5 2014, a year of strong growth 17 4.5 Other financial and accounting information AFR 221 1.6 The Group’s investment policy, financing policy and market risks AFR 25 1.7 Risk analysis AFR 26 5 CAP GEMINI and its shareholders 223 2 5.1 Cap Gemini S.A. Share Capital AFR 224 5.2 Cap Gemini S.A. and the stock market 229 Corporate governance 5.3 Current ownership structure 233 and Internal control 33 5.4 Share buyback program AFR 235 2.1 Organization and activities of the Board of Directors AFR 35 6 2.2 General organization of the Group AFR 54 2.3 Compensation of executive corporate officers AFR 58 2.4 Internal control and risk management Report of the Board of Directors procedures AFR 70 and draft resolutions 2.5 Statutory Auditors’ report prepared in accordance with Article L.225-235 of the French Commercial of the Combined Shareholders’ Code on the report prepared by the Chairman Meeting of May 6, 2015 237 of the Board of Directors AFR 79 6.1 Resolutions presented at the Ordinary Shareholders’
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Footprint & Energy Transition Report
    LAZARD SMALL CAPS EURO Carbon Footprint & Energy Transition Report 31-mars-2021 Carbon Footprint (Source : Trucost, scope 1&2) Emissions per M€ of Revenue (tons CO2 éq.*/M€ of REV CA) Comments : Emix Smaller Euroland reweighted ** 242 Portfolio Coverage : 97,51% Benchmark Coverage : 93,61% Emix Smaller Euroland 196 Lazard Small Caps Euro 67 - 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Main securities contributing to the portfolio's carbon footprint 40% 35% 35% 30% 25% 20% 13% 15% 10% 7% 5% 4% 5% 2% 0% Altri, SGPS, S.A. Mayr-Melnhof Karton STO SE & Co. KGaA F.I.L.A. - Fabbrica Corticeira Amorim, Surteco Group SE AG Italiana Lapis ed Affini S.G.P.S., S.A. S.p.A. Main sectors contributing to the portfolio's carbon footprint* Sectors contributing the most Sectors contributing the least Lazard Small Caps Euro Lazard Small Caps Euro Emix Smaller Euroland Emix Smaller Euroland Emix Smaller Euroland reweighted ** Emix Smaller Euroland reweighted ** 193 27 87 12 35 28 24 13 17 12 11 00 0 0 0 0 0 BASIC MATERIALS INDUSTRIALS CONSUMER GOODS TELECOMMUNICATIONS UTILITIES OIL & GAS * eq. : All Greenhouse Gas (GHG) converted to CO2 emissions ** Emix Smaller Euroland benchmark "reweighted" based on the portfolio's sectors allocation Energy Transition (Source : Vigeo Eiris) Energy Transition Score LAZARD SMALL CAPS EURO Weak 13 Emix Smaller Euroland Weak 25 Portfolio breakdown by score (in %) Portfolio highest scores (/100) Sopra Steria Group SA Avancé 83 5% 10% Alten S.A. Probant 59 Ipsos SA Amorcé 47 2% Weak Nexity SA Amorcé 45 SPIE SA Amorcé 43 Improving Portfolio lowest scores (/100) Convincing Interpump Group S.p.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Everest Group PEAK Matrix™ for Devops Service Providers 2019
    ® Everest Group PEAK Matrix™ for DevOps Service Providers 2019 Focus on Capgemini September 2019 ® ™ Copyright © 2019 Everest Global, Inc. This document has been licensed for exclusive use and distribution by Capgemini EGR-2019-32-E-3316 Introduction and scope Everest Group recently released its report titled “DevOps Services PEAK Matrix™ Assessment and Market Trends 2019 – Siloed DevOps is No DevOps! ” This report analyzes the changing dynamics of the DevOps services landscape and assesses service providers across several key dimensions. As a part of this report, Everest Group updated its classification of 20 service providers on the Everest Group PEAK Matrix™ for DevOps services into Leaders, Major Contenders, and Aspirants. The PEAK Matrix is a framework that provides an objective, data-driven, and comparative assessment of DevOps service providers based on their absolute market success and delivery capability. Based on the analysis, Capgemini emerged as a Leader. This document focuses on Capgemini’s DevOps services experience and capabilities and includes: ⚫ Capgemini’s position on the DevOps PEAK Matrix ⚫ Detailed DevOps services profile of Capgemini Buyers can use the PEAK Matrix to identify and evaluate different service providers. It helps them understand the service providers’ relative strengths and gaps. However, it is also important to note that while the PEAK Matrix is a useful starting point, the results from the assessment may not be directly prescriptive for each buyer. Buyers will have to consider their unique situation and requirements, and match them against service provider capability for an ideal fit. Source: Everest Group (2019) unless cited otherwise ® Copyright © 2019, Everest Global, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • IDC Marketscape Names Accenture a Digital Strategy Leader | Accenture
    IDC MarketScape IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Digital Strategy Consulting Services 2021 Vendor Assessment Douglas Hayward IDC MARKETSCAPE FIGURE FIGURE 1 IDC MarketScape Worldwide Digital Strategy Consulting Services Vendor Assessment Source: IDC, 2021 June 2021, IDC #US46766521 Please see the Appendix for detailed methodology, market definition, and scoring criteria. IDC OPINION This study represents the vendor assessment model called IDC MarketScape. This research is a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the characteristics that explain a vendor's current and future success in the digital strategy consulting services marketplace. This study assesses the capabilities and business strategies of 13 prominent digital strategy consulting services vendors. This evaluation is based on a comprehensive framework and a set of parameters expected to be most conducive to success in providing digital strategy consultancy. A significant component of this evaluation is the inclusion of digital strategy consulting buyers' perception of both the key characteristics and the capabilities of these providers. This client input was provided primarily from the vendors' clients, supplemented with a worldwide survey. Key findings include: . Consultancies are getting the basics right. Reference clients that IDC spoke with were impressed by the quality of the people from the leading digital strategy consultancies. On average, reference clients gave consultancies highest scores for people quality, action orientation, and client-specific insight. This indicates that digital strategy consultancies are getting the basics right — they are recruiting smart and empathetic people and are training and developing them well, they are getting to know their clients inside out, and they are producing very useful advice as a result. Clients want to be challenged more than ever by their digital strategy consultants.
    [Show full text]
  • Projet De Note En Réponse) Which Was Filed with the French Autorité Des Marchés Financiers on 23 September 2019 and Which Remains Subject to Its Review
    This document is an unofficial English-language translation of the draft response document (projet de note en réponse) which was filed with the French Autorité des marchés financiers on 23 September 2019 and which remains subject to its review. In the event of any differences between this unofficial English- language translation and the official French draft response document, the official French draft response document shall prevail. The draft offer and this draft response document remain subject to the French Financial Market's Authority review. DRAFT DOCUMENT PREPARED BY IN RESPONSE TO THE PUBLIC TENDER OFFER FOR THE SHARES OF THE COMPANY ALTRAN TECHNOLOGIES LAUNCHED BY This draft response document (projet de note en réponse) was filed with the French Financial Markets Authority (the "AMF") on 23 September 2019, in accordance with the provisions of Article 231-26 of the AMF's general regulation. It was prepared in accordance with Article 231-19 of the AMF's general regulation. The draft offer and this draft response document remain subject to the review of the AMF. Important notice Pursuant to Articles 231-19 and 261-1 et seq. of the AMF's general regulation, the report of Finexsi, acting in its capacity as independent expert, is included in this draft response document. This draft response document (the "Draft Response Document") is available on the websites of ALTRAN (www.altran.com) and the AMF (www.amf-france.org) and may be obtained free of charge from Altran Technologies' registered office at 96, avenue Charles de Gaulle, 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine – FRANCE. In accordance with the provisions of Article 231-28 of the AMF's general regulation, information relating to Altran Technologies, in particular legal, financial and accounting information, will be filed with the AMF and made available to the public in the same manner no later than the day before the opening of the tender offer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Capgemini Time
    1967 2015 The Capgemini Time 1967 1975 The Start of an Entrepreneurial Adventure 1 October 1967. Serge Kampf creates Sogeti, an IT services company, in Grenoble, France. A year later he opens offices in Switzerland to meet the needs of a client. Sogeti rapidly expands, first in the provinces and then in Paris, in 1969. The spirit of conquest is already established! 1970: the Group diversifies, first intoconsulting and then outsourcing, 20 years ahead of its competitors. 1974: With the acquisition of Cap and Gemini Computer Systems, Sogeti becomes a truly European company and enters the era of large IT systems. 1975: the Cap Gemini Sogeti Group is born. Two years later, the leading European IT services company, with nearly 2,000 employees, enters the United States, the country posting the Group’s best growth today. 1976 1989 Growth and Expansion At the forefront of innovation, the Group plays a major role in creating the French electronic directory, the largest IT system distributed across the world. The Group relies on large and small shareholders to assist its development. Among the most significant, CGIP, which enters the capital in 1982, remains a loyal supporter for more than 20 years. The information contained in the document is proprietary and confidential. It is for Capgemini internal use only. ©2015 Capgemini. All rights reserved. 12 June 1985: the Group is floated on the Paris Stock Exchange. The share price increases by 25% in 5 days and 5 months later Serge Kampf establishes the Group’s headquarters at the prestigious Place de l’Etoile in Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • ISG Providerlens™ Quadrant Report
    Salesforce Ecosystem Partners Germany 2020 A research report comparing provider Quadrant Report strengths, challenges and competetive differentiators. March 2020 Customized report courtesy of: ISG Provider Lens™ Quadrant Report | March 2020 Section Name About this Report Information Services Group, Inc. is solely responsible for the content of this report. ISG Provider Lens™ delivers leading-edge and actionable research studies, reports and consulting services focused on technology and service providers’ strengths and Unless otherwise cited, all content, including illustrations, research, conclusions, weaknesses and how they are positioned relative to their peers in the market. These assertions and positions contained in this report were developed by and are the sole reports provide influential insights accessed by our large pool of advisors who are property of Information Services Group, Inc. actively advising outsourcing deals as well as large numbers of ISG enterprise clients who are potential outsourcers. The research and analysis presented in this report includes research from the ISG Provider Lens™ program, ongoing ISG Research programs, interviews with ISG advisors, For more information about our studies, please email [email protected], briefings with services providers and analysis of publicly available market information call +49 (0) 561-50697537, or visit ISG Provider Lens™ under ISG Provider Lens™. from multiple sources. The data collected for this report represents information that ISG believes to be current as of February 2020 for providers who actively participated as well as for providers who did not. ISG recognizes that many mergers and acquisitions have taken place since that time, but those changes are not reflected in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Evry Asa Q1 2019 Presentation
    EVRY ASA Q1 2019 PRESENTATION CEO PER HOVE CFO HENRIK SCHIBLER . Group highlights Agenda . Business update . Financial highlights . Concluding remarks . Q&A Group highlights REVENUE (NOKm) EBITA2 (NOKm) BACKLOG (NOKbn) 3 330 332 18.6 FINANCIALS ORGANIC GROWTH1 EBITA MARGIN2 Cash conversion (LTM) 3.6% 10.0% 97.0% . Continuing organic growth and stable EBITA margin improvements activities on track in Sweden . Utilization rate Q1’19 was 78.5% from more activities in Norway, offset by lower activity level in Sweden . Increased cash conversion in Q1’19 to 97.0%, up from 70.3% in Q1’18 BUSINESS . Financial Services continues to achieve revenue growth, driven by demand across all solution and service areas UPDATE . Established a Nordic consulting organisation with seven practices . Announced a Nordic initiative to leverage the growth potential based on data economy drivers . Signed the biggest public tender contract in Norway within RPA3 with the municipality of Stavanger . Karin Schreil and Johan Torstensson will join the company as, EVP Sweden and EVP DPS4, respectively in Q2’19 1) ADJUSTED FOR CURRENCY EFFECTS, ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTMENTS 3) RPA = ROBOTICS PROCESS AUTOMATION 3 2) BEFORE OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES 4) DPS = DIGITAL PLATFORM SERVICES EVRY #1 in customer satisfaction in Sweden General customer satisfaction in sourcing, Sweden (percent) 1. EVRY, 79 2. TCS, 79 3. Telenor 78 4. Accenture, 77 5. Salesforce, 73 6. Microsoft, 73 7. CGI, 72 8. SAP, 71 9. Wipro, 71 10. Atos, 71 11. Telia, 71 12. Capgemini, 70 13. Atea, 70 14. HCL, 67 15. DXC, 65 16. Fujitsu, 65 17. IBM, 65 18.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTENTS BOARD of DIRECTORS Serge KAMPF CHAIRMAN
    CONTENTS BOARD OF DIRECTORS Serge KAMPF CHAIRMAN Daniel BERNARD Yann DELABRIÈRE 02 Financial highlights Jean-René FOURTOU 03 The Capgemini Group Paul HERMELIN CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 37 Management report Michel JALABERT presented by the Board of Directors to Phil LASKAWY the Shareholders’ Meeting of April 26, 2007 (April 10, 2007 on first call) Thierry de MONTBRIAL 50 Report of the Chairman Ruud van OMMEREN of the Board of Directors Terry OZAN 61 Group Consolidated Financial Statements Bruno ROGER 116 Cap Gemini S.A. Summarized Financial Statements NON-VOTING DIRECTORS “CENSEURS” 123 Text of the draft resolutions presented by the Board of Directors to Pierre HESSLER the Shareholders’ Meeting of April 26, 2007 Marcel ROULET (April 10, 2007 on first call) Geoff UNWIN 126 Specific information STATUTORY AUDITORS 143 Cross-reference table PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS AUDIT repesented by Bernard RASCLE KPMG S.A. represented by Frédéric QUÉLIN The English language version of this report is a free translation from the original, which was prepared in French. All possible care has been taken to ensure that the translation is an accurate presentation of the original. However, in all matters of interpretation, views or opinions expressed in the original language version of the document in French take precedence over the translation. ANNUAL REPORT 2006 Capgemini 1 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS in millions of euros 2004 (1) 2005 2006 REVENUES 6,235 6,954 7,700 OPERATING EXPENSES 6,259 6,729 7,253 OPERATING MARGIN Amount (24) 225 447
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Top 200 Employers for STEM OPT Students
    2018 Top 200 Employers for OPT and STEM OPT Students Number of Students Number of Students Number of Students Participating in Top 200 Employer Names Participating in OPT or STEM OPT Participating in OPT in 2018 STEM OPT in 2018 in 2018 Amazon 2,911 851 2,395 Integra Technologies LLC 2,081 1,302 936 Intel Corporation 1,348 368 1,111 Google 1,193 308 996 Microsoft Corporation 867 243 690 AZTech Technologies LLC 854 705 188 Deloitte 747 216 579 Facebook 725 259 528 XCG Design Corporation 680 355 362 Tellon Trading, Inc 647 455 229 IBM 628 143 563 Veridic Solutions 558 332 307 Apple, Inc 538 166 433 CG Max Design Corp 521 224 326 Global IT Experts, Inc 467 442 28 Marlabs, Inc 448 166 311 Randstad 439 231 231 Ernst & Young 432 157 298 Qualcomm Technologies, Inc 416 118 351 PricewaterhouseCoopers 412 160 273 Cisco System, Inc 411 133 322 Populus Group 381 137 275 Cerner Corporation 380 94 313 Modis E&T LLC 374 120 281 Capgemini America 370 99 312 Insight Global 357 160 217 eBay or PayPal 350 116 274 JP Morgan Chase 348 68 295 Robert Half 346 260 96 University of Florida 335 224 118 Saibersys 330 144 203 Cloud Big Data 324 251 98 2018 Top 200 Employers for OPT and STEM OPT Students Walmart 320 124 224 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 315 119 220 Sinocontech 315 252 73 Cummins 312 90 241 Findream, LLC 312 112 209 Goldman Sachs 312 112 232 Stanford University 306 113 215 Oracle 305 73 256 Cognizant 301 54 258 Collabera 300 149 161 Arizona State University 298 258 59 Tesla, Inc 296 126 198 Elbum LLC 291 236 60 Apex Systems 282 115 182 Pioneer
    [Show full text]